Category: Law

  • ‘Notice of Appeal without address for service is defective’

    ‘Notice of Appeal without address for service is defective’

    Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha and PDP (Appellants) as Petitioners, filed their petition  challenging the return of Owelle Rochas Anayo Okorocha (1st Respondent) by the Independence National Electoral Commission (INEC) (2nd Respondent) as the person duly elected as Governor of Imo State. All Progressive Congress (APC) (37th Respondent), sponsored the candidature of Owelle Rochas Anayo Okorocha (1st Respondent) at the said election contested inter alia by Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha (1st Appellant) on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    At the close of the pleadings, Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha and PDP (Petitioners) through their counsel submitted a letter dated 22nd June, 2015 to the secretary of the Tribunal hearing their petition requesting the issuance of pre-hearing notice on all the parties in the petition. There was a Hearing Notice for pre-hearing session, signed by the Tribunal Secretary that was not addressed to anybody in particular.

    The Respondents in the petition and this appeal filed their Answers to the Questions contained in the pre-hearing Information. The Petitioners had on 3rd July, 2015 paid N300.00 as filing fee for their letter dated 22nd June, 2015 but received by the Tribunal Secretary on 23rd June, 2015. It was this payment that prompted the 1st and 37th Respondents to bring a motion filed on 6th July, 2015 praying the Tribunal below for inter alia an Order dismissing the petition as having been abandoned.

    Upon hearing the application, the Tribunal partly granted same by dismissing the petition on the ground that the Petitioners had abandoned their petition for not filing, within time, the application, under paragraph 18(1) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010, as amended, for the petition to be set down for pre-hearing session.

    On the issue of abuse of the process of Court, the Tribunal below dismissed same, holding that there was no abuse of the Court’s process.

    Against this decision, the petitioners as the appellants lodged an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The 1st and 37th Respondents also filed a notice of cross-appeal. In their brief of argument, the 1st and 37th respondents raised, as preliminary objection, to the notice of appeal.

    It was submitted for the 1st and 37th respondents that the failure of the appellants to put the named 3rd-36th respondents on notice and serve the appeal processes on them robs the court of the jurisdiction to entertain the suit. For the appellants it was submitted that since the names of the 3rd-36th respondents are clearly reflected on the face of the notice of appeal as respondents to the appeal there has been sufficient compliance with Order 6 Rule 2(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2011.

    It was held that Order 2 Rule 3 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2011 is very clear and unambiguous. It provides that where under the Rules, any notice or other process is required to have an address for service endorsed on it; it shall not be deemed to have been properly filed unless such address has been endorsed on it. It was also stated that there is no ambiguity about the purport of Order 6 Rule 9 which is that “where in any proceeding in the Court below a party has given an address for service; Notice of Appeal from any decision made under such proceeding may be served on such party at such address for address.” That in the instant case, not all of the 3rd-36th respondents gave their addresses for service at the trial Tribunal. Only six (6) of them did in their replies to the Petition thus service could not be effected on others. It was stated that it can be held that Order 6 Rule 9 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2011 has watered down the effect or consequence of Order 2 Rule 3 as regards the six respondents who gave their address for service. However, same cannot be said of the other Respondents. It was stated that the purport, of Order 2 Rule 3 is audi alteram partem and the fair hearing provisions of Section 36 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended therefore, it is not a privilege, but a right of the respondent, that he must be given an opportunity to be heard on the appeal. He is therefore accordingly entitled to be served the Notice of appeal.

    The Court held that from the reading of order 6 Rule 2(1) together with Order 2 Rules 3 it is clear beyond doubt that the notice of appeal which does not have endorsed on it the address for service of the notice of appeal on the each of the 3rd-36th respondents is fundamentally defective. That it was stated that in a long line of cases from NGELIZANA v. HINDI (1965) NNLR 12, ENEBI v. YACHIM (1965) NNLR 26 to KALIEL v. ALIERO (1999) 4 NWLR (Pt. 597); (1999) LPELR-6591(CA) that the provisions of the Rules requiring a plaintiff, petitioner or appellant to provide address for service of an originating process or any other process on the defendant or respondent have always been construed to be mandatory and the effect of non-compliance therewith is that the process “shall not be deemed not to have been filed” and therefore liable to be struck out as an incompetent process. See also MARIAM OBIMONURE v. OJUMOOLA ERINOSHO & ANOR. (1996) 1 All NLR 250; SCOTT-EMUAKPOR v. UKAVBE (1975) 12 SC 31; (1975) LPELR-3024(SC) ODITA v. OKWUDINMA (1969) 1 All NLR 228 A 31-232, SKEN CONSULT LTD v. UKEY (1981) 1 SC 6.

    It was held that in the instant case the notice of appeal does not have endorsed thereon address for service of each of the 3rd – 36th respondents. That the filing of the notice of appeal in flagrant disobedience of Order 2 Rule 3 and Order 6 Rule 2(1) and same was struck out.

    It was stated that ordinarily, the striking out of the appeal should have been the convenient point to end this decision. However, the Appeal Court is not the final court, but an intermediate court in this matter. In the circumstance it became pertinent to consider the merits of the appeal.

    The core issues in the Appellants’ Brief, in the Court’s view are:

    1. Whether the letter to the Tribunal Secretary dated 22nd June, 2015 which was received by the said Secretary on the 23rd June, 2015 and on which said letter the Tribunal Secretary acted to promptly on 23rd June, 2015. Issued Hearing Notice for the Pre-Hearing Session was not sufficient under paragraph 18(1) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010, as amended?
    2. Whether the 1st & 37th Respondents, having taken steps in the Pre-Hearing Session by filing Answers to the Questions contained in the Pre-Hearing Information Sheet, are not stopped, by operation of paragraph 53 (2) of the said First Schedule of the Electoral Act, 2010, as amended, from raising the objection resulting in the dismissal of the petition.

    Appellant’s counsel relying on ABUBAKAR v. NASAMU (No. 2) (2012) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1330) 523 and MGBA v. P.D.P. (2013) 523 and UGBA v. PDP (2013) All FWLR (Pt. 686) 540 at 548 submitted that Paragraphs 18(1) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010, as amended, was sufficiently complied with once the Petitioner issues a letter to the Tribunal Secretary urging the latter to issue Hearing Notice for Pre-Hearing Session. Counsel further submitted that between the Petitioner and the Tribunal the preliminary steps taken by the Petitioner to nudge the Secretary to issue Hearing Notice for the commencement of the Pre-Hearing Session are purely administrative.

    On the other hand, the 1st and 37th respondents vehemently posit that such steps, as the application of the Petitioner to the Tribunal Secretary to kick start the Hearing Notice for the Pre-Hearing Session, are not administrative but purely judicial and the petitioner must pay the filing fee for the process by which he applies to the Tribunal Secretary to issue Hearing Notice for the Pre-Hearing Session.

    The Court held that there is nothing in Paragraph 18(1) of the First Schedule vesting any adjudicative or quasi-judicial powers on the Tribunal Secretary when he is presented an application by the Petitioner for the Issuance of Hearing Notice for Pre-Hearing Session. The function is purely administrative. That the duty imposed by Paragraph 18 (1) of the First Schedule on the Secretary, when nudged by the Petitioner to issue Hearing Notice at the close of the pleadings for Pre-Hearing Session, is merely to issue the notices.

    That Paragraph 18(1) of the First Schedule provides no special mode by which a petitioner “shall apply for the issuance of Pre-Hearing Notice as in Form TF 008” to the Secretary of the Tribunal. In absence of any special mode in Paragraphs 18(1) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010 as amended, the Petitioner’s letter to the Tribunal Secretary to issue Pre-Hearing Notice will suffice. Relying on ABUBAKAR v. NASAMU (supra) the Court resolved in favour of the appellants that they complied with Paragraph 18(1) of the 1st schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010, as amended.

    The appellants’ counsel, relying on the Supreme Court decision in SA’EED v. YAKOWA (Supra) and Paragraph 53(2) of the said 1st Schedule submits that even if there was non-compliance by the Petitioners/Appellants with Paragraph 18(1) of the 1st Schedule the 1st and 37th Respondents could not be heard to ask for dismissal of the petition since they had waived their right to do so by their participatory activities, and that if they did ask the Tribunal below was enjoined to refuse the application by the operation of Paragraph 53(2) of the 1st Schedule.

    In response, it is submitted for the 1st & 37th Respondents that the 1st & 37th Respondents only became aware of the fact that the Petitioners\Appellants did not pay for the filing of their application to the Tribunal Secretary to issue Hearing Notice for the Pre-hearing session until 5th July, 2015.

    It was held that the Records show that the Tribunal Secretary issued Hearing Notice for the Pre-Hearing Session on 23rd June, 2015. The filing fee was paid for this process. That the 1st & 37th Respondents took fresh steps to file, on 26th June, 2015, their answers to the Questions contained in the Pre-Hearing Information Sheet. That by their active participatory activities the 1st & 37th Respondents cannot say that they suffered any prejudice or embarrassment. That the purpose of Pre-Hearing Notice has thus being achieved. See SA’EED v. YAKOWA (supra) at page 1686, IPINLAIYE II v. OLUKOTUN (1996) 6 SCNJ 74 at 88; (1996) LPELR-1532(SC) (1996) 6 NWLR (Pt 453) 143; AKHIWU v. PRINCIPAL LOTTERIES OFFICER MIDWEST (1972) 1 All NLR (Pt. 1) 229 at 238; (1972) LPELR-333(SC) OKWECHIME v. PHILIP IGBINADOLOR (1964) NMLR 132.

    It was held that reading paragraphs 18(1) and 53(2) of the 1st Schedule of the Electoral Act, 2010 together makes it clear that failure to formally apply for notice of Pre-hearing session to issue is merely procedural. And being procedural the party who has the right to timeously question its non-compliance can waive strict compliance therewith. See ADAMS v. UMAR (2009) 5 NWLR (Pt. 1133) 41. The issue was accordingly, resolved in favour of the appellants.

    It was concluded that the decision on the merits in the appeal would have been one setting aside, in its entirety, the decision appealed, if not for the earlier striking out of the appeal for being incompetent.

    The cross-appeal

    The issue in the cross-appeal is:

    “Whether the trial Tribunal ought to have pronounced a decision, one way or the order, on the Cross-Appellants’ prayer contending that the Petition was an abuse of court process and in consequence hold that the petition was liable or not liable for dismissal in their Ruling delivered on 22nd July, 2015.”

    The Court stated that it is trite that a competent ground of appeal must arise from the judgment being challenged. In SARAKI v. KOTOYE (1992) 11-12 SCNJ 26; (1992) NWLR (Pt. 264) 156; (1992) LPELR-3016(SC)  EJOWHOMY  v. EDOH-ETER LTD (1986) 5 NWLR (Pt. 39) 1; AQUA LTD v. ONDO STATE SPORTS COUNCIL (1988) 4 NWLR (Pt. 91) 622; (1988) LPELR-527(SC).

    From the above principles it was found, that the complaint that the trial Tribunal omitted to consider and decide the issue of abuse of court process is most frivolous and vexatious. That the Tribunal did extensively consider the issue of abuse of court process, and came to the conclusion that the issue of abuse of court process raised by the 1st& 37th Respondents was clearly unfounded. The issue was dismissed, and there is no appeal against that decision. That the effect of a decision of court not appealed against is that the said decision is deemed accepted and remains forever binding on the parties. See AKERE v. GOVERNOR, OYO STATE (2012) 50.2 NSCQR 345 at 394; (2012) LPELR-7806(SC) See ALAKIJA v. ABDULAI (1998) 8 NWLR (Pt. 552) 1 at 16-17; (1998) LPELR-404(SC) IKEM v. EZIANYA (2002) 4 NWLR (Pt. 757) 245 at 261; SPLINTERS (NIG) LTD v. OASIS FINANCE LTD (2013) 18 NWLR (Pt. 1385) 188 at 213; (2013) LPELR-20691(CA).

    Consequently, therefore, the cross-appeal, premised on the incompetent sole ground of appeal from which a sole issue for determination has been formulated being incompetent was struck out.

    On the whole both the Appeal and the Cross-Appeal were dismissed.

    Edited by LawPavilion

    LawPavilion Citation: (2015) LPELR-25645(CA)

     

     

     

  • Amosun to judges, lawyers: Support anti-graft war

    Amosun to judges, lawyers: Support anti-graft war

    Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun has urged judges and lawyers to support the executive in ensuring the success of the war against corruption.

    Amosun, who spoke during a religious service to mark the beginning of the new legal year, said the executive alone cannot successfully pursue the war against graft.

    He said the active support of the bar and bench is needed.

    The governor assured judicial officers in the state of his administration’s determination to improve on their welfare in order to nip corruption in the bud.

    A church service was held at the Cathedral of St. Peters, Ake, while a Moslem service held at the Central Mosque, Kobiti in Abeokuta.

    Amosun, while praising the Chief Judge, Justice Olatokunbo Olopade, for the judiciary’s support, said his administration would continue to improve on judicial officers’ welfare despite the current economic situation.

    “A lot would be done to improve on the welfare of our judicial officers in the state. Government alone cannot fight corruption to a standstill. We need the active support of the Bar and Bench to nip the cankerworm in the bud.

    “There is no better time for you to rededicate yourself than now that the new administration at the Federal level is trying to kill what I call corruption.

    “So, we need the judicial staff – both the judges and the lawyers to assist in that process to have a new Nigeria,”the governor said.

    Speaking with journalists after the church service, Justice Olopade urged judicial officers to be steadfast in administering justice.

    She said they should ensure fairness and equity in the dispensation of justice at all times.

    Justice Olopade said the state would embark on renovation of all the courts, provide tools for workers andfocus on measures at decongesting the prisons, such as community service.

    Delivering a sermon, the Lord Bishop of Ijebu Southwest, Rev. Babatunde Ogunbanwo said judicial officers should endeavour to administer justice with truthfulness, righteousness and the fear of God.

    He added that they should be humble despite the enormous powers they posses.

    Prof Hafis Oladosu of the Department of Islamic Studies, University of Ibadan praised the state government for placing Ogun on the path of development.

    He urged the governor to complete all on-going projects.

     

  • Three quarters of Nigerians are lawless, says judge

    Three quarters of Nigerians are lawless, says judge

    A judge of the Lagos State High Court, Justice Gani Safari, has said three quarters of Nigerians deliberately break the law.

    Speaking at a one-day symposium titled: The constitution, law enforcement agencies and you, organised by the Human Rights Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Ikeja Branch, Justice Safari, who represented the Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Funmilayo Atilade, as the guest of honour, noted the difficulty law enforcement officers face in carrying out their duties.

    “Three quarters of Nigerians are lawless,” he said, “I have to say it the way it is. Unless he is compelled, the average Nigerian does not want to obey the law.

    “This is something we all know, and that is why I personally don’t envy our law enforcement agencies, because they have a job to do to enforce the law, against people who are not willing to obey the law.

    “In doing so, they are also enjoined to have respect for the rights of fellows.”

    He continued: “Somewhere along the line an officer gets caught up in the line of duty and gets accused of overstepping his bounds, like the instance where a police officer was charged to court for murder for misusing his firearm which led to the death of a citizen.

    “There was also a time when a Divisional Police Officer was charged for misuse of his firearm during a riot. If you look at your environment, we all go out on a daily basis, you’ll realise that the average Nigerian does not comply with simple instructions, until he is made to do so.”

    Justice Safari’s views were echoed by B. J. Fasopin, a Deputy Route Commander of the Federal Road Safety Corp (FRSC).

    Fasopin, who represented the FRSC’s Corp Marshall, said Nigerians are difficult when it comes to obeying the law.

    “I stopped a lawyer for not wearing a seatbelt, and he said he was going to court he had a case and it was his right not to wear a seatbelt.”

    The event, which was held under the chairmanship of Justice I. Buba of the Federal High Court, Lagos, also featured speeches by Professor Lanre Fagbohun of the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (UNILAG Campus), Mrs. Omotola Rotimi the Director of the Lagos State Office of the Public Defender, Mrs. Gloria Egbuji of the Crime Victims Foundation as well as representatives of the Nigerian Police, the Nigerian Civil Defence Corp, Kick Against Indiscipline (KAI) and the Lagos State Traffic Management Agency (LASTMA).

    Prof Fagbohun, who identified violations of human rights among all levels of society, urged law enforcement agents to see themselves as guardians of human rights.

    Mrs. Rotimi identified the government agencies who are most culpable in the infringement of human rights, based on the statistics available to her agency.

    She said: “Of all the enforcement agencies that operate in Lagos State, statistics show that the officers of the Nigerian Police Force take the lead in the infringement of the rights of the citizens. Next in  line is the Lagos State Traffic Management Authority.

    “The officers of the Kick Against Indiscipline, and the Federal Road Safety Corp are other major law enforcement agencies that take pride in infringing the rights of the ‘bloody civilians’ in the state.”

    The first Vice Chairman of the Ikeja NBA’s Human Rights Committee, Mrs. Gloria Nweze, said the programme was in response to several complaints received by the Committee daily from the public about their unpleasant experiences from Federal and State law enforcement agencies including the Police, FRSC, Civil Defence Corps, LASTMA and KAI.

    Mrs. Nweze said: “We investigated many of these complaints and the Committee came to the conclusion that there is a need to organise a programme of this nature to enlighten both the public and officials of these agencies on their rights and powers under the law.”

    A former chairman, the Ikeja NBA, Mr. Dave Ajetunmobi, presented plaques of appreciation to the speakers on behalf of the branch.

     

  • Who buys judgment?

    Who buys judgment?

    Michael Daly Hawkins was a former senior judge in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While reacting to harsh public criticism of several Supreme Court Justices, among other notable judges in the United States of America in his book, titled ‘’Dining with the Dogs: Reflections on the Criticism of Judges’’, he had this to say: ‘’We certainly have not seen the end of criticism of judges. Robust free speech, even of the coarse and inaccurate variety, may simply be one of the prices of a free society. Today’s judges may draw some relief from the knowledge that modem critics are normally not as colorful or as sharp of tongue as Horace Greeley or Teddy Roosevelt, as nasty as George Wallace, or as violent and aggressive as David Terry. In the end, while judges may not like what they hear and may be sorely tempted to respond to their critics, history does seem to teach us that our predecessors endured far worse, and both they and the Republic seem to have survived’’.

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) had on February 17, 2012 vowed to expose how politicians used “consultants” to buy election cases with “incredible sums of money.”

    The legal body, which made the allegation at a valedictory court session that was held in honour of late Justice Anthony Nnaemezie Christopher Aniagolu, said it was aware of all the senior counsel and eminent retired judicial officers that served as conduit between election courts and parties in electoral matters, saying it would forward their names to relevant anti-graft agencies for prosecution.

    In a speech that was presented by the then NBA President, Mr J.B. Daudu (SAN), said: “Corruption is now a live issue that is threatening to tear apart the foundations and fabric of the society. The Bar believes that as it does not possess the machinery and infrastructure to battle this scourge such as the EFCC and ICPC possesses, but it can be proactive in its battle against this vice which left unchecked will sink the whole ship of state.

    “We are no doubt aware that some of our colleagues including very senior counsel and at times eminent retired judicial officers go about offering their services as ‘consultants’ particularly in election cases for incredible sums of money so as to act as conduit between his client and the election court.

    “The end result is to facilitate ready-made justice for the persons they are acting for. We must strongly deprecate this practice. Our members and members of the public should feel free to avail themselves of the services of this NBA anti-corruption body. We do ourselves the greatest disservice if we fail to fight this ill which renders irrelevant the work and skills of hardworking lawyers who daily toil in and out of courts and who do not have the advantage of knowing with certainty the outcomes of cases as these ‘consultants’ are privileged to know.

    “Secondly, this charge falls at the feet of the Bar particularly counsel who for political manoeuvres or the gratification of ‘varying interests’ misuse the process of the Supreme Court and other courts by bringing applications that are clearly frivolous or contemptuous.

    “I have approached the Attorney-General of the Federation to call a meeting of the General Council of the Bar so that inter alia, the existing rules of Professional Ethics can be amended to include such areas that will safeguard the dignity of the courts and integrity of judicial process. Let us call ourselves to order in this regard. The essence of a just judicial system is to provide prompt qualitative justice for the people. Justice is meaningless when it is delayed, hurried or perverted”, it stressed.

    Since it has become seemingly attractive to revel on ‘’Judges’ Corruption Mantra’’, the current NBA President, Augustine Alegeh (SAN), seized the opportunity of the mammoth crowd that gathered for the special session of the Supreme Court to mark the commencement of the 2015-2016 legal year and the swearing-in of newly conferred Senior Advocates of Nigeria to accuse some judges of rendering judgments for a fee. The Vice-President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Professor Yemi Osibanjo (SAN) was also in attendance.

    Alegeh said: “It is indeed very worrisome that certain judicial officers still engage in rendering judgments for a fee.

    “Instances abound where judicial officers have resorted to turning the law on its head and making pronouncements which are at variance with the provisions of the law.

    “A few others have formed the bad habit of ignoring judicial precedents even when such authorities are brought to their attention by counsel.

    “This trend is quite injurious and erodes the confidence reposed in the judiciary by society.”

    While Daudu’s NBA promised to set up an anti-corruption commission to identify and hand over the culprits to EFCC or ICPC for prosecution, Alegeh also said the association would take the matters as prima facie evidence of corruption.  Up till the end of Daudu’s tenure 5-6 months after the famous speech, even till date the NBA’s anti-corruption commission has failed to release or even disclose the names of corrupt Judges to the appropriate authorities.  Time shall tell if Alegeh can walk his talk.

    Lawyers are regarded the world over as guardians of the law, and consequently play a vital role in the preservation of society. Unlike the Judges who are often only seen and seldom heard, they have unfettered access to the public, are often easily heard and very publicly seen.

    The Rules of Professional Conduct of the Legal Profession as contained in the Legal Practitioners Act (Chapter 207 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria) are intended for maintenance of respect for and confidence in the judicial office

    Rule 1 for instance, specifically states that: “It is the duty of the lawyer to maintain towards the Court respectful attitude, not for the sake of the temporary incumbent of the judicial office, but for the maintenance of its supreme importance. Judges, not being wholly free to defend themselves, are peculiarly entitled to receive the support of the Bar against unjust criticism and clamour. Where there is proper ground for serious complaint of a judicial officer, it is the right and duty of the lawyer to submit his grievances to the proper authorities’’.

    Perhaps, this becomes imperative when the CJN, Justice Mohammed described the allegation that judges were taking bribes as ’unfortunate unguarded comments’, because every litigant has at least a lawyer that prosecute his or her case before a Judge. The lawyer, at the risk of sounding immodest must be in the know of the conduct of his client, overtly or covertly. In other words, common sense dictates that lawyers have the dossier of how his client’s case was fought and won.

    It is even understood if an outsider or laymen hawk the allegations all over the streets. The CJN therefore, in his remarks during the special session of the Supreme Court to mark the commencement of the 2015-2016 legal year and the swearing-in of newly conferred Senior Advocates of Nigeria insisted that the allegation by prominent members of the Bar that some judges were corrupt was unfortunate.

    He said: “I regard as unfortunate unguarded comments of some prominent members of the Bar that the judiciary is corrupt.

    “Such comments coming from the members of the Bar mean that they know the identity of the corrupt judges and as such, they should fish them out to be dealt with by the National Judicial Council (NJC).”

    The CJN noted that the Bench was a product of the Bar and that unless they both work in synergy to ensure that only fit and proper persons remain in the Bar, it would be impossible to expect a different Bench.

    The immediate past CJN, Justice Aloma Mariam Mukhtar had in the Judicial Reforms Conference co-organized by the National Bar Association on 7 July 2014 held in Abuja, also lamented that many lawyers were quick to accuse the judiciary of being corrupt, yet refused to report judges who they knew to be corrupt to the NJC.

    “You (lawyers) all know those judges that are corrupt, but you won’t report. However, you will be the one who will raise the issue that the judiciary is corrupt. You will not do your part,”

    In a close, maybe lawyers and all concerned should borrow a leaf from the Ifa divination principles and posit as follows: “some judges engage in the sale of their court judgments on some cases, ably filed, prayed and argued by lawyers before same judges on behalf of some people known as litigants who are clients to the lawyers’.  Who then are the buyers?

  • Wanted: Robust justice sector reform

    Wanted: Robust justice sector reform

    With the enactment of the Administration of Criminal Justice (ACJ) Act 2015, many believe the delays in dispensation of justice, especially in criminal cases, will be reduced. President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice-President Yemi Osinbanjo (SAN) have spoken on the need for more reforms. Lawyers have identified other areas that need transformation, reports Precious Igbonwelundu.

    Since assuming office, President Muhammadu Buhari has repeatedly emphasised the need for judicial reforms that will aid his administration’s anti-corruption war as well as strengthen democratic governance.

    The Administration of Criminal Justice Act of 2015 has addressed some problems, such as staying proceedings pending appeal, and cases starting de novo when judges are elevated to the Court ofAppeal.

    Still, lawyers believe there are other areas that need reforms.

    These include ensuring financial independence for the judiciary, insulating it from political manipulation, reviewing the processes of appointment and removal of judges; addressing institutional limitations and incapacities, as well as ridding the judiciary of corruption.

    Speaking on areas that need reforms, a Supreme Court Justice, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, called for an amendment of the Constitution so that some cases can terminate at the Court of Appeal.

    This, in addition to more deployment of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), she said, would reduce the Supreme Court’s workload.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun backed suggestions that some cases terminate at the Court of Appeal, adding that a review of the constitutional provisions governing the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is necessary.

    “I am in full support of certain classes of cases terminating at the Court of Appeal. In my humble view, the amendment of the 1999 Constitution has added to the burden of the Supreme Court.

    “It made the Supreme Court the final court of appeal in respect of decisions arising from Governorship election tribunals.

    “Such appeals, by virtue of Section 285 (7) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) must be concluded within 60 days from the date of the delivery of the judgment of the Court of Appeal,” she said.

    She said the provision has led to an influx of appeals and has also affected other cases pending before the court, which are already overdue for hearing, but which had to be set aside while  election related appeals are heard and determined expediently.

    She also called for the use of more technology in court processes.

    She said: “The global village is moving at a faster pace, the apex court of the most populous nation in Africa cannot be left behind. We must embrace information technology and take advantage of all that it offers along with alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, where possible.

    “A reduction of the inflow of cases and more efficient management of the court’s docket will allow the justices to devote more of their time and resources to research, study, reading, consultations among themselves for the advancement and administration of justice.”

    Justice Kekere-Ekun
    Justice Kekere-Ekun

    Justice Kekere-Ekun said for the Supreme Court to discharge its role effectively, the adoption of Information technology will allow for easy sharing of information.

    She said it would also help to create a database for decided cases by all the courts and which will also be accessible by judicial officers anywhere.

    In addition, she said ICT will facilitate communication between the justices, the registry and other administrative staff. According to her, the project is capital intensive and requires political will, purposeful leadership, and the commitment of substantial resources.

    “It also requires training for the justices and upgrading the knowledge and skills of courts staff to enable them effectively manage the facilities.The leadership of the court is fully committed to this transformation.

    “The role of the Supreme Court today should primarily be that of development of legal policy and to discharge the role effectively, its current docket has to be greatly reduced,” she said.

    Worried by these challenges bedeviling the system, a former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Dahiru Musdapha, during one of his presentations at the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (NIALS), enjoined the Judicial Reform Committee as well as other bodies which have been empanelled, to explore how best to fortify the independence of the judiciary, and insulate Judges from political manipulation.

    Justice Musdapha considered several issues, such as Should serving Judges should continue to undertake ad hoc assignments, such as election petition cases? What are its implications for delays in handling regular cases? Will such assignments will make them vulnerable to corrupt practices?

    He  said: “Sadly, the judiciary in several states still goes cap in hand to the executive for funds. By section 162(9) of the Constitution, any amount standing to the credit of the judiciary in the Federation Account is paid directly to the National Judicial Council (NJC) for disbursement to the heads of Superior Courts, including those at the state level.

    “However, a significant part of the funding requirements of state judiciaries, especially in the area of the provision of infrastructure and welfare of Magistrates and other lower court Judges, remain the responsibilities of states.

    “The plight of the state judiciaries is compounded by the fact that, in spite of the best efforts of the NJC, the processes of appointment and removal of judges/security of tenure is the subject of political theatrics.

    “Delay in the dispensation of justice remains a major challenge due, in large measure, to institutional incapacities in the area of infrastructure (especially e-infrastructure), inbuilt delay mechanisms in the law, as well as failings on the part of some Judges, the official and private Bars, law enforcement agencies, litigants and witnesses.

    “The sobering reality is that if court backlogs grow at their present rate, our children may not be able to bring a lawsuit to a conclusion within their lifetime. Legal claims might then be willed on, generation to generation like hillbilly funds; and the burden of pressing them would be contracted like a hereditary disease.”

     

    The needed reforms

     

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria and Queens Counsel (QC), Mr Oba Nsugbe, said the secrecy surrounding judges appointments must be stopped.

    “We need to make greater efforts to completely demystify the system of judicial appointments in Nigeria from beginning to end,” he said.

    Nsugbe said he once sought to know how to go about applying to be a judge in Nigeria, and to learn about upcoming vacancies, criteria for appointment and the process, but came up with no reliable information.

    He interrogated various official websites for answers, read a number of publications, and spoke to people in the judiciary, and still got no useful information on how to be a judge.

    His words: “The answers never seemed complete or exhaustive. This needs to change. In so important an area, you can never have enough clear, systematic information about what each and every stage entails – exactly what is needed of the applicant, when, who will assess it; how it will be assessed; who will be spoken to; against what criteria, etc. There needs to be more transparency about the appointments procedure. The lack of it acts as a disincentive to many aspiring judges,” he said.

    A judge of the Delta State High Court, Justice Roli Harriman, in paper, said only a few states, such as Lagos, has any form of electronic recording of proceedings.

    Majority of courts, she said, still use archaic equipment and judges write longhand, which is later reproduced by typists. “The use of longhand and typewriters obviously tend to delay justice,” she said.

    Another factor, the judge said, is that little use is made of software designed for case management and legal research. This lack of tools leads to judges adjourning till further dates rulings they could otherwise have delivered immediately. “Apart from a few states, the acquisition of this software is not on the priority list of governments,” Justice Harriman said.

    Delays, the judge added, even start from the filing process. “I am hoping a time would come when e-filing will take centre stage in the judiciary, a time when lawyers can, with a registered access code, file their processes and make payments online,” she said. Besides, it will not be out of place if court registries accept Point of Sale (POS) payments.

    Lack of courtroom technology, such as video conferencing, is also a challenge. In criminal cases, a greater number of adjournments are due to investigating police officers being transferred to other locations or being sent on other assignments. Some witnesses are also reluctance to come to court. “If their evidence can be taken through video conferencing, then this would eliminate the delay,” Justice Harriman said.

    The physical state of some courts also does not help speedier justice delivery. Some courts do not have air conditioning, and some courtrooms are like cubicles.

    While stating his agenda for judicial reforms, Musdapha noted that it was imperative to explore ways to strengthen the provisions of laws and regulations, as well as the mechanisms for their enforcement.

    He suggested that the Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers should expressly forbid Judges from giving extra-judicial advice to other branches of government, just as he stated that only paragons of integrity, the best and the brightest be appointed to the bench and elevated.

    The former CJN envisioned a judicial system that is simple, fast, efficient and responsive to the needs and yearnings of the citizenry, which can be actualised by full computerisation of operations.

    He suggested the amendment of Section 233(2) of the Constitution to compulsorily require leave of the Supreme Court before an appeal may lie from decisions of the Court of Appeal.

    “This will engender a filtering mechanism that ensures that frivolous appeals do not continue to clog our cause list and thereby cause undue delays and backlogs.

    “Again, on the appointment of Judges, we are also of the respectful view that there is considerable merit in the call to diversify the pool from which judicial appointments to superior courts are made.

    “We are concerned by the declining intellectual depth and overall quality of the judgments of some of our Judges as well as the frequency with which some Judges churn out conflicting decisions in respect of the same set of facts.

    ‘’A wider diversity of experience will undoubtedly add quality to judicial deliberation in our courts.

    “We must, therefore, embark upon reforms that address not only the present problems but also rollout the infrastructure that would enable us cope with foreseeable future challenges,” he said.

    However, on the Criminal Justice System, some of the suggestions the former CJN made have been included in the recently amended Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

     

    Lawyers’ views

     

    That notwithstanding, lawyers believe more reforms are needed in order for the judiciary to efficiently carry out its functions.

    They argue that concerted efforts must be made towards decongesting the prisons and ensuring faster proceedings.

    • Adekoya
    • Adekoya

    Renowned legal practitioner, Mrs. Funke Adekoya (SAN), said the government needs to focus on the investigative and prosecutorial areas of the Criminal Justice System.

    She said: “On a practical note, the police needs to be properly equipped with resources and trained such that they can concentrate on investigating crimes before arrests are made, rather than after.

    “Proper investigation will decrease the number of Awaiting Trial Detainees, some of whom are incarcerated because they have been unable to make bail while the police are still conducting investigations.

    “The police should be trained in finger printing collection and analysis. All the biometrics collected from Nigerians through the BVN exercise and the collection of passports and drivers’ licences should be centralised and the police should access it to trace criminals.

    “This will further decrease the time before arrest, and between arrest and trial.

    “Only lawyers, trained in the art of prosecution should be allowed to handle criminal cases, and States that have not amended their laws in line with the Administration of the Criminal Justice Act, should be encouraged to do so.

    “Lawyers in the Ministry of Justice need to be trained to enable them handle the various types of prosecutions which are now a feature of our criminal justice system, rather than farming out briefs to private prosecutors.

    “The government also needs to review the jurisdiction of the courts. Too many frivolous matters are reaching the Supreme Court, such that the Judges are overburdened with issues that are not ‘cutting edge’.

    “The Constitution needs to be amended such that all matters except death penalty judgments should require leave from the Supreme Court before they can be appealed to that court.

    “Regular appellate jurisdiction should end at the Court of Appeal. The grant of leave should be based on public interest considerations [conflicting decisions of lower courts, constitutional issues, impact on legislation etc.”

    Constituional lawyer, Fred Agbaje, said emphasis should be placed on prison reforms as well as fast track in hearing and determination of criminal matters.

    He suggested that custodial sentencing for convicted persons should be deemphasised, just as he explained that convicts of lesser crimes, instead of outright jail, be given social punishment such as “sweeping Ikorodu Road for two weeks during the day under the supervision of a social worker or pay a fine!”

    He noted the need for a review of stringent requirements a surety must meet to stand bail for an accused, such as the demand for land certificates in Ikoyi, Lekki, Ikeja GRA to be produced by civil servants from grade seven and above.

    Agbaje said no accused person should be arraigned without the prosecution witnesses in court and failure by the prosecution to conduct and conclude the case after a stated number of adjournments, should warrant it being struck out.

    He also suggested the need for reduction of appeals on interlocutory decisions through the constitution.

    The Chairman, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, believes there is a need to be make the judici

    •Prof. Odinkalu
    •Prof. Odinkalu

    ary more accountable in appointment of judicial officers, as well as in jurisprudence.

    “In the last quarter of a century, the judiciary has become a sinecure, part of the retinue of patronage in public life.

    “Almost invariably, the path to judicial office now begins in the civil service and appointment to the Bench is increasingly viewed as part of the promotion structure in the civil service significantly dis-entangled from any rigorous considerations of integrity, professionalism, merit, values and temperament.

    “The resulting narrowness of pool of judicial skills and intellect reflects in the quality of both organisation and some of the jurisprudence that comes out of courts and imbues our judicial system with a structural flaw that can only be addressed through structural intervention. The time is ripe for this,” he said.

     

     

  • When policemen go haywire

    It did not start today. But, the trend is becoming worse by the day. In the past few months, there have been many cases of policemen either killing their colleagues or innocent citizens in Abuja, Lagos, Port Harcourt and Yobe. Nigerians are wondering whether policemen should undergo periodic psychiatric tests to determine their mental state. Beyond dismissing and prosecuting culprits, how else can the police make its officers to be less harmful to those they are meant to protect? JOSEPH JIBUEZE sought lawyers’ views.

    Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Solomon Arase has his work cut out – he and his topmost officers  must figure out how to tame trigger-happy men among the rank and file. The police, which are expected to protect citizens, seem to have become a danger to society. Their colleagues and the citizens are not safe from these trigger happy cops

    In 2008, global watchdog Amnesty International (AI) released a report titled: Nigeria Police kill at will, which documented cases of torture and shooting of suspects in custody. The group said the police were notorious for  shooting suspects, and torturing them to death.

    AI said: “The Nigerian Police is responsible for hundreds of unlawful killings every year. Police don’t only kill people by shooting them; they also torture them to death, often while they are in detention.

    “The majority of the cases go uninvestigated and the police officers responsible go unpunished. The families of the victims usually get no justice or redress. Most never even found out what happened to their loved ones.”

    The situation seems to have worsened. Not only do the officers kill innocent citizens, they also shoot their colleagues.

     

    Officers go crazy

     

    In the past few months, trigger-happy cops have gunned down people across the country. One of such incident occurred on September 17 when Corporal Musefun Aremu, of Isheri-Oshun Police Station shot a tricyclist and his wife, Comfort.

    The tricyclist (Keke Marwa operator), Godwin Ekpo, is still battling for his life at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Idi-Araba.

    Ekpo was reportedly returning home from chuch with his wife and their four children when Aremu stopped them. He allegedly demanded for N200 from Ekpo for being on the road beyond the stipulated time. But Ekpo was said to have explained that he was returning from church and that the time was just 8pm.

    As they attempted to drive off, Aremu shot at them with an AK 47 riffle. The bullet pierced through Comfort’s skull, killing her. The bullet was said to have hit the husband.

    Aremu (28) has been arraigned. He reportedly claimed that he never meant to kill the woman, denying that he also demanded money from them.

    He said: “We were stationed at Obalagbe when we saw the Keke Marwa coming at about 12 midnight, which was against the stipulated time for them to operate. When we stopped him, he refused. Rather, he hit our vehicle in an attempt to escape.

    “All I did was to aim at the tyres of the Keke Marwa.  Unfortunately the bullet hit the woman from behind and also hit the man in the jaw. I never meant to kill anybody. It was just a mistake. If he had not run, I would not have fired,” he said.

     

    Threat to other officers

     

    Trigger-happy policemen are not only a threat to innocent civilians, they are also a threat to themselves. Last Friday, a police Constable, Ibrahim Musa, of the Nangere Police Division reportedly shot dead two of his superior officers following a quarrel at Tarajim Village in Yobe State.

    Musa was said to have angrily opened fire and shot Inspectors Mohammed Musa and Ishaku Elam with an AK47 rifle. After shooting his colleagues, he turned the gun on himself and attempted suicide. He was said to have died of injuries from the gunshot at the Potiskum General Hospital.

     

    Shot for ‘love’

     

    On April 30, a jealous policeman took his own life after killing his lover and a colleague for allegedly cheating on him. The lady, who sold GSM recharge cards, was said to be double-dating the two married policemen.

    The incident took place at Karu, a satellite town in Abuja. The killer cop, a sergeant, was said to be the lady’s primary lover. However, his colleague working with him on the same patrol team, was also dating the lady without his knowledge. When the sergeant got wind of the development, he confronted his girlfriend.

    As they were arguing, the jealous sergeant reportedly shot the lady twice in the chest. As onlookers tried to come to terms with the unfolding incident, the sergeant again shot his colleague, killing him. Onlookers fled, fearing the gun might turn on them. Having certified that the two were dead, the sergeant reportedly turned the gun on himself and fired a shot to die instantly.

     

    Other acts of trigger-happiness

     

    In May, an Assistant Superintendent of Police, identified as Mohammed, allegedly shot dead a tricycle driver, Akeem Aranse, during an argument at Akowonjo area, on the outskirt of Lagos.

    Mohammed was said to have boarded a commercial motorcycle (okada), which was hit by the tricyle operator on Karimu Laka Street in Egbeda.

    The incident reportedly led to an argument which degenerated. It was reported that passersby had tried to settle the skirmish, but the police officer remained adamant.

    The officer was said to have eventually brought out his pistol and shot the tricycle driver. Thirty-one-year-old Akeem, who was said to have been shot in the chest, reportedly died on the spot.

     

    Extra-judicially killed?

     

    On May 19, four police corporals Adeleke Adedeji, Abena John, Henry Shobowale and Oniyo Musa, who were reportedly investigating a case of armed robbery incident that took place in Agege, Lagos, went to Edo State as part of the investigation.

    They were on the trail of those who robbed Alhaji Babangida Isa of his Toyota car, mobile phones and other valuables. In Edo, they narrowed their trail to Benson Obode, who was found at the Aduwawa area of Benin. In the cause of arresting the suspect, who was accused of receiving the stolen car, he was shot and killed.

    Following a public protest by his family and some members of his community in Benin, a petition was written to the IGP, who ordered an investigation. The FCID consequently commenced investigation which led to the officers’ arrest.

     

     ‘Police killed our son’

     

    The late Ikechukwu
    The late Ikechukwu

    The family of a polytechnic student killed in Umuahia, Abia State on September 10, Ikechukwu Uwagbaokwu, accused policemen from the state command of the murder. They petitioned the state Commissioner of Police Joshak Habila over the gruesome murder of the 21-year-old Imo State Polytechnic student.

    The family alleged that on September 10, Uwagbaokwu, a Marketing student, went to bed at about 9:00pm but at about 10:50pm there were persistent banging on the door of their family house.

    Ten fierce-looking, uniformed policemen had taken strategic positions around the house. They reportedly came in a Hilux pickup van and black Camry Saloon car. When they broke open the first room, they did not see Uwagbaokwu. But on sighting him after forcing open the wooden door to his room, the policemen allegedly shot him. He died on the spot.

    The deceased’s father, Mr. Emmanuel Uwagbaokwu (54), said: “I am not suspecting, but those who killed my son were policemen from Ehimiri Police Station, Umuahia.

    “Immediately I reported the matter to Ehimiri Police Station and the DPO there denied sending his men to duty to that area that night, he, however, ordered some police team to follow us to the scene of the incident. On the way, the team dodged us and did not reach our house.”

    The state command have denied the killing and the family have urged the IGP to order an investigation into the incident.

     

    ‘Shot over N100 bribe’

     

    On August 7, a commercial bus driver in Port Harcourt, David Legbara, was shot and killed for allegedly refusing to part with N100 bribe. The policeman was said to be attached to Kala Station.

    The deceased’s wife was delivered of a baby boy two months after the murder.

    ThankGod Legbara...whose father was allegedly gunned down by an officer
    ThankGod Legbara…whose father was allegedly gunned down by an officer

    The baby, named ThankGod David Legbara, will grow up without a father, no thanks to a trigger-happy policeman.

    Legbara’s death led to huge protests. Angry commercial drivers under the aegis of Rivers State Association of Road Transport Workers took to the streets. Former Rivers State Commissioner of Police, Chris Ezike, in a statement, confirmed that a police officer on stop-and-search duty shot the victim.

    The widow, Gift, said: “That day I felt like dying. I said ‘God, where will I start from? I don’t have anybody. He was the only hope I had; he was the breadwinner of his family…

    “As a commercial driver, he drove another man’s vehicle and rendered account daily. But later he got a vehicle to drive on hire purchase and he had completed the terms of agreement, meaning that the bus now belonged to him before he was killed.”

     

    ‘Killed with a gun’s butt’

     

    It was reported on September 1 that police officers in Ondo State allegedly killed Aderonke Eze, a widow, who owns a beer parlor close to her residence in Akure. She was allegedly killed with a gun butt by police officers from the Ala unit of the Oda Divisional Police Station.

    After her death, the policemen allegedly dumped her remains at the General Hospital’s morgue in Akure. It was learnt that the killer police officers, seven in number, stormed the streets around 6:45pm in a Hilux van with plate number NPF 4236 B. Eyewitnesses said the policemen were in the habit of raiding the street and arresting young boys suspected to be marijuana, or “Indian hemp smokers.”

     

    Any way out?

     

    The above are just a few instances of how dangerous some police officers have become to the society. Speaking at the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Annual General Conference in Abuja, Arase said it was likely that some officers could be suffering from temporary insanity.

    He said it was likely that an officer, who had been standing in the sun for over 12 hours could go temporarily crazy. He urged the public to show understanding and not argue with or provoke such officers.

    Arase vowed to ensure that such officers are disciplined appropriately. But some analysts say more needs to be done beyond dismissing and prosecuting killer-cops.

    National Coordinator, Network on Police Reform in Nigeria (NOPRIN) Okechukwu Nwanguma, recalled that in 2006, a female Divisional Police Officer in Onitsha, Anambra State, tried to compound felony by covering up a police corporal, Daniel Ayuba, who shot dead a lady, Nkechi Obidigwe, at a police checkpoint on Zik’s Avenue, Fegge, Onitsha.

    It took an impartial investigation to indentify the killer police corporal, who confessed during an orderly room trial. The DPO had denied that her men were responsible and claimed that it was MASSOB members that shot the girl. The matter was later taken over by the State CID Awka following a petition by the family members and the public outrage it generated.

    Three officers at the checkpoint were fished out, arrested and detained. Autopsy revealed that a police bullet AK47 killed the victim.

    To rid the police of such excesses, Nwanguma believed there must be no cover-ups. He said: “It appears that the culture of cover up of crimes and stalling of prosecution is entrenched more within the Nigeria police than in other uniformed services.”

    The Police Service Commission, he said, should also be prompt in disciplining erring officers. He recalled that it took the PSC close to 15 months to discipline the DPO in charge of Pen Cinema, Agege, Olusegun Fabunmi, who allegedly shot Ademola Aderinto during the January 2012 fuel subsidy protests in Lagos.

    “The performance of the commission was dismal. Police accountability under the past PSC was practically absent. And this failure by the PSC to discharge its constitutional mandate of enforcing discipline and accountability within the police accounts for the impunity, which protects perpetrators,” he said.

    The NOPRIN chief said how decisive errant officers are dealt will help deter others. According to him, on September 20, 2012, a 36-year-old Ugochukwu Ozuah, an engineer, was allegedly shot and killed by a policeman five days after his wedding. The incident occurred on Gbagada Expressway, Lagos as the victim went to drop off a classmate. His killers are yet to be brought to book despite promises by the police hierarchy that they will be fished out and prosecuted.

    “Failure to bring perpetrators of abuse to account sustains the climate of impunity that encourages others to commit abuse. There is the need to streamline the various internal disciplinary procedures in the Nigerian Police Force into a manageable framework that could easily be used by aggrieved citizens seeking redress for police misconduct, as well as using data emanating from such mechanisms in tracking police officials, who are subjects of unusually high numbers of citizens’ complaints.

    “There is also the need to strengthen external oversight of the police. The PSC evinced under the Constitution and the PSC Act of 2001 is an independent and impartial institution. A body which is established with the constitutional mandate to recruit, promote and discipline all police personnel other than the IGP in an independent and impartial manner, is expected to be composed and headed by non partisan individuals of unquestionable integrity.

    “What we need is a civilian-led PSC that has the courage to investigate all public complaints and cases of police abuse. Appointing a retired Inspector-General undermines and subverts this mission and renders the PSC ultimately into another department of the NPF.

    “This is not good for the Police; it is inconsistent with the structure and purpose of the Constitution and the PSC Act of 2001; and defeats the whole essence of the establishment of the PSC as a civilian oversight body on policing in Nigeria,” Nwanguma said.

    He said it is wrong for the PSC to opt to refer all complaints of extrajudicial killing back to the police for investigation. He said there is also the need for the immediate review of Force Order 237 on the use of firearms.

    Nwanguma said there is also the need to continue the process of changing officers’ mentality which emphasised force, violence and brutality. Rather, officers should have a democratic mindset that emphasises service and partnership with the community they serve.

    President, Women Arise for Change, Dr. Joe Oke-Odumakin, who is involved in Comfort’s case, said the police should subject its officers to periodic psychiatric tests, as extrajudicial killings were becoming unbearable.

    She also wants the police to bear the cost of training children of victims sent to their early grave by the police.

     

    Lawyers’ views

     

    Akeredolu
    Akeredolu

    A former NBA president Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (SAN) said the fact that other ranks in the police have become a threat is no news. According to him, their pastime has always been to turn their guns on tax payers they are paid to protect and whose monies are used to procure the ammunition. He said officers need re-orientation.

    “A lot of work needs to be done to make officers and men of the NPF appreciate their role as the people’s police and not a police force. The word ‘force’ is certainly a misnomer in the present democratic dispensation.

    “Periodic psychiatric test is only desirable for suspicious officers and men.  But how well placed is the institution itself to detect derelicts among its rank?  An important question. Officers and men who are at the brink of flipping to the other side sure need great assistance.

    “Does the institution care for them?  Are they well placed to do the needful in ensuring that they operate under minimum favorable conditions that will support stable mental disposition? These are posers to ponder on.

    Akeredolu said where officers or other ranks run foul of the law, they should be properly indicted and tried. Their prosecution, he said, should not be left to the ordinary and usual police prosecutors, who are more likely to compromise.

    “The Office of the Federal Attorney-General in collaboration with the Police Service Commission must set up a special prosecution unit to handle grave matters of this nature involving the police and the people. Proper prosecution and commensurate conviction would certainly deter future occurrence.

    “Above all the Nigerian Police no doubt need full re-orientation from head to toe, starting from their recruitment criteria,” he added.

    For Dr Joseph Nwobike (SAN), the reason for the incessant killing of civilians by armed policemen and, lately, of

    Nwobike
    Nwobike

    policemen by armed policemen is the direct consequence of impunity and the failure of professional value system within the police.

    He said it was unfortunate that policemen, who by their training, ought to apply themselves and disposition towards the protection of lives and property now pose a risk and challenge to lives and property.

    “In the light of the above, periodic mental or psychiatric evaluation of policemen, even where carried out properly, will not impact on the trend. The reason is simple: there is no evidence that those policemen who unlawfully kill others suffer psychiatric ailments.

    “The solution requires integrated reordering of the value system amongst policemen. This will involve training and retraining of police officers and men on a continuous basis with a view to building a responsive policing culture,” Dr Nwobike said.

    Ofuokwu
    Ofuokwu

    Constitutional lawyer Mr Ike Ofuokwu described the conduct of trigger-happy policemen as a monumental national embarrassment, which has persisted for so many years because the victims, who are often innocent and helpless citizens, have taken it as a norm and crude way of life.

    “The defective criminal justice system has not in any way helped the situation with its very slow apparatus of administering justice. The police force itself are always foot dragging and reluctant to release recalcitrant officers to justice save when there is overwhelming public outcry.

    “Such policemen should be made to face trial speedily and maximum punishment inflicted whenever they are found guilty, in addition to making them pay compensation to the victims or their dependants.

    “Their DPO’s or supervising officers should also be demoted or summarily dismissed. In addition, subjecting all policemen at the point of recruitment to psychiatric test should be a condition precedent to engaging them.

    “Periodically all serving policemen and officers of the law, who carry arms, should be subjected to a yearly psychiatric evaluation.  Finally, it is long overdue for a fundamental overhaul of the Nigerian Police so as to align them with best global practice. What we have today majorly are bandits in police uniform,” Ofuokwu said.

     

  • ‘Day I spat fire in court’

    ‘Day I spat fire in court’

    Mr  Tope Alabi is a Lagos-based activist-lawyer. He is well known for his suit seeking the removal of controversial police chief Mbu Joseph Mbu. He also got a judgment against the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) banning imposition of fines on erring motorists, except by a mobile court. Alabi tells JOSEPH JIBUEZE what drives him.

    What motivated you to sue Mbu Joseph Mbu?

    I am a social crusader. I studied law, not to make money per se, but to defend the cause of the poor masses. This is my calling. I sued Mbu Joseph Mbu because of the statement he made that for every policeman killed, the lives of 20 to 100 civilians would go in exchange. To say the least, it was an inciting statement that could have caused mass killings of civilians, including myself. To prevent such occurrence, I sued him. Actually, I was not asking for his head, but to checkmate him and other lawless police officers, who believe that with their uniform, they can do whatever they like as if they are above the law.

    What about the FRSC?

    I sued FRSC for violating the provisions of the Constitution and ignorance of the provisions of the Federal Roads Safety Commission (Establishment Act) 2007 and the National Roads Traffic Regulation 2012. The law says driving with shattered windshield or without windscreen is illegal, but they arrested me because of a cracked windscreen. Its men directed me to pay a fine without justification or court trial. I won the case at the Federal High Court Lagos. We are now on appeal.

    What was your most memorable day in court?

    That was when I appeared in the FRSC case and that of Mbu. The senior lawyers, who represented the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, the National Assembly and FRSC will not forget how we spat fire at each other.

    What was your worst day in court?

    My worst day in court was the day judgment in the Mbu case was delivered without hearing notice, even when our motion to adduce further evidence was still pending. I was sad because judgment was delivered when the case was yet to be concluded and Mbu escaped punishment.

    What kind of person do you think should be appointed Attorney-General of the Federation?

    An AGF should not be for cash and carry. The position should be for someone with specified expertise and demonstrable competence. It should also be for a person with clean record. It should be for someone who has achieved credit in the legal profession. It should be someone, who can prosecute corrupt politicians without fear or favour, not someone who will embark on selective prosecution.

    If you were to recommend, who would it be?

    I will strongly recommend Femi Falana (SAN). I believe he is an honest man, who will not compromise. He has contributed immensely to the legal profession. His appointment will add credibility to the government of the day. I am very sure he will sanitise the legal profession and the judiciary and help rid Nigeria of corruption.

     Who are your role models in rights activism?

    The late Gani Fawehinmi (SAN), Falana and my mentor Kunle Adegoke.

    What challenges do you face as a young activist?

    One problem is the issue of locus standi. When former House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal was facing political challenges, I prepared a case to stop the police and the Federal Government from harassing him, but I could not go forward because I found it difficult to reach Tambuwal to sign the affidavit in support of the originating process. Besides that, I have several public interest cases I would like to litigate on, but I do not have sufficient financial capacity to pursue them. I am still a young lawyer.

    Is that all?

    I also face the challenge of my colleagues, who are aiding criminals to escape the axe of the law. For instance, a client was defrauded of millions of naira. The fraudster was ready to refund the money and directed his lawyer to negotiate with us. Instead of negotiating, the lawyer went to court to file for enforcement of right to stop the process.

    What is your advice to other young lawyers?

    They should be focused. They should pursue the knowledge first; money will come later. I got a good training under Dr Muiz Banire (SAN). I also learnt from my mentors, such as Adegoke, Taiwo Kupolati, Falana, Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN) and Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), who is a father to me.

    If you were not a lawyer, what would you likely have been?

    A teacher.

    Where do you see yourself in the next 10 years?

    I don’t like the bench. I don’t see myself being a judge. But I pray I become a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) as well as a Senior Advocate of the Masses (SAM).

     

  • Family petitions Lagos Assembly over land

    The Orudu family of Ibeju-Lekki has asked the Lagos State House of Assembly to discountenance a protest recently staged on the premises of the assembly by some families over the ownership of some parcels of land in Ibeju-Lekki.

    Writing through their counsel, Chief Yemi Ogundele, the family asked the speaker of the state assembly to, in the alternative, allow the law to take its course in the matter.

    In their petition dated September 18, and addressed to the Speaker of the Assembly, Hon. Obasa, the Orudu family accused the protesters and their leaders of mounting a campaign of calumny against them.

    They contended that the protest, which they claimed was led by parties in matters pending in the court, was contemptous of the court processes as   issues raised by the protesters are subject matter in two suits pending before two high courts in the state.

    The family, which claimed to be the original and traditional owners of Orudu villages including Ayeteju, Ofiran, Oke Olokun, Igando Orudu and Alakun, said the land matter is the subject in  Suit No LD/368LM/2015 between Alhaji Sikiru Yusuf and others versus Mr. Theophilius Oyafunke and 23 others before Justice Abisoye Bashua of High Court 2, Epe.

    They also said a chieftaincy matter in suit No ID/1928/2011 between Chief Waheed Arepo and 24 others and Onibeju of Ibeju, Oba Rafiu Salami and five others is still pending before Justice Hakeem Oshodi of Lagos.

    Prior to the protest at the assembly complex, the protesters alleged that the other parties in the suit before the court had earlier used the police to arrest them for armed robbery, including a 90-year-old matriach of the family, Alhaja (chief) Basiratu Balogun.

    They claimed that the other party, using an Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sola Akinyede, who wrongly briefed the Assitant Inspector General (AIG) Joseph Mbu on the true situation of the matter.

    They said the charges brought against 22 members of the Orudu families were later struck out following the advice of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) as “no prima facie”  case could be established against them for illegal possession of fire arms.

    They stated that from time immemorial, the villages of Ayeteju, Ofiran, Oke Olokun, Igando Orudu and Alakun were founded by their progenitor,  Madam Orudu, a powerful slave trader and farmer about 300 years ago.

    According to their account, Madam Orudu migrated from Epe towards Ibeju of the present day following salt scarcity in Epe.

    While migrating and because she was powerful, they claimed she put a slave in charge of her farms.

    “The slave in-charge of Ayeteju was Oyafunke, Ilari-Ogun Ajia was the slave in-charge of Ofiran, while Alimi was in-charge of Oke-Olokun.

    “It is now an irony that because the true owners of the land, the Orudu family, are legally protesting the indiscriminate sales of their land by impostors and descendants of these slaves, they now decide to malign the character of the owners,” the petition stated.

    To support their claim, they referred the Assembly to the ‘Intelligence Report in Ibeju Area in Epe District of the colony’ as  reported in file no 29664-S3 and a report on the administrative re-organisation of the Ibeju clan in Epe district of the colony as reported by. E.J. Gibbons.

    “The pertinent question is, why are they afraid of the court actions if they are sure of their holdings? Why not wait for the court to decide?,” they asked.

    The Orudu family contended however, that no amount of police intimidation or blackmail will make them surrender their heritage to impostors.

     

  • ‘Save us from police harassment’

    ‘Save us from police harassment’

    A Lagos lawyer, Mr. Bamidele  Ogundele, has asked the Inspector-General of Police, Solomon Arase to call to order some of his officers, who harass and terrorise some community leaders in the Lekki Area of Lagos State over land disputes.

    Ogundele, in a Save Our Soul (SOS) letter written on behalf of the community leaders, alleged that a certain Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Mr. Oyinlola Adeoye of the X Squad, Force Criminal Investigation Department, Alagbon, Ikoyi, Lagos, always allow himself to be used in terrorising some principal members of the Dada Bakare Family of Abijo Town, Ibeju Lekki Local Government Area of Lagos State.

    The petition, which was jointly signed by the counsels to the family, Ogundele and Raimi Oluwaseyi Nojeen alleged that the DCP Adeoye has been using his officers  to terrorise the community. They warned that his actions, if not checked, “are capable of causing a breach of the peace, lawlessness or outright anarchy”.

    The Dada Bakare family of Abijo claimed to be  the traditional owners of a large parcel of land totalling 75,000 hectares  at Abijo Village, which was officially Gazetted by the Lagos State Government with No. 55 Volume 40 of 2007 and which is the  subject matter in suit number LD/2308/2011 before a Lagos High Court.

    The family said it was surprised when a certain Alhaji Akeeb A. Adams, a native of Lamgbasa Village in the same Ibeju Lekki, allegedly invaded their property with some land grabbers to take over their land without the consent or authority of the family.

    They alleged further that the said Alhaji Akeeb “engaged” the services of the DCP Adeoye, who they claimed has been giving security backing to the illegal and unconstitutional actions of the hoodlums hired by Alhaji Adams.

    “DCP Adeoye personally led a police patrol team to take over the Dada Bakare family land at Abijo Town without a Court Order or Execution of Court Order despite the suit pending in court by the Dada Bakare family in LD/2308/2011 against Alhaji Akeeb Alarape Adams & Ors for the illegal trespass.

    “Several members of the Dada Bakare Family including Mr. Raimi Oluwaseyi Nojeem, Mrs. Sikiratu Aduni Lawal, Chief Sadiku Noah, Mr. Kamoru Suleiman, Mr. Waheed Aluko and Mr. Sheriff Sulaimon were intimidated, harassed and arrested by the OC X Squad team without any justification.

    “Coupled with this, the rights of the Dada Bakare Family members to human dignity, liberty and freedom of movement as guaranteed by Section 34, 35 and 41(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) as well as Article 4, 5, 6 and 12 of the African Charter of Human and People’s Right Law of the Federation 2004, were curtailed and violated on several occasions.

    “We forward a petition to the office of the Inspector-General of Police and our matter was assigned to the P.R.O Department of Force CID, Area 10, Abuja and the case file of X Squad, Force CID, Alagbon, Ikoyi, Zone 2, Onikan and Area J. Ajiwe Police Headquarters were all retrieved for discreet and God-fearing investigation,” the petition stated.

    The family alleged that despite the intervention of the Inspector General of Police and transfer of the case file, DCP Adeoye still continues to harass and intimidate them at the alleged instigation of Alhaji Akeeb Alarape Adams.

     

     

     

  • Lawyer hails Ayade on aptitude test for appointees

    Lawyer hails Ayade on aptitude test for appointees

    An Abuja-based lawyer and arbitrator, Dr. Dorn cKlaimz  Enamhe,  has praised Cross River  State Governor, Prof. Ben Ayade for introducing aptitude tests for appointees.

    He said the decision to subject  nominees of political appointment  to mandatory integrity and aptitude tests before forwarding their names to the House of Assembly for confirmation was a welcome development.

    In a chat with our correspondent, Enamhe said: “ It ought to be a thing of joy and relief, considering that for the first time, there will be a dispassionate way of assessing prospective commissioners, Special Assistants and other officers of the state  with a view to identifying their peculiar strengths and weaknesses.

    “It will also assist to identify the mental alertness of those who will assist the erudite governor to drive the vision and  policies of his administration rather than merely juggling a list submitted by political leaders at ward, local government and state levels.

    “Come to think of it, is this not what past governors did, howbeit, mentally and without a definite format? Isn’t it a plus that now there will be specific considerations known to all three members of the committee headed by a learned Senior Advocate  of Nigeria, Mr. Paul Erokoro who should submit a report based on pure facts in addition to the fact that the nominees have been recommended?”

    Commenting on President Muhammadu Buhari’s botched visit to Cross River State, Dr. Enamhe said: “ There are many lessons to learn here,  it’s great to know that a breach of procedure can be curbed by a lot of things  in Nigeria like what just happened.

    “The Environmental Impact Assessment ( EIA)  is ongoing and should be completed without event. Certainly, there cannot be such an adverse impact that would warrant the project being stopped, especially as the road does not affect our forest reserves as many people would like to believe in order to further criticise Professor Ben Ayade.

    “The governor is a Professor of Environmental Law, whose programmes are environment and people-friendly. For instance, he recently provided for the recruitment of more than 500 people into the Green Police whose main responsibility is to guard our forests, our biodiversity, ecosystems and ensure sanitation in the state

    “The other day, he led others to clean up the capital city, Calabar and this he has done several times.

    “Also he has been in the forefront of making sure civil servants come to work early. He has set a standard in the state by being there before the rest.

    “He has also personally made sure that salaries that were owed were cleared and is in the process of clearing the remaining backlog of salaries. He negotiated with the Judiciary workers and got them to call off their several months strike which paralysed the courts in the state like many other states of the Federation.”

    On the challenge of child labour and prostitution  in the state, Dr. Enamhe said: “The State Government has a  programme tagged: “Operation  Skolombo” to take care of them.

    “The government recently cleared  Calabar  of the menace of  street  prostitution  and other social vices, showing clearly his no-nonesence intolerance for social menace.

    “It is more pertinent now than ever, so  all hands  must  be on deck to give our governor the expected support. He has kept his word, the materials for the garment industry have already hit the ground and, but for a few technical issues that are now being resolved, the Super Highway project would have gone very far.”