Category: Editorial

  • Hard tackle on Mali

    Hard tackle on Mali

    Mali has for some while been a sore thumb in the West African sub-region, owing to an armed uprising since 2012 that has left swaths of the country outside government control. The situation is compounded, however, by its restive military, which periodically butts in to hijack power from civilian leadership. Mali’s military has usurped power since 2020 and has shown an unwillingness to restore control to democratically elected leaders.

    But the sub-regional Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has vehemently objected to this, signposting a new paradigm in our clime regarding international engagement with internal affairs of member-nations.

    ECOWAS leaders rose from an extraordinary meeting in Ghana last Sunday, slamming an unprecedented slew of sanctions on Mali because of the reluctance of its military junta to steer the country back to civil rule. Army officers led by Colonel Assimi Goita had in August 2020 toppled elected President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita amid street protests against his unpopular rule. Under threat of sanctions, Goita installed an interim government led by civilians and promised holding presidential and legislative elections in February 2022 to restore full civil rule.

    But he staged a de facto second coup in May 2021 by dismantling the interim government – a move that disrupted the transition timetable and was met with diplomatic condemnation. Following the second coup, ECOWAS insisted on Mali holding elections this month. But Goita, who declared himself interim president, said he would only set a new date after a nationwide parley, arguing that a peaceful vote was more important than speed. At the end of the parley last December, the junta said it envisaged a four-year transition period beginning from January 1, 2022. Despite persuasions by ECOWAS mediator, former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan, to the contrary, it announced plans to hold elections in December 2025 instead of February 2022 as originally agreed.

    Read Also: Mali condemns ECOWAS sanctions against military authorities

    ECOWAS didn’t buy the dallying and unleashed sanctions with immediate effect against Mali, saying the plan “simply means that an illegitimate military transition government will take the Malian people hostage.” The new sanctions unveiled last Sunday in Accra include closure of member-nations’ land and air borders with Mali and recall of ambassadors from Bamako; suspension of non-essential financial transactions, among them ban on all exports except pharmaceuticals and other humanitarian items; activation of the bloc’s standby force to be “ready for any eventuality;” and freezing of Malian state assets in ECOWAS central and commercial banks. In line with the sanctions regime, the West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA) instructed all financial institutions under its ambit to suspend Mali with immediate effect, severing the country’s access to regional financial markets. The 15-member bloc had, following Goita’s first coup in 2020, shuttered Mali’s borders, imposed trade restrictions and suspended the country from its decision-making bodies, but when the junta installed a civilian-led interim government and pledged to hold elections February 2022, the economic sanctions were lifted although Mali remained suspended from the bloc’s main bodies.

    The new slate of sanctions by ECOWAS marked the toughest ever by the regional body and signalled an unprecedented resolve to beat back military intervention in power, which seemed to be festering in the sub-region and beyond. Both the toughness and regional consensus behind the sanctions were as well unprecedented, and punctured the notion of insular sovereignty of member-states so as to regulate political behaviour. Mali being a landlocked country, the sanctions are certain to bite, hence the junta in Bamako is rattled. In response, it condemned the sanctions as “illegal and illegitimate,” and applied the principle of reciprocity to recall its own ambassadors as well as counter-shutter its borders with “all affected countries.” But while the sanctions may hurt ordinary Malians, they will also worsen the challenge of internal legitimacy for the junta given that Malian opposition parties had rejected the timetable proposed by it.

    The new sanctions would have received endorsement from the global community but for Russia and China which, on Tuesday, blocked a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution drafted by France supporting ECOWAS. France, Mali’s former colonial power, and the United States expressed support for the sanctions; but China argued that Mali is amidst a critical transition period and outside forces must refrain from exerting excess pressure, while Russia rejected the proposed UNSC statement as unbalanced and expressed sympathy for the Mali junta. But it wasn’t ‘Uhuru’ for Mali as Algeria, with which it shares a long border, has objected to the Malian army perpetuating itself in power and urged negotiations with ECOWAS to “reach a plan to end the crisis, taking into account international demands and the legitimate demands of the Malian people.”

    The courage of ECOWAS deserves commendation. But the bloc should extend its swagger to leaders of member-states who perpetuate themselves in power through sham elections and arbitrary review of existing constitutional provisions. The aversion for illegitimacy in power must be comprehensive.

     

  • Ernest Shonekan (1936 – 2022)

    Ernest Shonekan (1936 – 2022)

    He paid the price for possibly his most momentous decision, and went to the grave irreparably diminished because of that choice.

    It is ironic that the Federal Government ordered that the national flag be flown at half-mast, for three days, as a mark of respect for Chief Ernest Shonekan, who died on January 11, aged 85.

    The posthumous honour was based on the same role that brought him considerable dishonour in his lifetime.

    He was controversially Nigeria’s interim head of state for about three months, August 26, 1993 to November 17, 1993, following the unjustifiable annulment of the country’s historic June 12, 1993 presidential election by the Gen. Ibrahim Babangida military regime.

    His acceptance of the appointment placed him on the wrong side of history.  The authoritarian rearrangement ultimately prevented the inauguration of Chief M.K.O. Abiola who won the election.

    It is unclear why Shonekan accepted the unpopular appointment. It was not only anti-democratic but also anti-people.  The anti-democratic forces he obeyed installed him to counter Abiola’s electoral victory.

    He hailed from Abeokuta, Ogun State, like Abiola, and his military sponsors apparently capitalised on this commonality to achieve their dark designs.

    Initially, Shonekan, from January 1993, was head of the transitional council and head of government under Babangida, in a curious arrangement that was supposed to culminate in a handover to a democratically elected leader of the third Nigerian Republic.

    Things went awry after Babangida wrongfully annulled the presidential election, and was forced to leave office. Under a new arrangement, which was no less odd, Shonekan became head of the Interim National Government (ING) but had no control over the military. Three months later, he was ousted in a palace coup.

    He was an accidental political leader. But more importantly, his administration was widely considered illegitimate, and he faced immense pressure and opposition from several quarters, which ultimately made his position unsustainable.

    Read Also: Shonekan displayed real sense of patriotism – Buhari

    It is striking that he tried to plan another presidential election and restore democratic governance, which suggested that he was on the same page with those who annulled the June 12 election. There was no greater evidence of his unprogressive political thinking.

    It is unclear why he was chosen to head the transitional council in the first place.  His background as a prominent boardroom player with obscure political skills did not immediately recommend him for the position. But it may well be that those who picked him wanted a yes-man.

    Before his messy political role, he was chairman and chief executive of the United Africa Company of Nigeria (UACN), a giant conglomerate with interests in manufacturing, services, logistics and warehousing, agriculture and real estate.

    He joined the company in 1964, and became a member of its board of directors in 1976, at the age of 40. He became chairman and managing director in 1980. At that height, he made a name for himself as a business leader. In the course of his leadership, the company underwent restructuring in response to new challenges in the business environment, particularly occasioned by government policies.

    He studied law at the University of London, United Kingdom, after his secondary education at CMS Grammar School and Igbobi College, both in Lagos. He also attended Harvard Business School, USA.

    It is noteworthy that he returned to familiar turf after his political misadventure. He founded the Nigerian Economic Summit Group (NESG) in 1994.  By launching an advocacy group and think-tank for private sector-led development of the Nigerian economy, he demonstrated a desire to contribute to the country’s development.

    A recipient of the national honour, Grand Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic (GCFR), he managed to remain relevant, and was Special Envoy on the Implementation of the Abuja Agreement on Zimbabwe in 2001 and Chairman, Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) in 2008.

    In the end, Shonekan’s political notoriety dimmed his business and economic notability. That is an inevitable conclusion.

  • Avoidable crisis

    Avoidable crisis

    The National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) just released an advisory and update on the umpteenth breakout of Lassa fever.  That development should worry everyone.

    Since 1969 when the illness was named for Lassa, a town in Borno State where it first broke out and claimed the lives of two foreign missionary nurses, it is sad that our local epidemiologists have done little to curtail the disease.  It’s time for all of that to stop.

    Since that initial outbreak, Lassa fever had spread to Liberia, Benin Republic, Mali, Guinea, Ghana and Sierra Leone, thus becoming a sub-regional health pest.  The viral illness is spread by infested rats that contaminate food items, in dirty homes, with their urine and faeces.

    This latest nationwide breakout, according to the NCDC, involves 4, 632 cases — and still counting; and 102 deaths so far.  The states worse hit by deaths include Ondo (47), Edo (15), Bauchi (12), Taraba (12), Ebonyi (9), Kaduna (4), Nasarawa (2) and Enugu (1).

    As the Lassa fever fatal count cut across states North or South, East or West, so have the number of cases, starting with the most affected states: Edo (2, 725), Ondo (1, 006), Bauchi (164), Ebonyi (143), Nasarawa (79), Taraba (72), FCT (59), Kaduna (53), Delta (50), Plateau (42), Benue (34), Kano (24), Gombe (22), Kogi (17), Lagos (16), Borno (15) and Enugu (14).

    That almost every state is hit by this latest outbreak again stresses the imperative to strengthen Nigeria’s primary health care (PHC) system.  Since the bulk of Lassa fever crisis appears rural, it makes sense that PHC facilities, the nearest to the populace, are strengthened nationwide.  Even in urban areas, these health centres are the nearest to the many communities and poor folks, who may be in distress.

    But beyond revamping these facilities, the government needs a renewed beam on them and services they can provide, at little or no costs, compared to struggling private hospitals that charge the world.

    Read Also: Pandemic kills 27 in five days, says NCDC

    Many of these PHCs, often tucked away in quiet neighbourhoods, are under-utilised; simply because the folks they are built to serve have near-zero knowledge of their use.  Better utilised, PHCs could offer effective treatment for Lassa fever, especially when reported early enough.  They could also offer the vigorous base of a sound referral system, from which serious Lassa fever cases are pushed up to secondary, and maybe tertiary hospitals in rare cases.

    Still on massive enlightenment — but this time in prevention.  Prevention, goes the age-old aphorism, is better than cure.  The primary driver of Lassa fever, in rural areas at least, appears ignorance: starting with the very basics of clean and potable water.  A sustained public education blitz on this basic fount of hygiene and sanitation is imperative.

    Such a blitz should also integrate how to shut out Lassa fever and other viral and water-borne diseases by rigorous basic hygiene and sanitation. A neater and tidier environment would breed less rats, for instance.  Rats are the vector for Lassa fever.  With less rats, the spread is logically curtailed.

    Local and municipal authorities, in urban centres and the suburbs, should also do much more on refuse clearing and waste management.  Piles of refuse breed rats.  That Lagos State has so far recorded 16 Lassa fever cases, despite its comparatively better health care facilities than many Nigerian states’, could be a signal that it should work harder on its refuse disposal system.

    The urban and suburban local governments nationwide should also do more serious work on routine health inspections of homes, markets, motor parks and even work places.  Not long ago, the concept of the “wole-wole” (Yoruba for government health inspectors and sanitation enforcers) was pervasive.  Now, it has all but vanished!

    But only routine, yet systematic health checks can keep epidemics like Lassa fever and other illnesses at bay.  So, there is an urgent need for a strong and vibrant health and environmental police.

    Meanwhile, citizens should follow the NCDC Lassa fever advisory: if you develop malaria symptoms and it persists after routine treatment, dash to the nearest PHC or hospital.  That “malaria” could well be Lassa fever; and it needs to be de-fanged before it develops needless complications.

  • Chief diplomat

    Chief diplomat

    Very few persons anywhere turn 80 years with the pedigree and accomplishments of Professor Bolaji Akinyemi. With his bow-tie and methodical speech, Prof. Akinyemi is a familiar persona in the Nigerian mind.

    He turned 80 January 4, a diplomat, teacher, professor, politician, human rights advocate, pro-democracy crusader, public intellectual, public speaker, polemicist, author and administrator. He is best noted as Nigeria’s face to the outside world when he was appointed the country’s external affairs minister. He occupied that position during the military era of General Ibrahim Babangida (IBB). Indeed, Babangida recently paid tribute to him as a sort of unwitting intellectual mentor in that he visited as a soldier the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) when Professor Akinyemi was the director-general.

    He impressed the general with his rigour and candour. When he became head of state, it was not difficult for him to appoint Professor Akinyemi to serve as the nation’s premier diplomat. Invisible mentee became boss who would still be learning at the table of his teacher-appointee.

    In that capacity, Akinyemi brought flair, imagination and audacity to the task, and he is perhaps the most consequential figure we have had at that desk.

    Okoi Arikpo is probably a second position to him. Arikpo was a cerebral fellow who dealt with the pangs of a post-colonial nation that also grappled with the stress at home. But it was a relatively calmer time for foreign relations.

    Akinyemi came with a vision for a country and continent in search for identity. His ideas of a ‘black bomb’ and Concert of Medium Powers were part of his attitude towards a country and continent still seen by the west as the backwaters of civilisation.

    He did not flinch to assert the instinct of a black race and a proud nation in spite of the democratic deficit and woes of underdevelopment.

    Read Also: Alao-Akala: When not to die

    It was an optimistic face he gave to the world and the continent. His Concert of Medium Powers was an original idea following on the coalescence of countries in the world to assert their position and influence.

    With the concert, he wanted to place Nigeria in the centre of global power games, and by that throw our weight on issues. His was not a rhetoric like that of General Murtala Muhammed who said “Africa has come of age.” That was never fledged out into a system. It turned out to be no more than a bluster, even though well-intentioned.

    The idea of a ‘black bomb’ was sometimes thought as comical but it was a clever counterblast to a western military triumphalism, and a rallying cry to self-defence. “Nigeria has a sacred responsibility,” he said, “to challenge the racial monopoly of nuclear weapons.” In the words of a seasoned diplomat and Nigeria’s former ambassador to the United Nations, Dapo Fafowora, “Neither the country nor the military who appointed him was ready for such visionary ideas. He was ahead of his time.” The west chafed at it and intervened. Northern leaders persuaded IBB to fire his mentor. That was one of the paradoxes of Nigerian diplomatic history.

    Akinyemi’s time as Nigeria’s chief diplomat synthesised his ideas over decades of scholarship around the world, beginning in Nigeria where he attended Igbobi College in Lagos and Christ’s School, Ado-Ekiti. He travelled to the United States where he studied at Temple University, Pennsylvania, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University and Trinity College, Oxford. He was also lecturer and visiting professor at Graduate Institute of International Studies, the University of Nairobi, Kenya, the University of California at Los Angeles and, of course, at the University of Lagos. He capped that sterling scholarship at the NIIA.

    In the febrile period of democracy struggle after IBB stanched M.K.O. Abiola’s June 12, 1993 victory, Akinyemi was a staunch member of the struggle to restore democracy.

  • Bashir Othman Tofa (1947-2022)

    Bashir Othman Tofa (1947-2022)

    Until his name appeared on the ballot paper for the June 12, 1993 election, not many Nigerians outside the Kano metropolis knew Alhaji Bashir Tofa. It will however be unfair to say he was nobody before that momentous occasion. He had actually been involved in politics since he was 29 in 1976. He got elected as a councillor in the Dawakin Tofa Local Government Area of Kano State when the military regime decided to reform the local governance structure of the country. A year later, when the Obasanjo military administration decided to give impetus to its transition programme by setting up a Constituent Assembly under the legendary Supreme Court Justice Udo Udoma to fine-tune the constitution for the Second Republic, Tofa was one of the young men who found their way into the rank of the elders in the forum. He mingled with the high and mighty and was an active participant in the meetings that gave birth to the National Movement that metamorphosed into the National Party of Nigeria (NPN).

    At the time, it appeared that he was set to continue the movement to the very last rung of the ladder. It was no surprise when, on return of power to civilians in 1979, Tofa was elected secretary of the Kano branch of the NPN. And, given the place of Kano in the politics of the North, he was able to catch the attention of the party leaders such that within the four short years of the Second Republic, the Kanuri Muslim from Kano was catapulted to the national scene as financial secretary of the ruling political party. One could safely say that, had the military not again intervened in the nation’s political system, Tofa would likely have commanded a key position in the government of Nigeria. However, apart from holding a party office, he only managed to be appointed a member of the committee set up to oversee the Federal Government’s Green Revolution Programme.

    At the collapse of the republic in December 1983, barely three months after the re-election of the Shehu Shagari NPN administration at the centre, and Alhaji Barkin Zuwo’s take-over of Kano State, Alhaji Tofa had to move into private business. His area of interest was publishing. He started by writing articles for prominent newspapers of the day, such as the Daily Times, New Nigerian, Daily Sketch and Nigerian Tribune. He used that as an opportunity to prepare himself for entry into the publishing space, as well as broaden his knowledge or announce his arrival. He thereafter came up with the Hausa newspaper Alkalami. Then came Pen, published in English. The Hausa paper was popular in Kano and it goaded him into book writing and publishing. In his lifetime, Alhaji Tofa published eight books in Hausa language which he probably saw as a means of communication with, and mobilising the people.

    Read Also: Trading by rail tracks suicidal, NRC warns

    In 1990, the man who was later to become the presidential candidate of the National Republican Convention (NRC) teamed up with men and women of like minds to found the party. And, he soon emerged a major pillar of the party in his Kano base. This helped him defeat the likes of John Nwodo, Dalhatu Tafida and Pere Ajunwa at the primaries that threw up the presidential candidate.

    At his death, one event that stands out in the life and times of Alhaji Bashir Tofa is that he contested the June 12, 1993 presidential election against Chief Moshood Abiola of the Social Democratic Party (SDP). There is no doubt that he was roundly defeated at that poll, as he even lost in his Kano homestead. Abiola won the polls in the North and showed that a Nigerian could actually command the support of Nigerians across the country, despite the country’s diversity. But the test of Tofa’s principles and philosophy came when the military decided to annul that election by halting declaration of its result. Rather than write his name in the nation’s history books in gold by conceding defeat and join in resisting the government’s divide and rule tactics, the NRC candidate missed that opportunity.

    This might have contributed to the silence from his end since then. Even when he criticised the Buhari administration’s declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day and conferment of the highest national honour, Grand Commander of the Federal Republic on Chief Abiola posthumously, Tofa protested but his efforts were too feeble to be noticed.

    The man has gone the way of all flesh. All to note is that he played his part the best way he could, but younger politicians should learn to stand for the country at critical moments in history.

  • Big stick

    Big stick

    Errant pupils in Ogun State face a heavy hand from the state government, which has vowed to not only expel them from public schools but also keep them from re-accessing education in the state. To that end, private schools are forbidden from taking in such students. Commissioner for Education, Science and Technology, Prof. Abayomi Arigbagbu, read the riot act last week when he addressed the press on strategies mapped out by the state government to tackle juvenile delinquency in schools. He spoke against the backdrop of social vices by some public school pupils that last year led to abrupt closure of some schools.

    In serving notice of its firm resolve, the government said it would not stand by and allow pupils to perpetuate ills that it linked to bad parenting, social media, peer group, wrong role models and economic conditions. Arigbagbu also blamed the trend on other factors like shortage of teachers and, where available, unqualified and unwilling teachers who do not use the right approach, congestion of classes, and ineffective communication between teachers and learners. And there are, according to him, societal predispositions like general moral laxity, craze for easy wealth, habit flaws such as procrastination and low self-esteem, among other factors that negatively condition young ones.

    The commissioner outlined measures aimed at stamping social vices out of schools to include naming and shaming pupils involved, and keeping expelled ones out of school. There is, however, a motivational dimension namely rewarding well-behaved pupils who distinguish themselves in academics and character and promoting extra-curricular activities to discourage pupils from juvenile delinquency. He added: “Students expelled should not be admitted into any public or private school in Ogun State, that is something that will be very difficult and that is why we put in place what we call the learner identification number. The e-platform we are using now will make it difficult for dual registration. Once you are in a school and you misbehave and you are sent away, it will be very difficult to get into another school in Ogun, but some of them would want to get into schools and that is why we are meeting private school owners. For them, we are going to apply sanctions because we are the one that gave them operating licence; if they flout these regulations we can withdraw their licence. All of us have to be on the same page because if we expel a student from a school, it would have been the last resort and we don’t want a situation where the expulsion won’t be effective.”

    By talking tough, the Ogun State government apparently aimed at dissuading prospective pupil-offenders, which is understandable. But it was nonetheless worrying that the grand plan as outlined by the education commissioner was long on sanctions and empty on measures to rehabilitate offending pupils, whose misbehaviour is only a function of deeper societal problem and the result of institutional failure. Arigbagbu rightly identified some causative factors in his presentation, but he didn’t seem to think those were extenuating enough to warrant consideration of how to help offending pupils track back from the path of ruin. This is a defect in the strategy unveiled by the Ogun State government.

    We live in a society where pupils learn much of what they do from parents and other role models, meaning the mould is corrupted both within the home and larger society. And the current school system isn’t exactly primed to make up for defect. When pupils misbehave and incur expulsion from school, they need to be reformed by social infrastructure like borstal homes, not dumped on society in their depraved state whereupon they become nuisance to society. Besides, what happens to the future of such pupils and the prospects of their reforming to become useful citizens? The Ogun State government will need to think beyond just sanitising its school space to how to rehabilitate affected pupils.

  • Sanitising NDDC

    Sanitising NDDC

    Again, President Muhammadu Buhari has threatened to deal with those who looted the funds of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC). He also vowed to recover every recoverable kobo of the looted funds. The president spoke during the virtual inauguration of the NDDC prototype hostel at the University of Uyo, in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State. The president, who decried the serial abuses that the commission has suffered, said the lives of people in the oil-rich Niger Delta region would have been significantly improved if the huge amounts allocated to the commission since 2001 had been well spent. He added that it was this fiscal recklessness that made him call for forensic audit of the commission’s finances.

    “The serial abuse, lack of delivery and what had become an entrenched institutional decay, was the reason why I called for the forensic audit.

    “Therefore, going forward, we shall ensure that every recoverable kobo is recovered for use in the service of the people of this region and those found culpable shall face the law.”

    This is the way it should be. Except that the president’s government has been long in words but short in action on several occasions. For instance, it is about nine months that the Federal Government promised to name terror sponsors in the country and prosecute them. That is yet to happen. Again, almost since its inception, the government has always threatened to unmask those behind the ghost workers syndrome that has led to loss of humongous amounts of money by the Federal Government. It has never released any name, not to talk of prosecute the culprits. Going by statistics released by the president, about N6trn had been given to the NDDC since inception. This comprised about N3,375,735,776,794 .93 budgetary allocations and N2,420, 948, 894, 191 .00 from statutory and non-statutory sources.

    This is huge. Unfortunately, the result does not justify these humongous allocations. Rather, poverty remains the defining characteristic of the oil-rich region, which has produced an insignificantly few oil sheikhs living in opulence at the expense of the vast majority of their poverty-stricken compatriots.

    It is disheartening that the NDDC, just like its precursor, the Oil Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission (OMPADEC), rather than transform the Niger Delta has become a cesspit of corruption. For instance, more than 13,777 contracts awarded by the NDDC were found to have been compromised. Sadder still is that the corruption has not abated even when the affairs of these institutional responses to the crisis of underdevelopment in the region are in the hands of those that could be called ‘sons of the soil’ who naturally should be passionate about bringing an end to the poverty and squalor in the region.

    It is the monumental frauds and serial abuses that the commission had been subjected to that made the people in the region clamour for sanity in the operations of the commission, a thing the president responded to by ordering the forensic audit last year. It was at the submission of the audit report that President Buhari threatened criminal proceedings against the looters.

    The Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, who received the final forensic audit report from the Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Sen. Godswill Akpabio, on behalf of President Buhari said: “The Federal Government will, in consequence, apply the law to remedy the deficiencies outlined in the audit report as appropriate.

    “This will include but not be limited to the initiation of criminal investigations, prosecution, recovery of funds not properly utilised for the public purposes for which they were meant for, amongst others.”

    We can only hope that, this time around, the president would follow his threat through to its logical conclusion. We say this conscious of some of the policy somersaults that have trailed certain activities at the NDDC, even under the Buhari administration. One of these is the replacement of regular board with interim management committees and appointment of sole administrator to head the commission. This does not augur well for its smooth operations. Indeed, it is a recipe for fraud. It is therefore high time a regular board was constituted to take charge of the commission’s affairs.

    We implore the relevant agencies of government that the audit forensic report has been submitted to, to expedite action on it, with a view to facilitating government’s response. We also call on the Minister of Justice to ensure that whatever process the government decides to adopt to punish culprits would be in strict accord with the laws of the land so that they would not, either by omission or commission, escape justice through legal technicalities. When the appropriate lessons are taught on this matter, its consequence would reverberate beyond the NDDC, that no looter of public funds would go unpunished.

  • Capsized priority

    Capsized priority

    Minister of education Mallam  Adamu Adamu has sent out a notice informing all qualified Nigerians to apply for the Bilateral Education Agreement (BEA) scholarship for both undergraduate and post-graduate studies in countries like Russia, Morocco, Hungary and Egypt for undergraduate degrees and Russia, China, Hungary, Serbia and Romania for post-graduate studies mainly for those who had done their undergraduate degrees in those countries. Qualified candidates were advised to apply through the ministry’s website.

    We welcome the idea of Bilateral Education Agreement (BEA) with these countries as ideas and knowledge belong to our common humanity and we, as part of the global community, must key into the wider opportunities such moves present.

    However, we are concerned about the seeming silence over indigenous government scholarships that ironically availed most of the people in leadership positions today the opportunity to get quality education. There has been some seemingly opaque narratives about some scholarship schemes. There have been reports about some schemes being riddled with nepotism and qualified applicants being losers in the game.

    Education is the bedrock of any form of development and scholarships are given to encourage brilliant citizens to study without worrying about funding. Scholarships are not seen as favours done recipients but as investment in human capital which in turn makes the individuals assets for national development. Scholarships serve multiple purposes, especially for national development and individual growths.

    Scholarship grants are ways of encouraging not just academic scholarship but also as an incentive to talented and academically gifted students. They also promote a sense of patriotism and gratitude in cases where individual foundations or corporate bodies offer the scholarships based on their chosen career paths.

    REad Also: Boards of polytechnics, colleges of education for inauguration Jan. 18

    The BEA under review has guidelines and is almost contractual in the sense that we assume that the named countries would ask for reciprocity in education or can choose other modes of gaining from the agreement. Did the ministry of education evaluate the value of the scholarships vis-a-vis education in a reciprocal level for citizens of the countries involved? If no, why and what are we gaining and how does the country prevent any deficit in value?

    While such agreements are good, we believe that the whole scholarship schemes for Nigerians must be re-evaluated. Why do we always jump to foreign universities with the economic and social implications. It costs a lot to train one individual abroad in a country with the highest out-of-school children in the world. Would it not be better to spread such funds in the country and get more students in the scholarship net and expand the literacy rate? Sending citizens abroad for undergraduate education often displaces them socially and most of them lose interest in coming back to develop the country.

    The handling of some federal scholarships to other countries has been notoriously badly handled, forcing the students to march in protest on the streets in their countries of study because their tuitions and living allowances are left unpaid. This is particularly true of the beneficiaries from the Niger Delta Amnesty Scholarships. The chaos being experienced says something about our education sector. They must be seen to be in charge of setting the rules and monitoring compliance.

    Beyond putting out the notice for this BEA, we expect the ministry to generally be more responsive to the needs of the education sector in the country. Scholarship schemes must not continue to be the cash cow for some civil servants who allegedly manipulate the schemes for personal gains. Education is one of the most important ingredients of development and must be handled with the diligence and commitment of a country in dire need of development. Again, we advise that the agreements in this type of cases must be such that benefits the country because there is no free lunch anywhere. We pray there are no grey areas that tilt the scale in favour of some of the countries in question. That would be shooting ourselves on the foot.

    What we are saying, in essence, is that scholarships must not be targeted at foreign lands only. We must interrogate why our universities are not good enough. Money pumped into foreign scholarships could be saved and used to develop the infrastructure in our schools and colleges. We must say no to second self-enslavement that shortchanges us as a nation. We can do better than jump at dangling scholarship carrots.

  • Dangerous laxity

    Dangerous laxity

    An accident was narrowly averted at the airside of the Murtala Muhammed Airport, Lagos, when a speeding airside operations car by slim chance missed colliding with a Dana Air plane taxiing for take-off. Reports said the Dana Air MD 83 aircraft with 157 passengers and seven crew members on board was departing Lagos airport for Enugu on December 21, 2021, and was taxiing to join Runway 18L when the speeding vehicle nearly rammed into it. The car reportedly belonged to the Nigeria Customs Service and was driven by one of its personnel.

    According to sources close to the incident, an angry pilot of the Dana Air plane put in a call to the airport control tower to report the incident. Upon receiving the report, officials of the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA) at the control tower alerted Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) airside personnel who chased after and apprehended the car and its driver. “The pilot of Dana Air flight 0371 complained angrily about a ‘military’ vehicle that drove dangerously past his (aircraft) nose, prompting him to apply the brakes unexpectedly,” a FAAN source was quoted saying. “The vehicle was apprehended by MM123. It was reported to the control tower that it was a Customs vehicle. They were immediately taken to AVSEC for further questioning. The Dana plane was later airborne at 11:27am,” said another source who gave the name and operation number of the Customs driver involved.

    FAAN General Manager, Public Affairs, Mrs. Henrieta Yakubu, confirmed the incident, saying the agency had since improved security at the airside of the airport. Other officers of FAAN who spoke anonymously because they weren’t official spokespersons explained that the Customs driver was probably not even trained in airside driving. “Agencies deploy new officers to the airport from time to time, but I am not sure if FAAN ensures these officers are trained in airside driving. I suspect this driver was not properly trained in airside driving because it is unlikely someone trained in airside driving will behave in such a very dangerous manner,” one officer said.

    Read Also: FAAN clears air on pilferage, collapsed man

    The Dana Air incident occurred barely one week after a Max Air jet that was about to land nearly ploughed into a malfunctioning vehicle being tested on  Runway 18L, following which FAAN suspended some officials. It was not certain if a similar step was taken in the wake of the latest incident, but the trend raises a question concerning airside security at the Lagos airport. FAAN was involved in some major runway and airside breaches in the past. In December 2019, there was a stir when an unidentified man mysteriously found his way into the airside and mounted a moving Air Peace plane. The man was later arrested by security operatives who were alerted by the pilot of a private jet coming behind the Air Peace plane. That incident occurred just six months after another man gained access into the Lagos airport and climbed aboard a Port Harcourt-bound Azman Airlines flight. The man, suspected to be mentally ill, was later identified as a Nigerien named Usman Adamu and could not speak or understand English according to the police. Authorities indicated at the time they were looking into how Adamu got inside a restricted area.

    Nigeria has been quite lucky with the safety of public aviation in recent years, but porosity of airport facilities could compromise that safety and there is need to do all that is necessary to secure those airports. In light of the recent near-mishaps, the biggest onus falls on FAAN to strengthen airside security. But the issue goes beyond FAAN alone. It is incumbent on all airport operating agencies to ensure due diligence, including up-to-grade training of their personnel. Actually, sanctions shouldn’t be spared against defaulters to keep air travellers safe.

  • New year window

    New year window

    This is one of those calendars when the wish of a happy new year bears a great deal of political resonance. It is an election year in the sense that two major polls, in Osun State and Ekiti State, will invoke the gubernatorial choices of their citizens.

    But more broadly, it is the prelude to Nigeria’s major democratic rites. It is the year that major political parties will chart their path for the next half decade at least, if not a full decade. The parties will pick their major officers. They will convene conventions that should help them mollify internecine rages, placate mammoth egos, navigate ethnocentric bigotry and inclinations, sue for general peace and decide who should be their point persons in key positions in the general elections billed for 2023.

    It is true the race for a general election begins after a general election. But it is never more tense and never more febrile than when the door opens for campaigns, candidates are nominated and deadlines erupt whether in the parties in primary quests or in the National Electoral Commission.

    It is often an uncertain time in the country. We see individuals duel for positions, aggregate interests and try to win either by following the rules or by overthrowing them

    That is when the social and political peace is at the mercies of perverted men and so the fabrics sometimes creak and crinkle. We see persons of great influence and affluence who deploy their resources to stamp despotic ideas and interests on the political parties.

    As we begin the year, the two major parties, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC), hold the nation in their grips. It is the nature of de facto two-party states. One of such is the United States with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party sometimes called the Grand Old Party (GOP).

    Osun State and Ekiti State will show us a hint of what is to come. We want to cheer at the Anambra State governor poll that ended as a joyful anti-climax. The winner Chukwuma Soludo will be sworn in this year.

    While the PDP has arrived at his party helmsman, it still has a convention to hold in order to resolve quite a number of issues. One of such is whether it wants its party to discountenance a convention of rotating the presidency between north and south, in which case the party has to chew whether its version of democracy will chose hegemony over accommodation. That remains nebulous as some of its key contenders have forsworn rotation and are couching it in terms of competence as though any region monopolises ability.

    Wherever they go, they have to be sensitive to the multi-ethnic profile of the nation. Again, the APC also has choices to make. It has fixed February for its convention, but it has not decided on the date. The internal unease within the party leadership has stirred much fear as to whether the party has or can ever design a formula for peace or find the time and avenue to do it.

    It has no party chairman or executive and it has operated without a clear road map to electing its chairman to steer the organisation towards the general elections. There is also the big challenge of getting its choice for the presidency and what formula it intends to adopt, and whether the party as it stands is in the mood for either reconciliation or despotism.

    Hence it is important that the two parties should come together and choose tranquillity over chaos, collective good over self-interest, and rule of law over the will of a few.

    One of the fears is the resort to violence. We call on all to eschew attacks and the deployment of thugs.

    After the conventions, and the candidates are known, we shall move swiftly into election campaigns. It is at that stage that we report shootings, kidnaps and assassinations, although these could also sully the party primaries.

    The other step is judicial rigmarole. Some politicians who seek to upturn the process tend to employ the help of judges and lawyers. This does violence to legitimate elections. But it is sometimes a conundrum when some big men rig the polls and foist the wrong candidates either on the party or the people or both. In those case, the aggrieved sue, and it tends to put a damper on the legitimacy and imposes delay. This applies not just to the presidency or national offices of the political parties but at every level from states to the local governments to wards. Politics at each level, if not handled with decency, could turn into a mayhem of local leaders or those seeking leadership.

    The year is also the time for lame ducks. While those eyeing new offices take over the narrative, it is important that both at national and local levels, office seekers do not stop work. It is a year of legacy, whether it is a governor who has begun a major road or school or hospital, or it is in the centre where major infrastructure work of different kinds is expected to be unveiled, the Nigerian people are waiting.

    This year harps on the idea that governance is a continuum. The vista of those who are winding down beside those gearing up paints for us the concept of democracy as collaboration not only in geography but also in time.

    One of the issues that must encapsulate the mind is security. Those who are leaving office next year should not allow the breakdown of law and order skew the nation towards fear and impotence by not acting. It has been a scary few years, and we look forward to a nation of peace.

    Political distraction should not doom citizens to Golgotha of kidnappers, ritualists and murderers.