Category: Law

  • ‘Fighting for rights requires resilience by citizens’

    ‘Fighting for rights requires resilience by citizens’

    Dr. Anthony Okechukwu Ojukwu (SAN) is the Executive Secretary of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), an independent national institution for the promotion, protection and enforcement of human rights in Nigeria. In this interview with Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE, he speaks on the challenges of checking human rights abuses by government agents, how to address pre-trial delays and the need for resilience in fighting for one’s rights. Ojukwu also responded to the latest report by the United States Department of State’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour.

    What was your reaction to the U.S. report on the human rights situation in Nigeria?

    I read the report. The issues raised, such as extra-judicial killings, are not lies. But even in the United States, there are also extrajudicial killings. You can never have a situation where there is no violation of human rights. That will be a perfect world. Other countries also deal with violations, even in the United States. They’re not peculiar to Nigeria. The only difference is that when it happens in the U.S., they will track you down and get you. But here, you can do it and run away. In this office (the new Ikeja office), there are no CCTV cameras installed yet. If I slap or shoot you and run into the street, before the police would respond, I would have left Ikeja. That is the difference. In the U.S., I would be trailed. There are means of identification. You cannot get away with murder. But more terrible things are also happening there. Someone would go to a school and shoot 30 people or more at a go. The point is that we can only try to ameliorate human rights violations. We can try to redress them, improve good governance and do the right things. But when you try everything, a policeman can still go and smoke Indian Hemp and pull the trigger when he’s not supposed to.

    That report also highlights issues with pre-trial detention. How is NHRC interfacing with the courts?

    It is not always the fault of the courts. For instance, if a judge has 50 cases on his list a day, even if he gives every case 30 minutes each, how many working hours do we have in a day? When we identify a problem, we must solve it. The judges write in long hand. Sometimes there is no power supply. Police will arrest you before investigation and to beat the timeframe for detention, they charge you to court so it will be the court holding you, and not the police. If the investigation takes six months, the case cannot go on in court. Can you see how pre-trial detention results? The court will adjourn. Next time, they will say prosecution is not ready and it will be adjourned again. So, is it the fault of the court? At times they send the case file to the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) for advice and it will not be ready on time. So, a lot of things need to play together to have an ideal system.

    What is the way out?

    Invest more resources in the administration of justice. If there are not enough judges or enough courts…look at the Supreme Court. For so many years, it never had the full compliment of 21 justices. They only had 10 or 11 justices out of the 21. For many years. If you file a case at the Supreme Court, before you get a date, it could take two years. And these justices are old men and women who are above 60. Right now I know how much I can do. When I see people who are 70 becoming ministers, I begin to wonder how they cope. Maybe when I get to that age I will know. And we expect these justices to sit and listen to 30 cases in a day and still write judgments, some of which you can read for two days? We expect magic to happen. How is that possible?

    Are the problems beyond solution?

    Someone can get in there today and tackle most of these problems. I came in as Executive Secretary in 2018. Now, we’re talking of eight permanent NHRC offices in five years. This commission was established in 1995. Maybe those before me had other priorities or were facing other things. I prioritised permanent offices as a key factor in our independence, and we have been able to achieve something in five years. A president can say: ‘Even if I don’t achieve anything else in four years, I’m going to solve our power problem.’ You face it and deal with it. Another president can come and say: ‘This issue of refineries, I will deal with it.’ Another can decide to face the issue of roads and infrastructure. If you check all these developed countries, that was how they were built. Face one problem and solve it once and for all. So, these issues with the administration of justice – lack of courts, delayed trials by the police – someone can get there and treat them as a priority. It’s about the political will to address them.

    What was NHRC’s reaction to the killing of soldiers in Okuama and the fleeing of residents?

    What we preach is that the military must keep to its rules of engagement. In the first place, the military is not supposed to be in charge of routine investigations. However, we all know why the military is called in at times – the situation has overwhelmed the regular police. If such number of soldiers of that rank can be killed in a community, you can agree with me that it’s not a normal situation. However, what we preach is let there be no violation of human rights. We intervened immediately to make sure the situation did not degenerate into what we had in Odi and Zaki-Biam. However, there is a need to allow the law to take its course by making sure that whoever is behind the killings is arrested. But you must respect the rights of innocent people. You must ensure that while you go after the killers, you’re not killing innocent people or molesting anybody and that those who are innocent are allowed to carry on their businesses. And once the suspects are arrested, you’re going to hand them over to the police. The reality is that there will be some inconvenience. If there is an armed robbery in a neighbourhood, police will block the entrance gate and that may cause traffic. They’re trying to block the exit route of the robbers. Sometimes people have to cope with some inconvenience as part of the general good.

    How much do Nigerians fight for their rights?

    If you must fight for your rights, you must be ready to put up with some inconvenience. I’ll give you an example. Police can arrest and detain someone. We would intervene and the person is released. We tell the person: ‘Let’s sue the police for illegal detention.’ Most would say ‘No. I’m out of detention. I’m okay.’ Some of our people are not resilient. Look at the likes of Martin Luther King Jr. and others who fought for human rights. Was it a bed of roses?  The late Gani Fawehinmi was frequently detained and when he was going out, he would carry his toothbrush and toothpaste just in case. He was ready to sacrifice for the common good. Fighting for human rights is not a tea party.

    How challenging has it been speaking out against rights abuses by government agencies while also heading one?

    It’s not easy. Some feel very uncomfortable by some of the things I say, but what can anybody do about it? You have to speak no matter how uncomfortable the person feels because if it is the truth, then it is the truth. Haven’t you heard of some countries where after somebody makes a statement they are shot dead or taken away? That is the kind of risk we take by condemning what we condemn, by saying it where it hurts but it is the truth, otherwise we’ll not be re-accredited, because the world is watching us. For instance, if we did not make a statement on the Delta issue, the global body would ask questions when it is time to re-accredit us, so we must speak out.

    Read Also: Tinubu directs mandatory procurement of CNG-powered vehicles for official purposes

    You just inaugurated the Lagos office of the commission. How significant is it?

    It means that the Human Rights Commission in Lagos State will be there forever. It boosts our independence and our ability to be of service to the indigenes of Lagos forever and ever. That’s the kind of confidence we have now. We are not a temporary organisation where maybe in the next two years, we cannot pay rent again. So, owning our own structure is a major statement of our independence and we want to thank the Federal Government because this whole building was funded by them. There was no other support. We want to thank them for giving us their support and we are also appealing for this to be replicated in other states.

    How many other states do you plan to set up permanent offices in?

    We are doing this in about eight states now. We’re renting offices in some other states. We know that the Federal Government will listen and we are hopeful that under this present administration, we will be able to realise the dream of having our own properties in all the 36 states of the country so that we can be of service to Nigerians.

    Which other ways do you intend to strengthen your independence?

    Some of the areas to further entrench our independence are adequate funding, construction of the remaining 22 state offices, resourcing the Human Rights Fund under the Act, amendment of the Act to reflect the 2023 observations of the Sub-committee on Accreditation that reviewed the status of NHRC, Practice Directions on the recognition and enforcement of NHRC decisions, provision of investigation vehicles for the 36 state offices, digitisation of the operations of the Commission, training and improved welfare of the officers of the Commission.

    What steps is the commission taking to educate Nigerians about their rights?

    This (setting up a permanent office in Lagos) is one of the steps taken. We try to create awareness for people to know that their rights are violated. Some people have accepted certain things as normal but they are not normal. Another thing is when your rights are violated, knowing you can go to somebody to assist you. That is what the commission is also doing. Most people now know that the commission is there, and when their rights are violated, they are now more vocal in complaining than before.

    What has the reporting rate being like?

    I can tell you in a year, we received more than two million complaints of human rights violations. Another thing is the ability to deal with these complaints. We are working hard on that, training our staff. We are trying to digitise our operations. We have established a toll-free number and a complaint response unit where people can call and we will be able to respond to them. For instance, if someone is arrested and detained for more than 48 hours or more than 12 hours as the case may be, we intervene and secure bail to enable the person defend himself. We visit prisons, police cells and correctional centres. We work with refugees in IDP camps. We settle cases for people who are suffering from domestic and gender-based violence. We try to make sure that children are taken care of by their parents, that they go to school, and that the child’s rights are not being violated. We also encourage the government to provide necessities like education, and shelter; to ensure that the people are economically engaged, that there is power supply and that other things are functioning, because these are things that will increase economic activities.

    What is the toll free number?

    The toll-free number is 6472. You can also visit our website to submit a complaint and you will be contacted by an agent as soon as the complaint is received. We can be reached from anywhere through digital means.w Ideally, we should be in all the local governments in the country, but that’s not feasible. What we are doing is to use digital means. We have created an app through which to reach the commission. We’re trying to let as many people as possible know they can reach us. You can reach us even through letter writing; you don’t need to come physically to our office. You can send an email or text message. The physical office is important for processing the complaints but we have numerous means people can reach us. We create awareness through radio jingles and newspaper publications. We organise town hall meetings, workshops, trainings and talk shows, sometimes in various local languages to create awareness.

  • Court adjourns activist’s defamation trial till May 21

    Court adjourns activist’s defamation trial till May 21

    The High Court sitting in Nnewi, Anambra State, has adjourned the trial of an activist, Boniface Okonkwo, till May 21.

    Justice Vincent Agbata had denied him bail despite the alleged misdemeanour offence.

    The activist was arrested on January 3 and has been in detention since then.

    Okonkwo had pleaded with the Chief Judge of Anambra State to reassign the defamation case against him to a new judge, but the request was turned down.

    His arrest and detention followed a complaint by businessman Sir Emeka Offor.

    Offor alleged he was defamed by the defendant on their Oraifite town’s WhatsApp platform.

    The activist was said to have described Offor’s meter manufacturing factory in Anambra as a “decorated warehouse”.

    Although a bailable offence, Justice Agbata denied Okonkwo bail and ordered the commencement of trial.

    At the last hearing, a forensic expert testified for the prosecution.

    The expert identified the device from which the alleged defamatory statement was sent.

    Okonkwo’s brother, Pastor Cyril Okonkwo, said the family was exploring settlement with Offor, who hails from the same town.

    He told reporters: “We’re suing for peace because one can win a case without having peace with your brother. In such a situation, there will be no progress in the town and charity begins at home.

    “The Bible says ‘follow peace with all men’. How much more your town’s brother?

    “I want peace to prevail between my brother and Emeka Offor, so there will be progress in our town. I’m talking about settling out of court.

    “I have reached out to Emeka through the President General of Oraifite. I have spoken to him.

    “I have consulted those close to him; they have spoken to him and we’re thinking there is a kind of progress.

    “The way I’m looking at it, he (Offor) is likely to accept our entreaties. We have pleaded with him for peace.”

    Defence counsel Oseloka Osuigwe added: “As a minister in the temple of justice, our role is to promote settlement where possible. If it’s not possible, we continue with the hearing of the matter.

    “So, I cannot stand in the way of settlement. It’s not a felony, so nobody will be accused of compounding felony. So, it’s a matter that can be settled.

    “Even the court is enjoined by rules to promote settlement. But for now, my duty is to defend him; but if the family wishes to explore other opportunities, I’m not against it.

    “I won’t take initiative, because it’s not my duty to do so. The court is amenable to the family’s move for an out-of-court settlement. We say all is well that ends well.”

    Okonkwo said he was surprised to be denied bail.

    He said the last time he had a similar case with Offor, he never jumped bail.

    “In 2007 and 2013, I was arrested by the same man on alleged defamation of character.

    “But at the end of the day, the Magistrate Court in Abuja threw the case out. It’s on record that they never asked for my International Passport. They only asked for a royal father and one guarantor resident in Abuja.

    “I never jumped bail. I sued through Femi Falana and the court awarded me N5million.

    “An Abuja Magistrate Court granted me bail, yet a High Court within my jurisdiction is talking about abscondment. It’s unbelievable,” Okonkwo said.

    On his brother’s peace moves, the activist said: “As a Pastor of 30 years calling, what do you expect him to say? He means well to sue for peace. Of course, if the matter is still in court and there’s an option for peace, why won’t I go for peace?

    “You can win a matter in court, but you’ll never win peace. But I won’t be seeking peace in detention.

    Read Also: FEC deliberations to run into day-two over “far-reaching” decisions

    “As a human rights activist, I fight for the vulnerable. I speak out against atrocities and injustice. I joined the Campaign for Democracy in 1990 under Ransome Kuti.

    “I was given chieftaincy title by the monarch of Ezumeru. Even though I rejected it, I was prevailed upon to accept it. I don’t lobby for titles. That was on December 27 before I was arrested on January 3.

    “Since then, I have been in detention. My current address now is Nnewi prison. If they’re talking about peace, yes I want peace, but not the peace of the graveyard. If you’re talking of peace, I won’t be in detention for four months.

    “I ask again, the alleged defamation of character, is it a capital offence? I’m once again appealing to His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, his wife Oluremi and the Vice President, Kashima Shettima, to intervene. I also want the press to help me out of this pathetic situation.

    “My children are all in school and I can’t pay their fees. The judge said I was a flight risk. Which flight risk? I’m a Nigerian, though I live in South Africa. But I’m an indigene of Oraifite. Where will I run to?

    “I’m equally calling on Femi Falana (SAN) to help out as a member of the human rights community to ensure I secure my bail so I can come to the court from my home.

    “Presently, I’m sick and can’t access treatment. The other day I nearly fainted. I was told they wanted to test me, but I said no.

    “I can afford to pay my bill in the hospital. I can’t be subjected to medication by those whom I don’t know.

    “I’m still open for peace, but it’s not when I’m still in prison.”

  • NBA gets caretaker committee for Surulere, Eti-Osa branches

    NBA gets caretaker committee for Surulere, Eti-Osa branches

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has constituted caretaker committees for Surulere and Eti-Osa branches.

    This was made known by the NBA General Secretary, Adesina Adegbite in statement released on the email platform of the association.

    The creation of the new branches of NBA in Lagos followed the creation of Eti-Osa and Surulere/Yaba Judicial Divisions by the Lagos State Judiciary.

    The Caretaker Committees as constituted by the NBA President are as follows: for Surulere Branch, Adeleke Agbola, (SAN)  was appointed Chairman while Ita Azim  was  appointed Secretary.   

    Read Also: Tinubu directs mandatory procurement of CNG-powered vehicles for official purposes          

    Other members are Roseline Akinbo Chuka Adimonye  and   Peter Ozobialu.           

    Those appointed Caretaker Committee for Eti-Osa Branch include Olawale Ajia  as Chairman while Chinyere Akwueze Nwaogu  was appointed      Secretary.

    Other menbers are Clifford Orighomisan Atakere, Hauwa Halidu  and Ganiyu Adebowale Johnson.

    The statement reads; “I am pleased to inform you of the constitution of Caretaker Committees for the newly created Branches of the Nigerian Bar Association, namely NBA Surulere Branch and NBA Eti-Osa Branch respectively.                                

    “Members of the association are by virtue of this development hereby put on notice of the existence of a recognised leadership in the two new branches, who have been mandated to oversee the emergence of duly elected Branch officers for both Branches.

    “We enjoin all members of the newly created branches to extend maximum support and cooperation to the Caretaker Committees to ensure a successful discharge of their responsibilities.

  • 2024 bid-round: Lawyer advocates net-zero emission

    2024 bid-round: Lawyer advocates net-zero emission

    An oil and gas expert, Tolu Aderemi, has stressed the importance of competence, capacity and patriotism in guiding Nigeria’s 2024 oil and gas bid round, which opened on April 29.

    Aderemi, a Visiting Professor at Afe Babalola University, highlighted the significance of meeting Nigeria’s OPEC quota of 1.38 million barrels per day.

    He noted that statistics from the fourth quarter of 2023 show Nigeria’s struggle to meet its OPEC quota, with production levels falling below the target.

    The OPEC Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR) for March 2024 revealed a decline in Nigeria’s output from 1.427 million barrels per day in January to 1.322 million barrels per day in February.

    This was attributed to challenges such as crude oil theft, insecurity, asset vandalism, and sabotage.

    Despite these obstacles, Aderemi, Partner at Perchstone & Graeys LP and Chairman of the International Law Association (ILA) Arbitration Committee expressed cautious optimism about the success of the 2024 bid round.

    He cited the government’s implementation of a robust Regulatory Action Plan (RAP) and a transparent bidding timetable.

    He believes the regulator has set out a robust, realistic and transparent bidding timetable and a credible data partner.

    According to him, where the regulator is faithful to its processes, the exercise will not only be successful but will deliver increased foreign exchange revenue to Nigeria.

    Read Also: FEC deliberations to run into day-two over “far-reaching” decisions

    Aderemi said it would also lead to improved job creation and a robust and vibrant market with new technologies and infrastructural development.

    “It is also bound to birth greater opportunities for indigenous players,” the lawyer said.

    As the bid round progresses, Aderemi stressed the importance of bidders’ commitment to Nigeria’s net-zero emission target.

    He also raised concerns about market exits following the passage of the Petroleum Industry Act in 2021.

    The lawyer urged the government to attract competent investors while ensuring transparency and sustainability in the sector.

    Aderemi warned against potential pitfalls in the bid round, including forced mergers of bidders, allegations of favouritism, unrealistic signature bonuses, and inflated asset values, which could result in failure if not addressed.

    Aderemi praised the government’s initiative and doggedness to consistently stimulate the Nigerian oil & gas market with a robust and friendly legal and regulatory framework.

    He urged the world to look at the new Nigeria and its market landscape under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s business-friendly administration.

  • Nurse demands N300m damages from hospital over death of wife, baby

    Nurse demands N300m damages from hospital over death of wife, baby

    • Lawyer issues pre-action notice to R-Jolad
    • Hospital denies negligence
    • HEFAMAA begins probe

    A registered nurse, Prince Ovwiomodiowho, is set for a legal battle with R-Jolad Hospital, Agege, Lagos over the deaths of his wife Loveth and son Oghenetega.

    He accused the hospital of gross negligence, but R-Jolad denied any wrongdoing, saying it followed standard medical protocols.

     Ovwiomodiowho’s lawyers issued a pre-action notice to the hospital, demanding N300 million in damages.

    He petitioned the Lagos Health Facility Monitoring and Accreditation Agency (HAFEMAA), which has launched a probe. Parties now await its findings.

    The petitioner’s lawyers are also considering applying for a coroner’s inquest.

    Ovwiomodiowho got married six years ago to Loveth Eneruvie, a teacher and business education graduate.

    They had their first child in 2020 at a different hospital with no complications.

     The nurse said Loveth chose R-Jolad after one of its doctors came to his daughter’s school during a PTA meeting to advertise it as having good medical facilities.

    So, when Loveth expected their second child, she registered at R-Jolad, where she was attended to by the consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist Dr. Marcus Mbakwe.

    Ovwiomodio who said the pregnancy progressed well from July 11, 2023 to March 6, but their excitement turned to deep sorrow on March 7 and 8.

    Ovwiomodiowho said: “It all started at 3:15am when I was still on duty at Coptic Hospital VI on March 7. I had a call from my wife that she had a ruptured membrane. We were so happy.

    “We arrived R-Jolad Agege at 11:00am. My wife was clinically healthy, not in any distress, fully conscious, cheerful, alert, well-oriented, not pale. Her recent PCV (packed cell volume) was 39 per cent and full blood count was normal.

    “At exactly 11:30 am after waiting for an update from the team, I chatted via WhatsApp with Dr Mbakwe. I expressed concern that my wife’s membrane ruptured at 3am but she was not contracting.”

     Ovwiomodiowho said the doctor later suggested a Cesarean Section in passing but allegedly did not educate them properly on the processes or stress the urgent need for it.

     “At 12:10am, Dr Mbakwe entered our ward to commence induction. My wife was not connected to a cardiac monitor for close continuous monitoring and there was no cardiotocography (CTG) to ensure maternal and fetal safety.

     “There was no single preparation put in place for any emergency. There was no contraction chart for documentation.

    “One-hour post-induction, my wife had a slight bloody small vaginal discharge which Dr Mbakwe said was normal with induction.

    “Dr Mbakwe did a Vagina Examination (VE) and said the bleeding was not significant and that my wife was just 3cm dilated.

    “There was no contraction but my wife kept frequently using the washroom to urinate and felt urges to pass stool.

     “At 8 am on Friday 8th of March, my wife was transferred to the labour room. 

    “Oxytocin 5IU was claimed to be added to 500ml of normal saline, which was infused manually using drop per minute dose despite my requesting they use an infusion pump for accuracy.

     “No cardiac monitor was connected, and no CTG (cardiotocography) was connected throughout labour. I became uncomfortable at this point and felt they were not adhering to standard labour protocol,” he said.

     Ovwiomodiowho said he noticed that his wife’s veins had somehow suddenly collapsed.

    “She still was fully conscious and communicating with no complaint of dizziness or chest pain, but the consultant was not available. 

    “At about 50 minutes post oxytocin induction, around 10:15 am, my wife started having vigorous continuous contractions due to hyperstimulation of the uterus and was in severe painful distress.

    “At about 10:20am, my wife suddenly complained she wanted to sleep and fell back to bed. She then pushed the baby out forcefully into the perineum while losing consciousness.

    “Her GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) dropped to 8/15 (E2 V1 M5). She had an altered mental state. Airway patency was compromised.

    “Both midwife and medical officer ran into panic. The oxytocin drip was immediately stopped. The midwife said she could feel the baby’s head stuck inside the birth canal. 

    “I requested a quick vital sign check only to discover BP was very low 65/40 mmHg PR 110 BPM SPO2 89% on RA.

     “I suspected a ruptured uterus from an overdose of multiple uterotonic drugs for induction. I told them my wife was bleeding heavily inside and the baby’s head was acting as tamponade (blockage).

    “I requested for the consultant to rush my wife in for immediate Caesarian Section and exploratory laparotomy.

    “I also requested a physician anaesthetist to intubate and resuscitate my wife and for a paediatrician to resuscitate my baby.”

    Medical experts absent

    Ovwiomodiowho continued: “To my biggest shock, none of these consultants were available in the hospital at the time of the crisis nor could the team on the ground resuscitate or perform surgery on my wife.

    “They obviously did not know how to handle the situation they were in acute confusion.

     “I then requested for an ambulance service to urgently transfer my wife to a competent facility but the hospital had no provision for ambulance in an emergency.

    “I was forced to kick off active resuscitative efforts just to increase the chances of my wife and baby’s survival. Major resuscitative equipment was not readily available.

    “I requested for Ambu bag and oxygen. When made available, I commenced airway support. I started Ambu bagging with 100 per cent oxygen to minimise hypoxia (lack of oxygen) with her lips already turning blue.

    Read Also: Tinubu directs mandatory procurement of CNG-powered vehicles for official purposes          

    “At this point of active resuscitation and panic, the O&G surgeon Dr Mbakwe was nowhere to be found. Meanwhile, my baby’s head was still stuck in the perineum with nobody to save him.

    “I watched helplessly as my wife and baby were dying.

     “The hospital did not have any emergency or ICU nurses. At about 12:05pm, over two hours after my wife had been unconscious, gasping for breath and profusely bleeding in severe hypovolaemic (blodd loss) shock, Dr. Mbakwe arrived, giving the excuse that he was in another branch running a clinic.

    “He came without any surgical team – no anaesthetist/intensivist, no paediatrician to perform the surgery with him.

     “I was again compelled to anaesthetise my wife for him so that surgery could commence.

    “The theatre was not ready for any emergency C-section. They had no perioperative nurse. The midwife became the scrub nurse and the inexperienced medical officer became the surgeon assistant.

     “There was no oxygen available, no laryngoscope to perform modified rapid sequence induction.

    “Persistent low blood pressure and hypoxia were noted. There was an additional delay in setting up the theatre even when Dr Mbakwe arrived.”

    ‘How my wife, baby died’

    Ovwiomodiowho said surgery finally began at about 12:30 pm.

    He continued: “There was no laryngoscope in the hospital to intubate and secure my wife’s airway. I was still actively resuscitating her to keep her vitals slightly stable.

     “I had to place her on inotropic support with my own noradrenaline since their pharmacy was out of stock to support her low blood pressure and she also had various crystalloids and colloids.

    “At about 12:42pm, the baby was delivered via C-Section from the perineum. At this time, the hospital anaesthetist and paediatrician were still not available.

     “Dr Mbakwe begged me to leave my wife and join his nurses to help resuscitate the baby. Out of love for the innocent baby, I did.

    “On getting to the resuscitator, the staff I met there were all incompetent with no clue on how to perform CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for fresh stillbirth.

    “When I assessed the baby, my son had already suffered prolonged birth asphyxia (lack of oxygen) from delayed interventions. There was no cord pulsation, no sign of life.

     “I started CPR with chest compression and ambu bagging with a concentrator. No 100 per cent oxygen was available.

     “I also gave two doses of 10mcg/kg (baby weight 4.2kg) of adrenaline via the umbilical vein because there was no paediatrician to secure an IV line.

    “Despite CPR for 15 minutes, resuscitation proved abortive. I was crying uncontrollably realising that I had lost my baby boy.

    “I quickly rushed back to my wife to continue the care since the hospital anaesthetist was nowhere to be found.

    “It took the anaesthetist three hours to arrive. My wife couldn’t be placed on a ventilator because the anaesthesia ventilator was either not working or the anaesthetist could not operate it.”

    Ovwiomodiowho said the doctor confirmed that his wife had suffered a ruptured uterus with deep vaginal injuries and had lost a significant amount of blood.

    “Before the knife on the skin, we noticed how de-oxygenated her blood was (the blood was very dark she was barely alive).

    “The surgery was prolonged and very embarrassingly power supply was epileptic.

    “The theatre was in total darkness on several occasions while surgery was ongoing. We had to turn on mobile phone torchlights. It took significant time before power could be fully restored.

    “My wife was infused with multiple colloids and crystalloids but they had minimal effects because the surgeon could not secure multiple torrential bleeding vessels and too much delay in starting surgery increased my wife’s and son’s mortality risk significantly.”

    Cardiac arrest

    Ovwiomodiowho added: “I left the theatre for 10 minutes because I was getting exhausted and family members were worried waiting at the reception… only to come back to the theatre and my wife had suffered cardiac arrest.

     “CPR was being done on my wife with no ECG (electrocardiogram) monitoring and no defibrillator available.

    “I checked her pupils; they were 5mm dilated. I was so traumatised. My wife and baby were not given any fighting chance to live. The entire theatre floor was a river of blood.

    “My wife was sadly declared dead at 3:52 pm. The death certificates were handed over to me. 

    “The secondary cause of death of my wife on the certificate is ruptured uterus with massive uterine haemorrhage. They claimed my son was a case of fresh stillbirth.

    “It is a miracle that I am still alive, that I did not collapse seeing my wife and baby die and no capable hands to rescue the situation. I was truly heartbroken seeing my wife and son being transferred to the morgue.”

    Ovwiomodiowho alleged the hospital failed to hand over to the placenta and uterus (womb) despite repeated requests.

    “Only the bodies with stained hospital linen were handed over to me,” he said.

     We were not negligent, says R-Jolad

     R-Jolad Hospital Nigeria Limited, in response to the pre-action notice, denied any negligence by Dr Mbakwe or any of its medical staff. It condoled with Owiomodiowho over the loss of his wife and son.

    The March 25 letter, signed by Executive Director/Chief Operating Officer Soji Osunsedo and Medical Director Dr. Abiola Fasina, reads in part: “Please note that at R-Jolad Hospital, we take the well-being and safety of our patients very seriously, and any suggestion of negligence is deeply concerning to us. 

    “Our team of qualified professionals worked diligently to provide the best possible care for the patient in question. We understand the gravity of the situation and the impact it has had on all parties involved. 

    “As you are aware, medical negligence relates to the failure of a healthcare professional to provide a standard of care that a reasonable and prudent provider would under similar circumstances, resulting in harm to the patient.

    “Following a thorough investigation and review of the medical records and procedures followed during the childbirth, we hereby confirm that R-Jolad Hospital as well as the clinicians on duty followed the necessary procedures expected of a reasonable hospital and provided the standard of care expected under similar circumstances.

     “Our medical team followed the standard protocols during the delivery process and the records confirm that all necessary steps expected were taken to ensure the safety of both the mother and the baby during the delivery at the Hospital.

     “We are, therefore, unable to grant your demands in your letter under reference…

     “We reiterate that R-Jolad Hospital is committed to transparency and accountability in all aspects of medical practice, and we are open to further discussions or investigations to address any concerns that may arise.

     “Please feel free to reach out to us if you have any further questions or require additional information regarding this matter.”

     The hospital, when contacted by The Nation, denied not releasing the placenta and ruptured uterus, adding that it was also constrained in administering blood due to religious preferences, a claim Ovwiomodiowho vehemently faulted.

  • How not to obtain a garnishee order

    How not to obtain a garnishee order

    Does a Magistrate’s Court in Rivers State have the jurisdiction to issue a garnishee order nisi over a judgment delivered by a High C​ourt in Cross River State? What have the appellate courts said about granting such orders and preventing process abuse? ADEBISI ONANUGA reviews the circumstances that resulted in such an order being made against Vintage Press Limited, publishers of this newspaper.

    A garnishee order enables a judgment creditor (a plaintiff who got judgment) to recover money from a judgment debtor.

    If a party has a judgment in its favour, it becomes the creditor and can apply to have the judgment debt recovered through third parties (garnishees) connected with the debtor.

    These third parties can be financial institutions holding the money of a judgment debtor.

    Money owed will then be redirected to the creditor instead of the debtor.

    A creditor may execute the court judgment via garnishee proceeding after he has obtained a court judgment against a debtor and the debtor has refused to comply despite being repeatedly demanded.

    Garnishee proceedings involve two court orders: the first stage is for the garnishee order nisi, whilst the second stage is the garnishee order absolute.

    Garnishee order nisi directs the garnishee to appear in court on a specified date to show cause why an order should not be made.

    The extant laws regulating garnishee proceedings are the rules of courts, case laws and also the Sheriff and Civil Process Act (SCPA).

    Garnishee order absolute is the name given to a final and conclusive court order after the condition of an interim or intervening order (decree nisi) is met.

    The order absolute is made at the second stage on the return date hitherto given at the first stage if the garnishee fails to attend court, or does not dispute the debt due or claimed to be due from him to the judgment debtor.

    In effect, the party against whom a garnishee order is made can challenge it or show cause why the order should not have been made.

    It can do this by applying to set aside the garnishee order nisi.

    The judgment debtor also has the right to be notified of the garnishee proceedings and to be allowed to be heard.

    The judgment debtor can also appeal the judgment that led to the garnishee proceedings.

    Case against The Nation

    A plaintiff, Chief Basil Otamiri, claimed that a publication by this newspaper was defamatory to him.

    The publication was a “Wanted Person” advertorial sponsored by the Rivers Police Command.

    The publication states that Otamiri was declared wanted in connection with a case of murder and asks anyone with useful information to contact the police.

    In a judgment by the Cross River State High Court, the Chief Judge, Justice Akon Ikpeme, held that the police did not demonstrate that the claimant was wanted in a case of murder.

    She held that the police “never came to court to state their side of the evidence.”

    This, she held, “translates to the fact that the claimant’s evidence before this court remains unchallenged.”

    Justice Ikpeme held that there was nothing before her to show that the claimant was charged with murder.

    “I find that by the evidence before me, the claimant has convinced this court that he was never involved in the murder of anybody,” the Chief Judge said.

    She was of the legal view that the publication was, therefore, malicious.

    The CJ awarded N8 million damages against the defendants “jointly” for the publication.

    She also awarded “exemplary or punitive damages” of N2 million “against the defendants jointly”.

    On August 16, 2023, Vintage Press filed a notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal, Calabar Division.

    This newspaper’s publishers also applied for a stay of execution.

    Read Also: First Lady salutes 1st Nigerian female Sandhurst graduate

    Otamiri could not be served with the processes because his known counsel declined to accept the papers.

    His lawyers, Mba Ukweni & Associates, wrote the Court of Appeal, stating: “We have been served by the bailiff of this court with a motion on notice on the above suit (by Vintage Press) dated August 17, 2023, seeking an order to stay execution of the judgment…

    “Be informed that…we have not been briefed by the first respondent (Otamiri) to further represent him…”

    The law firm returned the motion papers to the Court of Appeal registry.

    Further unsuccessful attempts were made to serve Otamiri with the appeal.

    On February 22, 2024, the Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, Calabar Judicial Division, Uchechukwu Onyemenam, granted an order for substituted service on Otamiri.

    The Notice of the Appeal was subsequently pasted at Otamiri’s last known address and published in this newspaper on March 20.

    This newspaper later received a garnishee order nisi made on February 9 by a Rivers State Magistrate Court sitting in Port Harcourt in respect of the N10 million awarded to Otamiri.

    The order followed a motion ex-parte filed by counsel for the judgment-creditor, Bruno Mbaeri.

    The judgment debtors in the garnishee proceedings are Rivers State Police Command, Rivers Commissioner of Police, Public Relations Officer (PRO) of the command Ahmad K. Mohammad and Vintage Press Limited, publishers of The Nation.

    Listed as the garnishees are 13 banks.

    Chief Magistrate Collins Godfrey Ali held: “Garnishee Order Nisi is hereby granted against the garnishees attaching the sum of N10 million only or any lesser sum available in the judgment-debtors accounts in the garnishee banks for the satisfaction of the judgment debt in suit no. HC/120/2015 delivered by Hon. Justice Akon. B. Ikpeme on 23rd January 2023 in favour of the judgment-creditor/applicant together with the cost of N200,000 only as the cost of this garnishee proceedings.

    “It is ordered that the garnishee banks shall appear before this Honorable Court upon being served with the order nisi to show cause why the judgment-debt and cost of garnishee proceedings or so much available should not be paid to the judgment-creditor/garnishor/applicant for the satisfaction or partial satisfaction of the judgment debt.”

    The pending appeal

    The garnishee order was made despite the pending appeal by Vintage Press.

    The appeal CA/C/232M/2023 was filed by the newspaper’s team of lawyers from Phoenix & Volge LP, including Marc Enamhe, Emmanuel Sani, and others.

    The appellant is contending that the CJ erred by misapplying the law when she stated that the suit was not defended.

    It argued that the principle relied on by the Chief Judge was faulty.

    Vintage Press stated that the CJ reached an erroneous conclusion that it abandoned its pleadings by not calling a witness during the trial.

    “The learned trial court rightly found that the appellant filed a defence, and cross examined the plaintiff’s witnesses, and had opted to rely on the evidence elicited thereof,” the appellant stated.

    Vintage Press also contends that the CJ erred in law when she failed to deliver the judgment within time.

    By delaying the judgment, the appellant said the CJ “apparently lost touch of the evidence elicited in the support of the appellant’s defence,” thereby denying it a fair hearing and occasioning a miscarriage of justice.

    On the CJ’s finding that Otamiri was falsely accused of murder, Vintage Press’ lawyers argued that the conclusion was erroneously based on the wrong principle of law and negated the appellant’s defence.

    “The evidence on record, particularly the tenor of Exhibit 8 (police document declaring Otamiri wanted), clearly shows that the publication was privileged.

    “Qualified privilege is a defence to an untrue publication.

    “There is no iota of evidence to substantiate malice on the part of the appellant,” Vintage Press stated.

    The appellant further argued that the duty of a publisher to investigate or authenticate information before publication cannot be equated with the standard of investigation carried out by the police or the court.

    “Exhibit 8 clearly shows that it was duly signed by the appropriate authority, who was duly appointed to act in the capacity of the police force public relations officer,” the appellant stated.

    It added: “There is no pleading or evidence on record to show that the appellant nursed a ‘wrongful intention or desire to harm’ the first respondent.

    “There is no pleading or scintilla of evidence to support any inference of malice in respect of the appellant.

    “The publication as borne out by Exhibit 8 is a standard form police document (praecipe/format) officially used in the declaration of wanted persons.

    “There was no input or analysis made in respect of Exhibit 8 by the appellant.

    “The appellant owes a public duly to society to make such publication.

    “Exhibit 8 constitutes a publication of an official document of a government agency, and not an opinion, commentary, exposition, finding or publication attributable to the appellant.

    “The presumption of regularity of official document inure in respect of Exhibit 8.

    “The claimant in the court below woefully failed to discharge the burden of proving malice on the part of the defendant.

    “It is trite that he who asserts must prove.

    “The learned trial court erroneously shifted the burden of proof on the appellant in that regard.”

    Otamiri, Rivers State Police Command, Rivers Commissioner of Police and Mohammad are the respondents in the appeal, which is predicated on seven grounds.

    The appellant is claiming that the lower court delivered the judgment out of time after several adjournments and “re-adoption” of final addresses by parties.

    It stated that when the substantive matter was adjourned for judgment, it was not ready for delivery due to the trial Chief Judge’s official engagements and health reasons.

    “The applicant was not put on notice and was not aware that the judgment was eventually delivered.

    “When the applicant counsel got wind of the delivery of the judgment, counsel promptly applied for a certified true copy, and it took several weeks before a copy was handed to counsel by the registrar of the court.”

    What the courts have said about garnishee proceedings

    In the case of Oboh & Anor v. Nigeria Football League Ltd & Ors, the Supreme Court per Ejembi Eko, described the nature and procedure of garnishee proceedings.

    He held: “The judgment creditor first makes the application to the court for garnishee proceedings. The order of court then comes in two stages.

    “The first is garnishee order nisi which directs the garnishee to pay the sum covered by the application either to the court or the judgment creditor within a stated time unless the party (the garnishee), against whom the order is made, shows good cause why the payment should not be made.

    “If no sufficient good cause is shown, the court then makes the garnishee order absolute directing the third party (the garnishee) to pay over the amount specified to the judgment creditor or to the court, whichever is more appropriate.”

    The Court of Appeal had faulted the granting of such an order where an appeal is pending.

    In WAEC vs. Mrs. Nkoyo Edet Ikang, the court held: “I am still at a loss as to the reasonableness of a court ignoring to deal with a pending application for stay of execution of the judgment and proceed to grant the ex-parte garnishee application.

    “I feel strongly that it is better for the court to dispose of the application for a stay of execution of the judgment before considering the ex-parte garnishee application. After all, the granting or refusal of a stay of execution is discretionary.”

    In Nigerian Breweries Plc v. Dumuje, it was held that it is improper to allow garnishee proceedings to continue in the face of a pending application for a stay of execution.

    The appellate court held: “I agree with the general view that where there is a pending application for stay of execution, especially in a superior court, it will be absurd for a party to execute the same judgment by way of a garnishee proceeding on the premise that it is an independent proceeding which is not an execution of judgment and does not require the attention of the judgment debtor.

    “If such judgment is executed, will it not impose on the superior court a fait accompli?

    “Is this not indeed the situation abhorred and condemned by the Supreme Court in Vaswani v. Savalakh (Supra)”

    A legal expert, Atilolaoluwa Taiwo-Nsirim, noted that in effect, where an application for a stay of execution is pending and the judgment creditor through garnishee proceedings proceeds to enforce and recover the judgment sum, it overreaches the pending application for a stay of execution.

    This is so because if a judgment is enforced or executed by the garnishee proceedings, there will be nothing left for the court to consider in the pending application for a stay of execution since a fait accompli had thrust upon it.

    In other words, the appeal will become a mere academic exercise.

    In Sani v. Kogi State House of Assembly, the Supreme Court held: “It is the court that determines whether a judgment debtor should be heard or not.

    “If the judgment debtor’s application before the court is to reopen issues settled in the judgment, the application cannot be heard.

    “But if the application is to draw the attention of the court to misleading facts presented by the judgment creditor, the application can be heard.”

    Accordingly, where there is a pending application for a stay of execution of judgment, a party cannot execute the judgment by a garnishee proceeding on the premise that it is an independent proceeding that does not require the attention of the judgment-debtor.

    Doing so will impose a fait accompli (state of helplessness) on the superior court.

    Considering that a garnishee proceeding is an enforcement proceeding, it thereby becomes pertinent for the court to hear from the judgment-debtor where a garnishee application is filed during the pendency of an application for a stay of execution.

    Taiwo-Nsirim noted that, based on the authorities cited, where a judgment-debtor has filed a motion for a stay of execution and the judgment-creditor files a motion for garnishee order nisi, the courts are enjoined to grant the judgment debtor a right of audience since the garnishee proceedings are enforcement and executory in nature, which the motion for stay affects.

    The expert maintained that a judgment-debtor should be heard in garnishee proceedings where he has lodged an appeal against the decision of the court and filed a motion for stay of execution.

    “It would be improper and unfair for the court to proceed to make a decree order nisi in these circumstances,” he added.

    Vintage Press’s next moves, by counsel

    A member of The Nation’s legal team, Emmanuel Sani, said aside from the appeal, his clients may file a complaint against Chief Magistrate Ali.

    He said: “We have a pending motion for an extension of time to file the appeal at the Court of Appeal.

    “We have a motion for a stay of execution before the High Court. It is when that is granted that we can regularise at the Court of Appeal and compile records.

    “We had to apply for a stay of execution before the High Court because of jurisdiction.

    “The publication was an official police form, without the presumption of irregularity.

    “The police issued the form that someone is wanted, and a media organisation published it, and you sue it for defamation?

    “The publication was based on an official document issued by the police. We thank God that we have the Court of Appeal.”

    The lawyer also explained one of the grounds for appeal.

    “The judgment was delivered eight months after we filed address, after adjourning more than five times before the judge became the CJ.

    “For five times, she could not deliver judgment within 90 days required by the constitution. And the day she delivered it, there was no hearing notice served on us. 

    “The next thing, we saw that there was an attempt to execute the judgment. Of course, we filed a motion for an extension of time.

    “The plaintiff is aware of the pending motion for a stay of execution and that we have gotten an order for substituted service to serve him at his last known address.

    “If you look at all his correspondences to the police, even at pre-trial, we never got his definite address apart from his lawyer’s address.

    “So, when you want to give him any court process, you must meet his lawyer.

    “He went to apply for the judgment by himself. His lawyer cannot even find him. 

    “His lawyer got annoyed and wrote to the court that he was no longer representing him.”

    Sani faulted the garnishee proceedings institued before the Chief Magistrate in Rivers.

    “The judgment was in Cross Rivers State. The plaintiff has now gone to Rivers State and a Magistrate’s Court, even after the publication of the processes in the newspaper. He is aware.

    “Though the constitution says that every authority should enforce judgment, this is a different jurisdiction.

    “If you look at the Sherriff and Civil Process Act, it is a court of coordinate jurisdiction that can make such an order.

    “Besides, it is a registrable judgment. You have to register it in Rivers State, being another jurisdiction.

    “You have to register it before you can enforce it.  Even though it is a garnishee proceeding, it is still registrable.

    “What we have done is to apply to set aside the order nisi, given the fact that Cross Rivers High Court is still sitting on the matter. There is a pending motion for an extension of time.

    “It would amount to judicial rascality for a magistrate to purport to enforce the judgment of another jurisdiction where the court is still sitting on the matter and when you consciously know that it is a matter before the Court of Appeal.

    “We can say that the Chief Magistrate was perhaps not informed of the facts.

    “We are considering sending a petition to the Rivers Chief Judge, which we will copy the Rivers State Judicial Commission demanding that the Chief Magistrate hands off the case.

    “Even if a judgment was brought to you to enforce, you should know that it is a registrable judgment.

    “It has to be registered and a certificate of registration ought to be issued by the court that gave the judgment before you can enforce it.”

  • School has trained staff on safeguarding policy, court told

    School has trained staff on safeguarding policy, court told

    A Deputy Director with the Lagos State Ministry of Youth and Social Development, Mr Jubril Yakubu, told an Ikeja High Court that  Chrisland School Opebi has trained   staff on safeguarding policy.

    Yakubu told Justice Oyindamola Ogala during resumed proceedings on Thursday that  he was once a  facilitator during one of the trainings of the staff on safeguarding in the school.

    The witness, however, admitted that he was not aware that three Child Protection Officers from Chrisland School were present at the inter-house sport held at Agege Stadium on the day the 12-year-old student, Whitney Adediran, died.

    He informed the court that he was also not aware that the trio of Mrs Taylor, Mrs Fajemirokun and Mrs Oladimeji who were at the stadium on the day of the inter-house sport were present on February 14, because he did not check the attendees list.

    At the resumed hearing and while being cross-examined by counsel to the 4th defendant, Mr Ademola Animashaun, the witness confirmed that he was aware that Chrisland School had trained their staff on safeguarding policy and that he was once a facilitator during such trainings.

    When asked if he agreed that the primary responsibility of school safety rests on his ministry, he answered in the affirmative.

    Yakubu, the third prosecution witness who reaffimed before the court that he is a Deputy Director with the Ministry of Youth and Social Development in Lagos State noted that he dd not know that the school had an emergency bus on ground on the day of the incident but he is aware that they have a school bus at the venue.

    “I am aware that the school had a nurse on ground, but I don’t know if there were any first aiders on the ground on the day of the incident. “

    Read Also: First Lady salutes 1st Nigerian female Sandhurst graduate

    When asked if he was aware that the deceased mother attended the inter-house sport, he said yes, but he did not know if she was taken to the hospital by the school.

    “I am aware that the deceased was taken to primary health centre in Agege  and that the stadium is far from the primary health centre where she was taken to.

    “I don’t know the time it took the school emergency bus to get to the hospital,” he said .“

    The Counsel, Mr Animasaun, brought out his phone to show the Lagos witness GPS timing, which showed the driving distance between the stadium to the hospital to be three minutes.

    The witness also re-affirmed that the meeting of February 14, 2023 is a fact finding  one and that he wrote his report based on the findings at the meeting held on the cause of death.

    “I don’t know whether the autopsy report was out as at the time I did my report, so, I also recommended that the cause of death should be looked into.”

    When asked if he knew that his report contained wrong account because he did not capture the account of the school on what transpired on February 9, 2023, he replied in the negative.

    “I was not aware that the school got to know about the death of the deceased until after the event and but I can confirm that the commissioner ordered the closure of the school after the incident

    “I can also confirm that the doctor at Agege Central Hospital, where the deceased was taken to is a qualified medical personnel, and that the hospital is licensed.”

    Justice Oyindamola Ogala adjourned the case until June 3 for continuation of cross-examination.

    Chrisland School and four staffers including principal, vice principal and two others were allegedly accused by the the Lagos State Government of negligence over death of a 12-year- old student, Whitney Adeniran during an Inter-house sport competition that was held at the Agege Stadium, Lagos State.

    The defendants were charged before the court on March 30, 2023, and they had all pleaded not guilty.

  • ‘Detention before investigation is unconstitutional’

    ‘Detention before investigation is unconstitutional’

    FACTS

    The case of the Respondent who was a Senior Officer in the service of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (the 1st Appellant) is that he was arrested and wrongfully detained in the cell of the 1st Appellant. He brought an application before the trial Court to enforce his fundamental rights.

    After hearing all the parties, the trial Court in a considered judgment found in favour of the Respondent. Aggrieved by the decision of the trial Court, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

    The appeal was determined the issue of whether the learned trial judge was right when he held that the Appellants violated the fundamental rights of the Respondent and therefore he entitled to damages.

    APPELLANT’S SUBMISSION

    Appellants’ counsel submitted that there was evidence to justify the restraint on the Respondent’s movement. He submitted too that the 21 per cent post-judgment interest awarded against the Appellants was raised by the trial Court suo motu and this occasioned a miscarriage of justice; OJELEYE VS. REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF ONA IWA MIMO CHERUBIM AND SERAPHIM CHURCH OF NIGERIA (2008) 15 NWLR (PT. 1111) 520.

    Read Also: Ondo 2024: Southwest PDP leaders meet in Ibadan, team up for victory

    Appellants’ counsel also submitted that the award of damages by the trial Court was perverse and unrealistic; ODOGU VS. ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION (1996) 6 NWLR (PT. 456)508.

    Appellants’ counsel finally submitted that the trial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Respondent’s action.

    The basis of the complaint of the Appellants on the jurisdiction of the trial Court to entertain the action before it was the pendency of a criminal charge against the Respondent at the time of hearing of the application for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

    RESPONDENT’S SUBMISSION

    Respondent’s counsel submitted that the affidavit evidence detailing the Respondent’s arrest was neither challenged, discredited nor contradicted and as such the trial Court could rely upon it; CHABASAYA VS. ANWASI (2010) 10 NWLR (PT. 1201)163.

    RESOLUTION OF ISSUES

    The Court held that jurisdiction is the blood that gives life to an action in a Court of law and any action heard and decided without jurisdiction is a nullity. See ODUAH VS. OKADIGBO (2019) 3 NWLR (PT. 1660) 433. The Court further held that the pendency of a criminal charge against a person for which he has not been found guilty would not deny him access to a Court to enforce his fundamental rights where he feels same has been infringed. See IHIM VS. MADUAGWU (2021) 5 NWLR (PT. 1770) 584 at 616, Paragraphs C-D.

    The Court also held that by virtue of Section 46 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 jurisdiction to hear fundamental rights actions is vested in the High Court.

    And by virtue of FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA VS. IFEGWU (2003) 15 NWLR (PT. 842)113 at 178 PARAGRAPHS A-B, it is the principal relief endorsed on the application filed that determines the Court’s jurisdiction. Since the Respondent from the relief sought alleged that his fundamental right has been breached by the Appellants, the trial Court was right when it assumed jurisdiction.

    The Court held that a person who admits the detention of another by him has a duty to prove that the detention was lawful. See DIRECTOR STATE SECURITY SERVICES VS. AGBAKOBA (1999) 3 NWLR (PT. 595)314.

    The Court held that the fundamental right of a Nigerian citizen is guaranteed by the Constitution. See Chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

    However, the Court held that the rights guaranteed under Chapter IV are not absolute but can be curtailed in the course of judicial inquiry or where the Defendant is arrested and detained upon reasonable suspicion of having committed a felony.

    The Court held that a party who leads evidence of the existence of a document in proof of his case is obliged to present it before the Court. The law does not allow oral evidence in proof of a document. See ABUBAKAR VS. WAZIRI (2008) 14 NWLR (PT. 1108) 507. The Appellants who relied on a document justifying the arrest of the Respondent did not produce same in Court and as such the Court has no business pronouncing on it.

    The Court held that though Section 41 of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act, Laws of the Federation, 2004 confers powers on the Appellants to arrest and detain any person whom it believes has committed an offence under the Act, such powers must, however, be exercised within the ambits of the law.

    The Court further held that arrest and detention before investigation where there is no prima facie evidence that the suspect has committed the offence, is unconstitutional. See FAWEHINMI VS. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (2002) 7 NWLR (PT. 767) 606.

    The Court further held that though Section 35(4) and (5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 allows the detention of a person for the purpose of bringing him before a Court upon reasonable suspicion of his having committed a criminal offence, this shall be done within a reasonable time. Reasonable time in the case of where the Court is within forty Kilometers radius is twenty-four hours. See AKILA VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL, STATE SECURITY SERVICES (2014) 2 NWLR (PT. 1392) 443.

    In considering the contention of the Appellants that the trial Court did not take into cognisance the number of days for which the Appellants can detain the Respondent before coming to the conclusion that the detention was unlawful, the Court still held that it is not every error or mistake by a Court that would warrant the reversal of the decision reached in the proceedings. Such decision would be reversed only where there is a miscarriage of justice. See ETIM VS. AKPAN (2019) 1 NWLR (PT. 1654) 451.

    The Court, in considering the contention of the Appellants that the award of damages was excessive, held that by virtue of Section 35(6) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) once it is established that a person has been unlawfully arrested or detained, he is entitled to compensation and public apology. The award of damages in such circumstance is at the discretion of the Judge.

    However, whatever compensation is awarded should reflect not only the pecuniary loss of the victim but also the abhorrence of society and the law for such gross violation of human rights. See MUHAMMAD VS. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (2019) 4 NWLR (PT. 1663) 492.

    As regards the award of post-judgment interest, the Court held that although an award of post-judgment interest by a trial Court is discretionary, the Rules of Court provide for the limit of such interest. The Court held that by the Rules of the trial Court the maximum he could award is 10 per cent.

    Thus, the Court held that the award of 21 per cent post judgment interest was ultra vires. See EKWUNIFE VS. WAYNE WEST AFRICA LTD (1989) 5 NWLR (PT. 122) 422. However, the Court ordered the Appellant to pay to the Respondent 10 per cent interest per annum on the damages of N7million awarded in his favour with effect from April 5, 2017 until same is fully liquidated.

    HELD

    The Court allowed in part, affirming the judgment of the trial Court and all orders made by it except the award of 21% post-judgment interest.

    APPEARANCES:

    I.J. IGWUBOR, Esq., Asst Chief Legal Officer, NDLEA                      For Appellant(s)

    Abubakar Shamsudeen,                                                                – For 1st Respondent(s)

    Compiled by LawPavilion

  • Trusts as powerful wealth transfer, asset distribution tool

    Trusts as powerful wealth transfer, asset distribution tool

    By Bukola Seun-Oloruntuga

    While contemplating the best way to secure her wealth and ensure a smooth transition for her children and grandchildren, Mrs. Thompson, the matriarch of the Thompson family, found herself at a crossroads.

    While searching for answers, she discovered a powerful estate planning tool: trusts.

    Mrs. Thompson soon realised that estate planning was more than writing a will.

    Instead, it is a meticulous process and a well-thought-out strategy to secure any financial future.

    At the heart of this strategy are trusts—legal entities that could hold and manage assets for the benefit of individuals or entities.

    Imagine you have a cherished collection of books.

    These books represent your wealth, home, or anything else you hold dear.

    You can create a “trust” if you convert these books into a library where they will be cared for and shared with your loved ones later.

    In the language of the law, you become the “settlor” or the one who sets up the trust.

    In our library analogy, the books are the “assets” held in the trust.

    The people you want to share these books with, perhaps your children or grandchildren, are the “beneficiaries.”

    Finally, to ensure everything is in order and runs smoothly, you will appoint a reliable librarian who the law calls the “trustee.”

    This trustee is your right-hand person who will ensure the books are shared as outlined in your trust deed when the time comes.

    Read Also: Nigerian minister chairs inaugural 2024 UN-Habitat executive board session in Nairobi

    With this illustration, “trust” involves four key players: you (the settlor), your assets (the books), your beneficiaries (those who get to enjoy the books), and your trustee (the librarian who makes sure everything goes according to your plan).

    As Mrs. Thompson dug into trust, she found some wrong ideas about it.

    One big one is that trusts are only for super-rich people.

    To help demystify this idea, creating a “trust” can be like caring for a garden.

    Whether it is a big or small garden, you want to plan it right.

    The same applies to trust—it is not just for the wealthy but anyone who wants to plan their estate well.

    Another mistaken idea is that creating a trust means giving up control of your assets.

    It is not necessarily the case.

    Creating a “trust” can be compared to steering a ship.

    You will agree that while you steer it as the captain, sometimes you will have to let others help.

    Hence, creating a trust does not mean you lose control; it means you are steering your wealth smartly.

    There is also the idea that trusts are too complex and meant only for experts.

    The truth is that using trust for wealth transfer and asset distribution can also be likened to baking.

    It might seem a bit tricky initially, but with some help, it gets easier.

    For instance, Mrs. Thompson discovered a range of options that suit different needs.

    Living trusts offer the advantage of avoiding probate—a time-consuming and often costly legal process—and irrevocable trusts, on the other hand, provide some asset protection.

    With a living trust, Mrs Thompson could maintain control of her assets during her lifetime and smoothly transfer them to her heirs upon her passing.

    She also discovered that trusts could help her secure the financial future of her minor children and any beneficiaries with special needs.

    Indeed, by creating a trust, Mrs. Thompson could provide for their welfare and ensure proper management of their assets until they became adults or could handle them.

    In conclusion, trusts are not just for the super-rich; they do not mean giving up control of assets and are certainly not just for experts.

    With professional guidance, anyone can use trust to plan their wealth smartly and create a legacy.

    ● Seun-Oloruntuga, a lawyer who specialises in estate planning, is also a career and executive coach. She can be reached at bso@morecraftlaw.com

  • SAN advocates funding policy for special needs kids

    SAN advocates funding policy for special needs kids

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Chief Anthony Idigbe, has urged the government at all levels to commit more resources to caring for children with special needs.

    Idigbe, the Senior Partner at Punuka Attorneys and Solicitors, made the call during the second edition of the Punuka Foundation Walk for Super Special Children, an initiative of the law firm’s not-for-profit arm, Punuka Foundation.

    The Foundation, which runs a childcare centre in Lagos, was established to pursue the objective of helping the needy.

    It focuses on people with developmental needs such as autism, down syndrome, cerebral palsy, Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and related conditions.

    Idigbe said: “There’s a lot the government can do in terms of policy. I think more resources should be committed to taking care of children with special needs.

    “Our Childcare Centre could be a centre of excellence where scientific research can be conducted.

    “An organisation in Canada that we’re associated with tries to identify the level of intelligence of these kids.

    Read Also: First Lady salutes 1st Nigerian female Sandhurst graduate

    “They found out that some kids may be challenged, but can communicate with the eyes. So a computer was designed to enable them to write through eye signals.

    “There are lots of things we can do in Nigeria as well, so we hope to partner with the government on some of these research activities.

    “We believe in early intervention and identifying children with needs in the general schools. It means improving the skills of the teachers.

    “Part of our work is empowering teachers on how they can identify children with special needs and how they can intervene very early.

    “A lot of kids not doing well in general schools could be because they have eye problems. A test can reveal that glasses could simply solve the problem.

    “So, there is a lot we can do with the government in terms of policy and training, in addition to the services we offer at our special centre.”

    One of the foundation’s objectives, noted the SAN, is to impact society generally across the entire country.

    “We’ll partner with different states for impact. We want to invest in the human infrastructure in Nigeria.

    “The walk is to create awareness and draw attention to the challenges faced by children with special needs, and the need for our society – the government and foundations such as ours – to continue to provide for their needs and do more.

    “It’s also an opportunity to draw attention to the work that we at Punuka Foundation are doing, such as the Childcare Centre and the Youth Centre that we established,” Idigbe added.

    Executive Secretary and Trustee of Punuka Foundation, Mrs Elizbeth Idigbe, said the childcare centre is equipped with modern facilities, sensory-motor tools and other learning aids, as well as the right mix of therapists (occupational, behavioural, language/speech), assessors and resident nurses to ensure the actualisation of the developmental goals of the super special children.

    “The foundation is focused on helping children who have developmental needs. Of course, we also offer support to the underprivileged in our society.

    “The centre offers full therapy – the children need to maximise their potential. They can only do that with the help of experts, and that is where the Punuka Foundation comes in. These children should not be left behind.

    “If we receive more support, we can take in more children and employ more experts, because feeding them and paying the therapists are not cheap at all,” Mrs Idigbe said.

    On how people can support, she added: “Aside from donations, organisations or individuals can take up responsibility for a child on a monthly, quarterly, half-yearly or yearly basis.”

    A partner at Punuka Attorneys & Solicitors, Mr Nnamdi Oragwu, urged well-meaning Nigerians and corporate organisations to support the work of the foundation.

    “It’s a laudable initiative which requires the support of well-meaning Nigerians.

    “We have various platforms for donations and support, so any contribution is welcome,” he said.

    At the fun-filled walk were many children with special needs, members of the law firm, staff members of the foundation and childcare centre, sponsors and many dignitaries from all walks of life.

    Dressed in white T-shirts emblazoned with “Walk for Special Children,” they walked from Lekki Phase 1 through Admiralty Way to Punuka Attorneys & Solicitors office at Oyibo Adjarho Street in Lekki Phase 1 amid music and dance.