Category: Law

  • Legal advisory volunteers monitor detention centres

    Some lawyers and paralegals under the Lagos Legal Advice Scheme have volunteered to monitor detention centres to ensure that the police respect human rights.

    At a workshop in Lagos by the Justice for All Programme (J4A), they were taught what to watch out for in the stations.

    Sponsored by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) with support from civil society organisations, the scheme is aimed at ensuring effective policing in line with international standards.

    Programmes Director, Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP), Adaobi Egboka, urged the volunteers to report any rights violations in any station.

    A lawyer, Nathaniel Ngwu, said they should monitor how suspects are treated, and check whether they are kept in humane conditions.

    The monitors were urged to report on the conditions of the cells, access to food and medication, means of restraint of suspects, waste management, overcrowding, access to lawyers and third parties.

    Where suspects are maltreated, the monitors are to gather relevant information such as the full identity of the person whose right is abused, the date and place where the violation took place, and the station, among others.

    There were reports of suspects being detained in abandoned buildings rather than cells.

    The volunteers said they also observed that torture, including shooting suspects, was still used to extract confession from those suspected of committing serious crimes.

    They accused some Divisional Police Officers (DPO) of being uncooperative and difficult to deal with regarding suspects detained in their stations.

  • How law reform’ll drive growth, by Osinbajo, others

    How law reform’ll drive growth, by Osinbajo, others

    Experts have called for a reform of the legal frameworks guiding critical sectors of the economy such as oil and gas, mining, solid minerals and power, among others. Vice President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) was among those who gathered at the 10th Annual Business Law conference of the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL) to dissect the economy. JOSEPH JIBUEZE reports.

    It lived up to its billing as a forum for regulators, lawyers and business executives to dialogue on policies and regulations that shape economic growth.

    From last Wednesday to Friday, legal and business experts gathered for the 10th Annual Business Law Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL) at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja.

    With the theme: Law reform and economic development, it featured 10 sessions with sub-themes on managing the economy, prospects for the oil and gas industry, arbitration, ease of doing business, agriculture, solid minerals, power and infrastructure. Over 80 experts chaired the sessions, moderated or made presentations.

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) opened the conference with a keynote speech. Some ministers, including Mrs Kemi Adeosun (Finance), Dr Ibe Kachikwu (State for Petroleum), Chief Audu Ogbeh (Agriculture), Dr Kayode Fayemi (Solid minerals), Babatunde Fashola (SAN) (Power, Works and Housing) and Dr Okechukwu Enelamah (Industry, Trade and Investments), made presentations.

    Kaduna State Governor Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, former Power Minister Dr Lanre Babalola, former Attorney-General of the Federation Chief Bayo Ojo (SAN), former NBA president Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), former All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) governorship candidate in Abia State Dr Alex Otti also participated in the sessions.

    Prof Osinbajo identified areas that need urgent reforms as land titling, pre-investment approvals, litigation and the appeal process. To him, there is a huge problem in land titling, which he thinks can be largely solved by deploying technology to reduce the time line for title processing.

    On pre-investment approvals, Osinbajo said it sometimes takes too long to set up a business and to get the necessary approvals. He said while it takes a few hours or days in other countries, it requires several weeks or months in Nigeria, which does not augur well for the economy.

    As a way out, the Vice President said there should be timelines  set for every approval sought, while there should be sanctions for any agency which fails to meet such timelines.

    According to him, commercial litigation could be especially frustrating, with cases dragging for years in court and killing investors’ confidence.

    “Our system is so slow that it has attracted all kinds of negative comments from across the world,” he said. He recalled a statement made  by a foreign jurist to the effect that “court cases in Nigeria have no terminal date”. He believes “decisive” action needs to be taken to solve the problem of delays.

    The Vice President said even where arbitration clauses are introduced in contracts, the arbitral processes are sometimes hobbled by litigation, with parties challenging the outcome in court. “Arbitration should completely oust the jurisdiction of the court. The court should not get involved at all,” he said as a way out.

    Regarding the appeal process, Osinbajo believes not all cases should terminate at the Supreme Court. “We must be able to terminate interlocutory appeals at the Court of Appeal. And not even all of them should go to the Court of Appeal,” he said.

    Osinbajo regretted that Nigeria is rated very low by the World Bank among countries where business can be done easily. As a way of correcting the situation, he said the Federal Government has set up the Ease of Doing Business Council, which will bring together the public and private sectors to explore ways of easing the business process.

    Osinbajo said there were already enough laws; the problem was about enforcement. “We have the laws, but we need to enforce those laws and show a bit more commitment to them,” he said.

    The Vice President began his speech on a jovial note, saying since he assumed office, he had been receiving a lot of requests for help. He said the requests appeared to increase after he declared his assets and everyone knew how much he was worth.

    Osinbajo hinted that he was no longer earning as much as he earned before becoming the Vice-President, adding that the assets he declared was not likely to change much by the time he leaves office.

    “What you see is all there is, and it’ll not likely change in the next few years,” he joked.

    He urged the elite to join the anti-corruption war, saying: “If we, as the elite, accept certain forms of conduct because it comes from people who we know or are our friends – unethical conduct, corrupt conduct and all of that – then our society is not going to go anywhere.

    “There is no society that has been able to make progress where its elite have no consensus on questions of integrity, questions of morals. We don’t have to be saints; we don’t even have to belong to the same religion. But we must accept that there are certain fundamental minimums that must be acceptable in a society that wants to grow.”

     

    Review “unsuitable laws”

     

    Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), represented by Justice Sylvester Ngwuta, said there was a nexus between law reform and economic development. According to him, law reform is needed to create a new society, adding that the challenge of “unsuitable laws” must be addressed. “It is important to examine ways to reform our laws,” he said.

    NBA president Augustine Alegeh (SAN) regretted that for 14 years, Nigeria had been struggling to pass the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB). He said if passed, the bill would enhance the country’s economic fortunes. “The most important law we should all commit to passing should be the PIB because our economic development is tied to it,” he said.

    SBL chairman Asue Ighodalo said “vital institutions” must be revitalised to put the country on the path of development, including the healthcare system, civil service and a transparent judiciary. He also called for amendment of old laws, saying they need to be taken a hard look at.

    “We must collectively examine and re-examine our laws and ensure that they are fit for purpose and consistent with our economic aspirations,” he said.

    Conference Planning Committee chairman Dr Babatunde Ajibade (SAN) said Nigeria had long paid lip service to the need to diversify and develop its economy and steer it away from sole reliance on oil revenue.

    “We have chosen conference sessions that focus, amongst other things, on the key drivers of the diversification and development of our economy, as highlighted by the current administration. We will be examining whether and in what respects law reform is required to drive this process,” he said.

     

    Solid minerals policy map

     

    Fayemi said a challenge the solid minerals industry is faced with is that Nigeria is not seen by the international community as a mining destination. He said ongoing reforms in the sector would take time to bear fruit as “mining is a long-term sector and requires a lot of investment and results are not immediate.”

    He said the government was working to get more banks to set up solid minerals desks and to sustain interest in the non-oil sector. He said a “road map” committee had completed its work on how to grow the sector.

    Fayemi said past administration did not show sufficient interest in solid minerals. According to him, such interest waned whenever oil prices rose but was always as “swansong” whenever oil prices were low. He said the government would prosecute illegal miners while registering small-scale miners so as to empower them.

    Former Lagos State Attorney-General Olasupo Shasore (SAN) said low domestic and foreign investment leads to low project funding of the solid mineral sector.

    According to him, lack of infrastructure, such as access roads, good roads to mining site all hamper the sector’s growth. Legal and policy uncertainty, he said, is also a problem.

    “Policy U-turn is sometimes more dangerous than no policy at all,” he said.

    He said there was a general recognition of the need for reform. He faulted the central control of the mining industry, saying states and communities should be allowed to get more involved and share royalties from mining.

    Shasore said the policy road map needs “a lot more urgency and aggression” to executive it, adding  investors’ confidence should be boosted so that Nigeria “can move from being a mineral country to a mining country.”

     

    ‘Why refineries aren’t working’

     

    Dr Kachikwu, who said Nigeria would end fuel importation by 2019, explained that it would require $50 billion to fill the infrastructural gap in the industry.

    He said by 2019, Nigeria expects to become a net exporter of refined products, adding that an investment drive is ongoing to meet the infrastructure requirement.

    His words: “I have faith that if we put the money where we should and quickly, my eyes are set on 2018 or 2019 and even if I’m not here, somebody’s eyes will  have to be set on that.

    “The whole idea is that from 2018, we must have achieved a 60 per cent reduction in importation of petroleum products and in 2019 we must be able to exit importation completely. To do that we have a lot of work to do and a lot of funding to put in place and we’re working hard to achieve this. I have hope. I’m a very strong optimist.”

    On why refineries are working at low capacity, he said: “How do  refineries work if the pipelines supplying them are out most of the year and so they can’t supply crude? You can’t refine an empty space.

    “How does it work when you don’t do your turnaround maintenance or if when monies budgeted for them are diverted? How does it work if your contracting process is so long that you never meet the turnaround days you’re supposed to? How does it work when you send the wrong set of people with the wrong set of skills to what should have been very important portfolios in the establishment?” he said.

    The minister said engagements with militants in the Niger Delta has been successful, resulting in a ceasefire and rise in crude production. He said he visited the creeks and met with the local chiefs with a view to finding a short, medium and long term solution to the crisis.

    “The greatest challenge for someone who is initiating policies is how to satisfy all the interest groups. It was why we couldn’t pass the PIB and in trying to get the militants to back out so we can have some peace in the place,” he said.

    Kachikwu said after visiting the creeks, he could understand why the militants feel aggrieved.

    “One of the reasons why I took time to fly into some of the creek areas wasn’t for publicity. It was to get a firsthand feel of what it is really like there. Once you get into an area where there are no roads, no light, no water, it’s a different mindset. And you need to spend time to understand that mindset.

    “In three of the locations that I visited, I could relate with the villagers living with the militants who are next door in the forest and who were respectful enough not to fire guns while I was there.

    “What it showed, as my father used to say, is that ‘mad men have rules of engagement.’ It doesn’t matter what you think of militants, they do the things they do because hopefully they have burning passions for the positions they take and we need to understand that kind of psychology.”

     

    How states can survive,

    by Adeosun

     

    “Speed up law reforms.” Those were the words of Finance Minister Kemi Adeosun while speaking on the sub-theme: Managing Nigeria’s economy – Is there a need for institutional reforms? She led discussions around issues surrounding economic management, saying there was the need to strengthen the legal framework to support economic management.

    The session was chaired by past SBL chairman Gbenga Oyebode. Panelists included former Diamond Bank Managing Director Dr Alex Otti, Managing Director, Project Management, Lafarge Africa Plc Mrs Peju Adebajo, Dr Doyin Salami of the Lagos Business School and Managing Director Bharti Airtel Mr Segun Ogunsanya. Chief Executive Officer of RTC Consulting Mr Opeyemi Agbaje was the moderator.

    Adeosun said there were many wastages and excesses in government, adding that states could save more rather than living above their means.  She attributed the excessive waste to loopholes in some of the existing laws governing some agencies, which make them less accountable.

    According to her, some revenue generating agencies declare less than what they make.

    “It is clear that there is need to review some of these laws that govern the financial sector. Some of those old laws need the support of legal officers to review them. We need to constantly evolve the laws especially those 20 or more years old that are rarely reviewed. If there are no consequences of financial discrepancies, these wastages will continue to grow,” she said.

    The minister urged lawyers to contribute to national development for the benefit of themselves and the next generation.

    “We have ideas that are not implemented. We should translate our ideas to action,” she said. To her, more lawyers should get involved in politics rather than sitting on the fence. “The professionals cannot sit on the sidelines anymore. You must shape the legal environment that controls government,” she said.

    The minister said with dwindling resources due to falling oil prices, states must figure out ways of generating more revenue internally. According to her, the problem with oil revenue is that it made some states lazy and less innovative, leading to some ignoring other sources of income.

    “The problem in Nigeria is lack of diversification,” she said, adding that more investment is needed in other sectors.

    Adeosun said although Nigeria is not in the same category as oil producing nations such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and others, it had been spending without discipline.

    She urged other states to emulate Kebbi which she said is transforming the state’s economy through massive investment in rice production.  “Kebbi’s slogan for IGR is: I Grow Rice. Zamfara is now talking about gold,” she said.

    “Nigeria has this unique opportunity, which it’ll probably never get again, to really do some introspection with some honesty, and look at ourselves very, very dispassionately to know where we have gone wrong and to correct it very quickly. There is urgency.

    “It’s time for us to think the unthinkable. It’s about the next generation. It’s not really about us. We need to look them in the eye and say Nigeria did the right thing. All the economies that have grown spend 60 per cent of their budget on capital. We can do it too,” she said.

     

    ‘Reduce number of

    law makers’

     

    Dr Otti believes a fundamental constitutional amendment is needed if money is to be saved so that government could spend more on capital projects. One way to do so, he said, is to reduce the number of National Assembly members. Doing so, he said, will save recurrent cost.

    According to him, Nigeria does not need the large number of lawmakers it currently has, adding that it is no longer sustainable in the face of dwindling resources. He said it was regrettable that 70 per cent of Nigeria’s budget goes to recurrent expenditure.

    Otti said it was even higher last year at 86 per cent during which only 14 per cent went to capital projects and worse the previous year.

    He said: “The problem comes from the constitution we copied and implemented in 1999. We copied from the United States. If we must copy, copy well, do photocopy.”

    Otti does not believe each state must produce three senators; one for each state is enough, he said. He also called for regional government rather than the 36-state structure.

    “Do we need 109 senators and 360 House of Representatives members? Can’t we have one Senator per state? Do we need 36 states, most of which are not viable yet some governors are still flying private jets? Do we need 774 local government areas?” he asked.

    Otti recommended regional economy for Nigeria rather than the 36-state structure that he said is no longer sustainable. He urged the government to address the difficulties in doing business, saying it must build infrastructure to end multiple taxation.

    Otti urged lawyers to join politics, saying: “Politics is difficult but not that bad. By the time a lot of you show interest, some of those who populate the place will leave.”

    Professor of law Gabriel Olawoyin (SAN), who chaired the third session with the theme: Vehicles for doing business – is CAMA fit for a modern growing economy?, believes the Corporate and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) needs a comprehensive amendment.

    “What we need is a fresh legislation. Mere amendment will not address the issues raised,” he said. The session speaker, Dr Gbolahan Elias (SAN) said CAMA is 26 years old, adding that several of its sections need reform.

     

    Way forward for power

    sector

     

    Fashola blamed the poor state of infrastructure in Nigeria on the bad choices the country made in the past, which manifested in the form of meagre budgetary allocations to the critical sectors of Power, Works and Housing by past administrations as well as non-release of funds even after budgets were passed, while officials were stashing away money.

    “We’ve been through a decade of daily production and sale of crude oil at $100 per barrel and all of us know some of the things that happened during that period. But what has changed? What has changed is that with a budget benchmark of $38 per barrel, this administration has budgeted more than N4 trillion; we have budgeted N6 trillion,” he said.

    Fashola drew a comparison between past budgetary allocations and this year’s in order to highlight that things were changing for good.

    “This year the Ministry of Power has N66 billion to spend to complete its transmission projects. In Works, for roads and infrastructure we now have N244 billion, and in Housing, we have N35 billion in the 2016 budget. So for those three ministries we have N345 billion to spend,” he said.

    “So instead of N66 billion this year, Power had only N5 billion to spend in the 2015 budget for the whole of Nigeria. We know how much has been found in banks and under all sorts of places. That is why we don’t have infrastructure. It’s very simple, we just made poor choices. Works had N18 billion for all of Nigeria’s roads and bridges last year, whereas money was being hidden here and there. Those are the poor choices that we made.

    “And of course for Housing, we had N1.8 billion to build houses for the whole of Nigeria. That gives a total of about N34 billion compared to about N345 billion that this administration is willing to commit,” he added.

    The minister said his meetings with contractors in Works and Housing preparatory for implementation of the 2016 budget revealed that they had not been paid for two to three years in spite of the budget, adding that what happened then was that after the budgets were made, cash was not released.

    He added that all that was changing as currently, contractors were being paid and they were returning to site, and even where they had not been paid, they were going back to work on the integrity of the Buhari administration knowing that they would be paid.

    He also reeled out some of the projects being embarked upon by his ministry, saying all these would serve to reflate the economy and make it vibrant once again.

    Dr Babalola blamed the power sector’s problems on persistent “inadequacies” rooted in market and government failures. He said for years, insufficient capacities persisted, as well as supply and networks constraints, high system losses, poor energy accounting, adding that there was no proper framework for capacity development.

    He identified critical issues for further consideration, including the need for access and rural electrification, diversification, the need to revisit industry architecture: transmission and distribution, as well as capacity planning and expansion. He called for more investment and alternative funding.

    He urged the government to review the Electric Power Sector Reform Act, enforce market rules and contracts, mitigate risks, account for energy, implement cost reflective tariffs, review imbalanced tariff structure, among others.

    The conference also featured social events such as an opening dinner, tea breaks and lunches, “African night” party at Jabi Lake on Thursday, and a closing party on Friday featuring contemporary artiste Olamide.

     

     

  • ‘How to enhance criminal justice’

    ‘How to enhance criminal justice’

    Lagos State Chief Judge, Justice Olufumilayo Atilade, has  reiterated that the Administration of Criminal Justice Law 2011 (ACJL) is a revolutionary law enacted to hasten criminal justice administration.

    Justice Atilade spoke at a workshop organised by the Ministry of Justice and the Judiciary in partnership with the Legal Defence Assistance Project (LEDAP) for magistrates on effective implementation of the ACJL.

    Justice Atilade, represented by the Chief Registrar, Mr Emmanuel Ogundare, said the purpose of the workshop is to ensure uniformity among magistrates in the law’s implementation.

    She sought a synergy among stakeholders in the justice sector agencies, while deliberating on issues bordering on the interpretation of the ACJL, with particular reference to sexual offence cases. Justice Atilade lamented that sexual offences have become rampant in the society, adding that the method and procedure for handling the prosecution of these offences must be appraised critically.

    She urged all participants to look critically at those sections of the Law in order to ensure uniformity in its implementation.

    Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Adeniji Kazeem, said the training would help the Magistrates understand the law better.

    Represented by the Solicitor-General and Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Justice, Mrs. Funlola Odunlami, he said: “The magistracy, being an integral part of our judicial system must assist in the pursuit of justice for victims of crimes, defendants and of course the larger society through the full implementation of the procedural law (ACJL).”

  • Ex-NTA chief alleges threat to life over land tussle

    Ex-NTA chief alleges threat to life over land tussle

    For 19 years, former Controller of News at the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) Prince Woboroma has been waiting for justice on a land case at the Port Harcourt Division of the Court of Appeal. While the case was pending, part of the land was allegedly sold to a former senator. Woboroma is alleging threat to his life. Is there more to the delay than meets the eyes? JOSEPH JIBUEZE reports.

    When two lower courts gave favourable verdicts in his favour, former Controller of News at the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) Prince Woboroma, did not imagine that an appeal on the verdicts would spend over two decades at the Court of Appeal.

    Woboroma, who is now on the run for his dear life, has accused the Court of Appeal justices of complicity in the plundering of his $12 million worth of assets.

    According him, 200 plots of prime land belonging to him have been decimated, with part of it allegedly sold to a senator from Bayelsa State.

    While fighting to save his assets from being completely plundered, three gangs of hired assassins went after him, and for nearly 19 years, he and his family have been living in hiding without sustenance, his children without access to healthcare and education.

    His case got worse when his lawyer allegedly defrauded and threatened him. The height of it was when Woboroma had a close shave with death as his assailants left him for dead with matchete cuts.

    The 19-year-old land case pending at the Port Harcourt Division of the Court of Appeal is over 200 plots of prime land located on both sides of the road between Ngbuoba Rumuokwuta and Rumuwike, which Woboroma and his four elder brothers, inherited from their father.

    In 1993, following a disagreement with one of his brothers, Chinyerengozi, a Customary Court ruled that Woboroma and his siblings were entitled to inherit their late father’s land, noting that grand children could not jointly share it with their fathers.

    After inspecting one of the land containing 36 plots, the court shared it among the brothers – Chinyerengozi, Woboromazim, Thomas, Igwechi and Prince, all of whom got seven plots each. The remaining one plot was allocated to Chinyerengozi as a matter of privilege.

    Dissatisfied with the Customary Court’s verdict, Chinyerengozi appealed to the High Court, challenging the Customary Court’s verdict. On March 29, 1996, the High Court appeal panel dismissed the case.

    In 1997, Chinyerengozi further appealed to the Court of Appeal, but the case was struck out on November 27, 2012. The appellant, according to Woboroma, did not apply for a relisting of the case within 90 days.

    Three years later, following Chinyerengozi’s death in 2014, the appellant’s children last February applied to re-list the case and their request was granted.

    Woboroma said the case suffered seven adjournments last year without hearing, during which some of the land in dispute was allegedly sold.

    “Questions are being asked everywhere as to why an elite court should keep an incompetent appeal pending for upward of 19 years without hearing,” he said.

    When the case up for hearing last May 11, the appellate court directed parties to explore out-of-court settlement.

    Woboroma’s lawyer E. J. Amiofori, in a petition to the Court of Appeal’s Deputy Chief Registrar in Port Harcourt, wrote: “While we were working out modalities for the first meeting, the appellants took the interim as an advantage to sell the land the res in this suit so as to render the proceedings in this suit meaningless.”

    The lawyer urged the appeal court to intervene to prevent the appellants from selling off the rest of the land.

    Woboroma, in a petition to the Amnesty International, said: “It cannot be overemphasised that the action of the applicants and their lawyer in bulldozing and clearing the land at Okporo after the Appeal Court ordered a settlement constitutes a flagrant disrespect to the Appeal Court itself and the judgments of the two lower courts. It’s also a sign of repugnance to the court’s order for settlement.”

    According to him, 95 per cent of three parcel of land with over 190 plots “has been decimated and dissipated …”, with only 16 plots left.

    He expressed worry that the appellate court did nothing to preserve the land over which an appeal was pending.

    Woboroma, in his petition to the Amnesty International, believes that the Port Harcourt Division of the Court of Appeal “unlawfully stifled the ‘lucrative’ appeal” by keeping it in abeyance for years.

    He said the attempt to eliminate him was in a bid to cover up the injustice being meted to him by those he accused of “illicit participation in the unlawful sharing of his heritage.”

    “In the wake of their relentless pursuit, we fled the region, and have been living in hiding for about two decades. My family is in dire straits, without sustenance and means,” he cried.

    Woboroma wondered why the case would drag for 19 years on appeal if the justices did not have vested interest. He said following threats to his life and those of his children, he had to relocate for fear of being killed.

    “On one occasion, I was abducted at the gates of the Port Harcourt High Court and ‘summarily executed’ and left for dead on the outskirts of the city. In the wake of all this threat, I fled my hometown and state. My family and I have become refugees in our own country,” he said.

    Woboroma also accused the police of partisanship, saying his cries for help and protection were not heeded.

    “Government agencies are now allowing themselves to be used by criminals to do their dirty jobs for them for the sake of money. I have never heard of a matter under trial in court being sublet to the police for adjudication until this happened in 2012. That is the degree of corruption in the service and in all fabrics of the Nigerian society,” he said.

     

    Bid to frame him up

     

    Woboroma said a criminal charge was filed against those who allegedly trespassed his land in 2012. He said the case was subsequently bungled by the magistrate and the police.

    Instead, he said there was a bid to frame him over his claim that he was “attached” to the NTA. He was accused of impersonation for claiming to be an NTA staff after retirement. But, Woboroma said what he meant when he stated that he was “attached” to NTA was that he was working for NTA as a consultant.

    To make matters worse, NTA responded to police enquiry by saying that Woboroma “was not a staff”. He was subsequently arrested, detained until he was granted bail after paying N2 million.

    “That was the outcome of NTA’s collaboration with the criminal gang, the police and a chief magistrate. It took the intervention of the Inspector-General of Police who withdrew the matter from Port Harcourt,” he said.

    It took another letter by Woboroma’s lawyer for NTA to clarify issues. “Prince Woboroma was a staff of the NTA from 1975 to 1995 when he retired from the services of the authority. Recently, he is in consultation with the programmes/marketing to produce about three programmes for the authority,” NTA wrote in November 2013.

    Woboroma urged the government to protect his family and ensure that justice is done and his property retrieved. He wants all permanent structures built on the land built illegally on the land to be demolished.

    “In view of the Appeal Court’s demonstrable inability to hear the appeal for almost two decades, the lower courts’ subsisting judgments should be quickly upheld and the original court authorised to proceed to enforce and implement their decisions on the mode of sharing my late father’s estate to only his five descendants at the time of the ruling in 1993.

    “This will enable those grandchildren whose fathers have died to legally inherit what belonged to their biological fathers,” he said.

    In 2014, the law firm of Falana & Falana petitioned the Commissioner of Police in Rivers to seek police protection for Woboroma.

    “We urge you to use your good offices to grant our client police protection anytime he is in Port Harcourt to safeguard and preserve his life from the persons complained about and their cohorts,” the firm wrote.

  • NBA electoral committee fails to meet timelines

    NBA electoral committee fails to meet timelines

    There was palpable uncertainty at the weekend over  the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) election scheduled to hold on July 23 and 24, as electoral committee failed to deliver on timelines.

    While Law Pavilion is the ICT Partner and administrator for the election, the Electoral Committee of the NBA (ECNBA) headed by Mr. Ken Mozia (SAN) is tasked with conducting the poll.

    The committee had guidelines on the election, but has been unable to meet the timelines it set.

    Stakeholders are also in the dark as to the reasons for non-publication of the Voters’ Register.

    The final Voters’ Register has not been made public as at press time, notwithstanding that the ECNBA stated that the register would be published on June 24. The final processes leading to its publication are yet to commence.

    The guidelines stipulate that “pre-voting” entails collating member verification, Bar practising fee and branch dues lists from registered branches.

    The administrator will then publish the Voters’ Register across all branches, while members are expected to review the Voters’ Register to confirm that their names, email addresses and phone numbers are error-free.

    “Those who have issues with their credentials are advised to visit their local branch to fill an amendment form with their current details, and append their signature confirming their request to edit their details,” states the guidelines.

    “The editing of details will be opened for a period of one week, after which the Branch Chairman is required to send a signed collated verification list of members’ details to the Electoral Committee, so that members’ details can be updated, and a new voters register published finally on 24th June, 2016,” it added.

    The provisional list of voters has not been dispatched to branches or published for viewing and complaints.

    Law Pavilion had assured stakeholders that it would organise another demonstration to clarify concerns raised by stakeholders.

    The firm is yet to conduct the demonstration till date nor has it fixed a date for it, deepening fears that the elections may be truncated.

    The company was criticised for allegedly failing to deliver conference materials to lawyers as and  when due during the last NBA conference.

    Analysts argue that the election management agency must rise to the occasion and clean up the process in order to deliver free, fair and credible elections that Nigerian lawyers can be proud of.

    It is also believed that successful conduct of the elections is the best legacy the Augustine Alegeh (SAN) administration can bequeath to the NBA in line with his strong support for universal suffrage and e-voting.

    The elections will be conducted through electronic voting. In line with the amended NBA Constitution 2015, all lawyers who have paid their practising fees and branch dues within set deadlines are eligible to vote, as against the collegiate system that  held sway before now.

  • Group sues NYSC over ‘call-up letter fees’

    Group sues NYSC over ‘call-up letter fees’

    A group, Citizens Advocacy Initiative for Accountability Leadership (CAIFAL), has sued the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) at the Federal High Court in Lagos for charging a mandatory N3,000  call-up letter fee from prospective Youth Corps members, contrary to its enabling law.

    The group said NYSC officials, in partnership with a private company, charged the fee as a condition to print out call-up letters before mobilisation.

    They urged the Federal Government to make the fight against corruption all inclusive by investigating what they called violation of the NYSC Act.

    At a briefing in Lagos, the group said the suit is to get a court pronouncement halting the alleged ‘illegality’.

    According to the plaintiffs, asking prospective corps members who are obligated to serve to pay the mandatory fee is fraudulent, illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional.

    The plaintiffs want the court to order NYSC to account for the monies so far realised from the previous collections, and that the perpetrators should be punished according to the Law.

    “The perpetrators of these fraudulent charges have claimed that the fees collecting project was a Public Private Partnership (PPP) arrangement. The question is: does that confer the right on them to abuse their offices and violate the Law setting up the NYSC, and even the Constitution?” the group querried.

    According to them, NYSC claimed to have entered into a Public Private Partnership arrangement that gave the company 70 per cent the proceeds, while the balance goes to the NYSC.

    “Our investigation revealed that the Finance Department of the NYSC has vehemently denied the illegal collection of those fees and claimed ignorance of where the money so far realised was kept or how it was expended.

    “This NYSC fraud is worse than the similar alleged scam cases currently been prosecuted by the ‘new’ EFCC. The service provider, Sidmach, claimed that only N1.3 billion has so far been realised from the fees so far collected.

    “The NYSC declared that it mobilised between 300,000 and 350,000 Corps members per year, which amounts to 700,000 for 2014-2015 batch, so, if the 2016 batch A is added thereto, that is about 800,000 to 900,000 Mobilised Corps Members, multiplied by N3,000 paid by each participant, we have about N2.4 billion. Where is the money?

    “The N1,000 re-deployment fees collected from any of the mobilised corps member, who want to be re-deployed, was not been taken into consideration when we arrived at the N2. 4 billion stated above,” they said.

    At the briefing were the group’s board of trustees’ chairman Dania Abdullahi, executive directors  Mudasiru Lawal and Tunde Atobatele, board members Segun Adeleye and Ishiak Akande, a lawyer Mike Ogie and a member Miss Precious Ekwo.

  • ‘Why mediation is better than litigation’

    ‘Why mediation is better than litigation’

    Mrs Oluwatoyin Odusanya is the Director of the Citizens’ Mediation Centre (CMC). A graduate of History and Law of the University of Lagos, she earlier worked in the Directorates of Civil Litigation, Legislative Drafting, Advisory Services of the Lagos State Ministry of Justice. In this interview with ADEBISI ONANUGA, she speaks on the centre’s activities.

    There is  confusion about the activities of some agencies of the Ministry of Justice. What are the functions of the CMC?

    The functions of the Citizens’ Mediation Centre are clear and distinct. The core functions are to promote the use and practice of mediation as an alternative to litigation, to provide Alternative Dispute Resolution (mediation) free of charge in conflict resolution among the people of Lagos State, to provide access to justice to the indigent residents of Lagos State.

    So, how  many cases or matters have you handled so far since establishment and how many were successfully resolved?

    Thousands of cases have been handled by the CMC since establishment as a complaints Centre in 1999 when Prof. Yemi Osinbajo was the Attorney General during the Asiwaju Bola Tinubu administration. However, capturing of data on same began in 2008. CMC became an agency in 2003 by virtue of the CMC Mediation Law which was amended in 2007. Since then, the CMC has received 197,283 cases, mediated 134,612 and resolved 100,584 cases.

    What is the nature of matters you have handled so far?  Which of them is in the highest proportion?   

    Most of the cases we handled include landlord/tenant; employee/employer; family/marital disputes; inheritance; breach of contract; land dispute; small debts among other. They are essentially civil disputes. The highest proportion is in the landlord and tenant which makes up about 90 per cent of the matters. This is followed by inheritance and family disputes.

    What is your perception of mediation ?

    Mediation is a good development and has effectively decongested the courts. It is faster, cheaper, provides a win-win situation and maintenance of relationship. It provides a relaxed atmosphere, an informal setting and flexibility.

    To what extent has mediation assisted your agency in resolving matters brought before you?

    The growing acceptance of the process has assisted in resolving matters apart from the fact that it is free of charge.

    Where mediation fails, what is the next line of action in resolving matters brought before your centre?

    When mediation fails, parties may decide to go to court, while some have med-arb agreements and may opt for arbitration.

    What are the advantages of mediation compared to litigation?

    The advantages of mediation when compared to litigation are many. They include the speed with which matters are concluded, the win-win situation and maintenance of relationship, the provision of a relaxed atmosphere, an informal setting and flexibility, freedom from technicalities unlike litigation which is more expensive and cumbersome, making it difficult for parties to understand.

    How do the activities of CMC differ from that of the Multi Door Court House?

    The difference in activities of the CMC from the Lagos Multidoor Courthouse is that the CMC is under the executive arm of government while the LMDC is under the Judiciary. Both use mediation in resolution of disputes but the LMDC is a court- attached mediation outfit which charges fees for their services. The services of the CMC are targeted at the indigent residents of Lagos State and is free of charge.

    What do you have to say about the quality of your mediators?

    The quality of our mediators is very high as almost all of them have been trained by the British Council through the Justice for All programme. Most of them are also members of the Institute of Chartered Mediators and Conciliators (ICMC). They are seasoned mediators.

    It appears the CMC is not close to the people enough. What are you doing in the area of awareness?

    Sensitisation is carried out every other Friday with distribution of fliers to markets and busy areas in the several units. We also speak on radio and television to create awareness of the existence of the centre.

    What is have been the challenges of your centre?

    Some of the challenges include but are not limited to inadequate number of staff, difficulty in getting new offices from some local governments.

    What is your major achievement?

    We have resolving over 80 per cent of our matters, increase in resolution rate. For instance, this year alone, we have received 18090 cases, had 10396 mediations and resolved 9851 of them. We have 15 centres all over the state. The newest being Ojokoro opened about a month ago which has already recorded over 157 cases.

    Will your centre consider litigation against a recalcitrant landlords?

    CMC only mediates. However, it is possible for the enforcement unit under the Attorney General/Commissioner for Justice to enforce terms agreed by parties in court. CMC  is expected to be neutral and impartial, not to support any party

     

  • Court stops monarch from selling land

    A Badagry High Court has restrained a traditional ruler in Ojo Local Government Area of Lagos, Oba Abideen Akanbi Durosimi, from selling or collecting rents on ‘any portion of the Osolu family properties at Irewe land in Ojo.

    Justice Mojisola Dada made the order of interlocutory injunction pending the determination of Suit No: BD/76/2012 filed by Prince Bolaji Oyefolu and seven other claimants/applicants through their counsel, Mr. O. Adenekan.

    The other claimants/applicants are Mr. Timothy Ajiboye, Chief Rasaki Odunewu, Mr. Shefiu Olatunde, Prince Akeem Oyefolu, Chief Afolabi Giwa, Alhaji Prince Abu Oyefolu and Alhaji Prince Shamsideen Durosimi.

    Justice Dada granted the plaintiff’s prayer upon a March 2, 2015 affidavit deposed to by Ajiboye and the claimants’ counsel’s application of February 27, 2015 which was not opposed by defence counsel, Mr. Abdul-Azeez Jimoh.

    The court ruled that the defendant or his agents and privies were restrained from further dissipating, selling, leasing the properties “and from further collecting royalties and rents from tenants in respect of Coconut Farm, beach huts and houses.”

    Also included were leases, dredging sites, sand excavation sites, debtors and “any other monies payable to the Osolu family in respect of the Osolu properties.

    Justice Dada also directed the Registrar of the court or any neutral person(s) to enter the properties and collect royalties, rents and other monies payable to the Osolu family in respect of the properties at Irewe land and pay same into an Escrow account for the family “till the determination of this suit.”

    The case was adjourned till October 10.

  • Family seeks protection for rights activist

    The family of a rights activist, Efemena Agadama, has urged security agencies to protect him.

    The family claimed that a group was contracted by an oil bunkering cartel to eliminate him over his campaign against bunkering.

    The family said a “circular” by the group signed by one “Major Sharp-shooter” and “Col. Reconnaissance” claimed they had obtained Efemena’s mobile line and would apply real-time GPS tracking to get him.

    The group allegedly also placed N2 million bounty on Agadama’s head for information on his whereabouts.

    A family member, David Oveki, said the group accused Agadama of being the informant behind the death of 12 of their engineers in a clash with the Joint Task Force in Bayelsa in 2011, which led to their loss of over 200,000 barrels of crude oil.

    “This specialist squad is desperate to make him vulnerable to serious harm from all quarters if they can’t assassinate him as they believe he is challenging their trade.

    “Chasing someone to abduct or harm him because of speaking against the devastation of the environment is not encouraging,” the family said.

    The family claimed that last December 2015, a friend was tortured for failing to disclose Agadama’s hideout.

    According to the family, some unknown persons believed to be part of the killer-squad threatened an associate, Harrison Umudi, to reveal Agadama’s location.

    Umudi was said to have reported the matter to the Otor-Udu Police Station and petitioned the Warri Area Police Command last December, but there has been no arrests.

  • ‘Saraki’s allegation of bias against CCT, a desperate move to frustrate trial’ – Prosecution

    ‘Saraki’s allegation of bias against CCT, a desperate move to frustrate trial’ – Prosecution

    …Tribunal to rule July 13

    The prosecution in the false asset declaration trial of Senate President, Bukola Saraki before the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) said yesterday that a fresh application by Saraki, asking the tribunal Chairman to disqualify himself from the case on ground of alleged bias was a desperate move to frustrate his trial.

    Lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) cautioned the tribunal against granting application on the ground that it was intended by Saraki and his legal team to “obtain from the backdoor, what they failed  to achieved at the Supreme Court,” in reference to the February 5 judgment of the apex court which dismissed Saraki’s appeal against his trial.

    “They know that this tribunal has only two members, and if the Chairman recuse himself from this trial, the tribunal will stop sitting. What they failed to achieve through their appeal, they now want it through the back door,” Jacobs further said.

    Jacobs was reacting to the application by Saraki Saraki, alleging that a comment made by  the tribunal Chairman, Danladi Umar during the proceedings of June 7,  in which he expressed his displeasure  at the defence’ delay tactics and warned that the delay would not reduce the consequences that awaits the defendant at the end of trial.

    Arguing the application earlier, a member of Saraki’s legal team, Paul Erokoro (SAN) argued that the implicit meaning of the tribunal Chairman’s comment was that the delay will not reduce the severity of his client’s punishment, which he said implied that Umar had concluded in his mind that Saraki would be convicted at the end of the trial.

    Erokoro argued that by his statement, Umar has betrayed his inability guarantee fair hearing to Saraki in line with the provision of Section 36(1) of the Constitution.

    The lawyer said: “Our chairman will no longer be able to comply with section 36(1) of the Constitution in this trial and that is the point we are making. The fundamental point is that once it is no longer possible for the chairman of the tribunal to be fair to both sides, he has to recuse himself.

    “We are saying that once a judge, by word or action, can no longer hold the scale of justice, the judge should withdraw. The prosecution has not disputed the fact that the chairman made this statement. For the avoidance of doubt, the prosecution has implicitly admitted that the Chairman made that statement.”

    Erokoro, who referred to the reports of the June 7 proceedings in seven newspapers, quoting the Umar  as making the statement, also referred to affidavits of “four concerned Nigerians” who were at the June 7 proceedings, allegedly confirming  that the chairman made the statement and reaching conclusion that he (Umar) could never be fair to Saraki, were filed as exhibits.

    He identified the deponents to the affidavits as Abubakar Shehu Mahmud, Ogbonna Emanuel Azuke, Omokanye David Adetoyese and Nasir Suberu.

    Erokoro said: “The prosecution has said in their counter-affidavit that the chairman assured the defence on June 7 that he would keep his mind open and do justice. No counter-affidavit has said that the tribunal chairman said so. If indeed the chairman said so, it is another reason to be afraid. Why did the chairman have cause to re-assure the defence?

    “No reasonable person, who listened to the Chairman would not conclude that the chairman had made up his mind,” Erokoro siad.

    Responding, Jacobs faulted the application, arguing that the applicant failed to attach certified record of proceedings, which he is complaining against. He noted that it was only intended by the defence to further stall proceedings or at best ensure further delay.

    He noted that Saraki had in the past filed similar application, which the tribunal refused, and which now forms the subject of an appeal before the Court of Appeal, Abuja.

    Jacobs argued Saraki and his lawyers were interpreting the tribunal’s Chairman’s statement to suit their interest.

    “The chairman said the consequences of trial, which is either conviction or acquittal. Sections 309 and 310 of the Adminiatration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) are clear on what the consequences of trial are. The consequences of trial is the end/conclusion, which can go either way.

    “The Chairman did not use the words consequences of the ‘offence’ or ‘conviction,’ which would have implied that the Chairman had concluded that he will convict the defendant. The Chairman used the word ‘trial.’

    “Your lordship is eminently qualified to continue with this trial.  Their application is based on false premise and misunderstanding of that word. Every trial has its own consequence, which is conclusion.  This is an attempt to further delay trial. Their conclusion is mere conjecture,” Jacobs siad.

    Citing a Supreme Court decision, Jacobs  described the four affidavits of concern by the four persons attached to the defendant’s motion as extraneous and deposed to by “rash persons”.

    Jacobs argued that the affidavits were mere opinions of some individual,s who were seeking political patronage from the defendant, and were not the reasonable common man who had the full knowledge of the case as envisaged by law.

    “The affidavits deposed to by the four persons were deposed to by supporters of the defendant. A motion must be supported by an affidavit. Extraneous affidavits such as these are unknown to law. The deponents are obviously supporters of the defendant. They have their interest to serve, and they went to the counsel for the defendant telling him they want to depose to an affidavit of concern.

    “Those people are rash persons. Rash! Rash! Rash! The affidavits are opinion of those who do not have full knowledge of the case. They are people who will sit in the gallery seeking political patronage. They just hold on to one word and say the judge is bias.  They are not the reasonable common man,” Jacobs said.

    He argued that the statement made by the Chairman was justified based on the antecedence of the defence, who has spent 12 days cross-examining the first prosecution witness and was yet to conclude.

    Jacobs further argued that even if the tribunal chairman made the statement, it did not imply a threat of conviction, as the “consequence” mentioned in the comment implied the two possible outcomes of a trial.

    “What the tribunal Chairman said was an expression of his determination to see the trial to the end despite the delay tactics of the defence. He simply said the defendant will meet the consequence of the trial which could either be acquittal or conviction.

    “”What the tribunal said is I must conclude this trial; there must be an end to this trial. I must conclude this trial. His lordship did not express the opinion that I must convict you.  Your lordship will have to look at sections 309 and 310 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

    “This application is based on false premise. There is a clear intention to delay. The decision of the tribunal cannot be based on conjecture. It cannot be based on an unreasonable application of affidavits of concern that replaced trial in the statement of the chairman with offence,” Jacobs said and urged the tribunal to dismiss the application.

    Tribunal Chairman, Umar adjourned to July 13 for  ruling.