Category: Tunji Adegboyega

  • Wale Adeeyo @ 70

    An amiable fellow joins the septuagenarian club

    Until he mentioned it on Sallah day, August 21, myself and one of my colleagues that went to his house together as we are won’t to do on that special occasion did not have any inkling we would have cause to be at his residence again to celebrate his 70th birthday, barely seven days after, precisely on August 27. The reason is simple: he does not look the age. As a matter of fact, we would have needed to get confirmation from him if the invitation to attend the event had not come straight from the horse’s mouth.

    I am talking about none other than Dr. Adewale Adesoji Adeeyo, a man I met for the first time when I joined The Anchor Newspaper that he founded. The paper debuted in January 2001. I was not a pioneer member of the staff of the newspaper, but I soon got to know the man closely as a member of the newspaper’s editorial board. He was passionate about the publication, which, somewhat, unfortunately, did not live long before it was rested in 2002. I remember, in the course of compiling the list of topics for discussion for one of our editorial board meetings, Dr Adeeyo walked up to me, took a copy of the topics and wondered why The Anchor  hardly featured in the newspaper references from where we derived the topics for deliberation. Rather, some of the other newspapers were repeatedly cited. I must confess this had not made any serious impression on me until he pointed it out. That is the typical publisher for you.

    But if The Anchor did not live long, it was not necessarily because of lack of proprietary interest. One reason, among other internal and external factors, was the peculiar nature of the newspaper industry in the country. I will explain, using the advertisements and commissions paid on them as example. This is one aspect of the business that many publishers, auditors, etc. do not understand. In the first place, there is nothing like global standard because each newspaper fixes rates, both for advertisement and commission, as suits its operations. Thus, some newspapers pay between 15 to 20 percent commission; others pay 25 to 30 percent. As a matter of fact, some others crash theirs by as much as 40 to 50 percent. Even some of the most influential newspapers today have had cause to start from ‘humble beginnings’ in terms of commission on adverts. They stopped losing sleep over the issue when they became strong. That explains why there cannot be any global standards.

    It was therefore not surprising that the issue was one of the most contentious at the retreat that The Anchor organised, sometime in late 2001 at the Akodo Beach Resort, Ibeju Lekki Local Government Area of Lagos State. Like most other publishers, Dr Adeeyo could not understand why his newspaper should pay about 40 percent or more commission on adverts. The matter was debated back and forth at the retreat, and one could see that efforts to convince the publisher failed to achieve that objective. Not even the passionate presentation by Abdulrahman Black (now of blessed memory), one of those who facilitated many of the adverts in the newspaper, could sway the publisher. As one of the rapporteurs at the occasion, I concentrated more on my assignment even as the debate raged.

    It is easy to know why publishers find it difficult to understand why things have to be like this: they cannot imagine why they that bear the burden of the investment and the risks would have to share revenue with someone who invested nothing in the real sense of the word, on a 60:40 basis. This is understandable. But unfortunately, things do not always work out that way, especially in the newspaper industry in Nigeria, particularly as it concerns new publications. They do all manner of things to attract some of the advertisers, including wooing them with extremely generous commissions on adverts.

    But I got the shocker of my life when, shortly before the end of the retreat, the publisher asked me to collate all the expenses incurred during the retreat. I wonder how this should be my job, realising that I was only a few months old in the establishment then. Anyway, I did as he instructed and he issued a cheque for the amount I was able to verify.

    Before I rest my case on The Anchor, it is important to mention that the paper died, not for lack of efforts or interest on the part of the owner. I remember a painful incident at about the time the publication was to be rested, when someone strolled in from Union Bank with between three to five pages of advertisements for publication the next day. I only happened to be in the office at Kudrat Abiola Way, Oregun, Lagos, that evening and cannot describe how depressed I was when we told the man the paper would not come out the next day.

    Born in Kadjebi-Accra, Gold Coast, now Ghana on August 27, 1948, Adeeyo started his educational career at the patrician Western Region of Nigeria Academy, the children’s Home School, Molete, Ibadan. He had a two-year stint at Adeola Odutola Comprehensive High School (Olu-Iwa College), Ijebu-Ode, where he began his secondary education in 1962, from where he moved to Ibadan Grammar School, Molete, Ibadan, where he completed his secondary education with distinction passes in 1966. He did his Higher School Certificate (HSC) programme at the same school. Indeed, his superlative performance was to lead to the reappraisal and re-profiling of his previous admission status by the State University of New York at Albany (SUNY), Albany, New York, where he had secured admission into the university’s undergraduate programme. He was thus issued a fresh letter of admission by the university, which made it possible for him to graduate earlier than he should have.

    It is noteworthy that Adeeyo demonstrated that he was not a local champion who could only excel in his examinations in Nigeria but someone who could match brain for brain, his counterparts from any part of the world. At the end of his first semester in SUNY, the university declared him a recipient of the prestigious Rockefeller Foundation Scholarship Scheme because of his exemplary performance. This meant he would have to study tuition-free for as long as he was able to sustain the highest academic point average that made such scholarship possible. Adeeyo did not disappoint.

    He bagged his first degree in Political Science and Sociology in 1973 and immediately proceeded to SUNY’s Graduate School of Public Affairs where he was awarded a Master of Arts degree in International Relations and Public Administration a year later. Between 1975 and 1978, he served as research intern and research officer at the New York State Legislature at Capitol Hill, which has always enjoyed extensive and pristine scholarship bond with SUNY.

    Without doubt, all of the experiences garnered along the line, particularly abroad, have helped to shape Adeeyo’s attitude to life generally, and particularly, its vicissitudes. Not even the terrible armed robbery attack that he suffered shortly after founding The Anchor could change his attitude to life.

    Adeeyo had served at various times at the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) where he was its public affairs manager from 1978 to 1984. He also served as director in Wema Bank from 1990 to 1995. From 1984 to date, he is managing director, Vintage Enterprises Ltd; publisher/chairman The Anchor Newspapers and Book Publishing Ltd. (1999 to date);  member, University Governing Council, Adeleke University, Ede, Osun State and chairman, Skyrun Cocoa Products Industry Ltd, Ede, from 2014 till date.

    It was in recognition of his contributions to nation-building that the Olusegun Obasanjo administration awarded him the worthy honour of Officer of the Order of Niger (OON) in 2001. And, as if all these were not enough, the present administration of President Muhammadu Buhari also gave him a New Year gift by appointing him chairman of the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN) on December 31, 2017.

    One thing going for Adeeyo is his ability to retain old friends. And when I say old friends, I mean people who are older than him, his age mates as well as even those of the younger generation. Although The Anchor newspaper which brought many of us in contact with him had since 2002 been rested, he still finds a way to get in touch with us, including the most junior of his former employees. Indeed, we have made visits to his house an annual ritual at Ileya festivals.  Then his Friday sermons; hardly would you know he is not an imam the way he preaches peace, justice and love among mankind in a most inoffensive manner, using the instrumentality of the power of the Queen’s English with which he is richly endowed.  The man makes it a point of duty to reconnect with many of us through his sermons every Friday. I guess he must have missed it only if ever there was an earthquake!

    At 70, Adeeyo looks about a decade younger. He still walks straight and smart; talks smoothly and recollects so easily. He is simplicity personified. Not for him any ostentatious lifestyle despite the fact that he could afford it. He is ever ready to help people in genuine need. Like most human beings, Adeeyo is not immune to being annoyed, but he does not keep malice. He is well connected; yet he does not flaunt it.

    May this man who is ever proud of his Ede, Osun State ancestry continue to age gracefully.

    Welcome to the septuagenarian club, Dr Adewale Adesoji Adeeyo.

  • Undue haste

    It is difficult for someone to comment on the face-off between the Oyo State government and ace musician, Mr Yinka Ayefele, without at least a tinge of emotions. And I guess that was one thing the Oyo State government did not reckon with or simply ignored or underrated in the build-up to the avoidable imbroglio. Yes, imbroglio because it has become messy. Governor Abiola Ajimobi can only claim not to be perturbed by the criticisms of his government over its demolition of parts of the Music House where Ayefele’s broadcasting station, the Fresh FM based in Ibadan, the state capital, is situated, only if (to recall the Yoruba saying) he has eaten the head of a tortoise. I have the feeling that the governor is just grandstanding in his statement that being handicapped is not an excuse for someone to break the law. Something tells me that if Governor Ajimobi is not already reflecting that he could have handled the matter differently, he would do so sometime in the future. Indeed, if there is anything going for Ayefele now, it is the fact the he is perceived as the underdog that is being harassed by the almighty state government. Simply put, Ayefele is riding on the crest of being an underdog in the matter.

    As a Yoruba man, I guess the governor must be aware of the proverb o na mi ko dun mi; ko dabi ara ofo. In other words, there is a difference between someone that was flogged and says he did  not feel the pain and the person that was not flogged at all. The point I am making is that the state government does not need the kind of negative publicity that the demolition generated; it is not good for its image at all, this is much more so when it is avoidable. I do not know what the state government would have lost if it had tarried for the case in court over the matter to be decided. If the government had waited this long, why couldn’t it wait a little longer for the court’s pronouncement?

    But this appears the predictable pattern in governments across the country. They appear to be ever ready and willing to show their ‘tigretude’ (apologies to Prof Wole Soyinka), sometimes even over inconsequential matters. I remember the story of one of the south west governors a few years ago who had gone to a trouble spot on the prompting of some local politicians in the state who told ‘His Excellency’ that he had to go there in order to  impress it on the trouble makers and their ilk who might be thinking of formenting trouble in future that he is the executive governor of the state! Pray, is there a non-executive governor? Can there be two governors in a state?  It is instructive that no life was lost when the governor’s wife who had earlier gone to the place visited. But when ‘His Excellency’ decided to go on a ‘reconnaissance mission’, a student was killed in the ensuing fracas. I wonder how, till today, the parents of that student would feel whenever they remember the sad incident. I wonder too if the said governor would still have handled the situation the same way if confronted with it today.

    But that is the way of many of our political leaders. The kind of people that mill around them, the praise orchestra who clap for ‘Their Excellencies’ when they know in their heart of hearts that what their principals are about doing would have negative consequences on the government they are serving. Some of those who chose to be bold to tell it as it is would either get fired or the governors would keep them at an arm’s length, if they cannot fire them outright.

    Although Oyo State government’s partial demolition of Ayefele’s property at about 5.30 a.m. last Sunday was not the first such demolition in the early hours, those of us out of government should be asking why most governments find it convenient to carry out such tasks at such ungodly hours. When in February, the Kaduna State government pulled down the building of Senator Suleiman Hunkuyi , a property used as the secretariat of a faction of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kaduna, it was done at about 5.00 a.m.

    Then, in the Ayefele’s case, the man had approached an Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan seeking to stop the demolition. His counsel, Mr Olayinka Bolanle, in an exparte motion, filed before the court, sought for an order restraining the state government from demolishing the property pending the determination of the suit. He added that due process was followed in the construction of the structure while relevant approvals were obtained from the state’s departments and agencies associated with land and housing. Justice I. Yerima, in his wisdom, ordered the claimant to ensure service of the court process on the respondent and adjourned the case till Monday for the hearing of the ex-parte motion. But the court process would appear to have been aborted as the state government demolished the structure on Sunday.

    I wish there is a way the courts could be punishing persons and institutions that treat court orders disdainfully. In several respects, the impunity that the Oyo State government demonstrated in violating the court order is what many governments, including the Federal Government, do. Yes, we could say Ayefele preempted the government’s determination to bring down his building, hence his rushing to court when he did when, actually, the issue did not just start today. So, why did he wait till now before going to court? But then, there is no time that an aggrieved party cannot go to court to seek redress. The moment Ayefele had gone to court, the government, as a law-abiding entity, ought to have suspended action on the property, at least pending the resolution of the matter. Our politicians should not give the impression that the courts matter only when their votes are stolen or election figures are altered in favour of their opponents.

    Another common trend is that of governments taking on their opponents in the most cynical manner. Fresh FM might have been critical of the state government; that does not necessarily make it an enemy of the government. Even if it is an enemy; that is no excuse for the government to clamp down on it the way it did. After all, as we are seeing all over the country in the shameless defections by many of our politicians, there are no permanent friends or foes. What has remained permanent is the interest of the individual politician, not even that of their constituencies. At any rate, should a media house be friend to any particular government? Shouldn’t it carry out its functions as it deemed fit? Where then is objectivity if a station has to be a permanent friend of a government?

    But nothing I have said so far should be taken as support for Ayefele, especially if he violated any building code. I love Ayefele’s music like millions of other Nigerians. But that would not make me support illegality on his part, or on the part of anyone for that matter. I perfectly understand the consequences of people violating building codes. But I am worried more because we are in a democracy and the government should be a little more sensitive to the public mood in many of the decisions it wants to take. This is not necessarily saying it should be led by it. Then the courts; our political leaders should accord them more respect. But we do not seem to have much of that anywhere in the country now. And it is worrisome.

  • Not to the swift

    What came to my mind as I read a divorce story in the online version of this newspaper on Wednesday was this biblical quotation that “the race is not to the swift.” The story is about a wife whose divorce prayer was answered by a Grade C Customary Court in Iseyin, Oyo State, Baliki Oke. Baliki had dragged her husband, Arowolo, to the court in July, seeking a dissolution of their seven-year-old marriage over his unending demands for sex.

    “My husband wants to kill me with sex; he demands sex more than he does for food; he wants sex with me six times in a day before he gets satisfied”. She is not done yet:  “Arowolo goes to the farm very early in the morning and would not wait for me to bring his lunch. He will come home in the afternoon just to have sex twice before he goes back to the farm and would still make demands when he returns at night.” Again, she is not done: “Anytime I try to resist him, he will beat me till I surrender. I have decided to quit for the sake of my life, I don’t want to die now, my Lord; please divorce this marriage.”

    Contrary to what we find in similar divorce cases, one would have expected the husband to deny that he is a sex maniac. But he didn’t. As a matter of fact, he admits it is a problem he has been battling unsuccessfully to let go of. “I have worked very hard to solve this problem of incessant sex urge to no avail. The truth is that I can’t cope with life without sex; I can’t work, eat or play; sex is more important to me than anything else in life”, he said. Arowolo added: “ I have been suffering since she packed out of our house about 10 days ago; I have not been going to work, I have begged her relatives to plead with her on my behalf”, Arowolo told the court. Finally, he begged the court not to grant the divorce, with a promise to check his urge for sex if given a second chance.

    But the president of the court, Chief Abiodun Raheem, apparently took pity on the wife; he therefore had no choice than to grant her prayer for divorce because, according to him, all entreaties by the court to the wife and her family to make the wife reconsider her stance were futile as she insisted that she has had enough. He then dissolved the marriage and ordered Arowolo to be paying his (now) former wife N2,500 weekly for the upkeep of their only child.

    Those who read papers regularly know that our customary courts are where things are happening. Things, juicy, salacious things. And I keep wondering how the court presidents cope with some of the cases that are brought before them.I wonder how many times the court officials would shout “order, order” in view of the hilarious laughter that normally follows when the cases are going on. Sometimes the court presidents need Solomonic wisdom to decide. Like the instant case. A wife suing for divorce on account of her husband turning her into a sex machine. Some would ask: so what are marriages for if a party cannot demand sex at any time of the day from his or her legal partner?

    As I was reading the story, so many things crossed my mind. Our world is indeed a place with many different folks, different strokes. It’s a world with amazing peculiarities. Whereas one wife is complaining about her husband frequently or incessantly turning her inside out beneath some ruffling sheets, many others out there would not mind being pounced on the same number of times, perhaps more, by their husbands, who have become absentee husbands since they are hardly there to even touch their wives. I have no doubt Chief Raheem would have decided many of such cases too.

    Even when some husbands are present, there is hardly a difference as they merely relate to their wives as if relating to a log of wood. “Mi Lord, I am tired of this wedding because my husband has no time for me (euphemism for he does not have sex with me). “Mi Lord, he is treating me as if I be wood”, the soft sell newspapers would scream with their banner headline.  One paper that knew how best to treat such stories was the defunct Lagos Weekend. I wonder why it has not crossed someone’s mind to set up a paper in the mould of this once upon a popular tabloid. With the vanities that have seized the national, nay the global space, I have no doubt such tabloid would sell like hot cake. I was reliably informed that even chief executives of many blue chip companies in those days would denigrate the Lagos Weekend openly whereas it was an inevitable companion  of theirs in the comfort of their closets. But this is not where I am going.

    There are also the Christians among us who would be wondering why any court would dare to put asunder what God has joined together (especially if the couples are Christians). But others would also counter that it is dangerous to force people who have lost interest among themselves to stay together as husband and wife. We have seen the result of such forced marriages in the rising incidence of murder among such couples. Again, this is not where I am going.

    In the specific case under focus, one question that is bound to be agitating our minds is whether the couple courted before getting married. If they did, did the man’s insatiable sexual urge not manifest then? If it did, how was it handled? Did the woman continue to cope then because of the marriage carrot that was dangled by the man, the ‘trophy’ in sight? Or, did the problem (because it has now become a problem since it has led to the separation of the couple) develop after their wedding? In which case, one can sympathise with both parties, especially with the man himself acknowledging his weakness; all he wants is for the wife to show more understanding. Germane as some of these posers are, still, this is not where I am going.

    One would naturally expect that a marriage that has lasted seven years, with such a track record of insatiable libidinal urge, should have produced many children. But no. All they have to show for it is a child (the story did not even state whether they had a boy or girl). This, exactly, is where I am going. As a matter of fact, this was one of the questions agitating my mind as I read the story. I was waiting to see how many children the couple had and perhaps what would become of them now that the parents are parting ways. But, instead of being disappointed when I eventually learnt the couple had only one child; what came to my mind was that, the race, as the scripture says, is really not to the swift.

    Indeed, it occurred to me that some men would have gone to some of our customary courts to seek divorce on the grounds that all their efforts in bed had produced only one issue in seven years, despite the fact that they were always having sex the way former Mr and Mrs Oke did! (As if the fault is that of the woman). It dawned on me that this is a world where some people are crying that they do not have teeth; yet some others are yearning for lips to cover theirs. This is a world where those who have heads don’t have caps and those with caps are looking for heads on which to wear the caps. It is a world in which some females literally begin ante-natal care the moment they jump off the bed after the very first attempt; yet some keep doing it whenever, wherever, for donkey years, in rain or sunshine, in sickness or in health, with empty or full stomach, yet, they have no child to show for it. The race indeed, is not to the swift.

    This is the reality that our politicians must realise, especially with General Elections around the corner. None of them needs to tell us that he is not desperate for power. As General Olusegun Obasanjo reportedly said in 1979, they (the outgoing military government) may not know who (among the politicians) would succeed them, but they knew who would not. In the same vein, we, the people, may not know who is not desperate for power, at least for now, we will know when the primaries come. But these politicians had better be warned again: the race is not to the swift.

     

  • NYSC allowance as metaphor

    I wonder for how long youth corps members will have to wait for their miserable allowance to be reviewed upward. This matter has been talked about several times, especially by the current Director-General of the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), Brig-Gen Suleiman Kazaure. One could feel the fatherly concern of Kazaure on this matter; unfortunately, there is nothing he can do if the approval does not come from above.

    Kazaure raised corps members’ hope again last Thursday, while inspecting the NYSC Orientation Camp in Abuja: “The Federal Government is working to increase your monthly allowance. Therefore, wherever you find yourselves, conduct yourself well and be good ambassadors for the country. We received a letter from the Presidency through the Ministry of Youth and Sports and copied to the Ministry of Finance, which shows that the corps members’ allowance will be reviewed upward. This is in the pipeline.”

    In Nigeria, when government says something is in the pipeline, it is often saying that thing may never see the light of day; it may jolly well rot in the pipeline. It is like when some executives say they are working on something when, in actual fact, what they mean is that they are not working on it.

    For those who are conversant with how government works here, particularly when it comes to an issue like the minimum wage, tying the review of corps members’ stipend to minimum wage is government’s way of saying the review is still a long way from reality.

    What we have is therefore a situation whereby corps members who are supposed to be doing national service are still being catered for by their parents. Parents who do not want their children to suffer during the one year national service find ways of augmenting their miserable allowance. In essence, therefore, it is still the parents that should be resting after going through thick and thin to see their children get educated up to the tertiary level that still pick some of their bills during the compulsory service year. In other words, the parents are subsidising their children’s upkeep while the latter are supposed to be serving their fatherland. And this in a country where there is no guarantee that the children would get jobs, lucrative or otherwise, after the service year! So, in a sense, it is not just the corps members’ suffering that continues even after the service year, even that of their parents too, because, at a time they should be sucking from the proverbial children’s breasts, the parents are still the ones forced to squeeze out milk from their dry breasts. The children often become disillusioned because the expected milk is not coming out of their parents’ breasts. A Yoruba proverb says omo lo mo omu iya on to lomi (it is the child that knows how succulent his mother’s breasts are).

    This is most heartless; especially against the backdrop of the scandalous pay members of the National Assembly pay themselves monthly. It shows how far many of those who are ruling us are from God. This is also why it is laughable when some of them who are facing some of the toughest challenges of their lives are now saying they are enduring the tough times in the interest of democracy. Which democracy? Whose democracy? When people who for the better part of their lives have been like leeches on the system now find the vaults shut against them, they remember to fight for democracy. Democracy my foot!  Let them go tell that to the marines! Where we operate a true democracy, people would have invaded the National Assembly (as our own Bastille), among other places, to drive away those who are buying and selling there in the name of making laws for us, or in the name of democracy.

    But if the NYSC stipend is too small, it is only a reflection of the hypocrisy that characterises wage determination in the country. Salaries are small across-the-board, especially in the public service. Only those in politics have been criminally inventive in devising some other means of taking money from the public till. Even civil servants too, that some have renamed ‘evil servants’ because of the attitude of some of them to work, generally, are poorly paid.

    It is only in sections of the private sector that efforts and achievements are bountifully rewarded. And the difference is clear; as many people would even tell you these days that government has no business being in business and should therefore vacate the business space for those who are well equipped to handle it. One wonders why government itself has not been outsourced then. Or, what is left when we are suddenly waking up to the reality that government can no longer do successfully those things it used to do well? So, instead of probing into the corruption that has thrown this incapability up, we simply pass the buck and move on. Yet, each senator, for example, gets nothing less than N13million monthly, more than what about 722 workers get monthly at the current N18,000 minimum wage.

    Yet, it is the same government that is stalling the upward review of the minimum wage, despite the fact that it knows it cannot take anyone home. What this country needs are not public officials who will endure hardship because of democracy. We need God-fearing leaders, not the present rulers who are posing as leaders. A God-fearing leader would not have to be prodded before realising that because of the way they have messed up our economy, N18,000 minimum wage cannot take care of a family of four. How many of those who are dilly-dallying over the upward review of the minimum wage give such peanut to their children; some of them even have dogs that they maintain at public expense with probably 10 times that amount. Yet, it is when workers ask for a review of minimum wage that they suddenly remember that there is no money to back such demands. But the money will surface when it comes to matters of their own comfort and undue indulgence.

    Before those conversant with my position on minimum wage take me up for making a volte face to now be advocating for review of minimum wage, I again restate my preference for good governance to unending demand for new minimum wage. It is true that minimum wage is reviewed periodically in many countries, but it is not the way we do it here, with very high margins in-between. Here, it can be as high as 200 per cent. Although Labour’s justification for that is that it has to be so because it sometimes takes as long as 10 or more years before reviews are done here. If workers are able to fight for good governance, we may not need to raise minimum wage by more than the percentage it is raised in other places. In 2004, for instance, our minimum wage was N5,500.00 per month. It was raised to the present N18,000 per month in 2011, barely seven years after. I do not know of any civilised country where minimum wage jumps at such progression in a seven-year period.

    All said, we are not likely to conquer corruption until we know how to pay a living (minimum) wage. When we hear what directors and permanent secretaries earn, we know we have not started the anti-corruption war. These same people who earn peanut in spite of their big titles are still given the offer of first refusal in buying their official apartments upon retirement. Yet, we know that it is only if that perm sec had not touched his salary throughout his career years that he can pay for such apartment. Yet, we still go ahead to sell to him without anyone asking questions, especially since he is not permitted to have another business while in service.

    Now, Brigadier-General Kazaure is asking youth corps members not to engage in electoral malpractices when drafted for ad-hoc election duties. Is it the person that you are given peanut that you expect that much from? We should stop kidding ourselves. These boys and girls, even if they do not want to be compromised, still have their lives to value. So, it would not be out of place for them to look the other way when election riggers, armed with all their usual weapons, are at work. Corps members had been killed in the past while doing their bit as electoral officers. How many of the perpetrators have been prosecuted not to talk of convicted for the murder of the youth corps members?

    Let the files on the NYSC stipend review move faster on whichever table they get to. Pay these children reasonably instead of tying their fate to minimum wage which involves not just economic considerations but also has political implications. Those who are in charge know how to facilitate the process if really they are keen. This is not the time to bring out calculators that they hardly use for themselves. Permit me to repeat the expression I used last week: let’s separate Genesis from Exodus. In other words, let’s not tie review of corp members’ stipend to minimum wage.

  • Defections foreknown

    To thy tents o Israel! This best describes the ongoing political defections that we have been witnessing since Tuesday, with the defection of 13 All Progressives Congress (APC) senators to the immediate past ruling party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and one to the African Democratic Congress (ADC). At least 32 members of the House of Representatives also dumped the ruling party for the PDP; four defected to the ADC while the remaining one representative did not state which party he was defecting to. One does not need to be a political pundit to know that the defection of some PDP stalwarts to the APC in 2014 was nothing but a marriage of convenience which was bound to collapse sooner than later. That the unholy wedlock even lasted this long was due to the high degree of tolerance on both sides. But the scales are now finally falling off the eyes of the incompatible lovers.

    When politicians defect aimlessly like a rudderless ship, it is pointer to the fact that ideology or principle has fled the polity. These days, the difference between the progressive hue of politicians and the conservatives is not clear at all. Today, someone is a conservative; the next day he is in the progressive train. No qualms. This blurred distinction between both explains why these days, progressives’ votes are stolen and there are no protests, even in the very strongholds of the progressives’ camp. It is for this same reason that the Bukola Sarakis of this world would find accommodation in the APC, albeit temporarily, because he knew clearly where he was going from the beginning; and his entry into the progressive fold would be celebrated like the angels in heaven celebrate whenever a convert gives his life to Christ.  It was because Saraki knew where he was going ab initio that he ensured Ike Ekweremadu, a PDP senator, was elected his deputy! That is rare in any presidential democracy.

    Without doubt, corruption is a defining factor in all of these defections. It is its own way of fighting back. And it is President Muhammadu Buhari one has to blame. He is the one to blame for marrying their wives when he should have married their mothers. If this appears like a coded message, the president has more than enough Yoruba people around to help him untangle the knot or decode the message. Definitely, the way he opened his eyes and allowed Saraki to seize the Senate at the very beginning was the height of his political naivety, for which he is  paying and would continue to pay for probably till the end of his term, if care is not taken for, no kangaroo attempt to remove Saraki as Senate President shall prosper.This is neither a wish nor a prayer; it is just that Saraki has done his homework sufficiently to ensure it is so. Buhari has not.

    Senate President Saraki is at the centre of these defections because of his ambition to become president. Indeed, he is the face of the defectors, even though he is yet to ‘port’ from the APC for the simple reason that he has to vacate his senate presidency the moment he does that. And that will render him bare; so vulnerable because the hue and cry about whatever some people see as his tribulations becomes an issue because he is the country’s Number Three citizen. His latest trouble has to do with the confessional statements made by some of the Offa robbery suspects, to the effect that Dr Saraki is their financier.

    It is sad that some people have begun to read political motives to the police invitation to the Senate President in connection with this criminal matter. But it would necessarily be so because of the way the police are handling it. This was one robbery that the police have described as about the deadliest in the country’s robbery annals. No fewer than 31 persons were killed in the operations even as 21 AK47 rifles were allegedly snatched by the robbers when they struck in Offa, Kwara State, on April 5.

    We need to wean ourselves off this mentality that certain people, because of their exalted positions, are above the law or cannot be questioned for their suspected involvement in criminal activities. I think we should separate Genesis from Exodus; as one of my lecturers in the university used to say.

    Be that as it may, it is a weighty allegation that the Senate President could be linked with such people in the society. So, his defence that as a politician, he has too many supporters and could therefore not have known all of them, or probably what they do for a living, cannot be enough alibi to convince the police. This is much more so with the claim by the police that four of the suspects escorted Dr Saraki to pay condolence visit to the Olofa of Offa, shortly after the robbery. No fool will take this defence for the gospel truth. There is a big question mark on the integrity of the Senate President. Yet, the office that Senator Saraki occupies is not one to trivialise; therefore whoever occupies that office must, like Caesar’s wife, be above suspicion.

    Dr Saraki might not know what the people who claimed he finances their activities or buys vehicles for them, as well as gives them plenty of cash do with whatever he gave them beyond using them as political cannon fodder. He might not know they use those gifts and probably his political clout fto perpetrate crimes, including armed robbery. So, the Senate President has to give more convincing reasons beyond what he has said so far that is in the public domain about what the Offa robberies’ suspects alleged he is to them.

    One must confess though, that the way the Buhari presidency has been handling the Saraki matter leaves much to be desired. And that is one thing many people do not understand about the government’s style. If truly the robbery suspects made such claims about Dr Saraki; that is enough to keep him busy with the police asking him to report to their office at intervals since the allegation was made. But to wait until the week that Saraki and his friends had perfected defection plans from the APC to move against him is what has given room to insinuations in many quarters that the whole thing was politically motivated. In other words, the ruling party is ready to shield or tolerate Saraki for as long as he is ready to remain in APC. If people who are adept in political maneuverings had handled this matter, it is the Senate President who by now would be begging people to help him beg the government for safe landing. But, the Buhari presidency is about bungling this again.

    It is because President Buhari had left undone what he ought to have done, or had done wrongly what he ought to have done that many of the people whose mouths should be in ‘permanent position of shut up’ are still having their voice. Those of them who had lost it before have found it. Even Olisa Metuh (remember him?) the master actor whose ‘lying-in-state’ on stretcher was well recorded in the media has suddenly resurrected. Add this to the drama in the defection of Benue State Governor Samuel Ortom to the PDP, then you get a clear picture of the kind of game that is playing itself out. First, it was youths in the state who were putting pressure on the governor to leave the APC. Then, they removed the APC stickers on the governor’s vehicles. Only God knows what next they or some other characters would do in some other places to make their political godfathers look like they are being forced to do something that is against their wish. Yet, to me, the APC might have expressed surprise over Ortom’s exit, he appears to have a good reason for his action. His state has been the centre of herdsmen’s killings, with his government having to provide mass graves for the victims. But the way the governor has painted the whole scenario, the only thing I can say to him is that when next he and the other defectors who are pretending to be angry with Buhari’s dictatorial tendencies go to the supermarket, they should not forget to buy bibs for the rest of us so we put on our necks in order not to soil our clothes when eating.

    Again, whether the N-PDP or whatever contraption they ultimately form  will last is a different matter altogether, given the sheer number of presidential aspirants that will flock the party. I do not see many of them willing to gift the ticket to another without a fight. So, it might yet only be the end of a scene, with another scene in the offing.

     

  • Fayemi’s return

    When on June 15, 2014, about a week to the then approaching governorship election in Ekiti State (billed for June 21, 2014), I called on Ekiti people to #BringbackFayemi, little did I know that that call would count for nothing. Little did I know that the people had made up their minds on what to do. At least that was the situation until the morning of June 21, Election Day, when I started receiving anonymous calls on phone by people who claimed to be speaking from Ekiti. I vividly remember one of them said that Ekiti people appeared set to take one of the most (?) decisions of their lives, and they knew it; but nonetheless were bent on treading that path. I received a few more such calls, with the people sympathising with, and telling me that they knew I was not one of the regular visitors to their state but just happened to be in love with what the then Governor Kayode Fayemi was doing. Mind you, they too acknowledged that Fayemi performed.

    When, on the day after the election I saw the picture of the governor (I think in The Guardian) on the queue when he was about to vote the previous day, I saw apprehension all over his face. Apparently, he must have heard some of the things I heard and that was enough to put the fear of God in a man who hitherto thought that election was all about performance. Fayemi had cause to worry then not because he did not perform; but because of the enormous resources deployed by the then ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to ‘capture’, as it were, Ekiti State from him and his political party, the All Progressives Congress (APC)).  That was why I laughed whenever any of the PDP stalwarts, including Nyesom Wike of Rivers State (who literally stepped on corpses of electoral victims to Government House in Port Harcourt) was complaining of militarisation of Ekiti State in the July 14, 2018 governorship election. Theirs was like the case of a hangman who would not want anyone to dangle a sword over his own child’s head.

    Anyway, given what was later to be in the public domain about alleged Fayemi’s haughtiness and how it played a crucial role in the 2014 governorship election in the state, it was obvious to me that Fayemi could still have lost that poll; but not by the wide margin that Fayose was credited to have defeated him. If anything, the then PDP government at the centre itself knew that if it was about performance, Fayemi would not have been so easily uprooted. In other words, even the PDP was unsure of itself given Fayemi’s impressive delivery of democratic dividend to Ekiti people, hence its stalwarts’ going beyond the ordinary to intimidate Fayemi out of office and putting his supporters asunder.

    I crave your indulgence to quote copiously from my June 15, 2014 piece because, by and large, many aspects of that write-up are still relevant, even today. After the years of the locust, the south west has rediscovered its lost compass; it has woken up from its slumber to remember that the region used to be the pace setter in terms of development in the country. It is instructive that the governors of most states in the region know that they are like cows without tails that are at the mercy of God to ward off flies, unlike their PDP counterparts that look up to the Federal Government for crutches at election time. Even if that explains the efforts being made by governors in the region, particularly in Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti and Lagos states, including even Edo in the south south to leave enviable legacies that they would be proud of, it is something. What matters is that progress is being made in these states.I was in Ekiti about five years ago, and I was there again in December, last year. What I saw was amazing. It is unimaginable that anyone would have been able to make such a difference in less than four years, especially when it is realised that the state is not among those awash with petro-dollars. What are we talking about? Is it Fayemi’s social welfare grant of N5,000 to every old citizen in the state? This is commendable in a country where pensioners are left to their own device. And the uncommon transformation of the Ikogosi Warm Springs? Roads, especially intra-state roads in Ekiti are in good condition such that it takes only about one hour to travel from the state capital to anywhere in the state. Fayemi’s covenant with Ekiti people is encapsulated in his eight-point agenda which he has been pursuing diligently.  “My eight-point agenda would be pursued with vigour and life would be more abundant for our people. Governance shall not only be transparent and accountable but the good of our people would be the template,” the governor said during his inauguration in 2010. He has largely kept faith with that promise.

    Without doubt, those who chose Ayo Fayose (PDP) to contest against Fayemi either wanted the PDP to fail in the state ab initio or are relying on something else to ‘win’ the election.  This was the same Fayose who established a poultry project worth over N1billion as governor in the state which Chief Olusegun Obasanjo (also a PDP president then) was shocked the usual smell associated with poultries was missing in Fayose’s when he visited the place! As a farmer, Chief Obasanjo should know and he did know that the poultry was a ruse. Moreover, Fayose has all manner of allegations hanging on his neck like a necklace of iron, and it is only a party suffering from an acute shortage of good men that could have fielded such a candidate and expect to win an election.

    All said, what people are pleading for is that the June 21 election in Ekiti State be free and fair. No more, no less. And that cannot be a misguided plea. Those who are relying on wars and chariots or crutches from the Federal Government or the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the election are advised to go dust up their history books. A word is enough for the wise.

    The 2014 governorship in the state has come and gone; so is the 2018 edition. Whilst Fayose coasted to victory in the former (during which Ekiti State was heavily militarised in the real sense of the word), Fayemi reclaimed his position following his victory in the July 14, 2018 governorship election. So, barring the unforeseen, Fayemi , the APC governorship candidate in the election will be sworn in on October 16, 2018.

    But, beyond all of this is the lesson that Fayemi must have learnt by now, especially about politics and human psychology. Ekiti has shown that performance alone is not enough to take a governor to the Promised Land when seeking reelection. This is regrettable, though, coming from Ekiti that many of us had since our childhood years regarded as home to many erudite professors – Prof Aluko, Prof’ Igun’, Prof ‘Odidere’ (as we sarcastically used to say when discussing Ekiti State then). It is sad that it is from that same state that incredible stories are now being told about how the people are, like women, now led by toys, apologies (I think) to Napoleon Bonaparte. Under the outgoing governor, the state succeeded in adding a concept to our political lexicon: ‘stomach infrastructure’. Except that the idea sold like hot cake in the ‘Fountain of knowledge’, and for the negative reasons, the concept is akin to what Metternich described as ‘high sounding nothing’.

    Moreover, Fayemi should not forget the Dayo Adeyeyes, Olusegun Onis and others who made his victory possible. Their votes here and there made the critical difference.

    I do not expect Fayemi to go and be frying gari in some remote parts of the state as proof of his love for Ekiti people. But then, he should not be in the other room when he should be tending to issues affecting market women in the state. The point is; Ekiti is not Lagos. It is not oil-rich Rivers or Bayelsa. Ekiti is a predominantly civil servant state. Although, if you ask me, I do not know what this is supposed to mean. There is no state that is not sufficiently blessed, especially in the south west. It is Fayemi’s business to see how much of this narrative he can change in the next four years.

    And time is not on his side. He should start to assemble his team immediately if he has not done that. Also, there is no room for witch-hunting, beyond the routine business of accountability and transparency. He should realise that Fayose remains a potent politician in the state given the little margin of about 20,000 votes that he nailed Fayose with. If Fayemi succeeds in handling the affairs of state well, it is only a matter of time for Ekiti people to realise that they had been conned under the Fayose administration. But if he does otherwise, then he would give them the opportunity of remembering, albeit nostalgically, the Fayose years and to earnestly yearn for his return, even if by proxy.

    The ball is in Fayemi’s court.

  • Executive Orders

    Executive Order No. 6 is not the first to come from the Muhammadu Buhari administration since its inauguration on May 29, 2015. Acting PresidentYemi Osinbajo in May 2017signed three executive orders with the potential to significantly change some of the ways government business and operations are conducted. Therefore, something must be wrong with Executive Order 6 for Nigerians to reject it; saying yes, we want to fight corruption, but this order is not the way to go. So, why is the order this maligned? Perhaps we should start by looking at the essence of executive orders and what this particular Executive Order No. 6 is all about. The order seeks temporary forfeiture of the assets of persons undergoing trial or suspected of corrupt enrichment, pending the determination of the case in court so that they would not use the assets to pervert the cause of justice.

    An executive order is a presidential directive that has the force of law. Although this is not expressly provided for even in the American constitution where the president has copied it from, it, nonetheless, has been used by successive American presidents to achieve certain aims and objectives. The point though is that it must not be at variance with the constitution. Since the Nigerian constitution is largely fashioned after the American constitution, by extension therefore, it would seem whatever Executive Orders the Nigerian president makes must not conflict with the constitution. Moreover, by virtue of the legal system that we inherited from the British, an accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction. By this maxim, therefore, it is unthinkable that the powers sought by President Buhari under this order 6 can be popular or acceptable to the majority of Nigerians.

    Without doubt, some of the influential Nigerians who are against the order might be doing so for selfish reasons; the point must nonetheless be made that it is too dangerous to leave an individual with such powers of life and death, so to speak. It is especially so in our kind of environment where the president already has too much powers. In fairness to the critics of the order, the president has not shown that he has the capacity to arraign his own for alleged corruption. As a matter of fact, if many Nigerians are now not as happy with the president as they were in 2015, or even last year, it is not necessarily because he has not performed well economically to justify their expectations, but more because of this double standard in the way government business is being conducted.

    Without doubt, President Buhari might have been moved to issue the order by his desire to tackle corruption. But then, since the genuineness or otherwise of any intention is not written on the forehead of those to actualise it, it is difficult to believe that he means well in this regard. We have not got to a situation where we can trust our leaders with such maturity. Executive Order 6 could be a tool to haunt the opposition, which will not augur well for democracy. Although we may argue whether it is the kind of opposition that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) represents that will make a dent on the country’s problems. That is beside the point; we still need the opposition to put the incumbent government at the centre on its toes.

    If we agree to this order; then a lot of assumptions must have gone into reckoning. The most important perhaps being that all human beings are rational. We know this is not always so. Put differently, it would be assumed that the leadership, all leaderships, will always take decisions in the best interest of their countries. We know too that this is fallacy. If this were so, then many countries, particularly in Africa, will not be the way they are today; whilst their backbencher counterparts in the 1970s have since left them behind.

    We have seen that so many considerations go into policy making in any given environment, from the most noble to the most disgusting. Decisions are taken sometimes when some people wake up from the wrong side of the bed. There is no room for robust debates where all issues are thrashed out.

    Therefore, we cannot dismiss the fears of people who feel the president could abuse the order. At any rate, are the courts not already taking care of the president’s fears on the assets of looters or suspected looters? Above all, like many have asked, how do we compensate the suspect if in the end he or she is discharged and acquitted of the corruption charges?

     

     

    Fayose’s pain in the neck

    By the time you are reading this, the governorship election in Ekiti State would have been won and lost; in other words, the election would have become history. But not so some of the shenanigans; particularly the ones that trended until election eve on Friday. One of the badly scripted and poorly acted comedies was sent to me via WhatsApp on Thursday. I could not help but keep laughing like someone who has inhaled an overdose of laughing gas. Some readers might have seen it before now; but I have found it so evergreen that it would continue to elicit laughter whenever one comes across it. The more you read it, the more you crave for more.

    But, beyond the comedy is the past that appeared to be haunting Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti State. As I used to say, it is someone who knows the havoc that spittle could be used for that spits on the floor and quickly rubs it with his foot. Fayose has every reason to be in pains now, physical or psychological, or even both. There is every reason why his Christian courage should fail him at this point of the struggle. He knows what they did with the governorship election in Ekiti in 2014. Just as darkness takes a flight when light arrives; so does fantasy when confronted by reality. A word is enough for the wise.

    Meanwhile, enjoy Fayose’s comedy of the absurd. It is relevant whether ‘he won’ or ‘lost’ the election.

     

    Fayose – Hello hello taniyen (who is that?)

    Lere – Baba, Leke Ola on the line

    Fayose – How far? Shey the video is still trending?

    Leke – It’s trending but …… its trending sha

    Fayose – But what idiot.. you.. I do not have time for eeeeeeee? …….. What?

    Leke – There are some defects in our movie and people have started noticing and reacting negatively…

    Fayose – Defects wo niyen? Did I not cry well? Even Wiki told me I cried well and Seconder even hugged me for acting so good. So, what the hell are you trying to say?

    Leke – It’s not the cry, you did the cry part perfectly oga mi, but…

    Fayose – So.. But what? What is it? I already ordered prompt payment to two television channels (names withheld) for live coverage. TVC turned down our request while the other one owned by that oyibo claiming Omo Niger insisted that he can’t do it for free, stating that he has not recovered all the money he spent during 2015 election.

    Leke – Oga, It’s the neck collar and the hand sling part sir..

    Fayose – What about it? Was it not convincing enough?

    Leke – Apparently we made a mistake connecting the arm sling to the neck collar. Instead of your shoulder, some medical doctors noticed it and that’s what’s trending now… And we were not able to produce any evidence that a police man slapped you. Oga, you could have sticked (stet) to original plan of the inhaling harmful toxic thrown at you by the police. We don’t know how you changed the story thereby making us look stupid in the eyes of Nigeria, oga.

    Fayose – Nonsense, what’s the point in all this grammar?

    Leke – It’s like this sir, there’s no way a broken hand would be supporting a broken neck and vice versa.

    That’s where we made the mistake sir.

    Fayose – Do we need to stage another one?  Money is not the problem, Wiki and Atike are paying

    Leke – ……………………

    Fayose – Leke are you there? Why the silent?

    Leke – Baba network ni sir, sorry sir

    Fayose – Do we stage another one?

    To be continued ……..

    Cinema loading… 

     

  • A unique policy meeting

    Since its establishment about 40 years ago, precisely in 1978, the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has come of age. The board has witnessed several vicissitudes in its four decades of existence. JAMB, with the mandate to, among other things, (a) conduct matriculation examination for entry into all universities, polytechnics and colleges of education (by whatever name called) in Nigeria;  (b) appoint examiners, moderators, invigilators, members of the subject panels and committees and other persons with respect to matriculation examinations and any other matters incidental thereto or connected therewith; (c) place suitably qualified candidates in the tertiary institutions, etc. The board has been performing these functions since then. It had sometimes been applauded just as it had also earned knocks due to the many inefficiencies and laxities observed in its operations in the past. Indeed, it got to a head when people began to clamour for its scrapping. The conduct of its examinations was marred by all manner of irregularities and confusion. Indeed, hardly would people not know that Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examinations (UTME) were going on whenever they were held a few years back.

    But Prof Ishaq Oloyede’s appointment as JAMB registrar on August 1, 2016, would appear God-sent, especially given the many achievements the board has recorded in recent times. His barely three years stay in JAMB has changed the narrative. Not only are the board’s examinations now better conducted; some other government agencies are now approaching it to conduct recruitment examinations for their prospective employees. Under Oloyede’s watch, JAMB has suddenly become a revenue centre, turning in billions into government’s coffers. Before his advent at JAMB, the highest amount of money remitted to the national treasury was about N3million in a year.  This new trend has been well celebrated not only in government circles but beyond. Oloyede has also brought to bear sanity into the way things are done in JAMB.

    Obviously, business as usual could not have brought about the humongous savings leading to the huge remittance the board has made, especially in the last two years. It is now clear to the board’s members of staff that it is zero-tolerance for corruption.

    Perhaps one of the innovations introduced into the running of the board was the live telecast of JAMB’s 2018 Policy Meeting on tertiary institutions in Nigeria, the last edition of which was held at the Bola Babalakin Auditorium, Gbongan, Osun State on June 26. The auditorium, just a few metres from the Bisi Akande Trumpet Bridge in itself is another matter entirely. When I got the invitation to attend the policy meeting and saw that it was to hold in Gbongan, the first question that came into my mind was why would such an important meeting of the country’s egg-heads be held in Gbongan? Why not somewhere else, probably one of the other southwestern towns with the capacity and facilities to host such an august occasion?  And if it must hold in Osun State, why not at Osogbo, the state capital?

    But, when we entered the auditorium, it was then we realised that its choice as venue of the meeting was not misplaced. It was so spacious that all the vice-chancellors, rectors, and provosts in the country, as well as other guests were comfortably seated and the ambience itself conducive to the event.

    Anyway, the Bola Babalakin Auditorium experience was just a digression.

    The policy meeting, at least from what I witnessed at Gbongan, is quite a useful exercise. It was transparent enough, with virtually everybody connected with admissions into the tertiary institutions in attendance. This year’s edition was even televised live by the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA). This, apparently, is to prevent the kind of blame game that trailed the last exercise whereby some universities disowned the UTME cut-off mark, thus making it look as if it was imposed on them by JAMB. This was the universities’ reaction to public perception of the cut-off mark as being too low. There cannot be any such argument this time around.

    The point is that, given the different levels at which the institutions operate; it would be difficult for them to have the same cut-off marks. For instance, while the universities of first choice would want to peg their UTME cut-off mark at about 200-250 out of 400 marks obtainable, less endowed ones would clamour for between 150 and 180, some even less. This applies to polytechnics and colleges of education for the same reason. The private institutions pose another challenge altogether. One, due to their relatively young age, it is difficult for them to compete with the first or second generation universities. Yet, they need students that would make their existence profitable and worthwhile. They are likely to settle for what is becoming the minimum cut-off mark of 180. So, it is a case of different folks, different strokes.

    The policy meeting is good in that it enables every institution to come to the table with its peculiar circumstances, with a view to arriving at a consensus. One could observe some of the institutions’ representatives making passionate appeals and cases as to why they want certain positions upheld. One fascinating aspect of the whole exercise was Prof Oloyede’s easy recall of some of these peculiar circumstances and pinning them down to particular institutions that had issues with them in the previous year/s. Hence, when a particular issue was raised, he would mention institutions with such challenge that was brought to his notice so that they could understand what led to the decision that was taken or about to be taken this time around.

    Two institutions that would not easily forget this year’s policy meeting are the University of Ibadan (UI), Ibadan, and the University of Ilorin (Unilorin) in Ilorin. The JAMB boss made it a deliberate policy to use them as examples on certain issues and he defended his position saying he could not be accused of bad faith in mentioning the universities because one, UI is his alma mater and Unilorin was where he served last as vice chancellor before his appointment as JAMB registrar.

    To say that Oloyede enjoyed the support and confidence of his colleagues at the forum is stating the obvious. And this is because he knows his onion. As former vice chancellor, he knows the game inside out.

    The innovations he has brought to bear have made the calls for the scrapping of JAMB in some quarters (a few years back) a thing of the past. The UTME had been conducted in the last two years without much of the confusion that usually trailed the exercise in the past. As a matter of fact, candidates walk into the examination centres to do the routine that the examination should be. Only those directly involved and those who take exceptional interest in it knew when the examinations held last year and even this year, with the process only getting better as a result of the innovations put in place by the board under Oloyede’s leadership. The only people who have cause to worry about the ongoing changes in JAMB are the shameless elite who can go to any length to get admission for their children through the back door, and members of the staff of JAMB who benefited from the corrupt past. JAMB’s anti-corruption war has (euphemistically) led to the ‘recruitment’ of snake charmers since one of its members of the staff accused of corruption said it was a snake that swallowed the money.

    And, talking about the corrupt past, perhaps the major way to understand this is the huge remittance the board has made to the federal purse since Prof Oloyede took over. Even the finance minister, Mrs Kemi Adeosun, could not hide her surprise when the board remitted about N7.8billion last year. Yet, the board has not increased its fees. As a matter of fact, it has been reducing some of the fees, like the $150 fee that foreign candidates used to pay to obtain forms which has been slashed to about $30, when the new leadership realised that the global average charged by similar institutions is about $20.

    A major take-away from last month’s policy meeting was the admonition by the National Universities Commission’s (NUC) executive secretary, Prof Abubakar Rasheed, that university calendar be returned to the normal school calendar of September to June, against the current practice where institutions have chosen to begin the academic year when it suits them. The Federal Government must insist on a return to this glorious past because that is one of the ways to restore sanity to the education system.

    The meeting was also useful because those who did not know before now that cut-off mark is not all about UTME score now know. There are other marks that are graded like the school certificate or advance level result, the post-UTME, as well as other assessments that are scored to arrive at the cut-off mark.

    This year that JAMB has turned 40, one cannot find celebration in the air. Even if one is yet to come, there is no doubt it would not be as flamboyant and luxuriant as it should have been, even under people that would have taken money from government to do the celebration. That only explains the Spartan lifestyle of the man who is rewriting the story of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board. Yet, he is one of the most qualified JAMB registrars to roll out the drums to celebrate, not merely mark, its 40th anniversary.

  • Poorest of the poor

    Last year, World Poverty Clock predicted that this year, Nigeria would overtake India as the country with the highest number of poor people in the world. True to that prediction, the country has overtaken India (which was at the bottom of the ladder until last year), and is now wearing the cap of the world’s poverty capital. A report by the Brookings Institution, quoting data from the World Poverty Clock, shows that Nigeria now has over 87 million people living in poverty. If this is frightening, then, wait for the bombshell: six Nigerians become poor every minute. “According to our projections, Nigeria has already overtaken India as the country with the largest number of extreme poor in early 2018, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo could soon take over the number two. At the end of May 2018, our trajectories suggest that Nigeria had about 87 million people in extreme poverty, compared with India’s 73 million. What is more, extreme poverty in Nigeria is growing by six people every minute, while poverty in India continues to fall. In fact, by the end of 2018 in Africa as a whole, there will probably be about 3.2 million more people living in extreme poverty than there are today.”

    So that we can better appreciate what we are talking about, what is poverty in this context? It is defined as living on less than $1.90 a day at 2011 purchasing power parity prices. Even at today’s exchange rate in Nigeria, that is about N720. A lot of money, isn’t it? When you get to the market you’ll know how little it is.

    One good thing is that so far, I have not seen any negative reaction from the Federal Government, unlike in previous assessments. This is uncharacteristically Nigerian. Nigerians may not be in the position to say categorically that their country is home to the world’s poorest poor; but they know that millions of their fellow citizens live below the poverty line. As a matter of fact, the figure of the poor given by World Poverty Clock would appear too small when we consider the ever-increasing army of ‘executive beggars’ that dot the landscape in recent years. At any rate, what is there to dispute when even our own National Bureau of Statistics had painted a grimmer picture in 2016 when it reported that about 112 million Nigerians live below the poverty line?

    When, as reported in Ekiti State a few years back, someone had to keep vigil until a neighbour who was preparing ‘amala’ left the kitchen to fetch something from the room and then carried the pot of ‘amala’ on the fire and took it to her apartment before the owner returned and began to eat it without soup with her children, then you know that really, poverty is based here. The other time somewhere in the north, a man had to use his son as collateral when he bought a bag of rice without having any money on him. He pretended as if he forgot the money at home and told the rice seller to hold his son while he took the bag of rice home, from where he hoped to bring the money for the rice. He never returned with the money and when traced to his home, it was discovered that he actually had no money to pay. We have had instances where some parents sold one of their children in order to be able to feed the remaining children. There are many cases of mothers whose newborn babies were seized in hospitals because the parents could not settle hospital bills. There are countless such mind-boggling stories.

    Yes, mind-boggling because that is not God’s wish for this country. If God had wanted Nigeria to be the Wretched of the Earth that she is now, He would not have endowed us with the human and natural resources that the country is blessed with. It may be an exaggeration to say Nigeria has the highest number of churches and mosques in the world. But we have quite a surfeit of both; that this is not reflecting in the way we live is the jigsaw puzzle. We are so close to our churches and mosques; yet so far from God. Unfortunately, we also lack the capacity to tame corruption, which is the real cankerworm that is stunting the country’s growth. Until very recently, the country has been dancing in circles with graft cases involving especially the politically exposed persons in our midst, otherwise referred to as the big or untouchable thieves.

    The World Poverty Clock, created by the Vienna-based NGO, World Data Lab, in 2017, is a tool to monitor progress against poverty globally and regionally. Funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, it provides real-time poverty data across countries. Although it is relatively young, by virtue of its coming into existence only last year, it has set criteria on which it based its assessment. What the body does is to update its data every April and October, to take into account new household surveys and new projections on country economic growth from the International Monetary Funds’ World Economic Outlook. These then form the basic building blocks for poverty trajectories computed for 188 countries and territories, across the world.

    A major factor that has put Nigeria in this hall of shame is the lack of social safety nets in the country. For instance, if we had these, the state would naturally have a funding arrangement for indigent expectant mothers such that they would not be ‘detained’ in hospitals with their babies on account of inability to pay bills. Similarly, people would not be keeping vigil in expectation of the time their neighbour would briefly step out of the kitchen before stealing their pot of ‘amala’ or soup on fire if stipends are handed out to people without jobs.

    So, what do we do to get out of this mess? Simple. It is the same prescriptions that have been made several times that, sadly, one must repeat here, in the expectation that, perhaps, when we keep harping on them, the governments would see the urgency in accelerating the pace of development. Infrastructural development is key to any meaningful attempt to get out of this poverty conundrum. Yet, we have a huge infrastructural deficit, and one in which our National Assembly legislators do not seem to appreciate its enormity. If they do, they would not be slashing budgets for roads, etc. while raising their own budget. Improved power supply must be taken beyond rhetoric.

    Railway must be developed. The disaster that happened in Lagos on Thursday on Otedola Bridge, which claimed several lives and property, including vehicles would have been averted if we had a functional railway. We do not have to be transporting fuel by road. We need to do more on agriculture. We need to do more functionally by way of diversification of the economy. It is when we do all these and more that we can stimulate the economy, job creation and the increased spending would reflect in reduced social tension and crimes.

    I know our brethren would say “I reject it in Jesus’ name” when told that Nigeria is the world’s poverty capital. They will add, to boot, that “it is not our portion.” But, beyond rejecting it, we have to take practical steps to snatch our fate from those who have sworn to mess up our lives and the lives of our children. We have to do something about this National Assembly. We have to device a means of making governments at all levels more responsive and responsible. The other time, we were adjudged the happiest people on earth. Today, they say we are the world’s poorest capital.  While the former is sarcastic, the latter is real. But none, at the end of the day, is complimentary.

  • I remember Monica Lewinski

    America’s former President Bill Clinton is one person that will not forget in a hurry that the cost of an “inappropriate relationship” (whatever that meant) with an intern  could be huge, even if he narrowly escaped impeachment. His romance with Monica Lewinsky, described by Wikipedia as “an American activist, television personality, fashion designer, and former White House intern” nearly cost him his presidency. Clinton, relatively young (in his 50s), handsome and dazzling, was any lady’s man any day. That he was the World’s Number One Citizen was an added advantage. Only the naïve would be asking what such a Very Important Personality (VIP) could be doing with an ‘ordinary’ intern; that was later to degenerate to a scandal of monumental proportions. The answer lies in the fact that this thing called “inappropriate relationship” does not discriminate. It is no respecter of social status, colour or creed. For as long as it took two to tango, the affair between Clinton and Monica Lewinsky remained under wraps until something snapped. Thereafter, what began as an amorous relationship between two seemingly consenting adults then became a public scandal.

    But this is not about the Lewinsky-Clinton affair. Rather, it is about Prof. Richard Akindele, (now, unfortunately) formerly of Management and Accounting Department, Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun State. Perhaps only Monica Osagie, the prof’s erstwhile student who blew the lid open on the affair that never was; and Prof Akindele can tell when it all started. But by the time it went viral online in April, and until it was finally resolved with the dismissal of the professor on June 20, it was the issue in the newspapers, both print and online. It was so salacious that even the almighty CNN did not want to be left out of the feasting!

    In what apparently was a setup, Osagie had called the professor to inquire about his earlier demand for sex to pass her in a course that she supposedly failed. The prof was said to have boasted that she would repeat the exam in the next academic session since she had refused to “take the opportunity” he offered her to have sex with him.

    Their conversation is interesting: “I gave you an opportunity and you missed it,” the Professor told her on phone. “Forget about it. You will do it next year.” Osagie then asked if she would pass once she agreed to his demand.

    Prof: “Me that agreed to do something. I know what I meant. If you don’t trust me forget about it. If I wouldn’t do it, why should I give you audience in the first place? If I am not interested in doing it, I won’t give you audience.

    “The other person has come and I told her straight away because there is nothing I can do to bail that person out and her mark is even better than your own. The person scored 39 while your own is 33.”

    ”I was really seeing my period Professor Akindele,” the lady responded when the prof asked why she told him she could not give in to him the other day. (At this point, Prof Akindele, perhaps smelling a rat, told her to stop mentioning his name).

    ”And now nko?” he asked, to which she replied that her period had ended.

    ”Your boyfriend has done it yesterday?” he asked.

    ”Is it every time that someone will be doing with the boyfriend?” she responded. “Is it every time you do it with your wife?”

    ”Yes,” he answered.

    ”It’s a lie,” the girl said. “Not possible.”

    He then told the student when she asked when they would start the sex orgy that they should start the next day, to be continued on four subsequent occasions.

    “Is not five we agreed? Our agreement is five,” he reportedly said.

    ”Is it B that you want to give me or C?” the student asked. “Why would it be five times you will knack me?”

    It was at this point that she gave him a sense of what she had planned. She told him point blank that she would not have sex with him five times.

    ”Prof, you know what? Let me fail it. I can’t do it five times. For what nah? No worry. Thank you, sir,” she said and ended the conversation.

    This was what reportedly transpired between a student and her professor, who is also a reverend. Biblically, sex is supposed to be engaged in by people that have been legally pronounced husband and wife. Every other sex, at least for Christians, is ‘haram’. Sex remains such a top secret when it takes place between two romantic pair of lovers; that is, when the parties agree to do it together from the depth of their hearts or for pecuniary gains. But when it is a one-sided affair, the best thing is for the other party to back out. The other party, which could be male or female (because this sexual harassment is not just about the women folk). There are occasions when men too are harassed sexually. It is only that it is more of a challenge to the females than the males. A lady or girl that does not want to have sex with you will resist with everything at her disposal. Even if Monica had agreed to honour prof’s request not because she is interested but because she wanted to pass her exam, it still would have amounted to rape.

    It is now that Prof Akindele will suddenly realise that it is possible for one to stroll into joblessness from an otherwise promising career, just like that. May be it would have been better if he had tasted the forbidden fruit before this fall. At least, then he could have taken consolation in the fact that he has enjoyed what he is being punished for.

    But we should not delude ourselves that Prof Akindele is alone in this. Many lecturers do; and even beyond the four walls of various institutions of higher learning, sex-for-marks or promotion or other favours is nothing new. As they say, we are all thieves; it is only the person that is caught that is the barao (real thief). If the test that Jesus Christ administered on those who ‘arraigned’ the woman that they accused of adultery had been administered on some of those that sat over Prof Akindele’s fate, perhaps they too would simply have dropped the stone in their hands so that the ill-fated professor could be ‘discharged and acquitted’. This is not my wish though; because people in Prof Akindele’s positions should use same to mentor the children in their care, rather than teach them nonsense (apologies to Fela).

    As I said earlier, libidinal matters care less about creed or colour. It has no respect for social status either. If a whole Clinton could go for an intern, then we should know it is a serious matter. Unfortunately, some teachers, lecturers or even bosses feel diminished when a student or subordinate turns down their sexual advances and would begin to look for ways to victimise them or frustrate them outright, whether in school or in the office. What such men do not realise is that the moment they made up their mind to demand sex from their students or subordinates, they are already surrendering part of what makes them the teacher or boss over such ladies. As the saying goes: if you don’t want to get wet, stay away from the brook. When a man makes sexual demands from the opposite sex, no matter how low that member of the opposite sex is, he must know his case is like that of someone going to war: You either make it back home or die in the warfront. When you say ‘let’s get down’, you must know that there are only two answers: you either get a yes or a no for an answer. There cannot be a third answer.

    It was because Monica was not interested that we heard about the matter. Unfortunately, the prof fell like a pack of cards, even though he seemed to  suspect at a time as he had to caution the lady against mentioning his name during the telephone conversation that did him in. If Prof Akindele had been doing it before, as some account seemed to suggest, and he was not caught, it was either he knew when to back down or he was lucky. One would think that after the fall of Prof Akindele, other randy lecturers or bosses would take a cue and say never again would they attempt to force their female students or subordinates in office to bed when they are not interested. I am sure Prof Akindele, like Clinton, would forever remember the role his amorous desires with his student has played in his life.