Category: Friday

  • Letter to Nigerian youths

    Letter to Nigerian youths

    Dear Nigerian youths,

    This letter being addressed to you through this medium (The Message)is not by design but by accident. Nigerians of my age and beyond (60+) never had an opportunity to be so addressed. Let it be known to you that except life and sound health, none of Allah’s bounties to man is as treasure-able as youthfulness. The definition of youth varies from place to place and from faith to faith. But generally, youthfulness spans from the age of puberty (at 16) to that of reasoning (at 40).

    That is the second stage of human life as it follows that of adolescence. It can be said therefore that the juiciest part of human life is what people call youth. And whoever is blessed with it is blessed with all hopes of life.

    Youth is the spur of ambition and risk. It is the period of determination and resolution. It encourages attraction between genders and engenders association across boundaries. All efforts in human life that yield results in old age are made at youthful age. To an average youth anywhere in the world, the sky is never the limit. There are still many other firmaments beyond the sky. Youth is the stage of hard work. It is the stage of planning. It is the stage of vision and mission. That is why the youths of any nation are seen as the bone marrow of such a nation and the beacons of the future. And fortunately, youths invariably constitute majority of the existing people at any given time in any given nation.

    Youths before now

    In the years past when life had meaning and culture had value, youths were seen as the pride of the nation. They were the natural arrows fixed to the parental bows which were often shot through the iron gate of life. This was the case in Nigeria before and during the colonial era. And after the country’s independence, the youths constituted the glory and hope of their parents. Their role in the family encouraged the bearing of many children as they partnered their fathers in tilling the farm land and harvesting the crops. In short, they formed the live wire of their families.

    When a father was said to be rich in those days, it was only because he had many children (male and female) who constituted the workforce of the family. The father’s pride then was not just the number of children he had but the volume of contribution made by those children to his wealth. Thus, children were considered as wealth.

    In those days, youths were not just helpers of their parents on the farms or in   their trades they also assisted them in training the younger ones. Yet, they had the highest esteem for those parents in their utterances and in their conduct. The level of discipline in those days was such that boys were handled by their fathers while girls were mostly handled by their mothers. And the mothers dared not utter a word while any child was being subjected to discipline by the father. In a nutshell the upbringing of a child was the main key to societal serenity.

    Change of trend

    Today, Nigeria is a different story altogether. The youths of yesteryears have become the elders of today. They have left the chord of discipline that escorted them into the world of decency to the new train of indecency. And that chord is no longer suitable for either today or tomorrow as the trend has changed dramatically. The current trend began in January 1966 when some uncultured youths in military uniform, spurred by blind ambition, threw the value of age and experience to the winds and killed the then leaders of the Nigerian nation in what was called a military coup d’état. By that unfortunate act they plunged the nation into a precipitate civil war that rendered the youth wild and eroded the value of youthfulness.

    For 13 years thereafter, the vagabonds remained in power using whim in place of experience. And when a brief civilian interlude came on board in 1979 for only four years, the vagabonds perched on the governance again and like hungry vultures, they fed on the carcass of democracy to their fill. Through that unbridled usurpation of power, the so-called Nigerian military weaned themselves from the ladle of integrity and destroyed whatever was left of their nomenclature.

    Here we are today, looking desperately like a starved hawk and hanging restlessly in the balance like a gagged hyena. Virtually every Nigerian has forgotten the real cause of our calamity. The cry everywhere is now about the effect of that calamity on the nation. No one endeavours to look back and see where the downfall started from.

    And without looking back, there can never be any correction as to how to rise again. A Yoruba adage states axiomatically that when a toddler falls down he looks forward (to see if there is any adult around to lift him up). But when an adult falls he looks backwards (to see the cause of his fall). That is the difference between experience and potential.

    Banking on potential to govern a nation that requires experience as did the eaglet Nigerian military can never bring any meaningful result. Both potential and experience have their role and chance in any society. But neither can take the place of the other.

    The difference

    You the youths of today are different from those of yesteryears in many ways and the differences are clear. The youths of the past were very hardworking and dedicated. They served their parents diligently and stood by them in all circumstances. They sought their parents’ advice and learned from the latter’s experiences. You the youths of today are very lazy, slothful, time wasting and lackadaisical in your attitude to life even as you are served by your parents from infancy to old age. Yet you despise those parents and treat them with disdain like nonentities. You believe that those parents had worked on your behalves and that you are only in the world to enjoy the fruits of their labour.

    The youths of the past were patient contended and full of respect for the elders. They were humble, obedient, always eager to know as they queued up to learn.  You the youths of today are very inpatient, greedily ambitious and you see yourselves as masters of knowledge when in actual fact you are slaves of ignorance. Unlike the youths of the past, you the youths of today are mostly empty-headed, very arrogant, highly materialistic and hastily avaricious.

    You always want to start your lives from the peak of your parents’ achievements without asking about what those parents had gone through before reaching the peak.

    You spend money lavishly without working for it and you never think of bearing any responsibility either in the homes or in the society. You are generally characterised by all the conducts that were classified as shame in the past. To you shame has its price. And as long as you can pay that price in coins by whatever means, you are important in your own estimation. Thus, shame, as far as you are concerned, is a vital aspect of culture which has no negative effect on your lifestyle. As a matter of fact you have taken shame for pride.

    If a few youths of the past can be described as a bunch of problems for their society, due to their misbehaviour, majority of you today’s youths are the real cogs in the societal wheel of progress. To you, life has no meaning except it is heavily coded in money.

    Your slogan that “long life is irrelevant in the absence of money” is a testimony to this assertion. That life span in Nigeria has dropped so drastically is due to your disappointing lifestyle which often creates hypertension for your parents and leads to their early death. Few parents talk of heirs nowadays because those of you who are supposed to be their heirs have long thrown away the toga of worthy heirs. In the past, mothers were not known for staying with their daughters in the latter’s matrimonial homes while leaving their husbands behind without care. This strange but new trend that has almost become a part of Nigerian culture arose because of the incompetence of today’s young women, even after many years of training, is questionable. Thus, despite the ubiquity of young men and women, there is scarcity of husbands and wives just as there is dirge of fathers and mothers.

    Virtually everything that matters to you today’s youths is devoid of our known core value. By your measure, the value of life can be found only in the volume of naira.

    Causes of generational change

    Whenever there is cause to review the generational trend with the intention of righting the wrong, you the youths of today are often quick in pointing accusing fingers mischievously at the generations ahead of you saying they caused the debacle. But while pinching the back of the elders you often forget that sooner or later you may become elders whose back will be pinched by the youths who succeed your own generation. You have forgotten that most of the scientific discoveries and technological advancement of your age which lured you into roguery were not available for the past youths. There were no such things as hard drugs, cyber crimes, armed robbery, sophisticated fraud through manipulation of figures and forgery of signatures. There were no cases of rape, child trafficking, audacious prostitution and day light murder with impunity as are rampant among you today.

    To you, all these crimes are either professions or callings in which you   actively engage. Thus, you do not believe in the existence of any demarcation between decency and indecency an indication that ‘family name’ which was highly valued in the past has no meaning to you. Unlike most youths of the past, you were sent to school but your goal was mere certificate rather than knowledge. And what you acquired in those schools in the name of education is hardly worth the paper on which your certificates are printed. For most of the years you spent in school, your preoccupation was either cultism or other frivolous activities that have no bearing with education. That is why most of you turn out to be unemployable University or Polytechnic graduates. A few of you who secured public employments have been discovered to be sheer misfits on those jobs as your competence remains questionable.

    Implications

    The implications of all these are many. While most of you are not quite useful to the present you are also not hopeful about the future.

    There is hardly any major crime in Nigeria today that is not principally committed by you today’s youths all in the quest for money. It seems that the only language you understand is money and only those who can speak the language of money command your respect.

    Many centuries before our time, an Arab poet intuitively came up with a sonnet fits perfectly into today’s Nigerian situation. He said: “Here is the era against which we had been warned through the admonitions of Ubayy Bn Ka’ab and that of Abdullah Bn Mas’ud; an era in which truth would be totally rejected while falsehood and insurgence would be glorified and held aloft; Should this era linger without any change (of attitude) neither cry at a funeral nor smile on the announcement of a new birth would be experienced”.

    Which of the situation expressed in the above poem is not applicable to Nigeria today. What impact does religion have on the society again?

    We used to know of motor spare parts. Today, spare parts are no more of motor but of human beings. And the most active merchants of this queer business are you the youths of today. When we talk of illegal oil bunkering, it is the business of the youths. When we talk of kidnapping, it is the business of today’s youths. When we talk of suicide bombing and terrorism, it is the business of today’s youths.

    And all these are for money and nothing else. Where is Nigeria going from here?

    Conclusion

    The aim of this expository article is not to malign or denigrate the youths of today. All the children of this columnist are today’s youths who do not constitute a separate island. But preaching is like a mud surrounded by men and women in immaculate regalia. No one of them will be spared if the mud is splashed. As a onetime youth and now a father qualified to be called an elder, it is not expected of my type to start throwing stones while residing in a glass house. But truth knows no boundary. It cruises on like a surging train without minding whose ox is gored. To rekindle Nigeria’s old hope or create a new one for the future, the youths of today must return to the established values of the past. It was through those values that the tranquility of the world was solidly upheld. And it was through deviation from it that the world became as restive as it is today. If tranquility must return as wished by many, you the youths of today must change your loins. And that is the only atonement that the world requires to return to tranquility.

  • What Ekiti: A taste of history (SOCIAL)

    What Ekiti: A taste of history (SOCIAL)

    “Of course, the path of honour doesn’t lie down in flat miles. It’s in the imagination with which you perceive this world and the gestures with which you raise your banner that the honour finds its domicile”.

    Saturday, November 21, 2015 was a day of honour in Ekiti State. For two days before that Saturday, Ado Ekiti, the capital of the state, had come alive with a memorable history. The people of the state trooped out in their thousands to take a glimpse of a rare guest on a rare occasion. The guest was no other personality than His Eminence, Dr. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, the Sultan of Sokoto and President-General of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA). He was there as the first Sultan ever to visit Ekiti State.

    The occasion was for the installation of an indigene of the state and a gentleman of honour as the President-General of the League of Imams and Alfas of Yoruba Land.  The honoree is Sheikh Jamiu Kewulere Bello who incidentally is also the Grand Imam of Ekiti State. It was a special day of joy on the part of Ekiti people as it was on the part of the Sultan.

    Two days earlier (Thursday, November 19, 2015, His Eminence had travelled down to Ado-Ekiti from Ibadan where he had been installed as the new Chancellor of the University of Ibadan on Tuesday, November 17, 2015. The day of Imam’s installation in Ado Ekiti was his sixth day in Southwest. Shortly after his arrival in Ado Ekiti, penultimate Thursday, His Eminence paid a courtesy visit to Oba Rufus Adeyemo Adejugbe Aladesanmi III, JP, the Ewi of Ado-Ekiti (at his palace) who hosted him and his entourage including yours sincerely with the grandeur of royalty.

    Observance of Jum’at Prayer

    On Friday, November 20, 2015, His Eminence opened the renovated city’s Central Mosque after paying visited the State Governor. The Jum’at prayer observed in that Mosque was led by the Rector of the Centre for Arabic and Islamic Culture, (Markaz) Agege, Sheikh Habibullah Adam Abdllah Al-Ilory. In his sermon, Sheikh Al-Ilory laid emphasis on the duties of an Imam and the importance of Mosques in Islam. He counseled the new President-General of the League of Imams and Alfas on the challenges ahead of him and how he could surmount those challenges. While admonishing the Muslim Ummah against hearsay and tutored them on the need for cooperation with their leaders for the purpose of   unity, he called on Muslim leaders in the Southwest to give Imams and Muslim scholars their deserved respect and work hand in hand with them in promoting Islam in the region.

    Dignitaries

    Among the dignitaries that observed the Jum’at prayer were Sultan Abubakar and Oba Adejugbe (though a Christian who regarded joining His Eminence in the Mosque as part of royal hospitality). Others were Olukare of Ikare Oba Akadiri Momoh; Alhaji Sakariyau Olayiwola (S. O.) Babalola, President of the Muslim Ummah of Southwest Nigeria (MUSWEN) who made the highest single monetary donation of N1 million; Secretary-General of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), Prof Is-haq Oloyede, a retinue of Sokoto Chieftains who were in the royal entourage of the Sultan, the Head of Department of Arabic and Islamic Studies Department, University of Ibadan, Dr. Kamil Koyejo Oloso and all the Chiefs and Senior Imams of the six States of the Southwest as well as those of Edo and Delta States.

    Some of those dignitaries including Alhaji Babalola; the Magajin Rafi and Galadima of Sokoto; Professor T. G. Gbadamosi; Dr. Abdullah Jibril Oyekan; members of MUSWEN’s Secretariat Task Force as well as a retinue of other Muslim dignitaries from various states had been parts of the entourage of His Eminence since his arrival. The Vice Chairman of the Task Force, Alhaji Murziq Bidemi Siyanbade’s role in this was particularly distinct as he virtually relocated to Oyo State Government House, Ibadan, where His Eminence was officially hosted as he was shuttling between that place and the University of Ibadan to ensure that the hosting protocol was properly maintained.

    Grand Finale

    At the Ground Finale held at the grandiose Ado Ekiti pavilion, a galaxy of traditional rulers, Imams and Alfas as well as representatives of various Islamic Organizations were present in their joyful mood, an indication that the long awaited unity of the Southwest Ummah had come at last. Governor Ayodele Fayose was represented by his wife Mrs. Feyisara; Delegates of Hausa communities from various states and representatives of some Emirs who came from the North were also there. The Chairman of the occasion was Alhaji Khamis Tunde Badmus of Osun State who was ably represented by Senator Adebayo, made a very handsome monetary donation.

    The President-General designate was presented to the Sultan and the public for turbanning by the Secretary-General of the League of Imams and Alfas, Sheikh Ahmad Aladesawe of Owo, Ondo State, who also gave the welcome address.

    Alhaji Babalola gave a goodwill message in which he emphasized the unity of the Ummah and   further reiterated Sheikh Al-Ilory’s lecture.  

    Profile

    The 63-year-old new President-General of the League of Imams and Alfas of the South West, Edo and Delta, Sheikh Muhammad Jamiu Kewulere Bello, was born on January 2, 1952. After his primary education at Ansar-ud-Deen, Ajilosun, Ekiti, he attended the famous Arabic/Islamic Institute (Zumratu Diyau Salihin) and later became a student at Arabic Training Centre, established by Sheikh Mahally Badrudeen of Ile Ami in Iwo, Osun State. He was also a student of Sheikh Agbarigidoma of Ilorin in Kwara State and a number of other renowned scholars were his teachers.     

    Sheikh Bello briefly dabbled into transportation business before he was persuaded to become the Chief Imam of Ado Ekiti in 1985. He was turbaned by the then Chief Imam Yusuf Olatunji Ogunlayi of Ikole Ekiti. When Ekiti State was created from the old Ondo State in 1996, the Muslim leadership in Ekiti State unanimously appointed him as the Grand Imam of Ekiti State.

    Appointment as President-General

    On June 4, 2015, Sheikh Bello was unanimously appointed as President-General of the League of Imams and Alfas of the Southwest at a meeting of the League thereby becoming the 6th Imam to occupy that post. After his installation by the Sultan, the new President-General thanked everybody that played a role in his emergence and in making the occasion a success. He then promised to strengthen the unity of the Southwest on the one hand and that of the latter and the Northern Muslim Ummah on the other.

    Acceptance Speech

    In his acceptance speech, Sheikh Bello said: “I accept this responsibility placed on my shoulders through my appointment as President-General of the League of Imams and Alfas of the South States. As you are all aware, the responsibility of the office is enormous. However, with the special grace of Allah (SWT) coupled with the cooperation of all and sundry, I hope to contribute my quota to move forward the Muslim Ummah……”

    “Essentially, I would be ready to work with all Islamic Organizations, groups, sects and associations to advance the frontiers of our religion towards achieving greater peace, progress, unity and development. Good initiatives towards achieving peaceful co-existence and societal peace among various other faiths shall always be supported…….”

    Chronology

    Among his predecessors in that office were the late Chief Imam Muili Basunu of Ibadan, Oyo State; the late Chief Imam Armiyau Parakoyi of Ijebu Ode, Ogun State; Chief Imam Yayi Akorede of Akure, Ondo State, Chief Imam Mustapha Olayiwola Ajisafe of Osogbo, Osun State and Chief Imam Aruna Shuara of Ibadan, Oyo State (who was not formally installed before his death in 2015).

    History

    The League of Imams and Alfas was established in 1964 at the instance of Sheikh Adam Abdullah Al-Ilory of the great Institute of Arabic and Islamic Culture (MARKAZ), Agege who served as its second Secretary-General. At the inception of the League, Sheikh Adam Al-Ilory was nominated as President-General but he turned it down and opted for the post of Secretary-General. When the post was conceded to him, he chose to nominate Alhaji Jimoh Bamgbola of Abeokuta, Ogun State. The latter was both a scholar and a publisher.

    Other personalities that later served as Secretary-General after Sheikh Adam Al-Ilory were Sheikh Sadrudin Biobaku of Gbagura, Abeokuta, Ogun State and the current Chief Imam Ahmad Aladesawe of Owo, Ondo State. With that arrangement, the league succeeded in creating a formidable unity forum for all Imams and Alfas in the South-West region.

    Comment

    The establishment of the League of Imams and Alfas of Southwest was a turning point in the unity of the Muslim Ummah especially in speaking with one voice on matters of common interest and in fighting for the rights of the Muslim clerics in the region. And with the formal establishment of the Muslim Ummah of South West Nigeria (MUSWEN) in 2008, that unity became formidably strengthened as both bodies began to work together like a pair of scissors. Today, Yoruba Muslim clerics and their elite brothers and sisters are one and the same in brotherhood. Their spiritual union has created a strong synergy between the Northern and Southern Muslim Ummah in Nigeria.

    Central Planning Committee

    Members of the planning committee for the installation of Sheikh Bello were selected from the states that constitute the League. They included: Imam Ahmad Aladesawe (Secretary-General), Owo, Ondo State; Alhaji Morufu Olawale Isola and Imam Rabiu Salahudeen, from Osun State; Dr. M. T. A. Alayinde, Imam Wasiu Nuru, (markaz) and Alhaji Saadullah Bello, Lagos State. Others were Imam S. S. Bamgbola, Ogun State, Grand Mufti Batuta, Ondo State; Alhaji Fatai Muili Alaga, Oyo State; Alhaji Abdul Fattah Enabulele, Edo State as well as Chief Imam of Delta State.

    Local Organization Committee

    Some members of the Local Organization Committee for the installation  included the following: Alhaji Yakubu O. Sanni (Chairman); Dr. Sikiru Tae Lawal, former Deputy Governor (Ekiti State) and Chairman, Finance Committee; Aare Sulaiman Afolabi Ogunlayi, Chairman Programme and Publicity Committee; Alhaji Jimoh Dayo Ajayi, Chairman, Security Committee; Alhaja Maryam Ogunlade, Chairman, Welfare and Entertainment Committee; Dr. Ibraheem Azees, Chairman, Medical Committee; Alhaji Ganiyu Ibrahim, Secretary, LOC and Alhaji Jamiu Babalola, Assistant Secretary, LOC as well as a host of others. As can be seen on that list, some members of the LOC were also members of the Central Planning Committee.  

    The Role of MUSWEN

    Since its inception in 2008, the MUSWEN, being one of the two main pair organs of Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) in partnership with Jam’atu Nasril Islam (JNI) of the North has been playing a very vital role in solidifying the unity of the Muslim ummah. For instance, the former Secretary-General of the League of Imams and Alfas, the late Sheikh Sadrudeen Biobaku was a member of the Board of Trustees of MUSWEN until his demise. Also, the late President-General of the League of Imams and Alfas, Imam Mustapha Olayiwola Ajisafe was the Vice-President of MUSWEN. Thus, in furtherance of that unity, Sheikh Bello as well as Sheikh Aladesawe have been officially invited to be members of the Central Working Committee of MUSWEN.

    Besides, a special powerful delegation from MUSWEN, led by Alhaji Babalola visited Ekiti Muslim Community in the residence of the then President-General designate of the League in August 2015 in the spirit of unity and cooperation. These and many other gestures are pointers to the fact that MUSWEN’s hand of fellowship is always out for the League to grab with love. Also, in October 2015, another MUSWEN team led by its Executive Secretary, Prof. D. O. S. Noibi visited Ondo Muslim Community and even observed the monthly meeting of that community. If all these efforts by MUSWEN are adequately reciprocated and complimented by other stakeholders in the Southwest, any tendency for deviation that could cause fanaticism and consequent terrorism may become easy to nip in the bud.    

    Observation

    This is an era of religious uncertainty. What we call religion these days is nothing more than a fraudulent cloak for fraudulent activists. The more we claim to be religious the deeper we sink into the quagmire of iniquities. Some people who claim to be men of God are nothing more than men of evil. There is hardly any crime in the world today that is not aided or even generated by people who masquerade day and night in the cloak of religion. The modern day generation has turned religion into a capitalist mercantile. It is the duty and responsibility of both MUSWEN and the League of Imams and Alfas to cooperate in stemming any spate of such ugly trend and return sanity to Islam in the region.

  • Governance Islamica

    Governance Islamica

    What can we say of a man who fixes his eyes on the sun but does not see it?

    Instead, he sees a chorus of flaming seraphim announcing a paroxysm of despair. That is the parable of the country called Nigeria. Like the Israelite of yore, Nigerians have become gypsies wandering aimlessly in the wilderness of despair and wallowing helplessly in abject poverty even in the midst of abundance. What else do we expect from Allah beyond the invaluable bounties with which He has blessed us? What is Nigeria not blessed with?

    Our resources

    We have land in abundance, not in terms of size alone but also in terms of agrarian soil, rich vegetation and exceptionally clement weather. At least over 77 million hectares of land is said to be arable in Nigeria. Out of this, only about 34 million was reportedly cultivated for various agricultural activities some years ago. This has now dwindled to less than 25 million square hectares as more and more youths are migrating to cities and towns in search of imaginary but unavailable greener pastures only to further aggravate the frightening insecurity in the land.

    We are blessed with rainfalls that water our crops from the sky and graze our animals to satisfaction. We are blessed with sunshine that photosynthesises our plants and balances our weather. We are endowed with a variety of nourishing foods that are enough to feed us from generation to generation without necessarily importing anything from anywhere. No country is more fitting to chapter 80 of the Qur’anic testimony to this than Nigeria: ‘Let man reflect on the food he eats; how We pour down the rain in torrents and cleave the earth asunder; how We bring forth the corn, the grapes, the fresh vegetation, the olive, the palm, the thickets, the fruit-trees and the green pasture for you and for your cattle to delight in’. Allah’s favour is constant and manifest. We cannot deny it.

    Dedicated workforce

    In addition to the aforementioned, we have energetic and dedicated work force that is married to the farm land, plants and husbandry in Nigeria. We also have intellectual brains that are permanently engaged in research work to ensure Nigeria’s economic improvement especially in the agricultural sector. Yet, hunger, poverty and squalor are the profits of these endowments.

    Nigeria is not lacking in forest and savannah. She is rich in rivers and mountains all of which are great resources for people who are seeking reasonable comfort and are not self-deceptive.

    What we lack is a competent, responsible leadership that can manage all these resources with sincerity to the benefits of the citizenry and care about Nigeria’s foremost economic heritage which is agriculture. That food is becoming a luxury rather than necessity in Nigeria today after 62 years of independence is a misfortune successively engendered by the naivety and short-sightedness of those who claim to be in government especially at the federal level. Capitalising on the docility of Nigerians, the Federal Government keeps squeezing the citizenry in the Machiavellian belief that people’s impoverishment is a major instrument of perpetual rule over them by those in government.

    Margaret Thatcher’s wish

    A former Prime Minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher, alluded to Nigeria’s precarious situation in a press interview some years back when she was celebrating her 80th birthday. She was casually asked by journalists to indicate where she would want to live if she had opportunity of coming back to this world. In her response to that question she said she would like to come back into the world as a Nigerian ruler an answer that threw the interviewers into sarcastic laughter. And when asked to explain what she actually meant the Iron Lady said: ‘Nigeria is the only country in the world where people can be pushed to the wall and they would rather enter the wall than turn back to confront their rulers’. Thatcher’s statement here may sound like an impetus to a parochial government, but any reasonable person will know that elasticity has its limit.

    Parable of governance

    Governance in Islam is like pregnancy in the womb of a woman. Its duration is naturally defined barring any anomaly or aberration. Its delivery depends on the safety of its carrier and the circumstances of her well being. And, after delivery, the baby is claimed, not by the pregnancy carrier but by the impregnator. There is no pregnancy without semen firmly planted in the womb of a woman. And the semen planter is a man who will eventually be called the father. For this reason, children bear the names of their fathers rather than those of their mothers as surnames. By analogy, one can compare the government to a pregnant woman who could not have become pregnant without an impregnator. The impregnator in this case is the populace that gave those in government the mandate to rule them.

    And just as the product of the womb (the child) belongs to the impregnator as a matter of legitimacy so should dividend of governance be the property of the populace. A child who bears his mother’s name as surname is nothing but a bastard. After life, security, law and justice, nothing else is held more sacrosanct in Islam than governance which can be compared to a magnificent umbrella under which the people are supposed to take cover during torrential rains or burning sun. In a democratic setting, such umbrella is owned by the citizenry. Its bearer is just a servant holding it in trust for the people. Perhaps that was why the late President Umar Musa Yar’Adua called himself a servant leader on his assumption of office in May 2007. Advising the Federal Government to learn from the experience of countries like Saudi Arabia and Japan may be quite irrelevant here since such advice has no meaning to those in government. After all, the same advice had been given severally in the past without any sensible response. You can’t give what you do not have.

    The Saudi example

    In Saudi Arabia, education is totally free from primary school to the University. Everything including tuition, hostel accommodation, books, feeding and transportation is provided free by the government. In addition, all students are paid monthly stipends to solve personal problems that can divert their attention from studies. And, in summer, all foreign students on scholarship are issued free tickets to travel to their home countries on holidays. What it takes to enjoy all these is to be qualified for admission and every other thing follows automatically. Yours sincerely knows this much because I was a beneficiary. My first degree was obtained from King’s University, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. And if I was not fortunate to benefit from that great opportunity I, probably, would not have had the opportunity of university education because of my modest background to which Nigerian government was indifferent despite the obvious talent in me and many other Nigerians in my shoes.

    If all these could be done for students in that country, research facilities for lecturers can be taken for granted. Today, Saudi Arabia has taken her wealth beyond oil and other mineral resources. The two gigantic industrial cities of Yambu’ and Jubail alone with more than four thousand industries including petrochemicals which she established in the early 1980s are enough to see her through the future in the absence of oil. And what is more, that country does not depend on oil for survival anymore despite her position as number one oil exporter in the world. Besides, there is no aspect of human development and material investment eluding Saudi Arabian attention in all parts of the world today, including agriculture, shipping aviation, textile and electronics. And most of these are public owned without any dubious deregulation and deceptive ‘blind trust’ privatisation.

    Japan’s experience

    Japan, on the other hand, is an exclusive island delicately resting on a vast array of waters. Her natural farm land is very limited. Yet, she shares that water with some neighbouring countries in accordance with international law of water boundaries. To manage her national economy therefore, Japan had identified human brain as her strongest economic resource. She knew that without human resources there could be no effective economic management hence her concentration on human training. And, today, the result is manifest. Contrarily, at the commencement of every new regime in Nigeria, a newly sworn in President would deceptively promise manna and salwa knowing very well that such promise is a mere deception just to attract momentary applause. The greatest misfortune confronting this so-called giant of Africa is in entrusting the management of the country to mere mediocre who see governance as a sheer opportunity to amass wealth and wield political power against opponents. Managing a national economy is neither by wishful thinking nor by chanting slogans. It is rather a serious business that cannot be left in the hands of charlatans.

    Why USSR failed

    In her vainglorious days, the defunct Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) had indulged is similar self-deception by toying with all sorts of meaningless economic theories jumping from socialism to communism only to finally collapse upon her own face like a pack of cards after about 74 years of catastrophic experiments. Today, the greatest bane of Nigerian economy is not just the elimination of the middle class but also the extremely high cost of running the government by the greedy self-centered elements at the helm of national affairs. This fact has been emphasized many times privately and through the media in the past but the lotus eaters will rather die eating the intoxicating lotus than heed the voice of reason. And, unless this situation is changed positively, Nigeria may continue to wander aimlessly, in economic wilderness, for many, many years to come. We hope that the current seeming ‘undertakers’ will not pilot Nigeria to Siberia.

    Nigeria’s federal might

    Shortly after the Nigerian Southwest governors assumed office in 1999, yours sincerely wrote an open letter to them, which was published in Vanguard where I was then the Deputy Chairman of the Editorial Board. In the letter, I suggested three major areas of economic success with which they could sustain the pace-setting of that region. First was a regional power generating center with which to permanently stabilize electricity supply. With this, I argued that not only would industrialization take a sound footing but also that most unemployed young men and women would become self-employed to the greatest relief of those governments. Second was a regional railway system that could serve not just as a mass transit for the commuters but also as a cargo courier for all the goods in the region. With such a regional railway in place, the region would have become the doyen of commerce in the country and every able hand would have been effectively engaged without bothering the governments. Third was the establishment of a common refinery that could fill the vacuum created by constant non-availability of oil products and incessant arbitrary increase of their prices. Each of these projects could be jointly put in place by the six South-West states since they were all on the concurrent list. If the then Southwest governors had not been prevented from implementing those suggestions by the then vicious government at the centre, perhaps the situation in the region would have been different today and the other regions would have followed suit in a new progressive economic competition. That was the kind of competition that put the Asian tiger states (Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore) ahead of Africa. An inept federal government in Nigeria can only hold the rein of power for the purpose of self-enrichment and never for the benefit of growth and development. The experience of Lagos State’s innovative investment in electricity which was thwarted by the federal government can still be vividly recalled.

    The missing link

    In modern economic management, there can be no place for the middle class in the absence of such infrastructures as mentioned above. And without the middle class which is conspicuously missing in Nigeria, no economy can thrive to the benefit of the populace. That is why the multinational companies in Nigeria are leaving the country in droves for some other African countries. The current lopsided situation which deliberately puts over 97 per cent of the national wealth in the hands of about three percent of the idle populace is not only ungodly but also prone to unpredictable future consequences. We have begun to see such traces. It is therefore, not in the interest of those who are now basking in the euphoria of being in power to continue to drag the dead body of this country towards political murky water.

     Oil as lotus

    If it takes less than 10 dollars to produce one barrel of oil and the same one barrel of oil is sold for well over 100 dollars in the international market, what prevents a responsible government from building and maintaining functional refineries to the comfort of all and sundry? As the sixth largest oil producer, should Nigeria, an OPEC country, be exporting crude oil only to import refined one for domestic consumption? And yet, the populace is being forced to pay for the ineptitude of a tendentious clique holding tenaciously to the power at the centre with nothing to show for it. After decades of independence in this age of high technology, should any country without electricity, refineries, functional rail system, befitting industries and effective shipping and airlines that could create mass employment for the youth claim to be in existence? Yet, here in Nigeria where this situation prevails some people are still shamelessly claiming to be in government and in power. Isn’t that insane?

    Forced Diaspora

    Today, Nigerians are not only subjugated internally, they are also humiliated status wise internationally as they are forced to prefer living in other countries to theirs. Days and nights, Nigerians are found at the entrance gates of foreign embassies seeking to obtain visa and coping with stringent conditions of those embassies willy nilly even as our very best brains are the forces behind the development of other countries. If there is anything that has not been privatized in this country it is governance.

    Never has the government come out to tell Nigerians how much it costs to produce a barrel of oil. What we have always been told is that the government subsidizes the local consumption price of every litre of oil. That was the callous theory in which the obnoxious pioneer regime of this republic regaled for eight agonizing years. And that has now been inherited as a political culture. The question now is this: who actually owns the oil; the government or the people? And even if there is any subsidy at all, as often claimed by our rulers, shouldn’t Nigerians, who are supposed to own the oil by constitutional right, be entitled to such subsidy? The posture of owner and seller of petroleum products assumed locally by the federal government is not only criminal but also a flagrant betrayal of people’s trust. As a matter of fact, the populace has not much confidence in the federal government following years of deception and inhuman policies which continue to keep people in abject and perpetual poverty. Those are the same policies that engendered ethnic conflicts and religious dichotomy which led to the emergence of youth restiveness in various parts of the country.

    Candid advice

    Now, rather than celebrating mediocrity in the name of democracy as often done on the 29th of May every year since year 2000, what the current administration should spend its remaining tenure doing is true and sincere reformation which should henceforth take the front burner of governance if only to restore the missing confidence by people and reassure that Nigeria can still become a nation after all despite years of economic devastation. If those in government are not tired of ruling a country in perpetual cycle of despair, some of us, the ruled are. Celebrating anything called democracy in this situation is not just a sham but also an additional injury to the bleeding hearts of the citizenry. While the intra-party rancour surges ahead, it is necessary to hint here again that only a forthright economic clemency can serve as a panacea for Nigeria’s chronic ailment called ‘the government’. God heal Nigeria.

  • Welcoming the other

    Welcoming the other

    Preamble

    The theme of this writing is based on the title of the 9th Conference of ‘Religions for Peace’ held in Vienna, Austria. The year’s World Assembly of Religions for Peace (RfP) focused on building bridges and greater social cohesion amongst the world’s religions. The theme also imports a focus on religious repression among and within the world’s religions.

    After two days of intensive deliberations, in Vienna, the Assembly resolved to make a declaration which may serve as guidance for religious leaders all over the world and the declaration was unanimously adopted as follows:

    ‘We – more than six hundred religious leaders and people of faith representing all historic faith traditions and every region of the world – have convened in Vienna, Austria as the 9th World Assembly of Religions for Peace.

    We have come from the global Religions for Peace family of ninety national inter-religious councils and groups, five regional councils, one world council, and international networks of religious women and religious youth. Our respective religious traditions have called us to work together for Peace.

    Previous World Assemblies of Religions for Peace have discerned positive elements of Peace, common threats to Peace, and a multi-religious consensus expressed through shared values for Peace. We commit to common action based upon these deeply held and widely shared values, as a foundation for affirming the imperative of ‘welcoming the other’. as the heart of our multi-religious vision of Peace.

    Re-affirmation

    We reaffirm the positive elements of Peace shared by our respective religious traditions:

    Peace is central to our respective religions, and our diverse faiths compel us to work together to build it; Love, compassion and honesty are stronger than hate, indifference and deceit; All men and women are endowed with human dignity, share common humanity, must care for one another, and are called to consider the problems faced by others as their own; We accept the call to stand on the side of and raise up the most vulnerable, and to promote just and harmonious societies; We value women and men as equal partners in our efforts to build peace; Children are a paramount concern; the special state of childhood deserves our protection and care, and should receive priority from among our societies’ resources; Non-violent conflict transformation through dialogue and reconciliation are central to peacemaking.

    The use of nuclear weapons and all weapons of mass and indiscriminate destruction is immoral; and Advancing human development and protecting the earth are part of the struggle for Peace.

    The positive elements of Peace we share are inextricably linked to our shared calling to confront common threats to Peace. These threats include: The misuse of religion in support of all manner of violence, including violent extremism; An ongoing spiritual crisis that erodes values that support life; Violent conflict and the proliferation of arms; Extreme and growing inequality, including widespread violations of basic rights; Violence against women, abuse of children and weakening support for families; Extreme poverty, preventable diseases left untreated, and broad scale lack of opportunity; and Environmental degradation, natural resource depletion, and climate change, all of which threaten civic order and human flourishing.

    Confession

    While we confess that some religious believers betray the peace teachings of their faiths, we continue to commit ourselves – and our communities – to a culture of Peace that advances shared well-being, grounded in common healing, common living and shared security.

    Rising hostility

    The 9th World Assembly of Religions for Peace calls attention to a new threat to Peace – rising hostility.

    We are deeply troubled by this rising hostility, in society and within and among religious communities. This hostility toward the ‘other’ is an extension of intolerance, and too often takes the form of violence. Victims of hostility are often vulnerable populations, including members of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities; migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced and stateless persons….

    1. Religious communities can work to reverse the rising tide of hostility toward the ‘other’ by advancing a multi-religious vision of Peace and through multi-religious action. Specifically, the Religions for Peace World.

    Assembly calls on Religious leaders and people of faith to:

    Honour and protect human dignity whenever and wherever it is under attack;

    Foster more active collaboration between women and men in exalting the dignity of women and girls, and work together to prevent violence against them;

    Speak out on behalf of vulnerable individuals and groups, and all people persecuted, or whose existence is denied, because of their faith;

    Recognize that the well-being of immediate and extended families, as well as of communities, are a prerequisite to the well-being of children; Address issues of responsibility and accountability for the causes of climate change;

    Acknowledge the value of youth-led, grass-roots initiatives aimed at welcoming the others and promoting sustainable Peace;

    Advance spiritual values essential to shared well-being; Reinforce acceptance of diversity in our communities; Welcome the other through prayer and service; Engage in multi-stakeholder partnerships to welcome the other; and Leverage the power of multi-religious networks to ‘welcome the other’ by advancing human dignity, shared well-being and citizenship through concrete multi-religious action.

    Governments, international organizations and civil society to: Promote transparent governance that ensures and protects the development of comprehensive well-being and full enjoyment of universal human rights for all;

    Provide legal remedies for victims of intolerance; Promote social policies and legal norms that recognize the dignity of migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced and stateless persons; Advance citizenship that ensures human dignity while protecting the safety and well-being of all individuals, including freedom of religion or belief, and other rights of individuals and groups, whether in the majority or in the minority; Ensure the protection of places of worship; Eliminate nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, and stem the proliferation of small arms; Promote restorative justice to heal both the victims and the perpetrators of violent conflict; Address threats of nuclear exposure and contamination to protect all living things and future generations; and Support and partner with people of faith, religious leaders, religious communities and religious networks in their efforts to welcome the other.

     All people of good will to: Call attention to, and work to eliminate, all forms of intolerance and discrimination by states, by non-state actors, by civil society, by religious groups and leaders, and by individuals.

    Welcoming the other

    We, the Delegates of the 9th World Assembly of Religions for Peace, are united in our commitment to resist threats to Peace that take the form of hostility toward the other, and to take positive action to welcome the other by promoting the true flourishing of all human beings. These dual commitments and corresponding calls to action express our multi-religious vision of Peace..

    This Declaration was made in Vienna, Austria this day of 22 November 2013. More will come about Vienna Conference of ‘Religion for Peace’ in the near future.

  • The Muslim family

    The Muslim family

    Preamble

    His (Allah’s) sign is that He created mates for you of your own kind that you may find peace of mind through them, and He has put love and tenderness between you. In that are signs for people who can reflect.’ Q.30:21

    Modern civilization seems to have given a new connotation to the word family. By contemporary definition, that word has come to mean a man, his wife and children. This definition is contrary to that of Islam or what obtains in African culture.

    In Africa as in Islam, family is an esoteric community that emphasizes the web of a pedigree. Such a pedigree may be by consanguinity, affinity or fosterage. The main essence of calling it a family is to give every member a sense of belonging and that of security. When family becomes larger than what a compound or a village can accommodate, it becomes a clan. Islam does not only recognize family setting with its legitimate norms and characteristics, it also gives adherence to those norms a pass mark in faith. In Islam, family is a major yardstick for measuring the seriousness of Muslims. That is why its definition transcends what the west now calls nucleus family. Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was reported to have said that: ‘Marriage is part of my culture. Whoever is qualified to marry but refuses to do so is not part of me’. And, talking about family can only be in vain without reference to marriage.

    Marriage

    This discourse is not about marriage per se. It is rather about the family of a Muslim in all its ramifications, as prescribed by Islam. Besides ventilating the atmosphere for harmony and concord, a family is supposed to resolve any conflict among its members. But where a family is afflicted by disharmony, Islam has an alternative means of resolving conflicts. That alternative is the Shari’ah court.

    Most Muslims, like non-Muslims, do not understand the essence of court beyond dishing out penalties or dissolving marriages. That is why most couples don’t take their conflicts to courts until they have reached the point of divorce. If Nigerian Muslims thoroughly understand Islam, they would have known that going to court over matrimonial conflicts does not necessarily entail bitterness. It is the duty of the family to resolve any matrimonial conflict before it gets out of hands. But where the family fails, it becomes the duty of the local Mosque to resolve. It is only where both the family and the Mosque have failed that a matrimonial conflict can be taken to court for adjudication. And, even that should not be with the intention of dissolving the marriage. For Muslim family, Shari’ah courts are not meant for marriage and divorce alone. They also serve as a forum of arbitration on knotty issues like business and inheritance.

    How Muslims should write Will

    One of the obligatory Islamic duties which most Muslims take for granted is the writing of will. For every Muslim adult, male or female, writing a will is not a matter of choice. It is incumbent. But not many Muslims know this. And the few who know do not seem to be comfortable with it. The general thinking is that writing a will is only for old people who are close to death or those who are very rich. This does not only contradict the concept of Islam about death, it also contravenes the principle laid down in Islam about will writing. No one knows when death will come. An octogenarian may continue to live while a man or woman of twenties or thirties may die. The healthy may die while the sick lives. The circumstances of life in this age of technology which cause death are very unpredictable. Thus, death may come to anybody at any time.

    One of the advantages of Tafsir in the sacred month of Ramadan is to disseminate knowledge especially on sensitive but fundamental issues often over-sighted by most Muslims. Writing a will is one of such issues. Will in Islam is called wisayah. It is a very significant means of providing a flexible instrument of transferring estate or a fraction of it to those who are not heirs. It is also a means of leaving a permanent instruction for one’s children, wives and siblings on how to conduct life after the legator might have been demised.

    Wisayah basically means an instruction for posthumous implementation that contains a bequest of assets and debts to others after one’s death. It depicts the differences between hibah which means a gift in one’s life time and wirathah (inheritance). Hibah therefore is a voluntary gift delivered to the intended beneficiary after the death of the giver.

    In Islam, writing a will is not about bequest of wealth per se. It is rather more about the explanation of certain things in the life of the will writer which were not known to his or her family members, relatives and close associates. For instance, if the concerned will writer did not pay Zakah when he was able to pay it, or if he was indebted but did not disclose it to his relatives or if something was entrusted to him without involvement of witnesses or if he made a promise to someone without the knowledge of his relatives, it is incumbent upon him to include such matters in his will. This is to clear any possible ambiguity or doubt about his relationship with other people while alive. The contents of such a will are never disclosed until after the death of the writer. A Muslim will can be written or oral. And it is forbidden for anybody to alter such a will in any form. Altering it is a crime punishable in Islam.

    Writing of will by Muslims is ordained by the Almighty Allah in Q.2:180 thus: ‘It is decreed that when death approaches, those of you that leave wealth shall bequeath it equitably to parents and kindred. This is a duty made incumbent upon the righteous. He that alters it (the will) after hearing it shall be accountable for his crime. Allah is all-Hearing, all-knowin’. The Prophet was also reported by Bukhari and Muslim as saying that ‘Any Muslim who has something to bequest should not pass two nights without writing his will…And Ibn Majah also reported a narration from Jabir quoting the Prophet as saying those who die leaving will behind died in the path of truth and righteousness and they shall receive the forgiveness of Allah.

    Ordinarily, in Islam, a Muslim has no right to share his property among his off springs or relatives by his own whim. The Islamic way of bequeathing inheritance has been divinely spelt out clearly in the Qur’an. And that is a different topic entirely not to be lumped with the issue of writing will on this occasion.

    Who should write a Will?

    If a will must be written according to Islamic prescription then the writer of such a will must be a Muslim. He must have attained the age of maturity. He must be sane. He must use an understandable language and clearly identify himself in his will. He must also append his signature and date to every page of such will. There must be witnesses to the writing of the will and those witnesses must also identify themselves clearly and duly sign the space left for them as witnesses in the will.

    How?

    But if the will is to be orally recorded, the voice of the will recorder must be very audible with understandable language. The executors as well as the trustees of the will must be clearly named and if necessary, described to avoid any confusion that may arise from similarity of names. In that case, four original copies of a written will must be produced. And one each must be given to the four appointed witnesses. No one of the witnesses must know another and no photocopy should be produced for any reason. All available copies must be original. This is to prevent any possible leakage or connivance that may lead to betrayal of trust. Every appointed witness must be an acknowledged trustworthy person of integrity. Ditto the executors.

    Contents of the Will

    An Islamic will should contain the following facts as a matter of necessity:

    •Listing all the children if any

    •Listing all the available assets

    •Listing all liabilities including debts, unpaid Zakah, promises made but not yet fulfilled, entrusted property, illegal acquisition in the writer’s possessions

    •Listing the wives and relatives including parents, siblings and other beneficiaries who are alive and are qualified as inheritors

    All these must be clearly spelt out without mentioning the amount or share due to each beneficiary.

    •Listing any special bequest and testamentary transfer and endowment as well as the names of the beneficiaries. All these must be clearly spelt out.

    •Appointing a guardian or trustee for minor children until such children attain the age of maturity

    • Specific sections of the will may be addressed to the wife/wives and children

    •Any written will must be updated from time to time and each latest copy must be given to the witnesses and the trustees while the old ones are withdrawn for destruction.

    •The executors must not know the trustees. And the trustees must not take part in the execution of the will. Their duty is to ensure that the executors comply with the letters of the will.

    Outside the Will Some facts not to be included in the inheritance aspect of the will of a Muslim are as follows: A non-Muslim child of a Muslim will-writer or an illegitimate child or a murderer (one who kills his parents) should not be included in the list of those to inherit because they are not qualified to inherit a Muslim parent under Islamic law. If, however, the will writer feels strongly about giving his non-Muslim child something from his estate, this may be contained in the aspect concerning testamentary transfer (habau). Ditto the non-Muslim wife and illegitimate child. But the total aggregate of what a Muslim can will out to those not qualified for inheritance should not exceed one third of the entire estate after the deduction of debts.

    The idea of one third came about from a conversation between Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and Sa’d bn Abi Waqqas. The latter had sought the Prophet’s permission to bequest his entire estate to certain people and groups. The Prophet said ‘NO’. He, (Waqqas), then said what of half? And the Prophet said ‘NO’. Then he said what of one third? The Prophet at that stage reluctantly gave a node indicating that even the one third was too much concluding that ‘it is better to leave your heirs richer than poorer’. Thus, the final approval became as a Prophetic tradition which Muslim must abide by. This means that one third is the maximum a Muslim can bequest to anybody in his will outside the inheritance bracket.

    Islam does not allow Muslims to bequest or make special provision in the will for those who are legitimately eligible as heirs. Therefore, anybody who is qualified to inherit cannot be included in the will for any gift.

    The copies of the will may be given to banks, government treasuries or any other corporate institutions like courts for safe keeping without the knowledge of the beneficiaries. However, such copies must be accompanied by covering notes.  But there must be witnesses to the keeping of such document in the bank or the court. A Muslim must not wait until death approaches before he writes his will since he does not know when death would come. Neither should he wait until he becomes rich before doing same since he does not know if he would ever be rich. For a genuine Muslim, writing a will must begin as soon as he marries. And what is applicable to men in this case is equally applicable to women. The issue of inheritance will be discussed in not far future in sha’Allah.

  • Muslim funeral

    Muslim funeral

    Mother earth can be described as man’s inseparable companion. She accompanies man day and night, in life and in death. She surpasses biological mothers in playing her role in the life of man. From a chip of her natural being, man is said to have been created. The Qur’an tells us that ‘From her (the earth) We created you and into her We shall return you..

    In playing the role of a mother, the earth carries man on her back while the latter remains alive and in death, she incubates him in her belly in readiness for the resurrection that will see him through the inevitable Day of Judgment. In that process, there is a similarity between the duties of a primary mother (the earth) and that of a secondary mother otherwise known as biological mother. While the biological mother cares for man only when she and man are alive, the mother earth cares for him both in life and in death. Unlike that of the biological mother, the life span of the mother earth is indefinite.

    Some scientists have given us different ages of the earth using all sorts of technological instruments. But the only authentic knowledge of that can come from the Almighty Allah Who created the earth. If scientists have the means of telling us the age of the earth, do they also have the means of determining her life span? The earth is not just a carrier of unlimited weight; she is also a scale of unlimited measure. She weighs the load on her head as well as the one in her belly and balances them up for natural equanimity.

    Without the earth, mountains and oceans would have no habitat to call their own and the long term fossils which turn into what we call minerals would have had nowhere to hibernate. Before all these and millions of other unidentified matters came into existence, the earth had been. And when all of them might have vanished into permanent oblivion, according to their scheduled time, the earth will continue to be until Allah’s scheduled time for her termination comes.

    We know that man was created from the earth. We know that the earth harbours all living and non-living things on and in her. What we do not know is the source of the earth in creation. From what was the earth created? In luring us to reasoning, Allah has severally called the attention of man to the nature of certain creatures like the mountains, the valleys, the oceans and the seas, the minerals and the human and animal fossils buried in the earth as well as the varieties of plants and insects which dot the earth like a galaxy of stars on the Milky Way. He has also challenged man to observe the very nature of the wonderful carpet called the earth.

    All these are to enable man know that all things except the grace of Allah will perish. And Allah confirms severally that a record is being kept for everything which will eventually be opened as a means of reassessing the existence and otherwise of all things on earth.

    Any Muslim who has performed Hajj with full consciousness of piety will understand the gravity of this mysterious scenario. We came into the world naked. We brought nothing into it except the placenta. And, as soon as we settle down as babies on the laps of our biological mothers, we forget about the sojourn that brought us into this ephemeral transit called the world. No one remembers again how he or she travels down to the world. No one can

    describe features of the womb through which he or she came into the world. Even the real purpose of our mission in the world becomes lost on us until we are taken through a new earthly tutorial that makes us what we grow up to be. At least, no book or document has shown the role of anybody’s placenta in the journey of life. And could that natural luggage have been in vain?

    Placenta in the life of man is just a symbol of vanity which life represents. A sincere pilgrim prepares for Hajj as if he is preparing for death. His journey for that mission is unpredictable. No one knows for sure who will return from the journey and who will not. That is why an intending Muslim pilgrim makes all necessary provisions for his family and leaves vital instructions or advice behind. It is a way of saying ‘in case I do not return from this journey, these are the steps to follow in my absence as a way of keeping life going..

    At the end of every Salat in both Sanctuaries of Makkah and Madinah, especially during Hajj, there is a funeral prayer (Janazah) which confirms that people die in virtually every minute of life. Those who die between Dhuhr and .Asr prayers might not necessarily be patients in the hospitals. Some die while observing Salat. Some die while eating. Some die in toilets. Some die while talking. Some die in the market with their purchases in their hands even as the wristwatches on their hands keep working. Death in such circumstances is a matter of destiny rather than ill health. It is only in our own part of the world that death is expected to be caused by ill health lamented endlessly. That is why an Arab poet crafted a stanza to remind man that death could strike at any time by any means. This is how he puts it: ‘Whoever does not die of sword may die of anything else; There are many ways of dying but death itself is only one..

    Just as no man can remember to ask about his placenta after settling down in life so can no dead person remember to ask about his luggage or his money after death. As a matter of fact, no dead person knows that he or she has left the shores of this world. Death is like a dream. You move from one spot to another as if you are alive. You interact with people, at times dining and wining with them and at other times rejoicing or grieving with them without knowing that you are already dead.

    After death has struck down a Muslim, the first duty of other Muslims is to clean his body and wrap it up for burial. Then, the funeral service (Salatul Janazah) is performed congregationally and this is followed by burial. Men are to wash the body of a deceased male. Women are to wash the body of a deceased female. In Islam, the closest people are expected to wash the body of the deceased. But where such deceased had indicated who should carry out that function, no other person should do it.

    A husband may wash the body of his wife if there are no qualified women around to do it. Same can be done by a wife for her deceased husband for the same reason. Mature children can wash the body of their parents but the rule is that of male to male and female to female. It is only in the absence of close relatives that outsiders are allowed to carry out this duty or where his will indicates so. There are no professional undertakers in Islam.

    The burial of a Muslim body within hours of death is in accordance with the Prophetic tradition (Sunnah). Muslim bodies are quickly buried for three important reasons: One is to prevent it from decomposing. Another is to minimize the grief which it may bring to its relatives and the third is to let people know that life continues despite the death of anybody. After all, death is as normal in the life of a Muslim as birth of a new baby.

    It is for the same reasons mentioned above that Muslims are advised to create their own cemeteries and not bury their deceased fellows inside houses or in cemeteries meant for adherents of other religions or around the compound.

    The dead is not expected to take over the abode of the living just as the living is prohibited from seeking an abode in a cemetery. Both the living and the dead have their pattern of space occupation which cannot be interchanged.

    Cemetery in Islam is as important as community settlement. Physically, the deceased cannot act in congregation as the living. But within the colony of their cemetery, spiritual interaction is quite possible. This does not however, have any statutory basis in Islam. Once a soul has departed from the body reunion of souls and body is only possible on two occasions. One is the period of transit (Barzakh), when the deceased is interrogated by two designated Angels (Munkar and Nakir). The other is the Day of Judgement when all souls will rejoin their bodies for the purpose of rendering account.

    Another important role of the living Muslims is to take care of the cemeteries in which their departed fellows are buried. No cemetery should be allowed to grow bushy or be left un-kept. The environments of those buried in the cemeteries deserve as much care as when they were alive. And the living should always remember that sooner or later, they will join those in the belly of the earth.

    Muslim cemetery should be like a settlement of equal beings where no traces of segregation can be found. Such a cemetery should be kept tidy by the living and protected against any possible invasion or destruction. A non-Muslim should not be assigned or employed to watch over a Muslim cemetery. The cemetery should be weeded and even swept from time to time if possible.

    Every Muslim community or group should have a cemetery. And the maintenance of a Muslim cemetery should be the responsibility of every member of the community. No funeral ritual bath or funeral service (Janazah) should be performed at the cemetery. It is desirable to plant trees in the cemetery either for the purpose of protecting it against erosion and sand storm or for making it cool and serene.

    It is preferred that a Muslim be buried where he or she died, and not be transported to another location or country which may cause delay or require an embalmment for the body. The deceased is laid in the grave without a coffin (if permitted by local law) on his or her right side, facing the Ka’bah in Makkah. At the gravesite, erection of tombstones as well as elaborate markers or flowers or other decorative is discouraged. Rather, one should humbly remember Allah and His mercy, and pray for the deceased.

    While all members of the community attend the funeral prayers, only the men of the community accompany the body to the gravesite. The relatives of the deceased may observe a 3-day mourning period. Mourning is observed in Islam by increased devotion, receiving visitors and condolences, and avoiding decorative clothing and jewellery. Widows observe an extended mourning period (iddah) of 4 months and 10 days in accordance with Qur’an 2:234.

    During this period, she is neither to remarry nor move out of her home, nor wear decorative clothing and jewellery until the iddah period is over. Iddah is for women alone.

    Observing the eighth day or 40th day after burying the deceased is an act of extravagancy which Allah prohibits.

    When one dies, everything in this earthly life is left behind, and there are no more opportunities to perform any acts of righteousness and faith. Prophet Muhammad once said that there are three things, however, which may continue to benefit a person after death: charity given during life which continues to help others, knowledge from which people continue to benefit, and a righteous child who prays for his or her deceased parents regularly.

    Grave is the final abode of man. All the mansions and castles built in cities and towns are a mere vanity which will eventually crumble into dust. Thus, whoever expects death should know that grave is inevitable. In there, there are neither kings nor Presidents. And there is no difference between masters and servants. Everybody lies helplessly in anticipation of resurrection and judgment.

    Life is a transit. There is a time to be conceived in the mother’s womb. There is a time to be born into the world. There is a time to grow up and become a man or a woman. There is a time to work and earn a living. There is a time to marry and bear children. There is a time to rejoice over the pleasantries of life. There is a time to grieve over certain calamities or tribulations. There is a time to be strong. There is a time to be weak. And finally, there is a time to die. No time can be substituted for another. In all these, the earth has a role to play. Her role cannot be denied. And when the time comes, we shall all be assembled in the presence of the Almighty Allah and give the account of our sojourn on earth. And, based on such account, each person shall take his final abode in paradise or hell. Thus, death is like visa which authorises the right of entrance into Paradise or of preventing it. You can choose the one you want. The criteria are there.

  • Stoning to Death

    Stoning to Death

    Preamble

    Laws are like spider’s webs. If anything small falls into them, they ensnare it. But large things break through and escape. By Solon, Athenian statesman and poet (638-559 B.C)

    Europeans who likened law to an ass may have generalized that opinion but they are surely not far from the truth after all. Laws generally are what human beings make them through  interpretation. No law in any given society is naturally controversial. What brings about controversy is interpretation. All human laws, written or conventional, emanate from societal norms. Those norms only become laws when they are backed up by governing authorities.

    In Islam, the body of the laws that govern the lives of Muslims is called Sharia. This constitutes what is known as Islamic law or culture. It is derived from the following four sources:

    Qur’an, the direct words of Allah revealed to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) through the Arch-Angel Jubril

    Hadith, the divinely guided but personal expressions of Prophet Muhammad (SAW), which give interpretations to the contents of the Qur’an.

    Ijma’, the consensus of opinions of the learned Muslim scholars which must conform to the first two sources above.

    Qiyas, a scholarly analogy deduced from the first three sources above.

    These sources are in sequence of authority. Qur’an is the first and foremost among them. No other source can supersede or equal the authority of the Qur’an. If any other source contradicts the Qur’an, that source automatically becomes null and void.

    Because the Qur’an was revealed in coded language, the need to decode it for the purpose of understanding necessitated the adoption of Hadith as the second source of Islamic law. No one was as competent to give accurate interpretation of the Qur’an as the Prophet who received its revelations from Allah through Arch-Angel Jibril. The Prophet himself acquired the knowledge of interpreting the Qur’an through informal interactions with Arch-Angel Jibril who gave him tutorials as well as the informal revelations he received while sleeping which are called ‘Hadith-ul-Qudsi’

    The third source is the consensus of opinion of highly informed Muslim scholars (Ijma’) based on the provisions of the Qur’an and Sunnah. It came into being as a result of scholarly understanding of the first two sources by credible Muslim clerics. This source became necessary for the harmonization of Islamic jurisprudence even if environments and circumstances would still leave room for variations in language and presentations.

    The fourth and last source is analogical deduction (Qiyas) which arose from peculiar situations in which clerics might find themselves at certain times and in certain places. This source allows for logical deductions that could be derived from the first three sources without contradicting any.

    In sequence of authority, therefore, it becomes clear that only in the absence of Qur’anic provision can Hadith become the supreme legal authority in Islam. And, neither ‘Ijma’ nor ‘Qiyas’ can become a point of reference where the Qur’an and Hadith are available. (Hadith is the collection of the divinely guided utterances of Prophet Muhammad while Sunnah is his exemplary conducts that Muslims are supposed to emulate).

    Classification of Shari’Ah

    Like any other law, Shari’ah is classifiable into civil and criminal aspects. As relevant here, adultery is within the criminal aspect of Sharia. In Islam, it is a crime which incurs a severe sanction. And the sanction is clearly prescribed in Qur’an 24 verse 2 as follows:

    “The woman and the man who are guilty of adultery, give each of them one hundred lashes of the cane. Let no compassion in their case prevent you from obedience to Allah, if you truly believe in Allah and the last day; and let their punishment be witnessed by a number of believers”.

    The above quoted verse is Allah’s prescribed punishment for adulterers and adulteresses as well as for fornicators (male and female). In Arabic language, there is no distinction between an adulterer and a fornicator. The word for illegitimate sexual intercourse generally is ‘zina’ which is a crime in Islam. An adulterer is called ‘zani’ while an adulteress is called ‘zaniyah’. And those are the precise words used for the two respectively in the Qur’an. The two words are equally used for fornicators.

    As is general with all laws, the interpretation of this verse of the Qur’an varies from scholar to scholar and from school of thought to school of thought. While some scholars believe that the quoted verse refers to unmarried people others contend that since the word zina applies to both fornication and adultery, the verse must be in reference to the two categories of people (married and unmarried).

    Proof of law

    As for stoning, no specific chapter or verse of the Qur’an can be cited as evidence for its application. In other words, the Qur’an does not prescribe stoning as punishment for adulterers and adulteresses as it is in prescribing flogging.

    Islamic law, as mentioned earlier, is a combination of sources. And we had been warned by Allah that:  “It is not for true believers, male or female, to have a choice (but to abide) when Allah and His Apostle decree on an issue. Whoever disobeys Allah and His Apostle has strayed far indeed”. (Q. 33, verse 36.)

    There are many narrated versions of how and when stoning as punishment for adulterers and adulteresses became a law. All the available evidences advanced in favour of this law are based on Hadith and Sunnah. But when did the Prophet’s expression or action authorise stoning vis a vis the Qur’anic revelation on flogging quoted above?

    Was it before or after the revelation? If it was after, could the Prophet have given a verdict that would contradict the contents of the Qur’an? If it was before, shouldn’t such Hadith or Sunnah be superseded by the Qur’anic revelation that came after it? Yet, there is the issue of homosexuality and lesbianism and the punishment prescribed for them by the Qur’an and Sunnah.

    With good knowledge of Islam and thorough understanding of Islamic jurisprudence, the issue of stoning as punishment for adulterers should not, ordinarily, generate any controversy. The position of the Qur’an on this issue, as revealed by Allah, is very clear. What brought controversy into it is the interpretation of that revelation as attributed to several Hadith relayed in various versions.

    Given the antecedence of the record of Hadith, any informed Muslim must be careful in using Hadith against the contents of the Qur’an especially as a legal code in Islam. Statutorily, Hadith is meant to complement the Qur’an and not vice versa. Where the former seems to conflict with the latter, the Qur’an prevails.

    If any of these two major sources of Islamic law was ever controversial it could only have been the Hadith and not the Qur’an.

    And, it was for this reason that Hadith was subjected to such serious scrutiny that led to scholastic separation of the wheat from the chaff in what came to be known as science of Hadith.

    Documentation of Hadith

    It must be remembered that the official compilation and documentation of Hadith did not take place until several decades after the demise of Prophet Muhammad. And what led to that exercise by great scholars like Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Maja, Abu Daud, At-Tirmidhi, An-Nisai and a host of others was the rampant fabrication of statements attributed to the Prophet by some mischievous elements.

    Unlike the Qur’anic revelations which were promptly documented officially as instructed by the Prophet himself, Hadith and Sunnah were not authorised for documentation by the Prophet. His (Prophet’s) position was that such documentation could lead to a conflict of Hadith with the contents of the Qur’an and therefore cause confusion among the Muslims. That fear was never fully allayed after all, despite the efforts of the mentioned scholars. And, today, we still have thousands of Hadith classified as ‘weak’, ‘unauthorised’ and ‘rejected’. Yet, they bear no names other than Hadith.

    In such a melee, it will be foolhardy to depend exclusively on Hadith in giving a verdict as fundamental as stoning to death especially when the Qur’an is silent on it. Though I am not a Mufti, I personally believe that if Allah had intended stoning as penalty for adultery, He wouldn’t have left its pronouncement to the Prophet since Allah was categorical in respect of flogging for adulterers.

    Categories of adultery

    In Islam, adultery is not limited to married men and women alone. The acts of homosexuality (i.e. man to man sex) as well as lesbianism (i.e. woman to woman sex) are equally treated as adultery. And this is where the logic of stoning becomes questionable. It is through the Qur’an that we came to know of a whole city of the people of Prophet Lut (Lot) which Allah wiped out for committing homosexuality otherwise called ‘sodomy’. The Qur’an does not tell us of a similar punishment meted out to any group of adulterers in history. Yet, homosexuals and lesbians are still given the opportunity to repent with a promise of Allah’s forgiveness.

    This is how the Qur’an put it: “Against those of your women who commit adultery (lesbianism), call witnesses, four in number, from among yourselves; and if they bear witness, then keep the women in confinement until death release them or Allah shall make for them a way out of it. And if two (men) of you commit it (homosexuality), then punish them both; but if they repent and show remorse, leave them alone. Verily, Allah is forgiving, compassionate. Q. 4:15-16.

    Fabricated Hadith

    Many versions of Hadith were relayed in respect of stoning. One of them was that a married woman once reported herself to the Prophet confessing adultery. The Prophet pretended not to hear until the woman repeated herself three times, saying she had become pregnant as a result. The Prophet thereafter asked her to come and repeat the confession after delivery. It was thought that the woman would never come back having known the implication. But surprisingly, she came back after delivery and repeated the same confession three times.

    There and then, the Prophet was said to have ordered some of his disciples present to pelt her with stone. This act was carried out as the woman took to her heels. When those disciples returned to inform the Prophet that they had stoned the woman to death, he was alarmed and scolded them for carrying out such a dastardly act saying he did not send them to kill her.

    One would wonder why the Prophet who was so compassionate and cautious about anything life would rush to give such a verdict without investigating the matter conclusively. For instance, nothing in the referred Hadith tells us anything concerning the woman’s sexual partner (i.e. the man who impregnated her) before the judgment was allegedly given. That is not the exemplary Prophet described by Allah in the Qur’an thus: “you have a good example in Allah’s Apostle for anyone who looks to Allah and the last day and remembers Allah always” (Q. 33: 21).

    Relevant questions

    Some questions can be raised in respect of the process of applying the penalty for adultery. Some of the questions are as follows: when can a man or a woman be pronounced an adulterer or adulteress? How can such a person be tried? Who should pass judgment on him or her?

    To ascertain that a man or a woman has committed adultery, there must be convincing evidence. One such evidence is for the married woman to be pregnant outside the wedlock. Another is for the woman or the man to voluntarily confess to adultery. However, the sexual partner must also voluntarily admit that adultery was actually committed between both of them. The third is for other people to prove catching them in action. Anybody who came up with such allegation without proof must bring four male witnesses or eight female witnesses. Each of the witnesses must have seen the accused duo in action. This means they must have all seen the physical insertion of the male organ into the female organ. And they must be made to swear to on oath that they actually saw the act. This is to avoid any possibility of conspiracy.

    Anything less than that should be considered mere suspicion which cannot warrant any penalty because adultery is not committed in the open.

    If, through open evidence (like pregnancy outside wedlock) or voluntary self-confession by both sexual partners, a man or a woman is found guilty of adultery, the next step is prosecution in a Shari’ah court. In the absence of an official Shari’ah court the accused person should be tried by a judicial committee of a Mosque headed by a Mufti.

    Such an accused person must have attained puberty, he or she must be sane and the act must have been committed with his or her consent.

    In the case of the woman becoming pregnant, the court or the Mosque must allow her to deliver the child before any judgment is executed.

    And if she alleges rape, she is automatically free if her claim is found to be true. But the best is to defer the judgment till after delivery to avoid any psychological complication that may affect the child in her womb. Such deferment will also allow for thorough investigation before judgment is given.

    As for the male partner, the penalty may be carried out as soon as the judgment is delivered, if enough evidence is established against him.

    That penalty as prescribed in the Qur’an is flogging which should be done publicly and witnessed by members of the community in order to serve as a deterrent to others.

    However, banishment from the community for one year after flogging may be waived, according to Imam Hanafi, if the culprit repents sincerely and promises never to repeat the crime, depending on the discretion of the judge or the Mufti.

    Essence of punishment

    The essence of any punishment in Islam is to enable people repent and desist from evil deeds. But what is amazing about the application of Islamic punishment for adultery is that only the lowly people in the society are caught and punished for it even when it is obvious that adultery is more rampant among the makers and shakers of the society especially the law givers. Why is it that no single highly placed person has ever been caught and punished for adultery either in Nigeria or elsewhere?

    Besides ‘shirk’ (associating something with Allah), no act is more annoying to Allah than miscarriage of justice, especially against the helpless people. Adultery is a very grievous crime in Islam and no true Muslim will solicit for adulterers or adulteresses. But, in applying the law against this monstrous crime, due process must be followed without any discrimination. Justice is the hallmark of Islam.

    Let those who administer justice fear Allah.  Like many other Hadith fabricated and credited to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) for authenticity, the commonly quoted Hadith about stoning sounds very much fabricated because it contradicts logic and misrepresents the just personality of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

  • Bola Ige: 21 years ago

    Bola Ige: 21 years ago

    Twenty-one years ago on this day, Chief Ajibola Ige was murdered in his bedroom while serving as Attorney-General and Minister of Justice of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. His murderers are still at large, while some folks are busy dancing on his grave. It will take a hell of an effort to come to terms with this unpleasant surprise. A broken human nature!

    On 10th January 2002, Lagos State Government organized a Commendation Service for Chief Ige, to which I was graciously invited to represent Egbe Omo Yoruba North America. Today, I share my remarks on that day with readers, some of whom weren’t born at the time of Chief Ige’s death, or were too young to know much about him. Compared with our predicament 21 years later, it is a nightmarish experience to read again my remarks with its bold predictions. But here it is:   

    “Dear Uncle Bola: It is too much for those of us that your life of dreams, vision and ideals has impacted so positively to accept the fact that you are no more. No, for us, you are, and will continue to be. Your ideals cannot and will not be allowed to die unrealized. Your vision will not dim, as it will guide us toward the complete realization of your dreams in our lifetime. You will continue to be in our midst, you will therefore be addressed in the present. For the future that you struggled so selflessly to bring into being is currently pregnant in the present.

    ‘Your death, we hasten to predict, is the midwife that is destined to deliver that future. Then your martyrdom will have attained its utmost splendor and you will not have died in vain.  It is in the light of this prospect that I have chosen to address you in the present because I am convinced that those who killed your bodily frame have not succeeded in getting rid of your spirit, which I am now invoking to rise up and energize those of us in whom you invested so much of your time, ideas, intellect, hope and dreams. You were defiant even unto death. That is the legacy that we must cherish.

    “But Uncle Bola, please remember now, oku olomo ki i sun o. You are the Baba Ewe of Yorubaland, the Asiwaju of the Progressives, the icon of political intellectualism, the skilled master of oratory, the super model of political stewardship in the noblest tradition. No, you cannot afford to sleep. For you have to help us expose treachery in the garb of political leadership; you have to help us advance the discourse of democratic norms; a discourse that eschews violence and thuggery, a discourse that exudes courage in the face of tyranny and oppression. Yes, you have to help the generation that you so much loved and trusted to break the barriers of self-despise, self-loathing and self-distrust, which have been placed on its path. For this generation must now rise to fulfill your dreams and realize your ideals.

    “We remember your suffering in the cells of the prisons at Kirikiri, Ikoyi, Zaria, Agodi, and Makurdi. You faced all these humiliations and brutalization with uncommon courage. The forces that unleashed terror on you in those days did not like your courage, which humbled them. It is clear to me that the Abacha terror apparatus that survived his shameful demise has been able to infiltrate the camp of the progressives. There are wolves in the clothing of sheep. We need your newly acquired celestial power to expose them and annihilate them.

    “We urge you to recall your speech to us in Washington, DC and your June 12 Lecture in Atlanta. Your dream is our dream. You dreamed of a Federal Republic of Nigeria that “can still be the first Black super power in the world and a beacon of democracy and rule of law to the remaining fifty one countries in Africa.” You challenged us to use our intellectual resources to find the means of internationalizing Yoruba language, food and attire. These remain our dreams as well.

    Read Also: Bola Ige and the ghosts that haunt Nigeria

     “You challenged us to avoid all the dangers that one of your favorite statesmen, Robert F. Kennedy, vigorously warned against-the danger of futility-the belief (that) there is nothing one man or one woman can do against the enormous array of the world’s ills-against misery and ignorance, injustice and violence. Kennedy also warned against the danger of timidity. As he eloquently puts it: For every ten men who are willing to face the guns of an enemy there is only one willing to brave the disapproval of his fellow, the wrath of his society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change.” (Ige, Golden Quotes 2000:155).

    “Your bitterest enemy must concede that your moral courage never failed you. This is your challenge to us and we promise to meet it with a resolve that will make you proud even in your grave.

    “When you wrote “Murder Most Foul” on the occasion of the sadistic assassination of Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, the Moremi of our time, in 1996, you observed with an anguish that reveals itself even in black and white that “Alhaja Kudirat Abiola’s murder has shown how far down Nigeria has sunk in barbarity, barbarousness, insensitivity, cowardliness and anarchy”. You were right. But none of us could have ever imagined that it could happen in a civilian dispensation, which you courageously helped to usher in; talk less of it happening to you-not a government opponent, not a small fry, but the Chief Law Officer of the State. This is why the barbarousness of this cowardly act is incomparable to any.

    “It is also an irony of fate that a few days before your forced transition, you had read what amounted to your own tribute in your tribute to Pa Solanke Onasanya. For everything that you said of the old warrior apply most roundly to you. For yours “has been an exemplary commitment to public service, one that has sustained the zeal of a younger generation by being exceedingly constant, always daring and outspoken, without being obtrusive.” And as you said of Pa Onasanya, “if our society is lucky always to have the gift of such a man as you, our future as a people would always be full of hope and the assurance that our collective dreams will never fail (Tempo, Jan 3 2001).

    “And now as we bid you a good night, we are also fully conscious of your expectations of us and of the message you wish to send to all your elders who now have the misfortune of seeing you go before them; your colleagues, who must now continue the struggle without your intellectual guidance, and your aburo’s and omo’s, in whom you have always placed your hope for a brighter future.

    “Your loud and clear message is that we all must seize this moment and resolve to avenge your death-not with weapons of destruction, but with the armor of love and a stronger weapon of unity and progress. You are urging us passionately to be courageous in doing the right thing for our nation and our country. You are challenging us to close ranks in Yorubaland so that your martyrdom for the cause of Yoruba unity may yield positive results for our people and for our country. You are insisting that we must not leave here today without each of us renewing our commitment to unity and progress for the sake of our people. And if we do so, the hosts of heaven, which you have now joined, will strengthen us.”

    The above commitments were made on behalf of many of us. How have we fared? Is Uncle Bola pleased as he looks down on us? I don’t know about how you feel. But for me, it’s a shame where we find ourselves as a people.

    As I pause this page for a while, Merry Christmas to all.

  • Service or servitude?

    Service or servitude?

    Preamble

    My service to my people is part of the discipline to which I subject myself in order to free my soul from the bonds of the flesh…For me the path of salvation leads through the unceasing tribulation in the service of my fellow countrymen and humanity’. Mahatma Ghandi (1869-1948)

    The above quoted statement by the late Indian Statesman and sage, Mahatma Ghandi, epitomizes patriotism in all its ramifications. However, it requires life, hope and sincerity of purpose to be so dedicatedly determined. Perhaps, if Ghandi had been a Nigerian he would not have made such a statement or if it was necessary, he would have made it with reservation and that is if circumstances of life would ever permit him to make it at all. This indicates that an Indian of Ghandi’s status and intent might be an aberration in Nigerian environment. Detailed analysis on this may be left for another day.

    On May 22, 2013, the compulsory National service scheme in Nigeria generally known as National Youth Service Corp (NYSC) was 40 years old. It was another time for the federal government to roll out drums characteristically in celebration of the occasion with pump and pageantry. And the cost, as usual, was though not disclosed, must have run into billions of naira. From that jamboree, new millionaires or even billionaires must have emerged while bank accounts of some government officials must have swollen beyond imagination. Yet, we are fighting corruption tooth and nail.

    The Value of 40

    Forty years is universally acknowledged as the age of maturity. It is the age of mature reasoning when man is expected to handle matters with little supervision. It is the age at which the mistakes of the adolescent years and early adulthood are corrected. Incidentally it is the age at which every Prophet of Allah except Isa (Jesus) was commissioned to deliver Allah’s message to mankind. Any man at that age who can still not think before acting is called ‘a fool at 40’. Ditto a government or a nation.

    The establishment of the NYSC scheme by the military government under the leadership of General Yakubu Gowon was not fortuitous. With the promulgation of Decree 24 of 1973, the scheme was established on May 22 of the same year not only as a demonstration of the government’s genuine intention to fulfil the regime’s post civil war policy of ‘Reconstruction, Rehabilitation and Reconciliation’ (otherwise called three ‘R’) but also to accelerate the country’s socio-economic development as well as to foster national unity and integration.

    Purpose of NYSC

    The Scheme was charged with the responsibility of mobilizing, deploying and administering Nigerian Youths who must have graduated from tertiary institutions. Their duration of compulsory national service was scheduled to be one full year during which they are to be groomed for leadership. The objectives of the Scheme which compel the youth graduates to serve in States other than those of their origin are as follows:

    •To inculcate discipline in Nigerian youths by instilling in them a tradition of industry at work and of patriotic service to Nigeria in any situation they may find themselves

    •To raise the moral value of Nigerian youths by providing them with the opportunity to learn about higher ideals of national achievements as well as social and cultural improvement

    •To develop in the Nigerian youths, the attitudes of mind acquired through shared experience and suitable trading which will make them amenable to mobilization in the national interest

    •To enable Nigerian youths acquire the spirit of self reliance by encouraging them to develop skills for self employment

    •To contribute to the accelerated growth of the national economy

    •To develop common ties (among Nigeria youths) geared towards the promotion of National unity and integration

    •To remove prejudice, eliminate ignorance and confirm, at first hand, the many similarities among Nigerians of all ethnic groups and

    •To develop a sense of corporate existence and common destiny of Nigerian people

    The Cardinal Points

    There were four cardinal points upon which the scheme is based. These are Mobilization, Orientation/ Induction Course, Primary Assignment/Community Development Services (CDS) and Winding Up/Passing Out. Through these cardinal points the scheme mobilizes Nigerians below the age of 30 years who are graduates of Universities and Polytechnics (at a time, graduates of Colleges of Education were involved) for a one year national service in any part of the Country. Such qualified Nigerians are given an instrument of mobilization otherwise known as Call-Up letter which shows the state in which to serve and other particulars relating to the prospective Corps members.

    Also, a three weeks training programme primarily designed to prepare corps members for the one year national service is provided and the training takes place in venues called Orientation Camps located in all the States of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    The orientation course provides a platform for interaction among Nigerian Youths of diverse backgrounds and inclinations. Then, at the end of the Orientation exercise, corps members are posted to serve in both the public and private sectors. During this period, they provide skilful assistance in meeting the much needed man-power in the rural and urban Communities.

    The corps members are distributed to all the communities which now make up the 774 Local Government Areas in the 36 states of the Federation plus the Federal Capital Territory.

    In addition, a Community Development Scheme was designed to be carried out by the Corps members along with their Primary Assignments. The CDS was planned to bring development to the host Communities through the activities of the Corps members for whom a day was set aside in a week to carry out Community Development initiative based on community need and to provide a platform for sustainable development in active cooperation of host communities.

    Finally, a winding up/passing out programme was designed to draw the curtain over the service year and bring the corps members together once again to enable them share their experiences during the service year and deliberate on their individual future agenda. This is an opportunity for most corps members to exchange contact addresses and thereby establish permanent relationships. Thus, from such relationships, intertribal marriages and business partnerships emerged. The scheme remains one of the greatest achievements of General Yakubu Gowon’s regime as Nigeria’s military Head of State.

    Policy Formulation

    At the time of formulating the NYSC policy, Nigeria was still a country plagued by a myriad of problems generally known with underdeveloped countries such as poverty, mass illiteracy, acute shortage of high skilled manpower (coupled with most uneven distribution of the skilled people that are available), inadequate socio-economic infrastructural facilities, terrible housing shortage, lack of water and sewage facilities, roads, healthcare services, and effective communication system.

    Read Also: Firm celebrates four years of cleaning service

    Faced by these almost intractable problems, which were further compounded by the burden of reconstruction after the civil war, the government and people of Nigeria set for the country, fresh goals, and objectives aimed at establishing a new Nigeria from the debris of the old. The aim was to build a united, strong and self-reliant nation; a dynamic economy; as well as open opportunities for all citizens in a free and democratic society.

    It must be remembered that only six Universities existed in Nigeria by that time. These were the University of Nigeria, Nsukka; University of Ibadan,

    Ibadan; Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria; University of Lagos, Lagos, University of Ife, Ile Ife and University of Benin, Benin City. All these Universities, except University of Ibadan, (which was left behind by the colonialist as a national heritage) were forcefully acquired by the federal military government from their regional owners. And the inadequacy of needed manpower supplied by these Universities warranted the inclusion of graduates of Higher National Diploma (HND) from Polytechnics and later, the holders of National Certificate of Education (NCE). (The latter was however excluded with time following the establishment of more Universities and Polytechnics).

    These universities and other institutions of higher learning are normally expected to serve as training grounds for future leaders, besides being committed to the advancement of learning and knowledge as well as training of people for good citizenship. Perhaps the deviation experienced from this expectation led to the accusation levied by members of the public against the products of those institutions of being too elitist in their outlook and of not identifying with the plight of the common man by appreciating the predicament of the vast majority of the citizenry who live in the rural areas.

    Besides the reasonable policy of emulating compulsory national service from some civilized countries, the year 1973 symbolized the foundation of many great thoughts that would have made Nigeria a great African nation. That was the year in which Nigeria could be said to have gained economic independence by changing the national currency from pounds and Shillings inherited from the colonial masters to Naira and Kobo. It was also the year in which Nigeria’s oil boom began.

    Corps members were paid a monthly stipend of N100 which was only a little less than the new salary of a fresh University graduate at that time. That stipend was not to be increased until the 1980s when inflation began to force the corps members to agitate for more. And for most of the 1980s the stipend paid to corps members was not more than N200 per month. It was only in the 1990s that the stipend attracted some major reviews. And, besides the stipend paid by the federal government and private companies also paid some token to those deployed to them for service. That was in addition to accommodation provided. All these are no more as corps members are now deployed at their own expense. The idea is that they should bear all their expenses from the N19500 or thereabout paid to them monthly. As a matter of fact, the new policy just formulated and which will take effect in November 2014 is that every Youth Corps must now pay the sum of N4000 to the federal government for accepting to serve the same government. The newly imposed amount may be reviewed upwards in the near future. That is an evidence of patriotism in Nigeria.

    Irony of Life

    Ironically, some so-called former militants of the South-South who are virtually illiterates without any skills and are not engaged in any job are paid N60000 per month for doing nothing other than laying down their weapons of vandalism. The implication of this is that any youth who wants to share in the federal government’s largess can just carry arms and engage in vandalism and then be invited to negotiate with the government for a regular monthly salary in lieu of violence. Those who are being forced to serve their country for paltry monthly N19500 are University graduates. And those who are paid N60000 per month for doing nothing are stark illiterates not even qualified to aspire to future leadership. Yet after one year of compulsory service by those corps members, there is nothing for them in terms of job even while the ex-vandals will continue to enjoy their largess of N60000 per month. What an irony? What a country?

    Apart from preparing corps members for formal post graduation jobs and managerial administration in theory, NYSC is also supposed to serve as a major employer of labour by opening doors for many job seekers to be employed across different cadres. But is this the case now? There are hundreds of thousands of University graduates who have served their fatherland only to end up loitering around and riding motorbikes on commercial basis. Is this how to develop a nation? If University graduates are rendered so useless in a country where sheer mediocre are glorified what future is expected of such a country?

    The year 1973 in the history of Nigeria can be called the turnaround year. But how much of that turnaround was utilized for the benefit of the country is a different question.

    During the celebration of the 20th anniversary of NYSC scheme in 1993, the need to reassess and upgrade the scheme arose. Thus, Decree 51 was promulgated on June 16, 1993 to replace Decree 24 of 1973 with which the scheme was originally established. The aim of the new Decree was to look beyond the immediate present and think of the future leadership of the country for which the corps members were being groomed. This was done with a view to giving them the proper guidance and orientation relevant to the needs of the country. But now, 21 years after the new Decree, what is the result?

    Deep down in the hearts of the formulators of the NYSC policy the scheme was primarily to inculcate in Nigerian Youths the spirit of selfless service to the community, and an emphasis on oneness and brotherhood of all Nigerians, irrespective of cultural, social or religious backgrounds. The history of our country since independence has clearly indicated the need for unity amongst all our citizens. And, looking at the scheme retrospectively, it is evident that its real effect is vivid not only in the understanding of the cultural settings of certain tribes by corps members from other tribes but also in the settlements of some of those corps members in some parts of the country which, hitherto, could never have been in their dreams.

    Pertinent Questions

    Now, over 40 years after the commencement of this visionary scheme how much of the country’s objectives have been achieved? Does the scheme truly remain a national service that it was design to be or a servitude to a political clique called leaders? In its early days, NYSC was the pride not only of the serving corps members and undergraduates looking impatiently towards their turn to serve but also that of the nation. Does that still obtain today? Has corruption not derailed the original purpose of that laudable scheme? Are the genuine graduates of Universities and Polytechnics not being replaced by ghost graduates as characteristic of Nigerian system? Are graduates qualified for the service not being delayed for a year or two to enable corruption thrive by bringing in hoodlums and political thugs at the expense of the nation?

    Have factors like nepotism and tribalism not crept into the scheme today? Have stories of embezzlement and other financial scams not disorientated potential corps members and devastated the zeal in them to serve their nation? And what has become of hundreds of thousands who have served in the past many years? Are Nigerian graduates useful for Nigeria today as originally planned?

    Further Questions

    Is Nigeria really reaping the fruits of the NYSC scheme today? Should compulsory service to the nation be an end or a means to an end? And now that corps members are incessantly becoming sacrificial lambs either at the slaughter slabs of some barbaric elements in the north or in the dragnets of some brutal kidnappers in the East shouldn’t there be a review of the law guarding that scheme if only to safeguard humanity and civility? Should parents continue to lose their children at that level to barbarism and unwarranted brutality in the name of non-existing national unity? Some people sat down to plan the establishment of this scheme. But besides planning to use the scheme as an instrument of embezzling money what plan does the current government have for sustaining it and safeguarding the lives of the youths being compelled to serve the nation? 

    Conclusion

    These and many other questions are begging for urgent answers from the current government while some elements in the government are getting richer by the day. If the pleasant past produced the agonizing present to the benefit of a clique of misfits let no one assume that the agonizing present will produce any hopeful future. The days of life are never the same in other countries. They cannot be the same in Nigeria.

    ‘Allah never changes the situation of a people (or a nation) until those people have sincerely repented and refrained from their iniquities’. Q. 13:11

  • Apero and security

    Apero and security

    That Apero is fixated on security is an understatement. A committee of Egbe Omo Yoruba North America, Apero bounced into national consciousness when it sponsored a series of virtual summits that lasted nine weeks from June to August this year. There wasn’t one of those weekly summits where the threat and reality of insecurity did not come up for thorough thrashing. Even concerned participants once expressed displeasure when they wrongly perceived that security was not a priority of the organizers.

    The concern of participants at Apero summits and the obsession of Apero leadership with the state of security in our land should not come as a surprise. It shows, first, that Apero and its virtual summits participants didn’t drop from the sky. They are living beings with lived experiences not dissimilar to their kith and kin across the land.  Second, it is also a reflection of the importance that they attach to the security of lives and property, including, but not limited to their own.

    Yet, it is not unimportant to note that there used to be a time when we all took security for granted. Surely, there have always been petty thieves, even violent criminals. But compared with the state of insecurity that we all experience now, it does not stretch the truth to observe that the 1960s to early 1980s were close to paradise on earth.

    Those were times when we slept in open space in warm weather with apartment doors left wide open. We traveled in the night without confronting checkpoints or fearing for kidnappers or bandits. Even during the civil war, soldiers gladly escorted businessmen with large amounts of funds to their destination, without demanding for a share. Are we now a different species? Has our DNA somehow changed since those days? I think not. But there is no denying the fact that times have changed for worse in many respects, not least of which are the political and economic dimensions of life for many.

    In the 60s and even 70s, the nation took care of the wellbeing of citizens. Political leaders of that era governed with conscience. Even military leaders from Gowon to Obasanjo, aside from their assault on the federal system of government which they inherited, made great progress on social programs including education and health, as well as security. To be sure, we hardly gave them credit then. But looking back and witnessing the horror that pretends to be governance these days, we should probably ask for forgiveness.

    As some of our heroes past rest their souls in the bosom of their Lord, we must continually remind ourselves of their selfless contributions to national advancement. What was their secret weapon against insecurity forty to sixty years ago?

    In the 1960s, we had a federal constitution which granted each region its security apparatus, including regional police, akodas, and forest guards, among others. Barring political thuggery that reared its ugly head during elections, there was little to no security problem.

    But it wasn’t only security agents that ensured security. There was also a robust social program that included free primary education, technical and trade schools in addition to tertiary education. A developmental agenda that fostered economic growth ensured gainful youth employment which protected them from being hijacked by the devil. Primary health care was also taken seriously and people had the peace of mind needed for the pursuit of their private business.

    In the 1970s despite unitarism, the first military dictators also focused on education, economic development, civil service reforms, and social welfare. So, there was a continuity of a liberal agenda from the first republic. Obviously, in a climate of useful employment, youths cannot be recruited into cults, gangs, banditry, or terrorism.

    From the mid-1980s till now, however, new breed politicians came under the tutelage of carefree military generals with corrupt minds. The idea quickly and effectively gained traction that money can buy anything, including people’s conscience, and you can get away with political crimes of neglect, if you play the game well. All that matters is the self, its preservation and promotion. Whereas in the 60s, 70s, and early 80s, success in politics was not determined by wealth accumulation but by the effectiveness of policy in promoting development and welfare, since the mid-80s, politics has been turned upside down into the means to riches and wealth. This turn of events has two consequences both of which are inimical to progress and security.

    First, when wealth accumulation is the purpose of politics, corruption by way of embezzlement and siphoning of funds meant for developmental programs is inevitable. Therefore, when this is the norm, our current experience, from local to state and federal governments, is unavoidable. While it is unfair to generalize, it is also true that the few who are committed to selfless politics and are making the best of efforts to get things done are almost always going to be unpopular with the people who have misleadingly been led to believe that you must get rich in politics.

    Meanwhile, with dwindling national resources, what has to suffer cutback, in the mind of the selfish breed of politicians, are the programs that benefit the people, and not the perks that accrue to the politicians. So education, health, and social welfare become policy luxuries that public expenditure cannot accommodate while the private sector is encouraged to take over with limited, if any oversight.

    Secondly, with visible wealth accumulation by politicians and public servants who used to be role models for the youth, it is not unreasonable to expect that young ones will take after their “leaders” who set the pace for the “norm”. When, for obvious reasons, they find it challenging to get into the political arena, they turn to other tested sources of wealth, not excluding crime.

    Now, if we appropriate the wisdom of our elders, our current experience shouldn’t be a surprise. The children you don’t train will auction out the mansion you build in lieu of their training. (Omo ti a ko ko ni yoo gbe ile ti a ko ta). It is logical. They have to survive. But there’s another zinger in the wisdom of the elders. They counsel that if you would rather have your dinner without paying any attention to the hungry around you, then you must learn to lock your door tight. We have failed to take the moral of these sayings into cognizance in our approach to security.

    The country has neglected the youth across the land. They feel the heat of poverty and hunger. They are easy recruits for bandits and terrorists. What the selfish diner must do, namely lock his door tight, to avoid a violent invasion of his home by hungry folks, the nation has failed to do. Hence the spate of violence and insecurity in the land.

    The federal government, which has assumed monopoly over the security architecture of the country, hasn’t been up to the task of securing citizens against bandits, terrorists, and kidnappers. And, in an inexplicable way, it has also denied state governments the capacity to intervene effectively on behalf of their residents. It is bizarre!

    What’s to be done? As in every aspect of life in this obodo of ours since the 1990s, citizens have had to fend for themselves. Whereas in the beginning, government took responsibility for the security of citizens, that era was long gone. Security, which is the foremost function of government, the rationale for governments, has become the task of citizens themselves.

    This is why Apero has been focused on security in Yorubaland. The meeting held on Saturday, December 10 was a continuation of the initiative. It was an open forum which did not frown at the presence of non-Yoruba folks, some of whom participated without hiding their identity. It is just to demonstrate that Apero is not a secret cult. Among others, the summit reviewed recent developments along Lagos-Ibadan expressway and the drone sighting of terrorists in the forests around Ogere. The meeting called on Southwest Governors and traditional rulers to rise to the occasion and secure our people. Egbe Omo Yoruba and Apero will also play their part.