Category: Thursday

  • EndSARS and Yoruba’s misguided youths

    EndSARS and Yoruba’s misguided youths

    Youths across the nation protesting against police brutality, extra-judicial killings and unfair profiling  embarked on a protest to demand the scrapping of the dreaded SARS outfit in October last year. They also wanted justice for victims of police brutality and a total reform of the Nigerian police force. The protest in Lagos was anchored by Yoruba and Igbo youths. Northern youths however organized a counter protest to denounce the EndSARS protesters in the south. This was followed by public expression of support by their northern governors who insisted SARS was needed because of criminal activities of bandits, kidnappers and cattle rustlers in majority of states in the north.

    One of the first to take to the streets was the 22-year old Rinu Oduala, an activist. Armed with a letter for President Buhari, she and her group had set up a camp outside the Lagos governor’s office In Alausa, Ikeja on October 7, 2020.  Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu demonstrated his solidarity with the youths not just by calling for the disbandment of SARS but by promptly taking the youths’ letter to President Buhari in Abuja.

    While this was going on, another group led by some musicians ignored Ikeja seat of government and Gani Fawemi garden in Ojota where many protests had taken place in the past opting for Lekki toll gate as the epicentre of the EndSARS protest. Although the protest was not against Lagos State, economic activities in the whole of the Lekki axis was paralysed for 12 days the siege on the toll gate lasted. Intervention by the military according to Amnesty International claimed 10 lives, a figure disputed by the military and the state governor who directed those who lost loved ones to present evidence before the judicial tribunal of inquiry set up to look into the youths protests.

    However, following the judicial commissions of inquiry ‘s recommendation that the toll gate be reopened , some aggrieved youths who felt it was ill-timed issued statements threatening to take over the toll gate with the police also  declaring the place a no-go-area for protesters. Some 17 youths including Jay D Boy, a comedian, who dared the police were arrested on Saturday night. Calling attention of journalists to his predicament from inside the Black Maria, he had said he was there “for human rights”, adding “three of my friends were killed here last year. And we are not hearing anything about it.” Many will however argue the right place for such submission is at the on-going tribunal and not the toll gate.

    Lekki, a high-brow area, is a pride of Lagos. The opening up of the area was said to have been initiated by Alhaji Lateef Jakande, governor of Lags State (1979-1983) who died few days ago. But like the Metroline project, derailed by the late President Shehu Shagari and buried by Buhari’s military regime, the project could not start because of funds until the administrations of Tinubu and Fashola. The toll gate, one will assume, was one way of recouping  the huge investments in forms of loans and taxpayers money that have turned Lekki into an exclusive preserve of the wealthy.

    Events have since shown, the obsession with Lekki toll gate by some youths was all part of Lagos State PDP politics. In the heat of the protest, Chief Olabode George, former deputy national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), had called for the dismantling of the Lekki and Ikoyi toll gates at a press conference attended by PDP party chieftains and members.

    And finally his ill-will against Lagos and its current temporary power holders became obvious when he tried to justify the curious choice of Lekki toll gate by a section of the Lagos protesters. According to him “the choice of Lekki toll gate as the epicentre of these legitimate protests was very symbolic about the massive aberrations in the state”, adding for effect: “Lagos was gutted from within and outside”.

    From the above, one can draw a parallel between a telephone conversation of two ill-informed young girls with Bola Tinubu the morning after the military assault on the protesters.  They accused Tinubu of inviting soldiers to shoot protesters at the toll gate because of the losses he was incurring as a result of the toll gate lockdown. The two girls were not convinced by Tinubu’s argument that he was not in government and could not have possibly influenced deployment of soldiers to the toll gate in which he had no personal stake. Curiously, the conversation was aired live by Channels.

    Later that morning, those who tuned to Channels and Arise could observe well-dressed young men leading  mobs to torch business concerns  including TVC and Channels suspected to belong to APC stalwarts in Lagos State. The palace of Oba of Lagos was not spared. So were the Lekki toll gate and many Lagos State’s newly purchased buses. Assets replacement cost for the 12 days siege on Lekki toll gate and destruction of Lagos state assets was put at N1.1 trillion.

    Surprised at the extent of damage to lives and properties in Lagos, chairman of the Southwest governors, Rotimi Akeredolu, said during their visit to Lagos State governor: “We will be right to say Lagos was turned into a war zone. We are deeply concerned with the ease with which public buildings, utilities, police stations and investments of our people have been burnt despite the proximity of security agencies to those areas”.

    It must however be of interest to Nigerians that while TVC and The Nation owned by an APC stalwart were torched by arsonists, Lagos-based media concerns of PDP stalwarts such as Silverbird, AIT, Arise, Daily Independent and Daily SUN were all spared . And with TVC off the air and The Nation off newsstand, it was nothing but a sardonic humour that the narratives and views of the above papers on honour, integrity and patriotism became the dominant view.

    And for the Yoruba youths that joined other groups to destroy Lagos, and their patron, Bode George, whose only known legacy in Yoruba land was selling of public enterprises he and his fellow Yoruba military administrators inherited to non-Yorubas, they must be reminded that Lagos is no more Nigeria’s federal capital city and for her pains in providing for the millions of immigrants, she does not enjoy special federal subvention.

    They must also understand that those driven by forces of competitive federalism to take refuge in Lagos are fortune seekers. They have no stakes in Lagos. And if a proof is needed, it would be recalled the other day when the Oba of Lagos threatened to curse those who would work against the interest of Lagos after making their fortunes in Lagos, not a few groups protested openly.

    Finally, the Yoruba youths must be reminded that the Yoruba nation has paid dearly for waging other peoples wars including supporting the self-actualization quest of some Nigeria middle belt groups who Ahmadu Bello insisted were his great grand-father’s slaves  and the marginalized Ijaw, Efik, Anang and Ibibio minority groups of the old Eastern Region. The elites of the former have since the collapse of the First Republic behaved like slaves until the current revolt by the likes of Theophilus Danjuma; rather than be identified with the Yoruba aspiration, they have always aligned with the Hausa/Fulani of the north.

  • Prodigals’ song

    Prodigals’ song

     

    I will not dare to think that this grave we dig today shall bloom  tomorrow. It could. Nigeria could become the varnished tomb of our dreams, flowering with innards of nationhood and bodies of the poor.

    This is no country for the indigent. A wretched man is a hideous thing, a tattered crow upon our tree but his existence is politically-correct, going by the leadership of the 36 state governors and President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Little wonder they have been unable to commit passion and resources to revivify Nigeria from the grassroots. Many governors currently preside over impoverished states with unexploited consumer markets, untapped potential for commercial agriculture, and under-employed labour pools. Add insecurity to the mix, and you have a perfect picture of their menacing leadership.

    The victims of the Zabarmari massacre, the Buni Yadi Killings, the abducted Chibok girls, the Fagba-Agege bloody riots, and the ethnic crisis at Shasha, in Ibadan, Oyo State, are mostly impoverished. They comprise the hapless millions living below poverty line due to unemployment, comatose industry, infrastructure deficits and policy misadventure.

    In a nutshell, they are victims of government corruption and leadership failure. And our governors, fearful of what fate may befall them if the victims of their failings, should awaken to the truth, have chosen to hoodwink the populace.

    While we must applaud the initiative of the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) for sending Governors Abubakar Bagudu of Kebbi, Abdullahi Ganduje of Kano, Abubakar Bello of Niger, and Bello Matawalle of Zamfara, to visit their counterpart in Oyo, Governor Seyi Makinde, over the Shasha ethnic crisis, it need be said that the riot and killings could have been averted if they had devoted themselves to humane governance.

    Of course, Nigerians do not want war but we know when we are being hustled. By visiting the scenes of mayhem in Ibadan, the governors peddled a fake fantasy of intimacy with the victims and the citizenry at large.

    On their watch, Nigeria has been reduced to a war zone. Our night has murder in the eye, and our noon, murder in the heart; even daybreak drips with blood. One ill begets the other and every tragedy a great deal more.

    The solstice of sanity has sagged, and we have become indiscriminate pawns in the theatre of the absurd. Some would call it our drama of carnage and blood.

    There is “virtue” in the insanity of the rampaging hordes, according to irate segments of our biased divides, but if you dig beneath our sea of grief, you could discover the politics that incite the murderous rage of Boko Haram, the devilry of armed bandits cum killer-herdsmen, and the death and destruction they incite.

    Perhaps you would understand why peace-loving citizens become blood-thirsty brutes and the average human becomes subhuman.

    You could understand too, why the Bauchi State Governor, Bala Mohammed, could say, tongue in cheek, that Fulani herders wield the deadly AK-47 rifle for self-defence because cattle rustlers are attacking them even as he ignores the hundreds of farmers hacked to death across host communities laid siege to by killer-herdsmen.

    You could also understand how Mohammed could fault the quit notice given to Fulani herders in some southern states, particularly Ondo, claiming that the moves of the “southern governors are wrong.”

    The Nigeria of our dream is not the Nigeria of their will. That is why every minute they spend in office manifests like grotesque versions of a gory plot; every day a bizarre tragedy thus we suffer through spells of tumultuous seasons and bloodshed.

    We do not foresee that terrible thing called betrayal. When we get to breaking point, our leaders shall flee to safe houses abroad with their families. We shall not be the ones to receive political asylum from our neighbours in the “First world” because we are the negligible indices in a state of war.

    We shall become the bruises that must be concealed until our sores erupt into blood bursting blisters and lesions.

    Reason and morality shall elude us and we shall actualise the worst versions of every tragedy the world should be done with – in the name of tribe, patriotism, mammon and God.

    We shall watch the deployment of arms to our youth. Having seen too much bloodshed and suffered it, we shall learn to think with the machete and speak with bullets. We shall hound and hack to death, people with whom we lived as neighbours, in-laws and “best friends forever (BFF)”; simply because they are Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa, Itsekiri, Ibibio and so on.

    We shall watch our mothers, daughters and wives get raped to death. They shall become sex slaves to rival militia and ‘comfort women’ to at least four or five of our own tribesmen, at the same time.

    And when they are delivered of the children that no man will father, we shall name the “poor, regrettable products” of our shame Okwuoeimose (War is ugly), Okwoeinata (Not to be told), Okwoba (Red is the colour of war), Enitaiyeko (The one whom the world rejects), Enitan (Child of intrigue); Aiyeteminimowa (I have come to live my own life); Ogunbayoje (War has destroyed our joy) and so forth.

    Our boy-child shall shudder to hold position in the blazing wind, relishing the cold muzzle of an assault rifle over the dullness of a freshly sharpened pencil. Along our deserted sidewalks, within our bombed and cratered streets, we shall avoid and trip over clutters of human bodies and bones decomposing like orange rinds in the dust.

    We shall hunt our journalists, poets and writers to the death; we shall crucify them for luring the world to see the septic belly of our pride even as we export our grief to arouse the sympathy and “support” of our “First world” neighbours.

    We shall turn our plantations into mass graves while we jostle for aid and confer with dying hope in a dark place. Through the sadism of it all, we shall accomplish the separation we love to talk about. The Igbo may have Biafra; the Hausa/Fulani may have Arewa; the Yoruba, Oodua Republic; and the South-south, Niger-Delta Republic.

    Every tribe shall have its nirvana; in those lands of our dreams, the earth shall be fertile but the heat of our greed shall scorch our heaps with the seeds. Our fates will be worse in the dream lands that we seek – whether we like it or not, we shall be led by the same old brutes, and worse, that made Nigeria a living hell.

    We shall grope through the lattices of personal disaster into the ruins of national disaster. We shall wonder how genocide found its perch past corruption and greed, in our hearts  even as we burn and blaze in the name of tribe, mammon and “God.”

    The language of our mayhem shall not be understood by all even as we are enabled and patronized by all. And after our battles have been lost and won, we shall live to dread the pyrrhic prize for which we ruined our lives.

    It’s about time we stopped pounding the drums of war. War, in whatever guise, is never expedient. Yet we who ruin Nigeria are dying to break Nigeria. If we couldn’t love her enough to save her, we shall ruin whatever “Eden” we carve from her.

  • Oduola Osuntokun (Feb. 20, 1921 – Feb. 20, 2021): A centenary – 1

    By Jide Osuntokun

     

    I have had the pleasure to celebrate in prose, the centenaries of Chief Jeremiah Obafemi Awolowo and Samuel Ladoke Akintola at the invitations of their families. I would have liked to do the same for the Rt. Honourable Benjamin Nnamdi Azikiwe if there was a project I could contribute to. Some years ago, even before John Paden was funded by some northern Nigerian elite to write for Hudahuda Publishing House, the biography of the Rt. Honourable Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, first and last prime minister of Nigeria, I was engaged in research to write the prime minister’s biography with title of “A bottled up man” on account of his rather reticent, self-effacing and quiet personality.  This was how the late Ibrahim Tahir, scholar and politician of the 2nd Republic and the author of the book – The last Imam, described Abubakar who was his teacher in an interview I had with him.

    I later wrote the biography of Sir Kashim Ibrahim, Wazzirin Borno and governor of the entire northern Nigeria in 1984. I was not interested in writing about Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto, because I did not want to get embroiled in religious disputation. My readers should note my reference to Dr Azikiwe and Sir Abubakar as Right Honorable gentlemen. That is the correct usage because they were members of the Queen’s Privy Council. I always laugh at the misuse of the term when pompous and ignorant politicians misappropriate the use of the term in reference to themselves including even speakers of state assemblies!

    I had interest in biographies because of the excellent biography of Adolf Hitler with the title of “Adolf Hitler: A study in Tyranny” by Alan Bullock and A.J.P Taylor’s biography of Lord Beaverbrook, the British press lord in 1972. These two intellectuals and Regius professors of modern history at Oxford and Cambridge universities respectively were my heroes. In other words, I have been interested in biographies or biographical essays as intellectual pursuits. But as a ‘philosophical doctor’, is it not inappropriate for me to treat my own relation as it would have been for a medical doctor?

    This is how I feel writing about Chief Oduola Osuntokun.

    I believe it is still necessary to put on record my assessment of the life of Chief Joseph Oduola Osuntokun because he was a major player in the politics of Western Nigeria before and after independence. He was born in Okemesi in colonial Ekiti district on February 20, 1921. It was on a Sunday morning. Even though his parents were Christians, the father had the Christian name of David and the mother Elizabeth, they were not too removed from the traditional belief of prophetic insight by consulting traditional seers who promptly told them that the new baby was the reincarnation of Dada, his father’s grandfather who was a General along the likes of Balogun Fabunmi and Ogedengbe  in the Kiriji war fought against the Ibadan / Oyo forces in the Ekiti Parapo war of 1876 to 1886 which finally ended when the British imposed a pax Britannia on the whole of yorubaland with the defeat of Ilorin in 1893. The meaning attached to this revelation to the young couple was that they should be prepared for a boisterous and eventful time for their new son. This did not come as a surprise because David’s father, Ojo and Agbaje his uncle had followed the martial tradition of the family by fighting for the British against the Germans in their colony of the Cameroons in the First World War.  So they thought the baby Oduola would also end up as a warrior. Before he was born, David in search of glory and fortune had gone to the Gold Coast for some years before returning home with some money to get married.  While in the Gold Coast, he had worked in the Manganese mines in Nsutta and moonshined on weekends as a deacon ministering to mostly Okemesi and Ogbomosho immigrants in the area. He made enough money in the Gold Coast to start trading business employing his younger and older brothers. He was sufficiently comfortable to build a rambling bungalow in Okemesi divided into three flats for his family and his two brothers. As the son of a trader ( Osomalo) the young Oduola followed his parents wherever business took them to in Ekiti towns of Awo, Ikere, Egosi (Ilupeju) Oye and Ilawe. This peripatetic life continued until young Oduola went to Christ School Ado -Ekiti when it was still a Middle school in the 1930s.

    His father had been beaten by the bug of western education by his sojourn in the Gold Coast and was determined to educate all his sons. In those days, educating daughters was not a priority. It was from Christ’s school that the young Oduola gained admission to Saint Andrews College, Oyo during the Second World War years of 1939-45. This college was like the ultimate place those who wanted to be professional teachers went. It was also one of the few places an aspiring young man could go for a decent and relatively cheap education. It was founded, funded and run by the CMS (Anglican Mission). Oduola stood out among the students there. He was young and handsome and very fair in colour taking after his illustrious ancestors who originated from the present day Ajase Ipo in today’s Kwara State. Oduola was the most brilliant student in his class and he was also a great sportsman distinguishing himself as a footballer. He was also very articulate and spoke English as if English was his mother tongue. He was quickly identified to present on weekly basis the account of the battles raging all over the world between the Allied Powers of France, Great Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union and the Axis powers of Germany, Italy and Japan. He was able to gather the news through listening to the BBC and Voice of America radio broadcasts and reading newspapers voraciously. His mastery of the issues so impressed his tutors that they knew he was marked out for great things in the future. It was not clear if he had career expectations himself. But he left Saint Andrews College with flying colours during the war and returned to Christ’s School Ado Ekiti to teach. Christ’s school was by this time a secondary school preparing young people for careers not limited to teaching. There were no African graduates in the place. The few graduates apart from the principal of the school, Reversed Leslie Donald Mason were from Great Britain. The young Oduola was not prepared to play a second fiddle to European teachers in the school and  by private studies,  he prepared  himself for university education through self-help and the generosity of the CMS which got him admitted for a  four-year Bachelors  of Arts course in Economics, Geography and English. He returned to Christ’s School in 1950 armed with a Bachelor’s degree and a Diploma in Public Administration which he studied for as a private student with the University of Durham to which Fourah Bay College In Freetown, Sierra Leone was affiliated.

    It was not just all books and books he buried himself in Freetown; he was also involved in students’ politics and other social activities like ballroom dancing which made him attractive to quite a few female students. His academic performance attracted the attention of his lecturers who advised him to go for higher education in England not knowing he was bonded to return to Nigeria to serve the CMS in any of their institutions. He of course  in 1950, returned to Christ’s School Ado Ekiti where he was immediately designated senior tutor as the only Nigerian graduate on the staff .On his return, he met most of his colleagues he left behind still teaching as “certificated teachers .” Even though this did not put a distance between him and them, it strained the relationship. Soon one after the other, his colleagues who were much older than him either went to Fourah Bay College or to the new University of Ibadan which opened to students in 1948. He was later to enjoy meteoric rise in public life because of the accident of history of being the second graduate in Ekiti and his dynamic drive and amiable personality and his physical handsomeness or what Muhammad Ali the famous American boxer called beauty while describing himself. He inherited his good looks from his father. I remember Ambassador Lawrence  Fabunmi introducing me to one of his colleagues sometimes in 1970 by saying I was the son of one of the most handsome men he had met in reference to David Osuntokun, Oduola’s  father.

    While in Fourah Bay College, he had imbibed some of the radical nationalist views of Wallace Johnson about “Africa for the Africans’’ that were sweeping the black world from America, the Caribbean to West Africa. This nationalist tendency soon affected his relations with the white staff of Christ’s School although not to the extent of affecting his pedagogical duties. He was also influenced by some of the writings of Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe popularized by his string of newspapers led by the ‘West African Pilot’ with the motto of “Show the way and the people will follow”. Most young men of his time were decidedly anti-imperialist and could not wait to liquidate the British Empire.

  • The ‘diplomatic’ soldiers

    The ‘diplomatic’ soldiers

    By Lawal Ogienagbon

    The only surprise will be if they are not confirmed. That is what will draw a gasp from the people. “Haa, so the Senate can find the courage not to confirm them”, many will mutter. But do not bet on it. Take it from me: they will be confirmed and in record time too. The nomination of the immediate past Service Chiefs as non-career ambassadors may have surprised Nigerians, but their confirmation, which to me is a given, considering the kind of Senate we have, will not. Anybody who  thinks that the Senate will reject their nomination has another think coming.

    I do not say this to disparage the ‘distinguished’ senators; I say it because I know them very well and what they can do or not do. So, ‘take a bow and go’ Gen Abayomi Olonisakin (former Chief of Defence Staff), Lt Gen Tukur Buratai (former Chief of Army Staff), Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (former Chief of Naval Staff) and Air Marshal Sadique Abubakar (former Chief of Air Staff). The Senate may not put it the way I have, that is,’take a bow ….’, that trite phrase with which certain class of ministerial nominees are allowed to pass through its hallowed chambers without being grilled, but it will not ask them probing questions to determine their suitability for the job.

    If it were to be a people’s Senate, the military brass would be run through the mill before they are confirmed. Their confirmation is going to be a walk in the park and the Presidency is already working towards that. The military chiefs are a hard sell. To many Nigerians, they did not give a good account of themselves for the almost six years that they held office.  Under their watch, the insurgency war dragged and dragged. At every turn, they claimed that Boko Haram had been ‘technically defeated’, but each time, the insurgents gave a lie to those claims by invading military formations,  farms, schools and houses to wreak havoc. Then, they would say it is an asymmetry war that cannot be fought the conventional way!

    It got to a point that the people became fed up with them and demanded that they be removed. In the past three years, no day passed without such demands, but President Muhammadu Buhari ignored the clamour. As if we did not know, his aides said the prerogative to retain or remove them was the President’s. Of course, if that was not the case, the people would not have called on him to remove them, they would have done so since, without recourse to him. The military chiefs were in office for that long because the President tolerated them. Under another president,  they would not have stayed in office one day longer than necessary and that would have been over four years ago.

    This is why Nigerians are shocked that the military chiefs are coming back as non-career ambassadors. What qualifies them for the job? It cannot be their performance as Service Chiefs. No matter what some of them are saying now, they too know that they did not perform. So, what did the President see in them to make them ambassadors? Is he giving them the appointment, as some are saying, to shield them from prosecution by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes? If they failed as Service Chiefs, is it on the unfamiliar terrain of diplomacy that they will succeed? Are there no other Nigerians that can do the job?

    What form of compensation is this? What message is the President passing across? The President has made the appointment in exercise of his executive power, but it is left to the Senate to determine their suitability for the golden parachutes given them. Can the Senate be trusted to do a thorough job of screening them? That is the problem. The Senate, which on two or so occasions, resolved that the military chiefs be removed because of their handling of the insurgency war, now has the opportunity to walk the talk. It should demand from them an account of their last mission and seek to know what they can offer on the diplomatic circuit.

    The President cannot seek to make diplomatic soldiers out of the Service Chiefs despite their shortcoming while in office, without those that should ask questions like the Senate, lifting a finger. This is why in a democracy like ours,  there are checks and balances. The nation must be sure that its best are being sent out there, whether as career or non-career ambassadors, and it is the Senate’s job to ensure that this is so. Will it be diligent in its duty or just rubber-stamp the President’s request?

     

    BUA vs CACOVID

    BUSINESSMEN do things in their own way. One thing they are very good at, is shocking people by catching them unawares. Call it a business trick  and you may not be wrong. Businessmen are eternally in competition with one another. They only see eye to eye when their interests do not clash. Once, there is a clash in interests, it is war and they use everything at their disposal to fight. To help the government in the fight against COVID-19, the private sector in collaboration with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) went into partnership to provide succour for the vulnerable. The private sector-driven Coalition Against COVID-19 (CACOVID) built and equipped isolation centres across the country, bought ambulances and  Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for frontline workers. It did all these from donations by its well-heeled members.

    The house that CACOVID built is developing cracks and this is unfortunate. It all has to do with the donation of vaccine for public use. Vaccine is a big deal in the treatment and prevention of Coronavirus because it is expensive and somewhat scarce for now. Only the rich can afford it and some of them have been travelling out to get the jab. What is causing the tiff in CACOVID is the purchase of one million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine by BUA Group. The firm, which is a member of CACOVID,  plans to buy additional four million doses, according to its promoter,  Samad Rabiu. The vaccine will be given free to Nigerians. For the public, this is cheery news. But it is not being celebrated within the larger CACOVID family.

    CACOVID has distanced itself from the BUA vaccine, saying the firm alone could not buy it. The vaccine, CACOVID said, would be bought collectively through an arrangement with CBN and Afreximbank, which is headed by a Nigerian, Prof Benedict Oramah. BUA procured the vaccine through Afreximbank. So, why the wahala? Whether the vaccine was bought jointly or severally should not lead to quarrel. What should bother CACOVID is the genuineness of the vaccine. If the vaccine is genuine, why not take it from the donor, which in this case is BUA? Must a body like CACOVID allow extraneous matters affect the good work it is doing? Whether the vaccine is from BUA or CACOVID, as a family, it does not matter. They are supposed to work together, not at cross purposes.

  • Akeredolu versus the herdsmen

    Akeredolu versus the herdsmen

    By Jide Oluwajuyitan

    To be sure, the herdsmen had acquired a notoriety for mindless killings that earned them an unsavoury reputation as the fourth most deadly terrorist group in the world long before Buhari became president.  But there is no doubt the irresolute deportment of President Buhari on whose desk the buck stops contributed to the arrogance and unconscionable language of Miyetti Allah and emboldened the criminal elements among the herdsmen to carry their deadly trade of kidnapping, banditry and killing of innocent farmers to the southwest region after sacking and confiscating farmlands of victims who were reduced to candidates for IDP camps in the middle belt region.

    In a December 2018 report titled “Harvest of death, three years of bloody clashes between farmers and herders”, Amnesty International claims over 2000 Nigerians were killed in 2018 alone because “the authority’s lethargy has  allowed impunity to flourish and the killings to spread to many parts of the country inflicting greater sufferings on communities who already live in constant fear of the next attack”.

    Not much has changed. Many Nigerians now believe government’s apparent indifference or inadequate response to the activities of unrepentant killer herdsmen poses greater threat to the survival of our nation as resorting to self-help tactics by aggrieved groups could lead to chaos, anarchy and civil war. Those who however swear by the president’s patriotism and integrity put the blame squarely in the court of the president’s ‘loyal gate-keepers’  who  appear to shield him from knowing the truth by trading in insults, ethnic stereotyping and sometimes outright lies.

    With periodic harvests of death inflicted on Benue people by herdsmen expelled for not obeying the state rules, Governor Samuel Ortom last week took the battle to the president’s loyal gatekeepers. He urged them to tell the president that all is not well with Benue State and indeed the rest of the country where kidnapping, raping and killing have become the mainstay of many communities.

    Wole Soyinka who, while not supporting self-help approach of some individuals believes the war  was brought to the door steps of the Yoruba people  who want to live in dignity and not as slaves in their own land, challenged the president to publicly denounce the herdsmen, Miyetti Allah and those fraudulently using his name as Saint Christopher’s barge for good luck while engaging in  banditry, kidnapping, murder and illegal occupation of other peoples land. So far, it has been a deafening silence from the president.

    Mindless killings of farmers and some prominent indigenes of Igangan and the whole of the Oke Ogun area  by suspected Fulani herdsmen have been going on since 2015.  The killer herdsmen are believed to be shielded by Seriki Fulani, Alhaji Saliu Abdul Kadiri,  the godfather of  migrant herdsmen and who according to governor Makinde’s  special adviser on security, also doubles as chief ransom negotiator  in many kidnap cases. The indigenes insist that most of the kidnappers disappear into the Seriki’s sprawling enclave while the police treat him with kid gloves after each report.  Failure of government forced Sunday Adeyemo and his groups to react the only way they knew – self-help.

    On their part, the people of Ondo State have had enough of criminal herdsmen who after each act of violence against the people disappear into Ondo forest reserve they illegally occupied. The state governor hearkening to the cries of his people, ordered the vacation of reserve forest and an end to open grazing in the state. He also took the first step in bringing sanity to his state by ordering those who want to live and do business of cattle grazing in his state to register.  I am sure governors of Kebbi and Jigawa and Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) who were with Akeredolu at the meeting anchored by Nigeria Governors’ Forum would readily admit that no Ondo indigene can convert any of the parks in their state to living quarters or other people’s land into rice-farm without permission or registration of their businesses with government.

    Besides kidnapping and destruction of farm and farm products, for Ondo State, there is much more at stake.  For instance, while following the 2007 Nigerian Conservation Foundation  recommendation, the state stopped logging, hunting, farming and human settlement on the 829 km2  Oluwa Forest Reserve whose 40 per cent  natural forest harbours elephants and chimpanzees, rampaging herdsmen with respect for neither law nor authority had no regard for forest bio-diversity. Neither they nor their cows similarly recognized the Idanre Forest Reserve designated ‘nature reserve’ by International Union of Conservation of Nature and its elephants and chimpanzees habitats.

    The  Osse River Park, formerly known as Ifon Forest Reserve established through a 1951 Gazette for the protection of Wild Game such as many wildlife species recognised by many international treaties and conventions including the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species was similarly not spared.

    The way forward is for the governments of Southwest to clear its forest of all herdsmen including those that take delight in nocturnal grazing. They must be made to key into modern pastoral practices as obtains elsewhere in the world. Experience from the middle belt has shown that as long as there are vestiges of herdsmen left behind, unforgiving Fulani who lust over other people’s land will always invite diaspora Fulani to visit violence on those who refused to be driven from their land. Governor Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna not too long ago confirmed those visiting violence on southern Kaduna farmers are trans-border Fulani immigrants. The besieged farmers of Igangan in Ibarapa part of Oyo also recently accused  the Seriki Fulani in the area  of inviting trans-border herdsmen through Benin Republic.

    Southwest governors whose citizens like Epicureans consume 10,000 head of cows every day should pull resources together or take part of the federal government surplus RUGA fund to establish ranches that should  be run as a public enterprise just as Awolowo’s administration did in the first republic. Herdsmen who are ready to embrace modernity should be encouraged to buy into the business.

    Those who however insist open grazing is part of Fulani culture including Miyyeti Allah and  Shehu Garba , the president spokesman who also doubles as  herdsmen’s spokesman  are at liberty to condemn children of the poor among them to nine months in the  Kebbi and Jigawa forests or  Zamfara and  Runka reserve forests established  in 1919 by the British colonial regime and later converted  into a grazing reserve to prevent seasonal migration of pastoral Fulani from north to south and vice versa.

    A former PDP chairman now APC chieftain while celebrating his 70th birthday last week narrated how the north encourages influx of Fulani immigrants from the Sahel region into the country during elections. This perhaps explains why most of those who kill, kidnap and rape in the north and now in the southwest are hardly found to face justice after their heinous crimes.

    Governor Akeredolu has started well. If we intend to seriously address the problem of insecurity, states must register her citizens and those they host. It is hoped those serving other tendencies in President Buhari’s government who after rejecting state and local policing  derailed Fashola’s first initiative will not sabotage Akeredolu’s current efforts but have it replicated in all the states.

  • Public opinion as barometer of democratic governance

    Public opinion as barometer of democratic governance

    By Jide Osuntokun

     

    Democracy is not just periodic elections, independence of the judiciary, separation of powers, freedom of expression including freedom of the press, free political association  necessary  for the formation of political parties, freedom of belief guaranteeing a secular state, protection against arbitrary executive actions including freedom from  arbitrary arrests and above all respect for public opinion. The idea of public opinion may prove difficult to define because the question may be asked as to what constitutes public opinion and what are the parameters for defining an opinion as public opinion and not the opinion of the articulate elite or the opinion of the unelected intelligentsia as found in the press, amongst the academia and political parties?

    Even though political power in a democratic state proceeds from electoral victory which depends on numbers of votes won, nevertheless, what determines political victory may be the result of public opinion which in most instances is articulated by the intelligentsia which is then consumed by the generality of the people sometimes without the people knowing the origin of whatever opinion they hold which then influences their voting preference in spite of their political party affiliation.

    In advanced democracies governments that go against public opinion are eventually defeated at the polls. The recent defeat in the United States of President Donald J. Trump is an example of a man who went against decent public opinion which he denigrated as “fake news” or liberal opinion or the “deep state”. In spite of whatever he said, it was still possible to mobilize the public against him even in an ideologically divided United States. In an essentially conservative country like Great Britain, a non performing government of whatever hue will fall when public opinion is against it. It is only in in dictatorship of the Left or Right that governments ignore public opinion because they know they are not accountable to the people. This is why in democracies, opinion polls are keenly watched to gauge the popularity of policies or of the governments themselves.

    Opinion polls can sometimes go wrong but it is only a foolish leader in a democracy that would totally ignore opinion polls. In culturally plural countries, public opinion may be difficult to gauge whereas in culturally homogeneous countries public opinion is not vitiated by religion or ethnicity or even ideology. This does not mean public opinion is monolithic. There will always be aberrant opinion that would challenge what seems to be the general tendency in a country.

    In a country like Nigeria with its plurality of nations and ethnicities and religions, what seems to be public opinion may lie in the ear of the hearer. What seems to be public opinion in the south may not be subscribed to by compatriots in the north of the country. In other words, the force of public opinion is eroded by the power of ethnicity and religion. In the recent past of our country, public opinion was very strong in favour of the removal of the service chiefs of the military for their apparent non-performance. Non-performance was of course measured by the military’s inability to defeat the Boko Haram insurgents and to curb the wide spread terrorism that is enveloping the country as seen in the rampaging campaign of the Bororo Fulani herders against farmers all over Nigeria. Public opinion in this particular occasion was uniquely national because there was opposition to their staying in office by newspapers, organized labour, religious leaders in the Church and the Mosque, representatives of the people in the House of Representatives and the Senate as well as by the court of governors in Nigeria. It seems only President Buhari and those beholden to him in the executive that continued to keep quiet in the face of stiff opposition to their remaining in their commands.

    In spite of this unanimity of public opinion against the continuation in office of the service chiefs in Nigeria which is very rare, the president refused to bend to public opinion until the bitter end. Some may argue that the president and the security people around him have access to information that the people who influence public opinion may not have access to. It can also be argued that government cannot be run on the basis of public opinion which is sometimes shifting but any government which does not pay attention to public opinion will certainly not be successful.

    In Africa including Nigeria, an unpopular government can force itself on the people through rigged elections but to what end and for what purpose and for how long? In the case of the removal of the service chiefs, Buhari to rub salt to the wound and festering sore of Nigeria, sent their names to the Senate to be confirmed as ambassadors!

    I consider this as total rejection of public opinion. Is it that the president has no advisers that can tell him this is not a wise decision? Can’t the retired service chiefs do the president and Nigeria and even themselves a favour of saying no to his offer? Unless these people are sent to such places like Russia, China and the Philippines where their rulers do not care for public opinion, their appointments may be rejected by proposed host countries. On this particular issue of non-career ambassadors, President Buhari is going against established tradition of not having more non career political  ambassadors than career ones.

    I remember that the Presidential Advisory Council on International Affairs headed by Chief Emeka Anyaoku from 2000 to 2015 on which I served with five other Nigerian experts advised government to make career ambassadors 75 % and non-career political ambassadors 25% in our foreign representation. It seems the Buhari government is bent on putting the recommendations on its head by loading our foreign representation with non-professional diplomats.

    The same week he made the former military leaders putative ambassadors, he also approved the establishment of 20 new private universities in the country bringing up their number to 99. This action has drawn the ire of ASUU and NANS representatives of staff and students of Nigerian universities. Thank God his government did not follow the Jonathan overnight establishments of 12 federal government universities without planning about staff and funding.

    Of course we have witnessed clandestine establishment of army, navy and transportation universities during this regime. I am sure the police university is on its way. What a joke of a country! Who is going to teach in all these universities? Where will the staff come from?

    Certainly not from abroad; it is not likely foreign professors will like to come to Nigeria to earn less than $1000 a month! This proliferation of universities will lead to the watering down of the quality of university education and the turning out of half-baked unemployable graduates which will then fuel youth unemployment and consequent insecurity. The good thing is that many of the private universities will fold up in the course of time because of inability of the founders to fund them adequately. This is already happening and I know a few of them that are at the last gasp of death.

    The most serious non-payment of attention to public cry and opinion is on the question of insecurity in the country. This is unfortunately an existential problem unless quickly and frontally tackled. In the last three years or so, there have been on-going conflicts between herders and peasant farmers because the bororo herders insist on foraging on farm crops cultivated by the sweat, tears and blood of farmers. Some of these herders according to President Buhari are foreigners. This is evidenced by the fact that some of them speak French, the official language of our neighbours in Chad, Niger, Benin and as far afield as the completely devastated Central African Republic where there is an on-going war between Fulani-led rebels and the government. Some of these herders claim they have taken to terrorism and brigandage because their cattle have been stolen by cattle rustlers. But the truth is that these brigands and terrorists are fighting a territorial war in Benue, Plateau, Adamawa, Taraba, Southern Kaduna, Zamfara, Nassarawa and even in Katsina. These conflicts have now moved to the south where the same territorial tendencies of not only foraging on farm crops but now occupying forests have reared up their ugly heads.

    There is a national opinion calling on the federal government to deploy security forces to curb the rampaging onslaught of the Fulani herders on farmers. This is what the president swore to do when he took over the reins of government from President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015. It is either the government is unwilling or incapable of guaranteeing security to its people. The result of this is that people may take to self-help and what then will become the fate of this unfortunate country when we engage in a war of all against all?

    It is obvious from the examples I have given above that we cannot boldly say we have a government of the people by the people for the people when the president ignores all pleas to him to take action to protect the hapless, hopeless and helpless people of this country. It seems to me that we are all living on borrowed time.

  • Ethnic to the bones

    Ethnic to the bones

    By Olatunji Ololade

     

    The soul of Nigerian politics is ethnic. Thus every time you see a politician or public officer advocate for a de-ethnicised social space in the mathematics of economic and political resources, you must identify him as a fraud. A desperate, soulless conman.

    He is both a product and vector of toxic altruism, a system of thought that cloaks cunning and subterfuge under the thick veil of patriotism, in a cutthroat jostle for political and socioeconomic resources.

    We are all ethnic to the bones. Every global citizen is first an ethnic national. It is a cardinal prerequisite of identification, racial and class taxonomy – irrespective of wishful academic and political soundbites. Thus the oft detailed profiling of migrants, expatriates, settlers and indigenes of host communities.

    Ethnicity depicts relationships among Nigeria’s ethnic groups and by it self, it poses no severe threat to nationhood and development. Its seeds and harvests are appreciable in the late Premier of the Western Region, Obafemi Awolowo’s monumental strides at improving the fortunes of the southwest via visionary education social and industrial policies.

    On the contrary, where it is weaponised as ethnicism against perceived aliens or outsiders, it destabilises the polity and hinders progress.

    I am first an ethnic citizen and then, a Nigerian. I can’t be one without the other. We all channel ethnic citizenship as the underbelly of our nationality.

    But we must be just, humane, tolerant and respectful of other ethnic nationals with whom we comprise the country. Politicians, however, profess ethnicism as inverse patriotism, especially where their interests are best served. This is selfish.

    Consider, for instance, the methodical puppeteering of southwest governors by their northern counterparts. The northern members of the Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF) knew the best way to control their southern comrades was to accord them a semblance of authority, by letting one of them occupy the forum’s uppermost seat.

    It makes it easier to control them, among other measures taken to keep the southeast, southsouth and southwest perpetual strange bedfellows in a wedlock of status, resource and material spoils.

    The chairman of the NGF may parade conditioned authority and independence in reaching a decision, but in truth, he is simply a sounding board for his superior governor and liege lord from the north. It’s a crafty form of tokenism and ethnic bigotry.

    At the backdrop subsists fierce politics within the NGF. Yet through the fog of influence and frantic politicking, the NGF hazarded a ban of night and free-range grazing, underage herding, and herders’ illegal occupation of state forest reserves.

    The NGF’s meeting with some stakeholders in Akure, Ondo State, though atrociously prejudiced, is a feeble but first step at ridding Nigeria of killer-herdsmen crisis.

    It need be acknowledged too, that the Kano State governor, Abdullahi Ganduje’s call for the enactment of a law to ban movement of cattle from the north to other parts of the country, stressing that this would resolve incessant clashes between farmers and herders is right on the mark.

    Predictably, Ganduje has attracted flak for his position; he is under intense pressure to issue a recant but the governor has chosen to stay his ground.

    “Go and read his submissions. He is suggesting a permanent solution to the problem and some people are complaining, and you ask me if he is worried. Over what? He is not moved. He is building RUGA here in Kano. If herdsmen continue to go to Lagos and Saki, who will stay in the RUGA here? That is just the simple explanation you need,” a close ally of the governor told The Nation’s Sentry on Wednesday.

    Ganduje’s position is no doubt a honest take on the killer-herdsmen crisis amid  the tantrums of presidential aides, and shady politicking by compromised governors of affected states in particular.

    Some governors have condemned Sunday Adeyemo aka Sunday Igboho’s ultimatum to herders in unmistakable terms. But if Igboho’s recourse is deemed inciting, he is only enriching the anarchy doled across the country by murderous herdsmen and  their enablers in public offices. Of course, it is dangerous to let such persist, especially in a country ‘ruled’ by a self-serving political class.

    There is no gainsaying Igboho’s rising profile across grassroots and middle class divides causes the governors sleepless nights. Consequently, they are forced to act out of character, in the citizenry’s interests.

    By placing a ban on open grazing, underage and night herding, and illegal occupation of state forest reserves, the governors have applied sheabutter on political lupus. They have done nothing to neuter its cause.

    Some of Nigeria's ethnic nationalities
    Some of Nigeria’s ethnic nationalities

    Government must address widespread poverty, end insecurity, and restore confidence in the country’s corrupt government tiers and organs of governance.

    Curiously, the presidency and governors’ endgame is the reintroduction of the Rural Grazing Area (RUGA) as solution to the recurring conflict between nomadic herders and farmers. In time, they will urge the people to accept the scheme that they initially rejected.

    However, it would be foolhardy for governors of states afflicted by killer-herdsmen to connive with unpatriotic elements in the presidency, their liege lords in the NGF, and herdsmen to impose RUGA in the southwest using inverse-bullying tactics.

    In a few weeks, their plot will manifest. They will tell bereaved communities to forget their human and material losses to the killer-herdsmen, and urge them to accept RUGA to forestall future losses.

    “You better accept RUGA now before the herdsmen come back to kill you all. Remember, Sunday Igboho won’t relocate to live with you and protect you,” their agents will subtly threaten.

    In an ideal situation, where the presidency is truly humane and representative of the interests of all sections of the country, the RUGA scheme may be welcomed by interested communities. It mustn’t be imposed upon them.

    But having done more to polarise the citizenry than unite them, the incumbent government flirts with disaster by proposing the RUGA scheme in Nigeria’s southwest, without addressing the grievances, social and economic woes inflicted by herdsmen on prospective host communities.

    In an ideal situation, a Sunday Igboho wouldn’t assume the role of an accidental leader or defender of the Yoruba.

    An ideal situation would produce neither the killer-herdsmen nor  defensive measures by  afflicted communities.

    In an ideal situation, state governors would rise to the challenges of governance, guaranteeing security of lives and property in their domains.

    They would understand that they are public servants and not power hungry, tyrannical overlords ruling over conquered territories.

    In an ideal situation, governors would allow greater autonomy of local government; they wouldn’t stifle the third tier of government by denying it funding crucial to grassroots development.

    Governors, in an ideal situation, would initiate visionary and viable agricultural, industrial schemes as necessary cushions and pivots for medium and small scale enterprises.

    In an ideal situation, governors would initiate pro-citizenry economic empowerment schemes to prevent recruitment of idle youths into the devil’s terror workshop.

    But we haven’t an ideal situation. We are a nation stuck in a dysfunctional system, presided over by an insentient, self-serving political class.

  • Against anarchy

    Against anarchy

    By Olatunji Ololade

     

    The Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF) regards anti-herdsmen dissent as a repulsive social fiction. The dissenters, in turn, scoff at the governors’ pompous hierarchy, labelling it insensate and a scourge to consciousness.

    Thus in the wake of political actor, Sunday Adeyemo aka Sunday Igboho’s ultimatum to killer-herdsmen, it was a given that governors and politicians would startle from inertia.

    Suddenly, Oyo governor, Rotimi Makinde, stopped seeing himself as a People’s Democratic Party (PDP) governor, but as an entitled comrade of the NGF, a co-runner of Nigeria’s political space.

    By threatening to arrest Igboho, Makinde was speaking for all the other governors, who feel very threatened by Igboho’s militant recourse against the killer-herdsmen’s murderous sprees across the southwest.

    The governors, who were hitherto unperturbed, have resorted to face-saving, power preservation stunts. They will not let Igboho steal their thunder. They are threatened by his raucous storms.

    Their fears are understandable; if a northern muscle like the Coalition of Northern Groups (CNG) should retaliate by re-enacting its 30-day ultimatum (issued in July 2019) to southerners to vacate the north except they accept the RUGA ranching scheme, the situation could aggravate and cause Nigeria to implode. If that should happen, new demagogues would emerge – dangerous and untameable. Some governors will be consumed by the resultant carnage. Their money, positions, and powers would be taken from them, and the NGF will lose relevance.

    If Igboho was hitherto a minion or negligible gadfly among the populace, Makinde and the NGF have lionised him. Scared silly, the governors scurried to meet with representatives of the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) in Akure, Ondo State to defuse the crisis.

    Yet they conveniently ignored their duplicity in leaving out of the deliberation, crucial actors in the conflict, that is, the victims of killer-herdsmen’s murderous quests.

    The southwest governors have been faulted as spineless and too eager to curry the favour of the presidency and their ‘superior comrades’ from the north who ordered the meeting.

    “Sit! Stand! Run! Speak! Keep shut! Good boys!” ordered their northern counterparts and handlers at the presidency, with a chuckle perhaps.

    In a conflict, it is the duty of the umpire to facilitate an equal representation of all concerned parties; the governors could never claim to adequately represent or speak for the victims, given the huge gap that they have painstakingly created between their offices and the people whose mandate they earned or stole to emerge as governors.

    However, the southwest governors were only being expedient. In a communique read by the NGF chairman and Ekiti governor, Kayode Fayemi, at the forum’s meeting in Akure, the stakeholders agreed to ban night and free-range grazing, underage herding, and herders’ occupation of state forest reserves describing these as illegal.

    Fayemi clarified that herdsmen were not asked to vacate Ondo State as Governor Rotimi Akeredolu did not order the Fulani to leave the state, stressing that, ”The area concerned is the forest reserves and it is about registration and also to work in line with the law. What we are after are the criminals, not Fulani herdsmen. Criminals are criminals irrespective of their ethnic group.”

    He said the meeting was conveyed to find lasting solutions to the incessant killings, kidnapping, and crises between herdsmen and farmers in the southwest, and urged states to reduce criminalities by creating economic opportunities for the people.

    I agree with Fayemi but I must question as I did in a previous piece, the prevailing political system, and its constitutional pitfalls. While most governors and politicians pay lip-service to fiscal integrity, accountability, patriotism and true federalism, very few among them actually walk their talk.

    Governors and deputy governors are entitled to N2,223,705 and N2,112,214 as annual salaries, states the Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) but there are numerous allowances, including the controversial security vote not reflected in the figures.

    Thus very few individuals, less than 50 in number to be precise, cost over 196 million Nigerians hundreds of billions of naira, every year, as salaries and other allowances for serving as governors.

    Lest we forget the NGF’s troubling clamour for increased security votes; security votes are opaque corruption-prone security funding mechanisms, drawn monthly from the federal purse to fund fictive security expenses that have been widely criticised as fuelling corruption, since its deployments are never made public and unaccounted for.

    These secretive, unaccounted-for outlays add up to an estimated $670 million (N241.2 billion) annually, according to Transparency International (TI). The international watchdog’s recent estimate, published in September 2018, revealed that the 36 governors spend $670m (N241bn) yearly on security votes which are not subject to audit or legislative oversight.

    In just one year, these off-budget expenditures add up to over nine times the amount of US security assistance to Nigeria and the total amount of counterterrorism support the UK promised to give Nigeria by 2020.

    Amid the begrimed imagery, some governors covet frivolities, like a frantic and unjustifiable lust to construct airports between states that are less than an hour’s drive from each other, like Lagos and Ogun.

    Funding and efforts wasted on such initiatives could be committed to building good roads, water and rail systems, and actual crime-fighting.

    The legend subsists of an ex-governor of Ogun State, who at the expiration of his tenure, contacted the state’s Police Commissioner, confessing that he had thousands of arms and millions of ammunition in-store at a secret armoury in the Government House, and that he had decided to hand them over to the police.

    The police boss raced to the Government House with subordinates, and on arrival, the governor reportedly surrendered about four million rounds of ammunition, 1,000 units of AK47 assault rifles, 1,000 units of bulletproof vests, and an armoured personnel carrier (APC).

    The truckloads of arms and ammunition would have served the police in fighting off killer-herdsmen perpetually prowling the state’s fringes but the governor kept them in his nondescript armoury, claiming he procured them to check the widespread insecurity in his state of less than five million residents.

    This is no doubt instructive about what an average member of the NGF would do for ‘security’ reasons.

    It’s about time the NGF discarded the serpent desires of power and belly, and seek realistic solutions to the states’ security and development challenges.

    Beyond some governors’ hysteric pursuit of unearned clout and their presidential ambitions; beyond their lust to construct airports and embark on borrowing sprees, they could commit passion and resources to re-energise their states from the grassroots.

    Many NGF members currently preside over impoverished states with unexploited consumer markets, untapped potential for commercial agriculture, and under-employed labour pools.

    It’s about time they imaginatively engaged the grassroots, federal, and state-level actors in driving the economy, combating insecurity, and addressing post-conflict needs.

    It’s instructive to note that no governor in the NGF enjoys a cult following save the Governor of Borno, Babagana Umara Zulum. None of them has successfully started a political movement driven by a ‘game-changing’ ideology.

    None has initiated a development programme or policy that truly addresses and resolves social, human crises at the grassroots.

    None of them enjoys widespread love and goodwill among the citizenry. And none of them has built a name that would outlive him.

  • Buhari vs. elites

    Buhari vs. elites

    By

     

    President Buhari had while on a visit to Katsina on January 20, accused Nigerian elites of harassing his person and administration without taking into consideration the serious crisis of nation-building he inherited in 2015 and his heroic efforts at addressing them these past five years. Before this, he had on December 12, 2020 during the graduation ceremony of 78 participants of the Senior Executive Course 42 of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), blamed the elite for the nation’s intractable social-political problems.

    Playing the victim, the president  wondered why the elite  would not acknowledge  his efforts at rehabilitating our collapsed infrastructures including roads, rail lines health facilities and  providing monies to the states to clear backlog of unpaid salaries by states piled up by his predecessors at a time the nation was selling a barrel of crude oil for over $100. If they were not impressed by that, how about his government plan to lift  100million out of poverty in 10 years which took off with N30,000 grants for taxi, bus, okada, Keke Napep, Uber, Bolt drivers, and cart pushers across the country?

    I don’t think the president needs to lose sleep over elites’ opposition to his government. A journey through memory will clearly show the elites, because of their greed, intrigue and conspiracy against Nigeria, have always been the scourge of the nation. The bitterness that accompanied their struggle for elective position in the 1920s was what probably forced Oliver Stanley to conclude that “through the greater part of the colonial empire, it is the British presence alone that has prevented a disastrous disintegration and the British withdrawal today would mean for millions, a descent into turmoil of warring sects”.

    Many of the nationalists were also believed to have been driven not by altruism but by personal ambition and were prepared to set Nigerian ethnic nationalities against each other in other in the pursuit of power. It was also perhaps for this reason Hugh Clifford, the then Nigerian Governor-general in an address to the Nigerian Council on December 1920 articulated a British policy designed to produce a ‘regional government that secures for each separate people, the right to maintain its identity, its individuality and its nationality and its own chosen form of government which have been evolved for it by the wisdom and by the accumulated experiences of generation of its forbearers’.

    On his part, Chief Obafemi Awolowo observed as far back as 1945 that “given an option to choose between our educated elite, the traditional rulers and the colonial masters, Nigerians would choose in reverse order”.

    The constitutional success the nation achieved between 1914 and 1958 was therefore in spite of the Nigerian educated elite for whom democracy was just a means to an end.  It was therefore not a surprise the new value system collapsed in less than five years of independence.

    And little lesson was learnt as the elite regrouped in the fourth republic under what John Campbell, a former US ambassador to Nigeria described as, a “cartel with no ideological or programmatic basis but as essentially a club of elite for sharing oil rents and political spoils” who in the name of election, between 1999 and 2015, reduced Nigerians to periodic participants in a selection ritual of those a British court also described as “thieves in state houses’.

    It was the same elite who according to BPE’s one-time chairman, Nasir El Rufai, that presided over the sale of Unipetrol, AP/National oil, Ashaka Cement, WAPCO, CCNN, BCC, Calabar Cement, Capital Hotel, Abuja Sheraton, and FESTAC 77. Others include Ikoyi residential houses, Tafawa Balewa Square, Ikoyi Federal Secretariat, 1004 residential flats, Abuja legislators’ residential quarters, vice president’s guest houses, senate president’s residence, etc. to their cronies who had access to state resources at 0.5% of $100b government invested on these public enterprises between 1970 -1979.  Lawan, the committee chairman, speaking on the killing of Daily Times which he said was ‘one bad example of privatization” concluded that “In most cases, most of our enterprises were dashed out”.

    Unfortunately, President  Buhari still does not realize that it was because of elite betrayal Nigerians saw  a messiah  in him; that the  northern poor (talakawas) massively voted  for him in spite of his de-marketing by the northern establishment  who said he was not ‘pure Fulani’ and the  southwest that led a crusade to remove him from office because of his human right abuses during his first coming as a military head of state  also supported him believing he was better placed to resolve our political problems.

    The Southwest was not alone. Late Maitama Yusuf Sule, two-time minister and former Nigerian Permanent Representative to the United Nations also shared those sentiments. At the head of the northern leaders delegation to congratulate him on his victory in 2015, he had described him as “a great Nigerian nationalistic compatriot…It is the same Buhari that gave Nigeria a sense of direction when he was a military leader, this time around I’m sure Allah has brought him to correct the ills of the past, to reform”.

    In power, President Buhari who listens only to himself also pretends he knows what Nigerians want without asking them. He is committed to rehabilitation of roads even when motorists for fear of kidnappers dare not drive through them.

    What Nigerians, who understand very clearly that lack of elite consensus, corruption and infrastructural decays are but symptoms of a dysfunctional political system want is solution to their political problems made intractable by political, economic and military elite, the main beneficiaries of the nation’s nightmare. As Kwame Nkrumah put it “first seek the kingdom of politics, every other thing will follow.

    Majority of federating nationalities want state and community policing to protect themselves from rampaging herders. The polluted oil producing Niger Delta that can no more support fishing or farming and whose resources are being used to build bridges over land in Abuja want justice.  Lagos with the same population as Kano and Jigawa that whimsically allocated over 80 LGAs as against her own 20 wants justice. The Kogi and Kwara Yoruba which constitute about four per cent of the northern population want to join their kith and kin in the southwest.

    In an age of competitive federalism driven by market forces, while it is perfectly normal for Lagos, the fifth biggest economy in Africa to attract immigrant from even across West Africa, the state must be able to take control of those who live within her territory including thousands of non-Nigerian okada riders

    Justice is the foundation of peace. Justice rather than guns, bombings and other forms of violence has better prospect of ending banditry, kidnapping and insurgency.

    The late Nigeria elder statesman, Maitama Yusuf Sule believed resolution of our political crisis through institutionalization of justice is a task not beyond President Buhari.  “With justice”, he had told him, “you can rule Nigeria well, justice is the key. “If you are going to judge between two people, do justice irrespective of the tribe, religion or even political inclination. Justice must be done to whosoever deserves it.”

    President Buhari still has two years to decide whether he wants to be remembered as a statesman or as an ethnic irredentist.

  • Makinde and the Ibarapa conundrum

    Makinde and the Ibarapa conundrum

    By Lawal Ogienagbon

     

    WHAT is happening in Oyo State should be of concen to every well-meaning person. The government, it seems, does not appreciate the enormity of the problem. If it does, it will be more serious in tackling the issue. As it is, it believes it is one of those problems over which you make some noise here and there and it blows away. It is more than that. What we are seeing in the Ibarapa communities of Oyo State is a crisis of monumental proportion which must be tackled frontally and the rootcause removed.

    A war is brewing in Ibarapa. That war can be averted if the government is tactful in its handling of the feud between the villagers, who are mostly farmers, and the herders. The herders are settlers in Ibarapa, where they have lived for hundreds of years. Many of them know only that place as home and they have lived peacefully with the villagers until something broke. What broke? Is it trust? Is it a business deal gone awry? What is not in doubt is that peace has since broken down in that area.

    The absence of peace has led to a breakdown of law and order, resulting in killings, maiming, raping and kidnapping. All these are said to be perpetrated by herders. Why would herders take to kidnapping? That’s the question. Is it that it is more lucrative than cattle rearing? Is kidnapping such an easy task that people can just take to and start making money from it to the knowledge of those who know them well? Something just does not add up about what is happening in Ibarapa, especially in Igangan where Sunday Adeyemo aka SundayIgboho had to come in for a rescue job on January 22.

    Since he stormed Igangan to flush out those he described as “criminal herders who have been killing my people” the town has not been the same again. Igangan has since become a reference point in the farmers/herders clash in the southwest. What the nation is experiencing in Oyo is similar to what happened in Makurdi, Benue  State, not too long ago. Then, almost on a daily basis, herders were invading farms with their cattle,  destroying crops and killing people. Governor Samuel Ortom moved swiftly to check the herders’ atrocities. Lawmakers in the House of Assembly, who saw the clear and present danger in what was happening were on the same page with him. They quickly passed the anti-open grazing law.

    Under the law, it is an offence to take cattle about to graze on people’s farms. Although, the herders are not comfortable with the law, they have no choice than to comply  with it. Most often, they do so in the breach,  but the law is being applied to put them in check. Sadly, the same cannot be said of Oyo State, where Governor Seyi Makinde keeps talking, without acting with the utmost dispatch required to address the problem. His soft touch approach is not helping matters. He needs to be tough because a drastic situation requires a drastic action. Being tough does not mean that he hates the herders or does not want them in Oyo. That would be missing the point.

    He needs to be tough so that they would know that what they are doing is not good. It has been said times without number that not all the herders are bad. What he needs do is to sift the bad from the good for there to be peace in Ibarapa. If he continues to hold to its postulation that you do not resolve criminality with criminality,  which is a way of saying the problem is beyond him, he would leave the people with no choice than to resort to self help. This has already happened, with the emergence of Sunday Igboho. The problem in that is that the crisis may snowball into an ethnic war, which some of the herders are secretly wishing for. By his action, Igboho has woken the government from its slumber. The government should take things up from where he stopped and bring back the herders and farmers in Ibarapa as brothers.

    It can still be done. But first,  the government must check the growing menace of an herder, described as Iskilu Wakili, who is said to be making life difficult for Ibarapa people. The government cannot be talking of peace and people like him will be involved in quite the opposite. Wakili, according to a report in this paper on Monday, has mounted a ‘no-cross zone’ on some farms in Ibarapa. Consequently, people can no longer go to their farms. Those who dare to do so know the consequences of their action. Two brothers were said to have been shot when they attempted to cross the forbidden zone, which is designated with a red flag. How can an individual become so powerful as to stop others from going about their lawful businesses.

    This is the same area that Makinde visited last weekend in the search for peace. No individual can be more powerful than government. No matter how connected an individual may be, his friends in power should let him know that government is for all and that they would do everything to protect the country and uphold the right of everyone to life and peaceful assembly. Makinde wants peace, but the way he is going about it is not helping matters. The herders are cashing in on his meekness to wreak havoc, but presenting a peaceful face to him. What is happening in Ibarapa does not show that the herders are sincere in their desire for peaceful co-existence with others.

    Wakili or whoever he is, is overstepping his boundary and he should be called to other. He should stop his inciting actions which could lead to a war of attrition. Enough of bloodshed in Ibarapa. If the community,  with the help of Igboho, drove the Sarkin Fulani out of the place because of these same atrocities, why should Wakili be allowed to engage in such evils? The earlier Makinde steps in to stop Wakili’s excesses, the better for the community. How can a settler become an overlord in another man’s land? This is the question on the lips of Ibarapa people.

    Tony Momoh (1939 – 2021)

     

    Tony Momoh
    Tony Momoh

    IT was at Anthony Village, Lagos, in 1990 that I first met Prince Tony Momoh. Then, he had just completed his tenure as Minister of Information in the Babaginda regime. I was in the law office of the late Chief Fola Akinrinsola when Momoh sauntered in. He was also a lawyer. Right from the reception,  we knew that “Chief” as I called the late Akinrinsola had an important visitor. His booming voice rang into Chief’s office as he demanded from the secretary: “is your oga around?” Without waiting for an answer, he moved on. Chief met him at the door and taunted him: “you this Auchi man you don come be that. Meet your boy, Lawal”. Good afternoon, sir, I greeted him and he looked at me for a long time before responding. Momoh was a journalist’s journalist, who went through the whole gamut of journalism. Subediting, reporting,  feature writing, proofreading, production and editing. He was also a trainer of journalists as pioneer head of the Times Newspaper training school. His death, last Monday, is a huge loss to journalism. May he find rest in the Lord’s bosom.