Category: Law

  • Gtext Homes threatens N1b, $50m suit against influencers

    Gtext Homes threatens N1b, $50m suit against influencers

    GTEXT Homes Ltd and its founder, Dr. Stephen Akintayo, are taking a firm stance against recent malicious social media attacks by threatening legal action, seeking N1 billion and 50 million USD damages for libelous publication against the company.

    GTEXT Homes, through its legal representative, Malachy Ugwummadu, made this known in a press  statement dated April 29.

    He said the case highlighted the challenges companies and individuals face in the digital age, where false information could spread rapidly and cause significant harm.

    He said “the company was taking a proactive approach to address these issues, protect their good name and remains steadfast in its commitment to its customers, partners, and the community.”

    Ugwummadu, a former National President of the Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), said the troubles began when various online platforms spread false and damaging allegations about GTEXT Homes and its founder.

    According to him, the claims include accusations of fraud and wrongdoing, which the company vehemently deny.

    The human rights lawyer said  thorough investigations by competent authorities had repeatedly confirmed that neither GTEXT Homes nor Dr. Akintayo had been indicted or convicted of any wrongdoing in any jurisdiction.

    READ ALSO: Can Nigeria First policy fire up sluggish manufacturing sector?

    He said the fact directly contradicted the malicious reports circulating online.

    Ugwummadu said one specific allegation that has been particularly damaging is the claim of a $15,000 Dubai property fraud in which the company asserted that the claim was entirely baseless and lacked factual basis.

    The law firm representing GTEXT Homes and Dr. Akintayo has also shed light on the issue involving Kingsley Nwankwo.

    According to Ugwummadu, Nwankwo is a disgruntled volunteer sales representative who made unreasonable demands related to a client who defaulted and cost the company money. Consequently, he has been remanded in prison custody.

    He said: “In light of these false and damaging allegations, GTEXT Homes and Dr. Akintayo are pursuing substantial legal action by seeking 1 billion Naira in damages each from all parties who actively engaged in spreading libelous falsehoods against them.

    “The company and its founder are particularly focused on a US-based YouTuber who has not only defamed Dr. Akintayo but also profited from the defamation through monetized content. They are seeking damages of $50 million from this individual.

    “GTEXT Homes remains committed to integrity, transparency, excellence and the company is determined to vigorously defend its reputation against these malicious falsehoods.

    “The legal action being taken by GTEXT Homes and Dr. Akintayo sends a strong message about the importance of truth and accountability in public discourse.”

    Ugwummadu said by standing up against defamation, the company and its founder are protecting their reputation and setting a precedent for responsible communication.

    “GTEXT Homes and Dr. Akintayo are confident in their position and they believe that the truth will prevail as their commitment to excellence will continue to define their reputation.”

  • Basiru: Deploying legal knowledge in public service

    Basiru: Deploying legal knowledge in public service

    By Kodilichukwu Okelekwe

    Senator Surajudeen Ajibola Basiru, PhD, stands as a testament to the power of knowledge and the impact of dedicated public service.

    His journey is not just a personal narrative; it is an inspiring chronicle of resilience, intellectual rigour, and commitment to progressive politics in Nigeria.

    With a profound appetite for knowledge and an unwavering dedication to his constituents, Basiru has carved a niche for himself as a leading figure in Nigerian politics.

    Basiru’s academic journey is remarkable, underscoring his relentless pursuit of knowledge.

    He earned his L.L.B. (Hons) Bachelor of Laws from the prestigious University of Lagos, where his passion for law took root.

    His academic excellence propelled him to pursue further studies, resulting in an LLM (Master of Laws) with a focus on Secured Transactions, Planning & Compulsory Acquisition, Law of the Sea, and Comparative Company Law.

    This diverse academic foundation equipped him with a multifaceted understanding of legal frameworks crucial for navigating the complexities of governance.

    His quest for knowledge did not stop there; Basiru further achieved a Ph.D. in Property Law, solidifying his status as an authority in the field.

    READ ALSO: Can Nigeria First policy fire up sluggish manufacturing sector?

    This academic rigour not only reflects his personal ambition but also demonstrates a commitment to fostering a legal landscape that supports social justice and economic development.

    His scholarly pursuits have informed his legislative agenda, enabling him to advocate effectively for laws that promote equity and justice.

    Senator Basiru’s political career is marked by a steadfast evolution through significant party affiliations, beginning with the Alliance for Democracy (AD) and advancing through the Action Congress (AC) and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), culminating in his current role within the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    This trajectory reflects not only his adaptability in the face of changing political climates but also his unwavering commitment to progressive ideals.

    His journey is a testament to the belief that political affiliation should be a means to an end: the betterment of society.

    In a political environment often marred by instability and inconsistency, Basiru’s alignment with parties that champion democratic values and progressive governance underscores his dedication to fostering a Nigeria that thrives on transparency, accountability, and development.

    Basiru’s tenure as the Commissioner for Regional Integration and Special Duties, as well as the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in Osun State, laid a solid foundation for his political ethos.

    His focus on regional integration showcased his understanding of the importance of unity and collaboration among states, a vital aspect in a country with diverse cultures and interests.

    As Attorney General, he championed legal reforms aimed at ensuring justice and equity, addressing long-standing issues within the legal framework of Osun State.

    His efforts to enhance legal access and promote human rights have left an indelible mark, establishing him as a figure of integrity and competence.

    Throughout his political career, Basiru has exemplified the qualities of a true leader—integrity, vision, and an unwavering commitment to the welfare of his constituents.

    Representing the Osun Central Senatorial District from 2019 to 2023, Senator Basiru made significant contributions to the Nigerian Senate.

    His leadership as the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Diaspora, Non-Governmental Organisations, and Civil Societies showcased his commitment to inclusivity and empowerment.

    He understood the importance of engaging the Nigerian diaspora and civil society in national discourse, recognising that their contributions are vital to nation-building.

    As the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Basiru served as the Senate spokesperson, where his articulate communication skills shone.

    He adeptly handled the Senate’s public relations, ensuring that the institution remained transparent and accountable to the Nigerian people. His ability to convey complex legislative matters in an accessible manner reinforced public trust in the Senate.

    As the current National Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Senator Basiru continues to play a pivotal role in shaping the party’s direction.

    His leadership position allows him to influence policies that align with the party’s vision for national development. His commitment to progressive governance and his deep understanding of legal frameworks position him as a crucial player in Nigeria’s political landscape.

    Senator Surajudeen Ajibola Basiru’s journey is not just a personal story but a reflection of what is possible in Nigerian politics.

    His steadfast commitment to progressive ideals, coupled with his extensive experience in governance, positions him as a role model for aspiring politicians and citizens alike.

    As he continues to influence the political landscape, Basiru represents hope for a more accountable and responsive government. His story encourages us to believe in the power of consistency, integrity, and vision in the quest for a better society.

    Senator Surajudeen Ajibola Basiru, Ph.D., embodies the essence of a modern leader—an individual who values knowledge as a tool for empowerment and change.

    His academic achievements, political consistency, and legislative accomplishments reflect a life dedicated to public service and the pursuit of justice.

    As he continues to serve in various capacities, his journey inspires many to embrace education, remain steadfast in their principles, and engage actively in the democratic process.

    Senator Basiru’s story is a reminder that through knowledge and dedication, one can indeed make a meaningful impact on society.

    Dr. Okelekwe is the 2023 APC Senatorial Candidate for Anambra Central Senatorial District.

  • NBA Lagos to address ethical challenges, future of legal services

    NBA Lagos to address ethical challenges, future of legal services

    • Annual Law Conference for June 14 – 20

    Members of the Lagos Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) will swear to an ethical oath during its 2025 annual law conference.

    The newly introduced Official Ethical Oath Declaration will be supervised by the Attorney-General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), supported by his Lagos counterpart, Lawal Pedro (SAN).

    Billed for June 14 to 20 at the MUSON Centre in Lagos, the theme of the conference is: “Reimagining the practice of law: Ethics, innovation, and the future of legal services – (Let’s be lawyers again).”

    Branch Chairman Olabisi Makanjuola said the ethical oath declaration was introduced as part of the conference to remind lawyers of their enormous responsibilities to society.

    He said: “We cannot run away from the fact that there is a lot of decadence in the profession. We cannot run away from the fact that we lawyers are the major cause of our problems.

    “In my capacity as chairman of the Bar in Lagos, I receive at a minimum three or four petitions every day against lawyers, including from landlords complaining that lawyers refused to pay rent. It is that bad. Some of the petitions are against senior lawyers.

    “So, we chose the topic to remind ourselves that as lawyers, we owe ourselves, the practice and Nigeria the duty to live as lawyers. That is why there will be an ethical declaration.

    “It’s our little way of cleaning up the profession. We hope that after the conference, lawyers will sit up and begin to conduct themselves appropriately.

    READ ALSO: National Assembly should reconsider rotational presidency

    “The conference will not just be a talk show. At the end, we shall issue a communiqué, and I am confident that whoever takes over after my tenure will enforce whatever we have agreed to do.”

    Chairman of the planning committee, Dr. Tolu Aderemi, added that there would be a mechanism by which lawyers would be held accountable after the ethical oath declaration.

    “We’re all very concerned as to what the minimum ethical standard is. It does not look like we have any. Post-conference, I believe that will be in place and the disciplinary committee will have a lot more work to do,” he said.

    Giving a breakdown of the week-long programme lineup, Aderemi said it would begin with an advocacy walk/fun day on June 14, followed by the opening ceremony on June 16, which will feature a keynote address.

    Aderemi said the keynote would reflect on the current state of the legal profession and set the tone for the week.

    “It will address how lawyers can navigate rapid technological change while upholding ethical standards, balancing commercial pressures with professionalism and reclaiming the noble identity of legal practice,” he said.

    The keynote will be followed by a panel session, which will feature NBA President Afam Osigwe (SAN), his predecessor, Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), and Mrs. Funke Adekoya (SAN).

    After the official ethical oath declaration, there will be an ethical icon award presentation.

    The sub-theme: “Restoring public trust in the legal profession” will be discussed on June 17 (Day 3), during which speakers will explore strategies to reform the disciplinary system and restore the profession’s moral leadership.

    The second session of the day will dwell on “The Business of Law – Profitability without compromising professionalism,” while the third session’s theme is: “Image, Communication and Client Relations in Legal Practice.”

    On Day 4 (June 18), there will be concurrent masterclasses in different locations, while Day 5 will feature a regulatory clinic – a walk-in session where lawyers can directly engage with government agencies and departments, such as the Lagos Lands Bureau, Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), EFCC, LIRS, Probate Section, FCCPC, and SEC, among others.

    There will also be an FX Market dialogue and a workshop that will explore the intersection between judicial efficiency and economic development.

    The day will also feature the Hard Talk – “an unfiltered conversation with the Lagos State Judiciary” involving a one-on-one interview with the Chief Judge or his representative.

    The last day (June 20) will feature a town hall meeting where the branch’s chairmanship aspirants will speak on their plans, followed by an in-house counsel forum, a young lawyers’ forum and a closing party.

  • Community seeks justice for slain truck driver

    Community seeks justice for slain truck driver

    The Awomamma Development Forum,  an umbrella association of Awomamma indigenes at home and Diaspora, has called for justice for a 60-year-old truck driver and gravel dealer, Vitus Mbah, who was allegedly shot dead by security agencies in the Imo State community.

    The Forum sent a strongly worded petition to the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, and the Chief of Defence Staff, General Chris Musa, to urgently intervene in the continuous killing of its citizens under the guise of fighting insecurity.

    In the petition signed by its Legal Adviser and Attorney, Obinna Amagwula and the Diaspora Representative, Chris Ndedigwe, the Forum stated that whereas the community was not against the fight against bandits and kidnappers by the agents of the state, it can no longer watch while security agents backed by the state government continue to kill unarmed civilian citizens, bombing family houses, which has gone on unabated for over three years now.

    The petition, which was also copied to the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS) as well as Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma, condemned the shooting of Mbah, who was shot right inside his truck.

    The community wondered how the old man, who is well known as a focused gentleman in the villages, could be a bandit and why soft targets should be shot instead of being arrested and prosecuted.

    READ ALSO: National Assembly should reconsider rotational presidency

    “We are, therefore, appealing to your highly esteemed office to urgently direct the Commissioner of Police in Imo State to launch a thorough and independent investigation into the activities of the joint task force personnel in Awo-Omamma, especially the activities of the 10th day of May 2025 in Ubogwu Awo-Omamma community.

    “Identify and prosecute those responsible for the killing of Chief Vitus Mbah and other victims of extrajudicial military actions.

    “Ensure justice for the families of the deceased and provide assurances to prevent future occurrences.

    “Deploy appropriate law enforcement measures to restore peace and protect the rights and lives of law-abiding citizens in the community.

    “We believe that justice must be served and the rule of law upheld. Our client’s community seeks your intervention not only for accountability but also to restore faith in the institutions meant to protect us,” the petition reads.

  • Abule Ado stool: Court grants order of substituted service on AG, others

    Abule Ado stool: Court grants order of substituted service on AG, others

    An Ikeja High Court has granted an order of substituted service of Form 48 via newspaper publication against the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Lawal Pedro (SAN), Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Mr. Bolaji Robert and others.

    Justice Mathias Dawodu granted the order yesterday following a Motion Exparte filed by the claimants in the suit marked  ID/12044GCMW/2024 through their counsel, Morufu Akogun.

     Akogun, while moving the motion exparte dated May 6, 2025, told the court that the application was seeking an order of the court for an order of substituted service of notice of Form 48 on the contemnors by publishing in a national newspaper.

    Akogun listed the contemnors to include Attorney-General of Lagos State, the Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Chairman, Amuwo Odofin Local Government, Chairman, Chieftaincy  Committee, Amuwo Odofin Local Government and Sulaimon Surajudeen Aro.

    The motion exparte was brought pursuant to Order 9 Rule 5(1) and (2) of the High Court of Lagos Civil Provedure Rules 2019 and accompanied by a seven-paragraph affidavit  deposed to by Sheriff Adetoye Oluwabunkunmi and assigned to effect service of Form 48 on contemnors and other subsequent processes.

    READ ALSO: Can Nigeria First policy fire up sluggish manufacturing sector?

    In the affidavit, Oluwabunkunmi averred that he had mande several attempts to serve the respondents the court processes but the efforts proved abortive.

    Earlier, during the proceeding, Mr. A. Bashua (SAN) announced appearance for the 5th, 6th and 7th defendants, while Mr. A.A Osaro represented the 4th defendant in the suit.

    The defendants’ counsel informed the court  that they filed preliminary objection and served same on the claimants’ counsel.

    Akogun, however, acknowledged the service, and told the court that the application was not ripe for hearing.

    He said  the court had on January 15, 2025,  ordered parties to maintain status quo pending hearing of interlocutory injunction dated October 11, 2024.

    Akogun further submitted that the first to fourth defendants, in flagrant disobedience of the court order, went to install seventh respondent as Oba Abule Ado.

    It would be recalled that the claimants in the suit filed by Alhaji Rafiu Owolabi Teslimi and nine others on behalf of themselves and members of Sanusi Olawumi family of Abule Ado, Amuwo Odofin area of Lagos State, had urged the court to restrain the respondents from installing a new king for Abule Ado.

    Other claimants in the suit include: Alhaji Taiwo Hassan Tesilimi, Mr Dauda Mojeed Lasisi, Chief Jelili Obanla Lasisi, Alhaji Wasiu Ramon Bisiriyu, Mr Nurain  Yinusa Bisiriyu, Alhaja Lateefat Agbaje, Mr Akeem Agbaje, Alhaji Jamiu Balogun and Mulikat Balogun.

    Aside Lagos AG, other respondents include: Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Lagos State, The Executive Chairman, Amuwa Odofin Local Government, Chieftaincy Committee Amuwo /Odofin Local Government, Prince Eniola Adeshina Muftau Ado, Babatunde Semi Bakare, Sulaiman Surajudeen Aro and Alhaji Nurudeen Abu as first to eighth defendants.

    In the claimants’ suit,  they asked the court for an order restraining the defendants from recognising or approving the presentation of any staff of office to the 5th to 8th defendants or anybody from the defendants’ family to be crowned oba  of Abule Ado.

    In support of the motion on notice, they filed a 91 paragraphs affidavit sworn to by the first claimant,Tesilimi.

    Tesilimi averred that the claimants’ progenitor was the founder and first settler family having been the first Baale while subsequent Baales were from Oteyi Odan.

    He posited that the progenitor of Sanusi Olawunmi was never rotated between the claimants and the defendants prior to the inquiry report.

    He averred that the claimants be made a ruling house and entitled to produce the next Oba Ado of Ado village.

    He stated that: “Memorandum of Obaship of Abule Ado of May, 2024 was forwarded to the office of the 14th defendant, stating the historical facts and grounds as to why the claimants be allowed to nominate a candidate for the vacant stool of Ado Village.”

     The claimants also averred that in all these legal claims of the claimants’ family with government, individuals and community dwellers one critical point that stood out is that the claimants’ family history, ownership of the land settled upon by Oteyi-Odan, their progenitor himself and baaleship geneology in Abule Ado have always been protected and upheld by the government and public authorities.

    The matter has been adjourned to June 30 for hearing of preliminary objection.

  • SERAP, NGE seek end to use of Cybercrime Act against journalists

    SERAP, NGE seek end to use of Cybercrime Act against journalists

    Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and Nigeria Guild of Editors (NGE) have urged “the government of President Bola Tinubu to immediately end the use of the draconian Cybercrimes Act to target journalists, activists, critics and other Nigerians peacefully expressing their views online, and release those in custody across the country under the legislation.”

    This was contained in a statement issued yesterday and signed by SERAP Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare and General Secretary, NGE, Dr. Iyobosa Uwugiaren, after a press conference jointly organised by SERAP and NGE held at the Radisson Hotel, Ikeja, to mark the World Press Freedom Day.

     It was titled: “Unchecked Injustice: How Authorities Are Weaponising the Cybercrimes Act to Stifle Peaceful Dissent and Media Freedom in Nigeria.

    The groups said the use of the Cybercrimes Act to lock up people peacefully expressing their views sends a chilling message to Nigerians that rights won’t get priority under the Tinubu-led administration.

     According to them, “using laws that don’t conform with constitutional and guarantees and international human rights standards – like the Cybercrimes Act – erodes democracy and the rule of law in Nigeria. 

    READ ALSO: National Assembly should reconsider rotational presidency

    The groups also asked Nigerian authorities at all levels should show that they tolerate peaceful dissent and media freedom if the Nigerian people are to have any chance of holding them accountable on their constitutional oath of office, commitments and promises.

    The statement, read in part: “We are concerned that Nigerian authorities have continued to use the Cybercrime Act to normalize repression of the rights of journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders, opposition politicians, artists and other Nigerians.

    “Nigerian authorities at all levels of government should immediately stop using the Cybercrimes Act and regulations disguised as broadcasting code by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) to target, intimidate and harass journalists, bloggers, critics and media houses.

     “Impunity for those who threaten, intimidate and harass journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders and activists exacerbates the hostile environment for these defenders of constitutionally and internationally guaranteed human rights in Nigeria.

    “We note that the suppression of the press in recent times takes various forms ranging from extrajudicial to unlawful detentions, disappearances, malicious prosecutions and wrongful use of both legislation and law enforcement.

    “Since the amendment of the Cybercrime Act in 2024, Nigerian authorities at all levels have consistently used the provisions of the Cybercrime Act including the provisions of section 24 on “cyberstalking” to harass, intimidate, arbitrarily arrest and detain and unfairly prosecute users of social media, activists, and journalists.”

    The groups accused the authorities at all levels of increasingly using criminal defamation laws and other repressive laws to crack down on human rights and peaceful dissent, bringing frivolous lawsuits against journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders and activists.

    “We are also concerned about the persistence of threats to journalists’ safety, and the potential chilling effect of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) and harassment, including by security agencies and politicians.”

     “We note that journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders and activists play an indispensable role in documenting and reporting on human rights violations.”

    “The right to freedom of expression applies to all kinds of information and ideas, including those that may shock, offend or disturb, and irrespective of the truth or falsehood of the content.

    “The provisions of the provisions of the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act 2024, including Section 24 are inconsistent with the provisions of section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.

    “We note that the ECOWAS Court of Justice on 25 March 2022 held that section 24 of the Cybercrime Act is arbitrary, vague and repressive and therefore, is in contravention of Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

     “The Court also ordered the Federal Government to amend section 24 of the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015 in accordance with the country’s obligations under Article 1 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

     “However, while the National Assembly amended the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention etc.) Act, 2015 in 2024, section 24 of the Cybercrimes Act (as amended) is still vaguely worded, arbitrary and easily lends itself to subjective interpretation and repressive use by the Nigerian authorities.

    “Because the provisions of section 24 of the Cybercrimes Act 2024 are so broadly defined as to expose them to abuse for less legitimate ends, Nigerian authorities have persistently used these provisions to crackdown and violate the human rights of Nigerians including activists, bloggers, journalists, and social media users.

     “The amended Cybercrime Act 2024, despite the wide-ranging provisions in its section 24, still provides a vaguely worded meaning for ‘Cyberstalking’ in section 58 as ‘a course of conduct, directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to feel fear.

    “The provisions of the Cybercrimes Act 2024, including section 24, contain several broadly defined offences with harsh sentences that threaten human rights and have had a chilling effect on freedom of expression and media freedom in Nigeria.

    “Stories published online have been deemed ‘offensive’, ‘obstructive’, ‘insulting’ or ‘annoying’ with actionable consequences under amended provisions of section 24 of the Cybercrime Act 2024, even when the stories are true and factual.”

    “Also, stories published through traditional media outlets (print and electronic) that were never sanctioned by the government have been picked on upon being rebroadcast or republished through online platforms.”

    “Section 24 of the Cybercrimes Act 2024 represents a harshly punitive attempt to address the problems relating to stalking and harassment, and the Act fails to provide sufficient safeguards against misuse, particularly for peaceful and legitimate exercise of freedom of expression and investigative journalism.”

    “What constitutes ‘causing a breakdown of law and order’ is also unclear, threatening to punish peaceful and legitimate expression and opening the provisions up to abuse.”

    “According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), Nigeria has dropped 10 spots to 122nd in the 2025 World Press Freedom Index.”

    “According to the 2023 and 2024 Freedom House Reports on Nigeria, internet freedom of expression declined due to an unprecedented pattern of arbitrary arrests and detention of bloggers after the enactment and amendment of the Cybercrime Act in 2024; most of whom are either pending at various police stations or courts of law.”

     “According to the Centre for Journalism Innovation and Development (CJID) Press Attack Tracker, there have been 110 verified attacks in the year 2024. In comparison to the previous year, the press attacks between the first and third quarter of 2024 have surpassed those of the entire year in 2023.”

    “We therefore call on President Bola Tinubu and his government to review the Cybercrime Act and other repressive laws for potential restrictions on free speech and press, and amend them in line with constitutional and international human rights standards and to uphold the human rights of every Nigerian and media freedom.”

    “We urge President Tinubu and his government to publicly call on Nigeria’s state governors, the Nigerian Police Force, the Department of State Services (DSS) to uphold and ensure full respect for the rights of everyone in the country, including journalists, bloggers, human rights defenders and activists.”

    “We call on President Tinubu and his government, the country’s 36 governors and Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister to genuinely uphold press freedom, ensure access to information to all Nigerians, obey court judgments, and respect the rule of law.”

    “We urge the Attorney General to push for the immediate amendment of the Cybercrimes Act and other repressive legislation, and bring these laws in line with the Nigerian Constitution and international human rights obligations to which Nigeria is a state party.”

    “We urge the Attorney General to advise President Bola Tinubu to promptly obey all outstanding court judgments, including the ECOWAS Court judgment directing the Federal Government to repeal the repressive Cybercrimes Act and bring it in conformity with Nigeria’s international human rights obligations and commitments.”

    “We urge the National Assembly to promptly and comprehensively review the Cybercrimes Act and other restrictive legislation, and revise them as appropriate to bring them into line with Nigeria’s international human rights obligations and commitments regarding human rights and media freedom.”

    “We urge state governors to ensure that security agencies, the Nigeria Police Force and other authorities drop all charges against journalists, bloggers and other media workers and critics, and cease further arbitrary closures of radio and television stations.”

    “We urge the international community to hold Nigerian authorities to account for violations of human rights in the country, including by calling on the authorities at both the Federal and state levels to immediately and unconditionally release anyone detained solely for peacefully exercising their human rights.”

    The press conference was attended by senior members of the media, civil society groups and other stakeholders. Those who attended the event included: Richard Akinnola; Eze Anaba, President, NGE; Dr Iyobosa Uwugiaren; Martins Oloja, former Editor-Chief, Guardian; and Ms Bukola Coker, Channels TV.

    Others who attended the event included: ⁠Steve Nwosu, Treasurer, NGE; Hamza Idris, Editor-in-Chief, Daily Trust; Femi Adekoya, Editor, The Guardian; Mustapha Isa, director of news Silverbird TV; Ikechukwu Amaechi, Editor-in-Chief, Niche; Onuoha Ukeh, Editor-in-Chief, The Sun; and Nwosu Iheancho, editor, The Sun.

    Others included: Juliet Bumah, editor, News Telegraph; Korede Ogunbunmi, GM,  Radio 1 FRCN; Niyi Ojemakinde, GM, Miliki FM; Joy Anigbogu, editor, Daily Independent; Oluwatosin Odusola, editor, Radio Lagos; James Oluyombo Tokode, editor, The Nations; Ufuoma Egbamuno, manager, Cool/Wazobia News; ⁠and Don Okere, editor, Daily Independent.

  • Fed Govt plans to reduce cost of drugs, ensure best practices

    Fed Govt plans to reduce cost of drugs, ensure best practices

    By Dr. Wahab Shittu, SAN.

    Nigerians have generally been thrown into more hardships healthwise since the American Government under Mr. Donald Thrump stopped the financing of USAID to all countries including Nigeria. This action has created unexpected problems, especially in the health sector as aid to this sector is no longer available and majority of the drugs and medicines used by our health institutions and pharmaceutical outlets are imported with the prohibitive prevailing foreign exchange rate. It is in response to this unfortunate development that the Nigerian Government introduced several initiatives to reduce the cost of medicines in the country.

    Key plans include:

    • Rejuvenating Local Pharmaceutical Industry: The government aims to boost local production of medicines, making them more accessible and affordable. This move is expected to reduce dependence on imported drugs, which are often more expensive due to foreign exchange rates.

    • Executive Order to Lower Drug Prices: The government plans to issue an executive order to control and lower the cost of essential pharmaceutical medications. This order aims to enable local manufacturers to survive, thrive, and deliver life-saving commodities.

    • Presidential Initiative to Unlock Pharmaceutical Value Chain: Launched in October 2023, this initiative focuses on stimulating local manufacturing, improving access to quality pharmaceuticals, and reducing costs. The government is working with the private sector to finalize an instrument addressing fiscal policy constraints for raw materials and manufacturing equipment.

    •Procuring Essential Medicines: The government has announced efforts to procure essential medicines to address rising costs of medications and healthcare products. This move aligns with the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) objective of reducing the financial burden associated with health services.

    • Expanding Health Insurance: The government is working to reform the health insurance landscape, believing that an expanded National Health Insurance Scheme would enable millions of Nigerians to access healthcare services, including essential medicines, without bearing the full cost.

    Challenges and Potential Impact:

    • Devaluation of Naira: The high exchange rate has made procurement of raw materials and equipment imported for production extremely high, contributing to the current high cost of medicines.

    • Long-standing Healthcare Financing Issues: Affordability of healthcare financing in Nigeria has been a long-standing issue for over 40 years, with less than 10% of Nigerians having health insurance or any issuance.

    • Potential Benefits: If successful, these initiatives could make medicines more affordable, reduce dependence on imported drugs, and contribute to the growth of the local pharmaceutical industry.

    • It is our contention that in as much as the government policy on cheap medicines in Nigeria is good and in the right direction if implemented with vigour, we suggest that the agency charged with the regulatory framework should be energised monitor and enforce the smooth implementation of the scheme so that many people will actually benefit to access the medicines.

    • Reacting on the policy, a Lagos-based medical practitioner and social commentator Dr. Waheed Shoyembo, said the plans of the government to make medicines cheaper to the people of this country are very commendation, especially at this time when economic hardship is becoming unbearable to Nigerians.

    • To him, whatever that is done by the government to cushion the effect of the prevailing hardship will be welcomed by all, as the cost of accessing treatment in our health institutions is very prohibitive.

    • Federal Executive Council (FEC), presided over by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, approved this scheme last Monday according to the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Professor Muhammad Ali Pate.

    Read Also: Italy-based Nigerian barber Ofuoyan features in global magazine

    • The prices of medicines have been skyrocketing in recent times as a result of naira devaluation and other variable indicators, thereby making healthcare accessibility to the poor and the vulnerable in the society unaffordable and brutish.

    • But questions will arise in assessing this policy of government as to what extent will it go in comparison to what is obtainable in other climes.

    • Is this a novel approach to solving non availability of cheap and affordable medicines to the people or will it end the same way most government policies are abruptly brought to an end or manifestly managed poorly by those given the responsibility to make positive change.

    • Here are some guides to best practices for medicine cost reductions, whether you’re managing a healthcare facility, working in policy formulation, or just trying to stay solvent while staying alive:

    Strategic best practices for reducing medicine costs:

    1. Promote Generic Substitution

    Why it works: Generic drugs are up to 85% cheaper than branded versions.

    Best Practice:

    Implement policies that mandate generic prescribing when therapeutically equivalent.

    Encourage bulk purchasing of generics for hospitals or national health systems.

    2. Pooled Procurement

    Why it works: Buying in bulk across regions or hospitals boosts bargaining power.

    Best Practice:

    Use group purchasing organizations (GPOs) or regional consortiums.

    Examples: The WHO’s PAHO Strategic Fund, African Union’s AVAT for vaccines.

    3. Essential Medicines Lists (EMLs)

    Why it works: Keeps procurement and inventory focused on cost-effective and necessary drugs.

    Best Practice:

    Update your EML regularly to reflect current evidence and disease burden.

    Prioritize cost-effective treatments over fashionable or marginally beneficial ones.

    4. Regulate Markups and Profiteering

    Why it works: Cuts down on exploitative pricing along the supply chain.

    Best Practice:

    Cap wholesale/retail markups via price controls.

    Monitor supply chain transparency to prevent hidden costs.

    5. Local Manufacturing and Technology Transfer

    Why it works: Reduces dependency on foreign exchange and import markups.

    Best Practice:

    Offer incentives for domestic production of generic medicines.

    Support public-private partnerships for manufacturing capacity.

    6. Smart Formularies and Therapeutic Interchange

    Why it works: Drives competition and price negotiation.

    Best Practice:

    Create formularies based on cost-effectiveness, not pharma influence.

    Encourage therapeutic interchange with clinical decision support systems.

    7. Use of Health Technology Assessment (HTA)

    Why it works: Ensures that new drugs entering the market are worth the cost.

    Best Practice:

    Mandate HTA reviews before reimbursement or inclusion in public procurement.

    Example: NICE in the UK, which frequently denies overpriced meds with low benefits.

    8. Combat Irrational Use and Overprescription

    Why it works: Less waste = less cost.

    Best Practice:

    Invest in prescriber education and auditing.

    Use e-prescribing systems with built-in checks against overuse.

    9. Incentivize Cost-Conscious Prescribing

    Why it works: Doctors and pharmacists often drive unnecessary costs.

    Best Practice:

    Provide performance-based incentives tied to cost-saving and rational prescribing.

    Monitor patterns using electronic health records (EHRs) and intervene accordingly.

    10. Public Awareness Campaigns

    Why it works: Informed patients ask for generics and resist pressure to overconsume.

    Best Practice:

    Use media and community outreach to promote value-based medicine consumption.

    Bonus Tip: Tame the Patent Beast

    Where legally viable, challenge questionable patents and utilize TRIPS flexibilities (e.g. compulsory licensing) to bypass monopolistic pricing, especially in LMICs.

    Need a tailored strategy for a specific country or facility (e.g., Nigeria’s NHIA framework or HMO models)? I can break it down further.

    Comparative Analysis of Medicine Costs in Côte d’Ivoire, South Africa, Nigeria, and Ghana

    The cost of medicines varies across countries due to factors like local manufacturing capabilities, import dependence, currency fluctuations, healthcare policies, and government regulations. Below is a comparison of the costs of medicines in Côte d’Ivoire, South Africa, Nigeria, and Ghana.

    1. Côte d’Ivoire

    • Overview:

    Côte d’Ivoire’s healthcare system faces several challenges, including limited access to essential medicines, the prevalence of counterfeit drugs, and economic factors that contribute to high prices.

    • Medicine Prices:

    • Prices can be higher due to the importation of most pharmaceutical products.

    •There is a notable issue with counterfeit medications, which affects the market, making genuine drugs expensive and less accessible.

    • Regulatory Environment:

    • The government does not have a fully centralized procurement system for medicines, leading to fragmented and inconsistent pricing in the market.

    • Key Challenges:

    • Counterfeit medicines are prevalent, and many low-cost alternatives enter the market.

    • Access to essential medicines is restricted in rural areas due to the high cost of imported medicines.

    • Typical Medicine Prices:

    • Certain essential medications like antibiotics and pain relievers can cost up to 30-50% higher than in some other African countries, due to importation costs and low local production.

    2. South Africa

    • Overview:

    South Africa has a relatively well-developed pharmaceutical sector, with a regulated market for medicines and a government-led procurement system aimed at keeping prices lower.

    • Medicine Prices:

    •  Prices for medicines are controlled by the Single Exit Price (SEP) system, which regulates the cost of drugs in both the private and public sectors.

    • For example, South Africa’s antiretroviral (ARV) treatment costs are among the lowest in the world due to bulk procurement and negotiations for affordable pricing.

    • Regulatory Environment:

    • The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) oversees the regulation of medicines, ensuring that both pricing and quality standards are maintained.

    • The government has adopted a centralized procurement system for key medicines, including ARVs, reducing the price per person significantly.

    • Key Challenges:

    • In the private sector, the cost of medicines can still be high due to additional fees and markups by pharmacies and hospitals.

    • Importation of specialized medications also results in price fluctuations.

    • Typical Medicine Prices:

    • Generic medicines tend to be affordable, especially in the public health sector.

    • Prices for ARVs are substantially lower, around $75 per person per year in government-funded programs.

    • Common medications, like antibiotics, are comparatively cheaper than in many other African countries.

    3.Nigeria

    • Overview:

    Nigeria is the largest economy in Africa but faces significant challenges in its healthcare sector. A large portion of its medicines are imported, leading to fluctuations in drug prices due to currency depreciation and inflation.

    • Medicine Prices:

     The cost of medicines in Nigeria has been rising dramatically, particularly since 2020. The Naira has devalued significantly, making imports more expensive.

     Common medications like antibiotics, painkillers, and antihypertensive drugs have experienced price increases of up to 1000% in the last few years.

    • Regulatory Environment:

    • The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) regulates the import and distribution of medicines. However, lack of strict enforcement of pricing regulations has led to unpredictable pricing in the market.

    • Key Challenges:

     Currency devaluation has a significant impact on the cost of imported medicines.

     Inflation and poor economic conditions have compounded the cost issue.

     Many Nigerians are forced to rely on out-of-pocket spending for medications, with some paying as much as 37 days’ wages for a single course of antibiotics.

    • Typical Medicine Prices:

     Ampiclox 500mg antibiotics, for example, saw price increases of over 1,000% from 2019 to 2023.

     Insulin prices have also increased by more than 30% in the past few years.

    4. Ghana

    • Overview:

    Ghana faces similar challenges to its neighbors when it comes to medicine costs, including reliance on imports and currency volatility. However, the country has made strides in improving access to affordable medicines in certain sectors.

    • Medicine Prices:

    • Medicine costs are relatively high in the private sector, but the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) helps subsidize the cost of some essential medicines.

    • Comparative Overview

    Country Medicine Price Trends Key Factors Influencing Prices Regulation & Access

    Côte d’Ivoire High prices due to imports and counterfeits Counterfeit drugs; import reliance Lack of centralized procurement; high rural cost

    South Africa Controlled prices; generic drugs affordable Single Exit Price system; bulk procurement (ARVs) Regulated by SAHPRA; affordable ARVs in public sector

    Nigeria Significant increases (up to 1,000%) Currency devaluation; inflation; import reliance Price fluctuations; lack of effective regulation

    Ghana Moderately high, but NHIS helps reduce costs Import reliance; inflation; currency depreciation FDA regulates, but rural access issues persist

     Like other West African countries, Ghana struggles with a high level of imported medicines, which can drive prices up.

    • Regulatory Environment:

    • The Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) of Ghana regulates the pharmaceutical market, but issues like counterfeit drugs remain a concern.

    Ghana has made attempts to localize drug production, but local manufacturing is still not sufficient to meet demand, contributing to high prices for many medicines.

    • Key Challenges:

    • The exchange rate and inflation contribute to high import costs.

    • Access to medicines in rural areas can be difficult due to high prices and transportation costs.

    • Typical Medicine Prices:

    • Essential drugs like antibiotics and antihypertensive medicines are usually slightly more affordable compared to Nigeria but still higher than in South Africa due to the reliance on imports.

    Summary:

    • South Africa offers relatively affordable medicines due to regulation, particularly in the public health sector.

    • Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana face high medicine prices due to import reliance, with issues in rural areas and counterfeits being prevalent in Côte d’Ivoire.

    • Nigeria has the highest increase in medicine prices, driven by currency depreciation and inflation, affecting accessibility for many people.

    Efforts to reduce medicine prices in all these countries would benefit from stronger regulatory frameworks, enhanced local manufacturing, and strategic procurement practices to reduce reliance on imports.

    Having assessed this whole effort of government in reducing the costs of medicines in Nigeria and the challenges ahead of procurement and manufacturing locally, in addition to strengthening the regulatory framework, it is our view that the government should ensure that this program succeeds as it will help the people to access medi-care.

    CONCLUSION

    Reducing Nigeria’s dependence on imported medicines is not just an economic imperative. It is a national survival strategy that will depend on key parameters. First, by investing in local pharmaceutical manufacturing, the country can create jobs, save foreign exchange, strengthen health security, and tailor treatments to its unique disease burden. However, manufacturing alone won’t move the needle unless it is backed by strategic procurement practices that prioritize local suppliers, ensure quality, and create stable markets.

    In my view, these twin strategies form a powerful engine: manufacturing builds capacity, and strategic procurement sustains it. This synergy can transform Nigeria from a passive importer into a self-reliant, export-ready pharmaceutical force, resilient in crisis, competitive in trade, and proactive in safeguarding public health.

    This is the way to go.

    • Shittu SAN is a leading litigator and rights defender

  • The dynamics of poverty and crime

    The dynamics of poverty and crime

    Any keen observer of events would agree that it is a truism that there is a correlation between poverty and crime, such that both could be referred to as first cousins.

    This has become more apparent with recent recessions and financial meltdowns.

    Even before this time, immediately after the Nigerian civil war that occurred between 1967 and 1970, it was recognised that the economic dislocations that came as a result of the war, coupled with the free flow of arms, increased the rate of armed robbery in the country.

    This fact was recognised by the court in Emelogu v. The State (1988) 2 NWLR (pt.78), 524 at 535.The teeming number of child labourers/hawkers around and senior citizens still grappling with basic needs, and the high rate of unemployment and underemployment are all indices of a financially troubled society.

    If stocks were taken of the wealth and resources that Africa boasts of, poverty should be an exception rather than the norm.

    According to statistics, Africa is home to some 30 per cent of the world’s mineral reserves, eight per cent of the world’s natural gas, 12 per cent of the world’s oil reserves; the continent has 40 per cent of the world’s gold and up to 90 per cent of its chromium and platinum.

    Africa has the richest concentration of natural resources such as oil, copper, diamonds, bauxite, lithium, gold, hardwood forests and tropical fruits.

    In spite of these huge endowments, Africans have long been numbered among the poorest people in the world. Forty per cent of the population lives in poverty according to the World Bank, accounting for two-thirds of the global extreme poor population.

    The society in which we live gives the impression that there is something esoteric about making a decent living or that wealth is a state achievable most of the time by cutting corners, supporting the statement attributed to Honore de Balzac that “behind every great fortune there is a crime.”

    The current international poverty line, which is $1.90 a day, is the threshold that determines whether someone is living in poverty. The line is based on the value of goods needed to sustain one adult (as per the World Bank.) The economic theory of crime (Becker, 1965) demonstrates a direct correlation between poverty and crime.

    It assumes that people resort to crime only if the cost of committing the crime is lower than the benefits gained.

    The people living in poverty, therefore, have a much greater chance of committing property crime than the general population.

    As reported in the crime index, often, persons who are known to commit street crimes are poor, uneducated, often unemployed and residents of low-income neighbourhoods.

    According to Prof. Richard Delgado, while the vast majority of poor people do not violate the law, most criminal offenders are from poor backgrounds.

    Generally speaking, poverty is not a known defence to crimes. In Victor Hugo’s classic, Les Miserables, the protagonist, Jean Valjean, stole a loaf of bread to feed a starving family of eight.

    He was sentenced to five years of hard labour. It is emphasised that the purpose of criminal law is to condemn and blame, and not to serve social welfare goals.

    Even the famous wise King Solomon stated in Proverbs 6:30-31 as follows: “Hunger is no excuse for a thief to steal; when he’s caught, he has to pay it back, even if he has to put his whole house in hock.” (The Message Translation).

    Our case law is replete with crimes that were induced by poverty. In The State v. Mbong Billy Udobong (1996) 6 DTLR pt.1 page 116, the deceased was alleged to have stolen one and a half cups of rice belonging to his father ( the accused), cooked same and ate with his younger brother and sisters.

    When the accused returned home and learnt of the incident, he raved and scolded at the deceased, who, according to the accused, remained stubborn and unrepentant.

    The accused, therefore, reached for his machete and descended on the deceased, who fell and died on the spot.

    The wife of the accused, who was not there when the incident happened, on becoming aware of the ugly situation, reported same to the police, who arrested the accused.

    He was charged to court, found guilty and sentenced to death by hanging. The court described the act as “wicked and unfatherly.”

    The gravity of this case could be better appreciated if we realise that the cup of rice spoken of in this case is the size of an average mug of coffee.

    In lamenting the peculiar circumstances of this case, the Honourable Justice Niki Tobi said “…what are we really up to in this country? Has the economy degenerated so badly that a child has to pay for one and a half cups of rice with his dear life?

    And what is more, the father, the murderer, is likely to face the hangman, all because of one and a half cups of rice.

    Again, because of one and a half cups of rice, the mother of the deceased has been denied permanently the company of the accused, thus experiencing the exit of two persons from the family. It is really sad.”

    The bottom line of the above case is poverty! If the man could easily afford rice, then he would not be so angry as to kill his own son who stole one and a half cups of rice.

    As the adage goes, a hungry man is an angry man. He was angry because he was hungry. If he could afford bags of rice, he would not be upset by his son taking one and a half cups from his stock without his consent.

    The idea of crime being correlated to poverty took a completely new dimension in Mr X v The State ( suit number HCI/MI/2002), which yours truly handled as a prosecutor at the High Court Issele – Uku, Delta State of Nigeria.

    It was a motion praying the court for an order to admit on bail a certain young man aged 18 then in prison for rape, rape of his own mother, contrary to section 358 of the Criminal Code.

    According to the investigations conducted by the police in the case, the young man under caution admitted to raping his mother but stated that a native Doctor whom he had consulted to proffer a solution to his economic difficulties had through divination advised him that one surest way of overcoming his miseries was to sleep with his mother, an advice which he carried out to the letter.

    The above cases, amongst others, are indices that all is not well in our society. According to Taylor, crime could be seen as a fault of the social system, whose institutions do not work equally for all its members.

    According to Prof. Richard Delgado, “an environment of extreme poverty and deprivation creates in individuals a propensity to commit crimes such that punishing the individual is unfair.”

    Read Also: Italy-based Nigerian barber Ofuoyan features in global magazine

    According to some scholars, when the rules of society are unjust, the social contract is broken and citizens are not to be totally blamed for not following the rules, such that a room ought to be made for the defence of poverty.

    In the social contract theory, promoted originally by theorists such as John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Jean- Jacques Rosseau, the people impliedly surrendered their rights to the leaders to lead them aright and give them protection (including economic protection).

    It is gratifying to note the various programs now put in place to ultimately reduce poverty in our land and especially equip the citizenry with the requisite skills necessary to tackle unemployment and its resultant poverty.

    Poverty appears to be a defence to the crime of desertion of children under Section 372 of the Criminal Code.

    The section provides: “Any person who being the parent, guardian or other person having the lawful care or charge of a child under the age of 12 years, and being able to maintain such child, willfully and without lawful or reasonable cause deserts the child and leaves it without means of support, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is liable to imprisonment for one year.” (Italics mine).

    The Section makes a qualification that the person must be able to maintain such a child for him to be convicted under the section.

    It is submitted that the inability to maintain such a child as a result of poverty could be a defence.

    Section 311 (3) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act provides as follows: “A court, after conviction, shall take all necessary aggravating and mitigating evidence or information in respect of each convict that may guide it in deciding the nature and extent of sentence to pass on the convict in each particular case, even though the convicts were charged and tried together.”

    This, it is submitted, is an instance where the court, in determining the punishment to pass on a convict, can consider the fact that the offence was committed as a result of poverty.

    If this fact is found to be true, then the court can impose a less severe punishment.

    •Read more about Adigwe, a lawyer, at benadigwe.com

  • SAN advocates support for special needs children amid funding gaps

    SAN advocates support for special needs children amid funding gaps

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Dr. Anthony Idigbe, has called on the government, private sector, and the public to step up support for children with special needs.

    Idigbe, Board Chairman of Punuka Foundation, spoke during its annual “Walk for Super Special Children”.

    He stressed that Nigeria’s greatest challenge lay not in laws but in the spirit of commitment to providing adequate care and opportunities for vulnerable children.

    Idigbe, the Senior Partner at Punuka Attorneys and Solicitors, notted that the core issue was the lack of a systematic approach to identifying individual disabilities and tailoring accommodations accordingly.

    “Once a disability is identified, there should be a process of assessing the level of ability or disability and providing resources, be it mobility aids, assisted living, or tailored education to ensure they can live with dignity and purpose. 

    “The system must recognise each person’s needs and consistently provide the necessary support,” he said.

    He pointed out that Nigeria’s current efforts fell short, with many children languishing without proper assistance, thereby becoming a burden on society.

    The SAN said: “The government is not doing enough to identify needs and provide accommodations.

    “Instead, we see many physically challenged individuals and children on the streets, often as beggars.

    Read Also: FULL LIST: Nigeria’s varsities that accept 140, 150, 160 JAMB scores

    “They are not sufficiently empowered to advocate for themselves, and that makes it difficult to push reforms.

    “It is our collective responsibility to ensure their voices are heard and their rights protected.”

    Executive Director and Trustee of Punuka Foundation, Mrs. Elizabeth Idigbe, underscored funding as a primary obstacle.

    “Funding translates directly into infrastructure, adequate facilities, assistive devices, and trained personnel.

    “While some states like Lagos have started inclusive education in public schools, the facilities are often rundown due to insufficient resources.

    “We need more government support to sustain and expand these initiatives,” she said.

    Mrs. Idigbe, who is the Managing Partner of Punuka Attorneys and Solicitors, lamented that many parents, especially indigent ones, struggled to afford therapies and basic needs for their children.

    “Most of these children come from impoverished backgrounds, and foundation-led efforts are often limited by a lack of funds.

    “There is a dire need for regulations that mandate accessible public buildings and enforce penalties for non-compliance,” she said.

    Mrs. Idigbe stressed the importance of enforcement, noting that Nigeria’s legal frameworks were often not effectively implemented.

    “Having laws on paper is not enough; they must be enforced from the top down,” she added.

    Acting Chief Operating Officer, Mrs. Angela Ezenweani, noted that the Punuka Foundation’s “Walk for Super Special Children” served as a platform not only for raising awareness but also for showcasing the talents and resilience of children with neurodiverse conditions.

    “Every child has unique potential; we must create opportunities for them to express themselves and reach their full capabilities,” she said.

    She believes that despite the challenges of funding and policy gaps, sustained advocacy, stricter enforcement of regulations, and increased resource allocation could drive meaningful change.

  • Firm writes IG over discontinuance notice in N350.9m fraud case

    Firm writes IG over discontinuance notice in N350.9m fraud case

    A financial consultancy firm, Rosiyke Financial Consult Ltd, has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun, over a notice of discontinuance filed on a pending criminal case involving N350.9 million fraud.

    The petition, dated May 15, was submitted by the firm’s legal counsel, Ernest Annie Nwoye.

    It concerns charge ID/24069C/2024 pending before a Lagos court.

    Rosiyke is urging the IGP to investigate the circumstances under which Superintendent of Police (SP) R.N. Maiguru and Inspector A.I. Aminu, both of the Legal/Prosecution Section of FCID, Force Headquaters, Abuja, sought to discontinue the charge.

    The Notice of Discontinuance is dated March 28.

    The case stems from a July 2022 transaction in which Ms. Rukkaya Saadina Dantata allegedly received N350.9 million from Rosiyke to remit $580,000 to suppliers in China.

    While she reportedly admitted receiving the funds during interrogation by the Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID), the telex confirmations she provided were later discovered to be fake.

    Despite the severity of the allegations, Ms. Dantata was granted bail and not detained, allegedly due to high-level interference.

    Read Also: FULL LIST: Nigeria’s varsities that accept 140, 150, 160 JAMB scores

    A proposed repayment plan soon collapsed after she became unreachable, and both she and her guarantor were declared missing.

    According to the petition, the FCID under former Deputy Inspector-General Sylvester Alabi made efforts to trace Ms. Dantata, including placing her on an Interpol red notice and an immigration watchlist.

    In early 2024, a N100 million settlement was reportedly brokered by a retired Commissioner of Police.

    However, the settlement was never honoured, and Ms. Dantata remains at large.

    The petitioner alleged that members of Ms. Dantata’s family made a fresh settlement offer in March 2025, which also failed to materialise.

    Shortly after, Maiguru and Aminu filed the notice of discontinuance.

    The petitioner urged the IG to investigate the duo and to ensure that the case proceeds to full prosecution.

    It emphasised that a criminal charge cannot be withdrawn without the consent of the court or the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    Any attempt to circumvent due process, it warned, undermines public confidence and damages the reputation of the Nigeria Police.

    The petitioner also called on the IG to ensure justice was served, restitution made, and anyone involved in obstructing the case held accountable.

    The Lagos State Police Command had arraigned Dantata for N350,900,000 fraud.

    She was arraigned on two counts of fraud, cheating, and obtaining money under false pretences before the Ikeja Special Offences Court.

    Prosecuting counsel, Ezekiel Rimamsomte, told the court that Dantata committed the alleged offences between July and August 2022.

    He said the defendant obtained N350,900,000 by fraudulent means, which was transferred into her account and that of her firm, Adat Ventures, under the name Rukayya Saadina Dantata.

    The police added that Dantata deceived her victims, Saka Rasak of Rosiyike, and others of Financial Consultant Ltd, located at No. 50 Kingsway Building, Lagos, by pretending to conduct legitimate business transactions.

    According to him, the offences committed contravened Section 1(a)(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act 2006 and Section 323 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State 2015.

    Dantata pleaded not guilty to the charges preferred against her.

    Justice Rahmon Oshodi granted Dantata bail of N30million with two sureties in like sum.