Category: Insurance

  • How long will it take me to get my claim?

    Say it’s March 1 and you have a fender-bender in your car. Just how long do you have to wait to get your insurance check for the damages? Generally you should be riding pretty by April 1. At least that’s the goal of most auto insurers — to have your claim paid out on or before the 30-day mark. Of course, there’s no certainty your vehicle will be repaired by then.

    But auto insurance rules are made to be broken. The time limit to pay your claim varies by state, according to each state’s “claims settlement provisions.”

    When there’s a dispute or larger claim like a total loss, insurers need to assess the damage, which can stretch out the process. A typical fender-bender should be handled and closed fairly quickly.

    Most auto insurance companies have direct repair programs and can refer you to one of their shops. The shop assesses the damage and communicates with the insurer for you.

     

    Time is money

     

    When an insurance company snags a new customer, there are costs associated with “acquiring” the new client. There’s advertising, paying the insurance agent their commission, and the cost to produce the policy for the first time. It can take as many as seven years before an insurer can break even on a particular policy, and that’s assuming the customer doesn’t have a claim, explains Passmore.

    If they have a claim the insurer will have to keep them even longer — ideally claim-free — to make back its money. So insurers are always better off providing good service and fair settlements in order to retain customers, who on average submit a claim only once every 10 years, according to Passmore.

    And if you don’t like the customer service, “There’s a lot of competitions out there that will be happy to take that customer off your hands,” says Passmore. Insurers don’t have much incentive to delay; they want to get claims paid as fairly and quickly as they can.

     

    Staking your claim

     

    Claims against someone else’s policy are a different ballgame.

    “Any time you are going through a carrier that you’re not insured with the other party’s insurer, that process has the potential to be slowed down a bit just while the investigation is continuing,” says Dan Young, senior vice president of CARSTAR, North America’s largest multi-shop network of independently owned and operated collision repair facilities.

    When the car is drivable, most people go to their carrier’s drive-in location, where they get an estimate and a claims check on the spot. Or they can use a direct repair facility, a one-stop option. They’ll drive directly to a specified shop affiliated with the insurer, pick up their rental, get a written estimate and have repairs begin.

    Your own inability to cover your deductible could delay your repairs. Young observes that 20 years ago he never saw a $500 or $1000 deductible. That’s changed.

    “In order to try and make insurance less expensive, many people have these very high deductibles and so they can’t afford their portion of the repair,” says Young. That’s why you see so many cars with dents and damaged fenders.

     

     

     

     

     

  • West African insurers, banks attracted to East Africa

    Oil and gas finds in East Africa have become very attractive to West African financial services firms with some firms starting up divisions there.

    With this move, West Africa’s financial services firms want to capitalise in insuring and financing oil and gas projects in East Africa.

    South Africa’s banks and insurance companies had also identified this opportunity a little more than three years back.

    Insurance firms Ghana Re and Nigeria’s Continental Re have launched new wholly-owned firms in Nairobi in the past 12 months, paying more attention to the oil and gas sectors.

    Old Mutual Kenya, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the London and JSE-listed life insurer Old Mutual, has introduced its products in Kenya. It is not clear if it will expand to other parts of East Africa.

    GTBank Plc, two weeks ago, said it was acquiring a 70 percent shareholding in Kenya’s Fina Bank with the aim of providing finance in the oil and gas sectors.

    Another West African lender, Ecobank, has seen its Kenyan unit, Ecobank Kenya, say it will start an investment bank in the next two months to lend in these sectors.

    In 2008, South Africa’s Standard Bank acquired Kenya’s CfC bank with the aim of exploiting imminent opportunities in the country.

    In 2011, FNB, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FirstRand, South Africa’s third biggest bank, set up its first branch in Dar Es-Salaam, the capital of Tanzania.

    The bank, which already has a presence in Kenya, has plans to expand to Uganda and Rwanda.

    It is believed that Kenya and Uganda have about 2.5 billion barrels in oil resources while Tanzania has unprocessed gas resources amounting to 33-trillion cubic feet.

    East Africa’s financial services firms have been slow to take up these opportunities because they are not well capitalised and lack appropriate skills.

     

  • Insure your health, not cars, Minister urges

    Insure your health, not cars, Minister urges

    The Minister of Health, Professor Onyebuchi Chukwu, has urged Nigerians to pay greater attention to insuring their health, as against the importance placed on their cars,

    Chukwu, who spoke in Umuahia while inaugurating a Dialysis Centre built by the Abia State Government, urged Nigerians to give priority to their health by enrolling in the National Health Insurance Scheme NHIS, stressing that the scheme has developed a laudable programme that accommodates all categories of persons in our society.

    He listed the programmes to include the Community Based Health Insurance Programme (CBHIP), Voluntary Contributors Social Health Insurance Programme (VCSHIP) and Tertiary Institutions Social Health Insurance Programme (TISHIP).

    He urged Nigerians to take advantage of the services designed by the Scheme, adding that the Community Based Health Insurance Programme (CBHIP), is targeted at people in the informal sector of the economy, particularly those living in rural communities.

    While making a case for the effectiveness of the scheme, the Minister stressed that “NHIS is the only tool through which Nigerians can access qualitative healthcare services at an affordable rate and at a low cost, saying the Scheme established under Act 35 of 1999 by the Federal Government, is aimed at providing easy access to healthcare for all Nigerians at an affordable cost through various prepayment systems.

    He said: “NHIS is totally committed to securing universal coverage and access to adequate and affordable healthcare, in order to improve the health status of Nigerians, especially for those participating in the various programmes/products of the scheme.

    He explained that the contributions cover healthcare benefits for the employee, a spouse and four biological children below the age of 18 years, saying that more dependants, or a child above the age of 18 would be covered on the payment of additional contributions from the principal beneficiary.

    However, children above 18, who are in tertiary institutions, will be covered under the Tertiary Insurance Scheme, he said.

  • Nigerian Risk Awards to test insurers, bankers, others

    The measurement index targeted to test Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) adoption and practice among firms has become more critical, since industry regulators, particularly banks and insurance received tightened regulations on risk management, the Chief Executive Officer, Conrad Clark Nigeria (CCN), Joachim Adebayo Adenusi, has said.

    Adenusi explained that based on this, organisations making huge investments in ERM on her people and infrastructure, will soon be celebrated at the Conrad Clark/BusinessDay rating coming up this year.

    He said the Nigerian Risk Awards, will celebrate those very special organisations and individuals that are pioneering best practice of ERM in Nigeria across a variety of industry sectors, adding that nominations for this year’s awards have opened on-line.

    He said: “Over the recent years, Nigerian firms have gone the extra mile in the management of risks, and many of them have employed innovative and practical strategies to embed risk management to drive cultural change and influence decision making.

    He said the successful Risk Manager of the Year would have an all-expense paid trip to attend one of the international yearly risk management conferences, 2014, in the UK, or US, adding that the submissions for the Nigeria Risk Awards will be independently assessed and judged by a panel of distinguished individuals, drawn from within and outside the country, many of whom are international leaders in the field of risk, corporate governance and leadership.

    He listed them to include, Dr. David Hillson (UK), regarded globally as The Risk Doctor, Ahmed Babatunde Popoola (Nigeria), Managing Director/CEO of CRC Credit Bureau Limited, Prof Peter Young (United States), Principal Adviser to (and co-creator of) the University of St Thomas’s University Actuarial Science programme, among others.

    The awards will be presented in the following categories: Risk Manager of year (for the best CRO/Head of Risk across sectors), Banking and Financial Services, Insurance and Pension Services, Telecoms and Media Services, Manufacturing and Industry and Oil and Gas Services.

  • 95% insurers yet to comply with IFRS requirement

    95% insurers yet to comply with IFRS requirement

    •Oasis gets NAICOM’s approval

    Underwriting firms are in a race to meet up with the requirement by regulatory authority, the National Insurance Commission’s (NAICOM’s) on the 2012 International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) account.

    Oasis Insurance Plc has, however, joined the league of firms that have passed their 2012 IFRS test, two weeks after the June 30 deadline.

    The Nation learnt that out of 59 insurance firms, 54 are yet to pass the test. Out of these, 16 have submitted their accounts but have not got approval, while 38 are yet to submit their account to the regulator.

    According to NAICOM spokesman, Rasaaq Salami, as at July 1, only Mansad Insurance, Adic Insurance, Consolidated Hallmark Insurance and Wapic Insurance Plc, have been able to get approval on their financial accounts which are IFRS compliant. Oasis made the league recently.

    Salami explained that the accounts of First Bank Life Assurance, Continental Reinsurance Company Plc and Law Union and Rock Insurance, were queried, saying their responses are being awaited.

    He said accounts of AIICO Insurance, UBA Metropolitan Life, Custodian and Allied, NEM, Crusader General, Crusader Life, Zenith General, Zenith Life, FIN Insurance and Standard Alliance Life, are being reviewed.

    On the development, Managing Director, Consolidated Hallmark Insurance Plc, Eddie Efekoha, said NAICOM approval of its IFRS 2012 account was a positive development, attributing it to the determination of the management, Board of Directors and the entire staff of the company

    He said the transition to the IFRS reporting was not as seamless as envisaged in the industry, noting that subsequent years would be less problematic for the players because of lessons learnt.

    He added that the company remained committed towards ensuring that compliance issues with all regulators, both industry based and capital market, would be continually adhered to.

    The Commissioner for Insurance, Fola Daniel, warned that the regulatory body would not approve any account that fails to meet the required standard.

    He assured that the commission will maintain strict reporting standard in the financials of insurance firms, adding that the inability of the operators to meet the set deadline for accounts’ submission would attract sanction of N5000 per day, in accordance with the provision in the Insurance Act.

  • ‘Risk protection for low-income population rises’

    ‘Risk protection for low-income population rises’

    Risk protection for the low-income population by insurance has increased significantly over years, says a report by the Responsible Finance Forum.

    However, only adequate products of good quality can help low income households in effectively managing their risks.

    This entails consumer protection needs to be higher in this segment and failures can have severe consequences for the insured as well as for the development of emerging insurance markets in general.

    The report came during the Responsible Finance Forum, hosted by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) recently in Berlin, representatives of supervisory authorities, industry and development organizations discussed consumer protection in emerging insurance markets.

    The Responsible Finance Forum is an important milestone in sharing knowledge and best Practice around the topic of Responsible Finance, which includes three pillars: financial consumer protection regulation, industry self-regulation and the enhancement of consumer capabilities. The participants of the Forum exchanged ideas and experiences and presented initiatives on how to increase consumer protection within these three pillars for low-income-households in emerging insurance markets.

    The topic of responsible finance has become a priority of the G20 and of Financial Sector Development worldwide and the Responsible Finance Forum is an important milestone in sharing knowledge and best practice in responsible finance globally.

    The Forum was organized in partnership with the Access to Insurance Initiative (A2ii), the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the International Labour Office (ILO), the Microinsurance Network, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, and the Munich Re Foundation.

    At the fourth Responsible Finance Forum, hosted by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) and organized by GIZ on June 24-25, 2013 in Berlin, representatives of supervisory authorities, industry representatives and development organisations discussed consumer protection in emerging insurance markets.

     

     

    The timing of the debate on responsible microinsurance could not be more pertinent, the report had stated.

    “There are now more than 500 million micro insurance consumers and that number keeps growing. Innovations are taking place to bring down costs, guarantee profits, achieve affordability and extend the reach. In order to sustain growth, achieve scale and sustainability, consumers must experience true value. 85 high-ranking participants from 23 countries exchanged ideas and experiences and presented initiatives on how to advance the agenda for responsible finance in emerging insurance markets.

    “Adequate consumer protection solutions can help consumers to use microinsurance effectively, ensuring greater trust in microinsurance and as a result encouraging further market development.

    Queen Máxima of the Netherlands, UN Secretary-General’s Special Advocate for Inclusive Finance for Development (UNSGSA), underlined in her written welcome note to the conference that it is essential to guarantee the provision of “products that are responsible, that build consumer confidence and trust, and reach scale and sustainability”.

    Participants recognised that the main challenge in consumer protection in microinsurance is to strike the right balance between effectively protecting the consumer and increasing access to microinsurance by promoting the development of the microinsurance market. In doing so, the three pillars of responsible finance were confirmed to increase both protection and access for low-income households:

    In respect of the first pillar of responsible finance, consumer protection through regulation, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) is playing an essential role in setting standards and building regulatory and supervisory capacity.

     

  • Team on universal health coverage inaugurated

    Team on universal health coverage inaugurated

    The Federal Government has set up a 12-man technical committee to help work towards the goal of providing universal health coverage for Nigerians under health insurance scheme.

    This is in compliance with World Health Assembly’s resolution urging member nations to provide universal health coverage for their people,

    Head, Media and Public Relations, National Health Insurance Scheme Mrs. Hannatu Ardo, who disclosed this to reporters, said the committee is expected to work on frameworks that will culminate in Presidential Summit on Universal Health Coverage later this year.

    Setting up the committee in Abuja, Minister of Health, Prof Onyebuchi Chukwu who was represented by General Manager of Planning and Research, of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), Dr Kenneth Korve, said the country was taking some steps to ensure all its citizens were covered under health insurance scheme.

    According to him, it had increasingly been acknowledged worldwide that the most important strategy to improve the health outcomes of any nation “is to provide to its citizens an unfettered access to health services when the need arises.”

    The minister added that: “Over the years, various stakeholders in Nigeria have espoused the need for providing access to equitable and affordable health services to our population. Unfortunately, these efforts have not yielded optimal results. Achieving this goal goes beyond rhetoric and symbolic demonstrations, but requires decisive action, especially providing adequate resources to finance healthcare for all.”

    According to him, at the recently concluded 66th Session of the World Health Assembly, following approval of Mr. President, the assembly was informed about efforts to move towards universal health coverage in Nigeria. In the end, in recognition of the consensus of member nations, the assembly approved a resolution urging all member states to aspire to provide universal health coverage for their people.

    He added: “This meeting today is in furtherance of Mr. President’s directive for us to chart the way towards ensuring universal health coverage for Nigeria through a cohesive, comprehensive, realistic and coasted roadmap.

    “The work of the technical Working Group to be inaugurated today is expected to set in motion, the implementation of series of activities that will culminate into a Presidential Summit on Universal Health Coverage as directed by Mr. President.

    He said the major outcome expected from this Summit is a detailed and coasted roadmap that will put us on track towards providing universal health coverage for Nigerians in a sustainable manner.

    The committee chaired by Permanent Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Health, Mrs Fatima Bamidele, has four weeks to submit its Terms of Reference which include: to review the Draft Concept Note of the Universal Health care Summit; identify relevant topics under UHC for technical papers and documents to be developed and collected, if existing; to identify and contact experts/resource persons to develop technical papers.

  • Shareholders to NAICOM: Be decisive on Goldlink

    SHAREHOLDERS of Goldline Insurance Plc have expressed doubt over the sincerity of the regulator, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM), in exposing the forensic report of KPMG over the true financial position of the risk bearing firm.

    In line with its regulatory oversight function, NAICOM had taken over the management of Goldlink Insurance Plc, one of the composite insurance companies in the country.

    The takeover is similar to what happened in the banking sector in 2009 when the Central Bank Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, wielded the big stick against some erring chief executive officers of banks in the country.

    NAICOM has in the past six years taken over Spring Life Insurance and Investment and Allied Assurance Plc. Goldlink is the third insurance company to be taken over by the commission.

    Following the resignation of the former board in November 2012, NAICOM, headed by Commissioner for Insurance, Mr. Fola Daniel, reconstituted an interim board comprising the chairman, Mr. James Ayo and Mr. Gbolahan Olutayo as Managing Director.

    The former board had Mr. Gbenga Afolayan as Chairman and Mr. Femi Okuniyi as the managing director of the company.

    They were forced to resign over alleged misstatements of the company for the year ended December 31, 2011.

    Daniel said the interim board is charged with the responsibility of carrying out full investigation on the financial reports and corporate governance failures observed in the course of reviewing the company’s financial statement for the year 2011.

    It was however gathered that NAICOM had received the forensic report of Goldlink Insurance Plc.

    It was also gathered that the regulator had also secretely extended the tenure of the interim board members which expired in April to end of July this year.

    Shareholders and sources in the insurance industry who spoke with The Nation over the company’s takeover said they want NAICOM to take a bold step on the company and reveal the findings of the report.

    They want to know if money has been stolen from the company and the financial status of the company.

    According to them, there is a lot of pressure on the commissioner not to disclose some of the findings of the report, adding that the further extension of the interim board may be part of the pressure mounted on him not to disclose the findings of the forensic report.

    A source who does not want his name mentioned disclosed that the KPMG’s forensic report contained damning revelations.

    Another source who spoke advised the regulator to be decisive about the way the intervention should go and not bow to any pressure if the ultimate goal of the takeover is survival of the company.

    He noted that NAICOM should be more sincere with its supervisory roles as the problem in Goldlink did not start in 2011.

    Chairman of Standard Shareholders Association of Nigeria, Mr. Anono Godwin, said his members were not happy with timing of NAICOM’s takeover of the company, lamenting that efforts were underway to get funds to return the company back to profitability before the regulator swung into action.

    He said, “The regulator is only interested in slamming fines and penalties on these companies. The shareholders already gave the company the mandate to get a loan from the bank either on short or long term to get the company going.

    “But they went ahead and intervened. Now that they have intervened, how long will it take them to let us know what is happening in the company? But we will wait for them till the end of the three months extension which ends this month before we know what step to take.”

    A shareholder said NAICOM ought to let them know what the achievement of the interim board is in the first six months of their investigation before extending their tenure for another three months.

    The shareholder said his members would also like to know the financial cost of the intervention on the firm.

    “If the commission had been carrying out its oversight functions properly, it would not have waited until things got bad before reacting. “It was the same problem with Spring Life and Investment and Allied Assurance,”the shareholder said.

    Responding to an email enquiry on its intervention in Goldlink, the Commissioner confirmed that the commission has received a forensic report from KPMG on alledged misstatements in the company’s 2011 account.

    Stating reasons for the extension, Daniel had explained that it was in order to allow for the conclusion of the forensic audit which was still in process then.

    Daniel said: “Yes, a copy of the report was forwarded to the Commission just by way of information only. But it is the responsibility of the interim management of the company to submit the report to NAICOM, stating its observations, comments and advice.

    “The Commission awaits the report of the interim management, which is being expected soon and wouldn’t want to inadvertently pre-empt or influence their report.”

    When The Nation contacted the Chairman of the Interim Board, Mr. James Ayo, over some of the questions raised by the shareholders, he said the board members have decided not to speak with journalist and advised that all questions be directed to the regulator as the board members were its agents.

  • ‘Royal  Exchange  to boost performance’

    ‘Royal Exchange to boost performance’

    Royal Exchange Prudential Life is focusing on the deployment of a robust retail marketing strategy to take insurance to the grassroots and improve on financial performance, its Managing Director, Mr Wale Banmore, has said.

    Speaking at a retreat for the company’s management staff, he said the company also identified improved service delivery to boost its premium income in the financial year.

    He said the company has begun the training and upgrade of its marketing personnel, in line with realities, who are expected to impact positively on the fortunes of the company.

    He noted that the management believes in the Royal Exchange’s brand and its people, adding that it’s most important resource, are more than capable of delivering outstanding service to existing and potential clients, nationwide.

    Speaking on efforts of the staff, which has resulted in winning ways for the company, he challenged them to work harder in the years ahead, in order to achieve objective of becoming a world class company by 2015.

    Also, the Group Managing Director of Royal Exchange Plc, Mr Chike Mokwunye, urged staff of REPLA to focus on customer service excellence, among other major initiatives, to drive its quest for market leadership and enhance the company’s status as a dominant player in the life insurance industry in the next three years.

    He said: “The customer is at the heart and soul of every organisation’s growth and success and it is very important to keep them satisfied if one wants to remain in operation. If the customer is treated well, he or she stays with you, but if they receive shabby and unsatisfactory treatment, the customers will take their business elsewhere.

    “The future of insurance in Nigeria is the life business, which has not been fully tapped into, and for Royal Exchange Prudential to seek market leadership, an effective and efficient policy of customer service, loyalty and retention must be in place in the organisation.”

     

  • Small business property insurance

    Property insurance can be purchased based on the property’s actual cash value (the replacement cost minus depreciation), its replacement value (the cost of replacing an item without deducting for depreciation) or an agreed-upon amount (commonly used for art objects and other unique items).

    Basic property insurance will cover your losses in the event of a problem such as a fire or a lightning strike, and will pay the cost of removing property to protect it from further loss. Additionally, a standard small business policy will usually cover losses from windstorm, hail, explosion, theft, and damage caused by aircraft, automobiles or vandalism. Optional coverage can insure against earthquakes, floods, building collapse and glass breakage. Property insurance can be categorised by what is insured and by the events leading to a loss.

     

    Taking stock of your business property

    You should take a complete inventory of all your business property, determine its value and decide what’s worth insuring. Make sure the items you want to cover are provided for in the basic policy; if not, buy more coverage.

    If your business rents space, your lease might require you to carry certain types of insurance coverage. However, just because the building owner carries all the necessary insurance on the building doesn’t mean it will cover any of your equipment, furniture or other business property.

    “Named-peril policies” will cover certain losses resulting only from the perils that the policy names; “all-risk policies” offer coverage for all perils except those specifically named in the policy. A business owner may choose a named-peril policy if his business is located in an area that is frequently hit by natural disasters such as flood, hurricanes. Insurance experts recommend that the average small business purchase an all-risk policy.

     

    Find an insurer specialising in small-business insurance

    Some insurance companies specialise in small-business insurance coverage. Their policy offers additional optional coverage’s for small business owners who also own their own buildings.

    It pays out if your building is destroyed and it costs more to demolish and rebuild it to code than its previous value; it provides full glass coverage and full sign coverage; it provides additional coverage for damaged landscaping; and it extends coverage limits for newly acquired buildings. So, when you shop around, keep in mind that this coverage’s are not standard.

    If your company has a variable growth pattern, you may want to adjust your coverage annually.

    Other coverage that you can buy through riders include: accounts receivable coverage from $25,000 up to $250,000; coverage for loss of stock; protection against counterfeit money orders or currency; employee-dishonesty protection; sewer and drain back-up coverage; and valuable papers coverage.

    Deductibles for property insurance can be calculated on a per-claim or on an aggregate basis. The out-of-pocket cost for per-claim deductibles is often lower, so if you’re in a business that has a relatively low chance of filing a claim, you might consider this. Companies with a lot of claims would do well to consider calculations on an aggregate basis.

     

    •Culled from insure.com.