Category: Law

  • Lawyer to entrepreneurs: be guided by Constitution, laws

    Lawyer to entrepreneurs: be guided by Constitution, laws

    By John Austin Unachukwu

     

    Lagos lawyer Mr. Donatus Chinwoke has charged new executives of the Plaza Owners Association (PLOWASS) in ASPAMDA to be guided by the association’s rules and regulations and extant laws, particularly the 1999 Constitution.

    He said this would engender peace and harmony among them.

    “As businessmen, you need to work in synergy with relevant authorities to ensure a smooth business environment,” Chinwoke said.

    PLOWASS’ new President, Innocent Nnamene, thanked members for their confidence reposed in him and his exco to pilot the association’s affairs.

    He said: “We promise that you shall not regret voting us as your new leaders.

    “I want to equally thank the PLOWASS electoral committee, led by Ezenwosu Frederick Chidozie, for conducting such free, fair and credible election. I will not fail to thank the outgoing president and his executives who displayed quality leadership and never interfered with the affairs of the electoral officers.

    “The outgoing President, Chief Lawrence Sunday TabugboAgu-Ide Ugochukwutubelu and his executives performed wonderfully well as time permitted them. Considering the manner they started, history will be kind to them.”

    He affirmed his exco’s resolve to lead “a revolutionary government that will reshape and remodel the complex to world-class business environment by constructing good roads, installing electricity, street lights for better security at night, better security as well as attracting banks to the complex to ensure businesses ran without hassles.

    “We shall work with agencies like Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON), National Agency for Foods and Drug Administration (NAFDAC) and the Nigerian Customs Service to ensure that trade is not obstructed”.

    Nnamene pledged his allegiance to the Constitution and members of PLOWASS and promised to  serve them, adding: “I want to assure you that this government  will be fair in delivering justice and equity to the members of PLOWASS and shall run an honest and transparent government where ethics and (accountability shall reign supreme.

    “I solicit for your moral and spiritual support as the journey ahead is challenging and I urge members to pay their annual dues on time as no government runs without finance,” Nnamene stated.

    The new officers were Innocent Nnamene-President; Patrick Umerioha-Vice-President; Idamu Chima-Secretary; Chief Comas Anayo Ojukwu; Treasurer; Chinedu Anthony, Financial Secretary; Ikechukwu Anthony, Financial Secretary and Ogueloka Okechukwu, who was elected Provost.

  • Nembe lawyers to hold session on law practice building

    Nembe lawyers to hold session on law practice building

    By John Austin Unachukwu

     

    A group, Nembe-Se Lawyers Forum will hold a special session on the theme: “Law practice building in contemporary times” on May 3.

    According to a statement by the Chairman of the Planning Committee of the association, Mr Iniruo Wills, the aim of the session is to enhance members’ preparedness and competitiveness in contemporary legal practice.

    Wills said this would empower members to seize or take advantage of unfolding local and international opportunities in the legal profession.

    The session will be hosted in Port Harcourt by Serenity Legal Union and Partners.

    The lead speaker is the pioneer Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Section on Business Law, George Etomi.

    Read Also: NBA to re-introduce ‘Black book’ for erring lawyers

     

    Others include:  A former President of the Commonwealth Lawyers Association (CLA), who was also the first black President of the Female Solicitors Association of England and Wales, Mrs Boma Alabi (SAN); the Dean of the Niger Delta University’s Faculty of Law,

    Professor D. K. Derri.

    Top executives of public and private corporations of special significance to the region have also been invited to interact with members at the session.

    Some of the invitees are expected to be on a discussion panel around the theme and such sub-themes as “Law in a fast-changing world” and “Expanding opportunities in the legal market”.

    Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Olumide Akpata, judges and national/state legislators of Nembe-Se and monarchs have also been invited.

    “Participation will be hybrid: physical and virtual (online). Physical attendance is strictly by invitation, which every member of NSLF is entitled to, whilst attendance online (by Zoom) will be open to the public for purposes of bringing it into national and professional reckoning,”  Wills stated.

  • Prada Uzodimma launches scholarship grant for law students

    Prada Uzodimma launches scholarship grant for law students

    Our Reporter

     

    Managing Partner of Principle Legal Consult, Prada O Uzodimma, has launched the Prada Uzodimma Law School Scholarship Grant to provide financial sponsorship to selected indigent law school aspirants across Nigeria.

    A statement by Uzodimma said the scheme is an educational philanthropic project initiated, sponsored and facilitated annually by her.

    The statement reads: “Winners of this scholarship grant will have their Law school tuition fees fully catered for. There are no stringent requirements (such as being a first class student); applicants are required to display a show of impassioned drive and determination towards becoming a lawyer.

    “The scheme is birthed from a passionate understanding of the financial inhibitions, which confront a size-able number of Nigerian Law School Aspirants, restricting them from attaining their aspirations, and is targeted at positively re-scripting these sad narratives by emitting rays of hope and succour through financial grants.

    ‘’We are keen on ensuring that bright minds and intellectuals are not deprived of their ambitions to be called to the Nigerian Bar as a result of financial incapacity and have benevolently setup this scheme to infuse life to those vulnerable dreams.

    “The programme introduced by Prada Uzodimma, Esq, ACIArb in 2020, will provide its first batch of scholarships to the 2021 Law School Aspirants through an unbiased and meritorious selection process.

    ‘’The scholarship grant has been fully endorsed by the Director General of the Nigerian Law School, Prof. Isa Chiroma and the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami , SAN.

    “Applicants can access the application portal for the scholarship on the Principle Legal Consult Website.

    “The application portal opens on 10th May 2021, 9:00am WAT and closes 10th of August 2021, 4:00pm WAT.

    “Applicants are encouraged to keep up to date on Principle Legal Consult social media platforms, @plconsult_ on Twitter and Instagram”.

  • Ex-MD, two others arraigned for N1b ‘theft’

    Ex-MD, two others arraigned for N1b ‘theft’

    Our Reporter 

    Former Managing Director of a Murtala Muhammed Airport-based firm, Star Orient Nigeria Limited, Dare Osamo, and two others have been arraigned at the Yaba Magistrate Court, Lagos State for allegedly stealing N1 billion.

    The defendants, Osamo, Ayoola Olore Abisola and Hussaina Abdulkadir, were in the dock before Magistrate Mrs A. A. Oshiniyi on a four-count charge, which include forgery and stealing, by the Zone 2 of the Police Command, Onikan, Lagos.

    The Prosecutor, Jimoh Joseph, said the accused had been under investigation for a year and six months before they were arraigned, following the Department of Public Prosecution’s (DPP’s) advice that they had a case to answer.

    However, when the charge was read to the defendants, they pleaded not guilty.

    The presiding Magistrate, Mrs Oshuniyi, granted them bail of N5 million with two sureties, one of who must be employed, provide his residential address and tax payment evidence, while the other, a member of their family.

  • Insecurity: Can special courts do the trick?

    Insecurity: Can special courts do the trick?

    Banditry, terrorism and kidnappings have reached a crisis point and everyone agrees that the country must find a way to stem the tide. But can establishing special courts to try these crimes be the solution, writes ADEBISI ONANUGA

    Last Sunday, Sheikh Abubakar Gumi led a delegation to meet with former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo in Abeokuta, Ogun State.

    Discussions at the meeting was said to have centred on the need to find solutions to banditry, kidnapping and all other forms of insecurity bedevilling the country.

    Gumi, on arrival at Abeokuta Obasanjo Hilltop mansion, went into a private meeting with the former president.

    Gumi was accompanied by Prof Usman Yusuf; Mallam Tukur Mamu; Dr Umar Ardo; Dr Ibrahim Abdullahi; Suleiman Gumi; Alhaji Suleiman Yakubu and Mallam Buba Mohammed.

    The visiting team was received by Chief Obasanjo; Agura of Gbagura Oba Babajide Bakre; Ogun State chapter Chairman of Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN); Bishop Tunde Akin-Akinsanya; Chief Imam of Egbaland Sheikh Sa’addallah Alade Bamigbola; Chief Kenny Martins; Chief Ola Babajide Jaiyeoba; Rev. Tony Ojeshina; Chief Imams of Oke-Ona, Gbagura, Owu and Mr. Vitalis Ortese.

    In a statement issued after their meeting, they agreed among others that special courts should be created to deal promptly with cases of banditry, kidnapping, ransom-demanding and unlawful carrying of weapons.

    Obasanjo and the cleric appealed to Nigerians not to advertently or inadvertently encourage or support criminality, lamenting that the security situation had gone beyond tolerance.

    They identified the various forms of insurgency, particularly banditry and herdsmen crisis as “micro ethnic conflict” between the Fulani and their host communities and the remote causes as educational and economic disparities, the negative use of religion and ethnicity by unscrupulous politicians.

    The meeting provided short, medium and long term based solutions which they said must be composed of stick and carrot for the offender and the vulnerable.

    They said: “All well-meaning Nigerians have to be involved in finding solutions by: desisting from blame game; desisting from ethicising these crimes; desisting from religionising these crimes; desisting from regionalising these crimes.”

    They agreed on the slogan: ‘Security is the responsibility of all Nigerians.’

    They also agreed to continue to work together for the security of Nigeria and to seek others to join them in this new cause.

    Prior to his last Sunday’s visit to Abeokuta, Gumi had attracted notoriety for speaking for the cause of the bandits, notwithstanding the havoc, including deaths they had caused in many villages that they attacked in many parts of the North.

    Gumi was reputed to be the campaigner for amnesty for bandits and ‘killer’ herdsmen. He was also reported to have held meetings with some banditry gangs in Kaduna, Niger, and Zamfara to negotiate their peaceful surrender on their behalf.

    On Friday, February 19, 2021, Gumi reportedly met with Niger State Governor, Abubakar Sani Bello, to discuss the result of his negotiation with some bandits that allegedly kidnapped the Government Secondary School  (GSS), Kagara, students.  Gumi had then told reporters that the bandits were victims themselves, that “They were persecuted, arrested, lynched. The Federal Government should give them a blanket amnesty.”

    He stated that the easiest and safest way to end insecurity in the north is to negotiate peace with the bandits.

    Endless banditry, kidnapping waves

    A March 2, 2021 report by UNHCR, a United Nations refugees agency, stated that about 77,000 Nigerians are taking refuge in Republic of Niger’s Maradi region, following the spread of banditry and armed attacks.

    Only a few days into 2021, gunmen attacked Rambadawa, in northern Nigeria, to loot the village and steal cattle.

    The attack on Rambadawa is one of a growing number in north-west Nigeria. The surging violence is driving displacement into Maradi, which now hosts nearly 100,000 displaced people, including the 77,000 Nigerian refugees, 7,660 of whom have fled to the place since the start of the year.

    According to UNHCR’s representative in Niger, Alessandra Morelli, “The rise in cross-border activity by criminal groups since the start of the year is a cause of real concern. We are adapting our response to the waves of forced displacement caused by growing insecurity and we are providing protection and access to basic services such as health, education and access to water.”

    On Friday January 29, 2021, according to a BBC report, gunmen ambushed the Kungi village in Birnin Gwari Local Government Area of Kaduna State and carried out house-to-house search before kidnapping 30 people.

    Although, there are security personnel in the village, their presence did not stop the gunmen from invading.

    According to reports, Birnin Gwari is now full of internally displaced people, fleeing continuous attacks by bandits in neighbouring villages.

    In the North, kidnap-for-ransom industry seems to be growing as each kidnapping seems to inspire another and it is not just the well-off who are at risk, but poor villagers and ordinary schoolchildren who are the victims.

    In the Southwestern state of Ogun, residents of Yewa and Imeko-Afon Local Government Area have of late been fleeing to Benin Republic towns as refugees, following attacks by herdsmen which have become a frequent occurrence.

    Herders

    As the nation continues to groan under the pains of insecurity, stakeholder hold divergent views on events in the country.

    Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) Secretary-General, Othman Ngelzarma, explained that herders are lured into crime due to ignorance and poverty. He said some of the herders were impoverished after their cattle were stolen.

    Ngelzarma who was addressing the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) National Executive Council (NEC) led by Chief Audu Ogbe in Kaduna said the solution to herdsmen attacks is to settle the pastoralists within a place and educate them.

    According to him, the criminal herders have powerful backers.

    “The merchants take advantage of the ignorance of the young Fulani and their poverty to engage them in crime. Crime is everywhere. When you catch criminals, you always get Fulani among the group because of their lack of education, their ignorance and their poverty,” Ngelzarma said.

    Acting IG to the rescue

    Last Thursday, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, while decorating the new acting Inspector-General of Police, Usman Alkali Baba, told him that that there was a lot to be done and charged him to rebuild trust with the Nigerian public.

    Osinbajo said: “The organisation you are leading is one that is itself facing several challenges; your officers work in extremely difficult conditions and some face the threat of physical harm by terrorists and hostile non-state actors while in the line of duty.

    “Under your leadership, the Police must now rebuild some bridges of trust and regain the confidence of the citizens. This is an on-going challenge and task that the Police Force and all the senior members of the Police must take on as a responsibility.”

    The VP also charged him to implement the Community Policing Policy which had already taken off as well as restore the dignity of the Nigeria Police.

    “One of the ways you can restore confidence and build trust is by implementing the Community Policing Policy which has already taken off and reconceptualising policing as a task carried out in partnership with local communities and officers who are members of these communities”, he said.

    Responding, Baba pledged to tackle insurgency and other security threats in the shortest possible time, restore security and order, and return the country to the path of national unity.

    To achieve the task, Baba said he would rejig Police operational strategies, asked Nigerians to “expect improvement in the security situation” and pleaded for their collaboration and cooperation.

    Special Courts

    Agitation for specialised courts is not a new concept in Nigeria. Specialised courts are often established to adjudicate and fast-track the trial of special criminal offences and minimise delays. Some special courts in the country include the National Industrial Court which handles disputes in work places; the Courts of Arbitration, the Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse to quicken civil matters among others.

    Challenges in the trial of high profile corruption cases, increase in criminal matters like kidnapping and sexual assault led to the establishment of the Special offences courts and Domestic and Sexual Offences Courts in Lagos State by its former Chief Judge, Justice Opeyemi Oke in February 2018. The decision followed a directive and issuance of necessary practice direction by a former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen issued in 2017 to heads of courts in the country for the establishment of such special courts. The special courts took off in Lagos as pilot scheme for other states to emulate.

    Special Court for banditry, kidnapping

    A special court for banditry, kidnapping, unlawful possession of firearms and others as proposed by Obasanjo and Gumi is not alien to the Nigeria’s judicial system. But some stakeholders consider this as unnecessary, a waste of effort and a duplication of various criminal courts across the country with practice directions giving vent to acceleration of criminal trials. Those of this opinion noted the situation has already been taken care of by a 2013 practice direction from the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) with specific direction on accelerated and speedy trials of criminal matters.

    Stakeholders’ concern

    Banditry, kidnappings, and other violent crimes have increased in many parts of the country and no part of the country is spared from insecurity. There is the Boko Haram issue in the Northeast, banditry in the Northwest , Northcentral and the Middle Belt, herdsmen attacks in the west and the east while kidnapping is in every part of the country. Stakeholders noted that several possible solutions to address the country’s hydra-headed insecurity issues have been suggested to the government but none seems to be working so far.

    Can special courts curtail or end banditry and other forms of insecurity?

    Lawyers did not think so. Those who opposed the idea included a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Dr Olisa Agbakoba; Dr Fassy Yusuf; a lecturer in the Faculty of Law, University of Lagos, Wahab Shittu; and a former Commissioner, Ogun State Judiciary Service Commission, Abayomi Omoyinmi.

    Special court not solution – Agbakoba

    Dr Agbakoba argued that Special Courts will play “absolutely little or no role and have no influence” on the spate of banditry terrorism kidnappings etc, now engulfing Nigeria.

    He said the systemic nature of violence, according to leading criminologists, has always been associated with poverty and exclusion.

    “The leading authority in the world on the subject of exclusion is the indomitable Professor Thomas Pikety. His theory is simple that the cause of violence of any kind is rooted in extreme want and exclusion,” Agbakoba said.

    There is no question, he added, that exclusion in Nigeria is “a massive problem.”

    Agbakoba recommended that government policies should provide for and include “the fragile people living on the margins of extreme want.

    “The other important factor is simply to create new economic opportunities other than the political pyramid at Abuja. I strongly suggest that devolution of political and economic power will disperse prosperity and new opportunities at the base of Nigeria, namely the local governments, where active recruitment of violent manpower occurs. So, I disagree with respect with President Obasanjo and Sheikh Gumi.”

    Government must be strategic – Yusuf

    Like Agbakoba, Dr Yusuf said creating special courts is not the solution.

    “The solution should be more profound, should be more strategic and we need to put on our thinking cap,” he said.

    According to him, “fundamentally, the security architecture of the country has collapsed and those saddled with the responsibility of ensuring security of life and property have failed in every material sense. Intelligence gathering is nil and our security operatives are not doing what they were supposed to do. The society is not cooperating with them, maybe because there is a loss of confidence or because government on its own is not sincere. The insincerity of government has led to apathy. So, when you see a crime about to be committed near you, you turn the other way because you don’t want to be involved.

    “So setting up of special courts to try bandits or kidnappers, how would that solve the problem? It would only cause problems for the judiciary because those judges you are asking to try cases of banditry, kidnappers would be left with just those cases. The regular cases they are handling would be left undone and as they say, justice delayed is justice denied. We cannot afford a situation where the judiciary would become the weeping voice.

    Amend constitution to accommodate State Police

    To end banditry and other forms of insurgency, Yusuf said the first thing to do is to amend the constitution to allow for state police and even local government police.

    He said: “The country is under policed and the federal Police, that is Nigeria Police is detached from the people. The orientation of the present crop is largely skewed. Most of our policemen and policewomen are after financial gains.

    “Corruption has eaten deep into the fabric of Nigeria Police. The same corruption has taken over nearly every spectrum of the country including other security agencies, the SSS, the military intelligence, Customs Service, Immigration Service, Naval intelligence. How do we explain to the outside world, the massive and the humongous arms and ammunition that we see in this country, all in the hands of criminals?”

    Yusuf expressed worry over how hoodlums nearly overran Owerri during Easter Monday. “Criminals, hoodlums took over Owerri, bombed Nigerian Correctional Service overpowered Nigerian Police state command headquarters and other areas! Look at the way bandits have taken over in other parts of the country. Look at the insecurity we are experiencing in the Southwest, in the Southsouth. In fact, no place is spared. We have people charged with the responsibility of ensuring security of life and property. These are indices of a failed state.”

    He contended that Nigeria can only get out of this situation “if we are serious with ourselves and are ready to take the bulls by the horn.

    Yusuf said: “Let us decentralise the Nigeria Police Force and let every state including the local government have its own Police force, let them carry arms and let us spread our intelligence network. The government should be proactive. Anybody that is found culpable or not performing his or her job, should be dismissed with ignominy.”

    According him, government has been lethargic, that is why the citizens, the police and other security agencies are not performing.

    He lamented proliferation of arms and ammunitions in the country and indicted the police on the issue. Patriotism, he added, has dwindled.

    He urged government to lead by example

    Yusuf said: “The government has to set the pace. To me, it is a problem of leadership. If the leadership is willing to navigate change, is willing to make a difference, I believe Nigerians will take a cue and follow. So, we must as a nation be proactive in our security architecture and if we cannot do it, we can invite experts and give them free hands to work. The era of ethnicity, affection should stop in governance.Accountability, transparency, proactiveness must be our watchword. That is the path to ending banditry, kidnapping and other forms of insecurity in the country.”

    Poverty, hunger root cause of banditry – Shittu

    Shittu said putting an end to banditry, kidnapping and other forms of insecurity require a multi- pronged approach. He said the critical factor will be to address the root causes of the manifestations of insecurity in the land.

    He noted that “at the heart of this needless violence are the elements of ignorance, hunger, disease, poverty, illiteracy, underdevelopment and bad leadership. We need to put in place proactive policies to address of all of these symptoms of underdevelopment. Setting up special courts as proposed will partly address the effects of insecurity not the root causes of the malaise.”

    Shittu suggested sustained campaigns and sensitisation aimed at changing the mindset of those who view deployment of all kinds of violence as objects of pleasure to end insecurity. According to him, “a deliberate policy of constructive engagement with the population is fundamental. Thirdly, entrenching core values in our youths vulnerable to such tendencies at all levels of society’s critical structures cannot be over emphasised.”

    He argued that the family unit, the school system and all the tiers of the government structure must enlist in this crusade.

    Shittu added: “Of course setting up special courts will assist in the sphere of criminalisation and penalisation as critical tools of law enforcement. Trials of suspects will be fast- tracked. This is also critical because it will enthrone a regime of consequences for criminal infractions.

    “The point I’m making is that setting up special courts will be useful as part of a holistic package measures to stem insecurity in the land. It is, however, not one option alone that will deliver us from this malady. We will also need to strengthen our security agencies, institutional frameworks including enhancing international cooperation, capacity building, information and intelligence sharing including technical assistance in line with best practices for stemming insecurity.”

    State Police not special court – Omoyinmi

    For Omoyinmi, the government both at the federal and state should do a lot more to ensure that the perpetrators of these crimes are brought to book.

    He said: “Perhaps this again leads us to the issue of state police as a way out. I do not subscribe to the idea of creation of special courts as such will serve no actual purpose in solving the problems associated with these offences and crimes. The regular high courts as a creation of the constitution have jurisdiction to try all criminal offences. There is really nothing special about trial of persons or persons who commit banditry, kidnapping and other forms of insecurity that will warrant government creating special courts.”

    Omoyinmi urged government to be proactive, budget more funds to security forces and manpower, invest more on acquiring equipment that will enable the security forces secure the country, pay more attention to the issue of drones as widely suggested by security experts.

    He added: “The government should also create enabling environment for our youths to get jobs by also engaging them in meaningful activities like enlarging the scope for huge investment in agriculture. And perhaps the government should take a second and final look at the issue of state police.”

  • CCB to launch website for online asset declaration

    CCB to launch website for online asset declaration

    By Adebisi Onanuga

    The Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) is to launch a website for the submission of asset declaration forms by public servants soon.

    The initiative is part of efforts to ease the asset declaration through the use of technology.

    CCB Justice Danladi Umar disclosed this in Lagos  at a High-Level Meeting on Promoting Transparency and Accountability in Asset Declaration by High-Ranking Public Officer in Nigeria organised by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP).

    Umar, who was represented by his Special Assistant, Dr Mustapha Musa, said the website was ready for use.

    He said the  website would be launched soon and that the staff that would be responsible for its operation would soon be receiving documents on its platform electronically.

    According to Dr. Musa, the CCB asset declaration website is live and online, with all security features and certifications necessary for its takeoff.

    “Information on the website regarding asset declaration can only be assessed by the CCB and the site is https://assetdeclaration@ccb.gov.ng,”  he said.

    Umar said that the CBB can only give access to information regarding declaration of assets to any citizen on application as provided by the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act subject to conditions given by the National Assembly.

    He noted that the rule was subject to the provisions of Paragraph 3 (c) part 1 of the third schedule of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    “This is a specific provision that is exclusive to the CCB.

    “The provisions of the FOI Act are general, general on all agencies, Ministries, departments and bodies of government but this paragraph is specific on the Code of Conduct Bureau”, he said.

    “It is not that the Code of Conduct Bureau is not willing to give information to applicants.

    “The Constitution states that we can only give such information subject to some conditions or guidelines to be given by the National Assembly.

    Speaking, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Tayo Oyetibo said that the issue on whether the public should have assess to information on the assets of public officer has been at the centere stage of discourse  for years.

    Oyetibo who was represented by Mrs Mobisola Odimegwu, the Managing Associate of Tayo Oyetibo and Co. said that the courts can intervene in situations where a citizen’s request for information has been declined by CBB.

    According to her, “the Court of Appeal in the case of Code of Conduct Bureau vs Nwankwo noted that there is a restriction that the National Assembly has to provide terms and conditions.

    “However, it said that the fact that these terms and conditions have not been provided does not obliterate the fact that citizens have the right to access this information.

    “The court noted that the asset declaration of a public servant is a public document.

    “Paragraph 3 (c) of the third schedule of the Constitution deems any citizen of Nigeria the right to inspect the asset declaration of any public servant.”

    She said since the right to inspect the asset declaration of public officers is a constitutional right, failure of the National Assembly to prescribe the terms and conditions does not obliterate or take away such right.

  • Arbitration clause and the case of Sea Tiger v. A.S.M. (HK) Ltd

    Arbitration clause and the case of Sea Tiger v. A.S.M. (HK) Ltd

    In this piece, Ayodele Ashiata Kadiri examines whether the Court of Appeal in The Vessel MT. Sea Tiger v. A.S.M. (HK) Ltd missed a chance to chart a course for vessels arrested in seeming breach of an arbitration clause.

    The exclusive admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal High Court of Nigeria (the “FHC”) is guarded jealously. Section 20 of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, 1991 (“AMJA”) unequivocally declares any agreement which seeks to oust the FHC’s jurisdiction null and void (to the extent that certain elements listed in that section are present). Nevertheless, the necessary implication from a holistic review of the AMJA is that an arbitration agreement is not in violation of section 20 of the AMJA. The AMJA itself recognises that the FHC’s admiralty jurisdiction extends to claims arising out of or for the enforcement of an arbitral award (section 2(3)(t)). The AMJA also empowers the FHC to stay or dismiss proceedings before it where a ship is arrested and it appears to the FHC that the proceeding should be stayed or dismissed on the ground that the claim in question ought to be determined by arbitration (in or out of Nigeria) or by a court of a foreign country (section 10).

    An arrest of any vessel pursuant to the enforcement of a claim ordinarily subject to an arbitration agreement should, therefore, ordinarily be a breach of that arbitration agreement. This is, however, not always the case. While this is yet to be tested in Nigerian courts, it is likely that when faced with such facts, Nigerian courts will be persuaded by English case law. Nigerian authorities have acknowledged that the development of the Nigerian admiralty practice has been greatly influenced by English law. See The M.V. S Araz v. Scheep (1996) 5 NWLR (Pt. 447) 204 at 224H; and M/V Da Qing Shan v. P.A.C. Ltd. (1991) 8 NWLR (Pt. 209) 354 at 365G.

    English case laws have established that “… the English Court will not restrain a party to an English arbitration clause from arresting a vessel in another jurisdiction where the sole purpose of the arrest is to obtain reasonable security for the claim to be arbitrated or litigated in England.” See Kallang Shipping SA Panama v Axa Assurances Senegal (2008) EWHC 2761 (Comm). In Kallang’s case, the English court recognised a claimant’s ability to properly arrest a vessel (in proceedings instituted in respect of claims ordinarily subject to an arbitration agreement) pursuant to s. 11 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 (the “English Arbitration Act”).

    Section 11 of the English Arbitration Act and section 10(1) of the AMJA have nearly the same effect: (a) proceedings for the arrest of a ship instituted pursuant to claims subject to an arbitration agreement may be stayed where equivalent satisfactory security is provided as security for the arbitral award or (b) the ship’s arrest may be retained as security for the arbitral award. Under the English Arbitration Act (as interpreted in Kallang’s case), where the proceedings for the arrest of the ship “go beyond simply seeking reasonable security for the arbitration proceedings, there is a breach of the arbitration clause which the English Court will restrain.” The principles in Kallang’s case were also applied in Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret SA v Amadou LO et al. (2008) EWHC 2762. Consequently, the FHC ought to come to a similar conclusion if faced with facts requiring the interpretation of section 10(1) of the AMJA.

    Did The Vessel MT. Sea Tiger v. A.S.M. (HK) Ltd. (2020) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1745) 418 (“Sea Tiger”) present the Nigerian Court of Appeal with an opportunity to settle the Nigerian position? Perhaps. The facts are that foreign entities, Sea Tiger Tankers S.A. (“ST”) and Accord Ship Management (HK) Limited (“Accord”), entered into a ship management agreement (the “Agreement”) for the management of the ST’s vessel (the “Vessel”). Disputes arising from the Agreement were to be referred to arbitration in London. However, Accord instituted an action against the vessel and its owners for the arrest of the vessel in Nigeria when disputes arose from the payment of the management fees. Accord also gave an indemnity as to damages for any loss or damages if the application for the order was found frivolous (“Accord’s Suit”). Eventually Accord and ST pursued and completed an out-of-court settlement, further to which the vessel was released and Accord withdrew the suit by a notice of discontinuance. ST, thereafter instituted another action claiming damages caused by the wrongful arrest of the Vessel in Accord’s suit in violation of the Agreement (“ST’s Suit”). The FHC dismissed ST’s claims in ST’s Suit holding, among others, that ST had submitted to the FHC’s jurisdiction in Accord’s Suit. ST appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    There were several issues before the Court of Appeal for its consideration. However, there was only one issue connected with arbitration, which was, whether the FHC was right to have held that (i) ST was a party in Accord’s Suit, and (ii) ST waived its right to the international arbitration clause, even though ST had taken no steps during the proceedings. The Court of Appeal found that: (a) ST did not enter a formal appearance and was not represented by counsel in Accord’s Suit and (b) ST had paid the negotiated sum of US$112,000 to Accord as settlement to secure the release of the Vessel (the “Settlement”). Consequently, the Court of Appeal held that: (a) by failing to appear in Accord’s Suit, the reasonable presumption in law was that ST had submitted to the jurisdiction of the FHC; (b) the Settlement gave the reasonable impression and presumption that ST had waived its right to insist on arbitration further to the Agreement; and (c) by waiving its right to have insisted on reference to arbitration in accordance with the Agreement, ST submitted to the procedural jurisdiction of the FHC. The Court of Appeal stated that ST should have insisted on its rights to arbitration in Accord’s Suit. Accordingly, it was not permissible for ST to “resile on the waiver and insist that the abandoned right was still available to them”.

    The Court of Appeal missed the chance to expressly pronounce that arbitration agreements will not violate section 20 of the AMJA. The Court of Appeal made a generic pronouncement on the attitude of Nigerian courts to upholding arbitration clauses and agreements. The Court of Appeal was unable, however, to pronounce on the arrest of ships in a seeming breach of an arbitration agreement. Perhaps, if ST had insisted on its rights to refer disputes under the Agreement to arbitration, the outcome of Accord’s Suit would have been different. Of course, the facts in Kallang’s case are largely different from the facts in Sea Tiger. The only similarity is that in both cases, the vessels were arrested in jurisdictions outside the jurisdiction the parties agreed to submit disputes to. The reactions of the claimants to the arrest in each case were remarkably different. Similarly, the reliefs pursued by the respective claimants in each case were also different.

    Sea Tiger is quite remarkable for two reasons. First, the fates of parties with no connection to Nigeria were decided in a Nigerian Court. The parties to the suit, as well as the Agreement, had no connection with Nigeria. Although not clear from the report, it appears that the seat of the arbitration would have been London. The application for the arrest of the Vessel must have been filed at the FHC because the Vessel was “within the limits of the territorial waters of Nigeria” section 7(2) of the AMJA. Second, a party’s attempt to pursue amicable settlement of an arbitrable claim may backfire if it is not exercised simultaneously with his right to insist on arbitration. This was one way the claimant’s reaction to the arrest in Kallang’s case was remarkably different from the claimant’s reaction to the arrest of the Vessel in Sea Tiger.

    • Kadiri is an associate at G. Elias & Co. where she is a member of the Disputes and New Economy (traditionally called the Technology, Media and Telecommunications) practice groups.
  • Wanted: New legal regime for oil, gas

    Wanted: New legal regime for oil, gas

    Strengthening the legal and regulatory framework of the oil and gas sector was the thrust of the fourth oil and gas law conference, reports JOSEPH JIBUEZE.

    Will the Petroleum Industrial Bill (PIB) ever become law?

    An energy law expert, Prof Yinka Omorogbe, believes the sooner the law is passed, the better for the country.

    The PIB, she noted, has been pending for over 12 years. But, in her view, Nigeria has “stayed static for much longer” with regards to the legal status of the oil and gas sector.

    Last November, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, said the PIB would be passed by March. This has not happened.

    Omorogbe described the extant oil and gas legal regime as “obsolete” and “outdated”, noting that the PIB has been pending since 2007.

    She spoke at the fourth Lawyers in Oil and Gas Conference and Industry Awards in Lagos, organised by the Lawyers in Oil and Gas Network.

    Its theme was: “Nigeria’s Oil and Gas future: Law, policy, regulation.

    Tracing the trajectory of the PIB, Omorogbe recounted that between 2007 and 2011, after the President submitted the bill to the National Assembly and it was gazetted, various drafts emerged under the auspices of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

    The bill eventually went through the third reading at both the House of Representatives and the Senate but was not passed.

    Between 2011 and 2015, the professor said the drafting of the bill recommenced, after which the PIB 2012 was submitted to the National Assembly. It never passed the third reading at the House even after further amendments.

    According to her, another drafting recommenced, with four sets of bills emerging. The President withheld assent to one of them – the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill.

    “Will there be another version of this Bill after 2023? We may be waiting, but the world is not,” she said.

    Omorogbe believes there is the need to pass the bill without further delay as the law that regulates the sector is “not in alignment with international best practice”.

    Besides, she said the extant law is “opaque, lacking transparency, lacking good governance practices and processes and is not in the interests of Nigeria.

    “The PIB has mutated over the years. The latest variant is a throwback to the original one, in that it is one omnibus law. It is comparably lean, with three main institutions and a minister.

    “There are likely to be major changes as it passes through the National Assembly. Watch out for your position! May it finally pass before 2023,” Omorogbe said.

    The conference, which had three sessions, featured energy law experts and major players in the oil and gas sector.

    Improve local content

    Experts also spoke on the need to improve the local content policy.

    Managing Director of AOS Orwell, an oil service firm, Femi Omotayo, called for close monitoring of the local content policy implementation and enforcement.

    This, he said, is to ensure its efficacy towards value addition and backward integration.

    On how to achieve these, he urged the government to continue with the provision of infrastructure facilities as well as single-digit financing to the sector.

    He also urged the government to extend awareness on how to access financing.

    Omotayo called for the harmonisation of laws that promote local production and the promotion of policies that will enhance competitiveness.

    An energy consultant, Dr Wisdom Enang, welcomed the prospect of expanding the scope of the local content policy within and beyond the oil and gas sector.

    He, however, said standards must never be compromised.

    “Actualising the goals of the Nigerian local content policy cannot be at the expense of quality.

    “As such, indigenous companies must continue to invest in improving the quality of their products and services, and deliver same to the Nigerian market at competitive prices,” Enang said.

    At partner at Olaniwun Ajayi LP, Tominiyi Owolabi, speaking on financing for large gas projects, said Nigeria’s financial institutions do not have the liquidity to support the foreign exchange required for such transactions.

    He explained that though Nigeria has the largest gas reserve in the continent and the eighth largest in the world, developing the gas sector requires significant funding on all activities involved in the gas value chain, from processing to transportation and storage, among others.

    “Major issues involved in sourcing for funds are the cost of financing itself. Project sponsors should make use of a bankable structure for record purposes. We also need to look into offshore funding,” he suggested.

    Viability of mass metering

    The Federal Government, last October, launched the National Mass Metering Programme (NMMP).

    It was borne out of the need to bridge the metering gap, as it is estimated that about 6.25 million customers are still unmetered.

    Head, Legal and Regulations of Ikeja Electric, Babatunde Osadare, who represented the Managing Director, Folake Soetan, urged stakeholders to closely work together to ensure NMMP’s objectives are effectively achieved.

    “For example, the funds must be timely disbursed; meters must be delivered and installed timeously; sufficient personnel must be provided by the MAPs for meter installation; there must be continuous sensitisation of customer by the DisCos; etc.

    “Furthermore, the transition or interplay between the MAP Regulation and the NMMP must be carefully managed to avoid legal pitfalls.

    “It is widely known that some investments have already been made by the Meter Asset Providers (MAPs) before the initiation of the NMMP policy.

    “The Regulator in this regard is already working with all stakeholders on how to seamlessly manage the two metering regimes.

    “The financial intervention of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in the metering challenges of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) is a laudable initiative.

    “It is aimed at growing the local meter manufacturing sector thereby creating more job opportunities and supporting Nigeria’s economic recovery while bridging the metering gap in the NESI.

    “However, all NESI stakeholders must work in alignment to achieve the desired objectives,” Osadare said.

    The event also featured award presentations to major oil and gas players in recognition of services to the development of the energy industry.

    Among those honoured were Chief Sylva, NNPC Group Managing Director Mele Kyari, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, Prof Omorogbe, a former Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Section on Business Law (SBL) Mr George Etomi, Technical Adviser (TA) on Gas Business & Policy Implementation to Sylva, Mr Justice Derefaka, among others.

  • HoSF seeks MDAs compliance with rules, regulations

    HoSF seeks MDAs compliance with rules, regulations

    By John Austin Unachukwu

    The Head of Civil Service of the Federation (HoSF), Dr. Folasade Yemi-Esan has urged   Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) to ensure strict compliance with rules and regulations guiding service and establishment matters so that their organisation can stand the test of time.

    She stated that agencies that failed to comply with such rules and do not have proper structures may eventually crumble because they may not be able to weather possible storms in the future.

    Yemi-Esan stated  this when she received  the Chairman of Competition and Consumption Tribunal (CCPT), Hajia Saratu Shafi and the Executive Vice Chairman, Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC),  Babatunde Irukera on a courtesy visit to all  in her office in Abuja last week.

    The HoSF urged the commission to be prepared to defend its manpower position so as to have a solid structure from the start, adding that the organisation must stand firm and be strong.

    While advising the commission to ensure that essential manpower budgeting was carried out properly before recruitment, she assured that her office will render the necessary support to enable the commission achieve its mandate.

    Speaking earlier, the Vice-Chairman of the FCCPC,  Irukera, said the commission would appreciate the assistance of the office of the Head of the Civil Service on issues relating to organogram, recruitment, training and accommodation to enhance smooth take-off.

    Nigeria, he said, was one of the top 19 countries that did not embrace competition framework in time, thereby giving rein to business monopoly.

    He said that this has now been redressed as competitiveness has been added to the mandate of the Commission, adding that this will go a long way in breaking monopoly in the scheme of things.

    The Vice-Chairman was accompanied by the Executive Commissioner, Corporate Services, Alhaji Adamu Ahmed Abdullahi.

  • Estate association urges IGP to take over ‘murder’ case

    Estate association urges IGP to take over ‘murder’ case

    By Joseph Jibueze

    The Stonewater Royal Estate Landlord and Tenants Association, Lagos, has urged the Acting Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Usman Baba, to probe the circumstances in which a man was allegedly killed in the estate.

    Through its lawyer Bartholomew Aguegbodo, the association said an unbiased team of investigators should handle the probe.

    The association accused the Zone 2 Police Command, Onikan, of compromise and asked that the case be transferred to the Force Criminal Investigation Department Annex, Alagbon, Lagos or to the IGP Monitoring Team.

    The landlords and tenants said they were dissatisfied with the activities of men of Section D8 of the Zone 2 Command in the probe of the death of Mr Ifeanyi Olebala, who allegedly died on February 22.

    According to the association, on February 22, at about 1 am, there was an attempt to demolish the estate’s security building using a bulldozer following a land dispute.

    It said the security men at the gate accosted the bulldozer driver, insisting that the demolition could not be done at night.

    The driver was said to have called on two of his colleagues to join him, including the late Olebala.

    “At about 8 am of the same day, some area boys with two armed mobile policemen came into the estate, rounded up the security men found at the security house after shooting sporadically and sending other residents running for safety.

    “The security men were taken to Tradefair Police Division and later transferred to Festac Police Division.

    “On the 24th February 2021, the matter was transferred to State CIID, Panti Street, Yaba for further investigation,” the lawyer wrote.

    The association said following a petition against it, the case was further transferred to Zone 2, where it was assigned to the Section D8.

    “They issued invitation letters to landlords in the estate and started calling the chairman with constant threats of arrest.

    “At this point, the estate chairman reminded the team that the estate was not aware of any physical confrontation or violence that resulted in death.

    “The team, without foundation, concluded that the security men and landlords jointly killed the deceased,” the association’s lawyer wrote.

    The association said it petitioned the Deputy Inspector-General of Police and IGP for a neutral body to conduct a discreet investigation into the killing, a request it said was granted.

    “Officers from Abuja came for the case file but the AIG Zone 2 remained adamant that he was not going to comply with the signal,” the association alleged.

    The association said its security men, who were not on duty on the day of the incident, had been in detention since February 23.

    Aguegbodo said: “The estate association has maintained that there was no physical violence from the account of the security men and the death of Mr Olebara has nothing to do with the security men or landlords of the estate.

    “They have clamoured for an independent team to cause a discreet investigation to unravel the circumstances surrounding the death of Mr Olebara who they strongly believe has been used as a pun in the battle over the land tussle…

    “It must be stated that the alibi raised by the detained suspect has not been investigated by the police at Zone 2 Command. They are not interested in unravelling the mystery of Mr Olebara’s death.

    “We call on the public to impress it on the IGP that justice is a-three way traffic: for the victim, the suspect and for the society at large.

    “Let an unbiased team of investigators do a discreet job to unravel who the actual killer(s) of Mr Ifeanyi Olebara is or are. The world is watching.”