Category: Thursday

  • Gate across the Niger

     

     

    IN politics, interests only count, not friendship,  not kinship. Once interests clash, friends become sworn political enemies. In the 1960s, one political coinage that people fell in love with was “handshake across the Niger”.

    It was a statement to mark the political marriage between the East and the North. In this sad era of COVID-19, that seemingly uniting political statement is being thrown into River Niger, from which it got its name.

    To stop people from flocking into Anambra State and importing COVID-19 there, Governor Willie Obiano erected a gate at the foot of  the bridge in Onitsha.

    Is such a barricade needed? You do not kill a fly with a sledgehammer. What the gate is meant to do, security agents will do better, if properly mobilised.

    Eventually, that gate will go after COVID-19 abates, but some people would have smiled to the bank. So, why waste money on the project?

    You know what, the resources used in erecting the gate would have been more than enough to cater for security agents to curb the influx of people into the state.

  • A virtual anniversary

    A virtual anniversary

    Lawal  Ogienagbon

     

    HINGS will never be the same again. Life after the novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will be unlike what it was before the pandemic.

    The pandemic has upturned everything in the world. Businesses are in shred,  economies are in a shambles and nations are in tatters. The virus has dealt the world a blow that nobody foresaw.

    Powerful nationshave been rendered weak in the face of a tiny but invisible  virus. The super powers are tottering like a ship buffeted at sea, while the not so super ones are at a loss over what to do.

    The latter are looking up to the former, which are also in a quandary for help. The situation is precarious as people continue to die from the virus which seems not in a hurry to go.

    The developing countries have been copying all they do in the developed world to tackle the scourge without taking into consideration the peculiarities of their own nations.  Of course,  some solutions remain constant and these are the guidelines to prevent the spread of the virus.

    To avoid the spread of the disease, many meetings and social events have either been postponed or cancelled. In the wake of the virulent virus, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) suspended its weekly meetings held at the State House, Abuja, for four weeks in the first instance last March 23.

    The top class felt the fury of COVID-19 when the President’s Chief of Staff (CoS), Mallam Abba Kyari, caught the virus and died last month.

    FEC resumed sitting on May 13, adopting the social distancing rule. The meeting was conducted via Zoom, the online application which allows people to meet without everybody being physically present at the venue.

    All around the world, Zoom is now the way to go. This was something hitherto unheard of. In the past, meetings were postponed because all the participants could not make it to the venue.

    It never crossed anybody’s mind that such meetings could be held online using  Zoom or Skype.

    Coronavirus has  opened our eyes to a technological wonder which is at our fingertips but which we never knew existed until circumstances beyond our control forced it on us.

    Gathered at the Council Chamber for the first virtual meeting, were President Muhammadu Buhari, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) Boss Mustapha, the new CoS, Prof Ibrahim Gambari, and ministers who had memo to present.

    Gambari whose appointment was subject of media speculation that same May 13 was formally “unveiled” at the meeting. His appointment was the first business of the day at the meeting.

    Gambari is coming on board as the Buhari administration marks the first anniversary of its second and final term of four years.

    The anniversary comes up tomorrow. All in all, the administration is marking its fifth year in office,  having been reelected for another four-year term last year.

    Despite the discontent against it, the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led government won the 2019 election. It was not an easy fight as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) tried to cash in on the nation’s mood then to return to power.

    The Buhari administration may not have been outstanding in its first term,  its second term which first anniversary comes up tomorrow presents it with a great opportunity to redeem itself before the people.

    Read Also: How the booming demand for Zoom is changing our virtual world

     

    Nigerians have been denied an opportunity to assess the administration based on its performance in the past year because ministers did not present their scorecard.

    Virtually,  all the ministers seem to be busy today at the Presidential Task Force (PTF) on COVID-19. If they are not featuring at the PTF daily briefing in Abuja, they are busy talking to people at their respective ministries, on the dangers posed by COVID-19 or commissioning projects such as walk-through disinfection machines.

    It is as if the world must wait for us because we are battling COVID-19. In other words, the business of government today begins and ends with the COVID-19 campaign.

    Since there is a committee on COVID-19 led by the SGF, ministers, at least those not on the PTF, should face their job squarely.

    Governance should not grind to a halt because the government is fighting COVID-19. Nigeria is not the only country in the world doing that.

    In the past, when anniversaries like this were at hand, the respective ministries lined up to brief the media on their achievements in the year under review.

    The event was usually coordinated by the Federal Ministry of Information. With that  ministry now busy with the PTF, nothing stops the other ministries from taking up this job on their own, especially as they have press and public affairs units.

    For none of the ministers to have showcased their achievements in the past year shows how much regard they have for the people.

    The war against COVID-19 should not be an excuse for not giving an account of stewardship by those who hold public office.

    If FEC could hold virtual meetings, nothing stops the ministries from doing same in order to let the people know what they have done in the past year.

    For now, we can only hazard a guess on what some of the ministries are doing or have done.

    The government cannot earn the people’s trust for keeping quiet under the guise of fighting COVID-19. It will rather distance itself from them by its action.

    To the people, it might have kept quiet because it has nothing to say or show as its achievements in the last 12 months.

    Sooner or later, COVID-19 will go, but the issues of governance will remain. What then will the government showcase as its achievements?

  • Gambari has his job clearly cut out

    Gambari has his job clearly cut out

    By Jide Oluwajuyitan

    Ibrahim Gambari, Nigeria’s former permanent representative to the United Nations (UN) and a former foreign minister (1984-85) last week replaced the late Abba Kyari pas President Buhari’s chief of staff.  He promised to serve the president to the best of his ability by offering him his “loyalty, competence and support”.

    Both Gambari and Kyari to whom he narrowly lost the position in 2015 share the same world view with President Buhari. The only difference perhaps is in approach. The president had described his late chief of staff as ‘a loyal gate keeper’. Gambari, was no less a loyal gate keeper because although shut out of the presidency after losing the contest,  he unofficially remained part of President Buhari’s administration, using his wide contacts in the diplomatic community and the media to launder the image of a president which was continuously under assault as a result of the selfish interest of those that caged him.

    I suspect it was out of frustration Professor Ganbari called me early in March 2015 to discuss the piece titled “President Buhari needs help” published on March 3, that year. He had said his attention was drawn to the piece by Professor George Obiozor, the former Nigerian ambassador to the United States. All through the discussion, he kept on repeating why it was necessary to bring the piece to the attention of the president. I had wondered after the discussion why Professor Gambari needed to inform anyone before passing an opinion he considered helpful to the president. The answers we now know lies in Abba Kyari’s gate-keeping style which did not preclude shutting-out even those who carried Buhari on their back on his way to the presidency.

    The main thrust of the piece that close to a year after Nigerians vengefully voted out Jonathan who was never really in charge and his government of ‘delegation by abdication’, as against governance, what Nigerians saw was “creeping dictatorship and offensive indolence from a government of a party dominated by young and vibrant intellectuals; that some self-serving northern elite who love neither Nigeria nor Buhari were trying to make a Leviathan out of Buhari; that ‘as against a think tank, Buhari like all oligarchs, surrounded himself with short-sighted people who are more interested in protecting what they think the north is currently benefiting from our federation; that modern government is a science and democracy is a game of consensus and compromise where delegation without abdication has been found to be more productive than centralization which produces nothing but paralysis”. And finally, the piece reminded the president that he would need more than “integrity and honesty, virtues which were not enough to win him the presidency during his first three attempts to become a successful president”.

    Very little has changed. Many of these observations are as true today as they were five years ago. The good news however is that Gambari, having spent all his life proffering solutions to crisis of primordial attachment and feeling of group identity among warring nations, has his job clearly cut out for him. He is uniquely placed to help Buhari change the course of history.

    First, Gambari understands communication is critical to the political process. Buhari is not a Leviathan or an Emir but the servants of the people having been democratically elected. ‘The master’, Jesus, the greatest social crusader said ‘must become the servant’. President Buhari must speak to defend his position on any issue. That is the only way to earn legitimacy in a democracy.

    Let us remind Professor Gambari where communication would have made a difference. Some seasons ago, Fulani herdsmen from Loco and Doma in Nasarawa State ‘in combat gears, armed with AK-47 rifles, were said to have invaded several villages and farm settlements from Aila to Obagaji, Akwu to Odejo, gunning down children, women, men and the elderly leading to about 400 deaths. Paul Ede, who led the coalition of protesting civil society groups to the National Assembly claimed the invaders after chasing out about 7000 farmers and their families from their homes, took over the villages with their 5000 cows, a development the state police commissioner also confirmed.

    In his own intervention, retired General Theophilus Danjuma, former Minister of Defence described what is “happening in Taraba and other states as ethnic cleansing “which needed to be stopped if we are to prevent the nation from the fate of Somalia”. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar in a statement had argued that: “Labeling the attackers as Fulani is wrong. Fulani people are peaceful and live in harmony with other ethnicities. To call the killer herdsmen Fulani was according to him, was a misnomer”. Supporting him, Governor Nasir El Rufai of Kaduna told us that killer herdsmen were “non-Nigerian Fulani from Niger, Mali, Chad and other such places”. Long before this, Fulani herdsmen, had been rated by Global Terrorism Index as the fourth deadliest terrorist group in the world, coming after Boko Haram, ISIS and Al-Shabab. Of course, the perception in the absence of a coherent response from government was that the president was protecting his Fulani kinsmen.

    In democracy and even in dictatorship, public opinion is everything. And   because government is built around people’s sentiments, leaders can only ignore public opinion at their own peril. As Abraham Lincoln, the 16th American president, warned: “Public sentiments is everything. With it nothing can fail. Against it nothing can succeed. Whoever moulds public sentiments goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces judicial decisions”. Our history is full of relics of those who ignored public opinion. Gowon ignored the general sentiments of Nigerians about 1976 as the handover date by the military and became marooned in Britain where he joined fresh undergraduates to queue for food. Buhari despite his crusade for a better Nigeria, ended up in prison in 1985. Babangida who exploited public opinion to secure power moved from disaster to disaster after rejecting the popular sentiments of Nigerians.

    Professor Gambari from his works at the UN knows that social dislocations in the world are caused by social injustice. Nigeria has been haunted by a spectre of injustice since 1962.This is why an angry Pa Ayo Adebanjo has been consistent in his demand for a restructured Nigeria  with a federal constitution which he said was the agreement reached by our founding fathers and sanctioned by the colonialists in London in 1954 and implemented in 1960. He has been unequivocal as to what his people want out of Nigeria: “autonomy, within Nigeria as an independent entity, self-sustained but not subservient to any part in a true federation.”

    Besides ethnic representatives such as Pa Ayo Adebanjo of Afenifere, Prof Nwabueze and General Theophilus Danjuma , other eminent Nigerians such as Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka, who served 30 months in detention during the civil war, Emeka Anyaoku, former secretary general of Commonwealth of Nations, Balarabe Musa, ex- governor of old Kaduna State have asked for a restructured Nigeria, an intervention President Buhari dismissed as “those involved in loose talk”.

    Gambari is uniquely placed to let those who kept on insisting ‘Nigerian unity is not negotiable’ understand they constitute a greater threat to the unity of the country.

    Finally, as against those who study the President’s body language before acting, Gambari is uniquely placed to remind him of Maitama Sule’s 2015 admonition: “You are a Nigerian with sense of justice and fair play; Do justice to us, do justice to them and do justice to everyone…With justice you can rule Nigeria well. Power remains in the hand of infidel if he is fair but not in the hand of a believer if he is unfair.”

  • When comes the cure?

    When comes the cure?

    Lawal Ogienagbon

    IN the search for the ravaging Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic cure,  the world seems to have put all its eggs in one basket. It is focusing on only one part of the globe to  get the yet elusive cure. Thus, people from Europe, America, Asia and the Middle East have come to see it as their divine right to proffer solution to the problem.

    They conveniently forget that the pigmentation of one’s skin has nothing to do with his mental capability.  We were created with different gifts, notwithstanding the complexion of our skin. Though seen as inferior by many of their White counterparts, Blacks are no pushovers in the world of knowledge.

    Pride is at stake in the search for COVID-19 cure. It is because of this pride that the developed countries believe that the cure can only come from them. Europe and America have been doing all they can, but so far their efforts have not yielded result. The cheery news though, is that some 120 drugs are undergoing clinical trials.

    While foreign scientists  are still battling to find the magic COVID-19 drug, some countries in Africa appear to be ahead of them. Although these African made drugs might not have undergone the kind of elaborate clinical tests approved by the World Health Organisation (WHO), they have been administered on patients and  some of them got well.

    The most popular of these drugs is the Madagascan therapy known as Covid-Organics (CVO). This reporter has always believed that the race for COVID-19 cure will not be for the swift nor the most intelligent. Many other factors, such as the continent you come from,  your country’s per capita income and its role in international affairs will come into play. This is unfolding already, with the way WHO has been bellowing that no known cure has been found for COVID-19

    This reporter warned in this space last April 9 in an article titled: Human guinea pigs! that our scientists should make their voices heard in this raging debate for COVID-19 cure.

    In the olden days,  our forefathers had their own way of treating themselves.  They passed down the roots and herbs they used to us, but what have we done with them? We discarded them and embraced civilisation. We became addicted to western ways of doing things and forswore the roots and herbs that we inherited.

    In their time, our forebears would have used these God given leaves, herbs and roots that abound in Africa to fight the virus. These herbs and roots which we now so much disdain because of foreign influence will eventually form the bedrock of the eventual magic cure for COVID-19.

    No matter how WHO perceives the claims from Madagascar and other African nations, they are worth looking into. Something good may yet come out of them despite the single fatality just recorded  in Madagascar. With a population of nearly 200 million,  Nigeria has the human capital to develop a cure for the virus. Is it not a shame that Madagascar, a country of only over 27 million people, is sending us its home-made COVID-19 cure at only a asking price of €170,000 (about N78.2million)?

    As I mentioned last month, even though, many have lived to tell their COVID-19 stories, how they overcame the disease seems to be shrouded in secrecy. It is still so today, except for Bauchi State Governor Bala Muhammed  and former presidential aide Dr Doyin Okupe, among a few, who opened up on how they were treated. They also told the world some of the drugs they took. Before them, Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde and University College Hospital (UCH) Chief Medical Director Prof Jesse Otegbayo relived how they used herbs, chloroquine, among other drugs, while undergoing treatment for the virus.

    The Presidential Task Force (PTF) on COVID-19 is not happy that these survivors have been talking about the drugs that cured them. The task force is worried that this may encourage people to embark on self medication. Really? Many Nigerians did not start self medication today and it is not what they hear from these survivors that will push them into it now. Let’s be frank, how many of the PTF members can thump their chests and say they never tried self medication before?

    What should be of paramount interest to PTF is how to use what worked for these survivors to get a local cure for COVID-19. It should not wait for WHO to do that, but that is not to say it should not carry the global watchdog along in whatever it does. It is not enough for PTF to be parroting WHO’s refrain that “no specific cure” has been found for COVID-19. It may take time to get a specific one-drug cure-all for the virus. And the reason is not farfetched.

    The scare-mongering, mostly from official and related quarters, is troubling. All we are bombarded with is “it has no cure”. Then, how come some people are surviving it? WHO is more interested in looking for a “specific cure” because the disease is not like say Ebola, SARS (Severe Accute Respiratory Syndrome) or MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome), other strains of Coronavirus which predated COVID-19,  that doctors know exactly what to look for when treating a patient.

    COVID-19 has overwhelmed the world. WHO is at its wit’s end. Nothing best captures its concerns than its statement  that COVID-19 may never abate. WHO’s Executive Director, Emergencies Programme Michael Ryan declared unequivocally: “it is important to put this on the table; this virus may become another endemic virus in our communities and this virus may never go away… I think it is important that we are realistic. I do not think anyone can predict when or if this disease will disappear. This disease may settle into a long problem or it may not”.

    With that coming from WHO, we should be prepared for a long drawn battle.  While Nigeria joins the world in the search for the cure, we should also look inwards in seeking a local therapy for the virus. Nigeria should be spearheading such campaigns in Africa, but we have allowed smaller nations to seize that initiative. We have been following the WHO template blindly that we forgot to rally our scientists and traditional and complementary health practitioners to look for the cure.

    What next for Nigeria after taking the stock from Madagascar? This batch is said to be a gift. Despite what has happened in Madagascar, we should not look the gift horse (read as drugs) in the mouth. What this shows is that we should not wait on anyone for the solutions to every problem, whether economic, social or medical. If herbs can work for our forebears in the past, they can still do the same trick today.

    If our scientists do not make their voices heard now, their foreign counterparts will come up with series of experimental drugs on COVID-19, using our herbs, leaves and roots as formula. In that circumstance, our continent becomes the ultimate loser because we pointed to our father’s house with the wrong finger.

  • Life and livelihood in time of Covid-19 pandemic

    Life and livelihood in time of Covid-19 pandemic

    Jide Osuntokun

    There is a heated debate about when it is safe to lift the lockdown imposed on several countries including Nigeria caused by the novel coronavirus. This is because the people the various governments in the world are trying to protect are protesting against the lockdowns which are denying them their means of livelihood. This is particularly severe in the United States where close to 35 million people, that is about 10% of the country ‘s population, have been thrown out of their jobs following the lockdown of the economy. In Nigeria where in the best of times, there is massive unemployment and where millions of people particularly in the urban centres survive on hustling and daily paid jobs, there is already some kind of urban disquiet if not outright rebellion. Our people are not taking kindly to any policy, however well-intentioned, that would deny them the means of economic survival. The upshot of this is the growing divide between the knowledge elite and the ordinary and not so ordinary people about the correct way to deal with the problem caused by the coronavirus. The elite and upper middle class, armed with their technological gizmos can work from their homes and their children can also study online, but the vast majority of the people even in the developed world do not have the luxury  of  their homes being wired up for the new world of working and studying from home. Even some of the elite are complaining of boredom and lack of concentration because of their restless children who demand attention while their parents are “working” from home. The sea change in lifestyle imposed suddenly on people is creating serious domestic problems erupting into domestic violence in the gun-crazy United States and in other places where husbands are running away from their children and wives!

    This situation is now being exploited by rival politicians in the Western world particularly in the United States where some people are glibly saying the medicine is killing the patients. President Donald J. Trump has weaponized the issue to suit his campaign for re-election in November. He has been fuelling the growing rebellion against governors, who to protect their people, have locked down their states. Trump has been calling for the people of such states to liberate their states as if the governors were their enemies holding them in bondage. The presidential call has been sweet music in the ears of those on the lunatic fringe who in the case of Michigan State invaded the local parliament with blazing guns and bazookas. The fear of violence and the serious dent on the local economies of the states have forced most of the states in America to partially or totally open their states for business. The most populous states like New York and California have been blackmailed into opening certain sectors and areas of their states to business. The argument over the appropriateness of the time to open up has been marred by the politics of presidential election in November. President Trump is accusing the Democrats who control such populous and strategic states as New York, Illinois and California of shutting down their states to portray him in bad light in order to facilitate the election of his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden. Even in countries where there are no elections, politicians have turned the new coronavirus pandemic into convenient political games. In Southeast Asian countries of Korea, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand which have escaped from the deleterious impact of the viral pandemic, business have opened up more or less. European countries just coming out of its serious impact have also been following suit. All this is making it difficult to have a rational discussion of what measures to take to confront this serious medical problem.

    Right from the beginning of the viral onslaught, the Scandinavian country of Sweden refused to close down its schools and to lockdown its economy. This is on the grounds that doing so may create unintended consequences such as mental problems arising from unemployment and lack of money and claustrophobia for the home-bound children. There have however been more fatalities in Sweden than in neighbouring states of Denmark, Norway and Finland which took opposite direction by locking down their states. The economy of Sweden is however not as damaged as those of her neighbours. This however is not a conclusive evidence of the appropriateness of the Swedish model. The British and the Russians which prevaricated for sometimes have now suffered horrendous fatalities compared to the quick response of Germany which immediately locked down the country at the first news of the coronavirus pandemic.

    People are now asking whether the impact of this viral pandemic outbreak has been exaggerated by the media or not. Up to now, about 315,000 souls have been lost globally which is still a fraction of a global population of over six billion people and less than the number of those who died in Nigeria from the Spanish influenza of 1918-1919. This relatively small figure may be due to the lockdown of the global economy. The loss of one soul is of course regretted. During the influenza outbreak of 1918 -1919, the number of those killed ranged between 30 million and 50 million in the world. Every year the number of people who die from flu in the United States alone from October to May is in the region of   between 25,000 and 62,000. This is despite the availability of flu shots. This is why many rational people are beginning to say the world may have to live with this Covid-19 just as it is living with flu virus, Ebola virus and HIV and other viral diseases. The vaccines that are eagerly expected will hopefully temper the seriousness of future outbreak of Covid-19. This sounds cruel but it is a realistic way out.

    In Nigeria the outbreak of this viral pandemic should be a call for action. The African continent has largely been spared of the horror of this plague at least for now. This is the time to put our house in order. When I was young, we had one or more infectious diseases hospitals in the old Western Nigeria. It is now obvious that each state needs a more sophisticated infectious and viral diseases hospital with modern equipment and therapeutic facilities. We really need to reorganize our health practice through a compulsory and strengthening of whatever putative health insurance that we have. We need to so organize our medical practice around the concept of each person reporting to his family’s doctor who will keep his or her record and the kind of treatment he or she is receiving. General hospitals will therefore not be the first port of call every sick person will report to. The teaching hospitals at the apex of the medical architecture will therefore remain teaching and referral hospitals for serious ailments. If Cuba, the small Caribbean island can provide medical cover for all its people, I see no reason why we cannot do the same in our much-abused and misgoverned country. If this lumbering behemoth of a country cannot and would not do what is in its interest, shouldn’t we take a second look at the structure of the country that is militating against optimal performance?

    The time has come when we have to put on our thinking caps and re-examine the policy of lockdown which, I dare say, is not being obeyed in most parts of the country except by force. We need to educate our people about the need for hygiene and cleanliness and the need to wash our hands as well as not sneezing and coughing on each other and spitting in the public. While on this, we cannot ask people to wash their hands without providing tap water in public places. We need to modernize our markets away from the present bedlam where people are literally falling on each other to shop for what to eat. The government must seriously begin to intervene in the economy to create jobs and if needs be, move out of the urban squalor into agricultural settlements, jobless miscreants roaming about the streets making the job of creating clean environment near impossible. The current situation of hustling for a living in the urban areas is not sustainable and should be discouraged. Our people should not have to choose between death from hunger or coronavirus. People should be able to work and maintain all the protocols against coronavirus such as physical distancing, isolation of infected persons, hand washing and medical consultation.

  • The city is our plague

    The city is our plague

    By Olatunji Ololade 

    The Nigerian city achieves epic sweep. But it is superfluous to the country. That is why economic activities in most cities got grounded in the wake of COVID-19 as if industry and metropolis didn’t matter – ask the Curmudgeon in his attic.

    The same could hardly be said of the countryside; as the pandemic persists, so does its rural economy. Yet cities parasitise the labour of the countryside; they sponge off rural sweat for ponds of sheen, and Nigerians wade through the lustre, bewitched. Cities charm residents. They turn citizens into metro pets and auspicious leaders into silhouettes.

    Cities deify sponge bobs but like Virgil would say, fortunate is the man who has come to know the gods of the countryside. Such a man, I would say, must have wandered its groves before its roads became too dangerous to traverse. Before cash crops and wildflowers were decimated by herdsmen and their ruck; before bucolic treasures frothed with pesticides and fishes floated belly-up in Ewekoro and the oil creeks.

    Cities don’t produce food. They depend on the countryside to provide it. Save their food distribution systems, cities can quarantine, shut-in, and shut-down, so long as the countryside doesn’t, the Curmudgeon would chirp.

    True. A deeper look at our fate through the pandemic reveals how worthless the Nigerian city is, with its parade of glitz and chug-chug of industry. But for the country’s agricultural economy, Nigeria would starve.

    Were he clairvoyant, President Muhammadu Buhari would commit more vigorously to improving the agricultural economy. While his administration makes a great show of doing that, its federal pronouncements and gazetted schemes may become self-impeding calcifications, in time.

    The ongoing agricultural revitalisation, for instance, stifles by its magnification of tropes as truth, and slogans as change theory. Ask its touted and supposed beneficiaries. It’s all slick insentient theatre, majorly.

    Perhaps the problem is not with the city; after all, what are cities but manufactured monoliths? City institutions, symbolised by government and industry, are built to serve individuals.  Depending on the quality of leadership, however, their impersonal walls may deafen to the farmer’s cry and street sweeper’s sigh.

    Of course, the Anchor Borrowers Programme (ABP), the Presidential Fertiliser Initiative (PFI), shutting the land borders against import and smuggling, and other protectionist policies are admirable in their mixed blessings but the skyscraper, big business, drone technology, and glorified slums become Nigeria’s face: abstract, mechanical, lifeless.

    It takes a tremendous degree of lifelessness for corporate and government-fabricated Edens to thrive amid hedges of state shanties cum low-cost housing schemes and countrified dystopia.

    It will be said of this administration too, that it found Nigeria a land of promise and rendered her promiscuous, if President Buhari fails to curtail the countryside’s ravage by the city.

    The city unfurls as a plague; it is diseased because its sensuality is both morbid and commercial. It’s hidden graces unclad, like the proverbial harlot, self-exiled from the village but always returning under cover of night to stalk and prey the countryside.

    Cities do nothing for the countryside. Knowing this, Buhari announced his decision to resurrect the country by endowing its peasant, agricultural economy with remarkable fillips. He proceeded to do this, forgetting that his team and tools, like Thel’s worms, are corrupt pathogen miming his change mantra.

    Buhari must understand that his government cannot achieve agricultural boon simply by pronouncing passion to resources. He must thoroughly examine if resources are pronounced to his passion.

    Agreed, the picture was grim pre-Buhari. At his arrival, he boosted productivity via such schemes as the PFI by which he supplied farmers with discounted fertilisers. At his intervention, fertilisers became available to farmers at ¦ 5,500 per bag, a significant cut from the ¦ 9,000 per bag initial regime. And to provide peasant farmers access to credit, the ABP was established. Between 2015 and 2018, ¦ 174 billion was reportedly disbursed to about one million farmers. The total repayment as at the end of 2018 stood at ¦ 21 billion. No thanks to corruption.

    Buhari’s agricultural initiatives look good on paper but there is a lack of clarity on their actual impact on the economy. Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Muhammad Sabo Nanono, recently stated that the Federal Government has concluded plans to distribute over 10,000 tractors, valued at N150 million each, and inputs as soft loans to farmers in the 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Nigeria, to be repaid in an 11-year plan.

    “What we need is that the beneficiaries must be genuine farmers and indigenes of the participating Local Government Councils,” he said, thus venting a major snag to the initiative. Asides debate on the cost of each tractor, ethnic bigotries, and administrative inefficiency may pose major bottlenecks to the initiative.

    Recently, the government’s rice production initiative birthed Lake Rice but the scheme hasn’t attained the widespread success and cumulative impact anticipated of it. Nanono, however, enthuses that Nigeria will be a rice exporter by 2021 because of the border closure. But a border closure won’t resolve infrastructure deficits of recurrent power outage, bad roads, and inadequate storage facilities. It won’t eliminate governance shortfalls of bureaucracy, corruption, and overlapping responsibilities among the three tiers of government. It won’t resolve policy confusion, like a constantly shifting list of items that are prohibited from being imported.

    To truly improve the fortunes of the agricultural sector, government must eliminate the structural impediments of unreliable power supply, dilapidated irrigation systems, overcrowded ports, and poor roads. For example, it takes an average of six to eight days to move a truckload of tomatoes along the country’s main transport corridor, from Jibiya in the far north to Lagos in the southwest. Unless the cargo is refrigerated—and invariably it is not—it will perish before reaching Lagos port.

    There are hopes, however, that the ongoing rail transportation venture would eliminate the challenges associated with transportation.

    At the moment, poverty has risen in Nigeria with almost 82.9 million people living on less than one United States dollar per day, according to a National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) May 2020 report. The figure represents 40.09 percent of the total population, excluding insurgency-ravaged Borno, and the bureau predicted that this rising trend is likely to continue.

    According to the report, 52.10 per cent of rural dwellers are living in poverty while the poverty rate in urban centres is 18.04 per cent. But going by the UN’s definition of extreme poverty as a condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education, and information, 82.9 million is a highly conservative estimate.

    Yet government assails the citizenry and its global audience with fantastic stories of growth and agricultural rebirth. So doing, Nigeria rejects the strife of contraries by which its innards convulse.

    At the outbreak of COVID-19, Nigeria’s fabled artifice ended in hysterical retreat, as the country leapt from her tinsel perch and dashed, shrieking, back to her native valleys.

    What was hitherto regarded as an underprivileged fetish, or a peasant preserve, has become the nation’s major source of sustenance and rebirth. Nigeria weeps but does not recognise her own tears.

     

  • Ignorance is the disease

    Ignorance is the disease

    Olatunji Ololade

     

    MATERIALISM has failed the world over. Compulsive philistines and prescient think-thanks attack grievous social problems- mostly self-inflicted – with paper bullets. They are peashooters trying to collapse Gibraltar.

    In Nigeria, however, we see combustive ‘change’ pulse with lust and self-interest among political personae. But the electorate does not know better. They fall for the same ruse, repeatedly.

    Both politicians and electorates are caught in a familiar cycle of political cannibalism, often enacted by characters, who attack and retreat in obsessive rhythms of victory and defeat.

    The electorate has Sappho’s fever thus their suicidal instinct to self-destruct by recycling familiar tormentors in the public office via the ballot box. They have caught Olohun Iyo’s bug hence they sway to the melody of supernal choirs, and vanish to the lure of infernal conductors – or sweet-tongued politicians if you like.

    The politics of domination by deceit, violence, and deep pockets is implicit in Nigerian culture, and this escalates at charged historical moments, like the present. Even in the throes of the coronavirus aka COVID-19, large segments of the electorate ignore the ravage of bad governance, and go to war, online and offline, to defend the honour of presiding oligarchs. Ultimately, they guard their tormentors’ right to keep exploiting and dominating them.

    We have seen this happen in successive ‘civilian’ governments from 1999 to date. Its a function of ignorance. I would call it the ritualisation of eye and mind to witlessness.

    The bêtise of such heedlessness manifests around us in real-time. The eye and mind elect narcissistic, bigoted personae as galvanizing objects, and then formalise the relation via votes at election time.

    Ignorance is the first rung of the ladder leading to death. It precedes the plunge to nothingness. Nigeria must be guided by this truth through the pandemic. Our increasing vulnerability to COVID-19, for instance, is yet another manifestation of our plummet down the steep vale of ignorance.

    It was ignorance that drove state governors to acquire toxic chemicals to rid the public space of COVID-19 via fumigation. Against the rule of wisdom and uncommon sense, they are dumping toxic chemicals on communities in their domain as a preventive measure and solution to COVID-19.

    They conveniently forget that cleaning with simple disinfectants and providing sanitisation stations in public places present cheaper, better alternatives.

    It is hilarious to see supposed state agents flaunt fumigation gizmo in exaggerated onslaughts against COVID-19 in public space. It’s about time the government understood that disinfectants are ill-suited for dispersal via fogging machines, they are solvents applied to surfaces to kill microbes argues Paul Erubami.

    Rather than drown the citizenry in poisonous fumes, the governors should redirect their energies at more simplified testing, humane quarantine measures, contact-tracing, physical distancing awareness, and efficient distribution of palliatives.

    Ignorance stirred the initial reluctance of the health and science ministries, to explore opportunities presented in the nation’s herbal endowments, and Madagascar’s COVID-Organics.

    Prominent public functionaries revealed a source, wish that Madagascar’s herbal therapy fails at clinical trials. They are wary of losing contingency funding and lootable loans accessible via international lenders, she said.

    The contingency fund of NGN984 million ($2.7 million) reportedly released to the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) and the additional NGN6.5 billion ($18 million) mooted afterward must be closely monitored by the media and civil societies.

    Likewise, the N500bn COVID-19 Crisis Intervention Fund purportedly established for the upgrade of healthcare facilities at the national and state levels, must be closely monitored to prevent fund administrators from embezzling such monies.

    Right now, there are no social safety measures and intervention schemes for society’s handicapped: the deaf, blind, homeless are left to the ravage of the elements. Leprosariums, orphanages, geriatric homes, to mention a few, are ignored in ongoing intervention efforts.

    Before COVID-19, Nigeria grappled with terrorism, kidnap for ransom, child and sex trafficking, armed robbery, homelessness, mental health problems, divorce, collapse, and corruption of the family unit. These are social problems requiring sustainable welfare policies but the country’s lack of a visionary and humane leadership denied the citizenry such benefits.

    There is currently no social welfare programme that offers health care assistance, non-discriminatory entrepreneurial loans, food stamps, and unemployment compensation, among others to deserving citizenry divides. The absence of such initiatives wreaked untold havoc on the citizenry at the outbreak of COVID-19. Bandit youth attacked Lagos and Ogun suburbs and rural areas, robbing folk who already had too little or nothing to survive by.

    While government intervention efforts focus on the poor citizenry, presumed middle-class segments have lost their jobs, suffered arbitrary salary cuts, and lack of access to welfare relief that could help them cope with the economic hardship foisted by COVID-19. There are no housing subsidies, energy and utility subsidies, and assistance for other basic services to individuals that are most affected by the pandemic, notes Peterson Ozili.

    At the backdrop of these challenges, the numbers of the unemployed sky-rockets. A 2019 World Bank report shows that Nigeria created about 450,000 new jobs in 2018, partially offsetting the loss of jobs in 2017. And while over five million Nigerians entered the labour market in 2018, the number of unemployed increased by 4.9 million in 2019.

    More radical estimates indicate that over 18 million youths were unemployed by the end of 2019. Many more have lost their livelihoods in the wake of COVID-19.

    Recently, President Muhammadu Buhari approved the employment of 774, 000 youths as part of a Special Public Works Programme aimed at cushioning the economic effects of COVID-19. As usual, this is a knee-jerk reaction to rising unemployment and the pandemic.

    Nigerians must use this crisis as an opportunity to reconstruct the power equation, redistribute social privileges, reinvigorate civil societies, and dormant economies.

    The public healthcare system must be overhauled with better social safety nets and driven to earn foreign exchange. And this can never be achieved by recycling the incumbent ruling class in power, come 2023.

    Something’s got to give. Renaissance hierarchies are dramatized in the noisy climax of gladiator politics. The average voter must re-emerge decisively as political personae of a renaissance Nigeria, come 2023.

    He must re-emerge as the culture hero and worker of marvels: the farmer, painter, plumber, sculptor, street trader, student, unemployed graduate, and manual labourer must reprise their roles as fearless change-makers, irreconcilable to visions of them as pawns and inferior social elements.

    Their task is well laid out. COVID-19 has reorganised human behaviour around survival instincts. In the ongoing duel with the pandemic, the ultimate purpose of families, states and nations, is to breathe. Its a sublime irony: man labours to breathe in an atmosphere corrupted by his labour for material wealth.

    The relentless drive for profits birthed COVID-19, the nondescript virus that tamed the champions of industry, nuclear warlords, mortal destroyers of the ecosystem, political minions, and juggernauts.

    In order to keep breathing at a time like this, the Nigerian voter must quit participating in heavily choreographed elections, in which the demands of corporations, individuals, and banks are paramount.

    He must vie to tilt power to the citizenry divide. It’s time to take back what’s ours. As Omoyele Sowore would say, it is time to “take it back.”

    But how? Slogans and scathing bromides are hardly the way to go in reclaiming Nigeria’s soul from the fangs and talons of raptorial oligarchs.

     

  • West, hegemonic class and workers

    West, hegemonic class and workers

     Jide Oluwajuyitan

     

    Two days ago, Anthony Fauci, the US top infectious diseases doctor told the US Senate that reopening too soon will lead to ‘needless suffering and death’ for a country that has already lost over 80,000 to CONVID-19 pandemic.

    The WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has also pointed out that several countries that have lifted coronavirus restrictions and reopened businesses have seen jumps in coronavirus cases.

    But despite not meeting the four critical conditions set by National Coronavirus Response report, over 40 states in the US are now set to open their states to business.

    Britain with 32,065 deaths, and France and Spain, two of the hardest pandemic-hit countries in Europe are also set to lift the corona virus lockdown this week.

    Donald Trump who has been encouraging demonstrations in order to force state governors to loosen the coronavirus lockdown and restart the economy had told his supporters back in March: “Our country…is not built to shut down”.

    Apparently, President Trump as representative of the hegemonic class, the owners of America would not mind sacrificing about 200,000 people so that the economy can pick to satisfy those who put him power. The workers on their part have realized how vulnerable they are.

    Most of them who live a false life cruising around in beautiful cars because they do white collar jobs live on credit. Just three weeks after lockdown, they were on the streets queuing up for food. With their loss of self- esteem, some are probably ready to die on their feet providing for their families.

    Unlike Africa, where with our superior social organisation, we are our brothers’ keepers and whereas Hillary Clinton puts it – “it takes a village to raise a child”, the West is governed by law of nature. If you are strong you survive and if you are weak you die.

    Influenced by their hostile environment where life was brutish, nasty and short, Hobbes through reasoning believes the fundamental law of nature is that  “man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life or taken away the means of preserving the same” and John Locke  insists law of nature “grants to all persons access to the earth and its fruit to their sustenance”. But these are mere appeals to man’s conscience.

    Under law of nature, it is the survival of the fittest. This perhaps explains why the forbearers of the people of the west were often driven by greed.

    Some centuries back, they escaped this hostile environment to search for food, gold and glory in Africa. In Africa they found paradise. Then out of greed because their tomorrow was not certain, they wanted more.

    Slavery through which Africa was first integrated into the world economy became the new economic model. Through this, about 12.8 million Africans were shipped across the Atlantic over a span of 400 years.

    With Europe in firm control of capital so unfairly accumulated through the sweat and blood of others, we were told capitalism with its laws of demand and supply must be worshipped.

    Then with the punishing depression accompanied by massive unemployment after the Second World War, demand and supply gave way to a new god.

    And John Maynard Keynes, a British economics model builder was on hand  to provide theoretical support for government intervention through public enterprises in order to pave way for massive employment with his ‘General theory of Employment, Interest and  Money’ .

    The logic was simple.: Since “businesses will not employ workers to produce goods that cannot be sold”, government can produce workers who will have purchasing power to buy goods produced by business.

    The objective dear compatriots, was not to change the status-quo between employer-owners of business and labourers but to have a ready pool of workers and consumers.

    Having created massive consumers, public enterprises model became a rejected god. The governments put in place by the hegemonic powers in US and Britain, Republicans Ronald Reagan and Tory’s Margaret Thatcher were  mandated  by those who put them in power  to divest and sell government shares  back to business , the real owners of society.

    Then globalization became the new god they insist we all must worship. The new economic model insists we are all equal.

    But a cattle farmer in Europe and America gets government subsidy of $2 a day for a head of cattle whereas 75% of Africans live on less than two dollars a day. For Africans, the difference between slave trade and globalization is that of paradigm.

    But even in Europe and America, globalization brought nothing but disillusionment to the average labourer or serf which all workers are.

    In the US, a graduate refunds his or $75,000 loan he borrowed to acquire a university degree for some 15 years after graduation. In Britain less than 60% actually bothered to obtain a university degree because of cost especially since the collapse of Labour government.

    With 25 million filing for stimulus support as a result of COVID-19 America is today in a worse situation than the 1930 great depression.

    Britain, France, Spain and Italy share the same fate. But as it is often the case, the poor workers will bear the brunt. Those who survive COVID -19 scourge will remain workers and consumers.

    US and Europe as it is now apparent, are prepared to sacrifice many more workers to keep the economy going. As for the owners of society, the state will not allow them to sink.

    Apart from the bulk of the Trump’s stimulus package going to big businesses, Trump is also considering a reduction in the capital gains tax rate and measures that would allow companies to deduct the full costs of their current investment.

    The first $2.2 trillion stimulus package aims to help individuals who will receive a pay cheque of up to $1200 and bail out small businesses.

    It was followed by a $484 billion package which would provide $320 billion to allow the PPP to take new applicants for the program, which provides forgivable loans to small business that keep employees on the payroll for eight weeks.

    The measure includes $60 billion in loans and grants for a separate Economic Injury Disaster Loan programme, and makes farms and ranches eligible for the loans.

    Also, there is $75 billion for hospitals, with a significant portion aimed at those in rural areas and $25 billion for virus testing.  All these efforts are aimed at creating consumers.

    Trump’s approach is in line with those of his predecessors. Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal policies (1933-1939) put people back to work to create a class of consumers.

    But deal was also about saving capitalism and restoring faith in the American economic system. Ronald Reagan used the 1980 recession to damage the unions and celebrate capitalism.

    George Bush, through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, authorized the U.S. Treasury to buy risky and nonperforming debt from various lending institutions with $700 billion.

    In January 2009, Obama’s $350 billion bailout with no string attached went to the banks placing the burden of the financial crisis on borrowers.

  • Executive (dis)order

    Executive (dis)order

    Lawal  Ogienagbon

     

    ON Sunday, Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike demolished two hotels in Port Harcourt for allegedly flouting his executive order on lockdown.

    The state like many others is on a lockdown to contain the virulent Coronavirus. Of course, every rational person will support the states for the measures they have taken to protect lives in the wake of the virus.

    People have been breaking this lockdown order across the country.  This is not a good thing to do because the violators are endangering not only their lives but also those of others.

    As the governor of his state,  Wike has powers to take steps to protect the lives of the people; it is a constitutional responsibility for which he will be held accountable after his tenure.

    But he has to discharge this responsibility with a cool temperament. A governor is the father of his state; so he should act fatherly always even in the face of anger.

    Demolishing an hotel at a time like this when businesses have been crippled by Coronavirus  does not portray the governor as a father indeed.

    A true father will not kill his son for disobeying him, which is akin to what Wike has done by demolishing an hotel which flouted just an “executive order”.

    The hotelier broke no law, he merely disobeyed the governor’s order and his excellency, a lawyer for that matter, reacted disorderly. May God save us from these emperor governors. The day they get state police, we are all done for.

  • Acts of ignorance

    Acts of ignorance

    Lawal  Ogienagbon

     

    LONG before the lockdown in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Lagos and Ogun states were relaxed, many people had started complaining.  Their complaint was over hunger. Their hunger was fueled by their anger.

    They were angry because they were expected to hunker down without provisions made for them on how to feed during the lockdown which was informed by the ravaging Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. These are people who normally do not wait on government before they eat.

    They go out daily to fend for themselves, but after the lockdown was first introduced for two weeks on March 31, following the President’s broadcast on March 29, doing that became a problem.

    They could no longer go out as they used to because doing so will be a breach of the lockdown order. Government foresaw the problem.

    It knew that these people who populate the informal  economy would suffer. To ameliorate their suffering, it introduced palliative measures.

    Under the palliative regime, government provided foodstuff and cooking ingredients for the poorest of the poor described as the vulnerable.

    The Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) under which the old and vulnerable were paid N5000 monthly was also stepped up. Beneficiaries of the TraderMoni, MarketMoni and FarmerMoni were also given some funds upfront to enable them stock up on their needs.

    These measures were to make these people stay at home during the lockdown for their own safety and that of others to avoid spreading the deadly virus.

    The truth is the palliatives did not go far. Even as I write this on Monday night, complaints are stiff rife on the distribution of the food items which are expected to ensure that the poor do not die of hunger before the world conquers Coronavirus.

    The inequitable distribution of the food made people angry. Their anger may be justified because they are people who naturally take pride in their abilities to look after themselves.  They do not need a handout to live. To them, that is demeaning.

    But in a situation where they have been handicapped from going out to look for what to eat, they expected the government, which put them in that position,  to come to their aid.

    To them, it is better to go out to hustle than wait for a handout that may never come. “This food they are sharing will never get to people like us.

    They know the people they are going to give. These are their party people and others close to their leaders. It is only by luck that it will get to the suffering masses”, a Lagos artisan said when asked why he took the risk of  mingling with the crowd when the lockdown was relaxed on May 4, following the President’s April 27 broadcast.

    Many are like this artisan. Even among the educated and the well-heeled, we have those who think like this. I always tell them that we are asked to stay at home not only for our own good but also that of others.

    Public interest demands that at a time like this, we should all be thinking of the well-being of  others; we should not do anything to jeopardise the health of those close and not close to us.

    Whether we like it or not, Coronavirus is real. We have seen the havoc it can cause in countries far more developed than ours.

    The easing of the lockdown should not be a licence for people to put the lives of others at risk. It is one thing for somebody not to believe that COVID-19 is real, but it is another thing for him not to allow that to affect the lives of others.

    As I watched people trooping out on the streets last Monday in search of what they described as what to eat, I shook my head at their ignorance.

    Then, something struck me, can one really describe what was happening as ignorance? People just chose to believe what they wanted to believe because Coronavirus is far from them. As the saying goes, he who feels it knows it. He who wears the shoe knows where it pinches.

    Some people can show lackadaisical attitude to the virus because they are not infected. Even at that, have they not seen some of those infected? Have they not heard their stories? Are these not enough to bring home to them the realness of the virus? Everyday for the past two months, the Boss Mustapha-led Presidential Task Force (PTF) on COVID-19 has been shouting itself hoarse over this matter.

    Being hardhearted over Coronavirus cannot help anybody. What can help us is to keep all the safety guidelines wholeheartedly. Hardheartedness can only lead to needless deaths.

    We have been lucky so far that the number of confirmed cases and casualty figures are not too high. This is not of our making, but the grace of the Almighty.

    What do we have to contain the virus if there is an explosion in the number of infected people? With the little figures we presently have, we are complaining of shortage of bed spaces. This is why I was troubled when I saw the huge number of people who flocked the banks and other business places last May 4 in their desire to make ends meet.

    How much did they go to withdraw from their banks? What is the worth of the businesses they went for? Are these worth more than their lives? Can the money they went to look for take care of them if they catch the virus?

    Many are playing ludo with their lives because they know that it will cost them nothing to treat themselves if they come down with the virus. The bill will be on government. But this should not be the reason for anybody to jeopardise public health.