Category: Online Special

  • Ajala: 9/11 Nigerian hero who died for others to live

    Ajala: 9/11 Nigerian hero who died for others to live

    The eleventh anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on United States was marked on Tuesday. A tribute on one of the three Nigerians who died in the attack, Godwin Ajala first published in The Nation on the tenth anniversary is reproduced below

    Ahead of today’s tenth anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the UnitedStates (September 11, 2001), families, friends, colleagues and others worldwide have in various ways been remembering the victims of the incident.

    Residents of Dividing Creek in New Jersey have been placing flags to represent those who lost their lives. One of the flags is for Godwin Ajala, the only Nigerian officially listed among the deceased.

    Although he is known at home as Godwin Ajalli, all the records of tribute referred to him as Godwin Ajala. He hailed from Ihenta in Akaeze Local

    Government Area of Ebonyi State.

    As part of activities marking the 10th anniversary, Janice Laws on September 7 this year wrote in the guest book of tributes for the victims on the website

    legacy.com: “I am proud to say that I placed a flag for Godwin Ajala” Ajala, who was 33 and a qualified lawyer before he left Nigeria was at the time

    of the attack an Access Control Officer working at the Concourse level of one of  the World Trade Centre buildings.

    Apparently exhausted after helping to guide many out of the attacked building, Ajala reportedly first went into a coma and did not die until the following Sunday.

    But for the economic situation in Nigeria which has forced many professionals to seek greener pastures abroad, Ajala might not have been anywhere near the scene

    of the attack.  He would have been practising as a lawyer in Nigeria.  According to a New York Times profile on him, he migrated to the United States

    in 1995, hoping to earn more support for his family.

    The New York Times report on the life and times of the 9/11 victims titled Profiles in Grief provided some insights into Ajala’s sojourn in the US and

    his unfulfilled dreams. The paper wrote, “At first he bounced between jobs, but ultimately he landed a steady position as a security guard at the World Trade Centre. Still, he was frustrated, and he began pursuing his dream of becoming a lawyer in America, setting his sights on passing the New York State Bar Exam.

    “His roommate, Christopher Onuoha, said Mr. Ajala worked from 6 a.m. to 2

    p.m., went home for a nap and then studied for the Bar for six to eight hours, often late into the night. Co-workers said he was last seen helping people

    escape from the trade centre.

    “When he was living here, he was suffering in terms of always working and studying,” said a close friend, Christopher Iwuanyanwu.

    “Every September, Mr. Ajala visited Nigeria, and he was planning to travel  there again this past September to visit his wife, Victoria, and their three

    children, Onyinyechi, 7, Uchechukwu, 5, and Ugochi, 1. His friends said he was

    planning to apply for visas to bring them to the United States.

    “His dream was that he would take the law exam, pass it, and with that bring his family here and invite them to the swearing in,” Mr. Iwuanyanwu said.

    “He would have been much happier if his wife and kids were around.”

    In response to the NY Times profile of Ajala, one Vanessa during the 2010 anniversary wrote “rest in peace, Mr. Ajala. I read your story on a memorial

    site and it struck a chord with me. Your work ethic reminds me of my boyfriend, who is also Nigerian. Thank you for coming to this country and helping to guide

    people out of WTC. You will not be forgotten.” Another reader, Alissian wrote in September 2003: “He worked so hard to make a better life for himself and his family only to have the dream destroyed by

    hatred. I hope he is at peace now and that his family can find peace and happiness in his memory”.

    A Nigerian resident in New York, Austin Obi recalls his chance meeting with Ajala and how they became friends.

    “It was sometime in early 2000 and I was the Manager at the Burger King right across from the Trade Centre, when Godwin came in for lunch. He saw my name tag

    and introduced himself and from then on he would stop by every lunch. He was tall, imposing yet very warm, friendly and affable towards my staff and I.

    Everybody knew him. We would often talk about home, our families and our goals in America. He was a good man. May You Rest in Perfect Peace, my friend”

    Monsurat Laidi, a Nigerian lady who was lucky to escape from the WTC according to a report on Nigeriaworld.com said Ajala who also works with the same company

    was a surveillance security guard and was normally outside the building. She believes he must have been wounded while trying to help others.

    Iwuanayanwu, Ajala’s friend, confirmed that people remember seeing the late lawyer and asking why he was there, why didn’t he leave? His response was

    “Why are you running? Why aren’t you helping people out?” Another colleague of Ajala, a security supervisor, who opted to remain

    anonymous, said he met Ajala that morning in the locker room. He said Ajala was a very popular person at the company and a workers’ union leader.

    The security supervisor told Nigeriaworld: “he started work at 6 a.m. that day and we talked about the Jos crisis. I was going to leave at 7a.m. after an overnight shift. He was a union leader and was involved in contract talks on pay with the management of WTC. They just agreed to a salary raise for us. There was

    a meeting scheduled between the union and the management on that day.”

    Continued the source: “After we left the locker room together, we departed and  he went to resume work, I left him and we said we would see later.” The

    meeting was never to be.

    Ajala is undoubtedly one of the heroes of the 9/11 attack. One of the best tributes which aptly captures the place of Ajala among the victims of the attack is by a blogger named CarpeDM.

    “In a world where so many people are looking out for their selves, this man  risked his life for others. Who knows how many were saved because of him? Today, whenever I see a flag or hear someone speak about 9/11/01, I will think of all those who died. And I will think of all those who survived because of men and women like Godwin Ajala.”

  • Transcript: President Barack Obama’s Convention speech

    Transcript: President Barack Obama’s Convention speech

    Michelle, I love you. The other night, I think the entire country saw just how lucky I am. Malia and Sasha, you make me so proud . . . but don’t get any ideas, you’re still going to class tomorrow. And Joe Biden, thank you for being the best vice-president I could ever hope for.

    Madam chairwoman, delegates, I accept your nomination for president of the United States.

    The first time I addressed this convention in 2004, I was a younger man; a Senate candidate from Illinois who spoke about hope – not blind optimism or wishful thinking, but hope in the face of difficulty; hope in the face of uncertainty; that dogged faith in the future which has pushed this nation forward, even when the odds are great; even when the road is long.

    Eight years later, that hope has been tested – by the cost of war; by one of the worst economic crises in history; and by political gridlock that’s left us wondering whether it’s still possible to tackle the challenges of our time.

    I know that campaigns can seem small, and even silly. Trivial things become big distractions. Serious issues become sound bites. And the truth gets buried under an avalanche of money and advertising. If you’re sick of hearing me approve this message, believe me – so am I.

    But when all is said and done – when you pick up that ballot to vote – you will face the clearest choice of any time in a generation. Over the next few years, big decisions will be made in Washington, on jobs and the economy; taxes and deficits; energy and education; war and peace – decisions that will have a huge impact on our lives and our children’s lives for decades to come.

    On every issue, the choice you face won’t be just between two candidates or two parties.

    It will be a choice between two different paths for America.

    A choice between two fundamentally different visions for the future.

    Ours is a fight to restore the values that built the largest middle class and the strongest economy the world has ever known; the values my grandfather defended as a soldier in Patton’s Army; the values that drove my grandmother to work on a bomber assembly line while he was gone.

    They knew they were part of something larger – a nation that triumphed over fascism and depression; a nation where the most innovative businesses turned out the world’s best products, and everyone shared in the pride and success – from the corner office to the factory floor. My grandparents were given the chance to go to college, buy their first home, and fulfil the basic bargain at the heart of America’s story: the promise that hard work will pay off; that responsibility will be rewarded; that everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules – from Main Street to Wall Street to Washington, DC.

    I ran for president because I saw that basic bargain slipping away. I began my career helping people in the shadow of a shuttered steel mill, at a time when too many good jobs were starting to move overseas. And by 2008, we had seen nearly a decade in which families struggled with costs that kept rising but paychecks that didn’t; racking up more and more debt just to make the mortgage or pay tuition; to put gas in the car or food on the table. And when the house of cards collapsed in the Great Recession, millions of innocent Americans lost their jobs, their homes, and their life savings – a tragedy from which we are still fighting to recover.

    Now, our friends at the Republican convention were more than happy to talk about everything they think is wrong with America, but they didn’t have much to say about how they’d make it right. They want your vote, but they don’t want you to know their plan. And that’s because all they have to offer is the same prescription they’ve had for the last thirty years:

    “Have a surplus? Try a tax cut.”

    “Deficit too high? Try another.”

    “Feel a cold coming on? Take two tax cuts, roll back some regulations, and call us in the morning!”

    Now, I’ve cut taxes for those who need it – middle-class families and small businesses. But I don’t believe that another round of tax breaks for millionaires will bring good jobs to our shores, or pay down our deficit. I don’t believe that firing teachers or kicking students off financial aid will grow the economy, or help us compete with the scientists and engineers coming out of China. After all that we’ve been through, I don’t believe that rolling back regulations on Wall Street will help the small businesswoman expand, or the laid-off construction worker keep his home. We’ve been there, we’ve tried that, and we’re not going back. We’re moving forward.

    I won’t pretend the path I’m offering is quick or easy. I never have. You didn’t elect me to tell you what you wanted to hear. You elected me to tell you the truth. And the truth is, it will take more than a few years for us to solve challenges that have built up over decades. It will require common effort, shared responsibility, and the kind of bold, persistent experimentation that Franklin Roosevelt pursued during the only crisis worse than this one. And by the way – those of us who carry on his party’s legacy should remember that not every problem can be remedied with another government programme or dictate from Washington.

    But know this, America: Our problems can be solved. Our challenges can be met. The path we offer may be harder, but it leads to a better place. And I’m asking you to choose that future. I’m asking you to rally around a set of goals for your country – goals in manufacturing, energy, education, national security, and the deficit; a real, achievable plan that will lead to new jobs, more opportunity, and rebuild this economy on a stronger foundation. That’s what we can do in the next four years, and that’s why I’m running for a second term as president of the United States.

    We can choose a future where we export more products and outsource fewer jobs. After a decade that was defined by what we bought and borrowed, we’re getting back to basics, and doing what America has always done best:

    We’re making things again.

    I’ve met workers in Detroit and Toledo who feared they’d never build another American car. Today, they can’t build them fast enough, because we reinvented a dying auto industry that’s back on top of the world.

    I’ve worked with business leaders who are bringing jobs back to America – not because our workers make less pay, but because we make better products. Because we work harder and smarter than anyone else.

    I’ve signed trade agreements that are helping our companies sell more goods to millions of new customers – goods that are stamped with three proud words: Made in America.

    After a decade of decline, this country created over half a million manufacturing jobs in the last two and a half years. And now you have a choice: we can give more tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, or we can start rewarding companies that open new plants and train new workers and create new jobs here, in the United States of America. We can help big factories and small businesses double their exports, and if we choose this path, we can create a million new manufacturing jobs in the next four years. You can make that happen. You can choose that future.

    You can choose the path where we control more of our own energy. After 30 years of inaction, we raised fuel standards so that by the middle of the next decade, cars and trucks will go twice as far on a gallon of gas. We’ve doubled our use of renewable energy, and thousands of Americans have jobs today building wind turbines and long-lasting batteries. In the last year alone, we cut oil imports by 1m barrels a day – more than any administration in recent history. And today, the United States of America is less dependent on foreign oil than at any time in nearly two decades.

    Now you have a choice – between a strategy that reverses this progress, or one that builds on it. We’ve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration in the last three years, and we’ll open more. But unlike my opponent, I will not let oil companies write this country’s energy plan, or endanger our coastlines, or collect another $4bn in corporate welfare from our taxpayers.

    We’re offering a better path – a future where we keep investing in wind and solar and clean coal; where farmers and scientists harness new biofuels to power our cars and trucks; where construction workers build homes and factories that waste less energy; where we develop a hundred year supply of natural gas that’s right beneath our feet. If you choose this path, we can cut our oil imports in half by 2020 and support more than 600,000 new jobs in natural gas alone.

    And yes, my plan will continue to reduce the carbon pollution that is heating our planet – because climate change is not a hoax. More droughts and floods and wildfires are not a joke. They’re a threat to our children’s future. And in this election, you can do something about it.

    You can choose a future where more Americans have the chance to gain the skills they need to compete, no matter how old they are or how much money they have. Education was the gateway to opportunity for me. It was the gateway for Michelle. And now more than ever, it is the gateway to a middle-class life.

    For the first time in a generation, nearly every state has answered our call to raise their standards for teaching and learning. Some of the worst schools in the country have made real gains in math and reading. Millions of students are paying less for college today because we finally took on a system that wasted billions of taxpayer dollars on banks and lenders.

    And now you have a choice – we can gut education, or we can decide that in the United States of America, no child should have her dreams deferred because of a crowded classroom or a crumbling school. No family should have to set aside a college acceptance letter because they don’t have the money. No company should have to look for workers in China because they couldn’t find any with the right skills here at home.

    Government has a role in this. But teachers must inspire; principals must lead; parents must instil a thirst for learning, and students, you’ve got to do the work. And together, I promise you – we can out-educate and outcompete any country on Earth. Help me recruit 100,000 math and science teachers in the next ten years, and improve early childhood education. Help give 2m workers the chance to learn skills at their community college that will lead directly to a job. Help us work with colleges and universities to cut in half the growth of tuition costs over the next ten years. We can meet that goal together. You can choose that future for America.

    In a world of new threats and new challenges, you can choose leadership that has been tested and proven. Four years ago, I promised to end the war in Iraq. We did. I promised to refocus on the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11. We have. We’ve blunted the Taliban’s momentum in Afghanistan, and in 2014, our longest war will be over. A new tower rises above the New York skyline, al-Qaeda is on the path to defeat, and Osama bin Laden is dead.

    Tonight, we pay tribute to the Americans who still serve in harm’s way. We are forever in debt to a generation whose sacrifice has made this country safer and more respected. We will never forget you. And so long as I’m Commander-in-Chief, we will sustain the strongest military the world has ever known. When you take off the uniform, we will serve you as well as you’ve served us – because no one who fights for this country should have to fight for a job, or a roof over their head, or the care that they need when they come home.

    Around the world, we’ve strengthened old alliances and forged new coalitions to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. We’ve reasserted our power across the Pacific and stood up to China on behalf of our workers. From Burma to Libya to South Sudan, we have advanced the rights and dignity of all human beings – men and women; Christians and Muslims and Jews.

    But for all the progress we’ve made, challenges remain. Terrorist plots must be disrupted. Europe’s crisis must be contained. Our commitment to Israel’s security must not waver, and neither must our pursuit of peace. The Iranian government must face a world that stays united against its nuclear ambitions. The historic change sweeping across the Arab World must be defined not by the iron fist of a dictator or the hate of extremists, but by the hopes and aspirations of ordinary people who are reaching for the same rights that we celebrate today.

    So now we face a choice. My opponent and his running mate are new to foreign policy, but from all that we’ve seen and heard, they want to take us back to an era of blustering and blundering that cost America so dearly.

    After all, you don’t call Russia our number one enemy – and not al-Qaeda – unless you’re still stuck in a cold war time warp. You might not be ready for diplomacy with Beijing if you can’t visit the Olympics without insulting our closest ally. My opponent said it was “tragic” to end the war in Iraq, and he won’t tell us how he’ll end the war in Afghanistan. I have, and I will. And while my opponent would spend more money on military hardware that our Joint Chiefs don’t even want, I’ll use the money we’re no longer spending on war to pay down our debt and put more people back to work – rebuilding roads and bridges; schools and runways. After two wars that have cost us thousands of lives and over a trillion dollars, it’s time to do some nation-building right here at home.

    You can choose a future where we reduce our deficit without wrecking our middle class. Independent analysis shows that my plan would cut our deficits by $4tn. Last summer, I worked with Republicans in Congress to cut $1tn in spending – because those of us who believe government can be a force for good should work harder than anyone to reform it, so that it’s leaner, more efficient, and more responsive to the American people.

    I want to reform the tax code so that it’s simple, fair, and asks the wealthiest households to pay higher taxes on incomes over $250,000 – the same rate we had when Bill Clinton was president; the same rate we had when our economy created nearly 23m new jobs, the biggest surplus in history, and a lot of millionaires to boot.

    Now, I’m still eager to reach an agreement based on the principles of my bipartisan debt commission. No party has a monopoly on wisdom. No democracy works without compromise. But when Governor Romney and his allies in Congress tell us we can somehow lower our deficit by spending trillions more on new tax breaks for the wealthy – well, you do the math. I refuse to go along with that. And as long as I’m president, I never will.

    I refuse to ask middle class families to give up their deductions for owning a home or raising their kids just to pay for another millionaire’s tax cut. I refuse to ask students to pay more for college; or kick children out of Head Start programs, or eliminate health insurance for millions of Americans who are poor, elderly, or disabled – all so those with the most can pay less.

    And I will never turn Medicare into a voucher. No American should ever have to spend their golden years at the mercy of insurance companies. They should retire with the care and dignity they have earned. Yes, we will reform and strengthen Medicare for the long haul, but we’ll do it by reducing the cost of healthcare – not by asking seniors to pay thousands of dollars more. And we will keep the promise of Social Security by taking the responsible steps to strengthen it – not by turning it over to Wall Street.

    This is the choice we now face. This is what the election comes down to. Over and over, we have been told by our opponents that bigger tax cuts and fewer regulations are the only way; that since government can’t do everything, it should do almost nothing. If you can’t afford health insurance, hope that you don’t get sick. If a company releases toxic pollution into the air your children breathe, well, that’s just the price of progress. If you can’t afford to start a business or go to college, take my opponent’s advice and “borrow money from your parents.”

    You know what? That’s not who we are. That’s not what this country’s about. As Americans, we believe we are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights – rights that no man or government can take away. We insist on personal responsibility and we celebrate individual initiative. We’re not entitled to success. We have to earn it. We honour the strivers, the dreamers, the risk-takers who have always been the driving force behind our free enterprise system – the greatest engine of growth and prosperity the world has ever known.

    But we also believe in something called citizenship – a word at the very heart of our founding, at the very essence of our democracy; the idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another, and to future generations.

    We believe that when a CEO pays his autoworkers enough to buy the cars that they build, the whole company does better.

    We believe that when a family can no longer be tricked into signing a mortgage they can’t afford, that family is protected, but so is the value of other people’s homes, and so is the entire economy.

    We believe that a little girl who’s offered an escape from poverty by a great teacher or a grant for college could become the founder of the next Google, or the scientist who cures cancer, or the president of the United States – and it’s in our power to give her that chance.

    We know that churches and charities can often make more of a difference than a poverty program alone. We don’t want handouts for people who refuse to help themselves, and we don’t want bailouts for banks that break the rules. We don’t think government can solve all our problems. But we don’t think that government is the source of all our problems – any more than are welfare recipients, or corporations, or unions, or immigrants, or gays, or any other group we’re told to blame for our troubles.

    Because we understand that this democracy is ours.

    We, the people, recognise that we have responsibilities as well as rights; that our destinies are bound together; that a freedom which only asks what’s in it for me, a freedom without a commitment to others, a freedom without love or charity or duty or patriotism, is unworthy of our founding ideals, and those who died in their defence.

    As citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It’s about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government.

    So you see, the election four years ago wasn’t about me. It was about you. My fellow citizens – you were the change.

    You’re the reason there’s a little girl with a heart disorder in Phoenix who’ll get the surgery she needs because an insurance company can’t limit her coverage. You did that.

    You’re the reason a young man in Colorado who never thought he’d be able to afford his dream of earning a medical degree is about to get that chance. You made that possible.

    You’re the reason a young immigrant who grew up here and went to school here and pledged allegiance to our flag will no longer be deported from the only country she’s ever called home; why selfless soldiers won’t be kicked out of the military because of who they are or who they love; why thousands of families have finally been able to say to the loved ones who served us so bravely: “Welcome home.”

    If you turn away now – if you buy into the cynicism that the change we fought for isn’t possible . . . well, change will not happen. If you give up on the idea that your voice can make a difference, then other voices will fill the void: lobbyists and special interests; the people with the $10m checks who are trying to buy this election and those who are making it harder for you to vote; Washington politicians who want to decide who you can marry, or control healthcare choices that women should make for themselves.

    Only you can make sure that doesn’t happen. Only you have the power to move us forward.

    I recognise that times have changed since I first spoke to this convention. The times have changed – and so have I.

    I’m no longer just a candidate. I’m the president. I know what it means to send young Americans into battle, for I have held in my arms the mothers and fathers of those who didn’t return. I’ve shared the pain of families who’ve lost their homes, and the frustration of workers who’ve lost their jobs. If the critics are right that I’ve made all my decisions based on polls, then I must not be very good at reading them. And while I’m proud of what we’ve achieved together, I’m far more mindful of my own failings, knowing exactly what Lincoln meant when he said, “I have been driven to my knees many times by the overwhelming conviction that I had no place else to go.”

    But as I stand here tonight, I have never been more hopeful about America. Not because I think I have all the answers. Not because I’m naive about the magnitude of our challenges.

    I’m hopeful because of you.

    The young woman I met at a science fair who won national recognition for her biology research while living with her family at a homeless shelter – she gives me hope.

    The auto worker who won the lottery after his plant almost closed, but kept coming to work every day, and bought flags for his whole town and one of the cars that he built to surprise his wife – he gives me hope.

    The family business in Warroad, Minnesota that didn’t lay off a single one of their four thousand employees during this recession, even when their competitors shut down dozens of plants, even when it meant the owners gave up some perks and pay – because they understood their biggest asset was the community and the workers who helped build that business – they give me hope.

    And I think about the young sailor I met at Walter Reed hospital, still recovering from a grenade attack that would cause him to have his leg amputated above the knee. Six months ago, I would watch him walk into a White House dinner honouring those who served in Iraq, tall and twenty pounds heavier, dashing in his uniform, with a big grin on his face; sturdy on his new leg. And I remember how a few months after that I would watch him on a bicycle, racing with his fellow wounded warriors on a sparkling spring day, inspiring other heroes who had just begun the hard path he had travelled.

    He gives me hope.

    I don’t know what party these men and women belong to. I don’t know if they’ll vote for me. But I know that their spirit defines us. They remind me, in the words of Scripture, that ours is a “future filled with hope.”

    And if you share that faith with me – if you share that hope with me – I ask you tonight for your vote.

    If you reject the notion that this nation’s promise is reserved for the few, your voice must be heard in this election.

    If you reject the notion that our government is forever beholden to the highest bidder, you need to stand up in this election.

    If you believe that new plants and factories can dot our landscape; that new energy can power our future; that new schools can provide ladders of opportunity to this nation of dreamers; if you believe in a country where everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules, then I need you to vote this November.

    America, I never said this journey would be easy, and I won’t promise that now. Yes, our path is harder – but it leads to a better place. Yes our road is longer – but we travel it together. We don’t turn back. We leave no one behind. We pull each other up. We draw strength from our victories, and we learn from our mistakes, but we keep our eyes fixed on that distant horizon, knowing that Providence is with us, and that we are surely blessed to be citizens of the greatest nation on Earth.

    Thank you, God bless you

  • What my parents taught me- Dlamini-Zuma

    What my parents taught me- Dlamini-Zuma

    AU Commission Chairman, speaks on the virtues she learnt from her parents

     

    The recently elected chairman of the Africa Union Commission Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma’s work and success has earned her various awards, accolades and extensive media coverage.

    However, not much is known about her personal life, including her upbringing. Dlamini-Zuma spoke about her upbringing during a gathering organized by POPLAR Women on the Frontline in Daveyton on the East Rand, Gauteng in South Africa recently.

    “I was the first born of the eight children and life was a bit tough then. It is still now but maybe it was much tougher then. One of the things that my mother taught me was that you are the eldest so if there are four oranges you need to split them amongst the younger kids and if anyone has to go without it, it must be you. I used to think that was not fair but I learned to go around it. If there were seven oranges I knew I’m the one who was not going to get it. So, I’d give each one of them an orange and say ‘mina angiyitholanga’ (Isizulu meaning for I did not get it) and they’ll say ‘sisi sizokusikela’ (sister, we will cut it for you). Each one of them would cut half for me and I would end up with more oranges,” she chuckled.

    The experience taught her “that if you give, you will always receive. It may not be necessarily material, it may be spiritual, love, emotional support or service. But if you give and give honestly you’ll always receive. It may not come in the form you’ve given but you’ll always receive. So, I do agree with what the Bible says that a hand that gives is blessed.”

    According to Dlamini-Zuma, her late mother Rose Dlamini was very strict. “Even when she was a grandmother and sometimes I would say to her but you are unfair”.

    “My mother would go somewhere and when she finds that there is something wrong in the house I’d be the one who gets punished. She’d demand to know where I was and why I didn’t I see what was happening. Even if I said it’s not me she’d say ‘I don’t care, if you took your responsibilities seriously you would have seen the person who was doing it. The fact that they did it and you did not see means you were not responsible enough’,” she recalled.

    She explained that what made matters worse was that she had a very “naughty brother” who enjoyed stealing her mother’s Condensed milk.

    “My brother loved Condensed milk and when my mother was out and nobody was looking he would take it, make a few holes with a tin-opener and literally drink it. He would then turn over the tin. My mother loved her tea and when she tried to pour Condensed milk in it thinking it was full she’d find that it’s empty. Then, I would be the one who gets punished and I hated Condensed milk! But at the end I realized that she was just teaching me responsibility. It’s not that she was unfair. But as the first born, it taught me to look after my siblings and know their whereabouts.”

    Her father, Mr Willibrod Gweva Dlamini according to Dlamini-Zuma was a very special man who had great respect for women and highly encouraged his daughters to get educated.

    “When the collar of his shirt was torn, he would remove it, turn it around and sew it back. He would say, ‘I’ m doing this because the only way I can give you a heritage is this way. I won’t leave you money but I can leave you with education. I would like all of you to get educated but if there has to be a choice the girls must get educated because boys can take care of themselves’.

    “As a girl you must get educated because in our tradition what is left from the family turns to go to the eldest boy and that’s traditional. But your education will not go to the eldest boy it will be yours until you die. Then my father would say if you get married and everything is good you can be able to assist your husband. But in the event things don’t work out I don’t want my daughter to stay in a bad marriage for a plate of food. The third reason is that if that nice husband of yours by some unfortunate reason passes away while he is still young, I don’t want your children to be abused by a step-father and you turn a blind eye because you are looking for shelter and food.”

    Dlamini-Zuma recalled that her father had to convince villagers who were opposed to her decision to get higher degrees instead of getting married. “When I completed my first degree and said that I was going to school again, the villagers said to my father, ‘tell this child to stop it, she doesn’t want to get married she just wants to be at school all the time. Then my father started explaining to them that it is important for girls to get educated,”.

    The AU Commission Chairman enjoys listening to music and catering for her guests. “Music is a very important aspect of my life. I find it soothing, calming and energizing. I choose music according to what I want. Even when things are going wrong in my life either in my private life or wherever, music to me is always helpful.”

    She said her parents taught her to share with others. “When you cook you always had to leave a bit of food because somebody might just walk in. So, you must be able to give them something to eat and that taught me that you share what you have. You know there are some of the things you’ve done before and you hate them when you are old, but this is one thing that I still like to do. You don’t come to my house and leave without having had anything to eat.

    Prophetess Sibongile Sithole of POPLAR Women on the Frontline echoed her sentiment, “You never leave her house without having had a full meal. She makes sure that she serves us and that we are well looked after.”

  • Ezekwesili heads new Africa Economic Initiative

    Ezekwesili heads new Africa Economic Initiative

    Building on her work in the last five years as World Bank Vice President for Africa, former Education Minister, Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili is teaming up with the billionaire George Soros to chart a new economic course for Africa, Empowered Newswire reports.

    In her new assignment, Ezekwesili said she will get the opportunity to advance economies in the continent to finally reach and positively touch the lives of the poor African majority, and set-up a world-class graduate school of public policy in Abuja.

    Speaking with Empowered Newswire, Ezekwesili disclosed that her partnership with the Open Society and its billionaire founder is strategic, providing the opportunity “to advance the centrality of sound policies for economic growth that delivers benefit to a larger number of African citizens especially because capable states do better in articulating and executing sound public policies.”

    The immediate past World Bank official added that “in this assignment, I want to bring in structural transformation , especially now that Africa must prioritize structural transformation through economic diversification.”

    A statement from the Open Society in Abuja on Tuesday, where Ezekwesili would be based in her new role also said “the Open Society Foundations has asked Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili, a world-renowned expert on economic reforms and economic governance, to lead its new Africa Economic Policy Development Initiative. ”

    According to the statement, the initiative was created to build on the strong growth performance of Africa over the last decade and the emergent urgency for structural transformation of economies to expand benefits to the poor majority through policies that boost private sector jobs and incomes.

    Continuing the Open Society said, “operating from Abuja, Ezekwesili will advise the leaders and policymakers of the countries on their economic strategy and policy reforms that can help boost investment and create job growth in the Mano River region. The initiative over the next three years will expand to include other countries across Africa.”

    The initiative which is focusing on Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea, countries fresh from conflicts in West Africa, will help develop leadership in public policy and economic reforms within governments, and will leverage African expertise in the Diaspora to strengthen state capacities in various sectors of economies in Africa, according to the Open Society.

    Commenting on the new role of the Nigerian former ministers of Education and Solid Minerals, President Alpha Conde of Guinea said “we very heartily welcome this initiative by the Open Society Foundation and are eager to seize the opportunity to receive the valuable policy advice and support from Oby Ezekwesili. We benefited from her rich experience and policy expertise when she was at the World Bank and helped us considerably in advancing our country’s economic reforms and development priorities.”

    In his own comments, Open Society founder, George Soros, observed that “I am delighted for Oby to join our team working on Africa.”

    George Soros, who is also the chairman of the Open Society Foundations added that “my foundations have long been committed to fostering economic development in post-conflict countries and nations transitioning to democracy.”

    Ezekwesili will take the title Senior Economic Advisor in the Open Society Foundations and in that capacity “will oversee the creation of a public policy advisory center in Abuja that will collaborate with Paul Collier, the professor of economics who focuses on developing countries, and others to provide economic policy solutions to pro-reform governments starting with Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.”

    In addition to that the former World Bank VP for Africa will also help establish “a separate Africa-wide graduate school of public policy, based in Nigeria, that will collaborate with leading universities including the School of Public Policy at the Central European University.”

    Ezekwesili said the plan for the School should begin within a two-year timeline, “to begin to build towards the school.”

    Open Society President Christopher Stone also praised Ezekwesili saying “Oby has dedicated her career to the proposition that governments in Africa, as elsewhere, can achieve equitable growth when they are open, honest, and disciplined. She is the right person to lead this new initiative.”

    In her job at the World Bank, where she was VP in charge of Africa, Ezekwesili was responsible for operations in 48 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and supervised a lending portfolio of over US$40 billion.

    Previously, she worked for the federal government of Nigeria as presidential advisor in charge of public procurement reforms; Chairperson and Implementer of the first ever, country-led Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative; Minister of Mineral Resources; key member and Governance task team leader of the widely acclaimed Presidential Economic Team; and Minister of Education. Ezekwesili has a long track record in the transparency, accountability, good governance, and anti-corruption movement worldwide having been one of the co-founders of Transparency International nearly two decades ago.

    Before her public policy service in Nigeria’s federal government, Ezekwesili served as director of the Harvard-Nigeria Economic Strategy Program in Boston and Abuja.

    A holder of a master’s in international law from the University of Lagos, and another master’s in public policy and administration from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, Ezekwesili is a chartered accountant.

  • Sharia Law: Endless violence against women

    Sharia Law: Endless violence against women

    It shook the world. International organisations were involved. Ambassadors of various countries discussed safety measures, Oprah Winfrey mobilised more than 1.2 million people to protest and Human Right Watch was under severe pressure to act.

    It was an exclusive story published by Daily Mirror on August 24, 2002 about the case of Amina Lawal, a 30-year-old woman from Kastina in Northern Nigeria who was sentenced to death by stoning on August 19 of the same year, by an Islamic court for adultery and conceiving a child out of wedlock. She was to be taken, buried to the neck in the earth and left to perish beneath a hail of rocks.

    The story was that of oppression by one gender upon another. Even though Ms Lawal’s case was overturned, the issue of stoning to death still exist in countries like Indonesia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Somalia.

    Professor Hauwa Ibrahim, the pro bono lawyer who handled Ms Lawal’s case ten years ago, confirmed that this form of violence and injustice never existed until 2000 when religious cleric feared for the effects of globalisation on their women. She said: “Globalisation through Nollywood, Hollywood and Bollywood was exposing women to nudity, so the Sharia Law was introduced to protect women which ended up destroying them and introducing a huge form of violence.”

    Furthermore, there are misconceptions surrounding the fact that stoning to death is supported by the Holy Book of Qur’an. This is untrue. The only part of the Qur’an that describes punishment for adultery or fornication is Qur’an 24:2 which states that: “The [unmarried] woman or [unmarried] man found guilty of sexual intercourse- lash each one of them with a hundred lashes, and do not be taken by pity for them in the religion of Allah and the Last Day. And let a group of the believers witness their punishment.”

    While the law provides that women are stoned to death, the father of Ms Lawal’s daughter was not prosecuted for lack of evidence. He was deemed innocent by the court without any DNA tests. However, the punishment for men in the Sharia Law is based on three proofs. One is confession, the second is pregnancy and the third is that four witnesses must see the sexual act before a man can be convicted. How possible is that?

    Professor Ibrahim confirmed that the law is in the book but the judges in Nigeria no longer pass judgement of stoning. One obvious reason is the international interest which Ms Lawal’s case attracted and the other is the notion that corruption has crept into the system. Judges in Northern Nigeria whose children get pregnant fly them abroad to avoid conviction and open disgrace. The Professor of Harvard University also said she is working with Nigerian lawyers and other countries especially in Pakistan, Palestine and Iraq to see that the law is abrogated.

    Ms Lawal who lived in a tiny room made with mud and a thatched roof in 2002 was arrested in her home. She could neither read nor write. She didn’t understand the law. Her first marriage was at the age of 14. She had five children after which she became divorced. Two years later, she had a daughter for another man who had promised to marry her but denied her in court.

    Her case is a typical example of religious violence existing in developing countries. Women worldwide face different forms of injustice. They are vulnerable to abuse, domestic violence and rape. In Northern Nigeria where Ms Lawal comes from, when a boy is born, friends and relatives exclaim congratulations! A son means insurance. He will inherit his father’s property; get a good job to help support the family. When a girl is born, the reaction is different. Some women weep when they find out their baby is a girl. Her place is in a man’s house and when she is between ages 12- 14 she is given out in marriage.

    Some of these women end up being used as machines to produce children. Professor Ibrahim recollected a case she handled in January. It was a case of a well known man [name withheld] in Nigeria who married his first wife and for several years she couldn’t produce children. “So, he had to marry a second wife. The second wife was more productive. In six years of marriage they had five male children. When he knew he had what he wanted, he started maltreating her and he decided to divorce her. We couldn’t get the settlement out of court but now the case is before a magistrate court.”

    In some countries, deliberate attempts are made to reduce the female population. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimates that around 5,000 Indian women are killed in dowry-related incidents each year. The gender ratio across India has dropped to an unnatural low of 929 females to 1,000 males due to infanticides and sex related abortions. Also, the Chinese government claims that sex-selective abortion is one major explanation for the staggering number of Chinese girls who have simply vanished from the population in the last 20 years.

    UNICEF in a press statement on violation of women rights in developing countries said “A combination of extreme poverty and deep biases against women create a remorseless cycle of discrimination that keeps girls in developing countries from living up to their full potential. It also leaves them vulnerable to severe physical and emotional abuse.”

    Injustice against women is a devastating reality. UNICEF continued: “It results in millions of individual tragedies, which add up to lost potential for countries. Studies show there is a direct link between a country’s attitude towards women and its progress socially and economically. The status of women is central to the health of a society.”

    Professor Ibrahim recollected that Ms Lawal’s case officially ended in 2003. By 2004, she was remarried and again faced maltreatment from her husband. He beat her up and when she was six months pregnant, he divorced her.

    Ms Lawal, alone again with a child kicking inside of her struggled through life until she had the baby who she named Miriam. In 2010, she remarried again but this time Mrs Ibrahim says; “I can’t tell if she is happily married or not.”

    While the Human Right Watch and Amnesty International claim they have grip of violence against women around the world, Senior Researcher on gender in Open University Oxford, Dr. Tina Wallace said nobody has the true data of how much domestic violence, religious violence or discrimination women endure. She said: “I don’t think anybody has that kind of data. Who are these women going to tell? Who knows what goes on behind closed doors? I don’t think there is a significant difference between religious and domestic violence against women because a lot of domestic violence are based on religious understanding of men being superior to women and women owing men allegiance. You can’t separate religion from domestic violence.”

    Dr Wallace, whose research is mainly on women in Africa, added that: “These are really difficult issues that go to the heart of marriages, their culture and the way they have been brought up. Even here in the UK, it is a very difficult subject to tackle; we have loads of homes with domestic violence a lot of which is not known.”

    However, Sarah Haynes, grassroots campaigns officer, Women for Women International; said they work extensively with women to address violence when it is reported. She said: “We are helping women deal with the trauma in African continent especially in Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan and Nigeria where gender crisis is ongoing. These women are sponsored for one year to equip them with the skills to contribute to the society without bearing hangovers from their past hurt.”

    Head of Centre for Gender and Violence Research Bristol University, Professor Marianne Hester says gender injustice has increased in various dimensions. She said this increase has a link to decreasing services in the most countries.

    In her view, the injustice melted on women especially in developing countries would tremendously reduce “if men begin to address their violent behaviour and also there should be a measure to call for equalising of gender.”

    Researcher and director of Tilda Goldberg Centre for Social Work and Social Care, University of Bedfordshire, Dr Sarah Galvani said: “It is totally unacceptable to abuse women in any way because it perpetuates the subjugation of women and convey messages to young and old that women are not men’s equals and deserve to be treated as lesser beings.”

    To reduce or eradicate this form of injustice, she said: “a start would be to introduce and enforce laws that suitably punish those that abuse women. More so, services and support for women in need of protection should be intensified.”

    Mrs Oby Okonkwo, Nigerian gender activist and a lawyer for about 30 years said progress has been made through organisations like International Federation of Women Lawyer (FIDA) and Women’s Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative (WRAPA) in Northern areas to educate them of their rights as women.

    She however lamented that most “women are scared of speaking out as a result of the stigma they could face after bringing their problem to public eye.”

    As for Ms Lawal, who represents the voiceless, poor, powerless uneducated woman, 10 years on, she is still struggling to endure life.

    Professor Ibrahim who also escaped marriage at the age of 12 but ‘accidentally’ became educated said “Education is the tool that can help break the pattern of gender injustice and bring lasting change for women in developing countries.”

    UNICEF 2011 report says, nine million girls than boys miss out of school every year.

    Chinonye is currently studying for an MA in International Journalism at Cardiff University, U.K

  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPLY

    TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPLY

    Exhausted and thirsty from participating in the daily hustle for a living in the congested city of Lagos, Tolu, a motor-parts dealer begins his three hour journey home from Alaba International market.

    In a bid to beat the traditional traffic-jam, he hurries to the bus stop. Sitting on a curb he waits in vain for the frantic call for passengers heading to Alagbado by a half dressed conductor. Each second added to his thirty minute wait at the bus stop heightens his growing head ache.

    With a defeated spirit, Tolu decides to quench his raging hunger by purchasing a wrap of sausage roll from a hawker. He peels away the nylon wrap with the intention of devouring his make-shift meal. Suddenly he spots the life-less form of a house-fly lodged in his snack.

    Enraged by this discovery, he demands a refund from the ‘Oni sausage’ (sausage seller) but is met with a stumbling wall. ‘Oni sausage’ vehemently refuses to proffer a refund rather she posits “Once nylon don tear, notin (nothing) wey person fit do. The money don go be dat!”.

    Confused, angry and defeated, he tosses the sausage roll into the bush and walks away without saying a word. After all, Terms and Conditions Apply!

    The above cuts the picture of the level of awareness of the average Nigerian on his rights as a consumer. In a global economy bound by legal laws, a firm grasps of the terms of agreement upon which goods and services are exchanged or bought cannot be over-emphasized.

    However, what has come to be a common source of grievance between the buying population and the goods or service providing company is the act of creating extreme non-liability claims made by these companies as well as consciously or unconsciously withholding the details of these ‘terms and conditions’ from the consumer before the transaction is made.

    One of these clauses can be found in the rule book of an airline company which serves as a national carrier. It states “All claims for compensation for Damage to Baggage must be accompanied by an itemized list identifying each affected item by description, manufacturer and age, together with proof of purchase or ownership for all such items. Proof of purchase will not be required in relation to any item which costs less than US$5 (or local currency equivalent), or is more than five (5) years old and has a claims value of less than US$50 (or local currency equivalent). Depreciation will be deducted from claims, where we consider appropriate.”

    Another typical case study is cited when Miss Fortune of Fabricare dry-cleaning service states that if while dry-cleaning, a cloth gets damaged, they do what they can to mend the dress. “If the tear is beyond repair, we beg the customer to accept the cloth like that. If the person is a Christian, he will forgive and let it go. It is only in extreme cases that we pay a small percentage of the amount the person is asking because many times these our customers tell lies about the cost of the dress. They will say they bought a N4,000 suit for N18,000 so that they will cheat us out of some extra cash”.

    The refund or money-back system seems to have lost its meaning on the average Nigerian business man. Most of the people who conduct business on the streets of Lagos claim that once a legal tender, in this case – money, has been exchanged, there is virtually no hope of the buyer getting his or her money refunded. This condition stands even when the purchaser of the product is dissatisfied with the quality of service meted out.

    Mr. Samson Olajide, a photographer, says “Normally, when I take a person’s picture, I will do my best to let it come out well. After I finish washing the picture and I give it to the customer and the customer did (does) not want to collect it because it is not fine, there is nothing I can do. I can never return the money because I have done my best”.

    This manner of conducting business does not seem to be restricted to the small-scale business man as many of the multi-national companies fall into this category. In light of this situation, Barr. Amobi Agbara, a Lawyer who runs an activist group called The Consumer Rights Project says, “There’s something called Caveat emptor which simply means ‘buyer-beware’ which ideally should be made public before the transaction is carried out. However, there are some exclusion clauses (terms and conditions) which we consider unconscionable (unacceptable to the senses). These exclusion clauses tend to limit the liability of a supplier of a goods or service and are therefore detrimental to the user. If these clauses are not brought to the knowledge of a buyer before the transaction is made, the supplier cannot rely on it to disclaim liability. In such cases, the law will treat these exclusion clauses as unconscionable”. he states.

    Invariably, this means that if the ‘terms and conditions’ are not conspicuously revealed to the buyer before a purchase is made and any form of damage occurs, the buyer has the right to demand money back and sue the company if his demands are rejected.

    Even with the tide turned in their favour, some consumers still refuse to take the bull by the horn and stake their claim citing the unreliable judicial system as an excuse. Fatima, a 28 year-old nurse posits “It is not easy to say you want to carry a big company to court. They (the big company) can hire good lawyers who will defend them no matter what but people like us who are still looking for money to pay school fees, who will you run to for help and where will you see money to hire a good lawyer?”.

    In response Barr. Agabara says “In Nigeria we do not have a legislative body per say that can enforce these legislations but we have snippets that tend to protect the rights of consumers like the National Agency of Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) and the Standard Organization of Nigeria (SON). We do not yet have a compendium of legislation that relates to consumers except only recently that the Consumers Protection Council (CPC) was formed to protect the rights of consumers”.

    Some blue-chip companies who are at the risk of facing legal squabbles are finally taking up the task of alerting the public to these exclusion clauses. A representative of the Nigerian Bottling Company had this to say, “We regularly announce the ‘terms and conditions apply clause’ in most of our adverts especially when we are running a promo because we are tired of being dragged to court over issues that could easily have been avoided.

    “There are people out there who are just looking for an excuse to make huge sums of money whether they deserve it or not and so we try to do our part by letting people know that that these terms exist. If you still chose to do business with us then nobody can put the blame on us”, he stated.

    Purchasers of goods and services are therefore encouraged to protect themselves by enquiring about and thoroughly reading through the ‘terms and conditions’ binding whatever product they purchase, in order to avoid a legal dispute.