Category: Editorial

  • Professorial governor

    Professorial governor

    • Fetishisation of aptitude and integrity, in tests, is hardly the way to go

    People of Cross River State must be proud of their governor, Prof. Ben Ayade and his love for scholastic rigour.  Yet, isn’t the new governor rather over-playing the scholastic part of him?

    Governor Ayade has come out with a rather curious pre-test for his would-be cabinet and other state appointees.  They would all have to undergo a mandatory “integrity and aptitude” test.

    “His Excellency, Prof. Ben Ayade, wants all the nominees for appointments as commissioners to undergo and integrity test,” declared a release by Christian Ita, the governor’s chief press secretary.  “Additionally, the nominees  would also write an aptitude test.”

    To show that His Excellency means business, a committee to conduct the tests has already been set up, made up of Paul Erokoro, an Abuja-based lawyer, Martin Orim, the chief of staff to the governor and Mrs Grace Ekanem.  After the putative cabinet members have had their day with the committee, the committee would shift its attention to would-be members of boards of parastatals and agencies.  It is only after that the governor would pass their names to the state legislature for endorsement.

    For starters, since integrity and aptitude tests are a sine-qua-non for any sinecure under the Ayade governorship, which body vetted members of the Orim-chaired committee — or did His Excellency do it himself?  And what of Mr. Ita, who rolled out the diktat — under instruction, of course.  Did he too have a private grilling with the governor?

    Do not get us wrong.  With mass governmental turpitude and the attendant decay in the public space, every political leader ought to take an especial interest in the moral tincture of his lieutenants.  Whatever each of them does, their principal, the governor, takes the can: for they act in his name; and hold office at his pleasure.

    Aptitude is no less important — for it is a matter of competence; and the ability to grind out results, even with telling circumstances.  We do not want to pump officials with so much state resources, without commensurate results, do we?

    Still, is sitting virtual examinations on morality, integrity and competence the way out?  It could be, but not necessarily so.  By the way, did the governor himself write such tests when he was gunning for nomination?  And the aptitude bid: since he most probably would pick from among his party peers, when did he start having doubts on their competence: before the elections when their inputs were needed to secure power?  Or after: after power had been sealed and delivered?

    All this might sound like playing the devil’s advocate but that is exactly what is probably playing out in the mind of the potential candidates for the proposed test.  But such is Nigeria’s political sociology that even the most hurt and humiliated would quietly lick their wounds, stoop to conquer and gain the el-dorado of their dreams — government sinecure with all its lollies.

    Governor Ayade must take every logical step to ensure he marshals a dream team, such that can sustain and improve on the worthwhile legacies of the Donald Duke and Liyel Imoke years.  On all objective fronts, Cross River would appear one of the relative success stories of this democratic dispensation.

    But he must be careful not to appear, ab initio, crassly disrespectful of his team; and elevating himself to a virtual tin god over his cabinet, when all he needs is mutual respect between him and the cabinet,  to fire their sense of individual worth; and nurture a collective creative instinct.

    Making full adults sit for “integrity and aptitude” test is taking campaign for rectitude in public offices too far.  The governor should forget such an idea, and think of a more nuanced method of achieving his goal, without making the subject of the test feeling hurt or humiliated.

    ‘But he must be careful not to appear, ab initio, crassly disrespectful of his team; and elevating himself to a virtual tin god over his cabinet, when all he needs is mutual respect between him and the cabinet,  to fire their sense of individual worth; and nurture a collective creative instinct’

  • United we stand

    United we stand

    •Federal government should nip fresh challenge from the Niger Delta in the bud

    An irony, indeed. At a time that the people are full of expectation of a final push by the Army  against the Boko Haram insurgents, the equally deadly Niger Delta militants have threatened to resume their action against the state.  Human and material resources are being devoted to addressing the terrorist attacks that once threatened to overthrow the sovereignty of the land and ultimately break up the country.

    Unfortunately, too, the Movement for a Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSPB), which is the South East version of the subversion threat, has indicated it would soon embark on another fresh wave of violence and open challenge to the sovereign power of the Nigerian state.

    These call for urgent action. At a time that the international community is being rallied to fight the Boko Haram war, there should be no distraction. We therefore call on the federal government to visit any attempt at insurrection from other parts of the country with the full weight of the law.

    It is on record that, following the earlier wave of protests and the reign of anarchy in the area, it took the introduction of the Niger Delta ministry and the amnesty programme to rein in the rough necks in the area. Only then did the reign of kidnap of expatriates and professionals and attacks on public buildings subside. At the height of the subversion of authority, life became so cheap that no one wanted to invest in the oil-rich territory. The national revenue, dependent on oil wealth, plunged and development was severely threatened.

    But, that was before the slump in the oil market. Added to it are the prohibitive cost of prosecuting the War against Terrorism in the North East, the inclement economic weather and the corruption in the land. The insurgency in the North got out of hand because the security agencies failed to pay it adequate attention in good time. Now, the militants in the creeks are known and their capacity could be fairly addressed.

    The threat of regrouping must be nipped in the bud now with with the support of the intelligence agencies charged with monitoring the key figures.

    While the rule of law should be scrupulously adhered to, the full weight of legal provisions should be exploited in dealing with the budding situation.

    It has been suggested that politicians may be prodding the militants to strike to disrupt plans by the new administration to ensure that the power and energy sectors are sanitised. The truth in this might has not been ascertained, but it should not be dismissed without investigation. Where any politician is found culpable, he should be exposed and charged with the relevant offences in the law.

    The MASSOB and its backers must be told that the era of impunity and inaction is gone. It is unacceptable that, 45 years after the civil war with the slogan “no victor, no vanquished,” anyone or group of persons could still be suggesting that Biafra is feasible. All Igbo leaders and elite should call the young men to order before another line of calamity is opened in that part of the country.

    This is a convenient point to put the militia groups in the various parts of the country in their place. One of the attributes of a sovereign state is that it has a monopoly of control and use of agencies of coercion. Nigeria cannot be an exception; otherwise anarchy looms. We call on the federal government to be fair in the distribution of resources to all parts of the country and in taking care of the citizens. This may go a long way in allaying the fears of the ethnic groups and even the economic minorities.

    At the end of the hostilities in the North East, we call on government to look into the demands of the various peoples of Nigeria. A convenient point to start might be revisiting the original covenant entered into by the people and political parties before independence and granting more autonomy to the federating units. The emergence of regional groups is perhaps an indication that the Nigerian people still owe more allegiance to the old regions that have largely translated to the geo-political zones.

     

     

  • With parents like these …

    With parents like these …

    • The Omorieves, and other parents, are no longer moral guides for their children

    Recent reports that a man and his wife were apprehended in the act of writing papers for two of their children in the West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) are sad reminders of the moral quagmire Nigeria finds itself in.

    The cheating couple, Frederick and Evelyn Omorieve, were arrested while writing papers in a so-called “miracle centre” in Delta State. Their decision to embark on this adventure in mercenary parenting apparently came from the repeated failures of the children in previous examinations; and the fact that several friends and neighbours had gotten away with similar strategies in the past.

    This is the epitome of dysfunctional parenting: the Omorieves were not only unable to keep their children on the right path, they actively steered them down the highway of moral turpitude — and eventual damnation.

    In this regard, they are similar to parents who pay others to write examinations for their children and those who bribe invigilators to look the other way while their offspring engage in atrocious acts of blatant cheating.

    In addition to exemplifying depraved parenting, the Omorieves have also committed a crime, for which they must be punished. Apart from examination malpractice, they should be charged with conspiracy, impersonation and fraud, at the very least, and must answer for these offences.

    The police must ensure that they get their day in court; perhaps if these crimes are treated with the seriousness that they deserve, Nigerians will be less inclined to dismiss them as “minor” issues, in comparison to kidnapping and armed robbery.

    It is difficult to overestimate the extent to which this case reveals the ethical desert that Nigeria has become. This is now a country where a 66-year old retired federal civil servant and his wife feel no shame in perpetrating examination malpractices on behalf of their children, and in fact consider it a worthy act of selflessness on their part.

    If what the Omorieves did was morally reprehensible, more troubling is the fact that existing social attitudes and institutions conspired to make it easier for them to commit their crimes. They were not the first to do it: others had also written examinations for relations with resounding success.

    The country is riddled with a profusion of miracle centres, compromised supervisors and corruptible invigliators who routinely allow the grossest abuses of the examination process to go ahead in return for money. There are the widespread amoral social attitudes which contend that nothing is really bad or unethical if it results in financial and other benefits.

    Fortunately, there are signs that Nigeria has begun to understand the danger of the situation it finds itself in. The most prominent of these signs is the emergence of Muhammadu Buhari as president. Campaigning on an anti-corruption platform and bolstered by unimpeachable personal integrity, Buhari has brought more positive perspectives to the way the country is run. In less than four months, he has shown the citizenry that unethical behaviour will no longer be permitted in public office.

    This promising start must be built upon by the Nigerian people. It must be no longer considered acceptable to adopt morally flexible attitudes simply because there is some benefit or advantage to be gained. Ethnic, religious and other primordial interests should no longer determine responses to patently criminal acts.

    It is also time that existing legal sanctions against examination malpractices are properly enforced. Even though there is the Examination Malpractices Act of 1999, as well as the amended WAEC Act, culprits rarely go to jail; few are even put on trial.

    If these laws are fully utilised, cheating in examinations will be seen as a criminal offence that it is, as opposed to an act of parental love that many misguided citizens consider it to be.

    ‘If what the Omorieves did was morally reprehensible, more troubling is the fact that existing social attitudes and institutions conspired to make it easier for them to commit their crimes’

     

  • No, to capital punishment

    No, to capital punishment

    •But treasury looters deserve stiff and long jail terms, after a swift but fair trial

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), led by its President,  Ayuba Wabba and Trade Union Congress (TUC), under its President, Bobboi Bala Kaigama, have thrown their weight behind President Buhari’s fight against corruption.

    At a rally both Labour movements held on September 10 in Abuja,  not only did they advocate jail terms for looters, they also called for capital punishment for corrupt officials, as obtained in China and India.

    Mr. Wabba noted that corruption had badly damaged the core of Nigeria’s national existence, which called for a decisive action to prevent the nation from the brink of disaster.

    On the NLC’s support of capital punishment for corrupt Nigerians, Mr. Wabba said, “if such capital punishment can happen in China, India and South Africa, it can also happen in Nigeria; whatever measure that will address the issue of this mind-boggling corruption in the country, NLC will support it”.

    Mr. Wabba was particularly sad because he felt that massive corruption in the polity had deprived Nigerians good standard of living, and therefore supports the establishment of anti-corruption courts to try cases of corruption in the country. He then asked the Federal Government “to ensure that all the funds illegally looted from the treasury are traced and the looters brought to book”.

    TUC’s Mr. Kaigama, on his part, was especially worried about the inability of governors to pay workers for months on end, while pointing out that Nigeria had not experienced such long bouts of salary non-payments in the last 20 years.  He said that state governments had to rely on federal bailouts, before they could pay monthly salaries, was very bad, sad and scary.

    Comrade Kaigame declared: This sad scenario “is due to massive corruption in the country”. He therefore supports the enactment of laws for fighting corruption, and also that all public officers must declare their assets henceforth.  Calling for special anti-corruption courts, Mr. Kaigama called for the abolition of joint accounts for states and local governments, adding that such accounts are often abused by state governments.

    Organised Labour’s rather grim view on corruption is understandable.  The high level of corruption in Nigeria today is abhorrent.  Its spread and scope are alarming and threatening.

    Given the danger corruption poses to our survival as a people, and how it has promoted poverty and underdevelopment, we quite sympathize with Labour’s stand, canvassing death penalty for those found guilty of corruption.

    Still, we are philosophically opposed to death penalty — not for corruption  alone but for any offence.

    First, we believe death penalty is not the solution, although it would appear to send out dire signals to would-be looters.  So, instead of killing the corrupt — and given the epidemic, the number of the doomed will add up to a tidy sum — they should be jailed after conviction, and their loots recovered.

    So, nobody  found guilty of looting should be allowed to go scot free to enjoy his/her loot. But this can only be effective if the trial system is fast and swift, without losing the rigour of prosecution, and fairness of trial.  That way, the acused, the immediate victims of  his sleaze and the general society will get justice.  The moment looters of the public till know they face long years in jail, with its attendant shame and disgrace, we will start getting positive change.

    Still, even with a fair, fast and credible judicial process, prevention is still better than cure.  So,  we advise iron-clad preventive measures, that makes it almost impossible to steal public funds, not to talk of escaping with the loot.

    ‘We are philosophically opposed to death penalty — not for corruption  alone but for any offence’

    It is good and appropriate that the NLC, as a pressure group that should at all time keep government on its toes in a democracy, is back to its crusading turf. But while we appreciate the effort of the NLC in its support of the fight against corruption by the Buhari administration, we advise that Organised Labour should sustain its regained crusading zest.

    In order to be credible and convincing and therefore effective, we believe that charity must begin at home.  That means  the NLC must put its house in order, doing some soul-searching and self-cleansing, so as to rid its own rank of corruption.

    Anything short of this would surely weaken the credibility of the NLC and the TUC in their welcome support for President Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade.

  • Northern ‘decay’

    Northern ‘decay’

    •The North must look inward to fix its own problems

    Northern governors, under the auspices of the Northern Governors Forum (NGF), met on September 11 and declared their region was ‘decaying’.

    “It has become imperative, especially for northern state governors,” said Kashim Shettima, chair of the forum and governor of Borno State, “to brace up for the challenges ahead.”

    The governors’ alarm would elicit varied responses, with not a few claiming it could be another northern ploy to corner more resources, now that the president is from that region.

    That would be cynical but not altogether unfounded.  But if that is true of the North, it is also  true of other parts of the country.  The Nigerian political elite, for selfish interests, often regionalise power — the Goodluck Jonathan Presidency’s South-South – South East coalition being the latest example.

    But there appears no guarantee that even other regions yet to taste federal power, would not return to such clannishly self-destruct behaviour when they eventually get their chance.  Still, that is no path a nation should travel.

    That is why it is reassuring that the northern governors themselves, from their resolutions, appear to be looking inward, not towards some federal might (euphemism for loading the dice of federal favours in a regional direction), to solve their present and pressing problems.

    Again, from Governor Shettima: “After exhaustive deliberations, the northern state governors have resolved to adopt a holistic approach towards solving the problems.  Should the present leaders fail, the consequences would be better be imagined than experienced.”

    On this, the NGF is spot on — the region, wilting under numerous crisis, from the economy to security, does need a holistic plan: of the North, for the North,  by the North.

    Take security.  The Boko Haram menace is the North’s most reported security challenge.  It is good news the government appears to, at last, be routing the insurgents.  But even with that, the terrible scars remain.  So, there must be a grand post-militancy resettlement and reorientation programme.

    Aside from Boko Haram, ethnic killings, with roots firmly in economic parchment, lay the North prostrate.  Even with a reported peace initiative, 20 people, on September 11, were reportedly slain in killings in the Plateau communal crisis, where the Fulani and Berom are falling upon themselves.  In Taraba and Adamawa, it is the same gory tale of ethnic killings.  This conundrum of inter-ethnic resentment, if not outright hatred, is what the North must sort out — and fast.

    But it cannot do that without digging deep into its roots; and a major problem is the fatal match-up between Fulani herdsmen and local farmers.  The herdsmen appear to have gifted themselves the divine right to feed their cattle, even if that means wilfully destroying the farmers’ livelihood.  The farmers too would appear to take laws into their own hands, pleading criminal collusion from some elements of state, who they allege illicitly embolden the marauding herdsmen.

    Yet, both herdsmen and farmers are entitled to legitimate livelihood.

    What to do?  The northern authorities must come up with a solid plan of building modern ranches, within which the herdsmen can graze their cattle, without endangering farmlands of pastoralists.  Aside from doing away with the traditional nomadic grazing, that has triggered so much violence and bloodshed, the modern ranches would come with a sweet value-added: agro-allied processing.  That way, the ranchers would get more money for their produce now turned products; but exert less physical energy; and suffer less loss of human lives.  The same argument goes for the farmers.  But mass enlightenment is needed to sell this new approach, to wean the mind of traditionalists off the old ways.

    But more than anything, if the North really is desirous of exiting its present sorry pass, it must make conscious and collective investment in social infrastructure.  Encouraging vibes are already coming out of Sokoto and Kaduna states, which governments have declared free and compulsory education to secondary school level.  The key word is compulsory, for education in the North has always been largely free; but not many have taken advantage of this precious investment.

    This challenge can be confronted with a sound and  comprehensive education master plan, under the auspices of northern regional integration.  Indeed, integration should be the developmental elixir for other geo-political regions in the country.

  • Banks’ unwholesome ways

    Banks’ unwholesome ways

    •Banks must be held to account for holding on to federal government money and unilaterally hiking interest rates.

    For an industry permanently on the spotlight, two developments –not unrelated – have merely driven home the reality of extant practices that continue to erode trust in the financial services sector.

    The first is the whopping sum ofN12 billion said to have been collected as revenue by banks on behalf of the federal government but which they failed to remit. This was the finding by the consultant engaged by the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) to verify and reconcile revenue collections and remittances by 19 collecting banks engaged by the Nigerian Customs Service and Federal Inland Revenue Service. The period is said to cover January 2008 to June 2012.

    Now, RMAFC is demanding that the banks promptly remit the amount into the federal government coffers.

    The other is the subject of an on-going probe by the Consumers Protection Council. It involves alleged N1.8 billion excess charges on the account of the Bauchi State government by one of the banks. The CPC is said to have stepped into the matter following a petition to the council; that was after the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) reportedly declined further adjudication on the case earlier brought to it by the state government.

    In the petition, the state government alleged that the bank, without any prior information, charged 21 per cent interest rate per annum on two loans of N10 billion and N3 billion, which the bank granted it on January 22, 2009 and June 15, 2011 respectively both at the rate of 13 per cent interest per annum, and that this has resulted in excess interest charges on its account, amounting to the sum of N1,864,188,594.78 as at February 2014.”

    The state government further alleged  inconsistencies in the application of interest rate with the rate going up as high as 54.46 per cent in some cases.

    Both cases, obviously exemplify some of the more brazen abnormalities in the banking system for which Nigerians are now only too familiar. To start with, only in the most permissive, laisez-faire environment that the banking sector has become can the idea of an agent withholding revenues collected on behalf of its principal for months, if not years, can be contemplated. Worse is that a process so basic or elementary, and yet so fundamental to the revenue collection process, would take several years to accomplish.

    The same – unfortunately – is no less true of the dispute between the Bauchi State Government and one of the banks over interest charges. This time, a bank is accused of changing the applicable interest rates at will, leaving the customer terribly short-changed.

    The RMAFC should proceed forthwith to get the offending banks to remit the funds – we daresay with appropriate penalities-  without further delay. As for the matter before the CPC, we consider it as deserving of serious investigations to be undertaken – and this expeditiously.  It goes without saying that Nigerians are entitled to know how the matters are resolved given the public interest nature of the cases.  The whole affairs reek of fraud and impunity.

    Both developments obviously underscore the need for further sanitisation of the financial system. Here, the challenge would seem essentially one of restoring integrity and best practices into the system without which the factor of trust will continue to be a mirage. The issue is simple. If the financial services industry cannot be trusted to play strictly by the rules, wherein lies the future for the overall economy?

    The need to embrace global best practices is even more imperative now with the coming of the Treasury Single Account. We expect the federal government to enforce the deadline scrupulously as the issues of transparency which made it imperative can no longer wait.

  • Ambode, a listening governor

    Ambode, a listening governor

    SIR: The Governor of Lagos State, Mr Akinwunmi Ambode has not only proved his readiness to seriously consolidate on the performance of his predecessor, but has also proved to be a listening public servant. I wrote an open letter to the Governor published in The Nation Wednesday August 5, page 19, on solution to the teething traffic gridlocks across the state, calling for the reopening of Alimosho junction of the Lagos-Abeokuta Expressway, blocked by the Federal Emergency Road Maintenance Agency (FERMA) last year.

    The road which allows free-flow of traffic in Dopemu, Iyana-Ipaja, Abule egba, Agege and Egbeda axis was created three years by former Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola in response to my suggestions through private and open letters. Like I stated in my open letter to Governor Ambode, it worked like magic.

    To my amazement and excitement, the state government has again opened the Alimosho link road on Lagos-Abeokuta Expressway on Tuesday September 1, barely one month after The Nation published my open letter to Governor Ambode. I hereby express my eternal gratitude to The Nation for giving me the opportunity to express myself.

    Like Oliver Twist, I will also remind the governor of a kilometer L-shaped road leading to my hotel at Mosan-end of the Federal Low Cost Housing Estate (Shagari Estate), in Mosan-Okunola Local Council Development Area. It was built by me some 18 years ago with street lights and personal maintenance without any form of government assistance.

    The road which has turned into an alternative route to people of Baruwa, Abesan Estate, Ipaja, Ayobo and Ikola E.T.C Years ago, following the construction of the Iyana-Ipaja/Ayobo Expressway, is now seriously dilapidated, begging for your government’s attention. Please yield our distress call sir

     

    • Tony Adenubi

    Mosan- Ipaja, Lagos.

  • Unruly libido

    Unruly libido

    University teachers have gone out of control in exploiting and harassing female students for sexual favours

    Sexual exploitation of female students by their teachers who should stand in loco parentis for them has for long been a disquieting but neglected phenomenon in Nigerian universities.  It gained national salience for a while in the late 1980s, largely through the attention it received from former first lady Maryam Babangida’s Better Life for Rural Women and allied women’s societies.

    Unfortunately, their intervention, seen largely by a skeptical attentive public as just another front on Babangida’s regime’s unrelenting crackdown on the universities, the bastion of resistance to his dictatorial rule and his agenda of self-perpetuation, soon fizzled out.

    Today, campus sexploitation has now grown to an extent that warrants forthright discussion and prompt action.

    This ugly phenomenon takes many forms.

    In perhaps the most brazen manifestation, lecturers blackmail female students into granting them sexual favours, on pain of failing a critical course.  Some lecturers even ask the unfortunate student to arrange, at her own cost, a rendezvous for her own violation.

    That is not consensual sex.  It is rape, pure and simple.  And it is not uncommon.  In one widely reported case, a professor and faculty dean at the University of Calabar has been cited in the investigation of a sexual assault on a 20-year-old female student. In another, an adjunct lecturer at the University of Lagos is alleged to have raped an 18-year-old, seeking admission into the university.

    In another common practice, some lecturers invite female students to their offers under the pretext of academic consultation or and advisement, only to grope and fondle them, without their consent and without the least regard for consequences.

    In a more subtle but no less deplorable manifestation, some lecturers lace their classroom presentation with gratuitous sexual allusions guaranteed to make female students uncomfortable.

    One line of argument in this tawdry business has it that some female students dress “provocatively” and thereby invites attention to themselves, wittingly or unwittingly.  This is simply untenable.  Lecturers are supposed to be disciplined adults in full control of their emotions, not predators.

    The instances the public gets to know about may seem few relative to the university population, but the fact is that, for every case reported, there are probably dozens that never get reported not just from for fear of further victimization, but also from the shame of it all.

    Returns from a survey conducted by the Dream Project for Africa in its End Sexual Harassment and Bribery in Nigerian Colleges indicate that 75 percent of those polled said that sexual harassment was common on their campuses.  One-third of the respondents said they or someone they know has been or is being sexually harassed.  More than one-third of them said they feared the idea of reporting the issue to anyone, and only one in 12 students believed that the authorities took the matter seriously

    That enough is not being done to address sexploitation on campus is clear from the recent announcement by the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission that it has concluded plans to prosecute lecturers against whom a case has been established.

    The announcement should serve as a wake-up call to the university community.  With the National Universities Commission providing broad guidelines, University authorities should develop a code of conduct that defines sexual harassment in clear terms and specifies sanctions for conduct that violates it.  The code will be binding on serving and new appointees, and it must be rigorously enforced.

    A climate that offers protection to those reporting sexual harassment will have to be created.    Without such protection, they will not feel confident to come forward.  And unless they come forward, the problem will not get the forthright attention it requires.

  • Licensed to kill?

    Licensed to kill?

    • Why would NDLEA officials pursue a suspect to his death?

    To what do we put this heinous crime down to: callousness? Poor training? Overzealousness? Lack of regard for the sanctity of the human life? Or sheer power drunkenness?

    It is indeed a bit difficult to come to terms with the report of the gruesome death of a certain Dapo Olasore, a 32-year-old man said to be a graduate lawyer. He was reportedly caused to drown by officers of the Nigeria Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

    As the story went, officers of the NDLEA, apparently on a tip-off, had stormed the waterside area of Agboyi community in Alapere, Lagos, in search of drug traffickers last Sunday. Upon getting to the scene, the law officers had attempted to apprehend Olasore who had already boarded a canoe. In the ensuing scuffle, he was said to have tipped into the Agboyi River. Obviously unable to swim, the boatman had attempted to rescue him but the NDLEA men were alleged to have prevented him by pointing a gun at the boatman.

    They thus watched Dapo Sasore drown. His body was washed up to the shore the following day.

    Surely, this is no way to enforce law or treat any suspect. Officials of the NDLEA could not have been trained to snuff out the life from any suspect even if he attempts to escape. One would expect that NDLEA personnel, like all other armed officers of the law, are afforded specialized training on self-control, suspect management, sanctity of the human person, human rights and the rule of law.

    It is unthinkable that these officials would have been burdened with such high responsibility of bearing arms and life ammunition without a thorough tutoring on the essence of control, comportment under pressure and the ultimate supremacy of the rule of law.

    The incident leading to the drowning of Mr. Olasore if true as reported, is callous and reprehensible to say the least and criminal for sure. There is nothing to indicate so far that the victim is the actual suspect being sought, in which case it would have been easy to have apprehended him and made to face the law. Uncannily, the authorities of the NDLEA had not made any public statement on this matter, even as the body was washed up and family members are seeking to retrieve the body for burial.

    We urge the police to step in and apprehend the officers of the NDLEA who carried out the Agboyi operation last Sunday. They must be prosecuted — and publicly too — so as to serve as deterrence not just to them but to others who are armed by the state to maintain law and order.

    This incident also calls to question, the quality of training the agency avails its recruits and officers. There might be a need for an overhaul of the current training regime. We seem to have become too enarmoured with brute force and gun-wielding where intelligence and soft power would often suffice. What was the point of storming a riverside commando-style in unmarked vehicles and shooting sporadically? The only result, it seems now, was to blunder into a likely manslaughter.

    The lesson must be learned and indeed reinforced at every opportunity that uniform and arms are never licenses to kill. The point must indeed be made all the time that to turn the gun at a fellow citizen under any guise, is a criminal offence which comes with dire consequences.

    The agency must also see to it that it does everything necessary to assuage the pains of the family of the victim; that is the very least expected of them.

  • Misplaced priorities

    Misplaced priorities

    • That is the sad tale of Nigerian states that maintain executive aircraft but can’t pay salaries

    It is no secret that the vast majority of Nigeria’s 36 states are today financially crippled; and are unable to discharge their obligations to the citizenry.

    Nothing better demonstrates this predicament than the inability of most of them to pay salaries and allowances of their workers for several months now. So bad had things degenerated that the Federal Government has been forced to bail out the affected states through a lifeline loan of approximately N804.7 billion to enable them clear the backlog of unpaid salaries.

    The plight of the states has been attributed largely to the drastic fall in accruals to the Federation Account following the crash in international oil prices, which has implied a huge reduction in the monthly allocations to the various levels of government.

    Matters were worsened by the inept and opaque management of the Federation Account by the Goodluck Jonathan administration, particularly the large scale theft of the country’s crude oil; and the phenomenal corruption which saw the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) illegally withholding humongous amounts that should have been remitted to the government coffers for distribution as constitutionally stipulated.

    However, a substantial number of the states have also been the architects of their current financial misfortune through sundry acts of corrupt enrichment, profligacy, complacency, poverty of imagination and sheer misplacement of priorities. This has been responsible for their continued dependency on Federal allocations rather than creatively enhancing their Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) base.

    Reports that two Embracer ERJ 145 aircraft purchased by the Taraba State government at an estimated cost of $42 million (N8.3 billion) have been lying idle at the Abuja and Kaduna airports since they were bought about four years ago exemplifies the kind of reckless expenditure and poor prioritisation characteristic of the states.

    The aircraft purportedly purchased for the proposed Air Taraba were reportedly abandoned due to the political crisis in the state following the air crash involving former Governor Danbaba Suntai. Apart from the loss of an estimated N3.3 billion in probable revenues due to the grounding of the planes, aviation experts reckon that it will cost no less than N2.1 billion to service and make the planes airworthy once again.

    Now, the question is, does it make any sense for a poverty-challenged state like Taraba to invest in an airline business, rather than focusing on basic infrastructure and poverty alleviation programmes in health, education, rural roads, water supply, agriculture and other critical areas that affect the majority of the people?

    This is particularly so as Jalingo, the Taraba State capital, reportedly has only an airstrip and not a full-fledged airport with the capacity to accommodate the planes purchased.

    What really is the rate of air traffic between Taraba and the rest of Nigeria and other parts that would make an Air Taraba a viable proposition? Even if it had potentials of profitability, should the state government not have encouraged private sector investment in the business instead of getting directly involved, given the country’s dismal experience with state-run businesses?

    In the same vein, the reported discovery of an aircraft belonging to the Bauchi State government in Morocco has recently generated considerable controversy. Governor Mohammed Abubakar insinuates that the plane found its way to Morocco in suspicious and opaque circumstances. But his predecessor, Isa Yuguda, cries foul. His handover notes, he claims, clearly explained that the aircraft owned by the Bauchi State government, but currently on lease to Overland Airways, is in Morocco for routine checks and maintenance.

    Still, should owning an aircraft for whatever reason be the priority of a state where the basic needs of life elude the vast majority of the people?

    If this pattern of expenditure is not curbed, most states will remain perpetually unviable and fiscally vulnerable.  If struggling states spend their little resources on useless projects, how can they ever get out of the poverty loop?

    Such irresponsible behaviours should no longer be tolerated — and the time to stop is now.