Islamic cleric Sheikh Gumi has a proposal to check Nigeria’s booming banditry industry: amnesty, rehabilitation and jobs for repentant criminals, possibly as farm or forest guards. The alternative, he warns, is more indiscriminate killings and abductions. But not everyone agrees that forgiveness is what the situation needs, writes ROBERT EGBE.

 

President Muhammadu Buhari on June 10, this year ordered security forces and law enforcement agencies to deal ruthlessly with bandits terrorising the Northwest.

This order came on the heels of an earlier, controversial one that those carrying AK 47 rifles should be shot on sight.

Kidnapping for ransom, cattle rustling, and terrorist-like violence—all characterised as banditry—have increased dramatically in the region in recent years.

“We are going to treat them in the language they understand. We have given the police and the military the power to be ruthless. You watch it; in a few weeks’ time there will be difference,” he said in an interview with Arise TV.

But for Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, the President’s command is not enough.

Unemployment, easy access to guns and seemingly underfunded and inadequately equipped security forces have combined to make banditry a booming industry in some parts of northern Nigeria.

Between December 2020 and March 2021, for instance, 769 students were taken in at least five school kidnappings in northern Nigeria.

The number is thought to have risen close to or over 1000 since then, following more abductions and attacks.

Gumi, who has been acting as a go-between for the bandits and families of their victims, sees the situation differently.

He believes the root of the problem is mostly pure economics and tribalism. According to him, the bandits are victims of government neglect. They are involved in a tribal war with their neighbours, and must be granted amnesty if they must quit their criminal acts.

Speaking last Wednesday via the same medium as the President, Gumi said the bandits were ready to surrender if government would provide a means of livelihood for them.

“The Niger Delta example, I think we can take example from that. When they were vandalising pipelines, they were given the pipelines to guard.

“Now, the herdsmen are controlling a big chunk of land whereby they are preventing farmers from farming. As the Niger Delta is important to the economy, these herdsmen now are becoming important to the Nigerian economy.

“They can be our guards, they can guard the forests. They have qualities that we can tap from,” Gumi said.

The scholar said the amnesty must be genuine, otherwise it would fail.

He dismissed the amnesty granted to bandits by Katsina State Governor Bello Masari, describing it as “political amnesty” without any package.

“When you grant a political amnesty, I mean amnesty in front of the press and the media but in the real sense there was no amnesty.

“Amnesty comes with a package. The package is you rehabilitate these criminals, you provide for them social amenities. You entice then to leave the forests by providing them with skills. But there is no project put forward.

Read Also: Gumi demands apology over DSS questioning

 

‘’But now, there is relative peace in Katsina because the government now appears to be implementing real amnesty. We can understand why Zamfara cannot implement amnesty for bandits. It is because of financial constraints. We can take examples from the Niger Delta where government even gave militants the job of protecting oil pipelines in the region.

‘’The same can be done for bandits who have promised to guard the forests to enable farmers return to their farms and release hundreds of captives held by them. The bandits are ready to sit down with the government to discuss issues but I don’t know why government is not forthcoming on this.”

Who are the bandits?

According to Gumi, the situation is complex and some of the bandits are from opposing tribes in the North.

He said: “We over-simplify a very complex issue and this breeds confusion. Nigeria is fighting a tribal war and government is supposed to be neutral but it is not. This is what I saw in Zamfara; this is what I saw in Niger.”

There are, however, fears that many of the bandits are not even Nigerians.

Many are thought to be Nigeriens or Malians who have taken advantage of Nigeria’s porous borders. Cattle rustling has long been a problem among the Fulani, and over the past decade, rustlers have begun engaging in more lucrative kidnappings for ransom as well, particularly, targeting highways. Many Fulani accuse some Hausa in the Northwest of dispossessing them of their cattle and building on grazing routes, driving Fulani youth into destitution and criminality.

Large-scale kidnappings of dozens or even hundreds of people have also become easier to stage as the flow of weapons from North Africa and the Sahel has increased since Libya’s civil war in 2011.

In 2019, the Zamfara State Government estimated there were more than 10,000 bandits in 40 camps across the state.

Between 2011 and 2019, up to 3,600 people were kidnapped in Zamfara alone, while violence has killed 8,000 people and displaced 200,000, according to the ICG.

Gangs have also stepped up attacks on workers in the informal gold mining sector. And, in recent months, they have targeted schools for boys and girls. Four mass kidnappings of students have taken place since December.

Amnesty for militants

Hoping to quell a violent insurgency in the Niger Delta, the Federal Government implemented an unconditional amnesty in 2009, offering a clean slate to militants whose demands for resource control, environmental justice and sustainable socioeconomic development had resulted in massive regional disruption.

The militants’ sabotage, oil siphoning rackets and kidnappings hit the economy hard.

Then-President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua introduced the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) or the Niger Delta Amnesty Programme (NDAP), as a disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration scheme in answer to the increasing violence throughout the prior decade.

The amnesty was originally designed to last only five years, but it remains in effect.

Approximately 30,000 people in the Niger Delta enrolled in the PAP as ex-militants. However, only 2,700 weapons were surrendered. Some militants, fearing the programme and its potential repercussions, abstained from participating.

The PAP was modelled after the United Nation’s Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) interventionist programme. It was adjudged a success for restoring oil production to pre-amnesty level and reducing the scale of insecurity in the region.

Read Also: Between PMB and Sheik Gumi

 

Between 2010 and 2014, the implementation of the Amnesty programme gulped N243 billion ($1.68 billion), making this home-grown DDR programme one of the world’s most expensive. In 2017, the amnesty budget almost tripled, with an additional N30 billion ($98.47 million) being released and an extra N5 billion reportedly added at a later stage. Until 2016 the annual budget was N20 billion.

Amnesty for bandits?

While amnesty for militants received widespread support, Gumi’s proposal on behalf of bandits has not.

A former Deputy Director-General, Nigerian Law School, Prof Ernest Ojukwu (SAN), pooh-poohed the idea.

Ojukwu said: “No, there cannot be an amnesty for bandits. Gumi calls them bandits not agitators of any cause. Bandits are simply robbers or outlaws belonging to a gang or gangs and typically operating in an isolated or lawless area.

“The solution to banditry is not amnesty. The state should demonstrate that the state owns its land and not bandits. Lawlessness means a breakdown of governance, a failed state. The Nigerian Government should demonstrate that Nigeria has not failed. If she does, there will be no banditry.

“To compare banditry to the Niger Delta amnesty case is the highest form of dishonesty and to succumb to that blackmail will be a confirmation that Nigeria is a failed state because amnesty to bandits will not solve banditry.”

Prof Bukola Akinola of the Department of Private and Property Law, Redeemer’s University, Osun State, also kicked against amnesty for bandits.

Akinola said: “It is not something worth considering. The rationale for the Niger Delta militants is different; the entire nation is using their resources, they are the goose that lays the golden eggs.

“So, their agitation was totally different from what Gumi is canvassing. Gumi himself told us that some Boko Haram elements are among the bandits. So, if they are, are we giving amnesty to terrorists? Is that the practice globally? If the political will is there, Gumi knows where they are, we have the air force, the military.”

The don reasoned that environment degradation, among others, suffered by the Niger Deltans pushed them into militancy, but there are no such conditions for the bandits.

“What is the meaning of amnesty itself? In this case you can’t compare bandits to Niger Delta militants. The Federal Government is still cleaning up oil spills till now. The people of the Niger Delta are still battling with it; their water, their land.

“What is wrong in the Northcentral and Northwest that the bandits are going on a rampage there? We must be able to factor into consideration, what their agitation is.”

Akinola also argued that even if the identity of bandits is stretched to include herders, it would still not be justified to grant them amnesty.

“If he says they are herdsmen, can’t cattle rearing be a private business? If you create grazing routes for cows, what about pigs? Will you allow pigs to have grazing routes from southern to northern Nigeria? Will the northern states allow it?

‘Constitution preaches fairness and equity’

The don noted that the Constitution in Chapter 2 “preaches fairness and equity across every sphere of the country. A criminal is a criminal; they should be arrested and tried lawfully.

“There is no justification for giving amnesty to bandits. Don’t forget that these bandits have been said to be non-Nigerians. So, are we going to give amnesty to non-Nigerians coming to destroy Nigeria? If we grant them amnesty, where do we settle them?

“Is that the practice globally, that you give amnesty to illegal migrants? If you and I sneak into the United States and we start killing people, will they grant us amnesty? Will Canada or Italy give us amnesty?

“The President once told us that these people are from the aftermath of the war in Libya. Should Nigeria pamper such persons? Are they within ECOWAS? Is there any ECOWAS treaty that requires us to allow them into the country? None.

“So, the idea of amnesty for bandits is not legal. We have to deploy the military to do their job and the political will must be there to arrest the situation.”

Amnesty law

If the Federal Government heeds Gumi’s advice, one of the ways it could execute an amnesty for bandits is to pass an amnesty law to free them from liability from their past.

An amnesty law is any legislative, constitutional or executive arrangement that retroactively exempts a select group of people, usually military leaders and government leaders, from criminal liability for the crimes that they committed.

More specifically, in the ‘age of accountability’, amnesty laws have come to be considered as granting impunity for the violation of human rights, including institutional measures that preclude the prosecution for such crimes and reprieve those crimes already convicted, avoiding any form of accountability.

Why amnesty law

Why would the government need an amnesty law for banditry? To potentially stave off (particularly criminal) litigation against pardoned persons.

Many countries have been plagued by revolutions, coups, and civil war. After such turmoil, the leaders of the outgoing regime that want, or are forced, to restore democracy in their country are confronted with possible litigation regarding the “counterinsurgency” actions taken during their reign.

Read Also: The Sheikh Gumi terrorism paradox

 

It is not uncommon for people to make allegations of human rights abuse and crimes against humanity. To overcome the hazard of facing prosecution, many countries have absolved those involved of their alleged crimes.

However, victims, their families and human rights organisations-e.g., Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Humanitarian Law Project-have opposed such laws through demonstrations and litigation; they argue that an amnesty law violates local constitutional law and international law by upholding impunity.

Also, providing amnesty for “international crimes”-which include crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide-is increasingly considered to be prohibited by international law.

International, regional and national courts have increasingly overturned general amnesties and recent peace agreements have largely avoided granting amnesty for serious crimes.

With that in mind, the International Criminal Court was established to ensure that perpetrators do not evade command responsibility for their crimes should the local government fail to prosecute.

Countries that have granted amnesty to rights violators

In recognition of the need to make amnesties lawful, many countries in Africa have backed it up with amnesty laws, with varying degrees of success.

Afghanistan

The Afghan government adopted the Action Plan for Peace, Justice, and Reconciliation in December 2005, and hotly debated the plan’s focus on criminal accountability. Later, Parliament adopted a bill that provided a nearly blanket amnesty for all those involved in the Afghan conflict in previous decades.

The drafting of the amnesty bill was pioneered by some of the former commanders known to have committed human rights abuses and who felt threatened by the sudden emphasis on accountability.

Although this bill was never formally recognised as law, it has had major political significance, serving as a clear signal of some human rights violators’ continuing power.

Algeria

A decree by the President in 2006 makes prosecution impossible for human rights abuses, and even muzzle open debate by criminalising public discussion about the nation’s decade-long conflict.

Benin Republic

In exchange for a full pardon for any crimes he may have committed, President Mathieu Kérékou who served as President of Benin Republic from 1972, peacefully ceded power in early 1991.

By March 1991, the Beninese electorate had ratified a new constitution and democratically elected Soglo president.

Free of criminal liability, Kérékou again contested for and won election in 1996 and served till 2006.

Brazil

In 1979, Brazil’s military dictatorship-which suppressed young political activists and trade unionists-passed an amnesty law.

This law allowed exiled activists to return, but was also used to shield human rights violators from prosecution.

Perpetrators of human rights abuses during Brazil’s 1964 to 1985 military dictatorship have yet to face criminal justice.

In 2010, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights declared Brazil’s amnesty law illegal because of the provisions that “prevent the investigation and punishment of serious human rights violations” and ordered the nation to begin exploring the gross human rights violations of the past.

On April 9, 2014, a bill (#237/2013) that would modify this law to exclude human rights violations committed by state agents was approved by the Brazilian senate.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

In November 2005 an amnesty law was adopted regarding offences committed between August 1996 and June 2003.

President Joseph Kabila put the law into effect in May 2009. This law forgives combatants for war-related violence in the eastern provinces of North and South Kivu committed between June 2003 and May 2009 – excluding genocide, war crimes international crimes against humanity.

Although of limited temporal and geographic scope, by granting amnesty for many crimes perpetrated by rebel groups, Congolese armed forces, militias, and police, there is a risk that the law may perpetuate the DRC’s culture of impunity.

El Salvador

Following the twelve-year-long civil war an amnesty law was passed in 1993. The law modified a previous amnesty law which was passed in 1992.

In 2016, however, the amnesty law was overturned by the El Salvador Supreme Court.

Will amnesty shield bandits from civil or criminal liability?

 

 

By Eric Ikhilae, Abuja

The Deeper Christian Life Ministry (DCLM) has faulted the demolition of its church building at No: 2/4 Biney Street, Yaba, Lagos by alleged agents of the Lagos State Government and the Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority (LAMATA).

The church, in a statement by its lawyer, Nojim Tairu, claimed that the demolition, which was carried out on June 5, this year, a day to the church’s founder’s 80th birthday, was done without notice to the church’s management.

“No opportunity was afforded nor Notice given to the church and her members including several students resident in the premises to remove their belongings which became war booties in the hand of the large throng ‘of hoodlums and area boys employed by Lagos State and LAMATA in the dastardly act

“Apart from the church land itself located at 2/4 Biney Street, Yaba, Lagos and the subsisting Lagos State Government approved building foundation thereon valued at about N50million for a proposed two-storey ultra- modem church/headquarters complex, the moveable properties of the church, including items belonging to her members, particularly the resident youth brethren, who are mostly students of Yaba College of Technology, which were carted away by the hoodlums during the demolition, was estimated about N100million.

“This is apart from the existing structure on the land, which the valuation report by the church’s Estate Surveyor & Vaiuer, Olusola Oladapo assessed at N120million (although the amount was inadvertently stated at N140million in the church’s solicitor’s earlier correspondence to the state.

“The demolition was clearly wrong and illegal by any standard. However, more worrisome was the fact that the state and LAMATA carried out their above ungodly and unlawful act despite the earlier letter by the church’s solicitors, Nojim Tairu & Co, calling for communication from the state on its quest to use the church’s property. The church’s entreaties fell on deaf ears as there was no reply from the state till date.

LAMATA could not be immediately reached to comment on the latest development, but it had earlier denied the church’s claim in its earlier letter referred to by the lawyer.

LAMATA’s Head of Corporate Communications, Kolawole Ojelabi, told an online platform, Premium Times that “the issues raised in the petition by the Deeper Christian Life Ministry are untrue.”

Ojelabi said the state government had last October, embarked on a Redline Rail Project from Agbado to Marina to improve public transport.

He added: “All property owners and tenants in affected communities of Yaba and the rest were duly informed and compensated.”

Ojelabi said contrary to the claim in the petition, the government had communicated the planned demolition to the church.

He also blamed the church for not ‘cooperating’ with LAMATA to be compensated. He accused the church of rejecting the N19 million compensation offered by the government.

“We (LAMATA) offered the church over N19 million as compensation for the unoccupied property. You see, when the government acquires a property for public use, it only pays for the depreciated value of the property, not the land itself,” he said.

He added: “They (the church officials) have been to our office twice. I have been to theirs twice.

“We engaged the local government, market women, religious bodies and school authorities; members of the Community Development Association were invited. The meeting was held last year.

“We engaged a consultant to enumerate everybody, property owners and tenants. All the names and properties involved were published in the media.

“All landlords were invited as part of a groundbreaking ceremony, where they were all compensated by the Lagos State Governor.

“They claimed that they were not aware of the announcement for property owners to submit ownership documents. That is not true. The affected properties were all published in the media.

“The church was not willing to cooperate with LAMATA. But this is a public interest project that everyone should key into. Their title documents have been revoked by the Lagos State Government.

“We have given them compensation value. They are contesting the amount of the compensation. It’s strange for a church to misinform the public about the project.”

By John Austin Unachukwu

The cream of the legal profession were in Enugu last week to honour the late Dr Joseph Nnabuchi Nwodo.

The event held at the Enugu State Bench of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Bar Centre, Enugu.

Also there were family, and friends gathered to extol the virtues of the departed.

In her tribute, Chief Judge of Enugu State, Justice N. P. Emehelu stated: “Dr born in Nsukka on January 19,1944. Joe Nwodo, as he was fondly called, was born into the prominent political family of Chief  Igwe and Mrs J. U.Nwodo, a former Minister of Works, Eastern Nigeria.

Justice Emehelu recalled that Joe was the first male child and second child of the family, a family filled with several prominent and accomplished personalities, including politicians, medical practitioners and lawyers.

“This  sparking of a literary prowess East of the Niger started his primary education at St. Josephs School Nsukka in 1955 and  later moved to St.Patricks School, Ogbete, Enugu where he completed his primary school education.

“For his secondary school education, he enrolled at the College of the Immaculate Conception (C.I.C) Enugu and  completed his O’ Level  with flying colours in November 1963.

“At the CIC he held several positions of responsibility, including School Perfect 1959-1962, President Debating Society, 1961-1962, and Secretary, Debating Society, 1962-1963, among other positions in the sporting field.

“Before proceeding abroad for tertiary education, he held the position of president United States Information Discussion Group, Enugu, Eastern Nigeria and was also the anchor of a weekly Television Debater Eastern Nigeria Television Service, Enugu, Eastern  Nigeria.

“For his tertiary education, he  travelled to the United Kingdom at 19 in September 1963.There, he completed his ‘A’ Levels in Economics, History and British Constitution in a record three  months at Woodnewtoon Tutorial Establisment, Hanwell Castle Banbury Oxfordshire in 1963.

“His principal at Oxford, Mr Browne said Nwodo was a very hardworking and diligent student who was interested in world problems that he could be relied on to treat people wisely and firm.

Justice Emehelu recalled that at Oxfordshire,  Nwodo held several positions: School Prefect, President Castle Club and member first 11 (Football).

Justice N. P. Emehelu said:“From there, he moved to London. His father had wanted him to study medicine, but he opted for Law. ‘’

She enrolled at the London School of Economics in September 1964 and left after 10 years bagging a Bachelor of law in 1967, a master of law in 1968 and a doctorate in law in 1974.

“He returned home in 1974 where he remained until recently he died.

“While in school, Nwodo, in addition to his schedule of studies engaged in paid employment while studying in United Kingdom. He worked at the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), worked at a Tax office in south East London and worked as a teacher at the south East London Technical College. He was a man of humility who rarely displayed his privileged background.

“Nwodo  established his legal practice where he specialised in commercial law practice.

“He held retainership for several corporations foreign and Nigeria Banks including: Deutsche Bank AG, Nigerian industrial Development Bank, Fichtel and Sachs AG, Wayss and Freytag AG (Sister company to Julius Berger)  AG machinery and plant limited, Man AG, The Salzgitter group – covering Salzgitter West Africa, Noell West Africa limited and Nigeria Commercial and Industrial Enterprises (NCIE), Wurzburg Corporation.”

The CJ continued: “He added more German company retainer ships, including Micheal Thomas and Partner KG, and Ferrostaal AG.

He said Nwodo promoted the development of Nigeria’s electrical infrastructure, encouraging  more domestic and foreign direct investment into the lucrative power sector. He obtained several licences for power generation, developing numerous power purchase Agreements (PPA) during his consultation.

He was well versed in the modalities for implementing Nigeria’s electricity laws as shown on the various legal opinions and consultations he handled.

“In the mineral sector, he stamped his feet and was involved with the search for solution to the problems of the coal production in Nigeria.

“Foremost of his consultation was an investment of $10 billion in Nigeria coal sector by a consortium he packaged and headed by Consol Energy INC, an American mining company.”

She said Nwodo made his mark in commercial law trade and practices. His most challenging yet rewarding legal brief and career was his appointment as the legal adviser to the German-Austria Consortium of 17 companies that developed and built the Aladja Steel Plant in Sub-Saharan Africa and was built for $1.8 billion.

Nwodo had a flourishing legal practice. His clients, she said, were happy with his commitment to duty.

Justice Emehelu continued: “As I hinted earlier, this iroko of a man manifested interest in politics and leadership early in life during his secondary and tertiary school years. His emergence as the political gigantophicus of Nsukka and of Enugu state did take time to materialise.

“In 1991, he became the guberna-torial candidate of the defunct National Republican Convention (N.R.C) in the Enugu State Governorship election.

Following the turbulence that followed the preparations for the election, he and his main challenger were disqualified by the military rulers.”

“Nwodo drafted his younger brother,  Dr. Okwesilieze Nwodo to take his place and run for the election. His brother won and sworn in as the first Governor of Enugu State (1991-1993).

“He moved to the national scene and became a presidental aspirant under the same party (NRC) but was declared runner-up to the eventual winner of the ticket, Alhaji Bashiru Tofa.

“It was Albert Schwaitzer who postulated that there is no higher religion than human services and to work for the common good is the greatest creed.

“Nwodo served as a member of the Board of Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company (W.R.P.C), a subsidiary of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) where he helped facilitate several laws guiding the petroleum industry and contributed towards resolving various complex legal issues.’’

Justice Emehelu said it  was while at the Southeast London Technical College that Nowdo met his bride, Tina. They married and had the famously referred first class squad of six, because all their six children graduated with first class honours in their various disciplines.

They are: Mrs. Nkiruka Genervieve Wakeley-Jones, a lawyer and Management consultant.; Mr. Chukwuemeka Agunechibe Nwodo, a software engineer and banker; Mr. Joseph Nnabuchi Nwodo (Jnr.), a lawyer at Dr. J. N. Nwodo & Co.; Mrs. Chinenye Nwodo Zakariyau; a lawyer, Miss. Obiageli Lorraine Nwodo; a chartered accountant (Fellow) and Dr. Odinaka Nwodo, a surgeon.

A good family man and lover of his people.  His legacy is summarized by his ability to create lasting memories across any social circle because of his love for people, particularly the poor.

Concluding Reflections Our departed legal icon ran the race of life most successfully and has hit the rope in a very commendable manner.

Up until his death, Dr. Joe Nwodo, popularly called “Ochendo Umu-Ogbenye” (the protector of the poor), was a humanist per excellence.  He was intent on developing a robust agricultural programme for the people when death struck.

He was a man who believed so much in transparent conduct and accountability, both in public and private life.  He exhibited these traits very well as a Legal Practitioner, Public Servant and a Politician.

He served meritoriously and was not the man to be carried away by the trappings of public office.  He kept no social boundaries.  He had an enjoyed immense goodwill from his colleagues, learned friends and other associates.

It is clearly impossible to cover the field of his life and times using this allotted space.  He had so many great qualities and recorded so many successes as a Legal Practitioner, Public Servant and as a Politician.

As I conclude this speech, I am moved by the tested words of William Shakespeare in his literary work fitted “As you like it” that: “All the world is a stage, and all the men and women merely players; they have their exists and their entrances; and one man in his time plays many parts, his acts being seven ages…”

Dr. Joseph Nnabuchi Nwodo has played his part and without doubt has taken a glorious bow.  He has left lasting and indelible footprints on the sands of time in the legal profession.  He was a man contented with life.  These and other legacies he left behind should comfort the immediate and extended families of this Iroko of a man, whom we pay our condolence.

It is therefore our sincere hope that the love, life and times he shared with you all will forever remain green in your hearts.

The siblings: Chief Mrs. Grace Uche Obayi – former Commissioner for Education, old Anambra State. Dr. Emmanuel Okwesilieze Nwodo – the first Executive Governor of Enugu State. Chief John Nnia Nwodo – Immediate past President General Ohaneze Ndigbo, former Minister of Civil Aviation and former Minister of Information & Culture. Dr. Mrs.

Catherine Eyiuche Owelle. Prof. Mrs. Valerie Azinge, (SAN) Who are knit together and had kept the Nwodo family a reference point as a good family.

In his own tribute, Mr. Joe Nwodo ( Jr) said:”The grieving process has not been easy and I am still struggling to come to terms with your departure to heaven. I wake up everyday with my heart feeling heavy but with some lightness to it because I know you’re in a much better place and also because of the great things you achieved, the sacrifices you made, your love for people particularly the poor and needy. You taught us that real wealth was never measured in terms of money but instead on the person you were, your values, beliefs and ability to make an impact on the lives of others.

“The tributes pouring in are testament to this.  The opportunities you created for many who had no hope but today hold some of the most important public offices across all arms of government are also testament to this.  That indeed is true wealth, not the cars or houses we accumulate but the lives we touch and the opportunities we create for the less privileged in society. Growing up, you were my role model as a child. Your passion for the law was so infectious. You were also a visionary.  You ability to visualize problems and resolve them pragmatically with a sense of purpose was also something I admired.

Daddy as we mourn your death we also celebrate your life. You did your best.  You fought numerous battles in life. You fought and fought until you could fight no more.

“ You were a fighter. You are the true definition of a Spartan. On average you were admitted to hospital eight times a year. On each occasion you were told you may not come out alive but you kept fighting and fighting. Even in your sick bed, you were more concerned about others than yourself.  Those final moments with you in the hospital were very special moments even though very hard to watch.

Something we will never forget as a family.  The doctors only gave you two hours to live but you waited until the whole family arrived and even when we arrived you decided to leave us when we were all distracted. In your usual way not wanting to bother anyone.

“When death occurs and we lose a loved one especially one who was very ill we are sometimes selfish in the sense that we are more focused on ourselves and our grief rather than what the other person went through and the sense of relief they must be feeling now in heaven. As we work through our grief we must remind ourselves that this is really not a sad moment but a celebration. No more hospitals Daddy, no more pain. You can rest now. You can also now walk freely in heaven without a wheel chair.  We are so proud of you Daddy. You never held any political office but you are a household name in Nigeria because of what you stood for and the sacrifices you made so others could excel.

“ You were the President Nigeria never had.  If you were President, I have no doubt that you would have created a fairer society that worked for everyone.  If you were President, I have no doubt that you would have addressed issues of national unity with sincerity and a sense of purpose. You had great plans for the country.  You gave a lot to your country. Unfortunately the country did not reciprocate but yet you never held any grudges. Instead still wanting to give more even in your sick bed. We miss your presence everyday. Adaeze misses you as well. She is glad she got to meet you before your departure to heaven.

You prayed for her and gave her your blessings. You also gave her a wonderful Nickname – “Woman Leader”. I will let her know when she is much older. I’ll also tell her your story, so she knows she is the true grand-daughter of a King. Goodbye Daddy and continue to Rest in Peace. Till we meet again.

A Tribute to A Great Soul – Dr Joe Nwodo, LLB, LLM, PhD (Lond), BL.

In his tribute, Prof. Epiphany Azinge (SAN) stated that ‘Great souls die…our minds, formed and informed by their radiance, fall away.’

–       Maya Angelou, When Great Trees Fall, (1990) Joe [our great leader], as he was fondly called in the family was my brother-in-law and a great man; intellectually, professionally and in his private family life. He was also called Agadagbachiliuzo (Agada) and Ochendo Umuogbenye, titles he acquired by Ukehe customs and traditions.

“Agada was a legal luminary, regent of Ukehe and heir apparent of the renowned Nwodo political dynasty. My early conversations with Agada revealed his profound intellect. But as is often said ‘the measure of intelligence is the ability to change’ and Agada worked passionately hard to change his immediate community, state and country through his political machinery and legendary agricultural policies. No doubt, his actions which has propelled his mentees into high-level political positions across Nigeria has been catalyst for positive change in the country.

“While discharging his responsibilities, Agada mesmerized everyone with his oratory skills. His speeches were well-crafted, compelling and poetic with the aim of conveying an optimistic worldview with practical strategies towards achieving same. Agada was simply poetry in motion, a strength that endeared him to his people who would often

chant in response‘Joe Nwodo, Joe Nwodo, ka’anyi ga eso, ona  eje je ka ona na na Joe Nwodo ka’anyi na eso’. His relationship with his people strongly revealed his ability to dine with kings without losing the common touch, this distinctive feature was fundamental in deepening our relationship as brothers.

 

“Agada was my wife’s brother, but beyond this role, he was her third parent. I was opportune to observe their relationship around the 1980’s at the London School of Economics (LSE), when my wife (Val) and I were students, and Agada, a stellar doctoral graduate of the same University. Agada supported my wife, guided her and gave her the

much-needed protection at all times. Agada inspired my wife with his work ethics in law and exposed her to his law practice in many jurisdictions in Europe. Agada also encouraged my wife and I to not just excel but to thrive. He always celebrated our achievements.

 

“ When Val became the Secretary of the 2014 National Conference, Agada

was always one call away to give her the much-needed guidance. When

she became a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Agada blessed and

celebrated her accomplishments. Agada extended the same support he

showed my wife to my entire family, selflessly. I remember when we

dealt with a family emergency; Agada not just empathised with us, he

also promised his unwavering presence. Despite his busy schedule,

Agada lived up to his word. He remained physically and emotionally

present with words of encouragement, updates and prayers. Like a

brother, Agada was my family’s rock through difficult days.

 

“In writing this tribute, I often wondered what I could say about

Agada that would do him justice? That would connect you to the

greatness my family and I experienced. Agada had many virtues, too

many to extol, yet he remained humble. This says a lot about a man who

achieved so much. I would tell you that Agada was an icon of words, an

orator and an intellectual giant of many paths. Agada was a lawyer per

excellence and the political juggernaut of our times. Indeed, Agada

was the President Nigeria never had, the President Nigeria will

forever miss. He lived for the downtrodden and closed class divides, a

characteristic that earned him the title Ochendo Umuogbenye.

Agada left us too soon, but as a great soul, he left us with an

indelible guide of how to model our thoughts with kindness and how to

live our lives with love. I do not doubt that his legacy will live on,

in us” Azinge stated

The Chairman Nigeria Bar Association ( NBA) Enugu branch Mr. Jude

Ezegwui stated in his tribute that: “We came not only to mourn Dr. Joe

Nwodo but to celebrate him. Pain tugged our hearts as we tried to

absorb the news of demise of this great man late Joseph Nnabuchi

Nwodo, PhD London, who slept in the Lord on 10th day of March, 2021.

 

“How could Dr. Joe Nwodo die? He stood like a colossus over the legal

and political terrene of Nigeria. My mind keeps going back to his

numerous outings where he bamboozled the people with his stature and

eloquence. How he toiled in de the field of law and politics; made

invaluable and indelible mark yet to beaten. He has achieved so much

in such a short time. He had a long winning streak of phenomenal

successes as one of the most iconic leaders for our time. Before he

succumbed to his last fight, he has survived many fights.

“ He was exceptional-a sagely intellectual, a dogged activist and

development practitioner, a prodigious administrator and patriotic

nation builder. Above all he was a friend to many people. So how could

he die? I have no answer to the question. I could only be rescued or

consoled by the clear provisions of book of Ecclesiastes chapter 3

verses 1-2 “to everything there is a season, and a time to every

purpose under heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die;..”

Few lines hymns 798 of scared songs and solo did say “they fade away

like the stars of the morning, losing their lights in the glorious sun

thus would be pas from this earth and its toiling only remembered by

what we have done”

 

We fondly remember  Dr. Joe Nwodo today. One of the most remarkable

traits of Dr. Nwodo is his ability to build genuine bonds of

friendship with so many people from so many people from many different

backgrounds all over the world in the course of his political and

legal life. Every engagement with leave you with an indelible

impression of his passion for excellence.

 

“His interest is first to you as a human being before any other

interest. He was stellar and he had obsession for birthing ideas,

nurturing them to success continuously.

 

He was one of those that fought for democracy in this country putting

in all he has to actualize it. There is no way you will not be

infected by dr. Joe Nwodo’s good nature and friendship once you are

contact with him oozing out great familiarity as if you have known him

for so long. He was equally infectiously witty and at the same time

deeply caring about people. He was highly place yet he condescended to

men of low estate which earned him the name “Ochendo Umu Ogbenye”.

He was irreverent of power structure when the occasion demanded to

court the power that be and mobilize stakeholders toward achieving

developmental objective and protection of his people, human right and

rights of his numerous clients. He was an achiever per excellence!

“Dr. Joe Nwodo, lying lifeless here, was a great asset to the legal

profession especially lawyers in Enugu state. We pride ourselves about

him at all place and at all levels.

His understanding of the law, wealth of experience and his

undisputable achievement in commercial law practice has generally

contributed immeasurably to the success and promotion of joint

ventures between foreign companies and Nigeria entities. He shall be

greatly missed.

He was mainly an international lawyer specializing in international

commercial practice with wide cliental spread. Most of his clients are

multinationals. Dr. Joe Nwodo had his PhD in international law and has

turned down severally when he was beckoned to sit as a judge in the

international court of justice. He was always in UK, Germany, USA  and

all over the world including village doing good. He has trained and

produced many senior lawyers, politicians, ministers, Professors, SANs

and Judges” Ezegwui stated

 

Mr. Onyekach Okafor,  Chairman of NBA Oji River branch stated that:

“The Demise Of  Dr Joseph Nnabuchi Nwodo reminds us of th quotation

made  by Leonardo Da Vinci Who said: “As A Well Spent Day bring happy

sleep, so also a  life well lived brings happy death”

 

“Dr Joe Nwodo lived a good life and impacted positively on others

when he was alive.

We submit that it is due to his absolute belief  in the equality of

all men in the eye of the natural law that emboldened him to become a

human right advocate as well as the  voice for the voiceless or

Ochendo Umuogbenye (Protector of the poor).

President Eisenhower, The 34th President Of USA Said:

“America is great because it is good. And America cease to be great

when it Cease to be good”.

“As a matter of fact, considering the testimony of people about late

Dr. Joseph Nwodo, he was indeed a good man when he was alive.

It is this great personality that we have all gathered here today to

pay our last respect.

 

“Those Of us In Nigerian Bar Association Oji-River Branch Use This

Medium To Advise The Children To Endeavour To Emulate Their Father So

As To Live The Good Life Their Father Lived.

 

My Lord, The Chief Judge Of Enugu State, I crave your indulgence to

submit that by virtue of the profile of our learned friend late Dr.

Joe Nwodo,  he was indeed a great man when he was alive.

 

On this note my Lord,  I  hereby adopt my tribute in honor of our

departed learned colleague Dr. Joseph Nnabuchi Nwodo” Okafor stated

 

—

 

 

By Adebisi Onanuga and Robert Egbe

The Lagos State Ministry of Justice has provided free legal consultations to residents of Epe and Ikorodu local government areas as part of its continuous statewide legal clinic exercise.

The event, which held at both communities’ local government secretariats  featured a joint legal clinic team which comprised all legal service-oriented directorates and agencies in the ministry.

They included the Office of the Public Defender (OPD), Citizens’ Mediation Centre (CMC), Public Advice Centre (PAC), Community Service Unit, Office of the Administrator-General & Public Trustee (AG&PT), Directorate of Citizens Rights (DCR) and the Domestic and Sexual Violence Response Team (DSVRT).

At the Epe clinic, Director, Citizens’ Rights, Mrs Oluwatoyin Odusanya, said the joint legal clinic was an initiative of the Ministry of Justice to have a one-stop shop for free legal consultation and other related matters for Lagos residents.

Odusanya noted that the free legal clinic would hold in all five divisions of the state—Ikorodu, Badagry, Ikeja, Lagos, Island and Epe—to provide easy access to legal consultations and representation for the indigent and vulnerable members of society.

Director, Office of the Public Defender, Dr. Jide Martins, who also participated in Epe, explained that the clinic was organised for people at the grassroots of every community to bring access to justice closer to them, and sensitise the residents on their fundamental human rights.

“This initiative by the Ministry is in compliance with the THEMES agenda of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu which aims to promote and achieve security and good governance among the residents of Lagos State,” Martins added.

The Alara of Ilara land, Oba Olufolarin Ogunsanwo, urged Epe residents to take advantage of the services as this would ensure social development and peaceful co-existence of people within the community.

Attesting to the efforts of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN), at ensuring speedy dispensation of justice, he pledged that his office would continue to promote, among Epe residents, the option of resolving conflicts through mediation, using alternative dispute resolution platforms provided by the state government.

Expressing his appreciation to the state government on behalf of the community, the General Secretary, Oloja in Council, the Odofin of Epe Land, High Chief Olatunde Oluwo, praised the Ministry of Justice for bringing the Legal Clinic to their door steps, adding that it afforded them the opportunity of accessing within Epe, qualitative legal consultations free.

At Ikorodu, Assistant Director, Community Service, Mr Kuforiji Olawale explained the functions of Community Service, saying the department was charged with dealing with offenders found to have committed minor offences such as non-usage of pedestrian bridges.

He said punishments like sweeping of market places and ensuring general environmental sanitation among others were in place to serve as a deterrent, hence, there was no need for prolonged litigation in such instances.

The Director, Public Advice Centre, Mr Tunji Dawodu, further assured participants that the clinic was free and targetted at providing easy access to legal consultations and representation for the indigent and vulnerable.

Appreciating the government for the initiative, the Olubeshe of Ibeshe, Oba Richard Ogunsanya; and the Adegboruwa of Igbogbo; Oba Abdul Semiu Kasali, urged the public to embrace alternative dispute resolution, noting that not all matters should be taken to court.

They also used the medium to appeal that the state government should consider the role of traditional rulers in mediation, as this would go a long way in strengthening the institution.

Responding on behalf of the participants, Hon. Babayemisi Kehinde Fakumoju, expressed gratitude to the state for bringing the legal clinic to Ikorodu.

He said the state had done well in the areas of alternative disputes resolution in aspects such as landlord/tenant disagreement, marital issues, and employers/employees related disputes among others through the Citizen Mediation Centre (CMC) divisional office in Ikorodu, hence, decongesting the court of unnecessary litigations.

In this article, Ahuraka Yusuf Isah identifies some salient recommendations contained in the 17-page paper recently submitted by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Ibrahim Muhammad, to the Senate Committee on Constitution Review.

On June 3, 2021, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad submitted some proposals to the National Assembly ostensibly to alter some provisions of the Constitution concerning the Judiciary arm of government.

The proposals are contained in the paper the CJN presented as recommendations of the Judiciary during the national public hearing conducted by the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, held at the Africa Hall of the International Conference Centre (ICC), Abuja.

The 17-page paper, entitled: ‘’Input by the Judiciary to the proposed alteration to the 1999 Constitution (as amended),’’ the CJN submitted to the senate committee,  contained 45 constitutional amendment proposals on the reform of the Judiciary.

Some of the amendments the CJN proposed have elicited reactions from many stakeholders, especially on his reasons behind such radical departure apparently from the norm, and against positions of the government that be. Let us take cursory look at some of the proposals once more.

• Pegging Supreme Court’s bench at 16

Section 230 states that the Supreme Court of Nigeria shall consist of the Chief Justice of Nigeria; and such number of Justices of the Supreme Court, not exceeding twenty-one.

The CJN has suggested that Section 230 of the Constitution should be altered by ‘’(a) substituting paragraph (a) of the existing subsection (2) with a new paragraph (a); ‘’(a) The Chief Justice of Nigeria who shall be the head of the Judiciary of the Federation.’’

‘’(b) Substituting the words ‘’not exceeding twenty-one’’ in lines 1 to 2 of paragraph (b) of the existing subsection (2) with words ‘’not exceeding sixteen.’’

The reduction of the apex court bench to 16 is followed with other proposals to reduce the workload of the Supreme Court. For instance, all the appeals to the apex court would be by leave of the apex court. This is like creating toll gate to sieve appeals that could be heard by the apex court, and invariably reducing several spurious appeals usually sponsored by lawyers seeking for the Senior Advocates of Nigeria award before the apex court.

Again, three justices of the Supreme Court sitting in the chamber, the CJN said could dispose the application for leave of the court. Besides, a single justice of the Supreme Court sitting in chambers could exercise power vested in the apex court in some instances.

In addition, all the appeals from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court should be by leave of the Supreme Court. No appeal shall lie to the Court of Appeal (and by extension to the Supreme Court) from any decision of an election tribunal in respect of an interlocutory decision. By this insertions, the proposal for the reduction of the apex court bench is to larger extent justifiable.

Moreover, several stakeholders have viewed an attempt to appoint more justices possibly to make up the Supreme Court Bench to 21 as a drive to turn the apex court to magistrate court. Whereas, all that the apex court requires is to streamline avalanche of appeals lying before it.

Besides, President Buhari neither increased the N110 billion budget allocation to the judiciary for 2021 fiscal year nor provided additional fund to the Supreme Court when he appointed eight justices to the Supreme Court.

However, if the CJN is named as the head of the Judiciary of the Federation in the constitution, the Judiciary would perhaps assume its rightful position in the order of protocol in the nation.

Many legal persons are irked with the CJN being called as the fifth person instead of the 3rd in the Order of the National Protocol. When the constitution recognises him as the head of the judiciary, he’s then the head of the Third Arm of the Government with the President as the 1st, Senate President as 2nd and CJN the 3rd.

• Fixing and periodic review of judges’ salaries.

The CJN also asked the National Assembly to alter the constitution with the effect that the National Judicial Council (NJC) would fix and review judges’ salaries every four years.

In item 38 of his submission, the CJN requested that Part 1 of the Third Schedule Paragraph 21 to the Constitution be altered to include sub-paragraph ‘h’ to the effect that, the NJC should ‘’fix, in conjunction with the Salaries and Wages Commission, the salaries and other emoluments of judicial staff; in the case of judicial officers, to review such salaries not later than four years from the last exercise.’’

By the dictate of Section 84 (1), the Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) reviewed judges’ salary along sides with some public officers through the enactment of, ’’Certain Political, Public and Judicial Office Holders (Salaries and Allowances, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2008’’ which came into force on February 1, 2007. Since this Act has not been reviewed with effect from 2008, judges’ salaries have remained the same for about 13 years with attendant implications.

The CJN who has now decided to take the bull by the horn wants the lawmakers to separate the duties of fixing and reviewing of salaries of both judges and staffers in the Judiciary, to be done by NJC following the Salaries and Wages Commission laid down guidelines.

Of course, this is a far reaching instrument for the Judiciary to take control of its affairs both at the federal and state levels. Perhaps, this is why he called for the alteration of Section 84 of the Constitution by deleting the words ‘’other than allowances’’ in line 2 of sub-section (3). Ostensibly to protect judges and judiciary staff, the allowances cannot be altered downwards once set.

• Other far reaching proposals

‘’A person shall not be qualified to hold the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria or a Justice of the Supreme Court, unless he is qualified to practice as a legal practitioner in Nigeria and has been so qualified for a period of not less than fifteen years.’’

Also, he called for the number of the Court of Appeal Justices, that the constitution pegs at 49 under Section 237 to be amended such that they are not less than 100 justices.

He proposed that the. NJC should collect, control and disburse all monies, capital and recurrent for the Judiciary.

The CJN said the Constitution should be amended for the NJC’s Secretary seat to be at par with that of the Clerk of the National Assembly.

He also proposed that the Judiciary should exercise control over the Code of Conduct Tribunal, as the Federal Judicial Service Commission is to advice the NJC in nominating persons for appointment as the Chairman and members of the CCT. This, he said, is necessary since the CCT is of coordinate jurisdiction with the High Courts. Appeals against its decision also lie at the Court of Appeal.

 

• Ahuraka is the Senior Special Assistant on Media to the CJN.

They went to the University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) for a Law degree, but ended up falling in love. Usman Abdulrasheed and Musinat Zubair-Usman found ways to nurture their relationship despite pessimism by their friends and coursemates. Now married with two children, the happy couple share their law and love stories in separate interviews with ROBERT EGBE

Mr Usman Abiola Abdulrasheed

 

My name is Usman Abiola Abdulrasheed (a.k.a) B20, I am from Osi in Ekiti LGA of Kwara State. I am the last of seven children of the family of the late Mr and Mrs Usman Ajaludo, both from Osi. My dad was a mechanic at the National Electric Power Authority (NEPA) before his retirement.

 

Jebba train encounters

I attended NEPA Junior Staff Primary School Kainji, Niger State. I went to three secondary schools in all: Government Secondary School Omu-Aran; UMCA Comprehensive High School, Jebba and lastly NEPA Secondary School, Kainji. I have a lot of memorable experiences of those days, too many to mention. The one I feel I should share was from my time at Jebba. Any time we missed the bus to the camp, we would have to walk through the first and second railway bridges down to tollgate before getting to Kara and our eventual arrival at the camp. Whenever the railway passes while we were on the bridge, it was always a scary experience.

 

UNILORIN alumnus

I went to the University of Ilorin (UNILORIN), graduated in May 2010. Studying Law was such an interesting experience; among other things, we had a dress code. Students from other faculties of the university used to envy us a lot. I had many challenges, but we bless God today.

 

No history of lawyers

(There were no lawyers in my family). The only person that was close who is a lawyer is Barrister Abdulkareem, who married our fourth born and he was such an inspiration.

 

Law School

I have always wanted Law and I had to wait for few years to eventually gain admission for my desired course. Law School made me the Lawyer that I am, university, to me, had little impact on my Law (journey). Law School did the real law teaching and things I now come across in my everyday Law. If I had my way, I would do a reform for university law to be four years and Law school to be two years. Not much time for recreation at the Law school, you are there for a specific goal and, because you don’t want your mates to become your senior, you will have to give your best.

 

Call to Bar

My family members were in Abuja in their numbers (for my Call to Bar). There was no party as such but there was plenty to eat and drink, then we took plenty pictures.

 

No academic awards, but…

I didn’t win any academic award (at the university or law school); but maybe I would have won an award for the guy who chased the most girls at the university if there was such an award. (Laughs).

 

First solo court appearance

It was at the Court of Appeal, Ilorin Division. I thought I was there to only pick a date but, unfortunately for me, the record of court showed otherwise. I struggled to convince the court that I couldn’t go on as I was not really abreast of the facts of the case. I was eventually allowed to pick a date after plenty of backlash from my Lords. But, to the glory of God, this experience gave me so much courage moving forward.

 

Embarrassing court experiences

(I have had) Plenty. We are not expected to know the whole law especially as a junior. Sometimes judges see us as unserious and when you suffer a backlash from them, you prepare better next time to appear before them.

 

Wig and gown

In my opinion, if it can be scrapped, it will be a welcome development. Leave every other piece of our dressing but take away the wig and gown; the bibs are enough to distinguish us with our lovely white shirts and dark suits.

 

Judge, SAN or Prof?

I wish to be a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) one day, but, above all, I want to be a very rich legal practitioner.

 

Problems in the legal profession

The only thing I don’t like about Law thus far is the fact that, there are a lot of quacks in our midst, helping clients to devalue the core lawyers. Sometimes you see clients offering amounts they can’t offer agents on registrable documents. NBA should do more in this regard.

 

Marrying a lawyer

I met my beautiful wife at the university. I was in Part 5 at the time while she was in Part 3. We became friends and all. Several people met with her to discourage her that she was messing with the wrong person, but we ended up disappointing them in their numbers. (Laughs) Just kidding though, but a lot of persons actually thought we couldn’t (make our relationship) work, but today, we have two kids together, A female and a cute young man. By the grace of God, I would like our kids to follow in our footsteps.

 

Law vs football

I love football a lot; I am from a football family. One of my brothers is a national team coach. We all like football in my house, but if I have up to a fifth chance to choose a profession, it would still be Law.

 

JUSUN strike

I am in full support of the strike; the judiciary above all other arms of government needs autonomy to be able to dispense justice without fear or favour. I want to encourage both the federal and state governments to do more to avert subsequent strikes of this nature. A lot of Nigerians were affected by the strike, some languished in prison while others who needed affidavit or court orders to correct some immediate wrongs had to suffer cos courts were under lock and key.

 

Fed Govt’s threat to prosecute persons using Twitter

When there is no law criminalising an act, it cannot become an offence overnight except there’s a legislation to the effect. I will not want to dwell too much on this but we play too much politics in this country not putting into consideration its effect on the electorate.

Mrs Musinat Zubair-Usman

 

I am Musinat Adebola Zubair-Usman (Alias Mrs B20) from Ifelodun Local Government Area (LGA) of Kwara State.

 

Family of girls

I was born and raised in Surulere area of Lagos State. I was born into a family of all girls by very spiritual parents. I spent most of my childhood in the company of my mother and sisters. I am the third and the last girl of my mother although (I have) several half siblings. My father is a clerical man who believes in his father’s last wish of propagating the teachings of our lord in Kwara State, precisely Amodu Asungbolu. My mom on the other hand is a non-governmental organisation practitioner with more than 30 years’ experience of active practice.

 

Memorable secondary school experiences

I attended Dawah Nursery and Primary School in Jakande Estate, Oke Afa, Isolo, Lagos State. Upon completion of my primary education in September 2000, I proceeded to Federal Government Girls College (FGGC) Omu Aran in Kwara State to join my two older sisters. While one was in Senior Secondary (SS) Two, the other was in Junior Secondary (JS) Three. Spending six years in a boarding house made me more brave and self-independent. In senior class, I bagged several awards in literature, government and Islamic studies. My Art Class teachers were top-notch and I found myself so interested in all Art subjects. Boarding house was fun and at the same time very challenging. I remember a period of water scarcity and we decided to go to the school stream which was quite a walk from the school. On our way back, it rained heavily. While we were trying to network our way back to the hostel, some of us fell and got injured. Luckily for me, when I got to the hostel, I was still strong but not with a single drop of water. We were all rushed to the school clinic for proper check-up and the rest was history. In 2006 I graduated from secondary with top grades in my O’ Levels.

 

Tough first year at Unilorin

In 2007, I proceeded to the prestigious University of Ilorin, in Kwara State to pursue my law degree. At the university, unlike secondary school, I had no mentor or guardian. I was all by myself and tried to find my feet with my colleagues. When our first exam result was released, it was so bad. For instance, I was expecting an A in the Law course, Legal Method, but to my dismay, I got a ‘C’. The course lecturer later told us that we did not answer the questions ‘legally.’ We did some other ‘minor’ courses in my first year, and we had issues with other departmental lecturers such as those in the Social Science, Political Science and some other departments. When we came back to the Law faculty in 200 level, I had a few senior friends who then advised us about building our Grade Points (GPs) and all. At this point, I started working towards making a 2.1 (Second Class Upper) degree. Eventually, I graduated with a 2.2 (Second Class lower) degree, just a few points from a 2.1.

 

First lawyer in the family

To my knowledge, I am the first lawyer in my immediate family. However, we had a few close family friends that are lawyers. They include Fajimite, Dairo and Barrister Faoziyyah Bakare. At one point or the other, each of them was of good mentorship to me.

 

Inspiration to study Law

I grew up reading the write ups of people like (the former president of the International Court of Justice and Nigeria’s first Attorney General after independence) Taslim Olawale Elias and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Gani Fawehinmi. At such early days, I knew I wanted to be part of people who protect the interest of fellow women and the masses. Law is the only choice I made in my teenage years. I would still choose law over and over again.

 

Law School less difficult than expected

I attended the Lagos campus of the Nigerian Law School. I enjoyed every piece of the experience. I would say it was less difficult than expected. I recall that right from my 100 level at the university, our lecturers kept telling us that there was quota for Law School and Law School was as difficult as anything. I got in in 2012 and was called to the Nigerian Bar in 2013 with a 2.1. No award was won though, but I was well known amongst my peer for being modest and intelligent. My Call to Bar celebration was well attended with my mom, dad and my husband and his family. We had a party in Abuja with friends in attendance.

 

First solo court appearance

After my Call to Bar, I joined John Baiyeshea SAN & Co. My first appearance was before a female judge who was so calm with me and made me feel I wasn’t a fresher at the Bar. After I left the SAN’s office, I joined the law firm of J.W. Iroju in 2015.

 

Embarrassing court experience

I would say that at one of the sittings at a high court, my boss called me over the phone to take up the brief without giving me the file. I announced our appearances, obviously the matter was for a motion for an extension of time within which to file a statement of defence, and the judge asked me for the computation of time. I was lost. I didn’t even know for how many days we were out of time, let alone of the penalty to be paid. The judge was furious at me, but I learnt my lessons never to go to any court without being prepared.

 

Wig and gown

I feel the wig and gown are symbols of uniqueness and honourary. They should not be scrapped.

 

Judge, SAN or Prof?

I prefer being a SAN because it gives room for more opportunities in the practice of law.

 

Dating a law student, marrying a lawyer

I met my husband while I was in my 300 level and he was in 500 level. A lot of people discouraged me about forging ahead with the relationship, but, at last, here we are, married with two kids and still waxing strong. Being married to my colleague has been so eventful though with a few hiccups. But on the whole, I will still choose being married to a learned man over other professions.