Category: Agriculture

  • Nigeria on self-sufficiency path in fish production

    The Board Chairman, International Fish Resources Park (IFRP), Mr Olusegun Mogbojuri, has said Nigeria is on a sure path to becoming self-sufficient in fish production.

    Mogbojuri, who spoke in Abuja, said the organisation had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.

    He said as part of the agreement, fish resources parks would be established in each of the six geopolitical zones. Mogbojuri put the capacity of each park to be established at 2,500 to 3,000 factories with a production capacity of 200,000 tonnes of fish when fully operational.

    Mogbojuri, who is also the Agricultural Attache to the Consulate of Malta in Nigeria, said the parks would empower no fewer than one million persons as they would simplify aquaculture for the citizens to produce fish in a secured environment.

    He said while oil spill in the Niger-Delta region was being tackled, other technologies that could guarantee sufficient production would be introduced via the park initiative.

    According to the chairman, the park initiative was a mandate from Malta’s Consul to Nigeria in order to strengthen the bilateral relationship between both countries.

    He said Malta as a maritime nation, had expertise in maritime and fisheries which Nigeria could benefit from.

    He said some multinationals, including IES-GMB of Germany had offered to finance the project in Nigeria with two billion Euros, adding that more financiers could be accommodated so as to fully develop the fishery sub-sector.

    Mogbojuri commended the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Federal College of Fisheries, Lagos, and the University of Abuja for their contributions to maritime and fisheries.

    He further said that the IFRP provide modern teaching and research facilities that could help to upscale  technology in the institutions.

    “I am excited; looking forward to more achievement as Nigeria is on the path to join league of nations that are self-sufficient in fish production’’, he said.

  • Food security: Smart villages to the rescue

    Food security: Smart villages to the rescue

    In  decades to come, the agriculture  systems will need to change to meet the challenges of rising demand for food, its accessibility, affordability, improved nutrition and health. Against this backdrop,  experts are canvassing the establishment of smart agricultural villages, DANIEL ESSIET reports. 

    Agriculture employs 70 per cent of the nation’s population. Experts say of this figure, nearly 80 per cent are small and subsistent farmers. With meagre land holdings and virtually no financial support, they have managed to survive. Nearly 60 per cent of them live in villages and are not making much profit. Given a choice, some of them would want to quit farming.

    But this will not make the Programme Co-ordinator, Farmers Development Union,Victor Olowe, happy as he sees agriculture as the ultimate indicator of economic growth. Like others, he is worried as markets have failed to infuse confidence through economic prosperity among food growers. This is as a result of the revenue farmers get from their commodities.

    The good news, however, is that agriculture is now a subject of national discourse. To make farming economically viable, Olowe called for the development of a new plan, under which the government would add fresh impetus to rural economic reconstruction programmes.

    By this, he means strong interventions in the rural areas with public sector investments.

    The government, according to him, has to do more to provide modern amenities in the villages. A beginning can be made by revitalising agriculture in a manner that brings back the smile to farmers’ faces.

    People in the rural communities, he said, comprised mainly small farmers, who need improved farming technologies, training, access to roads, transportation, markets, electricity, schools and health facilities to improve their livelihood.

    Rural roads, for example, Olowe said reduce transport costs and enable farmers to bring crops to market. They also increase access to hospitals, leading to improvements in health.

    Consequently, he aligned with the global crusade to establish smart agricultural villages, which would contain an array of techniques ranging from simple local crop and water resource management, that  offer scope for beleaguered farmers battling erratic weather patterns.

    Setting up a smart agric village, he explained, requires providing weather forecasts and crop advice; rainwater; harvesting; reducing water needed for irrigation;  conservation tillage and agro-forestry. Others will include site-specific nutrient management and precision application of fertilisers and ‘energy smart’ features through fuel-efficient engines and crop residue management.

    The villages will not only bring internet connection to the hinterlands, they will also provide support for sustainable agricultural practices.

    To make the villages work, he  said, Nigeria needs a network of small scale industries linked to agriculture, and a strong network of rail and road corridors with amenities such as education and health for all to transform agriculture.

    Smart agric village as a strategy for boosting food production is showing promising results in other parts of the world.

    A project of the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) programme under Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research (CGIAR),  kicked off in India and Nepal in South Asia in 2012. The project is being expanded to four other Indian states of Bangladesh; Vietnam in southeast Asia; Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda in East Africa; West Africa; Guatemala and Nicaragua in Latin America.

    As part of the project, some villages are changing their cropping practices in various ways.

    According to experts, one of the new practice is to use direct seeded rice in which rice seeds are sown directly on a dry seedbed. This is in contrast with the traditional practice of sprouting rice seedlings in a nursery and transplanting them to tilled fields with standing water.

    Another technique, experts said, is to replace the traditional method of continuous flooding of rice field with alternate wetting and drying, using a monitoring instrument called a tensiometer that helps farmers decide when to irrigate their fields.

    One of the key approaches in turning villages ‘climate smart’, experts said, is crop diversification from rice-wheat systems, to include shorter-duration varieties and switching to maize, pulses and oil seeds that require less water.

    An innovative component of the project is the use of information communication technology (ICT) tools to disseminate ‘climate smart’ agro advice to farmers, by sending voice and text messages in local languages to farmers’ mobile phones. The messages include weather forecasts and recommended actions, information on pests, seed varieties and techniques for conservation agriculture.

    The important thing, however, is  that the system is credited with making food more widely available and affordable to large areas of the world.

    The Director,Africa Region, Cassava Adding Value to Africa (CAVA), Dr Kola  Adebayo,  said  there is  need for  government incentives to enable  farmers switch to various modes of agriculture, involving a workable mix of traditional and modern farming methods, including reviving local seeds, multi-cropping and smart water usage.

    Added to this is that Nigeria is in need of low-cost/energy efficient and ecological sustainable cold chain technologies.

    Farming the climate-smart way, he said, would give farmers shorter-cycle harvests, translating into higher income for them.

    Where they are supported, he said, farmers can use technologies to produce exceptionally flat farmland and  ensure equitable distribution and lower consumption of water.

    Adebayo   said there are tolls to help assess the exact fertiliser needs of his crops. Text and voice messages received on phones about weather forecasts, would help  farmers’ sowing and irrigation to perfection.

    To this end, he said, the government  has to support  farmers to adopt climate smart practices in villages.

    The challenge in inducting farmers into new models of agriculture is that the older generation has no faith in the new system, preferring “to stick to tried and tested methods practiced for generations”.

    A consultant  to  the  World Bank, Prof  Abel  Ogunwale,  said  with changing demand for food, there  is  need for  rural farmers to innovate.

    With smart agric villages, he said, the government will be able to address sustainable rural development involving economic and social infrastructure.

    Such villages, he explained, will promote agricultural innovation, ensuring that extension and advisory services, market institutions and infrastructure are inclusive.

    He said building smart agric villages will accelerate industrialisation, adding that there is need to further explore extension of workers’ role as a catalyst of transformational change.

    In particular, he said, additional efforts were required to enhance productivity by building up high-tech industries such as packing, biotechnology, electronics, ICTin such places. He believes smart agric villages provide the answer, emphasising how valuable it  would be in improving food production throughout the supply chain.

    As climate change threatens food production, countries fight back by arming farmers with precise advice on growing conditions.

    With weather extremes caused by climate change now widely seen as a major threat to food production in Africa and South Asia, a new report has shown that many countries are already providing millions of farmers with innovative “climate information services”, which allow them to anticipate and adapt to rapidly changing conditions.

    Countries are mobilising community radio stations, government meteorological services, religious groups, agriculture extension agents, schools and farmers to develop and distribute forecasts and farming strategies. These would provide front-line defence against the effects of climate change on food production, according to the study by the CGIAR Research Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).

    Titled: “Scaling up Climate Services for Farmers: Mission Possible”, it is the first analysis of this new approach to adapting to the stress of climate change.

    “It’s encouraging to see climate information services emerging that are drawing from many types of experts and engaging a wide range of partners to devise effective strategies to help farmers cope with a changing climate,” said Dr. Arame Tall, CCAFS’ climate services scientist and lead author of the report.

    Tall added:“They are allowing farmers to protect themselves from the effects of weather extremes, such as droughts and floods, and also helping them take advantage of especially good conditions. The involvement of farmers in developing these climate services is essential to their success.”

    The CCAFS report features 18 case  studies from Africa and South Asia. It finds that countries are taking a variety of approaches to climate services, which generally involve developing high-quality, location-specific data on temperature, rainfall, wind, soil moisture and ocean conditions, among other things, that help farmers decide the best crop variety to cultivate and when to plant and apply fertiliser.

    The analysis revealed that the services work best when they involve broad collaborations between, for example, meteorologists, agricultural experts, farmers and agriculture extension agents. In many of the programmes, farmers practice a kind of citizen science, using rain gauges to collect data on precipitation and then feeding it into centralised data repositories.

    “The involvement of farmers in developing these climate services is essential to their success,” Tall said.

    Prior to the advent of climate services, farmers in most developing countries had been going it alone. And while indigenous knowledge often proves accurate, the shifts in growing conditions caused by climate change are increasingly moving beyond anything many farmers or their ancestors ever experienced.

    “The increasing vulnerability of small-holder farmers to climate risk is a major motivation for much of the interest and investment in climate services—not only to help farmers plan for tomorrow or the upcoming season, but to help them be better prepared for climate change 10, 20, or 30 years from now,” said Dr. James Hansen, a co-author, who led the CCAFS Climate Risk Management research team.

  • Biotechnology offers farmers hope

    The Co-ordinator, Open Forum on Agriculture Biotechnology in Africa (OFAB), Nigerian Chapter, Mrs. Rose Gidado, has said the country stands to gain from the adoption of biotechnology.

    The benefits of biotechnology, according to her, will be evenly spread among biotech companies, farmers and consumers, adding that it will immensely contribute to agricultural productivity.

    Speaking as a  panelist at the just-concluded AGRA Innovate conference in Lagos, Gidado said Genetic Modification Technology (GMT) is an important instrument for plant breeders.

    “GM Technology makes it easier for the breeder to transfer genes of desired traits from unrelated specie of crop to an unrelated specie solving problems that can’t be solved in conventional breeding.”

    While arguing that GM Technology will make quality seeds available to farmers, she said biotechnology creates opportunities; increases crop yields; reduces losses to insects, pests and diseases; post harvest storage problems and enhances the nutritional value of some  crops.

    She added that resistance to a biotic stress, such as drought and high soil salinity, resulting in increased crop production and empowerment of youths in rural areas are other accruable benefits from application of biotechnology.

    The OFAB coordinator said countries such as Burkina Faso and Brazil are already reaping the benefit of embracing biotechnology as their farmers are smiling to banks. “The income of Nigerian farmers will increase, like in Burkina Faso where BT cotton has been embraced, the income of farmers has increased by 51per cent, and the farmers make a lot of money. Burkina Faso makes $1.2billion yearly and Brazil $2billion yearly from biotechnology,” she said.

    She added that the hectares cultivated by farmers in those countries continue to increase yearly and more farmers are now beginning to adopt the technology.

     

  • IITA votes $2.2m for cassava development

    IITA votes $2.2m for cassava development

    The Support to Agricultural Research and Development of Strategic Crops(SARD-SC) project, funded by the African Development Bank (AFDB) and executed by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), has budgeted $2.2million  for its cassava value chain activities for next year’s  cropping season.

    This was revealed  when the SARD-SC project had its review and planning meeting for cassava crop held  in Bagamoyo, Tanzania. The purpose of the meeting, a statement said,  was to review project achievements this year; develop work plans, budget and procurement plans for next year.

    The review, it said, also provided an opportunity to identify militating factors against increased  cassava productivity of cassava and proffered solutions.

    The meeting which had in attendance a broad spectrum of scientists including agronomists, socio-economists, breeders, plant pathologists and Commodity Specialists, reviewed how the productivity and profitability of cassava can be improved to enhance food security and farmers’ welfare.

    Some of the issues affecting increased productivity of cassava crops identified were: inadequate use of fertilisers and herbicides by farmers which causes degradation of land. This affects its commercialisation and profitability. The other issue, according  to the statement, was the pervasive Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD) affecting crops in some African countries. The viral disease wastes crops, engenders low productivity and discourages farmers from investing in cassava cultivation. Scientists at the meeting discussed various strategies to combat the menace.

    One of them is dissemination of disease-resistant cassava varieties to areas majorly affected by CBSD in any project target countries.

    To increase the productivity of cassava, the scientists’ proffered intercropping cassava with legumes, while extensive discussions were held on the release of bio fortified yellow cassava.

  • Summit pushes for national cocoa database

    Stakeholders in the cocoa  industry have urged the Federal Government to establish a national database of cocoa resources.

    Rising from its just-concluded cocoa summit in Abuja, the operators said there was a need for  the government to work with agribusinesses and farmers if it is to implement a transformational    agenda  that will  have  an  industry wide  impact.

    In a communiqué issued at the end of the event, the  stakeholders  said  this would  only be possible if there is a comprehensive database of all stakeholders in the cocoa industry.

    The world cocoa econometric analyses, the summit observed   showed  an estimated supply deficit of over one  million tonnes by 2020, offering tremendous opportunity for the Nigerian cocoa sector to earn foreign exchange and  improve the nation’s economic balance sheet.

    To seize the opportunities, however,  the summit  maintained that  the sector needed a national cocoa policy that will support accelerated action to enable farmers improve production.

    To this end, it said the government must be ready to support  farmers with various interventions and help businesses improve processing operations.

    The summit called for a national policy on cocoa that incorporate all critical activities across the value chain.

    To make the policy functional, it advised the government to constitute a team comprising representatives from the ministries of industry, trade and investment and agriculture and rural development and the cocoa private sector.

    The policy, it added should also provide for special incentives for companies and individuals involved in large scale cocoa backward integration of at least 50 hectares.

    To drive local consumption of finished cocoa based products, the summit implored the government to develop a template to promote   local cocoa consumption.

    The summit appealed to the government to set up a stakeholder advocacy group to network with ministries, departments and agencies (federal and states), the national assembly and the presidency to gain support for cocoa related activities.

    The   stakeholders recognized the challenges of the cocoa value chain and urged the government to set up of Cocoa Development and Investment Corporation to coordinate all the activities in the cocoa value chain. Such a body, it reiterated should be private sector operated but public sector enabled, like the proposed Cocoa Corporation of Nigeria.

    It also urged the government to  establish a National Cocoa Development Fund to provide critical funding for the proposed Cocoa Corporation of Nigeria and for cocoa related research.

  • Blast fishing destroys marine habitats, expert warns

    With Nigeria losing millions of naira to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, Fisheries expert, Prof  Martins Antekhai, has warned that allowing fishers to use explosives to fish would destroy coastal marine life and add to the nation’s economic woes.

    Though not practised here, he said fishing that could harm the nation’s hope for a blue revolution, an idea to increase the population of fish should not been encouraged.

    Generally, he explained, that explosions generate underwater shock waves which stun fish and other marine creatures. Any fish that float to the surface are scooped up with nets and taken to the fish markets.

    Experts say one blast is enough to kill everything within a 20-metre radius. But the explosions also destroy underwater coral systems, home to countless fish and other marine animals.

    He said “Blast fishing destroys the fish habitats underwater where fish reproduce. As a result, the number of fish drastically reduced and fishers not able to catch many fish like before.”

    To this end, he said the government will be justified to take action against blast fishers to save the environment.

    He stressed the need to pay attention to measures that prevent, deter and eliminate Illegal fishing.

  • ‘How to boost fish production’

    ‘How to boost fish production’

    Smallholder farmers can raise agricultural productivity and meet food security, livelihood needs and environmental objectives by adopting sustainable agriculture approaches, an industrialist, Tolu Olatunbosun has  said.

    According  to him,   adoption of sustainable approaches towards  fisheries   production will provide smallholder farmers with all that is needed to escape poverty and hunger.

    Speaking during an evaluation tour by West Africa Agricultural Productivity Programme-Nigeria (WAAPP-Nigeria) in Enugu, Olatunbosun, Chief Executive, R Fisheries Nigeria said the promotion of sustainable aquaculture become necessary with increasing demand for sea food, adding that the programme support for the local fisheries industry may lead to growth and development of higher yielding varieties.

    He noted that the support of WAAPP Nigeria has helped  farmers enhance their productivity, a result which is already having a significant impact.

    With the support of the programme, he said farmers are benefiting from research and technology transfer and this has boosted the resilience of farming communities.

    According to him, farmers benefit from training, study tours, knowledge exchanges between stakeholders, and equipment prototypes which help strengthen their technical capacities.

    He urged farmers in Enugu to maximise the provision of subsided fingerlings by WAAPP-Nigeria.

    He said his company has delivered over 2,000 fingerlings to boost farmers productivity in the last one year. According to him “we have created more jobs in the fisheries industry by distributing  improved breeds to over one hundred farmers through our partnership with the world bank funding made  available to us through WAAPP.” “I urge farmers to register with the agricultural development programme (ADP) to enjoy these benefits’’, he added.

    Also,WAAPP-Nigeria Monitoring and Evaluation Officer, Hassan Isah, told reporters that  the scheme is partnering with over 23 private hatcheries in the country to distribute fingerlings and brood stock to farmers and young Nigerians who would  want to make a living out of fisheries. “We partner with the ADPS in various states to get the fishes and sometimes funds  to the rural people. The ADPS are closer to the farmers as such orientate  within the six months of rearing the fingerlings”.

    One of the beneficiaries, James Uzodufa who rears about 1000 fishes, said the business is lucrative as he intends to sell a fish for N1,000 this yuletide.

    He however called on the state government to make more land accessible to farmers in order to encourage the enterprise which  is  requires space for expansion.

  • Gates Foundation spends bulk of agric grants in rich countries

    Most of the $3billionb (£1.8billion) that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has given to benefit hungry people in the world’s poorest countries has been spent in the United States, Britain and other rich countries, with only around 10 per cent  spent in Africa, new research suggests.

    Analysis of grants made by the foundation shows that nearly half the money awarded over the past decade went to global agriculture research networks, as well as organisations, including the World Bank and United Nation agencies, and groups that work in Africa to promote hi-tech farming.

    The other $1.5billion went to hundreds of research and development organisations across the world, according to Grain, a research group based in Barcelona.

    “Here, over 80 per cent of the grants were given to organisations in the US and Europe, and only 10 per cent  to groups in Africa. By far the main recipient country is the US, followed by the UK, Germany and the Netherlands,” it says in a report.

    Of the $678million given to universities and national research centres, 79 per cent  went to the US and Europe, and only 12 per cent  to Africa.

    “The north-south divide is most shocking, however, when we look at the $669million given to non-government groups for agriculture work.

  • Declining food prices ‘very good’

    Declining food prices ‘very good’

    The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization’s (FAO) monthly food price index was stable in October, as sugar and vegetable oil prices rose to offset declines in dairy and meat prices, the Rome-based agency reported today.

    The FAO Food Price Index is a trade-weighted index monitoring five commodity group price indices – cereals, meat, dairy products, vegetable oils, and sugar. In October, it dipped to 192.3, technically its seventh consecutive monthly decline, but a marginal 0.2 percent drop from the revised September figure.

    The ongoing slight decline in the index is “very good for food importing countries,” FAO senior economist Concepción Calpe said in a statement.

    Dairy prices fell by 1.9 percent, as butter and milk powder prices dipped due to increased output in Europe, where many producers are grappling with Russia’s ban on cheese imports. The sub-index for dairy products dropped to 184.3, down 3.5 points from September, and 66.8 points, or 26.6 percent down from October 2013.

  • ‘Agric revolution in Africa could increase global carbon emissions’

    Productivity-boosting agricultural innovations in Africa could lead to an increase in global deforestation rates and carbon emissions, a Purdue University study finds.

    Historically, improvements in agricultural technology have conserved land and decreased carbon emissions at the global level: Gaining better yields in one area lessens the need to clear other areas for crops, sidestepping a land conversion process that can significantly raise the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere.

    Agricultural advances in Africa, however, could have the reverse effect, increasing globally the amount of undeveloped land converted to cropland and raising greenhouse gas emissions, said Thomas Hertel, a distinguished professor of agricultural economics.

    “Increasing productivity in Africa – a carbon-rich region with low agricultural yields – could have negative effects on the environment, especially if agricultural markets are highly integrated,” he said. “This study highlights the importance of understanding the interplay between globalization and the environmental impacts of agricultural technology. They are deeply intertwined.”

    Debate surrounds the effects of agricultural innovation on the environment, Hertel noted. Some researchers suggest that increasing the profitability of farming will amplify its negative environmental effects, raising greenhouse gas emissions and accelerating tropical deforestation. Others argue that intensifying agricultural production is better for the environment overall because more land can be spared for nature if the same amount of crops can be produced using less land.

    “We set out to determine who was right,” Hertel said.