Category: Waheed Odusile

  • Be a man Jonathan, own up

    Be a man Jonathan, own up

    A colleague told me recently that he met repentant Niger Delta militant Asari Dokubo in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia during last year’s or 2011 hajj operation (can’t remember which year now) and their discussion naturally veered into politics and the comrade was at his vintage best.

    Dokubo he said wasn’t happy with what he perceived as the discriminatory way Muslims from the north treat their southern counterparts and would therefore not go to the north in the run up to the 2015 presidential election to campaign to them on behalf of President Goodluck Jonathan. He would rather do his campaign for the president in the south and leave others to handle the north.

    While one is not in a position to verify the alleged position of El Hadj Asari Dokubo on northern Muslims, one can safely say at this moment that the man is not likely to campaign for Jonathan’s 2015 presidential project anywhere in Nigeria or even outside. He is simply fed up with the lackluster performance of the president and he has in all intent and purpose told the man to count him out of his second (or is it third?) presidential bid and carry his own cross.

    His grouse with the president is simple. Jonathan he opined has failed to live up to expectation and deliver on his promises. And he (Dokubo) an Ijaw man like Jonathan can not in good conscience go before the rest of Nigeria to canvass support for him for another term. What would he tell them or us?

    Expectedly the President’s attack dogs saw Dokubo’s comment as an attempt to derail their principal’s fresh presidential bid and have spared no word in condemning the ex militant. They called it bad belle, that the man was annoyed that the president had refused to renew his multi-million-dollar security contract for the protection of oil pipelines in Rivers State against theft/vandalisation.

    Recall that the presidency sometime ago discreetly awarded multi-million-dollar pipeline protection contracts to ex. Niger Delta militants covering the oil facilities in Delta, Bayelsa, Rivers States and environs. Many, including this writer saw it as a nepotistic gesture on the part of Jonathan to settle his own people, buy their support and loyalty (for 2015) and reward criminality. The contracts to Asari Dokubo, Ateke Tom, Gens. Boyloaf and Tompolo were not made public by the government until a foreign news agency scooped on it and revealed the details to the world. In criticizing the deal then, one had argued that it was not likely to deter fresh attack by militants in the region on oil facilities there, as those outside the loop of beneficiaries would see any successful attack on the oil facilities as a way of telling the president that they also want a piece of the pie.

    Recent pipeline attacks, oil thefts and piracy in Rivers and Bayelsa States have affirmed this position while the jury is still out on the success or otherwise of the contract awarded to Tompolo for pipeline protection in Delta State.

    As an aside, it is good to note that Tompolo is carving a new image for himself by veering into humanitarianism using the money he made from militancy and the pipeline protection contract to set up a foundation to take care of the less privileged in the society.

    If the pipeline protection contract was meant to shut Dokubo and co up and buy their loyalty, it failed and it remains to be seen whether the termination of his own contract was punishment for being critical of government or failure to secure the pipelines. What is clear however, is that the president is using a multi-prong approach to buy his way into the heart and mind of the society instead of working/warming his way into society through performance, to secure majority support from Nigerians for his 2015 project.

    If Jonathan wants to re-contest in 2015 he is free to and he should be bold and man enough to say so instead of beating about the bush and looking for scapegoats among critics of his abysmal performance.

    While he is denying interest in the next presidential election for now, it is no secret that he wants another shot at the presidency and his foot soldiers are already on the field trying to hoodwink us into buying a bad and failed product. It is in this light that one would want to view the half-hearted denial of any link to the Jonathan for 2015 posters now all over Abuja, by the presidency, as another of the character weaknesses of President Goodluck Jonathan. What is he afraid of? As the saying goes man dies only but once, but cowards die many times before their death.

    It is a matter of yes or no for Nigerians in case he decides to throw his hat into the ring and the earlier he throws his hat in there or keep it with wife Patience the better, instead of accusing imaginary enemies of trying to distract his attention or derail his programmes with the Abuja posters and similar campaigns for his 2015 project currently being carried out through proxies.

    From his first day in the White House, it was clear President Barack Obama was going to seek a second term barring any catastrophe and even when the US economy was wobbling and unemployment rising he was still able to convince his party and the rest of America that he remains the best man for the job. And they obliged him with a second term, but not without anything tangible to show as achievement. He was proud to point at his bailout package for the auto industry that saved millions of jobs and affirmed his commitment to strengthening the middle class, even as he vowed to extract more tax from the very wealthy Americans who constitute 2 per cent of the American society.

    These with a combination of other factors including the killing of world renowned terrorist Osama bin Laden won him a second term even when the situation on ground economically was so grim that were the times to be different or his opponent Mitt Romney better, he would have been rejected.

    Pray, as bad as things are in the country today, especially the deteriorating security situation, is there anything or a combination of things that Jonathan has done well for us to deserve another term even if he is entitled to it?

    I am sure it is this fear of what do I tell them that is driving the man into using third parties to sell his second term ambition while publicly denying them. We know the trick Mr President, you don’t need to hide behind one finger. If truly you or your people are not behind the Abuja posters and similar subtle campaigns for your 2015 project why don’t you direct that the posters be put down or ignore them? Why are you labouring to convince us you knew nothing about the posters? Conventional wisdom dictates that when someone tries strenuously to convince the other person or a people about his own position, the likelihood of lies somewhere in the explanation should not be ruled out.

    What has been lacking in Jonathan since fate put him at the helm first in Bayelsa State and now at the Presidential Villa in Abuja is a firm, strong and decisive character who knows his onions and ready to act at all times in the best interest of Nigeria and not given to nepotistic tendencies.

    It’s been argued rightly or wrongly that part of the weaknesses of his character is his inability to rein in the alleged excesses of his Ijaw kinsmen both within and outside the government. Not that his predecessors were any better or his critics would behave differently in this regard, but because of his level of education Nigerians expect a much better performance from him.

    One can go on and on pointing at his character flaws, but what we as Nigerians are not, as Jonathan probably thinks we are, is that we are no fools. We know where his going and we are waiting for him. And as we like to say here, he should not tell us a dog is a monkey.

  • Let us pray

    As we commence a new year today in line with Gregorian calendar, it would be necessary as a country and a people to seek the face of God who led us through year 2012 successfully for another success in year 2013. After going through the events of 2012 I feel compelled to offer the following prayer for our dear country Nigeria and I invite you to join me.

    Let us pray.

    Almighty God, we thank thee for seeing us through the year 2012 successfully. Though not all that started the year twelve months ago are here today to witness the beginning of year 2013, it is not by our good deeds that those of us still alive today are here but by your grace, and those that have passed on can not be said to have offended you. It is Thy will that they come back home when they did and we should remain behind to complete our term. As we are enjoined to say always; let Thy will be done.

    Oh Lord, it is universally agreed that apart from corruption, bad leadership has been a major problem of this country, we know it but unfortunately we’ve been unable to correct that problem.

    After several decades of failed leadership we had the opportunity to turn a new leaf in 1999 with a new democratic dispensation and indeed we thought we have turned the page when retired General Olusegun Obasanjo, a one time military Head of State was elected president and commander-in-chief., but alas we ended up with 8 wasted years of that presidency.

    God you know the story. Obasanjo not only wasted that golden opportunity but inflicted further pains on us when, having failed to illegally extend his tenure, he forced a reluctant president on us as a successor in the person of late Umar Yar’Adua. God, the jury is still out on Yar’Adua’s tenure but certainly not a few Nigerians will declare his tenure a failure.

    When you decided to take Yar’Adua away, Obasanjo again manipulated the system and forced another colourless and reluctant leader on us in the person of President Goodluck Jonathan. Even though he still has two years to end his tenure the jury has already returned a verdict of failure on him.

    Oh God our Lord, even though we have no authority to question you we want to humbly ask why you have allowed those who never had the intention of ruling Nigeria become president or Prime Minister of this country, while those who genuinely aspired did not get there. From Tafawa Balewa to Jonathan, with the exception of the Babangida and Abacha interregnum, all the leaders got there either by accident or reluctantly. Babangida and Abacha wanted to rule Nigeria and they got there, but what did they make of that opportunity.

    God, power belongs to you and you only can give power and anoint leaders. We cannot question your judgment, but as we begin the countdown to the 2015 election we pray that you give us leaders at each tier of government, who are genuinely interested in serving us and not just ruling us, leaders with compassion who will feel what we feel not those who because they have power supply 24/7 in the government villas across the country forget that majority of us are still living in darkness or on “I better pass my neighbour” power generator. Not leaders who will fly their children and spouses to specialist hospitals in Germany even for common cold leaving the rest of us to attend the glorified clinics that we call hospitals here. Not those whose children and relations will attend elite schools in Europe, America, Asia and even in nearby Ghana while watching our educational system nose dive. Not those who because they can fly around in state funded executive jets forget that our roads are bad; not those who because they cruise around in fleets of government fueled limousines would want the rest of us to go around on bicycles or pay through our nose for a litre of fuel.

    God, the sins of our leaders are many but even in these closing stages of their tenure preparatory to the 2015 elections, we pray that you touch their hearts to turn away from their evil and wicked ways and serve the interest of Nigeria and Nigerians. Beginning from today our Lord, we pray that our leaders will rule with the fear of God and respect for us the people.

    While not blaming our leaders entirely for the woes that have befallen our country, we equally recognize the ignoble role some of us followers have been playing in bringing the nation on to her knees. Just as we pray for guidance for our leaders we also pray for committed and sincere followers who will not sell their conscience or birthright for a mere pot of porridge.

    God we agree that not all our leaders are that bad, there are rays of hope of better leadership tomorrow within the ranks of our present State governors, and to a little extent members of the National Assembly. We are still waiting for those in the State assemblies and local governments to show their true colour.

    But of recent God there has been a disturbing trend within the ranks of our governors that is giving cause for concern. In the course of the year 2012 the ranks of our state governors have been visited by tragedy leading to death in at least one instance and on two occasions, close to death. Governor Danbaba Suntai of Taraba State was flying a small aircraft from his home town in Taraba State to Yola airport in nearby Adamawa State when the aircraft crashed as he was approaching the airport. All on board were badly injured and Governor Suntai almost lost his life.

    Almighty God as you know, our health facilities are nothing to write home about, not even our best hospital; the National Hospital in Abuja could handle the treatment of Suntai and the others on board that aircraft; they had to be flown to Germany for treatment. As at the time of this prayer, we are not sure whether they would survive but we pray that through your mercies they will survive and come back home to their loved ones in good health. Our First Lady Dame Patience Jonathan recently returned from a medical treatment in a German hospital, we don’t even know what was wrong with her.

    God in this New Year please direct our leaders to establish that kind of German hospital that is good enough to treat our First Lady in at least each of the six geopolitical zones in the country, for the rest of us to also enjoy good healthcare.

    God as the year 2012 was drawing to a close you decided to recall back home Governor Patrick Yakowa of Kaduna State. He died in a military helicopter conveying him, former National Security Adviser Gen. Owoye Azazi and three others including the crew to Port Harcourt airport from Bayelsa when it crashed into the creeks killing all on board. God this is one air accident too many. We are yet to fully recover from the tragic air crash involving DANA Air in Lagos. We recall similar ones in the past involving some of our domestic airliners. If this was due to our sins please God forgive us and prevent such tragedies from befalling us this year and in years to come.

    Just as we are about drying the last drop of tears in our eyes as a result of the death of Governor Yakowa and co, Governor Idris Wada of Kogi State was involved in a fatal road accident that claimed the life of his ADC but left him badly injured. On top of all these accidents and death are wicked rumors flying around announcing the death of no fewer than three other State Governors. God what is happening to our governors? Please deliver them from all evils.

    The accident involving Governor Wada has once again highlighted the carnage that daily takes place on our roads, especially highways. God, in our country today, as you know, road accident has taken more lives than any known disease due in part to poor conditions of the roads and the reckless suicidal driving culture in this country. .God please in this New Year direct our leaders to fix our roads for us even if they won’t build new ones and touch the hearts of our drivers.

    Lord our prayers are by no means limited to these, but the space here is too small to accommodate them all, but you know what is in our hearts, please grant us those ones that will make us a better people and a better nation. In your mighty name we pray.

    Amen.

     

  • Beyond that chopper crash

    Beyond that chopper crash

    As we continue to dry the last drops of tears in our eyes following the death of Kaduna State Governor Patrick Yakowa, former National Security Adviser Gen. Owoye Azazi and three others including the crew of a Nigerian Navy helicopter in a crash somewhere in the creeks in Bayelsa State penultimate Saturday, let us begin to ponder over how our rulers (as against leaders) abuse the resources and facilities of State put at their disposal.

    Too often, we’ve seen and heard of cases of top public officers, especially politicians, top level civil servants and military officers extending the privileges of their office to their spouses, children, relations and friends and even aides to the detriment and at the expense of the State.

    This malaise did not begin with this present crop of rulers but dates back to as long as one could remember and it’s about time we begin to take stock of the toll this abuse of office is taking on our resources and collective security and decide on what to do to either encourage or stop it.

    The Navy helicopter that crashed was for the umpteenth time conveying guests that attended the burial ceremony that weekend in Bayelsa State of the father of an aide to President Goodluck Jonathan, Mr Oronto Douglas to Port Harcourt airport in nearby Rivers State, for their return flight back to base. While the earlier batches made it safely to the airport in the same ‘copter Yakowa, Azazi and the others weren’t lucky, they all perished; a big loss not only to their respective families but also the whole nation and particularly to the military.

    There is no debating the fact that Oronto Douglas by virtue of the position he holds in Jonathan’s government is not entitled to assume the privileges he did by flying guests that came to commiserate with him on his father’s death and attend the burial (a private affair) in a military aircraft. We’ll come to that later, let’s look at similar instances in the past.

    Recall the Abacha years when one of his sons, Ibrahim died in one of two HS 125 presidential jets then in the presidential fleet? Ibrahim, his girl friend, a couple of friends and I am sure some secret service agents were reportedly celebrating Ibrahim’s birthday in the air, in the presidential jet when it crashed somewhere around Kano. While the nation grieved and sympathized with the Abachas and the other bereaved families, the fact that could not be raised then, for obvious reasons, was that Ibrahim Abacha and his friends had no business flying that aircraft let alone partying inside it in the air.

    That aircraft that cost Nigerian tax payers millions of dollars to acquire and meant to serve the interest of State was deployed on a frivolous assignment that had nothing to do with the interest of Nigeria, except as we often do here, we equate the personal interests of our leaders to that of the country. With all the monies his father had acquired over the years (the source notwithstanding) and his own vast business empire, Ibrahim could have hired a private jet for his birthday celebration and spared the nation the loss of millions of dollars in the crashed presidential jet. This is not without sympathy for the lives lost. I am sure the HS 125 series had been phased out of the presidential fleet and replaced with newer aircraft types, even when it still remains one of the best executive jets flying around the globe.

    In Nigeria once an aircraft crashes and lives are lost, that aircraft type is no longer good and must be banned from our air space even if it is in service in other countries with better aviation facilities as well as better understanding of aircraft and aviation in general. And this is a nation that cannot even manufacture the tiniest and simplest part of an aircraft.

    Recall the Nigeria Airways F27 crash at Emene in Enugu in 1983 killing, I think all on board, including a Senator and almost his entire family? In hysteria, Nigeria sold off the entire Fokker fleet in Nigeria Airways and I think Libya was a beneficiary. President Ibrahim Babangida was reportedly flown in one of those aircraft during a State visit to Libya years later. Meanwhile the Fokker series on which Nigeria Airways had built expertise up to D-check level was replaced by a more modern aircraft, Airbus A310-200 series on which we had none or few Nigerian engineers rated. No surprise then the A310s didn’t last for long in the airline’s fleet. Nigeria Airways, of course you know is dead, liquidated by Obasanjo and his Aviation Minister, Kema Chikwe.

    The same fate befell the BAC 1-11 series in our commercial aviation fleet here and since that aircraft type was phased out of our air space following a fatal crash, commercial aviation in Nigeria has been flying from one crisis into another. Sorry for the digression and back to the issue at hand; abuse of office by our rulers.

    I don’t know how you would classify this? I recall that the Nigerian Navy used to have a frigate named NNS Aradu as the nation’s flagship. I don’t know what has happened to Aradu now. It was reputed to be one of the best battleships of its era and used to carry three British made Lynx Helicopters. As a Defence Correspondent then, I, like my other colleagues was very proud of this and we were looking forward to not too distant a future when our Navy will acquire its own fleet of submarines. We are still waiting.

    But unfortunately before our eyes (pardon the cliche) Aradu started deteriorating and one after the other the helicopters were crashing, not during combat missions or military exercises, mind you, but during frivolous assignments. I remember one crashed in Calabar when Babangida was there on a state visit. Pray why did we have to deploy this chopper there just because the president was visiting? Except we are told why, that deployment was uncalled for and a misuse or abuse of office, being the Commander-In-Chief notwithstanding. Of course, another millions of dollars down the drain.

    There are instances as this in the past and not limited to aviation alone. Quite often we hear or even witness wives of State governors and even the President’s wife and their children driving around in long convoys of official vehicles as if they are officials of State. In the process some have been involved in accidents that even claimed the lives of innocent people. These are people that before their husbands or fathers got elected or appointed into public office could hardly afford more than a car let alone a fleet of luxury vehicles.

    Before Oronto Douglas became an aide to President Jonathan could he afford to fly his friends or even think of flying them to attend a private ceremony he was holding? If he was not in office would he do that even if he has all the millions in this world? Who is Oronto Douglas to be flying his guests in military aircraft? What is this country turning into? One thinks State resources and facilities are meant to be deployed to State use/events. Is Oronto Douglas now part of the State or his father’s burial a State event?

    I am not trying to make a scapegoat out of our friend Oronto Douglas, don’t forget he was in the trenches with others during the fight for this democracy, I am only trying to draw attention to the rot going on in high places under Jonathan’s watch, which though didn’t start with him, but must not be allowed to continue.

    In probing the cause of the Navy helicopter crash, the political fall out of the unfortunate incident should also be looked into, may be by a judicial commission of enquiry which should among other things look at the entire gamut of how our rulers deploy State resources to check not only abuse of office, but also of power. The technical report of the investigation carried out should also be made public and not treated as secret because a military aircraft was involved; aviation is universal. May be its about time we are also told of what caused the presidential jet crash involving Ibrahim Abacha earlier mentioned and who authorized him to fly and party in ‘our aircraft’. Enough of these cover ups. Did I hear you mention the FOI Act?

     

  • Our hearts are broken

    Our hearts are broken

    The last four months of the year or the ‘ember months as we call them in Nigeria are perceived here as wicked and blood thirsty, especially December. Not only do we usually witness an upsurge in the number of road traffic accidents and the attendant fatalities recorded, some other evil things like kidnapping, armed robbery, burglary and carjacking also take place during this period thus driving fear into Nigerians at the approach of December.

    Such evil acts as kidnapping are now so lucrative that the evil men and women behind them no longer wait for December before striking. In the past it used to be that people mysteriously disappear around December/Christmas time and most ended up in the hands of ritualists working for their principals who wanted quick money which they could flaunt and squander during Christmas  and New Year festivities to show their community that “they’ve arrived” as we like to say here.

    If that was kidnapping for money making ritual, the in thing now is kidnapping for ransom and it is very lucrative and highly rewarding. In the South East region, the headquarters of kidnapping in Nigeria, the crime is now big business fetching the kidnappers an average of N750m (seven hundred and fifty million Naira) monthly.

    Relations of the rich and influential members of the society, including politicians, top government functionaries and even Nollywood stars are always their target and there is no age limit; young, old or aged, no problem, as long as their victim can bring in the ransom.

    The most vulnerable are children and the aged who are often defenceless and powerless. Each time these evil men strike our hearts break as was the case penultimate weekend when the 82-year old mother of Nigeria’s Finance Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for the Economy Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala was kidnapped at Ogwuashi-Uku, Delta State. Professor Kamene Okonjo, a professor of Medicine was kidnapped by gunmen at the palace of the traditional ruler of the town. She spent five days with the kidnappers before she was rescued by security agents. To secure her release or rescue, whichever way you want to put it, the kidnappers, according to unconfirmed reports were paid N9 million.

    As usual nobody confirms this kind of payment but we all know it happens. Even the police do at times advise families of victims to pay the ransom to secure the release of their loved ones. More often than not we only hear that the victims have been set free by their abductors and not rescued by the police.

    Just as the nation was still adjusting to the reality of the kidnapping Professor Okonjo another old woman was being abducted in Ibadan, Oyo State. The wife of a former Military Governor of old Western State Gen. Oluwole Rotimi, Titilayo, was kidnapped in front of her haulage company, AOP Logistics Limited, on the new Ibadan-Ife Expressway at about 6.30 pm last Monday. And just over the weekend a Nollywood actress and Special Assistant to the Governor of Imo State on Public Affairs, Nkiru Sylvanus was kidnapped on the street in Owerri, the state capital. Her abductors want N100m. Though they are not likely to get paid in full, something substantial will be paid as ransom; so the business continues.

    It is quite surprising and annoying that the police still have not found a solution to this problem in spite of the numerous shake ups and reshuffles that usually take place after each case of high profile kidnapping. Some are even insinuating that some elements in the force are working together with these kidnappers. Considering the unenviable record of the Nigeria Police, this cannot be ruled out. Remember the Iyamu story in the Benin robbery ring of Lawrence Aninih and Monday Osunbor during General Ibrahim Babangida presidency? Iyamu, a police officer was later discovered to be part of the notorious armed robbery gang when Aninih and co stated ‘singing’ when they were arrested. Promises of radical changes to the Police were made then but nothing changed. Recall that a one time Assistant Inspector General of Police in charge of the Southeast zone at the height of kidnapping in the area who failed woefully to curb the menace was instead of being fired promoted as the Inspector General of Police after the then IG who hails from the area was fired for incompetence.

    The tragedies we often associate with the ‘ember months are not peculiar to Nigeria. Last Friday in far away United States of America, a 20-year old man, Adam Lanza walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, dressed in black battle fatigue and a military vest and began firing. By the time he was done, 26 were dead- 20 of them young students between ages six and seven. The nation with a notorious gun culture was not only shocked but also broken-hearted following the tragedy. We also share in the grieve of the families of the victims including that of a 27-year old female teacher in the school who hid her students inside the cupboards when Lanza, the agent of death came calling in her class, telling him the children were in the gym. He shot her dead. What a brave woman. I hope we have teachers like that in Nigeria who in the face of death would be ready to protect their students. I doubt.

    In the midst of all these, the curse of aviation descended on Nigeria again when a military helicopter conveying VIPs from Nembe in Bayelsa State to Port-Harcourt, Rivers State crashed into the creeks killing all on board. Among the dead were the Governor of Kaduna State Patrick Yakowa, former National Security Adviser Gen. Owoye Azazi, their aides and the two-man crew.

    Our hearts are broken and bleed as yet another accident from the sky has claimed lives in this country. Recall that some years back another military helicopter crashed in Makurdi killing some Generals. Have you forgotten the Nigeria Air Force Hercules C-130 crash in Lagos during the Babangida era that killed whole generation of middle ranking military officers from the Army, Navy and Air Force? Too many accidents involving our military aircraft are becoming worrisome. And this call for urgent action on the part of the military high command.

    President Goodluck Jonathan as the Commander-In-Chief must take more than a passive interest in what is going on in our military aviation. Just as attention is being focused on civil aviation by the Federal Government the military arm, especially the Air Force, Navy and even the Police deserve similar attention. We cannot afford to continue to lose lives like this.

     

  • Listen to the message

    Listen to the message

    Central Bank governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi is a straight talker, always shooting from the hips. Although some of his views could be annoying and irritating, but give it to the Kano prince, he says it the way he sees and feels it and seems not to care whose ox is gored.

    And any time ‘Basket Mouth’ decides to leak or open, apologies to late Afrobeats legend Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, you can be rest assured that not a few feathers would be ruffled. And so it happened last week when the head of the apex bank decided it was time the government was told the home truth (according to St.Lamido) about its workforce; it is too large, he says, cut it.

    In plain language, the economist is calling on the three tiers of government to sack some of their workers. And you may want to know why. The CBN governor says the government is spending about 70 per cent of resources available to it to service its workers, leaving just 30 per cent for other sectors. And for a government workforce of just a little more or less than a million, consuming the resources meant for a population of about 167 million does not just make sense, he argues.

    He is therefore calling on government to lay off some of these workers in order to free some of the revenue used in paying their salaries and other emoluments for investment in social infrastructure that are presently seriously deficient. Spot on did you say? Good talk. But then that is just looking at the problem from purely an economist point of view. A sociologist will definitely differ and consider the wider implications of a massive sudden job loss as being suggested by Sanusi on the entire society, including the government.

    As expected, the CBN Governor’s suggestion is not being well received especially by organised labour which has called for the sacking of Sanusi instead, by the Federal Government, which itself doesn’t seem to fancy the top banker’s unsolicited advice. And Sanusi as usual is unperturbed, after all this is not his first time of swimming against the tide of public opinion and every time he emerged unscathed. Will he be lucky again this time and weather the gathering storm of public anger, especially of workers against him? I think so. Will this basket mouth once again get away with this intellectual arrogance and I know it all attitude that gives him that aura of an untouchable who could talk down on anything and anybody and nothing will happen? Sadly, yes. Has our CBN Governor attained that level of infallibility like the Pope that he can say and do no wrong? Something like that. Is he beyond reproach? It seems so. Recall that this man had done and said certain things outside his core area of competence as an economist/banker that could have caused social upheaval and nobody called him to order? Even in banking where we are told he is an expert in risk management, some of his whimsical decisions (some bordering on political rather than sound economic considerations) have done more harm than good to the sector and not a few workers have a sad story to tell as a result. The success or otherwise of his famed banking reforms is there for all to see and the jury is still out. You remember his failed N5,000 note project that crashed following public outcry? Even when his reasons for wanting to introduce this new note fell short of basic economic principles and were shot down by fellow economists, he still insisted on going ahead until public outcry and common sense prevailed on the government to turn him down.

    I am not trying to catalogue the sins of Sanusi, and they are many, depending on which side of the argument you are, the man also has some strong points that could help us get out of our economic problems. Now before we crucify him over his latest unguarded comment and unsolicited advice wouldn’t it be better if we look at what he said and not himself? That is, looking at the message and not the messenger. Quite often the personality of the messenger tends to influence or interfere with the reception the message gets. And this is exactly the problem with Sanusi. He has put himself in a situation where not a few would read meanings into every of his actions or utterances no matter how altruistic and genuine they appear. They now look for the motive first before supporting or believing him, even when he is saying the truth, as he seemed to be saying in the matter at hand.

    Speaking last Tuesday at the second annual Capital Market Committee Retreat in Warri, Delta State, Sanusi observed that “at the moment 70 per cent of Federal Government’s revenue goes for payment of salaries and entitlement of civil servants, leaving 30 per cent for development of 167 million Nigerians. That means for every naira government earns, 70 kobo is consumed by civil servants.

    You have to half of the civil service because the revenue of the government is supposed to be for 167 million Nigerians. Any society where government spends 70 per cent of its revenue on its civil service has a problem. It is unsustainable.

    The various tiers of government should cut down their recurrent expenditure and use the fund to provide basic infrastructure like schools, hospitals, etc

    “How can we be using the proceeds from our major source of revenue to service recurrent expenditure, by paying salaries, allowances, etc. The country should be thinking of enhancing its productivity base rather than spending on things that cannot create wealth,” Sanusi said.

    Whether his observation in terms of the percentages is true in fact is debatable, giving the fact that accurate statistics are rare to come by in Nigeria, but what is undeniable is that we spend far too much; the bulk of our resources paying its workers and this is unfair to the rest of us in the private sector. So why call for Sanusi’s head for saying the ‘truth’? is the solution he proffered to the problem he identified.

    Calling for the sack of half of the population of government’s estimated one million workers cannot be the only solution to the problem. Indeed it was a callous suggestion borne out of insensitivity and utter show of contempt towards these set of workers. Agreed that they are too many, but to what end are they being deployed by government? If government is not optimally utilizing them whose fault? Do you blame them for that? Bureaucracy definitely can not grow the economy the way business would, but then government can use bureaucracy to pave way for job creation and growth of the economy. This same one million or so government workers can still be effectively used by government to facilitate wealth creation in other sectors apart from oil for the rest 166 million or so other Nigerians not in government employ. I agree they are taking too much out of our resources but this is an issue now because they are not serving us well. If the civil service is actually providing the service to the public as expected, how much they earn wouldn’t necessarily be an issue. When the 30 or so players and officials of our national teams play well and make us proud, nobody cares how much they get as match bonus. It is only when they lose matches and play disgracefully that we remember that what they earn per match individually is probably more than the monthly or annual take home pay of the bulk of this same workers.

    Rather than carpeting Sanusi’s suggestion what if these workers were retrained, refocused and redeployed to other more productive sectors or sent to the private sector to help grow the economy and create jobs. It’s just a matter of making them do other things that are more productive and beneficial to the rest of us than what they do now and still earn the same thing.

    Instead of sacking half of the civil servants to conserve funds for use in other sectors of the economy, the problem I think lies with the large retinue of political appointees that currently service our bloated democracy. What each member of the National Assembly earns annually for instance is probably enough to build, equip and staff a primary health care facility in his/her constituency.

    This is not a defence of the civil service. In fact I am in support of any measure that will make it effective and plag waste. Who knows, it might be that the bulk of the 70 per cent Sanusi is talking about goes into servicing ghost workers or the very few top people at the helm of our bureaucracy including himself.

    We have often spoken about the curse of oil, may be this lopsidedness is part of it but then cutting the head is not the cure for headache.

    Agreed Sanusi can be tactless and unguarded in his statements; call him basket mouth if you like, but don’t ignore his observations, they are valid. The problem is just his suggested solution. Take the message, you may ignore the messenger.

     

  • EFCC: Same old story

    EFCC: Same old story

    Are you a businessman or woman with substantial dealings with the Federal Government, or a politician fiercely opposed to the sitting government at the centre and eyeing a top position in Abuja? If you are, then take heed of this warning, it is in your own interest; don’t do or say anything that could make the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) come after you, because that could spell danger for you as the commission appears poised once again to go after the supposed enemies of their paymaster, the Presidency.

    Why am I saying this?

    Have you not been following the travail of Lawyer/Businessman Dr Wale Babalakin (SAN), the billionaire with connections in high places, who wines and dines with the high and mighty; the businessman who sits atop an emerging conglomerate that includes Bi-Courtney Highway Services, the firm that won the concession agreement to fund, build and manage Lagos/Ibadan Expressway for 25 years and recoup his money (of course plus profit) within that period, but has done little or nothing on the road almost four years after; the owner of the rebuilt terminal (MM2) at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Ikeja?

    Yes, the same man who has been battling the Federal Government to stop the construction of another domestic terminal at MMIA, which he claims contravenes the terms of the agreement with Bi-Courtney Aviation Services, leading to the construction of MM2. Recall that the Federal Government recently revoked that concession on the Lagos /Ibadan Road citing non-performance on the part of Bi-Courtney Highway Services? Now the man is in trouble, real trouble, multi-billion naira trouble, courtesy EFCC.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has brought charges of money laundering against Babalakin and four others totaling N3.4billion. The 25-count charge were slammed on the accused barely 48 hours after the revocation of the concession agreement raising concern that the Federal Government could be using the EFCC to prosecute a political agenda of witch hunting and vendetta against its opponent. It also raises doubts about the sincerity and impartiality of the commission in its drive to rid Nigeria of corruption.

    Make no mistake about it, this is not a defense of Babalakin or a call on EFCC to go soft on the anti corruption crusade, but then it must be seen to be working devoid of government influence for it to continue to enjoy the support and confidence of all Nigerians, including the accused.

    Ordinarily, matters like this should not raise dust anywhere other than in the camp of those involved, but the timing of EFCC’s move against the accused when the man is involved in a contractual dispute with the government definitely points at more than ulterior motives on the part of the commission. Did this money laundering issue come up just yesterday? Why immediately after the man lost his contract for the Lagos/Ibadan Expressway reconstruction? Couldn’t EFCC have waited for this contractual problem between Babalakin/Bi-Courtney and the Federal Government to be resolved or even go down before bringing these corruption charges against him? All the commission needed to do if it was convinced it has a strong case against Babalakin and others, was to put them under watch while their contractual dispute with the government lasted and move in immediately. No matter the merit of their case against the man, the timing of their action has tainted the motive behind it and the public is likely to view it as such, whether the man is freed or convicted if and when the matter gets to court.

    Pursuit of vendetta by our leaders against political opponents in particular has been part of our politics for long. But this was raised to its peak by former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who deployed every tool, trick and power at his command to fight his political opponents both real and imagined. The Nigeria Police used to be the willing tool for this, but since everything is a matter of cash to our policemen as they are always on the side of the highest bidder, the government, it seems needed a super agency with enough teeth and muscle and which enjoys public support and confidence to fight its dirty war against its opponents. I am not saying this was why the EFCC was created but over the years, especially under Obasanjo, the agency was used effectively to fight opponents of that presidency.

    Recall the K-Leg story of then candidate Rotimi Amaechi who was running for the governorship seat of Rivers State in 2007 on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)? He was stopped by Obasanjo and his clique using the EFCC to cook up and manufacture evidence of corruption against him. Eventually nothing was established against the man, but Obasanjo had his way as he was dropped as PDP’s candidate in the election. I am sure you know the rest of the story. Amaechi is today the governor of Rivers State.

    The story of the failed presidential ambition of a former Governor of Rivers State, Dr. Peter Odili and the role played by Obasanjo’s EFCC in his botched attempt to clinch the presidential ticket of the PDP in 2007 is known to not just a few. There were many people like that who were politicians in PDP and who at one time or another were close to Obasanjo but fell apart with the former president when their interests collided and the man punished them using EFCC.

    Some opposition politicians also suffered similar fate, but just as this was going on, a whole lot of Obasanjo’s friends politicians and businessmen alike accused of one form of corruption or another were left untouched. The EFCC pretended not to see them. They were untouchable. You still remember the story of Chief Olabode George, the erstwhile deputy National Chairman of PDP, who wielded so much power and influence under Obasanjo that he became untouchable. Until he fell out of favour with Obasanjo the EFCC defended him stoutly against accusations of corruption during his tenure as chairman of Nigerian Ports, but once he became an “enemy” of the Villa, the EFCC story changed and Bode George went to jail.

    I am not sure to what extent this trend continued under President Umaru Yar’Adua but definitely it wasn’t as rampant as it was under Obasanjo if it did happen. But then who knows, maybe illness and eventual death robbed us of knowing what kind of leader Yar’Adua would have been and how he would have deployed the EFCC under his watch. But this move against Babalakin by EFCC could eventually lead us into a clearer picture of what the anti-graft agency would look like under a Jonathan presidency. His EFCC is beginning to bear its fangs now and ready to bite. Good. But how far he can go, remain to be seen, especially considering the fact that he might need to bite some of the fingers that put him in the Presidential Villa. But if he has to bite and even cut off some of those fingers in the fight against corruption Nigerians won’t mind, but then he shouldn’t do it selectively; nobody should be untouchable. No sacred cow.

    The untouchables have been the pillars of successive administrations in this country and are somehow linked to this corruption we are all talking about. Until last week, Dr Wale Babalakin could rightly be classified as one of them, but whether he remains so after Jonathan’s EFCC onslaught or if indeed the onslaught can stand the stern test of the judiciary remain to be seen. But as things stand now, the man and his co-accused are innocent until found guilty by competent authorities.

    The lesson for EFCC here is that if it doesn’t assert its independence and be seen to be doing so by the public, it risks the erosion of its fragile credibility with the public and could easily go the way of the Nigeria Police. It should not allow itself to be used by anybody or be seen to be used by anybody, especially the government. It is about time it focuses attention on the government especially those ministers perceived to be corrupt to prove its independence. Let charity begin at home.

    To Babalakin and his co-businessmen/politicians, I don’t envy them. Mixing business with politics is tough and navigating that dangerous terrain requires tact and delicate balancing in order not to breach any unwritten rules. My advice to them is to stick with the international best practices in business relations especially with government and be fair and even handed/minded in their dealings with politicians. They could be dangerous.

     

  • The face of Boko Haram?

    The face of Boko Haram?

    As the saying goes, as long as there are still lice in the hair, the finger nails can never be free of blood. That seems to be the case with Nigeria and our home grown terrorist organization called Boko Haram.

    Each time we pretended the threat was over or we are on top of the security situation, the group, believed to be linked to the worldwide terror network of Al Qeada either comes out smoking or throw up another trick.

    You remember a couple of weeks ago they said they were ready for peace talk with the Federal Government which sent Aso Rock into wild jubilation, only for them to strike few days later at the home of Major General Muhammed Shuwa (retd) in Maiduguri, Borno State, snuffing the life out of the civil war hero.

    Their offer of peace talk, blindly embraced by the Federal Government has been neither here nor there since the announcement was made. The man they nominated to be their negotiator-in-chief, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd), a former military Head of State as you know, has declined the nomination. Saudi Arabia, their chosen venue for the peace parley has not said anything about the proposed peace talk, suggesting that the Arab country probably doesn’t know anything about it.

    With the government’s optimism and initial embrace of the offer of peace talk by Boko Haram driven, from my own view, by naivety, President Goodluck Jonathan has now come out to say that no talk is on-going with the terrorists who he says are faceless. Informed sources within his government were reported to have said that the Federal Government was not sure of the position of Saudi Arabia on the issue.

    So we are back to status quo ante.

    Having said so much about Boko Haram and the latest offer of peace talk, it would have been ideal to move to other issues but then as stated above, as long as lice are still in the hair…

    Listening to a former governor of Yobe State and now a Senator representing Yobe East Senatorial District in the National Assembly, Alhaji Bukar Abba Ibrahim, one is left with no option than to revisit the issue of Boko Haram.

    Speaking on the floor of the Senate penultimate week while contributing to debate on a motion on the state of insecurity and banditry in Maru village in Zamfara State, Senator Ibrahim gave a robust defence of Boko Haram and explained why the terrorists took up arms against the Nigerian state.

    Hear him: “Boko Haram is just like any religious sect; it has existed for ages. It is not a new phenomenon altogether, but it is the activities of security agencies, particularly the police, that pushed the Boko Haram people to the wall by killing their leaders; killing thousands of other innocent people. That is what forced them to come out against the Nigerian state”.

    Further blaming security agencies for causing Boko Haram insurgency, Ibrahim said; “they are killing people; many people, day in, day out. If one army officer is killed in an area, they will come and cordon off the whole place and kill people they can get hold of and then burn all property in that area. What has property got to do with people killing security agents on the road? If a security agent was killed on patrol, they will come and burn the whole area”.

    While calling on the head of the various security agencies including the National Security Adviser to look into the activities of their agents regarding the Boko Haram issue, Senator Ibrahim surprisingly couldn’t find any harsh word to say on the terrorists.

    I’ve heard his kind of argument before especially from people around the North east where the insurgency is at its fiercest. While one could understand where they were coming from, it is hard to accept their explanation.

    Recall that a group that calls itself Borno Elders and Leaders of Thought had equally blamed the security agencies for driving Boko Haram into terrorism. In fact they called for the withdrawal of the troops.

    If one could excuse the ordinary person in the Borno/Yobe axis and the self-serving Leaders of Thought having this kind of mentality, how do you explain it when a two term governor of one of the most affected States who is now a serving Senator of the Federal Republic is giving this kind of justification for terror. This is bad and spells danger for Nigeria if such a highly placed personality, a supposedly distinguish public officer is saying this, and inside the hallowed chambers of our National assembly for that matter.

    His explanation suggests that he knows Boko Haram or has a fair idea of who the people are. While it looks far fetch to say that he probably has a link to them, the defence of the organization that he gave on the floor of the Senate could only have been made by someone with inner or insider knowledge of Boko Haram.

    Can you recall that President Jonathan once said there are Boko Haram elements/sympathizers in all the three arms of government, including the legislature? Is the distinguish senator representing Yobe east one of those the president was talking about? I am not accusing this gentleman of anything but his comments coming on the heels of his nomination by Boko Haram as one of their negotiators in the proposed peace talk with the Federal Government speak volume about what he knows about these terrorists and on whose side he is.

    While neither holding forte for the security agencies or condoning their excesses no individual or group has the right to bear arms against the state except may be in a situation of war. So, if Boko Haram declared war on Nigeria because they were wronged by agents of the Nigerian State, what should we expect? And if the people continue to harbour Boko Haram because they felt they were unjustly/unfairly treated by agents of government, shouldn’t such a people expect to share from the punishment being meted out to the terrorists? And if the reason Boko Haram took up arms against Nigeria was because of the harsh treatment they received in the hands of agents of Nigeria, why then were they bombing churches, killing Christians and some other innocent Nigerians under the guise of fighting the federal Government? Were these innocent souls also agents of government?

    If anybody had been worried as to how and why a faceless terrorist group like Boko Haram chose Senator Ibrahim and co to negotiate peace with government on their behalf, that person should worry no more. Now we know that these guys are not spirits, they have a face. Now we know who they are and why they are killing us. But who will save us from this terror? These same security agents accused of causing it? I agree that our boys have not behaved very well in this fight against terror, innocent souls have been killed and the authorities need to do something urgently about this. Anyone found guilty among them should be punished. Mr. President are you listening?

  • Now that Buhari says NO

    Now that Buhari says NO

    Major General Muhammadu Buhari, retired soldier, politician and one time Head of State and Commander-In-Chief of the Nigerian Armed Forces is a man only a few can claim to know. The gangling Fulani man from Daura in Katsina State, northwest Nigeria is an enigma that is very difficult to unravel.

    As a soldier he remained committed to the ideals of his profession and stuck to the best in military tradition. When he became a soldier/politician as Head of State, he, together with his second in command, late Major General Babatunde Idiagbon brought that steely quality of a good soldier combined with unquestionable discipline to bear on our daily lives and living as a people.

    Not many Nigerians liked this then, but after living through the Babangida years of anything goes and the steady decline in our values as a people and a nation, not a few today would relish a dose of the Buhari/Idiagbon even if just a little, in order to bring sanity into our national lives. Such is the level that we have declined and things have degenerated that we would not even mind some “high handedness” of that era now.

    This, probably was what some new day politicians who believe in cleansing Nigeria of the evil of corruption, maladministration, nepotism et al, all rolled into bad governance thought they saw in the retired General when they dragged him into partisan politics at the outset of this democratic dispensation. But each time he stepped forward to lead, he was given a resounding rejection by the electorate, or rather, rejected by the electorate acting under the manipulation of the ruling class. This is debatable you know?

    These “qualities” were also probably what the terrorist organisation, Boko Haram saw in Buhari when they appointed him their negotiator-in-chief in their offer of dialogue with the Federal Government to end the mindless and evil terror they have been unleashing on the good people of northeastern and to some extent, northwestern Nigeria for some time now.

    Lest I am accused of eulogising Buhari, no. Neither am I interested in bringing him down, far from it. All I’ve tried to do is to bring out what we know of Buhari’s past/antecedent to find out why Boko Haram would want him to represent them in a peace meeting with the government.

    If it is the Buhari that we knew, I doubt if there would have been a Boko Haram then and even now if he were to be in charge, not to talk of being asked to represent them. But then you never can tell.

    Before I was struck by malaria last week forcing this column to be off, I was debating the Boko Haram appointment of Buhari as a negotiator and concluded that head or tail the former Head of State would be the loser. If he accepts, his opponents would say “we told you so. The man is a religious fanatic, in fact a terrorist. How come Boko Haram chose him to represent them? He must be one of them or a sympathizer”. And if he says no, the story would change; “ don’t mind him, he is not a patriot at all, he’s only interested in himself. To help Nigeria find solution to this security challenge using his experience both as a former Head of State and retired General he is saying no, just because he wants Jonathan to fail so that the north (Buhari) can retake the presidency in 2015″, etc.

    But considering the pros and cons, I thought Buhari should have accepted the offer but with conditions. Except there is contrary information, we all know that a former Head of State, especially one with Buhari’s kind of character would not support a Boko Haram. Forget about all his inflammatory political rhetorics of the past, he just doesn’t fit in. Yes, he has been carrying his religion/faith on his face but can he really do anything to hurt the other faiths if he gets to power? No. So, he’s just pandering to the Islamic faith just to get the support of the Muslims, which most politicians will do just to get elected?

    Was Jonathan not sold to the South and the Christian elements in the North, in 2011 as ‘one of us,a Christian’ hence we should vote for him? So, if we can conclude that Buhari is not a terrorist or can not be a member of Boko Haram, then why can’t he represent them in negotiating peace with the Federal Government?

    It is on the strength of this argument that I think Buhari ought to have accepted but may be as a mediator. Boko Haram probably chose him because of his integrity and belief that he won’t sell them out. Good if that was their reason. And I don’t think the Federal Government has anything serious against his choice. So it appears the man is his own problem over this matter. Why did I say this? If Boko Haram trusts him to negotiate for them and the government has no serious objection if any at all, why can’t he accept if it will help the nation find a peaceful end to this Boko Haram insurgency, after all he is are suppose to be a statesman and patriot? May be Buhari should ask himself why didn’t Boko Haram nominate Babangida or even Abdulsalami? Did I hear you say integrity?

    Now as a mediator, all he needs to do is to sit down with terrorists to know what they want and also listen to the government’s position. After series of talks and shuttle diplomacy between both sides transmitting each side’s position to the other, he can then bring both sides together at a formal parley, where one expects Boko Haram’s leadership to come out in the open.

    Buhari should not be afraid of the public perception of Boko Haram as murderers and terrorists. The Palestinian Liberation Organisation and it’s leadership, including charismatic Yasser Arafat were once regarded and labelled terrorists, especially by Israel and her allies, but that did not stop them negotiating underground before the now famous Oslo peace deal. The FARC rebels in Columbia are still similarly labelled and have not dropped their guns, yet negotiation is going on between their representatives and the Columbian government at a neutral country. So. If Buhari is really interested in helping Nigeria out of this conundrum he should accept to mediate between the Federal Government and Boko Haram and set up a formal platform for both sides to negotiate peace. After doing the ground work he can withdraw and allow them negotiate their peace. This is more honorable than outright no if he knows it. He should not mind all the noise and side talks, he should just face the task if he truly loves Nigeria. I am not rally bothered or persuaded by his explanation for his no, this is the time for all men and women of goodwill to step forward and pull his back from the precipice. For those abusing Buhari over this matter, time will tell.

    But if the man should remain faithful and stubborn to his no, that should not discourage both the Federal Government and Boko Haram from pursuing that window of opportunity to achieve lasting peace in the north and the country in general. May be both sides could look for and agree on a less controversial but equally credible negotiator to arrange preliminary peace talks at a lower level after which a bigger parley could then be arranged where an agreement could be reached. Friendly but neutral countries could be brought him at this stage to gain the confidence of both sides. At every stage both sides must negotiate in good faith for the main objective of peaceful resolution to be achievable.

    If at the end of the day nothing came out of this offer, Boko Haram in my opinion, have themselves to blame. All this while they have been fighting, bombing indiscriminately and killing innocent souls across the north without letting us know what their political demands are other than a vague reference to Islamization of Nigeria. Can that be a realizable agenda anywhere in the world today, not to talk of Nigeria?

    Struggling to have a political face or voice to speak or represent them shows that they were just interested in killing, destroying or causing mayhem to avenge whatever injustice they must have suffered in the hands of whoever. Even the Talibans have people who speak for them and negotiate on their behalf with the Afghan government and even the Americans. So if Buhari says no, then Boko Haram should bring out their leaders and we’ll negotiate with them. We are tired of this bombings and killings. Let there be peace in the north.

     

  • No sacred cow, please

    No sacred cow, please

    Violence, killings and terrorism are fast becoming the norm in Nigeria today such that the society is no longer shocked each time Boko Haram strikes. As if here is Iraq, Pakistan or Afghanistan, Nigerians are beginning to react with less concern to the unnecessary bloodletting in the country by these terrorists.

    There seems to be a sense of déjà vu each time there is another attack on Christians/churches and other innocent Nigerians in the north by Boko Haram leading to loss of lives and properties. Save for those affected in one way or the other, the rest of us seem to have lost count of the number of terrorist attacks and associated deaths/killings since we were pushed on this path by some forces of darkness and are going about our businesses as usual as if nothing is amiss.

    Hope is a tool Nigerians have been using since the existence of time to tackle their helplessness especially in the face of seemingly overwhelming adversities. Hope of a better tomorrow seems to make them live longer even when that tomorrow may never come. Little wonder then that we have been ranked the happiest people on earth even in the face of one of world’s most excruciating poverty.

    With our security forces seemingly incapable of protecting us against the onslaught of Boko Haram, Nigerians have resorted to hope, prayer and in some cases self help to free themselves from the grasp of these terrorists. But instead of the security situation as regards Boko Haram getting better, we are sinking deeper into this bottomless pit with seemingly no end in sight. Instead of our witch abandoning her witchcraft she kept on giving birth to daughters, so the matter continues.

    But since we are told that God is always behind the patient, the patience and hope of majority of Nigerians in this Boko Haram matter seems to be paying off as it does appear that we are getting closer to unraveling those behind this terror against the rest of us.

    Remember President Goodluck Jonathan alleged some time ago that our judicial, legislative and even the executive arms of government have been infiltrated by either Boko Haram operatives or sympathizers. Though he failed to name names, most of us believed him but were and still disappointed that he’s not been able to bring them to book. That seems to be about to change and the National Assembly has been his first port of call.

    Can you still recall one Senator Alli Ndume representing Borno North senatorial district in the National Assembly? The lawmaker accused some time ago of being in bed with Boko Haram? Yes, the same person who is currently battling prosecution in court to clear his name on this terrorism matter. Well, another Borno senator is being fingered again for allegedly aiding and abetting Boko Haram. His name? Senator Ahmed Khalifa Zanna representing Borno central.

    Both ‘distinguished’ Senators of the Federal Republic of Nigeria have vehemently denied either backing for Boko Haram or support for terrorism. This is not a court of law, so I would rather leave the prosecution to prove its case if any against them and allow the court to judge.

    My concern here is not about their guilt or innocence but the fact that prominent people are being linked to this terror organization confirms my stand that there was no way Boko Haram or any such organization can survive without the support, tacit or full of the leaders and elders of the area concerned. At the risk of abuse and name calling by some elements in the north, especially the northeast axis, I’ve shouted myself hoarse calling for security searchlight to be beamed on the elders, leaders and even traditional rulers of areas where Boko Haram is firmly rooted, Borno and Yobe states in particular.

    The story filtering from Borno and environs shortly after the terrorists began their killings was that former Borno State Governor Senator Alli Modu Sheriff was behind Boko Haram and that he created the group as the militant arm of his campaign organization and indeed his administration, not only to win elections, but also to suppress his opponents. If this was true, he indeed succeeded in his mission as he not only won the elections (not all though) for his All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP) but also ruthlessly dealt with the opposition, especially the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Since all bad intentioned things cannot last forever, we were told SAS, as Sheriff is better known, fell apart with his boys who, with the type of training, ammunition and orientation they have been taken through opted for terrorism instead of a quiet and peaceful reintegration into the society. Welcome to Boko Haram. That was the story we were told.

    Now after years of silence, SAS is fighting back and has pointedly accused the PDP in his State of not only being behind Boko Haram and terrorism in Borno, but also fingered Senator Ahmed Khalifa Zanna as being their godfather. Uhuuuum!

    Following the arrest of an alleged Boko Haram operative recently in a Maiduguri house said to belong to Senator Zanna, by security agents, the lawmaker even though admitting the suspect is a relation denied having anything to do with him and said the house in question does not belong to him but Sheriff. SAS, he said should be held responsible. Uhuuuum.

    This is getting interesting. It appears both have something useful to say or know something useful about Boko Haram that could lead us to the solution to this problem and I think it won’t be a bad idea if both are taken into custody by security agents for thorough investigation. Coming out now and throwing this accusation and counter accusation could mean that the heat was getting closer to them and they felt it’s better to open the Pandora box now than keep quiet and suffer alone.

    When JTF began its campaign against the terrorists in Borno, a certain group of elders and leaders of thoughts accused the military of high handedness and called for troops’ withdrawal. Why? May be not unconnected to their desire and determination to protect their personal interests as events have now proven. Do we still need any further evidence to convince us that these so called elders and leaders are part of the problem?

    There are so many of them out there masquerading as leaders and elders, hobnobbing with government in the day but having dinner with Boko Haram at night. Security agents should painstakingly make effort in seeking them, taking them and using them to get to the root of Boko Haram and stamp out terrorism in our land. Nobody involved should be spared, no sacred cow, but at the same time, no innocent soul should be punished.

  • History! What history?

    History is often written by victors but losers could also have their own version, but then who listens to them. Wrong? I doubt if there is or there will ever be a universal agreement of the account of a particular event especially where there were winners and losers or merely a truce (no victor no vanquished) as in the case of a war or ordinary (armed) conflict.

    History is more complicated where there was no clear cut winner as in the case of a war or where a truce was imposed by a superior but interested power. The warring but subdued parties tend to maintain their different positions, lie low and wait for the next available opportunity to restate their claim or strike again. And God helps such a society if there are recalcitrant elements who strongly believe in the cause.

    Even where there were clear cut winners but the losers were not vanquished, the tendency is there for the die-hards on the losers’ side to either reject the history as presented by the victors and write their own version or see the majority account from a jaundiced perspective. Whichever side the historian was coming from, I am of the strong view that when history is written by a participant observer or an active participant facts are often presented from a subjective point of view. Don’t you think so? But then is it possible to have an unbiased observer present the story of an event as divisive as a war without compromising the truth/facts and fairness/justice?

    I can not claim to know the rules of writing history as I am just a professional journalist, but then even as journalists, we are historians, only that we write history in a hurry. In our everyday reports we write about and document events of the day as they happen in the most objective manner prescribed by the ethics of journalism. In journalism facts are sacred just as objectivity and fairness are paramount. When facts are being presented as in the case of a news story, there is no room for personal opinion and the writer must be fair to all concerned and objective in his/her presentation. Even in interpreting the facts and commenting on the event, the writer has to be objective and fair taking in all the parameters and the circumstances.

    Because whatever we write as journalists form part of the raw materials ‘real’ historians will use in future while reporting and analyzing the events of the present, care is always taken to include all the above stated elements in our everyday reports. I believe no less is expected of an historian, who, with the benefit of hindsight, time and access to other sources apart from media reports should be able to present a more balanced and objective view of history.

    So when renowned Professor of Literature and world acclaimed novelist Professor Chinua Achebe decided to put pen to paper recently and write on his recollections of events as they happened between 1967 and 1970 when Nigeria fought a bitter 30-month civil war to remain one, one would have expected the literary giant to be fair to history, the participants in that unfortunate episode in the life of our country and the future generation of Nigerians by presenting events as they happened not just from his point of view but THE WAY THEY WERE without bias, especially as he was a participant observer (active participant?) in the failed project called Biafra.

    To refresh our memory, Biafra was an attempt by the then South east region of Nigeria to secede from the country following wide spread killings of mainly Igbos and other South easterners in northern Nigeria by some elements in the north in the mid/late 60s, partly in retaliation for the murder of the mainstream political leadership in the north in the first military coup, believed to have been spear headed by military officers of Igbo extraction and which in execution, deliberately or inadvertently spared main stream Igbo political leaders including then Nigeria’s president Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe.

    Following the failure of the Igbos under their charismatic leader late Colonel Odumegwu Ojukwu to break away from Nigeria, Ndigbo, both young and old, dead or alive have been made to believe that the failure of that project was due largely to Yoruba betrayal and in particular Chief Obafemi Awolowo’s refusal to make true his purported promise to Ojukwu that once the south east secedes Yoruba would also pull out western Nigeria. This is not only not true but Ojukwu also admitted before his death that there was no such pact between Awolowo and himself, but some mischief makers among Ndigbo would rather sustain this for whatever reason.

    And as if this anti-Yoruba feeling among Nidigbo was not enough, some of the policies of the then Federal Military Government of General Yakubu Gowon that brought the war to an end and which were unpalatable to Biafra and Ndigbo both during and after the war were blamed on Chief Awolowo who served in that administration as vice chairman, Federal Executive Council and Federal Commissioner for Finance.

    Two of such policies, stopping food delivery to Biafra and currency change/pegging the amount payable to bank depositors from the south east after the war affected Ndigbo badly both during and after the war. Awolowo being at the centre of implementation of the policies had been blamed severally for this setback by Ndigbo leaders then and even now, but we know that the man couldn’t have done it alone, at least not without the knowledge and support of Gowon as Head of State and Commader-In-Chief. But nobody is blaming Gowon.

    And following the furore generated by the implementation of these policies and its adverse effect on his political career/fortune, especially in the run up to the second republic, Awolowo had repeatedly explained his role during the war and the government policies of that time as far as he was concerned both in one of his books as well as in media interviews. His position on this matter as well as other issues are well documented in different forms for any well meaning historian interested in truth, justice and fairness and most importantly in the unity and well being of this country to consult before putting pen to paper to write on such a sensitive topic as the Nigerian civil war.

    Professor Achebe the great writer decided to follow the trend by blaming Chief Awolowo in his new book on the civil war, for the so called starvation policy of the Gowon administration that prevented food aid delivery to Biafra and thus ‘starved’ millions of Ndigbo to death during the war, without looking at the overall picture of the main objective of the Nigerian government then and most importantly Awolowo’s explanation.

    Whether Awolowo was right or wrong is not even my position here, I am worried that as a writer/historian, Achebe had conveniently ignored some facts which he could have access to if he wanted or in fact had access to but chose not to use, to present history the way he wanted it and not necessarily the way it is. This is unfortunate and could end up creating more problems for us as a people and a nation than solve.

    In a country with intense ethnic rivalry, reopening old wounds in the name of history or putting the record straight will do more damage than good. For the children of that period on both sides of the war who are now in their 40s and 50s trying to extend handshakes across the Niger, Achebe’s memoir will make such an effort difficult and if we ( I am in that generation) can’t do it then how do we convince our children to see Nigeria as one and be their brother’s keeper irrespective of where they found themselves.

    If we continue to write this kind of history there would be no end to such and the division and bitterness will continue. There are serious questions that could be asked on both sides, especially Biafra even on this so called starvation policy. It is convenient to blame the other side always for our failure or problem without looking inward first. Why were the initial food convoys to Biafra hijacked and diverted by Ojukwu to feed his soldiers at the expense of the ordinary Biafrans? Why did Ojukwu and in general, Biafra go to war when they were either not ready or prepared for the consequences of failure. The atrocities of Biafra on Nigeria have been documented and nobody is talking about that. Shouldn’t Achebe spare a thought also for those who suffered under Biafra both in Nigeria and even inside Biafra? There are so many whys, ifs and whats that could be asked but they will lead us to no where and they are better forgotten.

    History as I said here last week is good to the extent that it will serve as a useful guide to a better future. If the history will divide or destroy us why remind us? See what history has done and is doing to Israelis and Palestinians and other Arabs in the Middle East. The history of imperialist Japan is still causing trouble with China and the Koreans north and south. So as fathers of our nation Achebe and co should sow seeds of a united and prosperous Nigeria before they leave us. We wish them long live and prosperity. Awolowo is gone, let him rest in perfect peace. Enough of this kind of history.