Author: The Nation

  • Kano governor firms up APC defection plan

    Kano governor firms up APC defection plan

    kano State Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf yesterday took a big leap to consolidate his defection to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

    The governor has already left the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) on which platform he was elected in 2023, having parted ways with his political leader, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso.

    Yusuf met with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at Aso Villa.

    It was learnt that he also met with APC National Chairman Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda last night.

    The governor, who last week removed the NNPP flag from the Government House in Kano, arrived the Presidential Villa shortly after 4pm.

    He immediately went into a meeting  with the President having being led into his office by Chief of Staff Femi Gbajabiamila.

    Details of the meeting were not shared by the Presidential media team.

    Read Also: APC constitutional review highlights youth, gender inclusion

    The governor also left the Villa without dropping any hint for reporters.

    But it was learnt all discussions focused on putting finishing touches to his defection.

    A source close to Yilwarda said the party chair was preparing a smooth transition for the governor from NNPP to the APC.

    It was further gathered that Yilwatda has been working hard behind the scene to find a resolution to the crisis in Rivers State.

    “He is a hands-on chairman, whose approach to politics is pragmatic. He is rallying the party behind the President for the overall goal of achieving victory in next year’s presidential election”, a top party official said last night.

  • Court reserves ruling in suit against Army, others

    Court reserves ruling in suit against Army, others

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has reserved ruling in a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by Ambrose Akhigbe against the Nigerian Army and nine others.

    The plaintiff is a Deputy Director at Command Secondary School, Ipaja, Lagos.

    The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2138/25, came up for hearing on January 15 before Justice James Omotosho.

    Counsel for the first to eighth respondents, Chris Edache Agbiti, moved a motion for an extension of time, which was earlier filed on behalf of his clients, and the court granted it.

    Counsel to the applicant, Wayne Chikezie Elijah, urged the court to dismiss the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed by the first to eighth defendants, discountenance all counter-affidavits opposing the originating motion, and grant all the reliefs sought by the applicant.

    Justice Omotosho adjourned the case to March 3, 2026, for ruling or judgment.

    The plaintiff, while an Assistant Director, sued the Army, COAS, General Officer Commanding 81 Division; the Commandant of Command Day Secondary School, Lagos; Lieutenant Akabor, Private Sani, Private Ahmed and Private Montero over alleged threat to life, assault, battering and maltreatment.

    Akhigbe alleged that the respondents, particularly the fifth, sixth, and seventh, nearly killed him for making videos of the inhumane punishment meted out to a female pupil in SSS-3 who was asked to roll in muddy water.

    He said while they were on their way to the Commandant’s office to resolve the issue, “the sixth, seventh and eighth respondents, acting on the instructions of the fifth respondent, battered me from behind with the sole aim of killing me”.

    Read Also: Army records operational gains in 2025 amid security challenges –GOC

    “They were saying ‘We will kill you today, you bastard’ as they continued to assault me, targeting my face and neck using plank, koboko, sticks, pipe canes, irons and their fist,” the plaintiff said. He attached video evidence of the attack.

    Akhigbe said the assault resulted in a ceaseless flow of blood from his skull, while academic activities were halted due to a protest by staff members in solidarity.

    He said the Commandant, who handed over Akabor, Sani, Ahmed and Montero to the military police for investigation, paid N65,000 and N115,000 for his medical bills.

    “Shortly after the incident, my union, Association of Senior Servants Civil of Nigeria, served the respondents with a letter of demand for adequate compensation for me,” he said.

  • Why PDP secretariat will remain locked, by Police

    Why PDP secretariat will remain locked, by Police

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) national secretariat in Abuja will remain sealed for now, according to the police.

    It will only be reopened, if the two factions settle their protracted rifts and embrace peace, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) police commissioner said yesterday.

    Miller Dantawaye, told reporters that the factions have to inform the police after the resolution of the crisis before the Watada Plaza office can be unsealed.

    The secretariat was sealed on November 19 last year with barbed wire by the police after a fracas involving the two factions. The Police had to fire teargas to halt the melee that trailed the combat by the gladiators.

    Both factions, claiming superiority struggled to take charge of the offices.

    Read Also: PDP will win in 2027 despite legal intrigues against party — Gbenga Hashim

    Dantawaye said the police are not yet convinced that the two factions were ready for a truce.

    He said the two factions have requested the police to maintain the sealing.

    Dantawaye added: “They had an issue there and I’m sure you are aware of what prompted us (police) to lock the place.

    “Both sides are saying, don’t open. They want justice. So, when they resolve their issues, I’m sure they will tell us (Police).”

    The two factions, one ledt by Taminu Turaki and the other by Abdulrahaman Mohammed are currently operating at different offices in the FCT.

  • Fed Govt opens portal for technical college application

    Fed Govt opens portal for technical college application

    The Federal Government has opened a portal for the National Common Entrance Examination (NCEE) applications into Federal Technical Colleges, reaffirming its commitment to free technical and vocational education.

    Director, Press and Public Relations, Federal Ministry of Education, Folasade Boriowo, said registration would commence on January 26 and close on May 24, while the examination would be conducted nationwide on June 6.

    The ministry urged prospective candidates to complete their applications through the National Business and Technical Examinations Board (NABTEB) online portal via https://student.nabteb.gov.ng.

    Read Also: NABTEB, stakeholders review syllabi for 26 trade areas in technical colleges

    Only candidates aged 13 to 20 are eligible, and they must possess a valid National Identification Number (NIN).

    The ministry said technical education in federal technical colleges is fully funded upon admission, underscoring the Federal Government’s commitment to human capital development, youth empowerment, and enhanced national productivity.

  • No plan for mutiny, says Army

    No plan for mutiny, says Army

    The Nigerian Army has dismissed claims by an online publication alleging that soldiers are threatening mutiny over salaries and allowances.

    It described such a claim as “false, misleading and deliberately sensational”, designed to undermine public confidence and national security.

    In a statement yesterday by its spokesperson, Col. Apollonia Anele, the Nigerian Army stated that at no time has there been any threat of mutiny within the Army.

    According to the statement, mutiny is a grave offence under military law and alien to the ethos, discipline and professionalism of Nigerian Army personnel, “who remain loyal to the country’s Constitution and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.”

    It said that, to demonstrate the mischievous nature of the report, the online publication relied solely on anonymous, unverifiable claims circulated through non-official channels.

    “Such narratives do not represent the views, conduct or disposition of officers and soldiers of the Nigerian Army, who are trained to channel grievances through established military procedures rather than public platforms,” the statement said.

    Read Also: WASA strengthens army–civilian bonds in Katsina, says Army commander

    It stated that contrary to claims of neglect by the online publication, the Federal Government under the present administration has “consistently demonstrated commitment to the welfare and operational effectiveness of the Armed Forces”, particularly in the face of evolving security challenges.

    According to the statement, to demonstrate that troops’ welfare is a top priority on his agenda, the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Lt.-Gen. Waidi Shaibu, upon assuming office, initiated positive engagements with the appropriate authorities on troops’ welfare, which it noted were already yielding positive results.

    It explained that promotion increments are only one component of military remuneration and should not be misrepresented as total earnings, adding that military pay comprises consolidated salaries, rank-based allowances, operational allowances, field and hardship allowances and other entitlements, which vary by deployment, qualification and responsibilities.

    The statement emphasized that Issues relating to allowances are continuously reviewed within approved government frameworks.

    It noted that the Nigerian Army in collaboration with the Armed Forces of Nigeria and relevant government authorities, will continue to implement structured welfare reforms, including periodic salary reviews, enhanced operational allowances, improved accommodation, medical care, and insurance packages for troops and their families.

    The military high command reaffirmed that the Nigerian Army remains a “cohesive, disciplined and professional force” that is fully focused on its constitutional mandate of defending Nigeria’s sovereignty and supporting internal security operations.

    “Attempts to portray the institution as unstable or lawless are not only irresponsible but also detrimental to national security,” the Army said.

  • CBN: banks raised lending to firms, households in Q4 2025

    CBN: banks raised lending to firms, households in Q4 2025

    Access to credit finance for households and companies improved, according Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) report for quarter last year.

    Banks increased lending to meet higher demand for loans for mortgages, overdrafts, inventory and capital investments.

    The fourth quarter 2025 Credit Conditions Survey (CCS) Report released yesterday by the CBN indicated increases in demand, supply and approval for loans across personal and corporate credits.

    The survey- which covered the three-month period ended December 31, 2025 –  was coordinated by the Statistics Department of the Economic Policy Directorate of the CBN.

    The Credit Conditions Survey (CCS) is based on application of questionnaires across lenders and it report on secured and unsecured lending to households, private non-financial corporations (PNFCS), small businesses and other financial corporations (OFCs).

    In the latest survey, which was conducted in November 2025, banks indicated a rise in credit availability for secured, unsecured, and corporate lending.

    According to the report, the increase in credit availability was attributed to the changing economic outlooks and market share objectives for secured and corporate lending.

    “For unsecured credit availability, the main factors affecting increase in credit were attributed to changing economic outlook and changing cost and availability of fund,” the CCS report stated.

    Read Also: UBA exceeds N500b minimum capital base ahead CBN deadline

    The report also showed general improvement in demand for credit increased for secured, unsecured and corporate lending.

    “All the demand for lending types reportedly increased in fourth quarter 2025, except for demand for credit to OFCs, which remained unchanged,” the report stated.

    A breakdown indicated that consumer loans to households, credit for house purchase to households, mortgage and re-mortgage lending from households, lending for small businesses to households, credit cards lending from households and overdraft and personal loans to households all increased during the period.

    Besides, lending to small businesses and medium and large private non-financial companies, specifically real sector operators, increased during the period. However, credit to other financial companies remained unchanged

    The report stated that “inventory finance and capital investments were reported as the major factors that influenced the increase in demand for corporate lending”, corroborating other reports that showed improved confidence in the economy by chief executives and investors.

    The survey however showed that banks were more willing to lend to individual and corporate consumers with collaterals.

    The percentage of loan approvals for secured credit rose by 14.3 per cent while approvals for corporate lending increased by 26.1 per cent. However, approval for unsecured lending dropped by 3.9 per cent.

    Besides, banks appeared willing to offer lower interest rates to most corporate borrowers but rather increased lending rates on secured and unsecured lending rates to households.

    However, during the period, banks reported higher default rates for secure, unsecured and all corporate lending types, raising concerns about the disparity between the tendency to borrow and willingness to pay.

    A three-year data analysis provided by the CCS report showed consistent tendency to higher default rates, which underlined the need for banks and financial services regulators to further interrogate the disparity between credit access and fidelity to terms and conditions.

    As against the case with factors affecting increase in credit, the CCS report however did not provide reasons for reported higher default rates.

  • Otti’s govt clarifies Abia Citizens Law

    Otti’s govt clarifies Abia Citizens Law

    Misconceptions about the Abia Senior Citizens Centre by the administration of Governor Alex Otti have been laid to rest.

    The centre was established to provide social protection and access to healthcare for the elderly in the state and not for money sharing, the government clarified yesterday.

    According to the state government, the senior citizens centre will not serve as a retirement home or a place for abandoned senior citizens in Abia.

    There have been speculations that senior citizens in the state will be receiving monthly stipend and other packages from the government, through the centre.

    But the Commissioner for Information, Okey Kanu, who spoke on the matter, clarified that the centre would develop a reliable database of aged persons, ensure protection of their rights, access to healthcare and social welfare, in collaboration with relevant ministries and agencies.

    The commissioner said: “The‌ Abia State G‌overnment wi‌shes to clarify the‌ true context, intent, and content of Law No. 4 of 2025, which establi‌shes the Abia State Senior Citizens Centr‌e, in order to properly inform the public and dispel misconceptions surrounding the law.

    “Th‌is legislation is a deliberate and compassionate response by the administratio‌n of Governor Alex Otti, to the‌ growin‌g population of elderly persons in Abia State and the long-standing absence of a structured, government-backed system dedica‌ted to their care, welfare, and social‌ inclusion.

    Read Also: Alayabiagba market holds general sanitation

    “For decades, senio‌r citizens have con‌tributed significantly to the development of our communities, economy, and families.

    “H‌owever, ageing often comes with health challenges, social i‌solation, and economic vulnerability. Law No. 4 of 2025 is the‌refore a social protection policy, not p‌olitical‌ symbol‌ism, aimed at restoring‌ dignity, care, and rel‌evance to elderly citiz‌ens.

    “T‌he law formally establishe‌s the Abia State‌ Senio‌r Citi‌zens Cen‌tre as a governme‌nt-recognised institution. The Centre is neither a re‌tir‌ement home, nor‌ a place of abandonment.

    “Rather, it serves as a coordinated hub, where senior citizens can access support ser‌vices, engage socially, receive guidance, participate in recreational and skills-sharing activities, and benefit from structured welfare programmes.‌

    “Through this Centre, the government now has a un‌ified pla‌tform to plan, coordinate, and i‌mplement elderly-focused interventions across the state, replacing t‌he previously fragmented and informal approach to senior citizens’ welfare.

    “The Centre is mandated to promote the welfare, dignity and quality of life for senior citizens by providing social, psychol‌ogica‌l, and he‌alth-related support, while also serving as an advocacy platform for the protection of their rights.”

    “It is empowered to develop programmes, maintain a reliable database of e‌lderly pers‌ons, facilitate access to healthcar‌e and social welfare sch‌emes, and collaborate with releva‌nt min‌istries, agencies, NGOs, faith-based organisations, and developmen‌t partners.

    “Administratively, the Centre operates under the supervision of the Ministry of Poverty Alleviation and Social Protection to ensure accountability, transparency and alignment with the state’s broader social welfare policies to ensure accountability, transparency, and alignment with the state’s broader soc‌ial welfare policies.

    “Funding is to be sourced through lawful budgeta‌ry allocations, grants and approved‌ donations, in line with due process.

    “Law No. 4 of 2025 is a bold and hum‌ane policy choice that places Abia State among progres‌sive sta‌tes that recognize ag‌eing as a governance i‌ssue and institutionalize care for s‌enior citizens.

    “It i‌s importa‌nt to emphasize th‌at the Abia State Senior Citizens Centre is not a free money‌ distribut‌ion scheme.

    “Rather, it is a structured social welfare and support system designed to provide care, coordination‌, dignity, and inclusion f‌or senior citizens‌, no‌t direct cash handouts.”

  • Ekiti 2026: INEC excludes PDP, SDP from final list

    Ekiti 2026: INEC excludes PDP, SDP from final list

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Social Democratic Party (SDP) are missing from the final list of candidates released yesterday by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the June 20 governorship election in Ekiti State, with the

    According to a document sighted by our correspondent, the names of the PDP governorship candidate, Dr. Wole Oluyede and his SDP counterpart David Bankole, were exempted from the list released by INEC.

    It was reliabily learnt that the exclusion of PDP and SDP candidates were due to the pending court cases over the parties’ leadership, which are yet to be resolved.

    According to the list, 12 political parties met the requirements to participate in the election, following the exclusion of the PDP and SDP from the final list of candidates.

    Read Also: Okpebholo moves to save Court of Appeal, INEC secretariat in Edo

    According to the document released by the electoral umpire, the All Progressives Congress (APC) is fielding the incumbent governor, Biodun Oyebanji (58), with Mrs Monisade Afuye (67), as his the running mate.

    Other candidates include: Opeyemi Falegan (41) of the Accord Party, who is running with Omoyeni Bayode (48); Akande Oluwasegun (36) of the African Action Congress, paired with Oluwasanmi Fajuyigbe; and Ayodeji Ojo (42) of the Action Democratic Party, with Itunu Ibitoye (35) as his running mate.

    The African Democratic Congress is presenting Oluwadare Bejide (66) and Babatola Ayodeji (65), Bidemi Awogbemi (36) and Akinyemi Adewumi (53) of the Action People’s Party; and Joseph Anifowose (65) with Margaret Ilesanmi (68) of the Allied People’s Movement (APM).

  • From trial judge to apex jurist: Oyewole’s journey to Supreme Court

    From trial judge to apex jurist: Oyewole’s journey to Supreme Court

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has, in a move widely regarded within legal and judicial circles as both consequential and merit-driven, recommended Justice Joseph Olubunmi Oyewole for appointment to the Supreme Court. The recommendation, made at the conclusion of the Council’s 110th meeting, follows an exacting screening process and comes at a critical moment for the apex court, restoring it to its full constitutional strength and reinforcing public confidence in the judiciary’s commitment to integrity, intellectual depth, and judicial excellence. ADEBISI ONANUGA writes.

    The recommendation of Justice Joseph Olubunmi Oyewole for elevation to the Supreme Court has generated heightened expectations across the Bar and the Bench.

    Many view his impending appointment as a strategic reinforcement of the apex court’s intellectual, institutional, and jurisprudential capacity.

    At a time when the Supreme Court is increasingly called upon to resolve complex constitutional questions, high-stakes commercial disputes, and sensitive anti-corruption appeals, Justice Oyewole’s proven mastery of criminal jurisprudence, procedural discipline, and appellate reasoning is widely regarded as an invaluable addition to the Court’s deliberative strength.

    Seasoned practitioners anticipate that his presence on the Supreme Court Bench will bring a renewed emphasis on judicial efficiency, doctrinal clarity, and principled adjudication.

    Known for his firm control of proceedings, aversion to dilatory tactics, and well-reasoned judgments grounded in both precedent and policy, Justice Oyewole is expected to contribute decisively to the refinement of Nigerian case law and the harmonisation of conflicting appellate authorities.

    Beyond technical competence, his reputation for integrity, independence of mind, and respect for the Bar is seen as reinforcing public confidence in the Supreme Court as the ultimate custodian of justice, constitutional order, and the rule of law.

    The National Judicial Council (NJC), at the conclusion of its 110th meeting held last week, recommended his appointment to the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

    Justice Oyewole currently serves as the Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, Enugu Division.

    The recommendation for his elevation followed a rigorous and competitive screening process conducted at the Council’s meeting held last Tuesday.

    His appointment, however, remains subject to confirmation and approval by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    With the retirement of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, in August 2024, the Supreme Court had operated with 20 Justices.

    The appointment of Justice Oyewole restores the apex court to its constitutionally prescribed complement of 21 Justices.

    Justice Oyewole’s elevation, from the Southwest geo-wpolitical zone, was necessitated by the vacancy created by Justice Ariwoola’s retirement.

    Legal stakeholders have, however, argued that regional balancing alone could not have accounted for his selection.

    Rather, they posit that his unimpeachable integrity, judicial courage, and deep erudition, demonstrated consistently in the handling of complex and high-profile matters across all tiers of the court system, were decisive factors.

    Many judicial correspondents also remember Justice Oyewole as one of the few judges who ensured that seats for the press were reserved in his court, while he also made his verdicts available to them to enhance the accuracy of their reporting of proceedings.

    Legal career

    Justice Oyewole obtained his Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife) in 1985.

    He attended the Nigerian Law School and was called to the Bar in 1986.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Supreme Court okays Sule Lamido, sons, others’ trial in Abuja for alleged N1.35bn fraud

    He commenced his legal career as a Legal Officer with the Public Complaints Commission, Makurdi, Benue State, during his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) service between 1986 and 1987.

    Upon completion of the service year, he joined the law firm of Afolabi Adeniran & Co. (Legal Practitioners), where he practised between 1987 and 1988.

    In 1988, he established his own law firm, Olubunmi Oyewole & Co., where he served as Principal Counsel until 2001.

    He wound up the firm following his appointment to the Bench as a Judge of the High Court of Lagos State.

    Career on the bench

    Justice Oyewole was appointed a Judge of the High Court of Lagos State on May 24, 2001.

    Over the years, he served in various divisions and capacities, including Criminal Division (2001–2002), General Civil Division (2002–2004), Criminal Division (April 2004–2010), Family and Probate Division (April 2010–August 2013), Fast Track Commercial, Revenue and Mortgage Division (September 2013–March 3, 2014), Designated Judge for EFCC cases (2003–2010), Designated Family Court Judge, Ikeja Division (April 2010–March 3, 2014), Designated Probate Judge, Ikeja Division (April 2010–September 2013).

    Elevation to the Court of Appeal

    Justice Oyewole was elevated to the Court of Appeal on March 3, 2014.

    He served in five divisions prior to his recommendation for elevation to the Supreme Court, namely: Makurdi Division (April 2014–December 2014), Calabar Division (December 2014–August 2018), Enugu Division (August 2018–December 2023), Abuja Division (December 2023–April 2025), Presiding Justice, Enugu Division (May 5, 2025–date).

    Notable cases

    While serving on the High Court of Lagos State, Justice Oyewole presided over several landmark and high-profile cases.

    Nwude/Anajemba Case

    In 2005, he convicted and sentenced Emmanuel Odinigwe Nwude, Nzeribe Edeh Okoli, and Mrs Amaka Martina Anajemba for their roles in defrauding a Brazilian bank of $242 million under the guise of constructing a fictitious airport.

    The scam, one of the largest financial frauds globally, culminated in the collapse of Banco Noroeste in 2001.

    Rev. King Case

    Justice Oyewole sentenced Reverend King (Chukwuemeka Ezeugo) to death by hanging at the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja on January 11, 2007, for the murder of church member Ann Uzoh and the attempted murders of others.

    This conviction followed his arraignment on September 26, 2006, on a six-count charge.

    The Court of Appeal and Supreme Court later upheld the ruling in 2016.

    Rivers State Assembly Speakership

    At the Court of Appeal, Justice Oyewole authored and delivered the unanimous judgment affirming the decision of Justice Omotosho recognising  Martin Amaewhule as Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    He nullified the N800 billion 2024 Rivers State budget passed by a faction of the House during the political impasse between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike.

    Training, scholarship and awards

    Justice Oyewole has participated in no fewer than 13 international training programmes, 39 local training programmes, and over 20 local and international conferences, where he also chaired several sessions.

    He has delivered at least 62 academic papers locally and 17 internationally. His scholarly engagements have earned him multiple recognitions and awards, including the 2007 Anti-Corruption Award by Nigeria’s anti-corruption agencies, endorsed by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

    Professional affiliations and publications

    Justice Oyewole is a member of several professional bodies, including the Nigerian Bar Association, Commonwealth Association of Judges and Magistrates, International Association for the Reform of Criminal Justice Administration, and the UNODC Judicial Integrity Group.

    He has published extensively on financial crimes adjudication, judicial integrity, and justice administration.

    Expectations from the Bar

    Members of the Bar, including Godwin Omoaka (SAN), Dr Wahab Shittu (SAN), Dr Monday Ubani (SAN) and Kabir Akingbolu, have expressed high expectations regarding his elevation.

    Omoaka described the recommendation of Justice Oyewole by the National Judicial Council (NJC) to the apex court as a significant development for the Nigerian judiciary.

    Omoaka said Justice Oyewole has long been regarded as a “judge’s judge.”

    He said: “His trajectory from the High Court of Lagos State to the Court of Appeal has been marked by a rare combination of intellectual rigour and unflinching courage.

    “He gained national prominence for his handling of high-profile criminal matters and complex commercial disputes, where he demonstrated an exceptional grasp of both the letter and the spirit of the law.”

    Omoaka highlighted what he believes Justice Oyewole brings to the Bench.

    •Expertise in criminal jurisprudence: Justice Oyewole is widely respected for his deep understanding of criminal law and procedure. At a time when the Supreme Court faces complex appeals regarding anti-corruption and financial crimes, his experience in presiding over landmark trials will be invaluable.

    •Efficiency and speed: Throughout his career, he has been known for his “no-nonsense” approach to courtroom management. He is a jurist who discourages frivolous adjournments and technicalities that stall the wheels of justice. His presence may help enhance the disposal rate of appeals.

    •Intellectual depth: His judgments are typically well-researched and grounded in contemporary legal philosophy. He possesses the ability to balance strict legalism with the social engineering role of the law.

    •Integrity and public confidence: His reputation for impartiality is vital. His elevation serves to bolster public trust in the Supreme Court as an institution that rewards merit and consistency.

    •Strengthening precedents: I expect him to contribute significantly to the clarity of Nigerian case law, particularly in areas where there have been conflicting decisions at the appellate level.

    •Technological integration: Given his progressive outlook, he is expected to support the ongoing digital transformation of the judiciary, making the apex court more accessible and efficient.

    •Mentorship by example: His work ethic will likely serve as a blueprint for younger jurists aspiring to the appellate bench.

    Omoaka described the recommendation of Justice Oyewole as a “square peg in a square hole.”

    “He represents a blend of the old school’s discipline and the modern jurist’s dynamism. His elevation is a win for the Nigerian legal system and a step toward a more robust Supreme Court,” he posited.

    Shittu: his competence, knowledge can’t be faulted

    Foremost litigator, Dr. Shittu believes the choice and elevation of Justice Oyewole is a one hundred percent pick that no one can fault in terms of high competence, knowledge, integrity, professionalism and undiluted jurisprudence.

    “This is one addition to the apex court that is enriching, refreshing and unprecedented. The jurist scores very highly in all departments of the judex and we salute the appointors for commitment to high excellence.

    “I look forward to his robust and quality contributions to our body of jurisprudence,” Dr. Shittu said.

    Ubani: a jurist of sound intellect, proven integrity

    Dr. Ubani posited that the recommendation of Justice Oyewole for elevation is a positive development for the Nigerian judiciary and the country.

    According to him, “Justice Oyewole is a jurist of sound intellect, proven integrity, and commendable industry. His judgments often reflect clarity of reasoning, fidelity to the law, and a balanced pursuit of substantial justice.”

    Ubani argued that Justice Oyewole has shown that he possesses a deep grasp of constitutional and commercial jurisprudence, procedural discipline, and judicial restraint, and these are qualities that are indispensable at the Apex Court.

    “It is my expectation that his presence on the Supreme Court Bench will not only strengthen consistency in judicial reasoning but will also enhance jurisprudential stability and reinforce public confidence in the judiciary.

    “Over time he has demonstrated independence of mind, humility, and respect for the Bar and these are qualities that will further enrich the institutional credibility of the Court.

    “Nigerians are full of high hopes that his inclusion into the apex bench will enrich the Supreme Court in no small measure,” Ubani said.

    Oyewole’s knowledge of law superlative, says Akingbolu

    Akingbolu said Justice Oyewole is not an “anyhow judge” and not a common type of judge that you see anywhere.

    According to him, Justice Oyewole’s knowledge of law is superlative adding, “his comportment is something to write home about.

    His finesse is admirable and his sense of dignity which is the most important quality and attribute of a good judge is top notch.”

    He noted that Justice Oyewole means so many things to many people and those many things are good things and not the other way round.

    “He is going to make a change. We have good justices in the Supreme Court but Justice Oyewole is an additional asset to the apex court. I think that having him on board is a big plus for the Supreme Court.

    “The CJN Kudirat Kekere-Ekun is another justice of integrity. Justice Oyewole coming on board would boost the image, the performance, and the integrity of the apex court, and it also shows that the NJC did not go for an ‘anyhow’ person.

    “The process of his appointment is very transparent and lays so much emphasis on integrity, hard work, brilliance, knowledge of the law and on merit.

    “I want to believe that Justice Oyewole will be a good asset to the Supreme Court. He has been a good asset to the Court of Appeal.

    “When he was at Lagos State High Court, Justice Oyewole was a fantastic judge before whom you as a lawyer, would love to appear.

    “I believe the good job he did at the Lagos High Court, he continued at the Court of Appeal, he would still continue at the Supreme Court until he retires,” he said.

  • Clinical governance, patient safety and the urgency of now

    Clinical governance, patient safety and the urgency of now

    • By: Dr. Adebayo Bakare

    A fact many Nigerians will readily agree to is that our health infrastructure, manpower, investment, utility, and gains have improved significantly over the years, more than at any other time in our recent history. But there is one nagging snag: preventable deaths and disabilities owing to poor quality care.

    The disquiet and the claims of medical negligence and poor quality healthcare by many Nigerians on social media following the devastating loss of a child of a storied and respected Nigerian author naturally provoke concern, reflection, and the need for action.

    While some of the claims are unsubstantiated, not grounded in facts, and may be wild, they cannot all simply be dismissed. They call for serious concern.

    There are reports of medical officers abandoning patients during emergencies, mismanaging clinical situations, and even botching life-saving surgeries, like the recent case of a woman who died four months after doctors allegedly left scissors inside her during a surgery in Kano State.

    Although an investigation into this particular incident has been rightly ordered, the episodic occurrences and allegations of medical negligence have become too deafening to ignore. They signal deeper structural problems preceding the current administration. These are patently matters of lack of discipline, poor professional conduct, and poor oversight across both public and private health institutions. It is a critical challenge.

    The data is unsavoury. In low- and middle-income countries, such as Nigeria, it is estimated that 60 percent of avoidable deaths stem from poor-quality care, while only 40 percent are due to lack of access. Globally, this amounts to between five and eight million deaths annually, alongside a substantial financial burden of an estimated $42 billion in direct costs from medication errors alone.

    It is within this prism that the establishment of the National Taskforce on Clinical Governance and Patient Safety by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare is most judicious, forthright, honourable, and commendable.

    The establishment of the task force also goes to show that the current administration is a listening, intuitive, and responsive one, always ready to act for the collective good and uphold the dignity of every citizen.

    The task force will principally ensure sustainable clinical governance and patient safety structures, standards, and accountability mechanisms that improve health outcomes, patient experience, and workforce performance, and these deliverables will directly contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3.8 on quality essential health services, and actualising the aspirations of the Nigeria Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative.

    In furtherance of its mandate, the task force shall conduct a landscape analysis of clinical governance and patient safety in Nigeria; develop and standardise national clinical governance and patient safety frameworks, policies, and implementation guidance; strengthen systems for prevention, reporting, learning, and response to adverse events and patient safety incidents; promote adherence to evidence-based clinical standards, protocols, and ethical practice across health facilities, as well as institutionalise quality improvement (QI) and patient safety culture at facility, state, and national levels.

    In addition, it shall support capacity building for health workers and managers on clinical governance, risk management, and patient safety; enhance patient and community engagement in quality and safety initiatives, including feedback and complaint mechanisms; establish national indicators and monitoring systems to track quality and patient safety performance; and strengthen coordination among federal, state, regulatory, professional, and private sector stakeholders for quality and safety, while upholding confidentiality and ethical handling of sensitive information, including patient safety incidents and facility performance data.

    The composition of the task force affirms its significance and the gravitas of the task before it, with members drawn from some of the most accomplished phyla of the health sector, both in Nigeria and abroad.

    Read Also: Cancer patient, AuntieEsther dies after rejecting blood transfusion

    It is important to emphasise that the task force is not one of those bureaucratic distractions; its work is deliberate and clearly thought out from existential concerns and will begin with a thorough review of existing laws, policies, and regulatory instruments related to healthcare quality, patient safety, professional conduct, and ethics. This review will identify gaps, overlaps, and opportunities for alignment with international best practices.

    And based on these findings, the task force will lead the development of a National Clinical Governance and Patient Safety Framework for Nigeria, modelled on the World Health Organization’s Global Patient Safety Action Plan (2021–2030). It will recommend national minimum standards for clinical governance structures, harmonise patient safety policies with existing national health strategies, and propose an institutional architecture to guide implementation at both federal and state levels.

    In the area of standards, guidelines, and clinical effectiveness, the task force will support the development or revision of standard treatment guidelines, clinical pathways, and patient safety bundles for priority health conditions and services. It will promote evidence-based care and rational clinical decision-making while supporting the adoption of proven safety practices and tools. These include the use of surgical safety checklists, safe medication practices and pharmacovigilance systems, infection prevention and control standards, safe childbirth and maternal and newborn safety interventions, as well as safe blood transfusion and laboratory safety protocols.

    The task force will also strengthen patient safety incident management and learning systems by establishing national guidance for incident reporting and learning. It will recommend protocols for adverse event reporting, sentinel event investigation and root cause analysis, morbidity and mortality review processes, and disclosure to patients and families through open and transparent communication. In doing so, it will promote a “just culture” that balances accountability with learning and continuous improvement.

    At the facility level, the task force will focus on quality improvement and performance management. This will include reviewing the national quality improvement approach and toolkit, promoting continuous improvement cycles, and supporting the integration of clinical governance into facility performance reviews, supportive supervision, accreditation and certification processes, and routine health information management systems.

    Workforce competence and professional practice will remain a core priority. The task force will recommend competency standards and training packages for clinical governance and patient safety, support their integration into pre-service and in-service training curricula, and promote clinical audit, mentorship, supportive supervision, and peer review mechanisms. It will also recommend mechanisms for addressing professional misconduct, negligence, and ethical violations through appropriate regulatory pathways.

    In addition, the task force will promote patient experience, rights, and community engagement by strengthening patient rights, informed consent standards, respectful care practices, and effective redress mechanisms. It will recommend national minimum standards for patient feedback systems and enhance community engagement and public communication on safe and high-quality care.

    For monitoring, evaluation, and reporting, the task force will define national indicators for clinical governance and patient safety performance, support the development of national dashboards and reporting formats, and produce periodic national reports on patient safety and quality-of-care trends. These reports will highlight priority risks and provide actionable recommendations.

    As stated earlier, the task force is not a knee-jerk or ad hoc response but a carefully conceived plan to address the fundamental challenges of care in the health sector, and it shall operate for an initial, renewable tenure of 12 months. There is a clear mandate, scope of work, and actionable timelines.

    Clinical governance and patient safety are not abstract concepts. They are matters of life and death. The urgency of now cannot be overstated.

    • Dr. Adebayo Bakare is a consultant family physician from Kwara State