Category: Taxation

  • FIRS to host public webinar on taxpayer services, fiscal reforms

    FIRS to host public webinar on taxpayer services, fiscal reforms

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), through its Taxpayer Services Department (TPSD) and in collaboration with the Fiscal and Tax Reform Implementation Division (FTRID), has announced a public webinar to engage stakeholders on key taxpayer service initiatives and ongoing fiscal reforms.

    The virtual session is scheduled for Tuesday, 17th June 2025, at 11:00 AM and will be held via Zoom.

    This was disclosed in a statement issued on Friday by Arabirin Aderonke Atoyebi, Technical Assistant on Broadcast Media to the Executive Chairman of FIRS, Zach Adedeji.

    According to the statement, the webinar aims to improve public understanding of recent developments in taxpayer services, explain ongoing reform efforts in Nigeria’s tax system, and offer an open forum for taxpayers, stakeholders, and the general public to interact directly with FIRS officials.

    As part of its commitment to transparency and public engagement, FIRS is encouraging widespread participation. 

    Read Also: Tinubu will ensure Ajaokuta takes off before first term ends – Audu

    Interested individuals are urged to join via the Zoom platform as part of the Service’s broader efforts to enhance voluntary compliance and simplify tax administration.

    The agency also called on media organisations to support the initiative by publicising the webinar across traditional and digital channels, to help raise awareness and strengthen ties with taxpayers.

    Details, including the registration link, will be shared soon via FIRS’s official communication platforms.

  • Zacch Adedeji turns heads globally with tax overhaul

    Zacch Adedeji turns heads globally with tax overhaul

    By Arabinrin Aderonke

    If you think tax reform in Nigeria is all talk and no action, then you haven’t been paying attention to what Dr. Zacch Adedeji, Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, is doing at the agency. Where do we even start? Is it the tax reform bill that was recently passed, the changes to the agency’s structure, or the full-scale tax modernisation happening?

    Technology is no longer a side note. It is now playing a role in how taxes are collected. It reduces the risks of manipulation, closes up long-standing loopholes, and makes it easier for taxpayers to understand and meet their obligations. What used to feel like a complicated, stressful process is now becoming more user-friendly.

    Now, add global recognition to that list. At the just-concluded 96th Management Committee Meeting of the Commonwealth Association of Tax Administrators (CATA) in London, Dr. Zacch was honored by his counterparts for his outstanding contribution to tax administration, not just in Nigeria but across the Commonwealth.

    This is not a local commendation or a political appointment. This is a global acknowledgement by professionals who know what real work looks like. CATA’s Executive Director, Dr. Esther Koisin, and the Association’s Chairman, Mr. Mahmad Noor, who is the Acting Commissioner General of the Mauritius Revenue Authority, both praised Dr. Zacch’s leadership and Nigeria’s role in supporting CATA’s mission to advance tax administration in member countries.

    It is not every day that a Nigerian public servant gets international recognition for work that usually goes unnoticed. When it happens, it means one thing: the Tax Boss is doing well. He is consistently changing the face of tax administration, increasing revenue, and bettering the lives of Nigerians. This is no mistake.

    Read Also: Workers’ Day: FIRS staff experiencing better under Dr. Zacch Adedeji

    He is deserving of every bit of it. He is passionate, empathetic, and hardworking. Young children/adults should learn from him. He is a mentor. This is the kind of leadership we need. Nigerians are lucky to have him.

    For those who may not know, the Commonwealth Association of Tax Administrators (CATA) is a platform that brings together tax officials from across Commonwealth countries to exchange ideas and influence global tax policies. Under the Tax Boss, Nigeria has grown to become a respected voice in that space. And that progress is something every Nigerian should be proud of.

    It was not always like this. There was a time when Nigeria’s role in international tax conversations was barely noticeable, often limited to just showing up. But today, Nigeria does much more than participate; it helps set the agenda and drive the discussions. This change shows a transformation in how Nigeria approaches tax reform and sends a message to the rest of the world that we are serious about improving our systems and sharing our experiences.

    So yes, Dr. Zacch, the Tax Boss, got a big round of applause in London. Having just completed his role as President of CATA, he has helped improve tax systems not only in Nigeria but across many Commonwealth countries. This recognition shows that honest and good work attracts attention beyond our borders. It is a time to appreciate, but more importantly, a reminder to keep building on the progress made. Well done and kudos to you, Tax boss.

    Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is the technical assistant on broadcast media to the executive chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service

  • How we are enhancing standards to meet global changes, by CITN

    How we are enhancing standards to meet global changes, by CITN

    The Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN) has announced significant enhancement to its examination system, with planned launch of a revised syllabus and the adoption of Computer-Based Examinations (CBE) for all candidates.

    In a statement, CITN Registrar and Chief Executive, Afolake Oso, said the updated syllabus is designed to align with global best practices in taxation, while the CBE system brings CITN’s assessment methods in line with international standards.

    According to her, this strategic move aims to equip candidates with enhanced technical and analytical skills, enabling them to effectively meet the demands of the taxation industry.

    She said the new CBE system offers several key advantages as opportunity to enhance efficiency and ensure prompt result processing, provide candidates with increased accessibility and flexibility, offer modernized assessment methods for a more reliable and secure experience and maintain examination integrity and uphold the highest standards.

    Read Also: Voice alone not enough to thrive in music industry – Waje

     “To facilitate a smooth transition, CITN has been providing orientation programmes for students as well as recommended study materials. Candidates are encouraged to utilize these resources to optimize their examination performance,” she said.

    According to her, CITN’s professional certification examinations provide a valuable framework for career growth and development. The Institute remains dedicated to maintaining the highest standards in taxation, ensuring that CITN-certified professionals excel in their field.

     “CITN invites all candidates to embrace this enhancement and share the news with colleagues, members, and stakeholders. The Institute values the candidates’ commitment to professional growth and looks forward to their continued support,” she said.

  • The benefits of tax compliance in Nigeria

    The benefits of tax compliance in Nigeria

    By Arabinrin Aderonke

    Tax! Tax!! Tax!!! Who should be involved, and why does it even matter? People often see tax compliance as a burden, but the truth is it is a tool for financial stability, business expansion, and national development. 

    Most Nigerians do not like stress, yet many unknowingly create problems for themselves by ignoring their tax obligations. It is only when penalties hit, government services become inaccessible, or financial doors close that some realize the cost of non-compliance. 

    I have seen it happen over and over again. Someone needs a loan, a contract, or even government service, only to find that their tax records or lack of them are standing in the way. 

    The reality is that paying taxes is not just about avoiding trouble with the authorities. It comes with benefits that can protect your finances and contribute to a better Nigeria.

    One of the advantages of compliance is avoiding penalties and interest. Tax laws are simple if we follow them. Late payments and non-compliance attract fines and interests that only get worse over time. 

    Many people think they are saving money by avoiding taxes, but they end up paying far more in penalties. Beyond avoiding penalties, compliance guarantees access to government services. In Nigeria, a tax clearance certificate is not just a document. It is a key that unlocks many benefits. For example, in Lagos, it is required to access free education, healthcare, and even affordable housing schemes. Many businesses also need it to qualify for government contracts. Those who ignore their tax obligations often find themselves stuck, unable to access these services simply because they failed to comply.

    Read Also: Personal Income Tax by wealthy Nigerians to hit 25%, says Edun

    Another often-overlooked benefit is eligibility for tax benefits and credits. Many assume taxes only take from them, but what they need to know is there are provisions within the system that actually help taxpayers save. For example, small businesses in Nigeria can claim exemptions if they file their income tax returns properly. Larger businesses that pay early can receive tax credits of 1% or 2%, reducing their overall tax burden. These incentives are designed to reward compliance, yet many people miss out on them simply because they want to dodge taxes.

    Tax compliance also helps with better financial planning and also provides legal protection. A taxpayer who understands their obligations can plan ahead, budget effectively, and avoid unnecessary financial stress. 

    For people looking for loans or financial assistance, tax compliance boosts creditworthiness. When requesting loans banks and lending institutions review tax returns. A clean tax record demonstrates financial prudence, making it simpler to obtain loans and even lower interest rates. 

    However, a history of noncompliance raises red flags for lenders, making it harder to obtain financial assistance when it is most needed. Tax-compliant businesses have an edge because they are seen as reliable, while those that evade taxes risk damaging their reputation and losing potential business opportunities.

    Tax compliance is our civic duty. Everyone wants better roads, good schools, quality healthcare, and reliable security, but these things don’t just happen. Developed countries like the United States of America have strong tax systems because their citizens understand that taxes drive progress. 

    If we want a better Nigeria, tax compliance is not an option. It is a necessity. Tax compliance promotes economic stability and progress. When people and companies pay their taxes, the government has money to invest in development projects that create jobs, support industries, and boost the economy.

    Who doesn’t want peace of mind? No penalties, no last-minute rush to pay off debts or face legal repercussions. By promoting a culture of tax compliance, we can build a Nigeria where resources are allocated effectively and public services excel, ultimately benefiting everyone in society. Tax compliance is more than just paying taxes. The benefits far outweigh the costs. Do the right thing. Pay your tax today.

    _Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is the technical assistant on broadcast media to the executive chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service._

  • Women, taxation and Nigeria

    Women, taxation and Nigeria

    By Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi

    Women everywhere are known to be celebrated in the month of March. March is Women’s Month, a time when advocacy programs, policy dialogues, and social campaigns dominate the global space in honor of women. It is a month dedicated to reflecting on the progress made and the challenges that remain in achieving gender equality.

    As we celebrate women’s accomplishments, one question comes up: What about women and taxation? Women’s empowerment is more than just a social justice issue; it is a strategy for national growth. This is in line with Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5), which aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.

    In Nigeria, women make up a huge part of the workforce. From small-scale entrepreneurs in local marketplaces to women running home-based enterprises to professionals in various workplaces, women are the backbone of the economy. Can we go a day without women? Impossible. Nigeria has evolved. Women have become leaders, decision-makers, and key players in business and governance.

    A woman running a business in Lagos or Wuse market in Abuja benefits directly from taxation. The road she uses to transport goods, the electricity powering her store, and the market security protecting her from theft all exist because of tax revenue. Without taxation, the cost of running a business would be unbearable, and women would struggle to expand and succeed.

    Read Also: Ebonyi govt, PDP clash over alleged double taxation, economic hardship

    Without tax, the burden of poor public services falls heavily on women. When hospitals are underfunded, it is women who suffer during childbirth. When schools are in bad shape, it is mothers who struggle to secure a good education for their children. When roads are bad, it is women traders who find it difficult to transport their goods. Taxation is what makes it possible for these services to improve.

    Taxation is not just about collecting revenue; it is about building a system where women can succeed. A strong and transparent tax framework creates an economy where opportunities are not limited by gender. Women are not just taxpayers; they are nation builders, contributing daily to the progress of Nigeria.

    This Women’s Month, the conversation must go beyond celebration. The role of taxation in shaping a prosperous Nigeria for women must be emphasized. Taxation is not a burden; it is the foundation upon which better businesses, communities, and empowered women stand.

    – Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is the technical assistant on broadcast media to the executive chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service.

  • Tales from public hearing on Tax Reform Bills

    Tales from public hearing on Tax Reform Bills

    By Arabinrin Aderonke

    If Nigerians genuinely seek economic growth and financial stability, we must recognise that taxation is not a choice. It is a necessity. When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu introduced the Tax Reform Bills in October 2024, it signified another move toward creating a more efficient, transparent, and equal tax system (similar to removing fuel subsidies). As with every big reform or decision, there will always be people who see change as an opportunity and those who see it as a threat.

    For many years, Nigeria’s tax structure was inefficient, with leakages, multiple taxes, and an overreliance on oil money. Things changed when Dr. Zacch Adedeji became the Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), bringing transparency and efficiency.

    The proposed bills, Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, Nigeria Revenue Service Bill, Joint Tax Board Bill, and Nigeria Tax Bill, seek to simplify tax collection, reduce tax evasion, and ensure revenue is directed toward national development. 

    These measures will improve the ease of doing business, encourage investment, and establish a more equitable system in which big companies pay their fair share. 

    With improved enforcement and fewer loopholes, the government can increase money without burdening citizens. However, instead of seeing the big picture, some opponents focus on minor issues, rejecting the reform rather than strengthening it. 

    The public hearing on these bills has been a battleground of ideas, where stakeholders have voiced their support, scepticism, and outright opposition. 

    Over the past 5 days, lawmakers, tax professionals, industry leaders, and even religious organizations have all voiced their opinions, offering perspectives that range from practical concerns to strongly held beliefs. But amid the arguments, one thing is undeniable: Nigeria can not afford to maintain the status quo.

    Some religious groups, like the Supreme Council for Shariah in Nigeria and the Committee of FCT Imams Initiative, oppose the inheritance tax, claiming it violates religious rights. But inheritance tax is not a new idea. 

    It exists globally to promote economic fairness. Nigeria is not religious-rule. Our laws balance secular and customary principles. If there are concerns, the bill can be adjusted to ensure fairness. However, rejecting it entirely distracts from the goal of building a tax system that benefits everyone.

    The Trade Union Congress and others oppose raising VAT from 7.5% to 15 percent by 2030, fearing it will worsen the cost of living for everyday Nigerians. While their concerns are valid, the government needs revenue for infrastructure and social amenities. 

    Read Also: Tales from public hearing on Tax Reform Bills

    A gradual increase, with exemptions for basic goods, can ease the impact. Many countries fund public services this way, and Nigeria can consider this approach.

    The Nigeria Customs Service also raised concerns that the new tax laws will interfere with its duties. But this is not about power. It is about making things work better. The reforms will help government agencies work together and fix long-standing problems in revenue collection. 

    Fighting change will only slow down progress. Now that the hearings are over, the next step is to improve the bill where needed, not abandon it. Those against it should ask themselves: Do we want a Nigeria where the rich avoid taxes while ordinary people struggle? 

    Do we want to keep losing revenue due to loopholes? Or do we want a fair system where everyone contributes to national growth?

    While the Senate and House of Representatives have promised to thoroughly review the bill, Nigerians have much to gain from its passage. This reform will enhance the economy, create a fairer tax system, and better livelihoods. 

    If implemented effectively, it will ensure that the benefits of democracy reach everyone, not just a select few. The opportunity is here, we just need to seize it and make it work for everyone.

    _Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is the technical assistant on broadcast media to the executive chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service._

  • Refund procedure for Value Added Tax (VAT)

    Refund procedure for Value Added Tax (VAT)

    A salient feature of the VAT system is its ability and promptness in making refunds as and when due. Refund here does not necessarily mean direct cash payment as further explained in paragraph 4 below. The Value Added Tax Act Cap V1 LFN 2004 (as amended) permits a taxable person to claim refund of the excess tax, in the event of input tax exceeding output tax. Refund is also available for VAT paid on zero-rated goods and services. The FIRS is empowered to set the guidelines and requirements for VAT refund from time to time.

     

    The right to claim VAT refund

    It is the right of the VATable person to demand for a VAT refund where the input tax genuinely exceeds the output tax for a transaction period. VATable persons by their roles are agents of the FIRS in the administration of VAT and the FIRS is obliged to make timely refund to them in the course of their agency roles.

     

    How to apply for VAT refund.

    The VATable person must first fill the VAT return form 002, duly completed and submitted to the relevant tax office and the form must clearly and correctly indicate that it is excess of input tax over output tax, to warrant any refund.

     

    Nature of Refund.

    VAT refund can be claimed in any of these ways;

    i.) by credit method, or

    ii.) by direct cash refund method; or

    iii.) by both methods in (i) & (ii) above.

     

    Credit method

    This is carried out with the use of VAT form 002, which contains the calculation of total output tax and input tax and deduction thereof. Where output tax equals input tax, no tax is payable or refundable and where output tax exceeds input tax, the tax difference is remittable to government.

    Where the output tax is less than the input tax, the excess of input tax must be refunded. Here, the taxable person may decide to set off the balance resulting in his favor against the output tax in subsequent month by making the outstanding input tax in the previous month as the first charge in the current month output tax. This is a popular VAT refund approach in many VAT system and is encouraged by the FIRS since it saves time and unnecessary paperwork.

     

    Direct Cash method

    It is reasonable to expect that output tax will always exceed input tax. However, There are some companies whose input tax are perpetually in excess of output tax, such a company cannot reasonably be persuaded to engage in future set –off by means of credit because the need for refund is repetitive and could be so for an extended period. It is for this category of companies that regular cash refund may be necessary.

     

    Who is qualified for refund?

    Refund may be demanded by a registered vatable person in respect of its excess input tax. It follows that only registered vatable person can make refund claim.

     

    How soon can refund be obtained?

    Normally, all relevant document for VAT transaction will be verified before a refund can be made. The Service shall decide on who is eligible for refund subject to its refund rules and conditions. The refund shall be made within 90 days of the decision of the Service on the eligibility for the refund. The earlier the underlying documents are available for VAT audit, the quicker the refund process.

     

    Document verification

    All evidences of payments in respect of input tax must be kept for verification purpose before a refund can be made, while all source documents relating to the transaction in refund application must be kept and made available for inspection. The following document shall be produced for VAT audit:

    • related monthly VAT return form 002, input tax invoices, sales invoices, notices of import and original proof of tax payment on imports;
    • export documents, notices of export and proof of realization of export; and
    • other relevant document needed to back up refund claim.

     

    Refund procedure

    All claims for refund, irrespective of the mode of refund, must be subjected to verification by the VAT auditor. It is therefore important to stress that all tax invoices are to be scrupulously kept for at least a full year before they are stored away. Unless a vatable person indicates in writing his preference for direct cash refund, the FIRS will safely presume a refund by the credit approach.

    The VAT auditor’ report of findings is the acid test in processing any VAT refund through the FIRS internal processing channels.

     

    Refund Account

    In order to minimize delays in the refund process, especially for direct cash, a dedicated account has been opened by the Accountant-General of the Federation from which payment of all successful refund are to be made to applicants.

     

    Refund Offence

    Stiff penalties are provided in the law for offences that may be committed in the course of requesting for refund. Examples of such offences include among others:

    • Using false documents to make refund claim;
    • Issuing false tax invoice, with the intention to procure unmerited refund;
    • Resisting VAT auditor from the verification exercise or supplying false or misleading information.

     

     

  • VAT on services of banks and other financial institutions

    VAT on services of banks and other financial institutions

    The Value Added Tax Act Cap V1 LFN 2004 (as amended) imposes a tax known as Value Added Tax (VAT) on taxable goods and services.  Part 2 of the First Schedule to the Act only exempts services rendered by Community banks, Peoples bank and Mortgage institutions from VAT. Accordingly, all banks and financial institutions, except those exempted are required to charge VAT on services rendered by them to their customers and account for same to the Federal Inland Revenue Service.This is in line with Section 2 of the Act, which stipulates that “the tax shall be charged and payable on the supply of all goods and services (in this Act referred to as “taxable goods and services”) other than those goods and services listed in the First Schedule to this Act.

     

    Definition of Bank and other Financial Institutions

    These are legal entities incorporated under the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA)of 1990 and engage in banking and financial activities as defined by the Banks and other Financial Institutions Act(BOFIA), 1991.  They are companies within the financialsector of the Nigerian economy and are either publicly quoted or private companies.  Banks will ordinarily include commercial banks, merchant banks and development banks while other financial institutions will include; finance houses, insurance companies, re-insurance companies,stock-brokerage firms, investment companies and financial consultants.

     

    VAT Liability

    Banks in particular, charge commission, fees, or other charges for services rendered to theircustomers.  VAT calculations are expected to be based only on the charges made forservices rendered.  It should however, be noted that the focus of VAT is on the charges leviedon customers for the consumption of services rendered by Banks.

    The provision of loans and advances does not in itself constitute a vatable service but thereare other ancillary services to the provision of bank loan/advances or bank overdrafts, which arevatable.  The documentation and perfection of loan/overdraft agreements are examplesof such ancillary services and fees charged,which would attract VAT. The resultant interest chargeable on the loans and overdraft is however not vatable.

    Insurance companies’ brokers/agents earn commission, loss adjusters earn fees, surveyors earn fees, brokers earn commission and agents earn commission for various services rendered to the Insurance Companies.  The services which generated these income are vatable services, andeven though the premium received on policies is not vatable as it represents cost of risk tothe insured, the commission paid to brokers/agent from premium will attract VAT; with theburden of VAT being borne by the insurance company itself.

     

    Vatable Services Rendered by Financial Institutions

    In arriving at what constitutes vatable financial services, a distinction should be made betweenactivities that constitute return on investment and consumption of services rendered by financialinstitutions.All charges arising from the services of banks and financial institutions will ordinarily attract VAT and they include among others, the following:

    • Commissions/fees charged on forex trading or remittance;
    • Commission on turnover (COT), ledger fees etc;
    • Legal and other fees chargeable on lease arrangements;
    • Fees charged for advisory services e.g. mergers and acquisition, financial strategy counseling etc;
    • Fees chargeable on public/private issues;
    • Debt conversion fees;
    • Fees/commission on asset trading;
    • Fees earned on fund management;
    • Fees and commissions earned on letters of credit/documentary collection to finance import/export;
    • Commissions on sale of Bank drafts/certified cheques;
    • Fees chargeable on stock-brokerage and trust services;
    • Commissions paid to brokers, reinsurers, underwriters and other insurance agents by an insurer.

     

    Services of Banks and Other Financial Institutions not Liable to VAT

    A simple criteria for determining whether a service is vatable or not is the identification of those activities that constitute return on investment as distinct from those that represent consumption of services. The services of Banks and other Financial Institutions that willnot attract VAT include:

    • Premium on insurance policies;
    • Interest on loans/advances and overdraft facilities;
    • Interest on savings accounts;
    • Interest on bank deposits;
    • Dividends;
    • Interbank placements; and
    • Profit/gain on disposal of government securities.

     

    VAT Registration and Rendition of Returns

    Banks and other Financial Institutions are taxable persons within the provisions of the VAT Act and all services rendered by them are taxable with the exception of the servicesof Peoples Bank, Community Banks and Mortgage Institutions, which are exempted by theVAT Act. These Banks and Other Financial Institutions are to register for tax with the relevant tax office and obtain TIN. VAT returns are tobe made regularly to the relevant tax office within twenty one (21) days after the month oftransaction.

     

    Accounting Procedure and Records to be kept by Banks

    The mode of operation in the banks does not permit the issuance of tax invoices to customers. The VAT charges therefore have to bereflectedin the customers’ statements of accounts in order to enhance disclosure and easy verificationby tax officers. Banks and other Financial Institutions are required to adopt the following simple methods of recording their transactions for VAT purposes:

    (i)      When any service is identified as vatable, internal entries are raised by the Bank for the cost of the service plus 5% VAT.

    (ii)     The Bank is expected to debit the account of the customer accordingly with the cost of the service plus the 5% VAT charged.

    (iii)    Credit the Income account of the Bank or Institution with the income elementof the charge excluding the VAT

    (iv)Credit the FIRS VAT account in the particular Bank or Institution with the 5% VATdeducted from (ii) to arrive at (iii).

    Section 16 subsection (b) provides that where input tax exceeds output tax, the taxpayer will be entitled to refund of the excess tax from the FIRS on production of such documents as theFIRS may, from time to time require.  With regards to banks and otherfinancial institutions, thisis not applicable because of the provision of Section 17 of Value Added Tax Act on allowable input tax, which provides that input tax on any overhead, service, and general administration of any business which otherwise can be expended through the income statement (profit and loss accounts) shall not be allowed as a deduction from output tax.

    It is a common knowledge that the bank and other Financial Institutions render services; they do not produce goods and therefore regarded as final consumer of those goods purchased or servicesrendered to them.  In this connection, all input VAT payable in respect of assets purchasedfor use in the banks and other Financial Institutions should be added to the cost of the assets on which capitalallowances may be claimed.  Similarly, all VAT payable in respect of services consumed by the bank should be regarded as part of normal operational expenses chargeable to Statement of Profit or Loss Account. Under no circumstance should input tax on such items be claimed or deducted from output tax collected.  Banks and other Financial Institutions cannot claim or deduct any input tax suffered.  The entire amount collected on behalf of the FIRS should be promptly remitted in whole as prescribed by the law.

     

    The Central Bank

    The position of the Central bank with regards to VAT payment is not different from that of otherbanks in the system.  The Central Bank performs nearly all the services listed in paragraph 4 aboveand also acts as banker to other banks.  It is therefore expected that VAT would be charged on payments made to it by the banks for vatable services rendered to them.  This makes it necessaryfor the Central Bank to register for VAT purposes.

     

    Offences and Penalties

    Banks and other Financial Institutions have obligations to fulfill under the VAT Act like other taxable or registered persons.  Part V of the Act contains the list of offences and penalties to be imposed.  These include among others:

    • Failure to register within six (6) months of the existence of a bank;
    • Failure to issue tax invoice (debit note showing amount of VAT collected in the case of banks); failure to charge and remit VAT collected;
    • Failure to keep proper records and accounts;
    • Rendition of incorrect or false returns.

    For these offences, stringent penalties are imposed to check possible defaults.

    Banks and other Financial Institutions are taxable persons within the provisions of the VAT Act and all their services are vatable except those specifically mentioned in the First Schedule. Bank officials are strongly advised to familiarize themselves with the provisions of the VAT Act.  Whatever is peculiar to any Bank or Financial Institution in terms of procedures which has not been dealt with in this circular should be referred to the FIRS without delay.

    Finally, where computerization has been established and it is likely to skip these procedures, the FIRS should be notified of the system in operation and how it would take care of all procedures without leaving out anything uncaptured.

     

  • Features of a good tax system

    Features of a good tax system

    Taxes are the enforced proportional contributions from persons and property, levied by the state by virtue of its sovereignty for the support of government and for all public need. From the above definition it is seen that taxes are contributions to a common pool by the people for the use of the people. Government all over the world need taxes in order to sustain its relevance and to provide for the needs of its citizenry.

    A tax system is expected to be fair and non-discriminatory. For a tax system to meet these requirements, it must have the following attributes.

    1. Neutral – A Neutral tax must be unbiased across economic activities, and not overly penalize work in favour of leisure, nor tax income used for saving and investment more heavily than income used for consumption.
    2. Visibility – A very large segment of the population must be keenly aware that government costs money, government spending should be held to levels at which its benefits match its costs. This is a critical factor in most developing countries (including Nigeria) where the citizenry believe that tax revenues are not being expeditiously administered.
    3. Fairness – This is often stated as making the rich pay higher share of their income in taxes than the poor. There should be some amount of income exempt from tax to shelter the poorest citizens.
    4. Simplicity – A tax system should be easy for the government to administer and enforce, and be easy and inexpensive for taxpayers to comply with. There should be clear definition of income and elimination of multiple layers of tax would create a system that is much simpler and easier to administer, enforce and comply with. These are critical issues in Nigeria tax systems that require urgent attention. Our tax laws are old and complex, given room for varied interpretations and applications.
    5. Convenience – A good tax system should be convenient in terms of time and mode of payment to the taxpayer.
    6. Administrative Efficiency – The process of levying and collecting taxes must be administratively efficient, transparent and economical without any distortion.
    7. Productive – A tax system should be such that brings in sufficient revenue to the Government. Since tax payment involves the outflow of money or money’s worth from the treasury of taxpayers, some Taxpayers have adopted many strategies to evade tax, tax evasion is defined as “the wilful attempt to defeat or circumvent the tax law in order to legally reduce one’s tax liability”. Tax evasion is punishable by both civil and criminal penalties.

    Tax avoidance on the order hand, is defined as “the act of taking advantage of legally available tax-planning opportunities in order to minimize one’s tax liability. While tax evasion is criminal tax avoidance is legal. This was aptly supported by the celebrated case of Ayrshir Pullman Motor Services & D.U. Ritche V.CIR (1929). The fact of the case and the judgement is as follows:-

    The taxpayer changed the structure of its business from sole proprietorship to partnership with 5 of his children to minimise tax. He appealed to the Court of Session against an assessment which failed to recognise the change. Allowing the appeal, Lord Clyde held:

    No man in this country is under the smallest obligation, moral or other, to so arrange his legal relations to his business or property as to enable Revenue to put the largest possible shovel into his stores. The Inland Revenue is not slow…. and quite rightly to take every advantage which is open to it under the taxing statutes for the purpose of depleting the taxpayer’s pocket. And the taxpayer in like manner is entitled to be astute to prevent, so far as he honestly can, the depletion of his means by the Revenue.

     

    TAX COMPLIANCE TOOLS

     

    In order to encourage compliance taxpayers to continue to comply, and bring non compliance taxpayers into the tax net, to increase tax base and revenue, governments all over the world have put in place some compliance strategies backed by appropriate legislations.

    Section 26(1) of the Federal Inland Revenue Service Establishment Act (FIRSEA) 26(1) gives the Service to call for returns, books, documents and information.

    FIRSEA 27 – Gives additional power to the Service to call for further returns and payment of tax due.

    FIRSEA 28 – Requires every bank upon demand by the Service to provide quarterly returns specifying:-

    (a)     In the  cases of an individual, all transaction involving the sum of N5,000,000.00 and above

    (b)     In the case of a body corporate, all transactions involving the sum of N10,000,000.00 and above, the names and address of all customers of the bank connected with the transactions and deliver the returns to the Service.

    (c)     Section 28 (3) – Provides sanction to any bank that contravenes above provisions.

    FIRSEA 29 – Gives power to access lands, buildings, books and documents

    FIRSEA 32 – Gives power of addition for non-payment of tax and enforcement of payment.

    FIRSEA 33 – Tax Investigation; this section empowers the Service to employ special purpose Tax officers to assist any relevant law enforcement agency in the investigation of any offence under this Act.

    FIRSEA 47 – Gives the Service powers to prosecute any of the offences under this Act subject to the powers of the Attorney – General of the Federation.

     

    THE ROLE OF TAX AUDIT

     

    In addition to all the tax provisions mentioned above, FIRSEA S:26(4) and S.60(4) CITA went further to state:-

    “Nothing in any other provision of this Act shall be constructed as precluding the Service from verifying by tax audit or investigation into any matter relating to any return or entry in any book, document, accounts including those stored, on a computer, in digital, magnetic, optical or electronic media as may, from time to time, be specified in any guideline by the Service”.

    All the above provisions, among others, are compliance tools meant to ensure that a taxpayer does not pay less or more than what he is required to pay by law. This objective is achieved through tax audit exercises.

    The purposes of tax audit are to:-

    v To educate taxpayers

    v Maintain self assessment system

    v Collect taxes as imposed by the laws through the encouragement of voluntary compliance

    v Maintain public confidence in the integrity of tax system.

    v Provide deterrent effects on other taxpayers not yet audited, as they may quickly file their returns in order to avoid sanctions.

     

     

  • Value added tax (VAT) & voluntary compliance

    Value added tax (VAT) & voluntary compliance

    The operation of the tax law is universally administered. Every person (corporate or individual) is a taxable entity no matter how, when and what method is used to conduct the business.

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has adequate mechanisms to assess and bring all taxable entities into the tax net. Among these methods is cordial dialogues with stakeholders during enlightenment drives   to achieve mutual understanding and promote voluntary compliance.

     

    Registration by Taxable Persons

    Section 8(q) of the Federal Inland Revenue Service Establishment Act, 2007, directs the Service to issue a taxpayer identification number to every taxable person in Nigeria in collaboration with State Boards of Internal Revenue and the Local Government Revenue Boards. Section 8(1) of the Value Added Tax Act (VATA) Cap V1 LFN, 2004 as amended in 2007 also requires taxpayers (individuals, enterprises or corporates) to register for VAT.

    However, when the tax identification number (TIN) is generated, it suffices and covers all the tax types as no other registration number for any tax type will be required.

    Reference to Section 8(1) of the VATA as amended, it is specifically stated that “A taxable person shall, within six months of the commencement of the Act or within six months of the commencement of business, whichever is earlier, register with the Board for the purpose of the tax (VAT).”

    The phrase whichever is earlier, that specifies the time for registration, has caused a lot of pain for taxpayers in VAT administration. It is not practical to expect that a business just recently incorporated (say in 2011) to have registered in 1994 for the purpose of the tax. Hence, a business incorporated after 1994 is expected to register within six months of the commencement of business.

    Therefore, penalties (and other sanctions) for late registration for VAT would start counting immediately after the six months of commencement of business if the taxpayer fails to register for VAT and not six months from the commencement of the VAT Act when the business was probably not in existence.

     

    Historical Antecedents of VAT

    • VAT was first introduced as consumption tax in 1919 in Germany, France (1954), UK 1973 etc.
    • Introduction was occasioned by the impacts of 1stand 2ndWorld Wars.
    • The adverse effects of direct taxation on the economy, individuals and businesses.
    • The introduction of consumption tax was later modernized into VAT.
    • The high point of VAT is that it has no noticeable impact on the taxpayer because of its indirect nature.

    VATable Income

    In arriving at what constitutes a VATable income, all income from sales, rentals, charges and fees relating to activities enjoyed by customers are VATable and should be charged with VAT. The law did not make provision for any activities or services that is non-VATable in the industry.

     

    First Schedule of the Act stated Goods and Services Exempt from VAT in Nigeria.

    The implication of the schedule is that any other business activity in the form of buying and selling or rendering of services or enjoying any rights which are not stated in the schedule are liable to VAT.

     

    Duration of Remittance

    All VAT charges should be remitted to an FIRS office within 21 days in arrears on a prescribed form 002. This is supported by Section 15 of the Act.

    Meanwhile, a taxable person who does not remit the tax within the time specified above, will be liable to 5%  penalty and interest at commercial rate, added to the tax and the provision relating to collection and recovery of the unremitted tax, penalty and interest shall be employed.

    Similarly, a taxable person who fails to collect tax is to pay 150% of the amount not collected plus 5% interest above the Central Bank of Nigeria rediscount rate.

     

    Concept of Voluntary Compliance

    FIRS encourages voluntary compliance instead of the use of coercion. Tax compliance relates to the degree to which a taxpayer complies (or fails to comply) with the tax rules of a country, for instance, by declaring income, filing returns and paying the tax due on or before the due date.

    Voluntary tax compliance is a situation where a taxable person or entity files returns without the tax authority resorting to using the instruments of the law and force to ensure compliance.

    It is voluntary when a taxable person discharges the statutory obligation of tax payment on self-conviction and as a call to duty without notice or reminder within the time line allowed by law.

     

    FIRS’ Means of Enhancing Voluntary

    Compliance

    • Through education and sensitization of operators.
    • Business owners should have open an mind and seek clearance from FIRS when in doubt and seek further legal advice when not satisfied.
    • Regular monitoring/audit visitations to check compliance and enlighten taxable entities on their roles and responsibilities.
    • FIRS ensures that the principle of know your tax payer (KYTP) is adhered to, so that it would be easy for taxpayers to reach schedule officers for information and guidance/assistance.
    • Regular provision of VAT forms 002 for monthly rendition of returns.
    • Encourage voluntary compliance to avoid infraction of the law.
    • Consistency and civil enforcement of the provisions of the tax law
    • Imposition of interest and penalties and enforce compliance where default occurs.
    • Improvement in the work process of the tax office to make compliance easier.
    • Compliance with the Taxpayer Identification Number requirements by business owners.
    • Monthly rendition of returns and payments on or before 21stof each month in arrears, to the nearest FIRS office.
    • Proper documentation and record keeping of VAT charges taken at source, returns and payments vi-a-vis correct profiling of income sources.
    • Businesses should note that they are not the party suffering the VAT, but a mere agent of collection and remittance.
    • It is better to charge wrongly and remit to FIRS, than not to charge at all, because when the actual liability is established, it is owner of the business that would bear the entire burden.

     

    Consequences of Non-Compliance

    • Out of the entire VAT Act, of 47 sections, about one third of the provisions are on offences and penalties.
    • Statute based consequences are highlighted from section 25 to 37 of VAT Act Cap VI, 2004 as amended in 2007. Some examples of offences and penalties are: failure to submit returns attract a fine of N5,000 for each month the failure continues.
    • Failure to collect tax attracts penalties of 150% of the amount not collected plus 5% interest above CBN rate.
    • VAT evasion attracts N30,000 or twice the amount of tax evaded whichever is greater or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years.
    • Failure to keep proper records of accounts would attract N2,000 fine for every month the failure continues.
    • Failure to issue tax invoice attracts fine of 50% of the cost of goods and services for which an invoice was not issued.
    • Offences by body corporate: Every officer, manager, secretary and other similar officer including partner in partnership shall be severely guilty of an offence under the act, etc.

     

    Reputational Implication

    • Second categories of consequences of non-compliance are reputational and reporting risks. Apart from reputational damage arising from actions by FIRS to enforce compliance via distrain, search and seizure, and litigation, amongst others.
    • Reporting risk involves the imposition of interest and penalties.
    • All the interest and penalties imposed on any of the aforementioned offences would be enforced.

    FIRS tries to avoid enforcing compliance because of the Service’s slogan, “Taxpayers are King” except on recalcitrant taxpayers. It is necessary to once again emphasize that nightclub and event center activities are not exempted from VAT.

    Consequently, taxpayers are encouraged to embrace voluntary compliance since the consequences of non-compliance are enormous; ranging from statute based sanctions to reputational damage/reporting risk.