Category: Thursday

  • Bakassi and tyranny of Nigerian State

    With the spate of virulent attack on President Ebele Jonathan even from his own South-south constituency over the ceding of Bakassi home to about 300,000 Nigerians to Cameroon, it is difficult not to sympathise with him. The final phase of the Bakassi tragedy could not have come at a worse time for a president facing the crisis of legitimacy from the whole of the North-east and that of identification from the South-west that has sustained a principled opposition to nearly all the policies of a president who has equally responded by shutting out the area for appointments to sensitive positions in his administration.

    It is of little relief to the president’s critics including his cousins who have called for his impeachment over the Bakassi national tragedy that his role was no more than that of a caretaker long after the deeds had been done by other state leading actors such as Balewa, whose naiveté was exploited by Ahmadou Ahidjo, a fellow northerner with roots in Nigeria, Gowon who panicked over the threat of Ojukwu, his friend and rival to the unity of Nigeria and Obasanjo, who having tasted war, opted for diplomatic settlement following unfavorable ICJ ruling against Nigeria.

    Jonathan, who those who have become immigrants in their own country had thought should be most touched by their plight on account of being from South-south, was deemed to have performed less gallantly than former state actors such as Shehu Shagari, Murtala Mohammed and even Sanni Abacha. It was Shehu Shagari who for instance told his Cameroonian counterpart “that the existing Nigerian border at the sea coast of Rio Del Rey was protected by the OAU Resolution of 1964, respecting the inviolability of inherited colonial boundaries”. It was also Murtala Mohammed who consigned the Maroua declaration into the cooler insisting no part of Nigeria will be ceded to appease supporters of Nigeria during her civil war, while Abacha on his part called off the bluff of Cameroon over the disputed Bakasi peninsula.

    One can therefore understand why Cross River State that has half of its Efik population forcibly removed from their ancestral homes felt betrayed by the Nigerian state for failing to appeal the ICJ ruling especially after its Attorney General had provided seven additional grounds for an appeal.

    The ruling itself was a travesty of justice, an international conspiracy of the offspring of those who exploited our pre colonial antecedents and post colonial division they created for the purpose of pilfering our resources to cushion the social problems in Europe. Otherwise how can the ‘Yaoundé II Declaration’ of 4 April 1971 and the ‘Maroua Declaration’ of 1 June 1975, products of unratified agreement between two self-serving African dictators and the Anglo-German treaty of 1913 take precedence over a treaty of protection of 1884 between Britain and Obong of Calabar? It is curious how, in the wisdom of the ICJ, fraudulent horses trading between European fortune seekers carry more weight than the fundamental human rights of about 300,000 indigenes that are to be uprooted from their ancestral homes.

    But beyond President Jonathan, currently every body’s whipping child, this betrayal of the fundamental human rights of the Efiks of Cross River State has once again demonstrated the failure of Nigeria state that has since independence constituted itself in to an obstacle to the self-actualization and aspirations of most of our over 250 federating ethnic nationalities.

    Most of the groups have always striven to preserve their respective cultural values, religious beliefs and indigenous languages as supported by the United Nations Charter. Our founding fathers for political expediency failed in London in 1959. The social engineering efforts of the military brigands in creating states had been self-serving. Some of the current state actors both in the executive and legislative arms behave like hoodlums with little or no allegiance to the state they have repeatedly raped.

    Deformed and rendered dysfunctional, the state has today been reduced to an orphan by those who are expected to show more concern for her health. The children of those who have repeatedly raped the state in the last 30 years, caring very little for her health have followed the footsteps of their parents. Obviously neither the fathers nor their thieving children see the state as their own. After all, no thorough born of a father deliberately sets out to destroy his father’s estate.

    The tragedy of Bakassi and its 300,000 citizens occupying an area of about around 665 km² is the tragedy of Nigerian state that has always physically or metaphorically killed the best of its own rising ‘sun’ such as Isaac Boro,Saro Wiwa, Professor Awojobi, Fela , Vatsa, among many others as well as suppressing by force, groups that demand for self-actualization.

    For instance, a United Nations brokered accord between Cameroon and Nigeria specified that on taking over the peninsula, Cameroon should respect the rights of the Bakassi people, who should be free to remain in their homeland. The Bakassi were expected to either become Cameroonian citizens, or retain their Nigerian nationality and be treated as foreigners.

    We have also been told by experts that the collision of warm and cold oceans has built in Bakassi submarine shoals rich in fish, shrimps and amazing variety of other marine life forms which makes the area a very fertile fishing ground, comparable only to Newfoundland in North America and Scandinavia in Western Europe.

    We therefore had an opportunity in the last 10 years to have changed an adversity to an advantage since the ICJ judgment itself only asked Nigeria to transfer possession of the peninsula, but did not require the inhabitants to move or to change their nationality. But for those 10 years, those that have taken over the state have been too busy fighting over what they could take out of the state to worry about the economic potential of Bakassi. Economically empowered Bakassi would have become an indispensable ally of Cameroon even if they are regarded as foreigners on their own land.

    Similarly for 10 long years, none of the state actors was resourceful enough to scheme about exploiting the spirit of the judgment through turning the area to a new haven for its Nigeria inhabitants. But for the greed of the actors, we have enough resources this 10 long years to build schools ,provide health facilities and other infrastructures that would have set out Bakassi Local Government area as a Nigerian ‘new London’ within a rusty Cameroon territory.

  • And there was an ‘elder’ (2)

    (Truth and politics according to Chinua Achebe) 

    His pithy words are of the pitiful liabilities of his soul. But many people do not know that. Everybody loves Chinua Achebe. And every Igbo would die for Achebe; whatever it takes. Yet nobody knows what it takes to be Chinua Achebe. Nobody knows what efforts go into it. Everybody simply loves the idea of the man, Achebe. Thus it becomes sacrilegious for anyone, particularly of any other ethnicity, except Igbo, to call to question the politics and essence of the man, Achebe.

    It’s enlightening to see self-acclaimed Igbo intellectuals evolve into war-mongering assassins and hell raisers simply because I chose to write of Achebe, truths I think of him, just as he writes of others, truths he deems about them. The hate and the vitriol, illogicalities and wanton generalizations, all attest to the fact that anyone could get away with just about anything, even pre-meditated murder, if committed in the name of Biafra.

    But then there are those rare breed of Nigerians who would rather pass as towering citizens of humanity than subscribe to ethnic bigotry and propaganda of any kind, like Igbo victimhood and supremacy above any other tribe. Makes me doff my hat, to that wonderful female engineer from Port Harcourt among others; a towering Igbo woman and Biafran whose amazing intellect and good-breeding belies the arrogance and over-celebrated intelligence of every random nitwit baying for blood, in the name of Biafra. Well done Mrs. Pat M., Nigeria deserves more like you.

    Were Mrs. Pat a full time writer, generations of Nigerians would learn, and quite profitably too, those priceless truths that frequently desert the pages of our celebrated authors. But she isn’t thus we would have to contend with whatever truths Achebe and company deem worthy of us.

    How worthy is Achebe to us? Do the Igbo possess greater right over him than any other Nigerian? Achebe has answered these pertinent questions many times over and he makes no pretensions about the quality of his loyalty and passion to the Igbo race above any other. But then, that is where his problem lies.

    Nigeria’s literary hero has chosen to box himself into ethnic straits undeserving of a man of letters of immense global stature and renown. This is actually very revealing of the troubles within his soul. Achebe hurts. He is at a crossroads. Torn between his hate for Late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, who he recently labeled the arch nemesis to his defunct Biafran fantasy, and the responsibilities of his role as a man of letters, Achebe wrestles with values and heart sores undiminished by years of spurious blame-casting and frantic rationalizations.

    And even though we are all ignorant of the guilt that unmans him, he enjoys what could be likened to the peace of the killing fields just after a bloodbath. He is in dire need of peace and compassion. But the peace he seeks is never attainable by shirking his faults and casting the blame on some other people’s hero.

    The peace he seeks lies not in the rude admiration of hyper-sentimental fops desperate to deify him as some wise great Odin and worship him as such; his responsibilities as a man of letters are much more burdensome than that.

    He, by virtue of his stature and the immense weight of his letters, is expected to be the soul of all. What he teaches, his immediate world will rally to make sense of. The didactic value or not of his letters however, becomes a burden or gift to the world.

    Our manner of dealing with Achebe is the most significant feature of the world’s general position to his politics and literature. A careful look at his recent thoughts offers deep, revealing glances into the life of those singular centuries which have produced him. What is the quality of Achebe’s recent work? How genuine is it? To what extent has it been garnished with embroidered truths, untainted truth and the spurious? And

    If his work can be taken as genuine, then it can be found to be discharging a function for us which is very honorable and of the highest importance. He is propagating truth and humaneness in such way that many more generations of Nigerians will benefit from his truth and the incense that inspired his soul – and that is all that a very honest man of letters, in any case, can do.

    I say inspired; for what we call “originality,” “sincerity,” “genius,” and the heroic quality we have no good name for, signifies that.

    How does Achebe fare in this respect? Does his truth and brutal candor re-address and fearlessly condemn the first military coup by which the Igbo were blamed for ethnic cleansing of sort, particularly by Northern Nigerians? Does his truth seek to move every such “erroneous perception” or “hard-nosed truth” from planes of rancour to that of resolution?

    Does Achebe’s truth teach Nigeria highly practical and citizenry-centred means to eradicate youth unemployment, child prostitution, child trafficking, armed robbery, corruption in high places etc?

    Does his truth provide the pathways to empowering the highly industrious and yet helpless artisans of Nnewi, traders of Onitsha, Alaba, Mile 2…the disillusioned school drop outs of Umukegwu, Akokwa, Urualla, Apongbon, Idumota, Agege, Agbor, Sankwala, et al?

    Does Achebe’s truth teach the current generation of Nigerians, the youth especially, to evolve beyond the greed, selfishness and idiosyncrasies of his generation? Does it teach us to accept truths we cannot change, like the fact that they made their world as gory and burdensome as it was and still is? Does his truth teach us all to make peace with our guilt and conquer our most riotous demons? Does Achebe’s truth teach us that at the end, we get to choose what to make of our own lives and our own world?

    By his truth, do our world rise imaged once more as godlike, the workmanship and temple of a God? By his truth, is our world illumined by the prophetic healing balm symptomatic of the best and most humane from a man of letters?

    Or is it some self-serving and calculated plan geared to enthrall and excite heady plaudits in its wake? Does his truth establish him a true Hero; heroic in thought and manhood; heroic in what he has said and perhaps still more in what he did not say and did not do? Does his truth establish him a noble spectacle: a great heroic ancient man, speaking and keeping silence as an ancient sage and man of letters, as the circumstances demand? And keeping all savagery in straits in the true tradition of a most modern, high-bred, high-cultivated man of letters?

    Or does Achebe’s truth make him appear highly problematic and vindictive even as his heartfelt letters appear vague?

    The best kind of truth is that which establishes its provender as some heroic shiner of light and preserver of peace. It is that which fosters a victorious interpretation of the obscure to the understanding and unconscious acceptability of all. It is rather the grail of all literary endeavours and no amount of propaganda, bigotry and gross sentimentalism can dim the beaming brightness of its good.

    To be continued…

  • Brutes, beasts and bullets

    Brutes, beasts and bullets

    JUST how much more can a country take?

    Furious floods washing away lives and property that represent so many years of sweating and toiling, sparing neither the weak nor the mighty. The President’s home in Otueke is submerged. The once strange staccato sounds of guns firing bullets are now common. Streams of blood all over as more and more gangs of brutes and beasts stalk the land.

    Piles of natural and home-made disasters. Calamities upon calamities. Just how much more can Nigeria take?

    When Boko Haram, the insurgent group, murdered National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members in Bauchi last year, we all vowed it would never happen again. Little did we know that the worst was on the way. On National Day in Mubi, Adamawa State, some unknown gunmen stormed a community hosting students and, in a most absurd manner, killed 40. They called out the victims’ names one after the other, shooting them dead as they showed up. Some had their doors smashed, dragged out and shot. Three University of Maiduguri students were also killed on that day. The motives for these killings remain unclear.

    From Mubi, the absurdity moved onto Aluu community in Rivers State where a mob lynched four University of Port Harcourt (UNIPORT) students for allegedly stealing mobile phones and laptops. The police alleged that the community’s chief supervised the savagery. The police got a distress call and stormed the scene only to beat a hasty retreat. One of the suspects said a policeman actually joined in beating up the boys; another was pleading that they should be spared, he claimed.

    It was a bad day. The police said reinforcements came too late and that they couldn’t save the “UNIPORT Four” because the mob pelted them with stones. Were they not armed? Couldn’t they have shot into the air to scare away the mob? Didn’t they carry tear gas? At what point did they call for help? Why was the community leader not allowed to speak at the press conference where the suspects were paraded?

    In Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Itohowo Offiong Asuquo, a student of Uyo City Polytechnic, stabbed his cousin Uwana, whom he accused of stealing his phone. Asuquo found his phone, but the row that followed the incident turned bloody when he allegedly stabbed Uwana. He died. What is there in a telephone – or any material thing – to kill or die for? How will Asuquo be feeling now, assuming that he has some conscience?

    Before the Mubi and Aluu madness, there had been other exhibitions of pure insanity. Four NNPC engineers, who were sent to Arepo, Ogun State, to mend a vandalised pipeline from where thieves stole petrol, were murdered. This, the corporation said, is responsible for the shortage that has shot up price to between N100 and N110 in Lagos. Who killed the “NNPC Four”?

    Just last Sunday, it was the turn of a Kaduna State community to taste the wine of absurdity. Unknown gunmen killed 24 in Dogo Dawa in Gwari Local Government Area in what some believed was a reprisal for the losses suffered by a gang of robbers. A man, who is described as a “thief catcher”, and his two children were killed. The gunmen cut off his wife’s hand. The villagers had earlier organised a resistance against the robbers whose operations were crippled for three months. They returned in fury to spill blood, the blood of innocent villagers said to be returning from a mosque. Where were the security agents? Is Dogo Dawa so far from where help could have come? Doesn’t this kind of horror strengthen the case for state police?

    Add these to the massive canvass of blood in Jos where whole families,including babies, have been murdered. Gradually, we are losing our claim to decency and respect for human life for a disgusting descent into savagery–the jungle world of animals.

    How do you explain the case of a 20-year-old girl who was raped and disfigured by her assailants. Ruth Simon was returning home in Jos on September 23, according to The Sun, when two depraved youths grabbed her, pinned her to the ground and raped her. Disturbed by her screaming, one of the youths whipped out a knife and slashed off her lower lip. The police are holding a welder, John Akwara, and searching for a man who is believed to be his accomplice, Ezra Dachalon. It will be nice to find out why the duo did this to a poor housemaid. But, what can we say in a season of absurdity?

    Amid the aberrations , two Ogun State traditional rulers dragged royalty into the gutter, brawling like “area boys” at a police station in Itori, Ewekoro Local Government. Oba Fatai Akamo, the Olu of Itori, was said to have slapped Oba Adisa Akinremi, the village head of Lapeleke, following a disagreement over some traditional matters. What kind of royal anger led to this royal show of shame? Even nobility is not spared in this season of madness?

    In the flood victims’ camps, the depravities are hard to comprehend. Displaced women and girls are being raped in Benue. There are allegations that some of the officials whose job it is to cater for these traumatised people are the perpetrators of such unconscionable acts. Who will stop them?

    Even as the abnormalities go on, Nigerians are seeing some comic relief in the tragedy. Aluu community has become the subject of jokes. Consider this sent to my mobile by a friend: “Here is the news…Boko Haram condemns Aluu killings. Spokesman Abu Qaqa says, ‘this is pure wickedness’.”

    And this on a friend’s telephone: ‘ If you’re my friend and you’re from Aluu, please, I know we haven’t quarrelled. Biko, just delete yourself before you say I stole your BB charger.”

    Then, there is this other one with the picture of two young lovers looking passionately into each other’s eyes. The man asks the woman: “Are you leaving me because I’m from Aluu?” The woman replies: “Yes, my love. The youths may say I stole your heart.”

    Philosophers are finding it difficult to explain what is going on in Nigeria.

    Neurologists, such as Dr. Njideka Okubadejo of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), say many Nigerians have mental disorders. Does this explain the hell we prepared? Social scientists ascribe it all to the effects of a collapsed system in which values have been killed and buried. Spiritualists, who see this life as a cycle, believe that the strange events we are witnessing are signs of a closing cycle, which they insist the holy books have predicted. In other words, in their views, the end of time is fast approaching.

    Political scientists are talking of a failure of an overwhelmed leadership that is swimming in a pool of social and economic challenges. They compare Nigeria to a car with an overheating engine, even as the radiator and the fans that keep the cooling system in place are functioning. The engine, they stress, will get knocked if experts do not move fast. But the question remains, who will save Nigeria, the black man’s pride and hope? Who?

     

    As Ondo votes…

    In two days, Ondo State residents will go to the poll to elect a governor. I have been following the hustings, talking to my friends and relations in the Sunshine State. They say of all the parties, three – Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and Labour Party (LP) – are serious.

    PDP is wracked by a fratricidal war of attrition that has evoked the imagery of a torn umbrella. A torn umbrella is useless. It can’t provide shade against the sun or stop the rain from soaking its owner.

    Labour symbolises hard work and the dignity that goes with it. But, the popular thinking is that the labourers are weak and fagged out, having been poorly compensated with poor service delivery. Who wants to labour in vain? LP is buffeted by internal rancour that has sent many of its leading lights fleeing the labour room. The party has promised to do all that it promised but failed to do in more than three years – roads, schools, hospitals and more. Will it get another chance? Doubtful. Why? Its account seems to have been overdrawn in the bank of credibility. It is in the red.

    ACN is offering action. And change. The template is ready – in Osun, Lagos, Oyo, Edo, Ogun and Ekiti– and working. If I had a vote in Ondo, I will surely cast it for Rotimi Akeredolu, a tested lawyer, a fighter and a great defender of the poor. He will not betray the trust.

  • Lord have mercy

    I sometimes ask myself what exactly is going on in this country. Why are things so bad and why have the roads in the country collapsed suddenly? Why do we budget trillions of naira every year and there is no noticeable change in our lives?

    Why are most of the industries closing down and their premises converted to churches? Why is there so much insecurity in the land? Apart from the Boko Haram phenomenon, students are killing fellow students and at every little provocation, people are pouncing on each other and beating each other to death and people are burning each other alive because of petty thievery.

    We are suffering as a people in the midst of plenty. The insecurity in this country has become a fundamental issue that government must tackle. The situation has gotten so bad that when burglars visit your house in the night and they try to force their way into your house and you shout at them asking who they are, instead of them taking to their feet and running away, they would unashamedly announce that they are burglars and would ask you to open your door before they force their ways in. Things are that bad that when you go to bed nowadays, you sleep with one eye open.

    Our houses are like fortresses surrounded with high walls and barbed wires on top of them and burglary iron bars across the windows. We are just lucky in this country that the incidence of fire is not as frequent as it is in other parts of the world because escape from an inferno would be near impossible. Our electricity supply is terrible and irregular. We are in the rainy season when the demand is not so high because of the cold weather condition, we are being told that the dams are full; the fullest in 29 years and that they may collapse. When the dry season sets in, we will be told that there is no water in the dam which is why there is irregular supply of electricity. There is no aspect of our lives as a nation that one can celebrate right now. I do not blame President Jonathan for all the ills of our society, our problems started a long time ago and they seem to be culminating to the present chaos our country is in. But there is a need to demonstrate leadership because it seems the federal government is biting more than it can chew and it seems to me that there is a need for devolution of power and responsibilities. This is what the so called constitutional review should be about. It should not be about creation of states because we cannot afford additional states.

    At present, the cost of the huge bureaucracy that we have at all levels is 80% of our budget while sometimes less than 20% is used for capital development. This should be the other way round because no developing country can survive under this heavy over bureaucratization and governance cost. One sometimes wonders why in spite of close to 60 billion dollars of crude oil export and growing GDP, at about 7% per annum, our infrastructure seems to have collapsed. In all my life, I have never seen the network of roads in Nigeria being this bad. When we did not have oil, we were able to travel from the North to the South, from the East to the West on motorable roads. Those who did not want to use the roads had the alternative of railways. However, since the so called “oil wealth”, it seems as if everything has gone to the dogs. The collapse of the roads started with Obasanjo’s government when substantial amount of the country’s wealth was used to pay off Paris and London Clubs’ debt. At that time, we all thought this was a good idea but it should not have been at the total neglect of the country’s physical infrastructure. I also remember Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, then Minister of Finance and current Minister of Finance telling us in a closed door meeting that after the debts had been paid, one billion dollars out of what would have been part of the debt repayment would be used for roads rehabilitation and reconstruction annually. Now, what has happened to this promise and where is the money?

    There are so many questions to ask but space would not permit us. Our government needs to know that we need to change course. People want to see roads being rehabilitated and if needs be, being reconstructed. We have the people; we have young engineers coming out of universities and polytechnics. These people need to be engaged and we also have the resources. We need a Marshall plan in this country to keep everybody working and to keep the country developing. We need to depart from orthodox economics to Keynesian economics. This is not far from what the Chinese did and today everybody is running to China for foreign investment and technical assistance. In all my life, I have never seen Nigerians this despondent. It is even affecting our profile abroad. I was so angry with the international media that did not show our President attending the funeral of the late Ethiopian Prime Minister who died recently. It was so infuriating seeing only South African President and the President of Rwanda and even Thabo Mbeki, a former South African President being given media coverage than our own sitting President. During the last Olympics, every country was excited about winning medals; we were the only large country which did not win any single medal. This general decline of our country is affecting us in every respect. We used to be a proud people but what can we be proud of now? We are a giant with clay feet and we are gradually becoming the laughing stock of Africa. We are largely irrelevant globally and being an oil-producing country is no longer a ticket to ride because all the countries in West Africa now have discovered oil in their territories. Is it not ironical that Nigeria is now importing diesel from Niger, our northern neighbour which has discovered crude oil and which now has a functioning refinery as contrasted with our moribund four refineries necessitating our corrupt importation of refined petroleum?

    I am calling on President Jonathan to summon a national conference on national moral rearmament and strategies for future development. If we do not do this, this country will either implode or explode. There is no time to waste. May God have mercy on our country. Everything should be put on the discussion agenda. One hears the statements by some not well-informed persons saying national unity is non-negotiable. What is the meaning of this? Was Nigeria not made by man? All human institutions are of necessity imperfect and our national unity is not an exception. If not negotiated as had been the case since 1914, 1946, 1953, 1957, 1959, then we are heading for a national precipice. It is only the living that can enjoy whatever advantages national unity confers on Nigerians. In a situation where people are being killed because of where they come from or their different faiths, it behoves upon us to discuss and establish a constitutional modus Vivendiand a structural architecture within which hands and limbs will be preserved while we live together and if this cannot be negotiated, then unto thy tents o Israel may be the only way out as was the case in Yugoslavia, and the former Soviet Union.

  • Is anyone really in charge?

    ‘Two weeks earlier, it was the turn of Mubi in Adamawa state. There, hoodlums murdered about 40 students of higher institutions in the state. Their assailants armed with their names moved from room to room, calling each by name before the execution. The killing spree went on for two hours, enough time to deploy fighter jets from any part of the country to Mubi to confront the hoodlums. But for the two hours the nightmare lasted, there was no policeman in sight’

    Assailed and buffeted by myriad of problems, the nation’s nightmare continues. For two weeks, Lagos, the economic nerve centre of the nation has been brought to its knees by traffic grid lock created by long queues of motorists searching for fuel in a nation recognized as the sixth biggest oil producer in the world. Those who fought their ways into the filling stations after hours on the line are confronted by an insolent petrol attendant who dictates the gratification he wants before selling to you.

    A trip between Lagos and Ibadan on the broken express road , a distance of a little over a hundred kilometers take about three hours or sometimes 13 hours as it happened last week Wednesday when the unruly tanker drivers that the government has not been able to tame for 13 years once again closed the road to traffic. They only agreed to liberate their victims who slept on the road after government had begged them.

    The chaos and anarchy in Ogere is worse than it was 13 years ago. The dangerously packed trailers now stretched for about five kilometres. We also now have an army of Road Traffic Safety personnel paid by taxpayers to merely monitor the unruly activities of those who have repeatedly demonstrated they are above laws. The cumulative amount of taxpayer’s money government waste on this type of unproductive endeavour would be enough to rehabilitate the broken rail lines. But such an option is unattractive to government that has in its economic team some who own as many as 8,000 trailers.

    As we move towards South-south and South-east, the two zones responsible for about 75% of foreign earnings, the people’s nightmare increases. Kidnapping and ransom-taking which started with PDP ascension to power in 1999, initially limited to expatriate oil workers has become a very lucrative trade extended to politicians, babies, indigenes visiting homes from Lagos and abroad and university teachers. Only last week, Professor Hope Eghagha, once a member of editorial board at The Guardian and a teacher at the University of Lagos who took time off to serve his Delta State as Commissioner for Higher Education was taken away in a broad day light by hoodlums who slain his police orderly and shot his driver. He was only released yesterday. And it is business as usual in Abuja where the debate has always been about contracts.

    The north eastern part of Nigeria has been made ungovernable for about two years. Only last Sunday, hoodlums carried out a pre-dawn murder of about 24 people returning from early hour worship in Dogon Daewa village, Birmin Gwari Local Council area of Kaduna State. The hoodlums thereafter, walked leisurely to the house of a man they suspected could identify them, shot him along with his two children in the presence of his wife. The wife, they left a living dead after cutting off one of her hands.

    A few days earlier in Aluu, university town in Rivers State, hoodlums and traditional rulers supervised the brutal murder of four university students and set their bodies ablaze causing universal outrages.

    Two weeks earlier, it was the turn of Mubi in Adamawa state. There, hoodlums murdered about 40 students of higher institutions in the state. Their assailants armed with their names moved from room to room, calling each by name before the execution. The killing spree went on for two hours, enough time to deploy fighter jets from any part of the country to Mubi to confront the hoodlums. But for the two hours the nightmare lasted, there was no policeman in sight.

    Leadership is about vision and the capacity to motivate people to be part of that vision. Hoodlums have taken over our land because of the quality of leadership provided by President Jonathan and PDP. An overwhelmed President Jonathan who secured a pan Nigerian mandate less than two years back, instead of confronting the problems has been lamenting about being the most criticized president in the world. And to wade off criticism of his lack-lustre performance, he had said with innocence of a child, ‘it is not as if there were roads, electricity…and Jonathan brought hurricane to destroy them’.

    On the other hand, Obama emerged as president when America was under siege. He inherited two wars, massive unemployment and collapsing economy. Obama instead of engaging in blame game with his defeated Republicans reminded his sympathizers that he was elected to fix those problems. Obama in spite of sabotage by the defeated Republicans, and betrayals by members of his own party who only front for big corporations, has confronted those problems headlong sometimes taking some unpopular decisions.

    Our pre-independence years remain the golden age of Nigeria on account of quality leadership provided by representatives of the dominant ethnic nationalities – Awo, Ahmadu Bello and Zik. Murtala Mohammed with quality leadership in six months secured more mileage in terms of national pride and international recognition whereas all the billions wasted on fraudulent rebranding by Yar’ Adua, Jonathan and Akunyili only further consolidated our position as one of the most corrupt nations in the world. Buhari, in eight months, with his crude economic ‘barter arrangement’, saved the nation billions that would have gone into importation of petroleum products and grains which, with quality leadership, we produced in abundance, giving in the process, the West that survives only on our mystery, a bloody nose.

    It is inconceivable that the nightmare of motorists in Ogere that has lasted this past 13 years because of lawlessness of hoodlums would have survived Muhammed’s mercurial temper or Buhari’s zero tolerance for indiscipline for a month.

    For those who have said our founding fathers operated under a different milieu and that Murtala Mohammed and Buhari operated as dictators, both Tinubu and Fashola have demonstrated in Lagos that what our nation needs to move forward is quality leadership. Oyinlola in Lagos was a disaster, unable to mend pot holes, clear refuse that was choking Lagos or guaranteed security of life and property. Marwa shamed him with quality leadership. Tinubu left enduring legacies through quality leadership and today as we can see Fashola has taken the state to a new height making it a state to beat in terms of quality leadership. He has effortlessly tamed the traders’ anarchies in Mushin, Oshodi, Mile Two, Ikotun and other parts of Lagos. He has, with confidence, asked those who are not ready to comply with the laws of his state to go elsewhere.

    In Oyo State, we have seen evidence of resourceful leadership. The whole stretch of less than 10 kilometres portion of the express road from the Old Toll Gate to Ife By-pass that used to take motorists sometimes up to two hours under successive PDP governors today take less than 10 minutes. The Ife By-pass has been rid of anarchists as traders.

    If we need any proof that there is really no one in control, the ongoing haggling over the proposed expenditure of N5.8b for new quarters and offices for lawmakers, Senate President and the Speaker, the proposed N2.8b for the rehabilitation and repair of residential buildings for the president and vice president and the proposed N5.6bn to provide water for the residents of FCT is all that is required.

    If indeed there is someone in charge, those in Abuja serving none but themselves would have been wary of this type of scandalous proposed expenditure in the face of collapsed Lagos-Ibadan Express road and others in the country that are vital to our economic development.

  • ‘Impact of violence on kids in Northern Nigeria’

    ‘Impact of violence on kids in Northern Nigeria’

    In a sturdy iron cage, a monkey spins from the bars. Outside, a few metres from the cage, a boy twirls in the dust. Unlike the ape, he enjoys the wilderness of freedom. There, in the scenic ambience of a mobile circus touring Southern Kaduna, his ill-bred face, full African eyes are so dark, so quiet and remote, having seen too many empty dawns pass him by. His name is Aliyu and if he could, he would plead an immediate change in his fate and backtrack to those mornings when he sprang from his mat at the sting of his mother’s sharp pat on his butt. Aliyu misses the rations of steaming chili sauce and corn flour served by his mother every night. But most especially, he misses his dad. The latter, among other things, was the greatest hero he ever had.

    For a boy-child, Aliyu betrays a temperament befitting a man. He has probably made peace with his inner turmoil or rather, has grown impermeable to such human weaknesses, like pain. Nonetheless, the eight-year old native of Jema’a, Kaduna State, parades a photographic memory that recounts his parents’ gruesome death in the wake of the sectarian crisis that pitted the Berom and Jasawa tribes of Jos, Plateau State State against each other in the twilight of 2008.

    “My mother’s sister (his current guardian) came to pick me up from the police station the morning after my parents were killed,” he said. At his parents’ death, Aliyu stopped schooling. His aunt apprenticed him to a weaver but according to the 12-year old, he frustrated his boss to the point that the latter requested that he be removed from his apprenticeship.

    “I don’t want to learn a vocation. I want to be a General (soldier). I do not want to learn any trade but my aunty will not listen to me,” lamented Aliyu.

    Then he fell silent and stared ardently into the distance. It was a macabre silence replete with spasms of blood-curdling angst, misery and discontent, four-years-old. Hard as it was to picture the extent of bitterness devastating his heart, a careful glance at his face indicated a boy utterly torn apart. It seemed he wasn’t there but he was; even as the gruesomeness crackled in his grief and dissolved into the painful tribute of a tear. Today, he does nothing but loiter about town in the company of his childhood friends.

    Unlike Aliyu, Lemora Mohammed’s pain is more recent and it transcends the passing tribute of a tear. Simply put, crying would never be enough to express the brutal massacre of her parents, two sisters, an 18-month-old cousin and a crippled aunt. Mohammed, who was a victim of a more recent sectarian crisis in Jos, had her world viciously torn apart when the rampaging hordes of Jos attacked their home in Angwan Rogo, in the wee hours of a Saturday night.

    “We were just settling in to sleep after a late supper. Suddenly, we heard people running and screaming in agony. A neighbour rushed to our door and banged on it screaming: ‘They are here! They are here! Run while you could.’ She never made it past our door.” And so did Mohammed’s family. Save her and her younger brother, Jabir, whom she claimed had gone out to ease himself, “nobody else made it.”

    However, Mahmud, a 14-year-old from Watam, in Riyom local government area, survived with serious injuries after witnessing the execution of several of his playmates as they played football on a pitch in his neighbourhood. One minute, he was flaunting soccer skills to the applause of his playmates and the next he was running for his dear life as rampaging youths slaughtered his friends in cold blood and gave pursuit after him. “I ran into a bush and jumped into a dry well…I didn’t leave the well until the following morning. I had never experienced such wickedness in my life; while they pursued me like bushmeat, I urinated on myself even as I ran. In the well, I defecated in my pants and at some point, I got too scared that the stench of my faeces would lead them to me…By the time I got to the field the following morning, the sand on our pitch had congealed with blood. There was too much blood and pieces of flesh everywhere,” recounted the 14-year old.

    Few blocks from the pitch, Mariama Kali, 16, listened helplessly from her refuge inside an uncompleted building adjacent to her house as her family and two other families were hacked to death. “I couldn’t peep because I was too scared of being found out. If they had caught me, I wouldn’t be alive right now,” said Kali.

    Such experiences leave emotional and psychological scars that oftentimes last a lifetime. Even when the conflict is over or the children have reached safety, many of them remain filled with fear, bottled up rage and guilt, stated Muhammadu Alli, a clinical psychiatrist.

    Alli could not be too far from the truth. For instance, Margaret Uduma, 61, an ex-Biafran native, stated that although she survived the Nigerian civil war, she was convinced for a long while that she was alone in the world. Indeed, that would seem likely since she lost her parents and four brothers to the crisis at a very young age.

    She developed great hatred for people of a particular extraction in the country and blamed them for the murder of her family because the federal soldiers who invaded their house in Enugu were from that part. Thus for a long while, she lived with venom in her heart. She still does. “You talk of forgiveness… forgiveness. If it happened to you, will you forgive? I can’t. I feel only hate,” said Uduma.

    Eleven-year-old Ibrahim revealed that he has recurrent nightmares in which the ghosts of his two sisters who were raped and murdered in the heat of the Jos crisis visit him and urge him to come to the ‘other side’ (heaven).

    Ibrahim escaped with a neighbouring family when rampaging youths attacked his neighbourhood. Fortunately for him, he was watching musicals with his best friend at a gift shop. His friend’s mother had asked them to man the shop while she dashed home to prepare lunch for the family. His friend’s mother never came back. She was butchered on her way. Luckily, her husband escaped with their only daughter to rescue shop. “When I asked them about my family, they told me that my parents asked me to live with them, that they would join us very soon”.

    When civilian populations and infrastructure are targeted during conflict, traditional family and community networks which would normally give comfort and emotional support to children in crisis are also fragmented and destroyed. Parents in the tide of refugees pushed into camps are stripped of their capacity to shelter and protect their children. In such crisis situation, young women and mothers without protection are frequently raped or forced to trade sex for food, while fathers accustomed to farming and supporting their families stand in line for hand-outs, humiliated and powerless to help themselves or their children.

    The impact of such traumatic experience, especially on children, is usually immeasurable. The sheer magnitude of psycho-social distress among children of different ethnic backgrounds rules out the possibility of uniform textbook approaches. Children on the receiving end in such crises situations hardly survive the onslaught, according to Ibukun Faraayola, 44, a consultant clinical psychiatrist.

    “Every day, the world descends into a desolate moral vacuum. This is a space devoid of the most basic human values; a space in which children are slaughtered, raped and maimed; a space in which children are exploited as soldiers and orphaned; a space in which children are starved and exposed to extreme brutality,” he said.

    Faraayola noted that in extreme situations, most kids are forced to commit atrocities even against their own friends and families as a way of toughening them up and severing whatever ties they have with their loved ones and community at large. “This often rid them of humaneness. I hope things never get as bad as that,” he said.

    Children in flight

    Across the country, many children have been forced to flee to neighbouring states as refugees. Many of them, according to Idiat Bello, a social worker, are in need of special attention. That is because at a crucial and vulnerable time in their lives, they are brutally uprooted from their comfort zones and exposed to extreme danger and brutality, she said.

    However, while child refugees benefit from the specific attention of a number of international NGOs, those who are internally displaced receive less protection even though they tend to be at greater risk.

    In the chaos of full blown war and other types of armed violence, many children are parted from their parents or guardians. Among the most severe problems which all children face during armed conflicts is the heightened risk of being orphaned and raped. Others are forced into sexual slavery or prostitution and other forms of abuse.

    These crimes are often direct consequences of the general societal breakdown during armed conflicts. Children who are displaced but remain in their own countries face perilous circumstances. They are often worse off than refugees, since they may lack access to protection and assistance. There are an increasing number of situations where families and communities are chronically displaced due to localised, continued armed conflict. Surveys have shown that the death rate among internally displaced persons has been as much as 60 per cent higher than the death rate of persons within the same country who are not displaced.

    Even when internally displaced families are housed with relatives or friends, they may not be secure, eventually facing resentment from their hosts because of the limited resources to be shared. Another acute problem for internally displaced children is access to health and education services. In contravention of humanitarian law, the access of internally displaced persons to humanitarian assistance is often impeded. Flight can put them beyond the reach of existing Government or NGO programmes. Even if schools exist, the children may not be able to enroll because they lack proper documentation, are not considered residents of the area or are unable to pay school fees. Feelings of exclusion, as well as the struggle for survival and protection, may lead children to join parties to the conflict or to become street children.

    Children in camps

    In times of conflicts, children’s traditional systems of social protection come under severe strain or break down completely and there are often high levels of violence, alcohol and substance abuse, family quarrels and sexual assault.

    Adolescent girls are particularly vulnerable and even the youngest children can be affected when they witness an attack on a mother or a sister.

    One important aspect of relief that particularly affects women and children is the distribution of resources such as food, water, firewood and plastic sheeting. Control of these resources represents power. Men are usually in charge of distribution and often abuse their power by demanding bribes or sexual favours. This puts adolescent girls and women at risk, according to the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). The UNHCR alleged that the first days and weeks of a mass displacement of people usually result in high mortality rates for children. Among displaced children, measles, malaria and malnutrition account for 60 to 80 per cent of reported deaths.

    Factors contributing to high mortality include overcrowding and lack of food and clean water, along with poor sanitation and lack of shelter. Pregnant and lactating women require particular attention, as do displaced children living with disabilities. Children coming from armed conflict are likely to have injuries that require special medical attention. In these circumstances, only a multi-sector approach to health and nutrition can protect young children. Camp environments are often highly militarised. In some instances, children have been taken, either forcibly or fraudulently, from camps to a third country for “political education” or military training.

    Child health under attack

    Thousands of children die each year as a result of armed violence – from knives, bullets, bombs and landmines. But many more die from the indirect consequences of warfare as a result of the disruption in food supplies, for example and the destruction of health services, water systems and sanitation. In poor regions where children are already vulnerable to malnutrition and disease, the onset of armed conflict can increase death rates – with those under five years at particular risk.

    But beyond the physical dangers, children may also suffer lasting psychological damage as a result of the loss of their families. Children and adolescents also have very different capacities, and the lines between them are often blurred. In a child’s early years, the focus is on survival, with special attention needed in health, nutrition and protection. Research shows, however, that cognitive development is equally important.

    The ways in which children respond to the stress of armed conflict also depend on their particular circumstances. These in turn are affected by such factors as age, sex, personality type, personal and family history, and cultural background.

    Moreover, armed conflict often pushes children into roles beyond their capacity. It can also prolong certain transitions for young people. Because children are agents of their own protection, and appropriate coping mechanisms require specific cognitive competencies, a key priority is supporting children’s cognitive development through various life stages.

    The different ways in which armed conflict may have already shaped children’s lives can expose them to additional risks. Children can be especially vulnerable if they are living with a disability, with HIV or on the street, or if they lack access to school or health care.

    Similarly, separation from family, the experience of gender-based violence, internal displacement or refugee status, and current or former association with the armed forces or other armed groups can heighten the risk of further violations. A child’s reaction depends on the accumulation of risks, and also on her or his coping skills, available sources of support and other resources.

    Children are also affected by other distressing experiences. Armed conflict splinters communities and breaks down trust among people – undermining the very foundation of children’s lives. Different children will respond in different ways to such distressing experiences. Most will recover fairly quickly but a few may suffer permanent damage.

    The Almajiri factor

    The northern almajiris have also been found to be easily instigated and used as perpetrators of armed violence in the region. One young man sent by his family from neighbouring Niger told the American Cable News Network (CNN) then how the schools used him and other children as foot soldiers in religious clashes. Fearing for his life, he spoke on condition of anonymity, telling how he lost his arm in the 2000 in religious violence that killed about 1,000 people in the northern city of Kaduna.

    Tsangaya schools or almajirici as they are popularly known in the North, consequently were identified as breeding grounds for political thugs. Investigations revealed that the almajiris are exposed to city life with all the attendant corruption that comes with it at very impressionable ages. Left with no parental control or adequate social guidance, they turn vagabond with very real likelihood of drifting into a life of crime. Unfortunately, they are not equipped to cope with the pressures of city life. They hardly wish to be where they belong and they never fit in the city where they find themselves.

    The Kano initiative

    Asides the Federal Government-sponsored Almajiri Education Programme (AEP), which seeks to accord northern almajiri kids opportunities at a well-rounded education process, Governor Rabiu Kwakwanso of Kano State has done a lot to improve the lot of the kids.

    Currently, Kano runs four Almajiri schools and the schools among other benefits seek to eradicate illiteracy and begging along the state’s major roads. The state government is playing a major role in the almajiri school system by providing the teachers and maintaining the schools and the good thing about the scheme, according to most residents, is that the schools have practically thrown their doors open to almajiris from neighbouring states.

    And as part of its bid to improve the lot of its youths, the state government has provided vehicles for all the institutions in Kano for the inspection of primary and secondary schools and tertiary institutions. Governor Kwakwanso’s administration also foots examination fees for every child sitting for the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) and National Examinations Council (NECO) School leaving examinations. So far, the incumbent administration has allocated over N35 billion to primary and secondary education alone in the state. The initiative is geared towards furnishing the pupils with opportunity to enjoy quality education and at the same time shield them from becoming easy targets for criminal masterminds seeking to use them as canon-fodder for fomenting armed violence.

    However, the state government has a more comprehensive policy in the pipeline for the street kids. The State Commissioner for Information, Prof. Faruk Jibrin, said a report has been submitted to Governor Kwankwaso. He said the state would implement it by rehabilitating the Almajiris.

    A call to action

    Gladys Mobolade, coordinator of the Child Hope Nigeria Network (CHNN), suggested that an emergency assistance in periods of armed conflicts should always seek to specifically address the health needs of children. Emergency health teams should always include pediatric care and ensure access to reproductive healthcare for adolescents. She emphasized the building of community resources – helping close family members as well as school teachers and other community workers to provide children with the long term support they need.

    However, in the long run, UNICEF suggested that local and international NGOs, the government and affected communities must pool concerted effort to prevent the outbreak of armed violence by addressing the socio-economic roots of conflicts and guarding against the shipment of arms and ammunition into the conflict zones.

    In the short run, Farayoola said that conscious efforts must be made to protect child victims of armed violence. According to him, the most effective and sustainable approach is to mobilise the existing social care system. “This may, for example, involve mobilising a refugee community to support suitable foster families for unaccompanied children. Through training and raising the awareness of central care-givers including parents, teachers and community and health workers, a diversity of programmes can enhance the community’s ability to provide care for its children and vulnerable groups.

    “Some organisations, for example, put a great deal of emphasis on trauma therapy in residential treatment centres. Exploring a child’s previous experience with violence and the meaning that it holds in her or his life is important to the process of healing and recovery. However, such an exploration should take place in a stable, supportive environment, by care-givers who have solid and continuing relationships with the child. In-depth clinical interviews intended to awaken the memories and feelings associated with a child’s worst moments risk leaving the child in more severe pain and agitation than before,” said Farayoola.

    The most urgent wish made by the affected youth, however, is to be free to grow into adulthood safe from violence of any kind. Many of them would love to grow in communities that guarantee their right to attend school, to play and compete with each other, and learn the skills necessary for future jobs. The role of the community is paramount. In their recommendations, children and young people emphasize the importance of looking for solutions through dialogue with parents and local elders. Families and communities are seen as best equipped to respond to children’s educational, health and psychosocial needs, and to foster peace and tolerance.

    Most of the recommendations recognise that the state bears principal responsibility for protecting and caring for children, especially those who are abused and exploited. But youth led organisations also pressed their case for change in their communities, noting the obligation of governments to help foster changes through better implementation and monitoring of policies already in place. Young people ask for stronger legislation and better enforcement of the rule of law, especially in rural areas. They see clear links between security and peace building, peace education, and constructive dialogue between youth and authorities. In their responses, they emphasize preventive measures that foster peace and tolerance within their communities. They couldn’t possibly be asking for too much. Could they?

  • And there was an ‘elder’ (1)

    And there was an ‘elder’ (1)

    Nobody knows Chinua Achebe more than Chinua Achebe. But many have grown to love him as a world renowned novelist and elder of repute. So great is the love and respect enjoyed by Achebe that just recently, when Reuben Abati, ex-fiery columnist and critic turned Special Adviser to President Goodluck Jonathan on Media Affairs, insulted him for refusing a national merit award, Nigerians of all politics and ethnicity scolded Abati. Even Abati’s kinsmen, the Yoruba, reprimanded him, and rightfully so, over what was considered his brazen boorishness to a Nigerian elder and literary icon.

    Such is the love and respect enjoyed by Achebe and no national honour could best that; neither could any coordinated slander or slight sully that, ever. Achebe parades his knack for speaking the truth and quite unapologetically too, and this has over time, presented him as a writer and elder statesman worthy of note.

    But truth could be ugly; hence it will always be in a language alive to the just and dead to degenerate hearts, when it is true. When the truth is untrue, no degree of sophistry or arrant sentimentalism will justify it or make it acceptable enough. Thus for all its worth, the jury will forever dither over the honesty or vice versa of Chinua Achebe’s recently released civil war memoir entitled, There was a country.

    The memoir among other things, seeks to present a vivid and very honest account of the events that culminated in Nigeria’s civil war. Most contentious and inciting statement made by the author in his memoir was directed at the late nationalist, Chief Obafemi Awolowo. Achebe says: “It is my impression that Awolowo was driven by an overriding ambition for power, for himself and for his Yoruba people…Awolowo saw the dominant Igbo at the time as the obstacles to that goal, and when the opportunity arose with the Nigeria-Biafra war, his ambition drove him into a frenzy to go to every length to achieve his dreams. In the Biafran case, it meant hatching up a diabolical policy to reduce the numbers of his enemies significantly through starvation eliminating over two million people, mainly members of future generations.”

    Predictably, Achebe’s attack on Awolowo has provoked reactions from political pundits across the Yoruba and Igbo ethnic divides. Verbal bricks bats are being hauled even as you read but no matter what anyone thinks; Achebe possesses the inalienable right to narrate his account of the civil war debacle as he deems fit.

    However, when the war started, it is unclear what Achebe expected Awolowo to do; did he expect Awolowo to become a spy for Odumegwu Ojukwu in Gowon’s cabinet and help defeat the Nigerian government? Awolowo claimed Biafran soldiers persistently ambushed food and provisions the Nigerian government sent to the Biafran people, why couldn’t he blame the Biafran army for robbing vulnerable Biafrans of the food? Why didn’t he advise Ojukwu against turning down the Nigerian government’s offer of a food corridor for starving Biafrans?

    Why couldn’t he provide Biafra the intellectual capital to win the war given his unassailable wisdom? Why wait till they suffered agonizing defeat before summoning courage to write embroidered truths that neither Ojukwu nor Awolowo will read? Why support a war he and his Biafran leadership had no means of prosecuting? Why couldn’t he suggest less violent means by which Biafra could attain statehood?

    During the war, while soldiers like Christopher Okigbo marched to the front and fought till the death, why did he flee for the comfort of ambassadorial portfolio? Did he really lack the courage to pick up a gun and fight even as poor Igbo kids were forced to fight to the death? Given his self-acclaimed sense of morality, why couldn’t he protest and condemn the Biafran leadership’s forceful conscription of child-soldiers?

    Although many would argue that he opted for the ambassadorial role because he was best suited for it in light of his growing literary acclaim at the period, the flimsiness of such argument subsists in Achebe’s inability, despite his respectability, to counsel Ojukwu to throw in the towel for the sake of millions of vulnerable Igbo who suffered excruciating deaths as a result of the Biafran leadership’s arrogance, immaturity and self-centeredness.

    That Achebe worshipped Ojukwu and couldn’t tell him the truth is glaring in his feeble rationalization of the late Biafran warlord’s elopement at the certainty of defeat. Although Ojukwu’s flight invites accusations of cowardice, Achebe applauds his ability to declare a war, goad over two million people to untimely death only to desert them at the very end. Thus while poor Chukwuebukas, Ijeomas, Chikodis, and Amarachis died of starvation, disease and ‘enemy’ bullets, Achebe and company perfected their escape from a ghastliness that they jointly orchestrated with the Nigerian government.

    By his acceptance to serve in the Biafran government, did he not betray irrepressible narcissism and despicable bloodlust he tiresomely attributes to Awolowo? Aside his incendiary literature, aren’t there less provocative means to improve Nigeria’s lot or the lot of his beloved Igbo nation? Beyond arm-chair criticism, can he not foster viable means to eradicate societal evils like youth unemployment, terrorism, kidnapping, prevalent sense of insecurity, societal corruption, substandard health and education systems to mention a few, across the country or his beloved Igbo land to be precise?

    Were he a true patriot, Achebe would stay back to contribute his quota to the development of his beloved Igbo nation and actualization of whatever fantasies clutter his dreams of bliss. But he has chosen to abscond and fuel from his safe haven abroad, the fiery embers of bigotry, hatred and bloodlust in Nigeria.

    Thus is the tragedy of Achebe’s psyche. Despite his unassailable wisdom, literary prowess and acclaim, he has not learnt the nobler dialects of humaneness and elevated tact; instead he prizes and lusts after a cheap, self-serving, supremacist politics of ignorance and hate.

    Nonetheless, Achebe is unrepentantly sincere in his propagation of Igbo supremacy and his version of the Biafran debacle; and that is what makes his incendiary literature absolutely dangerous to the Igbo youth and Nigeria as a whole. There is little the younger generation can learn from him in terms of forgiveness, rationality, perception, honesty, courage and altruism. He does not believe in one Nigeria yet he lacks the courage to actualize his Biafran dream.

    And now, in his twilight, his treasured thoughts manifests like an accident to society. His heartfelt truths wander in logic and polemic like an untamed gypsy, burnishing a world in which he ought to serve as a bastion of love with hate, urging it into bitterness and everlasting darkness.

    In the final chapters of his memoir, Achebe provides his wish list to eliminating ethnic bigotry and state failure – that is, after stoking the scorching embers of ethnic bigotry and state failure in the preceding chapters. Convenient, isn’t it?

    His recent literature will accomplish no miracles, save its affirmation of Igbo victimhood and pathetic mindsets which sentimental fops are primed to perpetuate, simply because it’s socio-politically correct to do so. It’s a treacherous theorem of truth, written to brainwash the Igbo youth and sully their humanity and thought-process, in frantic bid to actualize Achebe’s lust for political immortality.

     

    • To be continued…

  • Mushrooming private universities in Nigeria

    There is no doubt that there is a great need for university placement in Nigeria for the millions of young Nigerians streaming out of secondary schools. The total enrolment of young Nigerians in tertiary institutions including universities, polytechnics, monotechnics, and colleges of education both private and public is not more than one million. This, in a country with a purported population of about 160 million people shows the low level of access to tertiary education. It follows therefore that there is a need for expansion of tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Virtually all the state governments now have universities and there is also a federal university in each of the states of the federation and Abuja.

    After the pandora box of private universities was opened, there had been a mad rush of various sectarian organizations and individual businessmen and all kinds of do-gooders to establish universities. The result has not been uniformly good. In general, most of the sectarian universities are likely to have some quality, although no one can vouch for this, but very few of those established by individuals have any quality whatsoever. Unfortunately, this tendency is undermining the genuine efforts of those who are committed to public good like Chief Afe Babalola and Chief Ade-Ojo who by all standards have built institutions that are certainly physically imposing. The National Universities Commission (NUC) needs to be very careful in approving licenses to all and sundry in establishing universities. I know that the NUC has various criteria including money in hand, huge hectarage of land, staffing and so on and so forth but one has doubts as to whether these criteria are being enforced. The most dangerous trend that most of us in the system have noticed is that because of shortage of staff, criteria for promotion of staff across academic levels are being jettisoned to the extent that people are being promoted and even appointed professors without proper assessment in the traditionally acceptable way. Not only that, some universities rent staff and even books and equipments for the purpose of securing accreditation. Some young academics sometime teach in three or four universities at the same time all in a mad rush to make money and certainly at the expense of academic quality and integrity.

    Some of the names of some on-coming universities make one to laugh because the names are so foreign that one wonders the reason for approving such names.

    I have just had the opportunity of travelling to some universities in England and Scotland and noticing new trends in university education and the stupendous resources needed to realize the academic goals of the well-established universities in these countries. To be specific, the University of Glasgow was established in 1451 and over these centuries, the university has built first-class infrastructure that has enabled it to produce Nobel laureates but in spite of this, the university is still building to renew itself and this year alone, it has a budget of about N266 billion for its services. If one were to compare this with any of our so-called universities in Nigeria, one would get the picture of why no university in Nigeria can be in the first one thousand league globally. The universities in Nigeria generally are poorly funded, poorly governed and poorly staffed.

    When the University of Ibadan was the only university in Nigeria, some of its products were acclaimed as one of the best in the whole commonwealth and at a time, the College of Medicine in the University of Ibadan was one of the best in the world. Those were in the halcyon days when things were done properly in Nigeria. Since the mushrooming of universities in Nigeria, things have gone to the dogs academically speaking, but what worries one is the speed and rate at which these so-called private universities are springing up. The Federal Government and even some state governments have also joined in this madness of announcing the establishment of universities apparently without thinking them through and locating them sometimes in inaccessible areas presumably in the interest of even development as if universities were roads, railways and ports. The whole situation is so confused and confusing that one worries about the future. Universities are about people, they are about the future of the country, and they should be anchored on the idea and notion of building our youths for the future of Nigeria.

    In a world of knowledge industries, the preparation of the youths for the future is very critical but the way we are going about it in our country raises fundamental questions about our plans for the future. We need to do things a little differently. Of course, every section of the country’s economy is crying for development whether it is telecommunication, transportation, electricity and health but all these are predicated on availability of the right kind of manpower, this is why education is critical. So, what do we do? We need to go back to the regime of planned development as was the case after independence when we used to have five-year development plans at the state and federal levels instead of the haphazard so-called “rolling plans” that was foisted on us by the military. This was the way the old Soviet Union, India, China and the entire Eastern Europe were able to attain the technological level in which they are today. There is no miracle about it, planning is essential to development. The lack of planning in the educational sector is symptomatic and a reflection of the lack of planning in the country as a whole, licensing and building mushroom institutions and calling them universities is not the way out. There are minimum standards of university education all over the world and what we have in Nigeria is by and large a travesty of these universal standards.

  • Salami : A Daniel has come to judgment

    Salami : A Daniel has come to judgment

    When in August 2010, President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Isa Ayo Salami, was suspended, right thinking members of the society kicked against the irrational act. They were ignored because the government was working towards the answer in a calculated and clinically executed plot to get Salami out of the judiciary.

    Out of the way? Yes, the ruling government considered and still considers him a threat to its ‘political fortunes’. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is not comfortable with having Salami around because he does not stomach nonsense. This judge is not ready to dine with the devil even with a long spoon.

    As a party, the PDP believes in doing things in the dark. Openness and transparency do not exist in PDP’s dictionary. They are Greek words to the party, so, wherever people of light like Salami are gathered, it feels threatened and is ready to do anything to tar them.

    They have applied different kinds of tar brush on Salami, but this incorruptible judge has always come out clean. But they are unrelenting; they are determined to give him a bad name in order to hang him. Nothing will be more pleasing to the party than to lay hands on evidence to do Salami in as a corrupt judge. It has searched everywhere for such evidence to no avail.

     If the party had been able to get such evidence, I bet you, Salami would have been history today after an ignominious sack from the bench, with a trial to boot. Salami, probably never knew that a day like this would come when he was joining the judiciary, but being an upright person, he stood firmly by his oath in the discharge of his duty.

    And as fate would have it, he made it to the pinnacle of his career following his appointment as PCA after the retirement of Justice Umar Abdullahi. He was doing his job without any hassles until politicians came with their troubles after the 2007 elections. The Appeal Court, which he headed, played a  crucial role in the post-election matters.

    The court upturned the election of sitting governors all of who were elected on PDP platform. The party was aghast. It was shocked by the temerity of the court in unseating its governors, wondering why the judges could not turn a blind eye to the rigging which brought them to power.

    Rather, the court dug into the rigging by doing  a forensic analysis of the ballot papers on the strength of which it removed the governors. The court was about delivering judgment in the Sokoto State governorship election appeal when former Chief Justice Aloysius Katsina-Alu, in his wisdom, intervened.

     All he wanted Salami to do was a simple thing, at least, according to Nigerian standard. He invited Salami to his office and told him to please ‘’arrest’’ the verdict. Salami asked why and when he did not get a plausible answer, he rejected Katsina-Alu’s request.

    The chief justice could not believe it that a judge in the judiciary headed by him could turn him down. He forgot that he could only throw his weight around where he is acting true to his oath of office. There is nothing in the rules of court that allow the chief justice to use other judges to subvert justice as Katsina-Alu tried to do in the Sokoto case. Salami resisted him and for that Katsina-Alu plotted his suspension.

    Reversing that asinine

    action has become a prob

    lem for the Presidency, which hastily intervened in a matter, which was best left to the judiciary to sort out by itself. Instead, President Goodluck Jonathan listened to no-gooders and appoved the suspension of Salami.

    When the president took that action, Salami was in court to challenge his planned elevation to the Supreme Court by Katsina-Alu and also stop the National Judicial Council (NJC) from giving effect to the report of the panel, which recommended his suspension. The president sidestepped the case and suspended Salami instead of sacking him as demanded by Katsina-Alu.

     The plotters have had their day on the political turf, but Salami has continued to rubbish them in court even though judgment is yet to be delivered. The matter is becoming more interesting by the day. The Presidency and NJC seem to have parted ways on the matter; they are no longer on the same page.

    This is a plus for Salami because those hitherto against him are now backing him, demanding that he be returned to office, without any input from the president, who thinks that Salami can only regain his job just by his saying so. Last week, the NJC, which has been hiding in between the Presidency’s legs on this matter, came out to assert its authority to reinstate Salami without recourse to the president.

    My fear is that the same set of people, who advised him to suspend Salami over two years ago are still around him and may urge him to ignore NJC. To them, NJC’s well-informed position may not be more than the rantings of an ant. That is where they are making a mistake.

    NJC is constitutionally empowered to discipline judges and in the exercise of that power, it does not report to anybody, including the president, but politics has changed things. This is why today, the NJC is tied to the apron string of the Presidency to which some of its past leaders sold its birth right. NJC under Katsina-Alu was a toothless bulldog in the Salami case because the former chief justice was working hands in glove with politicians to get the PCA out of the way.

    What the present NJC leadership is trying to do is to reverse the wrong done Salami and restore the people’s hope in the judiciary as the bulwark against oppression and injustice. Salami has suffered indignities in past two years despite his high office. If Salami could be so treated, what will be the fate of those who are not as privileged as him? The NJC has said it all that it reserves the right to recall him.

    In papers filed in court, it said the president has no power or role under the 1999 Constitution or any other law to recall or reinstate Salami or any other justice of the appellate court. It also frowned on the retention of Justice Dalhatu Adamu as acting PCA for two years now in contravention of the Constitution, which Jonathan swore to uphold.

     By now if the Presidency is actually acting with sincerity of purpose in the Salami case, it would have reinstated him in light of the NJC’s stand. But then as we have always maintained in this space, there is more to its action than meets the eye. No matter what happens, one thing is sure, a Daniel has come to judgment, with NJC’s new found courage to state the true position of things. It is a matter of time before Salami returns to his job.

  • A nation hijacked by brigands

    A nation hijacked by brigands

    President Jonathan last week paid glowing tributes to Nigerian founding fathers, who 52 years ago ‘brought joy and hope to the hearts of our people after six decades of colonial rule’. They, as he has rightly observed, achieved the near impossible by working together to restore dignity and honour to a ‘multicultural and multilingual nation of diverse peoples, with more than 250 distinct languages and ethnic groups.’ It cannot be more ironic than that while their unique contributions were being acknowledged, the general lamentations of the people has been about the exploitation of this very diversity by brigands that have left in their trail, a legacy of inept leadership, missed opportunities, corruption, greed and debilitating poverty in the amidst the bandit’s illegitimately acquired opulence.

    But then our current state of affairs was a tale foretold by the colonialists who were forced from their hostile environment where life was the survival of the fittest, by a desire for exploitation. If the misery of others will guarantee the attainment of goals of better life for those escaping from an environment where life was ‘nasty, brutish, and short’, sowing the seed of distrust and instability among the newly conquered territories was not considered immoral.

    We have since observed from ‘The End of Empire’ (BDEE) (ed Martin Lynn) that the British influenced the outcome of the pre-independence census and elections in favour of the north which as a result went ahead to hold onto power for about 40 years of the 52 years of independence producing nine of the nation’s 13 leaders. And as was pre-planned, all with exception of Buhari, supported the West’s economic policies that merely ensure we continue to pay for the social problems of Europe. Today as equal member of globalised economy, cattle farmers in the West get government daily subsidy of $2 per cattle while 80% of Nigeria so called equal partners live below a $1 a day.

    And as it is always the case, nationalism itself is not often driven by a deep sense of altruism. In this regard, it soon became obvious that our celebrated nationalists were no exception. Their resistance to foreign rule was driven more by personal ambitions and as representatives of ethnic nationalities. Thus they craved for their own nation states within the greater Nigerian nation. Nigeria, they said was a ‘geographical expression’ or a British intention’. Two years into independence after their epic battle against the unrepentant exploiters who merely replaced slave trade, the outdated and primitive tool of exploitation with neo-colonialism, which Nkrumah pronounced the worst form of colonialism, signs of cracks became noticeable and by 1966, the whole edifice had collapsed.

    It started in 1962 when Balewa encouraged hoodlums to take over the South-west and legitimized the action by an illegal declaration of state of emergency with tacit support of Zik, ostensibly over throwing of chairs by a few hoodlums in the Western House of Assembly. The hoodlums were to be further rewarded with the 1965 Western Region rigged election. The mayhem that followed the federal government perfidy was the only excuse required by more vicious brigands to unleash terror on their benefactors and comrades in arms. An orgy of more mindless sectional killings of military personnel was to follow in July 1966.

    From then on, every new set of hoodlums have been more vicious than the last.

    If we thought the reign of brigands ended with the civil war, we were living a lie. Babangida emerged in 1985 at the head of economic brigands that was to finally bring the nation to its knees. Just as colonialism held no pretentions to exploitation, the military with a culture of pillaging conquered territories descended on Nigeria under western-inspired Structural Adjustment Programme, (SAP). With its dubious privatisation and commercialisation policies, they sold all the commercial concerns established by the founding fathers to themselves and their cronies. For about 13 years stretching through Babangida and Abacha periods, the economy came under severe strains. Part of SAP legacy is that an exchange rate which was almost at par with American dollar in 1985 is today N160 to$1.

    For 13 years, Babangida and Abacha groomed new breed of politicians that bred nothing but corruption. When unleashed on the nation in 1999, it instantly took the form of an economic gangster. El Rufai’s recently disclosed how, through the instrumentality of Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), members of the gang shared among its members most blue-chip Nigerian companies. As if to confirm they are all brigands, nearly all their leading light such as, former party chairmen, ex-Senate presidents, ex-Speakers of the Lower House, ex-Governors, serving House Committee chairmen, top bankers and other leaders of industries have by different judicial pronouncements in the past 13 years been declared ordinary felons.

    Now we have been reminded by those who have always benefited from our instability and stand to gain even more if we descend into warring sects of ethnic nationalities that we are rated 14thon the index of failed state. Some of the signs we are told include endemic corruption by the governing political class, absence of transparency and accountability by the political class and loss of confidence of the ruled in the existing institutions

    They gave as further evidence; absence of functional government that can guarantee safety of lives and properties, the two major reasons why people trade their liberty for government protection; corrupt judiciary which in own case has in recent months ceded its function to other nations’ judiciary, endemic corruption, as evident in the mindless looting by government agencies as we have catalogued above. A recent study has also shown 80% of businesses in Nigeria bribe government officials. An earlier study has also shown the police, the customs, the road safety agency are all havens for corrupt officials.

    But is there any light at the end the tunnel with the on-going reign of economic gangsters, political brigands and hoodlums that have taken over parts of the South-east, South-south and the whole of North-east? President Jonathan thinks so. Curiously, he is putting his bet on the old strategies that brought the nation to its knees. He alone for instance thinks repeating Babangida, Abacha, Obasanjo fraudulent approach to constitutional review will produce a good architectural design that is needed to build a new edifice for the future of our children. He alone thinks economic whiz kids who have been alleged to be part of the banking scams and who are benefiting from the current anarchy will guarantee development.

    And as for the rest of us, the submissive members of a nation of miracle-seekers who dream of victories without wars, we have become prayer warriors. In my church, our bishop composed for us a very powerful prayer for Nigeria in time of distress which we have recited with glee all through Babangida, Abacha and PDP’s 26 years. Our Pentecostal cousins are praying hard to ‘stop evil men from ruling us’. Our Muslim brothers are engaged in the same ritual, doling out huge amounts to Muslim clerics. The only thing missing in all this is our refusal to hearken to God’s admonition that ‘we reap what we sow’.

    Perhaps it is time to stop mocking our Almighty Father who has lain down in all the holy books, the precepts on how to govern societies including details on how to curtail the excesses of brigands and hoodlums, to whom God in his infinite wisdom assigned roles.