Category: Femi Orebe

  • Leadership governor of the year: No amount of ‘bad belle’ will desecrate this honour

    Leadership governor of the year: No amount of ‘bad belle’ will desecrate this honour

    In two short years, Dr Fayemi has permanently changed the face of Ekiti

    At a time like this, we need leaders not looters, leaders, not rulers. We need leaders with the fear of God; those who will not lie; leaders who will accept in public what they can accept in private; leaders who are not corrupt; leaders who will not steal; leaders who look in the eyes of the common man with compassion and not eyes of the privileged few. May I congratulate you on behalf of the nation because the nation needs leaders like you” –Elder statesman, Alhaji Maitama Sule, former Nigerian Ambassador to the United Nations, congratulating Dr Kayode Fayemi, the Ekiti state governor and this year’s winner of the prestigious Leadership newspaper’s Man of the Year award.

    While dignitaries, far and near, have since been celebrating the quietly efficient governor of Ekiti state, a man not given to empty self-glorification, some, especially nearer home, have left nothing undone in trying to equate the award to the likes of ‘honour’ a segment of the Nigerian students union once bestowed on a professor who conducted the worst ever election, not only in Nigeria, but the world over as was eloquently attested to by the foreign election monitors amongst who were former Heads of State. Like the latter, they even have the temerity to suggest that it was bought.

    Questions, largely out of ignorance and an unbelievable insularity, if not self-inflicted limited choices of what they choose to read, have been asked, for instance about Leadership Newspaper which they claim they do not know. I have elsewhere lumped those who ask such questions with those whose newspaper choices most probably do not go beyond the soft sell magazines.

    Also, in an attempt to square up with those of us who criticize undiscerning recipients of just any ‘honour’, some have laid us up to charges of political partisanship whereas what underpins our abhorrence of ‘honour’ for honour sake, simpli cita, is the sure knowledge that there are too many such ‘honours’ being peddled around the country today that a governor Fayemi will not as much as touch with the longest pole. Of course we could not have so easily forgotten awards of ‘Best Banker in Africa’, Banker of the Year and such like ‘honours’ whose recipients were, within a year of such awards shown for what they truly are. The lesson we preach here is: let would-be awardees beware.

    A word or two then about the three most critical elements in this discourse since we must not attach any undue importance to the critics who may have been motivated by whatever considerations: political, an eagerness for a pound of flesh or what former President Obasanjo would rather describe as ‘bad belle’. They will always be entitled to their self-inflicted grumbles.

    Of the three, Sam Nda Isaiah comes first.

    After reading his ramifying 50th birthday anniversary interview sometime around May, 2012, I tried never to miss his weekly column and when I got news of this award, I reached out to my good friend and University of Ife contemporary, Dr Femi Adebanjo, who not only taught Sam Pharmacology and Toxicology at the Great University, but was his Project supervisor for the B.Pharm degree to validate what things I knew about him. It was a learning curve..

    Hear Femi Adebanjo: Sam Nda Isaiah was an exceptional student. Son to a former editor of the Nigerian Herald, he came from a journalistic background; a fact which helped him perform brilliantly as the youngest ever Editor-in-Chief of the Pharmaceutical Association in the 81/82 session. He graduated in the 2nd class (Upper) Division and although he subsequently went to read Law at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Sam refused to defend his project, strictly on principle.’

    Continued Dr Adebanjo: ‘Mr Nda- Isaiah has been a phenomenon since leaving school. A complete tee-to- taler, Sam buys books like Nigerians buy recharge cards and has several thousand volumes in his library. Sam, he says, is bolder than bold itself, and is hugely respected throughout the length and breadth of Nigeria. Concluding, Dr Adebanjo said ‘both Sam and Kayode Fayemi are two stars born to shine, and shine they always will.’ Prince Julius Adelusi-Adeluyi, former Health Minister, who also knows Sam very well, would later confirm Dr Adebanjo’s views of the publisher. You do not come from such a laudable background to join the crowd of award hawkers.

    The Leadership newspaper worships no creed, race, or persons, and, had late President Yar Adua had his way, the publisher and his editors would probably still be in jail for the paper’s objective assessments of that lacklustre administration. Nothing demonstrates the paper’s single-minded uprightness than its credo which reads as follows: ‘Leadership is not a regional or sectional paper. It is a national paper symbolically embedded in the nation’s capital. We shall stand up for good governance. We shall defend the interests of the Nigerian state even against its leaders and we shall raise our pen at all times in defense of what is right. These are the values by which we intend to be assessed and we shall never, ever, for any reason forget the noble reason of our coming into being. For God and Country.’

    The paper has studiously been honest to its raison detre.

    The third, and most critical in this discourse is governor Kayode Fayemi. For me, writing about him, as regular readers of this column must know by now, is like eating eko with akara –two popular Yoruba foods.

    A few weeks ago on this page, I treated readers to the efforts of a highly concentrated mind, and his enormously committed team, in turning around the fortunes of a beleaguered state which, for nine cheerless years, was in the throes of some thoroughly vacuous PDP governments, one of which lasted all of one day. That article was in continuation of the series I called: ‘FAYEMI’S QUIET REVOLUTION IN EKITI’, a subject which the Leadership award has further confirmed. Ordinarily, one will expect most people to see and appreciate his yeoman’s efforts in transforming a once beleaguered state but we must be gamely enough to concede that some are so occluded they will deny the evidence of their very eyes. It is permitted. But for the honest and objective observer, it should be about the easiest thing to conclude that in two short years, Dr Fayemi has permanently changed the face of Ekiti. The Ekiti of his dreams, no doubt, remains a work in progress as no one man will ever be able to do it all.

    Dr Fayemi is a far cry from the types who will not only accept but will luxuriate in cheap awards, the kind being marketed around political office holders and which many are eager to sign up to. In contrast to those, the Leadership awards are very credible, the process of award transparent and the criteria independently verifiable. The cheer calibre of eminent Nigerians who graced the occasion is proof positive of how highly Nigerians rate the Leadership awards and that, in itself, should be enough to shut up busy bodies.

    In conclusion, and paraphrasing Hakeem Jamiu, ‘the governor’s Senior Special Assistant on Research and Documentation, governor Fayemi was the first to sign into law, the Freedom of Information Bill, after it had been domesticated by the state House of Assembly, sign the bill against gender- based violence as well as the Social Security bill courtesy which Ekiti elderly citizens now receive N5, 000 monthly support. In spite of the state’s meagre resources , and a debt overhang of N42 billion from the immediate past administration, Fayemi has embarked on a massive transformation of the State through road construction, urban renewal, provision of pipe-borne water, streetlights, traffic lights and the general beautification of the state capital. He has done a lot to improve the quality of education and the administration is currently renovating 100 schools in the first phase of the Operation Renovate All Ekiti Schools. Health care delivery is in top shape with children and the elderly enjoying free health and old, moribund industries to which the last two regimes paid no regard are now being aggressively resuscitated just as agriculture and tourism are receiving appropriate attention’

    Need I say more?.

  • What game is the north up to at inec?

    Mr President should right the impunity displayed by Professors Jega and Oba

    Can Professor Jega, a celebrated academic and former University Vice-Chancellor, double as an ethnic bigot ? Is the famous Professor Oba, former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ilorin, working in tandem with Jega in his historic role of a northern irredentist? Or is it as simple as the Federal Character Commission becoming comatose or completely blind and toothless wherever in the Nigerian polity the North wields an unfair advantage? These and more questions agitate the mind on reading the advert:  THE TAKE OVER OF INEC published in the Monday, 20 August, 2012, edition of this newspaper by the  ELECTION INTEGRITY NETWORK  but which in itself emanated from an earlier story by  TheNews Magazine.  It will be a little disingenuous, even unfair,  to claim or even pretend that INEC has just so  suddenly become an ethnic enclave.  The story was the same when Igbo elements ruled the roust in the agency only that under Professor Jega  cronyism and outright nepotism has  assumed an industrial  scale, albeit, with  Professor Oba’s ludicrous connivance, no doubt.

    For ease of reference, let us quote directly from the advert under reference.  According to the publication, INEC’s top management is made up as follows: 1. Prof Jega (Chairman)- Kebbi  2. U.F Usman (Director of Logistics) –Kebbi  3.A. Muktar (Director of Human Resources) –Sokoto  4. A.A Uregi (Director of Finance) –Niger 5. M. Kuta (Internal Auditor) –Niger 6. E.T Akem (Director ICT) –Benue 7. I. Biu (Director of Voter Education) – North East 8.I.K Bawa (Dep. Director, Legal) –Plateau 9.Okey Ndeche (Director, Operations) –Anambra 10. Nyise Torgba  (Director M& E/Performance) –Benue 11. A.A Adamu Head, Commission, Secretariat) –Kogi 12. M.Ekwunja (Director, Civil Societies) 13. E. Umenger (Director, Public Affairs) –Benue 14. Regina Omo-Agege (Director, Political Monitoring) –Delta. 15. B.E Edoghotu (Estate & Works).

    It would have been mind boggling enough  if the above  was the  only  problem with  the  sheer crudity of the brazen institution  Professor Jega sits atop but it certainly does not stop there. The composition of INEC’s  national commissioners who head the vital committees overseeing  the most important departments as stated hereunder, according to the sponsors, is much more revealing:

    1.   Col. Hamanga  ( Chairperson, Logistics Committee) –Adamawa

    2.   Dr Nuru Yakubu ( Chairperson, Operations Committee) –Yobe

    3. Ambassador Wali (Chair person, Procurement Committee) –Sokoto

    4. Prof Jega           (Chairperson, F&GP) –Kebbi

    5. Prof Jega         ( Chairperson, ICT) –Kebbi

    6. Hajia Amina Zakari (Chairperson, Political Monitoring) –Jigawa

    7.   Membership of a newly constituted  INEC 9-Man Strategic Planning Committee  reads as follows: Nuru A. Yakubu, Istianus Dalwang, Mustafa Kuta, M.S Mohammed. Torgba Nyitse, Emanuel Akeem all from the North with only Mike Igini and Okechukwu Ndeche from the South. This is asides the fact that the commission’s secretary is also from the North. This Jega has ensured by all means in his two years.  How blatant can some supposedly educated people get?

    8. Pray, what is Professor Jega thinking? How on earth can a supposedly thorough-bred academic, whose appointment by a President  of Southern extraction  elicited rapturous joy across the entire country become so untidily insular and unfeeling? How can such an otherwise accomplished individual so conveniently forget that  Nigeria runs a federation  with a Federal Character Commission firmly in place in its constitution and  be so whimsical and selfish? What will he claim as alibi for this totally unacceptable lop-sidedness in an agency that is so critical?

    I found the following comments  by  Ifeanyi Izeze very useful in taking a look at the Federal Character Commission. Wrote Izeze in 2011 : “ When Nigeria’s Federal Character Commission (FCC) was established in 1996, it was supposed to enforce the federal character principles which aimed at ensuring fair and equitable distribution of posts; social-economic amenities; and infrastructural facilities among the federating units of the nation.

    The intention was for it to be the watchdog of government ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) in ensuring an evenly distributed workforce that reflects ethnic diversity and the geopolitical divides of the country. It was  also supposed to ensure that socio-economic amenities and development infrastructure are equitably distributed across the country.

    ‘In recognition of its failings, wrote Izeze, the Commission after a Port Harcourt stakeholders retreat recounted as follows: The FCC  has delineated the country into national, state and local government levels as channels of distribution among the federating units for ease of implementation. Allocations at the national level, it said, will now be based on the 36 states and Abuja or the six geo-political zones or north and south …’

    Given Professor Oba’s roaring  success as Vice-Chancellor, University of Ilorin, I am not in the least surprised that the  FCC under his watch has decided not to have INEC  on the commission’s radar. After all, it is very convenient for the interests he ministers to, but as a federal agency, one is at a loss  as to why not even the Presidency through the office of either the Secretary to Government or that of the National Security Adviser could draw attention to this totally inexcusable situation. Even if some of these individuals are career officers, they should promptly be transferred to other sections of the bureaucracy, leaving only what is genuinely due to the North. This wrong must be corrected for the world to see that we are a country under the rule of law.

    What then are the probable calculations of the North which these eminence griise so faithfully represent  on the  count down to the make or mar 2015 general elections in the country? The Election Integrity Network  has some take on this question. It stated that the structural iniquity in INEC  displays nothing but a suspiciously skewed regional interest especially at a time when geo-political struggle for power has assumed a violent dimension. The body believes that this is a carefully planned restructuring in which the most important organs responsible for future elections are placed smack in the hands of  the North.

    The only time in recent memory that I can recall a similar scenario was during the Abacha era when you could hardly find  four Southerners on the list of  the topmost  twenty security officers and a security council meeting could hold with hardly a southerner in attendance, going strictly by ranking. Without a doubt, this arrangement  at INEC  cannot be a happenstance; rather it is the result of cold calculations aimed at far beyond the present. And to imagine that these are by individuals  who are loudest  in  proclaiming the inviolability  of the Nigerian  state.

    Must it  be an Animal Farm too?

    The sponsors of th advert in question  touched on the total absence of any Yoruba man or woman in the management team of such a crucial agency.  For me personally, this is a non-issue since some leading Yoruba  would rather  permit themselves  be consumed by their cry of mainstreaming than fight to be treated as equals with members of their party from  other parts of the country. If these  PDP  people already traversing  the South-West  ahead of  the next elections were treated as co-equals, having comprehensively lost out in the legislature, they should have resolved with their party leader and President, the urgent  need to be adequately represented in agencies like INEC. This, however, will never happen since they are experts at feathering their individual nests as opposed to corporate South-West interests. It is for this reason too, that we never heard anything about regional integration when for some six or seven years they held the region in a stranglehold.

    As things stand in INEC today, I think Mr President owes it a duty to Nigeria  to right this egregious display of impunity perpetrated by two professors who, ordinarily, should feel outraged at the management structure subsisting in an agency so crucial to the very continued, peaceful co-existence of the country itself. In its present state, should the North decide so to do, it can, through these individuals so completely influence the 2015 general elections in ways that the Kenya experience of a few years back could be nothing more than a child play in a country of over 150 million people.

    So Mr President, a stitch in time could more than save nine.

  • Defending bigotry and cant at both inec and the federal character commission

    Defending bigotry and cant at both inec and the federal character commission

    INEC and Federal Character Commission have to do more to convince Nigerians that they have no ulterior motives

     Nothing can be more indicative of the synergy between the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Federal Character Commission in their determined bid to protect inequity at INEC than the fact that while Prof Jega, the INEC Chairman had caused Kayode Idowu, his Chief Press Secretary, to do a lengthy defence of INEC’s indefensible management composition, Prof Oba has, himself, resorted to granting newspaper interviews to achieve the same result. But only the unwary can be deceived by either of these two professors who head very vital, indeed strategic, national institutions.

    In my article: ‘What game is the North up to at INEC?, 18 August, 2010, and sundry other publications, attention was drawn to the overwhelming preponderance of officials of Northern extraction in the management of INEC. My aforementioned article went the extra mile of accusing the Federal Character Commission of being an accessory to the fact of this out rightly illegal composition going by the constitutionally prescribed functions of the FCC.

    In his laboured defence, Prof Shuaibi Oba Abdulraheem, the Executive Chairman of the commission said as follows: ‘the Federal Character Commission is essentially focused on the public service recruitment, at the entry point only. That is when we ensure equity of opportunity of all persons to be able to enter into an establishment by drawing the benchmark for merit’. In a quick volte face, as if he could not see the contradiction, he went on: ‘the other point which we get interested in is at the management level, which is where the INEC thing you are talking about comes in. We encourage all establishments that when it comes to management positions, there must be a practice of equity of distribution of offices among the various interest groups in Nigeria. The issue of INEC is about the management structure which is arising from the internal development of the individuals within that structure up to a particular level. Yes there are some issues there, but it is not intentional in the sense that at the management level we have given instructions, guide lines. Our circulars are there, that for all establishments, all management positions must be advertised and made public, even while we are practicing equitable distribution, but some institutions have been sufficiently clever enough and have been protected by whatever forces, I don’t know how they are able to manipulate the internal structures and appoint persons into, for instance, management positions…’

    Exactly the point that critics now being demonised are making.

    But beyond that it can safely be said that Prof Oba was being economical with the truth when he claimed that FCC is concerned only with the entry point, that is, unless he has since changed the practice at the Federal Character Commission since he became the emperor.

    One of the earliest reactions to my article of the 18 August, 2012, was a telephone call from my former boss at the University of Ife, (Dr J.G.O.Adegbite who, for many years represented Ekiti State on the Federal Character Commission .As he vividly recalls, the commission was nothing but an ombudsman which guided not only entry point appointments but also ensured an effective federal character presence in the workforce, especially, at the management level. Otherwise, why would Chief Executive Officers, only, of federal agencies and ministries be invited to present and defend their extant staff positions? Indeed, Dr Adegbite remembers, in particular, an occasion when, Mallam el Rufai, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Privatisation Agency, was about being refused entry into the chambers believing he was not the Chief Executive Officer, because of his generous stature.

    Professor Oba should tell Nigerians if he has since changed this procedure.

    Dr Adegbite also went further to inform me that non-compliant agencies, where management placements are noticed to have been unduly skewed in favour of a particular zone were always given a 6-month grace period to make amends. I will personally not be surprised if this has changed since our professor took charge of affairs at the commission.

    And what was INEC’s effete defence?

    Let us listen to Mr Idowu.

    After berating the Media for being a washed with what he called weird tales of goings-on within the commission, he generously informed us as follows, like we were some kindergarten: It is also alleged that there is regional disproportion in the chairmanship of INEC committees by the National Commissioners. That, simply, betrays grievous ignorance of legal provisions setting up the Commission and governing its operations. Section 14 (1) (a) of Part 1 (F) of the Third Schedule of the 1999 Federal Constitution (as amended) provides that The Commission shall comprise the following members: (a) a Chairman, who shall be the Chief Electoral Commissioner; and (b) twelve other members to be known as National Electoral Commissioners. In practice, the 12 National Commissioners are appointed by Mr. President on geo-political basis: two from each of the six geo-political zones making up the country. Also, Section 7 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as gazetted) provides that “the Commission may appoint one or more committees to carry out any of its functions under this Act.”

    He then went further to educate us on the criteria for appointment into the chair of these committees which he listed as: ‘personal expertise, previous experience and ultimate responsibility.’ What he failed to tell us is that only Northerners have these in overflowing abundance since we would have required that eternal truth as proof positive of how unbiased the composition of INEC management is.

    For ease of reference, and to help Mr Idowu, I recall writing as follows in my article under reference: ‘INEC’s top management is made up as follows: 1. Prof Jega (Chairman)- Kebbi 2. U.F Usman (Director of Logistics) –Kebbi 3.A. Muktar (Director of Human Resources) –Sokoto 4. A.A Uregi (Director of Finance) –Niger 5. M. Kuta (Internal Auditor) –Niger 6. E.T Akem (Director ICT) –Benue 7. I. Biu (Director of Voter Education) – North East 8.I.K Bawa (Dep. Director, Legal) –Plateau 9.Okey Ndeche (Director, Operations) –Anambra 10. Nyise Torgba (Director M& E/Performance) –Benue 11. A.A Adamu Head, Commission, Secretariat) –Kogi 12. M.Ekwunja (Director, Civil Societies) 13. E. Umenger (Director, Public Affairs) –Benue 14. Regina Omo-Agege (Director, Political Monitoring) –Delta. 15. B.E Edoghotu (Estate & Works).

    INEC’s national commissioners who head the vital committees overseeing the most important departments are as stated hereunder though he tried to delude us into thinking that no committee is more strategic than the other:

    1. Col. Hamanga ( Chairperson, Logistics Committee) –Adamawa

    2. Dr Nuru Yakubu ( Chairperson, Operations Committee) –Yobe

    3. Ambassador Wali (Chair person, Procurement Committee) –Sokoto

    4. Prof Jega (Chairperson, F&GP) –Kebbi

    5. Prof Jega ( Chairperson, ICT) –Kebbi

    6. Hajia Amina Zakari (Chairperson, Political Monitoring) –Jigawa

    7. Membership of a newly constituted INEC 9-Man Strategic Planning Committee reads as follows: Nuru A. Yakubu, Istianus Dalwang, Mustafa Kuta, M.S Mohammed. Torgba Nyitse, Emanuel Akeem all from the North with only Mike Igini and Okechukwu Ndeche from the South.’

    What needs be added is the undue emphasis on the restructuring going on in INEC. What Nigerians have seen, and which I suspect is the leitmotif for the exercise, is Professor Jega’s undue eagerness to emerge much more powerful by being crowned the commission’s accounting officer as if not being that had, in any considerable way, stymied his effective performance.

    In all, our friends at both INEC and the Federal Character Commission will have to do much more than what they have offered till date to convince Nigerians that there are no ulterior motives at play in INEC as things stand today, albeit, without a whimper from the almighty national ombudsman..