Category: Law

  • Judicial workers suspend strike Judicial workers

    Judicial workers suspend strike Judicial workers

    The   Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN)  has suspended its strike.

    Its President, Comrade Mustapha Adamu made this known on Sunday.

    The union had billed to resume the strike on Thursday. It was aimed at pressing for better welfare of its members.

    Earlier, the 36 attorneys-general had appealed to judicial workers to reconsider their decision to resume their strike on October 2.

    The plea was contained in a communique issued after a meeting of the attorneys-general in Lagos.

    It was signed by the Chairman and Ondo State Attorneys-General and Commissioner for Justice Mr. Eyitayo Jegede (SAN) and Secretary, Nasarawa State, Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Innocent Lagi.

    The adopted the strike option to enforce the judgment of a federal high court, delivered by the Hon. Justice A.F.A Ademola against the National Judicial Council(NJC) and 73 other defendants on the funding of the Judiciary.

    The body of attorneys-general reviewed the initial strike and picketing of the courts by the JUSUN.

    It decried the practice where  judges, magistrates and litigants were locked out of court under the pretext of enforcing court judgment.

    It said the development portends  danger to justice administration.

    It said the industrial action had a negative effect of depriving awaiting trial detainees of their liberty and access to justice.

    The body reviewed the issue of Taxes and Levies (Approved List) Collection Act, 1998 and the mounting of roadblocks by various council tax collectors across the country.

    It supported the President’s directive to the Inspector-General of Police to dismantle all roadblocks set up for the enforcement of revenue collection.

    The union condemned the attack on a judge in Ekiti State, urging that the matter be probed by the police and culprits punished.

     

  • Mediation centre seeks to increase settlement rate

    Mediation centre seeks to increase settlement rate

    As part of activities marking its 15th anniversary, the Citizens’ mediation Centre (CMC), Lagos has launched a new strategic plan for another four years.  ADEBISI ONANUGA reports. 

    THE Citizens’ Mediation Centre (CMC), an agency of the Lagos State Ministry of Justice, has marked its 15th anniversary.

    The occasion, tagged a stakeholders’ conference, held at the Adeyemo Bero hall of the State Secretariat, Alausa, Ikeja. It coincided with the launching of  a new four-year (2014-2018) strategic plan of the agency.

    The agency was inaugurated in 1999 by  former governor Bola Tinubu.  It took off as a  unit from one room in the Directorate I of the Ministry of Justice. Since then, it has grown with the passing of Lagos State Citizens’ Mediation Centre Law 2003 and become a model for Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) for other states.

    Today, the centre boasts of offices in 14 locations in the state – Agege, Amukoko, Bariga, Ikotun, Ikorodu, Badagry, Ibeju Lekki, Ikotun, Iba, Ojo, Oshodi, Alimosho, Yaba and Lagos Island.

    For the CMC, its anniversary provided it with an opportunity to showcase its achievements.

    A beneficiary, the Olojo of Ojo Kingdom, Oba Adeniyi Rufai,   told the audience that about two years ago, he dragged some of his tenants to the agency for failing to pay their rents. He said the tenants, after the mediatory role played by the CMC, not only agreed to pay but that they left the place as his friends.

    Oba Rufai, who said the relationship between him and the tenants, had remained cordial since then, said the staff of  the centre were wonderful as they saved him the huge cost he would have incurred as professional fees for lawyers, if the matter had been taken to court.

    In a documentary on the achievements of the centre, Justice Latifat A. F. Oluyemi, recalled a case that had lasted 15 years in the court without  a resolution. She said when herself and her team took over the matter, they resolved it in three months. She said the beauty of the ADR was that the meetings were held behind doors and ensured confidentiality.

    Justice Sodoten Sosi Ogunsanya said cases go through the ADR process in Lagos and that mediation is held in a peaceful environment. She said mediation provides parties the opportunity of stating  their minds and getting their disputes resolved.

    A former Attorney-General of the state, Dapo Sasore, attested to the efficacy of the system and had  several land, tenant and property disputes resolved through mediation.

    Also testifying to the gains of the centre, Governor Babatunde Fashola (SAN), in a keynote address,  disclosed that the centre recovered N1.5 billion on behalf of Lagosians, who sought the assistance of the agency, to recover their entitlements between January 2008 and August, this year.

    The governor, who was represented by the Commissioner for Commerce, Mrs. Olusola Oworu,  said this  year alone, the centre settled  14,297 cases.

    He noted that  but for the CMC, the cases would have ended up in court, thereby adding to the already congested dockets of the judges and contributing to justice delay.

    He said the number of cases handled by the CMC also represented the number of citizens, who, for reasons of poverty, ignorance or fear, would not have had access to justice despite that they have pecuniary claims and other enforceable legal rights.

    Fashola said his administration would remain committed to ensuring that no citizen of the state is deprived of justice on account of financial status or geographical location.

    He said this  decision was “anchored on the principle that injustice to one Lagosian that goes without redress is injustice to all Lagosians”.

    He said the principle of justice for all Lagosians would be achieved through the CMC, Office of the Public Defender (OPD) and other related agencies.

    The governor commended the director of the CMC and her team, as well as her predecessors and other support staff on how they worked  over the years, stressing: “Their constant commitment and sense of responsibility are highly commendable.”

    He expressed conviction that the stakeholders’ meeting would enable the centre “steps up to the next level and attain its full potential”.

    The Attorney-General, Ade Ipaye, who was represented by the Solicitor-General, Lawal Pedro(SAN), in a welcome address, said mediation has helped resolve many cases that would have ended up in courts, thereby taking a very long time to resolve.

    Pedro said the people of the state embraced mediation because of its benefits of ensuring confidentiality, particularly in family matters.

    Pedro said the system helps to create a win-win situation for both the aggrieved and the aggressor as they would leave the place as friends as against adversaries.

    The Director of CMC, Mrs. Oluwatoyin Odusanya, said the achievements of the centre within the 15 years of its existence attested to the fact that the aim of the government to ensure that the people of the state have access to justice was being achieved.

    Mrs Odusanya explained that the strategic plan sets out the modalities for training and re-training of the administrators to ensure that they are equipped to meet international standard, among other plans. The CMC director said the new strategic plan has three major goals.

    According to her,  the first goal is to become a household name in Lagos, recognised for speedy and free dispute resolution by 2018.  Under this goal, she said five new centres would be created, yearly, in the state by  2018 while there would be increased sensitisation  to reach all areas covered by the unit.

    Mrs  Odusanya said the plan, under the second goal, is to increase settlement rate and level of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) compliance by 25 per cent by 2018. Under this goal, she said they would develop standards for effective mediation, train 80 per cent of mediators and support staff by 2015.

    The director said the plan was to achieve 90 per cent user satisfaction of mediation as a viable means of dispute resolution by 2018.  This, she said, was being done to ensure that CMC units meet minimum agreed standards of facilities for user satisfaction, develop and implement  an operational  public complaints system by 2017 and to introduce staggered mediation appointment system in all units in order to reduce waiting time of users by about 80 per cent among others.

    The Head of Service, Mrs. Seyi Williams, attested that the people of Lagos have tested mediation and there was a great demand for the system to resolve their disputes.

    She said there was the need for sensitisation of the public on the benefits of mediation for the people who cannot afford the cost of litigation in court. She said a lot of people were still being maltreated but that they do not know where to get redress.

  • NBA president tasks SANs on ethics, professionalism

    NBA president tasks SANs on ethics, professionalism

    LAWYERS have been urged to  maintain high standards.Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) PresidentMr. Augustine Alegeh (SAN) made the call at a dinner he organised for the 17 new Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja.

    The SANs were sworn in earlier on that day at the Supreme Court Chambers by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mariam Aloma Mukhtar.

    All the new SANs attended the swearing-in and were presented with the stamp and seal of their offices by Alegeh.

    Dr Fabian Ajogwu (SAN) told  the SANs about their duties and obligations, saying they owe a duty first to the association and their colleagues, their clientele and the nation.

    He emphasised the urgent need for decorum and integrity, particularly in their  practice.

    Advising the lawyers on the need to be professional and exemplary, the President, Court of Appeal, Justice Zainab Bukachuwa said they must always demontrate high standards of ethics.

    “As Ministers in the temple of Justice, lawyers should always demonstrate high ethical standards, they should uphold the principles of the rule of law and respect for the judiciary.’’

    Similarly, NBA’s former President, Chief Okpoko (SAN), emphasised that the new silks have a role to play in the upliftment of the legal profession and the family.

    He called on the new SANs not to see their elevation as opportunity to make money; but rather, they should see it as an opportunity to serve humanity and  contribute to nation building.

    This dinner, which was described as novel, was attended by prominent Bar leaders, including the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN); his predecessor, Chief Michael Kaase Andoakaa (SAN), former NBA presidents, including, Chief T. J. N. Okpoko (SAN), OCJ Okocha (SAN), Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), Chief Bayo Ojo (SAN), Lanke Odogiyan (SAN).

    Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN) and  Dele Adesina, who had earlier contested the Presidency of the NBA with Alegeh (SAN),   were also present.

    Former General Secretaries of the association, who attended the dinner, include: Chief Philip Umeh, Dele Adesina (SAN), Lawal Rabana (SAN), Ibrahim Eddy Mark, Emeka JP Obegolu and the incumbent General Secretary, Mazi Afam Osuigwe  and all national officers of the association.

     

  • Printers urge INEC to obey laws on printing regulation

    Printers urge INEC to obey laws on printing regulation

    The Chartered Institute of Professional Printers of Nigeria (CIPPON) may sue the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over the violation of laws on printing of electoral materials.

    INEC is said to have voted about N6billion for the printing of ballot papers meant for the presidential and governorship election slated for February next year.

    The contract, it was learnt, would be awarded to American or European printing firms.

    It was reported that top INEC officials would visit the United States of America, Germany, Italy, and Ukraine to inspect elite printing companies which can handle the job, classified as ‘security documents’ by the commission.

    But CIPPON said patronising foreign firm does only lead to capital flight, which is contrary to existing laws, but INEC’s lack of trust in the country’s printers is untenable and illegal.

    The Desk Officer to CIPPON at the Ministry of Information, Mr Sunday Baba, urged the institute to sue INEC for allegedly violating the law.

    Baba, who represented Minister of Information Mr Labaran Maku, spoke at a  printers’ seminar organised by CIPPON in Lagos, with the theme: Printing regulation – a vehicle for national development.

    “If it means going to court to seek interpretation of the Act, please do so to force INEC to look inwards,” he said.

    Baba said it is left for the printers’ institute for fight for their right. “The fight is yours if you want to stand your ground. You’re like an orphan. If you keep quiet you will starve to death.

    “Nigeria belongs to al of us. Get a good lawyer. Sue INEC. Do whatever you have to do so that some of these billions will spill over to you,” Baba added.

    Section 7 (g) of the CIPPON Act 2007 empowers the institute to proffer advice to the federal and state governments on printing activities, while Section 7 (k) directs it to collate, process and disseminate printing data and information within and outside Nigeria.

    Section 23 (1) (b) says CIPPON shall ensure that no firm or partnership shall practice as printers in Nigeria unless registered by the council while Section 7 (i) mandates the institute to provide consultancy services to the public on printing.

    A former Chairman, House Committee on Judiciary, Mr Bala Ibn Na’Allah, represented by Mr Kenneth Ugwu, a lawyer, urged the police and other law enforcement agencies to help in the enforcement of the CIPPON Act.

    “Apart from the police, the judiciary is also an important player in this project. Our courts will need to apply to purposive interpretation approach (call it the mischief rule) to the enforcement of this law, i.e, by looking at the mischief (the situation) which the law was meant to address and giving the law the kind of interpretation which will achieve rather defeat that purpose.

    “That approach is the growing trend in judicial interpretation today the world over and Nigeria cannot afford to be an exception.

    “This approach places more emphasis on the merits of the case as against unnecessary, sometimes ridiculous technicalities, which are meant to defeat rather than promote the cause of justice,” he said.

    CIPPON’s President/Chairman-in-council Mr Wahab Aderemi Muhammed Lawal, said for the institute to provide advice to the government, it must be represented in its agencies.

    He said INEC has no reason to take printing jobs outside the country. “Printers in Nigeria are well-equipped. I see no reason jobs should be taken out. It is the same machines that are used abroad that we use in Nigeria. The institute can guarantee any licensed printer to handle printing of electoral materials,” Lawal said.

    On whether sensitive materials can be printed in Nigeria, Lawal said: “They’re just giving it a name to take these jobs out of Nigeria. What is ‘sensitive’ in electoral materials when we print cheque books, annual reports and accounts; we print all other confidential documents and certificates here.

    “We want the government to fully comply with this law. It means the institute must be represented in INEC, Universal Basic Education (UBE), National Population Commission (NPC) and other agencies where they use 70 to 80 printed materials.”

  • ‘How to defeat Boko Haram, rescue Chibok girls’

    ‘How to defeat Boko Haram, rescue Chibok girls’

    As the military and Boko Haram insurgents battle for the control of some towns in the Northeastern states of Borno, Yobe  and Adamawa, a Lagos lawyer, Kunle Uthman, examines the sect’s origin and its activities. He gives tips on how to rescue the Chibok school girls abducted by the group last April. 

    •Continued from last week

    It is clear and obvious that we are once again back to the era of Youth Earnestly Yearn For Abacha.  The result of that woeful exercise has been properly chronicled by historians as the dark era of our nation’s political history and it is apposite that the present “Sovereign” avoid the pitfalls and the resultant effects of such irresponsible and appalling conduct. As a people we need to be better focused and realize that power is transient.  There an obligation to rule with the fear of God.

    Abimbola Adelagun in an article titled “Youths Earnestly Ask For Goodluck Jonathan, stated that in respect of Ibrahim Babangida and Sani Abacha’s failed civilian transfigurations, President Goodluck Jonathan is being endorsed by vainglorious organizations.  The new kid on the block is the Transformation Ambassadors of Nigeria (TAN) that seek to sell the Goodluck Jonathan candidature to Nigerians.  They have collected 1.8 million signatures in the South West; 1.6 million in the South East and 4.15 million in the South South.  The irony of these beg-the-President-to-contest movements is that like all fly-by-night ideas, none has outlived its promoted candidate.  It is therefore a spurious waste of scare resources to engage in these charade of persuasion of collation of dubious signatures, endorsed tacitly and covertly by an high ranking official as the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, whose posture in receiving these signatures is a  clear testimony of a lazy public official, whose pre-occupation is to vacate his office and engage in meaningless activities that debase the institution of government, moreso in a country in a semi State of warfare.

    Chinua Achebe in analysing the prediction of the American government that Nigeria would be a failed state by 2015, put it in proper perspective when he defined a failed State as one that is unable to perform its duties on several levels; when violence cascades into an all-out internal war, when standards of living massively deteriorate, when the infrastructure of ordinary life decays, and when the greed of rulers overwhelms their responsibilities to better their people and their surroundings.

    Experts say many Northern Nigerians view the presidency of Goodluck Jonathan, a Christian, as illegitimate, arguing that he ignored an informal power rotation agreement that should have kept a muslim as President. President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, a muslim, died in 2010, two years into his four year tenure and Jonathan assumed office to complete the uncompleted term, he being the Vice President at that time.  He, Goodluck Jonathan has further contested and won an election for four years, which would be completed in 2015.  If Jonathan wins the Presidential election in 2015, or if there are no elections in 2015 because of social unrest in Northern-Nigeria, political tensions in Nigeria will increase.  So writes Campbell in his book ‘Nigeria: Dancing on the Brink’.  He further submitted that the “formal politics” of Northern Nigeria are “overwhelmingly dominated by muslim elites, who have, like their counterpart across the country, benefited from oil wealth at the expenses of regional development.  He says that the central purpose of the Nigerian State is to divide up the country’s oil wealth among elites, making Nigeria’s politics a “zero-sum game”.

    Is Nigeria a failed or failing State?  Is it not obligatory for our leaders, or the Sovereign to exercise the enormous powers entrusted in him by the constitution and the several legislations and can the present crop of political leaders guarantee the safety of lives and properties of the citizenry or are we as a people doomed to perdition because of bad leadership? Will the political gerrymandering and obsession by our leaders to perpetuate themselves in power blindfold them from seeing the urgency to solve the insurgency in the north and to secure the timeous release of the Chibok Girls from captivity and return them to their families?

    It is gratifying to note that Austin Alegeh (SAN), the President of the Nigerian Bar Association in his inaugural acceptance speech identified the problem of insecurity & Boko Haram insurgency as some of the problems bedeviling the Nigerian nation and unresolved by the Sovereign and his security apparatus.  The country needs a very dynamic and focus Bar Association leadership.  Lawyers by their calling are oblige to safeguard democratic institutions and the constitution and they have eminently discharged this responsibility in the past. We must be alive to our responsibilities and in unspeakable terms ensure that our leaders appreciate that ultimate power belongs to the people.  Our leaders, both elected and imposed are trustees of these enormous powers.  There is a social contract between them and us to ensure good governance and security of our lives and properties.  The era of profligate conversion of the resources of the state into personal wealth is the epitome of bad leadership and we have, like a cursed nation been unfortunate to be led at almost all level of governance by people who are not God fearing and who have continuously determined our fortunes and social and economic future within the context of a cabal.

    The limit of Sovereign power is concisely stated St. Thomas Aguinas (1225-74) who postulated that by his ‘oath of his coronation’ a king was supposed to have made a pact with his people, to promote a happy and virtuous life, and if he failed to fulfill his implied pact with his people he ceased to deserve that the pact be kept by the latter.

    The modern day President and Commander-in-Chief is that Sovereign above alluded to, who assumes this role upon taking his oath of office in accordance with the constitution.  Therefore, it is not the numbers of signatures gathered foolhardily that ingratiates the Sovereign in the minds of the people or the annals of history, but how he is able to provide the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Democracy as a system of government is where the people exercise their governing power through representatives periodically elected by them.  A State is therefore a democracy, if it provides institutions for the expression and in the last analysis, the supremacy of the popular will on the basic questions of social direction and policy, Nigerian as a geographical configuration  has a population of more than 170m people, and it is obligatory that our leaders at all levels of governance allow their performances to determine their eligibility for re-election and not through a dubious collection or collation of signatures when there are National emergencies that portend dangers.

    What do our leaders envision for our country and its people?  Let us take a clue from South Africa and the emergence of the iconic Nelson Mandela, a lawyer and statesman, our salvation at these times resides in a vocal, vibrant and critical NBA and populace to set the agenda for good governance.

    The government should continue to apply force so as to keep the Boko Haram Terrorist Group under pressure, on the run and on the defensive.  This should be followed by tracing sources of their funding and identifying sponsors. Though military and police pressure can drive terrorism into extinction, political problems could also require political solution.  The State should in open trial prosecute and humiliate terrorists and secure their due prosecution and imprisonment to serve as a detterence to others as a haven where there is no hiding place.  Enabling laws should be enacted and statutory provisions further strengthened to ensure expeditious prosecution and a deviation from the slow and snail pace of ordinary prosecution in regular courts.

    The amnesty solution applied in the Nigeria Delta region should be considered to resolve the menace of Boko Haram, only if the leaders would recent, lay down their arms, and come out to meet the government by surrender, because amnesty can only be given to identifiable persons.  Dr. David Oladimeji Alao and Oluwafisayo Atere in their publication titled ‘Boko Haram Insurgence in Nigeria: The Challenges and Lessons’, an article in the Singaporean Journal of Business Economics, And Management Studies, stated that the terrorists acts of Boko Haram since 2009 have created a state of palpable fear in Nigeria and beyond, while the helpless posture of government is worrisome.  It was found that insurgence was a manifestation of frustration on account of national political, religious and economic systems while the institutional mechanism adopted in managing the crisis was defective.  They wrote that the challenges are not insurmountable but a reflection of a weak State.

    The learned authors’ recommends the review of the Federal Government’s approach to handling political or other related crisis as peace approach is more successful than security approach.  The use of force with the intent of eliminating or suppressing opponents is like operating under security approach that often ends up in generating greater violence.  Peace approach often wants to see the opponents as potential friends if the situation is carefully handled.

    The government should involve the cross section of Northern Emirs and prominent individuals in a genuine dialogue with the leaders of the group.  The traditional rulers and local notables in each local government within the nation must be effectively accommodated into the local policing provided they were not imposed by government on helpless communities.  In addition, the government must be tolerant of opposing views as the security of the Nation is the collective responsibility of all of us, its citizens irrespective of political, religious or ethnic affiliation.  I totally agree with Joseph Siegle in his article ‘Boko Haram and the Isolation of Northern Nigeria: Regional and International Politics’ when he stated that the challenges posed by Boko Haram are emblematic of an emerging security paradigm in Africa today where local grievances are fused with international ideology, funding, and technology.  Effectively addressing the multi-layers of this threat will require the creative engagement of Nigeria’s neighbours and international partners.

    It is, therefore, necessary that our governments at all levels should treat with utmost priority their obligations to provide security of lives and properties within all the segments of the Nigerian Nation.  All efforts should be properly co-ordinated to rescue the innocent adolescent girls kidnapped in Chibok and our politicians and political parties should forthwith stop this drama of multiple accusations, unsupported by any empirical proof that certain high ranking government officials are sponsors of the insurgency in the Northern part of Nigeria, killing and maiming of innocent citizens including foreigners.  If there is any proof of funding of terrorism within the Nigerian Nation, relevant information should be supplied to the security agencies who should timeously deal with the culprits. Our Nation is at the brink of a precipice and we all, collectively as a people rescue it for the immediate benefit of ourselves and to secure the future of our children yet unborn.

    Our President and the security apparatus of State should decisively bring the Boko Haram menace to an end, as was done in the Niger Delta, where security of lives and properties has been restored after several years of kidnapping, vandalization of properties, destroying of oil-wells and capital flight within that region.  International assistance should be sought and obtained from other nations of the world who have been able to bring terrorism to an end.  The time to act is now.

     

    •Concluded

  • Desecrating the temple of justice

    Desecrating the temple of justice

    Twice in four days, the Ekiti State High Court was attacked by thugs believed to be loyal to Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governor-elect Mr Ayo Fayose. A judge was beaten up in an unprecedented act of hooliganism in the temple of justice. His suit was torn. The Chief Judge’s court was invaded, his staff roughened up and his record book shredded. To forestall further attacks, all courts have been shut indefinitely. wLawyers and activists are calling for the trial of Fayose and the perpetrators. But Fayose has denied involvement in the incidents. Will the perpetrators go scot-free? All eyes are on the judiciary to preserve its dignity, reports JOSEPH JIBUEZE.

    Twice in four days, judicial activities were disrupted by thugs in Ekiti State last week. The hoodlums broke  into the court, ransacked offices, destroyed records and attacked staff and judges with the tacit support of the police and other security agents.

    There has been outrage over the incidents, described as desecration of the temple of justice. Will the thugs, believed to be loyal to the Ekiti Governor-elect, Mr Ayo Fayose, be brought to book? Some lawyers are calling for the prosecution of Fayose, who seemingly justified the attacks but denied involvement. He was in the court when the attacks were perpetrated.

    The lawyers urged the judiciary to unite and resist intimidation. An example, they said, must be made of the perpetrators. Failure to punish those responsible, they argued, will set a bad precedent, endanger the rule of law, erode the judiciary’s integrity and encourage political urchins to beat up judges at will to intimidate and silence them.

    The first attack

    Last Monday was like a movie scene. Justice Isaac Ogunyemi of Court Six declared that he had jurisdiction to entertain the cases of the Citizens Popular Party (CPP) and Adeniyi Ajakaye and others challenging Fayose’s eligibility to contest the June 21 election, which he “won”.

    The hoodlums openly disagreed with the ruling. They sang songs to condemn the decision, and threatened to deal with the judge, who was said to have been protected by a special group of about six officers from the Riot Squad.

    However, panicky lawyers, litigants and officials ran out of the court room, screaming as scores of thugs hurled missiles at them. The police, apparently overwhelmed by the violence, looked helpless as windows were smashed and furniture broken. Those perceived to be obstructing the thugs’ aspirations were dragged on the courtroom’s floor and dealt with, using all sorts of objects.

    Judges, lawyers including Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), journalists and other court officials ran for dear lives, hiding in offices, court registries, under chairs, tables, or anything that could serve as temporary hideouts, as the hoodlums ran amok.

    The second attack 

    The outrage over the first attack was yet to abate when, three days later, an army of thugs, unleashed violence on the court again. This time, Justice John Adeyeye was beaten up and his suit torn. Another judge was assaulted, while the office of the Chief Judge (CJ), Justice Ayodeji Daramola, was invaded. His workers were beaten up, his record book destroyed and proceedings disrupted. Lawyers, litigants and court clerks fled as the thugs smashed property.

    Fayose was at the Elections Petition Tribunal for hearing of the case by the All Progressives Congress (APC) against his “victory”. The thugs were said to have surged forward, entering the court premises after the policemen manning the gate allowed Fayose in. There was commotion.

    Several detachments of policemen in pick-up vans and an armoured personnel carrier (APC) took positions around the tribunal before it began sitting. At a point, tear gas was fired and people scampered away, but the thugs regrouped in defiance. Some were said to be jogging up and down the main road, singing songs and checking for supposed ‘enemies’

    Reliving how the judge was assaulted, Ekiti State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice Mr. Wale Fapohunda said: “Justice Adeyeye, who was presiding over a case, accosted Fayose while moving around with his supporters (within the court premises) and advised him to desist from moving around and causing disruption of court proceedings.” According to him, that led to “the exchange of hot words between the duo, resulting in the manhandling of the judge.” Fapohunda said he was “informed that the irate youths attacked the judge on the order of the governor-elect.”

    The developments forced Justice Daramola to order the closure of all courts due to “the spate of attacks perpetrated by political thugs and their persistent presence on the Ado-Ekiti High Court premises in the past few days.”

    He said political thugs came in their hundreds, invaded the high court premises and assaulted the state’s third most senior judge, Justice Adeyeye “by beating him up and tearing his suit into shreds while the police officers on guard looked unconcerned and uninterested.”

     ‘Arrest, prosecute Fayose now’

    The All Progressives Congress (APC), in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, said since Fayose does not yet enjoy immunity from arrest and prosecution, he should immediately be arrested over ”the dastardly and barbaric attack, which represents an attack on justice and on the rule of law, and the violence that has gripped the state.”

    The party said while Ekiti State Police Commissioner Taiwo Lakanu did well by rushing to the venue to help restore order after the judge had been beaten up, the role of the police in the two attacks was shameful.

    It said: “According to published reports, which are yet to be refuted, police personnel stood by while litigants, lawyers and other citizens were being mauled by rabid PDP thugs in the first attack, and again seemed powerless as Justice Adeyeye was being manhandled and his suit torn until the Police Commissioner arrived at the scene. If this is not an act of collusion, then it is a case of unacceptable gross incompetence for which those security agents must be brought to book.”

    Fayose denies attacks

    After Monday’s attack, Fayose, through his Chief Press Secretary, Idowu Adelusi, said the perpetrators were angry Okada (commercial motorcycle) riders and others who voted for him.

    “His Excellency has no hand in what happened. He didn’t send them. They have been coming to the court and they have been seeing the trend. Their hope is Ayo Fayose and they felt their hope was about to be truncated. They are Okada riders and not hoodlums. They are angry that their mandate was about to be taken away.”

    Fayose denied that his supporters beat up Justice Adeyeye, describing the allegation as not only unfounded, but spurious.

    “I am not aware that a judge was beaten up. In fact, this is strange to me. This is reckless and strange to me. I visited the election petitions tribunal as a party to the case and I was the only one that was allowed passage by security men. To the best of my knowledge, the three judges handling the tribunal case sat.

    “How can I order the people to beat up a judge that has nothing to do with me? At what point was this judge beaten? Was he a member of the tribunal because I went to the tribunal and not the regular court?

    “But I want to point out that a situation whereby judges or judicial officers, who should be custodians of the law, got compromised with politicians, then anarchy will set in. The judge handling the suit against my qualification dropped the case because of tension and because he lacks the confidence to continue.

    “It would have been better for him to insist that he would try the case based on its merit. It is sad that most of our judges have compromised. If you have been defeated in all the 16 local government areas and you now want to come through the window, it won’t be like ice cream party to APC. I would not be too cheap like Segun Oni. I am not going to be cheap at all because I am elected by the people.

    “I don’t care about whatever they write about me because I have grown a thick skin. The strategy of APC will not work. Nobody, no matter how highly placed, will remove me cheaply,” he said.

    Fayose accused APC of a plot to truncate his inauguration on October 16 by trying to obtaining judgment through the backdoor.

    On Monday’s attack on the court, Fayose said: “It’s unfortunate. But don’t forget that the average man on the streets knows what they want and they are equally more enlightened than before, when somebody would just come, pay a judge somewhere for a backdoor judgment, to stall a process, to steal people’s mandate. We want trials done through due process. What is the hurry for this judge? What is his interest?”

    He alleged that the Chief Judge was an interested party in the matter. “We have been told that he wants to assign the matter to himself. He is a clear member of the E-11 – the petitioners. We want a judge, who is ready to carry out his assignment as a judge; who is ready to respect the Constitution of Nigeria, to try matters by being fair to all concerned and be accountable to Nigerians,” he said.

    Is judiciary under threat?

    At the height of the political crises in Rivers State, the courts came under attack. The High Court in Okehi, Etche Local Government, was torched by youths suspected to be thugs on January 6. The target of the arson was the office of a certain judge.

    Earlier, the high court in Ahoada was hit with an improvised explosive device. The bombing happened shortly before hearing in a case seeking to restrain self acclaimed House of Assembly Speaker Evans Bipi was due to begin before Justice Charles Wali.

    There was also a clash when armed policemen forcefully opened Rivers High Court’s main gate, which shut because of a strike by workers. A welder cut the gate’s iron bars.

    Some youths, who gathered at the gate, protested the policemen’s bid to escort the court’s most senior judge, Justice Daisy Okocha, and some others into the premises. Tear gas was fired at passers-by; journalists, motorists and those around the court fled.

    With last week’s attacks in Ekiti, some wonder whether the courts are still the common man’s last hope.

    Outrage trail attacks

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), human rights groups and a retired judge condemned the attacks and called for the perpetrators’ prosecution to prevent a recurrence.

    NBA, in a statement by its President Augustine Alegeh (SAN), said: “Reports from our members at Ado Ekiti indicate that policemen and other security agents present at the High Court Complex looked the other way while the hoodlums had a field day in perpetuating wanton criminal acts of violence and damage to property.

    “We call on the Nigeria Police Force and other security agencies in Ekiti State to perform their constitutional duty of providing security for the citizens of Nigeria.  This unfortunate development portends grave danger to the lives of our judges in Ekiti State.

    “There is, therefore, an urgent need to protect our judges and judiciary staff from these hoodlums whom we believe must be acting on instructions from some highly placed persons in Ekiti State to unleash mayhem on judicial officers and infrastructure.

    “We condemn in very strong terms these detestable acts of brigandage intended to intimidate and infuse fear into the minds of judicial officers. Those behind these criminal acts of violence have desecrated the courts, which are our temples of justice.

    “The administration of justice can never thrive in an atmosphere where judicial officers are brazenly attacked and, or intimidated in the course of carrying out their lawful duties. The administration of justice can never bow to the whims and caprices of persons who believe that judges must yield to their wishes.

    “The NBA is sending a high powered fact finding team to Ekiti to investigate the facts surrounding this matter. Any person(s), no matter how highly placed, found involved in this show of shame and desecration of our courts shall surely face the full force of the law as NBA will ensure prosecution of any such person(s).

    “We will not allow persons who do not mean well for our society take steps capable of plunging our country into anarchy.”

    The Ekiti branch of NBA, through its chairman, Joseph Adewumi, said there could be a serious constitutional crisis if by act of commission or omission an atmosphere of anarchy is encouraged.

    “If the current assault on the judges of the Ekiti State judiciary is allowed to continue, they would have lost the necessary independence that should be the bedrock of the performance of their constitutional duties,” he said.

    A retired judge of the state, Justice Demola Bakre, said with thugs taking over the court, it would be difficult, if not impossible, for judges to carry out their duty freely without fear of coming to harm.

    A human rights group, Access to Justice (AJ), condemned what it called unbridled affront on Justice Adeyeye.

    “The attack is shameful, vile, barbaric and grossly contemptuous of the person of Justice Adeyeye and the authority he exercises as a Judge. It is a brutal attack on the administration of justice and the integrity of the justice system in Nigeria. It undermines the independence of the Judiciary and the duty of judges to decide disputes without fear or molestation.

    “This attack on judges and the administration of justice must be repressed and repelled with all the power and authority of the state. Those responsible must be brought to book so that this impunity is not allowed to flourish,” the group said in a statement by Chinelo Chinweze.

    Lawyers seek justice

     Some Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN), who condemned the attacks, include Chief Felix Fagbohungbe; Malam Yusuf Ali; a former Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (NIALS) Director-General, Prof Epiphany Azinge; Chief Emeka Ngige; Deacon Paul Ananaba; Jibrin Okutepa; Femi Falana; Mr Mike Igbokwe and Dr Joseph Nwobike.

    Others are Mr Ike Ofuokwu; AJ’s Executive Director, Mr Joseph Otteh; Dr. Utman Abdulazeez; Richard Chukwuocha and Charles Titiloye urged the judiciary not to treat the show of aggression with kids’ gloves.

    Fagbohungbe said: “It’s an embarrassment to the judiciary. It’s an embarrassment to the society. The character (of the thugs’ leader) is beyond description. It’s awful. It’s terrible. I think he should not be allowed to get away with this.

    “The Judiciary and lawyers must come together to let him know that he cannot get away with it, that the hands of the law is so long that it can catch up with anybody. It should not be allowed at all. I’m quite concerned and worried.”

    Ngige said the attack was a consequence of voting for the wrong candidate in the governorship election. “It is a clear manifestation of a return of anarchy to Ekiti State. It’s unfortunate that this is what Ekiti people bargained for by voting against Dr Kayode Fayemi. The only unfortunate aspect of it is that the innocent people will also suffer along with those who voted for ‘stomach infrastructure’,” he said.

    Ananaba described the attacks as sacrilegious, saying: “This is a situation we must all unanimous speak against. Even those who think that they are benefiting from the hooliganism today will suffer its ripple effects in the long run. The act is sacrilegious and it must be treated as such. The perpetrators must be brought to book.”

    Okutepa said the attacks were a threat to the rule of law. “If the rule of the jungle is now taking over the rule of law, then might will soon become right and the peace and tranquillity currently being threatened, would have been completely wiped out,” he said.

    Falana said the mayhem unleashed on the court by a gang of hired hoodlums confirmed that “Ekiti people have fully returned to the wilderness.”

    “So far, those who perpetrated the barbaric attack and their sponsors have their admitted ignoble role through public statements issued by them. The Ekiti State governor-elect, Mr. Ayo Fayose has justified the shameful attack on the rule of law in Ekiti State by saying that his election cannot be challenged in court.

    “This is a reminder of the Idi Amin era in Uganda when judges were killed while discharging judicial functions.  Mr. Fayose and his thugs should not be allowed to kill judges and lawyers before calling him to order.

    ”Since the Ekiti State police command is completely compromised, the Acting Inspector-General of Police, Mr. Suleiman Abbah is called upon to ensure that all the assailants are arrested and prosecuted without any delay. Any attempt to cover up the brazen contempt of court should be resisted by the Attorney-General of Ekiti State, Mr. Wale Fapounda, who should take decisive measures to bring the criminals to book,” Falana said.

    Azinge said the attacks were “thuggery taken too far” and “totally unacceptable to a democratic setting”. “To that extent it stands to be condemned. The police must ensure that the courtrooms are well protected, not just when the court is sitting, but all round the clock to make sure that not just the personnel involved, but all documents and property of the court are continuously protected. If we don’t do that, then it means that we’re bidding farewell to the judiciary and to an extent our constitutional democracy in this country,” Azinge said.

    Ali described the attack as “an abomination that should not be encouraged,” while Igbokwe called it “a desecration of the highest order of the temple of justice! Indiscipline! Contempt of court!”

    “Who did they want to intimidate? The culprits should be fished out, tried and if found guilty, punished accordingly so as to deter similar occurrences in the future. Security at the courts/tribunals should henceforth be beefed up and their members protected,” he said.

    Nwobike said he could not imagine “this extent of institutional failure in Ekiti”, while calling on the Acting Inspector-General of Police and the Director-General of the State Security Services “to investigate and punish all those responsible for the ugly development.”

    Ofuokwu described the incident as judicial terrorism, adding that the perpetrators must be severely punished to serve as a lesson to others.

    “The perpetrators of this act of judicial terrorism and their sponsors no matter how highly placed they are must be investigated, tried and severely punished if found guilty. Failure to do this would breed anarchy which we will have to live with as a nation for a very long time,” Ofuokwu said.

    Otteh said any attempt to interfere in the judicial process through such “crude, deplorable, and treacherous” means “must be repelled and rebuffed with all the power of the state” to prevent a very dangerous precedent.

    Abdulazeez said: “This is the worst we should be willing to accept as a nation. Let’s watch and see how this Federal Government will treat this great act of desecration of the hallowed temple of justice. We are doomed in this country. God help us.”

    Chukwuocha described the attacks as “the height of contempt in the face of the court,” adding perpetrators of the mayhem “should be arrested and prosecuted, and if found guilty, should be prosecuted according to the law.”

    Titiloye urged the IGP to arrest Fayose. “We must remind the IGP that nobody is above the law. Fayose has no immunity from arrest and prosecution, having not taken oath of office as the governor of the state. His utterances are clear acts depicting his complicity in the criminal attack on the High Court. He must be brought to book in the interest of protection of institution of justice in Nigeria and protection of law and order in Ekiti State,” he said.

  • Army, DSS, police chiefs sued over N6.5m ‘theft’

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has been asked to direct the Chief of Army Staff, Director of the Drectorate of Security Service (DSS) and the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to probe and identify members of a joint patrol team that allegedly robbed two businessmen of about N6.5million in Abuja on September 13.

    The request is contained in a fundamental rights enforcement application marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/676/2014 filed last Wednesday for the victims – Abubakar Musa and Ajube Kumshe – by their lawyer, Kalouma Umar.

    The applicants, who are seeking N15million damages against the respondents, also want the court to order the Director, SSS to refund the N6.5m allegedly stolen from them by the joint patrol team made of mainly of men of the SSS, the police and army. Respondents in the suit include the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Chief of Army Staff, Director, SSS, the IGP and Ebonith Hotel, Lugbe, Abuja.

    Musa, who described himself as a metallurgist, said he had travelled, with Kumshe on a car from their base in Jos to Abuja on September 12 to conduct some business transactions the next day. He said he withdrew the N6.5million from his account in the Suleja (Niger State) branch of Ecobank on September 12 for the business transactions.

    He averred, in a supporting affidavit, that after withdrawing the money and visiting some of his police friends, they lodged in the Ebonith Hotel, Lugbe, Abuja preparatory to their business transactions the next day.

    Musa stated that about 1.30 am on September 13, “a joint team of security operatives comprising men of the Nigerian Army, the SSS and the Nigeria Police Force” stormed the hotel searched their rooms and confiscated the N6.5million he had withdrawn and kept  with him for the next day’s business transactions.

    “They arrested us and took us out of the room together with the money to the reception of the 5th respondent (the hotel). They counted the money and confirmed the amount of the money as N6.5million. They took us to the Lugbe Police Station and detained us for three hours for interrogation, without informing us about the offence we committed,” Musa said.

    He further stated that they were released about five hours later, but that they changed their plans and decided to return to Jos. He said on their way back to Jos,  their car was ambushed along Keffi-Abuja Road by the same joint patrol team, led by one Sadiq.

    Musa stated that the security men later robbed them at gun point, taking away the N6.5m kept in his car boot, N100,000 found in his pocket and N57,000 found with his co-traveller, Kumshe.

    “He (Sadiq) informed me that they were tracking all my phone calls  and had put me on surveillance for long, and that there is no way I can escape from them. When I asked him (Sadiq) what offence I committed, he hit me with his pistol and ordered me to enter into a nearby bush,” Musa said.

    He added that, while the team was leading them into a nearby bus, they heard the noise of an approaching siren and hurriedly abandoned them, but went away with their (applicants’) money.

    Musa, who accused the 2nd to 3rd respondents (Army, SSS and Police authorities) of not responding to his letters seeking investigation of the case, said he could identify members of the patrol team, particularly Sadiq, if they were paraded before him.

    The applicants, who also want the court to order the 3rd respondent (SSS) to refund the N6.5million, are seeking to restrain the respondents from arresting and detaining them. They also urged the court to declare their detention at the Lugbe Police Station as illegal and an abuse of their fundamental rights.

    No date is set for the case’s hearing, and the respondents are yet to file their responses.

  • Desecration of Ekiti State judiciary

    The anarchical conduct of some politicians and their thugs for two days last week, within the precincts of the High court of Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti state, is most reprehensible. Agreed that some politicians in Nigeria are not very different from street hooligans and bandits by their conduct, yet, until last Tuesday and Thursday I had thought that their peculiar madness will not extend to the hallowed grounds of the courts. But obviously nothing is sacred for these characters. To show that our country is not a lawless country, the Governor of Ekiti State, Mr. Kayode Fayemi and the President Goodluck Jonathan must exercise their constitutional responsibilities to defend law abiding citizens and officials of government, in their capacity as heads of the executive arms of government in the state and the federation, respectively.

    Also the governor-elect of Ekiti State, Mr. Ayodele Fayose, who has been fingered by Governor Fayemi, as allegedly being responsible for the mayhem that has led to dusk to dawn curfew in the state, after the murder of citizen Omolafe Aderiye, must do all in his powers to clear his name. Otherwise, his tenure as the next Governor would be tainted, even before it starts.  Unfortunately for him, he has a huge task, if the reports that the hooligans descended on the high court officials, lawyers and the general public, following the ruling of Justice Isaac Ogunyemi, that his honourable court has the jurisdiction to determine whether Mr. Fayemi had the locus to participate in the last gubernatorial election, is true. To compound the governor-elect’s challenge, the second round of mayhem last Thursday, again took place the day the governor-elect visited the election petition Tribunal hearing the case instituted by the All Progressive Congress against his election on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party.

    Considering that Mr. Fayose has stridently denied the allegations, there is the need for a thorough investigation of those responsible for disrupting the peace and tranquility of Ekiti State, particularly her judiciary. Regrettably, with the security agencies allegedly compromised, and the state and federal authority, partisans in the crisis, such an enquiry will be a tall order. But regardless, it is in the interest of Ekiti people and our democracy that those responsible for assaulting High court Judges, Justices Akintayo and Adeyeye, within the confines of the High Court premises; and the murder of Mr. Aderiye are brought to speedy justice. For it is better imagined the consequences, if Judges henceforth determine their cases, in a manner to avoid being molested by interested parties.

     

    Re: Rochas and local council aspirants

    The case I made here, penultimate Tuesday, imploring Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State, to, as a matter of honour and constitutionalism conduct the long awaited local government election in the state, has elicited some interesting reactions. One of the victims, who reacted anonymously, sent me the time table for the aspirants, starting from 2011, up to this year. I also got some text messages tending to support the status quo. First the aspirant, who wrote:

    In 2011, the aspirants were asked to familiarise themselves with the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA)(then Governor Okorocha’s party) at the grassroots.

    In 2012, the aspirants were instructed to attend ICAPS/IMSU leadership training to be acquainted with legislative rudiments and leadership for 14 weeks. They were given certificates.

    Last year, the aspirants to the position of Chairmen were asked to pay N100,000, under Governor Okorocha’s new party, the All Progressive Congress (APC).

    This year, the same aspirants were asked to pay N50,000, for intent form, N10,000 to Local Government Party secretariat and N5,000 to state secretariat for administrative services.

    Again this year, they were asked to tour the communities within the local government under context, to solicit for votes for mock-election, mobilise membership for the APC and sensitise electorate to come out en mass to register for Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) permanent voters’ card when it starts.

    The government of Imo State slated September 1, for the mock-election, but the election never held. The mock-election was designated as a prelude to party primary election to determine the party’s candidates.

    According to the aspirant, as at the time he sent the timetable, which in my earlier piece, I had likened to a journey to nowhere, akin to what in local parlance amounts to entering a ‘one chance vehicle’; there is no date for local government election in Imo State.

     

    The other interesting reaction by text, read:

    I thank you immensely for your article on the above subject matter. First of all, I will linked (like) you to know that Local Government in Imo State before the coming of Rochas were conduits of siphoning money that belong to the people. None of this councils executed meaningful projects like what we see in southwest part of this country. Funds for local governments were like personal estates, none of the chairmen live within the local government. All of them live expensively in Owerri, moving around with armed policemen as if they are something else.

    They only appear in LG once it is time to share allocations. There is a local government (LG) headed by a woman. I make bold to say that the husband of this woman was a Senator for good 16 years, with nothing to show for it, yet when allocation is received in LG, it is shared in their bedroom and when he travels everybody must wait until he comes back to base before anything can be done. So, in as much as we want LG elections to be held, we must first of all clean up the system and be ready for it.

     Uzoka  08057875094

  • Open ballot system on trial at Appeal Court

    On August 28, 2013, the Appellant as Applicant by an originating motion on notice commenced a suit in the Federal High Court at Abakaliki against the Respondents applying for the enforcement of his fundamental right to privacy and praying for the following reliefs amongst others: (a) a declaration that the applicant and other voters in Ebonyi State are entitled to the privacy of who they vote for in an election as guaranteed by section 37 of the 1999 constitution of Nigeria (as altered); (b) a declaration that the open ballot system of voting, that is queuing behind the candidate of your choice in the full glare of everybody constitutes a violation of the right of the applicant and other voters to the privacy of who they vote for in an election as guaranteed by section 37 of the 1999 constitution of Nigeria (as altered); (c) a declaration that Section 5 (1) of Ebonyi State Electoral (Amendment) and Other Related Matters Law No. 005 of 2010 violates the rights of the applicant and other voters to the privacy of who they vote for in an election as guaranteed by Section 37 of the Constitution of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered) and as such, ineffectual; (d) a declaration that Section 5 (1) of Ebonyi State Electoral (Amendment) and Other Related Matters Law No. 005 of 2010 is inconsistent with section 52 (1) of Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended) and, as such, null and void; (e) an order of perpetual injunction restraining the 1st respondent from using open ballot system of voting to conduct the Local Government Election slated for the 28th September, 2013 or any other Local Government Election.

    The 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents filed a notice of preliminary objection to the application along with a written argument of same. They also filed a counter-affidavit in opposition of the application and a written argument opposing the application.  The Appellant filed an affidavit in reaction to the preliminary objection of the 1st 2nd and 3rd Respondents and a written argument of same. On the 20th September, 2013, the trial Court delivered its ruling upholding the preliminary objection and stating that it will not go into the substantive motion having upheld the said objection.  It dismissed the suit. Dissatisfied with this ruling, the Applicant filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal against the part of the ruling dismissing the application for not falling within the purview of Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution.

    The Appellant’s brief of argument raised the following issues for determination:

    Whether the court below was right when it held that the complaint of the applicant does not fall within the contemplation of Fundamental Rights and cannot be enforced through the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure

    Whether the court below was right when it failed to apply the definitions of privacy and rights to privacy as given by Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition and Supreme Court in the case of Medical and Dental Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal V Dr John E. N. Okonkwo (2001) 5 NSCQR; 650 at 683 -685.

    Whether the court below was right when it held that the right to privacy contemplates only of “right to privacy at home, privacy of one’s communications, privacy in family life and other incidentals thereto” without seeing right to privacy while voting at an election as being incidental thereto.

    The Court adopted the issues as formulated by the Appellant in the determination of the appeal.

    The central argument of Learned Counsel for the Appellant in respect of the case brought by the Appellant is that, compelling an individual to disclose who he/she votes for in an election, by queuing publicly behind the person, violates the individual’s right to privacy under Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution and also exposes him or her to the danger of being attacked by political thugs and that it was this situation that led to the deaths and destructions that characterized the PDP primaries in Ebonyi State that was conducted via open ballot system, as those who saw that they were losing caused confusion with ensuring shootings leading to death and destructions. Learned Counsel further argued that the trial Court was wrong to have held that the Appellant’s complain does not come within the ambit of Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution as the right to privacy in that section contemplates only “right to privacy at home, privacy of one’s communication, privacy in private family life and matters incidental thereto.” According to Learned Counsel, this interpretation by the trial Court is over restrictive and dry, and that the fact that the Constitution did not expressly mention the right to privacy while casting vote in an election does not mean that the right to privacy provided for in Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution does not extend to privacy while casting vote in an election. Learned Counsel for the Appellant finally submitted that compelling people to vote by queuing behind the candidate of their choice is archaic, primitive and risky, that it is noteworthy that this is being practiced only in Ebonyi State, that majority of the voters who do not want to vote openly, stay away from voting and that the 1st Respondent unless judicially restrained, will continue to use this method.

    The Learned Attorney General for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents argued relying on the decisions in UNILORIN VS. OLUWADARE (2006) 27 NSCQR 18; (2006) LPELR-3417(SC), AMALE VS. SOKOTO LOCAL GOVERNMENT (2012) 492 NSCQR 1271; (2012) LPELR-7842(SC), and ABDULHAMID VS. AKAR (2006) ALL FWLR (PT 324) 1191 AT 1209 that the rights that can be enforced via the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules must be the rights contained in Chapter IV of the Constitution and that an application can be brought under those Rules only where the principal claim is one for the enforcement of the fundamental rights in the said Chapter IV of the Constitution and not where it is incidental or ancillary to a right not enforceable by those Rules. He then submitted that an application brought under the Fundamental Right Enforcement Procedure Rules to enforce a right not contained in Chapter IV of the Constitution is not initiated in accordance with the due process of law. The Learned Attorney General then submitted that the Appellant’s main grouse is against the mode of voting in the 2013 Ebonyi Local Government Elections, that the other complains are ancillary to the challenge of the validity of Section 5(1) of the Ebonyi State Independent Electoral Law and that he is unable to see where Section 5 (1) of the said Law which provides for mode of voting is inconsistent with Section 37 of the Constitution. The Learned Attorney General further argued that the right to vote and the mode of voting in secret is not a fundamental right provided in Chapter IV of the Constitution.

    In determining the appeal, the Court interpreted the phrase “privacy of citizens” generally, liberally, and expansively to include privacy of citizens’ body, life, person, thought, belief, conscience, feelings, views, decisions (including his plans and choices), desires, health, relationships, character, material possessions, family life, activities et cetera. Therefore the Court held that privacy of the choice of a candidate and the privacy of voting for that candidate constitute part of “privacy” as a citizen. The Court held that the Appellant was entitled to the privacy of his decision to vote for a particular candidate, his choice of that candidate and his casting his vote for that candidate. Therefore requiring or compelling him to vote openly in the public watch and knowledge by queuing in front of the poster carrying the portrait of the candidate he has decided to vote for intrudes into, interferes with, and invades the privacy of his said decision, choice and voting, completely removing that privacy, therefore amounting to a clear violation of his fundamental right to the privacy of a citizen guaranteed him and protected by Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution.

    The Court further held that Section 5 (1) of and paragraph 21 (2) to (5) of the 1st schedule of the Ebonyi State Electoral (Amendment) and Related Matters Law 2010 which provide for voting by open ballot system by requiring a voter to vote for a candidate by queuing in front of the poster bearing the portrait of the said candidate in the full public view, deprives the Appellant the right to privacy of his decision to vote for a candidate and his vote for that candidate and is therefore inconsistent with Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution. In the light of the foregoing, the Court held that Section 5 (1) and paragraph 21 (2), (3), (4) and (5) of the 1st schedule to the Ebonyi State Electoral (Amendment) Law 2010 and all provisions therein providing for voting by open ballot are void ab initio for being inconsistent with Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution and for not complying with Section 45 (1) of the same Constitution.

    On the whole, the Court held that the appeal succeeds and it was allowed. The part of the ruling of the Federal High Court sitting at Abakaliki, per M.A. Oyetenu J. in suit No.FHC/AI/CS/38/2013 delivered on 20th September, 2013 upholding the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents’ preliminary objection and dismissing the Appellant’s suit was set aside.

     

    Edited by LawPavilion

    LawPavilion Citation: (2014) LPELR-23682(CA)

     

  • Court sacks Agbakoba as Bi-Courtney assets’ receiver

    Court sacks Agbakoba as Bi-Courtney assets’ receiver

    Justice Ibrahim Buba of the Federal High Court, Lagos on Monday vacated an order appointing a former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) as receiver over the assets of Bi-Courtney Limited, its chairman Chief Wale Babalakin (SAN) and three others.

    The Murtala Muhammad Airport 2 (MMA 2) is owned by Bi-Courtney pursuant to a concession agreement with the Federal Government.

    Justice Buba said the order made by another judge, Justice Okon Abang, was in error.

    The judge held that the order should not have been made when there were related cases on the same issue before him.

    According to him, the whole facts were not disclosed to Justice Abang before he made the order.

    Saying his “brother judge” was misled, he declared Agbakoba’s appointment null and void and adjourned hearing on the substantive suit.

    Agbakoba was also appointed receiver over the assets of Chartered Investment Limited, Resort International Limited and Roygate Properties Limited.