Category: Law

  • Case for reintegration of former custodial centre inmates

    Case for reintegration of former custodial centre inmates

    The Executive Director of Prisoner’s Rehabilitation and Welfare Action (PRAWA), Dr. Uju Agomoh, has stressed the need to reintegrate former inmates of custodial centres of the Nigeria Correctional Services (NCS).

    She argued that societies and families that fail to reintegrate ex-offenders into their folds would further force them to the world to embrace hard criminal networks “and that will be worse for the country.”

    Dr. Agomoh spoke at a two-day workshop on: Inmates’ Behavioural and Cognitive Modification Programmes, organised by the Prison Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) for Nigeria Correction Service (NCS) officers from Zone A and held in Ikeja, Lagos.

    The theme was: “Remedial Programmes Symbiotic Reinforcement.”

    Dr Agomoh addressed the topic: “Nigerian Correctional Service Act 2019 and Faith-Based Correctional Programmes”.

    She cautioned against stigmatisation of persons who have served their terms and fully reformed if they must settle back in the society peacefully adding that the process of reintegrating back into the society must stand on three tripods viz “The victim, the family and the community.”

    Agomoh said: “The family has got to accept this person. If the family doesn’t accept this person, he would rather run to friends who might be drug users. If society will begin to stigmatise the person both when they are in custody and when they are outside custody, we as a society will be worse for it again and, as I said, we need to engage with the offender in such a way to reduce a repeat of the offending behaviour.

    “That provision that talks about this in the constitution is something that we need to revisit.

    It is not just about what we put in the law, it is about how we implement it.

    “How do we take steps and ensure that everyone who comes out of the custodial facility is supported and not stigmatised against? Is supported to begin to live a law-abiding life because if you don’t, nothing does not exist in a vacuum, they would go the other way.”

    She urged stakeholders to join hands to make “this important thing work, to make it possible.”

    Agomoh said: Every agency that is involved in socialisation, including the faith agencies needs to be very careful about what we do because we play a critical role. Some of the things we do can actually promote stigmatisation or de-emphasise stigmatisation.

    “We can decide to throw away the bath water with the baby or we can decide to just throw away the bath water, pick the baby and clean it up. That cleaning up is not what one agency can do alone or what one individual can do alone,  it must be a cooperative or collaborative effort for us to get it right.

    “I think it is only when we begin to do this that our justice system will begin to have a human face, and it does need to have a human face and that does not negate the focus and interest of the support mechanism that needs to happen for the offender not because you like the offender but because you want to reduce the offender’s chances of re-offending.”

    To ensure a successful reintegration of former inmates of the custodial centres, Dr. Agomoh urged the Controller-General of the NCS to commence issuance of “Certificate of Good Behaviour” to those who have successfully gone through the three Rs- Rehabilitation, Reformation and Reintegration, in accordance with the provisions of Section 14 of the Nigeria Correctional Act 2019.

    According to her Section 10 of the Act enhance the behavioural acts of inmates towards their reintegration to the society;

    “it also talks about empowering the inmates so that when they go back to the society, they already have something doing and to take their minds away from crime,” she added.

    In his address, PFN’s Executive Director Benson Iwuagwu said the country has a duty to ensure that the correctional system is more responsive than it is presently.

    Iwuagwu lamented the common characteristic involving high rate of recidivism, describing it as “a common denominator of a system that has either failed or it’s not effective.”

    He said this is what led the organisation to come up with programmes that are remedial to the inmate’s behaviour.

    He, therefore, urged the NCS to begin to explore and exploit the opportunities that are bound in civil society and faith-based organisations, stressing that they are not mere prison visitors.

    “Look at what they are offering. And in our particular case, we are offering specifically targeted objective programmes that address some of those behavioural attitudes that are disposed to crime and criminality.

    “Because crime and criminality are covert reasons or factors and if these are not objectively and intentionally addressed, it becomes an administrative situation,” Iwuagwu said.

    The Controller-General, Nigeria Correctional Services (NCS), Haliru Nababa, ìn his remarks at the event admonished participants to pay great attention to the content of the remaining programme.

    Nababa, who was represented by Assistant Controller-General, Training and Staff Development, Lawal Gusau, further harped on the importance of training for human capital.

    He said: “Training is an important aspect of staff development without which an organisation cannot progress.

    “You will need the content of this course for your progress ìn the service and the development of the organisation.”

    In his remarks, Assistant Controller-General of Prisons, Uche Nwobi, in charge of Zone A, made up of Lagos and Ogun states, said the issue of restorative justice is designed to help the system.

    Speaking of how inmates are treated, he said: “In the system, we don’t discriminate against anybody, we prepare them for the outside world. We give them equal treatment to help them with what will happen after imprisonment. “

  • ‘Why schools must enforce child protection policies’

    ‘Why schools must enforce child protection policies’

    The Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency (DSVA) and the Office of Education Quality Assurance (OEQA)  have commenced implementation of the state’s safeguarding and child protection programme in schools.

    To  this end, a one-day sensitisation programme was held at Adeyemi Bero Auditorium, Alausa to educate principals, heads of schools and school administrators on the policy.

    The programme is to be implemented in all education districts, thereby reiterating Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu administration’s commitment to ensure the safety and protection of the state’s children.

    The programme was facilitated by child protection experts including the Director-General , Office of Education Quality Assurance, Mrs. Abiola Seriki-Ayeni, an activist Taiwo Akinlami and Mrs. Modupeola Saheed Adebmabo.

    In her welcome address, DSVA Executive Secretary, Mrs. Titilola Vivour Adeniyi underscored the fact that whilst most child abuse incidents occur within families and communities, children also experience abuse and exploitation in organisations that provide them with support and services.

    According to her, research has shown that physical, emotional abuse and neglect in child-focused organisations and institutions are less systematic and usually unplanned, as they stem from poor conditions, bad work practices and negligent management.

    She stressed that it is now mandatory for all child-centred institutions to adopt and ensure full implementation of a Safeguarding and Child Protection policy.

    Mrs. Seriki- Ayeni, in her paper, highlighted the need for schools to recognise the role they play in ensuring  the wellbeing and safety of children, especially as children spend a significant time of their days in school.

    Mrs Seriki-Ayeni urged participants to take advantage of  the free online course “Introduction of Safeguarding and Child Protection Policy”.

    She stated that more than 10,000 educators had successfully completed courses under the programme while encouraging those who haven’t taken the course to do so.

    Mrs. Adebambo provided an overview of the executive order on Safeguarding and Child Protection programme, emphasising critical measures schools should take in ensuring the safety of their students.

    Some of the measures, she said, include safer recruitment procedures, adopting a safeguarding policy, having a designated safeguarding officer and establishing reporting, recording and feedback mechanisms.

    Mr. Taiwo Akinlami on his part, gave an insight into what child rights entail, societal and cultural perceptions of children as well as norms and beliefs that encourage child abuse.

    The issue of corporal punishment was also discussed, even as participants were reminded of the State Government’s No-Caning policy.

    A total of 400 primary and secondary schools, drawn from both public and private schools in Education District 6 were in attendance as participants were given the relevant tools required in ensuring they are able to effectively establish and implement Safeguarding and Child Protection Policy in their institutions.

  • Unending judgment enforcement troubles

    Unending judgment enforcement troubles

    In a judgment on January 13, 2014, Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja issued an order directing the governors of the 36 states to pay any amount into the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the state, meant for the Judiciary, directly to the heads of courts concerned in consonance with the provision of the constitution.

    The governors did not appeal the order, but simply declined to obey.

    In reaction, court workers across the country, under the aegis of the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), embarked on a series of strikes.

    Till date, the governors are yet to fully comply with the order.

    On July 18, 2011, Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of the Federal High Court, Lagos, in a judgment, awarded N20 million in damages against the police for unlawfully parading Ottoh Obono before the press on allegations bordering on armed robbery.

    Justice Aneke held, among others, that the fact that Obono was exonerated of any wrongdoing following the legal advice of the Lagos State Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), after being remanded for over 10 months at the Kirikiri Maximum Security Prisons, violated his right to presumption of innocence as enshrined in Section 36 (5) of the of the 1999 Constitution and left much to be desired in the administration of justice in the country.

    The judge descended on the police, noting that: “The respondents’ conduct against the applicant is totally reprehensible and condemnable, and I hereby condemn same without equivocation.”

    It is not in public domain that the respondents in the suit marked: FHC/CA/CS/91/2009 (including the Inspector-General of Police and Lagos State Police Commissioner) have complied with the judgment.

    In November 2019, Justice Oluremi Oguntoyinbo of the Federal High Court in Lagos ordered the Federal Government to “recover pensions collected by former governors now serving as ministers and members of the National Assembly” and directed the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) to challenge the legality of states’ pension laws permitting former governors and other similar ex-public officials to collect such pensions.”

    The orders, contained in a judgment, given in a suit marked: FHC/L/CS/1497/2017 filed by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), are yet to be complied with by both the Federal Government and the AGF.

    These three cases represent a few of the many instances where parties go through the rigour of litigation, which often spans years, only to be handed a pyrrhic victory, in the form of a judgment that is hardly enforceable.

    Confronted with this reality, SERAP recently demanded that the government of President Muhammadu Buhari “immediately take meaningful steps to implement several judgments it (SERAP) obtained against the Federal Government.

    It added: “Unless the judgments are immediately implemented, SERAP will consider pursuing contempt proceedings against the Federal Government in national courts, and international sanctions against the administration for its persistent disobedience of court judgments.”

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana, backed SERAP’s call that the Federal Government  and its agencies comply with court orders and judgments.

    “It is sad to note that many of the judgments delivered in favour of SERAP have been ignored by the Federal Government contrary to Section 287 of the Constitution which has imposed a binding obligation on all authorities and persons in Nigeria to comply with the verdicts of all courts.

    “I enjoin SERAP to take advantage of the provisions of the law to enforce the judgments without any further delay,” Falana said.

    Lawyers, Daniel Makolo, Tunde Falola and Mustapha Abdul, argued that the problem associated with judgment enforcement in Nigeria was rooted in the loopholes in the justice delivery system, which those unwilling to obey judgments or comply with court orders simply exploit.

    Some of such loopholes, they noted, exist in court rules and legal provisions on judgment enforcement.

    Some of the problems

    It is well known that, except the government or its agency wishes to allow the enforcement of a judgment or execution of an order against it, such effort hardly succeeds.

    To execute a judgment against either the federal or state government, a judgment creditor is required to submit a copy of a judgment to the Attorney-General of the Federation or of a state for his recommendation.

    There are options open to the Attorney-General under the laws. He/she could recommend compliance or appeal. There have been instances where the AG simply declined to act, forcing the judgment creditor to institute fresh cases in the form of application for an order of mandamus or a garnishee proceeding.

    The garnishee proceeding also comes with its many challenges, particularly in monetary judgment against the government or its agencies.

    This is because, under Section 84 of the Sheriff and Civil Processes Act, the consent of the Attorney-General is required for a judgment creditor to attach the fund that is under the control of the public officer.

    The section provides: “Where money liable to be attached by garnishee proceedings is in the custody or under the control of a public officer in his official capacity or in custodia legis, the order nisi shall not be made under the provisions of the last preceding section unless consent to such attachment is first obtained from the appropriate officer in the case of money in the custody or control of a public officer or of the court in the case of money in custodia legis, as the case may be.

    “In such cases, the order of notice must be served on such a public officer or on the registrar of the court, as the case may be.

    “In this section, ‘appropriate officer’ means- (a) in relation to money which is in the custody of a public officer who holds a public office in the public service of the Federation, the Attorney-General of the Federation; (b) in relation to money which is in the custody of a public officer who holds a public office in the public service of the state, the Attorney of the state.”

    By this provision, the public officer, who is unwilling to allow the execution of a judgment can withhold his consent or apply to the court for a stay of execution of the judgment sought to be enforced.

    There is also the challenge of time constraint in garnishee proceeding.

    A judgment creditor that seeks to recover debt from the government by way of garnishee proceedings is hampered by the provision that no garnishee proceeding shall be commenced before the expiration of 90 days after the date of judgment where appeal has not been lodged against the judgment.

    By this, it means that a judgment creditor cannot immediately initiate a garnishee proceeding against the government or its agency until after three months, even when there is no appeal against the judgment.

    Constitutional impediment?

    Another problem with the execution of judgment against the government or its agencies lies with the constitutional provision that no money shall be withdrawn from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the state except to meet the expenditure authorised by an Appropriation Law.

    The effect of this provision is that if there is no provision or sufficient provision for the payment of judgment debts in the Appropriation Law of the state for a particular year, the state government or its agencies can hide under that situation and refuse to pay judgement debts.

    There is also the procedure that allows a party, who is challenging a judgment to apply for stay of execution pending appeal.

    Under this procedure, a judgment debtor, who is not satisfied with the judgment of the trial court, can apply for an order of stay of execution against the judgment either before the trial court or the Court of Appeal.

    When granted, the order of stay of execution simply suspends the enforcement of the judgment, with the intention of preserving the res (subject of the dispute) to ensure that at the end of the day, the appeal is not rendered nugatory

    This procedure, though desirable, is open to abuse by dubious judgment debtors, who exploit the opportunity to dissipate the res or frustrate the judgment creditor.

    There is also the problem associated with the process of obtaining the certified true copy (CTC) of the judgment before it could be executed.

    By the provision of the law, a judgment of the court shall be enforced with the leave of the court after the expiration of three days from the day on which judgment was given and, if the judgment relates to writ of possession of land, it should be enforced after 14 days where no date was fixed by the court.

    On its part, the constitution provides that the court or tribunal shall keep record of proceedings and (in the case of a criminal proceeding), the defendant or any person authorised by him/her shall be entitled to obtain copies of the judgment in the case within seven days of the conclusion of the case.

    But, despite these legal provisions, CTCs of judgments in most courts are not made available to the affected parties as and when due.

    In most cases, it takes about three months or more to access a CTC of a judgment or ruling.

    The cost of executing a judgment, coupled with the problem of corruption among court officials, is another obstacle. A judgment creditor is usually required to provide funds for the successful execution of the judgment or order given in his/her favour.

    The judgment creditor is expected to pay certain prescribed fees to the court’s registrar and provide logistic support to the sheriffs and the police to enable them effect a successful execution. The sheriffs and police officers often take advantage of the judgment sum or value of the property to be attached and charge unnecessary fees to carry out their lawful responsibilities.

    A corrupt sheriff could easily inform the judgment debtor of the pending execution and the judgment debtor may either remove the property from the jurisdiction or run to the court with an application for stay of execution ahead of the writ of execution to be levied by the judgment creditor.

    In cases where the attached property are to be auctioned, the auctioneer is expected to pay the gross proceeds into the court, including the payment for the sheriffs, bailiffs, appraisers and expenses of sale to the auctioneer.

    In reality, after all the payments made to all the identified officers of the court, the amount left for the judgment creditor is often not sufficient to satisfy the judgment debt.

    Also, in instances where declaratory judgments or orders are obtained, they merely declare the rights of parties and are dormant, they have no force of execution.

    A party who obtained a declaratory order or judgment is required to take further steps by initiating a fresh proceeding for injunctive reliefs to enforce his rights or protect the threat to or violation of the right so declared in the judgment or order.

    This subsequent proceeding comes with additional cost and associated challenges of delay in proceedings and delivery of judgement in addition to the cost of enforcing the new judgment.

    A judgment debtor could refuse to comply with the judgment of a court, particularly in monetary judgment. In some garnishee proceedings, garnishee may refuse to disclose facts or money in its custody which can be used to pay the judgment debt.

    It is a common practice for banks to deny that a judgment debtor has funds in its accounts with the bank only to connive with such judgment debtor to transfer the funds from the accounts to other account to frustrate the success of such garnishee proceedings against a judgment debtor, who is the bank’s customer.

    A judgment debtor could also tamper with movable property by relocating it to a separate jurisdiction thereby frustrating the process of levying execution against the affected property.

    Confronted with such cases, the judgment creditor may be compelled to initiate committal proceedings against a judgment debtor who either disobeyed court order or frustrated the execution of a judgment given against him/her or his or her interest.

    Apart from the fact that this new suit comes with additional cost to the judgment creditor, if the judgment debtor becomes convicted and imprisoned on account of the committal proceedings, the judgment debt will still remain unpaid.

    There is also the delay associated with the enforcement of intra-state judgments, which involve the enforcement of a judgment delivered in a court in another judicial division or district in the same state.

    The procedure requires that the Registrar of the court that delivered the judgment is required to send the judgment to his counterpart in the division or district where it is to be executed. It is required that the judgment is accompanied with a warrant in Form II, authorising the execution and the Registrar of the receiving court would authenticate it as if it was issued by his/her court.

    The implication is that the court in which the certificate of enforcement of judgment has been registered (the new court) shall have the same control and jurisdiction over the judgment as if the judgment was the judgment of that court. With this development, the new court could order for a stay of execution of the judgment for such time and upon such terms as it may deem fit.

    A similar scenario applies to the enforcement of inter-state judgments where, for instance, a judgment delivered in Kano State could be taken to Lagos State for execution if the judgment is registered in Lagos State and entered by the Registrar in a book called: “the Nigerian Register of Judgments” as if the judgment was delivered in Lagos State.

    After paying the prescribed fees, as assessed by the court, the judgment creditor is required to obtain a certificate of judgment from the original court in Kano State, issued by the Registrar of the court.

    The certificate of judgment is only issued to the judgment creditor after he files an affidavit in the original court in Kano State, showing that the amount is due and unpaid, and that what the court ordered to be done remains undone or that the person restrained from doing an act disobeyed the order.

    The problem associated with this is that, beside the delay which the process will cause, there is also the danger that the new court could stay the execution proceedings pending appeal or set aside the judgment, if the judgment debtor is able to prove fraud.

    When it comes to the execution of foreign judgments, countries also have some room to manoeuvre. Under the Foreign Judgment (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, it is provided that the registration of a judgment in Nigeria may be set aside, if the court of the country or the original court had no jurisdiction in the circumstances of the case or the enforcement of the judgment would be contrary to public policy in Nigeria.

    There is also the legal provision of limitation period for enforcement of judgments. In Nigeria, a foreign judgement may be registered within 12 months from the date of the judgment or any longer period allowed by the registering High Court in the country.

    Also, a judgment creditor may enforce a judgment in a superior court within six years after the date of the judgment including the last date of a judgment that was given on appeal. However, the limitation laws of each state in the country also stipulate the limitation period for the enforcement of judgments.

    For instance, in Rivers State, the limitation law prohibits the filing of a case upon any judgment or on the interest on any judgment debt after the expiration of 10 years from the date on which the judgment becomes enforceable or the interest becomes due as the case may be.

    This is different from what obtains in Lagos State and other states. It may be shorter or longer.

    What should be done?

    Makolo, Falola and Abdul suggested ways the court system could be reformed to allow for seamless judgment execution.

    Makolo reasoned that judgment enforcement ought to ordinarily be seamless, but for the deliberate mischief embedded in the Sheriff’s and Civil Processes Act, which creates escape routes for wrongdoers to revel in perpetuating injustice by frustrating the execution of a judgment duly rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

    “To my mind, once a judgment is contested and delivered by the court, enforcement agencies should automatically enforce the judgment forthwith. There is no need for the Sheriff’s and Civil Processes Act, which creates escape routes for wrong doers.

    “We must build pillars of peace within our society by building our justice delivery institutions on integrity, honesty and justice always rather than building nepotistic and fraudulent instruments into the judgement enforcement process.

    “Once a judgment is contested and delivered by the Court on merit, that court should enforce the judgment immediately without subjective proceedings again, wherein the successful party would be made to go through further expenses and delays. These processes are unfair, untidy and unjust to the successful party,” Makolo said.

    Falola, who also identified some constraints that work against prompt judgment enforcement, suggested that it “is important for the judgment creditor to be very much alive to his/her responsibility any time he/she intends to carry out the execution of the judgment given in his/her favour, otherwise the judgment may be rendered useless by a dubious and recalcitrant judgment debtor.”

    According to Abdul, it was time for the Judiciary to create its own agency to be entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining of law and order in the court, securing the court premises, protecting the judges and other court officials, and ensuring the enforcement of court decisions.

    “The practice today is that the enforcement of judgments is very problematic, because when a judgment creditor seeks to enforce his/her judgment he/she is required to first, obtain the support of the police.

    “Judgment creditors are at the mercy of the police that are relied on to protect and support the court’s bailiffs and sheriffs when they go out to enforce judgments. In some cases, the police could frustrate judgment enforcement where the judgment debtor is the police (as an institution), a police officer or a major government department.

    “With the current state of affairs, it is practically impossible to enforce judgments against the police or the army or any other security agency in the country,” Abdul added.

    He also suggested a review of the Sheriff and Civil Procedure Law, which empowers the Attorney-General to grant consent in execution of judgment against government agencies, adding that “the major problem is with this very obnoxious law called the Sheriff and Civil Procedure Act that provides that before a court can order the release of funds belonging to government or its agencies, the consent of the Attorney-General must first be obtained.”

  • Shaping Africa’s legal framework for energy transition

    Shaping Africa’s legal framework for energy transition

    How will laws, policies and international regulations shape energy transition in Africa as the transformation of the global energy sector from fossil fuels to zero-carbon gathers steam? Oil and gas law experts met in Abuja for two days at a conference organised by the Lawyers in Energy Network to discuss the future of the African energy market amid a shift towards renewable energy. Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE reports.

    Africa’s energy transition prospects look bright, but the regulatory framework must be retooled to serve the continent’s energy needs, experts have said.

    With global focus shifting from fossil fuels, such as petroleum and natural gas, to zero-carbon energy in a bid to attain sustainable development and climate resilience, it is believed a blessed Africa can thrive in the transition.

    According to Mr. Huub Stokman, CEO of OVH Energy Marketing, Africa is projected to have the fastest urban growth rate in the world, and by 2050, 56 per cent of its population will be urban.

    The last two decades, he added, have seen the number of people living in cities increase by 90 per cent, a trend expected to continue over the next two decades

    “Growing urban populations mean rapid growth in energy demand for industrial production, cooling and mobility,” he said.

    And with 770 million Africans having no access to energy – the highest number in the world ‑ Skokman believes the continent’s energy opportunities remain huge.

    He was one of the experts who spoke at a two-day conference in Abuja. It was organised by a non-governmental organisation, the Lawyers in Energy Network.

    Its theme was: African future markets in energy transition: laws, policies and international regulations. 

    Highlighting Africa’s renewable energy potential, Skotman said the continent’s vast natural resources meant that low-cost energy technologies have plenty of potentials.

    Africa, he said, has the richest solar resources in the world but has less than one per cent of the global installed capacity.

    He pointed out that Africa is home to many of the minerals essential to the energy industry. For instance, he said DR Congo accounts for about 75 per cent of global cobalt production.

    “The continent is also home to platinum (cars and fuel cells), chromium (wind turbines) and manganese (batteries) which are key minerals powering the global energy transitions,” he said.

    Calling for a clear plan for moving away from fossil fuels, he noted that although carbon dioxide emissions in Africa represented about four per cent of total global emissions, the continent was on the climate change frontline.

    “African ecosystems have been disrupted and the future impact is expected to be substantial.

    “All African countries signed up to the Paris Agreement (an international treaty on climate change, adopted in 2015).

    “A clear plan to switch from fossil fuels to greener energy sources is critical to contributing to the global effort to mitigate greenhouse emissions and ultimately protect the continent,” he said.

    Skotman believes that Africa’s energy potential, especially renewable energy, is enormous, yet only a fraction of it is being employed.

    “The institutional, regulatory, legal, tariff structure and frameworks for renewable energy are largely nonexistent or weakly implemented,” he noted.

     

    Omorogbe: plan for renewable energy

    A professor of energy law and former Edo State Attorney-General, Yinka Omorogbe (SAN), blamed Nigeria’s energy poverty on a lack of planning.

    She emphasised the need for planning, especially for renewable energy.

    Omorogbe said: “Energy poverty is as a result of either poor energy planning, or energy planning that does not put the common man as the main beneficiary of the plan or policy.

    “That is why the grids of Africa are in the capitals and not the rural areas. Countries with 100 per cent access planned for it. It did not just happen.

    “Planning in this time and season must incorporate renewable energy. There is no alternative.”

    Omorogbe, who is the President of the Nigerian Association of Energy Economics, called for business models that grow modern energy access while the country aims for carbon neutrality or even reduced national emissions.

    She was of the view that an energy transition does not mean the end of the petroleum industry.

    “It means finding alternatives that align with protecting the planet,” she said.

    Omorogbe added: “Now is the time to come up with an innovative business solution to stimulate energy access. Different circumstances and terrains will require different models.

    “The right legal and regulatory environment is key and this must be driven by a policy that includes all – no one left behind.”

    Head, Directorate of Legal Services at the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board, Naboth Onyesoh, said energy transition was real as “there is no dispute about the science of climate change”.

    Noting that African contribution to global warming is too negligible, he said the countries “must not be stampeded to abandon oil and gas”.

    “The big polluters should carry the can,” he said, emphasising that energy availability and local content were crucial to Africa’s security and economic survival.

    On the way forward, he said: “Regulatory framework must be applied to enable businesses.

    “Regulations must be certain, transparent, uniform and predictable. A clear source of funding backed by law is required.

    “Africa must collaborate on finance and infrastructure to optimise its energy resource.”

     

    ‘Harness untapped energy’

    A law teacher, Dr Pereowei Subai, noted that if Africa is to transit immediately, it will mean less dependence on fossil fuels to fund its major economies.

    However, he said there is a need for investment in innovative technologies for carbon capture, storage and use in an environmentally-friendly manner.

    “There is a need for Africa to harness its potential for renewable energy, align its renewable targets to energy and climate plans, integrate its regional market structures, develop innovative power sector transformation plans and develop policy frameworks for just and inclusive transitions,” Subai said.

    He called for investment in transmission and distribution infrastructure and urged governments to make their policy and regulatory frameworks more conducive to private sector investment.

     

    The place of AfCFTA

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Adedolapo Akinrele, said the continent can capitalise on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement to improve its energy transition.

    He noted that an undoubted beneficiary of AfCFTA will be the energy sector, including traditional oil and gas operators in the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors.

    “Oil and gas and mineral resources account for more than 75 per cent of the continent’s exports and with the high growth potential in oil and gas, it will have a role to play in the short and mid-term,” he said.

    According to Akinrele, by consolidating small, poor, and fragmented African countries into one strong market, the agreement can change the dynamics in terms of access to funding, human capital, and technology for the green energy sector.

    Whether AfCFTA will strengthen the continent’s energy transition, he said, will depend on the ability to utilise the existing regional economic communities, monetary unions and free trade areas as building blocks for it.

    Guaranteeing the security of investments, transparent adjudication of disputes without delays and secure and truly frictionless infrastructure on land and sea for the delivery of renewables will determine AfCFTA’s role, he added.

    Head of Research and Development/Projects at Starzs Investments Company Limited, Sofieye Uzor, said as the world races to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030, Africa can use regional trade integration to strengthen the energy sector and existing power pools and improve utilisation of the region’s abundant renewable energy resources to meet the vast demand.

    He thinks AfCFTA’s role in stimulating the integration of Africa’s energy systems could create a single liberalised regional energy market.

    “An integrated energy market can act as a catalyst to strengthen financial systems to support energy development projects, fund new technologies to reduce production costs, increase capacity, and maximise energy generation, which in turn can improve access to diverse energy products.

    “Once investment increases, more capital becomes available for governments to allocate more,” Uzor said.

     

    Wanted: legal, regulatory overhaul

    An energy law expert and partner at George Etomi & Partners, Ivie Ehanmo, identified what must be done to close the energy access and transition gap.

    They include deploying all available resources strategically, such as natural gas; legal and regulatory overhaul for investment promotion, shifting domestic public finance away from fossil fuel subsidies towards clean energy access, ambitious policies and programmes and institutional capacity building.

    Others, she said, are skills development, reskilling and employment creation in the context of a ‘just transition’, research and gender mainstreaming, grid connection, expansion and integration programmes and decentralised solutions (renewable energy) with tailored consumer finance business models.

    Ehanmo added that a solid policy framework needs to be established by policymakers that can influence the cost-competitiveness of renewable energy.

    Removing subsidies for fossil fuels, she said, will allow for tariff increases closer to the true cost of power with the aim being to achieve grid parity in the long run.

    “There is, therefore, a need for well-designed long-term legislation and enabling framework for the deployment of renewable energy technologies to guarantee investment security,” Ehanmo said.

     

    Challenges ahead

    Managing Partner at Detail Commercial Solicitors, Dolapo Kukoyi, decried poor regulatory framework and institutional arrangements for alternative energy (including renewables) in Africa.

    He was of the view that the situation has stifled the ease of doing business and investments in alternative energy generation in Africa and must be improved.

     

    Resolving disputes

    A professor of law, Gbolahan Elias (SAN), said effective dispute resolution will be critical in the energy transition process.

    He said: “The question is not whether the world needs to move on to green energy (this is beyond question). The question is more centred around when? How? Uniform or in phases?

    “Africa desperately argues that it cannot transition at the same pace as the developed world.

    “There is no doubt that a lot of investment and financing will be required to make the transition.

    “However, investors and DFIs (development finance institutions) seek assurances that disputes arising from their investment can be resolved quickly and returns guaranteed.

    “For the energy sector to thrive, disputes must be settled as quickly as possible and in the best interest of all parties involved.

    “This makes ADR (alternative dispute resolution) imperative.”

     

    ‘Change won’t happen overnight’ 

    Justice O. Derefaka, Technical Adviser to Nigeria’s Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, believes the world’s need for oil and gas for heat, food and shelter “will not change overnight”.

    African governments and leaders, he said, should continue to invest in oil and gas while working to help speed up progress to a lower-carbon future.

    “Multiple pathways to the energy transition should and must exist to ensure that no country is left behind in the process of achieving net-zero by 2050/2060.

    “Fueling economic growth and powering our lives, hydrocarbons will continue to provide the foundation of world energy supply for at least the rest of this century.

    “As a continent, we need to recognise the need to develop hydrocarbon resources in environmentally and socially responsible ways.

    “The ability to manage CO2 is, therefore, a priority for the future development and growth of Africa’s oil and gas industry. We should aim to have a reputation for responsible CO2 management.

    “As Africans, our commitment to developing a robust alternative energy business should complement our efforts to meet evolving societal needs.

    “The climate change challenge cannot be met by a singular nation or by the energy industry alone.

    “A public-private partnership and a strong policy framework are needed,” Derefaka said.

     

  • ‘How law enforcement can safeguard electoral process’

    ‘How law enforcement can safeguard electoral process’

    Legal and other experts have brainstormed on law enforcement’s role in safeguarding the electoral process. It was at a three-day workshop, organised by the Attorney General Alliance Africa (AGA-Africa) in collaboration with the Police. ROBERT EGBE reports

    How can Nigeria safeguard its electoral process? Law enforcement and other experts provided some practical insights on the matter at a three-day workshop held from March 29 to March 31 at Abuja and Lagos.

    The event, with the theme: The Role of Law Enforcement in Safeguarding the Integrity of the Electoral Process, was organised by the Attorney General Alliance Africa (AGA-Africa) in collaboration with the Police.

    According to the organisers, AGA-Africa is a non-partisan organisation that, among others, seeks to foster relationships with Law Enforcement Agencies in Africa and the United States to combat transnational crimes.

    Speakers at the event from countries including Nigeria, the United States and Ghana were Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Usman Alkali Baba; Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Training, Danmallam Mohammed; Commissioner of Police, Training, Abduyari Lafia; Board Member, AGA-Africa Markus Green; and Deputy Secretary of State, Colorado Secretary of State’s Office Denver, Colorado, Christopher Beall.

    Others included Director, National Elections Security Task Force, Ghanaian Police, Florence Owusu; General Counsel, Attorney-General Alliance, David Blake; Executive Director, Steady Hope Support Initiative, Ehiz Odigie-Okpataku; Senior Partner, PUNUKA Attorneys & Solicitors, Anthony Idigbe, SAN; and Executive Director, Electoral College Nigeria, Kunle Lawal.

    Elections: Case for ideas exchange in law enforcement

    In his opening remarks, Idigbe, who is AGA-Africa Country Coordinator for Nigeria, noted that compromised or disputed election processes have led to protests and security lapses in Nigeria thus creating a need to exchange ideas on how best to prepare and deploy law enforcement tools to check similar incidents in the future.

    He expressed hope that the workshop would enhance competencies in managing issues that may arise and safeguard the electoral process as well as protect life and property during the upcoming elections in 2023.

    Idigbe said: “Mechanisms for promoting and maintaining integrity in every aspect of the electoral process play a critical role in every society.

    “Effective law enforcement in response to electoral violations not only helps to maintain the integrity of the electoral process but also deters future problems.

    “We all know of some of the recent happenings in Nigeria a few months ago, that led to some earlier collaborations that we had on managing civil disturbances.

    “There is a need for sharing and exchanging knowledge to enhance competencies in managing issues that may arise regarding the electoral process as well as protecting lives and property during the 2023 elections.”

    IGP Baba was represented by Commissioner of Police (CP) Abdul Yari Lafia, who noted, among others, that for democracy to survive, there have to be credible and transparent elections.

    He highlighted the Police’s mandate to uphold the electoral law and ensure that the electorate participate in the electioneering process without harassment.

    Lafia added: “To ensure credible elections, you must prepare those who are supposed to supervise the election and enforce some of these laws, and that is why we deemed it fit to have this training for our officers and men. That’s what we are trying to achieve.”

    What the Police need

    What do the police and other law enforcement agencies need to secure elections? Some of the participants, especially officers, shared practical ideas.

    It was observed that Nigeria is grossly under policed and equipped with a personnel strength of well below the United Nations recommended minimum of one police officer for every 450 citizens.

    They noted that this means that the police are often spread too thinly across polling areas in the country during elections making it difficult for them to enforce the law and protect the integrity of the election process.

    They also observed that during elections, policemen are, usually out of operational necessity, concentrated in cities. The few policemen in rural areas could then be easily outnumbered by persons with hostile intentions, forcing a policeman at a polling area to compromise for his safety.

    They urged the authorities to address the issue.

    It was also noted that a critical part of law enforcement welfare – feeding on election day – is often overlooked. They stated that policemen leave their homes before daylight on election day duty, usually on an empty stomach. But they are unable to buy food because businesses, including restaurants, are, by law, prevented from operating until after the elections, meaning the police would either have to go hungry all day or be forced to accept food from interested parties during elections, which could be misinterpreted by the public as a compromise.

    They urged the authorities to provide dry rations for law enforcement agencies on election day.

    Another speaker, Kunle Lawal, proposed some schemes to help the police excel.

    They included specialised training on electoral values, electoral laws and crisis management, ensuring non-partisanship and non-bias within the Police, adequate provision of welfare and massive recruitment of Police officers.

    Lawal further canvassed job creation to take youths’ minds off electoral offences as well as collaboration between the police and the citizenry.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    What does AGA Africa do?

    Established in 2016, AGA-Africa seeks to establish and foster robust relationships with justice and law enforcement agencies and officials throughout Africa to support the rule of law and combat transnational criminal activity.

    It collaborates with African Ministries of Justice, Attorneys-General, Solicitors-General, and Public Prosecution agencies to share knowledge and experience in the fight against crimes like human trafficking, corruption, money laundering, cyber-crime and other cross border criminal activity.

    AGA-Africa programmes focus on such initiatives as reinforcing court systems with greater efficiency and transparency; running training programs that promote a consistent application of Rule of Law disciplines, such as oral advocacy; and promoting collaboration among attorneys general from partner countries.

    It is currently working with justice departments, and law enforcement bodies such as the Office of the Attorney-General, Departments of Public Prosecution, the Police, academic bodies and other organisations in nine African countries – Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Seychelles, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia.

     

  • Businessman seeks injunction against AMCON’s ex-parte orders

    Businessman seeks injunction against AMCON’s ex-parte orders

    A businessman, Mr. Tunde Folawiyo, has filed an ex-parte motion before a Federal High Court in Lagos seeking an order of stay of execution of ex-parte orders made against him in satisfaction of a judgment-debt.

    Justice Lewis Allagoa made orders against Mr. Folawiyo in a suit filed by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) over Folawiyo’s alleged unpaid debt of N727.9 million in relation to a company directorship at Compagnie Generale de Logistique.

    Folawiyo, in a suit numbered FHC/L/CS/799/2020, is seeking an order of stay of execution of the ex-parte orders made against him on March 24, 2022 pending the hearing and determination of his Motion on Notice seeking to set aside the orders.

    He is praying for the following relief: An order restraining the AMCON either by itself, agents, privies, servants or through any person(s) from taking any steps howsoever to enforce the ex-parte orders made against the applicant by the court on March 24, 2022 pending the hearing and determination of the applicant’s Motion on Notice seeking to set aside the ex-parte orders.

    The ex-parte orders were predicated on the judgment of Justice Ibrahim Buba in Suit No: FHC/L/CS/207/2017, AMCON v Compagnie Generale De Logistique & others in 2017 (“Previous Suit”) in favour of AMCON in the sum of N522,464,978.66 against the defendants.

    The applicant said he was not a party to the previous suit and was not served with the judgment on it.

    AMCON claimed the applicant is a director in Compagnie Generale De Logistique, which took a loan from Spring Bank and which judgment was principally obtained in the previous suit.

    Contrary to the representations made by the plaintiff, the applicant said he was not a Director of Compagnie Generale De Logistique at the time of the previous suit and was not in any way connected to the loan transaction with Spring Bank.

    The applicant said he is, therefore, not a “debtor” within the contemplation of Section of 61 of the AMCON Act as to warrant the interim forfeiture of his assets and freezing of his bank accounts on account of the judgment obtained in the 2017 suit.

    He argued that a combined reading of Sections 49(2),50(2) and 61 of the AMCON Act would reveal that only current directors of a company fall within the definition of a “debtor” as to warrant the freezing of their assets or accounts.

    Mr Folawiyo told the court that AMCON failed to disclose and suppress material facts about the status of the applicant in Compagnie Generale De Logistique, the principal judgment-debtor in the previous suit.

    He added: “The ex-parte orders were obtained malafide against the applicant and constitute an abuse of court process.

    “The applicant has filed a Motion on Notice praying for the setting aside of the said ex-parte orders.

    “The applicant’s pending set aside motion raises serious issues on why the ex-parte orders ought not to have been granted.

    “It is in the interest of justice to grant this application pending the hearing and determination of the applicant’s motion to set aside the ex-parte orders.”

    Mr. Folawiyo argued that the originating summons filed by AMCON is incompetent as it had expired at the time of the grant of the ex-parte orders.

    He expressed concern about the impact the orders would have on his employees as well as the reputation of the three-generational family business he has worked hard to maintain and grow over the years.

    Tunde Folawiyo is the son and heir to the late Nigerian Businessman and philanthropist, Wahab Iyanda Folawiyo.

    Alhaji Wahab, whose father, Tijani, was a wealthy local merchant in the colonial era, was known for building orphanages and funding several local sports championships.

    In expanding his late father’s legacy, Mr Tunde Folawiyo attended the London School of Economics to broaden his business perspective and investment choices in addition to being a barrister of the Court of England and Wales as well as Nigeria.

    In 2016, Folawiyo and his firm announced its first production of crude oil from the Aje Field, the first producing field outside of the Niger Delta area in Nigeria.

    Reports say the multi-million dollar investment was aimed at reducing oil production pressure from the Niger Delta region.

    He is currently the Chairman of Yinka Folawiyo Group, established by his father in 1957.

     

  • SERAP inaugurates volunteer lawyers’ network

    SERAP inaugurates volunteer lawyers’ network

    Twenty lawyers have been inaugurated into the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) Volunteer Lawyers’ Network.

    The initiative was inaugurated by SERAP in Lagos.

    The group’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, said the lawyers had committed themselves as members of the network from across the country’s geo-political zones.

    Oluwadare said the members committed themselves to partnering with SERAP in its cause of enforcing socio-economic rights and in making public officers accountable to constitutional provisions.

    He said the Network would work as lawyers to file public interest litigations if the need arises and formulate legal issues using their skills and expertise for good governance.

    According to him, the initiative is targeted at expanding the scope of SERAP’s work, and to get the important part of citizens, members of the Bar, the lawyers to also join and advocate for good governance.

    He noted that lack of adherence to legal frameworks is one of the country’s problems, even as he stressed that corruption is hindering socio-economic rights.

    “It is not that we don’t have laws, lawyers as part of the citizenry are needed to amplify them,”Oluwadare  said.

    Expressing optimism, he underscored the roles of strategic litigations, citizens engagement, research and advocacy in its works.

    He said: “Our plan is to enforce those rights in our laws and draw attention to these rights. SERAP Volunteer Lawyers’ Network is a team of legal practitioners to drive the aims of strategic litigations, to have that spread across Nigeria, and must be non-partisans.

    “In your respective jurisdiction, we may have to call on you. We aim to interact with you on your legal knowledge and skills to drive the cause or issues.”

    SERAP’s Legal Adviser, Kehinde Oyewunmi, advised the lawyers to advance the group’s cause and not for personal interest but for public good.

    “We expect  members to have it in mind that they are non-partisan in their work and they would monitor activities around human rights”, he said.

  • Lawyer seeks youth representation in governance

    Lawyer seeks youth representation in governance

    Deputy Vice Chancellor, Academic, Research, Innovation and Strategic Partnerships (ARISP) of Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, Prof. Damilola  Olawuyi (SAN), has urged stakeholders in public and private sectors to address barriers that hinder active youth engagement and representation in governance, leadership, and entrepreneurship development.

    Olawuiyi, who is also co-chairman of the Legal Education Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), stated this at the 1st Young Lawyers’ Forum organised by the NBA Ikere Branch in his honour.

    The keynote lecture was delivered by Dr. Doyin Awoyale.

    The event themed:The Search for Sustainable Economic Development in Nigeria and the Role of the Young Lawyer, was to recognise Olawuyi’s trailblasing achievements as the youngest Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and his contributions to youth empowerment, mentoring and legal education in Nigeria and beyond.

    Moderated by a mix of current and past leaders of the NBA, the event featured insightful presentations from senior lawyers, including the Chairman on the occasion and Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda SAN; Executive Secretary, Ekiti State Mortgage Board, Oludayo Olorunfemi; the Chairman of the NBA Ikere Branch, Kikelomo Owolabi, and other panel discussants including Ayokunle Ogunleye, Michael Olaniyan, Adefolaju Ayobioloja, Dr. Ifeoluwa Olubiyi and a host of others.

    Olawuyi said: “Nigeria’s greatest asset is its vibrant young population. If adequately mentored and supported, Nigeria’s young population can unlock an era of technology-driven economic rebirth, social transformation, and sustainable development in key sectors.

    “We must, therefore, join hands to urgently address barriers that hinder active youth engagement and participation in governance, leadership, and entrepreneurship development at all levels’’.

    While highlighting the important roles of young lawyers in building vibrant and healthy communities, Olawuyi urged young lawyers to leverage their legal training to become society’s voice and conscience.

    He also encouraged all NBA branches to identify priority areas of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and design tailored programmes and seed funding that can accelerate the SDGs, especially in areas of youth entrepreneurship and empowerment, technology access, poverty eradication, gender justice and green growth amongst others.

    Mr Fapohunda  commended Olawuyi,  for his enormous and tireless contributions to the development of law and the society.

    He also emphasised the important roles that economic empowerment of young lawyers can play in enhancing the development of Ekiti and the country.

     

    He urged the NBA to continue to prioritize the professional development and welfare of its young members.

     

  • ‘Why appointment of judges must be insulated’

    ‘Why appointment of judges must be insulated’

    Abiodun Olatunji (SAN) is a partner at Abdullahi Ibrahim & Co. In this interview with ADEBISI ONANUGA, he examines the judgment of the Federal High Court that ordered the removal of Governor David Umahi of Ebonyi State from office and the implication of cross-carpeting for elected public office holders.

    A Federal High Court, Abuja ordered Governor David Umahi and 16 lawmakers of Ebonyi State to vacate their offices after defecting from Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) to All Progressives Congress(APC). What lesson(s) can, especially politicians, learn from this judgment?

    The judgment of the Federal High Court delivered in the action instituted by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against Engineer David Nweze Umahi (Governor of Ebonyi State), his deputy, Dr. Eric Kelechi Igwe, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is currently being tested at the Court of Appeal and whatever the decision of the Court of Appeal would be, a further appeal to the Supreme Court for a final determination of the issues raised in the action will certainly be made by any of the parties to the action.  The same goes for the judgment of the Federal High Court in a separate action filed by the Peoples Democratic Party against 16 members of the Ebonyi State House of Assembly who defected alongside the Governor and his Deputy from the PDP to the APC. So, it is imperative that we wait to see how the pendulum will swing at the appellate courts. Suffice to say at this point that the decision of the Federal High Court was like a bolt from the blues.

    Is it right to remove an elected office holder on grounds of defection?

    Nobody saw it coming. This is so because no governor has been removed from office by judicial order on the ground of defection since the return of democratic rule in 1999. This was so notwithstanding the fact that there had been several defections by governors from the party that sponsored their election to the opposition party. The fact that no governor had been sanctioned by way of removal from office for defecting from the party on the platform of which he got to power to another party had emboldened many governors to defect or threaten defection at the slightest provocation or even where there was absolutely no reason to justify such defection or threat of defection. When the Governor of Ebonyi defected to the APC what reason did he give? He said he was defecting to the ruling APC because the PDP which sponsored his election has not guaranteed that its presidential ticket for the 2023 elections will be given to a candidate from the Southeast.  That has nothing to do with good governance, it has nothing to do with the provision of dividends of democracy to the good people of Ebonyi State, it has nothing to do with the implementation of the manifesto of the PDP which the people of Ebony bought into and on the basis of which they voted massively for the PDP and its candidates. It simply shows that the governor defected in pursuit of his personal ambition. He had since gone ahead to inform Mr. President of his desire to succeed him in 2023.  The 16 members of the State House of Assembly who defected with him to the APC did not do so because they were convinced that the APC manifesto is superior to that of the PDP or has more to offer the people of Ebony or because they believe that the APC will hand over its presidential ticket for the 2023 general elections to a candidate of an Igbo extraction, they defected with the governor because they knew from experience that if any of them should take a principled stand against the position of the Chief Executive of the State, the member or members is/are not only dead politically, but dead and buried financially.  So, for them, it was a question of political and financial survival.

    So what lesson is there for politicians?

    Talking about lessons for politicians, I should say that politicians are poor students of history.  They are only concerned about the spoils of the office.  It matters not to them what negative effect or outcome a particular decision will have as long as such decision meets the political exigency of the time. What is paramount for the average politician is that his interest is protected.  Once that assurance is secured, what comes next is in the womb of time. It is all about interest, sadly, it is not the interest of the people but the parochial and self-centered interest of the political class.  Should the Supreme Court, when eventually the matter is brought before it, goes ahead to confirm the decision of the Federal High Court, our path to constitutional democracy, strong political institutions and virile party system would have been cleared of all the mines that these defections constitute on it.  If on the other hand, the Law Lords decide otherwise, a constitutional amendment to make it illegal for an elected governor to abandon the party that sponsored his election will become imperative if we are to continue on the path of constitutional democracy that we have chosen.

    What is the implication of the judgment for other governors and lawmakers who defected from the parties they were elected to another?

    As it stands today and until the appellate courts decide otherwise, the implication of the judgment for other governors and lawmakers who abandoned the party that sponsored their elections is that they are in the same position as Dave Umahi of Ebonyi State and the 16 lawmakers, that means they are no longer entitled to retain their offices as governors and legislators.  Having said that, it is imperative that we wait and see how the appellate courts settle all the legal issues that this judgment has brought up.  This is very important, given that the question of tenure and removal from office of an elected Executive Governor is a constitutional matter. A governor can only be removed from office in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. Section 180 and 188 of the Constitution of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended) respectively provides for the tenure and removal from office of the governor of a state. Anything done contrary to the provisions of the constitution is null, void and of no effect at all.  So let’s wait.

    Due to the contradictory judgments by the courts in Abakaliki, stakeholders have called for the removal of governors from the appointment of judges. Do you share this view?

    The conflicting judgments from the Federal High Court and the High Court of Ebonyi State on the same subject matter is the unfortunate result of the very powerful influential roles played by the Executive arm of government in the appointment of Judges and the general administration of justice in this country. The courts at the state level are heavily dependent on the Executive for their day-to-day survival.  This is not healthy for the smooth administration of justice. The judiciary has to be financially independent.  The appointment of Judges has to be totally insulated from any form of political influence. A judge who owes his appointment to no political godfather and who knows that his promotion, his salary, his entitlement, his retirement benefits and even the day-to-day running of his courts are not dependent on the ego, the whims and caprices of any political actor, will not hesitate to declare the law as it is or give judgment against any government where the facts and the law come to no other conclusion.

    Prior to the judgment, a High Court in Abakaliki dismissed a similar suit challenging the defection of the governor and his deputy. What is your take on the conflicting judgments from the same court of equal jurisdiction?

    It is rather sad. I blame both the political class and some pliable members of the bench.  The political class in their desperation to cling on to power at all cost will do anything to achieve their purpose including forum chopping for judicial determination of their political cases. Unfortunately, there exists in the judiciary, especially on the bench, individuals who are open to compromise and who either in awe of the powers of the executive or in gratification of their financial or economic desires are ever prepared to do the biddings of the politicians.  You must not lose sight of the fact that the High Court of Ebonyi State which sat in Abakaliki and dismissed a similar suit could possibly not have reached a different decision given the prevailing circumstance and the crushing weight of political influence that Governors exercise over the administration of justice in their respective states. That is one of the reasons why financial autonomy in the real sense of it, for the judiciary is a sine qua non for the administration of justice that commands the respect and trust of the people.  For as long as governors continue to play prominent roles in the appointment of Judges and the funding of the judiciary, citizens will continue to express doubt in the quality of judgments such as the one that emanated from Abakaliki and Umuahia in Ebonyi and Abia states recently.

    The governor has petitioned against Justice Ekwo before the National Judicial Council (NJC). Is the NJC the appropriate place to challenge the judgment or the Court of Appeal?

    The National Judicial Council does not sit as an appellate court on decisions of  Federal High Court established under Section 249 or the High Court of the Federal Capital territory established under Section 255 or the High Court of each state established under Section 270 or any other superior court of record established under the constitution. Appeals from the decision of the Federal High Court, High Court of the FCT, High Court of a State or its equivalent under the constitution lies to the Court of Appeal and not to the NJC. The powers of the National Judicial Council as enumerated under paragraph 21 of Part 1 of the third schedule to the constitution do not include taking appeals from decisions of the Federal High Court or any other court established under the constitution.  The appropriate court for the governor to challenge the judgment of the Federal High Court is the Court of Appeal which he has done anyways.  I believe Governor Dave Umahi’s petition to the NJC is without merit to the extent that it is based on perceived biases fueled only by frivolous allegations of underhand dealings or what he called “hatchet job”. The petition is nothing but an irritant meant to distract and possibly shake the Judge and others of his like.

    Was it right for President Muhammadu Buhari to have written the House of Representatives seeking the amendment of Section 84(12) of the Electoral Amendment Act 2022. Do you share his view?

    The President can propose an amendment to any law at any time by sending an Executive Bill to the National Assembly for consideration and possible approval by way of enactment.  Section 84[12] of the Electoral Act 2022 which the President wants the National Assembly to amend has now been struck down by an order of the Federal High Court which ruled same as unconstitutional. The decision of the Federal High Court has attracted varied commentaries, while some respected legal minds have condemned the decisions as being gravely erroneous, in view of existing judicial interpretations of the relevant provisions of the constitution, the Attorney-General of the Federation who is the Chief Law Officer of the Federation has hailed the decision as sound and represent the extant constitutional order, my take on it all is that there is an order of the court which struck down Section 84[12] of the Electoral Act 2022, until that order is set aside by a superior court of competent jurisdiction, Section 84[12] as at today is not part of the Electoral Act 2022. As to the policy rationale behind the lawmaker’s insertion of the provision of Section 84[12] now deleted by an order of the Federal High Court], I see it more of the political actors playing their games. It is all about survival.

    Now that President Buhari has signed the Electoral Act 2022 into law, what next?

    By assenting to the bill, the President has assured Nigerians that his administration is committed to his promise to bequeath an electoral system that guarantees that citizens’ votes will count, an electoral system that will produce a government that is truly representative of the people.  The President and the National Assembly have done their part. Section 50(2)of the Electoral Act, 2022 is now the law of the land.  The ball is now in INEC’s court to come out with a procedure of voting and transmission of results that guarantees transparency and integrity of the exercise. INEC has assured Nigerians that it has the capacity to transmit election results electronically. It now has the statutory backing to do so. We all look forward to a transparent election come next year.

    What are the innovations in the Electoral Act 2022?

    There are several innovative provisions in the Act which are designed to deepen our democratic experiment. The provisions relating to electoral offences, nomination of candidates by parties, limitation on election expenses and others are very interesting. One of the major challenges with our democratic experiment is internal democracy. As the parties geared for the 2023 contests, their compliance with the provision of the Act relating to nomination of candidates will be keenly watched.  Any failure on the part of any of the parties to strictly comply with the provisions of the Act will only result in such party not having its candidate included in the election for the particular position. Another challenge with our democratic experiment is the fact that electoral contest is quite expensive and it appears that with the limit placed on election expenses by candidates, as long as any candidate for any particular office is within the limit and he has the money, he can buy his way to such office.  While the Act makes provision for the maximum amount allowed, it has simply by implication closed the door to patriotic individuals with good ideas and programmes on how to develop this country but who unfortunately do not have the humongous amount allowed as such candidate will be no match for the moneybags who can afford to reach the maximum limit allow by the Act.

    The House of Representatives has rejected a bill seeking to provide special seats for women at the National Assembly, affirmative action for women in political party administration and inclusion of at least 10 per cent affirmative action in favour of women in ministerial appointment. What is your take on this?

    The initial votes of the House of Representatives to reject the bills on indigeneship, citizenship and 35 per cent affirmative action for women was rather a sad one. It is, however, gratifying that the House had since rescinded its earlier decision and has now voted to recommend the bills for consideration as part of the proposed amendments to the constitution.  Nigerian women deserve better treatment.  They are the ones that attend party meetings, campaigns and vote during elections but unfortunately, they have the least representation in government and party administration.  The bill on citizenship seek to amend Section 26 of the constitution to provide for citizenship by registration for foreign spouses of Nigerian women while the bill on affirmative action seeks to amend Section 223 of the Constitution to ensure that at least 35 per cent of political party offices are constitutionally guaranteed for Nigerian women.  These two bills and the bill on indigeneship which seeks to allow women to become indigene of their husbands’ states after five years of marriage should immediately be passed by both Chambers of the National Assembly and concurred to by the states.  Citizenship for the foreign spouses of our women, indigenship of the states of their husbands and 35 per cent seats in the administration of political parties should be guaranteed as fundamental rights for our women.  They deserve no less.

     

  • Military officer absent at land dispute mediation

    Military officer absent at land dispute mediation

    The Lagos State Taskforce on Land Grabbers has begun mediation on a land dispute involving Adewole Adeleye, Jide Sotuminu and the Commanding Officer, 174 Battalion Nigeria Army, Odogunyan, Ikorodu, Lt Colonel Seyi Sholotan.

    The hearing followed a petition by Adeleye and Sotuminu alleging a plot to take over their land by Sholotan in collaboration with one Ahmed Olorunimbe.

    The land is located on 2-3 Bashorun Street, off Haastrup Street, Alagomeji, Yaba, Lagos.

    Sotuminu assisted Adeleye to purchase the land and had been in charge of it until Sholotan laid claim to it and mounted a gate on the land.

    The Taskforce, in a letter by its coordinator, Owolabi Arole, had invited Sholotan to a hearing at the meeting room of the Lagos State Ministry of Justice Annex on March 23, 2022, but he was absent.

    The hearing was adjourned until April 13 to enable the military officer to attend as “he is not above the law”.

    The panel said the new invitation would be sent to Sholotan through the 81 Division of the Nigerian Army at Kofo Abayomi, Victoria Island.

    The petitioners accused Sholotan of encroaching on the land on more than three occasions with armed military personnel.

    The officer is claiming that the land belongs to him and that he bought it from Olorunimbe.

    Adeleye, who said he is the registered owner of the land, had in March 2021 reported Olorunimbe to the Force CID Alagbon for encroachment.

    Olorunnimbe was also absent at the taskforce hearing.

    Sholotan had told The Nation that he bought the land from Olorunimbe in 2017 before he was deployed to the Northeast on a military operation.

    He said when he returned to Lagos, he visited the land, and Olorunimbe told him someone else was claiming it.

    He said the case had been investigated by the military police and that he was found to have validly bought the land.

    Sholotan admitted that he went there to remove the gate himself and to fix his own.

    He said he did not assault anybody in the process.

    “The land is mine. I paid for it,” the military officer said.