Category: Monday

  • Vacillations on restructuring

    Restructuring debate was again re-opened by President Buhari and his deputy, Yemi Osinbajo when they spoke at separate venues last week. The president while addressing the Nigerian community in France claimed those calling for restructuring have been doing so without defining what it should be.

    According to him, “there are too many people talking lazily about restructuring in Nigeria. Unfortunately, people are not asking them individually what they mean by restructuring. What form do they want restructuring to take. Do they want us to have something like the three regions we used to have?  Let them define it and then we see how we can peacefully do it in the interest of Nigerians”, the president reportedly told his audience.

    At an entirely different occasion in Lagos, Osinbajo who spoke on the theme “Restructuring and the Nigerian Federation” told his listeners that good governance was what Nigeria needed rather than geographical restructuring. He said he has been “an advocate of fiscal federalism and stronger state governments. I have argued in favour of state police for the simple reason that policing is a local function. You cannot effectively police Nigeria from Abuja”. He also claimed to have argued before now that stronger, more autonomous states would effectively eradicate poverty in the country.

    When the two positions by the nation’s topmost leaders are paired, one cannot but be utterly dismayed at the manifest dissonance inherent therein- dissonance that exposed the naivety or insincerity in some of the claims ascribed to Buhari on the precise meaning or definition of restructuring. But even before some of those claims are appraised, it is clear Buhari and Osinbajo are definitely not on the same page on the matter. Not with the clear demonstration by the latter that he understands the meaning and confines of restructuring.

    Osinbajo prefers good governance to geographical restructuring. But he recognizes the imperative of fiscal federalism, stronger states and state police. He recognizes that more autonomous states would effectively reduce poverty and that policing is a local function, very difficult to perform from Abuja.

    He is not under any illusion as to the precise meaning and elements of restructuring canvassed by its army of proponents in contradistinction with what his boss wants us to believe. He neither offered any definition nor did absence of it bar him from identifying salient issues that needed to be tinkered with through restructuring. At any rate, the vice president must have been guided by the knowledge that in social analysis, definitions are rather inconclusive.

    Osinbajo is no stranger to the fact that the federal system we operate is not original to us as it was copied from somewhere. And that raises the issue of comparison embodied in his admission that policing is a local function. By logical inference, he is saying there are functions that are better performed at certain levels in a federal system and structural adjustments have to be made to properly align them and strengthen system. He identified fiscal federalism, stronger states and state policing as some of them

    Apparently deploying the most similar systems design of comparative analysis, he identified three areas that must align themselves to the realities of a true federal structure. There are many other nagging issues including geographical restructuring which he would want to avoid. There are no ambiguities on these despite Buhari’s prevarications. We are not surprised since it tallies with the hallmark behaviour of interests opposed to restructuring of inventing tenuous reasons to throw spanners into the wheel of its progress.

    More fundamentally, it was a huge joke reading some of the claims ascribed to the president on restructuring. He wants proper definition of restructuring before government could go into it. He wants people to define the form it should take and whether we should go back to three regions and all that. Perhaps, we can excuse the president because he was addressing citizens abroad some of who may have faint knowledge of issues surrounding a matter that has been very clearly and copiously canvassed.

    But then, the questions he threw to his audience are really for him to answer. And as the head of a government that promised restructuring in its campaign manifesto, is it not ridiculous that Buhari would be taking Nigerians abroad to task on an issue he ought to have a better idea of by now? And if one may ask, what concept or idea of restructuring did the president have in mind when he promised, campaigned and won election its basis? What definition of restructuring did his party have in mind or they just inserted the word without deep reflection on its precise meaning? Or are we being made to believe it was just a campaign gimmick?

    The latter poser is reinforced given the double-speak which Buhari and some of his functionaries have subjected resurging agitations for restructuring to. At the peak of those agitations, the All Progressives Congress APC set up a committee headed by Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai to distil the true intent and definition of true federalism or restructuring as it promised during the 2015 elections. The move then was largely seen as a ploy to buy time.

    But after four months of what they called rigorous research, the committee submitted its report to the party leadership with recommendations spanning 13 items on which they said a wide gamut of consensus existed among Nigerians for constitutional amendments to align them with the realities of the times. These included merger of states, delegation principle, fiscal federalism and devolution of powers.

    On fiscal federalism, they proposed amendment to section 162 and sub-section two of the constitution and revenue allocation formula to “give more revenue to the states and reduce the federal government’s share of revenue”, noting what it called the overwhelming demand for devolution of powers, the committee proposed that the second schedule of part one and part two of the constitution should be amended to transfer some items that are now on the exclusive list to the concurrent list to enable both the states and federal government legislate on them.

    There were also proposals on independent candidacy, local government, revenue allocation, citizenship, judiciary and referendum all geared towards resolving some of the imperfections of our convoluted federal order that has often resonated in agitations for restructuring or true federalism. It is almost a year since the committee submitted its report without any concrete action coming from the government. And as if the silence of the APC and the government on the report is not worrisome enough, Buhari seemed to have added salt to injury when he sought to interrogate his audience on issues his party has been properly advised by the committee. It is quite amazing that the president feigned ignorance of the wide gamut of consensus reached by the committee set up by the party he leads. What other definition, interpretation or suggestion does he expect on the matter rather than action?

    Or how do we explain his stunning dithering on the precise meaning and definition of restructuring even as Osinbajo appears clear as to aspects of the restructuring the government can possibly undertake to strengthen the federal order? If at this point the president neither knows the items of restructuring nor prepared to provide the required leadership and requisite political will to honestly address the matter, then this country is in a deep mess.

    The fact remains that restructuring the polity can no longer be wished way. It is also clear the current regime is not being honest on it. That is why it continues to erect obstacles on the road to its implementation. But restructuring holds the key to the continued progress and development of this country.

    The rancour and bitter competition that characterize our politics and the massive looting of public funds by sundry buccaneers masquerading as leaders are directly linked to the imperfections of our federal contraption. Restructuring will largely address all that and stave off the increasing recline to primordial and parochial predilections. Is it surprising these tendencies are at an all time high?

  • Video show

    If it happens, the public appearance of the contractor who recorded the sensational videos that allegedly exposed Kano State Governor Abdullahi Ganduje as a kickback receiver will take a riveting story to a greater level of intensity.  An online medium, Daily Nigerian, published by Jaafar Jaafar, had sensationally released the videos.

    A report said the unnamed contractor, described as a “whistleblower,” had set conditions for his appearance in a letter, through his lawyer, to the seven-man Kano State House of Assembly Investigative Committee. According to the report, “One of the conditions is that the video clips would be submitted to two experts for forensic analysis. He said one of the experts must be a serving officer of the Department of State Services and the other an expatriate, while their bills would be paid by the state.”

    Other conditions stated in the letter are: “That a Certified True Copy of the report(s) prepared by the experts shall be made available to our client prior to his appearance; that our client has undertaken to surrender to the experts the device used in capturing all the events in the video clips submitted and others yet to be submitted for discreet analysis and scrutiny; that all the proposed questions to be asked by the panel in the anticipated session shall not be more than 10 and shall be forwarded to our client in advance; and that the sitting be restricted to limited persons and that our client should be allowed to wear a mask, bear a fictitious name and receive protection from authorities for himself, family and business.”  In addition, the contractor demanded that the governor, the publisher, and one Aminu Daurawa should also appear when he appeared before the panel.

    It looks like the contractor means business. But it is curious that he wants to be allowed to “wear a mask” and “bear a fictitious name.” The spectacle of a masked man with a false name trying to clarify what is unclear is something to think about. One question: Why limit the questions to 10 when there could be more than 10 questions that need answers?

    Jaafar had told the investigative committee when he appeared on October 25: “A whistleblower, who is someone I know, gave me the video clips. He told me that Governor Ganduje is fond of collecting bribes of between 15 and 30 per cent from contractors executing various projects in the state. I told the whistleblower that we need evidence before we publish the story; and that we have to rigidly follow the rigours of the profession.”

    Jaafar explained how they got the said evidence:  “We then agreed to plant spy cameras on his Kaftan lapel so that he can capture the brazen act in hard evidence. He captured at least 15 clips, nine of which fully showed the governor’s face, body and hands collecting bundles of dollars.”  The first video, published on October 14, showed the governor allegedly receiving US dollars from a contractor. “The video also showed His Excellency tucking these monies under his flowing gown and putting them inside an envelope,” Jaafar added.

    The publisher argued that the authenticity of the videos was unquestionable:  “Before Daily Nigerian publishes stories, pictures or videos on its website (www.dailynigerian.com), the editors subject them to rigours of verification to establish their authenticity or otherwise. In the case of the video clips in question, our in-house technical expert, the editor-in-chief and editorial adviser certified that the videos were original and not doctored contents. Experts from Amnesty International Nigeria, BBC and Premium Times also watched the clips and certified their authenticity before we went to press.”

    Meddlers entered the picture when a lawyer and  the National Coordinator of Lawyers for Sustainable Democracy in Nigeria, Muhammad Zubair, asked a Kano High Court to stop the Kano State House of Assembly from conducting an investigation into the bribery allegation against Governor Ganduje.  This intriguing intervention further problematised democratic practice in Nigeria.

    Governor Ganduje chose to respond to the serious accusation in writing, saying he “did not collect, has not collected and will never collect bribe from anybody.” His defence letter was signed and delivered   to the committee by Information, Youth and Culture Commissioner, Muhammad Garba.

    It looks like Ganduje trivialised the accusation.  His appearance would have demonstrated that he understood the gravity of the allegation. But he didn’t appear.  Or did he think his position meant he didn’t need to appear?  It isn’t enough, and can’t be enough, that Ganduje responded in writing.

    It’s no business of Zubair and the group known as Lawyers for Sustainable Democracy in Nigeria.  Asking a court to stop the investigative committee from further probing the bribery allegation is anti-democratic. This is no way to sustain democracy. The group’s move to halt the probe is suspicious. If there is nothing to hide, and nothing to fear, why does the group want the investigation discontinued?  It is interesting that the committee is going ahead with the probe.

    Democracy is not expected to encourage corruption, which is not to say that the governor is corrupt, or that he is guilty.  Ganduje is expected to defend himself and prove his innocence. This meddlesome group does not help his case.

    This case of bribery videos represents a new high in the fight against corruption, particularly political corruption.  The publisher has demonstrated that fighting corruption is a serious business that requires more than the usual way of doing business. The legislature has also shown unusual enthusiasm. It is expected to fulfill the promise of its intervention.

    The drama is a warning sign.  Governors and others will have to be more careful in their dealings with contractors and others. It is important to find out the truth and nothing but the truth. If the videos are a reproduction of reality, the implications for the governor, his party and his supporters are clearly negative. If the videos are a presentation of fake news, it is bad news for the news business. It would be disappointing if the drama ends in suspense.

  • Wages of sin`

    Jesus said the poor will always be with us.

    Nigeria fulfilled it last week. We thought we had scored for the indigent with a new minimum wage. But it is still the same maximum weight on the dispossessed. It is the wages of upper class sin with organised labour in cahoots.

    Labour thrashed about like an enraged elephant. The government begged. 0ver N60k was the first bargaining chip. They chipped it down to about half, and the labour leaders hailed themselves as the kings of the little guy. Of course, they are kings of the little guy, not for the little guy.

    They are all riding the poor, both labour and government. They also put into the mix the legal opprobrium that says every five years we shall review the wages. We are just a nation that brings on the people after the horse has torn away. The people cannot even ride a horse or a cart. They have to walk to death as the contraption barrels into a dust bowl in the far distance.

    We increase wages in tandem with two things. One, inflation and cost of essentials. Two, the economy’s productivity. Tragically, we have one, that is inflation. The other, which is productivity, should trigger the wage rise. The economy is anything but productive.

    Yet, the poor man is poorer. His health limps. His rents soar. His transport costs strain long treks in place of a seat in a prostrate bus. He cannot pay school fees. The impact spirals all over the economy. So does he deserve a wage increase? Yes. But that is the wrong question.

    The question should be, does the economy provide for wage increase? The clear answer should be no. But the poor man who nearly suffocates at night from power outage looks at Abuja and the well-feathered men at the top. They live the life of flamboyance and opulence, and turn the poor into prayer warriors and citizens of heaven. The Jerusalem here on earth is gone. It is like Apostle John’s proclamation in the Revelations, Babylon the Great has fallen! Our leaders are whoring like the prostitute. So the poor would rather go to heaven and leave the powerful to the abundance and glamour of earth.

    What labour and government have agreed is to give them the illusion of the whore. They are the rich man giving Lazarus the crumb. Lazarus is so happy. Better to be crumb rich than stomach empty. It is the Hobson’s choice of the Nigerian masses.

    It is the perfect illusion. The economy is in such bad shape that even the state governments that cannot pay less than N20k have now agreed to add more than half. It is an easy win. An easy political victory for labour, and easy triumph for the governments.

    Labour goes and tells the workers, “we have been faithful servants. We have warred and won against the whores of power.”

    The government will tell the masses, “we have agreed to what your representatives bargained.” The people, in their grand lie, will say, “thank you for listening to us.”

    But who is deceiving whom? Pundits say it is better to increase wages and the government should get the money, whether by scavenging, borrowing, etc.

    We all know it’s all a lie. The federal government may be able to pay, but most state governments cannot. Most private concerns cannot. The minimum wage does not apply out of government anyway. There are many workers in private firms around the country who earn less than N10K a month, and they are happy just to  leave the home each morning. How they survive and move from day to day is a subject for research. They are the trapped.

    Tomorrow will come, and the crisis will rock. The governors will say they cannot pay. No one will provide the money, and labour will yell in bad faith.

    But the faith is without works. More clearly, without work. There are some things we ought to do to guarantee a five-year wage review, and also to make it workable. First, we must tackle waste. Corruption and waste go hand in hand in this society. That explains why a few are so rich that they afford for one meal what many spend in a month.

    The present anti-corruption war is the best we have had, even if it is not fundamental. It has not addressed lifestyle. And the judiciary, for all its self-scrutiny, is still very loose. The second point arises from the first, and that is a merit-based system. Reward those who serve and work, not those who doodle as loyal courtiers, flatterers and sycophants.

    But all of those cannot work without a federal system where the units account for their own income by tapping their own natural and human resources. For instance, every local government has a mineral resource. Is that not enough to keep the nation working rather than allow brigands to dig up our gold and kaolin and bauxite and fatten their purses at our collective expense.

    That is what I mean by productivity. An economy that has not put itself in a position to be fertile should not be craning for lush fruits on tree branches. The N30k deal was faith without works. Or shall I say, faith with cunning, or cunning in the name of faith.

    We merely put off the evil day. The poor will return to their poor wages. We started this with the Adebo Award, and we had Udoji Award and a few more such cynical bribes over the decades. But the poor did not improve in welfare. They had a month or two of swagger before inflation subdued them.

    The poor will again lament, and scripture was right when it said, the destruction of the poor is their poverty. In her book, Nickle and Dimed, American writer Barbara Ehrenreich investigated America’s poor by living with them for a year. He detailed with chilling details how most of them have no pathway out of their misery. It is the bane of capitalism.

    Capitalism brought wealth and ruin. Because of its potential for human misery, the welfare state was born to counter the depredation of communism. At the end of the Second World War, many European countries flirted with soviet-style communism, and that compelled the Marshal Plan. It saved capitalism, and it was about that time that the idea of the minimum wage came into being. Capitalism has had a great and brutal triumph for decades until the crash a few years ago.

    The problem now is inequality, and it has grown worse and difficult to reverse. One of the best books in the past half-decade, Capital in the Twenty-first Century by Thomas Piketty, has stressed the urgency of treating inequality. If it is so serious there, can we wonder why someone is struggling to pay N30k when someone else buys a piece of cake with tea at that amount. It tells us how poor we have made ourselves because we have oil and too many drones growing fat.

     

    Watch out

    While we are yet to settle the dust over the Osun dancer, the nation ought to pay attention to the certificate saga in Adamawa State. The Governor, Mohammed Jibrilla Bindow, is being sued for perjury and forgery by an NGO, Global Integrity Crusade Network for not stating the facts about his secondary school certificate results. They sue him with lying and that he presented different certificates when he ran for senate and subsequently for governor.

    Bindow
    Bindow

    This is an interesting development. We may recall that like some other APC primaries, the Adamawa story was intriguing. It was first an indirect primary until they opted for an open one. The result gave victory to Bindow, while Mahmood Halilu came second and Nuhu Ribadu third. The losing duo publicly disputed the polls and called it fraudulent.

    This is not Ogun State or Imo State when the jury has flushed out the governors’ choices. This is different, potentially an earthquake for a sitting governor. It’s brewing in the court. Watch out.

  • Body of waters

    A pond is not a place for glum news. A host to fishes and nourisher of a neighbour of green lands, flowers and trees, it evokes romance. The worshipper sees God and even the atheist exorcises demons. Winds stir the water. Sunsets subdue it with tremors of golden colours, and sunshine with a velvet of hues. It is more a tapestry for the dreamer than observer.

    There the flesh is weak, the eyes glaze, the ear succumbs to the harmony of water and birds. There also we now hear of sadness. A retired general falls to civilian bands. A soldier without arms. It is not the sort of news you look for in a pond. But in Nigeria, as the racist philosopher Pliny predicted about Africa, something new always pops out.

    The pond, on the outskirts of Jos, was not just a body of water. It is now a water of bodies. Yet no one saw the remains of Idris Alkali in the water. The killers gave a decoy. The car, a corolla, was soaked in the water. The army saw his clothes, but not the man. The criminals committed the crime with despatch but had no rhyme. They left evidence: clothes, car, shoes.

    But the other quality of the story is the veneration of the water. Local women became divine activists of the pond. Half-naked and deviant, they protested to the army. They may not be mammy water in the mythical sense. But by virtue of their devotion to the pond, they were mammy water in flesh and blood. Even if death walked into the water, the soldier’s eye and gun should stay off. It was a water too sacred for the temporal truth of investigation. Gods lay in the water. It was poison for human step. They drank the water for sustenance and healing. They kept it like a sacred forest. It overthrows the Christian idea that warns not to touch the unclean thing. In the traditional world, you should not touch the clean thing. The Christian feels superior to things. The traditionalist feels inferior. That inspires the song, Babalawo mowa be be. (Priest I come to beg). To beg to reduce things the subject must not do to live a safe and happy life.

    The army defied tradition. Soldiers have always been taught to fear no such thing. The so-called Bini Massacre probably would have been averted if Captain Philips and his men dreaded the dance and visuals of ritual on Benin streets when the white man dared one of Africa’s flourishing empires. Canon fell to cannon. Gods fell to guns.  With colonialist rage unhinged, the Oba Ovonramwen was eventually captured. But it was not in Benin alone, but all over West Africa.

    In the book: The West African Resistance edited by Michael Crowther, our historians documented this tension between faith and weaponry as state after state collapsed under the firepower of the Europeans. Similar myths engulf the soldiery of late Brigadier Adekunle, aka Black Scorpion, during the civil war. I met him once and asked him if he disappeared as the legends claimed. He laughed it dismissively as efforts by humans to mythicise what they cannot understand. I learned from Alabi Isama’s classic, A Tragedy of Victory, that Adekunle was hardly in the teeth of battle.

    Sat Guru Maharaji paid a visit to The Nation a few days ago, and I put this question to him to showcase the fragility of our supernatural claims to superiority over military hardware. Sat Guru, with aplomb temper, said it was because the Africans did not get the right principle. I asked, so all of them missed it? And what was the principle that only he seemed to know? I said he seemed to be answering a question of mysticism with mysticism. But he was not one to faze.  He probably thought I was a secularist upstart.

    In Jos, the army upended the locals. Video shows how the car was pulled out of the pond. It turned out the army had more work to do. They probed and eventually identified some culprit who confessed the body lay in a shallow grave. The pond is apparently a host to human ferocity. Other deaths have occurred there, evidence other car parts, human parts, clothes, etc. It is pond of mystery.

    The intriguing part of the story is the breath-taking professionalism with which the army followed the investigation till they found the remains of their lost colleague. I have yet to excavate from our history any investigation with such painstaking attention to detail and alacrity. It shows we can do it as a people if we want. If the soldiers pay such diligence to the investigation of other crimes in the country, like the butchery in Kaduna and many episodes of the Fulani-locals imbroglio, we should have been a nation of law and decency. Boko haram still skulks and devastates in the North east, if in sporadic barbarism. The so-called herdsmen-farmers clashes have substantially gone under leash, thanks to some of the work the Buhari administration has put in place, especially with the deployment of Russian aircraft, Mi35. But the violence has mutated to highway robbery and a slew of kidnappings.

    If what the army did in Alkali’s case is done in the judiciary, in education, in tackling random violence among us, the country would have been happier and healthier.

    Alkali was just a retired soldier on his way to Bauchi. But a rash of young men, around expired mines, mounted a barricade. Was he a target or an accidental victim? Some arrests have been made.

    This is not a story to slow down. In view of revived violence in parts of Plateau State, a new law is being drafted to try  local criminals locally. The idea is to avoid the bureaucracy of Abuja.

    This is the second major step of Governor Simon Lalong on security. The first was to install a template for peace that worked for all of three years until rogue elements sullied it with bloodshed. The template is remarkably still working in most of the state, and it should be a work in progress.

    The law, as the Governor has indicated, is in the state house of assembly. Speed is of the essence so the criminals can meet the furious majesty of the law. Just like other victims, Gen. Alkali also should get justice even in the silence of the grave.

    The pond will now be avenged. It has lost its innocence to sacred savagery. This is different from the Walden Pond that Henry David Thoreau wrote lyrically about over a century ago, a bible of the environmental movement that preceded President Theodore Roosevelt or Rachel Carson’s 20th century masterpiece, Silent Spring.

    We want the pond to return as a body of water, pure and peaceful among leafy bowers and throaty birds. It should not be a water of bodies.

  • Imo: Limits of propaganda

    KEEN observers of events since the congresses and primaries of the All Progressives Congress APC in Imo State, would have been amazed at the narratives emerging from that state.

    Battle for the control of the party leadership was fought between a group loyal to the state governor, Rochas Okorocha and a coalition of other influential party members opposed to the governor. It produced parallel party executives with the ensuing primaries following the same predictable pattern as it threw up two governorship candidates. The claimants, Senator Hope Uzodinma and Uche Nwosu are currently locked in a legal battle over the authentic flag bearer of the party.

    When last week the state government issued a statement blaming people outside the party for its current predicament, one was at a loss to figure out how that could have been. In that statement, Okorocha through his press secretary, Sam Onwuemeodo accused the Catholic Archbishop of Owerri Diocese, Most Reverend Anthony Obinna, former governor of the state, Chief Achike Udenwa and former chairman of the state council of traditional rulers, Eze Cletus Ilomuanya of supporting Hope Uzodinma and nursing pathological hatred for both the APC and President Muhammadu Buhari.

    “So they are working together now in support of Hope Uzodinma, whose claim of being a member of the APC is not up to six months. And the PDP chieftains like Udenwa also supporting the senator. These people cannot love APC or President Buhari”, the statement further claimed.

    One is not holding brief for those accused of either supporting the candidature of Uzodinma or of pathological hatred for the APC and Buhari. Those accused are capable of defending themselves. But, it is difficult to gloss over the incongruities and contradictions brought to the fore by some of the issues bandied by the state government. Archbishop Obinna and Ilomuanya are not politicians even as they are free to have their personal preferences in political matters. But whereas Udenwa is a member of the Board of Trustees of the PDP, Ezekiel Izuogu also accused, belongs to the APC.

    The nagging poser is the purpose served by Okorocha going to town with the claim that these key personages hate Buhari and the APC? And if they hate the APC and Buhari, how come they now support Uzodinma to clinch the APC ticket? In what capacities will they achieve that since the issue in contention is the ticket of the party? That appears a huge contradiction that casts serious slur on the veracity of the claim. Perhaps, the only objective it could serve is to create a rift between them and the president especially given the weight of the phrase “pathological hatred”.

    But when we pair the allegation of pathological hatred for Buhari and the APC with the other that they are supporting Uzodinma, the objective of the linkage becomes more manifest. It is spurred by no other motive than the desire to gain advantage over Uzodinma in the feud over the authentic governorship candidate of the party. It is cheap propaganda at large; a smear campaign.

    The game is to invent imaginary enemies of Buhari and the APC and accuse them of supporting Okorocha’s foe. If this subterfuge sails through, Uzodinma will fall out of favor with the party leadership thus paving the way for the successful emergence of his preferred candidate. It is also difficult to reconcile the claim that Archbishop Obinna has never hidden his sympathy for APGA, with the other that he is supporting Uzodinma to secure the APC ticket. Which of the two claims do we now believe? Even then, Okorocha got to his current position under the platform of APGA. So, he may have more to tell about his relationship with the archbishop.

    Behind these claims lies a hidden agenda to get even with his rival through unwholesome means. It is an uncanny similitude of pursuing an objective through fair or foul means. That is why Udenwa, a BOT member of the PDP will be supporting Uzodinma to clinch the governorship ticket of the APC. Udenwa must be that powerful if he could influence who becomes the candidate of the APC in Imo State when he is not a member of that party.

    The state government further exposed the duplicity in the allegations when it said Uzodinma’s claim to membership of the party is less than six months. That could be true. But it also exposes the deceit in the attempt to find escapism for the current crisis into which the state wing of the party is enmeshed. It should be a serious source of worry that with less than six months in the party and the awesome and larger than life powers which Okorocha hitherto ascribed to himself, some seeming interlopers are about to pull the rug out of his feet.

    That is the issue to contend with rather than this recourse to shadow chasing. Those Okorocha lined up for selective attacks were neither organizers nor participants in the contentious congresses and primaries that brought about the current pass. They neither have hands in the crisis nor will they be part of its resolution.

    Okorocha must come to terms with the fact that his problem is within his party for now. He admitted that much when he blamed the national chairman of the party, Adams Oshiomhole for the fate of the party in Imo State. That is a more reasonable way to go about it rather than beating about the bush.  But his style of politics must have contributed immensely to his current predicament. He is generally seen to loathe competition and team work, almost always preferring yes members around him. People of worth and knowledge who worked with him have sour tales to tell. It is not surprising that most of these people currently hibernate in other parties.

    Before now, the governor had told whoever cared that he will retire all key politicians in the state except perhaps, himself. He had boasted that after the said retirements, he will throw up a new corps of emergency leadership in the state. The word retirement soon became a euphemism for chasing key leaders away from happenings in his government. It may have worked for him all this while.  But the pay time has come. Those he plans to retire from politics would rather, not allow that happen. They are fighting to have him retired together with his army of make-shift leaders. That is the dynamics of politics.

    It is intriguing that the fight started from within his domain. Members of the party opposed to his style of politics including his deputy would no longer tolerate his bid to handpick people for all elective posts and install his son-in-law as the next governor. To a large extent, his current predicament is self inflicted. It all has to do with the arrogance and corruptive influences of power. And as Lord Acton aptly captured, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    He had all the opportunity to make tremendous impact in the governance of the state given the circumstance of his ascendancy to power but failed to utilize it for public good. Okorocha had popular appeal that saw him defeat an incumbent governor. But he soon squandered that goodwill through anti-people policies; succumbing to the lure of exclusion, dictatorship and hero worshipping.

    The fact that he found himself waging wars on all fronts, even when his party’s candidate is yet to emerge is an eloquent testament to how enduring that goodwill has been. It is also a statement on how his government has been received by people of the state. These should constitute food for thought for him as the campaigns for the real elections commence.

    Beyond this, those conversant with the way Uzodinma left the PDP will scoff the suggestion that Udenwa is supporting his governorship candidature. Both are from the Imo west senatorial zone that produced Udenwa as the governor for eight years and Rochas about to complete another eight years. Uzodinma and Nwosu are from the same Imo west zone. And should any of them emerge and win, the zone would have monopolized that position for 20 years. How fair that will be to other segments of the state is a moot issue that is bound to influence the outcome of the governorship election.

  • Anenih’s unsung wonder

    When a dead politician’s good example is overshadowed by his perceived bad politics, it should be a lesson to the living.  Chief Tony Anenih, who died on October 28, aged 85, earned the nickname, Mr. Fix It, on account of his intensely controversial political manoeuvres. He had a reputation for fixing things to advance his own political interests, which suggested that he was not always guided by principle.

    But the same man was quoted as saying: “The only life worth living is the life lived in service to God and humanity.” This was his response when the management of the University College Hospital, UCH, Ibadan, asked him to endow Nigeria’s first geriatric centre.  Chief Medical Director, UCH, Prof. Temitope Alonge, had said: “At the core management meeting of the hospital held in July 2012, management unanimously agreed on the choice of Chief Tony Anenih, CFR, the Iyasele of Esanland as the most suitable Nigerian to endow this centre, the very first of such in Nigeria.”Anenih’s positive response resulted in the Chief Tony Anenih Geriatric Centre.

    Alonge explained that the then Minister of Health, Professor Onyebuchi Chukwu, had sold the idea of getting a philanthropist to endow the centre   to the management when he visited the university. “This will ultimately dovetail into the naming of such projects after the endower,” he added.

    At an event last year, Alonge highlighted the importance of the centre: “We are now at the Geriatric Age in Nigeria. The adult population is increasing at an alarming rate and therefore the demand for care of the aged has been on the rise as against what it used to be in the past. The Tony Anenih Geriatric Centre in UCH, commissioned five years ago, is the only centre committed to the care of the aged. The centre has since its inception treated close to 30,000 patients with the daily patients figure attendance at 1,000 daily.”

    It is sad that Anenih’s politics cast a shadow over his commendable endowment of the geriatric centre. His role after the military annulled the country’s historic June 12, 1993 presidential election won by Chief MKO Abiola was an albatross around his neck until he died. His lack of enthusiasm for the popular struggle to validate Abiola’s mandate was considered a betrayal of democracy. As chairman of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), which had won the election, Anenih was oddly apathetic.

    In the course of his political life, which spanned decades, Anenih projected the image of an unprogressive political player. As chairman of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) in the former Bendel State, his association with the conservative party spoke volumes about his political inclination. As National Chairman of SDP, it was an unlikely association exposed by his disconnection from the unjust annulment of Abiola’s electoral victory.

    Anenih’s participation in the Constitutional Conference in 1994 reflected his involvement in the country’s search for political solutions. His role as Deputy National Coordinator of Olusegun Obasanjo Campaign Organisation in the 1999 and 2003 elections showed his belief in the development capacity of the conservative camp. President Obasanjo appointed him Minister of Works and Housing in 1999, and he later became Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the then ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Anenih was a symbol of godfatherism in Nigerian politics, meaning he was identified with a form of political corruption. As a political godfather, particularly in his native Edo State, he regarded himself as a kingmaker with the power, and influence, to determine who became governor.

    However, Anenih was eventually demystified. In 2008, Adams Oshiomhole of the former Action Congress (AC) became governor of the state despite Anenih’s opposition. Anenih never recovered from the political blow. Not only did Oshiomhole do two four-year terms, his successor also came from the progressive camp opposed to Anenih. By the time he died, Anenih had announced his retirement from politics, a sign that the godfather recognised his decline.

    It is noteworthy that in October 2009, a senate committee issued a report following its probe of how over N300 billion was spent in the transport sector during the Obasanjo administration. The committee had recommended prosecution of 13 former ministers, including Anenih, who was accused of awarding contracts without budgetary provision.

    It is puzzling that Anenih’s death attracted flattering tributes, even by those who detested his politics. This thought-provoking contradiction is not redemptive.

    The redeeming feature comes from an eye-witness account by Folu Olamiti published last year: “At a point in my life, I could no longer afford the soaring cost of medical checks abroad. It was at this point that someone introduced me to Chief Tony Anenih Geriatric Centre at the University College Hospital, UCH, Ibadan… Behold, it was a sight to behold. I started seeing familiar faces of retired Vice Chancellors, Professors drawn from virtually every part of the country, aged politicians, businessmen, clergymen and aged peasants of all sorts. Some could barely walk and were in wheelchairs. The environment was sparkling, made beautiful with well- manicured gardens, gardens brimming with aromatic flowers. Everything the aged needed was provided.”

    Olamiti continued enthusiastically: “Upon investigation, I learnt that the centre is the brainchild of the politician popularly known as “Mr. Fix It”, Chief Tony Anenih. The man had hitherto been fixing virtually every political jigsaw in Nigeria’s current democracy but at some point, he decided to fix better life for the aged.  I give him kudos.  He deserves a big applause from all well-meaning Nigerians. I equally learnt that he started ploughing back the seeds realised in politics to build this centre to cater to the aged way back in 2012;and from then, he has never looked back as he keeps the centre going with regular funding; and he does so single-handed.  Chief Anenih picks the bills on anything and everything that has to do with the centre. He sets up a Social Health Insurance Scheme for all the clients at N18, 000 annually, which gives the beneficiaries access to health care of up to N500, 000 yearly.  Here, fees payable for clinical services are pegged at 50% of normal hospital fees.”

    Anenih is dead. The ultimate tribute to him is to keep the geriatric centre going.

  • Mighty men

    He walks like a teen. Short, eyes alert, his feet and arms crackle as though the fellow is about to leap in and out of his labour attire. Unlike his days as governor, he has no beauty, no svelte figure beside him, to chasten his speed. Sometimes he rails, sometimes he cajoles, but often with a visceral brutality. Some party members hold their breaths until they are about to lose them. Welcome Adams, goodbye wheeler dealer. Oyegun now sulks in silence.

    When he stepped in as APC chair, no one expected him to carry on the mercantile drollery of his septuagenarian ancestor.  No under-the-carpet, shadowy politics. Adams Oshiomhole could not have promised anything else. His labour past, a soldierly profile in the trenches of aluta, presents him as a sort of contradiction in politics. The activist meets the cunning. But such contradictions are good when put to good use.

    “Do I contradict myself,” asks the American poet of democracy, Walt Whitman. “I am large. I contain multitudes.” Adams is an example of a strong man in democracy. The view often is that a strong man is bad for democracy. Since it is an ideology that privileges the collegial over hubris, it is wrong to think of a big man in a system of popular persuasion.

    But history has given us many. Churchill. Washington. De Gaulle. Lincoln. Ghandi. Mandela. Awolowo. They are not big because they bully. They do not wield guns or rally mobs with blood in their eyes. They fall into what Max Weber describes as charismatic figures. They draw their strengths from moral example, intellectual power and courage. They are not like Franco, Mobutu, Hitler, or Mussolini, the sawdust Caesar. They exploit what Rousseau called the collective will.

    The good big men give the ideology role models. They are a sort of contradiction of royalty in the society of equals. They are big because they are like us. They ride on us. They do not ride us. The rise from us, not in spite of us. They are the sort of man Lord Jim aspired to be in Joseph Conrad’s novel.

    So, Adams is playing that sort of game in the APC. He is bringing sanity to the decay that Oyegun left. His ancestor brought the party to the brink. It did not help that the real leader of the party, President Muhammadu Buhari, looked on as elements like Bukola Eleyinmi Saraki, became a fifth columnist until he was naturally cauterised. Or a man like Dogara, who became speaker because of the northern guilty conscience about northern Christians being marginalised. Dogara cannot win a senatorial race in Bauchi State, yet he tries to challenge Governor Abdullahi Abubakar in a duel in which just one punch will fell him.

    He is not always elegant. He does not have to be. His diction is sometimes uneven for the purpose. But it is not a game for accurate shots. Some misses are acceptable as long as the main goal is within sight. On his watch, a new idea has shaken the Nigerian political history: the open primaries. It has scared many, especially some governors who cannot stand the popular test. And we have seen that even when it was not open primaries, it rattled some who lay regal claims to political offices. The concept has opened the eyes of the party to a new way of politics. They have seen the forbidden fruit, lush primaries that provide the people’s wish. If not exactly the people’s wish, something close to it. A hint of progress.

    When such men emerge, we confront obstacles. Hence the stories in some states, like Ogun, Zamfara and Imo. In Kaduna State, Shehu Sani has failed to make his way, because the dwarf governor, Nasir El-Rufai has turned himself into a monarch. But it is not only the story of a hectoring chief executive, but also about Sani’s sometimes juvenile outbursts in the course of his brief senatorial stewardship. He may not return as senator. He started a fight with a man when he had not sized up the foe to understand how much firepower he had to duel him down.

    Well, Sani the activist overpowered Sani the politician, and he may be sharpening his tool to return to his old trade. His naivety has given us some nuggets, though. Through him we know the pay and moral payload of our lawmakers. It was an extraordinary moment in our democracy. He blew the wind to a hen’s behind and we saw all the muck and bumps. No one denied, and he did it without shame or shamefacedness, and without drawing alienation. He kept taking the pay. He was like a man who carted away the loot after confessing to his iniquity. But we shall remain indebted to his tainted honesty.

    The story of Zamfara, Imo and Ogun are examples of how not to be a big man in a democracy. Ibikunle Amosun has been crying like a three-year-old, just the age of the party in power. Amosun, who has carried on like a little Pol Pot in Ogun politics is amazed how suddenly he has become an underdog in his party. The father thinks he is roaring. The children are asking why he is crying.  He does not know that there is a difference between a Kabiyesi and elected governor. He sees himself as his excellency kabiyesi Amosun. He saw the grandiose emptiness of Daniel’s reign. He brought his own and he could not even own it.

    Right before his eyes, he looked at a primary that upended his candidate. Out of illusory confidence, he had accompanied Akinlade to the mosque and proclaimed, in vacuous prophecy, that he would accompany him in the next Sallah as a friend to the governor. How soon he became a false prophet.

    He also took a real kabiyesi to see Mr. President without telling him the purpose. Well, he did not know that Buhari is not one to fight for anyone who is not Buhari. This is Buhari that Amosun always wanted to stand beside for photo ops. The story is told that when other governors were with the president, Amosun would jostle his way through his colleagues, brushing them away to create a path for himself to stand beside the big man. Where is the camera man!

    Okorocha’s story has been well documented in this column. It is not that his in-law cannot be governor. He should let the people agree with him. But he wants to be the wrong big man in politics. The same with Yari. Yoruba will say Oti yari o. (He has turned desperate). INEC has disavowed any APC candidacy. The big men are seeing, for the first time in eight years, that they are just human.  Shakespeare describes such a person as “proud man, dressed in a little brief authority.”

    They are trying to act in the philosophy of Plato that “might makes right.” In the slavery era, Abraham Lincoln declared that “right makes might.” It is that right that Adams is clutching and the Amosuns are crying over.

     

    Kanu and his dog

     

    Kanu the ethnic entrepreneur surfaced at last, in the land of David. Pictured with his skull cap and swaddle, he thought he was the ascetic hero. But he is the coward who revealed himself at last. He may think he is Odumegwu Ojukwu, who fled after the civil war. Ojukwu earned the right to a second act, although what anti-climax he became. He came to NPN, and wanted his people to support the very cabal that tied them in blood and tears for 30 months. At least, he was with his people for that long, and he died in the graces of many Igbo for his heroics during the war.

    But Kanu started wailing about his dog, and it was its only name he remembered, not his suffering followers. This is the man for whom some died, and others, including a famous lawyer and constitutionalist, called a hero. He is how not to make an epic. He jolted a country to tempest and ran for cover.

  • Health insurance scandal

    From whichever prism raging controversy at the National Health Insurance Scheme, NHIS, is viewed, the organization is unarguably, in a deep mess. Weighty allegations of financial impropriety have been traded and something very urgent and drastic has to be done to retrieve the scheme from the precipice into which it is irretrievably mired.

    As things stand, the environment of work has been badly polluted even as the safety of staff cannot be guaranteed. Not with the Gestapo entry into the headquarters of the organization by its suspended Executive Secretary, Prof. Usman Yusuf.  Aided by a contingent of about 50 policemen, Yusuf reportedly confronted the staff that blocked the gate to deny him entry.  In the ensuing melee unbecoming of a governmental institution, teargas was fired by the police as he eventually made his way into his office.

    It was a shameful scene to behold. And the impression created is that of a complete breakdown of law and order within that critical institution. With the scene that played out, it has become clear there is serious resentment to the authority of the executive secretary with the staff divided along the line. The organization cannot achieve its statutory mandate in such a hostile environment.

    But it would seem the current crises could have been avoided had the relevant authorities done the needful when Yusuf was suspended last year by the minister of health, Prof. Isaac Adewole and a panel set up to probe allegations of gross misconduct against him.  Then, the minister had sent him on suspension to enable the panel do a thorough job without encumbrances. The committee which was composed mainly of staff of the ministry found him culpable of infractions that ranged from nepotism to theft of public funds.

    Curiously, President Buhari overruled the minister and ignored the findings of the panel when he ordered the recall of the executive secretary. A letter to that effect urged Yusuf to work closely with the minister on resumption of duties. And that appeared to have resolved the crisis within the NHIS albeit, temporarily. Speculations regarding the rationale for the surprising reinstatement of Yusuf ranged from accusations that the panel was not independent and free from bias to inability to conclusively prove some of the allegations made against the NHIS boss by the petitioners.

    President Buhari’s order reinstating Yusuf may have been informed by these considerations. But as recent events have shown, that was not all there was to the crises. Only last week, the governing council of the scheme again suspended Yusuf accusing him of monumental financial infractions. The council handed the suspension order on him to aid thorough investigation of allegations against him.

    Chairperson of the council, Enyantu Ifenne said the council decided to suspend Yusuf after being inundated with petitions and infractions against him. The administrative panel set up by the council is to among others; examine allegations of attempt to illegally execute N30 billion investments in FGN bonds, fraudulent inflation of the cost of biometric capturing machines, unlawful staff postings, insubordination, willful defiance of council’s directives and refusal to reflect amendments made by the council in the 2018 budget. The panel has three months to report back.

    But Yusuf again resisted the suspension order and stormed the headquarters of the organization with a contingent of security men forcing his way through. And as was the case in his earlier suspension by the minister, he is challenging the powers of the governing council to suspend him. He claims by virtue of the NHIS Act, particularly sections 4 and 8, his appointment and removal from office, whether by way of suspension or otherwise, is at the instance of the president. But the same Act in Part 3 section 8(3) also stated that the executive secretary is “subject to the general direction of the council”.

    Apparently relying on the former, he would not subject himself to any suspension order unless that directly handed over to him by the president. But the same president that appointed him also appointed the minster and the governing council to supervise his activities. In his earlier suspension by the minister, he had offered the same reason though the order for his suspension was authorised by the then acting president. In his current predicament, he is at it again. How he gets to know whether his suspension order was not authorized by the president even when letters emanating from that quarters will still be passed onto him through the office of the minister remains a puzzle.

    With such mindset, should it surprise anybody that allegation of gross insubordination levied against Yusuf holds some water? And since he owes his office to the president, he is at liberty to do whatever pleases him. It is therefore not difficult to figure out that at the centre of his confrontation with his supervisors is the feeling that he can only take directive from the president.

    But the argument as to whether the Act establishing the scheme explicitly gave the council the powers to suspend the executive secretary or not is patently unnecessary. It is a mere exercise in technicality as the same Act could not have permitted a situation in which the executive secretary will be above the supervising council and the minister. It does not and cannot work that way.

    The council has accused him of insubordination and wilful defiance of its directives. It is very unlikely these are spurious allegations. If anything, his disposition to directives emanating from his supervisors goes to reinforce this. In the circumstance staff discipline will be at its lowest ebb.

    But it would appear Yusuf is not alone in his obduracy. Those beating the drums for him are somewhere watching. He is neither the first person appointed to such critical institutions nor will he be the last. He is not the only person so appointed by the president that can only be removed with the approval of the president. Why his has become an issue is the moot point. He has accused Health management organizations (HMO’s) and sundry politicians of masterminding his current predicament because he blocked their sources of ripping the scheme dry.

    That could as well be. But it is inherently deficient in accounting for why he has found himself unable to work harmoniously with the minister, the governing council and the generality of the staff. It cannot also exonerate him from the plethora of allegations levelled against him that landed him in two suspensions within about 14 months. There must be more to it than he would have us believe.

    The unmistakable impression we get is that Yusuf is bigger than the minister, bigger than the governing council and they may have to be sacrificed for him to function effectively. There is also the feeling that everything can be sacrificed and every toe stepped upon for Yusuf to have his way. If that is the feeling within government circles, the options are clear. They should go ahead and relieve the minister and the governing council of their posts since Yusuf cannot work with them. That will enable work unsupervised and perhaps report directly to the president who appointed him.

    But where the government cannot adopt this line of action, it is only rational to see the continued stay of Yusuf in that scheme as an unmitigated liability. He must be made to proceed on suspension for serious investigations into the recurring allegations against him to be thoroughly conducted. His supervisors cannot be all wrong. And for a government that brandishes the war against corruption as one of its cardinal programmes, it cannot afford to do any less. The government cannot afford to shut its eyes to the weighty allegations traded without compromising its commitment to that war.

    Before now, the government has been heavily criticized for double standards in executing the war against sleaze in public offices. Apart from allegations bordering on focusing almost solely on the opposition, it has also been criticized for looking the other way when infractions concern some of its favoured ones. The case of Yusuf fits into the characteristic double standards when officials of the Buhari administration are accused of financial infractions.

  • Of politicians and prophets

    She is now a royal. But for some who share her original faith, she has dumped one royalty for new loyalty. An ethereal damsel now earthbound. She has parlayed Zion for an earthly palace. I refer, of course, to the new queen on the Ife throne. Her picture, now viral, portrays her stepping on a map of blood spill as part of her wedding rites.

    It signals her transition to a Yoruba regal.  The blood could have emanated from any mammal or bird. But those who cherish her as a Christian evangelist are griping away over why she has abandoned the blood of Christ for the body waste of a mere beast. For them, she degraded the entrails of the highest. She disintegrated from a royal priesthood. She is no longer heavenly by stepping up to a lesser deity, less commanding than her former grandeur.

    But traditionalists see her as a convert. Secularists see her as a realist. Some may say she is assimilated but not converted. Or vice versa. A few see her as a mere hybrid of faith, one who has seen her rite as a glorious nexus of two worlds: a marriage within a marriage. By being the wife of the Ooni of Ife, Naomi is trying to wed Jesus to Orunmila, in the spirit of the Yoruba ancestors.

    For some Yoruba, this is nothing novel. History has shown the Yoruba nation to be inevitably syncretic, a soul where faiths conjoin in peace and harmony. Hence, it was easy for the Yoruba to embrace Islam and Christianity without rancour or philosophical remorse. Where some others saw a breach, the Yoruba felt at ease. Some Christian sects display this paradox of worship in the southwest in their modes and rituals.

    Those who have read Wole Soyinka’s translation of Fagunwa’s A Forest of A thousand Daemons, see how Christian and Yoruba worldviews segue. But many have failed to understand that Naomi, the evangelist Yoruba queen, only reflects how, as a people, we have not crested the 21st century’s materialist wave. We have first to look at our political elite to grasp this.

    It is the power of pastors, marabouts, babalawos, dibias, etc. In the last PDP presidential primaries, some contestants relied less on what they saw than on the eyes of their seers. To one aspirant, a marabout fleshed out the vision. He saw the aspirant smothered in his voluminous babaringa swearing in ministers.

    Naomi walking on blood during the ritual
    Naomi walking on blood during the ritual

    Another marabout saw another aspirant hanging his suit in the presidential office. The first was a man awash in ceremonial glory; the other in a grand grind of presidential duty.

    Nor is it restricted to marabouts. Pastors con many with rose-tinted visions. A few years ago, one politician bucked crystal-clear evidence by insisting a sitting governor would hand over to him because his prophetess saw the vision. An older politician counselled him, half in derision, to return to the prophetess for clarity. A few years ago, a prophetess could not foresee the assassination of a politician barely an hour after he left the woman of God in wee hours.

    Are they gullible or desperate? It reflects an underrated market that flatters ambitions. They invest politicians with hope. Hope emboldens them to action. After paying the seers, they move into the battle fray. All but they can see they have no chance. But they pooh-pooh advisers, pundits, the robust mockery of hard reality. They hear, like Joan of Arc in Bernard Shaw’s play, the mellifluous falseness of their voices. The seer at work.

    They are men of faith. They yield to the destiny of heaven. They already know their foot soldiers. They craft their path to power. They develop a sense of their human uniqueness. They are, like Queen Naomi, royals set apart by the Almighty. The flatterers who gulp their money also wonder. But they follow the candidate because it is bread and butter. Sometimes, the candidate infects them with his confidence because the candidate is fired by a celestial vision. His veins rise. His eyes shine. God glows over them. He walks on high winds. His belief cows any doubt. Everyone is on board the train to the presidential, gubernatorial, senatorial saddle.

    These candidates don’t have to wait for the miracles first or else they won’t contest. They hope for miracles. They are believers as risk takers. The marabouts and co. know that. As Dostoyevsky noted, seers possess three qualities that enthral people: miracle, mystery and authority. For the candidates, they wield authority with their sense of mystery, and so miracle must come. For other believers, miracles affirm their mystery and authority. Not like Jesus who said, blessed are those who believe even if they don’t see.

    It is the power of faith. Faith is the best friend of destiny.  Some people want miracles before they have faith. Those are the worst of believers. Even Jesus did not like people who wait for miracles before believing. Hence he poured woe on some followers: “You wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign. But I shall not show you any sign except that of prophet Jonah.”  Paul mocked the Jews for seeking signs. Paul defined faith as hope without evidence.

    Jesus did not yield to the miracle of the Satan, who wanted to give him the world. Rather, in his fleshly status, he endured for heaven’s command and succumbed to a shameful death. Our pastors and mallams these days want our people to believe them only if they perform miracles, even though the scriptures show that the devil also performs miracles. In his massive novel, The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoyevsky writes, “Faith does not, in a realist, spring from the miracle but the miracle from faith.”

    These candidates are not waiting for the miracles first. Hence some people believed in Father Mbaka and others of his ilk. Miracles are prophecies that happen only if you want them. Prophet Habakkuk says to run with the vision. To fulfil, you must act. Apostle Paul confirms it. You can derail prophesies like Macbeth. Or fall into woe like Oedipus. Prophecies are not cast in stone, even Jesus’ birth was about prophecies reinforced by prophecies of persecution.

    These faithful politicians exhaust their faiths before getting into power. When they get there, there is little faith left to fix roads, feed the poor or furnish schools to enlighten us and hospitals to heal us. With faith gone, no morality is left. They lose the fear of God. And as Dostoyevsky noted, “when there is no God, everything is permitted,” including and especially bad governance

     

    From error to a new era

    Governor John Kayode Fayemi soared into office with one of the best speeches ever delivered in our democratic experience. In rhythm, diction, evocations and content, Fayemi blended poetry with rage to rouse a people from an era he characterised as an error. My only complaint was in his “never again” part of the speech. It should have replaced “should” with “shall” to match the grandeur and intensity of the hour. No matter. He promises to bring back a governance of high principles and high dreams against Fayose’s cynically grovelling stomach infrastructure.

    But the new governor must blend that with a “common touch,” a charge that may have been exaggerated about his first coming but nonetheless a potent counsel as he recharges his people to cancel an error. He must note that he won with a thin margin, and he has to bind the wounds of the followers of the stomach.  It is no mean task. He will have to elevate a people of PHD to a realm of ideas from a pedestrian mentality. I wish him the best.

     

    Not presidential

    Bukola “Eleyinmi” Saraki came back to another storm. This time, he did the last thing first and first thing last. Rather than ask the Senate Clerk whether he granted Godswill Akpabio a permit to sit, Saraki asked him to change his seat. Again, he knew new sitting arrangement had not been resolved, so what seat was he asking Akpabio to take? Eventually the former Akwa Ibom governor spoke, and Saraki only created a convulsion in a healthy body. Was it an effect of his presidential snafu in Port Harcourt? He did not act presidential in the Senate.

     

    The Peacemakers

    Rev Kukah
    Rev Kukah

    The peacemakers said it was nothing partisan. But Atiku belongs to one divide. So, I want the trio of Bishops Kukah and Oyedepo as well as Alhaji Gumi to reconcile the other side. They should begin with Gumi, who loathes Buhari. Then they can reconcile Danjuma with Buhari. Their mission will be complete. Until they do it or, at least try, their mission remains partisan in my book. After all, Apostle said “follow peace with all men.” Peace beckons the clerics.

  • Umahi’s grouse

    Those calling for the head of Ebonyi State governor, Dave Umahi over his utterances on the choice of former governor of Anambra State, Peter Obi as running mate to Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party PDP, should tarry for a while.

    For, it appears the euphoria that usually greets such appointments is about to blur whatever point there is in the reservations of some southeast leaders as presented by Umahi. This should not be surprising given the high wire politics that usually surrounds which part of the nation’s geo-political divide that clinches the position.

    Given this, comments with prospects of narrowing the chances of the zone or even working against it in producing the number two citizen are bound to ruffle public sensibilities. The peculiarity of the southeast within the nation’s political matrix since the return to democracy in 1999, further reinforces such feelings.

    So it was when after a meeting of southeast governors of the PDP and some leaders, Umahi addressed the press repudiating an earlier statement by his media aide congratulating Obi on his nomination. “I am shocked over the choice of former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi as the running mate to the presidential candidate of the PDP, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar without consulting with the leaders of the zone. The earlier statement quoting me as congratulating Peter Obi was never to my knowledge and I dissociate myself from the statement” Umahi said.

    A barrage of attacks has been hurled at Umahi and the leaders on whose behest he spoke. Most of the views lampooned the governor for daring question the choice of Obi who in their view is eminently suitable and very qualified for the position. Umahi has been called all sorts of names with his promptings subjected to all manner of speculations. Some have even gone further to reel out Obi’s credentials all in an effort to rubbish whatever reservations might have informed the position of the southeast leaders. There are others who feel the governors should not have come public with such reservation as it tends to conform to the usual blackmail that the zone cannot agree on anything. For this group, Umahi’s comments could be capitalized upon by those against the progress of the zone to further divide and deny them their rights.

    The controversy is in part, self-inflicted. That Umahi issued a statement congratulating Obi on his nomination only to repudiate same shortly after is enough to raise eyebrows. It is immaterial whether the first statement was brought to his knowledge by his media aide or not. The fact that such a sensitive message went public without his endorsement also spoke volumes on the kind of administration he runs.

    It is curious that the governor, after issuing the congratulatory message turned full circle to express shock at the nomination on the grounds that the southeast was not consulted? Or put differently, were there no other available avenues to ventilate such grievances even in the seeming predicament he found himself?

    Having issued the first statement, one had thought that further developments on the matter should have been taken up privately. The retraction and the manner Umahi spoke conveyed the unmistakable impression that the southeast PDP governors were against the nomination of Obi. That is the general reading of the message. The governors are entitled to their position but as events have since shown, their strategy ended up producing direct opposite results.

    Apparently reeling on the sheer weight of these attacks, Umahi has made last ditch efforts to clarify his position.  In an interview with journalists in Abakiliki, he explained he was not against the nomination of Obi but the process leading to it. His grouse was that people from other zones met and took a decision that affected the southeast without the single input of any person from the area. “We have never said that Peter Obi is not good for us, we have nothing against Obi. But we want when decisions that concern us are being taken, we want to be part of that decision”, he said.

    He also picked holes with the manner in which the five names in the list were picked from three states in the zone to the exclusion of Ebonyi and Imo. He saw this as an attempt at marginalization contending that one of the reasons the Ebonyi man is not too comfortable with the idea of regions is that they are afraid of further marginalization.

    There are three issues raised in Umahi’s clarification. The first was that they were not carried along while decision on the nomination of the vice presidential candidate of the party was being deliberated upon by leaders from other zones. If people of other zones came together to consider the said list, it was only proper that the southeast should have had its representation irrespective of where the slot fell. This will make for equity and fairness and does not in any way compromise the right of Atiku to his choice of running mate.

    Umahi alluded to this in his earlier statement when he said if Atiku had just picked Obi without consultation with other regions; the southeast would not have raised eyebrows. But since he found it expedient to consult other regions, the exclusion of the southeast amounted to an error of judgment. We cannot agree any less with this view more so when the position was zoned to the region. Faulting that procedural error does not amount to a rejection of Obi’s candidacy as some are inclined to.

    It would then be improper to view that observation as evidence of schism within the ranks of the leadership of the zone. It is not. Neither should the lure of securing the vice presidential slot bar the leaders from making genuine observations on issues that affect them. After all, what is really there in the position and how does it remedy the precarious position of the southeast that we should be falling against each other? The slot is just one political post like many others that may end up not adding any real value to the southeast. It may not even be worth the energy being dissipated on it.

    There is the suggestion that PDP governors of the southeast did not support Atiku during the last convention of the party and that was why he did not consult them. This is neither here nor there since Atiku would still have to seek for votes in those states.

    Umahi went off tangent when he insisted that the five nominees in the list of possible vice presidential candidates ought to have been picked one from each of the five states. That would amount to trivializing the matter. If the nomination is based on merit as one should expect, demanding its sharing among the five states makes little sense. If all the states are ranked and one produces the five best nominees, the best of them all should emerge. This has nothing to do with marginalization as the governor erroneously argued.

    It was myopic for him to have alluded to this as some of the issues for which people of the state oppose the idea of regions copiously canvassed by proponents of restructuring. By extrapolation, he is saying that people of the area now known as Ebonyi were marginalized in the former eastern region and a return to regions would further accentuate that.

    The issue is not as simple as has been presented as whatever progress traceable to other sections of the zone are largely on account of individual efforts of those people depending on their competences, industry and hard work. And these vary from one area to the other. It was never a matter of deliberate government policy. Even then, Dr Akanu Francis Ibiam, the first governor of that region came from the present Ebonyi state. His position could have made all the difference in the lives of people of the area if all that was required for collective progress was ascendancy to high political office. Umahi must cure himself of such morbid prejudices if he must succeed in his current capacity.