Category: Law

  • Activists seek action on corruption, hunger

    Activists seek action on corruption, hunger

    The Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) in collaboration with the Centre for Anti-Corruption and Open Leadership (CACOL) has addressed a litany of urgent issues plaguing the country, highlighting pervasive corruption, political crises, soaring food prices, illegal arms importation, and the state of infrastructure, among others.

    In a press briefing in Lagos, CDHR President Debo Adeniran, shed light on these pressing matters and proposed solutions to mitigate their impact on the nation.

    He emphasised the need for a redefinition of democracy in Nigeria, saying: “Democracy should be redefined to ensure true representation and accountability. The issues we face today stem from a flawed system that requires urgent reform,”

    Adeniran underscored the pervasive corruption he identifies as the root cause of Nigeria’s socio-economic and political problems.

    “Corruption in all its forms such as stealing, oppression, nepotism, lying, embezzlement, and bribery has impoverished the average Nigerian while unjustly enriching the leadership,” he stated.

    He appealed to the government to intensify efforts to combat corruption, urging for measures such as ending the phenomenon of ghost workers and retrieving unlawfully collected salaries.

    Adeniran drew attention to a recent directive by President Bola Tinubu, which called for civil servants who have relocated abroad without formally resigning to refund their salaries.

    “This situation exemplifies the extent of corruption, which is spiralling to new levels. We call on the government to bring these perpetrators to book and publicly shame them to serve as a deterrent to others,” he insisted.

    The crisis in Rivers State also came under scrutiny where Adeniran expressed alarm over the political situation in the state between former Governor Nyesom Wike and his successor, Governor Siminalayi Fubara.

    “All lovers of democracy should be concerned about the situation in Rivers State. We implore President Tinubu to call Nyesom Wike to order.

    “If the crisis is not properly handled, it might delve into other states. Wike should allow Fubara to govern the state peacefully.

    “The Rivers crisis endangers our democracy and it is tantamount to planting time bombs on the foundation of the Nigerian Federation,” Adeniran warned.

    Read Also: FG orders 37 contractors to deliver 260 emergency road projects in three months

    Turning to the soaring prices of basic foodstuffs, Adeniran painted a grim picture of the hardships faced by ordinary Nigerians.

    “The astronomical rise in the prices of garri, millet, yam, palm oil, and other staples is alarming. This surge contributes to hunger, malnutrition, and an unbearable cost of living,” he lamented.

    He cited the 2022 survey by the Nigeria Bureau of Statistics, which revealed that 133 million Nigerians live in multidimensional poverty. He attributed the food crisis to violence, kidnappings, and destruction of farmlands, particularly in states like Benue, Plateau, and Borno.

    “The government must prioritise securing the lives and properties of citizens, especially farmers. Temporary measures to defeat hunger and introduce social safety programmes are urgently needed,” he advised.

  • Agency enlists pupils in anti-gender violence war

    Agency enlists pupils in anti-gender violence war

    The  Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency (DSVA), in collaboration with Youth Alive Foundation, has inducted  additional 40 young boys and girls into the Kings and Queens Club.

    The exercise was to promote positive masculinity and raise empowered girls against gender-based violence.

    The new inductees were drawn from secondary schools, in Education District 2, (the United Senior/Junior Schools and Ayangbunren Senior/Junior High Schools, Ikorodu).

    The development has brought the membership of the club to 5,507 since the commencement of the programme.

    Read Also: Samoa agreement: Tinubu govt won’t endorse sodomy -Fani-Kayode

    Head, Public Affairs Unit of the Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency (DSVA), Mrs. Adejoke Ladenegan-Oginni, said over six weeks, the selected boys and girls were engaged on critical issues such as SGBV, sexual and reproductive health, anger management, gender equality, the legal position on the Child’s Rights Law, technology-facilitated sexual and gender-based violence, feminity/masculinity, grit, tenacity&resilience and  new woman/ new man ,among others.

    “At the end of the six weeks, the boys and girls were inducted officially into the clubs even as they were encouraged to become positive change agents in their communities”, she said.

    The statement added that some of the students commended the Agency and the Youth Alive Foundation for bonding and imparting them with knowledge on these critical issues  and promised to share the experiences with the other students in their schools.

  • Court acquits APC chief Onamade of cybercrime charge

    Court acquits APC chief Onamade of cybercrime charge

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has discharged and acquitted Ikorodu-based chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and owner of Western Funeral Home, Ijede, Oluwatosin Onamade, of cybercrime charge.

    The charge followed a complaint by the former chairman of Ijede LCDA, Fatiu Jimoh Salisu.

    Justice Olayinka Faji acquitted Onamade of two counts of cybercrime.

    Salisu had accused Onamade of being the mastermind of the murder of Godfrey Ifeanyi, a staff of Western Funeral Home in 2021 in the build-up to the local government primary election.

    Onamade was a contestant while Salisu sought a second term.

    Ifeanyi was murdered after some thugs invaded Onamade’s office and attacked his staff.

    Salisu claimed that Onamade committed cybercrime by circulating his name on various Whatsapp groups accusing him of being responsible for the murder of Ifeanyi thereby tarnishing his image.

    He had also claimed Onamade granted a media interview where he mentioned his name as the sponsor of the attack.

    He further claimed the allegation prevented him from getting his party’s ticket for a second term in office as council chairman which has affected his political career.

    The charge reads: “That you, Oluwatosin Onamade ‘M’, sometime in May 2021 in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court did commit, an illegal act to wit; intentionally circulating a grossly offensive publication through your Facebook/Instagram handle which you knew to be false, to cause insult to one Hon. Fatiu Salisu, ljede LCDA Chairman by accusing him of the murder of late Tony Godfrey, you thereby committed an offence punishable under section 24 of the Cyber Crimes Act, 2015.”

    Count Two reads: “ That you, Oluwatosin Onamade ‘M’, sometime in May 2021 in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court knowingly caused the transmission of communication through your WhatsApp to harass one Hon. Fatiu Salisu, Ijede LCDA Chairman by falsely alleging that he sponsored the attack at Western Funeral Home Limited office and murder of late Tony Godfrey, you thereby committed an offence punishable under section 24(2)(a) of the Cybercrimes Act, 2015.”

    Prosecution counsel, Omotayo Olatubosun called two witnesses.

    Read Also: Nigeria Air N2.6b investigation: EFCC quizzes Ethiopian Airlines CEO

    The first witness, a Chief Superintendent of Police, Omaka Udodinma told the court that a petition was forwarded to his team for investigation by the then Inspector General of Police, from the office of former Minister of Interior, Rauf Aregbesola.

    He said his team invited Salisu to explain the rationale behind the petition after which the investigating team proceeded to Lagos to arrest Onamade for questioning.

    The witness said Onamade was asked to retract the statement accusing Salisu of being the attack’s mastermind or provide evidence backing his claim, adding that the team received a compact disc showing the defendant accusing the petitioner of his involvement in the incident.

    He added that Onamade told the team that on the day of the attack, he saw Salisu in an unregistered Toyota RAV 4 Jeep in the company of the assailants who attacked him in his office.

    He mentioned evidence provided by Onamade to the investigating team to include two Circuit Television, CCTV CDs containing footage of the attack, as well as a copy of a press release by a group, Concerned Residents of Ijede, claiming Salisu was not competent to contest in the election because of his alleged misgovernance in his first tenure.

    Under cross-examination by the defendant’s counsel, Adedayo Osijo, Udodinma admitted that his team did not investigate all the suspects arrested in connection with the murder, namely Farouq Fasasi, Gbolahan Olubi, Owolabi Sadiq, Shittu Michael Olawale and Olayide Opeifa to ascertain if the allegations against Fatiu were true.

    Osijo further asked the witness how his investigating team concluded that Onamade’s allegation against the petitioner was a defamation of his character since the team failed to investigate the suspects.

    Salisu, who was the second witness, presented printed chats in a WhatsApp group where he claimed Onamade accused him of the offence.

    In his argument before the court, Osijo said that the prosecution failed to provide concrete evidence that Onamade committed the offence of cybercrime and bullying. He thereafter filed a no-case submission.

    In his submission, the counsel sought ‘an order of the court discharging the defendant.

     The lawyer said: “The prosecution did not lead evidence to establish and/or show the existence of the essential elements of the alleged offence preferred against the defendant in Counts 1 and 2 of the charge dated 18th November 2021 neither did the prosecution lead evidence to link the defendant to the offence allegedly committed.”

    He further noted in his submission that the evidence presented by the prosecution is so “manifestly unreliable that this Honourable Court cannot rely on it to convict the defendant,” adding that the prosecution has not shown that the defendant has any case to answer.

    Osijo argued it would be in the interest of justice to grant this application and acquit Onamade of the charges.

    Ruling, Justice Faji ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its allegations against Onamade.

    The court noted that evidence presented by the prosecution did not show Onamade made such allegations and circulated them on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter (now X) as there was no evidence they were found on such social media platforms which would have supported the allegation of cybercrime.

    It further noted that the alleged Whatsapp group chats did not show Onamade’s telephone number to suggest he was responsible for the circulation of the allegation.

    The judge further ruled the first prosecution witness failed to conduct thorough investigations into the matter.

    Justice Faji noted that the two counts carry a punishment of 10 and three years imprisonment each if convicted or a fine of N7 million and N25 million each respectively.

  • Nzuko Umunna seeks curriculum on value of peace, reconciliation

    Nzuko Umunna seeks curriculum on value of peace, reconciliation

    A non-governmental organisation, Nzuko Umunna, has urged the Federal and state governments to develop a school curriculum that includes comprehensive lessons on the Nigerian-Biafran War.

    The emphasis, it said, should be on the importance of peace and reconciliation.

    This was one of the recommendations it made in a communique after its second monthly webinar.

    Its theme was: “Memorialising the Nigerian-Biafran War: a catalyst for better civic engagement and sustainable development in Southeast Nigeria.”

    The session was chaired by Obi of Onitsha, Igwe Nnaemeka Achebe, and featured stakeholders from the academia, traditional and civil society organisations, community leaders, and policymakers.

    Among them were Archibishop Chibuzo Opoko, Ikeazor Akaraiwe (SAN), Mazi Sam Ohuabunwa and Dr Okey Anueyiagu.

    They reflected on the Nigerian-Biafran War and its implications for civic engagement and sustainable development in Nigeria.

    They reminisced on the devastating effects of the war on Ala Igbo as a whole, which included the lives lost, people displaced, and other economic devastation.

    Read Also: Nigeria Air N2.6b investigation: EFCC quizzes Ethiopian Airlines CEO

    Speakers commended the resilience and determination of the Igbo people in the face of adversity, which brought about the significant progress made in rebuilding and reconstructing the region despite all the social, economic, and political challenges that tried to frustrate its sustainable development.

    The communique by members/executive committee of the Nzuko Umunna reads: “We resolved: To support initiatives that will solve the root causes of conflict and encourage sustainable and remarkable development in Ala Igbo;

    “To nurture a culture that enhances peace, tolerance, and understanding amid the diverse communities in Ala Igbo;

    “To sponsor and encourage participatory and inclusive governance to ensure that all citizens have a voice;

    “Encourage massive investment in vital areas of the economy like health, infrastructure, and education which will lead to massive human capital and economic growth.

    “We, after that, called upon the Federal Government of Nigeria, state governments and local governments in the Southeast, and relevant stakeholders to:

    “Establish memorial museums, digital archives, and online platforms dedicated wholly to the history of the Nigerian-Biafran War, showcasing personal stories, artefacts, photographs, and historical documents with interactive exhibits and multimedia presentations to engage visitors and educate them on the impacts of war;

    “Erect monuments in key locations to honour the victims and veterans of the war;

    “Develop a school curriculum that includes comprehensive lessons on the Nigerian-Biafran War with emphasis on the importance of peace and reconciliation;

    “Organise workshops and seminars with historians, survivors, and scholars to facilitate deeper understanding and dialogue;

    “Set out a day as a public holiday wherein annual commemorative events in the form of memorial services, peace walks, and cultural festivals on such significant dates related to the war;

    “Implement policies and programmes that address the lingering effects of the war;

    “Support initiatives that promote civic engagement and sustainable development in the region;

    “Encourage community participation in these events to foster a sense of collective memory and solidarity;

    “Collaborate with non-governmental organisations like Nzuko Umunna, Ohaneze Ndi Igbo, and international bodies to fund and implement memorialisation projects, ensuring that initiatives reflect the experiences and perspectives of all affected groups to foster inclusivity and ownership.

    “The government should identify and preserve significant sites related to the war, such as battlefields, refugee camps, and historical buildings.

    “This communique when implemented will not only help in memorialising the dead war veterans but will also help to promote healing and also educate the future generations and bring about sustainable development and peace in the Southeast and Nigeria in general.”

    The communique was signed by the organisation’s President, Prof. Chinedu Nebo and Executive Secretary, Dr. Uju Agomoh.

    Keynote speaker, Adaeze Anah, Managing Principal at The Anah Law Practice, said the event, which commemorated the 54th anniversary of the war’s end, holds profound sentimental value for her as an Igbo woman born after the war but acutely aware of the continued violations faced by the people of the defunct Biafra.

    “These discussions are crucial in fostering corporate healing and driving socio-economic endeavours in our region.

    “By reflecting on our past, we can address lingering injustices and promote sustainable development, ensuring that the welfare of our people is prioritised.

    “Engaging in such dialogues paves the way for a more inclusive and equitable future, honouring the resilience and spirit of our communities,” she said.

  • Experts offer insight on future of judiciary, energy reporting

    Experts offer insight on future of judiciary, energy reporting

    Judiciary and energy correspondents have been urged to adopt best practices to add more value.

    Experts made the call at the first phase of a training programme for journalists and media practitioners organised by Seplat Energy Plc.

    The programme featured 37 energy and judiciary correspondents and editors from print, electronics and online platforms.

    Organised in partnership with Channels Academy, it was aimed at building reporting and editing capacity.

    Participants were exposed to the intersections of law and energy, regulatory frameworks, major legal cases, environmental laws, ethical considerations and media objectivity.

    Modules of investigative reporting (techniques, advanced research methods, using public records, interviewing techniques); data journalism in judicial and energy reporting; analysis of energy sector developments; and collaborative reporting projects with story ideas development, were explored.

    Insights on legal challenges in energy reporting (understanding defamation, libel, navigating legal challenges) and the future of energy and law about emerging trends were provided.

    Read Also: Nigeria Air N2.6b investigation: EFCC quizzes Ethiopian Airlines CEO

    The training evaluated future legal challenges and the need to prepare for industry shifts.

    Seplat Director of External Affairs and Social Performance, Chioma Afe, who was represented by the Manager of Corporate Communications, Stanley Opara, thanked the media professionals, resource persons and Channels Academy for their commitment to the success of the training programme.

    Afe re-echoed Seplat Energy’s commitment to building capacity in the media and promoting best practices in the industry.

    Journalists from the Association of Energy Correspondents of Nigeria (NAEC) and the National Association of Judicial Correspondents (NAJUC) expressed their gratitude to Seplat Energy for the opportunity.

    They described the programme as timely and well-conceived, urging other corporate entities to follow Seplat Energy’s example in fostering growth and capacity in the Nigerian media industry.

  • Stakeholders seek scheme for community service officers

    Stakeholders seek scheme for community service officers

    Stakeholders in the justice sector  have called for the establishment of a scheme of service for community service officers in Lagos State.                    

    The suggestion was made at a “Stakeholders’ Forum On Community Service And Other Non Custodial Measures In The Administration Of Criminal Justice In Lagos State” which held at Marriot Hotel, Joel Ogunnaike Street, GRA, Ikeja

    Associate Professor of Law, University of Lagos (UNILAG), Akoka,  Dr. Akeem Bello, who was the guest speaker,  said institutionalising community service into the mainstream of the civil service  in the state is one of the ways to make community service work.

    “We need to establish a scheme of service for community service officers”, he said, adding that there was also a need to mainstream community service officers into the public service. 

    “We need to institutionalise community service and giving it the structure it deserves. If you can demonstrate to the government how the thing will work and the benefits it will bring to the state, I am sure the state will be willing to fund it”, he said.

    Dr Bello who spoke on the topic: “Community Service Pathway To Improved Security, Human Development And Economic Growth In Lagos State” recalled that community service was first introduced into Nigerian Criminal Justice System under Section 347 of the Ancillary Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State in 2007.

    Read Also: Japa: Canada lowers scores for skilled Nigerian workers, others

     He explained that the concept of community service in the context of criminal justice is a sentencing option for persons convicted of crimes in which the court ordered the defendant to perform a number of hours of unpaid work for the benefit of the public. 

    “Community service play a crucial role in reducing recidivism, which refers to the tendency of an offender to re-offend and providing targeted interventions, support and supervision, community correction programmes address the underlying factors contributing to criminal behaviour and help individuals develop the necessary skills to lead law-abiding lives.” Bello said.

    “This is 17 years since community service came to being in Lagos and there are many states running after us. One state has even overtaken us but we need to keep championing the cause”, he said.

    Bello  highlighted other ways to improve  community service to include employment and training  of more community officers to ensure adequate deployment at all magisterial districts, establishing structures for rehabilitation and reintegration.

    He added: “the Centre should redeploy councilors, therapists who focus on behavioral issues, substance and minor health issues.

    “Providing facilities for vocational training for unemployed offenders, collaboration with NGOs, where they provide skilled acquisition for unemployed youth.

    Earlier in his opening remarks, the Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice,  Lawal Pedro (SAN), emphasised the importance of non-custodial measures such as community service, suspended sentencing and parole. 

    Pedro, who was represented by Ibironke Allison in his opening remarks, said that there was a need to ensure that individuals who did not necessarily need to be incarcerated for punishment could still be held accountable in a manner that allowed them to remain productive members of society. 

    According to him, these measures help reduce re-offending rates and alleviate overcrowded correctional facilities.

    He said statistics have shown that community-based sentences have reduced re-offending rates by at least 50 per cent, proving the efficacy of the alternative measures.

    The Attorney-General highlighted the potential of the measures to involve the community more actively in the justice process, fostering a sense of restitution and reconciliation.

    He said: “The forum’s timing is significant, coinciding with recent constitutional amendments empowering states to own, manage, and operate correctional facilities.

     “Our experience has taught us that the landscape of criminal justice is evolving and it is imperative that we adopt our methods to better serve both justice and society.

    “These examples provide a roadmap for Lagos State to implement similar strategies, in line with Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu’s plans which focuses on security, governance and social inclusion.

    “Justice is a three-way traffic: justice for the claimant, justice for the defendant and justice for society.”

     The commissioner for justice said the forum marked a critical milestone in the journey towards a more equitable and compassionate criminal justice system in Lagos State, setting the stage for future reforms and collaborations aimed at enhancing community well-being and justice.

    Pedro encouraged participants to engage actively, share insights and propose constructive solutions.

    “Together, we can shape policies that not only uphold the principles of justice but also contribute to safer, more cohesive communities and a safer Lagos State,” he said.

    The Director of the Community Service Unit Lagos State Ministry of Justice, Mrs Tomi Bodude, in her welcome address, said that the community service and other non-custodial measures marked a pivotal moment as stakeholders explored innovative approaches to fostering rehabilitation, promoting justice and enhancing community well-being.

     Bodude also highlighted the importance of the collective effort and the forum’s timing was particularly relevant given the recent constitutional amendment.

    “Our collective presence here underscores our shared commitment to advancing solutions that prioritise rehabilitation over retribution, and community integration over isolation.

    “This gathering is very apt because of the recent constitutional amendment enabling states to own and manage correctional facilities.

     “This change provides a unique opportunity for Lagos State to implement more humane and effective justice measures,” she said.

    Bodude said the event was aligned with the state’s THEMES Plus agenda, on the heels of a recent constitutional amendment allowing states to manage correctional facilities.

     According to her, the forum aimed at shifting the focus from retribution to rehabilitation, emphasizing community integration over isolation.

     She encouraged participants to engage in thoughtful dialogue, collaboration to deepen their understanding of non-custodial measures and their transformative potential.

     The representative of the Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption  programme, Mrs. Ajibola Ijimakinwa, in her goodwill message, said that non-custodial measures were not being utilized optimally given the size of the Nigerian Correctional Service and the prison population.

     Mrs Ijimakinwa reaffirmed ROLAC’s commitment to improving the performance, quality, and oversight of the criminal justice system in Nigeria adding that these commitment includes the use of diversion and non-custodial measures aimed at decongesting custodial centers.

    Speaking at the agenda for stakeholders forum on community service and other non-custodial measures in the administration of criminal justice in Lagos,  Ijimakinwa highlighted ROLAC’s achievements and future plans.

     She urged stakeholders to commit to implementing the recommendations from the discussion, emphasizing the potential of non-custodial measures to decongest custodial centers and rehabilitate offenders.

     “Under ROLAC, we supported the assessment of the Community Service Unit, provided essential work implements, and offered capacity building for officers,” she stated.

    She also added that a key milestone for ROLAC has been its support for the announcement and implementation of the Nigerian Correctional Service Act 2019. 

    This act has facilitated the adoption of non-custodial measures in many focus states across the country.

    “We are working with the Nigerian Correctional Service to establish non-custodial processes and mechanisms and to promote awareness about these measures,” Ijimakinwa explained.

    She emphasised the need to explore alternatives beyond community service and to address operational challenges related to the courts and community service.

    She said ROLAC hoped to continue supporting the process to deepen non-custodial measures, including rehabilitation, reintegration, and diversion programmes, or introduce them where they do not exist.

  • Judge sends activist back to prison over defamation case

    Judge sends activist back to prison over defamation case

    Justice Vincent Agbata of the Anambra State High Court in Nnewi South has again sent an activist, Boniface Okonkwo, back to prison.

    Okonkwo has been in detention since January 3 following his arrest for allegedly defaming a businessman, Chief Emeka Offor, on a community WhatsApp group.

    The activist was arrested based on a complaint by Offor and has been in detention after he was also denied administrative bail by the police.

    The prosecution claimed that Okonkwo described Offor’s meter manufacturing company as an “empty warehouse” on the Oraifite community WhatsApp platform, a post that irked Offor.

    Okonkwo, who testified, denied defaming Offor.

    Read Also: 1m applicants seek N1.3tr Consumer Credit Loan

    Prosecution counsel Alex Ejesieme (SAN) requested Okonkwo to make calls from his phone, which had been in the court’s custody, to verify the number allegedly used to defame Offor.

    When Okonkwo made the call in the courtroom, the Truecaller app identified the caller as “Overheat Oraifite”.

    The activist insisted that his name is Boniface Okonkwo and not “Overheat” as suggested by the app and canvassed by the prosecution.

    Okonkwo’s testimony raised questions about the credibility of the case over which his freedom had been curtailed for months.

    Justice Agbata adjourned the case to July 9 and 10 for cross-examination.

    The judge had surprisingly denied Okonkwo bail despite the defendant’s plea that he would not jump bail.

    Onlookers were shocked that a citizen could be denied bail over what should ordinarily be a civil case.

    Okonkwo had appealed to President Ahmed Bola Tinubu, Anambra State Governor Chukwuma Soludo, and the human rights community, including Femi Falana (SAN), to intervene in his case.

    He claimed that his prolonged detention has resulted in his children facing threats of expulsion from school in South Africa due to unpaid fees.

    Okonkwo’s family has appealed for his release, citing the hardship they are facing due to his prolonged detention.

    They claimed Okonkwo’s continued incarceration was causing undue hardship and suffering for his immediate and extended family.

    Chief Judge of Anambra State had also rejected Okonkwo’s request to re-assign the case to another judge after he expressed a lack of confidence in Justice Agbata.

  • Wanted: Action plan to advance cause of justice

    Wanted: Action plan to advance cause of justice

    Lawyers owe it a duty to promote rule of law, protem President, National Association of Catholic Lawyers (NACL), Ibadan Province, Michael Agbolade, has said.

    Agbolade said lawyers also owe a duty to those “who are denied of their inalienable rights since law is a vital tool for liberation.”

    He spoke at the Ibadan Ecclesiastical Provincial Executive Council (PEC) meeting of the Catholic Laity Council of Nigeria which offers opportunity for members of the NACL to showcase their various programmes in aiding the rule of law and advancing the cause of justice in Nigeria.

    The PEC meeting was held at the Domus Pacis Pastoral Institute, Igoba, Akure, Diocese of Ondo.

    Agbolade said there had been great efforts since 1994 to bring practitioners of law, who are Catholic members, under one body.

    He recalled that at the inauguration of the association in Ibadan Archdiocese, it was initially named as the Catholic Lawyers’ Forum (CLF), but which was later changed to the National Association of Catholic Lawyers (NACL).

    Read Also: Southwest states firm up food production programme

    He said: “There is the need for an action plan to guide our profession as lawyers within the local church to enhance and embrace our activities, as a body of professionals for access to justice for all. As part of our proposal, we hope to have legal year thanksgiving Masses in all the dioceses in the province within the months of October and November every year on the approval of the local ordinaries, subject to chaplains’ contacts with the Bishops”, Agbolade said.

    He added that they were making the demand because the Catholic Church in Nigeria observes the month of May as the World Social Communication Sunday with the delivery of the Holy Father’s message.

    He listed the aim and objectives of the association to include cooperating with the ecclesiastical authorities of the province and shall be dedicated to the ideals of the Catholic church in the promotion of the gospel message of salvation and shall work to promote love, unity and progress among all people in the Ibadan province, in Nigeria and the world.

    The Protem President added that the focus of the group comprise rendering of advisory, advocacy and/or legal services to the archdiocese through any of its established institutions such as hospitals, schools and colleges, and seminaries’ ad-hoc committees with ecclesiastical recognition as well as partner with relevant agencies in government or individuals in the promotion of ideals of legal profession and scholarship in law and journal publication, among others.

    Others, he said include to mentor newly-qualified lawyers, empower the incapacitated and the aged members; to partner with the JDPC on matters involving church rights, duties and obligation as a means of creating awareness advocacy and concern for the indigent members through workshops, symposia, retreats and campaigns when necessary; to raise funds internally to support the growth of the forum as a form of Catholic apostolic work; to seek and to encourage members towards active participation in the life and culture of society and the church by performance of their civic and political obligations for justice, equity, fairness and peace.

    Agbolade said that NACL training venues are largely the Nigerian law schools, noting further that this is necessary and relevant to mentor Catholic law students from the dioceses preparing to go to law schools from their respective universities, through the Nigeria Federation of Catholic Students (NFCS) in a bid to enhance the upholding of ethics of the profession after being called to the Nigerian Bar.

    Agbolade expressed his optimism that the association would be able to contribute adequately the administration of justice since the NBA had not discouraged the NACL to be registered as an umbrella body for all lawyers.

    He assured that Ibadan province of the association would continue to wax stronger for the enthronement of fundamental rights and promotion of rule of law in Nigeria.

  • Concern over mounting judgment debts

    Concern over mounting judgment debts

    The Federal Ministry of Justice has not received any budgetary allocation since 2019 to enable it to offset mounting judgment debts. Legal experts suggest the way out of the problem, writes Assistant Editor ERIC IKHILAE.

    Nigeria escaped by the skin of its teeth late last year when a London court struck down the controversial judgment debt it owed to an Irish firm, Process and Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID), over a controversial contract with the Ministry of Petroleum Resources.

    The Ministry of Petroleum Resources had in 2010 committed the country to a Gas Supply and Processing Agreement (GSPA) with P&ID.

    A dispute arose, leading to P&ID initiating an arbitration proceeding against the country in the United Kingdom.

    In its decision in 2017, the tribunal awarded P&ID $6.6billion, with another $2.3billion in interest, a decision Nigeria later successfully challenged.

    Justice Robin Knowles of the Commercial Court of England and Whales in a judgment on October 23, 2023, set aside the award and interest, which had risen to about $ 11 billion,  on the grounds that it was secured by fraud.

    Soon after, an indigenous company, Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited (SPTCL), commenced a similar arbitration proceeding against the country before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Paris, France, alleging a breach of contract over the Mambilla hydropower project in Taraba State.

    Sunrise claimed it was awarded a $6 billion Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) contract in May 2003, during the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, but that the Federal Government repudiated the agreement.

    The firm is demanding a compensation of $2.3 billion, claiming to have spent millions of dollars on financial and legal consultants before the contract was jettisoned.

    The country has initiated moves to discredit the process leading to the award of the contract by pleading fraud, claiming that the then Minister of Power, Olu Agunloye, was allegedly induced into approving the contract.

    It has commenced Agunloye’s prosecution before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on a charge marked: CR/617/2023.

    In the seven-count charge, Agunloye is, among others, accused of accepting bribe,

    engaging in forgery, disobedience to presidential directives and conspiracy.

    The ex-minister was said to have conspired with Leno Adesanya (now at large) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited (SPTCL) in allegedly committing the offences.

    The Sunrise case is one of many similar cases with the potential of leading to judgment debt against the country if not properly defended.

    Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF)  and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) spoke along this line when he disclosed that his ministry was currently defending over 2000 cases, with huge potential liabilities, on behalf of the Federal Government and its ministries, departments and agencies.

    Fagbemi added: “These cases require diligent prosecution and effective defence to avoid embarrassment and enforcement actions.”

    How some debts arise

    The are many judgment debts resulting from the excesses and negligence of government personnel.

    One such case involved a German, Martin Gegenheimer.

    On February 22, the Federal High Court in Abuja ordered the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to pay Gegenheimer N63.7 million and $10,000 awarded against the Nigerian government for his unlawful arrest and detention by men of the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS).

    Read Also: 1m applicants seek N1.3tr Consumer Credit Loan

    Justice Inyang Ekwo ordered the CBN to deduct the amount from the Federal Government’s funds in its custody to settle the debt which arose from a 2021 judgment given against Nigeria by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

    Justice Ekwo rejected CBN’s claim that the Fed Govt’s foreign exchange accounts were currently in deficit, thereby making it impossible to pay the entire judgment sum.

    The ruling was on a garnishee proceeding, marked: FHC/ABJ/NJR/M/3/2022 filed and prosecuted for Gegenheimer by his lawyer, Daniel Makolo to enforce the judgment of the  ECOWAS Court delivered on March 4, 2021.

    Justice Ekwo agreed with Makolo that the ECOWAS Court’s judgments do not qualify as a foreign judgment in the strict sense and could be enforced by Nigerian courts.

    Justice Ekwo made absolute the garnishee order nisi he earlier issued against the CBN.

    It was part of the German’s averments before the court that he had visited Nigeria on a business trip, but while returning to Kenya on 23rd February 2020, he was stopped by men of the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) at the boarding gate of the Kenya Airways aircraft after all necessary departure formalities were completed.

    He said the NIS officials arrested him, seized his passport and detained him in a jam-packed cell between February 23, 2020, and March 4, 2020, despite the Covid protocol and without acceptable food as well as medical care.

    He challenged his arrest and detention before the ECOWAS Court, in a suit marked: ECW/CCJ/APP/23/2020.

    In the March 4, 2021 judgment a three-member panel of the sub-regional court, presided over by its president, Justice Edward Amoako Asante, declared Gegenheimer’s arrest and detention illegal.

    The court ordered the government to pay him N53,650,925 as special damages for various losses suffered and costs incurred while under unlawful arrest and detention by the NIS.

    The costs, the court said, relate mainly to hotel expenses incurred by the German while under forced detention by agents of the Nigerian government.

    The court further ordered the Nigerian government to pay him another N10million in general damages as reparation for all violations and moral prejudice suffered for the violation of his rights, and an additional $10,000 being the expenditure incurred by the applicant to secure his bail.

    The ECOWAS Court ordered the Nigerian government to remove the German from its watch list and to unconditionally release his German passport, which was “arbitrarily and unlawfully,” seized by agents of the Nigerian government.

    To date, the CBN has failed to comply with the order directing it to pay the German. Instead, it has appealed the ruling.

    How much is owed as judgment debts?

    Judgment debts are court-ordered payments or damage awarded against a defaulting party to a contractual agreement.

    Since the commencement of this administration, the actual amount of judgment debts currently standing against the Federal Government has not been made public.

    A glimpse into the state of affairs in that regard was only provided last October by a member of the House of Representatives, Lanre Okunlola, representing Surulere Federal Constituency II, Lagos State.

    Okunlola, in a motion, claimed that the judgment debts standing against the Federal Government and its MDAs amount to  $556,754,584.31 £398, 526.17 and N226,281,801,881.64.

    Earlier in May last year, former President Muhammadu Buhari put the size of the debts at $566.75 million, 98.52 million pounds sterling($124.35 million) and 226.28 billion naira ($491.92 million)

    Buhari disclosed the sums owered in a letter to the Senate, informing it of his decision to promissory notes to the tune of $1.18billion to settle various judgment debts.

    No budgetary allocation

    Solicitor General of the Federation (SGF) and the Permanent Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Justice, Mrs. Beatrice Jedy-Agba, said the judgment debts remain unpaid due to lack of budgetary allocation.

    Jedy-Agba said since 2019, the ministry has not received any budgetary allocation for judgment debt settlement.

    She noted that the Federal Government, through the Federal Justice Ministry, was often compelled to pay judgment debts that emanated from unlawful actions of law enforcement institutions and agents.

    Jedy-Agba added: “Most often, security or law enforcement agencies are the actual judgment debtors since their actions and inactions occasion the infractions.

    “However, the Federal Ministry of Justice is dragged into the arena either because the Attorney-General of the Federation is sued as a nominal party or the judgment creditor approaches the AGF to grant consent, pursuant to the provisions of section 84 (1-3) of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act.

    “As a matter of due process and FGN Financial Regulations, it is the policy of the Federal Ministry of Finance that payment of judgment debt by any agency must be based on clearance by the AGF and requisite budgetary appropriation.

    “Some of the debtor agencies do refer judgment debts to the AGF for intervention.

    “The Ministry itself is handicapped from settling any judgment debt either for itself or on behalf of the Federal Government or its agencies due to paucity of funds.

    “For instance, the Ministry has not received any budgetary allocation for settlement of judgment debts since 2019.”

    Jedy-Agba said since there were no funds, the Federal Ministry of Justice now demands that defaulting agencies either comply with or appeal such judgments.

    On the fate of the promissory notes issued by former President Buhari, Mrs. Jedy-Agba noted: “The scheme of issuance of promissory notes that were designed to bridge the gap of lack of funds occasioned by revenue shortfalls also comes with its own challenges.

    “One such process of issuing promissory notes which was commenced over three years ago, is yet to be concluded due to bureaucracy and same is now stuck at the National Assembly.”

    The negligence factor

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Olu Daramola, believes some judgment debts arise before some cases are not diligently defended.

    He said: “Most cases against the government are due to negligence and poor handling, leading to judgment against the government even where there could have been no judgment because it has been poorly defended.

    “But, unfortunately, the tragedy is that when you file a case against the government, they may not bother until you get a judgment.

    “When you already have a judgment, negotiations become difficult because if you win your case in court and the person is now negotiating with you to take a smaller sum than the one that was awarded in court, definitely you won’t be willing.”

    He added that the careless signing of contracts was creating problems for the government.

    Judgment debts as a fraud?

    While judgment debts arising from rights violations by security agents are common, others arise from contract breaches due to negligence on the part of government officials or outright organised crime where state officials collude with predatory minds in the private sector to compromise checks and balances in contractual engagements.

    Fagbemi referred to this possibility of collusion while reacting to the London court’s judgment in the P&ID case.

    He said: “This landmark judgement proves conclusively that the nation states will no longer be held hostage by economic conspiracies between private firms and solitarily corrupt officials, who conspire to extort and indebt the very nations they swear to defend and protect.

    “P&ID and its associates, both in Nigeria and the world over, shamelessly attempted to defraud the country and enrich themselves through sharing the Federal Republic of Nigeria’s privileged document, fraud, bribery and corruption on an industrial scale.

    “Those efforts, which took place over many years, have now finally been uncovered for all of us to see.”

    One of Fagbemi’s predecessors, Mohammed Adoke (SAN), referred to such collusion in his book: “Burden of Service: Reminiscences of Nigeria’s Former Attorney General.”

    In a chapter of the book, where he spoke about judgment debts and his experience while in office, Adoke said: “Many of the claims were bogus but since it was an organised scam, they were getting away with it…

    “Again, there were too many people interested in judgment debts. We were getting calls from all manner of people, including members of the National Assembly.

    “Actually, some National Assembly members were making an appropriation for judgment debts based on an understanding with the debtors (sic). It was a conspiracy against the national treasury.”

    Tackling judgment debts

    Fagbemi said given the nation’s experience with the P&ID case, his ministry has evolved a procedure to prevent a recurrence of such a case.

    The Federal Ministry of Justice has, against this backdrop, initiated a collaborative framework with specialist firms, to enable legal officers involved in drafting MoUs and other forms of binding agreements to acquire the required skills to identify possible areas of dispute or liability, which could lead to avoidable litigation or arbitration costs and judgment debt.

    “We are willing to extend the support to legal officers in the various states in order to strengthen their capacities in this regard,” he said.

    The AGF also suggested the need for inter-agencies collaborations, noting that the success recorded in the P&ID case was a result of a close inter-agency collaboration.

    Fagbemi also stressed the need for enhanced funding of his ministry to increase the capacity and boost the morale of state counsel through regular payment of duty tour allowances and robe allowances to enable them to effectively prosecute cases filed against the government and its agencies to avoid incurring judgment debts.

    He added that there was the need to clear the existing backlog of obligations to sustain the efforts of the ministry in reducing the government’s exposure to judgment debts as well as ensuring that the implementation of government policies and projects was not hindered by litigation.

    Falana: government alone should not defray debts

    Rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN), suggested that a measure should be in place where any government official, whose conduct results in judgment debt should be made liable.

    Falana decried the current practice where the government is solely responsible for judgment debts and compensations to victims of extra-judicial killings and maltreatment from erring security personnel.

    He argued that society suffers multiple losses when the state is made to bear the financial cost of judgments arising from the reckless use of arms by law enforcement personnel.

    Falana added that making the government alone to defray judgment debts was another way of misallocating and misapplying public funds, which could have been deployed for use in some critical areas of needs of the public.

    Ozekhome faults procedure

    Another Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Mike Ozekhome, who expressed discomfort over the difficulty experienced by judgment creditors, called for the scraping of the Sheriff and Civil Processes Act which makes it mandatory for the Attorney-General to authorise the payment of judgment debt by the government.

    Ozekhome said: ”There is a need for total reform of our justice system. What we have today is a mess and it is not working.

    “What is the use of a judgment when it cannot be enforced?

    “We need to perhaps have an enabling law that will allow private persons to enforce court judgments since the courts appear helpless.

    “The Sheriff and Civil Processes Act should be scrapped.

    “Both the Federal and State governments should also begin to make budgetary provision for payment of judgment debts,” he said

    The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, a lawyer, suggested how the enforcement of monetary judgments could be simplified to address the complaint raised by Ozekhome.

    He argued that the statutory burden placed on a judgment creditor to obtain the AGF’s consent before a monetary judgment could be enforced constitutes a “bottleneck, delaying justice and undermining the autonomy of our judicial system.”

    He said the Senate was looking at the possibility of replacing the requirement for the AGF’s consent with a mandatory notification system.

    In explaining how the proposed arrangement will operate, Akpabio said: “Upon receiving a judgment against the government, the relevant authorities will notify the Attorney General immediately in writing.

    “Following the notification, the Attorney General will have a specified period, say 30 days, to respond.

    “The response could involve initiating an appeal or settling the matter directly. This timeline ensures prompt action and prevents undue delays in justice delivery.

    “If there is no response from the Attorney-General within this period, the judgment will be executed automatically.

    “This measure is crucial to prevent stalling and ensure that judgments are respected and enforced promptly. In cases where the decision comes from a final court, the option to appeal is not available.

    “Therefore, the Attorney-General’s response would be primarily directed towards settlement.

    “This approach ensures that the government acts responsibly as a litigant and respects the decisions of our highest court in the land.

    “Reforms like this foster trust in the justice system and improve the overall efficiency of legal proceedings involving the government.”

  • ‘Judges deserve more respect than they’re getting’

    ‘Judges deserve more respect than they’re getting’

    ‘How my father shaped my aversion for injustice’

    Abdulkareem Musa comes from a family of lawyers. His father is Justice Yunusa Musa (rtd.) Three of his siblings are lawyers, while a younger one is studying law. Abdulkareem tells ELIZABETH EZE about his passion for justice, using law as a tool for development and his career aspirations.

    With several family members already practising law, Abdulkareem Musa was afforded the valuable opportunity to recognise early on that the legal profession offered a means to channel his passion for justice in a constructive and impactful manner.

    He said it was this lifelong drive to combat injustice that ultimately led him to the study and practice of law.

    “Now, as a lawyer, I have honed the ability to address societal ills through formal, structured, and civil channels.

    “I take great pride in the realisation that my legal knowledge and expertise can be leveraged not only to fight injustice but also to contribute to the development of government institutions and the strengthening of the rule of law,” he said.

    Musa is from Kogi State. His father, Justice Yunusa Musa, retired as a High Court Judge. His mother is serving as Director in Kogi State Civil Service.

    Despite being a Muslim, he attended Redeemer Nursery and Primary School, a Catholic institution in Kogi State.

    After his secondary education at the Global College Ojokodo, he applied to study law but was unable to secure immediate admission.

    Abdulkareem declined his father’s suggestion to attend a private university, preferring instead a public institution where he could freely engage in student activities.

    “Initially, I was admitted to Kogi State University to study English and Linguistics at one point. I applied for a change of course and was re-admitted to Political Science. I knew these weren’t my desired path.

    “I applied for another JAMB and was eventually admitted to study law. During my time at Kogi State University, I was actively involved in student politics, serving as class governor, club president, student union executive and eventually contesting for the position of SUG president which election was cancelled due to certain issues faced by the school at the time.”

    Musa attended the Nigerian Law School, Bwari Campus, where he was elected Financial Secretary of the Students’ Representatives Council.

    “Our Council effectively represented student interests while navigating the rigorous academic demands of the Law School.

    “My leadership was recognised with an award from the Council of Legal Education,” he said.

    He is pursuing a Masters Degree at Baze University, Abuja.

    Musa said he possessed a deep-seated aversion to injustice and a resolute determination to stand up for the fair treatment of myself and my peers since he was a young boy.              

    “I simply could not abide with the sight of bullies or the unfair treatment of others. This innate sense of justice and unwillingness to overlook wrongdoing often landed me in trouble, as I refused to remain silent in the face of perceived unfairness.

    “As I matured, I came to understand that my instinctive reactions had a name – a name that would come to define my professional aspirations: ‘injustice.’”

    For him, the journey has been a deeply fulfilling one, as he has transformed his youthful indignation at unfairness into a mature, principled, and multifaceted approach to effecting positive change through the legal system.

    He said it was this profound sense of purpose, rooted in his formative experiences, that continues to drive him in his pursuit of justice and aspiration to be a force for good in the world.

    Family of multiple lawyers

    “My dad has trained four of us to be lawyers and I still have a younger sibling in University studying law.

    “It is true that my father’s occupation as a lawyer had a formative influence on the trajectory of my own professional ambitions.

    “Observing the esteem and reverence with which he was held within his community instilled in me a sense that the legal profession was a noble and prestigious calling.

    “This early exposure, combined with my innate aversion to injustice, cultivated in me a desire to emulate my father’s accomplishments and to join the ranks of those who wield the power of the law to safeguard the rights and liberties of others.

    “The prospect of wielding such influence and authority, while simultaneously serving as a bulwark against societal ills, held a certain allure that was difficult to ignore.

    “Thus, my father’s example played a significant role in shaping my aspirations and fueling my determination to pursue a career in the legal field.”

    The pursuit of law was never a second option for him, but rather a calling that he was compelled to heed.

    However, as his worldview evolved, he became increasingly concerned with the pressing needs of nation-building, particularly in a growing country like Nigeria.

    Read Also: Mbaka endorses FeeFund, adjudges it best poverty antidote

    “I now firmly believe that the practical sciences – fields such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and agricultural sciences – hold immense potential to address the country’s most pressing challenges.

    “In contrast, many traditional arts-based courses may not be as immediately impactful in the current context.

    “Were the path of law not available to me, I would have enthusiastically embraced the opportunity to become an innovative scientist, driven by a desire to create tangible, life-changing solutions for the benefit of my fellow citizens.

    “The remarkable inventions that have transformed the world, from electricity to the internet, serve as a testament to the power of human ingenuity to uplift humanity,” he said.

    Law School experience

    Abdulkareem was given a leadership award in recognition of his service as Financial Secretary of the Student Representative Council.

    “For me, the true significance of my law school experience transcends the accolades or distinctions I may have received. Rather, it is the profound sense of purpose and the unwavering commitment to the rule of law that I have cultivated during that transformative period which stands as the truest measure of its impact.

    “This driving ethos, this steadfast dedication to the principles of justice and fairness, is what continues to guide my efforts and inspire me to leverage my legal expertise in service of the greater good.

    “It is this underlying motivation, this deep-seated conviction, that animates my work and propels me to champion the causes that matter most to the progress and upliftment of my society.

    “Awards and honours may come and go, but the values and aspirations that have been forged within me through my legal studies will remain the enduring legacy of that experience.”

    While his mother exhibited enthusiasm and celebrated his call to the bar, his father was more relaxed.

    Musa, however, took solace in the fact that it was his father’s unwavering support and guidance that enabled him to reach that juncture in the first place.

    He said he has profound gratitude for his father’s tireless efforts in ensuring his academic success, without which the call to the bar would not have been possible.

    “By adopting this understanding perspective, I have been able to maintain a harmonious relationship with my father, one built on mutual respect and an appreciation for the sacrifices he has made to pave the way for my professional journey.”

    Being son of a judge

    Growing up, Abdulkareem derived a sense of pride and importance from the fact that his father held the prestigious position of High Court Judge.

    However, as he matured and gained a deeper understanding of the realities of the judicial profession, his perspective on the matter evolved.

    “The restricted lifestyle that often accompanies being a judge no longer held the same appeal for me.

    “Furthermore, I observed that judges were not always afforded the level of dignity and respect I felt they deserved, particularly in relation to the other branches of government,” he said.

    Ultimately, he realised that the path of an advocate, with its inherent liberties, was more aligned with his personal and professional aspirations.

    Rather than follow in his father’s footsteps, he decided to pursue a career as a legal advocate – a choice that has allowed him to forge his own unique identity and professional trajectory.

    Most embarrassing moment in court

    In the legal environment, Abdulkareem was aware that there is an uncompromising standard when it comes to professional conduct in court.

    He was also aware that any behaviour that could potentially cause embarrassment would be seen as a reflection on the entire firm. Fortunately, he has not had any embarrassing moments during his court appearances.

    However, there was one particular incident that he found quite uncomfortable and disappointing.

    While appearing before a magistrate’s court in Nasarawa State, he sought to make a bail application for a client. In doing so, he began to cite relevant legal authorities in support of his argument.

    To his surprise, the other lawyers who were familiar with that particular court interrupted him and advised against citing authorities.

    They explained that the magistrate did not appreciate lawyers making such references during oral arguments and that it would only serve to anger him.

    “I found this practice to be rather strange and, frankly, quite mediocre. It went against my instincts as a legal advocate to thoroughly substantiate my arguments.

    “However, in the interest of serving my client’s best interests, I chose not to dwell on the unfortunate episode,” he said.

    Over the past five years, Abdulkareem has been privileged to gain extensive experience in the legal field.

    He has had the opportunity to be part of the legal teams handling high-profile cases.

    This includes representing approximately five gubernatorial candidates from various political parties in election petition cases, thanks to the guidance of his principal.

    He has also had the honour of being involved in the presidential election petition, where the firm was representing one of the presidential candidates and the party.

    While he enjoyed the thrill of winning many of these cases, he had also faced the reality of losing some.

    However, for him, the true joy lies not in the victory itself, but in the pursuit of justice.

    He told The Nation: “I approach every case with an unwavering commitment and a sense of purpose that borders on the evangelical.

    “My goal is not merely to win, as I recognize that there are numerous factors that can influence the outcome of a case.

    “Rather, I dedicate myself fully to ensuring that justice is served, regardless of the final verdict.

    “This mindset has allowed me to maintain a balanced perspective and a steadfast dedication to my craft.

    “Whether I emerge victorious or face defeat, I take immense pride in the work I do, knowing that I have given my utmost effort in service of my clients and the principles of the legal system.”

    Are lawyers liars?

    Musa said it was a common misconception that lawyers are liars, twisting the truth to serve their clients’ interests.

    This perception, he noted, misunderstands the fundamental role of lawyers in the legal system.

    “Lawyers do not deal in abstract truths, but rather, they work with the tangible facts presented as evidence.

    “The distinction between facts and truth is crucial. Facts are the building blocks of a legal case – the verifiable details and documentation that can be presented in a court of law. Truth, on the other hand, is a more elusive and subjective concept, open to interpretation and debate.”

    He contended that it is the court’s responsibility to determine the truth based on the facts presented by both sides.

    “A person may have a compelling case, but if they lack the supporting facts and evidence, the court may be compelled to rule against them – not due to the lawyer’s deceit, but simply because the facts did not align with the desired outcome.

    “This is where the importance of lawyers’ diligence and integrity comes into play.

    “Lawyers are tasked with gathering, organising, and presenting the facts in the most effective manner to ensure that the court can make a well-informed decision.

    “They are not arbiters of truth, but rather, facilitators of the legal process.

    “It is understandable for a person to feel frustrated if they lose a case, despite believing in the righteousness of their cause.

    “However, it is crucial to recognize that the legal system is predicated on the rigorous examination of facts, not on the personal convictions of the parties involved.”

    He further submitted: “Lawyers are not liars. They are advocates who work tirelessly to present the facts to the court.

    “The outcome of a legal case is not a reflection of the lawyer’s honesty, but rather, the court’s assessment of the available evidence.

    “By understanding this fundamental principle, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the role of lawyers in the pursuit of justice.”

    Should wig and gown be done away with?

    Abdulkareem noted that wig and gown have long been viewed as hallmarks of the legal profession, carrying with them a sense of tradition, formality, and gravitas.

    He said they serve to distinguish lawyers and judges, reinforcing the solemnity and importance of legal proceedings.

    “In many common law jurisdictions, this attire has been worn for centuries, cementing it as a core part of legal culture and identity.

    “However, a Justice of the Supreme Court’s perspective seems to suggest that maintaining these traditional vestments may not be fully suited to Nigeria’s unique legal landscape and cultural context.”

    He also noted that there is an argument that the wig and gown, as relics of the country’s colonial past, may not resonate as strongly with modern Nigerian lawyers and the citizens they serve.

    “Musa said: Adapting the professional dress code to better reflect Nigeria’s own traditions and sensibilities could help make the legal system feel more accessible and relevant to the populace.

    “Ultimately, I believe this is an issue that would benefit from careful consideration and broad consultation within the Nigerian legal community.

    “There are merits to both retaining the wig and gown and exploring alternative, culturally appropriate attire.

    “The key is to strike a balance that upholds the gravitas of the legal profession while also fostering a sense of connection between lawyers and the citizens they serve.

    “It’s a complex issue, but one worthy of robust debate and, potentially, meaningful reform.

    Law professor, or SAN or both?

    Abdulkareem said he was deeply committed to becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).

    According to him, this esteemed rank can be likened to a “priesthood of justice, which holds a profound allure for me.”

    He added: “It represents the pinnacle of the legal profession and the opportunity to make an indelible mark on the legal landscape of our nation.

    “I am utterly devoted to this pursuit. It aligns perfectly with my passion for the law and commitment to the administration of justice.

    “The rank of a SAN demands the highest levels of legal acumen, ethical integrity, and an unyielding dedication to upholding the rule of law.

    “It is a mantle that I am determined to don it, for it will allow me to utilize my skills and expertise in the most impactful way, serving as a beacon of justice and a champion for the rights of the people.”

    He said the prospect of becoming a law professor, while certainly intriguing, is simply a distraction from my primary goal. 

    He remarked that the role of a professor holds its own merits, but for now, he has his eyes firmly set on the “priesthood of justice”.

    He also did not entirely dismiss the possibility of pursuing a professorship at a later stage in my career.

    “The wealth of experience and the depth of knowledge that I would gain could indeed afford me the luxury of time and the opportunity to share my expertise with the next generation of legal scholars and practitioners.

    “Such a transition could serve to further cement my legacy and contribute to the ongoing development of the legal profession in Nigeria,” Musa said.

    He said, however, that his unwavering focus remains on the path to becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

    “This is the goal that consumes my thoughts, drives my actions, and fuels my determination.

    “I believe in God and I trust in his direction and timing.”

    Would he like to marry a lawyer?

    Musa said: “The prospect of getting married to a fellow lawyer holds a certain appeal for me.

    “As I contemplate my future and the path that lies ahead, I believe that forging a union with a partner who shares my passion for the law and the pursuit of justice could indeed prove to be a tremendous asset.

    “I believe that a marriage to a lawyer would allow for a deeper understanding and appreciation of the unique challenges and demands that come with a career in the legal profession.

    “A fellow lawyer would be better equipped to provide the emotional support, the practical guidance, and the intellectual camaraderie that I may require as I navigate the complexities of my chosen path.

    “Furthermore, I believe that the shared language and perspective of the law would foster a level of communication and synergy that could truly elevate the glory of our union.

    “The ability to engage in substantive discussions, to collaborate on legal matters, and to draw upon each other’s expertise could serve to enrich our relationship and our individual pursuits.”

    He, however, acknowledged that his aspirations in this regard have been subjected to the divine dictates that guide his life.

    He said he has subjected his search for a life partner to the will of God, for he believes that the divine plan for his life will ultimately lead him to the individual who is truly meant to be his companion and support on this journey.