Tag: 2015

  • Man accused of stealing N80, 000 from bread seller for betting

    The police in Lagos on Tuesday arraigned a 20-year-old man, Prosper Okeke, who allegedly stole N80, 000 from a bread seller and spent all on betting game and lost.

    Okeke, who lives at No 1, Samuel St., Ogudu, is facing a count charge of stealing, but he pleaded not guilty.

    According to the Prosecutor, Insp. Lucky Ihiehie, Okeke stole the money kept under the bed by Mrs Pricilla Kanu, on Feb. 28, at No. 45, Gafari St., Ogudu.

    “The complainant (Kanu) said that the defendant entered her room on Feb. 28 and stole the money which she kept under her bed.

    READ ALSO: 40-year-old admits stealing pepper

    “When she came back from her shop on that day she discovered that the money she kept in her handbag under her bed wasn’t there anymore.

    “She raised alarm, and her daughter told her that Okeke came to their house to see her son.

    “On March 4, she traced Okeke to his workplace and he confessed to have taken the money and used all of it to play a betting game in which he lost,’’ he submitted.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that stealing contravenes Section 287 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015, and is punishable with  three years’ jail term.

    Substantive hearing in the case will start on April 8.

    NAN

  • Why North dumped Jonathan in 2015

    The controversy generated by the new book launched by former President Goodluck Jonathan continued yesterday with more Nigerians berating him over some of his claims in the book.

    The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) last night berated the former president over his claim that many individuals and groups conspired against his re-election in 2015.

    The group described Jonathan as the architect of his failure for refusing to honour the arrangement of his party which zoned the presidential slot to the North.

    Jonathan on Tuesday in Abuja launched the book titled ‘My Transition Hours’ with eminent personalities within and outside the country in attendance.

    The book contains his views on various issues till he left office on May 29, 2015.

    The former president, among other issues, had indicated that corruption is worse under the present government than it was during his tenure and that the Chibok school girls’ abduction was a product of conspiracy by the then opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) in connivance with the Borno State Government.

    He also accused the Borno government and then President Barack Obama’s administration in the United States of undermining the efforts made to rescue the Chibok girls in 2014.

    In a swift reaction, Borno State governor, Kashim Shettima, described the work as an elementary book of fiction which “fell short of the courage required of him to publish findings by his own panel in Chapter Four of his book.”

    Explaining while the North withdrew its support from Jonathan, the ACF National Publicity Secretary, Muhammad Ibrahim Biu, said even though he had not read the book, “it is on record that Jonathan contested the 2011 and 2015 elections against the zoning arrangement of his party, which zoned the presidential slot to the North.

    “Therefore, his assertions that Northern leaders and socio-political groups in the North worked against his presidency is rather odd, considering the circumstances at that time.

    “Yet he won the presidency in 2011 and the ruling party also secured 25 per cent in some states of the North in the 2015 presidential elections.

    ”It may interest you to know that his party has since admitted the oversight in the party’s 2015 winning game plan.

    “This clearly means that leaders should always honour their words with deeds if they want to earn the respect of their followers.”

    In the same vein, former Kaduna State PDP chairman and Northern Elders Forum member, Alhaji Yaro Makama Rigachikun, said two factors were responsible for Northern elites dumping the former president during the 2015 elections.

    Rigachikun, who had defected to the APC prior to the 2015 general elections, disclosed that the first reason the North rose against Jonathan in 2015 was the fact that the former President had taken oath of office twice.

    According to him, “he was sworn in when the late Umaru Yar’Adua died. He was again sworn in in 2011 when he won that year’s presidential election.

    “To the Northern establishment, he was sworn in twice, which was in tandem with the constitution.

    ”So, to allow the former leader to be sworn in for the third time was against the spirit of the constitution, and the Northern establishment would not take that.”

    According to the Northern elder, the second reason was the issue of suspicion and distrust because the Northern establishment believed that the former leader had a hand in Boko Haram.

    “However, event later proved that the former leader was not behind the insurgency. As a former member of APC, we came to realise that Jonathan’s hand was never in Boko Haram.”

    The National Chairman of the United Progressive Party (UPP), Chief Chekwas Okorie, flayed the ex-president for saying that corruption is worse under the present regime than it was under his administration.

    In a telephone chat with The Nation, Okorie said: “I heard him say that corruption is worse now than when he was in office. Many of us don’t think so.

    “We know that millions of dollars were recovered from some of the people that served under him in raw cash.

    “He even boasted that 200 aircraft were flying about in Nigeria. Where are those aircrafts now?

    “Those people just ran away, knowing that they can’t account for those aircraft.

    “He should know better what the foreign reserve was when he left office and what it is now.

    “He has written his book based on his own perspective, according to his own experience and interpretation of things that happened around him as the president of Nigeria towards the end of his tenure.

    “People are free to criticize the book. If somebody feels so strongly about it, he can write his own too to enrich our literature and knowledge.

    “It is for discerning mind to know which one is the truth and the one that is a lie.”

    While calling for caution over the matter, the President of Ohanaeze Youth Council (OYC), Okechukwu Isiguzoro, aligned with the former president’s claim that some PDP governors worked against his re-election.

    “Former President Goodluck Jonathan is the one wearing the shoe and he knows where it pinches.

    “There is no lie in his claim that some PDP governors worked against his re-election. We are all living witnesses to what happened in the build up to that election.

    “We saw how many governors and trusted allies of former Goodluck Jonathan betrayed him.

    “We saw how people came up with all manner of propaganda to smear the image of GEJ.

    “I personally believe in GEJ because he has proved to be a man of candour in all he does.

    “He has moved from being a national hero to becoming an internationally respected figure. No amount of mudslinging can bring him down.

    “Many of the reactions to the publication are mere afterthoughts.

    “Be that as it may, I will urge everybody to put the past behind.

    “Let us focus on the future by working together to tackle the humungous problems facing us as a people and as a nation.

    “The brickbats over what happened before and post 2015 is needless, especially at this time that we are approaching the 2019 general elections.”

  • 2015: Jonathan conceded defeat without our knowledge, says Abubakar’s panel

    THE Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar-led National Peace Committee has narrated how it stopped the former President Goodluck Jonathan from arresting and prosecuting Muhammadu Buhari and other All Progressives Congress (APC) leaders before the 2015 general elections.

    It said it did not influence the former President Goodluck Jonathan to concede defeat to the APC candidate.

    The committee claimed that the former president acted without its knowledge.

    The revelation was contained in the report the committee unveiled in Abuja yesterday – three years after the 2015 general election.

    The committee reactivated its work yesterday, meeting with Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, heads of security agencies and representatives of the registered political parties.

    The 2015 report said the former president cited national interest for not going further with the plan to arrest and prosecute key members of the then opposition APC, including Buhari and ex-Vice President Atiku Abubakar, for allegedly committing treason against the Nigerian state.

    According to the report, tagged: “2015 General Elections: The Untold Story”, published by The Kukah Centre, the National Peace Committee said it didn’t convince Jonathan to concede defeat to Buhari, contrary to popular media reports.

    The committee said its primary concern “has always been how to get the defeated candidates to accept the outcome of the election by conceding promptly and unequivocally ” so that the winner would naturally have a much easier task to be magnanimous in victory.

    It added that its members in the evening of March 31 requested an audience with Jonathan at the Villa.

    The report said: “As it awaited confirmation for the meeting with the president, the committee chairman, General Abubakar, also put a call through to General Buhari, who informed him that President Jonathan had only minutes earlier called to concede the elections.

    “He particularly asked the committee to please convey his good wishes to President Jonathan for his great act of statesmanship.

    “Shortly after that, members of the committee, who were greatly relieved, headed to the Villa where they met privately with President Jonathan and thanked him for his great courage.

    “At this point, the Buhari Campaign team were yet to address the press on the historic development and as such, many Nigerians got the news of the concession from General Abubakar’s brief media scrum with State House Correspondents, which perhaps helps create the wrong, but widespread impression that the committee sat with President Jonathan at the Villa as the results came in and had directly prevailed on him to concede.”

    The report stated that Jonathan, in a meeting with the committee cited “national interest” as reason he stopped his earlier decision to press home with treasonable charges against the then APC presidential candidate and other leaders, over threats to form a parallel government, if they didn’t win the election.

    According to the 51-page document, Jonathan jettisoned the plan “in the interest of peace and national stability”.

    Part of page 13 of the report reads: “A meeting with Jonathan was held at the Aso Rock Villa in the afternoon of Wednesday, March 25, 2015. At the meeting, he (Jonathan) raised some issues concerning the state of the nation, the threat of violence by the opposition (APC ) based on allegations that he (Jonathan) and his party were planning to rig the elections.

    “He (Jonathan) noted that he took very seriously the threat by leading members of the opposition to form a parallel government in the event that they didn’t win the elections, but that he chose not to react to such apparent treasonable acts in the interest of peace.”

    The report also detailed series of meetings held with leaders of the two major political parties in 2015, especially with APC and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

    The committee, which came into existence before the 2015 general elections, was resuscitated as a result of heated political environment.

    Speaking after its meeting yesterday, Abubakar said politics must be played without bitterness.

    The former head of state, who briefed reporters in the company of Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe (rtd), Father Mathew Kukah and other members of the committee, stressed the importance of peace in the nation’s economic growth.

    He appealed to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the security agencies involved in the electoral process to play their roles accordingly.

    Abubakar also urged politicians to play the game according to the rules.

     

  • Nigeria’s airports record 2.3% increase in domestic passengers – NBS

    The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) has disclosed that Nigeria’s airports recorded an increase of 2.3 per cent in domestic passengers in 2015 and 2016.

    The NBS made this figure known in its Fourth Quarter 2016 and Full Year 2016 Air Transportation Data released in Abuja.

    The report, however, stated that the first and second halves of the year differed substantially.

    It stated that it differed substantially whereas year-on-year growth in domestic passenger, numbers of 9.7 per cent and 10.3 per cent were recorded in the first two quarters respectively.

    “Declines of 1.3 per cent and 8.2 per cent were recorded in the third and fourth quarters respectively.

    “The declines were due to their size, most of this decline was accounted for by Abuja, Lagos and Port Harcourt, and in both quarters, Abuja accounted for the largest fall.

    “Murtala Muhammed Airport (MMA) in Lagos remained the busiest domestic airport in the third and final quarters of 2016.

    “This airport accounted for 891,770 passengers in the third quarter and 909,851 passengers in the final quarter, which represented 33.3 per cent and 34.5 per cent respectively.’’

    According to the report, the share of domestic passengers accounted for by MMA remained broadly stable throughout 2016.

    “It remained stable in the year with the highest share recorded in the first quarter of 34.6 per cent, and the lowest recorded in the third quarter.

    “As with the overall number of domestic passengers, the number to travel though MMA declined relative to the corresponding values in 2015.

    “In the third quarter, MMA airport recorded a year-on-year decline of 7.3 per cent, compared to an overall decline in domestic passenger numbers of 1.3 per cent (when comparing same set of airports.

    “In the fourth, this fell slightly to a decline of 7.5 per cent, although this was a smaller contraction than in the overall fall of 8.2per cent.’’

    Similarly, it stated that the share of passengers accounted for by Abuja Airport, the second busiest airport in 2016, remained between 30 per cent and 31 per cent in each quarter of 2016.

    According to the report, the third and fourth quarters, there were 822,702 and 810,410 domestic passengers to travel through Abuja respectively.

    “In each quarter this was equivalent to 30.7 per cent of the total number, which is higher than the shares in the first and second quarter of 30.4 per cent and 30.2 per cent.

    “Abuja was the airport to record the largest year on year reduction in domestic passengers in absolute terms in each of the third and fourth quarters.’’

    In the third quarter of 2016, the report stated noted that there were 81,270 less domestic passengers to travel through than in the same quarter of 2015, a reduction of 9.0 per cent.

    It stated that in the fourth quarter, the year on year drop fell to 110,005, equivalent to a 12.0 per cent fall.

    “The third busiest domestic airport in 2016 was Port Harcourt, although the number of passengers fell throughout the year.

    Meanwhile, under the domestic aircraft movement, the report stated the shares of domestic flights accounted for by each airport were similar to the shares of passengers accounted for by each airport, as would be expected.

    However, it stated that aircraft departing from and flying to larger airports carried more people. Therefore, the share of aircraft accounted for airports such as Lagos and Abuja was smaller than their share of passengers.

    “During 2016, Lagos airport accounted for 34.2 per cent of domestic passengers, but only 27.5 per cent of domestic aircraft.

    “This is due to the average number of passengers on aircraft to and from Lagos being 61.1 per cent, more than 10 passengers higher than average.

    “Similarly, Abuja accounted for 30.5 per cent of passengers, accounting for 24.4 per cent of aircraft.’’

    In the third quarter of 2016, the report stated that Lagos recorded a fall in the number of aircraft.

    “It recorded a fall in aircraft relative to the second quarter, of 13.8 per cent, to reach 14,097, before rebounding in the final quarter, growing by 9.9 per cent to reach 15,491.

    Consequently, the report stated that its share fell to 26.5 per cent in the third quarter from 27.8 per cent in the second, before rebounding to 28.4 per cent in the final quarter.

    “Abuja also recorded a decline in domestic aircraft movement in the third quarter; 12,593 aircraft moved through Abuja’s domestic airport compared to 13,682 in the second quarter, a drop of 9.2 per cent.

    “However, growth in the amount of domestic aircraft movement in the final quarter was smaller than for Lagos, at 1.4 per cent, resulting in 12,764 domestic aircraft to leave and arrive in Abuja in the final quarter,’’ the report  stated.

     

  • Why PDP failed in 2015, by Ekwueme

    Why PDP failed in 2015, by Ekwueme

    Former Vice President Alex Ekwueme yesterday hinged the failure of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2015 presidential election on lack of internal democracy.

    Ekwueme, who spoke when he received members of the PDP Strategy Review Committee, who visited him to present a copy of their final report, identified impunity and imposition as some of the causes of the party’s downfall.

    He advised committee to reconcile aggrieved PDP members, especially those who left for other parties.

    He regretted that the vision on which the party was founded suddenly disappeared.

    “With that vision, the party was able to control 28 out of the 36 states of the federation,” the former vice president said.

    He promised the delegation that he would make a statement after studying the  report.

    The leader of the delegation, Ambassador Aminu Wali, agreed there were cases of impunity that made PDP to lose the election to the All Progressive Congress (APC).

    He added that his committee will review aspects of the party to determine areas where changes needed to be made.

    Aminu, who addressed reporters at the end of the committee’s meeting with the former vice president, wasoptimistic that the PDP would re-brand to go back to the visions of its founding fathers.

    He said the party belongs to all Nigerians.

    Aminu insisted that the PDP was already a mega party, whose presence was noticeable in every ward and village in Nigeria.

    A member of the delegation and founder of DAAR Communications, High Chief Raymond Dokpesi, said PDP was meant for everybody.

    He apologised to Nigerians on the areas in which they failed to meet their expectations, declaring that PDP was now a born again party poised to win the 2019 general election.

    Dokpesi insisted there “is no faction in PDP. What we have are a few dissidents”.

    He noted that the senators, governors “are with the caretaker committee-led by Ahmed Makarfi”.

    The delegation included former Minister of Foreign Affairs Dubem Onyia and former Aviation Minister Fidelia Njeze.

  • Minister: military recorded highest casualty in 2015, 2016

    Minister: military recorded highest casualty in 2015, 2016

    The Minister of Defence, Brig.-Gen. Mansur Dan-Ali (rtd) yesterday said the military recorded the highest casualty in the fight against Boko Haram insurgency and Niger Delta militancy in the last two years.
    He said the development led to an increase in the life insurance claims paid to the deceased’s families.
    Gen. Dan-Ali spoke in Abuja while presenting cheques to families of soldiers who died fighting insurgency.
    According to him, the insurance claims of the deceased were presented to their families in fulfillment of the objectives of the Federal Government to see to the welfare of soldiers who died in active service.
    The minister, who handed cheques to four of the 218 next-of-kins, did not disclose the amount being paid. He, however, reiterated that his ministry will ensure that the families are well cared for.
    He said: “The life insurance claims paid over-the-counter years have grown tremendously as a result of heightened activities of the insurgents in the Northeast and continued militancy in the Niger Delta, especially during the 2015 to 2016 scheme period.
    “However, it is gratifying to state that with improved security and overwhelming success in the fight against insurgency, we are hopeful we will record fewer casualties in the years to come.”
    Gen. Dan-Ali maintained that officers and men of the military remained steadfast in the execution of their duties – fighting insurgency, militancy, communal clashes and cattle rustling, among others, to ensure the country’s collective security.
    Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Defence Danjuma Sheni said the cheques were for the next-of-kins of “our deceased officers, men and women under the insurance scheme covering 2015 to 2016, covering specifically from March 24, 2015 to March 24, 2016.
    “601 deceased insured officers were prepared but 383 next-of-kins have been fully paid, leaving a balance of 218 deceased officers,” he said.
    “I appeal for your continued patience and understanding. The ministry will continue to ensure transparency and due process in the disbursement of funds given to it,” Sheni added.

  • Housewife jailed for cutting houseboy with razor blade

    ….As another is jailed for purchasing a baby

    Mrs. Onyekachi Okafor has been sentenced to a nine month imprisonment by  a Federal Capital Territory High Court sitting in Kubwa, for inflicting razor cut on her ward.

    It is the first conviction under the Violence against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015.

    Mrs. Okafor who was arrested by officials of NAPTIP in September 2015 had used a sharp razor blade to cut the victim on various parts of his body including his abdomen, left buttocks and thigh.

    In a statement issued by Mr. Vincent Adekoye, Press and Public Relations (NAPTIP) Mrs Okafor action violated aspects of the Act.

    Mrs. Okafor who resides at Dape, along Karmo Road of Abuja was dragged to the FCT High Court by the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) on behalf of the Federal Government for willfully inflicting physical injury on a 10 year old boy (names withheld).

    The boy who served her and her family as a house help received severe razor blade cuttings from Mrs. Okafor, an act which is in violation of and punishable under section 2 of the Violence against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015.

    Section 2 subsection 1 of the VAPP Act says,’’ A person who willfully causes or inflicts physical injury on another person by means of any weapon, substance or object, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years or a fine not exceeding N100,000.00 or both.”

    When the case came up on Monday, 4th July 2016, Mrs Okafor who was arraigned on a one count charge pleaded guilty of the offence. The presiding Judge, Justice N. Ogbonna therefore, found her guilty and sentenced her to 9 months imprisonment without an option of fine. No compensation was however, awarded to the victim.

    It would be recalled that the former President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan signed the Violence against Person (Prohibition) (VAPP) Act 2015 on 23rd May, 2015. NAPTIP was made the implementing Agency for the new Act.

    The Act which applies only in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, prohibits all forms of violence against persons in private and public life and provides maximum protection and effective remedies for victims and punishment of offenders.

    in a related development, a Federal High Court sitting in Port Harcourt, River State presided over by Justice A. Liman has sentenced Mrs. Mavis Solomon to two years imprisonment for purchasing a ten months old baby.

    She pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.

    Mrs. Solomon was charged by NAPTIP to Court for purchasing a 10 Months old baby at the cost of N200, 000 from 2 others who are also under prosecution. The offence is contrary to Section 21 of the Trafficking in Persons (Prohibition) Enforcement and Administration Act, 2015.

  • Lagos House takes up councils over 2015, 2016 budgets

    As part of its efforts to ensure good governance and accountability at the grassroots, three standing committees of Lagos State House of Assembly are currently holding talks with officials of the 57 local councils in the state on the performance of 2015 Budget and their proposals for the 2016 Budget, reports Oziegbe Okoeki

    IN its quest to ensure a proper and seamless budget process in Lagos State, three standing committees of the Lagos State House of Assembly: committees on budget and economic planning, local government administration and public account (local), led by its joint chairman, Hon. Rotimi Olowo, have been holding interface and discussion sessions on 2015 and 2016 budgets with officials of the 57 local councils in the state at the Assembly complex.

    While shedding light on the ongoing interface with local government officials over the budget performance for 2015 and 2016 budget proposals, Olowo said it became inevitable in order to engender good governance, probity and accountability.

    Speaking on the basis of the meetings, Olowo said: “There is no way you can talk about budget for 2016 without talking about 2015 performance, because 2016 is predicated on 2015 performance. We look at what they have done vis-à-vis what is coming in from the Federation Account and from tax. And we look at their performance vis-à-vis what is the ratio of capital to overhead to give us an insight on whether they have actually added value to their respective local governments.”

    Besides, he said, the peculiarities and the challenges Nigeria is facing today, has also made it very compelling for state governments to be ingenious in the way and manner they disburse funds.

    “We are trying to look at what is the real income coming from statutory allocation and what proportion of that must be spent on capital expenditure because all these while, we appreciate that more money is going to the recurrent to the detriment of capital expenditure. And more so, that they are trying to be on the same page with the state government by adopting MTBF -Medium Term Budget Framework.

    “So, what we are trying to do from our end is that, okay, ab initio, what is the total liability standing against the account of the local government, be it recurrent or capital expenditure? And what proportion of that is budgeted for, because over time, we’ve come to appreciate the fact that the outstanding debt is so huge that they don’t pay and they will embark on new projects. That will only tell you that many projects will become moribund. But if certain proportion, let’s say between 20 and 25 per cent of their revenue after they must have taken off personnel cost, is earmarked to service outstanding debt, that means in two-three years, they will be able to pay all outstanding debts and then all those projects would have been completed as against those that have been abandoned over the years. That is tantamount to waste. Jobs given in 2000-2001 and nobody is paying for it, obviously the contractor will be away and when that project is not completed, that means initial payment made becomes waste. So, those are the things we are guiding against.”

    In his assessment of the 2015 budget performance, the lawmaker said the only funding was the major constrain.

    “You know personnel cost, Lagos State has said it that we don’t want to lay off staff, and we don’t want to rationalise. The bulk of the staff in local government, many of them are redundant, doing nothing. But then when you face the reality of the moment, you know you cannot do otherwise than to accommodate them. But you know that has implication on the revenue of the local government, so by and large they’ve not been able to do great job because of paucity of funds. But what we are looking at is that we want to make overtures to state government at ensuring that whatever is due to them is paid timely, so that they can use it for capital expenditure and we are going to tie all grant to purely capital expenditure, no grant should be used to pay overhead or pay personnel.

    Explaining in details the process of monitoring execution or implementation, he said “there is a committee we call local government administration, it sees to the day-to-day oversight of the local governments, then the public account (local) will use local government Auditor-Generals’ report, if there are any queries, based on that they will be called to the House and they will use that to admonish them and if need be punish them according to the extant law.

    The lawmaker who acknowledged that Lagosians expect so much from the government and the councils, was however quick to add that the Ambode-led government is doing his bits.

    “The intervention of the state is not going to be limited to construction of roads. Maybe at intervals any money accruing to the state in support of local government he will come up with that.”

    On what the joint committee is doing on the issue of Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), Olowu said, “without revenue, budget cannot perform and IGR is an integral part of that. We have told the local governments that their IGR must be on upward swing. We told many of them to go back and give us a workable IGR projection that will make them to work; because leakages have to be blocked; there must be accountability and we must have proof and be able to track the budget for assessment and evaluation,” he said.

  • Do I see what I see?

    Do I see what I see?

    The prudent cultivates wisdom but the fool dons folly for a crown.

    Year 2015 is gone and irretrievable. It can only be remembered, revered or regretted, but never relived. What we did or failed to do stays where and as it is. Action lies in the future. The past may guide but never again can it serve as the canvas upon which we paint our lives.

    We invest a deep importance to the end/ beginning of a year that defies ethics andempirical evidence. Across the great sweep of history, these annual exit and entry dates loom no more important than any other moment. They are not weighted by the crush of great events more than another point on the calendar. Yet, weinject them with a mystical quality as if the portal from one year to the next has an inherently different impact on the course of human affairs than the portal from any day to the one that next follows it. The dynamics of physics and astronomy are turned into a rush of heightened religious expression. The remnants of paganism still drag behind us. In some ways, we have not graduated from Stonehenge and those ancient monuments deifying that which moves about in the firmament.

    As the year ends, prophets become flush with prophesies and preachers declare the coming year will be the year of this or that marvelous happening.  The lay crowd is counselled to take stock of their ways and to pledge to correct that which is bad or in disrepairregarding their personalities. None of this is inherently bad but all of it is terribly incomplete.

    If one waits until year’s end to perform these rites, then one has waited too long. Unless these exertions are persistent throughout the year, delaying until one instance infused with a dramatic but artificial climax will prove an inadequate device. To strenuously examine your moral compass once yearly is to subject it to erroneous disuse. By the time you view it, you may be so severely misplaced that the assessment may no longer be of any curative utility; at that point, it may only serve as a crying towel to weep regret for adhering too firmly to a path too incorrect to follow.

    The passage of a year is merely the track of the earth’s revolution around a sun which itself is slave to movement through the universe. It is a physical event. The correlation between the movement of these orbs and the interactions of social man is tenuous. It has no more bearing on the quality of our social relations, how man treats his fellow man, than if we elect to measure time by how long it takes a tethered goat to walk backwards around a pole.We waste the better part of a year waiting until the end of the year to be our better selves.

    Though no more imbued withmoral significance than any other moment, I admit the end of the year is a good time to take stock. It is consensus and convenient accounting measure, but one not to be infused with any greater cosmic or spiritual elevation than we would give the annual financial audit of a business firm. It is the action and quality of the auditing itself not the timing of it that is of import. Here, we must gauge whether, on the winepress of human strivings, we have advanced, fallen by the wayside or remained in place.

    Globally, 2015 was a year of regression. The world became a more dangerous habitation as the West angled closer to direct confrontation with Russia over Syria-ISIL. America and its European and Asian allies nearedthe completion of comprehensive treaties creating economic blocs that seek to isolate Russia and China. Establishment of these intimidating blocs and the transfer of traditional aspects of sovereignty from the state to the private sector the enabling treaties portend will likelyburden African efforts to industrialize. Meanwhile, Africa sits poorer due to falling commodity prices.

    Geopolitics and skewed economics conspire against all but a small portion of mankind. With few exceptions in 2015, the machinations of power and might suppressed the entreaties of justice and compassion.

    The exceptional occurred in Nigeria.Despite the bitter gruel of venal governance they had been fed down the years, Nigerian people clung to their faith that life can improve; they voted in a new government. For this reason, the Nigerian voter is my person of the year.This new government must now perform under conditions of steep adversity. There are signs of promise as well as concern as this government takes shape. It must not faint but it must not bluster.

    Governance is a most human endeavor. There is no infallibility in it. The lone act a man perfectly consummates is but death. All else is a fluid admixture of success and setback. The best thing this government can do is work to better the lot of the people. The second best thing is to recognize that it is imperfect; some of the programs it tries will not go as intended. That is no disgrace nor a sign of godly disfavor. The people have for a long time withstood the onslaught of bad government purposefully trying to wrong them. They can well stomach the errors of a government that sincerely intends their wellbeing.

    Government should not cover its missteps or stubbornly adhere toa failing course. If something does not work, jettison it.Create another program. Wed not itself to preconceptions but to desired results. The best policy is empirical success not political excuse. Unlike other governments, do not attempt to defend something that is manifestly wrong or indefensible.

    Do not try to distort reality to fit with your program. Make your program fit reality. This is how an organic connection between government and the people is created. Given the resilience of the Nigerian people, there is nothing that government can explain that the people will not accept. The people will stick with government as long as government is square with them.

    As such, the Nigerian change of government provides potential solace. The rest of the year’s landscape is rather dismal terrain. A partial reason for this sorrowful state is the bankruptcy of moral leadership in most nations. The clergy worldwide has abetted and not fought this decline. With the visible exception of the Pope, most Christian leaders have chained themselves to the ways and thoughts of the establishment as if in voluntary servitude.

    The behavior of Nigeria’s Christian leadership during the election is of record. Many embarrassed themselves, revealing themselves more as vessels of prejudice than piety. Others became outright mercenary, their behavior the stuff against which all ethical proverbs and aphorisms give stark counsel. As many clerics here accepted the illicit coin, their frocked brethren throughout the world fared no better. Most clerics sheepishly tracked behind the Western establishment on two vital issues – economic policy and foreign affairs – issues that will determine the destiny of billions of people.

    All claim to emulate Jesus. If so, I must be reading the wrong bible. The Jesus of my Bible did not march in lockstep with the masters of the city. When he entered Jerusalem for the last time, he did the unthinkable. He openly challenged their avarice. He entered the temple, upending the tables of the moneychangers and chasing thecorrupt from his Father’s house. The priests and the moneymen had turned the holy place into a waystation of usury and exploitation.

    The temple had been turned into Wall Street. Jesus more than occupied it; he turned the Street on its very head. That the moneychangers plied their trade in the temple compounded their infraction. Their commerce was wrong regardless of place. He called them “thieves” not pragmatic businessmen who set up proper shop in an improper place. The economic system they led was unjust.

    That economy is no more unjust than today’s. Man has harnessed the power of nature and knowledge to press forth unprecedented levels of wealth and goods. Yet, the number and percentage of people rendered poor and hungry by the artificial constraints of the economic system -and not by the imperatives of objective lack – is unprecedented.

    The Evangelical community says nothing about this. It does not rail against such injustice. It accepts the merciless capitalist system as somehow ordained from above even though no heavenly voice ever proclaimed such a thing. This clergy beckons to this congregations to enlist in a sort of divine lottery. Accept the system as it is. Just supplicate.More importantly,make sure you pay your obligations to the corporal church and you may be one of the few who are blessed beyond measure.There is no talk of making the world better or striving to inject compassion, mercy and justice into the life of mankind at large. The message is make sure you pay your religious dues and you may get a blessed payday, a divine dividend. Sadly, there is a sense of the casino in all of this.

    No major Pentecostal leader questions the debt-laden nature of our economic and financial structures, although it is this quality that has brought the global economy to serial crises and has impoverished hundreds of million who ought not to be. These leaders have wedded themselves to the system and its inequity. They support it. They love Jesus; yet they bank and banquet with the devil. Thus, they never upend the tables. They just watch intently to assure they get their fair cut. They even pay honor to people of great money and power before the congregation of ordinary men who are made to gawk in awe at the venal display.

    There is no rich man ever embarrassed out of church or publicly rebuked for the stained origins of his trove. Money and power are made blessed regardless of the origin and manner of their accumulation. These clerics assert that they preach the gospel. That might be true. They just don’t live it. Words are sonorous; they also are mostly air.  Deeds and work are the bedrock, the hard evidence, of belief and faith.

    When it comes to casting aside the yoke of poverty from the people, the message these leaders give adds greater burden. They ask people to give more and more in offerings but fail to question why the people earn less and less. The people are cajoled to make more bricks with less straw as if this is the way of Providence instead of that of Pharaoh. These men are today’s Pharisees. So closely glued to the establishment, they cannot see how they have replaced the ways of the gospel with those of greed. The Jesus they claim to follow more closely resembles mammon from this vantage point. Better to hold firm to a boulder cast into the sea than follow these people who delegate one eye on the Bible but plant both eyes on the till.

    The other unfortunate gap is in the area of foreign affairs. Too many Christians took perverse enjoyment denigrating Islam as a religion of violence due to the existence of vile Boko Haram, ISIS and Al Qaeda. Candidates in American presidential primaries even speak of banning Muslims, including American citizens, from entering the country.

    While libeling Islam as a religion of death and violence, these people seem blithely ignorant of the wanton violence done by leaders of nations supposedly guided by Christian principle. Perhaps these clerics should spend less time ridiculing Muslims and more time cleaning the scarlet corridors of their own house.  They would find a rogues gallery camouflaged in the attire of statesmen, prime ministers and presidents.

    Christian George Bush launched a massive war against a sovereign nation that was not a threat to his. He did so based on a lie. Hundreds of thousands perished needlessly. The decade before that, western sanctions against that same nation, Iraq, materially contributed to the premature deaths of over 200,000 children and likely many more. For over a decade, American drone bombs,ordered by born-again Christian presidents,have slain untold numbers of innocent, unarmed people who never lifted a finger against the West. Their deaths have been perfunctorily dismissed as collateral damage or as those of presumptive terrorists simply because they were in physical proximity to suspected terrorists.

    The term collateral damage sounds clinical. It is a euphemism mounted atop a deep brutality. There is nothing clinical about an exploding bomb. The incendiary may be the product of man’s most advanced technology; but the fury unleashed precipitates a carnage of rare dimension. The bomb may be smart; it is also intrinsically savage. Such ordnance pierces bodies and burns internal organs, ripping off limbs and decapitating heads so as to render victims unrecognizable. More often than not, this orgy of fire and force leaves bodies so pulverized that they cannot be segregated from the rubble of buildings and the dust of the earth. Too often loved ones are left to bury a portion of a corpse, a solitary bone, or just the idea of the departed.

    If we were to compute the numbers of innocent people the West has killed in its war against terrorism over the past twenty years, the numbers would exceed a million. At their present rate of carnage, the dreadful terrorists would need several centuries to equal the death toll that America and its league have achieved.

    Yet there is no cry from the main Pentecostal leaders who claim to have severed their ties with denominationthat they may more freely and completely commune with God shorn of the distraction of empty ritual and bias. They may have shunned denomination. But they seemed to have replaced it with another unseemly bias. For them, nationalism and cultural prejudice trump spirituality and objective fairness.

    In the West, those who committed this massive death are garlanded with praise although the sum total of their work has been to inch the world closer to mass disaster. Perhaps the hard-heartedness would be excusable if it resulted in peace and stability. But it has not. Iraq is a hot iron. Libya has combusted into anomie. Syria is a cauldron of misery and Afghanistan slips once more into chaos and fratricide. These are the fruits of their deadly labor. This tree cannot be allowed to further grow lest its blossoms consume us all.

    I know not what to make of all this except that slaughter is now regarded as warfare, depravity as courage and evil as necessity. Imperceptibly, our humanity escapes from us like droplets of precious water evaporating under the midday heat. The problem is not that we are in the desert. The problem is that we have become the desert.

    The truth be told, I hesitated a good moment before writing this piece. My flaws and transgression are manifold. I must ask forgiveness on an hourly basis. I write this not to appear as if I stand atop a moral promontory. To the contrary, we all are in the pit, walking through the valley of the shadow of death.

    This piece is not an indictment but a plea, an entreaty to those who claim moral leadership to exercise that leadership as never before. The world edges closer to mayhem of frightful proportion. Persistent economic crisis is nigh inevitable so long as the system evades reform. War freighted with global repercussions is likely if powerful nations continue their hawkish ways. We need to step back from the abyss. There is no better time for the messengers of God to answer their calling than now. May they speak the truth before it becomes too late. Happy New Year.

     

    08060340825 (sms only)

  • 2015: The  Year of Buhari, kleptocracy, Syria and Donald Trump

    2015: The Year of Buhari, kleptocracy, Syria and Donald Trump

    It  has always been difficult  for me  to pick  a Man of the Year for any year  and 2015 is not an exception. I  base my choice of the Man of the year on the concept adopted  by Time  Magazine several years ago, which is the choice of a man, woman,  events  or institutions  who or  which   have  influenced world affairs  for good or bad  in that   year. At  the height  of the Iran  hostage crisis  in the late 70s  when Ayatollah  Ruhollah Khomeini was the scourge of the West  and called the US- the Great Satan- even that did not stop the Magazine from making him the Man of the Year in consonance with the principle behind the choice. Nowadays Islamic  State and Boko  Haram would be in line for our choice of organisations that have influence world events certainly for evil in 2015 which  would certainly  be correct in very bloody terms but that would be glorifying cruelty, murder and mayhem which the two globally notorious organisations are  known and feared,  all over the world. In  Nigeria alone, Boko  Haram,  an  ally  of  Islamic  State  or IS, has reportedly displaced 15m   people  said  to be the largest of such people in the world. Boko  Haram  has  destroyed 1000 schools   in  Nigeria  in consonance with its notorious name which means No to Western Education, and killed  17000 people in its theatre of war and mayhem. What  should  be publicized and shouted  at the rooftops all over the nation was the announcement this week by President  Buhari himself  that Boko  Haram has been technically defeated and the army has  met the deadline given to it to eliminate Boko  Haram by the end  of the year. That announcement certainly takes the sting out of the pervading bloody nuisance   and menace  of  Boko Haram  during the year and  scuttles   effectively any consideration of that notorious sect  for influencing world or Nigeria affairs for sheer evil in 2015. The announcement  by the President who  as a military man certainly knows what he is saying reduces Boko  Haram  to a paper tiger and one can really say that as it recedes into oblivion from whence it came some time ago, Nigeria can certainly say of 2015 as far as terrorism is  concerned –  all  is well that ends well and  good riddance  to a very bloody  rubbish  indeed.

    Having eliminated Boko  Haram and  ISIS technically and from any consideration of mention with regard to the assignment of choosing those who have influenced world affairs for good or bad in 2015  let  me say my choice  of such people and events.  Serially  the first is our President Muhammadu  Buhari and the way, manner  and mode of his 2015 presidential  election victory as well as the massive size of the nation wide victory.  As  well as  the high expectations  of the electorate on solutions to well known Nigerian nagging problems of lack of electricity, unemployment and massive poverty in the land before  the elections. The  second is  an issue  which unfolded after the 2015 elections which put the new government to budget   for  2016  in a way that acknowledges  that  returned looted funds form part of  expected government revenue  for the first  time in our history.This  is   a fact which established  the practice of kleptocracy in the Jonathan Administration characterized  by  the exposure  by  the president that looted  funds  have  been returned  and  the ongoing   trial of   the  former NSA  for diversion of funds for arms to campaign  and other extraneous matters unrelated to the purchase  of arms to fight the insurgency of Boko  Haram in the vast North  East  of Nigeria.  So  like budget revenue targets for taxation, customs and assets  sale,  our government now expects revenue from funds  looted  by our leaders in  power at one point in time or the other. That  to me is like shoplifting and the return of items later  by  the  shoplifter  which is called  kleptomania  but which in a democracy  like ours is sheer kleptocracy.

    The  third person is the front runner of the Republican  Party in the 2016 US presidential  election, controversial billionaire Donald  Trump who asked  recently  that Muslims be banned from the US because  the issue was one of Security and  not religion  and he  was vilified  by all of us including the US government of the day. Yet  the news this week on CNN was  that some Muslim Families have  been denied entry  to the US  from Europe, in  particular  from Great  Britain. Whether Trump’s call  has influenced  world events  for good  or bad will divide world opinion on that score  for good or bad for some time. Yet there is no denying that Trump  has set the ball rolling on a new way to confront terrorism under what ever guise especially religion. My  contention here is that it does not matter whether Trump wins the GOP presidential nomination in 2016, he  has already  said a lot and stepped on so many big toes and issues such that he in 2015 set the tone and  agenda  for  the presidential  debate  to elect whoever emerges  as the next president of the US in  2016.

    The  fourth choice of mine is a nation and that is Syria  and its refugees  fleeing  war  in their  nation as well as  those fleeing from  Afghanistan and  all  heading for Europe.  At  the last count this week it was announced that a million people crossed to Europe  in 2015 from the Mediterranean and all the treacherous ocean routes that have emerged overnight  for desperate refugees seeking asylum and a new life in Europe.  Syria  has  been brought  to its knees in 2015  and was the place where the Cold War  of  the post World  War 11 between the  former Soviet Union  and the  US resurrected as it were in 2015 leading  to the rise of Islamic  State and now the establishment of a Russian  military base in Syria. This  goes  hand in  hand  with  the insistence of the Russian leader Vladmir  Putin  that the US cannot just wish away Syria’s hated President Bashar Assad because Syria is, one,   a sovereign state and that is the duty of its people,  and secondly that the removal  of Assad may create a void similar to that of the removal  of  Saddam Hussein  in Iraq which, with the help  of hindsight, destabilized the entire Middle  East even though it brought democracy  to  Iraq.

    In  effect then these are my choices of people  and  events  who  and which   have influenced  world events  effectively  in 2015. In  Nigeria  the election of President Muhammadu  Buhari brought an aura of respectability to the office of president which decayed with the campaign utterances of his predecessor and his infamous slang that stealing is not corruption. The  vote for change  in  the 2015 presidential elections was one for change of president and an endorsement of Buhari’s well known toga of integrity and passion to defend the Nigerian state against  corruption which  his predecessor rationalized at  enormous cost to his re election bid.

    Unfortunately  however looting may  have become institutionalized in our political and  economic system the way returned looted funds are being put in the budget as expected state revenue. Something is  really fishy about that. This is because once looters know that one way or the other their loot can be returned later through plea bargaining or some bizarre arm twisting after the   fraudulent act, there  is no deterrence on looting and no disincentive to steal public funds. This week  the news was that 350bn of such returned funds are being expected as government revenue in the 2016 federal budget. This needs clarification because democracy is always about the rule of law, transparency and accountability. There are  many things foggy  and tricky in  an arrangement  that gives a crook some breathing space once the stolen item is returned.  Its  like the saying in R L Stevenson’s famous book Kidnapped which says – play me foul and  I play  you tricky.  Either way  something is not right about that in any democracy including ours. Once  again long live the Federal  Republic  of Nigeria.