Conservatives, Labour dirty dossiers released in the UK election campaign

Our Reporter

 

IF the first week of the United Kingdom’s (UK) snap election campaign has been anything to go by, it’s the easiest way to guarantee your personal history being raided and your worst secrets splashed across the pages of national newspapers.

Just this week, the Cable News Network (CNN) reported that both the governing Conservatives and main opposition Labour party have suffered embarrassing revelations about candidates – some of whom have since been forced to stand down.

For Labour, the problem has been anti-Semitism. The party has been dogged by questionable comments by members, and a criticism they’ve done little to combat record high anti-Semitic incidents in the UK.

Kate Ramsden, a Labour candidate standing for election in Scotland, was forced to end her campaign on Thursday after the Jewish Chronicle newspaper uncovered a blog post from 2014 in which she compared Israel to an “abused child who becomes an abusive adult.” She later apologised for the post.

“I can see why many Jewish people have been hurt by my words. That was never my intention and I apologise unreservedly,” she said.

This came just days after Zarah Sultana, another Labour candidate, had to apologise for tweets sent in 2015 when she was a student, saying that she would celebrate the death of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former U.S. President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. She also apologised for a Facebook post in which she backed the Palestinian right to “violent resistance”.

“I do not support violence and I should not have articulated my anger in the manner I did, for which I apologise,” she said in a statement, according to the BBC.

Unlike Ramsden, she did not stand down.

Read Also: ‘Probe police, EFCC in Imo’

The Conservatives, meanwhile, have been firefighting equally uncomfortable revelations about candidates and activists, failing to take rape allegations seriously enough and, in one case, collapsing a rape trial.

Conservative Nick Conrad learned how quickly a party is willing to ditch a candidate once the media storm hits – Prime Minister Boris Johnson himself condemned Conrad’s comments from 2014.

Conrad, then a radio host, engaged listeners in a discussion on men and women.

“Women also have to understand that when a man’s given certain signals he’ll wish to act upon them and if you don’t wish to give out the wrong signals it’s best, probably, to keep your knickers on and not get into bed with him.”

Conrad apologised at the time for the comments. But that didn’t stop Johnson from criticiSing the candidate, and once that happens, it’s usually game over for any hopeful.

He dropped out of the race this week.

This came shortly after Johnson’s Welsh Secretary, Alun Cairns, was forced to resign over claims he knew that his former aide had allegedly sabotaged a rape trial. Cairns had said he did not know his aide was accused by a judge of sabotage until last week. However, BBC Wales obtained an email from over a year ago in which Cairns is clearly talking about the case. He maintains that he did nothing wrong and will comply with any investigation. He also stressed that he had nothing to do with the trial itself.

The aide, Ross England, was suspended by the Conservative Party pending an investigation and denies wrongdoing. CNN has tried to contact England for comment.

It should not come as a great surprise that these sorts of stories are now appearing so frequently in such a short span of time. They tend to hit the front pages as soon as an election campaign kicks off.

Some may call it dirty politics. Some simply call it opposition research.

With hundreds of national races, there are targets for each campaign team to take aim at.

“Opposition research has always focused on the weakest link in your opponents. This is usually individual candidates and what they have previously said or done,” said John McTernan, a former senior aide to former PM Tony Blair and former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

“It used to be painstaking. I used to have keep clippings in folders and hide them away for a rainy day. With social media, there is a database of someone’s pre-political life that is easily raided,” McTernan said.

 

 

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts