Category: Friday

  • Nnamdi Oji, judiciary and goal-line tech

    The umpire fall short: Most followers of football would be aware of that new device known as goal-line technology. It is not entirely new as it has been in use in tennis for some time. For readers who are not sports fans, this is simply a high-technology electronic device being introduced to help referees make more accurate decisions.

    Many sports, for instance, football and lawn tennis, depend on the ball crossing lines to determine a result. But no matter how thin a line is, there always arise tricky borderline situations. Let’s illustrate: a ball, be it football or tennis ball can fall spat on the line, it can fall on the line with more of it in front of the line and it can equally fall on the line with more of it at the back of the line.

    The ball may even be frantically cleared as it hangs above the line. But was the ball cleared from inside the net, whereupon it would have been a goal? Most times the referee is not sure; sometimes he is sure but like all humans, he sees an opportunity to make a biased or mischievous call. He may even be compromised so he makes capital of a confused situation.

    Forgive my long digressive introduction but the above analogy is most apt for a small legal issue that has been thrown up in the matter of a certain Citizen Nnamdi Oji. Here is a quick synopsis: Citizen Oji contested an election; his opponent rigged like crazy, openly mutilating the result sheets. Even the electoral umpire confirmed that the result was doctored.

    Citizen Oji gathered all the evidence, went to the tribunal, but his opponent manipulated both the lower tribunal and the appeal panel and affirmed his dubious result. Citizen Oji petitioned the Judicial Council. The council investigated his case, found merit in it, sanctioned the errant justices and bade Citizen Oji goodbye.

    But Citizen Oji insists on justice. The electoral system was breached, his mandate was stolen, justice was miscarried and in all of this, the judiciary would not redeem itself by affording him remedy through a review of his case. Even though the matter had exhausted its course having reached the apex court of jurisdiction, Citizen Oji insists on a review, on remedy, on restitution and on justice. Perhaps Nigeria’s judiciary needs goal-line technology for cases like this?

    A pathetic odyssey: Oji was the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) candidate for Arochukwu/Ohafia Federal Constituency election into the House of Representatives election on March 28, 2015.

    Now Oji will not stop weeping since after the election. His is a pathetic story about a chaotic electoral process, a rotten judiciary and a society where justice is simply sold, bought and almost, always miscarried. Though his struggle for justice has gone as high up as the National Judicial Council (NJC) resulting in just punishment for some of the justices, he still insists on an independent review of his case as the only remedy for his pains. The review, he insists, would also serve as precedential milestone for both electoral processes and election petition matters.

     

     

    Igbo leaders and ‘stomach’ politics

    It’s a mad rush; a scramble indeed! Each new day another set of Igbo weasels dive into the APC gravy train as if the world is coming to an end. As one wrote, it was Senator Andy Uba who announced his ‘escape’ from PDP. Prominent among the early birds were Chief Jim Nwobodo, Chief Orji Uzor Kalu, Senator Ken Nnamani and even businessman, Emeka Offor.

    Was it not these men who led almost the entire Igbo nation to commit political ‘suicide’ by supporting PDP against APC? Regardless that APC is currently not performing to expectations, they scurry back to their excrement in search of worms (positions and contracts). People devoid of any iota of principle, they have left Ndigbo in the cold.

    But Ndigbo are not fooled because in due time, a stuffed stomach will only give off much belching…

  • Transformational leadership in Lagos State

    Transformational leadership in Lagos State

    I start this piece with a confession. I have been mentally tortured in the last 72 hours over the turn taken by the greatest democracy on earth, the United States of America. I have watched partisanship go awry and political leaders wallowing in the mud of hateful nationalism.

    The final straw for me was President Trump’s announcement of a new Supreme Court nominee to fill a vacancy that occurred 11 months ago, when President Obama still had a`year to the end of his term. Confirmation of Obama’s nominee was, however, blocked for that length of time by the Republicans in Senate because they wanted a new president to make the nomination.

    Now that Trump has nominated a conservative, happy Republicans have called on Senate Democrats not to block the nomination. I wrestled with this development and was on the verge of mental breakdown. Is this what liberal democracy has come to? I thought of pouring my mind out on this matter in this column. But I eventually decided against starting a new month on such a depressing matter.

    Fortunately, I woke up on Wednesday morning and saw a more heart-warming story about the workings of democracy even in our own corner of the world. Yes, not too long ago, we were a pariah to the world of liberal democracy even though the leadership of that world hardly lifted a finger to help us out. Thankfully, while we still have issues to deal with, especially at the centre, we should beat our chests regarding the pockets of progress which give us reason to keep hope alive.

    I am especially elated about the story of Lagos State and the commitment of its leadership to development and human investment. It is what transformational leadership is about.

    In the last dispensation, we heard a lot about transformational leadership, especially at the federal level. Indeed, we were inundated with a well-orchestrated campaign of transformation agenda. We know now how it all ended in the dustbin of history.

    However, what the centre has not been able to achieve in 17 years of democratic governance, Lagos State has shown how, even in a democracy (as opposed to military dictatorship), transformational leadership at the helm of a people-centred administration can energise and inspire citizens. In the process, the people have a renewed hope in the future and an optimistic sense of what they can accomplish. In short, the people buy into leadership vision and both leadership and people can launch a new era of development. It is a win-win situation.

    The story that motivated this piece appears under the title “Ambode’s Massive Infrastructural Plan” in ThisDay edition of Wednesday, February 1, 2017. Apart from the content of the governor’s message at the meeting, which by itself was uplifting, what impressed me is that it was in the context of the sixth Town Hall meeting that the governor has held with the people on a quarterly basis, and the first in the new year.

    In practice, democracy thrives when the people, as the subject and object of governance, are not abandoned to their fate after elections, but are constantly coopted into government activities through regular interactive sessions. That Governor Ambode has institutionalised such meetings is a credit to his democratic credentials.

    The form is important. But the substance is even more so. What have been the concrete achievements of the administration of Governor Ambode in the last 20 months since he was sworn in to lead the Centre of Excellence?

    I recall the confusion and anxiety that characterised his first couple of months in office. There was traffic gridlock. There was concern for security of lives and property with the increasing menace of traffic robbers and kidnappers. And there was water shortage problem.

    Rather than panic at the time, however, I simply went down memory lane. I recalled Governor Ambode’s challenges were not dissimilar to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s in the first few months of his administration in 1999. Then Asiwaju received an earful from critics who were nostalgic about the administration of Military Governor Marwa. It was like the Israelites attacking Moses who liberated them from the Egyptian oppression! Asiwaju’s assurance that he had a plan for a lasting solution to the challenges did not persuade the critics. But when the turn-around kicked in, they were also the first to applaud. That has also been the experience of Ambode.

    Transformational leadership is thoughtful leadership. It is not a fire-fighter approach to governance. It develops a solid plan to tackle the root cause of problems such that, once applied, the problem does not have a chance of recurring. The continuity of progressive leadership in Lagos State for 17 years has also been a bonus. The governor did not have to reinvent the wheel of planning as he wisely decided to execute and further the achievement of the 2012-2025 development plan.

    It is under the auspices of this plan that Ambode has made enormous progress in the transformation of the state. Think of the impact of the initiative for the construction of 114 roads across the 57 local governments and local council development areas. At the Town Hall meeting, he announced an additional 181 roads projects across the state. Meanwhile, generously supplied street lights have dramatically transformed night life in Lagos.

    In December 2016, Governor Ambode launched the LAKE rice project, a collaboration between Lagos State and Kebbi State, which has brought down considerably the cost of rice in the state, and probably across the Southwest. This is another example of transformational leadership. While I find this highly commendable, and without any prejudice against Kebbi State, I do hope that there will be similar collaborations in future between Lagos and land-rich states in the Southwest. How about LAYO (be joyful) rice?

    One of the campaign promises of Governor Ambode was the creation of an Employment Trust Fund to boost job creation for the benefit of Lagosians. This is an important component of human investment without which there can be no economic or social transformation. The governor delivered on this promise at the inauguration of the Fund in March 2016, with an on-the-spot instruction to the Commissioner for Finance to disburse the yearly payment of N6.25 billion to the Fund. With government lifting the heavy side of the load, it sent a powerful message to the private sector to discharge its social responsibilities.

    Transformational leadership is a function of a vision and a determination to realise it despite the odds. To realise their vision, transformational leaders rely on the best hands to which they give the necessary support to succeed. That has been the story of Lagos State in the Fourth Republic. Governors have not been overly bogged down by political or partisan considerations. Since Asiwaju Tinubu himself had led in this area, his successors enjoyed the freedom to hire and fire their associates without been imposed upon. The state has been the beneficiary.

    Governor Ambode’s vision, as enunciated in his inaugural address on May 29, 2015, afforded us an understanding of his priorities. “No matter your age, sex, tribe or any other status, as long as you reside in Lagos, we will make Lagos work for you.”  In addition, he declared, “I will make your taxes work for you.” This was his full-throated promise.

    It was a simple message that resonated with citizens of the state. And now that they are witnessing the systematic fulfilment of the promise, their sense of citizen obligation to the state is rekindled. Citizen engagement and mobilisation is not activated in a vacuum. Government must lead the charge for citizens to follow. Transformation must begin with leaders.

    Lagos State is a microcosm of Nigeria. Every ethnic nationality is represented in the fabric of the state. The amazing story of Lagos is that while there have been ethnic skirmishes, especially at the beginning of this republic, no group has chosen to check out. This is because everyone is hopeful of making it in Lagos.

    With transformational leadership and good policies, Nigeria can also reassure all citizens that they can make it.

     

    • Follow me on twitter: @segungbadeg2002
  • Good morning, Northern leaders

    What an epochal day it was last Monday when the first ever joint meeting of  the Northern elite was held under the auspices of the Northern Governors’ Forum; Northern Traditional Rulers Council; Arewa Consultative Forum and Northern Elders forum, among others. The Sultan of Sokoto, MuhammedSa’ad Abubakar III, must be commended not only for spearheading this landmark gathering, but for his frank, brutal words.

    This column had also written so much about the issues at stake in the North in the last five years. It will suffice to say ‘Good morning’ to this august gathering and reproduce below, an article written on July 31, 2015 under the title:#harsh-truths-to-northern-elite. Some points here may be helpful to the resolution drafting committee:

    About four years ago, (precisely July 29, 2011) I had written in this column that then fledgling Boko Haram was the shame of the Borno elite. Expectedly, I was vilified to no end. But little did we (yours truly, his readers and drillers alike) know that what was happening then was mere child’s play. Between 2011 and now, so much innocent blood has drenched the Nigerian soil to the point that atonement may be impossible. But the point remains now as then, that the extreme criminality that the terror of Boko Haram has become, is the shame of the elite of the North. This point must be made without equivocation.

    Three recent issues have warranted a reiteration of this view which is even more valid today. First is the ‘face-off’ between Governor Nasir el Rufai of Kaduna State and the beggars of Kaduna. The second is the new-wave sacrificial offering of nubile little girls in an endless festival of suicide bombings and thirdly, the recent $2.1 billion World Bank loan for the reconstruction of the Northeast of Nigeria.

    An elite in retreat The point today as I made it then is that from the period of the violent outbreak of the Boko Haram (BH) sect up to this moment, the elite of the North have failed woefully to put up a well-reasoned and concerted response to deal with the evil.  As the sect callously made an ocean of blood especially in the Northeast, the elite of the North, (religious, intellectual, political and business) even more callously favoured a tacit accommodation of the scourge for the first few years.

    Where was the funding for BH coming from? Where was BH drawing its intellectual and logistical resources? Who purchased the arms, ammunition, rocket launchers and the dozens of armoured carriers the BH deployed to overrun many Nigerian towns at a time? For a region that boasts of about half a dozen former heads of state; current and former governors; respected traditional rulers; hundreds of well-trained retired military officers and a good number of men of means in the land, not one committee has been set up to date to as much as give a thought to the BH tragedy.

    An initial acquiescence grew into fear and cowering. Hardly anyone was known to have stood up boldly to the gang in defiant condemnation. It was convenient for many leaders of the North to hide behind the North-South politics of the Goodluck Jonathan era. Some simply found comfort in their corners and said to themselves: “since he chose to ‘usurp’ power, let him stew in the juice of insurgency”. It did not matter that hundreds of their compatriots were daily wasted in the heedless blood fest.

     

    BH as brainchild of the northern elite The point must also be made clearly that BH is the creation of some leaders of the North. While it may be argued that it may be the unforeseen outcome of poor quality leadership and ineptitude in high offices, it is elite failure albeit. Of course the feudal system of the North continues to take its vicious toll, fuelled by an uncontrolled and exponential population growth. Further, while it was the trado-religious lords who held sway in the days of yore, today, the political class has taken over with even more deadly intuition. As we know, in feudalism, there are only kings and serfs; or the ruling class and the hoi-polloi; hardly any middle ground.

    In the mid-80s while one was on National Youth Service in Sokoto, it was a culture shock then to witness a horde of scruffy, unclad children invade the camp refuse dump each day foraging for food. That scene has lingered most graphically in one’s psyche more than 30 years after. We must admit that it is anunconscionable and indeed wicked elite that would look on as children roam the streets with begging bowls; feed straight from dunghills or even lead cattle from Maiduguri to Majidun!

    Between medieval and modern states The elite of the North must be told to make those hard choices between living in ancient times as it still subsists largely in the North now or building a modern country as we have in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, UAE and the rest of the Muslim world.

    This is where El Rufai’s feud with the beggars of Kaduna comes of note. He, in concert with his colleagues of the 19 states of the North must immediately abolish the pernicious almajiri culture (if indeed it can be regarded as culture). It must be the highest act of irresponsibility for a man and woman to sire children and set them loose into the world with begging bowls in hand. The wickedness of marrying off little young girls in the name of tradition MUST also stop. If you brought a child into the world, you must take some responsibility to rear him or her. This must be the essence of our humanity and the crux of a legislation being proposed here.

    El Rufai and his colleagues must enact – and if possible – a pan northern Nigeria law to abolish almajiri culture and under-age marriage tradition immediately. This singular legislation will greatly stem the social dysfunction in the North. We must begin to deliberately uphold and emphasisefamily values, child rearing and early education. Why has the local government system which ought to lift our rural population become near extinct in Nigeria?

    In the same manner, we must begin a phased abolition of nomadic life. It is ignorance that has pushed the Myetti Allah Cattle Breeders to seek to metamorphose into an alternate ‘army’ instead of a regional economic construct. Where in today’s world, dear reader, do people still lead cattle over thousands of kilometres just to make basic living? Not in many sensible places any more. The result is that they may have slaughtered more compatriots than cattle in the last five years mainly in a bid to fend off rustlers and defend against farmland owners as they take livestock through long trails.

    Again, El Rufai and his brother governors of the North must begin a concerted and expedited rethink of the milk, beef and hide economic value chains. Think for a moment that Nigeria imports almost 80 percent of milk consumed by her 170 population. Animal protein production in Nigeria is still an ad-hoc business while animal wool and processed leather are massively imported. This is multi-billion naira business.

    State governments can catalyse the livestock value chain and unleash the inherently huge economic potentials of milk, beef, leather and wool production. Countries like Argentina, Brazil and Australia would make good benchmarks. Let us develop ranches in the vast swathes of Borno, Bauchi, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Kaduna and even Niger. We could start with pilot schemes. Pastures are nurtured these days and many species of grass mature in weeks. Why arewe still trapped in pre-medieval nomadism?

    Again, a savage elite The North, let it be said plainly, has some of the richest people in the world. One could count at least two dozen individuals richer than their states: TY Danjuma, the Dangotes, the Dantatas, the Mai Deribes, the Babangidas, the Yar’Aduas, the Indimis, Sani Bello, Rilwan Lukman, Abdulsalami Abubakar, Atiku Abubakar, Ado Bayero and Abdulsamad Rabiu, to name a few. This is not discounting the numerous new-rich politicos; all the former governors for instance.

    The World Bank has granted a loan of $2.1 billion to revamp the Northeast. This class of northern elite in concert, probably has more net-worth than the World Bank, they can raise $21.1 billion for the same purpose. They must consciously resolve to help lift the North from its present morass of despair and sub-humanity. They can start a sustained change campaign on family values for instance. They can build early learning centres and primary schools in areas too remote for government to reach. There are a thousand and one ways they can give back to this earth that has proved very clement to them.

     When the nose cry, the eye cries too The people of the South of Nigeria may choose to be aloof and comfortable about the backwardness of the North, but that would be basking in blissful ignorance. The Federal Government has spent trillions of naira in the last five years battling BH. That is cool cash that would have been spread round the country on development projects. The World Bank loan mentioned above for the reconstruction of the Northeast will be paid back by you and I, for instance.

    But we need more than loans; we need elite change of attitude and resolve.

  • Islam’s future in America

    Prologue

    Looking at Islam globally today vis-a-vis the multifarious problems being faced by its adherents, there is tendency that some ignorant and parochial people will think vaingloriously that the end has come the religion. This tendency is particularly manifest in Nigeria where religion is a big business and, like a vulture waiting to descend on the carcass of a prey, its merchants will do anything, no matter how devilish, to profit from it.

    Because of their untame-able avarice based on ignorance and parochialism, such merchants cannot understand that when a gargantuan  institution like Islam is about to take an unprecedented leap to further a progressive civilization, it must undergo a trying moment. Such a moment is an indication that an arrogant power somewhere is about to fall.

    Those who are lettered enough to be familiar with world history will recall that a similar scenario occurred to the old Roman Empire as it occurred to the ancient Greek Empire. At least, if the once so-called Great British Empire was not eclipsed at a stage, America would not have emerged as a foremost modern day world power. More will said about this, in this column, in the near future.

     

     Preamble

    Instinct is the main cursor of vision. It is the indicator of where today’s ship will anchor tomorrow. A man without instinct can be likened to a blind bull struggling to pass through the hole of a needle. An example is now being exhibited in the United States. Without instinct there can be neither projection nor premonition. All visionary prophecies are based on instinct.

    It was only by divine instinct that Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was able to prophesy the signs of the last days when he said: “One of the signs of the last days is for the sun to rise in the West and set in the East….” This prophecy is pregnant with meanings. Which sun was the Prophet talking about? Was it the physical or the hypothetical? Only a few people of other religions in history were able to comprehend that prophecy as much as the celebrated (Christian) Irish playwright, George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950).

     

    George Bernard Shaw’s prediction

    Based on his understanding of the contents of that Prophecy, Bernard Shaw decided to study Islam through deep researches. And consequently, he concluded as follows:

    “The Medieval Ecclesiastics, either through ignorance or bigotry, painted Mohammedanism (Islam) in the darkest colours. In fact, they were trained both to hate the man (Muhammad) and his religion. To them he was anti-Christ… I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing face of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him, the wonderful man, and in my opinion, far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the saviour of humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness”.

    “I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today…”

     

    Analysis

    America was just emerging as a champion of the modern world when Bernard Shaw made his famous prediction quoted above. Western civilization was then restricted to Europe and Shaw had taken any emerging civilization from America as an extension of that of Europe. He had thought that whatever would be acceptable to Europe ought to be automatically acceptable to the emerging power of the New World, the former being an offshoot of the latter. He was right.

    Although, Islam had reached America long before Christopher Columbus arrived in what was then perceived as a New World, very little was known about the Muslims in that country until 1886 when one Moorish immigrant, Noble Drew Ali, of North Carolina started to propagate Islamic faith to the black masses in the New World. However, that Noble D. Ali’s jihad became prominent with the growth of media influence in the United States did not necessarily make him the first American Muslim preacher.

     

    A valid question

    Today, with a Muslim population of almost 10 million and over 3186 Mosques, who says Bernard Shaw’s prediction of the early 20th century has not become a reality? If there is still any country in the world where Islam is not growing that country must be very backward.  Today, the geometric growth of Muslim population in the US has confirmed Islam as an official religion in America. Today, there are about 2000 Muslim associations and over 400,000 businesses as well as about 310 regular publications under the firm control of American Muslims. These are not only providing jobs for the residents, they are also enhancing America’s social security.

     

    The real root of Islam in America

    However, the real practical root of Islam in the US is actually traceable to 1790 when the South Carolina legislative body granted special social status to a community of Moroccans, which gave that community the freedom to practise its religion. And in 1797, President John Adams signed a policy declaring that United States had no “character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity of Musulmen (Muslims)”.

     

    President Benjamin Franklin’s position

    Then, in his autobiography, published in 1791, President Benjamin Franklin stated that he “did not disapprove” of a meeting place in Pennsylvania designed to accommodate preachers of all religions and concluded that: “even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach ‘Mohammedanism’ (Islam) to us, he would find a pulpit at his service”.

     

    President Thomas Jefferson’s stand

    Thomas Jefferson on his own defended religious freedom in America including those of Muslims and he explicitly mentioned Muslims when writing about the movement for religious freedom in Virginia. And in his autobiography also, Jefferson wrote: “When the Virginia bill for establishing religious freedom which was finally passed,… a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word ‘Jesus Christ,’ so that it should read ‘a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion.’ The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend within the mantle of its protection the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometans (Muhammadans), the Hindus and the infidels of every denomination.” Thus, as a confirmation of that policy, President Jefferson also joined the Tunisian Ambassador for an Iftar (Ramadan fast breaking) in 1809.

     

    Despite propaganda

    Despite over 60,000 publications by the Western Orientalists between 1800 and 1950 disparaging that divine religion and denigrating the personality of prophet Muhammad (SAW), Islam continued to wax stronger even as it displays dynamic tendencies on a regular basis. Today, with a global population of about 1.7 billion adherents in the world and with certain mundane ideologies and philosophies crumbling like a pack of cards, Islam has remained an unstoppable religion, the implacable hostility of the West to it notwithstanding.

     

    African American Islam

    The African American involvement in the propagation of a religion of immigrants though began in 1960s/70s in the American society, Islam had actually made its way into America in the sixteenth century when Muslims were brought as slaves from Africa but were forced to convert to Christianity. These Muslims were followed by a new wave of immigrants who came in the late nineteenth century as labourers from the Middle Eastern countries such as Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria.

    In the second half of the twentieth century, a large number of Muslims came from virtually every country of the Middle East, South Asia, and Southeast Asia who were more sophisticated than their predecessors in Islamic understanding. As those immigrants settled in large cities and small towns, they built mosques, Islamic cultural centres, and schools. Today, indigenous American Muslims, who have grown in number to well over a million, have succeeded in transforming Islam into an American religion.

     

    A Track Master

    In 1888, the American Ambassador in Philippines, Alexander Russell Webb, surprisingly became a track master by embracing Islam and becoming the first prominent Anglo-American Muslim in history. Thus, given his stats, he became the only person that represented Islam from the US at the first Parliament for the World’s Religions in 1893.

     

    New York Times

    In an article once published in the New York Times and entitled: ‘Muslim Schools in the U.S.: A Voice for Identity’, one Susan Sachs wrote on the rising demands for Islamic schools in the U.S. saying that “across the country, Islamic schools…that offer religion and Arabic classes…are expanding and flourishing, with many becoming oversubscribed so quickly that principals are scrambling for money to build more. Thus, the surge in the number of Islamic schools may be attributed to the success and determination of a Muslim community that strives “to define itself as a cohesive religious minority in the secular American society”.

     

    The World Street Journal

    Before then, an article had appeared in ‘The World Street Journal’ on August 7, 1987, which reported thus: “At a time when Marxism is so debilitated and is being shored up by capitalism; when Christianity lacks much of the missionary fire that once drove it; when Maoism is all but entombed with its founder and when democracy sounds only a muted appeal to much of the world, Islamic fundamentalism stands out as the movement on the march”.

    By and large today, not only is Islam formally recognized as the second religion after Christianity in the US, it has also become a tradition for the President and his cabinet to host Muslim leaders in that country to Iftar during the month of Ramadan.

    Today, with technology virtually reaching its climax, and backed up by over 60% of the world’s oil reserve in the Islamic world, the rising of the sun from the West as prophesied by Prophet Muhammad (SAW) is becoming undeniably vivid.

    Were George Bernard Shaw alive today he would have nodded delightedly to that fact.

     

    Conclusion

    Given the above historical account, it is unimaginable that a 21st century American President like Donald Trump, who also has personal businesses in many other countries of the world, will want to rubbish his ancestors by destroying the solid foundation which those ancestors had laid for America’s greatness. But, if, on the other hand, if he goes ahead to play a bull in the china shop it will still not be strange. Not every child who bears a father’s name can be truly legitimate.

    Through an erratic policy signed into law or a sadistic ‘Executive Order’, anything can be done to the lives of the Muslims in America but nothing can be negatively done to Islam as a religion. For the benefit of doubt, Islam is like the sun in its full regalia, any blind person who claims not to recognise its presence is only playing a fool. With or without recognition, the sun will always dwell majestically in the orbit. Today is today. Tomorrow is tomorrow. None can take the place of the other. That is a food for thought.

  • Between individualism and communitarianism

    Between individualism and communitarianism

    Congratulations! I saw the book.” Opalaba announced his New Year entrance into my world even before his usual boisterous “Happy New Year” greeting.

    “Happy New Year! Old Chum”, I replied. “But what book, if I may ask?”

    “It’s the beginning of a new year, and please don’t let us start it with old dirty games” Opalaba answered in his familiar baritone voice.

    “You know the book. It is in your honour. I saw it with my own korokoro eyes. I was even allowed to browse through. It says boldly on the cover: Exploring the Ethics of Individualism and Communitarianism: Multidisciplinary Essays in Honour of Professor Segun Gbadegesin. Of course, I was not invited to contribute and that’s alright. After all, I do not pretend to be an egg-head. But I am your friend of 60 years. And that must count for something.”

    Opalaba is right about our friendship, which has survived many trials and tribulations. But I had to confess to him truthfully that I had nothing to do with the book. And this did not help matters.

    “What do you mean you have nothing to do with the book? It is in your honour! Are you telling me that the authors did not alert you about their plan? Are the contributors not your friends and former students?” I can see that my friend was now agitated.

    “Alright, calm down, Omoloju Olofin” I teased him with his praise-name.

    “The book was conceived and edited by my old students from two continents. They collaborated with my former and current colleagues and friends across the continents. It was all their effort and not mine. That is why I can neither claim any credit for it nor feel comfortable being congratulated about it. But I feel proud about the outcome of their efforts for some reasons.

    “First, the three editors, Enoch Olujide Gbadegesin, Yunusa Kehinde Salami and Kola Abimbola, have made enviable progress in their intellectual journeys since the late 1980 when I had anything to do with their education. They have all done well for themselves and I cannot be more proud of their individual achievements.

    “Second, the work that they did on this book is an undeniable testimony to their skills and talents as scholars. While still expecting formal reviews of the book, the informal ones coming from those who have seen and read it such as your good self, have been encouraging. The editors have a lot to do with this and I cannot therefore hide my own feeling of satisfaction and gratitude to them.

    “Third, the editors cannot have accomplished the feat without the cooperation of the contributors that they invited to be a part of the project. These are first-rate scholars who I have worked with in various capacities and who have collaborated with me on scholarly projects and know my academic interests. It was not therefore difficult for them to agree with the editors on the topic of individualism and communitarianism, my life-interest in scholarship and research.”

    Opalaba was willing to accept my Mea Culpa. However, he was not pleased about not being involved.

    “And that is precisely why I am peeved that no one shared with me anything about the project prior to its completion”, he complained. “Even though I am not in the league of your first-rate scholar colleagues, I know at least one or two things about your focus on the dynamics of individualism and community and the necessary trade-offs between them in a progressive society.

    “On the one hand, the community is the anchor of individual progress and advancement. By which is meant that without the community, the individual is like an atom in the void. None of us can claim complete independence from community influence and impact. This was the meaning of former President Obama’s 2012 campaign slogan “You did not build it” with which he taunted his opponent’s individualistic posture. Obama’s point was that even the most successful entrepreneur cannot claim to do everything alone. The community made his or her success possible by its various tangible and intangible social investments in the life of individuals.

    “On the other hand, individuals make up the community, and it is their various contributions to its life that make the community thrive. Benthamites are right to the extent that the idea of a community without individuals that comprise it is a fiction.

    “This is where the dynamic of individualism and community plays itself out, and where we have to get right the ethics of the interaction between the two.

    “First, we must be mindful of the extreme positions and try not to be attracted to them. On the part of individualism, there is a temptation to see the individual as separate from the community and to argue for the promotion of its interest without recourse to its impact on the community. This is the spirit of crass egoism too much of which has rendered comatose community advancement across the globe. Our own share of the grief is unquantifiable. It is the spirit that drives individuals to corruptly enrich themselves at the expense of the community. It is what Yoruba sages decry as “imotara eni nikan, (selfishness).

    “On the part of communitarianism, there is the extreme tendency to see the individual as an expendable entity based on the notion of a metaphysical and spiritual predominance of the whole over its parts. It is the spirit that leads to the unjustified and counterproductive tendency to abrogate individual rights by appeal to the needs of the community even when it is only powerful individuals that benefit. This is the recourse of dictators trying to legitimise their usurpation of the will of the people.

    “Second, then, getting right the interaction between the two requires us to understand the basis of the relationship in the first place. For it is derived from the sensitivity of the individual to the role of the community in his or her life. It is my coming to the realisation of what my community meant to me growing up that fires up my sense of giving back in my adult life. My recognition of the impact of community love and sacrifice urges me to give back love and make sacrifice in return. To paraphrase Jesus the Christ: No one forced me to make the sacrifice; I voluntarily made it because I know the value of the community.

    “This is the African approach. I think it is the understanding of every individual-in-community in which the spirit and culture of extreme capitalism has not taken hold of individual psyche. It is what drives the average rural dwellers across the world to see themselves as their neighbour’s keepers. It is behind philanthropic giving by successful entrepreneurs from Bill and Melinda Gates to Aliko Dangote”.

    Opalaba’s perfect summary of my position on the matter of the relationship between individual community interests was quite impressive. And I told him so.

    “To the contributors, I owe a debt of gratitude for the honour. Dr. Wayne A. I. Frederick is the President of Howard University, Washington, DC. I know how busy his schedule is. But he enthusiastically wrote a beautiful foreword that he only can craft. A surgeon by profession, Dr. Frederick is a proud triple alumnus of Howard.

    “Dr. Dana A. Williams, chair of the Department of English at Howard University, is my sister and dear friend, who has given all to the Howard experience for students. Between Freshman Seminar and General Education reforms, Dana has been a great inspiration to me. Her lead paper in the volume is a reflection on her humility and communitarian spirit.

    “The contributions of Harvey Sindima, Tunde Lawuyi, Jide Gbadegesin, Segun Ige, Yolonda Wilson, Lawrence Bamikole, Charles Verharen, Gbenga Fasiku, Kola Abimbola, Simeon Ilesanmi, Bimbo Adesoji, Saheed Amusa, Yunusa Salami and J. O. Famakinwa to the 16 chapters of the book are great examples of first-rate scholarship.”

    Opalaba, my unchangeable friend, whimpered: “All well and good. But where is my copy of a book in your honour!”

    To him I responded: “In the spirit of community, go to Amazon.com!”

    Needless to add, I hung up before he exploded.

  • An expedition around ‘Biafra’

    Good morning agbero: I got some Biafra lessons or shall I term it Biafra treatment at a jammed bus terminal in Lagos last year. It was in the heat of the season between Christmas and early New Year. One was caught up in the usual bedlam that characterises the feisty period especially at bus parks. The family was going on home ahead, and to get them on a booked bus at the park was one helluva struggle.

    Fares had risen by between 100 and 120 percent (from about N5500 to between N8500 and 12000), depending on transport company. But service quality, if there were any, had dropped drastically as most transport firms were obviously overwhelmed by the throng of passengers.

    These companies with hundreds of bus fleet do not seem to understand that they need to employ well-trained managers and workers to run the business. Many still depend on or prefer drop outs and touts (agberos) to run what is a cash-churner. Poor scheduling, lax timing and lackadaisical attitude often mar what would have been the best quick turnover service business in Nigeria today.

    So in place of efficient and fluid movement of commuters and their luggage, what we have at most bus parks today is endless melee; bickering among frustrated passengers and listless workers. Having missed one’s scheduled departure by over two hours at the park; raw-nerved and testy, one got drawn into one of those ‘Biafra’ arguments that have become rampant everywhere one turned today.

    Biafra banters: “If we had our Biafra, there won’t be this kind of ‘mass return’ in the first place as most of us would be at home,” an able young man quipped near me. He could have been a passenger or a denizen of the park. He seemed dead serious and sure about his assertion and I, distraught and now unguarded, dove into the fray right after him.

    “You young people will not let us hear word about this your Biafra… were you there during the war; where is the boundary of Biafra; do you think you can survive in Biafra? Do you know the meaning of Biafra?”

    I had let out these salvos of questions before it occurred to me that I had goofed. There was a moment of silence as I became the object of attention of the motley crowd waiting to board. The mild morning harmattan wind filled the void.

    “Oga, if you say this kind of thing in Onitsha or Aba boys go carry you o!.” the quiet chill in the young man’s voice superseded the morning cold; the message was not lost on me and everyone around. I had already exited the arena mentally as a few other young men rushed in admonishing ‘Oga’ further as respectfully as they could manage. At the bottom of their argument is: we will eventually get Biafra peacefully or otherwise. Those who are bound to perish would perish anyway and the remnant would inherit Biafra. But more noteworthy, ‘traitors’ beware!

    Donald Trump is a ‘Biafran’! The Biafra fever is catching on almost all over Igboland albeit among the teeming underclass population. And the most moving, if ribald revelation one picked is that the air is thick with dangerous propaganda and mischief. An uncle who had heard me try to redirect some youths called me aside and asked declaratively: have you heard that Donald Trump has promised to recognise Biafra?

    I laughed unrestrainedly, loud and loose. “And you believed that?” I asked still laughing. “Well I don’t know for you people again,” he answered with resignation tinged with pain in his voice. I must have punctured his balloon.

    The intensity of the Biafra fervour and Nnamdi Kanu’s near deification today is a pointer to how much difference 20 months can make in the life of any people. Looking back over these months, it could be said that President Muhammadu Buhari has fed the Biafra monster so well he could almost be accused of being a member!

    For instance, if Mr. President had determined to reciprocate with only 3% federal largesse for the supposedly 3% votes from Igboland, he needed not have made a global proclamation of that point. No man announces the disownment of a son who still lives under his roof. It is this ill-humour that may have governed the president’s abominably skewed security team and overall personnel.

    It is a team that gives him no benefit of a balanced advice; and indeed, would kowtow to his idea to lay siege to a territory considered hostile to his government. Thus military ‘operations’ (e.g. Python Dance) were heedlessly unleashed where mere improved policing was needed.

    Fashola magic? Notwithstanding, in recent memory, the road to Biafra land may be said to have been the smoothest this last festival. From Lagos all the way through Shagamu, Ijebu-Ode, Ore, Benin (by-pass) Agbor, Asaba, Onitsha, down to Owerri bear marks of certain responsiveness. FRSC would probably report fewer accidents along this route this time.

    Those who knew these roads would remember when we would detour into thick forests only to resurface on the highway a couple of kilometres ahead. The hitherto horrific portions of these roads bear patches of fresh macadam, a testimony that indeed, someone is at work. And reconstruction work (which started in the last administration) is ongoing at Ondo-Ogun axes.

    All these, it must be said, bear the imprint of the indefatigable Babatunde Fashola who be-straddles three ministries including Works. Would he deliver the 2nd Niger Bridge before 2019 and that may well be the most strategic political statement this government would have made in ‘Biafra’.

    The annual movement of (conservatively) five million people eastwards is a phenomenon requiring a detailed study as a model of development. Though the region still remains rustic and uncharted and power supply its bane today. The place is largely in darkness being under the vice grip of an egregiously lax power firm.

    How a power ministry in Abuja can coordinate power supply in Umunze or Umuchoko must be one of the wonders of modern times. And how one distribution company would deign to light up about 10,000 communities across five states is one of the numbing incongruities of modern Nigeria. Until we elect to tweak our various systems and make them smart, we will continue to wallow in needless abjections.

     

    IDPs bombing: bumble, bumble

    It’s scary. When you think this GREAT WAR is about over and someone sensible would work out a closure, worse things happen. One is really troubled that this government may lack the capacity to properly defeat the REAL enemy elements in the Northeast of Nigeria.

    What manner of a national Air Force would drop bomb on a crowded place whether they be displaced people or a village square? Even if it were a Boko Haram settlement, the NAF jet could not have been under any serious rocket attack so why pulverise the target below? Even if it be a BH enclave, did the bomber isolate the women, children and perhaps the Chibok girls therein? There is surely more to this bombing…

    The same way there are hundreds of unanswered questions on the so-called terror ‘war’. Who are we still “seriously negotiating” the release of the Chibok girls with? Who has the N500m voted for the repairs of the Chibok girls’ school? Who are the financiers and masterminds of BH? Who is in charge of the IDPs camps and the rehabilitation of the Northeast? What do Borno Elders know about this crisis they are not telling the rest of us?

    One is afraid that this so-called ‘war’ will never end at this rate…

  • Welcoming a Trump of sadism

    Like the hands of a clock, many democratic countries in the world swear in a new President every four or five years at the exit of an old one. Now, it is the turn of the United States of America again. And the man to take charge as from today, for the next four years, all things being equal, is called Donald Trump, a man that most people including Americans, have seen as a wild surging into a china shop. In an article entitled ‘Waiting for January 20’ and published in this column two weeks ago, yours sincerely cited the example of Adolf Hitler’s oath of office and inaugural address of 1933 that culminated in the World War II which started in 1939 and ended in 1945. The dramatic events within that period of 12 years were the main determinants of today’s world history.

     

    Oath of office

    As from today, Donald Trump’s oath of office will become the symbol of authorisation for the seeming global anarchy ahead. His assumption of office as the 46th American President, subsequent to that oath, will confirm the loss of America’s long time cherished glass house that has always been a proud heritage.

    From the look of things, a wild bull may be taking over in the world’s china shop in a most likely confirmation of a popular 20th century Irish poem published in 1921 by William Butler (W. B.) Yeats, the original author of “Things Fall Apart”. In that sadistic poem, Yeats really proved to be the drummer for a future dragon who would dance sadistically on the surface of a tragic brook. That dancer is the 21st century America’s Donald Trump who the world is unlikely to watch with comfort. The expectations from that scenario are better imagined than experienced. Here is the poem:

    “Turning and turning in the widening gyre

    The falcon cannot hear the falconer;

    Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

    Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

    The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

    The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

    The best lack all conviction, while the worst

    Are full of passionate intensity”.

     

    Observation

    If the above quoted stanza is an impetus for Trump to behave like a typical dragon dancing on the surface of an ominous brook, another poem by Rudyard Kipling may equally serve as an intoxicant that can help exacerbate the already dangerous situation of the world in which the new American President wants to be an agent. Incidentally, both Yeats and Kipling were contemporary literary men of about the same age. They were both born in 1865 but died differently within a gap of about three years apart. Below is Kipling’s own divisive poem that strengthened the enmity between the West and the East:

    “Oh, East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,

    Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s great Judgment Seat…”

     

    The meaning of Trump

    The name TRUMP is a short form of trumpet, a musical instrument with which the decision of a tyrant is often announced in a local cultural setting. Ever since he was declared the winner of the American Presidential election of November 2016, this Trump has been trumpeting his tyrannical plans for the world. And the jitters rolled out from that trumpet have started gripping the world with icy cold. That an American President elect had begun to rule before taking an oath of office is a clear indication of what the world should expect from the china shop in which a bull will start to operate as from today.

     

    Fictitious comment

    Meanwhile, a fictitious statement about Africans and the Arabs credited to Donald Trump, which has now gone viral online, is not true. That statement was fabricated by some African cultural renegades who intended to use a foreign name to disparage the governments of their own countries. For those who are quite familiar with English language and its usage by native speakers, it must be apparent that the writing of that comment is totally African in style and perhaps Nigerian. An average speaker of English as a mother tongue cares so much about economy of language that he will not be that pedestrian in speaking or writing. Besides, through a thorough research, yours sincerely has discovered that the comment in question first appeared online on October 15, 2015 when the campaign for American Presidential election had not commenced and not December 8, 2016 as claimed by the mischief makers.

     

    Personal comment

    It is bad enough that Donald Trump cannot guard his tongue while commenting on sensitive issues, but that cannot serve as enough excuse to put fictitious words in his mouth. Such act is typical of Nigerian literary miscreants who are fond of marauding in day dreaming and wishful thinking. In fairness to him, If Trump ever made any such unprintable remarks about the black people at all, it must have been about African Americans and some other Africans residing in America. And the comment could not have been longer than two or three sentences.

    An excerpt from text of the controversial statement credited to Trump is published in this column today not to authenticate the fabricated version but to enable the numerous readers of this column to further know how evil-minded some Nigerians can be. Nigerian Muslims who have constantly been maligned through similar fabrications can testify to this assertion.

     

     The fabricated version

    “We are not obliged, even for a second, to try to prove to anybody and especially, to blacks and Arabs that we are superior people – we have demonstrated that to the black and Arabs in 1001 ways.

    The America we know today was not created by wishful thinking. We created it at the expenses of intelligence, sweat and blood…..we do not pretend like other whites that we like the blacks – We must admit without any fear, that we don’t like them and for so many, many valid reasons.

    The fact that blacks and Arabs look like human beings does not necessarily make them sensible human beings. Hedgehogs are not porcupines and lizards are not crocodiles because they look alike. If God had wanted us to be equal to blacks and Arabs, he would have created us all of a uniform colour and intellect. But he created us differently. Whites, blacks, yellow, the rulers and the ruled, intellectually we are superior to the blacks and the Arabs. That has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt over the years.

    I believe that a white man is an honest, God fearing person who has demonstrated practically the right way of being a humanity .By now every one of us has seen it practically that blacks and Arabs cannot rule themselves. Give them guns and they will kill each other.

     

    Further disparagement

    They (blacks and Arabs) are good in nothing else but making noise, dancing, marrying many wives, alcoholism, witchcraft, indulging in sex, pretending in church, jealousy, fighting and complaining of nonsense. Their only main concern (which according to me is stupidity of the highest magnitude) is same – sex marriages. They keep pointing fingers to us, we the west, that we have legalized it in our countries and that we always outspokenly support gay people around the world. And because they always foolishly want to demonstrate their ignorance, hatred and fear about the subject, some of them have even enacted harsh laws to condemn their own gay citizens. This shows that beyond illusions and doubt, what people do with their own bodies is Africans main concern. I hear they even strip their women publicly when they commit crimes.

     

    Reckless assessment

    Let us all accept the fact that the black man is a symbol of poverty, mental inferiority, laziness and emotional incompetence. To make the matter worse, he can do everything possible to defend his stupidity. Give them money for development and they will fight and create hatred and enmity for themselves. Drill oil wells for them and they will not have peace all the days of their life. See, for instance, what’s happening in Nigeria, Southern Sudan, Malawi, DRC just to mention a few. This proves to anybody including a stupid fool that Africans do not know what they want. Isn’t that plausible?

    Therefore that the white man is created to rule the black man, Africans will always have day dreams (sic). And here is the creature (black man) that lacks foresight but only sees what is near him and still fails to know what to do. A black man is stupid to the extent that he cannot plan for his life beyond a year. Therefore how can they develop and live longer.

     

    About corruption

    Corruption in the west (and China) is a big abomination but in Africa, it’s so huge that it is slowly becoming an acceptable way of life. They sing and rejoice to their corrupt political leaders. They worship their scandal-ridden religious leaders like their gods. Lest you forget, these so called Africans are praising, dancing and praying for the people that have impoverished them, and who come to hide their loot here.

     

    About begging

    Then which fool argues that the black man is not born a beggar, grows a beggar, looks a beggar, falls sick as a beggar and dies a beggar. This has been proven beyond reasoning. I wonder why even up to now most Africans still go to school by force and those still at school are just drug addicts who don’t know what took them there.

    This is a pregnant stupidity in Africa that needs Jesus’ immediate second coming. The body of Africans is a very fertile ground for all diseases in the world because they don’t fear even HIV/AIDS. This leaves me with a question: Are our eyes created the same with those Africans? I hear there are still cultures in Africa that prohibit them from using latrines which is very annoying.

     

    About freedom

    They cried for independence but have failed to rule themselves. For sure being African is a very untreatable disease that even prayers are not enough. They have minerals but they cannot do anything with it. Therefore let us (whites) go to Africa and pick what we can pick and leave what is of no use. Poverty is a disease to the whites but to the blacks it is very normal.

    The worst tragedy in Africa is that if you dare stand up and speak up for what’s right, you may end up regretting. The few wise and open-minded Africans who have tried to educate these fools about civilization have met the worst. They have been pushed hard on the wall, they have been silenced and others have been killed….”

    Even the other quote credited to him about Nigeria is a fabrication by Nigerian election riggers who can go to any extent to destroy the good image of any political opponent. The truth of the matter is that a former employee of Donald Trump who was playing pranks at work was once scolded by the man. While scolding the lazy guy, Trump alluded to the attitude of some Africans he had encountered and referred to him as having the trait in blacks. And that was as far back as 1991 when Trump had not developed any political ambition. An eye witness in the cited case (John O’Donnel) testified to this. The question now is this: where did Nigeria record Donald Trump’s quoted comment?

     

    Patriotism

    The issue here is not about Trump per se. There are more evil tendencies in some Africans than can be found in Trump. If an African can go this far to destroy the fabric of his own pedigree where is patriotism and what else can he not do to cause a civil war at home? Apparently, there are more Trumps in Africa than in America. And if Donald Trump, in deviance to any lesson from Adolf Hitler’s experience, unleashes his evil machination on some Africans, it will only be a good match for African evil doers. What do you say to that? As the world keeps moving, we hope the days ahead will allay our fear. Trump is welcome.

  • Celebrating democracy and First Amendment

    Celebrating democracy and First Amendment

    The peaceful transition of power from one administration or political party to another is the beauty of democracy, which should be a pride of all democrats and celebrated by every patriot. The succession crisis in little Gambia, with a sit-tight Jammeh, unperturbed about the image of his country, is a reminder of what might otherwise be.

    Americans have reason to rejoice in the strength of their institutions to withstand stress. An electoral institution that has, through the vagaries of life, stood firm and resolute for 240 years, is worth celebrating, and a people that have made sacrifices, including the ultimate one, cannot be accused of hubris if they chose to revel in grand style. The inauguration of a new President has offered the most adequate opportunity for such a national euphoria.

    In January 2009, I, along with members of my family, who had journeyed from three continents for the purpose, participated in this national festival of democracy when Barrack Obama was inaugurated as the 44th President of the United States. Some 1.8 million other citizens, residents, and visitors were there, including many who did not vote for Obama. That was the spirit of the time, following a long tradition.

    This time last year, a large majority of citizens had also hoped to be among the celebrants on the mall today. Many had made hotel reservations to beat the rush and the inflated cost that normally comes with procrastination. They didn’t have to know who was going to win the election. They just wanted to be part of the festival of democracy.

    As the primaries got under way, however, and the insults and bigotry came along with it, disillusionment and despair ensued. Whatever hope many of those trudging along for an acceptable outcome nursed was dashed on election day. And for many, the transition period from November 8 to date has not offered any reprieve from their sense of gloom and doom.

    Thus, while 900,000 visitors are expected for inaugural ceremonies in Washington, D.C. today, many are also coming to protest the inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States. Another 400,000 are estimated to participate in the Women’s March on Washington this Saturday. Per the National Park Service, protest permits have been issued to 22 groups, which is “a considerable uptick” compared to past inauguration permits of an average of six groups. This year, inauguration protest and boycott is the most intense and passionate in 35 years. Why?

    The “why” question must not be misconstrued. We must not assume that celebrating democracy and engaging in protest are, in some way, antithetical. Indeed, they are two sides of the same coin. Democracy idolises freedom, while dictatorship privileges repression. Protest for or against an event, a candidate, or even a president’s inauguration, is a time-honoured exercise of freedom and, therefore, a celebration of democracy.

    That is not just a positive spin. It is the truth and it is the reason that the National Park Service cannot legitimately deny permits for protests and rallies no matter how embarrassing anyone, including the President-elect may find it. Indeed, there is no good reason for the man elected as the leader of the free world to feel embarrassed with the celebration of freedom in the form of protest.

    There is another reality, however. While protest is an expression of freedom, it is also primarily a symbol of resistance and opposition to the incoming President and his administration. The disillusionment and despair that has been experienced by many citizens from the primaries to the conventions through election day and to date is directly attributable to the pronouncements made and positions taken on various issues by the man who is being installed as President today. For many, there has not been in recent memory a presidential candidate or a President-elect who has so effectively and successfully captured the White House by what his critics characterise as a campaign of division and hate-mongering.

    These are not frivolous charges even if Trump as candidate and President-elect, thinks otherwise. For Mexican-Americans and their Latin-American, African-American and European-American friends and sympathisers, labelling undocumented immigrants from Mexico as rapists and criminals was simply mean. The attack on a female journalist, Megyn Kelly, for daring to ask tough questions during a Republican primary debate, turned off many women. And when the Access Hollywood tape emerged out of the blue, it only confirmed the charge of misogyny that many of them had made against Trump.

    The mocking of a disabled journalist, an accusation which he has repeatedly denied, but which video images apparently confirmed to many, only increased the number of groups with an unfavourable image of Trump even before the election. African Americans are naturally upset about Trump’s characterisation of inner-cities as crime-infested in a weird appeal to them to give him a chance because they had nothing to lose. This was all before the elections. So, when polls showed him losing to Hillary Clinton up until the eve of the election, it wasn’t difficult for voters to believe that he was cruising to a big loss.

    Even the FBI surprise announcement of further investigation into Clinton email just a few days before the election was not considered a game changer at that time. Who will vote for a misogynist, a bigot, a protectionist and a Putin “puppet”, as Clinton put it? That was the basis of the confidence of many in a Clinton victory and a Trump routing. But they were all wrong. The polls were wrong, or the election was impacted by outside influence as the intelligence community later revealed.

    Since the election, President-Elect Trump has not backed down from his controversial positions and pronouncements. He has intervened in policy decisions of the Obama administration, ignoring the tradition of Presidents-elect waiting their turn. And for someone who had accused Obama of being an illegitimate president based on the conspiracy theory that he was not born in the United States, and who has held on to this bizarre claim for seven and a half years, it was the height of hypocrisy for Trump to be offended when his election was described as illegitimate.

    But that was exactly Trump’s reaction to Congressman Lewis, a civil right icon, who had made that observation, based on the intelligence community confirmation that Russia hacked the emails of the Democratic Party and Clinton Campaign Chair. Trump, who apparently can give insult but cannot conceive of himself receiving it, attacked Lewis as “all talk, talk, and no action” just days before his inauguration. And in solidarity with Mr. Lewis, about 50 House Democrats are boycotting the inauguration activities today. Again, in exercise of their First Amendment, they choose to express their disgust with their absence from the stage.

    There is a way in which all these actions and inactions, verbal expressions and silent motions are reconcilable as they can all be construed as what the founding fathers of American democracy had hoped for. Even though we may be offended by the misogynistic utterances, and by religious bigots and ethnic chauvinists, and even when the hypocrisy of haters that demand love disgust us, the beauty of democracy is its affording everyone the right of expression. It is the promise of the First Amendment.

    Of course, elections have enormous consequences which cannot be dismissed lightly. Policies will be made that can turn lives around in disastrous ways with no good escape routes. Checking out is not an option for many. Again, however, there is hope and it needs to be kept alive.

    In four years, there will be another opportunity for protesters and boycotters of today to exercise their rights to choose a candidate whose views and interests align with theirs, and whose policies they subscribe to. Voting is the ultimate positive form of political expression and it is to be celebrated and taken full advantage of. Perhaps, if everyone that qualified had taken advantage of the opportunity on November 8, 2016, a different outcome may have emerged. But it would not have prevented protests. Only a different group of protesters would probably have taken to the streets today.

  • National resolution for 2017 and beyond (2)

    National resolution for 2017 and beyond (2)

    While our primary challenge as a nation is the weakness of institutional structures, there is hardly a doubt that this is itself linked to our cultural predilection for misplaced priorities in the arena of values. When our warped values endorse, but institutions condemn, to us, that’s just too bad for institutions. That is how we have carried on, at least in the last thirty something years.

    Consider the following personal narrative which I had shared in this column before. After successfully completing the Secondary Modern School in December 1960, and not having secured admission for further education, I was hired as a pupil teacher by the late Chief I. A. Adelodun, the headmaster of First Baptist School, Isia, Okeho, to teach his class because, as headmaster, he had assigned himself a class while he was also an Honourable Member of the Western Region House of Assembly. He paid my salary of £5 per month from his pocket.

    I would like to highlight a few salient points from this story. First, membership of parliaments in the First Republic was not considered a full-time job and members were expected to keep their day jobs. How they managed the two was between them and their conscience on the one hand, and between them and their constituencies on the other. But where any of them might have a weak conscience, their constituencies did not let them get away with cheating.

    Second, because of the combination of a strong conscience on the part of many of those legislators and political appointees and uncompromising constituencies who monitored them, the values of hard work and honesty were preserved. Therefore, when in those days, we taught children J. F. Odunjo’s immortal lines “Ise logun ise” (work is the antidote to poverty), it resonated with them. When we taught them the lyrics “Bi mo ba ka we mi, bata mi a ro koko ka...” (If I am well-read, I am on the road to comfort), they were motivated, for they were witnesses to the stories of “rag to riches” because of education.

    Third, however, those values have suffered disastrously in the face of newly discovered vices of indolence, dishonesty and selfish greed that have unfortunately been promoted and celebrated as modern values. A headmaster could not have done otherwise than Chief Adelodun did in those days. His conscience would not allow him even if he wanted. And the parents and school authorities would not have condoned an absentee teacher.

    Now, however, we have some headmasters without other official jobs not only absenting themselves from their stations, but also condoning teacher absences. We have teachers seated in their boutiques three days a week at the expense of their students and getting paid at the end of the month. Far more serious is the contemporary phenomena of ghost teachers and ghost workers. We have evolved tragically in our embrace of greed and dishonesty as a new national value. And it appears we are not letting prudential considerations obstruct our dangerous sprint toward the edge of the cliff.

    Fourth, but who are we to blame the crooked tail when the head is itself wobbly? The teacher in his classroom, the headmistress in her office and the clerk in his cubicle, are all variants of a mini iromi. They all dance to despicable beats coming from the drums of selfish greed and economic sabotage. It’s surreal. Legislators pass bills for their self-aggrandisement. They vote to give themselves raises even when they know that there are no funds to repair roads or provide potable water for their constituencies. They allocate to themselves funds for constituency projects but heaven helps anyone that tries to find the location of such projects in the constituencies. In the age of twitter and snapchat, the teacher, the headmaster and the clerk are very much aware of what’s going on in the corridors of power. They are naturally, therefore, cynical about sermons that tell them to be the change they want to see.

    Fifth, as a corporate entity, we have lived our entire life spending beyond our means with an insatiable appetite for borrowing to finance our flamboyant lifestyle. We have never cut our national coat according to the size of our clothes. And because our productivity has not met up with, let alone overtake our consumption, we are in constant debt to other nations from which we import to satisfy our wants.

    Though we can live comfortably without much of what we import, our vulgar wants must be fulfilled. And the big ones among us are in the lead for these desires of the flesh. So, the driver is an insider to the boss’ lifestyle and he cannot wait to have what Oga has. What course is open to him? Theft or conspiracy to kidnap Oga’s kids! In the economies that we envy, individuals go about in jeans and T-shirts, while saving for education, home, nutritious food and vacation. We go into debt for aso-ebi.

    Sixth, while there are certain cultural values that have been passed on to us from our forebears and which we rightly think of as morally obligated of us to continue, we have, without much thought, taken them to insane heights. Naming of newly born, wedding and funeral represent the three most important landmarks of a person worthy of celebration. But while tradition recognises this, it does not impose on us an obligation to go into debt in recognising them. Unfortunately, this is what many folks have done, cheered on by the rest of us. We make feferity, apology to the late Chief Anthony Enahoro, our cultural pride, without the necessary constraint to rein in its excesses.

    Seventh, meanwhile, we hold government responsible for our normal parental responsibilities without even bothering to do our part. Besides civil servants and private sector employees, who are forced to part with taxable portions of their incomes through the PAYEE system, it is only a few conscientious ones that pay taxes these days because we assume that there is oil revenue to take care of our national wants. And when there is lull in the oil market giving rise to recession, we grumble.

    Eighth, as citizens, we aid and abet corruption with our inordinate and greedy demands from government and from candidates and elected officials. It is a rational law of economics that one invests to make profit. Therefore, when the electorate demand and receive gratification from candidates to give the candidates their support rather than support their positions on issues which would benefit them in return, those candidates are rational to consider the bribe they give voters as investment from which they must make reasonable profit. Do we then really have a good reason to complain when on getting to office, those elected officials dip their hands in the coffers of government?

    Ninth, from the immediate prior paragraph, it seems clear that big-time corruption, the type that involves politicians in 10 figure theft of public funds, has its root in the petty corruption initiated by the electorate. The victim may have been the culprit in the first place. Without recognising the impact of citizen demand and the culture that tolerates it, we are not going to resolve the big problem. More importantly, without dealing with the cultural ethos that celebrate undeserved opulence, and the perverse values that thwart our original belief in the wealth that comes from hard work, we are not going to successfully confront and win the war against corruption.

    Finally, we may then ask the question: what should be our national resolution for 2017 and beyond? First, we must create strong institutions that can withstand the onslaught of political jobbers parading as patriots. Second, we must reverse the vice of conspicuous consumption and vanity that presents itself as a fundamental cultural value. Third, we must affirm once again the truth that hard work is the antidote to poverty and teach the coming generations the same. Fourth, let us truly and in practical terms adhere to the declaration of our norm with a firm embrace of discipline, integrity, dignity of labour, social justice, religious tolerance, self-reliance and patriotism.

    • Concluded

     

     

  • Recession: Learning from Egyptian experience

    All eyes, Many readers of this column may be disappointed today and there is no apology for that. From various parts of the country, people have been calling or sending text messages or email, since last Monday, to ask yours sincerely to write today’s article on the raging controversial Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN) law that is currently causing unnecessary brouhaha across Nigeria. However, having turned down the seemingly popular request, the onus is on me to explain why I refused to succumb to their pressure on that subject. As readers, they are kings and queens in their own rights just like customers in an open market. And they deserve to be so treated.

     

    The focus of ‘The Message’

    ‘The Message’ is an Islamic column which does not concern itself with a matter that is unrelated to Islam. The FRCN law currently in contention does not affect Islam because the Mosque is House of congregational worship which no Muslim can claim as a private property. If any Muslim claims to own a Mosque he should be called a thief. A Muslim may build a Mosque with his money. He may offer to bear the cost of maintaining a Mosque on his volition. But as soon as the Mosque is ready as a House of worship, it becomes a public property within the Muslim community.

    What can ‘The Message’ write on an idea that was initiated by a Nigerian professional body during the second republic in 1982 to serve as one of its organs for regulating the financial institutions in Nigeria? What can ‘The Message’ say now about how that organ became a subject of legislation in 2003, when Olusegun Obasanjo, a Christian, held sway as Nigeria’s President? What did the readers of this column expect ‘The Message’ to write about the enactment of that legislation into an act of parliament in 2011 when Goodluck Jonathan, another Christian was the President?

    The Mosque is not a family business that can be bequeathed to a son or a daughter. It is therefore not for Nigerian Muslims to jump into an unnecessary brouhaha over a law that concerns materialism much more than religion. Neither is it for them to ask ‘The Message’ to write on such an inconsequential subject. Currently, there are many crushing issues on the table in Nigeria. One of them is recession which concerns every Nigerian Christian or Muslim. And the concentration here today will be on that. Read on:

     

    The Egyptian experience

    Egypt, a North African Arab country was never a member of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). She was not an oil producing country until recently. The main stay of her economy was agriculture which was well facilitated by her River Nile endowment. But of course the latter was backed up by the strategic Suez Canal that became a necessary need of all Western countries.

    This North African Arab country was in economic mess in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Her ravaging war with Israel had reduced her to a virtual beggar nation. Not only did her macro economy plummet, her micro economy also dwindled to the lowest ebb. No job for the rising army of highly skilful youths and no sources of income for the majority of the citizenry. Thus, the country looked like a famine- stricken one. The best residential houses were rented out to foreigners. And most vehicles on Cairo and Alexandra roads were terribly rickety at that time.

     

    Solution

    It took an ingenuous economic management by President Gamal Abdul Nasir and his successor, President Anwar Sadat to device a means of bailing out the country from what could have amounted to self-genocide. With the meagre amount of money accruing to the nation from agriculture and manpower export at that time, the government was able to set up a food distribution centre in each ward where every family in the ward was registered.

    All varieties of foods, including grains, wheat, meat, milk and eggs, were supplied to each family every week. And no family got less than what could suffice for one full week. The cost of those highly subsidised food were deducted from the salaries of those working while others were supplied free foods for survival. And to ensure that only the citizens benefited from the wonderful largess, the use of national identity card to qualify for supply was made compulsory.

     

    Security and patriotism

    This Islamic welfare business strategy did not only create a high sense of security in the citizenry it also spurred them to become die-hard patriots. With that strategy, Egypt was able to weather her economic storm of that time even as her war with Israel continued.

    What could have been a major problem for the ordinary Egyptians at that time was the education of their children. But President’s Nasir’s government had taken care of that since inception. A fundamental policy of the Egyptian government introduced by President Nasir in 1954 was free education at all levels. That policy which the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo adapted for primary education in western Nigeria a year later (1954) had put Egypt far ahead of all African and Arab countries. The policy was to put Egypt in good stead in later years when the going became economically tough.

     

    Reaping the benefit

    The country began to reap the benefit by supplying all other Arab countries with their needed man power such as teachers, doctors, Engineers, pilots, accountants, pharmacists, nurses, administrators and even drivers. Those experts were officially deployed to those other Arab countries on three years renewable contract. And each deployed expert was made to remit about 35 per cent of his/her income to the government of Egypt monthly. Such remittances were not difficult to make since those expert were well paid. The remittances were made directly by the employers who deducted the agreed amount from the salaries of their employees. Thus, in those days, manpower generated from planned education was more profitable than today’s oil wells. It is a confirmation that a well planned education is an investment like no other.

    Yet, countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates and others that benefited from the programme found the arrangements convenient because they did not need to employ interpreters separately as would have been the case if they had employed Americans, French, Germans and Italians for the same purpose. At least, based on Islamic principles, their languages and culture were almost the same.

     

    Social welfare

    With the provision of social welfare for the people, Egyptian government of the 1970s, led by Anwar Sadat after the demise of Gamal Abdel Nasir, was able to solve the problem of the three necessities of life: food, shelter and clothing. Not only that, the government was also very much aware that an idle hand was the devil’s workshop. It therefore provided soft loans for many university graduates to embark on small scale businesses that could boost the nation’s economy at the micro level.

    With this, it became possible for most of those fresh graduates to be self employed while aiming high to mount the economic ladder of life to the very top. Today, some of those businesses have grown into gigantic industries exporting their products to many countries, including Nigeria.

    If Egypt is not one of Africa’s poor countries today, it is because her government managed that nation’s meagre economy to the benefit of her ordinary citizens, despite several decades of war with Israel. Compared to the industrialised nations, Egypt may not be called a rich country now, but her preparation for the future seems to be assuring her of a front line economic position soon. Her unsurpassed investment on manpower through education is a confirmation of that.

     

    Industrialisation

    What obtains in Egypt equally obtains in most other Arab countries, especially those of the gulf. For instance, Saudi Arabia has always known that oil would not flow forever in her wells. Thus as far back as the 1970s, that country had diversified her economy by establishing two industrial cities of Yambu’ and Jubail, a project (commissioned in 1982) which the United states described as the most ambitious ever in the industrial history of mankind.

    Much more have since been put in place for the benefit of the future generations. And, travellers who have visited countries like Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, and Algeria will confirm that the future of global wealth will definitely be in the Middle East courtesy of foresights of the above mentioned leaders. But the greatest assets of those countries are manpower which their free education programme is providing from primary schools through the university with impeccable foresight.

     

    Shameless deception

    Long before now, a promise of economic leap was made in respect of year 2000. That year came to pass without any effort made towards fulfilment. Then, another promise was made in respect of year 2010. That year also came to pass without any sign of seriousness on the part of the government even as Nigeria sank deeper into economic quagmire. Now it is the turn of year 2020 which will also come to pass in three years time. Haba! Is there no shame all for those running the government in Nigeria? The speedy economic train of the modern time waits for no crawling nation like Nigeria.

     

    Blind trust

    Long before the West came to know anything about the term “blind trust” at all, Islam had educated the Muslims in details on that subject. The great religion had foreseen the possibility of manipulating this term to the advantage of the exploiters in certain societies and, had thus, forbidden it.

    In Islamic jurisprudence, “blind trust” simply means the transaction of business illegally between a seller and a buyer to the detriment of either of them. In this case, the buyer or seller may be an individual or a group. “Blind trust” is like a coin with two sides. In it, either the seller or the buyer can cheat. An example is a situation where a product is sold in a wrap without allowing the buyer to examine what he wants to buy before paying. This may occur in any sector of the economy. In agriculture for instance, it is forbidden to sell tubers like yam and cassava without uprooting them. Such a business is often done on a mere assumption, thereby putting either the seller or the buyer at a great risk and disadvantage.

     

    Varieties of blind trust

    Blind trust may also occur in an ordinary market of quantity grains like rice, beans, millet, bally salt or groundnuts where and when the instrument of measure is manipulated with the intention of reducing the quantity of its contents while receiving the payment in full. Also, selling wrapped dresses or textile materials without indicating their sizes, yardage or fault may amount to “blind trust”. Even, those who engage in the sale of electronics without allowing the buyers to test the products before paying are trading in “blind trust”, which is illegal in Islam. In a nutshell, any business that entails some elements of doubt and does not allow for transparency is “blind trust” prohibited in Islam. And, anybody who is engaged in such a business is deemed to be a criminal.

     

    In retrospect

    It must be remembered that the people of Madyan (Median) whose Prophet was Shuayb, faced with the wrath of Allah and became perished because of “blind trust”

    In modern times, the term “blind trust” has been given a new connotation through a new manipulation. Not only is the chain of business deliberately being elongated to allow for more middlemen to allow for unnecessary inflation, the sale and purchase of public shares on behalf of some people without the knowledge of those people is being treated as a legitimate norm in capitalism. And that is the haven of corruption in Nigeria.

    Today, if corruption does not wear the garb of ethnicity, it would robe in the garment of religion. When will this come to an end?