Category: Law

  • Lawyer writes Ambode, police over land grabbers’ threat

    Lawyer writes Ambode, police over land grabbers’ threat

    A Lagos lawyer, Gbenga Ojo, has urged Governor Akinwunmi Ambode to probe the release of suspected land grabbers by the Task Force on Environment and Special Offences Enforcement Unit.

    In a petition to the governor, which was also sent to the Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Zone 2 Command, the lawyer said his client, Chief Ishau Ogunlana, head of Aderoruwa Family of Agofunloye, Idi Orogbo Village, first wrote the governor last September 19 over “acts of criminal invasion” of the community by land speculators.

    Ojo said the governor, as “a no-nonsense leader”, referred the petition to the chairman of the Task Force for action.

    The lawyer said on January 17, the Task Force stormed the community and arrested some of the hoodlums stationed illegally on the land and recovered weapons such as guns and cutlasses from them.

    The suspects, he said, were interrogated and sent to the Committee on Land Grabbing for evaluation, ahead of their arraignment in court.

    “Unfortunately, the suspects and their backers made personal arrangements and clandestinely secured their release without any authority or directives of the chairman of the Task Force,” Ojo said.

    The lawyer said the recovered weapons were still in custody of the Task Force while the suspects were at large.

    “The hoodlums are regrouping with their full force to attack the community again,” Ojo wrote in the letter to the governor, signed by a lawyer in his firm, Yusuf Lawal.

    He described the situation as “worrisome “, saying it negated the state’s efforts at tackling the manace of land grabbers.

    According to the lawyer, the development was “enough to trigger immediate investigation before the situation embarrasses the office of the executive governor.”

    In the September 19 letter to Ambode, Ojo alleged that the community was invaded by armed thugs to suppress a valid court judgment in suit no IKD/2/2007.

    The Ikorodu High Court had on January 14, 2011 given a judgment in Ogunlana’s favour.

    It held: “It is hereby declared that the defendant (Ogunlana) is the head of the Adeyoruwa family of Agunfoye, Idiorogbo, in Igbogbo area of Lagos State.

    “It is hereby declared that all sales or transfers of interest in respect of portions of the Adeyoruwa family land carried out by the claimants without the consent of the defendant as family head are illegal, void and of no effect.

    “It is hereby ordered that the defendant is entitled to the immediate possession of all the portions of the Adeyoruwa family land sold by the claimants without the consent of the defendant as the head of family.”

    Justice M. A. Savage, in a ruling on July 2, 2015, held that the judgment remained valid, binding and subsisting until otherwise pronounced by a higher court.

    The judge also granted an ex-parte application for leave to levy execution of the judgment by taking possession of the land.

  • NBA branches win Eastern Bar Unity Cup

    NBA branches win Eastern Bar Unity Cup

    Abakaliki and Enugu branches of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) at the weekend won the first matches in the second round of  Chief Arthur Obi Okafor (SAN) Eastern Bar Forum ( EBF)  Unity Cup sponsored by  Chief Arthur Obi Okafor (SAN) and played at the Abakaliki Township Stadium, Abakaliki in Ebony State.

    In the first match of the day, Abakaliki branch defeated Cakabar branch by three goals to nothing, while Enugu branch defeated Onueke branch by a lone goal in the second match of the day.

    Performing the kick off, Governor David  Umahi of Ebonyi State  who was represented by his deputy, Dr. Emeka Igwe expressed his delight in hosting the tournament. The Governor expressed his likeness for football as a game because it represents the totality of human life. He said: ‘’We must always find love and trust in the state both in the government and among  its citizens.‘’

    The governor said the state government has so much interest in sports, especially football because it represents the totality of life.

    “I like football because it represents human life  and activities. In football, you have the highest demonstration of team work, goal keeper, the strikers who must go to score goals,, the back men whose role is to prevent the opponent from scoring goals against you. The forward men are there to push forward, in life it is either you push forward to achieve your goals or you leave them and this will either make or mar you.

    “Be magnanimous in victory, if you win, you celebrate, if you lose, you celebrate, this is the spirit of Ebony State. It shall be well with you and indeed any lawyer who comes here to wish us well, God will prosper him.

    “This has shown us that  the sponsor of this tournament is visionary, focused,  a team player, a goal getter and a unifying force at the Bar. He should be supported and encouraged to do more for the association and for God to prosper him,” Umahi said.

    The co-coordinator of the football match, Mr. Onyechi Steve Ononye,  thanked members of the association for turning out en masse to participate in the football match. He said the football match was conceived and sponsored by Obi Okafor (SAN) to enhance the wellbeing of lawyers,   provide a platform for recreation for lawyers and take them off the rigours  of litigation and Court gymnastics.

    The match was attended by the branch chairmen of the 43 branches of the NBA that make up the Eastern Bar Forum. NBA president was represented by the Second Vice President of the association, Mr. Monday Onyekachi Ubani, Deputy Governor of the EBF, Chief  Arthur Chukwu, Chief Judge of Ebony State, Justice Aloy Nwankwor who kicked off the second match of the tournament, Lady Debby Obodoukwu, former General Secretary of the NBA who is also the Vice-President (West Africa)  of the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU),  Chief Emeka J. P. Obegolu, former Governor of EBF, Mr. Ogbonna Igwenyi and national officers from the forum and outside it.

     

  • Lagos and justice sector reforms

    Lagos and justice sector reforms

    The move by Lagos State Government, through its Ministry of Justice, to assemble stakeholders to further discuss the way forward with respect to the nation’s quest and popular demand for justice sector reforms could not have come at a better time. To His Excellency, Governor Akinwumi Ambode and his amiable Attorney- General and Hon. Commissioner for Justice, it is a summit that is so crucially relevant and compelling as a way of moving the debate forward and offering a platform for Stakeholders to walk their talk. And they cannot be wrong on this assumption. It is indeed, like many of their policy decisions, a right step in the right direction.

    Much more interesting is the all important topic of the summit , which is Contemporary Trends: Catalysts for justice sector reforms in Lagos state. Quite expectedly, expectations are high regarding this Stakeholder’s summit on the administration of justice; being aware of the crucial role our beloved Lagos state plays not only for itself but also as a pacesetter in the socio-economic growth and development of our legal system in Nigeria.

    This article is a Stakeholder’s contribution aimed at examining some of the current trends in the justice sector and how they can push reform efforts in the judicial sector of Lagos. It is going to be divided into three parts: The first part of the article is going to deal with Nigeria-specific trends, the second part will deal with Global trends, and the third part of the discourse shall deal with how the combination of these trends can serve as a catalyst for justice sector reforms in Lagos State.

     

    The Nigerian contemporary trends

    At the forefront is the issue of corruption in the judiciary and the need for accountability.  We are all aware of the allegations of corruption leveled on high profile members of our judiciary. This is a truly alarming and worrisome trend, as the judiciary is supposed to be the mirror that reflects a clean, fair and great vision for society. Whether it is as bad as it is being portrayed is a question that may not be easily answered until the guilt of the alleged judicial officers has been established or otherwise. In the meantime, however, there is no doubting the fact that our judiciary is, more than ever before, enmeshed in a tragically scandalous situation. Certainly, this points to the need for the judiciary to create and strengthen internal accountability mechanisms. These mechanisms would serve two purposes:

    Firstly, they would prevent judicial corruption even before it happens. We must go back and look at the process of how we appoint Judges. It needs to be a more rigorous and transparent process, so that we can weed out bad eggs even before they get a chance to ever sit as Judges and in judgment for or against the citizens of this country.

    Secondly, these accountability mechanisms should involve self-cleansing of compromised and corrupt judicial officials in partnership with the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and the National Judicial Council (NJC).

    Since the recent arrests of certain judges, I have often heard public affairs analysts and legal commentators on TV and the mass media argue that arresting Judges is a breach of the independence of the judiciary. I do not agree nor subscribe to that line of thinking, but it does raise a challenge for us as stakeholders in the judicial process. The challenge before us is: How do we ensure an effective method of dealing with cases of corruption in our midst? When we fail to do what we have to, the other arms of government step in; and then some of us say that this is harming the independence of the judiciary. If we do not sweep our compound—if we leave it dirty—we should not be surprised or even angry when our neighbor cleans it for us. No one likes a dirty environment, so we must keep our compound clean.  Therefore, as stakeholders, we must be able to self-police ourselves as members of the judiciary.

    As a constant beacon of hope, Lagos, being at the forefront and cutting edge of judicial reforms and innovation, can lead the way in the fight against judicial corruption. The million-dollar question is: What do we do?

    Part of my suggestions for reforms and proposed agenda as all roads lead to Lagos for the Stakeholders summit  to be united in purpose and loud in re-echoing the call for urgent action on the need to reform the process of appointing Judges. The process must be transparent and free of political considerations. The NJC should have 100 per cent responsibility for appointing Judges.  That way, when Judges fail to adhere to the code of conduct of the judiciary, we will know how to deal with it.

    The conditions of service of our judicial officers must also be a matter of concer for Stakeholders as a cardinal point on the egenda for justice sector reforms. Coincidentally, this was a struggle Lagos State had spearheaded at the advent of this current democratic dispensation when, under the dynamic leadership of His Excellency, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu as Governor and his Attorney-General and Hon. Commissioner for Justice, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, there was a radical reform in the Lagos judicial sector which witnessed an unprecedented upward review of  the remuneration of our Judges and Magistrates. Today, His Excellency, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo is the nation’s Vice President and a keynote participant at the Lagos summit.

    We need to reduce the incentive for bad behavior by making sure that, as a system, we are paying our Judges competitive salaries and other benefits, so the temptation to involve themselves in corruption is less. Also, financial autonomy for the judiciary is a way to guard the independence of the judiciary and prevent it from being too dependent on the other two arms of Government for funding.

     

    Global Trends

    The first global trend in the judicial system concerns access to justice, fairer sentencing, and prison reforms. The rule of law is a critical ingredient for a democratic society, and we all know that access to justice is one of the most important and necessary characteristics of the rule of law. Major countries like the United States and the United Kingdom have been constantly tweaking this very important concept called access to justice; and I must say with all sincerity that I am truly proud of Lagos for the huge steps that it has taken to ensure that access to justice is real and concrete. I really mean this, and I think we are allowed to beat our chests on this point. The Lagos state Government has opened legal clinics and has made justice more accessible to the average man. But the challenge I want to throw at us, since we are talking about reforms, is: How do we institutionalise all of these laudable efforts, especially in criminal cases where Life and Liberty are often at stake? How do we help to ensure that it becomes a national philosophy as it relates to our administration of justice system.

    Yet again, I must commend the efforts of the Lagos state Government on the great strides it has made in alternative dispute resolution, especially in the use of mediation and arbitration.  This is very important, because it has made justice more accessible to the average man on the street who often views our Court system as too adversarial, lengthy and cost prohibitive.

    The second global trend in the judicial sector is the new debate that is growing on the very concept of justice itself. The legal system of justice we inherited from the British was a retributive system wherein all wrongdoers must be punished. But the world is changing and is moving towards a more rehabilitative and restorative system of justice.  The point of justice should no longer just be about punishment, but about rehabilitation.  The person who steps into prison should leave prison a better man or woman and—not only that—we need to be able to, where possible, reconcile the perpetrator and his victim. This might sound like a lot for us to change our entire concept of justice. But, to the great Victorian Statesman, Benjamin Disraeli, as emphasised in his speech delivered in Edinburgh in 1867: “Change is inevitable. In a progressive country, change is constant”.

    This is a progressive era, and Lagos is a place of progressive leadership, foresight and vision. It is possible for Lagos to begin the process of reassessing the very nature of justice in Nigeria.  Lagos can lead the way in creating a rehabilitative and restorative system of justice.

    Then, the subject of Prison Reforms.  Our prisons are over congested.  Most of the prisoners are low-level offenders who have never been placed before a Judge.  Some of them have been in pre-trial detention for years, very often for minor infractions.  This is a worrisome situation.  Yet, we are not the only ones with this problem as even a developed country like the US is dealing with issues of Criminal Justice reforms. In fact, the trend in the US is moving towards fairer sentencing for non-violent offenders, and also toward reducing the rates of recidivism among the prison population. So how can this global trend in prison reforms serve as a catalyst for justice sector reforms here in Lagos and in Nigeria? Well, we can start by stopping the practice of detaining people for more than 48hours until they have seen a judge and been sentenced by a Court of competent jurisdiction. That way, the situation of people in pre-trial detention would reduce.

    There is also the issue of bail.  Many of the people in jail have no business being there; the only reason they are in jail is because they do not have the funds to post bail. The concept of bail is not supposed to be burdensome, and people shouldn’t be kept in jail because they can’t post bail. At that point, we are simply criminalising poverty—not crime.  Also, for existing pre-trial prisoners (detainees) in our prison system, we have to fast track the process of bringing them before Judges; and for those who are in prison for minor offences/misdemeanors, we give them community service and let them be on their merry way. It is a threat to our future and to us all that one innocent man idles away in prison.

    The final point to make on prison reforms is on the issue of rehabilitation. Again, I hope that we realize that people in prison are a drain on the public’s finances as we have to feed them, clothe them and be responsible for their general well being. Who is paying for that? Surely, the taxpayers of Nigeria.

    Therefore, I am calling on us as Stakeholders, that we push for what I call Prisoners’ re-education for post-prison life. While they are in prison, we shouldn’t just lock them up and forget about them; we need to give them life skills and some basic education so that, when they come out, they can be productive members of society. If we do not do that, for many of them life in prison remains one that is better than life outside of prison. In prison, according to some, they at least have one square meal a day. So, Prisoner education is very important.

    Finally, on contemporary global trends, I should briefly touch the emerging Trend of Terrorism and National Security. Today, the legal systems of most countries have to respond to and deal with the issue of terrorism. There is an ongoing debate about curbing civil liberties in the name of national security, and we in Nigeria are also not immune from this grim reality of terrorism. The question before us is: How is the Nigerian justice system responding to this peculiar question of national security? How are our police—because they are also part of the judicial system—responding to this new challenge before us? I have a few thoughts and suggestions for reforms: We need to regain public confidence in our institutions, especially the police, because in this fight against terrorism, the police are the agents of justice closest to the people and so they must have the confidence of our local communities to be able to gather data and intelligence.

                                                                      

    Lagos-Specific

    This part of the article is dealing with specific trends that can impact the reform process of the judicial sector. First, we discuss the Impact of Technology on the administration of justice. With the advancement of technology, we need to embrace technology as part of our judicial process. This will require that Judges, lawyers and police use technology in the compilation of evidence and even video recording testimonies of witnesses. This will bring to an end the days of a long Court process where we adjourn proceedings because a witness or the Defendant does not show up.These trials are expensive and lengthy and are not good for the administration of justice. Technology can help smoothen the administration of justice.

    Therefore, we need to adopt a modern way of thinking.  Most of our Courts in the country use the longhand method of taking down Court proceedings.  This leads to a long and cumbersome process that slows down the administration of justice.  But, again, Lagos has been in the forefront of using technology to quicken the administration of justice. However, I would like for us to expand our vision of what a justice system should be about.  We do not only do justice for the sake of the man who brings a case to Court, but we do justice for society as a whole; and so in cases where there is a strong public interest, we need to consider digitally recording these cases. Yes, this might sound almost blasphemous to some of us, but it is important that in the adjudication of high-profile cases, with a strong public interest,  the people of Nigeria get to see the wheels of our justice system in motion. It requires us to unveil justice in action to the people.

    So I propose that we train our judicial officials on the use of technology in the administration of justice, and I want Lagos to lead the way on this.  If there is anyone that can take up this challenge, it is Lagos. So, the call to the same Lagos State, which has deployed more technology in the administration of justice than any other State, is to see more technology in action in the courts and police system of Lagos as a major contemporary trend that will act a catalyst to justice sector reforms in the State and, on the long run, in the Nigerian nation.

    More importantly, because this is Lagos, and to the extent that in Lagos we mean business; a best practice trend that stakeholders must urge Lagos to use as a catalyst for judicial reforms is on the need for the law to be more commercial and business-friendly, especially for Lagos. All of the nice things said about justice is all well and good on paper. But, in practical terms, justice can be possible and sustainable only in an environment where there is economic flourishing.  Lagos can model itself after the State of Delaware in the US; and London,  in England. English Courts have become the destination for big businesses requiring commercial certainty in their disputes.

    This is necessary for capital attraction. Lagos being the commercial hub of Nigeria, and indeed West Africa, requires us to ease the legal bottlenecks of doing business. This economic reality should be a catalyst for reforms that create special business courts for contract, tax and other commercial disputes that will be heard swiftly. Lagos Courts can model themselves as the place where commercial disputes can be solved swiftly, certainly and consistently. If we do that, you will find that most business people in other parts of Nigeria will prefer to sue in Lagos Courts because of the quality of the judgments, the swiftness of the judgments and the predictability of the judgments.  That will be another avenue for raising internally generated revenue. I call it legal tourism. We can even make Lagos a regional hub for the application of English commercial law, because we have the capacity right here in Lagos.  In the same vein, Lagos must take the lead in the much needed reform initiatives and efforts to ease the regulatory and legal obstacles of doing business. Essentially, we can reform and restructure our legal system in Lagos to make it pro- business and commerce. Then, we can have sustainable justice, because it is underpinned by economic growth. A clear message would also be sent to the rest of the country through this reform process.

    In conclusion, the Lagos summit on administration of justice is a welcome development targeted, among others, at underscoring the limitations that disabled the Nigerian judiciary from effectively discharging a nation’s eminently important and fundamental duty of fairly and impartially adjudicating disputes, protecting citizens’ rights and constraining the excesses of both the executive and the legislature. It also offers a solid platform for addressing the problems and iniquities of the judiciary, with emphasis on the roles of the stakeholders, especially lawyers, in restoring public confidence in the Nigerian judiciary.

    It is imperative that we must continue to welcome as many reform initiatives as possible to further strengthen our legal system, to the extent that we must design a positive organic policy that aims to curb corruption, inefficiency and disorder in our body corporate and, more particularly, in our judicial sector.

    More than any other category of stakeholders, lawyers must brazen up to the contemporary challenges and drive the reform initiatives. As lawyers, we must see ourselves as critical Stakeholders in the judicial process. We must take up the gauntlet of vigil Professionals working hard to defend the rights and privileges of lawful citizens and we must not shy away from our traditional duty as watchdogs of democracy and defenders of human rights. We must be ready to provide leadership and champion the struggle for a more humane, peaceful, decent and prosperous society. We must uphold the constitution as the grundnorm while playing active roles in its constant review to meet emerging needs of democratic advancement and we must ensure compliance to the rule of law in line with contemporary international legal order and global best practices. Let the reforms go on and let the real change begin!

     

    *Bamidele is engaged in trans-jurisdictional practice of law as an Attorney & Counselor-at-Law of the State of New York and a Solicitor & Advocate of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

  • Complexity of facts, technicalities of law: Dilemma of leadership

    Complexity of facts, technicalities of law: Dilemma of leadership

    Lagos State University (LASU) Vice-Chancellor Prof. Lanre Fagbohun presented this paper at a birthday lecture organised by former students of former Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (NIALS) Director-General Prof. Epiphany Azinge (SAN) in Abuja.

    For as long as we do not meet the challenge of failing institutions, well intentioned leaders will always be handicapped while bad leaders with divergent interests from the greater interest of the people will always have a field day in compromising and undermining the system.  For as long as this state of affairs persists, Nigerians will always be confronted with sporadic announcements of woes, human suffering, brazen criminal acts, high level insecurity, unprecedented political violence, and a host of other incapacitating conditions.

     

    Sequencing a Path Forward

     

    In terms of checks and impunity, the most formidable influence that Nigeria has at the moment is the media. Beyond identifying issues and setting the agenda for public discussion, the media has been the prime watchdog of the society.  Often time, I hear many deride the media by asserting over sensationalisation, and generally criticizing “media trial”.  What we fail to realise is that the gaps and disconnects in the system is what at times constrain some leaders and institutions out of frustration to resort to “media trial” in the hope that it would whip up public support against perceived violation.  Sadly, it’s a tool that does not go too far in that it does not remedy whatever wrong that might have occurred.

    This then brings me to the role of law and the interpreters of the law.  We cannot deny that there is relatively low level of public trust in our law making institutions.  Sadly, unlike the case in a number of developed jurisdictions where the courts are among the most trusted government institutions, there is so much of public dissatisfaction with Nigeria’s judicial system.  Beyond the challenge of delayed justice (which itself is justice denied), the judiciary is enmeshed in controversies of corruption.

    The role of the judiciary has always been regarded as a matter of great legal and constitutional significance.  When allegations of corruption are now made against justices of the highest court of the country, the situation can well be described as a constitutional crisis if we go by the fact that respect for the constitution is heavily dependent on the strength, integrity and independence of the judiciary.  A time there was when Nigeria prided herself as endowed with a judiciary that demonstrated the highest traditions of judicial decency, great erudition and independence.  Today, all of the encomiums have been eroded.  I will not in this paper go into the complex factual details of the recent events or the barrage of combative criticisms that have trailed what is now termed as the “DSS Sting Operation”…

    I am not in any way playing down on issues that have been raised in relation to intimidation, victimization, and harassment of judicial officers, or that made in respect of threat to independence of the judiciary. If the judiciary have been what it should be, judicial review is what would have immediately availed the persons affected.  The fact remains that we are running a most imperfect and poor functioning system where under the guise of complex facts and technicalities of law, violators have consistently legitimized themselves into authority.  The nemesis of corruption is what has brought Nigeria to where she is today.

    Unarguably, the current administration is poised to fight corruption.  Regrettably, the ghost of yesterday and the massive rot of the past have brutally traumatized the people and substantially diminished the ability of the system to give vestiges of hope.  Severally incapacitating conditions have festered so much that when people complain about corruption and its negative impact, they tolerate and condone it when it is in relation to someone close to them.  Public institutions are locked on poor power relations with the result that implementation of rational policies can only respond to the whims of individuals at the helm of political power.  The mutation in the Nigeria system is so deep and daunting that sincere leaders are constrained in pushing the frontiers of good governance, and are for reasons of political expediency predominantly pre-occupied with satisfying competing and often contradictory values.

    The summary of what I have sought to demonstrate in the last few pages is that public institutions in Nigeria have largely failed because Nigeria lacks both political constitutionalism (ability of the legislature to effectively and efficiently correct wrongs) and legal constitutionalism (ability of the judiciary to effectively and efficiently correct wrongs).  It will amount to no more than sheer pretense to expect a leader to emerge with a magic wand that will take Nigeria away from the darker side of optimism.  It will also be unconscionable arrogance to expect that the legislature and the judiciary will become self-correcting.

    The foregoing dictates two things that Nigeria must urgently focus on doing; two things for which we must give the luxury of time for thought if the country is not to continue to lurch into the future blindly.  First, we must urgently reform our justice system such that it is able to deliver on access to justice at reasonable cost and speed.  So much has been done, particularly, in the area of Administration of Criminal Justice, but so much still needs to be done in the area of civil justice reform.  Inspite of what has been done, the system remains slow, unduly complex and too susceptible to abuse.  When people know that they can effectively enforce their legal rights, they will develop confidence in the system.

    Second, we must empower private actors to play a greater role in surveillance and vigilance over the regulatory and enforcement processes of our public institutions. If Nigeria liberalizes legal standing for private individuals and civil society organizations, it would bring on board a pool of watchdogs that can constantly prompt the government to act; enforce the law beyond media attention and public support; push for greater transparency and administrative accountability; and significantly improve access to justice.

    If public officers and public institutions are aware that there are watchdogs all over who are fully empowered to call them to account, it will remove the arrogance and impunity in governance.  Permit me to again go graphic, if a public officer can legitimately be called upon by his neighbor (even if this is out of envy) to account for how he made the money to build his palatial mansion, we will begin to introduce decency into the Nigerian society.  The presence of an empowered informational society is what can nip social injustice in the bud, and redeem our corruption infested institutions.

    The traditional argument against legal mobilization of private actors is that it will open a floodgate of litigants (proliferation of suits).  We should think through how to manage this concern, but, it must not in any way deter us.  Indeed, pending statutory liberalization, the Supreme Court can do more using interpretative tools to move away from a restrictive approach that have consistently constrained private actors from serving as a corrective for ineffective political representation of the legislature; the abuse of the justice system; and the impunity of the executive.  I must emphasize that Nigeria’s approach to managing floodgates should not be the same as that in use in developed democracies.  Nigeria must radically innovate bearing in mind the depth of ambivalence that has characterized the country.

     

    Conclusion

    It is not the case that Nigeria does not have laws that can correct ills.  The challenge that Nigeria has and which cuts across all sector is lack of respect even for the ones we have.  Leaders constantly find themselves struggling to meet the challenges of impunity with the result that they are distracted from the real issues of an ailing economy with its burden on Nigerians.

    My position is: if our judiciary is responsive and we have an effective mechanism for keeping public officers and public institutions on their toes, recklessness and impunity will reduce, and Nigeria will have a self-correcting system. The embrace of democracy does not automatically translate to reform of the system.  Nigeria’s crisis calls urgently on us to move away from the conventional approaches and do the unconventional.

    In the words of Dr. Akinola Aguda:

    If every citizen conducts his affairs in accordance with the law of the land; if all the agencies of the Government, high and low, conduct public affairs in accordance with the laws laid down by that very Government; if all those called upon to administer the laws of the land do so, or/and are permitted to do so with clear understanding, honesty and dedication to the cause of justice – …then we would be able to appreciate the fact that the only saviour of Nigeria as part of the larger family of mankind is the law.

     

     

  • Court to hear suit against ex-footballer Feb 7

    Justice Christopher Balogun of the Lagos State High Court will on February 7 hear a suit by a firm, Megallus Nigeria Limited, against a former Nigeria international, Wilson   Oruma and   a firm,   Dok  Engineering Services Limited.

    The claimant is praying for an order compelling Oruma to assign and endorse all documents transferring his rights over a property in Lekki to Megallus Nigeria.

    In the alternative, it is praying for special damages of N450million, being the value of any similar land of same dimension and similar features within the location as the land in dispute.

    The claimant said sometime in August  2013, Oruma offered it a parcel of land for sale, measuring 57,739.633square meters at Idaso Village, Elekan in Ibeju Lekki.

    Megallus Nigeria said it made a part-payment of N5million out of N90million, with the balance to be paid in four months.

    The claimant said due to its inability to complete the balance, a new payment plan was drawn up, in which he paid additional N15million, with the balance  to be paid by March 31, 2014.

    The firm said when it sought to complete the payment and presented Oruma with eight managers’ cheque on March 31, 2014, totalling N70million, the defendant allegedly refused to collect the cheques and also did not execute the instruments of transfer, including deed of assignment.

    The claimant said the former footballer instead offered to refund the N20million part payment, rather than collecting full payment.

    According to Megallus Nigeria, Oruma claimed that he received an offer double what the claimant first offered and, therefore, would not accept a lesser offer.

    The claimant said the defendant “is estopped from reneging on an obligation voluntarily contracted and upon which the claimant had already furnished consideration to the extent that it can no longer revert to its former position.”

    Megallus Nigeria said Dok Engineering (the second defendant), which claimed to have also bought the land from Oruma, cannot rely on any agreement between it and the ex-footballer to overreach the claimant’s initial agreement with Oruma.

    Besides, the claimant said a deed of assignment between Dok Engineering and Oruma “was fraudulently procured” as the suit had already been instituted and proceedings ongoing when the deed of assignment dated October 15, 2014 was procured.

    Megallus Nigeria said requirements of the law were not complied with in executing the deed, including obtaining the governor’s consent, adding that it was not signed by the truly accredited representatives of families entitled to deal in or dispose of the land.

    The claimant also sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from entering or alienating or disturbing the claimant’s possession of the land.

    Megallus Nigeria prayed for an order nullifying or setting aside any sale, alienation, assignment or transfer of the land to Dok Engineering or any other person from the first defendant.

    The defendants, represented by S. Ugoeke (for the first defendant) and Mrs Tolulope Moseli, have been served with the claimant’s amended statement of claim.

    They are praying the court to dismiss the suit.

    Oruma claimed the plaintiff did not pay for the land in line with the agreement.

    Dok Engineering is claiming it acquired the land legally, therefore, the suit was unmeritorious.

  • Lawyers show fitness in WarriCentric run

    NO  fewer than 60 persons, mostly lawyers and other professionals resident in Warri, proved their fitness at the weekend in the maiden WarriCentric five-kilometre run.

    The event, sponsored by Compos Mentis Chambers and Perfectus Laundi Drycleaners, aimed at promoting fitness and wellness of residents of the city and environs.

    Participants arrived as early as 7am at the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) Housing Estate in Ekpan, the run which lasted less than an hour.

    Afterwards, medals were presented to winners in the different categories including under 30s, 30-49 and over 50s).

    Staff of Perfectus Laundi showed off their fitness levels as two of their own, Israel Agborume and Victor Lawrence won the second and third place prizes and took home N7,500 and N5,000 respectively as prize money. The first place was won by one Daniel Ekaun, who took home the sum of N10,000.

  • Fusengbuwa Ruling House: Court adjourns hearing till March 7

    A state High Court sitting in Ijebu-Ode has reserved till March 7, further hearing in a dispute over the headship (Olori-Ebi) of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House of Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State.

    The court  also admitted as evidence, five documents tendered by the claimants in support of their claims in the  suit.

    The suit was instituted by the former President, Institute of Chartered Accountant of Nigeria(ICAN), Otunba Abdul- Lateef Owoyemi, Prince Rasaq Akeju, Yisau Ajidagaba, Prince Adeleke Adeyemi and one other on behalf of themselves and Fusengbuwa Ruling House against the founder of the First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Otunba Subomi Balogun and others.

    The claimants are claiming that Otunba Abdul – Lateef Owoyemi is the right and legitimate person to occupy the position of the  Olori – Ebi of Fusengbuwa Ruling House and prayed the court to pronounce him as such.

    They had approached the court to challenge  Otunba Subomi Balogun who is a also member of  the Fusengbuwa Ruling House over the alleged manner he emerged as the head of the family after the demise of the former Olori – Ebi  of the Family, Chief Adebisi Adeyemi.

    But Otunba Balogun has since filed counter – claims in support of his defence as the Olori – Ebi of the Ruling House.

    At the resumed hearing of the matter before Justice Aderonke Asenuga last Tuesday, Prince Adeleke Adeyemi took to the witness box to testify about the exhibits, saying he wrote them from his IPAD as the Secretary of the Ruling House when led in evidence by the Claimants’ Counsel, Chief Adebayo Adesegun.

    The exhibits consisted of letters written by the ruling house to Awujale and Paramount ruler of Ijebuland, Oba Sikiru Adetona, the Ijebu-Ode Local Government Area, letter to the Permanent Secretary, Local  Government and Chieftaincy Affairs –  all pertaining to the nomination of Owoyemi as the authentic head of the Ruling House.

    Although, Tunji Ayanlaja(SAN), Counsel for the defendant (Otunba Subomi Balogun) objected to the tendering of one of the documents and urged the court to reject it on the ground that it was not signed but the judge overruled the objection and admitted the document as evidence, having been found to have been signed, also admitted others that were not opposed.

    The court  adjourned the case till February 13 and March 7  for continuation of  hearing.

  • Benchers chair Aiku for burial Feb 17

    The remains of chairman of the Body of Benchers, Chief Bandele Aiku (SAN), will be buried on February 17 in Ijebu Ijesha, Osun State.

    A statement by the family said there would be a Christian wake in his Ibadan, Oyo State home on February 14.

    A valedictory court session will hold at the High Court 1, Ring Road, Ibadan, on February 15, by 9am.

    Aiku died in his Ibadan residence last January 22. He was 81. He was due to step down as Chairman of the Body of Benchers in March, having assumed office in March 2016.

    NBA President Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) said it was a difficult time to lose Aiku.

    “The NBA administration has embarked on a major overhaul of the legal profession in Nigeria. This is therefore the wrong time to lose experienced lawyers and giant Bar activists like Chief Bamidele Aiku, SAN.

    “Chief Aiku was involved in all sectors of the legal profession in very active roles from the bar- at branch level at Ibadan to the national level, Body of Benchers and the Disciplinary Committee. He also contributed so much to philanthropic ventures, pro bono and service to community,” he said.

    Former NBA Presidents Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) Joseph Bodunrin Daudu (SAN) and Mr. Okey Wali (SAN) described Aiku’s death was a big loss.

    Olanipekun said: “He was a wonderful man, amiable, sociable, very dependable and highly committed to anything law and the legal profession. He was part and parcel of those who resurrected the Bar in 1999 and since then, he never looked back on anything concerning the Bar and the legal profession.

    “He was the chairman of the Body of Benchers and his tenure was to end at the end of March 2017 because he assumed office towards the end of March last year. Chief Aiku was very well respected in the profession, and was something like an idol and mentor to many young lawyers.

    “To me, he was a leader, despite the fact that I was the President of the NBA, I looked up to him as a leader. We will miss him so dearly and we will definitely celebrate him.”

    Daudu said: “Well, he lived a full and rewarding life. He was a prominent member of the Bar and his legacies are there for everybody to see. They are too numerous to mention. He was a serving chairman of the Body of Benchers till his death, he was very honest, and a stickler to standards. He believed that both your character and dressing must be compliant, fit and proper at all times. We will miss him in the profession,” Daudu said.

    “It is a big loss for the NBA, for me it is indeed a personal loss. I was very close to him. He was to me a friend, a mentor, hero and a role model. During my Presidency of the Bar, he was always there for me, to advise, support and encourage me. This is a very sad loss for me indeed. May God his soul eternal rest,” Wali said.

    Other SANs including Funke Adekoya, Chief Joe-Kyari Gadzama, Arthur Obi Okafor, Prof. Ernest Ojukwu, and Former Attorney-General and  Commissioner for Justice in Oyo State, Mr. Adebayo Ojo as well as former NBA General Secretary Mr. Emeka JP Obegolu all paid tributes to Aiku.

    Adekoya described Aiku as one of ‘the last of the Mohicans’ who “exemplified all the standards that the legal profession holds dear.”

    She said: “As the Leader of the EgbeAmofin (Southwest Lawyers Forum), he did his best to preserve unity within the forum, while refusing to compromise on his principles. Whether in English dress or native wear, he was always impeccably dressed, and he saw his chairmanship of the Body of Benchers as an opportunity to redirect the profession towards understanding what being a ‘ learned gentleman’ meant in terms of behaviour and dress. He will be missed by all who had the opportunity to interact with him.”

    Gadzama said: “Although he is gone, we will always treasure the legacies he left behind. We will never forget the fact he lived for the people and committed his entire life to the service of mankind in various categories. He will be sorely missed.”

    Okafor said: “The legal profession and the country will miss this great Nigerian leader and advocate per excellence, who for decades had bestrode the Nigerian legal landscape with great mastery and intellectual erudition.”

    Ojukwu lamented that Aiku’s death had “added to the gaps in the development of the Nigerian Bar Association, the legal profession and the nation”.

  • ‘Stop encroachment on Ogun community’s land’

    A law firm, W. K. Shittu & Co, has petitioned the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) of Idoleyin in Ado-Odo Local Government Area of Ogun State over the incursion of land grabbers and fake developers on Idoleyin communal land.

    It urged the police to intervene urgently so as to avoid unnecessary bloodshed.

    The letter, titled: Petition against incursion of land grabbers and fake developers on Idoleyin communal land, was signed by Mr. Alayo Akanbi.

    The firm said the Egun people of Idoleyin have been in exclusive and undisturbed possession of the land and warned the public to be wary of fraudsters “who have been parading themselves” as the community’s appointed attorneys.

    It noted that Justice O. S. Olusanya of the Ogun State High Court, Ota in two consolidated suits marked NCA/09/2009 and NCA/19/2012, restrained parties interested in the land to maintain status quo.

    “Please be informed that our clients are in exclusive possession of the said Idoleyin community land and pursuant to the order of the court, parties are restrained from invading, alienating, leasing or disposing off all or any parcel of land forming part of Idoleyin community land.

    “The community noted that the activities of suspected fraudsters and land grabbers became noticeable recently when unknown persons were seen erecting poles and bricks on portions of the community land.

    “When approached by our clients to stop work, the trespassers refused and posed to fight anybody that attempted to top them from their illegal acts,” the firm said.

    It continued: “In order to avoid unnecessary bloodshed, the community calls on the DPO to intervene urgently, especially against the background that innocent members of the community were killed by thugs sponsored by land grabbers.”

  • Supreme Court dismisses Fed Govt’s objection to land case

    THE Federal Government has no legal right to challenge the Land Regularisation Policy of the Lagos State Government, the Supreme Court has ruled.

    In a ruling by a seven-man panel, the court upheld the preliminary objection filed by the Lagos State government to contest the legality of the suit.

    The ruling was delivered on behalf of members of the panel by Justice Clara Ogunbiyi

    In its Land Regulation policy, the state specified the process of ratifying the title of holders of Certificates of Occupancy said to have been obtained from the Federal Government.

    But the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) represented by Mr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), had in a suit, reference number SC/50/ 2011, invoked the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to challenge the provisions of the policy.

    While arguing the case, Agbakoba cited particular properties where title holders were required by state to pay a  certain amount as “Ratification” of their title before any other transactions can be permitted on such land.

    But  the state raised an objection that the Supreme Court could not exercise original jurisdiction in the matter, because the subject matter was a land matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court.

    The  Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, in his preliminary objection, argued that the AGF lacked the locus to file the action on behalf of the Federation against the state because the matter was between the Federal and Lagos State government.

    The arguments of the state were said to have been based on a judgment of the Supreme Court  delivered in 2014 where it held that disputes between a state and the Federal Government cannot be arrogated to the Federation of Nigeria in order to cloak the Supreme Court with Jurisdiction to hear same.

    After considering arguments for and against the suit, the Supreme Court held that although it did not agree that it could not entertain the matter in its original jurisdiction, but from available evidence, the Federal Government had divested itself of the titles to properties which were subject of the suit and therefore had no locus to bring the action.

    The preliminary objection of the State Government was therefore upheld and the suit dismissed.