Category: SouthEast

  • Urhobos are Warri landowners, not tenants – Adehor

    Urhobos are Warri landowners, not tenants – Adehor

    Chief Westham Adehor is the Eguono of Agbarha-Warri and Osia of Okere-Urhobo kingdoms in Warri, and also the Urhobo ethnic nationality’s focal person in INEC exercise. He spoke with Elo Edremoda, emphasizing that the ethnic groups are better off as partners in progress rather than adversaries.EXCERPTS:

    On Credibility of INEC ward delineation exercise

    We at the Agbarha-Warri axis are conducting our own verification. Once we confirm that the coordinates (longitude and latitude) in our area are accurate, we’ll make our position known. If you look around Warri and its environs, most of the city’s population resides in Agbarha-Warri and Okere-Urhobo communities. That shows how significant our presence is.

    Itsekiris’ claim that Urhobos are customary tenant

    That’s not true. The Urhobos, particularly Agbarha-Warri, have been in Warri long before colonial contact. We have two riverine communities, Ukpokiti and Oteghele, and five in the urban area.

    When the Portuguese first arrived, they met Agbarha people on the ground and exchanged gifts. Later, the British came and signed treaties directly with our ancestors. Unfortunately, copies of those treaties were destroyed when the Itsekiris burnt the house of Igbi, the first Okuovo of Agbarha-Warri. But when we checked the British archives, we found the original records confirming our ownership.

    Even the courts acknowledged that once we locate the treaty, it remains valid evidence of our ownership. So, how can people we signed treaties with claim we don’t own our land? As for the Okere-Urhobo Kingdom, one of their families was taken to court by the Olu, and they won at the Supreme Court. The judgment clearly states that Okere-Urhobo was founded by three Urhobo brothers.

    Read Also: Olori Atuwatse III vows to ‘bring the world to Warri child

    We Urhobos are peace-loving and accommodating. We intermarry with our Itsekiri and Ijaw neighbours. Every family here has ties across ethnic lines. The truth is simple: the Urhobos are not tenants in Warri.

    There was even a court case over Warri Cemetery. The land belonged to the Ejenavo family from Agbassa. When the British wanted to pay £21 in compensation, the Olu demanded £13. The court rejected that claim, awarding £15 to Agbassa as community property, £5 to the Ejenavo family, and just £1 to the Olu. That clearly shows ownership. Everyone knows their boundaries: Agbarha has its land, Okere-Urhobo has theirs, and the Itsekiri have theirs.

     On delayed implementation of delineation exercise

    INEC is following due process. The initial report had some errors, and we’ve identified and submitted them for correction. We’ve also engaged the offices of the National Security Adviser and the Attorney General to ensure fairness and transparency.

    Each group has presented its documents to justify claims over certain areas, and INEC is reviewing them. Once corrections are made, the final delineation will be published. There’s no need for violence. Anyone who feels aggrieved should follow the proper channels. I’m confident the government will do the right thing.

    We must all live together peacefully. Leadership can be shared, if today an Urhobo man is council chairman, an Itsekiri or Ijaw can be vice chairman, and vice versa. We just need mutual respect and must stop using derogatory words like “tenants” or “slaves.” The Nigerian Constitution is clear: anyone who has lived in a place for ten years can vote and be voted for. We should focus on coexistence, not division.

  • Ogbe-Ijoh people own Warri – Keme

    Ogbe-Ijoh people own Warri – Keme

    Chief Monday Keme, Principal Secretary to Amako-Suo (King) of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom, spoke to Shola O’Neil, on his monarch and peoples perspective on the issues surrounding Warri.

    On fear of fresh crisis in Warri

    There will be no return to crisis. Nobody wants to relive the pain of the past. The Ijaw, Itsekiri, and Urhobo are close neighbours, and disagreements are natural, but they must be resolved peacefully.

    The last crisis began with the quest for fair political representation, which was later resolved through the courts. The case went from the High Court to the Supreme Court over 11 years, and INEC is now implementing that judgment. Those who oppose it should go to court, not resort to violence. Besides, wards and being the majority in an area doesn’t guarantee victory; collaboration does.

    On Recent Ijaw/Itsekiri clash in Warri over billboards

    The incident was unfortunate. Billboards are just means of communication; the reaction was unnecessary. It reflects a lingering misconception that Ogbe-Ijoh people are not part of Warri.

    Historically, that is false. In 1955, the colonial government divided the Warri Division into two councils – the Warri Divisional Council and the Warri Urban District Council. Ogbe-Ijoh was one of seven councils under the Division, with four electoral wards within the Urban Council. Those wards were later fragmented through political interference, erasing Ogbe-Ijoh names and creating wards like Pessu. The struggle to restore our rightful recognition has continued since then.

    Read Also: Relief for commuters as Warri-Itakpe rail services resume

    On Past Government efforts

    Governor James Ibori acknowledged Ogbe-Ijoh’s political suppression and created Community Development Committees (CDCs) to ensure representation. Under Governor Uduaghan, the CDCs were scrapped, citing high governance cost. But every administration knows Ogbe-Ijoh’s presence in Warri.

    During the 1999 crisis, the Traditional Rulers and Chiefs Edict was amended to recognize four monarchs in Warri South: the Olu of Warri, Amako-suo of Ogbe-Ijoh; Orosuen of Okere-Urhobo, and Ovie of Agbarha. The Olu of Warri challenged this in court but lost both at the High Court and Court of Appeal.

    On Ogbe-Ijoh claims to Warri land

    The facts are clear. The Warri Assessment Report and the Southern Nigeria Civil Service List (1910) state that Warri land originally belonged to the Ogbe-Ijoh and Urhobo. The first British land lease, dated July 30, 1906, covered 360 hectares of Ogbe-Ijoh land. The warrant chief, Dore Numa, an Itsekiri leader, only signed on Ogbe-Ijoh’s behalf as a colonial intermediary. We still have written proof of that acknowledgment.

    On INEC ward delineation, outcome

    It’s the most credible delineation ever conducted because it was based on verified field data and the Supreme Court ruling. I led the Ogbe-Ijoh team in Warri South, and we were allocated three and a half wards. If we had four in 1955, it’s logical that our number should increase, not decrease. The exercise is fair, but its success depends on political will to implement it.

    On Argument that Demography has Change

    Not significantly. Much of our land is still occupied by government. Besides, INEC is constitutionally limited to 20 wards per local government, so adjustments must be fair, not political.

    On Argument over Olu of Warri title

    Historically, the title was “Olu of Itsekiri.” It was changed in 1952 by the Western Region government, sparking protests from the Ijaw and Urhobo. Later, a law clarified that the Olu’s authority does not extend to Ogbe-Ijoh or other Ijaw territories. If titles were tied to geography, the proper name would be “Olu of Benin River,” since treaties with the British used that title.

    Itsekiris accuse other tribes ‘Stealing’ Warri into their kingdoms

    The name Warri actually comes from the Ijaw word Wari, meaning “house.” When the British established their administrative base there, the name stuck. The Delta State Traditional Rulers Law recognizes Itsekiri as a kingdom, not Warri, just as Urhobo and Ijaw kingdoms are named after their communities.

    On Solution to crisis in Warri

    Peace depends on justice. INEC must be allowed to complete its work without interference. Majority alone doesn’t guarantee leadership; cooperation does. The new delineation reflects realities on the ground — 14 wards for the Ijaw and five for the Itsekiri in Warri South-West. The government must sustain peace, assure investors, and treat every ethnic group with fairness.

  • Urhobos, Ijaws are customary tenants, don’t own land in Warri – Mene

    Urhobos, Ijaws are customary tenants, don’t own land in Warri – Mene

    Mr. Sunny Amorighoye Mene is the Secretary of apex Itsekiri socio-cultural body, Itsekiri Leaders of Thought. In this interview with Shola O’Neil, explained why the FG and Delta State government are responsible for perceived spike in violence against his ethnic group, why the group are against the INEC ward exercise in Warri. EXCERPTS

    On the brewing crisis in Warri:

    The headquarters of Warri South-West Local Government Area was relocated from Ogidigben, its statutory location, to Ogbe-Ijoh, an Ijaw community. To date, official federal documents still list Ogidigben as the headquarters. However, the Delta State Government and House of Assembly amended the Federal Act to relocate it, and it has remained so, albeit illegally.

    When the government granted amnesty to those involved in the Warri crisis, it gave them economic benefits without addressing the criminal aspects of the conflict. That blanket amnesty created the impression that might is right and criminality pays because one man confronted the Federal Government through acts of brigandage and violence, shutting down the area, killing people, and committing heinous crimes.

    The Ijaws often threaten mayhem and war, believing that violence can once again bring them advantage. This remains one of the major issues fuelling the current situation in Warri. Now, the Urhobos are trying to leverage the same advantage. They joined forces with the Ijaws during the crisis and now seek to benefit as the Ijaws have done.The two groups believe they can use their demographic strength in Delta State to suppress the Itsekiri in their own homeland.

    There’s also a growing issue of territorial expansionism in defiance of the rule of law. Every inch of land in Warri territory has been litigated, and judgments exist. Yet, people are now twisting or disregarding these rulings to pursue territorial claims.

    Some believe their might is right because of the patronage they enjoy from government and oil companies. They see the Itsekiri as weak in numbers and military strength and therefore try to use force against them.

    On Ward Delineation: Why are Itsekiris Afraid?

    We (Itsekiris) were apprehensive about INEC’s ward delineation from the start because the commission failed to obey an Appeal Court judgment on the 10 – 12 ward structure for over 20 years.

    When wards were initially delineated nationwide, Warri South, Warri South-West, and Warri North each had 10 wards. But INEC later re-delineated Warri South into 12 wards. Under the 10-ward system, the Itsekiri had eight wards and the Urhobo had two. INEC’s new delineation reduced Itsekiri representation to six, effectively transferring many Itsekiri units to Urhobo-dominated areas, shrinking Itsekiri influence and expanding Urhobo control.

    Chief Joseph Otumara and others challenged this illegal act in court and won. The court declared INEC’s action null and void, directing it to revert to the 10-ward structure. That judgment, now over 25 years old, remains unimplemented. So, when this new delineation exercise began, our apprehension was justified. The same INEC that ignored a lawful judgment for decades cannot be trusted to treat us fairly now.

    Can Itsekiri Distrust halt a Supreme Court Judgment?

    We know it cannot. We are not opposed to enforcing the Supreme Court judgment, even though we disagree with the initial claims made at the lower court that the existing polling units and wards in Warri Federal Constituency are fake and fictitious.

    We are not against compliance with the judgment, but INEC must follow due process. Before implementation, we asked INEC to ensure neutrality and objectivity by removing Prof. Rhoda Gumus, an Ijaw, in the committee. She had previously handled a related case. It violates natural justice for her and other Ijaw elements within INEC to participate. We asked that she recused herself. INEC ignored our request and proceeded with Prof. Gumus leading the process. We believe this has compromised the outcome.

    When we noticed these irregularities, we sought an audience with the INEC Chairman, knowing he had met with Ijaw and Urhobo representatives twice. Despite several letters, our requests were ignored.

    INEC must comply with the Nigerian Constitution and the Electoral Act. These laws clearly outline how wards and polling units should be created. Section 20 (i) and (ii) of the Electoral Act states that delineation must rely on the voters’ register, not arbitrary data, not Google Maps, and certainly not ethnic profiling.

    INEC has no authority to conduct its own population census or to determine ethnic majority in any area. It also cannot create polling units without registered voters, as it did in some Ijaw and Urhobo areas.

    INEC must also adhere to its own criteria and guidelines for creating polling units and wards. In Warri North, INEC illegally extended coordinates into Ondo State, and in Warri Federal Constituency, it brought coordinates from Burutu LGA.

    Ijaws Say the Exercise is purely about population, now land ownership

    We never brought land ownership into the matter, INEC did. In its compiled list of communities, INEC inserted fictitious Ijaw and Urhobo settlements that do not exist. By doing so, it introduced ethnicity into an exercise that should be purely administrative. The voter register contains no ethnic classifications.

    In Warri South, INEC created three so-called “Ijaw wards” in areas where the Ijaw have no presence, inventing places like Buruama and Ewein. This was a deliberate attempt to help the Ijaw lay claim to Itsekiri territories. INEC was heavily compromised and induced. I stated this clearly in the office of the National Security Adviser. Those who undermined the integrity of this exercise should be arrested, investigated, and, if found guilty, punished to serve as a deterrent to others.

    Anyone who examines this case objectively will see the truth. INEC overstepped its boundaries, acting as if it were the NPC, Boundary Adjustment Commission, and even a legislative body empowered to create communities and local governments.

    Ogbe-Ijoh Lands in Warri Metropolis

    There are very clear judgments, some of which went all the way to the Supreme Court, stating that the Ijaws do not own any land in Warri metropolis. The courts have also barred any Ijaw individual from challenging the Itsekiris on land ownership in Warri.

    In a more recent judgment delivered by Justice Mukoro Marshall a former Chief Judge of Delta State, in suit No We/277/2012, the position of the Supreme Court was reaffirmed that  the Ijaw cannot contest ownership of land in Warri. The matter is foreclosed.

    Read Also: Okowa lauds Urhobos’ contribution to Nigeria’s devt. 

    Therefore, it is baffling that INEC would wake up and begin to act as a court of law by declaring that the Ijaws have land in Warri and even proceed to create three new wards for them, on what legal basis?

    In the Warri urban area, there were three principal leases that the colonial authorities used in creating Warri Urban; the leases of 1906, 1908, and 1911. The lessor in all three was Chief Dore Numa, acting on behalf of the Itsekiri people. These leases have since been returned to the Itsekiri Land Trust –  the original and rightful owners of the land. We have certified copies of all the relevant documents.

    The very word Warri, contrary to what anyone may claim, is a corruption of Iwere, (the Itsekiri word for their homeland). We are not saying there are no Ijaws or Urhobos living among us. We all coexist in Warri and desire peace, but peace cannot mean surrendering what rightly belongs to us. We cannot allow anyone to take over our ancestral lands under any pretext.

    On Ijaw landmarks in Warri South – Ogbe-Ijoh Market and other areas

    The Ogbe-Ijoh Market is merely a name, a nomenclature, just like you have Ibo Market in the same Warri. Does that mean the Igbos own that land? There’s Oku-Isoko in Effurun, do the Isoko people claim it as theirs? There is Dauda (named after a Yoruba), Alders Town, do these names confer ownership? These names were simply derived from people or tribes associated with the area at some point, but they have no title to the land.

    The Ogbe-Ijoh people went to court to claim ownership of that market, and they lost. So, what next? Does their loss in court mean nothing? Should they now resort to lawlessness and brigandage to achieve what the courts have denied them? That is precisely what we are witnessing; attempts to create confusion and provoke conflict despite subsisting court judgments.

    On Ijaw, Urhobo Court Victories on Warri Land

    They do not have. Let them bring forward the judgments they claim to have. I challenge them. We are talking about documented, verifiable court rulings, not propaganda.

    On Claims Itsekiri Warrant Chief Manipulated Treaties with Colonialists

    That is a very shallow and uninformed argument. We have the actual documents, the leases, the court judgments, and nowhere did Dore Numa sign as an agent for anyone other than the Itsekiri. Those making these allegations probably haven’t even seen the documents they are talking about.

    Each of those leases explicitly states that Dore Numa signed on behalf of the Itsekiri people – the owners of the land. The Warri Urban area, as it exists today, was created from those three leases of 1906, 1908, and 1911. That was why, in 1959, the colonial authorities returned the lands to the Itsekiri Land Trust because the Itsekiri were the lessors, the original owners.

    Those lands were acquired to create the Warri Township, and it wasn’t just Dore Numa who signed. Others, like Chief Ogbe and other notable Itsekiri nobles, also signed those documents, giving out those lands as Crown Lands.

    When the colonial masters were preparing to leave at independence, they returned the leases to their original owners – the Itsekiri Communal Land Trust. The same procedure was followed in Benin, Sapele and other areas.

    The deed of release stated that some portions of land, such as the Warri General Hospital, the Naval Base, the Police Station, the Court premises, and similar public facilities, would remain under government use. But all other lands, including those housing markets, private companies, and residences, were released to the Itsekiri Land Trust.

    Under the deed of mandate, the Trust was instructed to issue fresh leases to individuals or companies with unexpired leases. This was duly carried out by the Itsekiri Communal Land Trust. We have certified true copies of all these deeds, and they are available in government records. If the Ogbe-Ijoh people or anyone else had genuine documents, why didn’t they tender them in court when they challenged the Itsekiris, and lost?

    You must separate facts from propaganda. The Itsekiri position is grounded in law and documented evidence. What others have are sentimental and political arguments, not legal ones.

    In our memorandum to the National Security Adviser, we listed all the relevant cases and judgments. Those currently occupying parts of these lands have no valid documents proving ownership. Their occupation doesn’t confer title; the law is clear on that.

    On Calls to Change Olu of Warri to Olu of Itsekiri

    Let’s be very clear: the Urhobos and the Ijaws are settlers within the Warri Federal Constituency where the Olu of Warri is the traditional overlord. Unfortunately, government policies and political considerations have worsened these conflicts. The Agbassa people, for instance, cannot claim to have a kingdom. Any community that did not have a kingdom before Nigeria became a republic in 1960 cannot suddenly declare one. The same goes for Okere, it is not a kingdom.

    On Urhobo legal Victory on Warri Land

    This is being twisted. In Dudu vs. Daniel Okumagba, Justice Ekeruche made it clear that the case did not address radical ownership. It only recognized possessory rights, which means the right to farm and occupy land given by another. How can they now suddenly have a kingdom there?

    Okere (Warri) has six quarters. Five of them are Itsekiri quarters, and only one (Idumu-Sobo), is Urhobo. The Urhobos came in as in-laws to the Okere people, who gave them land for farming. They planted rubber trees on the land, and over time, that became their area of residence. But to now turn that into a “kingdom” is historically and legally baseless.

    The latest trend of converting clan structures into kingdoms is dangerous. If the government doesn’t stop this illegality, in 10 or 15 years, Nigeria will have over 3,000 so-called kingdoms. Historically and officially, Agbassa, Gbaramatu, and Ogbe-Ijoh are clans, not kingdoms.

    For the Olu of Warri, Chief Obafemi Awolowo did not change it. It was Olu of Warri from time. After the 88-year interregnum in Warri Kingdom, when Ginuwa II was to be crowned in 1936, the Urhobos resisted, arguing that since then Warri Province (included Urhobo land, which now sits in 8 LGA, Ijaws in current three LGAs and other areas up to Kwale), the title would make him overlord. To avoid conflict, he was crowned Olu of Itsekiri.

    When Ginuwa II died in 1949, and Erejuwa II was to be crowned, the matter resurfaced. By then, the Warri Province was under the Western Regional Government. The debate reached the parliament in Ibadan. After due consideration, and the Warri Province had been renamed Delta Province, Erejuwa II was crowned Olu of Warri, restoring the title to its historical and rightful form.

    The Urhobo Progressive Union petitioned the Secretary of the Colonies, but investigations confirmed that Olu of Warri was the correct title, with the Warri Province then covering just the the present Warri Federal Constituency. These are verifiable historical facts.

    The Ijaws cannot have a Pere of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom. It simply doesn’t make sense. Warri is Itsekiri land, and Ogbe-Ijoh is Ijaw. You can’t dislike the Itsekiris yet covet their land, name, and heritage.

    The Urhobos often raise such issues when their kinsman is governor. But the current governor has rightly distanced himself from it; he’s the governor of all Deltans, not just the Urhobos.

    Recipe for Peace Coexistence

    We must all learn to live in peace. My wife is Urhobo, from the Ekwerre family in Agbarho, Ughelli North. All my children bear Urhobo middle-names. My brother’s wife is Ijaw, from Gbaramatu. We have no personal issues with any ethnic group. All we ask is that our neighbours respect our history and our rights. We want peace, but not peace at the expense of justice.

  • Warri on edge, again: politics reopen old wounds, fault lines

    Warri on edge, again: politics reopen old wounds, fault lines

    • How, why INEC wards threatens fragile peace

    Two decades after conflict tore through Warri, stealing its peace and slowing its progress, unease is once again rising across its creeks. A Supreme Court–ordered ward delineation has reopened old wounds between the Ijaw and Itsekiri in the creeks. On the upland, the Itsekiri are locked in new disputes with the Urhobos of Okere and Agbassa, and the Ijaws of Ogbe-Ijoh in battles rooted in land ownership and the contested title of the Olu of Warri. South-South Regional Manager Shola Nath O’Neil traces the politics, history, and lingering resentments threatening to pull this oil-rich region back into turmoil.

    The Ijaw/Itsekiri crisis in Warri, Delta State, end 22 years ago, but residents of the oil-rich constituency are once again sleeping uneasily. The same undercurrents of tribal distrust, political rivalry, and economic tension that triggered the bloody conflict between 1996 and 2004 are resurfacing, pushing the fragile peace toward the brink.

    Across the creeks and city centers, leaders of the two rival groups have resumed verbal hostilities, each accusing the other of provocation and injustice. In the riverside communities of the three Warri local government areas, the rhetoric is fiery; in the upland, tension is heightened by the Urhobo-Itsekiri dispute over who truly owns Warri. The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) recent ward delineation exercise has further complicated an already combustible situation.

    For many residents, the atmosphere brings back haunting memories of the dark years when tribal militias ran amok through the city, killing, maiming, and setting homes and businesses ablaze.

    The unease is being stoked by a new kind of warfare; digital and physical. “Keyboard Warriors” from the rival ethnic camps now trade venomous words on Facebook, X, TikTok, and WhatsApp, posting hate-filled content and spreading false news in a bid to please their patrons.

    Yet, while community leaders publicly call for calm, developments on the ground tell a more worrying story. Chief Godspower Gbenekama (Fieowei of Gbaramatu Kingdom) and Monday Keme of Gbaramatu (Principal Secretary to the Amako-suo of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri, alongside Itsekiri and Agbarha leaders, told our reporter they remain committed to peace, the conditions, followers’ actions suggest otherwise.

    These actions, activities of fifth columnists, and the struggle among political and economic interest groups to retain control of oil royalties, political offices, and proceeds from illegal bunkering are steadily eroding the region’s uneasy calm.

    In the riverside areas, the Itsekiris and Ijaws of Gbaramatu, Ogbe-Ijoh, Egbema, and surrounding communities in Warri Southwest and Warri North LGAs are sparring over land, political positions, and territories gained or lost during the last war. In the metropolis, the Urhobo and Itsekiri are once again clashing over the legitimacy of ‘newly created’ kingdoms and traditional titles, while quietly positioning themselves for future electoral contests. The Ogbe-Ijoh community revived claim to parts of Warri, particularly the waterfront enclaves and wards recently allocated by INEC, has reignited old suspicions.

    Emeka Nworie, an eastern businessman who lost his shop and livelihood during the war, said he sees disturbing similarities between now and the buildup to the 1996 violence.

    “These days, we are constantly bombarded with threats of war on social media,” he said. “This time it’s worse because, in the 1990s, there was no Facebook or TikTok to issue threats. It shows we learned nothing from the pain of that crisis, which still stares us in the face.”

    For many like Nworie, the parallels are chilling. The same actors, the same grievances, and the same fiery rhetoric that plunged Warri into chaos decades ago are once again on the rise, herding the area into yet another dark chapter in its history, if the key players do not pull the plug.

    Recurring Patterns of Attacks and Violence

    This reporter recalls how floats celebrating the first anniversary of Ogiame Atuwatse II, the Olu of Warri (1987–2015), were attacked in May 1988 by some Agbassa youths for allegedly “trespassing” into their kingdom. That incident marked one of the earliest sparks in a chain of events that crippled economic and social life in Warri and pushed Delta State to its knees.

    Thirty-seven years later, the feeling of déjà vu is unmistakable, and strong. The former prince from that royal household, Tsola Emiko, the son of Ogiame Atuwatse II, now sits on the throne as Ogiame Atuwatse III. Ironically, though he was only four years old when the 1988 attack occurred, his own anniversary celebration has suffered a similar fate. In early September, a float marking his fourth coronation anniversary was attacked by youths from the same Agbassa area.

    These recent incidents have rekindled ethnic suspicion and reopened old wounds, leaving the peace between the communities fragile once again. The latest clashes have already been linked to at least two deaths.

    Two weeks after the attack on the Olu of Warri’s celebration float, Itsekiri youths from the Ekurede-Itsekiri area of Warri metropolis were accused of launching an assault that left several Ogbe-Ijoh indigenes badly injured. The victims were part of a team putting up posters to announce the 10th coronation anniversary of their monarch, His Royal Majesty Couple Oromoni, Monbene III, the Pere of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom.

    Chief Keme condemned the attack in an interview with our reporter in Ogbe-Ijoh. “The posting of banners or billboards does not justify such violence,” he said. “Posters are simply a means of passing information.”

    While that may be true on the surface, the underlying motives tell a deeper story. An Itsekiri leader who also spoke with our reporter accused the Ijaw youths of provocation and of attempting to rewrite historical boundaries.

    “Find out where those so-called victims were attacked,” the Itsekiri leader said. “They were pasting banners right inside Itsekiri territory. Were they really just posting, or were they throwing stones at Ekurede-Itsekiri by the bypass?. Beside, it was not the Itsekiris that tore their banners, it was the police who felt that the action could start another fight.”

    Observers familiar with the terrain say the issue runs much deeper than the “posting of billboards.” Disputes over ownership of the NPA, McIver, and Ogbe-Ijoh markets, as well as adjoining lands, remain festering wounds between the two groups. These flashpoints, which were heavily bombarded during the 1997–2003 crisis have long been subjects of bitter litigation and political maneuvering. Dozens of victims were killed in those areas, their homes burned, their fates sealed by tribal profiling.

    Today, the sense of unease among residents and community stakeholders is sharpened by the reappearance of some key figures from that earlier conflict. The current Pere of Ogbe-Ijoh, HRM Couple Oromoni, was a central figure during the 1997 crisis. He was directly affected when the military government of General Sani Abacha controversially relocated the headquarters of Warri Southwest Local Government Area from Ogbe-Ijoh town to the Itsekiri community of Ogidigben, despite an election that Oromoni had won.

    Oromoni had contested and defeated another Ijaw candidate, Mr. Bosin Ebikeme of Gbaramatu, in the council election. He barely had time to assume office before the crisis erupted, derailing his tenure, governance and igniting waves of violence.

    Nearly three decades later, the past seems to echo again. The monarch’s younger brother, Chief Sylvester Oromoni, has now emerged as chairman of that council. His emergence aided by an unwritten power-rotation agreement between the two ethnic groups as part of the post-crisis peace accord. He succeeded an Itsekiri, Mr. Taye Duke.

    Given this background and the familiarity of the main actors, many observers expected the leaders of both ethnic groups to draw lessons from the past and chart a new path to peaceful coexistence. But investigations reveal that the issues have long spiraled beyond the original dispute over the relocation of the LGA headquarters.

    The Warri Crisis opened a Pandora ‘s Box, one that extended beyond politics into the larger struggle to settle historical scores, fight for resource control and development of the Niger Delta. What began as a fight over administrative boundaries evolved into a broader contest for power, oil royalties, and recognition.

    Mr. Sunny Amorighoye Mene, Secretary of the Itsekiri Leaders of Thought, blames both the federal and state governments for mishandling the post-crisis phase. He said official patronage and political empowerment of those behind the violence emboldened some groups to act with impunity.

    “People now believe that might is right,” Mene said. “The government rewarded the aggressors without addressing the criminal aspects of the conflict. There’s a negative historical trajectory rooted in the 1997–2012 Warri ethnic crisis. One ethnic group believes it emerged victorious and that gave them the right to usurp and take whatever they want, including other people’s land. That perception has given it undue political and economic advantages.”

    All Groups Should Sheathe Their Swords

    Mr. Aaron Aghorigho, Managing Director of Dama Holdings Nigeria Limited – a thriving trading company near the NNS Delta Naval Base, like Nowrie, expressed deep concern over the latest threats to peace in Warri.

    Flaying the battle for control of the city, Aghorigho lamented that ethnic bickering and clashes over ownership have stunted development, curtailed business opportunities, and disrupted the lives of residents.

    “Nobody can claim ownership of Warri,” he said. “True Warri belongs to all tribes, not just those within the state. There are the Old Warri people – those from all over Nigeria who love the city and have invested in it. They have more at stake than the agitators, who have nothing to lose.”

    Appealing to stakeholders to “sheathe their swords,” Aghorigho highlighted the lack of investments and limited economic opportunities in the city. While unemployment among youths is rising, he said there is also a shortage of skilled manpower. He urged those with resources, who might otherwise prepare for conflict, to channel them instead into vocational and technical training programs.

    Read Also: Relief for commuters as Warri-Itakpe rail services resume

    Killing the Peacemaker:

    Tensions, however, escalated further after a series of gruesome killings, and alleged attack on Apata, an Ijaw village, by suspected Itsekiris marauders. Among the dead victims was Jerry Aduara, chairman of an Urhobo vigilante group, allegedly killed by Itsekiri militias on Odion Road in Warri. Aduara, 49, was reportedly on a peace mission to an Itsekiri enclave when he was murdered.

    Sources told our reporter that Aduara had devoted himself to mediating between Itsekiri and Urhobo communities, hoping to prevent the type of violence witnessed during the 1990s and early 2000s.

    Violence has been rising in Warri before that incident. Earlier in September, an Itsekiri youth, Dele Ogunmayo, was shot dead allegedly by men in military fatigues. His remains was deposited at Warri Central Hospital.

    These deaths and frequent brawls have amplified fear across the city, where the scars of past devastation are still visible. Thousands of warehouses in the NPA area remain largely unoccupied or taken over by mega-churches. Burnt buildings and graves of victims serve as reminders of the cost the war.

    Estimates suggest that about 3,000 people died during the Warri crises across the riverside areas and Warri metropolis. Many Itsekiri towns remain desolate and uninhabited, and the current unrest makes return to these communities highly risky. The city’s economy, and indeed that of the state, has struggled to recover from the resulting slump.

    This left a generation of young men without jobs or hope. Many turned to tricycle (keke) operations for a living, while others engaged in cybercrime, ritual activities, organ harvesting, and working for beneficiaries of the crisis. Several followed oil companies and contractors that abandoned the area and relocated to neighboring Bayelsa, Rivers and even Lagos states.

    Members of the Ndigbo Traders Association said many of its members lost their lives, others died from illnesses triggered by business setbacks during the crisis. Many relocated to their villages, where many succumbed to poverty and hardship.

    Who Owns Warri?

    The question of Warri’s ownership is central to recurring tensions. Both Ijaw and Itsekiri groups trace the name to colonial-era mispronunciations. While Itsekiri historians argue that Warri derives from “Iwere” (Itsekiri word for homeland), Chief Keme and other Itsekir leaders say it comes from the Ijaw word “Ware,” meaning house.

    However, Warri is home to many and more than a city. It encompasses three LGAs: Warri South LGA, with headquarters in Warri metropolis; Warri North (Koko is headquarter), and Warri Southwest, whose headquarters location from Ogbe-Ijoh to Ogidigben (Itsekiri town in Escravos area) sparked the first major crisis. These areas form Warri Federal Constituency, which is a part of Delta South Senatorial District. Ijaws, Itsekiris, and Urhobos (of Warri metropolis) call it home.

    Communal conflicts worldwide typically arise from land disputes, and Warri is no exception. In the metropolis, Urhobo residents of Okere and their Itsekiri neighbors have long fought over land ownership. Prominent Okere Urhobo leaders, including the Okumagba brothers, Daniel and Benjamin, engaged in decade-long  legal battles with Itsekiris of Okere, each side claiming victory.

    Along the waterfront areas, the settlements are inhabited by Ijaws of Ogbe-Ijoh and Itsekiris. Land disputes here, including ownership of properties in the NPA and Ogbe-Ijoh market, were flashpoints of the first crisis. In Warri North, Ijaws of Egbema and Itsekiris of Koko continue to contest ownership of hamlets and towns, though less intensely. The Warri Southwest conflict between Gbaramatu Ijaws and Itsekiris of Ugborodo and neighboring communities is well documented.

    Much Ado About the ‘Olu of Warri’

    The Olu of Warri, overlord of the Itsekiris across all three Warris and beyond, remains the most prominent traditional ruler in the LGAs and Delta State. His title, however, has long been a point of contention. Neighboring ethnic groups argue that the king’s influence is overstated, particularly over the Ogbe-Ijoh, Isaba, Diebiri, and Gbaramatu Ijaws in Warri Southwest, and the Urhobos of Okere and Agbassa in the metropolis.

    Attempts to change the title by the Ijaws and Urhbobos have repeatedly caused friction. In 2003, Comrade Ovouzorie Macaulay, who was Commissioner for Inter-ethnic Relations, said the title was untouchable, prompting criticism from Ijaw leaders, including Chief Edwin Clark, who slammed him as a Baby Commissioner.

    Chiefs Keme and Gbenekama, have again insisted that the title of Olu of Warri fuels tensions. They argue it grants the monarch undue sense of authority over other traditional rulers, tribes and kingdoms. “The title has an intoxicating effect on the monarch and his subjects,”

    Gbenekama, who vehemently condemned the tag of customary tenants on his Gbaramatu kinsmen by the Itsekiris contends that the title was politically imposed. “The Awolowo government of Western Nigeria changed it from ‘Olu of Itsekiri’ to ‘Olu of Warri’ in 1957. Yet, in doing so, it was made clear that the Olu’s authority does not extend to kings of Gbaramatu, Isaba, or Egbema, or their lands.”

    Mene however differed. He argues that Gbenekema and others are threatened by the influence and recognition that the Olu rightly deserves. He traces the compromise on the title back to 1936, when Ginuwa II was crowned Olu of Itsekiri to prevent conflict with the Urhobo, who argued that Warri Province at the time included their lands. By 1957, the title “Olu of Warri” was confirmed for the present Warri Federal Constituency.

    As the contest over Olu of Warri title go on, Urhobo kingdoms of Agbarha-Warri and Okere-Warri are sprung up. Ijaw kingdoms in the area have also added the prefixes of Warri to their kingdom to reflect their stake and claim. Ogbe-Ijoh Kingdom is Ogbe-Ijoh Warri kingdom, a move to reassert sovereignty in their sides of Warri.

    Beyond ceremonial concerns, the disputes reflect deeper struggles over land, patronage, and control of the region’s vast oil and gas resources. Warri area sits on vast reserves of oil and gas.  Battles over small hamlets and fishing settlements often relate to nearby oil wells and pipelines, which attract royalties and patronages from companies. This is why their names are subject of disputes. For instance, Ijalla (Itsekiri) versus Ijalagha (Ijaw), and Okerenkoko (site of the National Maritime University), claimed differently by Itsekiris of Omadino, as Okerenghigho.

    The aftermath of the Warri wars empowered the actors financially and politically, particularly the Ijaws of Gbaramatu. They view the conflict as a fight for freedom from the cultural and political influence of the smaller yet more educated and politically advanced Itsekiris.

    “What is happening now is about righting ancient wrongs,” said an Ijaw leader from Ogbe-Ijoh. “The Itsekiris used marriages and relationships with Europeans to gain influence, which they then used to oppress our forefathers,” one member said.

    “We Keep Conceding, Ijaws Want to Take Everything” – Itsekiri

    On the other hand, some Itsekiris leaders feel they have made too much concessions to the Ijaw groups to sustain the peace. When the Warri Crisis ended in 2003, key concessions were made by the Itsekiris to the Ijaws, including the rotation of political offices in Warri Southwest. The arrangement allowed Chief George Ekemupolo, an Ijaw and younger sibling of Chief Government Ekpemupolo (Tompolo), to be elected chairman of Warri Southwest LGA for the first time.

    In 2019, another Gbaramatu politician, Mr. Dennis Guwor, became the state lawmaker representing Warri Southwest LGA. By 2023, he was inaugurated as Speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly. Before Guwor, the seat was traditionally held by Itsekiris, including Hon. Daniel Mayuku and others (four terms).

    These political gains by the Ijaws have set off alarm bells among Itsekiri politicians and elites, who argue that the Ijaws overran and seized their communities during the crisis. Their fears are compounded by the state of their desolate riverside communities.

    Our finding showed that the Itsekiris have over the years after the crisis moved from the hinterland to the mainland, often building mansions in urban centers from wealth accumulated during construction booms such as the Escravos Gas-to-Liquid project in Ugborodo, and other activities at the expense of their villages in the rural areas.

    Although Chief Ayirimi Emami, built the 911 resort and other projects, the business and profitability are affected by infighting within the ethnic group. Similarly, some members of the tribe are facing questions over mismanagement of both communities’ wealth and national and international projects that they are saddled with executing in their communities. A new town project sponsored by Chevron, an FG shoreline protection project, and a FIFA stadium are among comatose or abandoned projects in Ugborodo that could have change the landscapes of Itsekiri areas.

    Conversely, Ijaw communities are experiencing boom. Oporoza, the traditional headquarters, Okerenkoko, Kokodiagbene, Kunukuma, Benikrukru, and others are now hosting major projects and drawing visitors, artistes and actors from across the country. Gbenekama said his kinsmen were returning home in droves and developing properties, which is raising the profile of those areas.

    An Itsekiri youth, who refused to be named because of his connection to Tantita Security owned by Tompolo, conceded that the Itsekiris were victims of both their failures and fear of Ijaw militias’ incursions. “Many Itsekiris were killed by Ijaw militants during the crisis. We lost family members and property, and were forced to flee. People are afraid of rebuilding because the unknown factor. The Ijaws who were the aggressors have no such fears. Governments’ agencies like DESOPADEC and NDDC found it easier to work in Ijaw areas because they wouldn’t be attacked, unlike in Itsekiri lands,” our source added.

    INEC’s Ward Delineation: Fuel on the Fire

    It was against this backdrop, that the recent ward delineation exercise by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) assumed more significance and has heightened tensions.

    In 2022, after many years of shunning politicis, the Ijaws secured a strategic Supreme Court victory aimed at better reflecting their population in the Warri Federal Constituency. The apex court directed INEC to carry out a fresh ward delineation.

    Historically, the Itsekiris dominated the Warri South seat in the House of Assembly since 1999. The House of Representatives and Warri North assembly positions were exclusive preserves of the Itsekiris, while Warri South constituencies are shared with Urhobos. But the INEC exercise and an emerging alliance between the Ijaws and Urhobo is set to change the political dynamics.

    The INEC ward delineation held between July 2024 and April 2025, is set to redraw the political map, handing advantage to the Ijaws. In Warri South, the number of wards increased from 10 to 20. In Warri Southwest, wards rose from 10 to 19; of these, Gbaramatu Ijaws received seven, Ogbe-Ijoh five, Isaba and Diebiri one each, and Itsekiris five. Warri North went from 10 to 18 wards, split nine each between Ijaws of Egbema and Itsekiris. In Warri South metropolis, Urhobos secured 10, Itsekiris seven, and Ogbe-Ijoh three.

    The Itsekiris have rejected the outcome of the exercise, accusing INEC of bias. Mene claimed that Prof. Rhoda Gumus, and other Ijaw INEC officials involved in executing the Supreme Court judgment, compromised neutrality of the commission. “INEC should have removed all Ijaw and Urhobo elements from the delineation committee. We challenged this in court, but while the matter was ongoing, INEC proceeded using an Ijaw official,” Mene said.

    “The exercise was skewed against the Itsekiris. INEC brought coordinates from Burutu LGA and Ondo State into Warri constituencies, exceeding its mandate.”

    For the Ijaws and Urhobos, however, the exercise reflected demographic realities. Dr. Paul Bebenimibo, a Gbaramatu focal person, described the exercise as one of the freest and most credible. “It was thorough, technically, and painstakingly executed,” he said.

    His kinsman, Gbenekama criticized the Itsekiris for constantly “changing the goalpost midgame.”

    “Why is it that any time something does not favor the Itsekiris, they try to derail it?” Ward delineation and politics are about numbers. For the past 15 years, the Ijaws have been developing their communities. Our young men are returning home, especially because of the Maritime University. Our communities are growing rapidly. Meanwhile, many Itsekiri areas are empty. We are polygamous and they are monogamous,” he said.

    Nevertheless, our findings revealed some discontentment even within Ijaw communities of Ogbe-Ijoh, Diebiri, and Isaba. Those who spoke were unhappy with the distribution of the 14 wards allotted to their ethnic group in Warri Southwest.

    “With this arrangement, no other Ijaw kingdom can produce a political officeholder without Gbaramatu’s consent,” one source said. “They gave themselves seven wards and reduced others to five or one. They want everyone to bow before them before gaining anything.”

    IN Warri South, Chief Westham Adehor told our reporter that the Agbarha Warri people are vetting the coordinates used in the exercise. He said some issues they raised have been presented to the relevant authorities.

    INEC’s Head of Voter Education and Publicity in Delta State, Nse Abasi Udom, in an interview with our reporter in Asaba, debunked accusation of bias by the Itsekiri. She said the commission is busy with continuous voters registration.

    “We are not doing delineation now that process is over. What we’re doing is voter registration,” Udom said. “We are not compromised. I only resumed in Delta a few months ago, after the delineation exercise had been concluded, so I can’t comment on that process.”

    Udom urged the Itsekiri to channel their energy into mobilizing for registration rather than revisiting the delineation issue.

    Warri Federal Constituency Seat as the Target

    The INEC exercise and the resulting redrawing of wards have altered the political calculus in the Warri Federal Constituency. Once dominant, the Itsekiris now face political marginalization. The federal seat in Warri may soon become out of their reach, leaving them potentially as the only tribe in Delta State without representation at the national level.

    By comparison, the Urhobos, spread across eight LGAs in Delta Central, have three House of Representatives seats. The Ijaws have two exclusive constituencies – Burutu and Bomadi/Patani – while the Isoko (the fourth ethnic group in the constituency) has the Isoko constituency. These constituencies, along with Warri, largely determine the Delta South Senatorial seat, a position once held by Ijaw leader James Manager for a record five consecutive terms (2003–2023).

    “The Itsekiris risk becoming politically irrelevant under the new order,” a political analyst said. “Negotiation is the only viable option for them.”

    Yet, negotiation faces challenges. Many Itsekiri perceive the Ijaws, particularly from Gbaramatu, of pursuing an agenda to dominate, not just the Itsekiri, but the entire state.

    Chief Keme dispelled these fears, but called for dialogue, stressing that being the majority does not automatically guarantee election victory.

    Whether negotiation without the shadow of violence will succeed in Warri remains uncertain. How the tribes navigate this delicate path will determine the future of an area rich in resources but scarred by decades of conflict.

    Meanwhile, Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, is daintily skirting around the issues to avoid being sucked into the fray, after his faux pas at the initial stage. He came under attack when he told the warring groups to sheathe their sword until after his tenure, a statement that did not go well with the public.

    His aides said, “The governor is working behind the scene to douse the tension and forge another workable model for the three groups to live in peace. It is not everything that he does that should be publicized.”

  • Group cautions Akwa Ibom residents over former speakers’ political endorsement

    Group cautions Akwa Ibom residents over former speakers’ political endorsement

    A socio-political organisation in Akwa Ibom State, the Akwa Ibom Liberation Movement (AILM), has called on residents of the state to evaluate the activities of the Conference of Former Speakers of Akwa Ibom State legislatures, following the group’s recent endorsement of Senate President Godswill Akpabio, and Governor Umo Eno ahead of the 2027 general election.

    The group made its position known in a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Akparawa Prince Emmanuel Sam.

    According to the statement, AILM expressed concern over the timing and motive behind the endorsement, noting that the former Speakers’ forum had not consistently issued public statements on developmental issues affecting the state.

    AILM urged Akwa Ibom citizens to remain vigilant and prioritise leaders who support policies that advance the state’s development and welfare. 

    Read Also: Why Akwa Ibom is my first stop for Nigeria concert – Davido

    The group cited several unresolved legislative matters it believes require renewed public focus and commitment from political actors, such as the Youth Development Fund Bill — which has remained without executive assent since 2019 — and the domestication of the Disability Act of 2018.

    It also encouraged residents to evaluate past legislative decisions and prioritise leaders who support policies that safeguard vulnerable groups and strengthen good governance in the state.

    AILM encouraged the public to assess political endorsements critically and support leaders based on their track record in promoting the interests of the people.

    It was gathered that the Conference of Former Speakers met at D’Angelo Hotel, Uyo, on October 30, 2025, where they declared their support ahead of the 2027 elections.

  • Why I became a believer: Inside Governor Peter Mbah’s no-excuse revolution 

    Why I became a believer: Inside Governor Peter Mbah’s no-excuse revolution 

    • By High Princess Adaku Ogbu-Aguocha

    I wasn’t always a believer. When I first encountered His Excellency, Dr Peter Mbah, the Executive Governor of Enugu State, I was skeptical. He was in the PDP then, and I had no reason to trust his vision. But one evening changed everything. I sat with him and listened — really listened. I saw the intensity in his voice, the focus in his eyes, the clarity in his thoughts.

    This wasn’t a politician putting on a show. It was the quiet force of someone who had seen tomorrow and was determined to bring it into today. That night, his words echoed in my mind. Through Governor Peter Mbah’s eyes, I glimpsed a future where the glory of my beloved Enugu would shine brighter than ever before.

    After the war and years of neglect, our industries had gone quiet. Our proud civil servants held the fort in an economy that moved slowly — dignified, peaceful, but asleep.

    Then came Governor Mbah, with private-sector precision. And with almost startling speed, the work began. Sit-at-home ended. Insecurity was tackled. Not one, not two, but six ultramodern bus terminals were commissioned in a single day — a bold signal that motion had returned to Enugu. Then came the Smart Schools Project.

    Two hundred and sixty world-class schools — one in every ward. Learning systems built for the 21st century: solar-powered classrooms, digital labs, AI-assisted platforms, robotics, coding, green design. Imagine each school graduating at least five hundred students a year — that’s 130,000 young minds annually. A pool of ready talent to position Enugu as the Silicon Valley of Africa. With Governor Peter Mbah’s Smart Schools, our children’s tomorrow is already taking shape.

    At the same time, he’s reimagining Enugu as a global destination — a vision that came alive when the city hosted the Nigerian Bar Association Conference. Enugu exhaled after years of dormancy. Over 20,000 delegates arrived. Hotels sold out. Private homes, student hostels, even old guesthouses were refurbished and rented out. That one week put more money into more hands than a year of bureaucratic salary disbursements. It was a true awakening.

    Read Also: NFF, Jalla bicker over planned workshop on  amendment of statues at Ibadan AGM

    The five-star ICC Hotel is nearing completion, right beside the state-of-the-art hospital designed to support medical tourism, now almost finished. The Akanu Ibiam International Airport has been concessioned, with its international wing set to open in early 2026. Enugu Air launched just months ago, with six more aircraft arriving before Christmas. By the end of next year, four new branded hotels will be completed. And across the state, dozens of other high-impact projects are rising. Governor Peter Mbah’s government has set a bold target: attract three million visitors annually and grow Enugu’s GDP from four to thirty billion dollars.

    To anchor that ambition, he’s building what will soon be the tallest landmark in the state — the Cross of Hope. A monument of faith, culture, and tourism. It will draw pilgrims as Jerusalem and Rome do, reminding the world that spirituality and modernity can coexist beautifully on the hilltop of Enugu. Governor Mbah’s transformation plan is holistic — from power to infrastructure to culture.

    With the urbanization of Nkanu East fully underway, I know fresh investment and fresh purpose will soon pour into my hometown, Nara Unateze. So yes, I’m a believer. And a disciple. Politics must meet truth, and the truth is that Governor Peter Mbah is working — without excuses — for all of us. If you have a dream for Enugu, or children, or even business interests, take a moment to reflect on this. Verify if you must. And join me in defending, protecting, and championing Governor Mbah’s vision.

    I’m confident we’ll all witness the full sunrise of the tomorrow he’s building today. Because even if he reaches only halfway to the skies, Enugu will already be flying higher than it has in decades.

    But I believe he’ll reach them. And when he does, we’ll all say that a governor came who refused to dream small. Ndi Enugu, brace yourselves. The sleeping giant is wide awake. The hill is alive again — with the sound of music and a loud drum.

    Tomorrow is here indeed, and Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah is leading the charge.

  • Group mobilises traders for high turnout

    Group mobilises traders for high turnout

    The Social and Integral Development Centre (SIDEC) has begun mobilising traders across Anambra State to actively participate in the forthcoming governorship election. It said their involvement is crucial to achieving a higher voter turnout.

    SIDEC noted that only 92,000 out of over 2.6 million registered voters participated in the 2021 governorship election—a figure the organisation described as worryingly low.

    The group is currently implementing the Inclusive Mobilisation for Participation, Advocacy and Civic Transformation (Project IMPACT) in partnership with the Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, with funding support from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK-FCDO).

    Speaking during a voter education session at Ochanja Market, Onitsha, SIDEC’s Executive Director, Mrs Ugochi Ehiahuruike, stressed that good governance depends on the active involvement of citizens, not just elected leaders.

    “It is not their government but our government,” she said. “We all must take ownership, and one way to do that is by casting our votes for candidates of our choice.”

    Ehiahuruike urged traders not to stay away from the polls or allow a few voters to decide the future of the state.

    Read Also: I’ll end extortion of traders, transporters, Moghalu vows

    “November 8, 2025, is not a day for football matches or movie marathons. It is a day to decide the destiny of Anambra State for the next four years.

    Even if you choose not to vote, those who do will determine our collective direction. Come out and be counted. INEC has assured that every vote will count—speak loudly with your voter’s card.”

    She also appealed to candidates, supporters, and the electorate to maintain peace before, during, and after the election, stressing that development can only thrive in a peaceful environment.

  • Ukachukwu, Ekwunife promise to restore peace

    Ukachukwu, Ekwunife promise to restore peace

    The governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Prince Nicholas Ukachukwu, and his running mate, Senator Uche Ekwunife, have pledged to prioritise peace and security if elected in the November 8 governorship election.

    The duo said the state had experienced prolonged insecurity resulting from killings and kidnappings, which had affected residents and economic activities.

    Speaking during the APC campaign rally at Richie Hall, Umudioka, in Awka South Local Government Area, Ukachukwu said their administration, if elected, would work to restore normalcy and foster development.

    “Our state is destined for greatness. We have endured too many challenges. It’s time to choose prosperity, truth, and purposeful leadership. Together, we will build an Anambra that works for everyone,” he said.

    Read Also: Turkish Super Lig: Ruthless Osimhen keeps scoring streak in Gala comeback win

    Ukachukwu said insecurity had forced several businesses to close, including some of his manufacturing firms, following repeated abductions of expatriate workers.

    “The last experience was devastating. A huge ransom was paid to secure their release, after which they left the state. Anambra deserves a better environment for business,” he said.

    He also outlined plans to improve infrastructure and essential services, including a proposed 250-megawatt power plant and a statewide water supply system to ensure access to clean water.

    “We will work towards stable electricity and functional water systems.

  • Anambra students endorse Soludo’s re-election bid

    Anambra students endorse Soludo’s re-election bid

    Students of tertiary institutions in Anambra State have declared their support for the re-election bid of Governor Chukwuma Charles Soludo ahead of the November 8 governorship election.

    The students, under the auspices of the National Union of Anambra State Students (NUASS), made their position known during a colloquium in honour of Governor Soludo held at the ASUU Secretariat, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.

    Speaking on behalf of the student body, NUASS President, Comrade Felix Nwachinaemelu, said Soludo’s focus on youth inclusion, skill acquisition, and innovation has inspired students across the state to believe more in governance and their own role in shaping Anambra’s future.

    He praised the governor’s visionary leadership and enduring impact on innovation and youth empowerment, commending his people-oriented policies and pledging the union’s support for his re-election bid.

    Read Also: Anambra election: INEC extends collection of PVC to Nov. 2

    The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Anambra State ICT Agency, Mr Fred Agbata, commended the students for rallying behind the governor’s second-term ambition, describing Soludo as a visionary leader who has redefined governance through innovation and technology.

    Delivering a keynote address on the theme: “Rethinking Developmental Governance: The Philosophy of Prof. Charles Chukwuma Soludo,” Agbata highlighted the governor’s transformative strides anchored on a philosoph Students of tertiary institutions in Anambra State have declared their support for the re-election bid of Governor Chukwuma Charles Soludo ahead of the November 8 governorship election.

  • NYSC to Corps members: ‘uphold neutrality, integrity’

    NYSC to Corps members: ‘uphold neutrality, integrity’

    The National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) in Anambra State has charged corps members to remain politically neutral and uphold the highest standards of integrity as they prepare to serve as ad hoc personnel in the November 8 governorship election.

    Its State Coordinator, Mrs Pauline Ojisua, gave the advice during a Zonal Sensitisation Programme, where she warned the over 3,000 corps members in attendance against any form of partisanship, inducement, or misconduct during the election.

    Read Also: NANS urges Tinubu to shield Interior Minister Tunji-Ojo from false NYSC allegations

    “You are ambassadors of the NYSC. Your duty is to serve the nation impartially, with discipline, integrity, and courage. Remember—your neutrality is sacred, and your integrity is non-negotiable,” she stated.