Category: Monday

  • Foreign fraud cells in Nigeria

    Foreign fraud cells in Nigeria

    The alert by Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukayode on the existence of foreign fraud cells in the country opens a new dimension of threats to our national security.

    This is especially so with recent EFCC intelligence suggesting that foreign fraudsters are also illegally importing arms into the country using cryptocurrency as a means of payment. The fraud syndicates are also said to be establishing criminal cells in our cities, recruiting young Nigerians into cybercrimes including cryptocurrency fraud.

    Special operations carried out in Lagos recently by the agency led to the arrest of 194 foreigners in the heart of Victoria Island, Lagos. Among them were Chinese, Filipinos, Eastern Europeans, Tunisians and others; all in a single building. Some lacked valid visas and most of their financial activities were conducted through cryptocurrency.

    That was not all. Some of the arrested foreigners were ex-convicts in their home countries who had escaped prosecution and sought refuge in Nigeria and some other African countries.

    The EFCC further interrogated the flow of arms and ammunitions into the hands of terrorists, bandits and sundry criminal elements in the country and established a link between money laundering and national security threats. It is seeking the cooperation of all the security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies in Nigeria and Africa to deal with this potent danger.

    Two distinct but closely related challenges were thrown up by the EFCC’s alert. The first is the existence of foreign fraud cells in the country recruiting young Nigerians into cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud with dire repercussions for national security.

    The other with no less lethal consequences for the nation’s security is the intelligence suggesting that foreign fraudsters are illegally importing arms into the country using cryptocurrency as means of payment. That again, raises issues on the integrity of cryptocurrency as a credible means of transaction. Before now, Nigeria has had a running battle with one of the leading cryptocurrency companies operating in the country-Binance. Two of its officials were arrested after they flew into the country following a ban on their website. The arrest and detention followed investigations which implicated Binance in money laundering and terrorism financing activities conducted on their currency exchange platform.

    Curiously, one of the detained officials escaped in very questionable circumstances while the other was released after the prosecution dropped the charges against him following pressure from his home government. But the sabotage of the national economy through cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud by foreign nationals never abated.

    Read Also: Ramadan: Pray for unity, progress of Nigeria, Steel Minister urges Muslims

     As scary as the revelations by EFCC are, it is by no means the first-time foreigners are being implicated in cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud. Just last November, the Nigerian Police Force arrested 130 suspects comprising 113 foreign nationals primarily of Chinese and Malaysian origin and 17 Nigerian collaborators for alleged involvement in high-level cybercrime, hacking and activities that threaten national security. The arrests followed the raiding of a building at the Next Cash and Carry area of Jahi, Abuja.

    And a fortnight ago, 17 Chinese nationals and a company Genting International Co. Ltd were arraigned before the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos for fraud. They were among the 792-member cryptocurrency investment and romance fraud suspects arrested by the EFCC in a sting operation. One of the charges against one of the suspects spoke volumes on the dangers cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud pose to the health of the country.

    The Chinese was accused of having, “willingly caused to be accessed, computer systems which were organised to destabilise the social and economic structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria when you secretly procured and employed several Nigerian youths for identity theft and other computer related fraud”.

    There are recurring issues in the arrests by the EFCC and the police. The first is the large number of foreigners-Chinese nationals – involved in these criminalities. The other is their recruitment of young Nigerians as collaborators in cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud.

    There is also the dimension that many of the foreign suspects were ex-convicts and criminals escaping the justice systems of their country only to take advantage of the porosity of our borders and our law enforcement weaknesses to continue their nefarious activities.

    Again, in the two major but separate arrests, all the suspects were apprehended in one building. That also says a lot on the procedure followed by property owners in renting accommodation to prospective tenants.  In saner climes, such fraudulent activities cannot go on for long without the property owner suspecting something amiss.

    It is really amazing that the only business conducted in those buildings is suspected cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud with the foreign nationals at the head and young Nigerians as their employees. One can begin to understand why such devious criminal technologies are growing in geometric progression among the youths of this country.

    In an environment marked by abject poverty, high level of youth unemployment buoyed by greed, it is not surprising that a lot of our young men will be attracted to the illegal employment offers by the Chinese. Such people may ‘see something but refuse to say something’ because it is in their survivalist interests to conceal.

    So that sense of patriotism and commitment which the government expects of her citizens may be difficult to secure in a situation of near hopelessness which many of our youths find themselves. That is the uncanny dialectics.

    But we are confronted with searing questions on how these foreign nationals with seemingly no value to add to the national economy found themselves into our shores. What business profile did they present when they applied for visas that qualified them entry into the country? This poser is raised because of the high number of Chinese nationals regularly featuring in sundry criminalities.

    The impression we get is one of flawed screening and processing procedures at the visa issuing points in our embassies. Or how do we explain the high number of crime suspects from China including ex-convicts that feature each time the law enforcement agencies make arrests?

     China shares no border with Nigeria. Her citizens do not pose the challenge of identification as some of our foreign neighbours that share geographical contiguity, cultural and religious affinity with our country.

    And we are being told that some of those arrested for cybercrimes and associated fraud have no valid visa to enter the country. It is either such people entered the country illegally or they overstayed their visas. Whichever the case, this exposes the weaknesses of our law enforcement systems. But the nation bears the brunt of these official lapses or corruption. For a country assailed by all manner of security challenges, the addition of the threats of cybercrimes and cryptocurrency will be too heavy to bear.

    Boko Haram insurgency affiliated to ISWAP, banditry and the insurgency of killer herdsmen are security infractions that exert undue pressure on the national economy, overstretching the capacities of the government to maintain law and order. Ironically, foreigners were also fingered in their unceasing lethality. The nation is yet to come to terms with the toll in human and material capital and threat to national security they present.

    And when you factor in the revelation by the EFCC that cybercriminals import arms and ammunitions for non-state actors via cryptocurrency, the enormity of the challenge becomes more glaring. Cybercrimes and cryptocurrency fraud are serious national threats and may account for the unceasing tempo of insecurity in the country. It requires concerted action to stem the scourge.

    It is one thing to recognise the lethal threats such hi-tech crimes pose to the health of the country and another ball game for the government to roll out effective responses to tame the monster. The visa issuing processes in our embassies and high commissions need urgent overhaul. A system that allows people of questionable character or no genuine business easy entry into the country cannot but nurture the multiplicity of foreign sponsored crimes that assail national security.

     Beyond this, our policy makers must take more serious interest in the propriety of the cryptocurrency trade. There is everything to indicate that its operations are working at cross purposes with our national security interests. The escape of an official of the Binance organisation in very questionable circumstances exposes the extent official neglect or compromise can go in scuttling national security objectives. A decisive war on corruption and its manifestations in public offices is a desideratum.

  • Akpabio’s ‘harassment’ headache

    Akpabio’s ‘harassment’ headache

    It is striking that Senate President Godswill Akpabio, 62, a member of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), is at the centre of another case of alleged sexual harassment. In 2020, he had faced the same accusation.  He was then Minister of Niger Delta Affairs.  The accuser was a former acting managing director of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), Joy Nunieh.

    Their fight happened in the public square. That was the boxing ring. The spectators were members of the attentive public. There was no referee to determine what was fair or foul.   There was no predetermined number of rounds. So, the fight could go on for as long as the pugilists could keep going and keep the fight going.  

    Nunieh had been sacked in February 2020 for alleged insubordination.  Their fight happened mid-year, in the middle of a corruption-related legislative investigation and forensic audit of the commission. 

    There was a dramatic exchange of punches.  Akpabio threw the first punch. He said of Nunieh: “I wish she would go to a hospital, see a doctor and then get some injections and relax. I am not saying something is wrong with her, I am saying something is wrong with her temperament. You don’t need to ask me, you can ask about four other husbands she married.”

    Nunieh hit back. After pointing out that Akpabio was wrong about her love life, she stung him, saying: “Why did he not tell Nigerians that I slapped him in his guest house at Apo? I am the only woman that slapped Akpabio. He thought he could come up on me. He tried to harass me sexually.

    “I slapped him. He tried to come on me. I am an Ogoni woman and nobody jokes with us. I showed Akpabio that Rivers women do not tolerate nonsense.”

    The slap claim became the talk of the town. Akpabio threatened to sue Nunieh for defamation, denying her allegation of sexual harassment, which he described as “false, malicious, and libelous.”

    Then the fight fizzled out.  It wasn’t clear why the pugilists stopped punching. While it lasted, it was an attention-grabbing, high-profile public fight in which they not only fought dirty but also displayed that raw killer instinct characteristic of pugilism.

    Five years later, Akpabio found himself in the same situation. This time, the fight is likely to be messier and longer. Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, 45, a member of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) representing Kogi Central, accused him of sexual harassment in an interview with Arise Television on February 28, following a war of words between them regarding the sitting arrangement in the Senate chamber.    

    Read Also: Traditional institutions key to Nigeria’s health sector reforms – Minister

    Akpoti-Uduaghan’s narrative: “It all started on the 8th of December, 2023, which was a day before his birthday and my birthday. We are birthday mates. We were all in Akwa Ibom, because he had a big fanfare in the stadium, myself, my husband, and a few of his close friends, we went to Akwa Ibom.

    “At first, we were at Ikot Ekpene, his house in Ikot Ekpene, then we all moved to his house in Uyo, which was about 8 p.m., and he held my hand, and said he wanted to show me around his house. My husband was walking behind us, just three of us, walking around from room to room.

    “He showed me the beautiful interior. This was done by this, by that… look how beautiful it is, and then I noticed that he hastened his pace while still holding my hand. My husband was behind, still on his phone, but he was catching up whenever he could. And then he got to this particular sitting room, and he said,  ‘do you like my house?’ I said, of course, sir.

    “Every room, beautiful, nice interior, quality taste. He said, ‘now that you’re a senator, I’m going to create time for us to come spend quality moments here. You will enjoy it.’ At that point, I just pulled away, and I was like, I don’t really understand what exactly that meant.”

    She continued: “I thought that was going to be the end. But then in February, I wanted to move a motion for the investigation on the ills of a corrupt practice in Ajaokuta Steel Company. I listed that motion five times. It was the sixth time that it was listed on the order paper that it was approved.

    “Many senators can testify to that. Each time the motion is listed, just before he takes it, he will say, oh, Senator Natasha, we can’t take this motion because the board of the Senate does not accommodate it. Or he will speak on others and then let it drag…

    “So, he kept on doing that. I went to him in his office and I said, senate president, you know how important this Ajaokuta Steel Company is to me. You know how important it is to my people and to Nigerians. I’ve noticed that you have stepped down this motion. As a matter of fact, a number of senators told me, go and see him and plead with him so that he will take it. I was like, sir, please, why can’t you take this motion? It’s very important. It’s been listed. Then it was listed a third time and stepped down. He then said, Natasha, I’m the chief presiding officer of the Senate. You can enjoy a whole lot if you take care of me.

    “At that point, I said, sir, I’ll pretend that I didn’t hear this. He said, well, the ball is in your court.”

    In Akpabio’s corner is his wife, Ekaette, who has filed a fundamental rights suit at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, claiming that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s accusation had caused her husband and children “emotional and psychological abuse.” She wants the court to order her to tender a public apology, which will be published in two national newspapers. She also wants N350bn in exemplary, punitive, aggravated and general damages, as well as a perpetual injunction barring the senator from making any further defamatory remarks against her family’s reputation.

    Chief Emmanuel Uduaghan, Natasha’s husband, said his wife “confided” in him “about her interactions with the senate president.” In a letter to Akpabio’s wife, the Kogi senator, through her lawyer, said: “We will suggest that you leave the defence of the allegations for the senate president to maintain your sanity and that of your family.” She claimed to have “concrete evidence” to substantiate her allegations.

    The drama raises significant questions about possible abuse of power, possible undermining of women’s legislative representation, and possible manipulation of truth, among others. It remains to be seen if there will ultimately be clarity regarding what happened or did not happen between the accused and the accuser.

  • Hell Rufai

    Hell Rufai

    Nasir El-Rufai made it a date on television, and he thought he should let us know it was his first interview. It is what media theorists call pseudo-event. An act billed as more than it is really worth. It would have been less than a hype if he had clipped his lips since he left office as Kaduna State helmsman.

    But the voluble fellow has been talking, and he has not stopped. So, it is not new that he granted an interview. He just created a stage in order to ballyhoo. Very soon he will grant another interview. He likes to talk, he likes to hear his voice, he wants to be the tallest person in the building.

    Read Also: Bago pledges to strengthen efforts in making Niger state Nigeria’s food hub

    But what he said in the interview that struck this essayist were two. First, he tried to describe the president as an “area boy” while distinguishing from omoluabi in characterising the nation’s leader. How bitter could one get to reach down to such a nadir of thought and language! The other thing he said was that he was no longer a friend to his successor, Governor Uba Sani. He added NSA Nuhu Ribadu and he implied they are in cahoots to undermine him. Ribadu lashed back, but Governor Sani has always restrained himself, which is a classy way to respond to such a man.

    Now, who is he to speak of friendship? Ask Obj, who was once his friend. In the heydays of their warmth, he knelt to him. He was an obedient public servant, but the kneeling was not accidental. It was a calculated humility. He wanted to stoop to conquer. He eulogized Yar Adua, and knelt. He praised and kneeled for Atiku, kneeled for Buhari. For goodness’ sake, he kneeled for Asiwaju Tinubu. He has turned his back to these guys. So, who wants to be his friend. He thinks being his friend is a prize. Rather it is a price. No one wants to pay. He says he won’t go to PDP. He said the APC has left him. Who would not leave such a man who does not stick to a friend?

  • Our top comedians

    Our top comedians

    Comedy is a cousin of tragedy. When comedy enacts a scene, it is like a traitor in the family. It makes us laugh, but it is often about something sad. I think this way about two characters in our politics today. They are from different geopolitics, although they belong, by coincidence, to the same party.

    Both are the funniest duo in Nigeria today. In politics, that is. Outside politics, the gold card goes to Pastor Odumeje. From the Southwest, the honours go to Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State. From Rivers State, Governor Sim Fubara takes a bow. Two events last week puts both men in bold comedic relief.

    In Rivers State, the Supreme Court came down with a hammer on the Rivers State local government polls, and it berates it as illegal. It means all the ceremonies undertaken by the governor, the abuses, the voters register, the lineup of electors, the signing of results, and the jubilations of victory, all of these were what literary critics call burlesque. They were first up there, pumped up as balloons. Then the whole thing came down, burst and great was the sound of justice.

    The top court also said the comedy of a three- or four-man legislature was a farce – my own words. But it affirms the 27-man law chamber. We cannot forget that Fubara underwrote a budget with a sprinkle of men. He set up an executive council  with a few lonely men as lawmakers. He has been plodding along with a mockery of democracy.

    As for Adeleke, it was  about a local government and a demolition. He dissolved the local government, but the courts say he has no right to do so, that the terms of the incumbents have not expired. The court of appeal, that is. Then, with a sense of farce, he goes to a lower court to legitimize his action. The lower court, against all reasonable precedents, grants him order in defiance of the higher court. He goes ahead to conduct the poll, a sham of an election. His party, just like Fabara’s, sweeps the polls. And to avoid the clash of the winners as we saw in Rivers, Adeleke says the “winners” should not go to their offices. So, from winners take all, they become losers take none. They won but they lost. They are winners on paper. They are trustees of the mandate in waiting. It is a victory without spoils, a responsibility without power, a status without stature, a post of impotence.

    So, both men, Adeleke and Fubara, are funny, but they are not fun. Fubara is still examining the judgment. His lawyers want to make a continual buffoon of their client. So, they are looking for lacuna to exploit. Some lawyers are denying the Supreme Court verdict of the lawmakers as to whether they have defected. They are waiting for the top court to eat its own words and go back to its vomit. It reminds me of the words of Jesus, who poured woe on lawyers for taking away the “key of knowledge.” Money has held lawyers spellbound, so they turn the law with the facility of their crafty minds. Hence Shakespeare said, “the first thing we do, let’s kill the lawyers.”

    Read Also: Traditional institutions key to Nigeria’s health sector reforms – Minister

    The tragedy is that we need them. Some scholars are beginning to doubt the durability of the democratic idea because of the ability of men and lawyers to upend a popular system. We are seeing it in Europe, and the United States. It is a Hobbesian world we are walking into. It is a time for vigilance. In the sweep of human history, democracy has been a blip. We have had different forms of autocracy hold sway for most of human civilization, and we should not presume that it cannot die away. Democracies have voted in autocracies in Ancient Greece and in the 20th century.  In the U.S., the poor voted in a plutocracy. Nothing is guaranteed.

    With strong men with populist bravura and cunning, we may have a democracy by name, but the system would be essentially autocratic. We are witnessing that under Trump today. They are the models for Adeleke and Fubara. They are just not that clever yet. As the Russian novelist and philosopher Maxim Gorky wrote, the “only people who deserve freedom are those who fight for it every day.” Vigilance is the capacity for survival. Autocracy is beguiling; hence systems and masses tend to fall for them. It seduces hysteria. It is a charming brute. Adam Smith, in his Wealth of Nations, predicted that democracy will flourish as families break down to smaller units. His idea is that large patriarchies favour despots. That idea has been disgraced in public in the 20th century with the fascist seductions of Hitler, Franco and Mussolini in Europe and Pol Pot and Mao in Asia.

    One of the problems of democracy is the impotence of the courts, that is righteous courts. A court does not have an army. So, it can issue a verdict. The executive branch that controls the armed forces clips the police and soldiers. Nothing happens. We are seeing this in Osun right now. Lawyers are coddling Fubara and quietly cajoling him to defy.

    Hence, I say both men are comedians whose latest acts do not inspire laughter. They make us wince with fear for our system. They are different types of comedians. Fubara is not the laughing type, and makes us laugh just by his slapstick acts. We call such comedians dark. He does not intend to amuse, but he cannot help himself. What of a line like, “the jungle has matured.” Or his acts of lashing out at his predecessor when he is imitating his style of launching projects. Or when he says “I am not afraid of you.” His is what is called deadpan comedy, the sort that Soyinka gives in A Play of Giants. Or Oscar Wilde’s play, The Importance of Being Earnest.

    Governor Adeleke combines fat and athletic to give us dances. His dance cannot win a formal prize but it entertains more than those formal dances because he is so unoriginal that it seems original because of who is dancing. It is like an agabya entertaining everyone and no one has to laugh at him. His rambunctious humour is like Baba Sala, or Jagua. The difference is that Adeleke is governor and some people need quite a few laughs in a time of desperate need. If he cannot give the people bread, as Roman Poet Juvenal prescribes, at least he can stage a circus, spontaneous, unscripted, rip-roaring circuses. The local government poll saga shows the thin line between comedy and tragedy. After all, Trump is a funny man, an entertainer who is blowing up the world. It is like Nobel laureate Gunter Grass who turns a comic style to script a Nazi feast.

     Comedy and anomie are like beauty and beast. The beauty, like Delilah, is like trouble. Hence Ayi Kwei Amah calls his novel, The Beautyful Ones Are Not Yet Born, a testament to beauty as impostor. It is not John Keats’ definition as truth. It is more like poet Rilke’s view that it is terror. Hence in her novel, The Death of Vivek Orji, Akwaeke Emezi’s protagonist treasures how Amah spells Beautyful in his novel by retaining the integrity of the noun. Adjectives undermine the souls of matters. That is the fear that our two top comedians may want to bring to our system. Comedy is beauty, but not the sort we are getting from the top guns in Rivers and Osun.

  • No regrets

    No regrets

    The terrible thing about IBB last week was that we allowed him to be Maradona again. The headlines last week said it all. They said the former military president regretted his actions in annulling the June 12 poll.

    If you read the book, A Journey In Service, An Autobiography, and if you heard his short speech at the book presentation, Ibrahim Babangida never once said or even suggested that he regretted it. He described it as regrettable, which means we ought to lament his shameless action. That does not amount to a personal regret.

    He also said: “The nation is entitled to expect my impression of regret.” A tongue-twister. That does not mean he regretted it. The expression was a trap, and editors, reporters, commentators and even the political class fell into it. He indeed conned journalism.

    For you to regret, we expect remorse. There was no remorse in the diction and tone of his delivery. It was a cold-blooded offering. You need remorse to apologise. To regret is to be unhappy about what one has done to oneself. Remorse means you are pained for hurting others. He did nothing of that. We climbed a high moral pedestal believing he asked for mercy. He asked for no such thing.

    IBB was Maradona again, and he conned many with his rhetorical rigmarole. I don’t like him but I admire the man. He came to laugh at the nation, and at the end of that dark cackle, he carted home a profit. If he said, we are “entitled to expect my impression of regret,” he merely said it is your right to ask me to say I am sorry, but it is my choice not to say it. I cannot give you the throat to gloat, to wrest judgment, to humiliate me as a groveling sinner. I will never flatter your moral superiority.

    He boasted that he conducted the best election. That was his point. He knew Abiola won. His opinion was worthless. Buhari has declared it, and M.K.O. Abiola has earned GCFR. IBB gave us a meal, a poisonous meal, but no mea culpa. His confession adds nothing to the June 12 value. It was just a saga of a man – IBB – trying to be heard, when all ears were deaf.

    Ten he said he took full responsibility. He said, he would do it differently, if he had the chance again. How differently? Many, including the reviewer Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, implied he would have allowed Abiola be president. The same Abiola he said in the book would not be a good president? The same Abiola he paraded Yoruba topmen, including the Ooni of ife, to see his contracts with government, his government? The Ooni yelled, “Ohun nikan la s’aiye fun ni?” Was the world made for him alone?

    Doing things differently surely did not include Abiola restoration. After that assertion, he said he did it in the best interest of the country. It means annulling June 12 was in the best interest of the country. Restoring it was not. It was a binary choice? He chose the path of perdition. He just told us that, in June 1993, the best action was to annul. He even gloats that his action was right because democracy has prevailed over disintegration.

    Read Also: Beta Nigeria trains journalists, influencers to advocate for education reform in Kaduna

    If you read the book, you could hear IBB’s voice. For those who were alive when he was president, and listened and studied his speeches, there is nothing different now. The writers then may be different from the editors like Dr. Yemi Ogunbiyi and Dr. Chidi Amuta, yet the voice is inescapably IBB’s. In his style, he projects the air of the learned, but that is because he knows how to pick brilliant men. Who would go wrong with Amuta, Ogunbiyi, et al? But he has a native cunning, an earthy brilliance, a street wisdom, and an ability to appear to grasp concepts like a sponge. We saw it when he was military president. We see it now. He was a dangerous man and he exploited the air of macabre augury around him.

    Some have called him a coward when he blamed Abacha.  He cannot defend himself. Maybe his people can. Even if they do, it will all be speculative. Sophocles wrote. “The dead will never testify against a burial.” Cowardice is an elementary, if naïve, charge. A dictator is, by definition, a coward. Such a claim says nothing new. History has a list of such despots. Pol Pot, Mussolini, Kurunmi, Caligula, Nero. They are impotent without arms and state power. But Babangida is a special kind of coward. It is a special kind of coward who stakes his life in coup after coup. It is a coward who was shot at during the civil war, flown to Lagos, rejected a surgery, recovered and was not afraid to return to battle. It takes a special kind of coward to go upstairs in a radio station in Lagos to meet with coup leader Buka Dimka without any arms. His boss T.Y. Danjuma ordered him to return and flush him out.

    He did not fear court martial as implied in Alabi Isama’s book, The Tragedy of Victory. Isama wrote that IBB asked Dimka to drop his weapons and run. IBB writes that he “inescapably” escaped. It takes more than a coward to dare Idiagbon with a coup attempt. It took more than a coward to sit at his office on the top floor of the  Defence Headquarters in Lagos when virtually every soldier was running for their life out of the building over a bomb scare but IBB remained ensconced and unfazed in his office. This is not his story, but Debo Bashorun’s account in his anti-IBB book, Honour for Sale.

    One thing I wanted to read was his use of decree two. He gave himself plaudits for abrogating Decree 4 but says nothing of Decree 2. Four was a subset of two. Rather he undertakes a phony intellectual rollercoaster trying to frame a human and democratic system. He says nothing about the deaths he piled up during the June 12 turmoil, the hounding of radicals, the many dead on street protests, the long disruptions of life, the destruction of the economy, the high-profile deaths like Kudirat Abiola, Bagauda Kaltho, etc.  There was no mention, not to say regrets or even a funereal tone on the deaths he unleashed.

    The health challenges that ultimately took the lives of Gani Fawehinmi and Beko Ransome-Kuti derived from jail times under his gulag. I remember as the managing editor of the Concord Newspapers’ Abuja bureau, I was sitting on my desk when our Villa correspondent Mohammed Adamu walked in with what looked like a scrap of a paper. It had no letter head, no signature, no government insignia. He told me Chief Press Secretary Nduka Irabor gave it to him and other correspondents. I read it, and its writing bore IBB’s serpentine style. It did not say directly that the election was annulled, but it implied it. I called the editor of National Concord, Nsikak Essien. He asked me to call the editor-in-chief, Dr. Doyin Abiola. She asked what it all meant, as though she did not understand it. I explained that the election had been annulled. As the wife of the winner, the hope of a life in the villa held the prospect of a fantasy. She became angry with the messenger, and said I should have scooped this earlier.

    I was in the joyous halo of my birthday, but history decided to mock. IBB says, it was Abacha’s men who did it. We need Nduka Irabor to let us know if his boss Admiral Aikhomu did not know about it. IBB said Aikhomu was taken aback by the letter.

    IBB said he knew nothing about Arthur Nzeribe’s Association for Better Nigeria (ABN) that mobilized a circus for annulment. He did not know about Justice Ikpeme’s decision about the June 12 poll. He felt helpless about stopping the group, yet he banned newspapers, hounded human rights group like CDHR and CLO, and the Campaign for Democracy and NUPENG’s Frank Kokori. He locked up Beko and Falana, and I remember seeing them in court and even following them to know where they were kept until a soldier pointed a gun and asked me to go back. IBB and his men did not even stop his SSS men from following me around Abuja, I did not know until Abiola’s  first aide Olu Akerele hinted me that two cars, a Jetta and 505, took turns following me about town. The same IBB who boasted as though inebriated that “we are not only in office but in power.” He knew when now President Bola Tinubu, Olisa Agbakoba, and editors of The News and Tell magazines, were staked out day and night. Fearless reporters like Alex Kabba were hunted out of the country. Yet, ABN puffed on the streets and IBB could do nothing?

    The most fascinating was his telling of his life at 14. His father died, and he was so distraught that he wanted to join the army. The now orphan boy was dissuaded by his relations. But for a boy whose mother lost child after child, including twins, and only he and his sister survived, and to lose his father and want to join the army? That was an early flirtation with suicide. That was the beginning of his cruelty.

     In his The Rebel, Albert Camus demonstrates how tyrants kill others because they won’t kill themselves. He saw deaths in spades too early and may have wondered why he did not die when his mother was losing several of his siblings. But just like he survived all of that death scare, he survived coups and even a coup against him.

    Many are angry that the donations to set up a library was obscene. Bigwigs donated the fat of the land to evil, and he once called himself the evil genius. No problem, so long as the library is set up to include all the evils of his brutal reign, the death, the air of funeral parlor, the rhetoric of augury, the state of fear that characterised his army with a state rather than a state with an army, a la Bismarck. Those who have nostalgia for military rule can learn. Just like the Nazi Museum in Berlin, with all the madcap personalities and incidents.

  • Jonathan and military’s role in elections

    Jonathan and military’s role in elections

    The role of the military and the general attitude of Nigerians during elections came under intense inquisition at the launch of two books at the Federal Capital City, Abuja last week.

    The books titled, Selected Readings in Internal Security and Selected Readings of Election Security Management were written by former Inspector-General of Police, Solomon Arase.  Former President, Goodluck Jonathan who chaired the occasion, took advantage of the subject matter of the books to interrogate the involvement of Nigerian military in elections’ security management.

    His verdict was that Nigerian military should be excluded from getting involved in election security duties and day-to-day management of elections as obtains in other parts of the world especially, the developed ones.

    “Here in Nigeria, we overstretch the army. In most other countries, the military doesn’t get involved in day-to-day management of elections. In some countries, they are used to manage strategic systems. The air force and the army are used to carry and convey materials to dangerous areas” he said.

    Jonathan said the military are neither used in manning polling booths nor do they stay around them citing the elections in Botswana and Senegal which he had the privilege of monitoring. He extolled the simplicity and orderly conduct of the electorate in those countries and the effective management of the process by their electoral umpires and the police.

    Drawing parallels with the simplicity and orderliness of those country’s elections without the participation of the military, Jonathan noted ‘but here, we fully do the wrong thing’.

    The former president lamented that even with the introduction of technology to enhance the integrity of elections in this country, there are still problems. “And we, Nigerians, celebrate the wrong thing. And I believe that one day, the country will get to the level where people will reject bad behaviour. And when we get to that level, that we reject bad behaviour, this issue will not happen again”, he believes.

    Two issues linked to our elections’ security management are under focus here. The first is the propriety of the continued deployment of the military in the day-to-day running and conduct of elections while the other relates to the negative orientation and attitude of Nigerians on matters concerning elections.

    Jonathan wants the military to be excluded from the management of election security because it overstretches their capacities and runs contrary to practices the world over. He was led to this position by his knowledge of the smoothness and simplicity of the Botswana and Senegalese elections without the involvement of the military. Yet, they produced outcomes that satisfied integrity and credibility tests.

    His government unarguably, presided over a general election that is rated one of the best in the country. That is not all. Jonathan stands out as the only civilian president of this country that presided over an election in which he was a candidate but lost. So, when he says Nigerian military should be excused from election security management, he should be taken seriously.

    Apart from aligning to global practices, excluding the military from election security duties will also isolate that institution from the blame game associated with the coterie of infractions and malpractices that often mar our elections. During the last governorship off-cycle election in Ondo State, the Defence Headquarters said it deployed troops in significant numbers to support the Nigerian Police Force ensure smooth election.

    “Troops presence is to ensure the security of citizens, enabling them to cast their votes without any form of intimidation while keeping mischief makers at bay”, the DHQ explained. But Jonathan says NO to that idea. He would rather keep the military out of such routine functions concentrating in securing strategic systems and conveying logistics to difficult terrains. He has a point.

    Keeping the military out of election security duties will also isolate that institution from undue politicisation as well as partisanship accusations that are freely traded at each round of elections. Moreover, scholars have pointed to a link between the frequent deployment of soldiers to civilian duties and the rash of military takeovers at the foundation stages of new African states. That phenomenon is yet to peter out. Not with the currency of military rule in some African countries after sacking elected civilian governments.

     J.I. Clarke’s perspective on the issue is quite instructive. For him, unless the impulse to let the armed forces handle the ever-widening array of domestic tasks is checked, European countries may end up with “a very expensive, improperly equipped and overqualified emergency response instrument instead of a functional military force”.

    If the armed forces of European countries could face such potent challenges, the situation promises to be more dire for their Nigerian counterparts rated less in sophistication and capacity. The solution does not lie in the constant recourse to the military to handle internal security matters but developing, equipping and adequately funding the Nigerian police and sister organisations to effectively manage such situations. This objective is achievable given the right political will.

    The other strand of the issues raised at the forum relates to the attitude and disposition of the leadership and the led to elections. Jonathan gave clear account of the simplicity and orderliness of the voting process and the electorate in the two countries; how they complied with the regulations guiding voting. But he noted with disappointment that if it were here, people will observe the rules in their breach.

    He believes that the country will get to a point where the people will reject bad behaviour. He did not come clear on what he meant by bad behaviour. But viewed within the context he spoke, it is obvious that he had in mind, the plethora of infractions that mar our elections.

    In effect, he views the ills of our electoral process as a passing phase only if the people reject bad conduct and insist that the right things be done. That goes without saying even as it places the burden of positive change on the shoulders of the people.

    The penchant by the Nigerians to acquiesce to illegalities or succumb to all manner of inducements gives further impetus to the series of infractions witnessed during our elections. These can only stop with a positive change in the orientation and attitude of the electorate such that aligns with pristine democratic ethos.

    Read Also: Forgive Babangida over June 12, Ozekhome begs Nigerians

     But the electorate is not solely to blame. The governments in power share a larger chunk of the culpability.

    Former governor of Anambra State, Peter Obi shared this view in his speech at the occasion when he emphasised that the integrity of elections is determined by the leadership in charge. Free and fair elections, he said, are possible when the right people oversee the process. He has said it all.

    How long it will take for the right people be in charge in a fragmented and highly polarised system characterised by rancorous and cut-throat politics, remains a moot issue. Ours is an inequitable plural society where the various segments are in constant competition for the control of the huge resources at the centre buoyed by prebendal predilections.

    It remains to be seen how that culture of decent electoral behaviour can emerge and endure in a system the central government controls disproportionate share of the national resources and disburses same at will with the sub-nationalities locked in bitter contest for dominance and control. An inequitable system cannot nurture the culture of free, fair and credible electoral conduct.

    This should instruct that we dilute the omnipresence and omnipotence of the federal order to lessen the pressure of bitter competition and the stress it imposes on the system. With devolution of powers to the constituents in keeping with the federal spirit, the acrimonious competition to control the resources at the centre would have been largely stymied.

    Then, moral re-orientation and re-engineering direly needed to grow the culture of decent electoral contest and effective governance can commence in earnest. That has been the missing link. And as long as our system continues to operate in the most inequitable and most aberrant form, so long shall acrimonious and do-or-die politics assail our progress.

    Perhaps, moral or ethical revolution in the Kuhnian fashion could also be activated to save the situation. But its prospects in the extant order appear a remote possibility.

  • The reunion

    The reunion

    Atiku Abubakar calls it a courtesy call. The history between him and his host, the Owu chief, his former boss and former President Olusegun Obasanjo, has had everything but courtesy. They smile at each other but wiles contour their faces. They gladhand because they are not glad. They hug but might wish to choke each other. As a former soldier, OBJ may wish that the most, but Atiku is taller and heftier. Obj may prefer to reach for his legs and plot a pinfall. But his octogenarian energies may end the encounter in a dark, hospital comedy. So, the wiles and smiles should do.

    This invokes the phrase from Senegalese writer Ousmane Sembene in his short story, Her three days, about the malignant affability of wives in a polygamous home. They cloak an undertow of a warrior ethos with effusive joy. Sembene describes such affections as “the perfidy of words and the hypocrisy of rivals.”

    So it might have been at Ota when Atiku returned, his second coming.  Recall he did the same in October, 2018, ahead of the 2019 polls. He did not wish Buhari well. He gave him a witch eye. He who had called the Katsina titan the father of the nation after he became the president, typically played judas and abandoned the party. He had lost in the primary. He saw no way forward and went to his vomit. Vomit is a delicacy for the Adamawa chieftain. It is a familiar palate. So, he wanted to lock horns in 2019.

    He was in Ota, with Obasanjo. There was an episcopal touch to that visit, as he had pulpit men, two bishops from different divides of Christendom. Oyedepo and Kukah wanted Buhari out. We know how that turned out. This time, Atiku did not want any holy of holies this time. No amens or hallelujahs. He poohpoohed the pulpit. He came with men of his own class and cassock. Tambuwal, Imoke, Ningi.

     Maybe he thought Kukah and Oyedepo sullied his journey with the holy spirit. Or maybe he felt the holy spirit was angry with the men of God for accompanying the wrong candidate for an amen.

    So, this time he wants no holy distractions. However, both men were haunted by their sins in the same week they were hugging and backslapping. The news came from 2005 from the work of Atiku when he was vice president, and stripped government agencies. One of them was Aladja Steel. The present director general of the Bureau of Public Enterprises, Ayo Gbeleyi, announced that the Aladja Steel worth $700 million at that time was sold off for a mere $30 million.  Has any reporter investigated who bought it? What an advertisement for their time as stewards of our resources.

    We also know that actions like that led OBJ to plot the prosecution of Atiku as vice president. He planned to rip him of his immunity, so he could give him the pinfall over corruption charges. The pinfall he cannot give today, he wanted to give in 2007 but failed. If they can fight with muscles today, they can look for another kind of collaboration: the muscle of elections.

    Was that not why, as this essayist narrated last week, OBJ set up a panel with his favorite sons and daughter then to ban him for six years? Were the favorites not Bayo Ojo, Nasir El-Rufai and our own Oby Ezekwesili, two of whom are noisy today about the rule of law and decency? Did the media not call the panel a kangaroo? Did then Governor Tinubu not save Atiku with the legal fireworks of Wole Olanipekun (SAN)? How did Atiku show gratitude? With turncoat. Even today, the ICPC is asking OBJ’s favorite son, as he then was, to account for N1.3 billion allocated and disbursed for Kaduna Light rail, but no rail is whirring on the streets and arteries of the city.

    Read Also: An Open Letter To Donald Trump

    Was this not the background to their public spat then when OBJ uttered a comedic jest, “I dey laugh o”. In his lack of vituperative imagination, did Atiku not reply with “I dey laugh too o?”

    So, you can understand why their laughter cannot be a laughter but a mockery of it, or what playwright Samuel Beckett designated as Risus Purus, a laugh laughing at itself. A mirthless, soulless laughter.

    Even while they were meeting, two party men of the PDP had just gone to blows at Asaba. Maybe Obj wished one of those blows landed on Atiku’s jaws. Or maybe Atiku wished the same of his host. But they are elders, although some may call them oldies instead.

    Obj is not an official member of PDP, but he is still with them in spirit. He is not like Atiku who jumps from ship to ship. OBJ is more ethereal. He jumps in spirit. Thou canst see me jump and live. Atiku is better in this regard. He would not be a hypocrite. OBJ loves the pharisees in the Bible, except that the pharisees never jumped to the side of the Lord. So Obj is PDP in spirit. Things boomerang for the Ota titan. Remember detention centre called Inter Centre? OBJ set it up for his enemies when he was head of state. Abacha, no humorist, sent him there as victim. In his engrossing new book, The Adventures of a Guerrilla Journalist, Femi Ojudu – sees it as a comeuppance. Ojudu was also Abacha’s guest there before he was moved to notorious Awolowo Road, Ikoyi.

    Obj endorsed Obi and not Atiku. You could not accuse  him of treachery. He did not bear the party card. We also saw him make a public theatre by tearing up the party card, the card he brandished when he was president, the card as emblem of party supremacy. The party he wrecked, the party that gave him the air of a democrat.

    So, why did Atiku visit Obj when he knew what came out of it was to back his enemy?  He probably thinks ObJ would not back Obi this time, even though the thin-voiced maestro is still crooning alone and has foresworn any alliance. His Obidients would skewer him.

    But then, we know the same party is in crisis today. The loss of the 2023 polls is a tragedy in the PDP house, and they are like a family trying to come to terms with a death in the family. People grieve differently, so do families and so do political parties. In the novel, The Discomfort of Evening, Marieke Lucas Rijneveld shows how a Dutch family contends with the drowning of their loss that even involves constipation, incest, madcow disease and fantasies about a Nazi concentration camp in a basement. Grieving is like madness.

    Today, they don’t have an idea in PDP who is the chairman or secretary, and how and when to hold a convention or speaks for the party, or how to approach a court verdict. They know one thing, though: how to visit a dinosaur general who also does not understand why no one has invited him to dinner at the Aso Rock in a generation.

  • The parting of Adebanjo

    The parting of Adebanjo

    When a public figure breathes his last, we forbid ourselves to speak ill of the dead. It may console the friends and family but may not be fair to history or society. It defrocks the society of its integrity. Ayo Adebanjo’s passing has enacted worshipful praise across all platforms. This was the man only recently who was in the political doghouse of his opponents.

    Newspapers should not fall for this entrapment. We can call him an early Awoist. He also went to jail over treasonable felony. He deserves his plaudits for his personal sacrifices. But it was also true as Richard Sklar wrote in his Nigerian Political parties, on the formation of the Action Group that the AG was an amorphous amalgam of the faithful, loyalists and strangers, ideological turncoats, warts and all. We must applaud Adebanjo as a chieftain of NADECO. All fought for the enthronement of democracy and the rule of law, and no one can take that from him, no matter how little. But like many humans, some people go past their prime, and veer off course.

    What shall we say about his role during the military when Bola Ige was detained and he went to Ikenne, and he saw Baba Adebanjo on a table with him. Ige, ever boisterous, declined Awo’s offer to sit at table with him. He said it was Adebanjo and his friend Olaniwun Ajayi who gave him away to the soldiers. This is in the autobiography of Bisi Akande, My Participations, who was Ige’s deputy as governor of Oyo State. The story was confirmed by Dr. Yemi Ogunbiyi, in his autobiography, The Road Never Forgets. Here is how Ogunbiyi renders it without naming him, but did not deny when I interviewed him for TVC. “Uncle Bola looked across the table, and as he sighted some of the seated guests… he stiffened himself up in anger and refused the offer of a seat from Chief Awolowo…he bellowed and screamed relentlessly! “My Leader, I would not sit down with you for dinner with these (pointing across the table) traitors! No. I would not do that. These are traitors, My Leader. They should not be here with you.” Ogunbiyi and his wife, Sade, were at the table, too.

    Read Also: Adebanjo: Life and times of an irrepressible Awoist

    Adebanjo never ran for an office, and Akande and others have said it was because he lacked grassroots credibility. Akande described him as “organizing secretary”, a term for political hustlers during the Action Group and UPN days. He became a bitter man, and it was not for love for Peter Obi that he endorsed him. He did it out of spite. He became a fringe heckler of his own ethnic body, Afenifere, and a sullen, distracting agitator unbecoming of a nonagenarian.

    But people are free to eulogise him. After all, Shakespeare says, in a moment of rare mushiness, that “he who dies pays all debts.” Maybe hence the poet, Heinrich Heine wrote that “death does not separate us. Death unites us.” But let not the sentiment separate us from the facts of a life lived. Socrates knows about debts of the dying. “I owe a cock to Asclepius,” pleaded the philosopher. “Do not forget to pay it.”

  • Death penalty for fake drugs’ peddlers

    Death penalty for fake drugs’ peddlers

    A couple had cause to house a relation who had just secured a job at a medical facility in Lagos. After staying with his hosts for some months, the medical worker secured an apartment somewhere else and made the necessary preparations to move in.

    But before he finally left, he went to a prominent mall in his area and bought an expensive bottle of hot drink as a mark of traditional appreciation for the generosity extended to him by the couple. He proudly presented this drink to his hosts in the customised grocery bag of the mall and thanked them for the favour done to him. His hosts were very appreciative especially given the symbolism of such gifts in their culture.

    A day after he left for his new abode, the couple decided to have a taste of the hot drink gift. The husband opened it, took one or two shots, gave a shot to his wife and kept the remainder on the shelf.

    After a while, the wife began to complain of stomach upset. This was soon to be accompanied by frequent and ceaseless stooling that she had to be rushed to a hospital. The husband suffered the same health challenge but the effect was not as severe as that of his wife.

    One thing that continued to occupy their minds during this health encounter was the possible source of their affliction. They considered all possibilities including the food and other consumables they took in their house that day. They ruled out the ones they consumed with their children since none of them showed signs of stomach upset.

    They narrowed down to the hot drink because it was the singular item of consumption their children did not take. Their suspicion was high that the hot drink may have either been faked or adulterated notwithstanding that it was bought from a reputable mall with franchise all of the major state capitals.

    Buoyed by the suspicion of adulteration, the couple quickly went to the shelf, grabbed the bottle and poured its content away in the sink. They were lucky to have survived the affliction as no serious harm came their way.

    Henry Ogan (not real names) was diagnosed of an illness that requires him to be taking certain daily drugs duly recommended by his doctors. He went to a nearby pharmacy and bought the drugs. After taking the therapy for a good number of days, he discovered that relief was not coming.

    He was worried that the drugs were of no help in ameliorating his situation. A number of ideas began to run through his mind. After some time, he decided to see his doctor with the drugs. And on very close examination, the doctor asked him to discard those drugs because he was not just sure of their source. He then directed the patient to a particular pharmacy with samples of the brand.

    Read Also: Fake drug: NSA, NAFDAC launch biggest operation against fake drugs in Onitsha, Idumota, Kano, Yaba 

    Ogan did as instructed. This time he paid higher for the drugs but he got the right ones. And as he began taking them, considerable improvement in his health was noticed. Ever since, he has learnt to buy drugs from reputable pharmacies.

    The two accounts denote a tip of the iceberg in the mindless faking and counterfeiting of drugs, foods and assortment of consumables that go on in this country.  Sadly, innocent citizens are at the receiving end. The people in the two encounters were lucky to have survived.

    For many others, the reverse is often the case as they are dispatched to their early graves by the mindless quest of criminal elements to make illicit money at the expense of human lives. The situation is so critical and challenging even as efforts by relevant enforcement agencies to tame the menace have not achieved the desired results.

     The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has been raiding markets and sundry manufacturing and distribution outlets to curtail the activities of fake and adulterated drug peddlers. In the last couple of weeks, it embarked on the sealing of open drug markets across the country considered the largest source of fake, counterfeit and expired drugs.

    The Ariaria open drug market Aba, Abia State, that of Onitsha, Anambra and Idumota in Lagos State were some of the ones sealed by the agency. NAFDAC justified the simultaneous enforcement exercise in the three markets on the ground that they account for 80 per cent of the drugs sold in the country. That may well be even as they do not exhaust the list of markets such drugs are regularly sold to unsuspecting customers.

    Before now, the agency had severally confiscated lorry loads of fake and substandard products in various parts of the country, burning and destroying them to forestall their being pushed back into the markets. But all these efforts seem to pale into insignificance in the face of the high volume of fake drugs, foods and consumables that still flood our markets. In a clime where all manner of people seek quick wealth through cutting-corners and fraudulent manoeuvres, the challenge can be really daunting.

    The enormity of this challenge especially the mortal risks it poses to human lives must have so frustrated the Director-General of NAFDAC, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye that she last week, called for death penalty for fake drugs peddlers. For her, only strict penalty can deter offenders especially when their action results in the death of children.

    Hear her, “Someone bought children’s medicine for about N13, 000 while another person was selling it for around N3,000 in the same mall. That raised the alarm.  Guess what? When we tested the medicine in our Kaduna lab, there was nothing inside. So, I want the death penalty”.

    She succinctly captured the mortal danger posed by fake drugs when she said, “you don’t need to put a gun to a child’s head to kill them; just give them bad medicine”. That summarises the life-threatening risks fake, adulterated, expired drugs and consumables pose not just to the lives of children but the adult population as well.

    Even with efforts by the relevant enforcement agencies to stem the tide, the enormity and lethality of the challenge should instruct that stricter measures be taken to discourage the quick resort to faking and adulteration for profit. The malfeasance is so pervasive that one begins to question how some of these substandard drugs and consumables get into the country. It is true that some of them are faked locally. Yet, a good number come in through our ports. The regular seizures and confiscation of such products at the ports of entry give credence to this.

    Adeyeye was not unmindful of the limitations of NAFDAC in fighting the scourge. The conduct of other agencies of government at the various ports of inspection and entry must also be re-evaluated.

    There is the need for stricter laws to make fake and substandard drugs’ peddling a very dangerous enterprise. The way things stand, it is clear that enforcement and extant punishment in our status books have not been able to act as sufficient deterrent. Little surprising the illegal business continues to boom.

    During a recent sting operation by the agency in one of the markets sealed last week, Nigerian were shocked at the assortment of fake and substandard drugs, drinks, sachet milk products and consumable confiscated from there. Nobody is really safe as the public has no way of differentiating between the fakes and the genuine products.

    It took a lab test for NAFDAC discover that the drug sold for N3,000 had practically no healing value. It remains to be imagined the number of Nigerians that would have consumed them and the harm done to their lives.

    Adeyeye’s frustrations in routing for death penalty for fake drugs peddlers is understandable irrespective of its propriety as a necessary and sufficient deterrent to offenders. That prescription may also run into conflict with current concerns and diminishing lure of capital punishment. Bu the argument that those who take lives through unwholesome practices should be subjected to tame measure can only be ignored at our collective peril.

    Legislations no matter how well framed, may not achieve the desired results if the judicial system is weak. That is why the integrity and independence of the judiciary comes into serious reckoning. There is the urgency to re-jig our laws to make for penalties strict enough to discourage offenders. The pervasiveness of the malfeasance suggests loopholes in extant laws and administration of justice that requires to be plugged.

    It is also high time we addressed systemic and orientational dysfunctions that push our citizens to deadly trade practices in the name of making quick money. The level of moral decay in our society has become so alarming that some social re-engineering should be called into quick action to halt the slide to the precipice. But the starting point should be from the club of people the system throws up as leaders.

    The scourge of fake and adulterated drugs and foods is a national emergency; a mortal threat to human life. It requires genuine action to tame the monster.

  • Kanu’s stop-start trial

    Kanu’s stop-start trial

    A viral video captured the intensity of the conflict between Biafra separatist champion Nnamdi Kanu and Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja.  “I do not recognise this court’s authority over me,” Kanu declared forcefully in court, on February 10. “I only honoured the hearing notice out of respect for the rule of law. The Chief Judge’s decision to return my case to Justice Nyako is unacceptable.”

    The conflict is sustained by both sides: the detained leader of the proscribed separatist group, Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), and the Nigerian judiciary. Kanu, in September 2024, had requested Justice Nyako to recuse herself from his trial, citing a lack of confidence in her handling of the case. Consequently, the judge had forwarded the case file to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, for reassignment.

     However, Justice Tsoho seemingly complicated the matter by returning the case to Justice Nyako, on the grounds that she was best suited to continue handling the trial. Notably, he observed that two other judges were previously recused from the case. He directed that if at the next hearing of the case, Kanu still insists on recusing Justice Nyako, he must file a written motion on Notice, with an affidavit, stating all the grounds for requesting the recusal, for her review and determination, then she can make her decision. Justice Nyako’s earlier recusal was based on an oral application by Kanu and his lawyer. 

    Why didn’t she ask for a written request before deciding to recuse herself from the trial in the first place? Does her withdrawal following an oral application make it any less binding? Interestingly, after explaining at the resumed hearing that the chief judge had rejected her recusal, she directed Kanu’s counsel to submit a formal written application if they wished to insist on her withdrawal.  She adjourned the matter indefinitely.

    There are unavoidable questions: Following a written request for her recusal, could she reverse the decision she made based on an oral request? Wouldn’t such a reversal be suspicious?  Can the chief judge compel another judge to continue the trial?

    While Justice Nyako’s familiarity with the case dates back to its beginning, this is not a compelling reason to keep her on the case in the face of Kanu’s objection. To stretch the argument, if Justice Nyako was unable to continue the case because of incapacitation, for instance, the chief judge would have had to choose another judge for the trial. Perhaps her conscious recusal should have been allowed to stand, particularly because it helped to project her detachment.

    Kanu himself must be aware that there is a limit to demanding a judge’s recusal. How many judges could he reject, even if allowed, before being ridiculed? His conduct suggests that he believes he has the right to decide which judge should try him. Indeed, his letter to the authorities, dated January 30, 2025, seeking that his case be moved to the Southeast, ahead of the continuation of his trial in February, demonstrated his unrealistic sense of entitlement.  He needs to be reminded that he is facing a trial, and he is not in charge.

     He wrote: “Since Justice Nyako’s recusal is binding, she no longer has jurisdiction over my case. Given that no other judge in the Abuja division is willing to take it, the only viable option is to transfer the matter to any division of the Federal High Court in the South-East, particularly since the alleged offences have an impact in the South-East (not Abuja). This gives the South-East divisions superior jurisdiction compared to Abuja.” Is it possible that he believes he would receive a favourable judgment   in the Southeast?

    Read Also: Kanu rejects judge again, court adjourns case indefinitely

    He was first arrested in October 2015 and granted bail in April 2017 in the course of his trial for “alleged offences of conspiracy to commit acts of treasonable felony and other related offences.”

    He fled the country in September 2017 following “Operation Python Dance,” a military exercise in the Southeast during which “rampaging soldiers” allegedly invaded his house in Afara-Ukwu Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State.

     He had reappeared in Israel a year later, in October 2018. He had grabbed the headlines yet again with a tweet in January 2019, saying, “I am back in the UK to continue our excellent work to liberate #Biafra from the pit of darkness, Nigeria.”

    He was re-arrested in Kenya and brought back to Nigeria in June 2021, about four years after he mysteriously disappeared from the country.  

    His group is known for using terroristic methods in its fight for an independent “Biafra land” made up of Nigeria’s five Southeast states, and parts of the South-south geo-political zone. In 2020, IPOB illegally launched its Eastern Security Network (ESN), which it described as “a vigilance group.”

    But there are signs that IPOB has become a Frankenstein monster beyond the control of those who created it. This makes the group more dangerous. For instance, at some point, when Finland-based Biafra campaigner Simon Ekpa entered the picture there was strong evidence of divisions within the group as zealous enforcers ignored Kanu’s disclaimer, and violently implemented Ekpa’s controversial order that Southeast residents should stay at home from December 9 to 14, 2022.

    It is ironic that some campaigners for Kanu’s release see him as a solution to insecurity in the Southeast. On February 5, some days before the resumed court hearing, members of the House of Representatives Committee on South East Development Commission (SEDC) called for his release. The committee’s chairman, Chris Nkwonta, at its inaugural meeting was reported saying his release would be “a step towards lasting peace and development in the Southeast.” Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu, at the same event, also said his release “will ensure more security for our people and spring up development that this SEDC is going to bring.”

    These campaigners and others want him to be released without concluding his trial. Some have called the approach “a political solution.” The solution must be justice-based.  

     From all indications, insecurity in the Southeast is mainly due to IPOB’s activities, and it would require a reformed Kanu to reform the group. The question of leadership and control of the group is critical. Ekpa’s activities showed that it should not be taken for granted that Kanu is in charge.  So, it is uncertain that Kanu’s release will help to put an end to insecurity in the region. Ultimately, the authorities must demonstrate capacity to uphold law and order in the Southeast.

    Kanu remains lawfully detained, contrary to his oft-repeated claim that his detention is unlawful.  The Supreme Court had reversed his acquittal and the order for his release by the Court of Appeal. But his trial is taking too long.