Category: Law

  • How executive orders will boost oil and gas sector, by legal experts

    How executive orders will boost oil and gas sector, by legal experts

    Will the executive orders signed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu early this year boost the oil and gas sector? What are their provisions? How will they enhance the contracting processes and drive investments? Legal experts examined these and more at the 2024 Lawyers in Energy Retreat, reports Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE.

    On February 28, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu signed three executive orders as part of the Federal Government’s commitment to improving the investment climate and positioning Nigeria as the preferred investment destination for the petroleum sector in Africa.

    They are the Oil and Gas Companies (Tax Incentives, Exemption, Remission, etc.) Order 2024; the Presidential Directive on Local Content Compliance Requirements, 2024; and the Presidential Directive on Reduction of Petroleum Sector Contracting Costs and Timelines, 2024.

    For two days last week, oil and gas law experts gathered in Lagos to analyse the impact of the orders on the oil and gas sector.

    They backed the directives and called for their strict implementation, believing they would drive investments.

    The experts spoke at the Lawyers in Energy Annual Retreat with the theme: “Analysing the effects of the presidential policy directives on the Nigerian energy industry.”

    It was organised by the Lawyers in Energy Network, a non-governmental organisation working to develop human and institutional capacities, promote research and influence energy policies.

    Aside from its knowledge-sharing goals, the Network aims to develop the legal and regulatory framework of the international energy industry.

    What the orders are about

    Aside from the fiscal incentives, the orders entail a streamlining of contracting processes, procedures, and timelines.

    President Tinubu directed the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) and the Ministry of Petroleum Incorporated (MOPI) to take steps to raise the contract approval thresholds for Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) and Joint Operating Agreements (JOAs) to not less than $10 million or the Naira equivalent.

    The NNPC Limited and the Nigerian Upstream Investment Management Services Limited (NUIMS), in collaboration with the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) and industry stakeholders, were mandated to simplify the contract approval process.

    The duration period for third-party contracts awarded under a PSC or JOA is increased from three to five years with the option of renewal for an additional two years after the expiration of the initial three years.

    The directives are aimed at compressing the contracting cycle to four to six months, ultimately reducing project schedules, expediting the delivery of oil and gas products to the market, and increasing value to the country.

    Read Also; Unending grid collapse

    Pending legislative review of certain reform propositions, the President directed the NCDMB in its implementation of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development (NOGICD) Act, otherwise known as the Local Content Act, to consider the practical challenges of insufficient in-country capacity for certain services, and act in a manner that does not hinder investments or the cost competitiveness of oil and gas projects.

    The President believes that by providing flexibility with the application of the Local Content Act, local operators would be encouraged to increase their capacity, thereby creating additional business opportunities, upskilling the workforce, and ultimately creating more jobs and boosting economic growth.

    The incentives were developed in collaboration with the ministries of justice, finance, petroleum, budget and economic planning; Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), NNPCL, Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NMDPRA), and NCDMB.

    The retreat speakers

    Among the speakers at the retreat were a Partner at Tayo Oyetibo LP, Mr Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo (SAN), Senior Legal Counsel, Exploration & Production (Commercial) at Seplat Energy, Ademola Fashiku, and Group Head of Legal and Supply Chain Management at Waltersmith, Oluwadare Agbelese.

    The trio spoke during the first session on the effect of the presidential policy directive on the reduction of petroleum sector contracting costs and timelines on PSC and JOA.

    The second session featured Executive Director of Business Development and Nigerian Content at Dasoniel Energy Services Limited, Dr David Editang; an energy consultant Dr Wisdom Enang and General Counsel at Tetracore Energy Group, Okezi Okah-Avae.

    They examined the presidential order on Nigerian local content compliance and its effect on the energy industry.

    The third session had the Partner in charge of Dispute Resolution and Tax Practice groups at Templars, Sesan Suleiman, and a Partner at Olaniwun Ajayi LP, Folashade Oluyadi as the speakers.

    They analysed the presidential fiscal policy and its effect on tax administration in the energy industry.

    SAN lists benefits

    Tayo-Oyetibo said the PSC and JOA directive has a positive impact as it fosters a more efficient and attractive investment environment.

    Thus, Nigeria, he noted, can bolster its position as a leading oil producer, while addressing the longstanding challenges that have hindered growth.

    “As the sector adapts to these changes, the focus should remain on sustainable practices and long-term economic benefits for the nation,” Tayo-Oyetibo advised.

    The SAN identified the positive impacts.

    He said: “Cost efficiency: By lowering the financial burden on oil companies, the Directive frees up funds to be used by the companies for more productive endeavours.

    “This could lead to increased exploration and production activities, ultimately boosting Nigeria’s oil output.

    “Attracting investment: With reduced costs and improved timelines, Nigeria becomes a more appealing destination for investment.

    “Oil companies are more likely to commit resources to projects in a predictable regulatory environment, fostering a climate of growth and stability within the sector.

    “Improved timelines: The emphasis on faster contract execution is particularly critical for PSCs, where delays can be costly.

    “Streamlined processes will allow companies to bring projects online more quickly, enhancing cash flow and return on investment.

    “This timely execution is crucial in a sector where market conditions can fluctuate rapidly.

    “Enhanced collaboration: The Directive’s focus on efficiency may foster a more collaborative environment among partners in JOAs.

    “With less time spent on negotiations and compliance, companies can focus more on operational efficiency and innovation.”

    The challenges, by Tayo-Oyetibo

    Tayo-Oyetibo also highlighted potential challenges.

    He said: “While the Directive presents numerous opportunities, challenges remain.

    “Implementation will require significant changes within regulatory bodies to ensure compliance and efficiency.

    “External market conditions – such as fluctuating oil prices – will continue to impact the sector’s performance.

    “Moreover, the long-term sustainability of these reforms will depend on consistent political will and the ability to adapt to changing global dynamics.

    “The Directive addresses significant challenges in the industry and aims to foster a competitive petroleum sector.

    “It aligns with parallel processing, which enables various processes to occur simultaneously, thereby enhancing efficiency and positively impacting the economic projections of contracting parties.

    “The ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs) should be required to provide periodic public notifications regarding these deemed approvals to ensure greater transparency and accountability.”

    ‘Why orders were needed’

    Editang noted that the local content directive was designed to forestall the decline in investments in the oil and gas sector, enhance the investment and operational environment, attract both local and international investors and give predictability to the oil and gas ecosystem.

    He said despite challenges of limited capacity of local firms, corruption and governance issues, and the struggle to balance international standards with local content, the directive is a positive development.

    Editang said: “The issuance of the directive highlights the Federal Government’s deliberate effort and commitment to creating an environment that accelerates investment in the oil and gas sector.

    “It ensures the benefits of such investments contribute positively to the Nigerian economy.

    “This directive is seen to promote a favourable operating and investment climate by streamlining contractor layers.

    “It marks a positive move toward sector reform, with a focus on encouraging meaningful participation of Nigerian indigenous companies in the oil and gas industry.”

    ‘Reforms imperative’

    Okah-Avae noted that investments in the oil and gas sector significantly decreased, with the country having only five per cent of Africa’s total oil and gas investments despite holding 38 per cent of the continent’s hydrocarbon reserves.

    He said the situation makes reforms imperative, stressing the need for compliance.

    Okah-Avae believes the directive on local content compliance will result in greater competition, prevent unqualified contractors and boost long-term economic growth.

    “Industry stakeholders must monitor to ensure they’re complied with, otherwise, the rent-seekers will do what they do,” he said.

    ‘Directives will reduce delays’

    For Suleiman, the executive orders are a good development as they signal to investors, especially those seeking to exploit non-associated gas resources, that their investments will thrive.

    “The contracting directive signals Nigeria’s commitment to ease of doing business, aiming to resolve delays in contract awards and position the country as a preferred petroleum investment hub,” she said.

    According to her, deemed approvals from NNPCL and NCDMB, in line with the Business Facilitation Act, will enhance administrative efficiency and protect businesses from regulatory delays.

    “The directive’s expedited process for expatriate quota approvals is expected to reduce delays, though challenges may arise in the practical implementation of deemed approvals when interfacing with multiple regulators,” Suleiman noted.

    Tax incentives

    Oluyadi was of the view that the presidential fiscal policy provides incentives designed to reduce tax liabilities, help offset high initial capital expenditures, and make investments more attractive to both new and existing oil and gas companies.

    This, she said, might in turn lead to high voluntary compliance rates, thereby reducing the administrative burden on tax authorities.

    According to Oluyadi, the policy presents a significant opportunity for Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, especially in encouraging natural gas production, improving midstream infrastructure, and attracting deepwater investment.

    She said: “It is noteworthy that the issuance of the implementation guidelines was aimed at ensuring a smooth administration of the order vis a vis the existing tax laws, to provide transparency, certainty and ease of compliance by companies.

    “By reducing the tax burden on local and foreign investors in the sector, the Fiscal Incentives Order could help Nigeria achieve its goals of economic diversification, cleaner energy production, and global competitiveness in the oil and gas sector.”

    Way forward

    Fashiku suggested that strong advocacy is required to include the new contract approval threshold in the NOGICD Bill 2023.

    He stressed the need for sustained engagements between relevant stakeholders, and for capacity building for regulatory bodies to meet shortened timelines.

    He added: “Licensees need to increase the efficiency of their internal processes to align with new approval thresholds and timelines.

    “JV non-operators need to establish monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance with the 15-day approval process.”

    Executive Secretary, Lawyers in Energy Network, Miss. Raqeebah Oloko, said the theme was chosen to analyse the impact of the executive orders given the critical place of the sector and the effects recent energy policies have had on citizens.

    “This prompted the Network, in its bid to help the country chart a path forward, to bring industry experts together to analyse the energy policies being implemented by the presidency and how beneficial they are, and if not, help in proffering solutions towards better implementation strategies and way forward,” she said.

  • Yabatech retiree sues college over demolition of property

    Yabatech retiree sues college over demolition of property

    An octogenarian and retiree of Yaba College of Technology, Mrs. Vivian Osemwegie, has filed a motion before the Federal High Court  against the  college over alleged illegal demolition of her property.

    Other defendants/respondents  in the suit are the Governing Council of the college, the Rector, Dr. Olubunmi Owoso, Engineer O. A. Olabode and Mrs. Agbaje Williams.

    Mrs. Osemwegie, who retired as the institution’s Chief Lecturer in the Department of Graphic Design, School of Art and Printing, filed the suit through her lawyer, E. O. Etomi of FRA Williams Chambers.

     The motion, brought pursuant to Order 26 Rules (1)(3) of the Court, seeks the following reliefs: “an order extending the time to apply to set aside the orders of the Federal High Court dated August 30, 2024, delivered by Justice Dipeolu in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/753/2003, which granted the defendants leave to enforce the judgment of the Federal High Court delivered on February 2, 2007.

    Read Also: Petrol: Addressing supply shortfalls and pricing realities

    “An order setting aside the court’s order made on August 30, 2024, orders.

    “An order setting aside the court’s order made on August 30, 2024, order granting police protection to the first defendant to enter Quarters 39, Aggrey Road, GRA, Yaba College of Technology, Lagos, and take possession of the property.

    “An order for a stay of execution of the judgment delivered on February 2, 2007, in light of the August 30, 2024, orders.

    “An order setting aside the execution of what the retiree claimed is a non-existent judgment or order.

    The retiree listed five grounds for her application, which are: “that the defendants misled the court into granting the August 30, 2024, order.

    “The court was misled into enforcing the February 2, 2007, judgment.

    “The 2007 judgment contains no enforceable orders or directives.

    “The Federal High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the defendants’ application to enforce the 2007 judgment. Mrs. Osemwegie was not given notice of the application to enforce the judgment.”

    The court is yet to fix a date  for the hearing of the motion while  the defendants/respondents are yet to file their response.

    Mrs. Osemwegie, 80 years, had earlier petitioned the Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Force Criminal Investigation Department (Force CID), Alagbon, Ikoyi-Lagos, requesting for an investigation into the alleged illegal demolition of her property within the staff quarters.

    The petition dated October 10, 2024, was submitted by one of her. lawyers, Asia E. Elvis, and titled: “A Case of Fraudulent Interference with the Administration of Justice, Willful and Malicious Damage to Property, Breach of Public Peace, and Threat to Life and Property.”

    In the petition, Mrs. Osemwegie alleged that on October 2, 2024, unknown gunmen and thugs invaded her property at 39 Aggrey Road, Yabatech Staff Quarters, Yaba, Lagos.

    She claimed the men forcibly removed her from the property and threw out her belongings without offering any explanation.

    Counsel to the retiree stated in the petition that the 2007 court judgment in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/753/2003 was misrepresented in an attempt to forcefully take possession of his client’s property.

    The petitioner states that the judgment does not contain any enforceable orders against our client.

    The retiree’s lawyer further asserted that the property was legally acquired by Mrs. Osemwegie from the Federal Government and that Yaba College of Technology could not have authorised the actions, as the institution is aware of her ownership.

    Instead, the petition suggested that the actions may have been orchestrated by unknown land grabbers.

    The petition reads in part: “Our client, who is over 80 years old, served the nation meritoriously at Yaba College of Technology and invested her entire savings into acquiring the property.

    “As we write, all her belongings have been destroyed, and she has been left homeless due to a purported non-existent judgment.”

    The petitioner while offering to provide further information if needed, urged the AIG to urgently investigate the individuals involved, including the Rector of Yaba College of Technology.

  • Coastal threats: Lagos to review land laws, policies

    Coastal threats: Lagos to review land laws, policies

    Lagos State Ministry of Justice is working to promote stronger cooperation among key stakeholders and institutions. Its key agencies met last week, reports ADEBISI ONANUGA.

    The  departments and agencies under the Ministry of Justice converged in Lagos last week to chart a new course to improve justice delivery and economic development

    The meeting which was to improve collaborations amongst ministries and agencies in the state, was themed: Enhancing Collaboration for Effective Justice Delivery, held at the Radisson Blu Hotel, Ikeja, Lagos.

    Declaring the stakeholders meeting open, the Deputy Governor of Lagos State, Dr. Obafemi Hamzat, emphasised the significance of the Ministry’s efforts in organising the programme, noting that the state government is dedicated to creating a more responsive, inclusive, and efficient justice system for the benefit of all Lagosians, regardless of race, religion, or ethnicity.

    He acknowledged the complexity of justice delivery, noting that the difference between African countries and other developed nations is the rule of law and its advancements in science and technology.

    Hamzat stated that the rule of law is increasingly becoming a subset of technology and science, as both are transforming many lives, whether we embrace it or not.

    He expressed concern about delays in justice, citing the prolonged case of a BRT driver accused of rape and murder, which has remained unresolved for over a year. He called on participants to critically review Lagos’ judicial processes and seek lasting solutions to these inefficiencies.

    He also called for urgent reforms in land management laws to combat the growing threats posed by climate change, particularly in a coastal city like Lagos.

    He stated that Lagos, a rapidly growing coastal megacity, is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

    Read Also: Petrol: Addressing supply shortfalls and pricing realities

    The combination of high population density, rapid urbanisation, and being situated along the coast makes the city prone to flooding, land erosion, and subsidence.

    “The rising sea levels, along with the extreme weather patterns we are witnessing, place Lagos at significant risk of sinking in a few years if immediate action is not taken,” the Deputy Governor warned.

    He stressed that the existing land management system must be overhauled to mitigate these risks and ensure the future sustainability of the state.

    The Deputy Governor also highlighted that managing land effectively is a persistent challenge in Nigeria, particularly in Lagos State.

    “With a complex system of land ownership, traditional land rights, and bureaucratic processes, without proper regulation and reforms in land laws, we are not just risking environmental catastrophe but also exacerbating socioeconomic inequalities,” the Deputy Governor noted.

    He, however, proposed that new land policies must take into account climate resilience and environmental sustainability.

    This includes better planning to prevent overdevelopment in flood-prone areas, stricter regulations on construction near the coastline, and enhanced public awareness of the environmental consequences of unregulated land use.

    Furthermore, the Deputy Governor called on all stakeholders, including environmental agencies, urban planners, and community leaders, to work together in addressing these issues.

    He called for immediate action to reform land laws in a way that prioritises both environmental sustainability and the long-term security of the state’s coastal communities.

    Speaking earlier, the Attorney- General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Lawal Pedro (SAN) expressed pleasure in hosting the event and underscored the importance of collaboration in the pursuit of justice.

    The AG stressed that the stakeholders meeting was a continuation of the discussions held earlier this year at the Y2024 Lagos Justice Summit, where recommendations were made to strengthen cooperation, transparency, and coordination among stakeholders.

    “The meeting will focus on several critical areas, starting with enhancing the co-ordination between law enforcement agencies and the Ministry of Justice” Pedro stated.

    He mentioned that one of the key areas of discussion is the growing number of cases involving the Lagos State Government that are currently pending in court.

    “As of July 2024, over 6,000 cases are tied to the government, spanning issues such as land disputes, physical planning, housing, road transportation, environment, chieftaincy matters, breach of contract, employment, and fundamental human rights. The financial exposure of these cases is estimated to be N114.5 billion”, he noted.

    He further stated that another session wiould focus on environmental and physical planning, with stakeholders from the Ministry of Environment, LASEPA, and other related agencies, discussing ways to improve service delivery in environmental management and urban development”.

    Proceeding to note that in the area of land administration, representatives from the Lands Bureau, NTDA, Office of the Surveyor General, and related agencies will rub minds to harmonise operations and address gaps in the enforcement of land-related laws.

    Pedro emphasised the need for stronger enforcement strategies while ensuring that agency actions align with existing laws and are people-friendly.

    While drawing attention to issues related to chieftaincy matters and local government administration, the Attorney-General noted that there will be  discussions centered on the proliferation of chieftaincy titles and the involvement of traditional rulers in land transactions, as well as the increasing number of litigations surrounding these issues and finally.

    He said the future of local government administration in Lagos State will be explored, with a focus on improving efficiency and reducing conflicts.

    He also reaffirmed the state government’s dedication to maintaining the rule of law.

     Pedro emphasised that delivering justice is not solely the responsibility of one institution, but rather, that it necessitates a collaborative effort that involves all legislative arms of government, law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and the broader community.

    He urged stakeholders to engage meaningfully and contribute to building a more responsive, inclusive, and efficient justice system in Lagos State.

    He reaffirmed the Ministry of Justice commitment to supporting law enforcement agencies in the fight against corruption while ensuring that the rights of Lagosians are protected.

    Giving the vote of thanks, the Acting Solicitor General and Permanent Secretary, MOJ, Mr. Hameed Oyenuga, extended his appreciation to all participants, acknowledging their dedication to justice delivery and governance.

    In his remarks, Oyenuga  emphasized the importance of collaboration among various sectors in ensuring a more effective and transparent justice system.

    He commended the attendees for their commitment to the shared goal of improving justice delivery in Lagos State and fostering greater cooperation across ministries and agencies in the State.

    Mr. Hameed Oyenuga concluded with an expression of optimism that the discussions and deliberations initiated during the stakeholder’s meeting would pave the way for meaningful progress in the days ahead.

    The keynote speaker, Justice Cecilia Mojisola Olatoregun (rtd.) urged the law enforcement agencies and state prosecutors to come together and address the challenges facing the integrity of the officials by finding lasting solutions that would restore public confidence and justice for the people they serve.

    Justice Olatoregun who spoke on the topic: “Enforcement and Administration of Criminal Justice: Enhancing Coordination Between Law Enforcement Agencies and Ministry of Justice, Particularly in Criminal Prosecution and Anti-Corruption Efforts,” said there are so many government agencies that were supposed to put check to criminal incidences in Lagos.

    She lamented that there are still prevalent of crimes that  abound in the state.

    The Judge said corruption are part of the bane of dispensation of justice.

     “Corruption, in particular, financial crime often regarded as white-collar crime is extremely dangerous to the fabric of the society despite its often understated perception in reality.

    “We have all read in the newspapers about incidents of buildings collapsing, despite claims that they have the necessary structural permits, allegations of budget padding, the diversion of funds by public officials into personal coffers, and so on.

    “To address these issues, stronger regulatory oversight and transparency are crucial. Regular audits of public projects, stricter enforcement of building codes, and real-time monitoring of funds allocation can help curb corruption and prevent negligence.

    She said: “Our criminal justice system is a reflection of our society’s commitment to fairness, equity, and accountability. If we get it right, we can ensure that those who break the law are held accountable, victims receive justice, and public trust in our institutions is restored.

    “Let us commit today to fostering a culture of collaboration, accountability, and innovation within our criminal justice system. By working together, law enforcement agencies and the Ministry of Justice can create a synergy that delivers timely, effective justice and upholds the rule of law for all Nigerians.”

    Justice Olatoregun highlighted some of the challenges that may be faced by law enforcement agencies and officers from the Ministry of Justice during prosecution which include; Fragmentation and duplication of efforts, Inadequate training of stakeholders, Inadequate resources and inaccessibility to technology and  Organisational structure of the law enforcement agencies.”

    She also suggested  methods for achieving synergy and collaboration in criminal prosecution and anti-corruption efforts.

    According to her, adopting an integrated approach from investigation to prosecution, Capacity building and training, accountability for outcomes,  Investigation infrastructure, digitalisation and technology and  restoring the public’s confidence will go a long way to in addressing the problems and challenges.

    Notable attendees include; Chairman LASPAC, Hon. Justice Mojisola Olatoregun (Rtd); Head Legal EFCC, Lagos, Aso Larrys; Director Legal ICPC, Lagos, Henry Emore, Controller of Nigeria Correctional Service, Lagos State Command ably represented by ACC. Rotimi Oladokun, Magistrates, Directors and Counsel in the Lagos Ministry of Justice.

  • Appeal Court reserves judgment in Ikorodu Obaship tussle

    Appeal Court reserves judgment in Ikorodu Obaship tussle

    By Jesutayo Taiwo

    The Court of Appeal sitting in Lagos, has reserved judgment in the appeal challenging the installation of Kabiru Adewale Shotobi as the Oba Ayangburen of Ikorodu.

    Justice Muhammed Mustapha. leading other Justices of the three-man panel, reserved judgment, after parties adopted their briefs of argument.

    During sitting of the court on Thursday, counsel to the appellants,  Eyitayo Jegede (SAN),  while adopting his brief of arguement, prayed the court to vacate the lower court judgment and grant all the reliefs sought.

    Counsel to the first to 6th respondents, Mr. Olusegun Fabunmi (SAN) opposed the application.

    Fabunmi prayed the appellate court to decline same and uphold the judgment of the lower court.

    Consequently, the appellate court reserved judgment and is to communicate to parties, the date for the judgment.

    Justice Babatunde  Savage of the Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikorodu, had in his judgment ratified Kabiru  Shotobi as the Oba Ayangburen of Ikorodu, Lagos State.

    Read Also; Unending grid collapse

    Dissatisfied, the appellants, the Lambo branch of Lasunwon Ruling House, challenged the installation of Mr. Shotobi as the Oba Ayangburen of Ikorodu, Lagos State, and prayed the court to set aside the judgment of the lower court.

    The appellants/applicants, Mr. Matthew Shodipo, Omobo Sokelu, Shakiru Shodipo, Mr. Nurudeen Fakomaya and Mr. Albert Ania, are praying the court to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the lower court.

    In their notice of appeal, the appelllant stated that the trial judge erred in law in holding that third to sixth respondents were not parties to suit No KD/57/2007 and therefore, not bound by the decision in that case.

    They urged the court to hold that the third to sixth respondents are kingmakers of Ikorodu and privies to Mr. Z. Aro in Exhibit A, who was sued on behalf of the kingmakers.

    They are further contending that the trial judge erred in law in holding that Clause 2 of the consent judgment in suit No IKD 57/2007 did not preclude the Adegorushe branch from presenting a candidate, nor preclude the second respondent from being nominated as candidate for the vacant Ayangbure title of Ikorodu.

    The appellants argued that the trial judge misdirected himself in law and thereby came to a wrong conclusion that the Obas and Chiefs Laws are paramount and therefore, all the reliefs sought in the originating motion must fail.

    “The interpretation by the lower court took away cause of action and as brought by the applicants and extended it beyond the reliefs sought by the applicants into the response sought by the respondents.

    “The interpretation of the court by reference set aside the judgment of Abiru J., (as he then was) in suit No. IKD/57/2007, a relief not sought by the applicants.

    “The learned trial judge misdirected himself in holding that suit No. IKD/57/2007, is subsisting having not been appealed against yet, that 3-6 respondents are not bound by it but bound only by his judgment.”

    “The trial judge erred in law in holding that all reliefs sought in the originating summons must fall and indeed dismissed the same.

    “The learned trial judge, having extensively dealt with the issue of waver raised by the respondents, refused and neglected to ascribe nor articulate on the issue of estoppels in pairs, raised by appellants nor pronounce the same.”

  • Lawyer seeks end to naira abuse

    Lawyer seeks end to naira abuse

    A lawyer, Tope Adebayo has lamented the ignorance of Nigerians about the legal framework guiding the use of Naira currency.

    Adebayo a senior counsel in Tope Adebayo LP (TALP) regretted that many Nigerians were unaware of the law until recently after the arrest and trial of Idris Okuneye, a.k.a. ‘Bobrisky’, a Nollywood actress, Oluwadarasimi Omoseyin and Cubans Priest, Pascal Okechukwu for their involvement in Naira note abuse.

    He said their trial highlighted the seriousness of the issue.

    He, however, regretted that despite its significance, the abuse of Naira notes has become a pervasive issue in the country, undermining its integrity and the respect it commands.

     He said that this is exemplified in recent high-profile cases, the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of the socialites.

     Adebayo stated this in a published paper titled “Examining the Abuse of Naira Notes in Nigeria: A Legal and Comparative Perspective”

    The paper explores the legal framework governing various forms of Naira abuse, in Nigeria in contrast to the regulatory landscape in the U.S.A. to buttress his position on the issue.

    Adebayo argued: “Section 21 (1) – (3) of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Act 2007, addresses Naira abuse.

    Read Also; Unending grid collapse

    “The abuse of Naira notes is governed primarily by the (CBN) Act 2007 and this statute confers upon the CBN the authority to regulate the issuance, distribution, and handling of currency within the country.

    “Section 21 of the CBN Act specifically prohibits the abuse of Naira notes, prescribing penalties for offenders, including fines and imprisonment.”

    On the other hand, he said that the legal frameworks in the United States are more comprehensive. For example, 18 U.S.C. section 333 prohibits the mutilation, diminution, and defacement of the Dollar, with violators subject to fines and imprisonment.

    He emphasised the need for Nigerians to desist from Naira abuse and recognise the currency as a symbol of national pride and lifeblood of the nation’s economy.

    “Currency serves as the lifeblood of any nation’s economy, embodying its value and facilitating economic transactions. In Nigeria, the Naira stands as a symbol of national pride and economic stability.”, he said.

    “The arrest and pending trial of another socialite, Pascal Okechukwu, popularly known as ‘Cubana Chief Priest’, further underscores the prevalence of this illicit activity,” he stated.

    He recalled: “Omoseyin and Bobrisky were sentenced to six months prison terms after pleading guilty, Cubana Chief Priest is still awaiting trial after pleading not guilty and granted bail by the Federal High Court.

    “Unlike the cases of Bobrisky and Omoseyin, the not-guilty plea triggers a legal process where evidence and arguments are carefully scrutinised, ultimately leading to a court judgment.

    “The consequences of Naira note abuse are multifaceted, one of which is that it compromises the durability of the currency, leading to premature deterioration.

    “The desecration of a national currency (Naira) undermines its symbolic value and reflects poorly on the country’s image domestically and internationally.

    “Despite the existence of  legislation and enforcing laws, currency abuse remains a significant challenge in Nigeria.

    “Limited resources, tax enforcement mechanisms, and cultural attitudes towards money contribute to the prevalence of Naira abuse. Unlike in the USA where stringent enforcement and public awareness campaigns are in place,” he submitted.

  • ARCON Act Section 54: Beyond emotion, propaganda

    ARCON Act Section 54: Beyond emotion, propaganda

    By Adams Atata

    An opinion piece entitled ‘ARCON Act Section 54: A new threat to business growth in Nigeria’ by one Saheed Akinola caught my attention in The Nation Newspaper of October 23 and I immediately developed an urge to respond to some of the issues raised by the author.

    I’m not an advertising practitioner but a lawyer and a sociologist. Strangely, it wasn’t the legal interpretation of the referenced section of the ARCON Act that provoked my curiosity but my knowledge and experience as a sociology lecturer for many years before veering into law. And as a Nigerian consumer, I’m equally affected by issues related to advertising and marketing. Many times, I or members of my family have fallen victim to deceitful campaigns.

    One of the questions Sociology scholars battle to answer is a question appurtenant to social order, and in this context is the regulation of advertisement and the protection of the consuming public from the vicious consequences of the Macdonaldisation of our society through a microcosm beaming of searchlight on the nexus between advertising and individual well-being as it affects the collective conscience of the society.

    Can advertisers be blamed for the negative perception of consumers? What is the place of regulation in promoting sanity in marketing communication? Who bears the burden of a deceitful campaign; the advertiser, the regulator or the consumer? The questions are endless but the last question gives a straightforward answer; the advertiser sells and smiles to the bank, the regulator faces criticism while the consumer loses money or suffers serious health challenges due to the consumption of substandard products.

    Read Also; Unending grid collapse

    To this end, I see the need for stakeholders to lay to bear the issues around Section 54 of the ARCON Act once and for all, because it speaks to the core of advertising regulation.

    Unfortunately, like Akinola’s article in The Nation on Saturday, many of such articles have been sponsored by some individuals within corporate Nigeria because they feel the section is hampering their unbridled use as advertisers to lure in consumers.

    As rightly pointed out by the writer of the misleading article, Section 54 of the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) mandates that no person, corporate entity, or agency can advertise products or services without obtaining prior approval from the Standards Panel.

    Though Akinola admitted that the law intends to regulate advertising practices and ensure standards, he yielded to emotion when he concluded that the far-reaching scope and the heavy penalties attached raise several concerns about its impact on business operations, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

    Perhaps a second look at the section may be necessarily recommended to the gentleman for him to properly deeply decipher  the message therein: “Any person including sponsor or beneficiary of an advertisement, body corporate, organization or agency which creates or places for publication or exposure of an advertisement in any medium directed at or targeting the Nigerian market without the prior approval of Standards Panel commits an offence and is liable to such fine as stated in the Nigerian Code of Advertising Practice.”

    Looking at the argument of Mr. Akinola, perhaps a legal practitioner, and his concern about the penalties attached to breaking advertising law makes me sick because an elementary student of Jurisprudence is knowledgeable enough to know that there will be no enforcement without sanction.

    The legal term “sanction” came into existence after Austin’s ‘theory of sovereignty’ where he described “sanction” as one of the important elements of the law. According to this theory, any force that is applied by the State in order to administer justice could be termed as a sanction. They are blunt diplomatic tools that have been measured into the guidelines we know of today.

    The term “sanctions” in the field of law and legal theory, are deemed to be penalties or any other means of law enforcement tool that is used to provide an incentive to the obedience of the law, or any regulation or any other set of management or rules as provided by the State. A sanction may be defined as an element that is associated with accountability that corresponds to the consequences which result from the justification of the realization of such accountability.

    In the current scenario, it’s obvious that the writer of the article under review knows but little about advertising and its regulation. Rather than dismissing ARCON Act section 54 as nothing but a distraction to businesses, he should have availed himself with literature about advertising ethics as well as report on campaign vetting and approval in different markets of the world.

    In Nigeria and all over the world, communication materials are daily being subjected to legal scrutiny to be sure they don’t run against the principle of natural justice and public interest. In other words, the principle of nemo judex incausa sua & Audi alterem pattem must not be overlooked.

    It is on this note that the issue of false or misleading representations and deceptive marketing practices under the Competition Act becomes necessary for healthy advertising practices.

    The Competition Act contains provisions addressing false or misleading representations and deceptive marketing practices in promoting the supply or use of a product or any business interest.

    All representations, in any form whatsoever, that are false or misleading in a material respect are subject to the Act. If a representation could influence a consumer to buy or use the product or service advertised, it is material. To determine whether a representation is false or misleading, the courts consider the “general impression” it conveys, as well as its literal meaning.

    The Act provides two adjudicative regimes to address false or misleading representations and deceptive marketing practices. Under the criminal regime, a general provision prohibits all materially false or misleading representations made knowingly or recklessly.

    Other provisions specifically forbid deceptive telemarketing, deceptive notices of winning a prize, double ticketing, and schemes of pyramid selling. The multi-level marketing provisions prohibit certain types of representations relating to compensation.

    The classic case of the Kim Kardashian scenario in the United States in 2022 is a good example of how sanctions are used to put advertisers on their toes. After all said and done and Kim Kardashian was found guilty of unhealthy practices, she agreed to pay a US$1.26 million (NZ$2.2m) fine for advertising EthereumMax on her Instagram page.

    The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said the reality TV star had received US$250,000 for advertising the cryptocurrency, without disclosing she had been paid to do so. She also agreed not to promote crypto asset securities for three years.

    A similar case in Nigeria was the MMM and other Ponzi schemes which Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), also overruled in 2022. The SEC DG, Lamido Yuguda had stated that the Commission would continuously collaborate and engage relevant agencies to eliminate all Ponzi scheme operations in the capital market.

    He said the SEC has been fighting a serious war against Ponzi schemes, and has been engaging and alerting Nigerians on the need to only deal with operators that are registered with the Commission.

    Then last year, Nollywood Actress, Olutoyin Abraham, had no choice but to terminate her contract with RevolutionPlus Property Development Company Limited as a brand ambassador when she started receiving a lot of allegations and complaints from investors who claimed that the company had not allocated lands nor refunded them their monies.

    Coming to ARCON, many controversial campaigns would have resulted in anarchy and unrest in society if the regulatory body had not acted fast and nipped the crisis in the bud.

     Last year, FrieslandCampina Wamco, owners of the Peak Milk brand, was marked out for sanction by the apex advertising regulatory body for releasing to the public a creative material that was not vetted by it. The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) had condemned the makers of Peak Milk, over an offensive Easter advert that was said to have sparked outrage among Christians in the country.

    Closely related was the furore generated by the Easter day advert of Sterling Bank which also brought to the fore the banana peel that often confronts the business of creatives anywhere in the world.

    In the said copy, which was published in major dailies on Sunday April 17, 2022, the bank had likened the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ to ‘Agege Bread’, a popular brand of bread that is very common in Agege, a suburb of Lagos.

    As expected, many adherents of the Christian faith saw the copy as not just being offensive and insensitive; they also felt it was a denigration of the status of Jesus Christ, the symbol of the Christian faith all over the world. Again, ARCON rose to the occasion and saved the country from unnecessary religious unrest.

    Going back to Section 54 of the ARCON Act which Akinola views as placing undue burdens on smaller enterprises that may lack the resources to navigate complex regulatory processes is an illogical conclusion. In a sane environment, the government regulates advertising materials, not only to promote healthy living but to protect businesses.

    By allowing advertisers to operate unrestrained, caution is most times thrown into the air as business owners would churn out deceptive materials to deceive the public. Under such circumstances, responsible businesses that play by the rule may be at a disadvantage while those with deceiving campaigns will be smiling to the bank at the expense of innocent consumers.

    On the argument that subjecting businesses that rely on frequent advertising updates, such as those in the tech and retail sectors into missing marketing opportunities and hinder their ability to compete effectively, this is a baseless argument considering the framework of the current advertising regulatory system, which has put in place a measure that would fast track vetting and approval. Besides, APCON has decentralized its operations to address issues related to vetting as quickly as possible.

    Finally, rather than criminalising ARCON on regulation and presenting the regulatory body as the enemy of businesses, stakeholders should rather come together and abide by global best practices. To me, the ongoing campaign of calumny is nothing but emotional blackmail to set the body against the government and those who know but little about its operations. To build Nigeria, we need to promote the Rule of Law.

    • Atata, a Lawyer, writes from Lagos.

  • Identity of land

    Identity of land

    By Ben Ijeoma Adigwe

    When a person approaches the court to claim a declaration of title to land, he has a primary duty to show the court clearly the area of land to which his claim relates so that the land can be identified with certainty.

    The claimant in an action for declaration of title to land has the onus of proving to the court title to a defined area to which the declaration can be pinned down.

    Where the land being claimed is contained in a survey plan, the claimant has the responsibility of serving the plan on the defendant to inform him of the land being claimed against him.

    Such a survey plan must clearly show the dimensions of the land, the boundaries and other features. This is so decided in the following cases: Idehen v. Osemwenkhae (1997) 10  NWLR (pt. 525) 358 SC ;  Dada v Dosunmu (2006) 18 NWLR (Pt. 1010) 134 SC

    In a claim for declaration of title to land, the claimant has the burden of establishing his claim upon the strength of his own case and not upon the weakness of the defendant’s case.

    The claimant, therefore, has the responsibility of satisfying the court that he is entitled to the sought declaration upon the pleadings and evidence adduced by him. See Gbadamosi v. Dairo (2007)  3 NWLR (pt. 1021) 282 and  Ajibade v. Ishula (2006) 13 NWLR (Pt. 998) 628 SC.

    In a claim for declaration of title to land, where the claimant fails to give the exact extent and identity of the land he is claiming, his case should be dismissed. See Aribe v. Asanlu (1980) 5 – 7 SC 78.

    Thus the claimant in a claim for declaration of title to land has the duty of establishing with certainty and accuracy the identity of the claimed land. This is a condition precedent to the success of the claim.

    Read Also: Petrol: Addressing supply shortfalls and pricing realities

    It has also been held that where the claimant fails to prove his root of title relied on in a land matter; the proper order to make in such circumstances is a dismissal of his case. See Ndukuba v. Izundu  (2007) 1NWLR (Pt. 1016) 432.

    It is by a properly drawn survey plan that the identity of land is proved. However, a survey plan, no matter how well and how properly drawn, has to be countersigned by a Surveyor–General to be admissible in evidence. See Atolagbe v. Shorun (1985)  1 NWLR  (Pt.2) 360 SC.

    Where the two surveyors called by the parties are in conflict as to the identity of the disputed land, the proper thing to do is to call on independent surveyor agreed on by both parties. See Sanni  v. Ogunbode (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 714) 74 CA.

    The court is not bound to accept the evidence of a surveyor on boundaries and description. It is sufficient if the parties know the land. See Yussuf v. Keinsi (2005) 13 NWLR (Pt 943) 554 .

    A survey plan will not be necessary in a land case and can be dispensed with in the following cases: (a) where the land is properly described; (b) where there is no dispute as to the boundaries of the disputed land; and (c) where the parties are not in any doubt as regards the boundaries of the land. See C.G.C. (Nig) Ltd. v Baba (2004) 10 NWLR (Pt. 882) 658.

    It has also been held that where in a land case, the area of the land in dispute is well known to both parties to the dispute, the requirement of proof of it does not arise, as the court cannot possibly reach a conclusion that the area claimed is not certain. See Osho v. Ape  (1998) 8NWLR (Pt 562)  492 at 495 SC

    The claimant has a duty to prove the precise area to which his claim relates. The burden of doing this will not arise if the identity of the disputed land was never an issue.

    The issue of the identity of the land in dispute arises only where the defendant raises it in his statement of defence and supported by evidence. See Dada v. Dosunmu (2006) 18 NWLR (Pt. 134) SC.

    If there is a visit to the locus in quo in a land in dispute, the law and the practice of courts is that the court should bring with it all the parties in the case, giving them the opportunity to explain the nature and circumstances of the disputed land. See Azupkwu v. Oshasona (2005) 11  NWLR (Pt.937) 537 SC.

    Where the evidence adduced  (oral and documentary) by the claimant and defendant are in agreement and settled as regards the identity of the disputed land, the fact that different names are given to the land or the place of the location of the land is not fatal to the claimant’s case. See Ogbu v. Wokoma (2005) 14 NWLR  (Pt.944) 118 SC.

    In a claim for declaration of title, if the claimant should succeed in proving only the boundaries and title to a smaller parcel of such land, he would be entitled to a declaration of title as regards the smaller portion of the disputed land, the title and boundaries of which he has proved satisfactorily. See Ezeokonkwo v. Okeke (2002) 11 NWLR (Pt.777) 1.

    If a claimant fails to establish the identity of the land on which his claim of ownership is based, any other piece of oral or documentary evidence, adduced in court cannot in law ground a declaration of title in his favour.  See Otanma v. Youdubagha (2006) 2NWLR (Pt.964) 337 SC.

    • Adigwe (www.benadigwe.com) is a lawyer, poet, chartered mediator/conciliator and the author of many books.

  • Prada Uzodimma law school scholarship grant opens application portal for 2024 cycle

    Prada Uzodimma law school scholarship grant opens application portal for 2024 cycle

    Prada Uzodimma Law School Scholarship Grant (PUSG), an intervention programme for indigent Law school students, has opened its application portal for the 2024 cycle.

    Barrister Prada Uzodimma founder of PUSG, made the announcement in a statement, adding that the grant was committed to sustaining its vision of providing financial sponsorship to selected indigent Law School aspirants across Nigeria.

    According to her, the ongoing application for the 2024 cycle will close on November 3, adding that “Applicants can access the application portal for the scholarship on the Principle Legal Consult Website and keep up to date on Principle Legal Consult social media platforms, @plconsult_ on Twitter and Instagram.

    “The Prada Uzodimma Law School Scholarship Grant portal is now open. PUSG is an educational initiative project catering to indigent aspiring law school students.

    “In 2021, we launched the Prada Uzodimma Law School Scholarship Grant, graduating five beneficiaries. In 2022, we introduced the Fireside Mentorship platform graduating 10 beneficiaries, and In 2023, we introduced our internship programs merging our beneficiaries with top law firms and organisations.

    “This year, 2024, something special is coming with our Alumni beneficiaries playing key roles in this year process, and as always we are looking forward to your applications.

    Read Also; Monday Sit-at-home: where are Southeast leaders?

    “The portal closes 3rd of November and we can’t wait to welcome you into the league of next generation outstanding lawyers,” she added.

    While saluting partners of PUSG , Barrister Uzodimma emphasised the importance of giving back and providing opportunities to those who are in need, highlighting the transformative impact of the PUSG on the lives of its beneficiaries.

    She urged well-to-do Nigerians of good will to support the initiative in order to ensure that aspiring law school students across the country realize their dreams of been called to the Nigerian bar.

    “The year PUSG 2024, needs your support, let us together sponsor even more indigent aspiring lawyers. Your sponsorship will infuse life into the vulnerable dreams of indigent students and contribute to the journeys of aspiring lawyers in Nigeria.

    “We are seeking your kind support today. Join us on this path, sponsor a law student today,” she added.

    The PUSG is a collaborative Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiative between Barrister Prada Uzodimma and Principle Legal Consult, launched in 2021 to support deserving yet financially disadvantaged law students across Nigeria by paying their Nigerian Law School tuition fees, and has since inception supported 30 law students.

    This laudable intervention programme has been acknowledged by key stakeholders, especially in the legal space, including endorsement by the Director General , Nigerian Law School,Prof.Isa Hayatu Chiroma and former Attorney General/Minister of Justice,Abubakar Malami.

  • ARCON Act Section 54: A new threat to business growth in Nigeria?

    ARCON Act Section 54: A new threat to business growth in Nigeria?

    By Saheed Akinola Esq

    In Nigeria’s dynamic business landscape, Section 54 of the ARCON Act introduces a significant layer of regulation to advertising, affecting how businesses communicate with their target market.

    Section 54 of the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) mandates that no person, corporate entity, or agency can advertise products or services without obtaining prior approval from the Standards Panel.

    This regulatory requirement applies across all media—whether print, online, or audiovisual. While the law intends to regulate advertising practices and ensure standards, its far-reaching scope and the heavy penalties attached raise several concerns about its impact on business operations, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). For clarity purposes, Section 54 is hereinunder reproduced seriatim:

    “Any person including sponsor or beneficiary of an advertisement, body corporate, organization or agency which creates or places for publication or exposure of an advertisement in any medium directed at or targeting the Nigerian market without the prior approval of Standards Panel commits an offence and is liable to such fine as stated in the Nigerian Code of Advertising Practice.”

    Broad Scope of Section 54: A one-size-fits-all approach

    One of the most significant issues with Section 54 is its broad application to all products and services across all media platforms. The requirement for prior approval is not limited to specific sectors, meaning that even a small business offering simple services or skill acquisition programs is held to the same standards as large multinational corporations.

    This “one-size-fits-all” approach disregards different businesses’ varying capabilities and needs, placing undue burdens on smaller enterprises that may lack the resources to navigate complex regulatory processes.

    For example, whether a company is advertising foodstuffs, clothing, or professional services, it must first seek approval for every advertisement, regardless of the medium. This is especially challenging for businesses that rely on frequent advertising updates, such as those in the tech and retail sectors. Delays in obtaining approval could result in missed marketing opportunities and hinder their ability to compete effectively.

    Random checks and online surveillance

    Another bizarre aspect of Section 54 is the practice of ARCON officers randomly checking online platforms and publications like Castle Magazine to ensure compliance. If they find any advertisement that lacks prior approval, they charge the company responsible, even if the business is unaware of the requirement.

    This creates an environment of constant surveillance, particularly in the digital marketing space where advertisements are posted in real-time and updated frequently.

    The rapid pace of online advertising conflicts with the bureaucratic nature of approval processes, which may not be equipped to handle the speed at which companies now operate. For businesses, especially those leveraging social media and other digital platforms, requiring prior approval for each ad is impractical and could stifle innovation in how they engage with their audience.

    Corporate liability and director responsibility

    One of the most troubling features of Section 54 is the way it extends liability beyond just the advertising agency or company responsible for placing the ad. The law holds both the company and its directors personally liable for any infraction, regardless of whether the advertisement was placed by an agent or third party.

    This transfer of responsibility means that even if a marketing agency, hired by a company, fails to obtain approval for an advertisement, the directors of the company could still face prosecution.

    This creates significant legal risks for directors who may not have direct involvement in day-to-day marketing operations. Directors in large organizations, in particular, may have little oversight over every advertisement produced, yet they are exposed to the possibility of fines, bench warrants, and even arrests for non-compliance.

    The Advertising Offences Tribunal, which is empowered to enforce this section, has the authority to issue bench warrants against directors, escalating what is essentially a regulatory infraction into a criminal matter.

    Erosion of corporate liability protections

    From a jurisprudential perspective, Section 54 raises important questions about fairness and corporate responsibility. Under Nigerian corporate law, particularly CAMA 2020, the principle of separate legal personality generally shields directors from personal liability for the actions of the corporation, unless there is evidence of fraud or misconduct.

    Section 54 undermines this protection by imposing strict liability on directors for advertising violations committed by the corporation, even when the directors were not directly involved in the infraction.

    This goes against the basic legal principle that individuals should only be held liable for actions they control or influence. Moreover, the issuance of bench warrants for advertising infractions, a common practice of the Advertising Offences Tribunal, criminalizes what should be a civil or regulatory issue. Directors may find themselves facing arrest for minor oversights in compliance, which creates an environment of uncertainty and risk for businesses operating in Nigeria.

    The chilling effect on business growth and innovation

    The broad application of Section 54 and its enforcement through the Advertising Offences Tribunal have far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s business environment. For SMEs, the compliance burden could be particularly stifling. These businesses often rely on agile marketing strategies to compete in crowded markets, and the need to seek approval for every advertisement could significantly slow their growth.

    In sectors like technology, where advertising plays a critical role in customer acquisition and brand visibility, the potential delays caused by the approval process could result in missed opportunities.

    Additionally, the law’s overly punitive nature could have a chilling effect on innovation. Creative advertising campaigns that push boundaries or explore new ways to engage customers may be avoided altogether if businesses fear potential legal repercussions. Rather than fostering a competitive and dynamic market, Section 54 could result in cautious, risk-averse advertising, which may hinder both domestic and foreign investment in the Nigerian market.

    Conclusion: Striking a balance between regulation and business growth

    While the regulation of advertising is necessary to ensure ethical practices and protect consumers, Section 54 of the ARCON Act presents challenges that need to be addressed. The law’s broad scope, its ambiguity regarding compliance, and the potential for criminal liability for directors create an uncertain and restrictive environment for businesses.

    A more balanced regulatory approach should be adopted- one that differentiates between the different players in the advertising processes, and recognizes the varying capacities of businesses.

    Streamlining the approval process, providing clearer guidelines, and ensuring that enforcement is fair and proportionate will promote compliance without stifling business growth or innovation. Any regulation that seeks to control it should do so in a way that balances the need for oversight with the rights of businesses to communicate freely and effectively with their consumers.

  • Day I rejected a mother’s plea to withdraw daughter’s rape case

    Day I rejected a mother’s plea to withdraw daughter’s rape case

    Labaran Magaji (SAN) is the Nasarawa State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice. He was a federal prosecutor and member of Nigeria’s Complex Casework Group (CCG) in the Chambers of the Attorney-General of the Federation. In this interview with Assistant Editor ERIC IKHILAE, he explains why the prosecution must carry victims along in plea bargains, why the office of Attorney-General should be split from the Commissioner for Justice, how he speeds up justice administration, compliance with the rule of law, and his achievements so far.

    What is your position on the call for the separation of the office of the Attorney-General and that of the Commissioner for Justice?

    Since I came in, I  have also insisted that if you want me to answer you, call me the Attorney-General, but for the Commissioner for Justice, wait until I get to the Executive Council meeting. This is because it is a nomenclature that will compromise the professionalism in the office of the Attorney-General. The office of the Attorney-General is supposed to be a police to other MDAs, but the Commissioner of Justice is supposed to be a colleague to other members of the Executive Council. If I want to function as a police of the MDAs that I am, I wear the clothes of the Attorney-General. So, if the office is separated, I think it is even going to function well. The criminal justice system is going to function effectively well. It is happening in other climes. So, it shouldn’t be a strange thing to happen here in Nigeria. I have been maintaining that. Probably, because of my orientation as one who has worked for a decade in the Department of Public Prosecution. So, this is my take on that. It is personal though, and not the position of the government of the states.

    How are you addressing the challenge of delay in criminal trials?

    Since I came in, we have addressed that issue frontally. This is because I personally go to court. And anytime I lead my team to court, my first application to the judge is the application for an accelerated hearing. And, by virtue of my position as the Attorney- General, I go there fully armed with all my witnesses, all the exhibits and everything.

    So, every day I go to court, I finish a case, every day. I think the minimum number of witnesses I take a day is four. And, when I review a case of more than 10 witnesses and I see that I have only five or four that can produce what I need to prove my case, I do away with others to avoid unnecessary delay.

    So, even the inmates themselves are now happy. I went to the correctional centre last October. They (the inmates) were even hailing us because they know that any day they go to court, their case would go on. All lawyers in the ministry go to court. Nobody goes to court and takes adjournment under my watch, not at all. It is either you are ready to go on or you just forget it.

    So, all my lawyers, we are not many; every time, we always have a conference here. So, I know every lawyer by his name. I know every lawyer by the file he is handling. We also have our case management system, where at the press of a button, I will be able to tell you the number of cases we have in all the area offices, in Karu, in Kefi, in Akwanga, in Lafia. I know them. So, I know which court a matter is going on. So, the issue of delay in criminal trials in Nasarawa State is, in fact, a bygone. In fact, my experience will be useless if I will come here and we continue to experience delays in criminal prosecution.

    The Attorney-General of the Federation recently signed the National Minimum Standards intended to ensure uniformity in the application of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act/Administration of Criminal Justice Laws (ACJA/ACJLs) across the country. Will your state adopt the standards?

    That is a document that we are all putting together, which is just passing through the clearing house. There is absolutely nothing in that document that is strange to our thinking, our vision and what we are doing here in Nasarawa State. So, we are waiting, ready to receive it, and as soon as it is the final document, I think I have a proposal to bring in those experts to train my lawyers to key into it immediately and move on. We plan to be like a pacesetter in that area.

    Read Also; Local government administrators

    What are the key provisions?

    One of the provisions contained in the document is the timeline within which legal opinion must be given by the Ministry of Justice. Under my watch, you don’t dare go and keep my book. I don’t send you a file and you go and keep it. What are you doing? What are we even paying your salary for? That is not even an issue. We don’t even have any issue with that provision. In fact, what we have introduced here is that, where there is any case file that requires legal opinion, we don’t even wait till 14 days. No, it is just a phone call away to the investigating officers, or they call me themselves. It is either the DC, CID (Deputy Commissioner, Criminal Investigation Department) calls or the Commissioner of Police himself calls, and we move to court straight.

    No, we don’t have any cause to delay any legal opinion. You don’t have to go to your grandparents in the grave to ask them what to do. You are trained to give legal opinions, so you should be able to give it.

    What is your disposition to the provision in the document that plea bargain shall apply to all offences?

    For the idea of a plea bargain on all offences, I have a reservation. My reservation is actually, not only for capital offences, but some offences. I will give you an example. One lady came here, her four-year-old daughter was raped. The matter was investigated. We took the matter to court. Then, she suddenly came here one day and told me that her political godfather, who made her an APC women leader, asked her to go and withdraw the case. I told her that it was impracticable and that the most she could do was to withdraw her evidence. I told her that withdrawing the case was not within her powers. Her request beats my imagination. And I asked her if she was actually the mother of the victim. Somebody raped your four-year-old daughter. If we drop the case against the defendant who raped your own daughter, what if he goes and rapes other people’s daughters, who are not made political women leaders? What do you want us to do? I told her I was going to think about her request. But, the bottom line is that the guy is still in prison, so I’m still thinking about it. These are some of the things. That is why, sometimes, when we are doing a meeting on the prerogative of mercy, I consider what is the offence. If somebody is involved, what will he feel? If we are pardoning him, how will the government compensate the victim? That is what I do.

    How do you explain a plea bargain to the victim?

    In an ideal situation, we should call him/her (the victim) and say, gentleman/woman, that person that hurts you, don’t be surprised to see him/her on the streets tomorrow. This is the situation, but we are sorry, as a government. What do you want? Okay, take, this is what you can get. But, you can’t just let a criminal go based on a plea bargain, while the victim is there suffering. We are not saying that it is bad to grant pardon, but the person who is affected by the consequence of the criminality leading to that pardon should be carried along. This is my own concept of this idea of pardon or plea bargain. All of these can only be achieved if you have the experience of the things we are talking about. So, that is why, even the conventional plea bargain under Section 270 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, if you look at it, is compensating the government, because if you stole money and you want to enter a plea bargain, they will say you should surrender some. Who was a victim? The government. So, that something that you surrender is going to the government. If it was an individual’s funds that you stole, the individual should also be entitled to some form of compensation. That is fairness. This is the perspective from which I am looking at the plea bargain provision in the National Minimum Standards 2024. No matter where I find myself, this is going to be my argument.

    How do you ensure the state operates by the tenets of the rule of law?

    On the issue of respect for the rule of law and related democratic principles, this government is doing well. Again, I will give an example. There was an instance when a journalist, who worked in this state had a rift with the system, which he was not happy with and he resorted to blackmail, perhaps to attract attention to himself. That time was the buildup to the decisions of the tribunals on the various post-election cases. The period when people were all angry because they lost at the polls. You know that Nasarawa State was one of the hotbeds during the last election season because our election was characterised by two things – religion and tribe. But at the end of the election Engr. Abdullahi A. Sule won and those who were aggrieved went to the election tribunal to challenge the electoral outcome. It was during that time that I came on board, shortly before judgment was delivered by the tribunal. The tribunal upturned the election and we went on appeal. And, the Court of Appeal upturned the decision of the tribunal. Now, those who lost were not happy with everything, so they continued to mount pressure on the government, using all manner of weapons available at their disposal, including the media, to actually blackmail the government. But one thing that I discovered was that the governor remained steadfast. He never asked anybody to go after them. That was one thing very unprecedented to a sitting government.

    We had instances where women were recruited to sustain protests for upward of six months in the states, and for once, he never asked anybody to go after them. Now, it was in the heat of that, that the journalist just went and published online that N40 million was stolen from the governor’s bedroom. The governor was furious. He was furious, not because they said the money was stolen, after all no money was stolen anyway, but he was concerned about the perception of the common man. So, everybody was bringing his idea of how to go about it. Then, I said no, let us remind ourselves that we agreed to operate based on the principles of the rule of law, human rights and access to justice. For that reason, you the governor, an individual like every other person, what you should do is to cause a petition to be written to the appropriate authority, saddled with the responsibility of investigating this issue. So, we caused a petition to be written to the Commissioner of Police. It took the police months to trace who actually was the author of the publication and the police were left to handle the case without any interference from the government. Also, during that last protest, the police arrested almost about 63 people, but none of them spent one hour beyond the time allowed by law. At the directive of the governor, we went to court to obtain a release order, and it was served on the police, and they were all released. This is the kind of person that I like to work with, because, as a British-trained prosecutor, everything I was taught is in keeping with the principles of the rule of law, human rights and, of course, access to justice. In Nasarawa State, nobody is afraid of being harassed by any law enforcement agency.

    How are you addressing the problem of prison congestion?

    One of the measures being adopted is the deployment of the instrument of prerogative of mercy. On every event, His Excellency will make it a duty to commemorate that event by discharging or granting pardon to some deserving inmates. We introduced that when I came in in August last year. By October of the same year, he discharged 11 inmates. On January 1 this year, he discharged 14 inmates. Last, October 1, he discharged 12 inmates. And, aside from that, during prison visits of the honourable Chief Judge, he (the governor) always tells her (the CJ): ‘When you go the correctional centre, if find any inmate that is owing, either fine or compensation, put the money together and bring it the government so that we can defray it to allow the inmates have freedom.’ Through that method, the CJ has freed so many people.

    How did you end your tenure as the A-G of Nasarawa State?

    It was one of the few appointments that was not lobbied for. According to him (the governor), my appointment was purely meritorious. I have never taken it for granted and claim to be the best. On the contrary, I took the appointment as a very big challenge to me, because I have little or no knowledge of what he (the governor) saw in me that made him decide to appoint me.

    So, how has it been since your appointment?

    Governor Abdullahi A. Sule has never influenced any opinion coming from this office that shapes his government. Again, for once, he has never turned down any opinion coming from this office. And, there has never been any activity of government that he will ever engage in without consulting this office. When I came on board, the governor told me that he wanted a legal reform that was going to be built on three tripods – access to justice, human rights and the rule of law.  My immediate response to him was that in every society where the Chief Executive focuses on and gives attention to these three tripods, nothing is left.

    In what areas have you made an impact so far?

    Let me give an example. When I assumed office, none of the bank accounts of the Nasarawa State Government were functioning. No single account was functioning. Salaries of civil servants were paid via POS (point of sale) because all the accounts were garnisheed. And, what happened was that they were advising him (the governor) to go to court or go on appeal in respect of judgments that were already given against the state government. But, I came out with a robust idea. I said look, if you are owing you are owing, there are no two ways about it. I said let us negotiate with the people we are owing. I said why don’t we relieve ourselves of this burden? So, since then, gradually, we have been at it. Those we can defray, we have defrayed; those with whom we could negotiate instalment payment, we negotiated. Those we could win in court, we won. We were able to achieve these because of his (the governor’s) humility. This is because he agreed to the opinions my office supplied. And, I am happy to inform you that no single account of government is held on account of garnishee.

    How about staff welfare?

    When I came here, this office complex did not, in any way, look better than a glorified local government secretariat. Looking at the structure of the Ministry of Justice today, at least modestly, it looks like a chamber of the honourable Attorney General. The lawyers too are now afforded some level of comfort. At least, our lawyers in the state are now enjoying a certain level of comfort, courtesy of the regard and respect the governor has for the Office of the Attorney General.

    How about training?

    In terms of training for lawyers in the ministry, when I came in, they confessed to me that they had never travelled beyond Lafia (the state capital) for any training. But, I have access to the International Institute of Justice and Rule of Law, where lawyers from this place could have some kind of exposure. I took my management team to the National Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies, Kuru for managerial skills, and to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) Institute. I have been able to facilitate all manners of training for them. In most cases, I have taken them to Abuja and Lagos.

    How do you interface with other agencies?

    We position ourselves as police of all the ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) of the state government. We keep a check on their activities and the way they spend their finances, too. We do that all in an attempt to guide the government. And of course, this couldn’t have been possible if the governor had not given us the free hand to operate. He would say: ‘I brought in so that you can bring your experience to bear.’ So, I am happy to inform you that I am the most accessible member of the cabinet to His Excellency, second to the deputy governor and the secretary to the government.