Category: Thursday

  • Return of Fubara

    Return of Fubara

    Today, the six-month state of emergency in Rivers lapses. The suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara may return to work today or tomorrow, along with his deputy and the House of Assembly members. The emergency rule was for a reason – to restore law and order and governance in the state in the wake of the Supreme Court verdict that anarchy loomed there then.

    Read Also: Fubara’s return: MOSIEND calls for peace, unity, inclusive governance

    Of course, not everybody supported the emergency rule, especially the suspension of Fubara. All that is behind us now as a nation. Going forward from today, it is in the interest of Fubara and the other returnees to build on the legacy of peace of the outgoing Administrator Ibok-Ette Ibas. Let peace endure in the Garden City so that the people can feel the impact of governance.

    The difference between being in and out of office should be clear to the returnees by now. Thus, it will be foolhardy for anyone to allow lightning to strike him twice.

  • Before anger tips to rebellion

    Before anger tips to rebellion

    If Nigeria eventually burns to a rubble, let it not be because we didn’t see it coming. Those who would incinerate our homeland, will do so “for the love of country.”

    For the love of country becomes our sexiest lie, the curvaceous plague of bleeding-heart activism. Everybody cops a feel.

    For the love of country, the call persists for Nigerians to resist President Bola Tinubu’s stringent reforms. The same love purportedly spurred the coalition of disgruntled politicians into a frantic opposition. And for the love of country, dubious demagogues call on the youth to march on the streets, in Nepali Gen Z-style, “to take back our country.”

    The call to insurrection spreads like wildfire across Nigeria’s civic space as the Gen Z, instigated by the so-called “old takers” romanticise the seizure of power from the incumbent ruling class, come October 1, Nigeria’s independence anniversary.

    Chaos agents have re-emerged in the civic space, baiting insurrection in a manner akin to rubbing a lantern to make a genie appear. What they fail to tell their mindless herds is that the revolution they incite will dawn in a vortex of storms.

    Beyond their poesy of agitation and the citizens’ inalienable right to protest, they offer no promise or assurance of security if the protest gets hijacked by anarchists.

    Of course, Nigerians aren’t unreasonable for demanding affordable healthcare, education, secure communities, functioning infrastructure, and opportunities to earn a decent living. But these demands while justifiable, must never be countered by ruling class condescension.

    Read Also: FG disburses N330bn to households under social protection Programme

    President Tinubu must avoid the pitfalls of talking truth to the people. In asserting the needs and urgency for tax reforms, for instance, his administration must avoid any language bordering on conceit and prone to misinterpretation. There are several ways that a terse and simple statement like, “If you want good governance,  you must pay your taxes” could be misinterpreted and  weaponised by cynical citizenry and desperate opposition.

    To manage widespread dissent requires greater patience and tact, particularly in the digital age, where misinformation and rage are easily weaponised and destruction rapidly escalates within hours.

    The recent toppling of Nepal’s government by Gen Z protesters may seem a distant horror of Himalayan politics, but it is a parable for Nigeria’s political class, that young people, if ignored and oppressed, become easily manipulable and spurred to violence.

    Tinubu governs at the risk of similar disorder. The call for a Gen Z-led “mother of all protests” slated for October 1, should not be dismissed with the wave of a hand, given that the target audience comprises a younger generation bruised by economic hardships.

    Although the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reported an unemployment rate of 6.5% among 15- to 24-year-olds in 2024, following a controversial change in the methodology for calculating unemployment, labour experts argued that the agency’s previous record, that pegged unemployment at 53.4% of 15- to 24-year-olds,. is more representative of the reality on the ground.

    When these unemployed youths band together, as witnessed during EndSARS in 2020, the “10 Days of Rage” in 2024, and more recently, the 2025 Nepali protests, they can destabilise any country.

    Already, major online platforms are abuzz with comparisons, with many openly musing about launching Nigeria’s version of the Gen Z revolution. While it is true that an insurrection may be sponsored by foreign interests and opposition parties, it is harder yet wiser, to use the threat of such to engage with the youths who are often targeted and conscripted as canon fodder for actualising the masterminds’ plot for a regime change.

    The same social media that galvanises discontent can also be the bridge through which trust is rebuilt, among other platforms. Tinubu’s administration must reengage with the youths, online and offline, with greater candour. His message must explain, in simple but concrete terms; why painful reforms are necessary, how their burdens are being shared, and what timelines citizens can realistically expect for relief.

    He cannot afford to let his reforms, however well-intentioned, be perceived solely as instruments of suffering. His administration has taken bold steps—subsidy removal, exchange rate unification, infrastructure investment—but for many Nigerians, the immediate impact is unbearable.

    Humane governance means not just announcing reforms but cushioning their impact, communicating their purpose with sincerity, and showing that beneath the government’s fascination with economic indices subsists an undying zeal to dignify human lives.

    If Nigerians must brave the constraints imposed by his reforms, let them not see his administration reject the bitter herbs it seasons for the populace. One of the most significant arguments against the ruling class is its predilection for obscene benefits while urging Nigerians to embrace, unquestioningly, greater sacrifice.

    Worse still, the flaunting of ill-gotten wealth by the political elite and their progeny, the so-called “Nepo-babies,” fuels resentment. This same phenomenon lit the fuse in Nepal, children of the political class flaunted ill-gotten wealth on social media. The spectacle of privilege rubbed raw against the economic wounds inflicted on the impoverished citizenry and what began as online mockery snowballed into a bloody protest claiming over 72 citizens and dozens of politicians and security officials.

    The prime minister was forced to resign, and in the wake of the upheaval, the youths chose a new interim female leader, Sushila Karki. The lesson from Nepal is clear: governments must never ignore the cries of the young.

    Tinubu must not wait for the streets to burn before he reengages with the youths. The presidency’s current reliance on so-called friendly press and social media influencers to court goodwill is both inadequate and counterproductive. Rather than command trust, they echo like hired choristers singing a banal hymn.

    The youth can identify authenticity and also perceive condescension. What they demand is proof, forthrightness and acknowledgment of their suffering, not rehearsed slogans.

    The president must be explicit about what he has done. He should tell Nigerians plainly how much has been given to each state to alleviate hardship, and he must urge citizens, especially the youths, to demand accountability from their governors and legislators. This is not buck passing; it is simply truth-telling. For too long, state governors have escaped scrutiny while Abuja carries the blame for every unpaid salary, road crater and failed healthcare. Tinubu must help redirect the anger of the masses toward constructive civic engagement, where the electorate holds local leaders accountable instead of collapsing all grievances into one Abuja-shaped caricature.

    Yet this redirection must be done with empathy. While the president enjoys the support of a small circuit of discerning citizens, who understand that economic reforms come with pain, the wider population live too close to the cliff-edge of hunger to appreciate abstract economics. They want food, jobs, security, and dignity. Today, not tomorrow.

    Nigeria is yet to fully recover from EndSARS  and 10 Days of Rage, yet the likelihood of another bloody protest looms ominously. Influencers cannot stop it and journalists will turn punching bag in the crossfire, as in Nepal, where the press was branded both by the protesters as government stooges and by the state as saboteurs.

    Tinubu must, therefore, forge alliances with credible segments of civil society, student unions, professional associations, and faith communities. These are the bodies that can carry messages of constructive engagement to the grassroots.

    By responding more proactively to citizenry dissent, Tinubu can transform potential rebellion into renewed allegiance. If not,  neither the National Orientation Agency (NOA)’s Explainer journal nor friendly editorials in the press will be enough to tame insurrection, if anger tips into rebellion.

  • Nasir El Rufai and his politics

    Nasir Ahmad El Rufai is a controversial politician whose colleagues, whether in PDP where he cut his political teeth under Olusegun Obasanjo and Atiku Abubakar, the grand masters of political mischief,  APC where he acquired great influence through hero-worshipping of late President Buhari, SDP that found him too hot to keep and now in ADC, the vehicle he and his class of 1999 PDP members want to use to salvage Nigeria, cannot ignore. El Rufai, ever full of fire and fury, is never afraid of war.

    His major shortcoming according to Obasanjo who describes his political son, in his ‘Under my Watch’ as a “malicious liar, a pathological purveyor of untruths and half-truths with little or no regard for integrity”, is his “inability to be loyal to anybody or any issue for long, but only to Nasir El Rufai”.

     Atiku Abubakar his other political godfather and boss at BPE has also spoken of his character defects including his self-love. Following Atiku’s claim that he turned down his godson’s offer of shares in Transcorp, El Rufai wasted no time before savaging his political father’s character by challenging him publicly to talk about “the shenanigans surrounding Ericsson manoeuver and the Abuja water treatment plant contract scandal.”

    And if further evidence is needed to confirm Nasir loves only El Rufai, he provided evidence of that in chapter six of his “Accidental Civil Servant” sub-headed, ‘The enemy of my enemy is my enemy’.

    Obasanjo was determined to make him a minister in spite of his character defect, including what Obasanjo describes as his penchant for insulting and disrespecting people, savaging their character in their absence and thinking he alone knows everything.

    To ease his godson’s confirmation process at the senate, Obasanjo directed him to meet Senator Ibrahim Mantu, deputy senate president who told him that on account of how El Rufai treated senators while he was BPE chair where they watched him ‘cornered things to himself’, while avoiding to specifically mention the controversial presidential guest house El Rufai bought, he would have to raise N54m “to give to the more recalcitrant senators to soften the ground”. For Obasanjo who was desperate to make El Rufai, Minister for Federal Capital Territory to return sanity to a new city fast taking after Lagos, he was not going to allow anything including money to derail his plan. He therefore directed his godson to see VP Atiku Abubakar.

    Read Also: El Rufai absent as son takes second wife

    El Rufai got through the screening and later became minister without bothering about how the bribe demand by the National Assembly was paid. But few months after becoming minister, El Rufai did not think twice before securing the support of Obasanjo who was trying to humiliate his estranged VP, to leak the N50m bribe story to The Guardian on Sunday (August 31, 2003).

    Obasanjo got his own El Rufai’s treatment not long after. Following his disagreement with Obasanjo over privatization of Nigerian Airways, El Rufai joined forces with Atiku to start planning the downfall of Obasanjo on the strength of a prediction by a Cameroon marabout that Obasanjo would not last beyond first term.

    “When I am president, we are going to take charge of this place and fix it … you are one of my best people” to which El Rufai replied “fine, Mr. Vice President, I will hang in there”. While El Rufai daily assured Obasanjo of his loyalty as his minister, he was from  August 2002, engaged in nocturnal meetings with Atiku, Usman Bugaje, Atiku’s political adviser and Nduka Obaigbena, his close friend scheming how to take make the transition smooth. (Nasir El Rufai: Accidental Public Servant pg.131-152)

    Tinubu, the master of the game himself probably took a cue from the El Rufai’s well-documented history of disloyalty and refused to commit political suicide by going the Obasanjo’s 2003 way of allegedly bribing National Assembly with N54m to make El Rufai a minister by all means.

    Tinubu, an uncommon politician always in control of his environment probably had access to the DSS damning report on the El Rufai-led government of Kaduna State over the killing of the sons of the Shiite leader, Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, in Zaria, Kaduna State in 2015 along with about 300 members of his Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN), known to be a body of Shiite Muslims in Nigeria.

    The El-Zakzaky case, according to the SSS, was reported to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and is being investigated by the United Nations human rights body.

    Aside from the El-Zakzaky case, the SSS also accused El Rufai of having engaged in arbitrary arrests of political enemies and seizure of properties and wanton demolition of properties of perceived political enemies across Kaduna State.

    It was also apparent the senate was not ready to overlook El Rufai’s alleged abuse of trusts, allegedly involving the use of cronies, allies and family members for corrupt purposes during his time as head of the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    Tinubu might have pleaded with El Rufai to be part of is government, but decided to err on the path of caution to stabilize his new government. But El Rufai saw only betrayal. He publicly blamed President Tinubu and not the senate for his loss of the presidential slot.

    This is the source of his bitterness. This is why El Rufai, who hardly forgives is fighting with his two eyes closed. If he pretends to fight for Nigerians, it is because it is convenient for him and his fellow PDP members currently taking refuge in ADC, to blame Tinubu’s two years administration for the fallouts of his economic policies.

    On insecurity, although his failed policy of appeasement and ‘bomb Fulani terrorists out of their hide-out in Kaduna State’, instead of relief, brought more pains to Kaduna during his eight years of highhandedness. But El Rufai finds it convenient to lie by accusing his successor and the federal government of adopting his failed “kiss-the-bandits policy” by giving monthly stipends and food supplies to criminal gangs.

    It was this El Rufai’s attempt to misinform the people that recently forced Uba Sani to present his community-driven ‘Kaduna peace model’ which involved traditional rulers, religious leaders, and other stakeholders to the public. It was according to him, the result of six months study which identified the root causes of insecurity poverty, unemployment, lack of schools, hospitals, and commerce in rural areas, all of which pushed people into crime”.

    Uba Sani said he realised it is not the Inspector General of Police or the National Security Adviser  but he as the one elected by his people to solve their problems that needed to go to Giwa, Birnin Gwari, or the Dansadau forest to reconcile his multi-ethnic and multi-religious, diversified people with over 65 different languages.  That bold initiative is what has become the Kaduna peace model hailed and supported by the international community including Britain and Qatar.

    President Tinubu had also during the recent commissioning of  the first phase of 50 housing units for families displaced as part of the collaborative effort that also includes a school, clinic, and shopping complex as part of a broader 500-housing-unit intervention by the Qatar Charity Foundation, praised Uba Sani’s Kaduna peace model which he said steered Kaduna “from despair to stability, from a hotspot of insecurity to a more stable and hopeful environment”.

    Of course El Rufai who has never been known to fight anyone’s wars is fighting for relevance. Two years out of government, he has exhibited so much bitterness against the president, predicting he will lose the 2027 election probably coming a distant third. His battle cry is that the president be sent back to Lagos.

    El Rufai’s other colleagues including David Mark, Rotimi Amaechi and their group members that have been in control of the commanding heights of our political, economic and social lives in the last 30 years are angry and want to send Tinubu back to Lagos. But even in their selective madness, beyond their resolve to return Tinubu to Lagos, they are yet to provide alternatives to his renewed hope agenda that will make our lives better.

    Listen to them on Channels TV and Arise TV, they rant on and on telling you everything that Tinubu is doing that is wrong except providing alternative blueprint.

  • Osun LG crisis: Jankaraism at play

    Osun LG crisis: Jankaraism at play

    Ankara Was A popular slang among lawyers those days when legal practice was at its best. Those were the days when lawyers stuck to the rules of their trade. They only argued their cases in court and not on television, radio and in newspapers.

    Unfortunately, the reverse is the case today. What is troubling is that lawyers who should know and set examples for young wigs as their own seniors did for them when they started out are most guilty of this unprofessional act.

    They go on air masquerading as legal pundits when in fact they are discussing matters in which they are lawyers to a party. What they are doing is forbidden in law practice. It is elementary that cases are not discussed outside the hallowed precincts of the courtroom. Even law students and lay men know this. It is called sub judice in latin.

    But these days, very senior lawyers have made punditry their hobby. They hop from one television and radio studio to the other, commenting on the very case they are handling in court, in breach of their practice rule. They and their interviewers try to be clever by half – pretending as if the interviewees know nothing about such cases before coming on air.

    Whereas the interviewee knows a lot about the case and only came to defend his position. But they mask their intentions by skirting around other issues to deceive the gullible viewer before returning to where they are going which is the lawyer’s case in court. Thinking that he is wise, the interviewer after leading the interviewee on, will say something like this:

    “That is not where I am going. I didn’t know that you are seized of this matter. Now, since we have touched on it, let’s take it up from there. What are the issues involved in the case…” Responding in kind, the lawyer will cut in: “I am seized of the case. You see… (calling the interviewer’s name), there are two judgments of the Federal High Court and a judgment of the Court of Appeal on the matter…”

    And the lawyer goes on and on, without stating that he is a lawyer in the case. This is the depth to which legal practice has sunk. Regrettably, the undertakers are the many senior lawyers who are expected to shine the light for their juniors to follow, and their professional body, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).

    This is the kind of Jankara practice that eminent lawyers deplored in the olden days, even though some of then engaged in it too when it suited them. Jankara is the use of stealth to win a case by all means. It is a deplorable act which decent lawyers condemned then and still condemn now, but it has remained an untamed monster in legal practice because of the incorrigibility of many lawyers.

    Jankara is a strong phrase which no lawyer wants his colleague to use for him inside or outside the court. It was fun those days watching eminent lawyers in court, doing battle over the slang. They threatened fire and brimstone, even going to the extent of saying they would withdraw their appearance, if the Judge did not ask the user of the phrase to withdraw it.

    Read Also: Experts urge Nigerian universities to prioritise soft skills training to tackle youth unemployment

    Going the Jankara way as witnessed in the Osun local government debacle and in other cases, particularly during the last presidential election petition matters, did not start today. The only difference is that it was limited to the courtroom then. Now, it has been brought to the marketplace. Incidentally, Jankara is the name of a popular market in Lagos, where buyers and sellers, must be at alert in order not to be duped. Otherwise, either party may end up being shortchanged.

    In other words, some lawyers through their Jankara way attempt to con their colleagues and the Judge, as well, so as to obtain justice at all costs. Those who call lawyers liars may be right after all. What is happening in the Osun case has shown some lawyers for who and what they are. And these are the same lawyers who go all over the place, preaching on how to make society better.

    How can a lawyer or his association that is not true to himself or itself be true to the society? Honesty is an innate quality. It is either you have it or you do not have it. What do you say of a lawyer who cannot disclose that he is involved in a case, but goes on air to analyse the same case for the viewing audience? What do you say of the NBA that comments on a case that is in court and takes sides with one of the parties? Is that a bar association? A union of motor drivers will do better than that!

    NBA has since turned itself into a “busybody” in many matters. It has become a tool for blackmail and it is manipulated by many lawyers and politicians to fight their battles. At the bottom of it all is filthy lucre. There is nothing some lawyers and NBA cannot do for money.

    Their deployment of Jankaraism in the Osun council case is a big shame. Yet, they call themselves ministers in the temple of justice! Ministers? Do they truly understand the halo around the name that they cherish but desecrate with so much impunity? With ministers like these, can a nation ever be saved?

    These lawyers and NBA should allow the court to do its work without let or hindrance.

  • The global breakdown of pacific relations

    The global breakdown of pacific relations

    About two weeks ago, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, suddenly came out with an executive order changing the name of the Defence Department to War Department to indicate, according to him that he wants the potential adversaries of the US to note that the gun is loaded to be used against any country or alliance that may challenge the United States.

    Since the president is in possession of intelligence that may not be available to other people, it was conceded to him that he must have a reason for the aggressive change.  However, the global political environment in recent times has not been conducive to peace. The Russian war on Ukraine despite the Alaska meeting of Putin and Trump has not relented. On top of this is the unfinished war against Iran and the cruel crushing war against undefended people in Gaza that is raising the temperature of every sane person in the world. On top of this is Donald Trump’s tariff war against every trading nation with the United States without discrimination between allies and enemies.

    As if in reaction, though probably a long planned and scheduled programme, the People’s Republic of China mounted a celebration of power by staging a great display of military muscle in Beijing, celebrating the surrender of Japan in 1945 as if China was responsible for forcing Japan to surrender rather than the decisive United States dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    China invited most of the authoritarian regimes in the world like Russia, Turkey, North Korea and, surprisingly India that Trump’s policy has put in the wilderness by imposing 50% trade tariff to punish it for buying cheap crude oil and gas from Russia which is helping Russia to fund its campaign against Ukraine.

    India, the most populous country in the world seems to be shifting its implicit alliance from the democratic world to the changing leadership of China in a new world order led by China. To indicate that the peace of the world is under some kind of threat, the recent changes in the democratic western alliance leads one to the belief that we are witnessing mobilisation for war unless care is taken.

    Recently the British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said we were living in dangerous times. This was echoed by the new American Secretary of State for War Pete Hegseth.  One would have said this was the usual exaggeration for which the Donald Trump crowd is known for. But coming from the British prime minister, one cannot simply dismiss it because this was a preambular statement to the launching of a new British Defence and Strategic Review document which is going to increase Britain’s defence spending to 3% of the country’s GDP.  This will be well above the current 2%, still way below the 5% President Donald Trump is demanding from all NATO member countries even though the current amount the USA is spending is $895 billion just about 3.4%of its GDP which is way above the current expenditure on defence by the next three countries of China, $ 266.85 billion, Russia $126 billion and India, which comes fourth with an expenditure of $75 billion. From these figures, it can be seen that the USA alone spends more than the next three countries combined. The British prime minister’s statement was further explained by the Secretary of State for Defence, Right Honourable John Healey, who claimed that his country aims to build about 11 attack submarines, expand the carrying capacity of the British Navy and reinvigorate the air force by buying additional American-built F35 and increase the number of British-built typhoon aircraft and start recruiting people into the fighting force of the army while keeping the current men and women happy by improving their accommodation and stipends.

    All these coming from a socialist government which traditionally preferred to spend money on social services indicate that its analysis on threat to the realm is serious. This of course should be taken in the context of the NATO members feeling about the unreliability of the USA as a partner because of the statements of Trump who has perhaps rightly been saying that American Defence partners must share the burden of defence and not expect America to carry their burden as it used to do hitherto. This sharing of burden on defence extends not only to NATO members alone but to Japan and South Korea and to the rich Arab oil kingdoms and to Israel where the Israeli tail wags the American dog!

    As at the moment, Trump is prepared to fight future Israeli war against Iran and to possibly level the Persian theocracy down unless it kowtows to Israeli diktat and abandons its nuclear program. The current doctrine of expanding defence spending has also been embraced by the new German chancellor, Friedrich Merz who has publicly committed his country to go beyond 3% of GDP from its current low of below 2%. Merz has signed agreements with Ukraine to help it defend itself by building its own defence industry. The German posture on defence is influenced by President Putin’s aggression in Ukraine because ordinarily Germany is forbidden to rearm because of its militaristic past but in the current global context, the Western Alliance sees nothing wrong with Germany’s rearmament. For reasons of the big powers guarantee of Germany’s permanent disarmament, the Germans would probably have built their own nuclear arsenal for which they are capable of doing and the know-how of which they have. The current aggression of Russia in Ukraine has led to President Macron’s signing defence agreements with Poland in addition to the European Union’s opposition to the Russian threat.

    All these coming after Trump’s bluff that has not impressed President Putin, it seems the Europeans are determined to defend themselves with or without American support. A coordination of British, French and German preparedness to defend their interests on the continent of Europe and their threat to seize accumulated Russian financial assets and investments in Europe may eventually force Putin to count the cost of his policy of rebuilding the lost Russian empire and the reconstruction of the collapsed USSR.

    Recently the security conference in Singapore to which the Chinese virtually ignored by sending a low ranking delegation to witness, the campaign of rearmament carried to their door step with President Macron delivering the key note address and offering France’s support for their defence of democracy, and development for countries in South East Asia and warning those countries of the need to be prepared to defend their country’s autonomy. He also called on China to prevail on North Korea to stop its continued intervention on the Russian side in the current war between Russia and Ukraine on European continent.

    The American Secretary of State for War Pete Hegseth was less diplomatic as characteristic of American “open diplomacy” established since the time of President Woodrow Wilson at the end of the First World War by openly accusing China of threatening Taiwan and the Philippines and calling on countries in Asia to be ready to resist Chinese communist threats by increasing their arms spending. He gave the impression that America is prepared to defend Taiwan which is against Trump’s campaign statement that he would not commit American troops to the defence of Taiwan. The Japanese and the South Koreans were not openly attacking China.  But Japan in recent times seems to have abandoned its pacific policy to a policy of armed neutrality in Asia but is ready to protect the Japanese homeland. In the first Trump administration, the Japanese were publicly goaded to develop their nuclear umbrella. The Japanese did not publicly state their position apart from saying the American-Japanese treaty of defence was sufficient.

    Read Also: First Lady unveils N20m ‘Green Nigeria Challenge’

    My guess is that the Chinese does not have expansionist ambitions on the Philippines except to contest fishing rights on disputed islands in the South China Sea and Vietnam is capable of resisting Chinese ambitions. As for Taiwan, the eventual unification with the mainland is a foregone conclusion with or without America’s acquiescence.

    To make the new Arms race palatable to the suffering electorate in Europe particularly in Great Britain, politicians are now talking of a new concept of “DEFENCE DIVIDENDS” meaning that with expansion of defence industries in their neighbourhood, jobs will be created for working class people who can either enlist in the armed forces or work in arms industries. The idea of defence dividends are not strange because when a country’s economy is put on war footing, there seems to be the appearance of full employment which is a false prosperity against which the post 2nd World war American president and previous Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during the Second World War, General David Dwight Eisenhower warned against when he advised his country against being taken over by the “military industrial complex“.

    There is however no doubt that there is a growing hysteria about the possibility of an outbreak of war in Europe and the rest of us cannot just ignore it because of our distance from the current theatre of the conflict in Eastern Europe. However we can hope that like all other regional wars of the past since 1945, the Russian war in Ukraine will be contained because its spread and development into a nuclear confrontation is just too ghastly to be imagined. Even President Trump knows this and he is probably capable of palliating the military desire of his MAGA group by going to war against Venezuela and other weak countries in the Caribbean or South America accusing them of poisoning America people with their allegedly nefarious involvement in drug smuggling into the US which is less risky against a nuclear armed opponent.

  • Genocide, not wordplay (2)

    Genocide, not wordplay (2)

    After the colonists are done with Palestine, their next stop would be Africa perhaps. Occupying Africa will be easy. They simply need to flaunt a scripture to validate the siege and seizure of Africa’s most fertile tracts.

    Having successfully established and integrated religion as the most crucial element of colonial expansion, the psyops (psychological operations) that render Africans acquiescent to the eventual seizure of our land and resources will be easy.

    In Gaza, it’s Israeli Zionists murdering innocent civilians; in Africa, it would be the Christian Zionist pitted against the Muslim fundamentalist, and everybody else in a free-for-all.

    Consider the curious case of Nigeria, for instance; the magnitude of explicit and suppressed rage is enough to trigger the citizenry towards implosion. Here, the colonists need not actively get boots on the ground or soil their hands with the blood of innocents; Nigerians will happily slay each other in worship of imperial ‘gods.’

    Faith, as espoused by the Abrahamic faiths, teaches us to conquer our animal instincts, but caught in a fit of righteousness, we circumvent credo, that we may glorify our espoused and unarticulated sinful lusts.

    While it’s moral to rage against the bloodlust and carnage perpetrated by Boko Haram, ISWAP and other terror cells afflicting the peace and stability of Nigeria alongside her West African neighbours, shall we dare reproach the infamy and bloodlust flagrantly glamourised by the Christian Zionist across Africa and Nigeria?

    If we agree that only a mindless savage would applaud the mayhem fomented on the continent by Islamist terror cells, shall we also condemn, without equivocation, every African celebrating the occupation and daily murder of Palestinians?

    It’s horrid enough to witness – online and offline – the maniacal heckling of the Palestinians and their sympathisers by a people coming from a long history of slavery and colonist siege; it is even more alarming to see supposed ‘truth-tellers’ and leaders of thought dubiously pirouette, spinning words into apologetic shrouds for slaughter.

    We must be wary of validating the carnage we dread as just deserts for others, simply because they are of a different creed and civilisation. Brings to mind the curious case of my childhood friend, a Christian and proud son of Bokkos, who once defended Israel’s siege on Gaza. “It’s security,” he said, “self-defence.” Until his village was set ablaze and his cousin’s children were murdered and burned to ashes. “This is too much. There is no justice,” he cried. And I had no heart to say what I thought; that “Nobody savours the taste of the bitter herbs we season for others.”

    Lest we forget the reactions to the tragic fate of Apesuur Ukechia and Ward Khalil. On a Sunday morning, just after church, Ukechia watched as her husband and three children were gunned down by herdsmen in Aondona, Gwer West, Benue State. Months before, the same assailants killed her parents and all of her siblings. Ukechia’s loss is unacceptable, yet no more pitiable than Ward Khalil’s. The harrowing video of the five-year-old Palestinian girl trying to escape a burning Fahmi Al-Jarjawi School shelter in Gaza City after being incinerated by an overnight Israeli airstrike is heartrending. Although Khalil ambled through the flames to safety, her five siblings, aged two to 18, died in the flames along with their mother. “I was scared of the fire,” a teary Khalil told journalists, even as she had no words to relate her family’s massacre.

    Reacting to Ukechia’s loss, some Nigerians blamed the government for allowing the culprits roam free. They made a radical call to arms, urging every community hosting northerners to “evict them before they kill us all and take over our lands.”

    But these same anarchists, reacting to Khalil’s loss, described her as “collateral damage.” The tenor of reactions ranged from “Her people started it on October 7, now they must live with the consequences” to “Serves them right! Next time, they won’t attack God’s chosen.”

    This thought process is shamelessly propagated by many a bigoted Nigerian across the civic sphere and it catches like wildfire as you read, in Nigeria’s citadels of learning and religious faith. In an academic forum, some academics dismissed a video of  Zionist-Jews attacking Christian pilgrims in Israel, while claiming that it’s their divinely-ordained duty to kill every Christian because they are “idol worshipers.” They refused to condemn Israeli attacks on Christian brethren even as they justified the occupiers’ genocidal campaign in Palestine. “It’s a hard decision that must be taken,” said an esteemed Professor. These random reactions mirror our descent into moral atrophy.

    As of September 3, 2025, over 66,700 people (64,739 Palestinians and 1,983 Israelis) have been reported killed in the genocide according to the Gaza Health Ministry (GHM), Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, media and humanitarian workers. Scholars estimated that 80% of Palestinians killed are civilians, of which 70% were women and children (OHCHR).

    Read Also: DMO faults wrong insinuation on Nigeria’s debt service

    Yet, many Nigerians, armed with half-baked theology and deeply embedded bigotry, cheer the perpetrators with messianic zeal. More worrisome is the incursion of this murderous mentality into the Nigerian newsroom. Every editorial and commentary validating the genocide resounds as a mindless brushstroke in the mural of apology, painted for Israel as it ethnically cleanses Palestine. This is more the journalism of complicity than compassion. For it does not document the truth. Rather, it thwarts it.

    Never in modern memory has a genocide claimed so many journalists – at least 250 – as it has claimed in Gaza. But the bigoted newsroom would rather whip out alibis for the perpetrators, soullessly validating their siege, as a consequence of Hamas’s October 7 attack. Such pitilessness absolves the Israeli occupiers of ethnic cleansing and genocide perpetrated against their captive Palestinian hosts since 1948.

    How did we arrive here? Some say it is faith. But faith has been mutilated into idolatry. Zionism, as advanced by the African pulpit, has replaced God with a political state. Murderous Zionists command Christian Africa just as ISIS masterminds excite ISWAP allegiance. Proof-texts are dragged from Genesis and wielded like bayonets, as if the promise to Abraham to bless all nations could be warped into a license for ethnic cleansing and genocide.

    To watch journalists excuse the bombing of hospitals in Gaza is to see the rehearsal for the rationalisation of similar massacres in Borno, Kaduna or Lagos. To watch them amplify, even after being debunked, Israeli lies about “beheaded babies” is to understand how they will amplify the propaganda of local tyrants tomorrow. The “Hannibal directive,” which sanctioned the killing of its own citizens to prevent their capture, on October 7 and beyond, was once dismissed as fantasy until its grisly reality was exposed, but the newsroom is primed to conveniently ignore such disconcerting truths.

    The newsroom that celebrates Zionist tyrants will bend to domestic despots. What is denied abroad will be denied at home; what is excused abroad will be excused at home.

    There is a rhythm to atrocity, a choreography almost banal in its repetition. Palestine may seem a distant theatre. But it is a global mirror. Do we not see ourselves in those faces pressed against rubble? Do we not hear our own children in those cries? Or have we convinced ourselves that genocide is only real when it arrives at our gates?

    Imagine the first inhabitants of Lagos, Plateau or Benin rising to reclaim ancestral lands, citing scriptures or ancestral decrees. Would today’s cheerleaders of conquest by Holy Writ validate their siege? Would they call resistance, “terrorism” and couch dispossession in divine justification?

  • NBA’s haunted Enugu conference

    NBA’s haunted Enugu conference

    The haunted 2025 Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) annual conference during which a group of privileged elites tried to assault our sensibilities ended in Enugu last week. We have all come to terms that law by this privileged few is the law of society. And if as George Orwell said ‘we are equal but some are more equal than others”, it is our sad fate we can never be equal before the law.

    And I guess that was why Plato concluded that human law are like spiders’ web which catches the small flies but the great break through. And nearer home here, no one captures this better than the Sultan of Sokoto who in his keynote address, warned the gathering of our privileged lawyers against “the creeping commercialization of justice in Nigeria”, without forgetting to let those serving themselves while pretending to serve us that  “Today, justice is increasingly becoming a purchasable commodity, and the poor are becoming victims of this kind of justice, while the rich commit all manner of crime and walk the streets scot-free.”

    Lawyers in Nigeria as elsewhere in the world are fortune-seekers. And it is not their fault that they are often assigned the ignoble role of perpetuating injustice. But what often makes the difference as Itse Sagay once pointed out in all societies are the few noble men among those destined by virtue of their profession to perform ignoble role. Fortunately for us here, unlike the current leadership of NBA that behaves like the unthinking ‘obidients’, using the media to intimidate those who pointed out their shameful behaviour, it has not always been like this. Our judiciary which had performed creditably well at home and at the international level was once the envy of our African brothers.

    There was indeed a golden era of the Nigerian judiciary when the judiciary was truly the last hope of the common man. Itse Sagay in a recent lecture reminded us of the era of fearless judges like Kayode Eso,Chukwunweike Idigbe, Chukwudifu Oputa, Mohammed Bello and it is not too long ago we had Rotimi Williams (Timi the Law), Gani Fawehinmi and Bola Ige who would proudly describe himself as akoni ni iwaju adajo (the fearless one before a judge).

    This is why informed Nigerians felt offended when senior lawyers without character who are answerable to none and as representative of the judiciary which unlike the executive and legislature that periodically test their legitimacy, pretend they are working for the interest of Nigerians. Lawyers work for none but themselves. Chief Kehinde Sofola, a second republic attorney-general and one tine vice president of Body of Benchers  told Nigerians a long time ago that “the primary duty of the judiciary is to protect the judiciary”.

    Few Nigerians are therefore impressed when the Nigeria Bar Association, haunted by the huge baggage it carried, finally settled down for their annual conference in Enugu, Anambra State, from August 22 – 29, hiding its head in the sand like an ostrich, thinking no one sees it.

    Read Also: 23 terrorists killed, 26 kidnap victims rescued in Katsina

    What set this year’s event apart from the 2023 conference during which President Tinubu gave an enthralling welcome speech in which he called on members of the legal profession and other Nigerians alike, to commit to “a change of mind, a change of attitude and a change of approach to governance” in order to exploit our great potentials for the benefit of the people, was open partisanship and anti-Tinubu sentiments by ‘Obidients sympathisers including Oby Ezekwesili who didn’t believe the 2023 election had been won and lost.  There was also one of the moderators at the conference, Seun Okinbaloye who inadvertently disclosed where his political sympathy lies when he unprofessionally asked his audience three leading questions as to whether their lives are better today than it was in 2023.

    NBA was haunted by the burden it carried to the Enugu conference. Sim Fubara who in attempt to fight off the malicious influence of his godfather decided to wage war against anyone close to his estranged godfather, Osigwe and his NBA, perhaps because of the un-receipted and unbudgeted N300m  that had changed hands, decided to side with Fubara.

    When Fubara in his blind fury sacked and replaced  Rivers Traditional Rulers Council chairman, Sergeant Awuse, embraced a three-man legislature that vetted his budget and screened his cabinet and local government caretaker chairmen, allegedly masterminded the torching of the state House of Assembly in an effort to avoid impeachment, and disobeyed court pronouncements, Osigwe and his NBA kept their peace. They however woke up following the Supreme Court declaration that there was no government in Rivers and the federal government claiming to avoid possible chaos that could follow Fubara’s impeachment by a vindictive House of Assembly whose salary had been withheld for two years, declared a state of emergency and suspended the warring parties.

    Osigwe without restraint and without telling us in what capacity since he was not a party to the dispute, issued a press statement, declaring that “The constitution does not empower the president to unilaterally remove or replace elected officials—such actions amount to an unconstitutional usurpation of power and a fundamental breach of Nigeria’s federal structure”.

    He similarly did not wait for the National Assembly whose stamp all stakeholders agreed was needed to legitimize the president’s action before holding a press conference.  The NBA president only increased his visit to different media houses to declare that “the purported removal of Governor Fubara, his deputy, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly is unconstitutional, unlawful, and a dangerous affront to our nation’s democracy”, long after the National Assembly had upheld the position of the president

    In what many saw as lack of tact even while scandalously fighting their unfinished ‘obidient’s battle’ in the name of NBA, Osigwe and his  executive unilaterally moved the venue of the conference from Rivers to Enugu, thereby depriving Rivers the benefits of hosting the conference. Naturally, the administrator of Rivers asked Osigwe and his organizing committee to refund Rivers’ N300m but our men of ‘noble profession’ refused insisting the money was a gift.

    Instead of doing the most honourable thing, the NBA resorted to media war where untrained news anchors of some TV channels were asking ‘what is N300m compared to what it cost NBA to host their conference’?” For asking for Rivers State money, Osigwe and NBA media meddlers descended on the sole administrator, questioning the legality of his appointment, of his actions and labelling him a threat to democracy. Osigwe and his NBA media handlers told us they were driven by patriotism as if we don’t know “patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrels”

    The intervention of the president, Public Interest Lawyers League, Abdul Mahmud who issued a press statement saying Osigwe’s decision was “not only disgraceful but speaks to the organisation’s rot” adding that “the NBA cannot claim to be a watchdog of public morality while engaging in conduct so thoroughly devoid of the very standards it seeks to impose on others”, did not bring back  Rivers N300m.

    Sadly, it was this baggage NBA and its leadership carried to their dispirited Enugu conference last week.

    It will appear our senior lawyers who are accountable to only themselves are the bane of Nigeria judiciary. There are no doubt senior lawyers who would deliberately receive N300m from a sub-national government we all criticize for not doing enough for the people and their media enablers whose news anchors unprofessionally intimidate guests are men without character. And men without character according to Aristotle are the greatest threat to democracy.

    I have not heard a word of condemnation from Osigwe’s crusading NBA against Abubakar Malami, a senior lawyer and attorney general who but for the Head of Service would have smuggled an indicted civil servant into the bureaucracy through the back door or but for Justice Salami’s insider probe, sacrificed the career of a very resourceful  former EFCC Chairman.

    Why are men of many words, a euphemism for lying, called upon by virtue of their profession to perform ignoble role including taking N300m, be humble enough to understand that those who accept the law of the rich as the law of the poor to avert anarchy in society are not half-wits?

  • 2027: Will Jonathan push his luck?

    2027: Will Jonathan push his luck?

    He took the gamble in 2015 and scaled the legal hurdle on his way. But then, the 1999 Constitution was not clear on the status of contestants like him. This was in 2015. These are the contestants who had held office as president or governor under extenuating circumstances.

    Such a circumstance arose in 2010 when Jonathan’s principal, President Umoru Yar’Adua died, and he automatically succeeded the deceased in line with constitutional requirement. Thus, Jonathan became an accidental president in May 2010. His presidency was not borne out of his direct election into the nation’s highest office. It came by accident. He had been elected in 2007 on the joint ticket with Yar’Adua. Jonathan became vice president (VP) by virtue of that.

      It is likely that Jonathan would have remained  VP and served for eight years, if Yar’Adua had not died. This is now history. Fifteen years after he became president by accident in 2010, and 10 after he left office in 2015 after being elected in his own right in 2011, Jonathan is now at the centre of some people’s self-serving campaign for him to run again. They want Goodluck Ebele Azikiwe Jonathan to try his luck for the exalted office. Jonathan has always been a lucky man. Those rooting for his return seem to be counting on this luck, which saw him become accidental governor and president at different times, to get him through in 2027.

    By sheer luck, he always got on a platter what many others hankered after and never attained. He sits down on his own jeje reading newspapers, as his wife, Dame Patience, recounted in the uncertain days of the illhealth of his principal when he was sidelined by the hawks in government, and just like that luck smiles on him – the way manna drops from above. Those who will benefit from Jonathan running in 2027 are fighting tooth and nail to win the argument.

    They have exhumed a 2022 court judgment by the Federal High Court in Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital, to help their case that there is no constitutional encumbrance on their man’s path. There has always been something about Jonathan and the  Constitution. He became acting president in February 2010 by virtue of a ‘Doctrine of Neccesity’ created by the Senate to sort out a constitutional logjam.

    Indeed, the framers of the Constitution never envisaged the kind of crisis the nation witnessed then – where the president would be infirm and unable to hand over to his deputy during his long absence. Jonathan has since revealed that Yar’Adua did the needful, but the letter never got to the National Assembly. Some of those who hid the letter are now championing his return in 2027. He has to watch his back.

    In 2015, his reelection bid generated another constitutional interest. Those opposed to him running went to court, claiming that he was no longer eligible to contest, citing Section 137 (1) (b). The section says: A person shall not be qualified for election to the office of president if – he has been elected to such office at any two previous elections. To the plaintiffs, Jonathan had run for election twice and as such was no longer eligible. The high court disagreed and the appeal court upheld that decision. Jonathan contested and lost to President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The rumour of his running again in 2023 opened another constitutional challenge. By then the Constitution had been amended, with the insertion of a new Section 137 (3) which  states: A person, who was sworn in to complete the term for which another person was elected as President shall not be elected to such office for more than a single term. Having completed Yar’Adua’s term and subsequently elected into office in 2011, Jonathan is clearly caught by this provision. The snag is the amendment was done in 2017, but signed into law in 2018, three years after he left office in 2015.

    His supporters are arguing that the provision cannot take retroactive effect, citing the 2022 judgment of Justice Isa Dashen of the Bayelsa Federal High Court, which this paper analysed last Thursday. Going by the verdict, Jonathan can run. But it is wrong to describe  the judgment as ‘final’ on the ground that it can no longer be appealed because of the effluxion of time.

    Read Also: TALI partners government on enforcement of disability rights in Nigeria

     For the avoidance of doubt, no verdict of the high court can ever be ‘final’ because litigation does not end there. It ends at the Supreme Court, if the litigants decide to go all the way. Because it has been three years since the judgment, whereas the time for appealing it is 90 days, the ‘we want Jonathan again’ crowd is trying to wear it the toga of finality. It is for them to do whatever they can to have their way, but they must bear in mind that those opposed to their plan are not sleeping too.

    There is no argument over the subsistence of the verdict. However, those using it to make a case for Jonathan’s return are either only trying to be clever by half or do not know how the courts work. That the judgment can no longer be appealed does not mean that a fresh case cannot be instituted on the same matter since it never got to the Supreme Court where all legal disputes end. Another litigant can, therefore, go to court to stop Jonathan from running, if he decides to do so.

    Jonathan has beheld this spectacle before. This is not the first time that fairweather political friends will be gathering in his name to chorus ‘run, Jonathan run’. He knows what they are looking for – a pay check for all their hue and cry.Only Jonathan knows what is good for Jonathan and not the so-called do-gooders whose sole aim is to use him to achieve their selfish political ends. Will Jonathan’s running in 2027 change anything? It won’t. His first-and-a-half comings, that is his own four years from 2011 – 2015, and the completion of Yar’Adua’s term between 2010 and 2011, were nothing to write home about.

    He has no record to run on. His luck has always carried him, though. But he should not push his luck too far. In Jonathan’s life, luck has always lurked around him. From deputy governor in Bayelsa, he became accidental governor in 2005 when his principal, Diepreye Alamiyeisegha, got into trouble and was jailed in Britain. But he should not be carried away by this luck and the sweet talks of deceitful politicians.

    I can hear Chinua Achebe addressing Jonathan in his book: Things fall apart, “those whose kernels were cracked by a benevolent spirit should not forget to be humble”. Jonathan should remain true to himself as his  humility has always been his strength. He should not allow himself to be led by the nose by people who are only interested in building a political empire for themselves by using him to achieve their aim.

  • Post-colonial culture in Nigeria

    Post-colonial culture in Nigeria

    The vast majority of Nigerian after the amalgamation in 1914 continued to live their lives as before without noticeable change traceable to the imposition of colonial rule.  The most noticeable outcome of amalgamation was the gradual extension of the Beit-el mal (native treasuries) first introduced to the North by Sir Fredrick Lugard to the rest of the country beginning in Yorubaland and Benin.  The attempt to extend this to the acephalous Igbo societies by creating ‘Warrant’ chiefs where there were no traditional rulers met with failure. The economic implication of this system was the levying of taxes in the names of native rulers who were now made to enjoy political and economic power out of tune with pre-colonial tradition and culture. 

    Resistance to this imposition did not succeed in the face of superior physical force in the hands of the colonial administration.  Rebellion and revolts were shot down by the use of soldiers and Nigerians were cowed and made to face the responsibilities imposed by modern mode of governance which involved payment of taxes as a passage of citizenships rite.

    The colonial phase of Nigerian history witnessed rapid economic changes, building of railways roads and ports and even aerodromes.  Gradually our people were sucked into the western economic, political and social vortex.  With this came increasing contact between our people and the outside world.  Nigerian soldiers fought in two World Wars first between 1914 and 1918 in theatres in Togo, the Cameroons and East Africa.  Some naval ratings were even sent all the way to Palestine. 

    The Second World War saw more extensive use of our soldiers in the Ethiopian campaigns against the Italians and in Burma against the Japanese.  The involvement of our troops in these global cataclysms had serious political consequences. The weakening of the British in a changed world hastened the process of decolonization.  This process was hastened by the rise of African nationalism and the emergence of political parties each of which in different ways fought for the political emancipation of our country.  The growing political awareness led to cultural nationalism and the cry to “boycott all boycottables” that is to say Africans should go back to their cultural roots by jettisoning imported names and taking on native names.  This was particularly the case among the descendants of Nigerian repatriates from Sierra Leone resident in Lagos. They cast away their European and Hebrew names thus David Brown Vincent took an African names of Mojola Agbebi, Edmund Macaulay became Kitoyi Ajasa, Joseph Pythagoras Haastrup became Ademuyiwa Haastrup, Jacob Henry Samuel became Adegboyega Edun. Their examples were later to resonate with Azikwe and Awolowo when they dropped their biblical names of Benjamin and Jeremiah respectively. 

    The wearing of African clothes became fashionable.  Lugard would in his grave have approved this development unlike what he condemned in 1914 when he described educated natives as the “trousered Negros of the coast dressed in bond street attire, who send their laundry abroad every other week for dry cleaning”.  In this changed cultural preference, the cultural gap between southerners and northerners in Nigeria began to close. Northerners never abandoned their babanriga for western suits and in most cases stuck to their languages especially the Hausa language rather than taking to English.  This was to be their undoing in a   world in which English was the lingua franca.  This cultural recrudescence also led to greater interest in the study of Nigerian languages literature and history.  The vanguard in this regard was provided by the University of Ibadan which by the eve of independence in 1960 began to develop new curricula for students in liberal arts and the social-sciences as well as adapting the physical and biomedical sciences for the African environment.

    Read Also: Tinubu assures Nigerians: Revenue targets met, no borrowing needed

    The so-called Africanisation gathered pace in the civil service, the church and the judiciary and it was only a matter of time before Africans began to occupy the commanding heights of the economy and the politics of Nigeria and this had its cultural dimension in African pride and the assertion of what was called the “African personality”.

    The post-colonial cultural development

    With independence in Nigeria came a rising tide of expectations.  People wanted increased prices for their primary produce like cocoa, groundnuts, palm kernel and palm oil as well as cotton, rubber, hides and skins on which post-independence Nigerian economy depended.  The various governments of Nigeria tried to meet the expectation of the people but they were not always successful.  With the decline in producer price of farm produce, there was increasing migration of the youth to swell the urban conurbation of Lagos, Ibadan, Kano, Kaduna, Jos, Maiduguri, Benin, Aba and Port Harcourt.  The cities therefore became melting pots of cultures. The various governments particularly the one in the western part of the country spent vast sums of money from accumulated funds of the marketing boards on social welfare schemes such as education and health and urban planning and renewal.  The cities became more attractive to the youth who left the dreary existence of the villages for the cities in what has been appropriately described as rural-urban migration phenomenon.  With too many people in the cities, the infrastructure could not cope and there began a gradual and slippery slope to a situation of urban decay and dilapidation. Crime increased and there was a corrosion of values everywhere.  Money became the most desirable object without consideration of how it was acquired.  Bribery graft, fraud and corruption alien to our culture have become the order of the day.  This phenomenon was accentuated and exacerbated by the incursion of the military into governance.  Force was seen as a veritable instrument of success.  There has been growing culture of aggression in Nigeria and a noticeable breakdown of the culture of respect for elders and others.  Some have ascribed this decline to exploding population which has led to increased competition for resources and jobs particularly among the people.

    Nigerian fraudulent practices have even gone international with advance fee fraud and drug and human trafficking being increasingly, associated with Nigerians.  Surprisingly or perhaps because of the prevailing hardship, the religion of Islam and Christianity have witnessed revival.  The orthodox aspect or traditions of these religions are increasingly challenged by sometimes extremist or even millenarian tendencies sometimes leading to a clash of votaries of these religions. Sometimes the battle-line as in the North of Nigeria is between the traditional Islamic religion and groups preaching a Shiite form of Islam in a largely Sunni milieu.  Among the Christian orthodox traditions such as the Catholics and Protestants have seen huge erosion of membership who now troop to the so-called Pentecostal churches.

    Founding of churches have become big business and many of the churches have gone beyond what orthodox Catholic and Protestants missions used to do in terms of establishment of schools and hospitals.  Some now have housing estates where the ordinary lives of the people are rigidly controlled.  Pentecostalism shares much in common with Islam in the sense that it is not just a religion but a way of life.  This has radically affected the culture of Christians, particularly as it affects marriages, child naming and burials.  The absence of government has also been replaced by the role Pentecostal churches play in the lives of Nigerians.  Some now provide educational facilities from kindergarten to universities.  This is also being emulated rather slowly by Muslims in a struggle for the souls of the people.  Religion has become so fundamental in the lives of Nigerians that the role of men of God and Mallamai has become much pronounced. 

    Nigerians from their external appearances and what they say appear to be very religious.  This however is not reflected in the morality and behaviour of the people.  There is therefore a feeling of superficiality in the religious cultures of our people.  The churches and mosques are full every worship day and even political leaders have appropriated God while continuing with their nefarious looting of the state and national exchequers. 

    The culture of insincerity perfidy and religious perversion is everywhere.  Syncretism in our religious belief has led many observers to say our religion is skin deep, yet the culture of religious confrontation occasioning mass slaughter of the innocents has become a recurring decimal in Nigeria.  The culture of religious intolerance is sometimes fed by events outside our shores with many Muslim youth either out of frustration or fad are being found to support the call for Jihad against non-Muslims or those Muslims who are seen to be deviating from Islamic orthodoxy.

    While all this is going on there is also the effect of globalization on Nigerian culture.  Our economy is open to the rest of the world and with this openness come the importation of all kinds of things namely wine, food, films, educational materials and other things promoting particularly western culture.  It is not unheard of nowadays to hear calls for gay rights that would have been met with the worst kind of reaction in the past.  The modes of dressing of the youth even the kind of English spoken are pitifully American.  The dot.com generations have also exploited computers to perpetrate fraud internationally.  Nigerians like other people in the globalised world are not immune to the spread of pornography and even paedophilia and other kinds of sexual perversion unheard of in times past.

  • Fast money

    Fast money

    The lust for “ritual money” presages Nigeria’s ghastly nature. Its portents fulfill the grisly typecast that has become our fate.

    Despite our claims of morality and exaggerated spirituality, the recurrent arrest of teen ritual killers yanks the rug out from under our pretentious ideals.

    The most jarring message to date, rattles in Daniel Bamidele’s hymn of progeny as the new fiend. Consider, for instance, the sad case of Samuel, 18, who wanted to be rich. So, he strangled his mother to death and removed her briefs. Then he mounted her corpse and raped it.

    The victim, Christiana, didn’t see it coming. Perhaps because no mother ever worries about being murdered and raped by her own son. Samuel pounced on her while she slept, at her residence on Market Road, Ologbo, Ikpoba-Okha local council, Delta State.

    The youngest child of the deceased claimed to have acted on the instructions of One Love, a native doctor. He said, “I wanted to use her for money ritual. She was sleeping when I strangled her around 5 am. I was advised by One Love, a native doctor in Oghara, to kill her. After killing her, I slept with her. The native doctor told me to do so and keep her corpse for two days.”

    According to him, One Love persuaded him to use his mother for money rituals, and promised to give him N50,000 if he could cut her ears and fingers, and bring them to him. But just before he disemboweled his mother, he got caught. His grandmother saw him with her daughter’s lifeless body and sounded an alarm, which led to the teenager’s arrest.

    Six years since the gory incident, Nigeria still grapples with the chimera of bloodthirsty teens as young as 15 years, prowling the country’s neighbourhoods for anyone they could kill for “fast money.”

    The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) revealed that over 150 ritual killing cases were recorded in the six months leading to January 2025. NAN reports that the police apprehended many of the ritualists including a youth who killed his mother, grandmother, sister and her son on November 27, 2024 in Amaeze, Nsukka Local Government Area of Enugu State.

    On Friday, April 5, 2025, in Anambra State, Chidozie Nwangwu, Onyebuchi Okocha and Ekene Igboezekwe were arraigned before Justice Jude Obiorah on charges bordering on their claims to possess supernatural powers to perform money rituals and conspiracy to commit felony, to mention a few.

    The three suspects were reportedly arrested by the Agunechemba security outfit as Anambra sought to purge itself of ritual killings, armed robbery, kidnap for ransom, among other crimes.

    Interestingly, 18 suspected pastors out of the 53 mentioned by the suspects fled following the arrest of two of their members by the Agunechemba.

    “We went to the places where these people make the charms they call Okeite, bearing people’s names and pictures. We saw thousands of Okeite. Bad people have entered our land. They are not invisible like the air; they are human beings, and we know them. If you see any of them, just draw our attention to them,” urged the Anambra governor, Prof. Charles Soludo.

    Yet, the most jarring message to date, rattles in the hymn of progeny as the new fiend. Against the backdrop of the killings, Nigerian lawmakers have called for an intervention by the state. First, they must deal with the surfeit of incidents establishing  teenagers’ reckless lust for money.

    Recall that on January 29, 2023, in the misadventure of the quartet: Wariz Oladehinde, 17, Majekodunmi Soliu, 18, Abdul Gafar Lukman 19, and Mustakeem Balogun 20, who were arrested by men of the Ogun State Police Command for allegedly killing a girlfriend of an accomplice for money-making ritual.

    On interrogation, they confessed that what they were burning in the clay pot was the severed head of the girlfriend of their accomplice. They gang-raped her before beheading and cooking her.

    Their actions aren’t accidental; from plotting to execution, a hideous smattering of bestiality manifests as society’s just deserts. Yet the boys are neither freaks nor social accidents, they are simply karma coming home to roost.

    The frantic lunge for sudden wealth by teenagers and young adults establishes the fatal forming of Nigerian maleness, family and society. Toxic families produce toxic wards. Toxic children become toxic citizens. Toxic citizenry become poisonous to nationhood, in the long run.

    The interplay of excessive materialism, misandrist-feminism, and the absence of exemplary father figures has foisted upon us a generation of reprobate males.Economic forces aggravate their sense of disenchantment while corrupted gender roles and the denouement of masculinity afflict them with greater confusion.

    Masculinity flows from nature as an aspect of the birth mother, no doubt, but it is sculpted by society and a father figure into humane and effective manhood. The boy-child learns by instruction, counselling, and imitation.

    In an ideal setting, the father moulds his character by careful nurturing, awarding punishment for vice and reward for virtue. Where the father is absent or feckless, the child suffers exposure to degenerate blooming, like Afeez Olalere, who was encouraged to use his younger brother for money ritual by his mother; to embolden him, she fed poison to her younger son and watched him die.

    Boys are in trouble. They have become Nigeria’s trouble but society shies away from their plight, gagged by dubious gender politics and the notion that males enjoy greater socioeconomic advantages.

    Consequently, several boys are denied constructive counselling at home and necessary push through educational tiers.

    More boys drop out of school to become internet scammers (Yahoo Boys) disguised as bitcoin traders, I.T. and forex gurus. Many of them are casualties of dysfunctional families and the changing dynamics of the new global economy.

    That the economy has become less friendly to males is a global problem, however. Jacqueline King, of the American Council on Education in her group’s study of lower-income adults in college, discovered that men had a harder time committing to school. They reported feeling isolated and were much worse at seeking out fellow students, study groups, or counsellors to help them adjust.

    Read Also: Tinubu: reforms working, Nigeria now accorded respect globally

    The “protector” and “provider” theories of manhood and fatherhood are continually dismissed as credulous and crude, in a modern world where conservative ideals of masculinity are maligned and fiercely rebuffed.

    On the flip side, females enjoy patronage in crusader education and art. This slanted social complex has been adduced to a venomous leftist orientation.

    Responding to my query on the issue, a staff of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) told me recently, that his organisation ignores Nigerian boys and adult males in its intervention programmes because the government has failed to make provisions for them at the policy level.

    “The Nigerian government and local NGOs do not consider boys and men worthy recipients of any form of intervention,” he lamented.

    It is pleasing to see girls and young women succeed. But it is wrong to neglect boys. This is a sure recipe for disaster, the kind that is happening in real time.

    There is a reason the ritual money credo is embraced by increasing number of boys. The exasperating nature of their lusts, dysfunctional families, poverty, misgovernance and societal corruption amplify their rationale for embracing a creed of cruelty and carnage.

    The situation is aggravated by the frantic fostering and cues from media and literature. Popular culture’s celebration of grotesque and increasingly infantilised versions of masculinity aggravates the malady – from Nollywood’s neurotic man-boys to the bestial and slacker dudes of feminist-misandrist literature.

    But this is a discussion we aren’t ready for.