Category: Tuesday

  • Let there be light

    By Gabriel Amalu

    As Nigeria in a pre-creation stage, just as the earth “was without form, and void” at the beginning of time? Perhaps high-minders or idealists would say of course; what with the violence and brigandage that is now a daily occurence in our country. But even the optimists are beginning to doubt the grounds of their optimism, with the carnage going on across the country. Now kidnappers after collecting huge ransoms, go ahead to decapitate their victims, as happened recently to Michael Nnadi, a Seminarian at Good Shepherd Major Seminary, Kaukau, Kaduna.

    For reasons we may never be able to fathom, the Kaduna kidnappers are a special bread. They delight in killing even when huge ransoms have been paid. The other time they took a mother and her two kids, murdered the mother, and released the motherless babies, after collecting ransoms from the traumatised medical doctor, husband and father.

    So is Nigeria, at the beginning of creation, when according to the Holy Bible, “darkness was on the face of the deep?” Many would argue that literally and figuratively, Nigeria is in darkness. With the national grid, failing intermittently, electricity has become scarcer than essential commodity, as experienced during President Muhammadu Buhari’s first incarnation. Where it possible, Nigerians would have been forced to queue up for a ration of electricity, as in the days of yore.

    The gospel reading, Matthew 5:13-16, last Sunday in Catholic Churches was particularly instructive, as it talked about the importance of light. Jesus called His disciples, the light of the world, urging them to give “light to all in the world.” Rev Fr. Melvis Maiyaki, who preached at a Mass yours sincerely attended used the excitement that electric light brings, to illustrate the qualities Jesus envisages for His disciples. Perhaps, Nigeria needs leaders who can bring light to our blighted country.

    Without light, poverty endures. The barber idles away, even as the pepper grinder turns a loafer. Darkness entrenches laziness. But the country is too poor to promote laziness. So, like Jesus’s disciples, let the light so shine that Nigerians can have the opportunity to do good works and earn decent living. When federal government promotes the ease of doing business, to attract businesses, the starting point should be regular power supply. Without regular electricity, doing business would never be easy.

    This is particularly so for small scale enterprises, which cannot afford private power generation schemes. The crisis of unemployment would dramatically come down, if there is regular electricity supply. So let there be light, if we hope to put the youths roaming the country to work. Even the touted agricultural revolution may come to nought if the farm produce cannot be processed further. While awaiting the big companies to convert tomatoes to puree, families should be able to boil theirs and store them in the freezers for months.

    Small scale companies would also be able to convert yams and other tubers to flour, and sell. Cooperatives would be able to buy meats and fish in big quantities and members will buy at cheaper rates and store in chillers. Water, soft drink and beer sellers would make bigger sales, even pepper soup joints would boom with light. Night crawlers would operate more smoothly.

    Regular power supply would make Nigeria the preferred destination for investment in West Africa or even Africa. She will be “a city set on a hill (which) cannot be hid.” China became a world economic power because of cheap labour and availability of modern factors of production, like electricity. No manufacturing company would rate Nigeria a preferred destination, if electricity is scarce, even though she has the advantage of cheap labour workforce. But to take full advantage of the cheap labour, electricity has to be available.

    Going forward it is strange that the Buhari presidency which has shown courage in fighting other endemic national problems like corruption is shying away from confronting the menace of electricity challenge in our country. I dare postulate that the challenge posed by poor electricity supply in Nigeria, is as debilitating as the impact of corruption on our national life, if not more. After all, corruption feeds on poverty, and the greatest contributor to poverty in modern times is arguably the lack of electricity.

    With electricity in rural communities, learning is cheaply available. A child could drink from the fountains of the greatest teachers on earth through the use of tablets. He or she could read the most impactful books, and ask questions and get answers like the privileged in cities. Education becomes cheap if there is regular supply of electricity. The same with food. Without regular electricity, the school feeding programme cannot be sustained in the long run, because the food vendors would regularly run at a loss, if they have to keep buying a day’s need daily.

    Of course an educated and well developed child, is a panacea against corruption. As Apostle Matthew said: “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.” So electricity would reduce political corruption and financial corruption. For instance, which well-educated child would agree to be a political thug? That is why Governor Ganduje of Kano is educating the Almajiris. Electricity could make it easier

    Education is also a liberator. It is an antidote to fanaticism, one of the modern scourges of our country. If it doesn’t cure the purveyor, it will cure the receiver of the evil of fanatical believes. With information at the touch of bottom, information would damper fanatical tell tales. Electricity will also help disseminate information on mass media, and that would help improve the quality of health care. Medical consultation on video is helping to save lives. Even the campaign against Lassa and Coronavirus needs electricity to spread and save lives.

    The gains of regular supply of electricity is immeasurable, so let there be light. Indeed, Genesis 1: 4 says: “And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness.” What is keeping Nigerian leaders from seeing that the light is good? Or better still, why has Nigerians leaders refused to give what is good to the people? After all, many of them budget huge sums from our common patrimony to ensure constant supply of electricity to their homes and offices.

    There is an urgent need to revisit the power privatisation programme of the past regime, so that those with the technical know-how could get in to give Nigerians light. Also, there is no sane reason why we should have only one national grid. So, let there be light in the minds of those who could give Nigerians light.

    • email: gabrielamalu1@yahoo.com 07056004456 (Sms only, please)
  • ‘What does Jerry still want?’

    Olatunji Dare

     

    IF Dr Jerry Gana or his friends are reading this piece, they should rest easy.  It is not about him.

    Since his most recent presidential bid failed, the genial former academic who has logged probably a great deal more mileage across political territory and political appointments than most Nigerians living or dead has barely registered in the news.

    He always kept a low profile anyway in his many manifestations as a professor of geography, senator, director of the agency for food and rural development DFRRI, chief of the agency for social mobilization MAMSER, minister of agriculture and national resources, minister of information and culture, minister of information and national orientation, minister for cooperation and integration in Africa, and in his several runs for president.

    These appointments encompassed the era of military president Ibrahim Babangida, the interim administration of the deluded Ernest Shonekan, the brutal regime of Sani Abacha and Olusegun Obasanjo’s two terms.  But Gana never lost his equanimity, his even temperament.  More importantly, he was never tainted by scandal.

    This piece is about Jeremiah Useni, or Jerry as he likes to be called, another perennial presence in the political firmament who has been around for so long and held so many political appointments on so many fronts that even members of the attentive audience might be forgiven if they have forgotten that he was a military officer for practically all those years, more so, since along the way, he took the evocative title of Sardauna of Langtang and became chair of the National Council of Traditional Rulers.

    Few Nigerians have been given as many opportunities as Useni to serve the public and make a difference in the lives of his compatriots and the fortunes of his country – minister of transport and aviation, military governor of the old Bendel State, minister for Abuja Federal Capital Territory, and member of the Senate, the only position he won through an election rather than preferment.

    Somebody once said that they just kept moving him from one gold mine to another

    When Useni was appointed Minister of Transport Aviation, he was assigned the house formerly occupied by Umaru Dikko, who was well know known for his aristocratic taste.  A former student of mine, a senior official in that ministry, was assigned to get the house ready for the incoming occupant.

    Virtually everything had to be upgraded.  Appliances had to be the latest.  Furnishings, crockery, flatware and stemware had to be the finest.   Taking a cue from mai gida, the mai guard said the black-and-white television in his post was outmoded.  Pronto, the mai gida ordered that it be replaced with the latest, in living colour.  And so on and so forth.

    One day the supervising official, my former student, came to my office at the University of Lagos, utterly dejected.  He said he was scandalised by the cost of getting the house ready for Useni and was going to ask to be transferred to another department or ministry.  He said he feared that if it became public, the whole thing was going to stir up public outrage and that there         was no way he could defend or explain it away.

    Today’s civil service, it is necessary to interject, is governed by a different ethos.

    From Useni’s profligacy regarding the furnishing of his official residence, it was but a natural progression to the acquisition spree he embarked upon when he was named minister for the Abuja Federal Capital Territory.

    That portfolio made him sole administrator and dispenser of prime real estate worth at least as much as Nigeria’s oil fields.  And you needed no oil rigs, no pipelines, foreign technical partners, no syndicated loans, and no long wait to cash in.  All you needed was access to Useni, and you emerged clutching a piece of paper allocating a piece of the choice land to you.

    It was a fail-safe transaction, translating into instant wealth, in cash.

    Useni cornered a vast swath of the estate for himself, not forgetting his friends and cronies.  With funds of dubious provenance, he acquired and acquired more, on a scale beyond belief:  shopping malls, warehouses, residential homes, office blocs, undeveloped parcels of land all over the country.  When a man celebrates his 17th wedding anniversary on a lavish scale as Useni did, you know that money is no longer his problem but how to spend it.

    To be specific, his acquisitions confiscated by the Federal Government, apart from the N4 billion reportedly recovered from one of his homes, N2 billion of it in foreign currency, included a terminal in Jos, from where he operated a transport service with a fleet of 20 buses;  controlling shares in a bank, two shopping malls in Abuja, 40 lock-up stalls in Garki and Wuse districts of Abuja, more than 70 undeveloped plots in Abuja, more than 30 houses in Langtang and Abuja, and 43 personal cars.

    Not even the “special oil allocations” he said he had enjoyed “along with others” for three years as a member of the Armed Forces Ruling Council can begin to account for his sprawling portfolio, of which the foregoing is but an abbreviation.

    It is as if Useni had, well before his first public appointment, taken a vow to compensate himself over and over again for, and insulate himself from, the material deprivations of his childhood years in his native Langtang.

    Before then, he had been unmasked as the official who procured the women and manned the gates while his friend and principal Sani Abacha indulged himself in orgies of debauchery that eventually claimed his life.

    For a time, Useni vanished from headlines and the footnotes.  Not even his comprehensive notoriety, it seemed, was enough to earn him the attention of the junk press.  So they left him severely alone, thinking that he was finished.

    But Useni is nothing if not durable.

    He would bob up among the unrepentant enablers of Sani Abacha’s brutal dictatorship parading themselves as apostles of democracy, and even emerge as a chieftain of the ANPP, and later chair of its breakaway faction, the Democratic Party.

    Losing his bid for election to the Senate on the platform of that party in 2011, Useni defected to the PDP and was four years later elected to the Senate on that platform.  Not one to settle for mere “distinguished senator” when he can return to being “His Excellency,” and “Executive Governor” as a civilian, he entered the race for Plateau State governor, against Simon Lalong, the incumbent and his daughter’s former classmate.

    On every lip, the question was:  What does Jerry still want? He lost.

    Useni’s latest quest ended last week when the Supreme Court affirmed the verdicts of the lower tribunals and held that his appeal lacked merit.  And now, Useni finds himself in the unusual position of wielding no authority from an appointive office and no influence from a political perch.

    In the decades of his immersion in Nigeria’s public life, it is doubtful whether he has ever had a chance or an inclination to reflect seriously on his career and what it all means.

    This is perhaps Useni’s best chance to do so, forthrightly.

    What are his signal achievements in the ministries and agencies over which he presided? Where are the monuments he built? What marks did he make on public policy, and on the lives of his compatriots?  How is he going to be remembered?  In short, what is his legacy?

    He should not leave the answers entirely to history.

  • Minimum expectations

    By Gabriel Amalu

     

    There are minimum expectations from those in charge of our affairs, at the federal and state levels, but it appears we are in a season of great disappointments.

    From President Muhammadu Buhari, the nation expects answers to the insecurity in the land, while from the governors, the workers are asking for minimum wage. In a parody of Charles Dickens: Great Expectations, the minimum expectations are not being met.

    Last week, the president himself admitted as much. He said he was ‘taken aback’ at the resurgence of insecurity in the land, and his opponents and concerned Nigerian have lampooned him to no end, in a manner likening him to Pip, the lead character, in Great Expectations.

    Pip had his ups and downs, and despite the opportunity to learn to become a gentleman via the support of a roguish benefactor, he could not meet his great expectations, including gaining the affection of Estella, when he wanted it most.

    But Buhari shouldn’t be Pip, because he still has time to deal with the insecurity monster threatening to upend our country, and as a retired General, he is considered to have the capacity to deal with it.

    For many, taming insecurity in the land was why he was elected in the first place. The President must therefore not fail in the primary reason for his election and re-election. For this column, the President’s challenge is applying the same medicine, which is glaringly ineffective.

    Last week’s brouhaha in the National Assembly, is a pointer that even among Buhari’s admirers, they expect him to buckle up.

    The senate president who hails from the epicentre of the resurgent insurgency confirmed as much by his remarks, even though he did not ask for the president’s head, unlike the minority leader in the senate. For the two chambers of the National Assembly, it is time to say good bye to the service chiefs, who have overstayed their welcome.

    While clearly the service chiefs, who have reached their retirement age, should be allowed to go home and rest, I doubt if new security chiefs would be expected to deal with the other internal insecurity in the other parts of the country.

    As I argued last week on this page, the present federal government must come to tms that the present security architecture is not working, and unless necessary changes are made, the president should not be ‘taken aback’ if the entire country is suddenly engulfed in crisis.

    And the reason for the severe insecurity across the country is partly because the policing structure is grossly ineffective, and you cannot be applying the same medicine that is not curing an ailment, and wishing the sickness will just disappear.

    To make matters worse, it appears the feared Islamic State of West Africa (ISWA) or Boko Haram, are getting fresh funding, as they are reportedly getting access to new weaponry, even as our country’s capacity to keep fighting is getting overstretched with the unending war.

    So there should be concerted effort to deal with the internal security challenges in other parts of the country without involving the army, so the army can concentrate their efforts in the northeast. That is where the need to restructure the policing architecture comes in.

    If states and local governments that have the resources are allowed to establish their own policing architecture, albeit with clearly defined limited powers; to a large extent, insecurity in other parts of the country could be dealt with. That relief will allow the nation’s military concentrate in the northeast.

    With the benefit of hindsight, it is hoped that corruption is not part of the challenge causing the resurgence of insecurity in the country. Every day we are assailed with allegations of grand larceny by officials of the past regime.

    Just like the Sani Abacha loot saga, cases of looting of our common treasury under the past regime, continues to surface every day. Most repulsing are cases where the officials convert monies meant for arms purchase to buy houses and exotic cars.

    While everything humanly possible should done to recover the looted funds, Nigerians pray that similar acts of banditry is not going on under the table presently. The recent allegation by former President Olusegun Obasanjo that corruption is alive and thriving under the present government should not be dismissed with a wave of hand.

    Apart from getting elected to fight insecurity, the other reason why President Buhari was elected is to fight corruption, and to a large extent there are evidences that past corruptions cases are being unearthed and prosecuted.

    Even Buhari’s fiercest critics would agree that reasonable successes have been achieved in the fight against corruption. But, the president should also worry, whether similar acts of corrupt practices as happened in the past are being replicated by those serving in the present government.

    If it is happening then the war against insecurity in the land will not make progress, after all, a prolonged war can become veritable avenue for corrupt enrichment; just like in the past. So, this column hopes that on the two fronts, the president will meet the minimum expectation.

    On their part, the new minimum wage is the minimum expectation from the state governors. According to media reports, some states, including the centre of excellence, Lagos, have started paying the minimum wage from last month.

    The states which are yet to agree on the modalities for payment with the labour unions are being threatened with strike by the workforce. They should not wait for workers to down tools, before they do what the law provides. More importantly, the minimum wage is truly minimum.

    For this column, there is no excuse to delay the payment of the new minimum wage, considering the cost of living in the country. The excuse by some states that they cannot pay is not tenable, because it doesn’t reflect in the life style of those in the corridors of power.

    They all live well, while the workers, especially those at the low level cadres are living in penury. So, if truly any of the states can’t pay, it should reflect in the lifestyle of those in charge.

    One minimum expectation President Buhari has failed to deliver, is the rescue of Leah Sharibu, the lone Dapchi girls left behind, after other were released by the Boko Haram.

    Our great expectation that President Buhari would secure her freedom has further been dampened by the searing news that she has been raped and made a mother by the leader of the sect.

    Perhaps, her ordeal will remain one of the greatest tragedies of modern Nigeria. With the government failing Leah, I pray for the mercy of God on her.

  • Strange times indeed

    By Sanya Oni

     

    If Nigerians were ever in doubt about how far removed the current minders of the security establishment are from the new thinking required for the current time, they only need at to look at the spate of events since the governors of the Southwest launched the regional security initiative – Operation Amotekun.

    Nearly a month after, we have heard just enough of panic, denunciations, recriminations and brazen threats to make our cup of bad faith full and running over.

    Part of that, I presume, is the sudden announcement of the take-off of the long-awaited community policing programme.  At a time most Nigerians were probably still chewing the import of Attorney-General Abubakar Malami’s declaration of the initiative as “illegal”,  they woke up to the news of a signal from the  police authorities to their various formations across the country to commence the recruitment of special constables nationwide preparatory to the implementation of the community policing programme.

    Unfortunately, if that move was meant to steal the thunder from the regional initiative, it would seem to have had a direct opposite effect; Operation Amotekun would appear a done-deal if the mood across the Southwest is anything to go by.

    As one might expect, the mind games – that is what I call it – would appear to have move to another phase. Now, the Assistant Inspector General of Police in charge of Zone X1, Leye Oyebade under whose watch the spectacular pro-Amotekun rallies took place across parts of the southwest has reportedly been shoved aside – replaced by AIG Bashir D. Makama with the former posted to National Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies as a directing staff.

    Did I hear Siberia?

    Trust the police hierarchy to swear by the seventh heaven that posting was borne of service exigency; there are millions who, in the context of the preceding events, would smell mischief.

    And trust the institution to be bothered less by optics of the distracting sideshows by its hierarchy at a time of grave crisis, there will hopefully, still be time to spare for those bandits running riot all over the country with their harvests of sorrows, tears, and blood.

    This is where the tragedy looms. While the debate and the ensuing animus over the Amotekun initiative boils over, the nation is afforded the luxury of ignoring the unfolding disaster in the Northwest and elsewhere.

    Few days into the new year, gunmen, said to number about 100 reportedly stormed Tawari community in Kogi Local Government Area of Kogi State. At the end, 19 people lay dead with several houses burnt. The police, as in all accounts of such nature, only came after the murderers left.

    Few days after, on January 14, it was the turn of bandits, operating around Fandatio village, near Maraban Jos along the Kaduna-Zaria high way.  This time, their target was the convoy of Umaru Bubaram, Emir of Potiskum, Yobe State. In the attack, six persons were felled, including four of the emir’s aides.

    Today, the latest trending story is the heart-rending murders of the duo of Mrs. Philip Ataga and the Catholic seminarian, Michael Nnaji both of whom were abducted by some bandits on January 24.

    The same week, the newspaper reported how bandits operated twice within 24 hours interval at the Kaduna Railway terminus injuring many commuters and kidnapping a few others.

    And yet we have a police still answering to the name!

    Read Also: Southwest lawmakers awaiting bill to legalise Amotekun

     

    Yours truly is still struggling to digest the import of the statement credited to President Muhammadu Buhari on the security situation during the course of a visit by personalities from Niger State.

    Said President Buhari: “I was taken aback by what is happening in the North-west and other parts of the country…During our campaigns, we knew about the Boko Haram.

    What is coming now is surprising. It is not ethnicity or religion; rather it is one evil plan against the country…We have to be harder on them. One of the responsibilities of government is to provide security. If we don’t secure the country, we will not be able to manage the economy properly.’’

    Now, that is a tough one to swallow, coming from the commander-in-chief. That the president could be “taken aback by what is happening in the North-west” obviously says a lot not just about the quality, relevance and timeliness of the intelligence being availed him by those charged with that duty; more than mere indictment of the current mind-set governing the security architecture, it is a measure of how dated the thinking in those quarters have become over time.

    Moreover, in an age where intelligence constitutes a huge chunk of the security infrastructure, I guess the debate should no longer be about exclusivity, but a framework that best serves the needs of the people.

    As they say, nothing is new under the sun. Not kidnapping; not banditry or even terrorism. The difference is how they have evolved over time. And because they have evolved, it means those charged with the duty have to be several steps ahead in their game.

    Today, no one argues why the customs, the immigration, the civil defence, the neighbourhood vigilantes, the Hisbah and the countless other security initiatives should be. It’s all about filling the emerging void in the security system. What is important is that they all advance the goal of the orderly society. What needs to change is the governing mind-set that seeks to put security in some exclusive club.

    Part of the job of the Ninth National Assembly must be to help break down the wall of exclusivity and defensiveness. After all, members are known to have in their employ mai-guards for routine security work.

    Obviously, if that is good for the individual, it should be good for anyone desirous of a security framework to do so within the bounds of the law.

  • Kwara: post-Otoge wars

    Olakunle Abimbola

     

    In Kwara, the opening battle, of post-Otoge wars, has flared on the necromancy front.

    On Ile Arugbo (old people’s home), the Sarakis have pitched the formidable memory of Oloye, the late but well loved Dr. Olusola Saraki, against the executive integrity of Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRasaq.

    It is a classic sight of the dead, not staying dumb, taking pot shots at the living!

    Crave the potency of political necromancy, which Ripples, in an earlier piece (13 March 2018), defined as “the devastating politics of the dead, for the deadly benefits of the living”?

    Look no farther than Peter Obi, he of the (in)famous China stats, former Anambra governor and running mate to Atiku Abubakar, in their failed run for the presidency in 2019.

    Governor Obi, en route to enthroning Obiano as successor would, protégée in tow, do numberless sorties to the Nnewi tomb of Eze Igbo Gburugburu, Emeka Ojukwu, the late Ikemba.

    In the very living business of Peter and Willy, the dead Ikemba was the spark: to power the very serious business of Obiano succeeding Obi.  No less crucial was APGA, of which the mighty Ikemba was revered spiritual leader.

    As it turned out, Ojukwu is dead and gone. Obi and Obiano are done and dusted. APGA, for Obi, is dead as dodo.   The dead, of course, stay dumb.  So long for political necromancy!

    Not so in Kwara. But to be fair, you can’t blame the Sarakis for starting the fray, even if they are guilty as charged, for charging in from the necromancy front.

    In December 2019, the Kwara government had announced the reactivation of a long-truncated plan to build, for the state, a befitting government secretariat. It even outed with its model, pretty, modern and impressive.

    The snag, though, was that the land, on which the new public service edifice would stand, was the same land, housing the spiritual — if symbolic — soul of the Sarakis’ prime private interests, which feeds a doting and sympathetic rabble.

    That was “crossing the red line”, to use the exact words of Bukola Saraki, former Senate president and prime family scion, charging in hopping mad, like an enraged bull, after a red rag; hoisting the Saraki family standard, in high combat, to save family honour.  Enter, the Ile Arugbo debacle!

    Saraki the Son raved and railed, roared and foamed, growled and swore: he would unhorse the governor yet, for hiding behind state duties to settle ancient scores, between the Sarakis and the AbdulRasaqs, simply because he had fleeting gubernatorial powers.

    The rabble, both the Ilorin street battalion and the elite media corps, got the hint and rallied with a flourish — injury to the Oloye is injury to all!

    By carefully framing what the government claimed was sound public policy, as rabid Saraki-AbdulRasaq family squabble, Saraki the Son tapped into the lethal emotional stream of Saraki the Father.  The old Oloye army got stoutly and proudly roused!

    Rise o Kwara!  Post-Otoge wars are here, with an opening proxy campaign, blistering and savage, in memory of the late Oloye!

    It couldn’t get more explosive: Saraki the Son, acclaimed master of subterfuge, in the high capital of political mesu jamba (local lingo for high-wire intrigue), angling to get back on the Kwara high hustle, after the Otoge routing of 2019!

    Why, Gbemisola, Saraki the Daughter, no political friend of big brother, and current minister of the Federal Republic, weighed in, in fond memory of doting father — and with good reasons!

    It was on account of Saraki the Daughter, that Saraki the Son, defanged Saraki the Father; in the most ruthless political parricide in Nigerian history — or even regicide, if you regard the Saraki political court as a palladium of democratic feudalism.

    The closest, if far less messy perhaps, was the case of Samuel Goomsu Ikoku, who defeated his own father, Alvan, in the 1957 regional poll, for a seat in the Eastern Region House of Assembly.

    Indeed, the political trinity of Saraki the Father, Saraki the Son, and Saraki the Daughter, is rather gripping.

    Read Also: Abdulrahman apologises to Kwara govt

     

    At the zenith of their Kwara hegemony, the patriarch happened on the hubris — no: not a few swear it was solemn promise from a doting dad to an adorable daughter — that Saraki the Daughter would succeed Saraki the Son, in a conservative state none was sure was ready for a female governor; but which only the beloved Oloye could swing.

    The Son picked the most accurate signal, and stonewalled the Father, in painful democratic regicide, lest the dynasty come crashing down, on account of paterfamilias hubris.

    But that high moral didn’t stop the Son and outgoing governor, from succeeding the Daughter and outgoing senator — chauvinist-powered hypocrisy, if there was one!

    Still, as new master of Kwara politics, Saraki the Son, in no time morphed into a feudal Rehoboam, from the feudal Solomon his father was.  He scorched his “subjects” with scorpion, from the loving whips of the revered Oloye.

    That outside resent, coupled with intra-family feuding, oozing from a humiliated father and grudging daughter, laid the foundation for the Otoge electoral rout of 2019, after eight long years of incubation.

    Before that crash, however, the subversive love of feudal giving might have birthed a sense of (im)moral entitlement, that made little demarcation between public wealth and private trove.

    That must have birthed the Ile Arugbo, pat in the middle of a parcel of land, long earmarked for the Kwara Secretariat.

    The Sarakis, flaunting a document, claimed that public land was private property fair and square.  But the government countered the document was incomplete and the transaction inchoate; since there was, from government records, no evidence of payment and legal transfer.

    The court was to settle the debacle, until one of the parties sued for out-of-court settlement.  But even at that last meeting, the Saraki side didn’t show up.  They only sent in a letter, requesting a fresh date.

    Meanwhile, in the pre-court season of high-octane bluff and bluster, Brother and Sister Sarakis  insisted no one — repeat, no one: not even a “power-drunk” governor — could undo their father, the Oloye’s “legacy”.

    But what legacy?  The democratic feudal feeding of the rabble, which the stark and irreverent Ayo Fayose had unmasked as “stomach infrastructure”, in his best forgotten second romp at power, in neighbouring Ekiti State?

    On Ile Arugbo, the court would decide who blinks.  But whoever wins, that battle is only the opener of the blistering wars to come, for the soul of Kwara, in the post-Otoge years.

    The Sarakis’ odyssey is well cut out.  But it appears not many would lose any sleep, should they get further cooked.  Their rabid appeal to base emotion, over Ile Arugbo, is hardly a winning formula, against a Kwara government that appears anchored on solid public policy.

    But the bell hardly tolls for them.  Rather, it does for the AbdulRasaq government, that by the Ile Arugbo campaign, appears opening a new and exciting vista for equal-opportunity access, from the subversive feudal generosity of the Saraki hegemonic years.

    It is condemned to delivering on its enchanting mandate.

  • Tinubu as nationalist

    By Gabriel Amalu

    The controversy generated by the response of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister for Justice Abubakar Malami, SAN, to the proposed Western Nigeria Security Network, otherwise called Operation Amotekun, was expected.

    After all, it is the exclusive police powers, which Malami’s employers have wielded, albeit inefficiently, that the southwest governors are proposing to contract.

    But interestingly, instead of joining the fray on the southwest side, the former governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu called for dialogue between the federal government and the southwest governors.

    This column which has in the past 10 years advocated for the orderly decentralisation of police powers in Nigeria, agrees with the preeminent leader and politician.

    That is the way we must go, otherwise those controlling the levers of power would wake-up one day, to confront a total breakdown of law and order in the country.

    The Amotekun debacle is a pointer, and as should be clear to everyone, any effort to shoot down the outfit by fiat, could spiral out of control because the people are tired of waiting for an ordered decentralisation that law and order dictates.

    Significantly, few days ago, the President General of Ohaneze, Dr Nnia Nwodo, speaking on African Independent Television (AIT), was blunt in his claim that the 1999 constitution was foisted on the rest of the country by the military wing of those who won the civil war, arguing that it was skewed to favour their fancies.

    While his assertion appears incongruous to the reaction of the AGF to the southwest which ranks amongst the victors in the civil war, it is becoming crystal clear that the quasi-unitary constitution we operate needs tweaking.

    Interestingly, the states in the middle belt of the country have met since the birth of Amotekun to chart the way forward with respect to the debilitating insecurity in the region.

    One of their resolutions is the commitment to establish a regional security outfit. No doubt, Benue, Taraba, Gombe and Plateau in the middle belt of the country are under the siege of armed bandits, and a collaborative effort on security amongst the states could help.

    Of course, the south-south part of the country is permanently on the boil, partly because of the surrogate fights over the mineral oil in the region. S

    o, if there is any region that needs to collaborate on security, the states are in the south-south. And so whether as Egbesu or by whatever name it may be called, a regional police may soon rise in the region, or if they cannot agree, as a group, separately in the individual states that make up the region.

    As succinctly argued by the protagonists of Amotekun, there is already regional police and para-military agencies in the northwest and northeast of the country by way of Hisbah police and civilian JTF.

    Their argument being that what is good for the geese is good for the gander, unless of course, we are living in an Animal Farm, where some animals are more equal than others.

    They are seeing Amotekun as the solution to the massive insecurity in the region, and that is why they reacted very emotionally to the diktat by the AGF.

    So, when the AGF Malami barks as the governors of the southwest region take steps to set up a quasi-police structure to protect those who live within the southwest states, from the grave insecurity plaguing the country, the AGF is concerned that the enormous police powers of the federal government, which he works for, is further whittled down in the region.

    Read Also: How to resolve Operation Amotekun impasse, by Tinubu

    But, willy-nilly, those powers are already whittled down, by none-state actors, like the armed herdsmen, Boko Haram, and other organised criminal entrepreneurs.

    Without further hesitation, the federal government must latch onto Asiwaju Tinubu’s mediatory advice to address the ineffective policing structure in the country.

    Any strong-arm tactics of trying to intimidate sub-regional governments looking for solution to the security problem will further create doubt about the neutrality of the federal government, especially because of the crisis of confidence generated by what many perceive as the double standard of the federal government in handling the herdsmen-farmers crisis in the country.

    Of note, the northwest where the president comes from, and where the herdsmen dominate, is also exposed to severe insecurity. Indeed, there are also clashes between the herdsmen and farmers, even though the causa belle may be different.

    So, the scourge of insecurity is so high in all parts of the country that finding a common solution should be top priority. But instead, we see political skirmishes, while the insecurity monster plaguing the country raves.

    For this writer, without the enablement of the law, that would allow Amotekun to legitimately bear arms, investigate crime, arrest and prosecute offenders, the on-going effort may not yield the desired result. So, the call by Tinubu for dialogue is strategic.

    Of note, Kenichi Ohmae, in his book: Mind of the Strategist, wrote: “What marks the mind of the strategist is an intellectual elasticity or flexibility that enables him to come up with realistic responses to changing situations, not simply to discriminate with great precision among different shades of grey.”

    Thankfully, it is the southwest which helped to create the Buhari presidency that initiated the quasi-regional police; otherwise the federal government could have labelled it an insurrection and moved in the military to disperse the launch.

    With the great legal minds the region parades, other Nigerians are waiting for the model law that will be enacted to sustain Amotekun, and give it a fighting chance to deal with the armed banditry that plagues the region, without amending the constitution.

    As stated by Ohmae: “In business as on the battlefield, the object of strategy is to bring about the conditions most favourable to one’s side, judging precisely the right moment to attack or withdraw and always assessing the limits of compromise correctly.”

    It will be historical if the political alignment between the southwest and northwest that gave birth to the present political dispensation could negotiate a change of the nation’s police architecture.

    So, instead of declaring war against the governors of the southwest for forming a regional security network, the AGF should seize the opportunity to advise the federal government to initiate a historic dialogue over the nation’s police architecture.

    As John Maxwell, wrote in the 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: “How do leaders earn respect? By making sound decisions, admitting their mistakes, and putting what’s best for their followers and the organization ahead of their personal agendas.”

    Perhaps, for the country to make progress, the time to return Nigeria to the pre-civil war federal principles has come.

  • Matters lexical

    Olatunji Dare

     

     

    FINALLY, finally, the best authorities on the English language have decided to enrich it by yielding to some of the more creative and distinctive locutions that have emerged from Nigeria over the decades and will no doubt continue to emerge.

    In its latest update, the Oxford English Dictionary catalogues a number of Nigerian English words make it into the dictionary for the first time, most of them borrowings from Nigerian languages, or unique Nigerian coinages that entered English in the 1970s and 1980s.

    This development is liberating.  One can now use terms such as buka, or its more gentrified form bukateria without having to explain their meaning to the uninitiated, or even mama put, which at first blush seems incomplete, an expression arrested mid-way. Mama put what? But its apparent incompleteness, I suspect, is what really distinguishes it.

    I suspect that it originated from the average Nigerian’s disdain for standard measures. The food vendor (mama) dishes out food worth in her judgment the exact amount the buyer has indicated, but the buyer will have none of it.  So, the buyer implores the vendor, mama to put more, (shades of Oliver Twist) for the same price.  From this, it was but a short step to mama put as entreaty and  destination.

    Danfo makes the cut as a no-frills form of urban transportation; mass transit without the mass.  Perhaps much more than the defunct Okada Airline whose rutted remains now lie on the fringes of many airports in Nigeria, much more than its proprietor Gabriel Exemption Igbinedion and probably at least as much the university the named for himself, okada will now resonate across the English-speaking world as a motorbike taxi.

    Let us face it:  gubernatorial, of or pertaining to governors, is an ugly word. It is also not a word for headlines, where short but bracing terms count for the most. So Nigerians clipped it to guber.  Now everyone understands what it means.

    Agric has been with us for a long term as an abbreviation for agriculture, hence School of Agric, or BSc (Agric).  As in agric chicken, however, it is now used pejoratively to denote the brittle, commercially reared chicken, in contrast to the much tastier and probably more nutritious ‘native’       or traditionally reared) chicken.

    I used to think that K-leg, was a wholly Nigerian locution for a condition in which    a person’s knees turn inward, resembling the letter K.  Its history, I gather, goes back to 1842.  But its usage to denote a problem, setback, obstacle, or impediment, has been overwhelmingly Nigerian.

    I searched in vain for bow-leg, a condition in which the legs bend outwards, like a bow.  When I was growing up, the thinking was that you had to have bow legs to become a fine footballer, like the great Stanley Matthews and many of our contemporaries who excelled in the beautiful game.  And so, we walked on the edges of our feet, hoping to induce our legs to bend outwards.

    It never worked.

    Purists often frowned upon the use of next tomorrow to designate the day after tomorrow as an especially coarse indication of a poor education, if not outright illiteracy.  Now it is legit.  Eat your heart out, all ye stuffy purists.

    I was pleased to see Kannywood there, depicting the Hausa-language film industry based in Kano.                I hope Nollywood, the much larger English-language move industry, has won recognition, too.  No surprises at the legitimation sef for self nor with chop, which has long stood for food or eating,

    A young man who thought I should know much better once queried my using the terms “barbing” and “put to bed” on this page.  They had sneaked in at time of diminishing returns.  I admitted my error, and he and I became good friends.  Now the venerable Oxford English Dictionary says the usage is permissible.

    When a Nigerian speaks of qualitative education, he or she will be understood to be speaking of education of very high quality, rather than about the quantitative variety.  And when he or she has a gist for you, or has been gisting with another person, it means he or she has some rumor, gossip, or intelligence for you, or has been sharing same with another

    I must say I was disappointed not to find the popular uniquely Nigerian locutions on ground and not on ground in the OED update.  To say the former of a candidate for political office is to say that he or she has good prospects.  To say the latter is to pronounce the candidate politically dead.

    Maybe these terms will appear in the next update, as well as “majorly,” meaning “for the most part,” and others the attentive audience are sure to bring up.

     

    Of chutzpah and irony

    You will have heard the perhaps apocryphal story of young man who killed his parents and at his trial asked the judge to show mercy because he was an orphan.

    That trope is the classic example of what is called chutzpah (hootspah) in the Yiddish.  It means overweening impudence, unexampled temerity, in-your-face brazenness, outrageous effrontery, presumption of the most brazen kind, and like conduct.

    I was reminded of that term and conduct bordering on it the other By Orji Uzor Kalu, who used to be the executive governor of Abia State and until recently the Majority Whip in the Senate as well as the Senator representing Abia Central in that body.

    In the former office, he was presumed Excellent; in the latter, he was deemed Distinguished.  The titles came with the territory. He was nothing of the sort, of course, but he was never in the least embarrassed by the titles. Instead of striving to earn them, he disgraced and betrayed them through and through.

    For each of the eight years he spent in the Executive Mansion, he virtually carted home Abia State’s statutory appropriation from the Federal Exchequer and turned it into his personal portfolio of assets without the least regard for the consequences.

    Drawing on his mastery of stunt and subterfuge, he evaded justice for almost a decade.  But the law finally caught up with him, and he was sentenced to 12-year term in jail — beg your pardon, in a correctional facility.

    It was from there that he filed for release the other day, on the ground that, for every day he was kept there, the good and deserving people of Abia would be denied effective representation in the Senate and a voice in the governance of Nigeria, contrary to the Constitution’s express stipulation that all States shall be treated equally.

    The same Abia State he had sucked dry year after year without remorse or twinge of conscience.  The same Abia he had pillaged to build a personal business empire.

    And now, irony in the United States, where race colours everything and reflected daily in the lived experience of black people, making their very existence fraught.  This condition is amply reflected in their language.

    Driving while black.  Shopping while black.  Dining out while black.  Teaching while black.  Walking the streets while black.  Being ambitious while black.  Stepping out of line while being black, and so on and so forth.    Sometimes, just being black can create difficulties.

    Banking while black is one of the oldest constraints that black people live with the States, was shown dramatically on the floor of a bank the other day.

    A black had gone went to his bank to deposit a substantial sum of money won in a wrongful-dismissal lawsuit against his employers, whom he had accused of racial bias and do some transactions based on the cheques.

    A bank official took a look at the cheques and immediately radioed the police, who stormed the banking hall in a patrol vehicle, with another as back-up.  They were heavily armed.

    The bank’s officials said they suspected forgery and fraudulent intent.  It is doubtful whether they would have harboured such suspicions if the client was white.

    And now, irony of ironies, the black man who was trying to deposit the money he won for termination of appointment on racial grounds has served notice that he is going to file a lawsuit against the bank that worked an embarrassing racial fuss over his own money.

  • History soured by prejudice

    By Olakunle Abimbola

     

    Book: S. Ladoke Akintola: His Life and Times

    Author: Prof. Akinjide Osuntokun

    Publishers: Mosuro Publishers, Ibadan (2010)

     

    History has, more or less, consigned the late Samuel Ladoke Akintola (SLA), the second Premier of 1st Republic Western Region (December 1959 to 15 January 1966), as the ultimate villain of his political era — a perfidious fellow that met a tragic end.

    But the historian demurs, insisting that grim verdict is brutally unfair — for SLA, to use the words of Thomas Hardy, in Tess of the d’Ubervilles, echoing William Shakespeare’s King Lear before him, would appear more sinned against than sinning.

    In any case, that is Prof. Akinjide Osuntokun’s take in this posthumous biography, clearly aimed at rehabilitating SLA’s place in history.  Osuntokun is one of Nigeria’s finest historians.

    That grim take — yes, grim: by the way the author went about his task — is both the strength and weakness of the work.

    Strength, because a renowned historian, by providing “facts”, did a doughty swim against the roaring wave — and verdict — of history, already ingrained, and held near-immutable, by not a few.  Call it a profile in scholarly courage!

    In a Yoruba political cosmos, ripped in a stark saint-sinner divide — Awo and immaculate clan, the eternal saints; Akintola and fallen brood, the execrable sinners — it could well have been a stunning and refreshing triumph of reason over base passion.

    And weakness: that paradise of lithe scholarship, come to soar over flabby emotion, was all too soon lost, with the distinguished historian himself spraying a relay of base — well, unscholarly — commentaries, on the Awolowo persona.

    Awolowo sited a rubber plantation in his village (Ikenne) “against expert advice”; Awo was arrogant and insular, while SLA was affable and debonair; folks, the author prattled, shunned Awo’s imperious summons to his Ibadan home, en route to forming the Action Group (AG), though SLA managed to send a representative.

    The AG journey would start with a more successful — and clearly momentous — meeting at Owo (in present Ondo State) later.

    Even the furious spousal front, of the ferocious war of titanic husbands, from where Hannah Awolowo was uncritically loyal to her husband’s political cause, and Faderera Akintola, the restive one goading her premier-husband to throw off the Awo yoke (both portraiture, the author’s) wasn’t enough to sway the author’s own saint-and-sinner cosmos: Saint SLA; Sinner Awo.

    Nor could this authorial dichotomy flag on the politics-governance-policy front: after the AG crushing defeat at the 1959 federal elections, SLA brought unprecedented regional popularity for the party, to herald his reign as premier (politics); SLA retained most of the Awo era ministers, even if most of them were imposed by the ancien regime (governance); SLA was hobbled in his policy choices because the outgone Awo pre-programmed the cash, in the regional till, to specific projects, aside from having drained most of the regional reserves before quitting as premier (policy).

    Read Also: Buhari to Pa Ayo Fasanmi: You’ve truly upheld Awolowo’s legacies

     

    Now, some of these assertions may have been extracted from clinical historical facts.  For that, the author cannot be blamed.  On the contrary, he should earn praise for unearthing facts, to paint a more balanced picture, of that tempestuous and momentous era.

    But the problem, with all due respect to the distinguished historian, was the array of those facts, arraigned as a rich spray of snide remarks, which ran from the beginning to the end of the work.  It was as if the historian had a personal axe to grind with one of his two grand historical subjects.

    That, again with all due respect, would appear the major flaw of the work, despite its in-depth research; and rich vein of immaculate prose, crystal clear and uncluttered, like sparkling spring water.

    Still, on the SLA question, and his fair place in history, this is a welcome work.  It is the story of an ara oke (up-country bumpkin) — with heavy scarification to boot! — unfazed by the cocky Lagos coastal elite: fashionable conceit, wry condescension, empty superiority complex, and all.

    At Baptist Academy, then on Lagos Island, he not only proved a brilliant and dutiful Science teacher, he was the true Renaissance man: master of the English language, spoken and written; but also arch-purist of his native Oyo-Yoruba tongue, lest any invasion from its Lagos conceited and cosmetic variant.

    That would lay the foundation for SLA, the nonpareil political orator, with savage puns and caustic tongue!  Before then, he had taken his mastery of English into the Daily Service editorial suite.  As editor, he jousted with Nnamdi Azikiwe’s West African Pilot and its alleged Ibo hegemonic plot, for the political soul of colonial Lagos — and Nigeria.

    SLA’s niche for language and logic would fetch him a glorious berth in Law, after harrowing training in England; and gift him a platform to land big in politics, as other Titans of that era.

    In politics, he would become two-time federal minister (unlike now, there were regional ministers too) before climaxing everything with Awo’s succession as Western Region Premier and AG Deputy Leader.

    But as the ripest fruits are saddest (to raid Wole Soyinka’s rebel poem, “Abiku”), history clearly judged SLA, not by his fine personal qualities of early years but by his execrable conduct at his political peak — which also turned his historical nadir — as Western Premier, and (in)famous Awo adversary.

    On that, however, the author argues — and not a few also hold this view, even if fewer still are bold enough to write a treatise to back their claim: SLA was too harshly judged, simply because he eventually lost out, in the titanic political sweepstakes.

    Which puts the question: was Awo over-eulogized, just as SLA was over-demonized?

    Awo, over-eulogized?  Maybe on the human front, in the latter years, when he became a living saint that could do no wrong.  No living being, after all, is perfect!

    But on cutting ideas?  Certainly not!  Awo is the near-sole reason his political generation still hit daily news: thanks to his cutting mind on federalism (which still holds the structural key to Nigeria’s unity-in-diversity); and his developmental torch in social democracy, epitomized by his 1955 free primary education success, a well and truly Nigerian social developmental classic.

    SLA over-demonized?  Ay, but also only on the human front.  Surely no one could be so bad, sans any redeeming features?  Yet, that would appear SLA’s lot — the bogey this work admirably attempted to banish.

    Still, on the legacy front, SLA and Awo couldn’t be more starkly different: the one, the consummate politician that looks no farther than the next election; the other, the astute statesman that looks no nearer than the next generation — and his ready to ride the short-term pain to his long-term gain.

    Not even SLA Akintola: His Life and Times could not fault that assessment.

  • Amotekun: The leopard at the crossroads

    Olatunji Dare

     

    IT is perhaps just as well that the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Malam Abubakar Malami (SAN), peremptorily declared dead on arrival the security network, codenamed Amotekun, or Leopard, that state governments in the Southwest recently inaugurated to complement the federal law enforcement agencies that have proved supinely remiss in containing the menacing bands of marauders and their cattle herds that have virtually upended the way of life in their jurisdictions.

    The project is unconstitutional through and through, Malami declared ex cathedra, literally moments after the scheme was unveiled in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, by governors or their representatives from the six states, with leading traditional rulers and prominent indigenes of the Southwest in attendance.

    No state government, whether acting singly or in a group, Malami went on, has the legal right or competence to establish any form or organisation or agency for the defence of Nigeria or any of its constituent parts.

    “Security,” he declared with no sense of irony, “is the exclusive preserve” of the Federal Government.

    He seems totally innocent of the fact that it was precisely the Federal Government’s inability to discharge that fundamental responsibility that led to the setting up of Amotekun in the first instance. But he was not yet done.

    To leave its sponsors and supporters in no doubt about what they were bringing on themselves, Malami warned gravely, in the manner of a colonial officer reading the riot act to natives who have stepped out of line, that “the law will take its natural course in relation to the excesses associated with the organization, administration and participation associated (sic) with it as an association.”

    For some five years, the Southwest has been under the siege of shadowy elements who carry out their grisly business in different guises and disguises.  They and their cattle herd devastate farmlands. They have been known to expel entire communities from their farmsteads, and to put to gruesome deaths those who dared to resist.  They have ambushed unwary travelers on the highway, kidnapped them for ransom, and subjected to horrible ordeals those they do not kill.

    This campaign of murder and mayhem and arson and rapine, which cannot be attributed to the Boko Haram insurgency in the Northeast, has a longer, and some would even say, more barbarous history in parts of the North, notably Plateau, Kaduna, Adamawa and Taraba.   The Federal Government condemns each gruesome episode, rigs up some desultory resettlement centres for the displaced, and vows that the perpetrators would be brought to justice.

    But few of the perpetrators are ever arrested; fewer still are ever charged or prosecuted, and the number of convictions must be one of the best-kept secrets in the country.

    If the victims of the marauders can look forward to occasional material succour from the federal authorities, they cannot depend on Abuja for their safety and security even in the short or medium term.

    That is the grim reality that led the Southwest state governments to organise Amotekun.

    And yet, the nation’s chief law officer, at who bears no small responsibility for the pervading failure of law enforcement warns petulantly that they cannot do that, and reads them the riot act.  Haba!

    The marauders, many of them their national origin unknown, enter and reenter Nigeria at will. But there is no record and thus no monitoring of their movements.  They roam the countryside dealing death and destruction with Kalashnikov assault rifles and other lethal ordinance that should be registered by law.  No record exists of their compliance.  Precious little has been done to dispel the widespread impression that they have powerful friends in high places.

    If the Attorney-General and the establishment over which he presides had spent much more time enforcing the law than in spelling out its letter, perhaps the nation would not have descended into the lawlessness that now threatens the safety of citizens and the nation’s corporate existence

    It is not even clear that Malami has the law entirely right.  For the law that makes security and safety the “exclusive preserve” of the Federal Government also confers on the people the right to organise to pursue and protect common interests and common purpose, of which safety and security are the most important.

    In whatever case, to vest the overarching issues of safety and security exclusively in the Centre in a country that purports to be a federation is an aberration with few parallels.

    But as I was saying, it is probably just as well that, at least in the matter of Amotekun, Malami is relating officially to the Southwest as if it is Abuja’s internal colony.  From reactions across Nigeria to his provocative utterance, he will have realized that those Nigerians who have experienced the mindset he represents feel deeply insulted, as indeed they should.

    It is more; it is a calculated slap in the face of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, to whose political wizardry the APC owes in no small way its existence and ascendancy.

    And it brings to the fore with greater urgency the demand for restructuring, or call it whatever you will: an arrangement that will honour Nigeria’s essential diversity even while striving to promote its unity, not one that seeks unity for its own sake, nor unity that brings grief of the constituent parts.

    The stiffest opposition to restructuring has always come from those Malami represents and speaks for, and for whom the present arrangement is but a cloak for preserving their hegemony. They automatically conflate any talk of restructuring with secessionism.  They do not see it as springing from a yearning for justice and equity.  To them, unity is everything.

    The ruling APC promised change to the constitutional order.  That was the platform on which it was elected in 2015 and reelected in 2019. But since then, it has carried on business as usual.  You cannot even accuse it of pursuing constitutional change at a glacial pace.

    Raise constitutional issues requiring urgent attention, and Abuja says it is a matter for the National Assembly, which is only too glad to arrogate that overarching task unto its dilatory self. It is charged  with making laws for the good governance of Nigeria, but the vast majority of the laws that emerge   from that institution, even house-keeping rules, are initiated by the Executive Branch.

    Any meaningful move to review the Constitution must therefore begin at and be driven by the Presidency.  There is no shortage of ideas on the issues that must be addressed to make for a more equitable and more workable design – the size and structure of the federating units, the relationship between them and the Centre, devolution of powers, and so on and so forth.

    A first step would be to synthesize the ideas and solutions that have been proposed over the decades to address some of the most glaring deficiencies of the constitution.   The emerging document will then be discussed and debated in an assembly comprising no more than 10 representatives from the states, duly  approved by the state legislature.

    This assembly will have three months to come up with recommendations, including whether a referendum shall be held to give effect to a reworked constitution.  It will then be the President’s duty to parlay the recommendations into a Bill for the National Assembly to enact.

    By his ill-tempered intervention in the Amotekun issue, the Federal Attorney-General has given a fillip  to a cardinal issue in restructuring: the desire of a good many the federating units to set up their own police establishments. Opponents say the arrangement will be used to persecute political opponents.  But is the present arraignment not also abused?  And is federal abuse more acceptable than abuse at a lower level?

    The remedy is to make and enforce laws that will keep abuse to a minimum and punish it wherever it occurs.

    Whether Amotekun has come to stay and growl and rumble as its protagonists across the country maintain and as the marauders fear, or is dead on arrival as Malami has declared, one thing is clear: the clamour for Nigeria’s federating units to set up their own police force can only grow louder and more insistent.

     

  • There’s no killing the Amotekun!

    By Sanya Oni

     

    We will ensure that nobody undermines the territorial and national sovereignty of Nigeria. Our appeal is for all Nigerians and other stakeholders to join hands with the Armed Forces of Nigeria and other security and intelligence agencies to ensure that our country is secured rather than looking at other methods that are likely to negate the national policy and community policing (my emphasis) that the federal government has approved…”

    That was Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshall Sadiq Abubakar briefing journalists at the end of the meeting of security chiefs with President Muhammadu Buhari on Friday last week.

    Tried as he did to convince Nigerians to accept that the Friday meeting was merely routine – one of those meetings designed to rub minds with the commander in chief on the security situation, to the discerning however, the poorly disguised attempt to insert in the armed forces into the raging debate on Amotekun, as if to further undo the image of the institution as an aloof, impartial arbiter in the political process, could only have left more Nigerians bewildered about the actual motives of the meeting.

    And to imagine that we had barely digested the import of the statement by the chief law officer of the federation on the Amotekun matter in which he had sought to appropriate and interpret the law to such an end that could only be described as fiendish: “The Federal Republic of Nigeria is a sovereign entity and is governed by laws meant to sustain its corporate existence as a constitutional democracy.

    It is a Federation of states, but with the Federal Government superintending over matters of national interests. The division of executive and legislative authority between the Federal and State Governments has been clearly defined by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended)”, he had stated.

    “It is against the same background that matters relating to the peace, order and good government of the federation and in particular, the defence of the country, are enshrined in the Exclusive Legislative List. The Second Schedule in Item 17 deals with defence.

    This is a matter that is within the exclusive operational competence of the Federal of Government of Nigeria. No other authority at the state level, whether the executive or legislature has the legal authority over defence”.

    And then the barely disguised threat couched in implacable arrogance: “The law will take its natural course in relation to excesses associated with organization, administration and participation in “Amotekun” or continuous association with it as an association”.

    And to now add Friday’s inelegant threat from the military high command: “We will ensure that nobody undermines the territorial and national sovereignty of Nigeria…!”

    These are extraordinary times, no doubt.

    Both actors, to be sure, are acting from the same playbooks of yore; the same mind-set of arrogance and intolerable conceit that have continued to sour inter-ethnic relations in the federation while at the same time hampering its steady march to progress.

    The same mind-set that upholds the rightness of Hisbah, the moral police which purports to decree the trade in alcohol a haram and so insists on running those engaged in it out of business if not entirely out of town; that is after confiscating truckloads of their merchandise for destruction! The same mind-set would raise hell whenever the farmer-victims of rampaging herders insist – when confronted with the destructive activities of the vagrant invaders – on taking their destinies in their hands! And finally, the same mind-set that can only spot “a hidden agenda to prevent the Fulani herdsmen from grazing in their God-given areas” in any initiative designed to address an existential threat!

    Read Also: No court can stop Amotekun, says Fani-Kayode

     

    If one thought how easily our high officials have bought into that version of Amotekun; contrast with the efforts made by the promoters of the Western Nigeria Security Network (Amotekun) to present the outfit as a child of necessity, borne of the need to complement the works of mainstream security agencies in the country, and of the need to give the people of the Southwest, confidence that they are being looked after by those they elected into office, to appreciate how far some sections of the country would go to retain a country carved not only in their image but strictly in their own likeness!

    Until now, I had honestly thought that the ambiguous alternative reality and the deadly paranoia which it feeds were exclusive to the Miyetti Allah and the scores of loose amorphous groups that have taken upon themselves the role of the arch defenders of sub nationalist interests, and who conceive of attempts to curb their sense of entitlement as treason.

    Never in the imagination of yours truly could one have conceived a situation in which the chief officer of the federation, a Silk for that matter, would play poker with the law at a difficult time in the nation’s history; and a top brass – with all the intelligence available to the defence establishment –dignifying the farce with a dubious mind-game! And both operatives of state deign to pronounce, with magisterial fiat, on the actions of five elected governors, and this under a strange doctrine of legal cum defence guardianship!

    Or does anyone think it mere coincidence that phrases like – territorial and national sovereignty, and defence of the country were freely and loosely deployed by the two functionaries within days of the launch of the Amotekun? Perhaps, such attempts at mangling phrases are what you get when fifth graders are thrust into offices clearly beyond their ken. It is nothing short of blackmail – and should be treated as such!

    By the way, Section 14 (2) of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 is no way less operative than any other section of the much maligned constitution.

    That section charges the governors with the duties of security and welfare of citizens whereas, Item 17 on the Second Schedule is in the domain of defence of the nation’s territorial integrity!

    Although a challenge to the old, unitarist mind-set, what the southwest governors actually did are neither strange nor novel; in the current circumstances, it comes at best, to grappling with the dynamics in security and self-preservation more so at a time the national security architecture is not only outmoded but palpably inadequate.

    More importantly is that the governors have proceeded in a way that is neither threatening nor offensive to the collective will – with perhaps the exception of those who either profit in mischief or who require the cover of the leviathan federal government to further their sinister designs!

    As it is, there can be no wishing away of the Amotekun any more than a denial of the impressive collaboration between the Civilian Joint Task Force and the military.

    Both, creations of necessity, are meant to be complementary. Exertions shouldn’t be about killing one or the other but about how best to integrate them into the failing architecture of security for better results! In short, there can be no aborting of a baby that is already born!