Category: Law

  • Lawyer wins alumni award

    Lawyer wins alumni award

    Country Representative of the United Nations (UN) Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Uganda Dr. Uchenna Emelonye has been honoured with the Outstanding Career Achievement Award of the Central European University (CEU).

    He graduated from the CEU Legal Studies Department in 2004 with an LL.M in Human Rights Law.

    The university is a post graduate institution based in Budapest, Hungary; funded by a philanthropist, George Soros, and dedicated to promoting open societies worldwide.

    As part of its 25th anniversary, CEU held the Alumni Impact Award on May 7 to showcase alumni who have helped to bolster its overall mission and enhance its international reputation.

    The award was vested on 25 recipients selected from more than 13, 000 alumni who have contributed to the cause of humanity.

    Emelonye was the Senior Human Rights Adviser to the UN Africa Headquarters in Kenya, as well as Head, Governance, Institutional and Justice Reform Division of the International Development Law Organisation in Rome, Italy.

    He served as Judicial Affairs Officer of the UN-African Union Mission in Darfur Sudan. Before then, he was a Human Rights Officer at the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Pristina, Kosovo, and the UN Mission in South Sudan.

    He also served as Rule of Law Coordinator of the International Rescue Committee, New York USA as well as Executive Director of the Constitutional Rights Project Nigeria, among others.

    Emelonye holds a doctorate degree in Law (LL.D) from the University of Helsinki in Finland. In addition to his master from CEU, he also obtained an LL.M from the Abia State University, Uturu, where he graduated with an LL.B.

    Since his call to Bar in 1995, he has authored and contributed chapters to eight books on human rights, rule of law, protection of civilians and good governance.

  • Be patient, Gani’s widow urges Nigerians

    Nigerians have been asked to be fair in their criticisms of President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Widow of frontline rights activist Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN), Ganiat, gave the charge at the 78th posthumous birthday of her husband organised by the Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Organisation (GAFAMORG) in Lagos.

    Fawehinmi said Buhari should not be held responsible for the looting of the nation’s wealth in the last 16 years.

    She urged members of civil society organisations accusing the president of not having done enough since he assumed office to support the administration’s anti-corruption war.

    The looters of the nation’s wealth, she added, must be identified and made to return stolen funds.

    “Buhari is strong-willed, is not a greedy person and has passion to better the lot of the common man,” Fawehinmi said.

    According to her, the fight against corruption requires collaboration between the people and the government.

    Alhaja Fawehinmi announced the inauguration of the Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Hospital in OPIC Estate, Agbara, Ogun State by her daughter, Hafsat Fawehinmi-Oni.

    The hospital, she said, would provide services, particularly drugs, at minimal and subsidised cost that the poor can afford, in fulfilment of Gani’s wish.

    Chairman, GAFAMORG, Ayodele Akele lamented that politicians serve themselves rather than the electorate and that this has resulted in bad governance.

    “Gani believed that good governance means being with the people, knowing their pains, abolishing their poverty, and solving their problems”, he said.

    “We can assert without any fear of contradiction that had our Chief and Comrade Gani Fawehinmi been alive today, he would have hit the courts on several fronts to wage legal struggles against the numerous acts of impunity and insanity that dominate our lives today.

    “Most importantly, he would have hit the streets to lead protests and struggles against atrocities and social collapse that are everywhere around us”, he said.

    Akele lamented the state of degeneration in the country, adding that Nigerians don’t deserve the poor social services being experienced today, such as fuel scarcity, high electricity tariff without improved services and meagre minimum wage.

    Executive Director, Women Arise, Dr. Joe Okei-Odumakin described Fawehinmi as a strong advocate of democracy who made significant contributions to national growth and development.

    Mrs. Okei-Odumakin urged political stakeholders to imbibe all the ideals that Fawehinmi lived for, stressing that he defended human rights all through his life.

  • N153m debt: Firm seeks Japaul Energy’s wind-up

    A company, AYM Shafa Limited, has filed a winding up petition against a petroleum marketing company, Japaul Energy Limited at the Federal High Court in Lagos for an alleged N153million debt.

    The petitioner, through its lawyer Chris Ekemezie, alleged that Japaul offered to supply two million litres of petrol to it at N76.6 per litre.

    According to AYM, it was agreed that the product would be lifted from the Mainland Oil Depot in Calabar, the Cross River State capital between last October 5 and 12.

    The petitioner said it paid Japaul N153million last September 22 and was issued a receipt by the operations manager, Amondi Ashang.

    AYM said Japaul Energy failed to supply the premium motor spirit (PMS) despite repeated demands.

    The petitioner said when it got to the tank farm, it discovered that Japaul had no PMS stored there, nor was any on its way, adding that promises to refund the money were not kept.

    AYM Shafa is praying the court to hold that Japaul Energy is insolvent, and should, therefore, be wound up in line with sections 409(a) and 410(b) of the Companies and Allied Matter Act, Cap C20 laws of the Federation Nigeria.

    But, Japaul Energy, in its objection through its lawyer Ige Asemudara is praying the court to dismiss the petition for being incompetent and an abuse of court process.

    It said the product was only delayed, adding that the company was solvent. Japaul denied defaulting in the agreement or being incapable of repaying the alleged debt.

    Judge Ibrahim Buba adjourned until May 25 for hearing.

  • Odemo: Candidate not from ruling house, says witness

    A Sagamu High Court in Ogun State has heard why Prince Adetayo Odunsi is challenging the nomination of Albert Mayungbe by the kingmakers as the Odemo of Isara-Remo.

    Under cross-examination by the defence counsel, Dr. Victor Odunnaiya, a witness, Prince Adedapo Odunsi, told Justice A. A. Babawale that the plaintiff is challenging Mayungbe’s nomination because he is not a member of the Erinsiba-Ayoledoye Ruling House.

    The witness, who is also the secretary of the Erinsiba-Ayoledoye Ruling House, said Odunsi objected to the first defendant’s nomination.

    This objection, he said, was not because Odunsi wanted the position for himself.

    The witness maintained that no voting took place to nominate a candidate to the stool and disagreed with Dr. Odunaiya that the claimant and some of those who participated in the said exercise scored zero.

    He denied the claims of the defence counsel that he came to give evidence against Mayungbe or that he conspired with the late head of the Erinsiba-Ayoledoye Royal family, Lamina Awoyade to scuttle the exercise because his son failed to get the nomination.

    The witness denied the defence counsel claims that he instigated the late head of the Erinsiba/Ayoledoye Ruling house to write a petition against Mayungbe’s nomination.

    Responding to a question, Odunsi maintained that he haboured  no hatred for Mayungbe, adding that his opposition to his nomination was to protect the integrity of Erinsiba-Ayoledoye as a Ruling House.

    Joined as defendants in the suit number HCS/158/2013, are Secretary, Remo North Local Government;  Oliwo of Isara, Chief Ajibowu Ogunfowodu; Apena of Isara, Chief Jimoh Soyombo; Chief Ladipo Ogunyemi; Ogbeni Odi of Isara, Chief Olajubu Osibote; Ekeji Asipa Odi, Chief Tunde Kalejaiye; Asipa Odi of Isara, Chief Owuye Logba.

    Others are Ekeji Asipa Odi of Isara, Chief Efuwape Sotikare; Olori Emo of Isara, Chief Bashiru Awoniyi; Ekeji Olori Emo of Isara, Chief Korede Ogunwole; Asipa Emo of Isara, Chief Nosiru Sodipe; Ekeji Asipa Emo, Chief Adewole Sopitan; Governor of Ogun State; Executive Council of Ogun State; the State Commissioner for Chieftaincy and Local Government and the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice as second to 18th defendants respectively.

    In his 32 points statement of claim, Prince Odunsi , who claimed to be a direct descendant of the late Oba Oyemade Mayungbe and progenitor of Erinsiba-Ayoledoye Ruling House averred that he is the one lawfully entitled to the Odemo stool.

    But Mayungbe insists that he is a “bonafide member  and descendant of the Erinsiba-Ayoledoye Ruling House.

    The case has been adjourned till May 26.

  • ‘Why Extradition Act needs amendment’

    An associate counsel at a Lagos law firm, Marine Partners, Chibueze Muobuikwu, examines how to make the extradition law work better.

    Extradition is defined by Halsbury‘s Laws of England as the formal surrender by one country to another, based on reciprocal arrangements partly judicial and partly administrative, of an individual accused or convicted of a serious criminal offence committed outside the territory of the extraditing state and within the jurisdiction of the requesting state which, being competent by its own law to try and punish him, requests the individual’s surrender.

    In Udeozor V. FRN , it was also defined as the process of returning somebody, upon request, accused of a crime by a different legal authority for trial or punishment. From the above definitions, it can be gathered that the concept of extradition applies only to criminal matters.

    The concept of extradition dates back to the Medieval era, it was evidenced in the Treaty of Peace between Ramses II, Pharoh of Egypt, and the Hittite King Hattusili III. The document was written in Hieroglyphics and carved on the Temple of Ammon at Karnak and is also preserved on clay tablets in Akkodrain in the Hittites archives of Boghazkoi.

    It must be observed that the concept of extradition has somewhat not been well practiced in Nigeria, little wonder there are very few reported cases on extradition in Nigeria,  Nevertheless, there have been several instances of extradition in Nigeria, though some of them have not been successful. The incidence of extradition that brought this paper to fore is the recent attempt to extradite Senator Buruji Kashamu to the United States of America over drug charges.

    Applicable laws

    The major laws that regulate extradition in Nigeria include:

    • The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended): the Constitution being the grund norm in Nigeria vests jurisdiction over extradition matters on the Federal High Court.
    • The Extradition Act, Cap E 25, Laws of the Federation, 2010: this is the principal legislation for extradition matters.
    • The Immigration Act, Cap 11, Laws of the Federation, 2010: this makes provision for the procedure for the transfer of the fugitive criminal to the requesting country.
    • Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015: this makes provision for the procedure for search and arrest of the fugitives.
    • The Evidence Act, Cap E14, Laws of the Federation, 2010: this makes provision for the mode of documentation and tendering of evidence regarding extradition.
    • Various treaties between Nigeria and other Countries on extradition: here, the treaties are basis upon which extradition could be made. They determine the offences which are extraditable.

    Application of the Extradition Act

    By virtue of 1(1) and 2(1) of the Extradition Act, the Act applies only in respect of countries that have treaty or “extradition agreement” with Nigeria and Commonwealth countries. Nigeria has extradition treaty with several countries, prominent among them include United States of America, South Africa,  Liberia,  Britain.  Recently, Nigeria signed an extradition treaty with the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It is the treaties that enumerate what offences the two countries consider extraditable.   In effect, it is only the offences enumerated in those treaties that could warrant extradition. The general rule is that extraditable offences must be those commonly recognized as malum in se (acts criminal by their very nature) and not those which are malum prohibitum (acts made crimes by statute).

    Authority designated for

    extradition matters

    Section 6 of the Extradition Act confers the authority for extradition matters on the Office of the Attorney General. Section 6(1) of the Act provides thus:

    “A request for the surrender of a fugitive criminal of any country shall be made in writing to the Attorney- General by a diplomatic representative or consular officer of that country and shall be accompanied by a duly authenticated warrant of arrest or certificate of conviction issued in that country”.

    This is in line with section 174(1) (a) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, which provides that the Attorney General shall have the power to”institute and undertake criminal proceedings against any person before any court of law in Nigeria, other than a court-martial, in respect of any offence created by or under any Act of the National Assembly”.

    • To be continued next week

  • How stolen funds can be repartriated, by lawyers

    How stolen funds can be repartriated, by lawyers

    The London Summit on Corruption has ended, with participants agreeing on a concerted approach to tackling the malaise. President Muhammadu Buhari urged the United Kingdom to ease the repatriation of stolen funds. How can this be achieved? Lawyers proffer suggestions, including the need to strengthen internal mechanisms, Eric Ikhilae reports 

    For three days last week in London, global attention shifted to corruption and its negative impact on human development and world peace.

    Experts, including leaders and technocrats, at the Global Summit on Corruption, reviewed past efforts at combating the menace, and agreed on adopting more stringent measures.

    When it all ended, there was a consensus that combating corruption required concerted effort and that attaining global peace and development would remain a mirage if some powerful countries served as havens for stolen assets.

    Part of President Muhammadu Buhari’s submissions was for Nigeria’s stolen funds to be repatriated. He noted that the process had been tedious.

    Facilitating return of stolen funds

    The summit agreed to create the Global Forum for Assets Recovery (GFAR).

    It is to bring together governments and law enforcement  agencies to agree on modalities for returning stolen assets to countries like Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Ukraine and Tunisia.

    To underscore the importance of its mission, a meeting of the GFAR has been scheduled for the United States next year, with the United Kingdom (UK) agreeing to co-host. The United Nations and World Bank promised their support.

    For Nigeria, the message that corruption was no longer fashionable, was driven home by the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, to the effect that Nigeria was the first of the two “fantastically corrupt” nations in the world.

    Although many have criticised Cameron for his observation, many have also hailed Buhari for his response to the comment. He said Cameron was right about the level of corruption in Nigeria, but that it was time for the UK to review its policy of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds.

    To Buhari, who noted that an apology from Cameron was immaterial, there is the need for the developed world to shed its ambivalent posture on corruption, knowing that a candle cannot burn at both ends.

    Buhari urged the international community to create an anti-corruption infrastructure and a strategic action plan to facilitate the speedy recovery and repatriation of stolen funds in secret bank accounts abroad.

    He said new measures against corruption that would be adopted  should include mechanisms to assist Nigeria to combat illegal activities, such as  crude oil theft, to which it loses about $7bn annually.

    “Corruption creates a system where resources are shared by a small elite while the majority wallows in poverty. Corruption also undermines the ability of countries to finance development.

    “A prominent feature of that global framework is the recognition that good governance and measures to combat corruption and curb illicit financial flows will be integral to the effort to attain sustainable development globally by the year 2050.

    “I wish to reiterate our demand that the global community must come up with mechanisms for dismantling havens for stolen funds and facilitate the return of stolen assets to their countries of origin.

    “It is for this reason that my government is determined to address illicit financial outflows which have served as a major impediment to progress in our country,” Buhari said

     Internal measures to curb graft

    Buhari has vowed to implement the Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) in furtherance of the war against corruption.

    The OCDS, Presidential Media Adviser Femi Adesina said, enables the disclosure of data and documents at all stages of the contracting process by defining a common data model.

    “The publication of OCDS data ensures greater transparency in public contracting, and can support accessible and in-depth analysis of the efficiency, effectiveness, fairness, and integrity of public contracting systems,” he said.

    The President further spoke of plans to ensure greater transparency in the ownership and control of companies involved in property purchase and public contracting.

    “Nigeria is already collating this information through the Extractive Industry Initiative process and will extend it to other sectors.

    “Nigeria will establish a transparent central register of foreign companies bidding on public contracts and buying property. We welcome the proposal by developed countries to work together to improve the access of developing countries to beneficial ownership information for use in public contracting.”

    Buhari, who hailed a proposal to restrict the ability of those involved in corruption to travel, invest and do business overseas, expressed  Nigeria’s commitment “to deploying public-private information sharing partnerships to bring together governments, law enforcement, regulators and the financial sector to detect, prevent and disrupt money laundering linked to corruption.”

    Room for improvement

    Observers agreed that the President has, by his utterances and actions, demonstrated enough commitment to the anti-corruption fight.

    They said the administration’s war against graft lacked foundation, framework and tact.

    They wondered why, about a year in the saddle, the President was still carrying on as if the war against graft is a project for the Executive alone, without sufficient buy-in from other arms of government.

    To critics, since corruption became  a norm, a President, who hinged his campaign on anti-corruption, ought to have evolved a multifaceted strategy in this regard.

    Such strategy, they argued, ought to begin with a nationwide value re-orientation campaign; a total review of the recruitment and elevation process in government agencies, a departure from the existing reward system  and constant payment of workers’ legitimate earnings (salaries and emoluments), because war against corruption cannot be sustained where workers are denied their dues.

    They further argued that, one year into this government, no robust/well-articulated anti-corruption strategy is visible.

    To observers, it appeared every government agency is on its own, which accounted for why the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), who ought to serve as the arrowhead of the anti-corruption war, is seen more as an obstacle.

    Need for synergy

    To observers, the President’s inability to interface with the other arms of government, and convince them to buy into his agenda, reflects a deficit in the President’s democratic credentials.

    Democracy, they said, is about the ability to win the majority over. They contend that it was incumbent on the President to liaise effectively with the other arms of government, particularly the Judiciary to ensure prompt prosecution of corruption cases.

    Nearly one year into the Buhari administration, no conviction has been recorded in any of the corruption cases initiated since last year.

    In those cases where trial had commenced – those involving Senate President, Bukola Saraki and former Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), Alex Badeh – defence lawyers still exploit the inherent  inadequacies in the criminal justice system despite the innovative provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.

    This development compelled a prosecution lawyer in both cases, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), to complain that defence lawyers in the cases involving Saraki and Badeh were delaying proceedings by adopting slow cross-examination tactics.

    While a prosecution witness presents his evidence-in-chief in one or two days, it has taken an average of six to eight days for the defence to cross-examine the same witness.

    There is also the challenge of the paucity of expert and trustworthy prosecution lawyers. There are currently about 10 on-going high profile criminal cases in different courts in Abuja alone. Incidentally, they are being handled by Jacobs and a number of in-house lawyers in the EFCC, who are mostly junior counsel.

    This development has, in most cases contributed to delay in the trial process. There have been instances where trial had to be put off because Jacobs was involved in other proceedings in separate courts. And, as against the position presented by the government, a defendant in most of these cases parades a minimum of three Senior Advocates, with tens of junior lawyers.

     Lawyers speak

    Lawyers, including Dr. Kabir Mustapher of the Centre for Public Accountability (CPA), Adebayo Adedapo and Moses Ugochukwu are of the view that it was not yet too late in the day for the government to reassess its anti-corruption measures and make amend where necessary.

    Mustapher suggested the need for all arms of government to agree on the need to end corruption first, among public officials and institutions, which he believes will ultimately reflect on the private sector.

    “There is no doubt that President Buhari is interested in curbing corruption in the country. But he should realise that he cannot do it alone.

    “It is high time he was told to act democratically and seek audience with other stakeholders, particularly the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mahmud Mohammed and other leaders of the Judiciary, on what role the judiciary can play in this regard.

    “Luckily the tenure of this CJN will soon expire. I do not see why President Buhari should not look outside the Judiciary to appoint Mohammed’s successor. The law allows him to do so.

    “This will allow us have a clean break from the status quo and a tradition of succession that  encourages indolence and sustain a culture that we seem to now be uncomfortable with,” Mustapher said.

    Adedapo suggested the creation of separate courts to try corruption cases to ensure swift determination of cases involving corrupt individuals.

    He noted that with the current pace of trial, most of the existing cases may not be concluded before 2019.  He also suggested the introduction of time restriction in criminal prosecution procedure as is currently the case in election cases.

    “The Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee against Corruption (PACC), Itse Sagay (SAN), was recently reported that the government was working on special courts for corruption and  that judges who ‘can never be compromised by financial blandishments’ will be chosen to form the core of the bench for this special assignment.

    “Under President Buhari, the EFCC has shown its capacity to work. The AGF should coordinate effort at improving its proficiency in investigation and prosecution, and ensure that it is better funded.

    “I do not know what they are doing with the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC). The agency appears to be on holiday. I believe every agency’s support is required now and the onus is on the AGF to coordinate this.

    “To ensure a success of the fight against corruption, the government is required to build effective institutions, with the clear objective of developing a competent civil service that takes pride in being independent of both private influence and public interference,” Adedapo said.

    Ugochukwu urged the AGF to put on his thinking cap and ensure that he builds a robust prosecutor team that can effectively match what the defendants currently parade.

    “We have honest and quality criminal lawyers, who are willing to render their services to the government in this area. It is the responsibility of the AGF to work this out. He should be able to identify these people and work out a modality for their engagement.

    “We cannot be seen to complain that the rogues, who we seek to constrain, are more armed and powerful than the state. The AGF needs to identify what his responsibilities are. It is not his business to, individually, seek to recover funds in any manner.

    “It is embarrassing enough that the AGF went into a negotiation with a firm to reduce the fine imposed on it without the knowledge of the Minister in charge of that sector. I understand the BCC was also not involved.

    “How again, do you explain an AGF engaging an ex-convict to help recover hidden funds in banks, without the involvement of other relevant government agencies? I think someone should call this AGF to order, before he frustrates the President’s efforts to curb corruption in the country,” Ugochukwu said.

  • NBA, Court of Arbitration to hold conference

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in partnership with the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Paris, and  the International Chamber of Commerce Nigeria (ICCN) will hold the first ICC Africa Regional Arbitration Conference at the Eko Hotels & Suites on Victoria Island,  Lagos, from June 19 to 21.

    The theme is: Arbitration and Africa – Prospects and Challenges.

    NBA president Augustine Alegeh (SAN) will deliver a keynote speech.

    The three-day conference will focus on the relationship between inward foreign investment in emerging markets in Africa, types of disputes which may arise and the African experience resolving investment and other business disputes by Arbitration.

    The conference will also offer a veritable platform for chief executive officers of companies investing in African countries to share their experiences, as a backdrop to the subsequent discussions of the relationship between Arbitration and Investment, particularly Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

    Planning committee chair and Vice President ICC Commission on Arbitration and Alternative Disputes Resolution mechanisms (ADR), Mrs. Dorothy Ufot, (SAN) said the conference will offer an opportunity for a wide range of experts and participants to discuss the challenges and prospects of Arbitration in Africa.

    “Other participants will include former Director, International Maritime Organisation (IMO), United Nations Mrs. Monica Mbanefo, Director, ICC Dispute Resolution Services for Eastern Mediterranean, Middle-East & Africa,  Sami Houerbi Special Advisor to the President, Common Court of Justice and Arbitration of OHADA, Abidjan Mr. Jimmy Kodo and a host of others who will examine the ICC experience dealing with Africa related arbitration.”

  • Push for review of election petition timeline, others

    Push for review of election petition timeline, others

    A group, the Human Rights Law Service (HURILAWS), has urged the National Assembly to amend Section 285 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 134 of the Electoral Act of 2010.

    The sections provide that an election petition tribunal shall deliver judgment within 180 days and an appeal must be decided within 60 days.

    HURILAWS said the sections did not take into account a situation where the Court of Appeal orders that a petition be heard afresh (de novo).

    It said where such an order is made, there is no provision for extension of time if the 180 days–calculated from the date the petition was filed – are almost exhausted.

    At a briefing in Lagos, HURILAWS Senior Legal Programme officer Collins Okeke said: “The constitutional timeline for the conclusion of election petition is a double-edged sword, as it were.

    “On the one hand, it is a salutary reform that cured the mischief of prolonged election petition process that often enabled the beneficiaries of ‘stolen’ electoral mandates to hold political offices for several years before final judgment is secured.

    “On the other hand, the limitation of time prejudices numerous meritorious election petitions, which are unfortunately struck out for being choked by the time frame.

    “Therefore, Section 285 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 134 of the Electoral Act need to be amended to provide exceptions to the election petition timelines.

    “For instance, the amendment could provide for the 180 days to stop counting where there is a stay of proceedings, and for days to start counting afresh where there is an order for de novo hearing of an election petition.”

    HURILAWS said the Electoral Act should also be amended to strictly regulate the process of candidates’ nomination at party primaries, including limiting nomination fees to reduce pre-election disputes and curtail undue monetisation of politics.

    It said the Constitution and the Acr should incorporate the use of the card reader during accreditation of voters, and for card reader reports to be recognised as part of admissible evidence in proof of electoral malpractices, such as over-voting.

    The group also suggested that the Electoral Act be amended to merge accreditation and voting to speed up the process and significantly curb over-voting and other malpractices.

    Besides, HURILAWS wants the electorate (voters) to be empowered to file petitions.

    Okeke said: “The Electoral Act, especially section 137, needs to be amended to afford locus standi to the electorate to bring election petitions.

    “However, tribunals may also be empowered to consider and summarily dismiss in chambers frivolous petitions and petitions on issues already being canvassed in another petition or which should be more appropriately canvassed by a party to the election.”

    The group urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure that Card Readers are pre-tested to prevent malfunction.

    Okeke added: “The welfare and security of judges presiding over election petitions must be taken very seriously to avoid the chances of their being compromised or attacked.

    “Previous judgments of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court on election matters should be made available to election tribunals and Court of Appeal members and justices to ensure consistency in judicial pronouncements on electoral disputes.”

     

  • CJ, NBA, others hail retired judge  

    The Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Olufunmilayo  Atilade has described  Justice Adebisi  Kayode-Ogunmekan (rtd) as a woman with profound intellectual depth.

    Her deep knowledge of legal jurisprudence, the CJ said, is demonstrated in her judicial pronouncements.

    Justice Atilade spoke at a valedictory court session in honour of Justice Kayode-Ogunmekan.

    According to her, Justice Kayode-Oyemekun’s wealth of experience and ingenious resourcefulness at the Bar and in the Public service proved valuable as they were brought to bear on the job and earned her the deserved elevation to the High Court Bench almost two decades ago.

    “Not only has our retiree proved her worth as a jurist of immense quality, Her Ladyship has also stood the test of time. A woman of excellence with a keen eye for details, whose strength of character was ably exemplified in her reliability, uprightness and forthrightness. Little wonder that she is loved and admired by all, including her brother and sister judges in the Lagos State Judiciary,” the CJ said.

    Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association of Nigeria, Lagos Branch, Martin Ogunleye described the retired judge as an asset to the state judiciary. He said she promoted reconciliation in many cases that came before her.

    Ogunleye   added: “We at the Lagos Branch of NBA wish you a deserved rest and blissful retirement after 38 years of fruitful and rewarding public service, you have played your part and history will be kind to you when your role and time on the bench is chronicled.”

    Justice Kayode-Oyemekun in her remarks,  attributed her success at both the public service and the judiciary to the grace of God.

    She expressed her profound appreciation to the state judiciary for a well deserved honour bestowed on her by all and sundry in the justice sector and more especially her brother and sister judges at the bench.

    She used the occasion to call on appropriate authorities to provide better welfare packages for legal practitioners while also advising lawyers and judges alike to be mindful of their limitations in all legal proceedings by holding tenaciously to the guiding principles of the legal practice.

    Justice Kayode-Ogunmekan was born into the family of Prince Michael Adedipupo Ogun, the late Olofin Ajaiye of Orugbo Ikosi-Ejirin LCDA, in Lagos State on August 12, 1950.

    She attended the Anglican Girls School, Broad Street, Lagos from January 1956-Decemebr 1958, and Children’s Home School, Molete, Ibadan between January 1959 – December 1963.

    She enrolled at the prestigious Queen’s School, Ede in 1963 where she successfully completed her West African School Certificate Examination with distinction between 1964 and 1968.

    She thereafter proceeded to Ijebu Ode Grammar School for her Higher Secondary Education Certificate (HSC) from 1969-1970.

    She went further to obtain her General Certificate Examination (A-Levels), and her excellent performance in her chosen subjects earned her a direct admission to the University of Lagos, Akoka in 1971 for her Law degree. She was called to the Bar in July, 1975.

  • Isara-Remo stool: Hearing begins Thursday

    An Ogun State High Court sitting in Sagamu will on Thursday begin hearing in the suit by Prince Adetayo Odunsi challenging the nomination of Albert Mayungbe as the Odemo of Isara-Remo.

    The co-defendants are Secretary, Remo North Local Government;  Oliwo of Isara, Chief Ajibowu Ogunfowodu; Apena of Isara, Chief Jimoh Soyombo; Chief Ladipo Ogunyemi; Ogbeni Odi of Isara, Chief Olajubu Osibote; Ekeji Asipa Odi, Chief Tunde Kalejaiye and Asipa Odi of Isara, Chief Owuye Logba.

    Others include Ekeji Asipa Odi of Isara, Chief Efuwape Sotikare; Olori Emo of Isara, Chief Bashiru Awoniyi; Ekeji Olori Emo of Isara, Chief Korede Ogunwole; Asipa Emo of Isara, Chief Nosiru Sodipe; Ekeji Asipa Emo, Chief Adewole Sopitan; Governor of Ogun State; Executive Council of Ogun State; the Commissioner for Chieftaincy and Local Government and the state Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice as second to 18th defendants respectively.

    The court at its last sitting struck out the second defendant, the late head of the ruling house, Prince Obafemi Awoyade, following an application filed by the defence counsel, Mr. A.O. Odusanya.

    Counsel to the claimant Mr. Obanewa had told the court that he found five, out of the eleven documents filed by the defence contentious, stressing that about three of the documents were not written in the language of the court.

    In his response,  Odusanya said the defence would use an interpreter in respect of the documents that were not written in the language of the court.

    He also told the court that the defence found three of the about 12 documents filed by the claimant contentious.

    Prince Odunsi , who claimed to be a direct descendant of the late Oba Oyemade Mayungbe and progenitor of Erinsiba-Ayoledoye Ruling House, averred in his statement of claim that he is the one lawfully entitled to the stool of Odemo of Isara-Remo.

    Odunsi sought seven prayers and orders against the defendants including: “ a declaration that the first defendant is not a member of the Erinsiba-Adyoledoye Ruling House and therefore, not qualified to contest for the stool; that under native law and custom applicable in Isara and Remoland generally, an Odi (servant of the king) or  any of his descendants is not qualified to contest for the stool of Odemo of Isara; that the first defendant’s late grandfather and father, late Ogunsakin and Oyekunle Mayungbe were Odi  to the late Oba Samuel Akinsanya and late Oba Adeboboye Osideinde,  therefore, not qualified to aspire or to be considered for nomination to the stool”.

    He also sought an order of the court setting aside the nomination exercise of Erinsiba/Ayoledoye ruling house at a meeting held on February 21, 2011 during which the first defendant emerged as one of the candidates for the Odemo of Isara chieftaincy; an order setting aside the decision of the kingmakers selecting or electing the first defendant as the candidate for the Odemo of Isara chieftaincy among other prayers.

    In their statement of defence and counter claim, the first, second, sixth to 10th and 14th defendants admitted some of the averments of the claimant and deny others.

    The first defendant, Albert Mayungbe, had also insisted on being a “bonafide member  and descendant of the Erinsiba/Ayoledoye Ruling House and that the late Oba Mayungbe, aside from being a trader, met and married Arobo in Akure where Ogunsakin, his grandfather, was born.

    They  prayed the court for an order of mandamus compelling the 15th and 16th defendants to give approval to the appointment of the first defendant as the new Odemo-elect of Isara-Remo.

    But the claimant, in his reply to the statement of defence and counter claim of the first, second, sixth to tenth and 14thdefendants, had contended that the first defendant is not a bonafide member and descendant of the Erinsiba/Ayoledoye Ruling house.

    The claimant further contended that  though Ogunsakin was a child of Arobo, he was not fathered by the late Oba Mayungbe and that the late monarch was never a trader who lived in Akure but was an Ifa Priest and a pig rearer based in Isara emphasizing that there was never a time he travelled to or live in Akure.