Category: Law

  • ‘How lawyers can avoid sudden death’

    Lawyers, by the nature of their
    profession, are prone to stress
    and sleeplessness, and must undergo regular checks to avoid sudden death, according to a medical expert, Prof Kamar Adeleke.

    Adeleke, who is President/Chief Executive Officer of Tristate Healthcare Systems Ltd, spoke at the annual general conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Lagos.

    Tristate Healthcare Services partnered with the NBA to provide screening and medical treatment for lawyers at the conference.

    Adeleke said sudden death was a major problem in Nigeria, adding that its leading causes include diseases of the cardiovascular (heart) system.

    “It is estimated that more than seven million lives per year are lost to sudden cardiac death (SCD)  worldwide, including over 300,000 in the United States,” he said

    Quoting the World Health Organisation, he said one out of every five Nigerian adults over the age of 30 will likely die prematurely from non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases.

    Cardiovascular diseases, he said, include coronary artery disease, which constitutes 80 per cent of cause of sudden cardiac death; cardiomyopathies (heart muscle disease) and cardiac rhythm disorder.

    Risk factors for sudden death, he said, are older age, male sex, post-menopausal state, cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, high cholesterol, obesity and family history.

    On how to prevent sudden death, he said it involves identification of individuals at risk, treatment of underlying predisposing condition, lifestyle modification (healthy diet, exercise, weight loss and smoking cessation) and implantation of the automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD).

    AICD is a small electronic device implanted in the chest, just beneath the skin below the collar bone.

    Its main function is to prevent sudden death from cardiac arrest due to life threatening abnormally fast heart rhythms.

    Tristate Healthcare Systems Vice-President/Chief Operating Officer, Dr Olukunle Iyanda, said the company did full screening of lawyers at the even, which was the first time it would happen at any NBA conference.

    The tests, he said, included urinalysis, cholesterol testing, prostrate cancer screening, glucose level checks and body mass index examinations to determine obesity.

    “The tests are to prevent issues of sudden death, high blood pressure for those who have it but don’t know – people who think it’s only when they’re fat that their obese; all of which contribute to heart diseases.

    “Our strength is cardiovascular diseases treatment. We have done about 150 open heart surgeries and a lot of other cardiac interventions. We discovered that prevention is better than cure.”

    He said a full cardiac evaluation was also done for lawyers, which involves heart ultrasound.

    “We also provided emergency services and respiratory care, which has to do with issues of sleep disorder,” he said.

    Iyanda urged lawyers, who he said are prone to depression and sleeplessness, to always “know their numbers”.

    “When we say ‘know their numbers’, we’re talking about knowing their cholesterol level, their glucose level, their heart rate. The frequency of the tests depends on the age.

    “If you’re above 50, you have to undergo such tests at least once every six months. If you’re in your 40s you may do it once a year. It also depends on what the numbers say,” he said.

    He said 56 staff of Tristate Healthcare was deployed to the conference.

    “It’s like a value-added service to the NBA,” he said.

  • ‘Update your knowledge of native laws’

    Lagos Chief Judge (CJ), Justice Olufunmilayo Atilade has urged newly appointed  presidents of Customary Court and magistrates to acquaint themselves with the customs of the people to bring  justice administration closer to the people.

    The CJ gave the advice while swearing in 38 new judges into the state’s judiciary.

    The judicial oath was administered on them by the new Chief Registrar of the High Court, Mrs Abiola Soladoye.

    Justice Atilade advised them to read and get themselves acquainted  with the Customary Court Laws of Lagos State 2011 in order not act illegally.

    She warned them to live above board and up to the status of their new office, “your worship”.

    Justice Atilade warned the new  judges against using their new powers to oppress their community.

    She reminded them that they were carefully selected because of their track records, integrity, ability and qualifications.

    “ Your being here is a priviledge  granted by the Governor of Lagos State. So, I hope you will carry out your duties with integrity and honesty.

    “Do not take bribe. If you take bribe, you will be shown the way out by the Judiciary Commission on completion of their investigation,” she said.

    The Executive Secretary of the Lagos State Judiciary Service Commission, Mrs Ayodele Odugbesan who also admonished the new appointees to fair in their judgement, explained that the appointment of the judges was done in conformity with Section 2 of the Customary  Court Laws of Lagos State 2011.

    Mrs Odugbesan said the judicial oath administered on them by the Lagos CJ was also in fulfillment of Section 13 of the Customary Court Laws of Lagos State 2011.

    Responding on behalf of her colleagues, one of the magistrates, Mrs Desola Folami, promised that they would serve the state judiciary without blemish.

    While thanking Governor Akinbode for the opportunity given them to serve the state, she said they would not engage in any activity that would destroy the confidence reposed in them.

  • ‘Stop paying young lawyers peanuts’

    Lauretta Ikwuka was called to Bar in 2012. She is the National Secretary, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Young Lawyers Forum (YLF), and member, Onitsha branch of  the association. In this interview with Legal Editor John Austin Unachukwu, she shares her views on the challenges facing the young lawyers, justice administration, alternative disputes resolution mechanisms and sundry national issues.

    Why did you decide to become a lawyer?

    I decided to become a lawyer because of my burning desire to offer assistance to the vulnerable and less privileged  members of the society. I hate injustice and oppression, repression  and therefore  cannot afford to keep quiet or  fold my hands  helplessly in the face of such situations.  Hence I decided to  join the legal profession so that I can offer my own little assistance whenever such a situation arises.   In addition, I always like to uphold the truth, ensure equity and justice at all times, so the knowledge of law will help  me to appreciate what justice and fairness means at all times so that I can do them because you cannot uphold what you don’t know neither can you give what you don’t have Nemo dat quod non habet.

     So, how far have you done that?

    Well, I have always been able to offer my own little assistance to victims of such situations and circumstances whenever and wherever such situation arises. I am just a young lawyer still learning the art of the trade and by the time I become a senior lawyer, I will do better than I am doing now. By that time, I will have the requisite experience and resources and contacts to do what God places in my hearth for the vulnerable and less privileged members of the society. Law is life and a veritable tool for service to mankind, so for now I will deploy my skills to serve God and humanity for us to have a better society rooted in the rule of law, equity and justice.

    I also have a passion for the law profession. I love the profession of law because it is a noble profession. It always makes you conscious of you rights as human being, it teaches you your duties and obligations as a citizen and gives you the boldness to pursue you convictions with courage within the ambit of the law.

    Above all, it is a profession that makes you available for service and protects you from unnecessary harassment and molestation. The fact that you are a lawyer earns you a level of respect and honour from the members of the society

    Are you satisfied with what you see in the profession?

    Yes, I am quite satisfied with what I see but like every other human activity, there are lots of room for improvements. A lot still needs to be done or I still need to learn a lot in the profession to meet my expectations.  I believe that Rome was not built in a day and  with time I will get there. However, I still expect more  from the profession in the areas of ethics and  ethical standards  which I believe has fallen down drastically. The rules of conduct have to be seriously enforced and where such rules do not exist, leaders of the profession will make and update existing rules to protect the profession from falling into the mud, restore the dignity and pride of the profession.

    Which areas of the profession do you like best?

    My area of interest is Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms (ADR) which include Arbitration, Mediation, Conciliation  and so on.

    Why?

    Well, from what I have seen in practice litigation and court processes take very  long time to resolve issues. Unnecessary adjournments, preliminary objections, motions and similar applications help to prolong court procedures in litigation. The rules of evidence and so on must be observed in litigation but these are not the same in ADR.  ADR allows parties to determine and choose their arbitrators. They determine the venue of the meeting and also the speed of the whole arbitration process. I dislike divorce matters but I do not despise lawyers that handle it.       

    Why don’t you like doing divorce matters?

    Well, I respect the family and the marriage institution so much that I do not like anything that affects or hurts family relationship. I like seeing families staying in peace and in love, unity and peace so that they fulfill their divine destiny.

    How do you feel as the National Secretary of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Young Lawyers Forum (YLF)?

    I feel honoured being appointed the National Secretary of the NBA Young Lawyers Forum by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association A. B. Mahmoud (SAN), and I see it as a privilege to contribute my quota to the the  Brave New Bar  promised by Mr president. Young lawyers are an integral part of the legal profession and deserve to be treated as such. The Young lawyer has a lot of potentials to be tapped but if they are not allowed to develop those potentials by providing them the privilege and opportunity and platform  to contribute their quota to the development of the profession, they cannot function optimally. With the appointment of officers of the forum, we will now sit down and fashion out programmes for the forum and pursue same with a great zeal. We shall reshape and reposition the forum as a critical stakeholder in the affairs of the NBA and also make the young lawyer play his role in a globalised world.

    What is the greatest need of the young lawyer today?

    The greatest need of the young lawyers in Nigeria is empowerment. They need to be empowered and legal environment made conducive for them to unleash their potential. Law practice today is different from what it used to be. Modern practice is technology driven, so the young lawyer needs a lot of skills and resources to be relevant in global practice. He needs the skills as well as the technology to grow. He also needs to be grounded in the knowledge of the law so that he will contend with the influence of expatriates in a globalised world. You don’t get those  skills for free, you need a lot of both resources and mentoring to do so, you need a high level skills to deal with international clients and seal high level transactions.

    What are the greatest challenges facing the young lawyer?

    The greatest challenges facing the  young lawyers are locating opportunities for employment and demand for specialisation in different areas of practice as demanded in the global legal market. Our economy is not growing as it ought to grow, clientele  base is not expanding as it ought to expand, the working capital and tools of work are not there for the young lawyer, so we have to go the extra mile to survive in a highly competitive and capitalist economy. This, obviously, places a big burden and challenge on senior lawyers to not only mentor the juniors, but to also provide them opportunity to participate and develop their skills.

    How do you think the NBA can assist in developing the skills of the young lawyer?

    NBA can assist in professionalism and expertise of young lawyers in Nigeria by providing technical assistance for continuing legal education and advanced skills training. The standard of law firms need to be enhanced. There is need for the NBA to look into the stipends being paid by the law firms, some of them are not encouraging at all.  The young  lawyers  should be able to see themselves as the future visionary leaders of this great nation and this cannot be possible without the support of the great leaders of our noble profession.

    Do you have any regrets being a lawyer?

    I do not have any regret at all becoming a lawyer, I have passion for law profession and if given opportunity I will like to read law again and again. Apart from being a noble profession, it provides the average lawyer the opportunity to contribute his or her quota to the development of his country. It enables the lawyer to play active role in the society and therefore contributes in making the world a better place.

    What are your expectations from the NBA?

    I will like to see an NBA that is a sustainable institution, built on transparency,  integrity and highly regulated to  provide economic opportunities  that enhance the well being of the young lawyer and maintain very high ethical standards. I picked law as a career because of the  burning desire to assist the underdog, so I will like to be a lawyer that can battle the ills in the society, be able to rescue people in great distress, offer free legal services and assistance to  poor widows, the vulnerable orphans in the society and protect them against any oppression.

  • Thoughts on rape, defilement

    Thoughts on rape, defilement

    Text of a paper delivered by Vera Chinwuba at a symposium on The Rape Menace; Ending the silence on rape organised by the Action Group on Adolescent Health, College of Medicine, University of Lagos Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Idi-Araba, Lagos.

    There is no universally accepted definition of rape. Definitions of rape vary in different jurisdictions and legal systems. Rape is simply non-consensual sexual intercourse.  When a man has sex with a woman without her consent.  I have looked at some definitions internationally and locally.

    The Roman statute of the international Criminal Court is the most advanced.

    ‘’Perpetrator invaded the body of a person by conduct resulting in penetration, however slight, of any part of the body of the victim or of the perpetrator with a sexual organ or of the anal or genital opening of the victim with any object or any other part of the body.’’

    The invasion was committed by the force, or by threat of force or coercion, such as that caused by fear of violence duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of power against such person, or by taking advantage of a coercive environment, or the invasion was committed against a person incapable of giving genuine consent.

    Rape is the unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman by a man forcibly and against her will. It is sexual intercourse accomplished by force and against the will of the woman. More particularly, rape is the act of having carnal knowledge of a woman by a forcibly and against her will or without her conscious permission or where permission has been attained by means of force or fear of immediate bodily harm. Rape can be committed by both force and threat.

    The Black’s Law Dictionary defines ‘’Rape as unlawful sexual activities especially intercourse with a person usually a female without consent and by force or threat of injury’’.

    The criminal code defines the offence of Rape in a similar manner.

    ‘’Any person who has unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman or girl without her consent or with her consent, if the consent is obtained by force or by means of threat or, intimidation of any kind, or by fear of harm, or by means of false and fraudulent representation as to be nature of the act, or in the case of a married woman, by impersonating her husband, is guilty of an offence which is called rape.

    Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State also has its definition of rape.

    The World Health Organisation (WHO) defines ‘’Rape as physically forced or otherwise coerced penetration even if slight of the vulva or anus using penis or other body parts or object.’’

    In 2012 Annual Uniform Crime Report of the Federal Bureau of Investigation defines rape as carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will to …’’

    The above are diverse definitions of rape as a global crime. Therefore is not a local crime and it is not peculiar to Nigeria.

     Defilement

    It is important to note the distinction between rape and defilement.

    Means having any sexual intercourse with a child under the age of thirteen years. It is a criminal offence under the Sexual Offences Acts and Child Rights Act.

    The criminal code stipulates that ‘’Any person who has unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under13  is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for life, with or without whipping. Any person who attempts to have unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of 13 years is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years, with or without whipping. A prosecution for either of these offences must begin within two months after the offence is committed. A person cannot be convicted of either of the offences upon uncorroborated testimony of a witness.

    Defilement simply means to violate someone’s chastity. The offence of defilement involved a girl under 13 while rape affects a female at or above 13. It is a well laid down position of the law that a child below 13 cannot be raped. However, the age bracket differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.  It’s important to know that rape can only occur when the virginal of the woman is penetrated.  This does not mean that anal or unlawful sexual intercourse is allowed. This is a crime and covered under different descriptions in each legislation.  However, it is not a mandatory sentence in all of them. Sexual assault is similar to rape but it is not.  Any sexual assault is any form of sexual contact or behaviour that occurs without the explicitly consent of the recipient.

    Below are some of the legislations:

    Criminal Code   –  Applicable in all Sourthern States

    Penal   Code  –   Applicable only in Northern states.

    Criminal Law of Lagos State –      Applicable only in Lagos State.

    The Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act  –   Applicable only in FCT Abuja.

    Sexual Offences Act   –   The Child’s Rights Act

    Rape and child defilement are gender based violence (GBV) against women according to Beijin Declaration and platform for action. It is a global crime that leaves deep scars. It has caused emotional pains and exposes many to avoidable sexually transmitted diseases and some victims have killed themselves.

     Types of rape

    There are several other forms of rape (a)    War rape – sexual slavery (b)    Spousal rape (c)     Date rape (d)    Date rape drug (e)    Male – male (sodomy) (f)  Female – female (lesbian) rape – This is the most common and least reported especially in prisons. There are indications that these types of rape are substantially more common in real sense. Other forms of carnal knowledge are deemed unlawful in the eyes of the law.

    Attempted rape

    Any person who attempts to commit the offence of rape is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years without canning.

    Rape is distinct from attempted rape or assault with intent to rape. Any attempt to rape must be accompany the means to effect the crime. It therefore requires no corroboration. The evidence of the female victim is enough to sustain the conviction of the perpetrator.

    What constitutes rape?

    Deriving from the definition above, rape is unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman without her consent, by force, intimidation, threat, coercism etc. The essence of crime of rape is not the fact of intercourse, but the injury and the outrage to the modesty and feeling of the woman by means of carnal knowledge feloniously and forcibly infested.

    Elements of rape/ingredents of rape

    1. Penetration – carnal knowledge b.  Emission of semen c. Physical force d. Constructive forcee. Resistance f. Lack of consent  g.  Capacity to consent h. Consent  induced by fear

     Penetration

    To complete the crime of rape, penetration must occur. Emission of semen without penetration is insufficient. However what degree of penetration is required? It has been held in several case laws that a degree of penetration so slight and light that did not cause laceration or injury of the hymen would be sufficient in law for the offence of rape to be completed.  Even if the victim is Virgo Intacta (Virgin) or yet to be disvirgined. The court from surrounding circumstantial satisfies it will convict such accused person.  The offence is committed if the penis enters the labia of the female organ. It is not necessary for the hymen to raptured. Although sometimes ago, this was considered a sine qua non of the crime. It is also not necessary that there was a laceration of the Virginia. Some evidence is necessary to sustain a conviction. Where the prosecutrix and tending physician testify that there has been no penetration, a conviction cannot be sustained. The carnal knowledge to constitute rape must be ‘’res in re’’ but to no particular depth and the hymen need not be raptured nor body torn.

    1. b)    Emission of semen

    The reason that proof of penetration even without emission is deemed to be sufficient is that the essence of crime of rape is the injury to the person and the outrage to the feeling of prosecutrix.

    1. c)     Physical force

    Force, actual or constructive is an essential element of rape but no particular amount of force is necessary to constitute the crime but it is essential that actual force be used to overcome the will of the woman. Force could be by threat or serious body harm which over power the female and cause her to resistance to yield.

    1. d)    Constructive Force

    It implies force or violence threatened as a result of noncompliance and for the purpose of preventing resistance.

    1. e)    Resistance

    Resistance establishes two elements of the crime, force and non-consent. These are essential in every case in which the complainant has her mental and physical capacities intact.

    1. f)      Lack of consent

    The offence of rape, the sexual act must be committed against the will of the woman otherwise it will not be considered rape. Consent given at any time prior to the penetration deprives the subsequent intercourse of its criminal character regardless of how reluctant it was given.

    1. g)     Capacity to consent

    Where a woman is in a state of consciousness unlawful and forcible connection with her at the time is presumed to be without her consent and it is rape. As a general rule where a man has intercourse with an idiotic or insane woman without resistance or with her consent it is considered rape. If a man has connection with a woman while asleep, intoxicated or unconscious because of drugs. He is guilty of rape.

    1. h)  Consent induced by fear or fraud consent obtained out of fear of personal violence is void.
    2. i)       Age limit/capacity to commit offence of rape

    The criminal code stipulates that a male person under the age of 12 is presumed incapable of having carnal knowledge. It follow that a person cannot be guilty of offence of rape or attempted rape, although if charged he may be convicted of indecent assault.

    Burden of proof

    Rape is a criminal offence and must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

    He who asserts proves. The prosecution’s burden of proving the essential elements of the case of rape is beyond reasonable doubt. Where there is an iota of doubt it is settled in favour of defendant / suspect.

    The law looks at whether penetration was with consent and this is sometimes hard to prove. This also informed the reason why conviction in rape cases is very low. Generally, it is believed that when someone is raped the hymen is broken but it is not true. You can have intercourse with a man for many years and still your hymen is still intact. So medical practitioners must know that it is not the broken hymen that determines rape. So please don’t look at broken hymen when working with rape victims. Some medical practitioners believe once the hymen was not broken rape has not occurred. Cases are daily thrown mainly due to lack diligent prosecution of poor police investigation and inefficiency in documentation of evidence and prosecution. The fact that there is no physical injury does not mean there was no rape.

    Steps to be taken before, during and after

    Take note of the environment where you are. Observe the person perpetrating the act on you for purposes of identification. E.g complexion, height, accent, time of the day, tribal marks (if any), colour of shirt, trousers etc. Note: If he is the only one or in a gang. You must be able to identify the rapist for purposes of prosecution.

     During

    To avoid doubt, call for help, shout, scream to attract attention, show resistance if you can.  If he attacks you scratch him with your finger, make up excuse e.g period is on, or you have HIV or any other sexually transmitted disease.  Look out for escape route, do anything to let you go even if for a second. Devise a special code word you can call with a family member or friend when in danger. Tell him you do not want to engage in sex with him. Did you bleed or sustain physical injury or even if your dress was torn? Inform your parents, guardian, and brother or an elder after the incident. (However depending on the age). You will be asked in court: what did you while you are being raped?

    In case of defilement of underage child, this may not apply because the child is incapable of consenting to rape. The victim could also be injected with drugs to prevent resistance. (Date rape drug)

     After

    After the incident report to the Police immediately before even cleaning up or taking a bath so as not to destroy the evidence. The police will send you to a general hospital (not private) for medical examination in company of an officer.

    Keep a copy of the medical report. After investigation, the matter will be charged to court for prosecution. You can also involve NGO like the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) of which I am a member. Get a counsel to represent you in court. You can also seek assistance from Mirabel Centre at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, the centre offers help to rape victims or sexual assault survivors. All services apart from being provided in a compassionate caring manner are free.

    The above will assist greatly in prosecution of the case.

    Factors that instigate rape

    A number of reasons have been adduced for increasing sexual violence against Women in Nigeria. Its prevalence is quite disturbing. The World Health organisation states that factors include belief in family honour and sexual primary ideologies of male sexual entitlement and weak legal sanctions for sexual violence. Experts say there is no single scientific motivation for rape. While desire for power, anger sadism sexual gratification and mental depravity have considered as factors.

    Others include poverty provocative dressing among women. Excessive sexual orgies, pornography, alcohol abuse, being female, a sex worker having previously been raped or abused, physical attraction etc. The list is endless.

    Society’s perception of rape

    Rape is a global crime and crime against humanity. Apart from the fact that the offence devalues the human person with emotional scars and pains. In some societies the victims is blamed and sometimes castigated.

    In Nigeria, most victims will elect to remain silent leading to under reporting of the crime because of stigmatisation. Some have also killed themselves due to pain and stigmatisation associated with it. This informs the reason why it is the most under reported crime.

    Most petrifying is that most of the rape victims have been killed by the rapist after assaulting them.

    Rate of reporting, prosecution and conviction varies considerably in different jurisdiction. Collectively we can brace up against this evil by taking proactive steps and taking the ball by the horn to eliminate the menace from Nigeria rape must be reported no matter slight or insignificant the attempt to rape may be.

    Victims should not hide under stigmatisation to prevent the perpetrator from being brought to justice. The cases of Cythnia Osokogwu, and five-under graduates of Abia state University who raped a young woman despite pleading with them to spare her are cases in point. The video of that incident shook the nation. Investigation was launched nothing has come out up till today and are among the many instances.

    In India New Delhi, the case of 23-year-old Physiotherapist, who was beaten and gang raped and eventually died 13 days after attracted national and international condemnation. We all need to rise up and root out rape. Everyone has a role to play in the eradication of this menace from homes to religious gatherings, schools etc.

     Application of forensic science

    Forensic evidence plays a critical role in prosecution of perpetrators of rape. What is prosecution of offence of rape without forensic knowledge?

    In other jurisdictions adults raped in their teens have been able to get justice after several decades. Their abusers are made to face trial years after the act was committed. Forensic examination following rape has two primary functions:

     

    • To be continued
  • Lawyer petitions IGP over sack of three cops

    ALaWYER, Aiyewunmi Remilekun, has petitioned the Police Service Commission (PSC) and Inspector-General of Police (IGP), over the alleged unlawful dismissal of three policemen attached to Igbeba Police Division of Ogun State Police Command.

    Mufutau Olaosun, an Inspector; Adebayo Temitope, a Sergeant, Adesoye Ayokunlehi and Bakare Taiwo who are corporals, were dismissed last June for allegedly extorting N50,000 from Akala Oluwatobi.

    But Olaosun, Ayokunlehi and Adebayo, through their lawyer, described their dismissal as “illegal and unlawful.”

    In an August 27 petition , they complained of “intimidation, harassment, political manoeuvering of orderly room proceedings and conducts unbecoming of a police officer” against the officers who conducted their orderly room trial.

    The lawyer stated that sometime in June 2017, information was lodged at the Area Commander’s office, Igbeba, information reached the Igbeba Police Division that 10 youths were conducting themselves in a manner likely to cause breach of the peace at Molupa.

    Remilekun said: “Upon this information, the three cops and one other were drafted to the area to prevent breakdown of law and order, and for possible arrest, which the affected officers immediately booked at the charge room before leaving for the area.

    “On getting to the area, the affected policemen were able to arrest two of the boys while others ran away on sighting them.

    “One of the boys when asked to identify himself but could not give a satisfactory explanation, upon which the officers became suspicious and the boy was taken to their office for interrogation and investigation.”

    The lawyer said when his clients conducted a search on the arrested boy named Akala Oluwatobi, “N50, 000, was recovered from him but he could not give a satisfactory account of the money.”

    He said when the money was recovered it was registered with the Exhibit keeper in register 084/2017, of June 6, and a case file was opened and the statement of the arrested boy was taken.

    Remilekun also stated that instead of the arrested boy to present himself the next day with his father whom he claimed to be his boss, as directed by the policemen, he opted to call Police Complaint Rapid Response Unit (PCRRU), following which the Officer-in-Charge of the Unit directed the Divisional Police Office (DPO) of Igbeba Police Division to investigate the matter and report.

    Remilekun added that the DPO’s report exornorated his clients, “but this did not go down well with the Area Commander,” who directed that his clients be tried in an orderly room.

    According to him, the orderly room trial proceedings was then altered against his clients.

    The lawyer claimed that his clients were not given fair hearing as no memorandum of appearance was issued to them before their trial and they were also denied the right of Appeal.

    This, he added, contravened the 1999 Constitution,” which guarantees the right to fair hearing and the Police Act.

    He demand an “immediate retraction of the police wireless message DTO: 291121/06/2017, the publication purporting to dismiss of our clients from the Nigerian Police Force and their immediate reinstatement to their position without any loss of Rank, status and remuneration, with a letter of apology to each of them.”

  • Police arraign man for maltreating baby

    ATHIRTY-four-year- old man, Seyi Shodiya, who allegedly beat a three-year-old girl into coma for defecating on the bed, has been arraigned before an Ikeja Magistrate Court for child maltreatment.

    Police prosecutor, Sergeant Rapheal Donny said the suspect committed the offence at his residence at Ikotun in Lagos on May 30 at about 11.00pm

    Shodiya  pleaded not guilty to the one count charge of indecent treatment of a child preferred against him by the police before magistrate F.O. Davies-Adegunde.

    According to Donny, the defendant  unlawfully and indecently assaulted the baby, who is his wife’s niece by beating her because she defecated on her body.

    He said Shodiya after beating the girl, he flugged her to the floor causing her grievous harm.

    Donny said the girl passed out and was rushed to a hospital at Ikotun before being referred to the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) where she received medical treatment.

    “The girl was in comma for about two months and even had to undergo brain surgery before she came back to life and was later moved to an orphanage,” the prosecutor said.

    He said the defendant’s wife who is also the girl’s aunt has had cause to warn her husband severally to desist from such act but that he refused to change.

    The incident, according to the prosecutor, was reported at Ikotun Police station by the defendant’s wife.

    He said the management  of LASUTH reported the matter to the Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Response Team (DSVRT) at Alausa secretariat.

    DSVRT Coordinator, Mrs Titilola Vivour-Adeniyi, confirmed that the matter was reported to team and that drastic actions were taken immediately.

    “We were accompanied by an officer from the Social Welfare Department of our team and visited the location where the incident occurred. We tried our best to reach the aunt who had fled, but to no avail. So, DSVRT had no option than to serve as the complainant of the matter,” she said.

    DSVRT survivor-advocate, Mrs. Tuminu Oni, a social worker, Ms. Ayeni Fausat and a care giver from an orphanage were present during the arraignment of the defendant in court.

    The Chief Magistrate, Mrs Davies Abegunde granted the accused bail in the sum of N500,000 with two reputable sureties with verifiable address.

    Abegunde said the sureties should pay N30,000 into the chief registrar’s account and provide evidence of two years tax payment to the government.

    She referred the case file to the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for advice and adjourned the matter to October  9 for trial.

  • Court restrains ex-footballer, firm, from Lekki land

    The Lagos State High Court has restrained a former Nigerian international football, Wilson Oruma and a firm, Dok Engineering Services Limited from entering a piece of land measuring 57,739.633square metres at Idasho Village, Elekan in Ibeju Lekki.

    Justice W. Animahun granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants whether by themselves or their agents “from attempting to enter, entering or alienating or in any way disturbing the claimant’s possession of all that land…”

    The order, granted for seven days on August 24, was to subsist pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion on notice for interlocutory injunction.

    The claimant, through its counsel K. C. Atuenyi, applied to the court for an extension of the order in the face of the long vacation to prevent the respondents from encroaching on the land while the suit was still pending.

    Justice M. O. Obadina, who took over from Justice Animahun as the vacation judge, granted an extension of the order for another seven days. It will lapse on September 12.

    The claimant, Megallus Nigeria Limited, is praying for an order compelling Oruma to assign and endorse all documents transferring his rights over the property.

    In an affidavit of urgency, the claimant’s Managing Director, Ifeanyi Okafor, claimed that during the pendency of the suit and upon commencement of the long vacation, Dok Engineering “in collusion” with the Oruma, “forcefully beset the land” and started erecting fences and partitioning the property in dispute into two equal halves.

    The claimant said it was “in the bid to hoodwink the honourable court into believing that it (Dok Engineering) is in actual possession, and which we verily believe is also an act preparatory to selling and/or alienating same in a manner that will render nugatory any eventual judgment of the Honourable Court.”

    Megallus Nigeria accused the respondents of contempt and urged the court to hear the suit urgently.

    The claimant said sometime in August 2013, Oruma offered it a parcel of land for sale, and it made a part-payment of N5million out of N90million, with the balance to be paid in four months.

    The claimant said due to its inability to complete the balance, a new payment plan was drawn up, in which he paid additional N15million, with the balance  to be paid by March 31, 2014.

    The firm said when it sought to complete the payment and presented Oruma with eight managers’ cheque on March 31, 2014, totalling N70 million, the defendant allegedly refused to collect the cheques and also did not execute the instruments of transfer, including deed of assignment.

    The claimant said the former footballer instead offered to refund the N20million part payment, rather than collecting full payment.

    According to Megallus Nigeria, Oruma claimed that he received an offer double what the claimant first offered and, therefore, would not accept a lesser offer.

    But, the claimant said the defendant “is estopped from reneging on an obligation voluntarily contracted and upon which the claimant had already furnished consideration to the extent that it can no longer revert to its former position.”

    Megallus Nigeria said Dok Engineering (the second defendant), which claimed to have also bought the land from Oruma, could not rely on any agreement between it and the ex-footballer to overreach the claimant’s initial agreement with Oruma.

    Besides, the claimant said a deed of assignment between Dok Engineering and Oruma “was fraudulently procured” as the suit had already been instituted and proceedings ongoing when the deed of assignment dated October 15, 2014 was procured.

    Megallus Nigeria said requirements of the law were not complied with in executing the deed, including obtaining the governor’s consent, adding that it was not signed by the truly accredited representatives of families entitled to deal in or dispose of the land.

    The claimant also sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from entering or alienating or disturbing the claimant’s possession of the land.

    Megallus Nigeria prayed for an order nullifying or setting aside any sale, alienation, assignment or transfer of the land to Dok Engineering or any other person by Oruma.

    However, the defendants are praying the court to dismiss the suit.

    Oruma claimed the plaintiff did not pay for the land in line with the agreement.

    Dok Engineering is claiming it acquired the land legally, therefore, the suit was unmeritorious.

    Justice Obadina adjourned until September 8 for hearing of the motion on notice.

  • Mentor young lawyers, Olanipekun tells colleagues

    Former Nigerian Bar Association president Chief  Wole  Olanipekun has said it is the responsibility of senior lawyers to mentor their junior counterparts for them to become successful.

    He spoke at a reception by his law firm for lawyers from Ekiti and Ondo states, who attended the just-concluded conference of the NBA in Lagos.

    “I remember when we were following the Aka Basoruns, Gani Fawehinmis, Kanmi Osobus as their “boys”  to be guided right in the law profession. We saw them as role models and worked assiduously to make a mark the way they did.

    “Today, not  by our power but by His grace, we are where we are. I’m convinced and persuaded that it is the duty and responsibility of any senior lawyer to lift up the junior ones, consciously, unconsciously and deliberately”, he stated.

    Olanipekun said senior lawyers would feel fulfilled “when you find yourself mentoring and teaching younger ones in your profession how to tie the rope”.

    He lamented that junior lawyers were facing challenges, particularly  in the area of remuneration and opportunities as there are chambers that pay N25,000, N30,000 to lawyers as monthly salary.

    “If you are there and you are comfortable alone, you are in trouble. Of course, we have some of us who can beat their chests and say they are comfortable, but even at that, it is nothing but a mirage. If you are comfortable where millions are wallowing in poverty, you are in trouble.

    “In fact, that is the problem we have in Nigeria that we see in government; many people believe they are comfortable while millions of Nigerians are suffering. They are comfortable in the midst of millions who are hungry, who are thirsty without any idea of how to assuage ther thirst. Some are comfortable in the midst of people who cannot pay the school fees of those children. I don’t think that should be the definition of being comfortable. You see these set of people wandering and you think they are living but truth is that their minds are far away from their tabernacles,” he said.

    Olanipekun, who went biblical with the story of the cripple at the Beautiful Gate healed by Peter, urged his colleagues to devote more time to the junior ones by counselling  them.

    He described the theme of the conference as  important to Nigeria. “We should begin to build institutions, not personalities.  Let us take a cue from a country like America; she has strong institution and that has continued to strengthen the nation. It was because America has institution that is why, for eight years, Barrack Obama, an African American, could be the president of the country, despite being of Kenya descent, and things worked out very well.

    “Donald Trump is the president of America today and whatever may be his nuances, the strong America institutions will humble him and checkmate his excesses”.

    He said the worst that can happen to a nation is to exist without institution “because lack of institution will dovetail to lack of ethos and tradition.  In Nigeria, we don’t have institutions, we don’t have tradition and we don’t have ethos whether in the police, in the EFCC and other areas.

    “Perhaps, the only enduring one that has lasted and enduring is the Judiciary and this alone cannot address the challenges we are currently facing either in governance or other areas of human endeavours”, he noted.

    He advised Nigerians not to expect the president to solve the entire problem of the country all alone adding, “we need to put our best together, work as a team to develop our nation and solve her problems.

    “Today, there are lots of demand, a lot of agitations and a lot of expectations. We can only pray and support the government to fit in perfectly and respond promptly to the yearnings of the people,” he said.

    Ms. Oludayo Olorunfemi, vice chairman, NBA Ikere Ekiti Branch, in a vote of thanks, commended Chief Olanipekun for being a good leader who wants the best for all. She described the philanthropic gesture of the former NBA President as next to none, calling on those coming behind to emulate him.

    A former chairman of Ado Ekiti chapter of the NBA,  Dr. Foluke Dada, described Olanipekun as an inspiration to young lawyers and prayed God to continue to assist him to lift up more young lawyers.

    She also described the theme of the NBA conference as relevant and brought to the fore the fact that the country needs to advance more in the area of business.

    Speaking on behalf of Olanipekun Chambers Alumni, Mr Kabir Akingbolu, said professionalism and ethics will be stronger in the nation’s law practice if all senior lawyers can emulate Chief Olanipekun by paying attention to the younger ones.

    Others at the reception are Attorney- General and Commissioner of Justice, Ekiti State, Mr. Kola Kolade, the Solicitor- General, Mr. Lawrence B. Ojo,  two former NBA National Secretary-General, Messrs Obafemi Adewale (SAN) and Dele Adesina (SAN), Mr Goke Fakunle (SAN), former Ondo State Attorney-General, Mr Aderemi Olatubora, the Chairman, NBA, Ado Ekiti, Gbemiga Daramola,  Vice Chairman NBA Ikere Ekiti, Oludayo Olorunfumi, former chairman of Ondo chapter of the NBA, Mr Kunle Adetowubo, chairman NBA, Ikole Ekiti, Mr. Bayo Idowu and a former  chairman NBA Ikere Ekiti, Chief Bunmi Olugbade.

    They also include former Special Adviser on Legal in the administration of Dr. Kayode Fayemi in Ekiti State, Ibrahim Olanrewaju, Assistant Legal Adviser to APC in Ekiti State, Mr Tajudeen Akingbolu, the President of the state chapter of the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA),  Adefunke Aloma

  •  Digital surveillance and privacy: The uncharted path under Nigerian law

     Digital surveillance and privacy: The uncharted path under Nigerian law

    Akinpelu Oluwatobi, a Netherland-based lawyer writes on digital surveillance technology used during the arrest of judges and the recent direction by President Muhammadu Buhari authorising military surveillance on social media to address the issue of hate speeches and anti-government remarks

    Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you super-add the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy, than, that the office sanctifies the holder of it”.

    Notwithstanding the lon-gevity of the statement, Nigeria’s history validates the statement. Nigeria has a country with a chequered history of military rule has experienced the coercive force of state power, which was exercised through various security agencies and the military. A predominant feature of this orchestrated oppression during the various interjection of military rule in Nigeria is the state surveillance of Nigerians. However, with the return to democracy, mass state surveillance has been checked by the Constitution, by separating powers between different arms of government. Nigeria’s constitution not only separates power between the various arms but also empowers government with the authority to administer the country for the well-being of Nigerians. These constitutional powers are nevertheless subject to various limitations include the observance of the fundamental right of citizens, such rights are inclusive of the right to a private and family life.

    The constitutional power of the various arm of government is enshrined in Chapter II of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) 1999, specifically in Sec. 5(1)(a) CFRN 1999,  which provides that the executive powers of the Nigerian Federation shall be vested in the President and may subject as aforesaid and to the provisions of any law made by the National Assembly, be exercised by him either directly or through the Vice-President and Ministers of the Government of the Federation or officers in the public service of the Federation; and further requires by the provision of Sec. 5(1)(b) CFRN 1999 that such powers shall be for the execution and maintenance of the Constitution; all laws made by the National Assembly; and to all matters with respect to which the National Assembly has, for the time being, power to make laws.It is against this backdrop, that it becomes sacrosanct that government must not only obey the constitution and other laws but must also seek to protect and promote peaceful coexistence as well as deepen the integration of all Nigerians. It is also the duty of government to ensure the betterment of the welfare of Nigerians. In seeing to these responsibilities, government is saddled with the responsibility to tackle challenges that face the country including corruption and ethnic division which has long held the Nigerian entity bound from achieving its fullest potentials.

    Admittedly, Nigeria has been plagued by untrustworthy political leaders and malfunctioning public institutions that has depraved vast majority of its citizens, food, clothing and shelther; while a few powerful ones live a lavish and excessive lifestyle. According to Transparency International, Nigeria ranks among the top fifty corrupt countries in the world. Corruption has thrived in Nigeria not because the anti-corruption laws are not in the books but as a result of the systemic ignorance of the regulation and lack of political will to enforce sanctions. However, with the assumption of this current administration, there has been a renewed drive towards building strong public institutions that are rid of corrupt practices through the enforcement of anti-corruption regulations. The effectiveness of the criminal justice system is however hinged on successful investigation, apprehension, trial and eventually conviction of culpable persons.Also challenging is the rise of hate speeches and ethnic threats that continues to polarise the country along ethnic and religious lines. Technological invasion and the continuing rise in the use of social media therefore becomes a readily available tool for ignorant persons as well criminals to propagate their hate messages calculated at disrupting peace and stability in the country. Fortunately, technology does not only allow for the propagation of hate crime; it also provides new possibilities in aiding law enforcement officers in the investigation, apprehension and trial of accused persons but an unrestrained use could as well lead into deprivation of fundamental human rights and an abuse of legislations as it is been witnessed in Nigeria.

    The unrestrained use of technology by state power was prominently witnessed in Nigeria when the Department for State Security (DSS) sometimes in October 2016, made use of surveillance technology to track and arrest suspected judges who had allegedly been involved in corrupt practices. This use of surveillance technology is set again to be used at the direction of the federal government; that the military begins to monitor Nigerians on social media in order to checkmate hate speeches, anti-government and anti-security information. While there exists no privacy legislation in Nigeria, Sec.37 CFRN 1999provides that the privacy of citizens, their homes, correspondence, telephone conversations and telegraphic communications is hereby guaranteed and protected;but this right is not exclusive as Sec. 45(1) CFRN 1999 provides that the right to private life can be dispensed with for public interest and for the protection of the rights and freedom of other persons. Without gainsaying, the federal government is saddled with the responsibility of tackling corruption and hate speeches that threatens the sovereignty of Nigeria, but are these responsibilities sufficient to warrant digital surveillance and breach privacy right?

    A combined reading of Sec.37 CFRN 1999 and Sec. 45(1)(a) CFRN 1999 would seem sufficient to condone the recent digital surveillance invasion being conducted by state security services and the military. But, a further reading of the opening paragraph of Sec. 45(1) CFRN 1999 requires that before Sec.37 CFRN 1999 can be breached in the interest of the public or for the protection of the rights and freedom of other persons; circumstances to warrant such breach must be stated by law. Hence, the right to a private life as enshrined in the constitution cannot be breached by the need to enforce a constitutional duty or at the direction of the President or any person saddled with the executive powers of the state in the absence of a legislative framework to warrant such breach. While the intended result of digital surveillance is legal, it has been judicial established that the illegality cannot aid a legal process,1 so not just must the end result be legal, the whole process leading to the end result must also be within the ambit of law. In light of this dilemma, would it then be appropriate for state security agencies and the military to jettison the advantage of digital surveillance in achieving their constitutional responsibilities?

    State security agencies and the military need not jettison the advantage of digital surveillance in achieving their mandate. However, what is needed is a criminal justice privacy legal framework that safeguards against abuse of intrusion by security agencies and the military. The legal framework must provide for the legal authority that is competent to authorise the use of surveillance technology. Since the level of legal authority indicates the potential privacy infringement the legislator permits, it is advised that the legal authority be thrusted upon the court, in order to separate authorisation and executory duties and to create for checks and balances within the system. It is also essential that the legal framework clearly delineates the crimes for which the use of such technology is allowed. The severity of the crime or the gravity of the conduct being sought to be curbed should act as a prime indicator for which potential privacy infringement and digital surveillance is allowed. It also necessary to require the existence of relationship between the suspect and the crime taking into consideration the probability of the surveillance targeting only the suspects without infringing on the privacy rights of non-suspects. Without this requirement, there is a likelihood of a broad use of digital surveillance and consequently privacy infringement of citizens. In legislating a criminal justice privacy legal framework, there is a need for subsidiarity. The requirement of subsidiarity, is the consideration as to the extent which such power may be used in comparison with other less intrusive powers. For instance it may be required that before the use of digital surveillance by security agencies and the military, consideration has to be given to urgency, reasonable need and the general interest of on-going investigation.Further, the legislation must specify the object of investigation, as the more general an object is defined in law, the broader the scope of powers. Therefore the generality or specificity of the power to use such intrusive technology must be specified by law. For example, the power to intercept voice communication differs from the power to intercept all forms of communication. Also, there has to be a standard of need, that is, does the investigatory agency have a probable cause or a reason to believe that such intrusive technology is necessary for their investigation? Finally, in order to ensure compliance by the security agencies and the military, it is important that the legislation, creates a check that forces compliance. Such measure can be the exclusion of any evidence obtained without adherence to the legislation. In other words, the legislation can make use of the principle of “the fruit of a poisoned tree” in order to safeguard against abuse of the legislation and ensure the perseverance of privacy right in a digital age.

  • Epe monarchs, Lagos partner to end rape, gender-based violence

    Epe monarchs, Lagos partner to end rape, gender-based violence

    The Oloja of Epe, Oba Kamoru Animashaun, the Olu of Epe, Oba Shefiu Adewale, and their chiefs have promised to work with the Lagos State Government to end rape, child abuse and other forms of gender-based violence.

    They made the pledge while leading an “Advocacy walk to create awareness about rape, domestic violence, child abuse, maltreatment, neglect” held in Epe by the Domestic and Sexual Violence Response Team (DSVRT).

    The advocacy walk started from the palace of Oba Adewale to that of Oba Animashaun.

    Addressing the people of the town in front of his palace,Oba Animashaun said he would no longer tolerate rape and domestic violence in the community.

    Admonishing men to stop beating their wives, he warned them against raping young girls and forcing women to sleep with them against their wish.

    He counselled parents to send their children to school as against the common practice of sending them to hawk on the streets, describing such attitude as child abuse.

    He said the state government has zero tolerance for rape and that anybody caught would be sent to prison for life if convicted by a court of law.

    He charged leaders of the town to protect the vulnerable in the community from assailants and aggressors.

    “Any community that fails to protect the vulnerable members would not progress. Children are leaders of tomorrow.The leaders of today should protect them. We must all be our brother’s keeper,” he said.

    The two monarchs promised to carry the campaign against domestic violence to the nooks and crannies of the community.

    Epe Local Government Chairman, Mr Adedoyin Adesanya, promised to set up a committee to drive the campaign against domestic violence.

    He said the council under him would do everything possible to ensure the eradication of negative vices such as rape, child abuse and domestic violence.

    Women’s Rights and Health Project (WRAHP), Director and member of the team, Mrs. Bose Ironsi,  told the traditional rulers that they have become change agents  against gender-based violence.

    “We want to make you our ambassadors so that you can help us to drive home our message to the people of the community and kill the vice for us.

    “Thank God, we have people like you we can lean on and who are saying we should not keep quiet in the face of rape and gender violence”.

    DSVRT Coordinator Mrs. Titi Vivour-Adeniyi explained that the team chose the traditional rulers for their advocacy because they are the first responders and are close to the people.

    “They are the ones that would help us to spread the message against domestic violence, child abuse and other vices to the grassroot”, she said.

    The leader of the Epe Market women, Alhaja Mulikat Onibon, lamented that the men have taken to beating their wives as against advising them when they are in the wrong.

    She said her colleagues in the market would be used to spread the campaign against the evil of gender- based violence.