Category: Editorial

  • MTN’s reduced fine

    MTN’s reduced fine

    • We support the intention but wonder if it was legally done

    The whopping N1.4 trillion fine imposed on the global telecommunication giant, MTN, for having 5.1 million unregistered subscribers on its network, was not arbitrary. According to the regulatory agency, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), MTN admitted the infraction, and had pleaded for mercy. Lending his voice to that plea, the newly appointed minister for communication, Adebayo Shittu, shortly after his appointment, said that the fate of MTN on the fine imposed by law was in the hands of President Muhammadu Buhari, who would discuss with his South African counterpart, at the sidelines of the recent China-African summit in South Africa.

    In answer to that plea, the fine imposed on MTN has now been reduced to N780 billion. Pressed to explain the principle behind the reduction, the Director, Public Affairs of NCC, Tony Ojobo, said, “At that time, of course, the NCC Board had not been constituted, no minister, the authority of the President was required for such a decision to be taken in the absence of the minister, and so the commission had to notify the presidency”. His explanation did not, however, explain, whether the commission or the President has power to administratively amend the extant regulation or the yardstick used to impose the fine.

    We appreciate the argument by the minister, that “Nobody wants MTN to die” and the reemphasis that “It is not in the interest of Nigeria for MTN Nigeria to die”. As a corporate entity, and employer of labour contributing its quota to the economic development of Nigeria, it is indeed in our nation’s interest that the telecommunication company should survive and grow. But it is in our higher national interest that under a democratic government, administrative bodies operate in accordance with clearly definable standards and procedures, if they are not to be accused of acting arbitrarily.

    While the President has enormous powers as the country’s chief executive, such powers can only be legitimately exercised in accordance with the provisions of the constitution, laws, legislations, sub-legislations, rules and regulations. Much as we sympathise with MTN, reduction of a fine imposed on her by a law or regulation, in our view, can only be legitimately reduced by another law or regulation. We doubt if the argument of Mr. Ojobo, that “The stakeholders looked at it with all the pros and cons and reduced the fine by 25 per cent”; is not an arbitrary exercise of administrative power.

    Except of course the so-called stakeholders are by law or regulation empowered to determine the fine to be imposed for the infraction under review. Strangely, in determining the reduction of the fine, a new set of controversy was introduced. In the initial letter sent to MTN, and made available to the press, the fine was reduced by 35 per cent. Twenty-four hours later, 10 percent of the fine was reinstated, and the telecommunication giant was now granted a 25 percent waiver. Reinstating that only 25 percent waiver was granted, the NCC claimed that the original communication was in error, and should be disregarded.

    The NCC owes Nigerians more explanation than it has offered. If the discrepancy was an oversight, then it was grievous. Does it mean that the decision to reduce the fine was not communicated to the author of the letter in writing? If truly the decision was made after “the stakeholders looked at it”; how come such an important document was sent out without the chief executive of NCC taking a look at it, and confirming the content. We urge NCC not to muddle the appreciable integrity gained by our regulators, especially since the coming to power of Buhari’s presidency.

  • Corruption bigger than Nigeria?

    SIR: Corruption is perhaps the most widely discussed topic in Nigeria. It’s the sole reason why many sectors and institutions are in coma. On Wednesday, December 9, Nigeria joined the rest of the world to mark the 2015 edition of “International Anti-Corruption Day”. And the nation’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) vowed to recover all stolen funds. Whether or not their vows will yield tangible results is what we are yet to be sure of.

    In reality, corruption has single-handedly led to the death of countless number of Nigerians. In fact, it has bedeviled Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation so much that citizens are only hoping for a miracle to liberate the nation.

    It is not as if corruption originated in Nigeria, or that she is the only country where corruption is pervasive but it is worse here because it has been institutionalized. The country is even confused as to what the scope of corruption really is. Former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, now the Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido lamented in a CBS Newshour’s ‘Nigeria: Pain and Promise’ documentary that “In Nigeria, there’s no accountability at all. And that’s why I think the Nigerian corruption is worse in many parts of the world, because it’s the worst type of corruption. It’s stealing.”

    While Emir Sanusi believes that stealing is corruption, the former President Goodluck Jonathan is of the view that “stealing is not corruption.” In his hilarious but troubling “parable of yams and goat,” he symbolized the commonwealth of all Nigerians as ‘yams’ and the looters as ‘goats’. According to him, no matter how much anyone tried, these goats would always steal our monies so far they have access to them. What a belief!

    Just a couple of months ago, a mother-of-four was murdered while her husband, Godwin Ekpo, a ‘keke Napep’ driver, was shot in the jaw by a trigger-happy policeman because he refused to part with N2000 bribe. That’s just one of many reported cases. You can hardly do transactions in many government offices without inducement. It has somewhat become a way of life in the country. Meanwhile Nigerians console themselves by saying the above instances only represent the “low profile” corruption cases.

    Then what about the high profile ones? Naturally, names like James Ibori, Bode George, Depriye Alamieyeseigha, and Tafa Balogun come to mind. The likes of Farouk Lawan, a former member of the House of Representatives; Madam Diezani Alison-Madueke, the former petroleum minister; and Stella Oduah, a serving Senator, have also been mentioned in corruption scandals.

    Senate President Bukola Saraki is also slugging it out with the Code of Conduct Tribunal over an alleged false declaration of assets. Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), ex-National Security Adviser, has opened a new chapter in Nigeria’s corruption history: #Armsgate. He’s allegedly mismanaged $2.1 billion that was meant to arm the Nigerian military. Day in day out, corruption is on the rise and Nigerian masses are fast getting drowned in the pool of poverty. Frequently, cases of corruption are shouted to the high heavens, especially on social media, only to fade away after some months. Looters use different tactics—sometimes application for bail or request to travel abroad on medical grounds—to drag their trial. Is corruption, therefore, not bigger than Nigeria, the giant of Africa?

    Without any doubt, this monster is seemingly bigger than Nigeria. And unless corrupt elements are prosecuted and convicted accordingly, corruption will surely continue to grow. But Nigerians can make a difference by holding themselves as well as President Buhari and every member of the ‘Change’ government accountable. That is how Nigeria can win.

    • Kofoworola Ayodeji,

    kennydamola@yahoo.com

  • Arms deals saga

    The presidency and all institutions of state involved owe it to Nigerians to speedily bring those involved to justice

    It is no longer news that the national economy is in dire straits and security is threatened. This is due to acts of omission and commission, especially of the immediate past leadership of the country. One of the areas in which the national interest has been gravely subverted is in procurement of arms and ammunition for combating the Boko Haram insurgency in the North East.

    The arms deals are an eye-opener to all that much has gone wrong with the federation for so long. The mind-boggling figures being linked to the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) to the former President Goodluck Jonathan, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), shows that in the past, little governance took place as prominent Nigerians holding political offices or linked to men in power were more interested in milking the country dry, subverting institutions and diverting scarce resources.

    While the cases are still in court, signifying that no one has been found guilty yet, the figures being contested and the facts of the helplessness of the troops during the Jonathan administration are enough proof that a lot went wrong.

    It is gratifying that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Department of State Services (DSS) have undertaken intensive probe into how the money earmarked for prosecution of the war against insurgency was approved and released. The promptness of arraignment of suspects in the deals, including the former NSA, and Emeritus Chairman of Daar Communications, Chief Raymond Dokpesi, is an indication that the government is serious about fighting sleaze in the country and recovering the loot.

    We recall that about $9.3million was seized by the South African authorities last year for alleged aborted attempt at smuggling the cash into that country illegally. It is surprising that all this took place under the watch of Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala who was directly brought in from the World Bank to help straighten the accounting processes and procedures. The EFCC has already extended invitation to the former finance minister and coordinating minister for the economy to explain the part played by her office in the release of the funds. It has been said that her ministry, among other releases, caused about $322 million to be released to the office of the former NSA for security reasons.

    We call on the EFCC and the Attorney-General of the Federation to ensure diligent prosecution of the cases with a view to getting the guilty punished and the looted funds recovered. Recovered funds must be committed to getting the army of unemployed youths engaged as the All Progressives Congress (APC) promised while campaigning for votes.

    The pronouncements and conduct of military chiefs on this matter under the Jonathan administration amounted to man’s inhumanity to man. We shudder to think of the former Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), Air Chief Marshal Alex Badeh’s contention that troops that fled the war zone ought to have been summarily tried and executed in the field without due regard for their  rights as citizens, and circumstances. The same men who were tried and sentenced to death by a military tribunal in Abuja have now had their sentences reviewed. The revelations coming out of how money voted for procuring equipment was diverted and the men sent barely armed to  the war front is a vindication of the public outcry that greeted the kangaroo trials and sentences.

    The same CDS was later to admit at retirement that the troops were poorly equipped and that impeded operations. How did he expect them to willingly face superior fire from the terrorists? In addition, it is obvious now that money voted for the welfare of the men and their families were released for the wrong purpose. Those who partook of the heinous crime must all be properly identified, the degree of culpability established and properly tried. In this connection, the former military chiefs, including the CDS, the Chief of Army Staff and the Chief of Air Staff should be invited to help in the investigations. This is not one of those occasions when criminals are pampered and allowed to escape with a slap on the wrist. It is not a time to recover loot privately or encourage behind-the-scene plea bargains. Nigerians, the human rights community and, indeed, the international community are watching President Muhammadu Buhari and the anti-graft agencies to see how they would resolve the matter. It is time a firm stand is taken against corruption to deter people from fiddling with public funds.

    The Federal Government has thus far acted commendably on the matter. The executive and judiciary must ensure that the country’s soul is restored by bringing all the culprits to justice speedily.

     

  • Symbol of possibilities

    Symbol of possibilities

    Another Nigerian makes waves abroad

    Naturally, John Boyega’s Nigerian parentage is a source of pride to his Nigerian compatriots. He is also British by reason of his birth in Peckham, London. But that does not erase his Nigerian roots. His celebrity is strikingly captured by a UK report: “his name and face and every utterance will shortly be ubiquitous.”

    The 23-year-old London-based actor has been described as the “new hero of Star Wars”. His role in the 2015 film Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is coming four years after his successful 2011 film debut  Attack the Block, and it has taken his cinematic career to the next level. The Force Awakens, scheduled for release on December 18, is the seventh film in the Star Wars space saga.

    The first film in the American series about the adventures of various characters “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away” was released in 1977, and the production has since become a “worldwide pop culture phenomenon”.

    It is noteworthy that all six films before the latest one were commercial successes and were nominated for or won Academy Awards. A report said: “He didn’t tell his parents about the Star Wars auditions, despite a seven-month process, and says his dad was in the bathroom when he was told the big news, dressed only in vest and pyjama trousers. “And he said,” Boyega begins, putting on his dad’s heavy Nigerian accent, with some exaggerated finger-pointing, “‘I knew it! I knew it! Well done, well done, well done.’”

    On the day he got the part, the director reportedly quizzed him about his family, and wanted “to know exactly what’s going to happen when this fame, or whatever, comes.” A role in a primary school play got him noticed early, and he was invited to join a theatre school for talented children. He benefited from a hardship fund. As a performing arts student at South Thames College in Wandsworth, he participated in theatre productions at the institution and played a lead role in Othello in 2010.

    Listed among the “UK Stars of Tomorrow 2011”, Boyega in March 2012 featured in the film adaptation of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s novel Half of a Yellow Sun. In April 2014, he emerged as a lead character, Finn, in Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

    Boyega’s emergence on a bigger stage is a big booster for his career as well as his profile. By extension, his success is good PR for Nigeria because of his origins. It is always welcome when a development makes the country look better than international perception would suggest.

    In the professional world, Boyega’s rise should inspire actors and actresses in Nigeria’s film industry, known as Nollywood; and encourage them to aspire to professional excellence worthy of international recognition.

    Boyega’s stardom also makes a statement about how people can have their dreams come true in spite of difficult beginnings.  His journey to fame in Hollywood, the world’s leading film industry in America, is particularly remarkable because of his Peckham background.

    Interestingly, Boyega made light of Peckham’s image as a tough place. He said in an interview: “It’s too complicated to get into the whole tough-estate thing…It’s just boring, but I’m not representing that, because it’s not my story. I went to the theatre growing up and to Westminster City for secondary school, and was commuting from Peckham. My estate wasn’t tough. To this day, it isn’t tough. We used to draw a square on the brick wall and play penalties. What makes me laugh is when people say, ‘Oh my gosh, it’s tough.’ What’s tough? I don’t know what was tough about it.”

    Boyega is a symbol of possibilities. It is not enough for the country to identify with his achievement. It is more important for the country to work towards excellence.

     

  • Friends in need

    Friends in need

    • Nigeria must do more to protect its sporting and other heroes

    A recent declaration by a powerlifting coach that he was desperately searching for a job because he did not wish to become a thief exposes the dilemma of a nation whose retired athletes rarely enjoy the post-career welfare taken for granted in other nations.

    Sports professionals are particularly vulnerable to the dangers of indigence in old age. Although the financial rewards for sporting excellence are much better than they used to be, far too many athletes still do not pay enough attention to ensuring their financial well-being later in life. Nigeria’s stadiums and other sporting arenas are full of decrepit ex-athletes begging members of the public for money. The list of those who died in poverty despite their sporting prowess is a long one: Rashidi Yekini, Alloysius Atuegbu and Sam Ojebode are only some of the more prominent ones.

    Many destitute former sports professionals often admit their own culpability in contributing to the situation in which they find themselves. They confess to extravagant lifestyles which they never thought would come to an end. They failed to prepare for life after sport by considering alternative careers from which to make a living. They assumed their popularity could always be turned into profit.

    Such carelessness is worsened by the country’s own inability to care for its sporting heroes. Rewards promised to victorious athletes are sometimes not redeemed, as was the case with the Abuja homes promised to the victorious 1994 Super Eagles. Training grants meant to help prepare athletes for forthcoming competitions are not paid, delayed or not disbursed equitably. When athletes are injured, they are often left to their own devices.

    When they retire, it becomes clear that they are entirely on their own. Athletes do not have government pension or healthcare plans. Those who wish to go into coaching usually finance their training themselves. Their accomplishments and fame, which could be useful in social mobilisation programmes, are almost never put to use. When they fall ill, their predicament is hardly publicised until they are virtually at death’s door, only for hypocritical praise to flow after they die.

    The consequences of this lamentable situation are already becoming apparent. Many current athletes have developed a hard-headed attitude to national assignments, insisting on dollar payments for their participation, regardless of whether they win or lose. Their patriotic zeal on the field of play is often not as high as it should be. Those who are approached to fly the flags of other countries often accept such offers with alacrity.

    Nigeria’s ex-athletes deserve better. They are the heroes of sporting narratives which have done more to bind the country together than any other aspect of national life. Their performances on the field of play are symbolic of the nation’s aspirations and sense of self; by extension, their suffering is similarly reflective of an uncaring country.

    Pension schemes can be developed to cater specifically for athletes, enabling them to put away part of their earnings during their productive years so that they can be drawn upon when they are no longer active. Greater attention must be paid to training them for lives after sport, especially in the areas of coaching and physical education. All rewards promised to victorious athletes must be redeemed promptly.

    Nigeria’s attitude to its ex-athletes is a reflection of its attitude to the citizenry. If it is to change for the better, it will have to reform its welfare system to ensure that it guarantees everyone a life of dignity long after their productive years have ended. In achieving this, the Federal Government should build upon the pioneering examples of states like Ekiti, and Lagos, where senior citizens are paid monthly stipends and offered free medical check-ups and treatment, respectively.

  • As ministers settle for business

    As ministers settle for business

    SIR: Nigerians are currently waiting to see how the new ministers will contribute their quota to the much desired change in the polity. The new appointees, like their predecessors, are also Nigerians and it is the same blood that flows in their veins. They can make or mar the government and by extension bring the dividends of democracy or sufferings and hardship of bad governance.

    My candid advice to them is to use this one in a million opportunity to write their names in gold by contributing immensely to the transformation of the country to becoming a better place to live in and thereby, justify the long wait preceding their appointments.

    Much as the ministers represent their states in the federal executive council, they are ministers of the republic and not for states. So, it should be ‘Nigeria first’.

    Nigerians expect them to be prudent in the selection of their aides because they will also play key roles in their success or otherwise. Thus, if they want to make positive impact, they need people with patriotic zeal, commitment and, will-power to succeed

    They need to constantly consult and seek professional counsels from experts in fields related/relevant to their respective ministries. I urge them to make use of valuable/cogent points from constructive criticisms, contributions, articles/publications, public complaints and other related forums in proffering lasting solutions to inherent challenges under their purview.

    This is not a ‘chop and clean mouth government’. It is a government where you go to equity with clean hands. Hence, if you cannot do without accumulating wealth illegally, it is better you throw in the towel, before you are thrown into jail. They must accept the fact that whistle-blowing has come to stay and all eyes are on them.

    Since President Muhammadu Buhari is known for his commitment to the wellbeing of the people and the progress of the nation, we enjoin the ministers to work frankly and openly with him. They should call a spade a spade and let him see reasons why things should be done differently to achieve the desired results for the benefits of all and sundry.

    They should avoid being sycophants in order to curry his favours. The people are looking up to the President to spearhead the ‘Change Agenda’. The sufferings in the immediate past were so intense that Nigerians cannot afford to keep sleeping or incompetent minister(s) or any other appointee(s) in this era.

     

    • Raymond Oise-Oghaede,

    Surulere, Lagos.

     

  • Fair is fair

    Fair is fair

    •If INEC cancels Southern Ijaw vote for violence, it must look at other areas where peace was compromised

    It is odd, as now often happens in Nigerian politics, that the result of an election may not tell the story about the election except as farce. In the kogi State governorship, a sense of foreboding pervades the declaration of Yahaya Bello as governor-elect. It has now triggered ominous litigations.

    Now, in Bayelsa State, another theatre is unfolding. The resident electoral commissioner (REC) cancelled the Southern Ijaw poll on the grounds of violence.

    The governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Timipre Sylva, protested the cancellation, citing double standards and partisanship on the part of the umpire.

    Calling it a “rape on democracy,” Sylva said the REC cancelled the election because his party had won and overcome the lead of the rival People’s Democratic Party (PDP.

    The election raised a number of questions. One, if it was widely reported that violence sullied the elections in other local government areas, why did the INEC pick out the Southern Ijaw vote for nullification? Violence also flared in Sagbama, Nembe and even the state capital, Yenagoa.

    Ekeremor lighted up with unease when bands of hoodlums rammed into the residence of the minister of state for agriculture. Only a counterforce from the Joint Task Force quelled the onslaught. A protest from the APC representative was fobbed off by the INEC officer. Similar complaints attended other parts of the state. It is therefore curious that the same reason was cited in cancelling the Southern Ijaw vote.

    The other issue concerned the inadequacy of the military. As violence ran rampant on Saturday December 5, the military seemed coy as the thugs tossed bombs and unleashed a variety of high-profile weapons. On Sunday, when only Southern Ijaw Local Government Area remained after cancellation, the army ought to have settled for the relatively smaller swath of territory. How was it that violence ignited in the area? Sylva said he had to call the security forces a number of times to tame the impunity of his rivals. It speaks of a failure of intelligence, vigilance and readiness.

    The most egregious drama concerned the governor of Bayelsa State who was also the PDP candidate, Seriake Dickson. He had shown both on Saturday and Sunday that he did not want the election to hold in Southern Ijaw. He personally paid visits to INEC office against the law. More regrettably, he saw nothing wrong in his acts. After that, his subordinates also paid visits and curiously the INEC did not show any sense of remonstration with a player cohabiting with the umpire during a contest.

    Later, on Sunday, he went on radio to incite the people of the state to protest the vote. He asked them to surge to the streets at 2pm, and tried to appeal to tribal sentiments against the Federal Government. What he did amounted to a breach of the peace. It is a treasonous irony that a man who was elected to keep the peace decided to flout it in pursuit of his personal interest.

    Clearly, the INEC must steer clear of any impression that its officers in the field are pursuing a lopsided vision. It must work hard to ensure that the two elections conducted under the watch of the new helmsman are inconclusive because they are so, and not because of some subterranean designs.

    If the Southern Ijaw elections must be cancelled because of violence, it must also consider places like Sagbama and Nembe where the APC protests, according to Sylva, “died like a candle in the wind.”  We cannot afford an INEC that officiates a one-sided game.

  • Corruption of justice

    Corruption of justice

    •The CJN says lack of political will makes the judiciary lag in convicting corrupting officials, and we agree

    Which arm of government is to blame for the delays that attend high-profile cases of corruption in the country:  the executive or the judicial arm? Whilst President Muhammadu Buhari believes the judiciary is to blame, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mahmud Mohammed, blames it all on lack of political will on the part of the executive arm.

    President Buhari bared his mind on the issue on November 23 at the flag-off of the 2015 All Nigeria Judges’ Conference in Abuja, when he told his audience that more than ever before, “allegations of judicial corruption have become more strident and frequent.” The president, who was represented by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo at the occasion, accused corrupt lawyers and judges of sabotaging his efforts to recover stolen assets; by extension, they are the ones stalling the anti-corruption war.

    Justice Mohammed fought back about a week later, saying, instead, that lack of political will (on the part of the executive) is a major setback in the prosecution of high-profile corruption cases in the country. The CJN said in a statement by his media aide, Mr. Ahuraka Isah, during a meeting with the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN), alongside other Justices of the Supreme Court and the heads of federal courts that: “Experience within the judiciary shows that there is an abject lack of political will to prosecute some of those cases pending before our various courts, almost a decade in some instances. It is not because there are no special courts, but mostly for reasons of political expedience and other ancillary considerations.”

    Both the president and the CJN are right. This is clear even from some of the president’s observations as to why corruption cases linger interminably, when he observed that delays and sometimes inaction on some of these cases are “consequences of shoddy investigation”; a function that falls under the purview of the executive. Indeed, we have seen instances of complicity on both sides in many of the cases of corruption involving highly placed Nigerians. There are many instances too where lawyers used delay tactics in the trial process such that many of such cases do not advance beyond the preliminary stages years after the cases started.

    However, rather than trade blames, both the president and the CJN have a duty to ensure that justice does not travel at a snail’s speed. It is heartwarming that both of them have made useful suggestions on how to make the country’s judicial arm much more effective and relevant. The judiciary must, on its part, look inward and deal with the scourge of corrupt practices, real or perceived, within the system. A situation where some judges allegedly became billionaires overnight merely by handling election cases cannot be allowed to continue if the impartiality and integrity of the judiciary is to be protected. The judiciary must, in essence, be prepared to sanitise itself, to rid it of the bad elements soiling its image.

    Judges, as the president said, should not hesitate to punish lawyers and litigants who deliberately delay trials, even as the judicial officers should revisit reports of previous reform panels on how to improve legal practice in the country. A good point that President Buhari also made is that the Supreme Court, as a very busy court, should focus on key constitutional issues and not be bogged down by interlocutory matters.

    The Federal Government too must be ready to invest heavily on its prosecutors to reduce the incidence of shoddy investigation and other unethical practices that make those handling high-profile cases lose the cases that they ordinarily should win. It should ensure financial independence for the judiciary like the legislature and the executive arms, so that judges and the wheel of justice generally would not be slowed down by lack of funds. The judiciary is too crucial to the democratic process and should therefore not be imperiled in any way.

  • Armsgate: Culprits should face terrorism charges

    Armsgate: Culprits should face terrorism charges

    SIR: Nigerians yet again received the shock of their lives from the revelations emanating from the purchase of arms meant to prosecute the ongoing war against insurgency in the North-east. The insensitivity, high level corruption and lack of respect for the sanctity of human life by some highly placed individuals was once again exposed, when the office of the National Security Adviser was allegedly turned into a ‘father Christmas grotto’ where funds meant for counter-terrorism and national security were dolled out to private individuals, politicians and corporate bodies to campaign for the re-election bid of former President, Goodluck Jonathan.

    It is disheartening, unfortunate and worrisome that even after the former president made a proclamation that his ambition wasn’t worth the life of any Nigerian, he allegedly authorized the diversion of security funds to prosecute his campaign. That the funds that would have been used to procure arms and other equipments to put an end to the activities of Boko Haram, halt the killing of innocent women and children and prevent the untimely deaths of our gallant soldiers was so diverted goes on to expose his hypocrisy, moral bankruptcy, inhumanity and desperation for power.

    Its been alleged that an individual got a whooping N4.6billion to consult a spiritualist on behalf of the PDP presidential campaign organization; another allegedly got about N2.1billion for publicity on behalf of his media organization, amidst other several amounts that were dolled out to PDP members from the office of the National Security Adviser. The questions begging for answers are; even if such funds were meant to legitimately prosecute a task or a contract for the presidential campaign organization, must the office of NSA be turned and used by the PDP for funds disbursement? Even if the said funds weren’t the same meant for arms procurement, when did the NSA transform into a cashier for politicians and their campaign organization? What manner and how much of spiritual help does a presidential campaign organization really needs with such a huge amount while many of the PDP controlled states were facing challenges of payment of their worker’s salaries and the nation was under intense economic crisis?

    Now that the truth is gradually coming out and individuals who fed fat on the funds meant to fight insurgency are gradually being exposed and are under investigation, there is need for all hands to be on deck to ensure that the right thing is done within the ambit of the rule of law and constitution of the land. Gone were the days when impunity reigned supreme in our polity and certain class of people were high up above the law and hence carry out all sorts of criminal and despicable atrocities against Nigeria and Nigerians. All indicted should be properly prosecuted in the law court and made to face the full wrath of the law. The culprits must answer for every single life lost and blood shed by Boko Haram in the north-east and elsewhere in this country. It should be noted that diverting or sharing money meant to fight terrorism is tantamount to terrorism itself. Hence, the need for all involved and indicted to be tried and prosecuted as terrorists. This heinous crime and attrocity against the people of the north-east and Nigerians in general must not be allowed to go unpunished.

     

    • Hussain Obaro,

    Ilorin-Kwara State

  • Health sector calamity

    Health sector calamity

    • Nigeria is second in maternal mortality and first in HIV children!

    UNICEF representative in Nigeria Ms. Jim Bolken told federal legislators last week that five women die hourly at childbirth in the country. This sad news only confirmed what has been an abiding part of health care in the country.  At present, a woman’s chance of dying at childbirth is 1 in 13. With this revelation, it is clear that the country is not securely on track to meeting the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), especially reduction of infant mortality by two thirds and of maternal mortality by three quarters. According to the UNICEF country representative, most of these deaths are prevented in other countries, just as they are preventable in Nigeria.

    All the problems that lead to maternal mortality: poor nutrition during pregnancy, hemorrhage, infection, obstructed or prolonged labour, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, etc. are preventable through timely intervention. In the country, over 40 percent of women still do not have access to pre-natal medical care. Less than 20 percent of health facilities provide emergency obstetric care while only 35 percent of deliveries are attended by skilled birth-care professionals.

    Ms. Bolken did not mince words when she told federal legislators that over 30,000 healthcare facilities in the country remain in comatose condition. She added that maternal mortality rate remains the most significant indicator of healthcare service and warned that unless the governments at all levels and health-related agencies nationwide provide adequate fund to the health sector, the 2020 MDGs stand the risk of  not being realised.

    The news about HIV/AIDS epidemic in the country is as alarming as the revelation about maternal mortality. At the marking of this year’s World AIDS Day, the country’s public health professionals and researchers revealed another shocker about HIV/AIDS in the country: 2.9 million Nigerians are still not on treatment for their infection. New HIV infections have increased in the country to 632 daily, with 174,253 dying from the disease in 2014. About three million of the 16 million currently living with HIV across the globe live in Nigeria. While 11 million in the WHO African Region are receiving treatment, only 500,000 in Nigeria have access to retroviral drugs. According to WHO Regional Director for Africa, “the number of people acquiring HIV infection is still too high and young women and girls continue to be disproportionately at risk.”

    Just as with maternal mortality, so does Nigeria appear a disaster zone with respect to HIV/AIDS, not to talk of death of children under five. Preventable or treatable infectious diseases such as malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhea still account for more than 70 percent of the estimated one million under-five deaths in the country.

    Paradoxically, there is no dearth of right rhetoric among government leaders about the centrality of good health to national development. There is no better illustration of good intention on the part of governments in respect of nurturing a healthy citizenry than the National Health Act of 2014. This Act contains all the right words about health care:  achievement of Universal Health Coverage, government commitment to meet the MDGs target, improving funding of health care services at the grassroots, provision of basic health care to be funded from Federal Government Annual Grant with not less than one percent of its Consolidated Revenue Funds, etc.

    But with the dismal statistics about health care in the country, it is obvious that what is missing on the part of government is not good intentions but effective implementation of good public health policies. Any country that treats its public health with levity stands the risk of continued underdevelopment. The wisdom that health is wealth does not apply in a country that is unable to prevent its mothers from dying of preventable complications and its infants from dying of treatable infections.

    While it may be premature to blame the new Federal Government for the depressing statistics in the healthcare sector, it is proper to call on the government brought to power on the promise of change from business as usual to give urgent attention to a sector that looks ready for declaration of emergency. The lack of political will that turned Nigeria into the second country of funerals for infants and young mothers in the world has to come to an end under the new administration at all the three levels of government but with the right leadership that comes from the power of example by the Federal Government. This is the time to implement all the good policies in the books with regard to provision of universal health.