Category: Law

  • Lagos, traditional rulers rally against landgrabbers

    Lagos, traditional rulers rally against landgrabbers

    Lagos State Government and traditional rulers in Lekki and Ajah axis have agreed to jointly fight against activities of landgrabbers in the area. ADEBISI ONANUGA reports that the decision was taken at a meeting  of stakeholders last week

    Lagos State government and traditional rulers in the Lekki and Ajah axis of the state have agreed to work together to curb the activities of landgrabbers to pave way for peace and development in the area.

    The decision was taken at a stakeholders’ summit  on landgrabbers which held last week at Leawood Hotel, Lekki Epe Expressway, Ajah, Lekki. The theme was: “Safeguarding Possessory Rights on Land: The Role of The Lagos State Special Taskforce on Landgrabbers.

    The state’s Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Lawal Pedro (SAN) who expressed government’s concern over the rising activities of landgrabbers,  sought the support of traditional monarchs  to curb the trend in the area  during the meeting.

    Pedro said the state is seeking  to eliminate landgrabbing in its multi-dimensional form that include illegal sale and re-sale of land, illegal use of law enforcement agencies and vigilante groups for recovery of land or purported enforcement of judgment of a court on land.

    “To succeed in the fight against landgrabbers, we recognise the need for collaboration with you, the stakeholders who play a crucial role in our communities. This is why we have organised this stakeholders’ meeting to foster open dialogue, share information, experiences and collectively identify solutions to the problems inherent in the activities of landgrabbers.

    “Each of your voices is crucial in shaping the policies and strategies that will finally curb landgrabbing activities in our state’, he said.

    He expressed worry over situations where families sponsored landgrabbers  against each other.

    “We are working to ensure that justice system work swiftly  and fast. When this happens, nobody will need landgrabbers again to resolve issues bordering on land”, he assured.

    Pedro expressed concern over the use of inter-law enforcement agency conflict and misuse of Police force by some people to  frustrate enforcement of the law against landgrabbers.

    He told the traditional rulers that he was already talking with the Inspector General of Police (IGP) over the issue, adding that he was looking forward to his directive that will ensure the cooperation of all police formation with the office of the Attorney General to eradicate landgrabbing in the state.

    Earlier, the state’s Solicitor General and Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Mrs Titilayo Shitta-Bey-Jeje, in a welcome address, lamented that the activities of landgrabbers have been undermining the work of the task force and preventing investors from investing in the state.

    Mrs. Shitta-Bey-Jeje said this is why it has become necessary to engage stakeholders on the menace of landgrabbing and how it has been undermining industrial development of the state.

    The Director Public Prosecution (DPP), Dr Jide Martins, lectured the traditional rulers on various sections of the Lagos State Property Law 2016 and punishments, which included imprisonments, payment of fines or both under the law.

    He stated for instance that land once sold and re-sold illegally could earn an offender up to 21 years imprisonment while illegal demand of levy or fee or agent fee attracts N1million fine, two years imprisonment or both.

    Dr Martins reminded the monarchs that while government recognised their rights to own land with verifiable documents and historical analysis, the government still owns the land under the Land Use Act.

    The DPP disclosed that the task force on Landgrabbers, since establishement in 2016, received about 7,500 petitions and have dealt with 4,283 amongst them.

    He said 60 cases are on-going in courts while judgment was  delivered in seven cases last year.

    He disclosed that the task force received 1251 frivolous petitions while lamenting  that when people write petition, they don’t follow up as a result of which they are abandoned.

    The Elejigbo of Langbasa land, Oba Abdulafeez Kadurojaiye Badiru, in his remarks, sought the cooperation of all monarchs in the area to fight the menace of landgrabbers in the state.

    Read Also: Dangote names Lagos refinery road after Wigwe

    The monarch, however, remarked that landgrabbing persists in some areas of the state because when government allocate land to some persons  or companies for development, they sometimes failed to tell traditional rulers those land that have come under acquisition.

    Oba Badiru also decried a situation where land acquired for a [particular purpose are used for other purposes without the knowledge of the donor community, , pointing out that such will endanger peace wherever it happened.

    The Olu of Sangotedo, Oba Akorede Olufunmi, urged government to accord respect to traditional rulers on land matters.

    He lamented that sometimes, land allocation are made to three people for instance and that this sometimes cause problems.

    He, however, regretted that most communities don’t have recreation centres, hospitals and markets because of their lands have been taken by government and urged government to look into this to protect the future of their communities.

  • NBA-SLP seeks contributions to law journal

    NBA-SLP seeks contributions to law journal

    The Nigerian Bar Association Section on Legal Practice (NBA-SLP) has called for articles from lawyers for the annual SLP Law Journal.

    It is currently reviewing articles for the next publication which will be released soon.

    The journal will be distributed on all electronic platforms and made available to registered members of the Section.

    “Members of the Bar are welcome to send in their contributions of not more than 1200 – 1800 words, and this should be forwarded to info@nbaslp.org.

    “We encourage members of the Bar to read and take away something of value from the SLP Newsletter,” the Section said in a statement by its Chair, Mrs Bola Alabi (SAN).

    “The journal is an accredited professional and academic law journal. Volumes 4-9 are still available for purchase.

    “The Section is grateful to colleagues at the Bar and in the academia for their continued support.”

    During the National Executive Council (NEC) meeting held in Jos, the Plateau State capital, NBA-SLP gave a highlight of its activities.

    In the report presented by Mrs. Alabi, SLP said it has embarked on a series of training/webinars.

    The Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee chaired by Mr. Isaiah Bozimo (SAN) held a free workshop on February 19 at the Justice Umezulike Auditorium, Enugu State High Court.

    Its theme was: “Actionable strategies for mediation after court referrals.”

    The workshop equipped legal practitioners with practical skills and insights to address common challenges in mediation effectively.

    Read Also: FG organises National Minimum Wage Review public hearings

    Speakers were Director, Enugu State Multidoor Courthouse Caroline Etuk and Ag. Director, Lagos State Multidoor Courthouse, Achere Cole.

    The Litigation Committee, chaired by Mr. Tonye Krukrubo (SAN), will be organising a seminar with the theme: “Legal Practice in Nigeria: Reinforcing Ethical Behaviour.”

    The seminar will address the ethical behaviour of legal practitioners, how to strengthen ethical guidelines and enforcement mechanisms, and international best practices and solutions.

    The event is scheduled to be held this month on a date, time and venue to be communicated to members.

    Mrs Alabi said the Committee on Medicine and the Law has published five series of monthly healthcare tips consistently since inception.

    “We urge members to keep and maintain a healthy lifestyle,” she said while inviting lawyers to join SLP to benefit from its series of activities lined up for 2024.

  • Four banks ordered to pay customer N23m for negligence

    Four banks ordered to pay customer N23m for negligence

    Justice Oluwatoyin Odusanya of an Ikeja High Court has ordered four banks to pay N23,050,237. 54 as special and general damages  to a claimant, Dr. (Mrs) Oluwatosin Sanu in a N53 million suit instituted against them .

    Justice Odusanya awarded N3,050,237.54 as special damages, N20,000,000 as general damages against the defendants while interest was ordered to be paid on unauthorised withdrawal  of  N3,050,237. 59 at the prevailing bank rate from September 6, 2013 till August 5, 2014 and thereafter interest on the judgment sum at 10 per cent per annum from February 2, 2024 to the date of payment.

    The court, however, declined the claimant’s request for exemplary damages in the sum of N25million  for being unable to prove the offence of  “wanton, cruel and insolent conduct” against the 1st  to  the 4th defendants.

    The court gave the award  having established “negligence and lack of duty of care” against the four out of five banks listed as defendants in the suit marked ID/ADR/195/14..

    A copy of the judgment obtained by The Nation  showed  that Justice Odusanya gave the awards while delivering judgment on February 2, 2024 in the suit marked ID/ADR/195/14  filed by Dr (Mrs) Sanu through her lawyer, Prof. Akin Ibidapo-Obe.

    The suit was commenced by a Writ of Summons dated August 5, 2014 in which the claimant who owns  and runs’ a current and savings accounts at the Idi-Araba Branch of the 1st defendant bank stated  that  the two banking accounts had credit in the sum of N2,568,847.94 in the current account number and N477 379.55 in the savings account number of the 1st defendant.

    According to the writ, the claimant travelled to the United States when she received an e-mail from one Mr. Olatunbosun Alakija informing her that there were purported transactions going on in her banking accounts and that the claimant promptly repudiated the purported transaction as she had her cheque book and ATM card with her on her trip to the USA.

    “The  claimants was then informed by the 1st defendant that a total sum of N3,050,237 had been transferred to various purported beneficiary accounts through the bank’s internet banking transactions.

    The claimant stated that the 1st defendant breached the duty of care owed to her and was negligent in the management of her current banking account when it facilitated such huge withdrawals without the claimant’s knowledge and authorisation.

    In their variours amended statement of defence, the 1st to 5th defendants stated that they were not negligent in handling the account of the claimant and that they observed safe practice in handling the internet and electronic banking transaction activities on the account.

    Led by her counsel, Prof. Akin Ibidapo-Obe in her examination in-chief, the claimant adopted both the written deposition dated  August 5, 2014 which were admitted as evidence in her testimony before the court.

    Other  exhibits which were tendered and admitted included a letter dated  September 17, 2013 admitted and marked Exhibit A:, Letter dated August 26, 2013 admitted and marked Exhibit B”; Statement of Account with the Certificate of Identification  and marked Exhibit C1 and C2 “

    Delivering judgment in the matter, Justice Odusanya, citing several decided cases held that superior courts have held that “ a bank has a duty under its contract with its customer to exercise re:care and skill in carrying out its part with regard to the operations of contract with its customers. The duty to exercise reasonable care extends over the whole range of banking business within the contract customers.”

     The judge said this duty applies to interpreting, ascertaining and in accordance with the instructions of the customer.

    Justice Odusanya also held: “It is trite law that customers’ monies in the hands of the banker in the custody or under the control of the customer and such monies are property in the custody and control of the banker and payable when a request is made. Thus if anything happens to the money thereafter e.g. theft  or unauthorised withdrawal, it is the banker and not the customer that absorbs the loss.”

    Justice Odusanya, citing decided cases, held: “  in an action on negligence, for a plaintiff, to succeed, must in addition to pleading and establishing the particulars of negligence relied on, and also state and establish the duty of care owed to him by the defendant facts upon which that duty is founded and the breach of that duty by defendant.”

    Citing more authorities, the judge further held: “It is also accepted in law that there can be no action in negligence unless there is damage. Negligence is only actionable if actual damage is proved. The gist of the action is damage and there is even no right of action for nominal damages. Negligence alone does not give a cause of action. Damage alone does not give a cause of action. The two must co-exist.

    The judge listed the essential ingredients of actionable negligence to include the existence of a duty to take care of the amount  owed to the complainant by the defennt;  failure to attain that standard of care prescribed by the law and  damage suffered by the complainant, which must be connected with the breach of duty to take care.”

    Read Also: Dangote names Lagos refinery road after Wigwe

    The judge said once these requirements are satisfied, the defendant in law will be held liable in negligence.

    Justice Odusanya held that it has been established that 1st  to 4th  defendant banks owed duty of care to the claimant and were negligent in the performance of their duties and that it follows that she is entitled to damages that she is claiming. .

    The judge said all the defendants failed to comply with the CBN Regulation and were negligent in account opening of their customers and failed to exercise the requisite duty of care.

    The judge said they also failed to comply with what even a reasonable man and professional should do especially in respect of information obtained from customers addresses and identity card.

    She said the court however found that the case of negligence has not been established against the 5th defendant and consequently dismissed the case of the claimant against the 5th defendant bank accordingly.

  • Legal framework of mining in Nigeria: An overview

    Legal framework of mining in Nigeria: An overview

    The vast array of mineral resources in Nigeria holds immense potential to transform the economy and to leverage these resources, a firm understanding of the legal framework is needed, writes a lawyer YEWANDE BEJIDE.

    “SECTION 2 of the Explosives Regulations, Cap. 117, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990 defines explosives…The same section defines mining as having the meaning assigned to it in the Minerals Act, and shall include the use of explosives in works authorised under the Petroleum Act. Although there is no definition of ‘mining’ in the Minerals Act…”

    C. G.G. (Nigeria) Limited v Chief Lawrence Ogu (2005) 8 NWLR (Pt. 927) S.C.

    Mining may be defined as the process of extracting useful materials from the earth.  However, before mining activities are embarked upon, mineral exploration is required. Mineral exploration is therefore a precursor to mining; it refers to the process of exploring an area of land to determine whether there are minerals that are economically of interest. 2 . Thus, the prime objective of mineral exploration is to find and acquire large deposits of minerals at a minimum cost and in a timely manner.

    Mining operations in the region called Nigeria can be traced to over a century ago.  In 1904, the British started tin mining operations in some territories and by 1906, gold and coal deposits were also discovered. This eventually led to the promulgation of The Minerals Act 1946 and the Coal Ordinance in 1950 to regulate the growing mining sector. The Gold and Diamond Trading Act and the Explosive Acts were also enacted in 1964, as explosives were of great importance in opening up lands and caves for necessary exploration and discovery. Subsequently, with the exploration and mining of tin, the Tin Act was enacted in 1967 and the Quarries Act and Allied Regulations were enacted in 1969. In 1995, the Federal government (hereinafter referred to as “the government”) established the Ministry of Solid Minerals Development commissioning a phased investigation and appraisal of Nigeria’s solid mineral potential and an inventory of the mineral potential of Nigeria, which specified the occurrence of 34 mineral commodities at about 450 locations spread in almost all the states of the Federation.  In 2002, the government developed a seven-year strategic plan for the mining industry setting up the Nigerian Geological Survey Agency. The Nigerian Geological Survey Agency (NGSA) identified the occurrence of additional 42 mineral resources across the country in addition to the existing 34 minerals that had been identified and promoted for commercial exploration and production; putting the total number to about 76 minerals. In 1999, the government enacted the Minerals and Mining Act 1999.   

    Prior to the enactment of the Mining Act 1999 Act, a new Minerals Policy which favoured a private sector-led development of the mining industry was published by the government to replace the 1971 policy which favoured a government-led development of the mining sector that led to the 1977 Indigenization Decree.   

    Therefore, the mining industry is now open to any private investor—so far, they fulfill all legal requirements. The role of the private in economic growth and sustenance of the sector and the funds that accrue therefrom is quite prominent as seen by the on-going Ministry of Mines and Steel Development request for and receipt of proposals from Fund Managers to be engaged as consultants for the strategic management of Solid Minerals Development Fund’s Investment Portfolio. This in our view is a commendable development.

    The legal framework and impact of mining activities

    Section 4, item 39 of the Exclusive Legislative List of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) confers upon the National Assembly the exclusive power to make laws in respect of mining in Nigeria.

    In 2007, the National Assembly enacted the Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) repealing the 1999 Minerals and Mining Act. It is presently the primary legislation regulating mining activities in Nigeria.

    According to the National Bureau of Statistics’ executive summary on Mineral Production Statistics (2019 – 2020), the mining and quarrying sector is crucial to the growth and development of the economy through the exportation of non-oil mineral resources and the resultant diversification of the economy.

    However, the relevance of the sector is closely tied to the occurrence of deposits of minerals in the region. The reality is that  out of  approximately 44 identified solid minerals in Nigeria, only seven have been strategically selected and promoted for private sector participation and investment by the Federal Government and these include gold, coal, bitumen, limestone, iron ore, lead/zinc and barites but the occurrences of these minerals are in such small quantities that they can only be described as mere ‘showings’ valuable to someone somewhere, or of scientific or technical interest but with little or no commercial prospect while minerals such as  iron, lead-zinc, tin- tantalum, coal, bitumen, manganese and probably nickel, and valuable industrial minerals and rocks such as barite, halite, talc, kaolin, gemstones, lignite, uranium, limestone, marble and granite also occur as relatively small deposits and are therefore extracted by ASGM (Artisanal And Small- Scale Mining) and quarrying.

    According to statistics, in 2018 the sector contributed a meagre 0.5% to the Nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with an annual production averaging 40 million metric tons valued at about 34 billion naira ($95 million US dollars). The solid minerals with the largest production contributing to that production are industrial rocks: limestone, granite, laterite, sand, shale and clay constituting over 95% of production by tonnage and 90% by value while the metallic minerals produced are mainly lead-zinc, manganese, gold, tin and columbite-tantalite which are exported and form about 0.2% of total exports although the total volume of gold mined is unknown, and most are smuggled out of the country.

    Efforts are however ongoing to diversify the Nigerian economy by increasing production and domestic utilization of industrial minerals, iron ores, bitumen and coal deposits to form the core of a “roadmap” for the revitalization of the mining and solid minerals sector; with the main objective of increasing the sector’s contribution to 10% of GDP within the next decade.

    Mining activities in Nigeria, due to poor enforcement of extant law(s) amongst other factors has had a range of negative impacts on the environment and public health. These impacts include widespread environmental degradation, such as air pollution from particulate emissions, the release of chemicals from abandoned mines and ponds, water contamination, and the improper disposal of radioactive waste and lead poisoning incidents that have occurred in various regions. The mining sector has also been associated with human fatalities, further exacerbated by illegal acquisition of explosives and unsafe storage of same my illegal miners one of such incidents being the recent explosion at Ibadan on the 16th day of January, 2024.

    Additionally, the processing of solid minerals, particularly limestone quarrying and cement production in towns like, Shagamu and Ewekoro areas of Ogun S tate, results in significant air pollution posing serious risks to public health, with complaints from residents of several ailments ranging from eye discomfort, asthma, etc. Furthermore, the plumes of pollution have had detrimental effects on local flora, leading to a decline in kola nut production from plantations in affected areas.

    It is evident that the current state of mining activities in Nigeria has had grave consequences on the environment and public well-being despite the existence of State Mineral Resources and Environmental Management Committee (MIREMCO) in each State of the Federation created pursuant to Section 19 of the Act.

    Each Committee in each State is  made up of a cross section of officers of that State, to wit:  a representative of the Mines Environmental Compliance Department in the Ministry doubling as Chairman of the Committee, a representative of the Ministry responsible for Land matters or Mineral related matters, the Mines Officer, a representative of the Ministry of Agriculture or Forestry, a representative of the Office of the Surveyor-General, a representative of the Local Government Council when matters affecting the said Local Government Area are being considered by the Committee, a representative of the State Environmental Department or Agency, and a representative of the Federal Ministry of Environment in the State.

    The role of the aforesaid  Committee in each state includes, amongst others, considering and advising  the Minister on issues, to wit; matters/issues affecting grants of mining titles, affecting pollution and degradation of any land on which any mineral is being extracted, to advise the Departments of the Ministry established in accordance with the provisions of this Act for supervision of mineral exploitation and the implementation of social and environmental protection measures, advise the Local Government Areas and communities on the implementation of programs for environmental protection and sustainable management of mineral resources, advice and offer necessary assistance required by holders of mineral titles in their interaction with State Governments, Local Government Councils, communities , civil institutions, and other stakeholders, advise the minister in resolving conflicts between stakeholders and advise the Minister on Mineral Resources Development within the State as the Minister may, from time to time, refer to the Committee; amongst other sundry  responsibilities. 

    According to the Act each committee meets once every three months and at such times as the Minister may deem necessary; and it is worthy to note that the Committee is also empowered to regulate its own procedure.

    Also, each mining company or individual involved in the exploitation of minerals resources pay tax for environmental protection, mine rehabilitation, reclamation and mine closure costs.

    Hence the question at this point is are these committees in each state active considering they are mandatorily required to meet 3 times a year? How can these committees in each state discourage illegal mining and engender obedience to the Act and internationally recognized standards in order to mitigate the negative impacts of mining activities and ensure sustainable development of the sector.

    Nigeria, unlike Ghana, may well be described as a ‘Mineral Nation’ with several mineral occurrences, but not a ‘Mining Nation’ because Nigeria lacks large mines to extract, refine and induce sale of mineral resources.  Ordinarily the mining sector should bring extensive economic, social and political development as well as foreign investment opportunities to Nigeria.

    However certain conditions must be met like the existence of appropriate and effective legal framework, well-defined regulatory practices, political stability, flexible ownership, requisite tax reliefs and exemption from customs duty, etc.  Although in respect of the latter the Act makes robust provisions as it provides for a 3-year tax relief at the inception of operation which can be renewed further by the Minister and exemption from payment of customs and import duties in respect of plant, machinery, equipment and accessories imported exclusively for mining operation; amongst other reliefs. The Act provides that every Mineral Titleholder (person or company granted Reconnaissance permit, Exploration License, Small- Scale Mining lease, Mining Lease, Water Use Permit, or Quarry Lease or anyone granted such licenses in respect of minerals. It is important to note that although the Act recognizes rights vested by assignment it expressly excludes a mortgage or charge or a holder of a security interests).

    The Act also provides that the amount of any loss incurred by Mineral Titleholder(s) (“MTs”) is to be deducted as far as it is possible from the assessable profits from its first year of assessment after which the loss was incurred and if that cannot be ascertained, then it can be deducted such amounts of such assessable profits of the next year of assessment. MTs are permitted to do this up to a limit of four years after which period any unrelieved loss shall lapse. They also enjoy exemptions from customs and import duties in respect of plant, machinery, equipment and accessories imported specifically and exclusively for mining operations; expatriate quota and resident permit in respect of the approved expatriate personnel and personal remittance quota for expatriate personnel, free from any tax imposed by any enactment for the transfer of external currency out of Nigeria.

    Laudably, the Act also grants MTs permission to retain and use earned foreign exchange such that where the holder of a mineral title earns foreign exchange from the sale of his minerals he may be permitted by the Central Bank of Nigeria to retain in a foreign exchange domiciliary account a portion of his foreign exchange earnings for use in acquiring spare parts and other inputs required for the mining operations which would otherwise not be readily available without the use of such earning; while also enjoying free transfer of currency through the Central Bank in respect of loan servicing repayments where a certified foreign loan has been obtained by the MT for  mining operations; and also remittance of foreign capital in the event of sale or liquidation of the mining operations or any interest therein attributable to foreign investment.

    MTs also enjoy tax relief for three (3) years commencing from the date of operation which may be further extended by the Minister for a further period of two  years by having regard to the company’s level and rate of development.

    From the above it is evident that the Act provides a clear-cut path for the Mining Sector to contribute significantly to the Country’s economic development. However, like all sectors it is fraught with numerous challenges and obstacles hindering its growth in spite of the quite robust Act regulating the sector. These obstacles include overlapping responsibilities between federal and state governments, inadequate infrastructure such as transportation, power supply, access to water and last but not the least security challenges.

    How to apply to the Nigeria mining cadastre office for mineral title 

    A company seeking a mining lease must be a going concern duly registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission with requisite share capital for the business activity the company intends to undertake; and must not have shareholder holding a controlling share who has been found guilty of an offence under the Act within five years prior to the application.  It is important to note that individuals can also apply for and be issued mining licenses. However same must be a Citizen of Nigeria with legal capacity and who has not been convicted of a crime. Mining Co-operatives are also eligible.

    The company or individual’s Solicitor or Representative is to approach the Nigeria Mining Cadastre Office (NMCO) being the administrative body very similar to what the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) is to Companies and Allied Matters Act which establishes the CAC.

    The NMCO is empowered by the Act to receive applications from applicants seeking mineral titles, permits, issues, and to keep a register of Title holders same amongst other duties pursuant to the Act. Like CAC, it can sue and be sued in its own name. It is presided over by a Director General and is the only agency responsible for the administration/ issuance of mineral titles just like the Corporate Affairs Commission is the only agency empowered to register and issue certificates of registration to Companies/businesses.

    The NMCO also receives and disposes of applications for the transfer, renewal, modification, relinquishment of mineral titles or extension of areas. The NMCO also maintains a register of applications. The register chronologically records all applications for mineral titles in a priority book used to prioritise applications as received; Just like CAC its Head Quarters is situated in Abuja with a number of Zonal offices across the nation. According to Section 7 of the Act, the NMCO shall open a series of files known as Mining Cadastre Office Register, to wit: (a) a register of Reconnaissance Permits; a register of Exploration Licenses; a register of Mining Leases; a register of Small-scale Mining Leases; (e) a register of the Water Use Permits; and (f) a register of Quarry Leases.

    The Act further provides for the criteria for the acquisition of each license, permit or lease.

    Generally, there are two major types of mining licenses in Nigeria that are relevant and important for every company seeking to engage in the mining sector. These are Possess/Purchase License and Mineral Buying Centre License.  A company that desires to export minerals must also obtain a Mineral Export Permit which shall be obtained each time it seeks to export minerals.

    For either of the two licenses, the company must provide copies of its CAC Incorporation Documents, Tax Clearance Certificate, and Attestation of Non-conviction from a Legal Practitioner, Bank Reference Letter, and Consent of a Mining Permit Holder. For Mineral Buying Center License, since it includes storage, the company must furnish all the above plus additional Warehouse and Environmental Impact Assessment Report.

    The License permits a company to buy and store lithium in a particular location. All attracts statutory fees. Companies must also fill Mineral Buying Center License: Duly completed application forms, pre-feasibility report (with COMEG (Council of Nigerian Mining Engineers and Geoscientist) seal & signature), evidence of financial capabilities (bank statements etc.), evidence of technical competence person(s), Work plan, Irrevocable Consent from land owners/ those in possession of the land, Attestation of no conviction of criminal offence under section 53 of the Act, CAC Incorporation Documents preferably a Certified True Copy and of course proof of payment of processing fees.

    Note that before mining exploration commences, there are pre-exploration requirements and documents which must be provided, to wit; evidence of Environmental Impact Assessment through Mines Environmental Compliance Department of the Ministry, evidence of Community Development Agreement, evidence of host community Compensation for lands, cash crops etc. which may be lost during applicant’s activities.

    OPPORTUNITIES FOR DIVERSIFICATION AND GROWTH

    Notably, one of the most significant benefits of solid mineral resources is the potential to create employment opportunities from the nascent stage of exploration to extraction and processing leading to the export of minerals requiring a skilled workforce, to wit; geologists and engineers to laborers, technicians, health workers, etc. 

    Secondly, a booming sector will stimulate growth in related industries; such as manufacturing, processing, construction, health, logistics, etc thereby fostering a web of interlinked economic activities with the capacity to drive industrialization and in the long run, commercialization.

    Nigeria’s reliance on oil revenue leaves the economy vulnerable and susceptible to global oil price fluctuations. Diversifying revenue sources through the exploration of solid minerals is a prudent strategy to mitigate this self-induced risk.

    KEY CHALLENGES IMPEDING NIGERIA’S MINING INDUSTRY.

    Inadequate infrastructure is a major challenge plaguing the mining sector in Nigeria. Effective mining operations require essential amenities, and well-developed infrastructure. Unfortunately, Nigeria is plagued with insufficient road networks, irregular power supply, and limited access to water posing major obstacles to the efficient functioning of mining operations.  To address this challenge, it is imperative for the government to prioritize the provision of high-quality road networks, consistent water supply, and reliable power infrastructure to enhance the overall mining processes in the country.

    Another challenge faced by the sector is value addition. The Country’s minerals, similar to the oil and gas sector, are primarily exported in their raw form for example minerals like Lead and Zinc are mined and exported without undergoing significant processing. 

    Third is illegal mining. Generally, it is the responsibility of Federal Mines Office in each state through Special Mines Surveillance Task Force and MIREMCO to arrest illegal miners  but the reality is that illegal mining continues to persist as sometimes host communities protect these illegal miners by reason of the kick back they receive as unfortunately Nigeria is not bereft of corrupt practices. To successfully curb this there must be collaboration between the federal government and state/local authorities.

    Also, the reality is that mining is a capital-intensive venture – be it in terms of license application, renewal or man power/skill acquisition and retention.

    CONCLUSION

    The vast array of mineral resources in Nigeria holds immense potential to transform our Country’s economy and steer it towards a path of sustainable growth and development. A concerted effort to leverage these resources, along with prudent policies and effective governance, can drive job creation, diversify revenue streams, and bolster our position in the global economy. However, it is crucial to ensure that these efforts are underpinned by ethical and sustainable practices that protect both the environment and the rights of local communities. By embracing the multifaceted value of mineral resources, Nigeria can chart a course towards economic prosperity and resilience on a foundation of diversified strength.

    We cannot conclude without commending the NMCO site  (eMC+) for being resplendent with relevant information and a consistent reiteration that applications are treated on a first come first served basis. The department site contains several key features including quick statistics on the number of exploration licenses, quarry leases, small mining leases, mining leases already issued etc. We believe in celebrating our wins no matter how small or seemingly mundane. Also, sometime in November this year the annual Nigeria mining week shall hold having been initiated about 9 (nine) years ago as the go–to event for anyone looking to do business in the Nigerian mining sector.

  • Prosecution of unlawful killings by law enforcement agents

    Prosecution of unlawful killings by law enforcement agents

    • By Helen Ogunwumiju

    My Lords, this erroneous belief of police officers in their immunity from prosecution and the sense of impunity has once again been shattered by the High Court of Lagos State in Bolanle’s case.

    The point I want to make, my Lords, is that when police officers are prosecuted or convicted for killing innocent members of the public, such incidents are not adequately publicised.

    I believe that this lack of knowledge of how the legal process works is responsible for the belief of some police officers that they can get away with killing members of the public since they don’t see immediate consequences of their actions.

    All they see is that their colleague(s) involved in such an incident is given an Orderly Room Trial if he is a junior officer and is dismissed by the Police.

    They don’t know that the legal process of prosecution and appeals inexorably continues to the highest court, especially where the defendant has been charged and sentenced to death at the trial court.

    Invariably by the time the case/appeal process comes to an end, police officers and members of the public would have forgotten the incident. It’s only those who lost their loved ones who remember where they’ve kept track of the case.

    It is also important to make the point that it is not because of the public outcry over Bolanle’s case that ensured the prosecution of the police officer, but that the law had always taken its course in most cases of such incidents.

    The following are a few decisions I can remember off the cuff in the last couple of years where the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of police officers who killed members of the public.

    There are many more of these decisions and many at different stages of trial and appeal.

    My point is that policemen at large need to be enlightened about the consequences of their actions.

    Let us educate those within our sphere of influence. Hopefully, this will minimise similar incidents.

    1. P.C Henry Ekum v. The State – Appeal No. SC.1103/2017, reported in (2022) LPELR-57683(SC), delivered on 13th May, 2022:

    On October 23, 2010, at No. 24 Ochedore Street, Four Corners, Ikom in Calabar, Cross River State, the appellant (a police officer) murdered one Ebam Takim Obiba by shooting him in the head with an AK47 rifle.

    The appellant had held a certain woman hostage in a salon and after an altercation with his colleague on one side and the woman’s husband and the deceased on the other side, he started shooting randomly and killed the deceased.

    He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging. His death sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

    2. Onyebuchi Onwunze v. The State – Appeal No. SC.215/2017, delivered on 2nd December, 2022:

    On March 25, 2007, in Ilupa Village at Godwin Ozuma’s compound, the appellant (a police officer) took a combatant position on being commanded by his superior officer and shot and killed one Anna Otari Ogbodo, an unarmed elderly woman.

    The court convicted the appellant of murder and sentenced him to death by hanging. The death sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

    3. Matthew Egheghe v. The State – Appeal No. SC.304/2017- Reported in (2020) LPELR- 50552 (SC), delivered on 10th January, 2020:

    On Sunday October 16, 2011, along Sani Abacha Express Way Yenagoa, one Emmanuel Victor was on his way from church when he encountered some policemen.

    The appellant (a police officer), chased down the motorcycle wherein Victor was a passenger after having slapped him previously, pulled him down and shot him severally to death.

    The appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging. His death sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

    4. Akinyede Olaiya v. State – Appeal No. SC.562/2014 reported in (2017) LPELR-43714 delivered on 8th December, 2017:

    On  March 23, 2011, at Ota Junction, Omuo- Ekiti in Ekiti State, the appellant (a police officer) fired two shots into the crowd without provocation or any real threat to his life or the lives of other policemen with him.

    The shots fired by the Appellant killed one Kehinde  Ayo  Faluyi who was in that crowd.

    Read Also: Activists urge ICC to visit Baga over unlawful killings

    The Appellant was convicted and sentenced to death. His death sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

    5. P.C Adeusi Adesina v. The People Of Lagos State – Appeal No. SC. 622/2014, Reported in (2019) LPELR – 46403 SC), delivered on  January 18, 2019:

    On November 27, 2008, the Appellant, a Police Constable, in Apogbon Blackspot, Lagos State shot a lorry driver named Dauda Isiako Akao and killed him.

    He was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. His sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.  

    6. The State v. P.C. James Egigia (SC) (unreported) delivered on the 26th day of January, 2024.

    The respondent who is a policeman on or about February 16, 2006 at Ayama village in Auyo Local Government Area of Jigawa State, seriously beat and fractured the leg of the deceased, one Ismaila Dodo while investigating a case.

    The injuries led to the death of the deceased. The trial court found the Respondent guilty of the offence of committing serious assault under Section 224 and punishable under Section 225 of the Penal Code Law and sentenced him to five years imprisonment without the option of a fine. The sentence was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

    • Ogunwumiju, CFR, is a Justice of the Supreme Court. She shared this paper with the National Association of Women Judges.
  • ‘Lawyer breached agreement on sale of my mother’s house’

    ‘Lawyer breached agreement on sale of my mother’s house’

    • By Joshua Uche

    A Veteran journalist, Segun Adenuga, has told a Yaba Magistrate Court that a lawyer, Moses John Jackson breached their agreement on the sale of his mother’s property located at 19 Ramonu Street, Ikate, Surulere, Lagos.

    Adenuga stated this while giving evidence before Magistrate (Mrs) Yeside Balogun in the alleged N1.4million fraud charge brought against the defendant.

    Adenuga told the court that he had an agreement with  the defendant  that the property should be sold for  N12.5million but was later told that it was sold for N7.5million.

    He said the N7.5 million was rejected and  refunded to the buyers of the property because  the price was not a fair bargain.

    Adenuga denied claims by the defendant that he used the proceed of the house to pay rent  and solve family issues describing it as false.

    Read Also: Lawyer writes IG, accuses SAN of criminal conversion, sale of assets

    He claimed that since the defendant was owing them N600,000 as accumulated money for rent over the past years, he forwarded N280,000 to add to the money  collected as rent on the property in order to obtain the Letter of Administration.

    He said the defendant failed to obtain the legal document.

    Jackson, in his defence, said he had earlier told the claimant that a property cannot be sold without acquiring Letter of Administration and that the legal instrument  would cost about N900,000.

    The defendant claimed that the property was sold to Faith and Works Ministry Church for N7.5million by the claimant and that he collected the cheque.

    He stated that the claimant sold the property regardless of not getting the Letter of Administration.

    Magistrate Balogun has adjourned the matter to February 26 for further hearing.

  • Agency trains police unit on new trends in SGBV investigation

    Agency trains police unit on new trends in SGBV investigation

    • DSVA engages religious leaders on menace
    • By Adebisi Onanuga and Elizabeth Eze

    Lagos State government has  trained over 40 police officers on best practices for investigating and prosecuting incidents  of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (SGBV).

    Participants at the three- day  training session were  drawn from the State’s Family Support Units (FSUs) and other formations including Force Criminal Investigative Department CID Alagbon and Panti (D10).

    The Executive Secretary Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency, (DSVA), Mrs Titilola Vivour-Adeniyi said the engagement was designed to acquiant them with emerging trends on domestic and sexual violence and know how to relate with them when the needs arise.

    “Sexual and Gender-Based Violence is a globally pervasive human rights violation which the Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu has declared zero tolerance for all forms of this menace.

    She explained that the  police has an indispensable role to play in ensuring survivors are able to access justice, perpetrators are held accountable which is critical in serving as a deterrence.

    “The truth of the matter is that cases are not won in court, they are won at investigation stage and so we need the police to conduct thorough investigation when these cases are reported to their stations.

    “They must know the best practices for interviewing survivors and the intricacies involved and the investigation techniques in facing the alleged perpetrators at the scenes of the crime, connecting the suspect to crime.” she said

    She maintained that the State is working assiduously to ensure that going forward there are solid investigations conducted by these personnel as the state is craving for an increase in conviction and increase faith in the system.

    Facilitator at the training, Mrs Atinuke Odukoya of the Centre for Women’s Health and Information (CWHI)  took the participants on the issues of socialization, culture, social norms, value system and how they impact on how the police officers within the family support units respond to issues of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence.

    She said “We all know that things that we have behind our minds are in terms of how we have been raised or how our society has raised our expectations and attitudes with behaviours and how we are supposed to respond to issues, those impacts affect the way we respond to cases that survivors bring to the station when they come.

    “One of the things that we needed them to see is the fact that these people that you are responding to, they are coming with a lot of trauma. So it’s not in your place to determine because of how you feel or how you think or what you think is the way they should be dressed or the way they should talk on how they should be able to  respond to cases.”

    Odukoya enjoined the officers to look beyond ethnic coloration while making judgment and to see that objectivity is key and investigating the cases with all objectivity towards ensuring that justice is served “because justice is a form of prevention.”

    An SGBV Consultant, Mrs Juliet Olumuyiwa Rufai took the participants on issues such as “Guiding principles of SGBV Roe Play and the approach to SGBV Response, Survivor -centered and Multi-Sectoral.

    She highlighted the approaches to look out for when handling SGBV cases.

     In his presentation, Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP)Lagos state, Dr Babajide Martins highlighted the relevant laws in relation to their areas of investigation and put in perspective what is expected of them in terms of implementation, investigation and apprehension of offenders and preparing them to give good testimonies when they are invited in court by the directorate.

    He said some of the challenges are the process of getting officers to come and give evidence  in court , stressing that the training session will avail them the opportunity to know what their roles are and what is expected of them when they are coming to give evidence in court.

    Read Also: Lagos agencies to provide PWDs with SGBV services

    Some of the participants called for more sensitization at community levels as well as reaching out to religious and traditional rulers to cascade the messages to the people.

    In a related development, the DSVA has engaged about 200 religious leaders on SGBV as well as the role of religious clerics in preventing and responding to the vicious menace.

     Mrs  Vivour-Adeniyi lectured the clergy men on the provisions of the Protection Against Domestic Violence Law, 2015, the Criminal law of Lagos state, 2015 ( as amended)  as well as the Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency Law, 2021.

    She took the participants through the different section  the laws, in order for them to be knowledgeable about the intricacies of the document,  including section 261 which is on sexual assault by penetration and 137 which is about unlawful sexual intercourse with a child that attracts life imprisonment without option of fines among others.

    She explained that one of the major aims of the Domestic Violence law is to prevent domestic violence from happening and that can  be achieved through a restraining order granted by the court. 

    “The truth is that sexual and Gender-Based Violence is not a respecter of age, class, grade or religion. Indeed, anybody can perpetrate it and anyone can also become a victim, so it is important to engage religious leaders from this perspective.”

    “We know sometimes you serve as first responders whenever issues of Gender-Based violence are reported. it is therefore important for us to let you know the relevant laws that exist and support services available that your congregation can take advantage of anytime the need arises.”

    Vivour-Adeniyi added that there are 22 specialised police stations in the state that can be reached on issues of Domestic and Gender-Based Violence, while informing the participants that the High courts and Magistrate courts that have criminal jurisdiction are the appropriate courts that can grant a restraining/ protection Order against an abusive partner / spouse

    According to her: “We have Protection Against Domestic Violence law 2015 as amended, that law basically seeks to prevent reoccurrence of violence by encouraging survivors to approach the court and obtain what is called protection or restraining order. We also have the Criminal Law of Lagos state which is to regulate criminal conduct.

    The Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency Law 2021 which introduced some new provisions like child pornography,  sex for grades, frustrating investigation, concealment of an offence were also considered. It is our hope that this engagement will further broaden the knowledge for participants to assert their roles on how to make a case for survivors as well as make necessary referral to relevant responder agencies and seek justice for them.

    The Presiding Chaplain, Chapel of Christ Delight Lagos State, Rev Dr Oladele Ajayi said that the church has been and would continue to be at the fore front to ensure several marriages that are on the verge of collapsing are restored.

    He said “The reality is that we have this problem around and as a pastor we have seen so many issues on domestic violence, either complaints by a wife or husband it could be emotional financial or physical abuse at some point we have to engage to the level of separation. We must continue to inform them about the laws of the land as well as the punishments that can be meted out against  anyone that perpetrates any form of abuse and people should desist form stigmatising those that have come out to speak of being abused.”

    The Chief Missioner Nasirullahi-li-Fathi society NASFAT, Imam Abdul Azeez Onike, said Islam preaches peace and tranquil ambience between couples and frowns at any act that can jeopardize peaceful coexistence among the people.

    Onike said many islamic organisations including NASFAT have been working with numerous NGOs to enlighten and advance the campaign against any form of Gender-Based violence, and prevent anything that can breed peaceful homes.

    He appreciated the state government for taking up the initiative that will improve family ties and bring about a perfect society that devoid of rancour, enmity and ensure sanity among the citizenry.

     A continuous call for sensitization by the government and stakeholders was made as the participants advocated for an end to Domestic and Sexual Violence and also enjoined victims and survivors to break the culture of silence and escalate the case to the appropriate quarters in order to access justice.

  • Honours for general counsels‘ behind big deals’

    Honours for general counsels‘ behind big deals’

    Not fewer than 105 lawyers, working as legal professionals in-house in corporate organisations in Nigeria have been honoured by the London based “The Legal 500” in conjunction with GC Powerlist (Nigeria).

    The Legal 500 has been instrumental in recognising and highlighting influential General Counsel and Heads of Legal teams in business globally. Since 2013, the first of such award by The Legal 500 in Africa, took place in South Africa for in-house counsels  and corporate organisations.

     A law firm,The New Practice (TNP) teamed up with The Legal 500 to host the honourees in Nigeria at a reception which held Thursday night at Lagos Boat Club, Ikoyi.

    TNP Managing Partner, Baba Alokolaro told journalists that they took up the initiative in support of The Legal 500, to celebrate general counsel across the industries.

     Alokolaro said general counsels in-house are behind most big deals the big lawyers outside are celebrated

      “Usually in our industry, there is a fine line between in-house counsel and external counsel. And if you look at a spectrum of deals or distribution matters, you would see that it’s usually or generally the external counsel that is celebrated. So you hear the name of this law firm or partner in this law firm or that partner in this law firm made this achievement or achieved this feat.

     “But it is the two warriors that worked internally that determined whether they were going to go to war or determined whether the deal was worth doing, either from a compliance perspective or otherwise, is the general counsel.

    “And generally the in-house counsels are not celebrated for their achievements. So when Legal 500 started this initiative, they’ve done it in other parts of the world and I believe they’ve done it in South Africa, and said they wanted to introduce it in Nigeria.

      “What makes the engine room of any firm work? Are they the deals that we do? Where do these deals come from? They come from our clients. Who deals with our clients, it is the general counsel in-house.

     “If the top lot of general counsel across industries in Nigeria are being celebrated for their wins and achievements, it is something we wanted our firm associated with. In a nutshell, their success, and celebrating their success is what motivated us to sponsor this event”, he said.

     Alokolaro said the honour  was specific for internal counsel by a legal directory that generally just lists who is who in the legal landscape insisting that it is not the case of a prophet not having honour in his home.

    “They do it across the entire geography of the world. So you could have local recognition. But this is global recognition of what happens in Nigeria. So we have both”, he argued, adding. “these are canons that we have in the mix. So we’re also recognised within Nigeria by a couple of entities that do different things and recognise both in-house and external counsels.”

     Asked if the honour done the recepients  would motivate others , the TNP Managing Partner said: “When you’re recognised for something you do, you receive an accolade. It is a medal of honour. You’re being honored.  Beyond financial reward, your peers, your subordinates, your superiors, the industry is recognising you for something you are good at. You feel good. The feel-good quotient is something that I believe will propel anybody to do better and to do more.

     “If my boss got this award, it’s such a deal because my boss was recognised for the quality of work he was doing, then it means that the quality of work I am doing must be as good as the work of my boss or better so that I could be recognised as much as my boss in the future.”

     Giving reasons for the quality of lawyers coming out of Law School. he pointed out that the practice of litigation has changed significantly from where you had to cross all in advocacy.

    He noted that a  lot of advocacy now is done in written form.

    “Before I stopped litigation as a practice, we have already for closes all our process, So anything you need to say is in writing. The least you could do is adumbrate.

    “Gone are the days when you watch legal titans in court, whether this one has his foot on a stool or whether that one has his hands on a lectern, delivering their addresses.

    “Those of us who are not silks would be waiting for our matter to be called on adjournments and adjournments. So, in terms of law practice management and litigation process management, I think we have moved in leaps and bounds in time.

    “Now the quality of lawyers coming out of Law School, there is an argument that they are not as good as they used to be. Law as an industry is a continuing learning process. Whatever you learn at university and  law school, practice must correct it, plus continuing legal education. As I am sitting here, I am still learning new ways of doing things.”, he said

     Alokolaro said  most things in Law school are theoretical law and that there is need to correct these things.

    “They need a level of  correction or improvement in moving with the time. We need sustainability. It means you must keep up with the times and see what progress and the future has. If you are still talking about, for instance, agreements and documents, audio of an agreement and how they are prepared, and we are still teaching our lawyers how to be what they were  taught  30 something years ago, even  when agreements are refreshed on daily basis. The way I wrote agreement yesterday is not the way I am writing it today, talk less of tomorrow. Things have changed,

    “There also have to be that openness of mind to see that forms are just forms. We are not shackled to forms, it is a direction, a roadmap. As long as we know that it is a roadmap, and we update those road maps”, he said.

    Speaking about  NBA’s position  that UK lawyers cannot practice in Nigeria, he said it is fair that the NBA must protect its territory.

    “You have your home, I have my home. If I am allowed to come into your home with unfettered access, then you must be allowed to come into my home with unfettered access.  It must be reciprocal.

    Read Also: Handle withdrawal of Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger membership with tact, group counsels ECOWAS

    “A man  with a 1,000  lawyers,  vast in different laws about  different industries he has worked, and has advanced qualities better than I do and skills, more manpower, more resources,  comes into my industry to compete with me for same work, that is not the most reasonable thing to do.

    “But if you say I can practice in your own jurisdiction without doing anything further, okay then because some of us would like to compete because we have great experts in different places in the legal industry. Some of those ones would  want to get great business. However,  even if you cross over to Accra, we have almost a common law jurisdiction, you cannot practice Ghanaian law. It would only make sense if you want to change that dynamic, that you speak to industry leaders, find out what we want and what we want to give.  We have laws that  regulate the industry and we must follow what that law says.”

    Asked whether the honour done the in-house counsels would encourage other lawyers to do more, Alokolaro said the award is not for economic benefit.

    “This event is not economically beneficial  to anybody.  It is more of social benefit, there is  emotional benefit, there is psychological benefit.  If I am being celebrated for the work I have done, some people local and global decided  that I have to be celebrated for the things that I have done in the industry, then it can make me to do better and to do more  and could be better than what I had done,”

  • Lekki residents’ N50m suit against IGP for hearing March 6

    Lekki residents’ N50m suit against IGP for hearing March 6

    Justice Ibrahim Kala of the Federal High Court, Lagos has fixed March 6 for the hearing of a N50 million suit filed the board of trustees of Divine Homes Residents Association (DHRA) Lekki-Ajah, Lagos against the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun.

     Listed as second to fourth respondents in the suit marked FHC/L/CS/1991/23 are; Assistant Inspector-General of Police (Zone 2); SP Omo-Osagie M. A. (O/C Legal) and one Henry Uche Nwabueze.

     During proceedings on the matter last week, applicant’s lawyer, Chief Abdullahi Tony Dania, informed the court that all respondents except the fourth, have been served with the processes, adding that the respondents are yet to file any response to the application.

     He also urged the court to expunge the name of the third respondent, SP Omo-Osagie, from the suit.

     SP Omo-Osagie who was in court admitted being served with the applicant’s application but said he needed time to file his response to the application.

     He, therefore, asked the court for a short date for all parties to be served.

     Justice Kala, after taking submissions from counsels, adjourned the matter till March 6, for mention.

     The estate BOT through their lawyers, Chief Abdullahi Tony Dania and Ify Igwe, is seeking an order of the court  restraining all the respondents from alleged continuous  harassment, intimidation, arrest and re-arrest of its members of or its executives, particularly one Sir-Walter Babanta Chijioke, over a civil matter concerning the internal management of the residents association, DHRA.

     The BOT prayed the court  for a declaration that issues relating to the amendment of the constitution of the DHRA, the status of  Henry Uche Nwabueze within the association and the suits pending at the Federal High Court, are civil issues and cannot be given criminal garments to justify continual harassment by the Police at Zone 2.

     They prayed the court for a declaration that the letter styled “legal advice” or the position paper presented by the third respondent to the 2nd Respondent, dated August 17, 2023, was calculated to mislead the latter, is legally self-contradictory,  shows bias, constituted a circumstantial evidence of corrupt compromise and  was a feeble attempt to improperly justify Police intervention in a pure civil matter.

     They asked the court for an order prohibiting the respondents from utilising or giving any effect to the letter under reference dated August 17, 2023, from the continual harassment, intimidating, inviting, arresting and/or further arresting members particularly Sir Walter Babanta Chijioke, over or in respect of the issues rielating to or concerning the internal management of the DHRA.

    Read Also: IXPN opens in Lekki

     They asked for an order of mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to investigate the allegations of impersonation, forgery, conduct likely and giving the Police false information with intent against the fourth respondent; and corrupt compromise, insubordination, abuse of office and deliberately misleading the second respondent, made against the third respondent, as contained in the petitions dated September 6 and the 21, 2023, respectively.

     They also asked for an order directing the respondents to pay to the applicant, N50 million, as exemplary damages and compensation for the avoidable embarrassment, psychological trauma, cost of defence and cost of this instant action.

    The applicants, in a 27-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Abdulkareem Ridwan Kayode, a Legal Assistant in the law firm of Dania & Associates, claimed “that all the allegations contained in the charge are conspicuous falsehood, deliberately concocted and presented in a criminal charge, obviously calculated to get the applicant to be remanded in prisons pending the perfection of his bail.

    He claimed that if not for the justice-mindedness and diligence of the Magistrate that presided over the charge on the day of arraignment, the Police and the nominal complainant, would have succeeded in their heinous and mischievous plans.

    He averred that assuming without conceding that the prosecution/Police was correct, the amendment of the constitution of the Divine Homes Residents Association (DHRA) was valid and proper as confirmed by the CAC.

    He averred that the Police sent a formal inquiry to  the CAC and which in turn sent a response affirming the validity of the Constitution in issue, and these documents were inside the casefile adding that there was no forgery and that the constitution was not used or alleged to have been used to commit any fraud or crime.

    He affirmed that  the complainant is a tenant-resident and not a landlord-resident of DHRA, was never the chairman or acting Chairman of DHRA, and he was not even qualified to contest for the chairmanship position in DHRA.

    “That the status of Mr. Henry Uche Nwabueze within DHRA and the Suits

    pending at the federal High Court, are civil issues and that the issues cannot be given criminal garments to justify the charge in issue and the continual harassment by the Police at Zone 2 or at any other Command.

    “That members of the applicant conducted Estate election and elected new representatives, including the Chairman of DHRA to manage her affairs DHRA based on the amended Constitution which was filed at CAC,

    “That the nominal complainant did not contest for the position of chairmanship any position of DHRA, but he made a petition to the Police, and deceitfully or signed as the chairman of DHRA, based on which investigation was conducted and the applicants were vindicated by the X-Squad section of the Prosecution/Police; only for him to make another petition on the same facts, against the same persons.”

  • Women lawyers back state police

    Women lawyers back state police

    • Urge govt to tackle insecurity

    African Women Lawyers Association (AWLA), Nigeria has expressed its support for establishment of state police to tackle insecurity in different parts of the country.

    The group also asked the Federal Government to  review  the fuel subsidy removal and declare a state of emergency on insecurity as key measures to tackle the crippling economic hardship in the country.

    The President of the new executive members of the association, Mrs Caroline Ibharuneafe, made the call last week at a press conference at AWLA(Nigeria) Secretariat in  Lagos. .

     Mrs Ibharuneafe  lamented  the state of  Nigerians especially women  on how they have been coping with the astronomical rise in cost of living.

    “We are seriously concerned about the state of the nation, especially the high cost of living and insecurity in the land which is currently having a terrible effect on our women. Farmers in the rural areas can no longer go to farm for fear of killer herdsmen thus leading to high shortage of food items and other essential products in the market.

    “The Federal Government must consider a holistic review of its economic policies and tackle insecurity frontally to save the country from going into recession”, she stressed.

    The AWLA President argued that the prevailing high cost of living has been exacerbated by the grave insecurity in the land with a series of kidnappings, rape of women and children.

    Mrs Ibharuneafe  lamented that the removal of fuel subsidy and floating of the Naira has further compounded the situation in the country and made a lot of people hungry.

    “As an association that represents the interest of indigent women in the country, we cannot watch as our women face severe hunger and hardship and do nothing.

    Read Also: Southwest speakers demand state police, power devolution

    “We, therefore, call on the Federal Government to rise up to its responsibility by urgently taking the issue of insecurity seriously. If a policy is not working, it should be reviewed. The Federal Government should urgently reconsider the removal of fuel subsidy.

    “We also call on the government to do something urgent about the incessant electricity increases by the power holding companies in the country”, she said.

    She, however, warned that AWLA would not hesitate to drag the government before the court if concrete measures are not immediately taken to address the current hardship in the country.

     “Nigerians are dying in their hundreds and if nothing is done on all these issues enumerated, AWLA will have no choice but to take legal means to fight for our rights as enunciated in the Nigerians Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Child Rights”, she said.

    On State Police, Ibharuneafe declared the group’s  support of state police as a measure to tackle the security challenges in the country but added that women must be included in committees set up by the government to find lasting solutions to the nation’s problems.

    She insisted that any good measure that would put the country on the path of safety and food sufficient should be encouraged and added that AWLA is open to collaboration with government and other non-governmental organisation in finding solutions to challenges facing the country and more especially rendering prono-bono legal services to indigent women and the girl-child.