Category: autopost

  • Activists blame past govt for #EndSARS protests

    Activists blame past govt for #EndSARS protests

    Two Lagos-based human rights activists – Dabiraoluwa  Oni-Ayoku and Ifeanyi Okoye – have blamed the government of Muhammadu Buhari for the violence that trailed the 2020 #EndSARS protests in some parts of the country.

     They argued that if the then government had not deployed security operatives, including soldiers in the streets,  the protesters would have remained peaceful.

     Oni-Ayoku and Okoye  stated  that there was a need for Buhari and his then Chief of Army Staff Tukur Buratai to answer questions on why they decided to use coercion against   protesting youths and why the South was the most hit by the protests.

     The duo, who spoke at different fora in Lagos, absolved the Babajide Sanwo-Olu-led government of any complicity in  the casualties and destruction   recorded in the state during the protests.  

      Oni-Ayoku said: “I would be very honest and this is a constructive explanation from my end. First and foremost, there was an administration in power at that time and ex-President Muhammadu Buhari was the head of that administration.

    Read Also: No noise, please

     “ I know for sure that no country’s military acts without the approval of the number one citizen, in person of the President, so the number one and only person that should be held responsible for the #EndSARS incident which continues to resonate amongst Nigerian youths and has become a stigma, is no one else but   the ex-president.” 

     But  Oni-Ayoku, who is also an entrepreneur and construction expert, wants the state government to implement the recommendations in the  Whitepaper of the committee that investigated the protests.”

       “We are not saying we want to hold Sanwo-Olu responsible, but what we are saying is that there should be an implementation of the Whitepaper document. Even President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration can re-write the story of #EndSARS to give hope to the Nigerian youth and that is because they (youths) matter.”

     On his part, Okoye called for   Buratai’s trial for the role of the Army which was then under his leadership.

     His words:  “Many people talk and say Governor Sanwo-Olu should not be exonerated but I,  Ifeanyi Okoye, can categorically say that the governor was never in charge of the security apparatus.

     “We still run a federal police system and central military system with the C-in-C the President and the President is answerable for whatever transpired during that #EndSARS protests.

      “I   exonerate Governor Sanwo-Olu, who was the governor then and current governor of Lagos State. We all saw the efforts he made to ensure that the demands of the protesters were met by meeting the President several times.

     “Nigeria is a country where the citizenry needs to be on their toes to get what they want but sadly, the military struck, obviously, on the orders of the then  C-inC.

     “The former President should be asked to give account because he was   C-in-C and the actions of the military were carried out on his instructions. Same with the then  Chief of Army Staff Buratai.”

     Okoye however noted that the #EndSARS protests and their outcomes re-awakened the political consciousness of the Nigerian youth.  

    He added: “EndSARS remains a sad one and it’s something that has awakened the political consciousness as regards the quest for good governance and demanding accountability from our leaders in terms of creating and implementing workable policies.

      “ I would gladly say that the outcomes of EndSARS brought about the sub-consciousness of young people. The reality is that the outcomes of EndSARS were not what we bargained for and this was evident in the last elections.

     “The movement created a sub-conscious political awareness in young people but as much as that, many young people are disappointed with the process. It’s not yet Uhuru, it’s a time to build on the gains of the last election and build the momentum.”

  • Fire razes market as traders, destroys goods worth N300m in Anambra

    Fire razes market as traders, destroys goods worth N300m in Anambra

    Traders in Anambra state are gnashing their teeth as fire destroyed their goods worth over N300 million.

    The popular Nkpor Main market in Idemili North Local Government Area of Anambra state, near the commercial city of Onitsha has been gutted by fire.

    The inferno which occurred Wednesday night, reportedly affected a section of the market.

    The Nation gathered that the fire had already razed about 30 shops before the traders mobilised and managed to extinguish it before the arrival of men of the state fire service.

    Confirming the incident, the chairman of the market, Chief Paul Okafor, said over N300 million worth of goods were damaged in the inferno.

    He disclosed that the fire started from a cold room shop and spread to other nearby shops.

    Okafor, whose own wine shop was also gutted, said the fire affected shops loaded with paints, curtains, gum, shoe leathers and polish, wines, hot drinks, thinners, among others.

    He lamented that all phone calls put across to the state fire service did not yield positive results as firefighters did not show up until the traders mobilised and put the fire off.

    He called on government to station some firefighting vehicles under the flyover bridge at Nkpor main market to serve the three major markets within the vicinity.

    He said: “Goods worth over N300 million were damaged in the inferno and the traders are now counting their losses. This is not good for this Yuletide.

    “We call on the state and local governments and public-spirited individuals and groups to come to the aid of the affected traders to bounce back to business as soon as possible.

    A patron of Anambra Markets Amalgamated Traders Association and President of Building Materials Traders Association, Chief Jude Nwankwo, expressed his sympathy for the victims and also called on government, individuals and groups to assist them.

    Read Also: Tipper driver crushes cyclist to death in Anambra

    He advised market leaders to provide fire extinguishers in their various markets to mitigate the effects of fire particularly at night.

    The state fire chief, Martin Agbili did not pick his calls for confirmation.

  • Oyebanji: Celebrating a change agent at 56

    Oyebanji: Celebrating a change agent at 56

    By Yinka Oyebode

    Last week, December 12th to be precise, Ado-Ekiti, the capital of Ekiti State witnessed an unusual development. Pensioners in the state under the auspices of the Nigeria Union of Pensioners (NUP) organised a special prayer session for Governor Biodun Oyebanji and his administration. The sole purpose of the one- day intercessory programme by the senior citizens was to prayerfully support the Governor and his administration. On that day, the pensioners, in their hundreds, thronged the Jibowu Hall, venue of the programme and devoted the entire time praying for the Governor, who on invitation, attended the programme accompanied by his deputy, Chief (Mrs) Monisade Afuye and some members of the state executive council.

    The message being passed by the pensioners was loud and clear. What they were simply saying was that they might not have silver nor gold to give the Governor for his demonstrated commitment to their welfare and wellbeing, through prompt payment of pensions and consistency in defraying outstanding gratuities as well as other policies and programmes that have directly impacted their lives. But what they have- prayers- they would freely offer to God on his behalf. 

    Elder Joel Akinola, the state Chairman of NUP, said the pensioners had never organised such an intercessory programme for any sitting Governor of the state. He said they were moved to do it because of the Governor’s has prioritised their welfare in such an unprecedented manner.

    If the pensioners premised their support for Governor Oyebanji on the new lease of life he has injected into their union through prompt fulfilment of government obligations to them, the three former governors of the state that publicly endorsed Governor Oyebanji some six weeks earlier, hinged their decision on BAO’s performance and exemplary leadership style, which has united various tendencies within the state with concomitant peace, stability and massive development in the state.

    Read Also: No noise, please

    Former Governors Adeniyi Adebayo,  Kayode Fayemi and Ayodele Fayose as well as the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, gave what is aptly an endorsement that is unprecedented, during the thanksgiving service commemorating Oyebanji administration’s first anniversary on October 22nd.  Former Governor Fayose spoke on behalf of the trio, drawing a thunderous applause from the congregation. Former Governor Segun Oni, who was not present during the thanksgiving service made up for his absence some weeks later when he joined the Governor for a Sunday service at the Government House chapel. 

    How BAO is able to garner the support and cooperation of all his predecessors in office as well as all candidates of other political parties that contested the June 2022 election with him, remains a classical lesson in political maturity and demonstrated leadership capacity.

    Those who have followed Oyebanji’s trajectory right from his student’s days, through the period of pro- democracy movement, the period of agitation for the creation of Ekiti State as well as his foray into public service, would readily admit that his unique approach to governance does not come as a surprise. BAO, as he is fondly called, is guided by the social democratic principle of lifting the weak and supporting the vulnerable in the society as well as the biblical injunction of love your neighbour as yourself. His genuine concerns include how to give a voice to the voiceless; how transformational leadership can replace transactional politics; how to build strong institutions instead of strong men; how to make government wear a human face; how every citizen can feel the impact of government regardless of their social standing; and what mechanism should be put in place for genuine and effective empowerment of the citizens, especially the less privileged, towards the attainment of the good life for all.

    Governor Oyebanji is disarmingly unassuming. Those who have come in contact with him, and, indeed a vast majority of Ekiti people, believe his simplicity has brought a new level of zest to governance and redefined performance with emphasis on excellent service delivery, measureable impact, prudent management of resources, zero distraction, minimal noise and maximum benefit to the people, in line with the shared prosperity agenda of his administration.

    As a change agent, BAO believes it is not enough for a leader to lead the people. He believes a leader must live in the hearts of the people by serving them diligently and sincerely. He believes trust is a public good without which no great thing can be achieved collectively. Hence, he believes trust has to be earned. As a leader, he combines integrity, creativity, character, competence, compassion with passion for excellence and development.

    Many people have tried to explain the uniqueness of BAO’s exemplary leadership style. Some believe it is the “homeboy factor”, while many believe he got the necessary grooming having served two former governors in six different capacities before becoming governor. But while these assertions are correct, Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of World Economic Forum seems to have the right answer. According to him, “there are four ingredients in true leadership: brain, soul, heart and good nerves.” BAO, no doubt, possesses these four attributes, especially when one considers the outcomes of many of his developmental efforts.

    His decision to fix the power issues that had put several communities in about four councils in darkness for over ten years by connecting them to the national grid almost at the same time the state’s Independent Power Project (IPP) was commissioned for use is a game changer that has brought a remarkable boost in the socioeconomic development of the state by people and helped to resuscitate some dying businesses. His huge investment in agriculture as a pathway to industrialisation has also attracted an army of youths into commercial agriculture just as his efforts at making Ekiti a digital hub is already yielding fruits, what with the recent $80 million support from the African Development Bank. His local content policy as well as the inclusion policy are daily redefining government –citizens relationship for the betterment of the state.

    Born on December 21, 1967, in Ikogosi-Ekiti, Oyebanji had his early education in his home state and in institutions such as Baptist Primary School, Ikogosi-Ekiti; Awo Community High School, Awo-Ekiti;  C.A.C. Grammar School, Efon-Alaaye; District Commercial Secondary School, Aramoko-Ekiti; and  Federal School of Arts and Science, Ondo. He bagged a Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science from the Ondo State University (now Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti) in 1989 and  Masters’ degree in Political Science (International Relations and Strategic Studies), from the University of Ibadan in 1992.

    He started his career as a Lecturer at the Department of Political Science, Ondo State University, Ado-Ekiti, and worked for four years (1993 – 1997) . He later proceeded to work as Manager, Treasury, and Financial Services at the defunct Omega Bank Plc (now Heritage Bank) till May 1999, when he commenced an illustrious career in politics and governance.

    Since embracing public service in 1999, he has served in various capacities. He started as  Special Assistant to the Governor (Parliamentary Affairs, June 1999 – July 2000); Special Adviser (Parliamentary Affairs, Aug. 2000 – Sept. 2001); Chief of Staff to the Governor (September 2001 – May, 2003); Chairman, Governing Board, Citizenship and Leadership Training Centre, Federal Ministry of Youth and Sports Development (June 2009 – December 2010). He served as Commissioner, Ministry of Integration and Inter-Governmental Affairs, Ekiti State ( December 2010 – December 2011); Head, Office of Transformation, Strategy and Delivery (OTSD), Ekiti State (December 2011 – January 2013); Commissioner, Ministry of Budget, Economic Planning and Service Delivery, Ekiti State (January 2013 – October 2014).

    He also served as Secretary to Ekiti State Government between October 2018 to December 2021, when he resigned his appointment to join the governorship race, which he won on the platform of the All Progressives  Congress (APC) in June 22, 2022.  He was inaugurated Governor of Ekiti State on October 16, 2022.

    Oyebanji is a devout Christian who sees his career in politics and governance as a divine calling. His belief is that he is not only accountable to the people, he is also accountable to God. This philosophy remains his guiding light as he continues to serve God and country diligently as a loyal party man and conscientious public servant. As Governor, Oyebanji runs an inclusive administration and makes the welfare and well -being of the people a top priority. Through a combination of prudent management of resources, aggressive industrialisation drive and infrastructure upgrade, he has been able to reposition the state for economic growth. His strategic deployment of technology to block leakages has also led to a remarkable improvement in internally generated revenue for the state.

    In recognition of his inspirational life journey, BAO has received many awards and recognitions. His most cherished is the Ekiti State Exceptional Achievers (MEEA) Award, granted in recognition of his contributions to the creation of Ekiti State as Secretary, State Creation Committee and Secretary, Ekiti State Development Fund.

    Oyebanji is married to Dr Olayemi Oyebanji, a senior lecturer in the Department of Educational Management, University of Ibadan. They are blessed with three children.

    From the rolling hills of Ekiti comes fifty- six hearty cheers for an enigmatic leader, innovator and change agent- BAO the people’s Governor, as he clocks 56 today.

    • Oyebode, Special Adviser (Media) to the Governor, writes from Ado-Ekiti

  • ‘Lanrewaju Adepoju; a tribute

    ‘Lanrewaju Adepoju; a tribute

    By Ademola ‘Bablow’ Babalola

    SIR: Talented, fearless, bold, courageous and, influential. These are the words that best describe him.

    There is a very unique quality that distinguished him from his contemporaries: he attended not a formal school, but spoke impeccable, flawless and unambiguous Queen’s English.

    Despite the fact that he was self-educated, taught himself how to read and write, he went ahead to become an author and a publisher. He wrote many books to his credit. Ladepo Omo Adanwo, S’agbadiwere, Ironu Akewi and many others are his wonderful works.

    His voice was mightier than the swords of the most powerful in Nigeria, and this led to his occasional escapes and disappearances from public. More so, many of his poetic renditions made him to live the life of a fugitive during his productive years. Even in self-designed solitary confinement, his voice reigned supreme.

    Read Also: Three kidnapped while performing sacrifice at Enugu river

    The military fumed but feared him. He had many a time run away for his dear life to escape from the stranglehold of the military. He ran away not because he feared their guns or bullets, he ran because he always cared to fight another fight.

    He had several times dared the tigers. He dared both the military and the civilian government. He did this right from his youthful age. He spoke during the time that it was dangerous to speak. He confronted those whom many feared to look into their eyes.

    Olanrewaju Adepoju (Ààre Alásà of Ibadanland) was a very popular Yoruba poet during his time. His kind of poetry was confrontational no doubt.

    He, in many of his albums/records, satirized the unhealthy activities of some Nigerian rulers who posed as stumbling block to the progress of the country.

    Another social vice the ‘Ewi’ icon detested most was the excesses and unruliness of some Nigerian religious leaders. He not only pointed out to their immoderations, he exposed many of the tricks they employed to hypnotize their followers.

    Chief Olanrewaju was not only a poet and a publisher; he was also an activist, who, during his productive years, was always in and out of hideout. He was always in hiding in the days of military’s demonic terrors. His life was often on the line, owing to his non-stop confrontations with heartless rulers. He was on the run so the hope of good governance could not ruin.

    Chief Olanrewaju, until his death, lived for humanity. He was the people’s advocate. He was the voice of the masses.

    May the soul of the legend rest in peace.

    • Ademola ‘Bablow’ Babalola, <babalolaademola39@gmail.com>

  • How to identify adulterated products, by NAFDAC

    How to identify adulterated products, by NAFDAC

    The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has said a comprehensive list of adulterated wines and drinks in circulation.

      In response to this concern, NAFDAC said it will embark on an aggressive campaign to educate the public on effective measures to verify the authenticity of the original products. Acting on intelligence, NAFDAC’s Director-General, Prof. Moji Adeyeye, said in a statement that the agency conducted extensive intelligence gathering over several weeks. This proactive approach aimed to collect and collate data on the activities of individuals involved in the production and distribution of substandard and potentially harmful products.

     “In collaboration with other security agencies, NAFDAC carried out a sting operation in the market to burst the criminal operations taking place there. It is worthy of note that this dastard activity has been going on for a long time and they operate like a cartel threatening anyone who dares challenge them,” Adeyeye explained.

     NAFDAC’s list of identified adulterated products encompasses a broad spectrum, including various wines from popular brands such as Seaman Schnapps, Hennessey, Four Cousins, Carlo Rossi, Jenney, Chelsea London Dry Gin, Schnapp Dry Gin, McDowells, Black Labels, Gordons, Martell, Campari, Smirnoff Ice, Eva Non-Alcoholic Drink, Evra Non-Alcoholic Drink, Cartel, and others.

    In addition to exposing the proliferation of fake products, NAFDAC highlights the presence of date revalidation for expired items like Peak milk, powdered milk, Ketchups, Yoghurt, Coca Cola products, and the deceptive packaging of counterfeit and substandard products. These substandard items find their way into the market and are consumed by the public.

    Notably, NAFDAC recently intervened by intercepting counterfeiters engaged in the illicit production of various beverages, including wines, soft drinks, and consumables at Eziukwu Market (Cemetery Market) in Aba, Abia State.

     As part of its extensive operation, the agency conducted raids on more than 240 shops that had been transformed into makeshift factories, where harmful products were being produced and sold.

    Read Also: Three kidnapped while performing sacrifice at Enugu river

    The DG highlighted the deplorable conditions of these makeshift factories, describing them as extremely unhygienic. The manufacturing process involved the use of water from unsanitary sources, harmful chemicals, saccharin, coloring agents, dirty recycled bottles, and counterfeit packaging materials mimicking other established brands. The adulteration of alcoholic beverages in the country by criminal elements typically involves the mixing of cheaper sources of sugar and starch, often substituting grapes or fruit. This process may also include the addition of various harmful chemicals that are unsuitable for human consumption.

     “Over 1,500 cartons of the fake and substandard products were destroyed during the operation while 300 cartons were evacuated to NAFDAC warehouse. The street value of the confiscated and destroyed fake products is estimated at over N750million. Ten people were arrested on arrival at the scene of the crime and will be charged to court after thorough investigation,” she said.

     Given the extensive scale of illegitimate activities within that section of the market, Adeyeye emphasised that NAFDAC took the drastic step of temporarily closing down the market to conduct comprehensive regulatory activities. The closure remained in effect until an agreement was reached with all stakeholders in the market, accompanied by signed undertakings pledging that the market would never be used for such illicit activities again. Adeyeye sternly warned about the severe health risks associated with consuming adulterated alcohol, citing potential adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, drowsiness, dizziness, blue-tinged or pale skin, irregular or slow breathing, low body temperature, unconsciousness, kidney and liver failure, or even death.

     “Methanol, a substance which can be used in fake vodka, may cause permanent blindness. World Health Organisation (WHO) in their Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health estimated that more than three million people died all over the world as a result of alcohol poisoning. Furthermore, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) ascertained that one of every 10 cancer cases in Nigeria can be traced to Alcohol and 4.7 per cent of overall cancer cases in Nigeria in 2019 can be attributed to consumption of adulterated alcohol,” she disclosed.

     Encouraging Nigerians to stay vigilant, the Director-General urged consumers to consistently scrutinise branded drinks carefully to distinguish genuine products from counterfeits before consumption. “NAFDAC wishes to advice that the members of the public should shine their eyes during this yuletide season. We are using this medium to appeal to Nigerians to buy only NAFDAC registered drinks from reputable and licenced retailers, bars and supermarkets. If the product is being sold well below its normal price, or doesn’t seem to include normal taxes on liquors, then it is probably fake. Check for poor quality packaging, spelling mistakes and unusually shaped bottles. Look for the contact information and address of the manufacturer. If it is missing, the alcohol is fake.

     “Inspect the seal on the bottle. If the seal is broken or damaged, then the contents might have been interfered with and are not safe to drink. Check for fake bar codes. If you have an app on your mobile that scans bar codes, scan it and see if it’s listed as the correct product and beware of bad smells! If it smells like paint stripper or nail polish remover, then it probably is.”

     NAFDAC advises the public to stay vigilant during this festive season. “We appeal to Nigerians to purchase only NAFDAC-registered drinks from reputable and licensed retailers, bars, and supermarkets. If the product is being sold significantly below its normal price or lacks the usual taxes on liquors, it is likely fake.

    “Look for poor-quality packaging, spelling errors, and oddly shaped bottles.Verify the contact information and address of the manufacturer; if missing, the alcohol may be fake. Examine the bottle seal; if broken or damaged, the contents may have been tampered with and are unsafe. Check for counterfeit barcodes; scanning with a barcode app can help verify authenticity. Lastly, beware of unpleasant odors. If the drink smells like paint stripper or nail polish remover, it likely is fake.”

  • Securing critical assets for national development

    Securing critical assets for national development

    Since the discovery of oil in Oloibiri, Bayelsa State, in 1956, Nigeria’s economic development has been intrinsically linked to oil revenue. However, the persisting threat of oil theft and vandalism of crude oil infrastructure has posed a significant challenge to the nation’s prosperity. Recognising the gravity of this issue, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL) took a decisive action by awarding the contract for securing oil pipelines and preventing oil theft to Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited (TSSNL). CHINAKA OKORO reports.

    The move to engage TSSNL in safeguarding critical national infrastructure has proven to be a strategic decision, with stakeholders lauding the successes achieved in curtailing oil theft. The effectiveness of TSSNL’s surveillance and security measures has brought about a positive shift in the protection of the nation’s lifeline, prompting calls for the continued involvement of TSSNL in this crucial role.

     The battle against oil theft requires not only robust security measures but also sustained commitment and expertise. TSSNL’s track record in mitigating risks associated with oil pipelines has positioned them as a reliable partner in preserving Nigeria’s economic backbone. As stakeholders advocate for the continued collaboration with TSSNL, the imperative of securing oil infrastructure remains at the forefront of efforts to ensure the nation’s sustainable development. In the development process of any society, certain assets contribute to the advancement of society and its people. These assets ensure economic or monetary benefits for the people. These assets could be regarded as operating assets, non-operating assets or leased assets, among others.

     Experts have noted that “those possessions or assets that are known as national infrastructure are those facilities, systems, sites, information, people, networks and processes that are necessary for a country to function and upon which daily life depends.”

     Critical national infrastructure serves as the backbone of a society, encompassing assets, services, and systems pivotal to economic, political, and social well-being. From schools and hospitals to industries and transportation networks, these elements collectively contribute to a nation’s resilience and prosperity. Among these, Nigeria’s crude oil industry takes centre stage as a crucial component vital to the nation’s economic stability, public health, safety, and security.

     Regrettably, the vulnerability of critical infrastructure is heightened by the actions of individuals and groups with destructive motives. Deliberate acts of vandalism, theft, or sabotage pose serious threats to the proper functioning of essential systems, leading to economic losses, compromised security, and potential harm to citizens. In this context, safeguarding critical national infrastructure becomes paramount to maintaining national security and averting widespread disruptions.

     Nigeria, being heavily reliant on oil revenue, faces unique challenges in securing its crude oil infrastructure. The concerted efforts of entities like Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited (TSSNL) play a crucial role in defending these vital lifelines. As attacks on critical infrastructure can have far-reaching consequences, protecting these sites becomes an integral aspect of national security strategy.

     The ongoing battle against oil theft and vandalism requires a multi-faceted approach, combining advanced security measures, intelligence gathering, and collaboration with local communities. By recognising the intrinsic link between safeguarding critical infrastructure and ensuring the nation’s stability, Nigeria can fortify its defence against those seeking to undermine its economic and social foundations.

    Read Also: No noise, please

    Nigeria’s struggle to meet its petroleum quota set by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has been a longstanding challenge, primarily attributed to the disruptive actions of non-state actors. These actors often claim marginalisation, neglect, or injustice as reasons for their agitation, leading to recurrent disruptions in oil production. Pipeline vandalism has become an unfortunate and persistent phenomenon, jeopardizing the nation’s economic stability.

     Recognising the imperative of safeguarding its critical oil infrastructure, the Nigerian government, under the leadership of Managing Director Mele Kyari of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), took decisive steps to address these challenges. The initiation of measures to prevent production disruptions and protect oil pipelines marked a strategic move toward fortifying the nation’s economic lifelines.

     In this context, the decision to contract out the surveillance of oil pipelines has proven instrumental in mitigating the impact of vandalism. The proactive efforts undertaken by the NNPCL, particularly under Mele Kyari’s leadership, have demonstrated a commitment to defending critical national infrastructure. The importance of sustaining this vigilance cannot be overstated, as oil lifelines remain central to Nigeria’s economic prosperity.

     As the battle against vandalism and production disruptions continues, it underscores the need for a comprehensive and collaborative strategy. Advanced security measures, intelligence gathering, and community engagement all play pivotal roles in fortifying the defenses of Nigeria’s vital oil infrastructure. By maintaining this vigilance, the nation can not only protect its economic interests but also ensure the stability and resilience of its energy sector in the face of persistent challenges.

     In the past few years, the Mele Kyari-led management of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL) has shown enough know-how in protecting Nigeria’s national wealth as it concerns the war against oil theft and its effects on national security.

    Stakeholders such as Eshanakpe Israel popularly known as Akpodoro and Mayor of Urhobo land have been examining the successes of the NNPCL in securing the oil pipeline since contracting the security of the pipeline to Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited (TSSNL) and the entire national security as it concerns the dwindling fortunes of oil thieves in the creeks of the Niger Delta region.

     Interested parties, including Akpodoro, have been wondering how the security of the pipelines has become topnotch since Tantita was involved in securing the oil pipelines. Nigerians have been trying to unravel the magic wand applied as an elixir by the management of NNPCL to stem the tide of banditry in the Nigerian territorial waters vis-a-vis the national security situation.

     It should be noted that before the Nigerian joint venture partner decided to cede security of the surveillance security contract of oil facilities in the Delta to TSSNL, the country’s wealth plummeted hopelessly as all enemies of the state became interested in illicit oil bunkering; which, ultimately exerted pressure on the national security architecture snowballing into other areas of national insecurity.

     For instance, it is been alleged that money from oil theft formed part of what was used to fund banditry and other forms of insurrection in other parts of the country. For several years, the enemies of the state who vandalise oil pipelines and steal the national asset-crude oil- have been deploying the proceeds of their criminal endeavours to wreak havoc on society. It took Kyari’s NNPCL boldness to halt the trend and award the surveillance security contract to Tantita Security Services Limited as Chief Government Ekpemukpolo, also known as Tompolo as its Chief Executive Officer to wage war against political and business elites who seriously engage in oil theft by proxies. Such a development is said to have elicited several restiveness in some parts of the country.

     The threat to national security became loudening when the illicit trade in oil theft boomed. Stakeholders alleged that foreign collaborators were recruited massively while the so-called security agencies bribed their way into the Delta region, paid returns to the authorities that posted them and ultimately undermined the security of the country.

     Experts in the oil industry had raised the alarm of threats to security through the country’s waterways due to the compromise of national security by those who were paid to secure the wealth of the country.  As good luck would have it, TSSNL became the game-changer when it was awarded the contract to secure the oil pipelines and Nigeria’s waterways. Not even the senior oil workers were exempted from the horrid phenomenon that once characterised the oil industry as most of them were alleged to have sponsored protests, overtly and covertly engaged and or aided oil theft vandalism in exchange for money.

     Additionally and most importantly is the attitude of boisterous individuals who deliberately paint ethnic colourations in otherwise political confrontations and thereby issue threats to vandalise oil facilities in the creeks over conflict of interests which, of course, can be easily resolved through the intervention of notable political leaders in the country. Observers say the situation exerts much pressure on national security.

     Experts in oil matters have said the negative impact of oil theft in Nigeria assumed international proportion as Nigeria became a hub for oil thieves across the globe until the Kyari-led NNPCL decided to recruit TSSNL for the rescue of Nigeria’s oil wealth ostensibly redirecting national security.

     To salvage a situation in which the country’s wealth was being plundered through theft, criminalities, sea piracy, vandalism, sabotage, rent-seeking, insecurity and racketeering, the NNPCL brought in the Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited (TSSNL) to rescue the country’s oil wealth the enemies of the state. It is instructive to note that since TSSNL took over the security affairs of the pipelines, it has utterly dwarfed its contemporaries to whom other axes of the contract were awarded; thereby making Tompolo’s security firm the best among the pack It has achieved a whole lot of feats even in the face of sabotage, scandal, propaganda, jealousy and hatred-induced blackmail by some elements within the country’s security apparatus who have been edged out of illicit trade in the oil industry through the activities of TSSNL.

     As a result of the commitment to securing Nigeria’s treasure, the country is currently enjoying relative peace on her waterways as TSSNL has pushed away the petroleum products rustlers to whom the oil wealth is a cash cow and bringing about hope in the future of Nigeria. The country’s quota among its peers in the Organisation of Exporting Countries (OPEC) has been steadily on the rise since last year when TSSNL chose to do the right thing having been empowered to so do.

     Nigerians are exultant about the security situation in terms of pipeline safety engendered by TSSNL’s activities, even as they have praised the high productivity of the security firm. Again, the national security is near stable while the stability of the country’s wealth is on the increase. The Nuhu Ribadu-led Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) to the President should maintain the current tempo for a better future.

     Considering the success recorded in the security of this critical national infrastructure, critical stakeholders, and indeed, Nigerians have called for continued engagement of TSSNL to carry out surveillance of the oil pipelines. They, therefore maintain that “there is the need for expeditious renewal of the surveillance contract of oil pipeline awarded to Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited (TSSNL).”

  • Sugar-sweetened beverages and public health

    Sugar-sweetened beverages and public health

    By Opeyemi Ibitoye

    SIR: In a world where Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) like obesity and diabetes are on the rise, it is essential to address the root causes of these health epidemics. One issue that has gained significant attention in Nigeria in recent years is the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and the attendant health impacts they have.

    As manufacturers of these products prioritize their profits over the wellness of the nation, it is crucial to dispel misleading information about SSBs, the efforts of the government to manage the looming disaster and the important work done by civil society groups and the public health community. 

    The detrimental effects of excessive SSB consumption are well-documented and draw global parallels with successful sugar-sweetened beverages tax implementations. This argument calls for an increase in such taxes to promote public health and well-being, particularly in the Nigerian context.

    The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified excessive consumption of sugary drinks as a major contributor to NCDs, which are particularly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria. SSBs are a significant source of added sugars, offering empty calories with little to no nutritional value. High intake of these beverages has been linked to conditions such as obesity, Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, dental problems, and more than 15 types of cancer.

    Alarmingly, studies have shown that children and adolescents in Nigeria are particularly vulnerable to the negative health effects of SSBs, making this a critical public health issue.

    Read Also: No noise, please

    Countries that have implemented sugar-sweetened beverage taxes have witnessed positive outcomes in both health and fiscal terms. For instance, Mexico saw a 7.6% reduction in SSB purchases in the first two years after implementing the tax, with an even more significant decline in lower-income households. Similarly, Berkeley, California, experienced a 21% decrease in SSB consumption following the implementation of a local tax.

    It is essential to stress that there is no valid argument to categorize unhealthy products as “staple food” for the general public in Nigeria. While we admit that this attempt is due to a lack of stringent regulations that protect Nigerians from consuming unhealthy products that have now flooded the markets with misleading advertisements, the information disseminated by the sugary beverages manufacturers, their allies, and other front groups primarily serves to bolster their profitability and funding of their expensive lifestyle at the detriment of the consumers’ wellbeing. 

    The revenue generated from these taxes can be reinvested in public health initiatives and subsidizing healthy food options. In the Nigerian context, this revenue can also help offset the economic burden of healthcare costs associated with diet-related diseases.

    Sugary drink manufacturers often assert their innocence, claiming their products are just one part of a complex problem. They argue that consumer responsibility plays a significant role in health outcomes and that consumers should exercise moderation and make informed choices. They also argue against pro-health taxation, claiming that it unfairly targets lower-income individuals.

    However, evidence shows that lower-income populations will benefit the most from reduced SSB consumption due to the regressive nature of diet-related diseases.

    As the advocacy for an immediate increase in Nigeria’s SSB tax continues, it is crucial for the industry to provide accurate information through publications. Obesity, diabetes, and other cardiovascular diseases are non-communicable diseases that can result from unhealthy diets, including excessive consumption of sugary drinks. Providing clear nutritional labelling and increasing transparency about the sugar content in beverages can empower consumers in Nigeria to make informed choices.

    Pro-health tax is a critical step in combating Nigeria’s NCD crisis worsened by excessive sugar consumption. A higher SSB tax rate that is effectively implemented and not absorbed by the consumer will serve as a powerful tool in reducing the prevalence of diet-related diseases and ultimately improving the health of the Nigerian population.

    It is time for manufacturers to be more responsible by limiting the incomplete and false messages they put in public while we also ask the government and all relevant agencies to sit up and protect the health of Nigerians.

    • Opeyemi Ibitoye, Lagos.

  • Osimhen, Asisat, Nnadozie and Nigeria’s unity

    Osimhen, Asisat, Nnadozie and Nigeria’s unity

    By Zayd Ibn Isah

    SIR: Three Nigerian footballers, Victor Osimhen, Asisat Oshoala, and Nnadozie Chiamaka, enjoyed a triumphant day at the just-concluded Confederation of African Football Awards in Marrakech, Morocco.

    Osimhen secured the CAF African Footballer of the Year Award, while Oshoala clinched the African Women’s Footballer of the Year Award for a record sixth consecutive time. Chiamaka, shot stopper for the Super Falcons, was crowned the best Female Goalkeeper of the Year, marking three unprecedented awards for a country since CAF first presented an award to Ghana¼s Abedi Pele in 1992.

    Historically, two Nigerian players, Rashidi Yekini and Emmanuel Amuneke, went on to win this prestigious award given to Africa¼s most exceptional footballer in 1993 and 1994. The last Nigerian player to have won it before Osimhen broke the jinx was Kanu Nwankwo, popularly known as Papilo, in 1999.

    The award became monotonous, similar to Asisat Oshoala’s experience, as Super Eagles’ players dominated it year in and year out. However, after Kanu won it for the second time in 1999, it seemed as though there was an order from above to halt Nigerian players’ winning streak. Not even the cerebral Austin “Jay Jay” Okocha, so good they named him twice, got to win the award until he retired from active football.

     As the pursuit of the coveted award continued, the emergence of outstanding footballers like Samuel Eto’o, Didier Drogba, Yaya Toure, Mohamed Salah, Sadio Mane, and others made it even more difficult for Nigerian players to break through.

    Read Also: Three kidnapped while performing sacrifice at Enugu river

     The closest a Nigerian player came to winning the award was in 2013 when Mikel Obi was nominated after an incredible season with Chelsea and the Super Eagles. Till date, Mikel Obi seems pained that he couldn’t lay his hands on the coveted award, as the odds were in his favour until the final moments. He alleged in a recent YouTube interview with Dubai Eye 103.8 that he was robbed of the award. “I was robbed, mate,” Mikel said. “Before I went, I was told that I won it. I was at the airport flying to Nigeria because the ceremony was in Nigeria, and guess what happened? Manchester City was playing, and Yaya scored a hat-trick or two goals.” 

    But whether Mikel Obi was robbed or not, we are glad that the CAF Award has finally come back into the hands of our own, after 23 long years.  Surely, even Obi would be happy to see one of his younger brothers crowned Africa¼s football king.

    The announcement of Victor Osimhen winning this year’s African Player of the Year was akin to the proverbial long-sought treasure finally being uncovered. After a prolonged search, the day of its rediscovery would definitely precede a joy that knows no bounds. The entire country erupted in jubilation, much like the overwhelming elation that accompanies the discovery of a sought-after treasure.

    Victor Osimhen had an amazing Serie A season with Napoli after helping the Italian side win their first Scudetto title in 33 years. He broke several records in their way to the title-winning season, including scoring 25 goals to emerge as the highest goal scorer. Asisat, on the other hand, had an incredible season with the Barcelona women’s football team, likewise goalkeeper Chiamaka, who showcased her goalkeeping prowess for both club and country. Also worthy of note is the fact that Osimhen’s African Footballer of the Year Award came shortly after he won the Italian Footballer of the Year Award and was ranked as the 8th best player in the world during the recent Ballon D’or ceremony.

    In all of this, I’ve come to realize one thing about the Nigerian spirit: that we love to celebrate our own. It doesn’t matter the tribe or religion; if someone makes the country proud, especially on the international stage, Nigerians will roll out drums and celebrate as if there’s no tomorrow.

    Currently, Nigerians from all walks of life are celebrating the trio of Osimhen, Asisat, and Nnadozie, overlooking their region and religion. The only thing that matters is the colour of the country’s flag they represent. This further reinforces my belief that, beyond the social media drama, what truly binds us together is stronger than what tears us apart. “Though tribe and tongue may differ, in brotherhood we stand.” 

    Congratulations, Victor Osimhen: the boy from Olusosun Street is now the African Player of the Year. Just as he once said, dreams do come true, indeed. Congratulations to Asisat and Nnadozie for making the country proud as well.

    • Zayd Ibn Isah, lawcadet1@gmail.com

  • We need to protect and nurture our current democracy

    We need to protect and nurture our current democracy

    Recently in Phoenix, Arizona, President Joe Biden while declaring open the late Senator John McCain Library at the University of Arizona made some profound statements about democracy and America’s mission to defend it against its enemies all over the world. The American president has made it a point of duty to speak in support of democracy since he came into office about three years ago. This arises from his long service in the US senate and his service as vice president under President Barack Obama and his belief that democracy is America’s gift to the world. Going therefore to honour Senator McCain, a Republican, demonstrated his commitment to democratic ethos of accepting that differences of opinion without rancour is a basic attribute of democratic governance and principle.

    I listened carefully to the president’s call on Americans about the need to defend and protect their democracy by speaking against all acts and actions taken against it by political leaders and influential people in the society. The American president said without naming President Donald J. Trump that the greatest enemy was within America itself. It is of course debatable whether any country can save democracy if the people themselves feel let down by the democratic government they install after every election.

    In the same vein, I feel compelled to raise my voice against undemocratic actions of some functionaries of government that are undermining democracy and if attention is not called to such actions, this may lead to the demise of democracy in Nigeria. We have witnessed happily the return of democratic governance since 1999 when the military exited the scene of government. Although many people felt what we actually had was not democracy but militarised democracy. Whatever we have is however a semblance of democracy and if we protect and nurture it the possibility of it growing to what we want is there.

    About eight years ago there was an intra-party dispute between the retiring governor of Edo State and his deputy who wanted to succeed him. The dispute of succession led to the deputy leaving the governing party and joining the leading opposition party. Incidentally he was supported and financially aided by the leadership of the party in power in Rivers State. When he won the election he was faced with the majority members of his old party in the legislature. When he could not persuade them to follow him into the opposition party he refused to allow them enter parliament by not swearing them to the oath of allegiance to the constitution. He followed this up by removing the roof of the parliament thus daring its members to meet in the open. This went on for four years until the term of the parliamentarians expired. All threats against the governor even from the national parliament in Abuja came to nothing until the governor served two terms of four years each.

    Read Also: Three kidnapped while performing sacrifice at Enugu river

    The lesson here is that the governor is supreme if determined to stay in office even against the opposition of members of parliament and the courts. We are again faced with the same situation in Rivers State. The government there is confronting the former governor of the state who is currently serving as minister of the federal capital territory in Abuja. The new governor in Rivers State even though apparently supported to become governor by the previous holder of the office deservedly want to be his own man against the wishes of his former boss. The vast majority of members of the House of legislature, 27 out of 32 or so , who are beholden to the past governor decided to support the past governor and to impeach and possibly remove the incumbent governor despite the intervention of the president. The whole situation has assumed dramatic turn with the legislators leaving their former party on which they and the governor were elected. The scenario is that when and if they return to the legislative building, they would probably invoke impeachment procedure and send the governor packing. The governor has borrowed from the Edo play book which Rivers State which the incumbent governor and his predecessor had used successfully in Edo State. This time it was even more dramatic. The state governor sent bulldozers to pull down the legislative building on the grounds that it had been damaged when there was a fracas between the two groups.  This destruction of a building worth billions of Naira when the country is facing horrendous economic problems is not only insensitive but totally outrageous.

    In the meantime, the few legislators about four or five of them supporting the governor have approved the 2024 budget. The cabinet of the governor has been hollowed out with the resignation of the supporters of the previous governor. The governor is banking on the hope that if the House members cannot meet in the legislative building, all their decisions would come to nothing. I am not sure that his few supporters meeting in the governor’s chamber and approving the budget could pass through the cannons of law. The governor must be banking on previous history of this kind of contest between the executive and the legislature.

    During the first Republic, Chief S.L.A Akintola in the Western Region fought successfully the parliament’s intention to remove him. He had the support of the federal government at the time.  At the end of the day, the outcome was neither in in the interest of democracy nor the country. One is not sure the federal executive would support the governor now that the majority of the legislature are on the same side with the ruling party at the federal level. The minister of the federal capital territory even though still a member of the opposition party, is likely to follow his colleagues from Rivers State into the governing party. This will have effect on the federal position. The governor can hopefully take solace in that both in Edo and the old Western Region, the governors prevailed against the legislatures. One hopes the Rivers State judiciary will not be dragged further into the political miasma as it’s usually the case to the embarrassment of everybody.

    We have to take legally binding decisions on this kind of scenario for future occasions. There are constitutional provisions about resigning from parties that sent a person to parliament when leaving the party and joining another but those provisions are not strictly enforced. If enforced, the frivolous trading of positions in the parties will be eliminated especially if such people have to leave parliament. The constitutional provisions on impeachment have to be tightened up to include crimes which are justiciable in courts of law not just that the person has lost political majority.

    Certainly the physical attack on parliament must not only be deprecated, it must be forbidden. There ought to be laws to prevent former executives’ attempt to subvert the functions of the government of their successors. This kind of thing caused the crisis in the ACTION GROUP and remotely led to the civil war in Nigeria between 1966 to 1970. Anybody who thinks the present democratic dispensation in Nigeria is here to stay and that we don’t have to guard and protect it is not realistic. The country is too fragile and is beset by all kinds of fissiparous tendencies tearing the country apart ranging from ethnic and existential economic problems to social and political insecurity. Democracy is not a perfect system but it remains the best the human brain has come up with but it has to be protected and nurtured to preserve it.

  • Sore-losers’ assault on our judiciary

    Sore-losers’ assault on our judiciary

    For those who have taken the pains to study Nigerian politics and political process, the outcome of the 2023 presidential election was predictable. With PDP fractionalized into four, it was apparent the party was doomed. Unfortunately, leading lights of the party including Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Kwankwaso and other warring groups who out of greed for power unwittingly ceded the coveted price to a more versatile politician with a better brinkmanship on how to cope with party intrigue and ambition of party and non-party members and reconcile private affluence with public squalor, blamed everyone except themselves.

    First the target was Bola Tinubu, the winner of the election who from his party intra primary to the general election battled power and principalities to achieve what most people have come to regard as a miracle. After losing to a better prepared candidate, they embarked on sterile argument about his Chicago University certificate, his health status and his true identity. Then the battle shifted to INEC accused of not transmitting result by Irev. Obi, despite coming a distant third, claimed his victory was stolen. Atiku who ought not to have featured in the electoral contest claimed victory without proving how the victory was secured.

    And finally it was the turn of the judiciary for dutifully interpreting the electoral law and the constitution when approached by sore losers sworn to undermining the integrity of the judiciary if they could not have Tinubu’s victory over-turned on technical grounds.

    While Atiku and Obi may justified their assault on the judiciary by the fact that all is fair in war as in politics since politics is war by other means, I think both by their short-sightedness are unpatriotic. Destroying judiciary which defines humanity only takes us back to Hobbesian state of lawlessness and chaos where life is nasty, brutish and short.

    Read Also: No noise, please

    Of course our judges are Nigerians. It can therefore be argued that a part cannot be holier than the whole. But comparing our judiciary with other institutions of state will be odious. Beyond etymology, judges are called justices because it is envisaged they will dispense justice to ensure a just society. And a just society is where a person gets what he or she deserves. For a society, it should be an article of faith that their judges will dispense justice, protect citizens human rights and a nation’s constitution.

    Unfortunately, instead of promoting faith in our judicial system, those who should know better, precisely because they are sore losers have done everything to undermine the integrity of our judiciary.

    Let us start with last week’s open letter to Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Olukayode Ariwoola by elder statesman, Chief Edwin Clark asking him to reorganize the judiciary because of alleged corruption and the malpractices. Unfortunately, his intervention was ill-timed because Nigerians who are aware of where he stood in the last February election cannot but lump him together with supporters of Obi who because they see only the picture in their heads have become the greatest threat to the judiciary.

    Pa Clark’s case was not helped by the fact that except ‘conflicting judgments by same courts in different states of the country’, all the other cases he cited to support his allegation of corruption in the judiciary including the inhumane treatment meted to the former CJN, Justice Walter Onoghen; the illegal raiding of judges houses at midnight; socialization between the judiciary and some senators who are facing criminal charges;” all happened before the current CJN assumed office.

    Pa Clark who admitted he has been in the judiciary for 59 years knows Nigerian judiciary has come a long way from the First Republic when judges complained “their “hands were tied”, when the NPC/NCNC coalition partners engineered a midnight retroactive law to oust the jurisdiction of the Privy Council, the then highest judicial body in the country and during Buhari, Babangida and Abacha military misadventure when the judiciary was used to wage wars against Nigeria. He was alive and had influence on political actors of the fourth republic including President Obasanjo who without restraint freely used the judiciary to fight his political foes.  For Pa Clark to therefore insinuate just like the ‘Obidient’ that the judiciary today is the worst in our nation’s history will be a hard sell to those who live in Nigeria.

    Pa Clark also seem to have a problem with the chief justice’s declaration that judges are not moved by public opinion in the determination of cases before them but by facts’ as a response to Labour Party’s “all eyes on the judiciary” media campaign which many saw as attempt to intimidate the judiciary to see only their own truth no matter how jaundiced.  But with the outcome of the election, it has become apparent, results of polls after polls masterminded by Obi’s sympathisers which predicted his landslide victory in the February election could not have had universal applicability. And with members of Human Rights Groups accusing each other of partisanship during public presentation of what was supposed to be a joint report, the CJN’s apprehension or uneasiness with public opinion as determinant of court cases cannot be faulted.

    Attack by Atiku Abubakar on the judiciary that threw his case of alleged ‘banditry perpetrated by the APC and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on October 26, 2023 and upheld the election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has remained vicious. But this was just as his party’s governors’ forum led by Bala Mohammed, and his party’s National Working Committee (NWC) including the acting National Chairman, Umar Damagum distanced themselves from his attack by declaring “As a forum, (they) believe and restate our faith and confidence in the judiciary to do justice in political and other cases before the courts” adding that “the judges should be commended for doing a good job.”

    The judiciary also came under severe criticism following the Court of Appeal’s ruling by the three-member panel led by Justice Elfrida Williams-Dawodu that sacked the Governor of Plateau State, Caleb Mutfwang and declared APC candidate Muntawe Goshwe as the winner of the March 18 governorship poll in Plateau state.

      Again they ignored the precedents. In 2019, APC was unable to present candidates for the governorship, Senate, House of Representatives, and House of Assembly elections in Rivers State following bungled party primaries.

    It was the same story in Zamfara where the APC lost three senatorial seats and the seven seats in the House of Representatives they won during the February 23, 2019 presidential and parliamentary elections, the APC governorship election won with 534,541 to Bello Muhammad Mutawalle of the PDP’s 189,452 and all the 24 seats in the Zamfara State House of Assembly. APC lost all the positions to the opposition PDP because according to Centus Nweze, who spoke on behalf of a five-member panel of the apex court, “it is clear that the respondent (APC) was in grave disobedience of two lawful court orders and It is a serious matter for anyone to flout a court order”.

    Governor Abdulaziz Yari Abubakar who admitted APC breached the provisions of the law that mandates the party to conduct ward congresses, accepted the Supreme Court verdict, urged APC members to be law-abiding while directing security agencies to ensure adequate protection of lives and property of his people.

    We cannot afford to destroy our judiciary because of all the institutions of state, it is the only one that can ensure government accountability, fair resolution of dispute, uphold rights and bringing culprits to justice and sustain the democratic culture.