Category: Law

  • Pastor forged estate’s signatures, says witness

    An Ogba Magistrates’ Court in Lagos has heard how a cleric, Pastor Kola Shotayo, allegedly forged the signatures of the administrators of the Estate of the late Chief Emmanuel Oyedele Ashamu.

    Shotayo, 65, is the acclaimed representative of the Anthonio Delfino de Maranda Family of Lagos, which is in court with the Ashamu Estate over ownership of land in Anthony Village and Oke Alo in Gbagada, Lagos.

    He was arraigned by the police last December 16 on a two-count charge of conspiracy to commit forgery and making a false document.

    The defendant was accused of forging the signatures of Mrs Jadesola Lokulo-Sodipe (Nee Ashamu) and her sister Titiloye Ashamu (the Administrators of the Ashamu Estate as well as manipulating a deed of assignment purportedly prepared by the Law Firm of Bolanle Bamgbose & Associates.

    According to the prosecutor, Mr Michael Unah, the offences contravened sections 411(4) and 363 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2011.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty and was released on N200,000 bail with two sureties in the like sum.

    At the commencement of proceedings last Friday, first prosecution witness, Mrs Fausat Bolanle Bamgbose, under cross-examination by defence counsel, Mr M. A. Opawoye, narrated how she knew the deed of assignment was not from her office.

    She said: “Immediately I saw the document, I knew they were not mine. I have a standard format for my agreements and a specialised legal paper that I use.

    “We’ve always suspected that my signature and those of my clients could have been forged, and that is why we have continued to put out newspaper advertisements to warn unsuspecting prospective buyers of land in Oke Alo and Anthony Village.”

    The defendant is yet to open his defence.

    Magistrate A. O. Gbajumo adjourned till May 24, 2017.

     

  • Alegeh faults executive control of judiciary’s fund

    Former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president  Augustine Alegeh (SAN) has called for an amendment of 1999 Constitution to grant financial autonomy to the judiciary. According to him, executive control of the judiciary’s finances endangers democracy.

    Alegeh, who delivered the first Edo State University’s Founder’s Day Lecture titled: Strengthening democracy in Nigeria: the role of the Judiciary,  said the judiciary could not continue to depend on the executive.  Sections 81, 84, 121 & 162 of the 1999 Constitution, Alegeh said, make financial provisions for the judiciary.

    “The provisions are supposed to give the judiciary financial autonomy and full control over its own funds. However, these provisions appear couched in a manner that creates issues of compliance. Financial autonomy of the judiciary is the bedrock for a dynamic and pragmatic judiciary. The executive is advised not to engage in any action that would undermine the financial autonomy of the judiciary.

    “There is need for the provisions of the 1999 Constitution to be amended to give a more definitive provision for how funds due to the judiciary are to be determined and ascertained. A nation with a strengthened and vibrant judiciary will witness a renewed confidence by the citizenry in the justice delivery system, a reduction in crime rate, a decongestion of the prisons as well as increase in the revenue generation of the states. All these will strengthen our democracy,” Alegeh said.

    The Vice Chancellor, Prof Emmanuel Aluyor, said the university’s vision was to become a center of excellence in teaching, research, innovations and community development adding that the National Universities’ Commission (NUC), on January 18, after a successful verification exercise of the university, approved additional programmes in engineering, medicine, basic medical sciences and mass communication.

    Also at the event were the Deputy Govermor, Philip Shaibu, who represented Governor Godwin Obaseki, former Governor, Adams Oshiomhole, Chairman of the University Governing Council, Prof. Pat Utomi, among others.

     

  • Appeal Court upholds tax tribunal’s jurisdiction

    The Court of Appeal has upheld the jurisdiction of the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT) to determine tax disputes.

    It delivered judgment in the case of CNOOC Exploration & Production Nigeria Ltd. & Another v. Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation & Another, with appeal numbers CA/L/1144/2015 and CA/L/1145/2015.

    The appeals arose from disputes over petroleum profits tax and tertiary educati  on tax assessments issued to the appellants by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).

    Resolving the tax disputes between the appellants and FIRS, the TAT made orders joining NNPC as a party.

    NNPC objected to its joinder and also challenged TAT’s jurisdiction to hear the dispute because the subject matter was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court.

    The TAT ruled that it had jurisdiction to determine the disputes but struck out NNPC as a party.

    The NNPC then appealed , contending inter alia that the TAT did not have jurisdiction to determine tax matters, which it said were within the Federal High Court’s exclusive jurisdiction.

    The Federal High Court agreed  and held that TAT lacked the jurisdiction to hear and determine tax disputes in view of Section 251(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). Dissatisfied with the judgments of the Federal High Court, the appellants further appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    Represented by Adedapo Tunde-Olowu and his team from üLEX Law Firm, appellant argued that TAT’s jurisdiction to determine tax disputes did not encroach upon the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court as conferred on it by Section 251(1)(a) and (b) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    The appellants explained that institution of tax appeals at the TAT before approaching the Federal High Court was merely a condition precedent to approaching the Federal High Court and that the decisions of the TAT could be reviewed and quashed by the Federal High Court upon an application for judicial review or appeal to that court.

    The Court of Appeal, on March 10, agreed with the appellants’ arguments and held that TAT has jurisdiction to adjudicate over tax related disputes.

  • Court declares NBA constitution illegal

    •Plaintiff to CJN: set up care-taker committee

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has declared the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) constitution illegal.

    The court held that everything done on its basis, including the last NBA election, which produced the Abubakar Mahmoud-led executive, is null and void.

    Justice John Tsoho, in the judgment delivered last Thursday, invalidated the constitution on the basis of its non-registration with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).

    Consequently, counsel for the plaintiff, Mr A.C. Ozioko, has asked the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, to set up a caretaker comittee for the association.

    A lawyer, Supo Ojo, sued the Registered Trustees of the NBA over the validity of the NBA constitution.

    The lawyer, in a letter to the CJN, asked him as chairman of the Body of Benchers to constitute  a caretaker committee to take over the administration and management of NBA’s affairs pending the election of new officers under a constitution recognised by law.

    In the March 30 letter, the plaintiff notified the CJN of Justice Tsoho’s verdict which voided the 2015 amended constitution for non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA).

    The judge also voided all actions taken under the constitution, including the last election.

    The plaintiff had sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining NBA and its officers from conducting the association’s affairs on the basis of the constitution purportedly amended and adopted at the Annual General Meeting held in Abuja on  August 27, 2015.

    “Sir, worthy of note is the fact that the defendant herein did not file any counter-affidavit in opposition to the plaintiff’s suit,  rather  they filed a frivolous preliminary objections which were all dismissed by the court,” the lawyer wrote.

    Ozioko said the effect of the judgment was that the 2016 NBA national officers’ election which Mahmoud “won”  has been nullified and voided in its totality.

    “Put differently, the tenure of the Abubakar Balarabe Mahmoud (SAN) led NBA has ended abruptly by virtue of the instant court judgment, thus necessitating the takeover of the administration and management of the affairs of the NBA forthwith by the General Council of the Bar and subsequent conduct of fresh NBA national elections under the extant 2001 NBA Constitution, in line with its statutory obligations.

    “For the sake of emphasis, we will like to point out that the reliefs granted by the court as contained in the judgment are declaratory in nature and as such, they take immediate effect as they cannot be stayed.

    “We also wish to note that there is currently no appeal against the instant judgment and even if the defendant subsequently files one, the law is now settled that a stay of execution cannot operate against declaratory judgments such as the instant one,” the lawyer wrote.

    He copied to the Attorney-General of the Federation, past NBA presidents, Body of Benchers,  Council of Legal Education (CLE), Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN), among others.

       Ozioko also wrote Access Bank Plc, requesting the suspension of NBA’s account pending the appointment of a caretaker committee by the CJN.

    The March 31 letter reads in part: “The order of the Honourable Court only recognises the NBA constitution adopted at the delegates conference held in Calabar on August 31, 2001 registered with and approved by the Corporate Affairs Commission, as the only valid constitution.

    “Consequently, the President, Nigerian Bar Association, Mr. Abubakar Balarabe Mahmoud, SAN, the General Secretary, Mr. Isiaka Abiola Olagunju and the Treasurer, Abdullahi Aisha Ado, on behalf of themselves and other national officers, staff, organs, committees, branches, members, representatives and/or any person acting on behalf of or in the name of the NBA have all been divested of the powers of administration and management of the NBA effectively immediately.

    “Flowing from the above, the President, the General Secretary, and the Treasurer, who are signatories to account numbers – 0000976716, 0694192920 and any other account number held in any name whatsoever by the Nigerian Bar Association should not be allowed to operate and manage these accounts from henceforth.”

    However, NBA, in a statement by its General Secretary, Isiaka Olagunju, said the counsel to the Incorporated Trustees of the NBA “has already appealed the decision”.

    “The association has constituted a team comprising very senior and capable legal practitioners to represent the NBA and if necessary to join the appeal against this decision so as to preserve the continued smooth operation of the association both at the state and national levels,” the statement said.

    Olagunju said Mahmoud and other officers were not parties to the suit.

    NBA directed its officers “to continue to discharge their responsibilities”.

     

  • Group petitions IGP over businessman’s death

    A group, the Crusade for Justice, has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Ibrahim Idris, demanding investigation of the roles of the Special Anti-robbery Squad (SARS), Adeniji Adele, Lagos and the monitoring team attached to the IGP’s office in the death of a businessman, Chief Innocent Ofojee.

    The late Ofojee, who was Chief Executive Officer of Pierre Cardin West Africa, was killed at his 3, Yeye Olofin Street, off Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos home last July 5.

    The group  said it was “extremely disturbed” by rumours of money being paid out to some police departments to either quell the investigation or alter its outcome.

    A copy of the petition, signed by the group’s President/Founder, Mr Richard Nwankwo, was also sent to President Muhammadu Buhari, Senate President Bukola Saraki and House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara.

    “We call on the IGP to use his good offices to ensure that anyone implicated in this deadly transaction is made to face the full wrath of the law. We are ready and disposed to support the efforts by any institution in any way humanly possible, to resolve this riddle, unmask those who have compromised in their investigations, as well as the criminals who committed this heinous crime,” the group said.

    In the petition written on behalf of the deceased’s cousin, Geoffrey Okeakpu, Crusade for Justice said one of the suspects confessed to how he and others committed the crime.

    The suspect was said to have given graphic details of how the deceased was drugged, and when he became weak, how they used masking tape to seal his mouth and nose to prevent breathing, while pinning him down to bed, and injected him with acid.

    “Subsequently, his corpse was moved to a remote mortuary at Epe Town, Lagos, away from the prying eyes of his kinsmen. It was there that they hid his corpse until final burial without any autopsy, in his home town, in Anambra State,” the group said.

    The group said an official report was lodged at SARS, Adeniji, where the suspect allegedly repeated the confessions, but the statements were not recorded nor were they captured in the exhibits transferred to the X-SQUAD, FCIID Annex, Alagbon, which took over the case.

    “It is a mystery how the suspects got bail despite the serious and damning allegations made against them and their confessional statements,” Nwakwo wrote.

    The group said the X-Squad was making significant progress when men of the IGP’s Monitoring Team “inexplicably” took over the case, collected the case file, exhibits, and others.

    “The transfer of the case to Abuja and the intervention of men attached to your (IGPs) office leaves much to be desired.

    “The blood of Chief Innocent Ofojee is crying for justice. Justice will only come if there is a detailed and comprehensive investigation into the alleged murder and the roles played by the federal SARS and the monitoring team attached to your office, and all funds withdrawn and paid by the suspects.

    “We deserve to know how many arrests have been made by men of the monitoring team, where all the funds being frittered away are coming from, where the passports earlier seized from the suspects are, whether the remains of the deceased was exhumed for analysis, and if not, why? We want to know who killed Chief Innocent Ofojee?

    “The Nigeria Police Force must redeem its image by professionally delving into this case, and if need be, allow the men of the X-Squad to get to the root of same, as they have shown the zeal and competence to tackle the crime,” the group pleaded.

  • Isara-Remo kingship: My case, by claimant

    Prince Adetayo Falolu Odunsi, the claimant in the suit challenging the nomination of Albert Mayungbe to the stool of Odemo of Isara, has told a Sagamu high court in Ogun State that he is not a trouble maker.

    He told the court presided by Justice A.A. Babawale that he challenged the nomination of the first defendant to the stool of Odemo of Isara because he knew that he is not a member of the Erinsiba Ayoledoye Ruling House.

    “Since the first defendant is not a member of our ruling house, he cannot partake in things belonging to us”.

    While admitting that Arobo was the third wife of king Oyemade Mayungbe, he insisted that the first defendant was not fathered by the late king”.

    Prince Odunsi who was under cross examination by counsel to the first defendant, sixth to eight and 14th defendants, Dr. Victor Odunaiya contended, “ I believe in the truth and I am in court so that the truth can be revealed.

    He denied claims by the defence counsel that himself and his brother, Adedapo Odunsi are trouble makers and trouble shooters within the ruling house.

    He insisted that he was a witness of truth in answer to another question by defence counsel.

    The witness denied knowledge of a meeting of the kingmakers held March 3, 2011 and at which the first defendant reportedly scored five out of a total of nine votes.

    Under further cross examination by a Principal State Counsel, Mrs O.O. Adejumoke, counsel to 15 to 18 defendants, Prince Odunsi, as he averred in his statement on oath filed July 11, 2016, stated that because he was a contestant, he did not vote at a meeting of the ruling held before that time.

    He however admitted presence of three government representatives at another meeting of the ruling house held February 21, 2012 and that they did not vote at that meeting.

    He said the government officials prayed and took minutes of activities of the ruling house at that meeting.

    Earlier, Dr Odunaiya had told the court he was not representing  the second defendant and new head of the ruling house, Prince Prince Solomon Obasola Mayungbe as he was not interested in the matter.

    Aside from Albert Mayungbe, other defendants in the suit are ; Secretary, Remo North Local Government; Oliwo of Isara, Chief Ajibowu Ogunfowodu; Apena of Isara, Chief Jimoh Soyombo; Chief Ladipo Ogunyemi; Ogbeni Odi of Isara, Chief Olajubu Osibote; Ekeji Asipa Odi, Chief Tunde Kalejaiye; Asipa Odi of Isara, Chief Owuye Logba as second to ninth defendants respectively.

    Others are Ekeji Asipa Odi of Isara, Chief Efuwape Sotikare; Olori Emo of Isara, Chief Bashiru Awoniyi; Ekeji Olori Emo of Isara, Chief Korede Ogunwole; Asipa Emo of Isara, Chief Nosiru Sodipe; Ekeji Asipa Emo, Chief Adewole Sopitan; Governor of Ogun State; Executive Council of Ogun State; the State Commissioner for Chieftaincy and Local Government and the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice.

    In his 32 point statement of claims, the claimant, Prince Odunsi, had claimed to be a direct descendant of the late king Oyemade Mayungbe and progenitor of Erinsiba Ayoledoye Ruling House and averred that he is the one lawfully entitled to the stool of Odemo of Isara.

    But the first defendant, Albert Mayungbe, had also insisted on being a bonafide member and descendant of the Erinsiba Ayoledoye Ruling House.

  • Stakeholders vow to eradicate child abuse

    Stakeholders in child care have vowed to eradicate sexual and domestic violence against children and minors in Lagos State. They met at multi-agency training for Safeguarding and Child Protection Responders in Ikeja. The training was in line with the first Executive Order on Safeguarding and Child Protection Programme ratified by Governor Akinwunmi Ambode last December. Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Response Teams were given the mandate to implement the order.

    Participants at the training included social workers, guidance counselors, school administrators, the police, health workers, among others. A statement by its Coordinator, Mrs Titilola Vivour-Adeniyi, said there was the need for synergy to achieve maximum results.

    “The learning objectives of the training were, amongst others,  to improve the understanding of child protection, increase the capacity to prevent abuse, increase awareness on how to create a protective environment, protect children from maltreatment; prevent impairment of children’s health or development; ensure that children grow up in circumstances consistent with the provision of safe and effective care and enable all children have the best outcomes,” she said.

    According to her, the training was useful in ensuring that all responder agencies work together effectively, know what services are available locally for children and families in safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. She said participants received all the necessary materials required to performance their duties.

  • Oguntade, CJ, others for Ikorodu Law Week

    FORMER Supreme Court Justice George Adesola Oguntade, Lagos State University (LASU) Vice Chancellor Prof Olanrewaju Fagbohun and activist-lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) are among those expected at the 11th Asiwaju Babatunde Olusola Benson Annual Lecture holding today at the Ikorodu Town Hall.

    The lecture is part of the activities for this year’s Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ikorodu Branch Law Week.

    The branch Chairman, Mr. Levi Adikwaone, said Justice Oguntade will chair the lecture while Prof. Fagbohun will deliever the keynote address.

    Executive Secretary of Socio Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), Adetokunbo Mumuni will lead discussions on the role of the Bar and Bench in tackling corruption.

    The theme is: Combating Corruption In A Recession: The Transformative Role of the Bar and Bench.

    Also expected at the lecture are Lagos State Chief Judge,  Justice Olufunmilayo Atilade, NBA President, Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN), Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Adeniji Kazeem, among others.

    The Law week will end on Thursday with the Annual Law Dinner, which will be chaired by Hon. Justice Habeeb Abiru of the Court of Appeal and Justice of the Supreme Court of Gambia, while Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) will give Dinner Talk.

  • Legal requirements for small businesses, by lawyer

    A business lawyer, Mrs Aderonke Alex-Adedipe, has identified legal requirements small businesses need to get started.

    She spoke at a roundtable for business leaders and enterpreneurs with the theme: Law and Business Meet.

    It was organised by a law firm, Strachan Partners, in collaboration with SB Morgen and the Lagos State Employment Trust Fund (LSETF).

    Alex-Adedipe, a partner at Strachan Partners, in her presentation titled: Doing Business in Nigeria, a legal perspective, said an entrepreneur must first identify a business structure, register a company, preferably a limited liability, and sign documents, which identify obligations.

    She said there was need for due diligence on companies an entrepreneur or investor wishes to do business with. The exit strategies must also be defined.

    Some of the noteable challenges to doing business, she said, include erratic power supply which is very fundamental, huge fees payout to seemingly similar regulatory authorities, limited access to funding for SMEs, among others.

    Alex-Adedipe urged Nigerians not to allow foreign companies to take over all the lucrative businesses in Nigeria.

    “We don’t want to wake up in 10 years and find that all the good opportunities have been taken over by foreigners,” she said.

    She told newsmen that the certain sections of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) need amendment.

    Her words: “The CAMA is due for a review as some of its provisions have become obsolete and no longer practicable in today’s business world. In some instances, there are conflicts between the CAMA and the companies’ regulations.

    “The essence of the Companies’ Regulation is to specify the Corporate Affairs Commission’s (CAC) procedural requirements of a company where they are not provided in CAMA.

    “But, sometimes you find that there are conflicts between the companies’ regulations and CAMA. So, I would think that it is important for this to be considered when the CAMA is being amended.”

    Alex-Adedipe believes that if the Collateral Registry Bill is passed into law, it would address the issue of some states not adopting the Bill of Sales Law.

    Such non-compliance, she said, creates a lack of confidence by creditors intending to invest, especially in Small and medium enterprises.

    “What the Federal Government is trying to do is to make sure that every financial institution in Nigeria, by virtue of that law when passed, must register every security they have created over the moveable assets or personal goods of an individual or SME that wants to do business.

    “Passage of the bill will help businesses to a certain extent, at least as far as funding is concerned,” she said.

    The Senior Partner of Strachan Partners, who is also the President of the Lagos Court of Arbitration (LCA) Mr Yemi Candide-Johnson (SAN), urged small businesses to take advantage of the dispute resolution mechanisms available at the LCA.

    According to him, small businesses “are drivers of the economy and will be successful if built on sound structures”.

    He added, however, that since disputes were inevitable, the swifter they are resolved the better for businesses.

    Mrs Teju Abisoye of the LSETF said the agency offers loans to start-ups, micro enterprises and small and medium enterprises, with five per cent interest repayable over 12 to 36 months.

    She said the agency also provides business support services to those it gives loans, as well as interfaces with government agencies on behalf of small businesses.

    Mr Cheta Nwanze of the SB Morgen highlighted key provisions of the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP), saying the economy would be better off if the plan is well implemented.

  • Kidnapping: Is death penalty the answer?

    Kidnapping: Is death penalty the answer?

    To stem the rise in abductions, Akwa Ibom, Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Bauchi, Cross River, Enugu, Imo, Kogi, Rivers, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo and Oyo have passed laws making kidnapping a capital offence. Enugu, Anambra and Kogi demolished kidnappers’ properties. What is the impact of anti-kidnapping laws on abductions? ROBERT EGBE asks.

    It was my driver, Chinedu, who noticed that a vehicle had been used to block the road and he told me that the people were armed robbers. So, I told him to quickly turn, but before he could turn, a gun was already on my head. One of the men said if he moved an inch they would kill me. So, I told my driver to stay put. They dragged Chinedu and I out of the car, shot the tyres of the vehicle and locked him in the boot and made me lie flat on the floor of their car. I heard them say, Police! Police! Police! They also added, ‘no retreat no surrender.’ I heard a staccato of bullets; it was like a war situation as they were firing continuously. As they were firing, the car was moving. –  Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, narrating his August 2013 kidnap on the Benin -Auchi Road near Ekpoma, Edo State.

     

    Kidnapping did not start in the Niger Delta, but it was from there, beginning with the January 10, 2006 abduction of four expatriates from an offshore oil platform, that kidnapping-for-ransom (KFR) was entrenched in the national consciousness.

    Between 2006 and April 16, 2009,  96 persons – mostly foreigners – were abducted by militant groups, especially the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), in the conflict in the region.

    From the Niger Delta, KFR spread, mostly to southern states, and became a common criminal enterprise notwithstanding Section 364 (1) and (2) Criminal Code Act, CAP C38, LFN 2004, which stipulate a punishment of 10 years imprisonment for anyone found guilty of kidnapping in those states.

    Many felt a stiffer punishment was required to stem the tide, and before the end of 2009, Akwa Ibom, in the Niger Delta, and the five southeastern states of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo had had enough. They passed laws whereby a kidnapper could be executed by the state. Kogi, Cross River, Rivers, Ogun and Lagos have since passed similar laws.

     

    States where kidnapping is a

    capital offence

    At least 15 states have made kidnapping a capital crime. They are Akwa Ibom, Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Bauchi, Cross River, Ebonyi, Enugu, Imo, Kogi, Rivers, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo and Oyo.

    Nevertheless, KFR continues to be a security concern nationwide and is a lucrative industry. Criminal organisations target affluent, high-profile Nigerians and expatriates.

    Kidnapping in the North is more ideologically-motivated, and mostly by terrorist group Boko Haram. However, there are exceptions.  In  Zamfara, for instance, on November 18, last year, 40 persons, including a police inspector, were kidnapped in Maru Local Government Area. Over 100 unidentified gunmen reportedly stopped three vehicles in transit from Dansadau to Dankurmi and transported the passengers to an unknown location. Barely a month later, another 35 women working on a farm at Matankari Village in Dansadau District of Maru were also kidnapped.

    Last February 22, two German archaeologists, Professors Peter Breunig and Johannes Buringer were kidnapped in Kaduna.

    In Bauchi State on March 20, three children were abducted from their father’s house in the Ganjuwa Local Government Area of the state.

     

    Consequences for Nigeria’s

    reputation

    The regular occurrence of abductions has given Nigeria a reputation for insecurity with many western countries advising their nationals against visiting many states unless necessary.

    Last month, The United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), Canada, New Zealand and Australia, in their foreign travel advice, warned their citizens not to visit northern states — particularly Borno, Yobe, Adamawa, Gombe and Bauchi — due to kidnappings, terrorism, crime, inter-communal clashes and armed attacks, among others.

    In its foreign travel advice of February 24, on www.gov.uk, the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said: “There is a high threat of kidnap throughout Nigeria especially in the Kogi region. Recent terrorist kidnaps have occurred mostly in northern Nigeria, but could occur anywhere in Nigeria. Kidnaps can be for financial or political gain, and can be motivated by criminality or terrorism.”

    The Department of State of the United States on its website, www.travel.state.gov, asked American citizens to avoid all travels to Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Kano, and Yobe states “because the security situation in the North remains fluid and unpredictable.”

    With the exception of Abuja and Lagos, the US asked its citizens to exercise “extreme” caution when travelling to Nigeria.

    Canada, which gave similar warnings on www.travel.gc.ca, listed only three cities, Lagos, Abuja and Calabar, safe for its nationals.

     

    State of the states

    States have responded in similar ways to kidnapping with varying success rates.

     

    Lagos

    Governor Akinwunmi Ambode signed the state’s Anti-Kidnapping Law on February 2. It prescribes death for kidnappers in whose custody victims died and life jail for those who kidnapped for ransom.

    Last December 13, the state Commissioner for Police, Fatai Owoseni, at the 10th Town Hall Meeting on Security with Governor Akinwunmi Ambode, themed: “Optimising security funding in a recession”, said 51 kidnap cases were recorded in the state.

    But Police Public Relations Office (PPRO), Lagos State Command, Olarinde Famous-Cole, an Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP), told The Nation that incidents of kidnapping were declining in the state.

    He said: “For security reasons, I won’t be able to give you any statistics but the trend has declined in the last one year, notwithstanding the (February 9) kidnap of the Isheri CDA secretary that was widely reported.

    “Since the state assembly passed the law making kidnapping to attract the maximum sentence of death penalty, the incidence has been on the decline.

    “To stem the trend, we are at alert all the time, we conduct many security checks and take proactive measures after the directive of the IGP on the matter and this has paid off very well in Lagos for us.”

    Famous-Cole’s claim appears to be credible as Lagos, the nation’s economic hub and largest urban area, continues to enjoy a positive reputation for safety among Nigerians and expatriates. In their travel advisory for February, the governments of the United States of America (USA) and Canada listed the state among the cities safe for expatriates.

     

    Cross River

    It used to be thought that Calabar, the Cross River State capital and one of the cities with historically the lowest crime rates in the country, was largely immune to kidnappings. But things appear to have changed.

    Last June, Igbo traders in the city visited the palace of the Obong of Calabar, Edidem Ekpo Otu, to appeal for his intervention in obtaining protection from kidnappers. The Vice President of the Igbo community, Mr. Rufus Eze, told the Obong that 80 percent of kidnapped victims in the state were Igbo traders.

    In response to this and other kidnap incidents, on September 9, 2015, Governor Ben Ayade signed into law a bill that prescribes death penalty for anyone convicted of the crime.

    But the state doesn’t still appear to be rid of the menace.

    Last September 10, Onyebuchi Okwueze, the son of the Dean of Postgraduate  School of the University of Calabar, Emeka Okwueze, was abducted. A statement by the university’s information officer, Mr. Effiong Eyo, said the gunmen also shot two other persons during the operation.

    Nevertheless, the Canadian government identifies Calabar as one of the cities safe for its nationals.

     

    Ogun

    Governor Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State signed his state’s kidnapping (Prohibition) Bill 2016 on November 14. According to the law, any kidnapper whose victim or victims die while in captivity will be liable to capital punishment while a convicted offender whose victim is released or rescued unhurt upon the payment of a ransom, will be liable to life imprisonment and be compelled to pay back the ransom.

    The law further prescribes various punishments for any person who threatens to kill, maim or cause bodily harm in order to compel another person, corporate body or organisation to do or prevent from doing any act as a condition for the release of the victim. Similarly, anyone who makes an attempt to kidnap, aids or abets kidnapping will be sentenced to not less than 15  years imprisonment.

    The PPRO, Ogun State Police Command, Abimbola Oyeyemi, said: “For now, kidnapping attracts life sentence in Ogun state. However, there are efforts at legislation to make the punishment more tougher to stem the trend.

    ‘’We have been lucky in Ogun State that kidnapping has not been rampant as in other states. The most prominent of kidnapping cases has been that of Turkey International School. We rescued all those kidnapped from the school and arrested all those involved. We make bold to say that 95 percent of kidnapping cases were resolved in Ogun State within the last one year and in Ogun state, we don’t just rescue the victims, we also arrest the kidnappers’’.

     

    Anambra

    One of the states hit hardest by the problem of kidnapping was Anambra. It was also one of the six states which in 1999 enacted the death penalty as punishment for kidnappers.

    The immediate past governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi, also began the practice of demolishing houses built with proceeds of kidnapping and those used as kidnappers’ hideouts. The practice has since been replicated by some other states.

    However, although it was reported that many kidnappers fled to neighbouring states, this did not end kidnapping in Anambra.

    According to a report by civil society group, Campaign for Democracy, CD, between January 2008 and August 2012, kidnapped persons paid ransoms of about N1.2 billion during the period in the south east.

    The victims were said to have paid between N5 million to N30 million per individual. Anambra State reportedly recorded the kidnapping of 273 persons, the highest in the zone.

    It was reported also that between late 2012 to 2014, kidnappers in Anambra might have made about N1billion off their victims.

    On April 5, 2014, the Anambra State Commissioner of Police, Usman Gwary announced that the police had arrested 20 suspected kidnappers within one week of its ‘Operation Clear All’. It said the operation was against kidnappers and armed robbers.

    On assumption of office, Governor Willie Obiano continued the fight by intensifying the demolition of the kidnappers’ properties. He also set up the Anambra State Police Special Anti-Cultism Squad, (SACS).

    Last May 9, SACS SACS Commander in the state, Mr Bako Gado said no fewer than 140 suspects including kidnappers, cultists and armed robbers had been convicted, while 10 were freed by various courts in the state within two months.

     

    Ondo

    Former Ondo governor Olusegun Mimiko assented to the Ondo State Anti-Kidnapping and Abduction Law in 2010.

    On March 20, 2014, an Akure High Court sentenced three men, Olusegun Obaro, Jonah Lase and Theophilus Friday, to death by hanging for kidnapping and killing a one and half year-old girl, Rachael Akingboye.

    Justice Olusegun Odusola ordered that the convicts be hanged after they were found guilty on a two-count charge of kidnapping and murder.

    Last February 27, a 20-year-old herdsman, Ibrahim Abdul was remanded in prison by an Akure Chief Magistrates’ Court for allegedly attempting to kidnap fellow herdsmen, Muhammed Abdullahi.

     

    Imo State

    A breakthrough in the fight to checkmate kidnapping was recorded on March 2, when notorious kidnapper, Henry Chibueze, otherwise known as Vampire was shot dead by the police.

    Vampire escaped from prison custody last January 27, when his gang members invaded the Owerri High Court in Imo State and rescued him.

    The police said his gang members, who were apprehended in the gun battle with the police, confessed to having carried out four successful kidnap operations after the rescue of their gang leader.

     

    Way out

    Human rights lawyer Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, who was abducted on August 23 and released 21 days later, said the key to tackling kidnapping was not stiffer penalties but better socieconomic opportunities for the youths.

    He told The Nation that if the youth were gainfully employed, they would have little incentive to go into crime.

    “The government must make the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy in Chapter Two of the 1999 Constitution (as Amended) a priority.

    “Section 16 (2) of the Constitution requires the government to ensure that suitable and adequate shelter, suitable and adequate food, reasonable national minimum living wage, old age care and pensions, and unemployment, sick benefits and welfare of the disabled are provided for all citizens. If this is done, the temptation to go into kidnapping would be reduced.”

    He said some of his abductors were university graduates who spoke impeccable English but told him that the absence of job opportunities pushed them into kidnapping.

    Mrs. Adedoyin Rhodes-Vivour, chairperson of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators UK (Nigeria Branch), said the first thing was to determine “whether the death penalty is a deterrent to crime and then verify in which circumstances and the type of criminals that are deterred by the death penalty.

    “Armed robbery attracts the death penalty but I do not believe that there has been a decrease in armed robbery cases.

    “In my view we need to determine the root causes of kidnapping, factors that facilitate its increase and then attack the root. Socioeconomic disparity in our society which could push people to crime as a means of survival should be addressed.”

    Mrs. Rhodes-Vivour, who along with her daughter and a driver, was abducted on May 11, 2013 and released after three weeks, noted that better opportunities would not turn some person’s mind off crime.

    She said: “We need to also appreciate that some people no matter what opportunities are available to them to earn legitimate income are just criminally-minded.

    “Our police should be better equipped and trained to deal with and solve kidnapping cases and crimes.  I have read of some cases where our police have been very effective, efforts should be made to strengthen our police. When criminals know that there is a high chance of being caught and successfully prosecuted this may act as a greater deterrence than the risk of the death penalty which may seem a remote risk in a system where ransom is paid to get victims released more often than the kidnappers being apprehended.

    “The use of high tech security apparatus as well as effective mapping and aerial surveillance are also necessary. Nigeria’s land area which should otherwise be used for agriculture and other income-earning activities are being used as kidnappers’ hideouts and other nefarious activities. Very unfortunate.” she said.

     

    Fed Govt’s response

    A fresh initiative by the Federal Government to curb the growing menace of kidnapping across the country is on the way.

    The initiative is the result of joint efforts by security agencies to check what one of the most-lucrative criminal activities in the nation’s history.

    An investigation by The Nation, showed that the government had tasked relevant security agencies to come up with ideas on how best to tackle the problem before it got worse.

    The agencies have, consequently, identified some measures through which kidnapping and related crimes can be made unattractive throughout the country.

    The new measures may include the introduction of capital punishment for those found guilty of kidnapping.

    Police Inspector General Ibrahim Idris confirmed in Abuja that the Federal Government was working on a blueprint to address the issue.

    Besides, the police are also putting forward a plan to recreate two of its elite units at the state and zonal commands to deal with kidnapping.

    These are the Technical Intelligence Unit (TIU) and Anti-Kidnapping Unit (AKU), which are currently based at the force headquarters, Abuja.

    The police boss said his office and that of the Attorney-General of the Federation were collaborating on effective prosecution of kidnapping cases nationwide.

    Idris, who spoke  in an interview in Abuja, said for a start, suspected  kidnappers  would, henceforth, be prosecuted under the provisions of the Terrorism Prevention Act (TPA) 2011 and Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013.

    He explained that the two laws otherwise known as TPA 2011 (as amended) could be very effective deterrents against such grave criminal acts as they specified penalties that may include long jail term, life sentence and death.