Category: Monday

  • Ambode: Inclusion as solution

    Lagos State Governor Akinwunmi Ambode made history when he delivered the Convocation Lecture of the University of Lagos (UNILAG) on May 8.  His words: “True, I stand before you as the first UNILAG graduate to become Governor of Lagos. I am humbled by this distinction and elated to be the first to walk this path.”  The title of his lecture was “Inclusion: Path to a new nation.”

    He told the 2017 graduands:  ”In 1984, I attended a convocation much like today’s. On that day, I sat where you, now sit. I was an eager yet apprehensive young man set to graduate at 21. Although ready to tackle the world and make my mark, I was also a bit uncertain about what that world and life would bring.”

    How Ambode rose to his current position illustrates the power of performance. Between 1988 and 1991, he was assistant treasurer, Badagry Local Government, Lagos State.  Ten years later, he became auditor general for Local Government in Lagos State. In 2005, Ambode was appointed permanent secretary of the Ministry of Finance.

    As accountant general for Lagos State from 2006 – 2012, Ambode was “in charge of all the financial activities of the state and directly responsible for over 1400 accountants in the state service.” It is to his credit that “under his watch, the State Treasury Office (STO) revolutionised the way Lagos State finances were raised, budgeted, managed and planned.” Also to his credit:  ”In his six years as the Lagos State accountant general, the state’s financial performance improved visibly with the budget performing at a remarkable average of 85% annually.”

    These features of Ambode’s profile demonstrate that he is probably the most experienced individual in terms of familiarity with the state civil service operations to attain the position of governor since Lagos State was created in 1967.  After a 27-year civil service career, Ambode voluntarily retired in 2012 and started a consulting career. Then politics came up.  It is interesting that he was governor when Lagos celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2017.

    In three years as the governor of Nigeria’s most developed state, Ambode has shown that the pursuit of development requires politics of development. Through his concept of “One Lagos,” Ambode has promoted inclusive governance as key to inclusive growth.  It is commendable that his administration’s inclusive governance and inclusive development efforts continue to drive development at the grassroots.

    A winning governor will attract endorsements that are justifiable.   So, it is logical and predictable that Ambode is enjoying an abundance of justifiable endorsements.  He is qualified to seek reelection and his endorsers are backing him for a second term in office. The beauty of the endorsements is that they are based on what he has to show for his time in office so far. In other words, he has attracted powerful endorsements through the power of his performance.

    The point is that Ambode represents forward-looking governance, which Lagos needs to develop.  Listed 12th among the world’s largest 35 cities in 2015 when Ambode became governor, the former federal capital is work in progress, and the development-related results of Ambode’s progressive efforts are unmistakable and applaudable.

    The range of Ambode’s vision leaves no room for underdevelopment in any area, whether it is lighting up the city, keeping the city clean, building homes, rebuilding roads, providing security, tackling transportation, building theatres and so on.

    It is noteworthy that Ambode, in his lecture, modestly acknowledged the work of specific previous governors. “First, the administration of Asiwaju Tinubu and then that of Babatunde Raji Fashola, moved the master plan from concept to concrete reality,” he noted, adding,  “My administration is both a beneficiary of their work as well as a continuance of that work. We strive to go further because we have the opportunity to build upon what they have done.” Now the state has developed to the point where the Ambode administration is talking about turning Lagos into a Smart City.

    It was appropriate that he mentioned some of his achievements as governor. He observed: “In every way, our infrastructure is improved.  Our roads are better, our mass transportation has expanded, hospitals give better care to the sick and afflicted, education is improving and more affordable housing is being constructed before our very eyes.”

    Remarkably, Ambode focused on the subject of inclusion in his convocation lecture.  He said: “Here, I offer Lagos State as an example of what is possible for all Nigeria and Nigerians when we practice the governance of inclusion instead of the old, malign ways of exclusion… You see, the inclusion I talk about is more than a pretty word to say; so that I sound like some type of enlightened politician.” He added:  ”Inclusion is a principle by which we put to constructive use the full industry and skills of the people; Rich and Poor, Old and Young, Men and Women, Boys and Girls. This results in greater individual and collective productivity…Inclusion is not only the moral thing to do, it is the smart thing as well.”

    It is testimony to Ambode’s quality governance that the country’s other states cannot resist applauding his governance model. He has shown that well-rounded governance is an expression of well-rounded thinking, and has demonstrated the possibilities of political governance in a country that needs models of creative thinking in high political office.

    Ambode’s convocation lecture also focused on the connection between inclusion and federalism. He argued:  ”It is my unyielding belief that the principle of inclusion which has served Lagos so well can be employed in other states with similar effect…However, for states to give optimal service to their citizens the principle of inclusion first needs to be applied to the division of power between the Federal and State governments.”

    His solution is based on his concept of inclusion: “There is widespread consensus that too much power sits in the centre. We can correct this imbalance by reallocating power and responsibilities between the States and Federal government by amending the list of exclusive and concurrent powers and duties of these governments to reflect current realities in the nation.” Hopefully, more political players will pay more attention to inclusion.

  • Bomb at Ukehe

    The bomb attack at Ukehe, Enugu State country home of President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Chief John Nwodo, yet adds to the specter of unmitigated violence and insecurity that pervade the country’s landscape.

    Hurled into the compound penultimate Sunday as family members were getting ready for early morning mass, the bomb damaged windows, the ceiling of one of the houses in the compound and an air conditioning unit. Nobody was injured.

    Security operatives who visited the scene said they collected batteries, pellets and other materials used in the preparation of the Improvised Explosive Device IED with a promise to arrest the perpetrators to face the raw teeth of the law. But as we await security agencies to get at the root of this senseless and unprovoked attack, its motive has remained largely curious.

    Nwodo seemed to have opened the gateway to public feelings on the incident when he expressed surprise that anybody would be after his life with a promise that the attack would not deter him from leading his people. Expectedly, condemnations have trailed the incident. And the rumor mill has been awash with speculations as to what could be responsible for the attack and its motive.

    There are feelings that it has to do with Nwodo’s robust and focused leadership especially his principled stance on some of the contentious issues of our federal order. His recurring interface with leaders from other parts of the country agitating immediate restructuring of the country has been fingered as a possible clue. But the proscribed Indigenous Peoples of Biafra IPOB, in an apparent surprise with the turn of events, claimed it was an attempt by the government to criminalize it as a violent organization.

    All these are still within the realm of speculation. The lid to the puzzle will be possibly blown open if and when security agencies unmask those behind the bomb attack on the Ohaneze leader. In his current position, Nwodo represents the conscience of the Igbo race. He has been providing very enlightened and principled leadership to his people. His carriage and understanding of the contemporary position of his people especially in a regime that sidelined them added up to ender him to his people. Thus, an attack on him would easily be construed as an attack on his race especially in the circumstance of the current pass the nation is irretrievably entangled.

    Given the phenomenal high scale of violence in and around the country, the Ukehe incident would have gone unnoticed if not for the personality of Nwodo. Enugu state is far away from the North East where the explosion of Improvised Explosive Devices has been a recurring decimal. But the state has also had its fair dose of the despoliation and killings by the marauding Fulani herdsmen.

    Yet, the bomb attack reinforces the increasing slide to the law of the jungle in the face of the serial inability of the government to live up to its statutory bidding. Security agencies have promised to get at the root of the attack. We hope that will come through soon. Before then, Nwodo should be provided with adequate security to safeguard his life and that of his family. Those behind the attack may still be nursing hidden agenda with prospects of further precipitating chaos in the country.

    It is vital the current regime takes decisive action to arrest the fast declining state of security in the country. This is not the time to blame Ghadaffi or some other imaginary foreign nationals for the rising insecurity and killings. Sadly, President Buhari thought he could impress US President, Donald Trump during his visit to that country by fingering Ghadaffi’s militia for the killings by the herdsmen.

    He may have been misled by his advisers that given the role of the US in the ouster of Ghadaffi, heaping the blame for all the killings on his shoulders would impress Trump and attract US sympathy. That failed to happen as Trump directed him to go home and stop the killings. Ironically, the US government Buhari was counting on must have come to terms with the monumental disaster their outing in Libya has become. That former thriving economy has since lost its peace as disorder and insecurity reign supreme rendering life nightmarish for its citizens.

    The key thing at this point is the efficacy of measures put in place to secure lives and property from the mindless marauders and serial killers. That is the story that will make meaning and not the tepid and laughable recourse to excuses that suggest we are incapable of responding adequately to foreign security threats if and when they arise.

    The security situation has become so hopeless that the senate had to move for the sacking of all the Service Chiefs and their replacement with more enterprising people better attuned to modern dynamics in security engineering. It is also note worthy that the president promised Trump that he was doing something about the degenerate security situation.

    He told the Voice of America VOA in an interview that he had instructed the recruitment of 6,000 additional policemen across the 774 local government areas of the country to beef up security.  But he must have stunned his audience when he gave the impression that those hitherto recruited into the police were picked up anyhow from motor parks and markets. That is a serious indictment of that institution. May be that accounts for their poor performance profile as we have seen in their inability to maintain law and order.

    Apparently, the president’s insistence on getting to the 774 local governments to source the 6,000 additional police personnel is recognition of the need to decentralize policing in the country. But he contradicted that position when he displayed strong aversion to the institutionalization of state police. He would rather have the constitution to be consulted to see if it allows state police.

    Though section 214 ( 1) of the 1999 constitution provides for a central police force for the country and ruled out any other form of police organization for any other part thereof, Buhari believes even if state police was to be established, state governments would not be able to pay them. He cited the inability of state government to pay their workers to support his argument.

    But in arguing that way, he appeared to have lost sight of the central thrust of the agitations for state police as an integral aspect of restructuring. Restructuring would entail a new revenue allocation formula that will place more funds into the coffers of states. When that happens, the excuse of inability of states to pay salaries would have been taken care of. Even then, the inability of states to pay salaries is a twin consequence of mismanagement and the disproportionate share of the country’s revenue at the disposal of the center. The omnipresence and omnipotence of the federal government, virtually controlling life and death is responsible for serious conflicts in the country and the near state of anomie.

    Hiding under the putative financial burden the establishment of state police will bring to bear on state governments is no issue at all. Rather, such lame excuses expose the president’s poor understanding of the wider issues encapsulated in the restructuring debate. There is nothing so sacrosanct about the current constitution that was imposed by the military that it cannot be tinkered with to meet the yearnings and aspirations of those it is intended to serve.

    A constitution, any constitution is a living document. For it to be relevant, it must serve the interests of its constituents, constantly adjusting to environmental dynamics. State policing has become very effective in the maintenance of law and order especially in federal systems which this country has adopted. Rather than hide under extant constitutional stipulations to oppose state police, the president should support current agitations for devolution of powers through constitutional re-engineering. Restructuring is inevitable. Those who continue to oppose it under one spurious excuse or the other do not wish this country well.

  • Dino’s trials

    Senator Dino Melaye (Kogi West) should be congratulated. The move to recall him ended anticlimactically.  Not only did the petitioners fail, the result of the verification of signatories to the recall petition by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) showed that the attempt was unpopular. INEC said only 18, 762 signatures were genuine, though there were 39, 285 signatories. INEC’s presiding officer for the verification, Prof. Okente Morthy of the University of Abuja, said the number of genuine signatures fell short of the number required.

    An April 30 report said: “The genuine signatories represent a dismal 5.34 per cent of the total signatories to the petition, which fell short of 51 per cent or 98,364 signatures required for the petition to sail through. It was observed that the verification failed largely due to fictitious and forged signatures and names of dead persons affixed to the recall petition by its promoters.”

    It is noteworthy that before the verification Senator Melaye had alleged that there were forged signatures in the recall petition.  Melaye had reportedly said through one of his legislative aides, Malam Abubakar Sadiq: “Let me also say authoritatively that here in Lokoja Local Government Council, several others whose names and signatures appeared on the list of the signatories to this failed exercise were identified and known to us as being dead long before now. Such people like late Abdullahi Abubakar, his immediate younger sister late Halima Lawal Abubakar and Ibrahim Adama of Unit Code 021, Adankolo Ring Road in Ward ‘A’, Lokoja Local Government Council.”

    Whether Melaye’s forgery claims were correct or incorrect, whether the petitioners were verifiable or unverifiable, there is a time to prove or disprove, and there is a lawful body in charge of verification. Now that INEC has exposed fictitious and forged signatures and names of dead persons in the recall petition, it is time to find out what happened.

    Some of Melaye’s constituents had submitted a petition to recall the senator to INEC’s headquarters in Abuja in June 2017.  A report said: “One Mr. Cornelius Olowo led the petitioners to submit the recall petition which alleged poor representation as one of the reasons for the move to recall Melaye.”

    It is interesting that Kogi State Chairman of All Progressives Congress (APC), Alhaji Haddy Ametuo, was quoted as saying that “some ghosts” initiated the recall process against Senator Melaye. So, the police should be looking for the “ghosts” in this plot, including ghost petitioners and ghost forgers.

    Talking of ghosts, Melaye acted in a drama that reminded the public of ghosts. There were no ghosts, but there could have been because of Melaye’s overdramatic performance.  What really happened? Police spokesman Jimoh Moshood, in a statement, said on April 24: “At about 1200Hrs of today Sen. Dino Melaye while in lawful custody of the Nigeria Police Force and being taken for arraignment in Federal High Court, Lokoja from Abuja, escaped from lawful custody when hoodlums and miscreants in two Toyota Hilux vehicles blocked the police vehicle conveying Senator Dino Melaye around Area 1 Roundabout, Abuja.”

    He added: “In the process, the senator jumped out of the police vehicle through the window and was rescued from the policemen by hoodlums and miscreants to an unknown destination. The Police team reinforced and trailed Senator Dino Melaye to Zankli Hospital, Abuja where he was re-arrested.”

    That is one version of what happened. Melaye’s Special Adviser Gideon Ayodele gave the public another version: “Contrary to online reports about jumping out of a moving police vehicle; Nothing could be farther from the truth as such insinuation is practically impossible for a man sandwiched between gun-wielding policemen. Today’s incident was a last resort by Senator Dino Melaye in order to foil attempt to kidnap him and kill him by agents of Kogi State governor in connivance with the police.”

    Did Melaye jump out of the police vehicle? If he did, such a move was unbecoming of a senator.    If he didn’t, what did he do?  Why did he need to get treatment at the private hospital?  After he was re-arrested at the Zankli Hospital, he was moved to the National Hospital, Abuja, where the police reportedly handcuffed him to a bed.

    Melaye had been declared wanted by the police after he allegedly ignored their invitation to answer allegations made against him by two suspected criminals, Kabiru Seidu, aka Osama, and Nuhu Salihu, aka Small.  Saidu and Salisu had allegedly confessed that they had worked as political thugs for Alhaji Mohammed Audu who allegedly invited them to Abuja, where they were introduced to Melaye in December 2017. They also allegedly confessed that Melaye had given them a bag containing one AK47 rifle, two Pump Action guns and N430, 000.

    These allegations against Melaye are weighty, and he should be trying to prove his innocence rather than allegedly trying to run away from the police.  The drama of his alleged attempt to escape from the police has not helped matters. Does he expect the public to believe his story that his life would be in danger if the police took him to Lokoja?  When will he stop being overdramatic?

    On May 5, the drama developed as a Kogi State High Court sitting in Lokoja ordered that Senator Melaye “be kept at the National Hospital, Abuja under the custody and close watch and supervision of the complainant, the Inspector General of Police.” The Chief Judge of Kogi State, Justice Nasir Ajanah, who gave the interim order, said the application for the bail, in the case, would be heard on May 7.

    It is noteworthy that Melaye had been remanded in police custody until June 11 by Mr. Sulyman Abdullah of the Lokoja Senior Magistrates’ Court before the order by Justice Ajanah.  The senator was arraigned along with Kabiru Seidu, aka Osama, and Nuhu Salihu, aka Small. They were charged with criminal conspiracy, illegal possession of firearms and illegal gun-running.

    It remains to be seen what will happen as the trial progresses. There is likely to be more drama and more stunts.

     

  • Boy wonder

    It was all about the photos. They say photos don’t lie, but those photos exposed the lie of our democracy. INEC unveiled a report last week saying it had nothing to do with it. They were photos of boys voting, underage, innocent, deployed as soldiers of a dubious ideology.

    They streamed the social media. They were in long lines. If they were not children, they could pass for a queue of pigmies. But the faces, beatific and guileless, gave them away.  They had thumb prints, posed before cameras, tossed papers into ballot boxes. An air of official sobriety clothed the march. But they did not have the bravado of guilt. It was the naivety of righteousness.

    Everyone blamed the kids. The kids gave the votes away to the other party. First it was the PDP. That was in 2011. The second time around, in 2015, those who were in the opposition now benefited. Suddenly, those who triumphed in 2011 now fell in 2015. They turned critics. They had become losers. Those who howled foul in 2011 kept mum in 2015. APC would not shout because a big morsel of meat was in its mouth, apology to Achebe.

    They accused the fathers of the boys. They accused INEC for registering the underage. The election was rigged from genesis. The game was over before the whistle blast.

    The sapient element of the report is that the voter register was the same for both PDP and APC, but the results were manipulated. And the agency was the boys. Get the boys and give them papers, fake, fart, warts and all, count them and write the numbers and give them to INEC. Who would know?

    Here is a paragraph from the INEC report: “It is on record that during the course of the 2015 General Elections, a particular political party called for the cancellation of the results of the election in six states (Kano, Kaduna, Katsina, Bauchi, Jigawa, and Gombe) based on the allegation of underaged voting. Our investigation revealed that the core of the register used for the 2015 General Elections is based on the 2011 voter register. Interestingly, candidates of the same political party won the governorship elections in all six the states in 2011. There was no problem with the register at the time but when they lost in 2015 the register was the problem.”

    According to the report, INEC can only do so much when the political elephants brush their way through the process and stomp on everyone on the way. What triggered the investigation was the conduct of the 2018 local government polls in which the Kano State Electoral Commission, rather than INEC, presided. INEC says the Kano State umpire did not use its register. But more fundamental was that we use human beings to destroy a system. More painfully, we use the innocent to soil an innocent document.

    So, the boys were innocent. The register was and is also innocent, to all intents and purposes. But here is the irony. When the innocent boy interferes with the innocent document, we have corruption. So innocent plus innocent equals rigging. It was the sort of worry that made Russian writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky write off civilisation in his short piece, The Man From the Underground. He said one plus one is no longer two but the beginning of death. In the same way, innocent boy plus innocent register equals no democracy but the death of democracy. The good has lost all confidence. It is a metaphor for Nigeria where we all talk of the good. We are anxious to go to church and mosque and pretend that we are actually a godly nation. It reminds me of a line in Bertolt Brecht’s play, Mother Courage: “whenever there’s a load of special virtues around, it means something stinks.”

    What we witnessed in those elections in the north, including the Kano examples, is the deflowering of the northern boy. It is like Alexander Pope’s “the rape of the lock“. Sigmund Freud would call it the castration of the little boy. He is the one who has historically been used to commit evil in the north. They are the boy wonders of our elections.

    It is the almajiri, who has no food, no clothes, no home of his own. The almajiri who walks the street, in rain and relentless sunshine, barefoot, worn-out bowl in hand, forced into a street minstrel. The almajiri who cannot read or write or make out any literate word in English. He cannot understand the lay of the land unless his elder tells him. They tell him to wield knives and kill and cause some of the tempests in the north, targeting those who do not sound like him or believe like him, or share the same morning cry to worship.

    He is the metaphor of the manipulated. Almajiri is not a word for all boys. It is the word for the boy whose parents are poor, alienated and illiterate in a feudal tyranny. They are the ones Balarabe Musa has wept over, that Bala Usman serenaded. The boys of the rich are not called almajiri. They don’t need bowls or the beggar’s talent. They are clothed from wardrobes in London, Paris and New York.

    It is the almajiri who morphs into a Boko Haram and swoons over the fertile flesh of Dapchi or Chibok girls. It is he who is easily won over into bands of hatred. He kills but does not have a chance to process his hate. He hates because he is asked to hate. He is not even allowed the naivety of the soldier that W.B. Yeats laments: “Those that I fight I do not hate/those that I guard I do not love.”

    Northern boys get ruined before they become youths. In the south, the young are ruined systematically into angry militants. In the north, the young have faith in God and the elder. In the south, the young have faith only in themselves. Both are ruinous.

    In INEC’s report, we see how the little boy becomes a tool of lies, a fool for a lie called democracy. The political elite of either political parties use the boy to install a system that will make him a beggar for life. He has no chance to learn and choose. He only follows.

     

  • Trump card

    The Buhari visit to the White House last week was a Trump card. It was his own circuitous way of making a mea culpa after calling countries like Nigeria “shit hole.” We fell for it. He took advantage of Buhari’s presence to gain a photo op and sugar-coat his conscience. Our president helped Trump’s cause when he said he did not believe the “shit hole” allegation. It was a power show as well. After all, we had to say thank you for giving us a line of jets that was also big profit for the Americans and those here who brokered the deal. It was a way to sooth a crisis back home over why the planes were acquired without due process. It was the triumph of diplomacy over naivety. Trump card won.

     

  • The outcast

    He was the master once in the state. Now, he is neither home nor host. But hostile is what he will call the treatment he is getting. Ali Modu Sheriff can no longer play sheriff anymore in Borno State. He must be chafing at his impotence, his peripatetic paralysis, a rolling stone gathering no political moss.

    After playing a futile role as headsman of the PDP, he is now like a herdsman looking for pasture. He wants to return to the APC. But resistance awaits him from the party he once called home, a party he played a part, however dubious, in bringing into being.

    We should look at what kind of a returnee he is going to be if or when he actually morphs into an APC man. Is he arriving in the penitential humility of a prodigal son, where everyone, including himself, acknowledges the extravagance of his wayward past? Or shall we say he will come as the golden fleece metaphor in traditional African society where a son or daughter is financed to study abroad? They return as the lone figure of enlightenment now ready to impart knowledge and bring prosperity to the subaltern quiet of the village. Is Sheriff the political version of that man of enlightenment?

    Or is he like Jephthah, the biblical war hero who must pay with the pound of his daughter’s flesh, a humongous sacrifice, when he returns in the flush of victory? Shall we compare his return to that of Odysseus, as recorded in Homer’s The Odyssey, who must fight a battle of disguise? The chiefs in the village have turned themselves simultaneously into suitors and watchmen for his beautiful wife, Penelope, and are hoping to slay him as he berths.

    Or shall we say he is the new Ojukwu of the APC northeast? Ojukwu returned after exile to an ecstasy of embrace from his folks in eastern Nigeria but he got a pardon from an opportunistic northern elite who turned this jubilation into an ululation of a political funeral.

    So, where do we classify the bid of the Kanuri man who is like a public desperado banging his shoes to gain attention? His biography will help to situate him.

    When he was governor, he started his notoriety. He was a poor performer and the media rasped him for undermining his pact with the people. He scoffed at the media and said his people did not read newspapers because they could not read. The media could write as much as they wanted but the people, in their ignorance, would not move in their deference of him, the governor.

    But it was because of him that Boko Haram erupted in being. He did not educate the people, so they fell into the wiles of Mohammed Yusuf, who turned the sect into an alternative society. Where Sheriff’s Borno could not feed them, he gave them food. When they could not get shelter, Yusuf tented them. Where they lived alone, he gave them wives and a platform to breed their kind.

    Sheriff became the harbinger of intellectual darkness in the northeast. Yusuf died and the group, now indoctrinated and empowered, unleashed venom on society. He did not feel any remorse. He saw himself as a man with good to give.

    He duelled with Kashim Shettima, now helmsman of the state, but failed time and again. Governor Shettima was trying to repair and restore Borno. Sheriff fumed and wanted his successor to return the place to its antediluvian rot. In those years, especially under the inept Jonathan, Boko Haram soared as a bird of prey and Borno gradually turned into a wasteland.

    He had formed an army of bigots and bandits. Yet he was not ashamed to join the APC and thought he could edge out the governor, so his goons could continue in their lifestyle of fanaticism and murder. He tried in the state and in the centre, but the new party was not going to bow to this sheriff. He eventually read the message and entered into a bargain with the enemy. He moved over to the PDP. He was an opportunist who wanted to ride on the party’s chaos. He was well-heeled, and PDP was still treating its gaping wound from the Jonathan defeat.  He was now suffering from a delusion of grandeur. They needed his money. He obliged, and thought by the time the party wheel horses were ready, he would have pocketed the PDP.

    For a while, he was the top man of the party. But the wily party chieftains were bidding their time, waiting to recover from the APC spanking. When some of them, including Wike and Fayose, felt the party was ready, they battled him in conventions and in the courts. Eventually, they showed him the door. The party shunned him first. But the law did not save him.

    He no longer can abide the humiliation in PDP. So he is coming home. He evinced the following qualities: incompetence, opportunism, arrogance. So where do we place Sheriff in the classic stories of heroic returns. Not as prodigal son, because he has demonstrated no remorse. He is no golden fleece as no one in Borno sent him on a journey of impunity and chaos. He is no enlightenment man. He fathered ignorance and darkness in Borno.

    He is not Jephthah as he was no political war hero and he is not a type to sacrifice precious possession for principles. He is no Odysseus either. He needs no disguise and he cannot win his way to the party even when his fellow travellers like Gbemi Saraki have returned. Nor is he Ojukwu, who needs a pardon.

    Where does he fall then? He belongs to the character in Thomas Hardy’s The Return of the Native, who wants to return home for love but finds herself an alien. So, Sheriff is a returnee as outcast. He comes to Borno to his house, not political home. He is like one suffering from political sokugo in Cyprian Ekwensi’s Burning Grass. We hope against hope though that the man will give up. Such men don’t give up until they give up.

     

    Adams 2, Oyegun 0

    Finally John Odigie-Oyegun will bow out as APC chairman. He will give way to Adams Oshiomhole, the former governor of Edo State. But it was not the first both men will battle in recent times. In the battle for Adams’ successor, Oyegun wanted a different candidate who went belly up against the present governor of the state. That was defeat number one. Now, the second one has now happened, and it is rattling him in his geriatric time, a man in about his eighth decade on earth. I hope the man will keep quiet and quit playing stooge at this age.

    The first combat between the two men was through proxies. Now, it is a contact sport and we are seeing Oyegun go down the mud. So, we can say Adams has floored Oyegun both at home in Edo State and abroad on the national level. I think this is enough humiliation for the perfect stooge.

     

  • Adesanya: A time to remember

    Chief Abraham Adesanya’s 10th death anniversary is a time to remember and a time to reflect. The elder statesman and pro-democracy activist died at 85 on April 27, 2008.  It is fitting that a symposium on “Leadership and the future of Nigeria” to mark the remembrance will take place on May 2 at the MUSON Centre, Onikan, Lagos.  A statement by the chairman of the publicity committee, Prof Adebayo Williams, described Adesanya as “a great Nigerian nationalist, exemplary Yoruba patriot and leader, statesman, philosopher, moral avatar and illustrious chairman of the Afenifere and National Democratic Coalition (NADECO).”

    Interestingly, the remembrance will be spiced with a book of tributes    ”from the public as well as friends, associates, acquaintances, admirers, well-wishers and fellow travellers of Senator Abraham Adesanya.” These tributes to Adesanya are like pictures that capture not only his life and times but also significant parts of Nigeria’s political history in which he played historic roles.  When democratic rule was restored in 1999 after a 16-year period of military domination, there was no doubt that Adesanya was qualified to be named among the heroes of democracy.  He was a giant who made a gigantic contribution to the efforts that won the battle for democracy.

    Former Governor of Ogun State, Chief Olusegun Osoba, underlined the value of the book of tributes, saying, “The story of his life and the colour and fragrance of his politics are worth memorialising.” Osoba said in his tribute: “I am sure there are records of Chief Adesanya’s many speeches and writings on the subject of restructuring that can guide the honest scholar and politician on the way forward… I have lamented the dearth of published works on the political philosophies and experiences of our political leaders. I would have been happy to read first-hand while Chief Adesanya was alive some of his experiences in politics especially in the days of resistance to military rule when he led NADECO.” He added:  “It would have been thrilling to hear from him how he escaped the assassin’s bullets when his car was shot at in broad daylight in the dark days of Abacha dictatorship on January 14, 1997. What was his experience like in detention at Divisional Police Headquarters, Club Road, Ikoyi, and at the Police Medical Centre Bourdillon Road, Ikoyi? It would have been great to hear from him his encounters with Chief Olusegun Obasanjo whilst in office in the early days of the Fourth Republic.”

    Talking of how Adesanya survived a gun attack that defined his importance as a progressive combatant, Yinka Odumakin, National Publicity Secretary, Afenifere, told an interesting story in his tribute:  ”I once heard from him the story of native doctor in Ijebu-Igbo who used to call people to death. His modus operandi was pouring water in a calabash, placing a stick in the hands of a virgin girl. Once he calls the name of his victim and the head appears in the calabash, the girl will hit with the stick. The person died instantly.  But he got more than what he bargained for the day he was to practice his act on Abraham Adesanya .The girl was ready with his stick as the man called “Abraham Adesanya.” The virgin told him she could see two heads in the calabash, including the Babalawo’s, and asked which one to hit. He told her not to touch any! His escape from Abacha bullets earned him the sobriquet Apamaku (The one you kill that doesn’t die).”

     High-profile political player Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, in his tribute, gave an insight into one of his political battles that involved Adesanya: “Of course, we did not always agree on all issues. For instance, in the run-up to the 2003 election, Afenifere wanted the two dominant groups in the AD in Lagos State to share all elective positions on a 60:40 basis. The vast majority of rank and file party members, however, insisted on every interested party member testing their strength in free and fair party primaries. I had no choice but to go along with the decision of the majority in the interest of intra-party democracy and fairness. That decision, I believe, was one of the reasons why Lagos was the only state in the South West that the PDP was unable to capture in 2003. Even though, we did not go along with the position of Afenifere in that instance, Pa Adesanya did not hold it personally against me or the Lagos State leadership of the AD. He understood that it was a matter of principle.”

     Chief Emeka Anyaoku, Commonwealth Secretary-General (1990- 2000), said in his tribute: “Here, I would recall a personal anecdote of his powerful statement in defence of me in the Senate in 1983 when some members of the Senate Screening Committee, for questionable reasons, tried to mess me up during the Ministerial confirmation hearing that preceded my appointment by President Shagari as Nigeria’s Foreign Minister. Significantly, Senator Adesanya’s stout defence of me occurred even before he met me in person.”

    It is thought-provoking that this celebration of Adesanya, his ideas and ideals, is coming at a time when the meaning of progressivism has been corrupted and the definition of a progressive has been degraded.  What would Adesanya have thought of today’s self-defined progressives who pay lip service to the noble pursuit of progress?

    Adesanya played exemplary leadership roles in Afenifere and NADECO that should inspire the leaders of today. But the times have changed and things have changed. Afenifere, the Yoruba organisation that was known for its progressive essence, is essentially now a shadow of its former self. NADECO, the patriotic pro-democracy movement that was known for its punching power, was ironically a casualty of democracy and has failed to rise from the ashes.

    Ten years after Adesanya’s death, Nigeria is still grappling with the national question and structural issues.  Recollections of his life and times should inspire reflections on the nexus between progressive leadership and the progress of Nigeria. The ultimate tribute to the giant from Ijebu-Igbo is that his legacy is still relevant.

     

  • Senate invasion

    Recent invasion of the Senate and snatching of its symbol of authority-the mace by a band of hoodlums, is bad news for our democracy. The bandits who struck immediately a suspended member, Ovie Omo-Agege entered the plenary, attacked and intimidated members injuring the Sergeant-at-arms as they made away with the mace.

    Curiously, security at the National Assembly on that fateful day was so loose that the attackers accomplished their devious objective and vamoosed into the thin air, without any challenge from the array of enforcement agencies manning that critical arm of government. Omo-Agege has been accused of masterminding the invasion given the uncanny coincidence of his entry with the attack. But he denied having a hand in the despicable incident.

    An apparently bemused Senate had to secure a spare mace with which it continued its deliberations. It then proceeded to issue a stern order to law enforcement agencies to recover the stolen mace with 24 hours. And as fate would have it, the police were so efficient that they recovered the lost mace putatively under the flyover within the same time frame. Yes, the mace has been recovered. But the implications of the invasion for democracy will linger for a long time to come.

    Not unexpectedly, a number of theories have cropped up given the messy circumstances of the invasion and snatching of the symbol of authority of the Senate. The frosty relationship between the Senate and the presidency appear to have accentuated these theories. Allegations have been traded to the effect that the presidency has a hand in the unfortunate incident. There are two reasons for this.

    The first is that the issue culminating to the suspension of the warring senators suspected to be behind the invasion, hovers round their membership of a parliamentary support group purporting loyalty to the president. The second relates to the curious indifference of the security chain within the National Assembly that enabled the hoodlums penetrate the Senate carting away the mace without challenge. These add up to reinforce the feeling that security at the National Assembly was compromised on the day in question. It is therefore being contended that this could not have been possible without instruction from above.

    For, it remains to be conjectured the business those thugs have with Senate’s symbol of authority or the attraction it offered them. It is neither a commodity for social exchange nor of any real value (monetary or otherwise) outside the chambers of the Senate. Its attraction could have been nothing other than the lure to deploy it to subvert the authority of that upper legislative body. It was therefore intended as a coup d’état by the masterminds of the invasion. That is why the matter should be viewed with all the seriousness it deserves.

    This is not the first time in our contemporary political history the mace has been cornered by aggrieved legislators to effect leadership change in very controversial circumstances. During the regime of Obasanjo, late Senate president, Chuba Okadigbo had to spirit away that symbol of authority when some of his colleagues were being goaded to have him impeached. He refused to surrender the mace but was eventually impeached in some cloudy circumstances.

    There was also the case of Rivers State during the governorship of Chibuike Amaechi where a group of about five legislators cornered the mace and impeached the speaker without securing the mandatory two-thirds majority constitutional stipulations. These are by no means the only instances. And behind each disputation around the mace, lay a hidden agenda to effect leadership change. The case in point could not have been different.

    Perhaps, the equation changed because of the smartness of the Senate leadership in producing a spare mace with which they continued the business of the day. Having been beaten to their invidious game, the masterminds were compelled to abandon both the mace and their game plan. Without the way both the Senate and the House of Representatives moved to check the desecration of the national legislature, we would have seen a group of senators gaining access to the Senate to announce the impeachment of its leadership.

    Even with extant situation, our democracy has been ridiculed and the National Assembly defiled. If a band of hoodlums could have easy access to the National Assembly to the extent of attacking members without challenge, then nothing prevents murderers and armed bandits from invading that third arm of the government to deal with whosoever they wished.

    Condemnations have come from all corners indicating how bad the incident is. The federal government has also condemned the attack with the Senate setting up inquisition involving the House of Representatives to unravel the circumstances of the invasion. It has also promised stricter security measures even as it seeks to unravel all about the invasion. That is the way to go. It is important to get at the root of the matter by determining the acts of omission or commission of security agencies that aided the hoodlums to despoil the National Assembly in the manner they did without being either stopped or apprehended.

    It is not enough to condemn the invasion. Neither would recriminations suffice. Our security agencies should come clear with their finding in that national mess to clear suspicions of connivance and compromise. It is not good that they appear to have left the Senate with investigations into that breach of national security. The seeming mystery over the invasion of the Senate adds to the specter of insecurity hovering around the country.

    All these, point to the increasing inability of the government to maintain law and order such that citizens are frequently attacked and killed with our security agencies appearing utterly helpless. Each time such senseless killings occur, we take recourse to pontifications and platitudes in the name of condemning the atrocious acts as if denunciations are all there is to stemming the tide. Federal government’s recourse to condemnations of the recurring and well planned killings by herdsmen especially in Benue, Taraba and Nassarawa states are increasingly getting irritating in the absence of concrete action to stem the tide.

    We have been severally treated to these condemnations and promises to protect the sanctity of human life. But no sooner these trite pronouncements are made than we are confronted by fresh sights of unprovoked and senseless horror killings of innocent people both children and the aged in the most despicable manner. Such was again the situation in Benue where Fulani herdsmen attacked an early morning mass service killing two Catholic priests while celebrating mass and about 17 other worshippers. As the federal government was condemning the atrocious act and pontificating on its resolve to secure the lives of all citizens, more people were attacked and killed in other parts of that troubled state.

    The nation is tired of all these pontifications and high sounding pledges full of sound and fury but signifying practically nothing. Immediate solutions to the mindless killings are the things that can assuage the people now. We need immediate end to the killings and not trite talks that leave the people with a verity of the Hobbesian state of nature depicted by the war of man against his fellow man. That is the point this country has miserably found itself now.

    Practical solutions to the festering crisis were provided by the House of Representatives when it recommended the declaration of killer herdsmen as terrorists and security profiling of all herdsmen in the country. Our law enforcement agencies must be directed to profile all herdsmen who should be provided with identity cards. Such profiling has becoming urgent given conflicting claims by the government linking the spate of killings to influx of foreign armed men.

    They have also asked that service chiefs be relieved of their appointments to make way for more efficient and proactive hands. Time is ticking out. We must halt the carnage now or take responsibility for a possible relapse to the atavism of the state of nature.

     

  • Osunkeye: From Hands-on to visionary

    I recently was a guest of one of the world’s gentlemen, the debonair Chief Emeka Anyaoku, at the Metropolitan Club, and I had a conversation with Chief Olusegun Osunkeye, former managing director of Nestle Foods. He confirmed my primary view of how to lead. He said in the early 1970’s, even before he was head of the company, he observed that the Nigerian staff lacked expertise, and he decided to embark on a ruthless regime of training. Some, he observed, could not write a good sentence. So particular was he that he earned the nickname Black Power.

    By the time he became MD, he found out he no longer needed to do much supervision. “I discovered, they already knew about their assignments than I,” he said. So, he did not stay in their way and he allowed them blossom. He showed that the first job of a leader is to make leaders. Having made them self-sufficient, he now could sit back and concentrate on the big picture as a visionary. That accounts for why he became one of the outstanding leaders of corporate Nigeria.

     

     

     

  • Authoritarian democracy

    We cannot call it a coup. Not in the classic sense, although the symbol of power yields its pride to a raft of never-do-wells. For those who have the time to see the video, it has a whiff of comedy. A senator walks in, the whole chamber in a routine stir of lawmakers in pre-session mode. Some are chatting, others about to sit. A halo of a smile here, a shadow of a mood here, a hand gesture there. A few others, like Ovie Omo-Agege, are dabbing to their seats. That is not funny. It is the stir before the storm. Until, of course (or curse), the sudden burst of a light-coloured shirt on the high table.

    In a parody of an athlete, he lofts the mace like a trophy, and trots up the steps. Somebody is stealing democracy. There are more lawmakers than hoodlums. But they cannot hold their own against a democratic felony. They cannot fight for the people’s system. They look on, paralysed, dead in the limbs, spectators of their own misfortune. They become like stargazers as though watching aliens vacating a hallowed room. Ben Bruce exercises common sense and knows better than to stop the hoodlum.

    They who have too much money. They who fatten on allowances, a la Shehu Sani. They whose homes are a fable of luxury, whose cars a motion of dreams, who eat without work, peacocks of a bedraggled republic. They gape on while the ragamuffins leave.

    Not far away, outside the building, Senator Solomon Adeola, otherwise known as Yayi, gets into a drama of his own. He is shoved into a vehicle owned by the thieves but luckily forces his way out minutes later.

    So, shall we say this is a mini coup? The removal of a mace is not necessarily a change of government. Unless we recall what happened in England centuries ago when boisterous Oliver Cromwell storms the parliament in the throes of overthrowing King Charles. The lawmakers are sacked, and he sees the mace, standing, with nothing of its grandeur. “Take away that fools bauble, the mace,” he orders giddily. He smashes the symbol through the floor.

    Our lawmakers soon found their tongues. They who could do nothing about an hour earlier. They suddenly waxed into rhetoricians for the public good. They started speaking for democracy, for the rule of law, for the restoration of the mace. They bore the outraged beauty of the law. News reporters who looked but did not see immediately announced that Omo-Agege brought the thugs. A certain lawmaker in Babaringa also thought so, as he kept gesticulating in suppressed indignation in Omo-Agege’s direction. He, too, had looked as the visitors brushed off with the gem of authority.

    The Senate elite suddenly felt righteous against their foes. The police arrested and freed Omo-Agege, who has sworn he did not bring the bad guys. I called him and asked him what happened, and he said he came to the Senate on his own. He said he was not so foolish as to deposit chaos with thugs in the first law chamber in the land. He believed he had been suspended illegally, and the cases of Ndume and feisty Dino Melaye had proved that no lawmaker had the right to suspend his or her colleagues. He came to the chamber to affirm the majesty of the law of the land.

    What occurred to me as the news unfolded was not so much the impunity of the young men, which is reprehensible. The senate elite was getting a bite of their own lawlessness. Was it not the clique led by Bukola “Eleyinmi” Saraki, who hatched out a coup in the dawn of this 8th senate? They gloried in the rascality of that pre-dawn disorder. They now suspended a fellow senator. But worse, they evaporated a democratic group’s right to exist, because they supported Buhari over the order of the 2019 polls. They asphyxiated the right to assemble and associate.

    This is a lawmaker’s case against the law. The senators led by Eleyinmi were irresponsible, brutish, and a constant threat to the sanity of this democracy. They head a democracy but their minds hark back to the caveman’s malignity, to a bumpkin’s logic, to the morality of a soldier of fortune. The Eleyinmi of Village Headmaster bowed to the Oba’s restraint. He subscribes to what French president condemned as “authoritarian democracy” rather than the “authority of democracy.”

    Questions still trail what happened? How did the man get in and beat up a sergeant at arms? How did they miss the array of top security in the country? We need to know if it was carelessness, and that needs to be punished. If the IGP got away from disobeying the president’s order, the SSS persons who let this thugs reign ought to be put answer to the law. As Oscar Wilde wrote, “if one tells the truth, one is sure, sooner or later, to be found out.” Some of the participants in this drama have told the truth without knowing it.

    A question has arisen as to whether this was a response to the call to fire the service chiefs. Yayi had led the chorus to dump the service chiefs who have been coddled for no reason by the president. The service chiefs have outlived their stay in office. Winning teams often are allowed to stay because they are doing a good job. But this set of chiefs are a bumbling lot. They cannot secure us against the foes of herdsmen and the resurgent Boko Haram.

    So many are asking questions and so few answers. If this turns out to be a continuing war between law makers and the presidency, then it is not a way to go about it. It only shows that democrats have lost hope in democracy. Just as the dominant party, APC, has acted as though under the spell of the army era, our democracy has not flagged to exhibit its culture of the diktat.

    One of the intrigues of this country and its democracy is how we wheel from one cycle of bad judgment and incident to another as though nothing happened. The drama would soon fizzle out and our consciences and memories will be numb again to tragedy.

    In a sense, we are like Oscar, the anarchist dwarf in Gunter Grass’ novel Tin Drum. He, like us, never gets tired of shattering things because it seems to change nothing. So, we enter a new week, thinking a new lease has arrived and we need new drama to reawaken our thirst for adventure.