Tag: 2019 ELECTIONS

  • ‘2019 elections: The world is watching Nigeria’

    Former House of Representatives member,  Opeyemi Bamidele, has urged all stakeholders in the electoral process to ensure a successful 2019 general election. Bamidele, who is the All Progressives Congress (APC) senatorial candidate in Ekiti Central said all eyes are on Nigeria as the whole world is interested in the outcome of next year’s general elections.

    He urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct the elections in a way that would impress Nigerians and not the ones that would massage the egos of few politicians. According to him, politicians, especially those belonging to the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), must avoid actions that could truncate the country’s democracy in the polls.

    The former federal lawmaker spoke on Friday at the funeral of his late father, Pa Stephen Ogunjuyigbe Bamidele, held at Babamuboni Memorial Anglican Church in his native Iyin-Ekiti, Irepodun/Ifelodun Local Government area of Ekiti State. The burial was attended by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, APC National Leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu represented by former minister, Mr. Ademola Seriki and Ondo State Governor Rotimi Akeredolu. Ekiti State Governor Kayode Fayemi and his wife, Erelu Bisi, former APC Interim Chairman, Chief Bisi Akande, APC Deputy National Chairman (South), Otunba Adeniyi Adebayo, among others, who also graced the event. Bamidele said it would be a great disservice to over 180 million Nigerians for a few politicians to destabilize a process that was targeted at turning around the lives of Nigerians, in a bid to protect their interests.

    He saluted the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for setting machinery in motion to ensure that the electioneering campaigns, which began on November 18 are issue based. Bamidele said: “Those who are politicians in Nigeria are less than five per cent of the total population. So, it would be a great disservice to our dear nation for a few to plunge the entire nation into crisis just because they want to win election.”

  • On being thankful

    A lot is happening in the political world. First, INEC has declared open the campaign season for the 2019 elections and presidential candidates of major parties have released their action plans giving us a lot to chew and digest.

    Second, scandalous political statements have escaped the mouths of some politicians. One complained about the huge investment in a successful presidential political campaign across thirty states without the expected returns. For that reason, he is now backing a candidate with a more welcoming attitude to compensating supporters from the coffers of the state.

    Third, the matter of political restructuring has snowballed into the 2019 campaign in full force and it is unclear what impact, if any, it would have. It appears that one candidate is bent on exploiting the issue, which appears to be a favorite of at least four zones.

    All these are great stories that deserve critical reflections and insightful comments. Today, however, I choose not to take the bait. I choose to reflect on something more noble, in keeping with the practice I started three years ago around this time of the year.

    This is the time of year that Americans have set aside for reflection and thanksgiving. As a graduate student in the late 1970s when I first encountered the tradition, it was not difficult for me to connect it with the Baptist Mission-inspired tradition of Harvest Thanksgiving, initially known as Ikore in Yoruba, but later named Idupe.

    It made good sense for the church to conceptualize Thanksgiving as Ikore for the local people because it is the time of year when farmers harvest their crops and are in a mood for appreciating God’s blessings. From two or three seeds, they reap five or more ears of corn. From a short stem of cassava, a huge tuber comes back. For every small investment of seed or stem they get huge returns. Therefore, it is fitting to make harvest time thanksgiving time.

    But the American Thanksgiving is unique in terms of its origins and its development over four centuries. While it started in 1621 with the Pilgrims and the Indians sharing a harvest meal over a three-day period, it has developed into one of the most important national holidays with a diversity that reflects the evolving demographics. It also appears to be the one tradition that has not been usurped or taken over by the greedy world of business. This is good news for many who simply and genuinely are eager to be thankful for anything and everything that is dear to them.

    But why be thankful and what is the trigger for the practice? Put simply, Good deep thinking is a reliable trigger for thankfulness as it can always be expected that a good thinker will be a thankful person while an incessant complaint and whining is an outcome of shallow thinking.

    In our own tradition, ancestral wisdom concludes that no matter the station one occupies in life, there are always good reasons to be thankful because there’s always going to be a worse case. This presupposes that being alive itself is a gift for which thankfulness is due. That is simple to understand. But in some situations, we are also admonished that the death of a loved one may be an occasion for thankfulness. This suggests that something may be worse than death. When a long-term illness that includes serious pain with no hope of relief that is certain to end in death finally takes the life of the sufferer, it is not abnormal for relatives to be thankful.

    But thankful to whom? you may ask.

    For many religious persons, there is an author of existence, called Olodumare, Chukwu, Ubangiji, God, Yahweh, or Allah who is also the object of thanksgiving. It makes sense that a believer who traces his or her origin to an intelligent creator would also believe that whatever his or her lot in life is the doing of the author of existence who is therefore to be thanked.

    But what about the non-believers, the agnostic or the atheist? Do they also have any reason to be thankful? For many, the answer is, “of course, they do.”  “I am thankful” makes perfect sense because it defines and qualifies the person and doesn’t need a reference beyond the person. The only content that is needed is the subject of thankfulness: what am I thankful for? I can be thankful for my life even if perchance I do not think that I owe it to anyone. Therefore, an atheist could be a thankful person.

    Another way of looking at thankfulness is to see it as a fitting reaction to blessings that come our way, including the merited and unmerited ones. Thus, everyone that has a supportive family needs to be thankful for the blessing. There are many lonely human beings and there are those with family challenges. If we recognize the fact that the latter group may not be worse human beings than us, then our rational reaction is to be thankful. I am thankful for my family: my wife of forty-eight years, my children and their spouses, my grandchildren, my brothers and sisters, my numerous cousins, and the remainder of my older uncles and aunties. They all make life meaningful and worthwhile.

    I am thankful for my friends and associates, including the unpredictable Opalaba, with whom I share a similar understanding of life and a belief in the goodness of our common humanity despite many demoralizing incidents of depravity. It could be a lot more depressing were one to find oneself isolated in the contemplation of the affairs of our social and political life. But thankfully that has not been my lot. The elders suggest that no matter how bad a situation is, one will find some to rely upon. I have relied on allies who prop me up when it looks that I could be downed by the sadness of the news cycles.

    But I am also thankful for those genuine leaders who are guided by the ethos of national interest and place it above personal interest.  Despite the seeming conspiracy of the political class against the national interest and the apparent indifference to the plight of the poor and needy by the depraved looters, there is a core group of individuals who have demonstrated their impeccable loyalty to the common good in and out of office. That the country can count on them to pursue the right course is a thing of joy. Furthermore, that the country is still intact, despite the plurality of those power-drunk elite looking out for themselves, is a testimony to the abiding interest of selfless leaders in its integrity.

    Now, I have observed earlier that one doesn’t need to believe in the existence of a benevolent creator to have an attitude of thankfulness. I end this piece, however, with a personal appreciation of the eternal presence of the author of my existence in my life. My experience of life from the beginning to the present is a continuous affirmation of this testimony. My God has been a faithful God. He has kept my family from harm. He has prospered my children’s path, so they have kept the family name beyond reproach. To top his blessings in this season of thanksgiving, my God has preserved the life of my loving wife, Adetoun, who has stood with me through thick and thin, so she attained the landmark of 70 years as she ages with grace.

    I end this piece, therefore, with a song that has become a Thanksgiving anthem for many generations of believers.

    Now thank we all our God, with heart and hands and voices,

    Who wondrous things has done, in Whom this world rejoices;

    Who from our mothers’ arms has blessed us on our way

    With countless gifts of love, and still is ours today.

    Oh, may this bounteous God through all our life be near us,

    With ever joyful hearts and blessed peace to cheer us;

    And keep us in His grace, and guide us when perplexed;

    And guard us through all ills, in this world, till the next!

     

    HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

     

     

     

  • Buhari, Oshiomhole meet in Aso Rock over 2019 elections

    President Muhammadu Buhari and the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Adams Oshiomhole on Friday met behind closed doors at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Speaking with State House correspondents after the meeting, Oshiomhole said that the APC was fully ready to flag off the campaigns soon.

    According to him, the party’s campaign for the 2019 presidential election will focus on character and integrity of the key candidates.

    He said, “We are fully ready, we have done with our primaries and filled our nominations. As you know, INEC still has a window between now and First of January to deal with issues of substitution. As of campaigns, we are ready.

    “We are going to announce the date and programme for our campaigns, and speak to the issues. My idea of kick off will be the day we will do our first presidential rally where Mr. President as our candidate and other candidates, party leaders will assemble in a venue that will be agreeable to all of us.

    Read also: Ohanaeze endorsement of Atiku, no substance – Buhari 

    “There will be two sets of messages. One, on what we have done in the past, without failing to remind people of where we were before, what we are going to do in the next three years, and a couple of things we believe we will be doing differently.

    “Why we are a better choice? President Buhari if compared to the rest of the aspirants, there is no basis to compare day and night. The real issue in this election is not going to be religion. It is not going to be about political party, central to the issue and given our past experience as a country, we know that what makes a difference is the character, the issue of integrity of the candidates.

    “All those issues of character, especially looking at the past, the key candidates in the election are not strangers to governance, they are not even strangers to this villa, so we will be able to ask a couple of questions about what do they know now that they didn’t know then when they had power.

    “This edition is going to be focusing on character, integrity of those who want to govern us. In addition to what and how they will do things differently.” he added

    Oshiomhole also dismissed  the allegations of corruption leveled against him by Senator Shehu Sani

    Sani had accused him of collecting bribes of up to $2million to manipulate the senatorial primaries of Kaduna Central zone.

    Speaking on the crisis facing the Imo APC governorship candidate, Senator Hope Uzodimma, he said there was no crisis.

    He said, “What is the crisis? That somebody won and somebody lost and the person who lost said no, no, no, I am the son-in-law to the governor I can’t lose and therefore we have crisis. Go to Imo and find out, go to the markets, mechanic workshops or even the civil servants in Imo and ask how they think on the issue of son-in-law. Look at the crowd that received Senator Hope Uzodimma, it was a mixture of both a rejection of dynasty vis a vis the natural support base that Hope has.

    “Haven’t you seen on social media how the excited Imolites erected statue on Oshiomhole although the body is big” he said

  • 2019: Ayade urges NYSC members to be neutral, firm

    Cross River State Governor, Prof Ben Ayade, has charged National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members serving in the state who would participate in next year’s general elections as ad-hoc staff to discharge their duties with absolute neutrality and firmness.

    The governor, who was addressing the corps members at the closing ceremony of the 2018 Batch B Stream One, orientation course at the permanent orientation camp in Obubra local government area lauded the NYSC for raising the credibility profile of the electoral process in the past.

    This, he said, has culminated in public confidence in the NYSC and the electoral umpire.

    The governor, who was represented by the Head of Local Government Administration in Obubra, Chief Bary Inyang, said over the years, successive governments had rendered adequate attention and huge investments into the programme and projects of the corps members, who are seen as partners in actualizing projects in the state.

    He said despite the paucity of funds, the government remains sensitive to the plight of corps members especially on security and welfare.

    Ayade said the aggressive industrialization of the state is not just to boost the economy, but also to justify the steps taken in furtherance of the commitment to ensure adequate opportunities are provided for capacity building of the youths through job creation and skill acquisition.

    He told the corps members that the people of the state were peaceful and hospitable, assuring them of security and safety across the 18 local government areas of the state.

    He charged the corps members to remain dedicated to the service of the nation in their various places of primary assignment.

    According to him, corps members have a role to play both in the integration of culture and promotion of national unity and that this could be achieved through dedication to the course that has brought them from their various states to Cross River State.

    He went further to advice them to avoid anything that could expose them to danger throughout their service year.

  • Entrenching party reform ahead of 2019 elections

    In this piece, George Ukanna writes on the imperative of party reforms to consolidate democracy and party system.

    As the 2019 elections approach, a debate is on, on whether to maintain the character, quality and content of the nation’s democracy or lift it to avail majority of Nigerians the opportunity for inclusion in political conversations and decisions. The framing of the debate has made some analysts to think that the political firmament has been devoid of ideology or  party philosophy, which ultimately is at the root of the disconnect between the government and the governed.

    Within the broad context of the nation’s political history, the two opposing sides to the debate have found expression in determining the character that informed the formation, maintenance and proliferation of political parties that are ideology-driven. The deliberate efforts toward the closing-up of the political space against broad participation have generated grievances that are expressed in electoral violence and the marring of the electoral processes by malpractices.

    Within the context of political party formation in the First Republic, the perceived determination of progressive elements to ensure the widening of the political space against the stranglehold of a few persons which threatened political interactions and participation that led to the crisis that eventually resulted in the collapse of the Republic. The point must be made that the proponents of a closed political space are always hell-bend with their threats and preference to sacrifice the entire democratic project if they will not have their way. The struggle to entrench democracy in the country has been won and lost especially with the coalescing of national and international dispositions in favour of democratic consolidation as the sure path to guaranteeing effective public participation in governance. In the Second Republic, the narrowing of the political spaces resulted in the pilfering of the public treasury by the few elites and the entrenchment of mediocrity in governance. To maintain the status quo, the entire political party structures and processes dovetailed into the rentier government attitude and soiled the entire democratic experience in corruption. Sadly, the Third Republic was designed and destined by the General Ibrahim Babangida’s administration to yield the desired result, which was the exclusion of  participants on the basis of patronage and the deliberate skulduggery of the entire scheme with the annulment of a peaceful and credible election.

    The Fourth Republic witnessed the sustenance of the confrontations between the proponents and opponents of a closed political space. Within the specific context of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the struggle has raged for close to two decades, resulting in the arbitrary removal of the party’s national chairmen at the whims of powerful public office holders. The removal of the current Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Audu Ogbeh,  as PDP national chairman  under the leadership of former President Olusegun Obasanjo and former Vice President Abubakar Atiku is still fresh in our memory. As the controversy surrounding the removal of Governor Chris Ngige of Anambra State raged and in view of the role of the security agencies, Chief Ogbeh advised the former President to curtail the anarchy. However, he was forced to resign. This did not start nor end with Chief Audu Ogbeh, but with Chief Solomon Lar, Chief Barnabas Gemade, Vincent Ogubulafor, Okwesilieze Nwodo, Bamanga Tukur, among others. It was only Chief Ahmadu Ali that survived the onslaught of the proponents of closed political space because of his long time friendship with former President Obasanjo.

    In conscious struggle against the proponents of closed political space, the late social crusader, Chief Ganiyu Fawehinmi battled against the structure and process that narrow political participation to certain class of individuals who claimed to have the exclusive prerogative to determine membership, rules and procedures in political parties. Although the benefits of Chief Fawehinmi’s struggle is currently being felt across the country with the wind of political party registration by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the element of exclusion within the parties still lingers on.

    Sadly, recent happenings within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) brought to the fore the unfortunate memories of the heyday of PDP when national chairmen and proponents of fair political party participation are sacrificed on the altar of the narrow interests of some elite. Indeed, the deliberate efforts of APC National Chairman Comrade Adams Aliyu Oshiomhole to guarantee effective political participation within the party have been resisted by few some people. These efforts, however, are widely supported by majority of the teeming members of the party within and outside the country. Without doubt, the composition of APC presents the potential for cacophonous sounds in view of its formative history. Nevertheless, Comrade Oshiomhole is navigating the party towards openness, transparency, consolidation and inclusive participation of the diverse interests represented in the party.

    In initiating intellectually-driven reform mechanisms for accommodation, inclusion and broad participation in political parties, elements that have enjoyed the old order will want to maintain the status quo where a monarchical system of transition is institutionalised to the chagrin of the majority. This brazen oppression of the party structures and processes has denied not only the party, but also the country the benefit of harnessing the untapped potential inherent in individuals with no political godfathers. The task before political party administrators, which Comrade Adams Oshiomhole has confronted head on, is to institutionalise structures and processes for effective participation, which would afford political parties to identify and harness their best resource (s) for the benefit of all humanity. Fortunately, as the United States of America elected former President Barrack Obama, who navigated the country out of its economic crisis, so was Nigeria under the  Muhammadu Buhari/Yemi Osinbajo administration done with the Nigeria’s economic debacle, because of an institutionalised structure and process of wide party participation and consultations. As the then Illinois State Senator, Barack Obama gave the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (DNC) on the night of 27 July 2004, which exposed the leadership qualities of  the young senator to the party. The young Barack Obama would eventually become the President of the USA. In the same vein,  APC under the able leadership of Comrade Adams Oshiomhole has committed to harnessing enormous human resources that abound in the party and the country for socioeconomic and political transformation.

    The commitment towards the institutionalisation of internal democracy in APC informed the decision of the party’s organs to identify three methods for the selection of its candidates at national and states levels – direct primaries, indirect primaries and consensus. Suffice to note that the indirect primaries have been adopted over the years by political parties with testimonies of inducement, corruption, manipulation, intimidation and undue influence of godfathers. The ongoing reforms in APC have ensured that party candidates emerged from a legally accepted procedure that would minimise litigation and entrench credibility. The reality is that reform is painful. However, efforts must be made by political party members to explore both internal and legal mechanisms for dispute resolution in ventilating their grievances without necessarily tying them to personal sentiments. Happily, the National Chairman of APC, Comrade Oshiomhole has severally said that the decisions of the party, which are mostly fair and just, are not sacrosanct but are subject to further interrogation by the relevant courts of the law. This rule of law-driven reforms of the party under the leadership of Comrade Oshiomhole is mindful of the repercussion of non-adherence of the rule of law as occasioned by the crass violation of party instructions and court decisions by some politicians, which has caused the party goodwill and offices in some states. That some powerful individuals lost out in the just concluded APC primary elections does not mean they have lost out politically, in the sense that political parties are platforms for the actualisation of collective interests for the greater good of all Nigerians. But these reform initiatives are necessary and fundamental to the realisation of the broader principles for grounding the policies and programmes of the Buhari/Osinbajo administration, which are in consonance with the constitutional provisions for guaranteeing the security and welfare of all citizens.

    • George Ukanna writes from Lafia, Nasarawa State.

     

  • 2019 elections: Save Nigeria from hate speech

    As the 2019 general elections draw near, it is a healthy development that the Buhari administration has invested a lot of resources, hope and confidence, so that the exercise would be hate speech-free. The intent, for one, is to have an exercise that would be ruled, by all participating political parties, local and foreign observers and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), as transparent, peaceful, credible, free and fair.

    For another, it is to protect the country’s Fourth Republic and nascent democracy from the ugly effects of violence, destruction of lives and property that are associated with hate speech.

    It should be pointed out that until 2016, hate speech was rife on radio, television and the internet; and in form of opinion or news published in newspapers. Some had the impression that they were sponsored by the enemies of the Buhari administration. A majority of those involved in the propagation of such hate speeches – individuals who ought to have known better – probably mistook freedom of speech as enshrined in Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution, as a licence to be irresponsible and loose.

    And when the Buhari administration moved against the propagation of hate speech – making it a crime, as it were – via the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission (NBC) and Ministry of Information and Culture, which lodged a protest with proprietors of radio and television stations, and policy-makers at newspaper houses, many were those who felt it was an abridgement of free speech.

    The truth, nonetheless, is that, today, Nigeria’s airwaves are a lot sanitized than they were two years ago. The 2019 general election will be the first that INEC would organize under the All Progressives Congress-led Buhari administration.

    The Buhari administration wants to make a clean break with the experience that this country has had with most electoral exercise. And concerted efforts – beyond such lines as religion, ethnicity, tribe and political party – should be made, so that the elections are, if anything, peaceful.

    Therefore, there’s a pressing need for policy-makers of the various political parties and their standard-bearers to queue behind the Buhari administration to shun hate speech as they go about campaigning. They also have a compelling duty to admonish their supporters to be mindful of what they say in the run-up to, during and after the elections, if only not to create unnecessary tension in the policy – at the expensive price of national peace, security and harmony.

    When the Buhari administration threatened to withdraw the license of any broadcast medium that was found guilty of disseminating hate speech, it was with a conscious effort to nip in the bud what was perceived as likely to shove the country back to the early ’60s; if was not political rascality and brigandage, in which all the dominant political parties and their members were complicit, it was Operation Wet’ie – one of the top most acts of violence that buried the First Republic, following the military camp in January 1966. No responsible government would want a play-back of that tape.

    The prelude to that bloody event started with hate speech: intolerance, mud-slinging or character assassination, crude political intrigues that were centred unrepentantly on ethnicity, religion, tribalism and political affiliation.

    Worse still was the fact that they were very enlightened political leaders who, so it seemed, superintended over those untidy developments. Perhaps for their selfish political ambitions, the Nigerian nation state that they aspired to govern, should burn – and, possibly, too – to ashes.

    But, because the Fourth Republic has lasted longest than the three before it, all the political parties – their leaders and members – should see themselves as its worthy ambassadors or protectors. Their utterances should be constructive and their opposition to government policies or programmes should portray them as being of loyal disposition. Not being a specialist in hate speech that many a political party leader or captain of pressure group or activist have come to see as an expressway – via social media, in most instances – to sell him or herself as a representative of a certain genre of politics or social tendency that does not promote the cause of democracy and national stability.

    In place of propagating hate speech or fake news – ‘the bombing of the headquarters of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC)’ or Nigeria’s foreign reserves now empty’ – both fake news that some mischievous elements posted not so long ago on social media – one thinks it’s imperative for political, religious and tribal leaders, and media owners to do what they can – a la President Muhammadu Buhari – to the preservation of the unity, security and peace of the Nigerian nation state.

    After nearly two decades of the maladministration by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), which was terminated by the dawn of the Buhari’s administration in 2015, most discerning Nigerians are tempted to hold firmly to the belief that hate speech was invented by opponents of the APC-led administration to plunge the country into a deep crisis – one that would have had a crude mix of political, religious and tribal complexions.

    In place of hate speech and fake news on social media, which thrives somewhat unrestrained, Nigeria’s political leaders and their associates, who indulge in them should channel their energy and resources towards how best, in league with the Buhari administration, to make history of the Boko Haram terrorist sect, steel the country’s economy in a post-recession period and assist INEC – via non-violence, honesty and transparency – to conduct an election, come 2019, that will sink the roots of democracy in the Fourth Republic.

    In fact, one’s opposition to hate speech and fake news – two pointed instruments of violence that could harm this country, if unchecked, especially during an election period – is akin to advocating “politics without bitterness” for which the late Waziri Ibrahim, the presidential candidate of the defunct Great Nigeria People’s Party (GNPP) was very much admired.

    He was on record to have cautioned one of his party loyalists in the late ’70s against what was akin to hate speech at a campaign rally in one of the towns in what was then Cross River State. That’s an example that should be emulated by today’s actors.

    Nigeria’s political leaders should bear in mind that it was the criminal abuse of freedom of speech or expression that led to the Rwandan genocide: a large-scale slaughter in which nearly one million people – a majority of them Hutu people – were slaughtered. Nigeria’s political and opinion leaders have a binding responsibility to shield the country and the Fourth Republic from such a catastrophe by joining hands with the Buhari administration against hate speech and fake news.

    Same goes for faceless bloggers on the social media and journalists on mainstream or traditional media, too. Politics and democracy should be seen as allies in building a culture of tolerance, good behavior, trading of concessions, and peace. In the Nigerian context, it presupposes a responsibility to build and strengthen national cohesion and harmony; one that should be less accommodating of hate speech. Nigeria needs clean politics not only to fortify her economy and unity, but also to present her as a model worthy of emulation by other African countries.

     

    • Uzuakpundu, is a journalist.
  • Inanity as electioneering strategy

    Crass inanity, as electioneering strategy, dogs the 2019 elections, as they draw close.

    That is why the electorate must be clear-headed; listen to the right stuff, and ask the right questions.

    A prime inanity is the sterile uproar over President Muhammadu Buhari’s school certificate.  Despite the attestation by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC), not a few still jabber and yammer to the contrary.

    This rather passionate nuisance bickers over all sorts — the photograph affixed on the attestation paper; who or who didn’t request for the attestation; WAEC’s alleged “diving” into partisan waters for PMB; the summary dismissal of the attestation itself as a “forgery” — rabid rallies just to hold on to wilful falsehood.  Ignorance was never so combative!

    That is inanity in its crudest form.

    But it also comes “refined” — for lack of better words to define lobbies, passing off personal bitterness as sweet public good. For another election-eve inanity, look no farther than the Afenifere camp.

    The pugnacious Baba Ayo Adebanjo may not symbolize Afenifere at its most sublime and politically correct form.

    But he epitomizes, more than any other, its id — to borrow the language of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis — without the filtering powers of the ego and the super ego: the basest, of Afenifere’s essence, complete with its dark ethnic dross.

    Baba Adebanjo just decided to push his constitutional right to “sell” the Yoruba to  Atiku Abubakar.

    According to his logic, Bola Tinubu made a mistake by, in 2015, “selling” the Yoruba to PMB, with his Afenifere, he forgot to add, kicking, screaming and squealing, in protest-support for Goodluck Jonathan, and his raining dollars!

    Now, Baba Adebanjo is bent on making his own counter-”sale”.  The snag is no one remembers any Yoruba assemblage gifting him that power to play Hobson, for all the Yoruba.

    But no prize for guessing — that self-imposed mandate is “restructuring”, admittedly, a Yoruba political project, that has its root in Chief Obafemi Awolowo’s espousal of ethnic federalism, in his 1947 classic, Path to Nigerian Freedom.

    Still, in the Afenifere context, “restructuring”, as this column has always maintained, is nothing but a survivalist racket, tapping into the deepest of Yoruba ethnic recesses, after the Afenifere 2015 debacle.

    Besides, Baba Adebanjo, from his statements, would appear assailed by two major dissonances — PMB, on the ethnic plane; and Tinubu, on the partisan front.

    Chief Adebanjo was quick to dismiss PMB’s integrity as “fake”.  That was vulgar abuse, to be sure.  Still, even a child knows what partisan bile doesn’t confer, it can’t possibly take away.

    PMB has lived his integrity all his life.  That’s why he is facing down the everlasting vermin that dub themselves “owners of Nigeria”; and sending that camp, scuttling in sheer panic.  Still, those blinded by ethnic hate can’t see that!

    The Tinubu conundrum, among the fiercely contending blocs within the Yoruba progressives, is tantamount to Mark Anthony’s painful musing over Augustus Caesar, in Shakespeare’s tragic play, Anthony and Cleopatra.

    While crushing the anti-Julius Caesar conspiracy, Augustus was nothing but a mere lieutenant, while Anthony was already a full general.  Yet, as a co-member of the second triumvirate of Anthony, Augustus and Aemilus Lepidus, Augustus always trumped his old general!

    So, the Afenifere old guard might feel really hard done by Tinubu — and for good reasons.

    The one had peddled Awo and his name, all their long, long political lives; with little or no value-added: just fiery inheritors and fierce wielders of the lucrative Awo franchise.

    The other has used the Awo pedestal to build a surfeit of new generation leaders, true to their Yoruba progressive essence but uninhibited by the ethnic ancestral feud that limits the old guard; and can therefore view Nigeria from a more total picture.

    Besides, one camp shrivels while the other sprouts; and yet another judgment — nay, harvest — time is near!

    You can, therefore, see the shrivelling party hug, in sheer ecstasy, an especially virulent form of Yoruba irredentism, if not outright supremacy, to rally a crowd.  In that fevered nightmare, Tinubu is the perfect scapegoat!  Yet, the electorate isn’t that daft!

    All of these manouevres, nevertheless, belong to Afenifere’s spite-filled but vocal minority, a cabal that has seized that conclave and chisselled it according to its whims and caprices.  That Baba Ayo Fasanmi just called their bluff is ample proof.

    Still, beyond Afenifere is another ensemble of pretentious inanity — the so-called “objective” army of media critics.  This clan rattles with so much violence when they declare things are wrong.  But when things are right, they lose their thunder and become absolutely coy — if not outright miserable!

    No thanks to their patriotic clatter, a country at a dire strait can’t achieve a consensus to get out of its bind.  The social tragedy from this camp is huge: that their so-called analyses are rich only drives them to more rabid mischief.

    But again, it behoves the reading or watching or listening public to be wary — lest they be misled.

    The 2019 elections are as defining as any, in Nigeria’s chequered electoral history.  The choice is simple, really: to discard the gains of 2015 and go back to pre-2015 Egypt, Olusegun Obasanjo’s era of rot; or join PMB to consolidate on building a new Nigerian order, even if it is early days yet; and things are tough.

    But it is this stark choice that those who have nothing to offer try to obliterate and complicate, by throwing in all sorts of inanities — ethnic, religious and sundry noises.  Still, it’s the PMB’s camp bounden duty to keep the electorate focused.  That is crucial to wise electoral choice.

    By this time in 2014, a rattled President Jonathan was posing as “persecuted Christian” president, shopping for orchestrated but rogue blessings; and sending his Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) collaborators, in cant and in mammon, tingling with faith and ethnic hate!

    Shortly after would follow a massive dollar rain, from which even a pillar of the moral palladium of Afenifere could not but “obtain”!  Of course, Jonathan’s grovelling for pity followed four years of presidential collapse.

    Mercifully now, PMB hasn’t gone on his own sortie of illicit blessings, from mosques nationwide, as “Muslim” president.  He has made his own mistakes, no doubt.  But all he has done is concentrate on his work.

    Well, the only pre-election sortie, right now, is Vice President Yemi Osinbajo’s Tradermoni financial inclusion crusade, to the poorest of the poor and the most vulnerable of Nigerian hardworking folks, gritting it out in Nigerian markets, nationwide.

    What is more?  The seed money, for Tradermoni, comes from retrieved Abacha loot!  That makes a definite statement — a radical departure from the old Obasanjo order of feeding a few but powerful parasites, to spending Nigeria’s scarce resources on the majority of Nigerians.

    That critical shift is what the 2019 elections are all about — and why a panicky Obasanjo has abandoned his much vaunted “Third Force”, to gobble his twin vomit of PDP and Atiku Abubakar, incidentally Afenifere’s new beloved twin champions!

    True, it’s only in crises that folks really show who truly they are — and the Afenifere is living proof!

  • 2019 Elections: PDP has made our task easier – Gov. Bello

    Gov. Yahaya Bello of Kogi says the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has made the chances of President Muhammadu Buhari winning the 2019 presidential election much more brighter with its purported slogan, ‘Corruption is better than Incompetence’.

    Bello stated this when President Buhari hosted youth political appointees and supporters of his administration to a dinner at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    He described President Buhari as `a very good product’, and his competencies were desperately needed for the progress of the nation, `but we need to go out there and sell him to the people.’

    “Public Relations professionals will tell you that at some point, having a good product without excellent advertising is like winking in the dark – you know what you are doing, but no one else does.

    “Perception is reality when it comes to politics and campaigning.  Perception management is therefore critical in times like this,’’ he said.

    The governor stated that all members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) must market the `incredible accomplishments of President Buhari and of his administration to every voter’ – and in all the local languages in the country.

    He further warned that if the party failed to do so efficiently, the adverse narratives aggressively put out by the opposition PDP and other propaganda machines would dominate the land and shape perceptions.

    He said: “If those of us in APC do not sell this winning product very well – “Economic recovery will be mistaken for slow-down due to poor management of the nation’s economy;

    “Measures to protect local industries and stimulate domestic production will be mistaken for deliberate impoverishment of the populace via high prices of essential commodities;

    “Borrowing for rapid infrastructural development will be mistaken for unwarranted or misapplied debt;

    “A tough and progressive victory against a terrorist threat which continues to cost the nation the lives of her brave military and law enforcement personnel will be mistaken for inaction;

    “ A difficult fight against old and new forms of insecurity, which is designed to neutralize security threats across parts of the nation without criminalizing whole tribes or populations, will be mistaken for victimization of some and condonation of others;

    “Trial of politically exposed offenders using long existent laws which previous leaders were not willing to deploy against cronies and accomplices will be mistaken for extrajudicial measures and disdain for the Rule of Law;

    “Social safety nets for the poor under the various Social Investment Programmes and payment of long outstanding obligations to unjustly treated segments of our citizenry will be mistaken for bribery of the populace or vote buying tricks.

    “If we fail to take charge of the narrative and persuade people till they see the true intents of this Administration’s policies, we will have a much harder job mobilizing the votes we need to get Mr. President re-elected.

    Read also: Don’t underrate PDP, Yahaya Bello warns

    “If we do not put Mr. President’s achievements before our people till they can recite it themselves, they may agree with the shameless PDP that the heartless corruption which it is offering again is somehow better than the alleged ‘incompetence’ of the APC which has accomplished every good thing I listed above.

    “In summary, all may be lost if we do not get the Nigerian people to see why they must allow Mr President continue his great work as they go to the polls in 2019.’’

    The governor, who was elected under the platform of the APC, however, warned that the party has a huge task before it in the 2019 general elections.

    According to the governor, 2015 is about Change while 2019 is about Progress.

    He, therefore, advised leadership and members of the APC not to relent in educating and sensitising the electorate on the danger of reversing the achievements of the Buhari administration.

    “As members of the APC, we will not deny that our party has a huge task before us in the 2019 general elections.

    “The elections will not be a walkover, the PDP will not be a pushover and we ‘MUST’ take nothing and no one for granted,’’ he warned.

    Bello, who narrated the achievements of the Buhari administration in the past three years, condemned the 16 years of PDP administration, which he said were generally characterized by low capital investment on infrastructure.

    He, however, noted that the Buhari administration had invested in excess of N3 trillion on infrastructural developments, which he described as, the highest ever in nation’s history, and at a time when revenues were generally poor and a recession was on.

    He noted that the APC was offering greater inclusiveness for all Nigerians irrespective of tribes and voting patterns.

    Bello added that the APC would pay better attention to affirmative action – women, youth and special ability in appointive positions.

    “The APC will respect the unspoken but gentlemanly rotationally presidential pattern between North and South which most Nigerians defended in 2015.

    “The APC is promising to continue re-writing the age-long negatives which have plagued our nation to positives.

    “This is the message we must all take to every nook and cranny of this nation, and from door to door.

    “On the other hand, all the crooked PDP is offering Nigerians is ‘Corruption is better than Incompetence’ and ‘Anybody but Buhari’.

    “I say they have made our job easy, assuming we are ready to work hard,’’ he said.(NAN)

  • We won’t present candidates for 2019 elections, says Labour Party

    THE Labour Party (LP) has declared it was not presenting candidates in the forthcoming general elections.

    Its National Publicity Secretary, Ebere Ifendu, who spoke at a news conference in Abuja, said there was no substantive national chairman and secretary to sign Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)  nomination form for such candidates.

    She said the tenure of the party’s National Working Committee (NWC), led by Alhaji Abdulkadir Salam, expired on October 10, 2018.

    Ifendu added that Salam has refused to obey the consent judgment, which ordered the party to convene a national convention to conduct fresh elections.

    She dismissed a purported National Executive Council (NEC) meeting, which reportedly took place in Minna.

    According to the publicity secretary, the meeting was not properly constituted in accordance with the LP Constitution.

    She said: “There is a subsisting court order that gave us a mandate to conduct an all-inclusive national convention. The judgment is a consent judgment, which involved all parties, including Abdulsalam, who signed the documents that was used for the judgment.

    “So, it is no longer what INEC can interfere with. The court orders must be respected. INEC wrote the party a letter asking for an all-inclusive national convention, but Abdusallam went ahead to elongate his tenure outside the content of the consent judgment.

    “So, he is already in violation of the consent judgment. INEC on its part has obeyed the court order by asking LP to go and hold an all-inclusive national convention.

    “I am repeating it again LP cannot field candidates for the elections in 2019, reason being that the tenure of the party’s present National Working Committee has expired on October 10. There is no existing national chairman and national secretary of Labour Party as we speak.”

    Ifendu said: “Article 13 (2) A, explicitly spells out the composition of the party’s National Executive Councils members. Among the persons on the lists are the Presidents and General Secretaries of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC).

    “None of these constitutional members of the organ were in attendance nor represented. That clearly shows that the purported NEC meeting has nothing to do with LP whatsoever.”

     

     

  • 2019 elections: Centre urges Nigerians to make informed choices

    The Centre for Constitutional Government (CCG) has urged Nigerians to make informed choices in the next year’s general elections.

    It said only leaders, who mean well for the country and have the capacity to deliver, be voted for.

    CCG Executive Director, Dr. Adewale Balogun, in a statement, said Nigerians have a wide range of candidates for various offices to choose from.

    “There are a good number of candidates being fielded for the various positions by the different registered political parties in the country, so, there is no reason Nigerians should limit themselves,” the group said.

    The CCG condemned votes buying and selling, especially as witnessed in the Anambra, Ekiti and Osun states elections and party primaries.

    “Vote buying obstructs the democratic process by interfering with the rights of citizens to freely decide who will represent them and their interests.

    “Ultimately, it undercuts citizens’ ability to hold their elected officials accountable after they must have bought themselves their mandates,” CCG said.

    The Centre, in a statement by its Programme Officer, Juli Iregbu, deplored the lack of transparency and internal democracy within political parties as manifested in their primaries.

    It called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to improve on its efforts to ensure that the parties and their candidates comply with the electoral laws.

    The CCG urged the electoral commission to stop monetisation of process and refusal of political parties and candidates to adhere to the stipulated campaigning time-frame as been witnessed.

    The statement quoted Balogun as appealing to Nigerians, especially the youth, to shun violence and work together to support credible candidates with vision.

    It called for the rejection of candidates whose politics are marked by “greed and colossal pillaging that have sunk majority of the people into avoidable poverty, degradation and lack of say.”