Last week’s declaration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as a potential opposition coalition platform was hailed by stakeholders as a good development for the polity. However, the ADC’s legal and leadership woes have cast a long shadow over the quest by the opposition to unite and present a united front against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the next general election in 2027, writes Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI.
The latest attempt by Nigeria’s divided opposition to rally under a single banner against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) ahead of the 2027 general election is already showing signs of fragility. What was pitched as a game-changing alliance now appears caught in a web of lawsuits, leadership squabbles, and constitutional loopholes—factors that could unravel the coalition before it even finds its feet.
Last week, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, ex-Governor of Anambra State Peter Obi, and former Governor of Kaduna State Nasir El-Rufai stood side by side beneath the African Democratic Congress (ADC) emblem, declaring the opposition’s intent to speak with one voice. It was meant to signal a turning point. However, just days later, cracks began to appear—legally, politically, and procedurally.
What seemed like a strategic consolidation move quickly began to resemble a cautionary tale in political miscalculation. From unresolved lawsuits to internal party feuds, the ADC’s viability as a coalition platform is under heavy fire. And this isn’t just political theatre—it’s a real-time stress test of Nigeria’s electoral frameworks and the perennial dysfunction of its opposition class.
Cracks within the fold
Three major cracks that now threaten to derail the ADC-led coalition effort are a festering leadership crisis within the ADC, legal ambiguities surrounding its use as a coalition umbrella, and conflicting ambitions among its leading figures. Each of these could independently unravel the effort. Together, they amount to a political minefield.
Since losing power in 2015, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and other opposition parties like the Labour Party (LP), and the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) have struggled with internal cohesion. That’s what made the ADC’s emergence as a unifying hub so compelling, until it became clear the party was far from ready.
The ADC has been embroiled in a leadership crisis dating back to 2022, pitting long-standing chairman Ralph Okey Nwosu against Kingsley Ogga, leader of the party’s State Chairmen Forum. Nwosu cites a 2018 constitutional amendment that he claims legitimises his extended tenure. Ogga’s camp, however, insists he has overstayed his mandate and has launched a legal challenge.
That dispute has now entered the courts. Ogga’s faction has petitioned the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and is seeking injunctions to halt any mergers or alliances until the Supreme Court rules on who leads the party. For a party that was suddenly thrust into the national spotlight, such unresolved baggage could prove fatal.

From the spotlight into the fire
The ADC has long been a marginal player in the country’s political theatre. Its sudden elevation as the opposition’s flagship came with fanfare and fierce backlash.
READ ALSO: Nurses, midwives give FG 15-day ultimatum, threaten nationwide strike
“I watched the launch and couldn’t help laughing,” said Musa Matara, a spokesman for a rival faction. “It’s like renting a house when the ownership deed is still being contested in court.”
Despite the unresolved leadership crisis, Nwosu ceremonially handed over the party to former Senate President David Mark and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, now serving as interim chair and secretary of the coalition, respectively. While insiders hailed it as a seamless transition, legal analysts view the move as unauthorised and potentially void.
INEC’s watchful silence
The Electoral Act 2022, particularly Section 82, stipulates that only party officials recognised by INEC can nominate candidates or negotiate mergers. Anything short of that risks nullification.
“This is not hypothetical; it has happened before,” noted Professor Remi Adekoya of the University of Lagos. “Candidates have lost their mandates because of improper signatories and other paperwork technicalities. It’s a ticking time bomb.”
INEC, aware of the legal landmines, has so far remained silent. A senior official, speaking anonymously, said: “Symbolism doesn’t cut it. We can’t validate a party structure that’s still in court.”
Merger or coalition?
A major ambiguity continues to surround the nature of the opposition alliance. Is the ADC being used as a coalition umbrella or the legal foundation for a full merger? The distinction carries significant legal consequences.
In a formal merger, all participating parties must dissolve and re-register under a new name. In a coalition, each retains its identity, which complicates joint nominations.
Initially, the coalition floated the idea of forming a new political party, the All Democratic Alliance (ADA). However, delays with INEC and looming deadlines forced the coalition partners to settle for the ADC. “Honestly, we were out of time,” admitted one insider. “The ADC was already on the books.”
Critics argue that such shortcuts may backfire. “You don’t merge parties like mixing drinks,” warned Ifeoma Nwachukwu of the Centre for Electoral Reform. “A merger requires due diligence, not convenience. The APC legal team will exploit every gap in their paperwork.”
Walking the legal tightrope
Festus Keyamo, Aviation Minister and legal firebrand for the Tinubu administration, dismissed the coalition effort as wishful thinking. He argued that by aligning with the ADC, Atiku and Obi may be breaching party and electoral laws.
“They can’t eat their cake and have it,” Keyamo declared at a press briefing. “Are they the PDP, the LP, or the ADC? The law doesn’t permit this kind of political bigamy.”
While Section 68 of the 1999 Constitution primarily governs legislative defections, some legal experts argue its spirit applies more broadly to executive candidacies. Petitions may emerge challenging Atiku and Obi’s involvement without formal resignation from their respective parties.
Civil society warns
Civil society groups are growing increasingly vocal. YIAGA Africa, a prominent electoral watchdog, urged the coalition leaders to settle their legal disputes and behave with greater transparency. “If this coalition is serious, it needs to act like a government-in-waiting, not a legal circus,” said Cynthia Mbamalu, the group’s Director of Programmes.
Similarly, Ibrahim Zarewa of the Centre for Democracy and Development warned that without swift action, the ADC’s potential as a unifying platform could collapse before it begins. “Nigerians want a strong, united opposition. If the ADC remains entangled in lawsuits, it risks becoming irrelevant in the 2027 equation.”
Still, the ADC’s leadership projects optimism. Dr. Bamidele Ajadi, the party’s Deputy National Chairman, downplayed the legal challenges as “mere distractions”. He insisted that reconciliation efforts were ongoing. “These are just distractions from those who don’t want a strong opposition. The ADC is open to alliances, and we are resolving all legal issues amicably.”
Clash of ambitions
Even if legal hurdles are cleared, personal ambitions among the coalition’s top figures may yet doom it. Atiku and Obi, once on a joint ticket under the PDP in 2019, became rivals in 2023. That rivalry remains unresolved.
Reports suggest Atiku may push for a northern presidential ticket with Obi as running mate; a proposal allegedly rejected by Obi’s camp. “He didn’t build a national base just to be someone’s second fiddle,” said one of Obi’s aides.
El-Rufai’s intentions remain murky. Though once a close Tinubu ally, he is known for political pragmatism. “He’s ruthlessly opportunistic,” said a senior Social Democratic Party (SDP) figure. “If he sees a void, he’ll fill it.”
These dynamics make it unclear whether the coalition can produce a unified ticket or whether it will fracture under the weight of individual ambition.
Lessons from history
Nigeria’s only successful opposition merger remains the APC’s formation in 2013. That was a carefully negotiated, multi-year process involving ideological compromise, regional balance, and shared ambition.
The ADC move, in contrast, appears rushed and reactionary. As political historian Dr. Akinwumi Oyeleke puts it: “The APC was built on shared ambition. The ADC risks being a coalition built on shared desperation.”
A coalition racing against time
The launch of the ADC-led coalition was dramatic and headline-grabbing, but reality has quickly undercut the spectacle. Legal ambiguities, leadership clashes, and unresolved ambitions now threaten to turn the bold gambit into a cautionary tale. Can Nigerians rally behind a platform still unsure who holds the reins?
Until the legal issues are sorted out and unity becomes a reality, the best hope for change in 2027 risks becoming yet another courtroom casualty—more political theatre than credible threat. For this coalition to stand a fighting chance, it must urgently secure legal clarity, resolve its internal fractures, and earn the public’s confidence.
Otherwise, what began as a vision for unity may end as just another failed experiment in opposition politics.


