Tag: A nation

  • A nation on circuit show

    A nation on circuit show

    By Mike Kebonkwu

    Our experience has always shown that the more things appear to change, the more they remain the same; we have remained stuck to our old ways.  We have continued rocking and swirling on the barber’s chair; all motion no movement. 

    From the first republic immediately after independence till date, we have remained enmeshed in divisive ethno-religious politics mired with official corruption and nepotism.   Extravagance opulence has remained official badge of public office holders while the masses are gripped in poverty, diseases and underdevelopment due to poorly thought out government policies.  The ordinary citizens have remained leashed and locked up in want and hardly able to make ends meet. 

    We are so dazed and confused due to endless circle of poverty that we appear not to even understand the source(s) of our problem.  We continue to eulogize and venerate our oppressors just to have money thrown at us and to received handouts and palliatives.  Our natural endowment in rich mineral resources, flora and fauna pale into insignificance and nothingness due to the rapacious greed of our political leaders who steal the country blind leaving the nation pale and anaemic. 

    Read Also: Nigeria no longer safe haven for cryptocurrency traders

    Today, we spend more time at the filling stations looking for fuel to buy than we spend in productive activities in our business places; the circle of scarcity has become perennial.  The official price of petrol is probably only enjoyed in the two cities of Lagos, the commercial capital of the nation and Abuja, the federal capital territory and seat of power.  The price in all other states is arbitrary and at the whims and intuition of shylock marketers of petroleum products with no control by any official regulatory agency. 

    Oil was struck in Nigeria around 1956 in Oloibiri in present day Bayelsa State and over 60 years down the line, we are not able to satisfy our domestic need of gasoline.  We have no infrastructural platform for sustainable refining of the products but prefer to export and sell our crude cheap and import finished products at prohibitive cost and thereby creating subsidy regime with all the appearances of sleaze ingrained in it. Our four refineries have remained decrepit and white elephant projects with huge annual turn-around maintenance cost without production and with huge workforce.  Then we ask ourselves what are the workers of the refineries and its NNPC subsidiaries doing, earning money for phony jobs?  

    We import petroleum products from countries that do not have deposit of hydrocarbon and export our crude to them and thereafter we import and buy at double the price.  We behave as a people jinxed or under spell even in all our spirituality carrying the Bible and the Quran but acting wickedly and deceitful as individuals and corporate bodies.  We dance and donate money in the churches and mosques but leave the people hungry and deprived. What hypocrisy!

    Petrol queues have returned again with most filling stations not dispensing petrol due to non-availability of the product and worse of it is that where the product is available, we are paying double the price.   We do not know what is true about the supply chain and the reason for the scarcity. The recycled excuses of hoarding and sabotage by the opposition have since expired because you do not hoard something that is freely available, or that can be replenished without difficulty; and in any case, the opposition also runs on the wheel of gasoline. 

    We are simply being tormented by inefficient bureaucracy and very rapacious cabal that have hijacked the political space.  How long can we continue like this?  For commercial transport drivers, okadas, tricycles etc, they spend more time on queues at the filling station and have to sometimes pay extra money to some miscreants who disrupt the queues for impatient drivers and car owners without sense of order and discipline. What is now constant with us is chaos at the filling stations and market places with frustration on the faces of everyone acting aggressively.   At the end of the day it is the poor sapped commuter and traders who bear the brunt of the cost as everything is transferred to the common man.  

    Every government without exception has always called on Nigerians to tighten their belts and make sacrifice for a better tomorrow; but tomorrow never comes! This is where we are today.  We have been short-changed and fleeced with all manners of taxes and sometimes hidden charges for every consumable; goods and services.  We have become more vulnerable as a people that daily survival is difficult.  The masses are unable to buy food from the market as prices of commodities are prohibitive and farmers both commercial and subsistence have been driven out of their farms and businesses by activities of bandits and kidnappers. 

    We are at the mercy of criminals, gangsters and un-empathetic political class who literarily mock the poverty of the masses. On top of it is the fact that we have come under the eclipse of insecurity with everyone within the range and net of the criminal cartel. 

    The organized labour, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) which is supposed to fight for the protection of the entire labour force and Nigerians is busy with distraction on partisan politics and making very unrealistic demands of N615,000 minimum wage for workers.  They measure the wage and salary against the United States Dollar and came out with the arithmetic of the purchasing power of our local currency before arriving at the so-called N615,000.  This is just unreasonable; the NLC should fight to restore productivity in the key sectors of the economy by demanding that government fixes the necessary infrastructure, road and the power sector and improve on security.  They should also be fighting against multiple taxations and official corruption. Demanding for over N600,000 minimum wage is thoughtless because most state governments failed to implement the N30,000 minimum wage and NLC did nothing about it. 

    Again which private sector can afford N615,000 wage bill for workers and still remain in business?  The NLC has completely lost the organizing ability and articulation of demands based on logical analysis on solid economic terms. 

    The NLC fight against the petrol subsidy removal was also half-hearted, again due to poor leadership.  What government needed to do was to expose those behind the subsidy sleaze in the industry rather than increase the burden of the masses by making them to pay more for petrol.  If workers are paid one million naira monthly salary or wages, it would not translate to improvement of  lots of workers as it can only add to his burden by carrying a cartload of cash to buy only vegetable like the Zimbabwean experience. The Nigerian students and student union body, the National Association of Nigeria Students (NANS) has also virtually lost its relevance due to lack of ideological clarity and knowledge of its historical roles as veritable agents of change.  They now mimic and ape the politicians in every sense of the word with student leaders having SAs (special assistants) of what? 

    The economic situation in the country has turned everybody to fine ‘bara’ (mendicant) in gentle posture. To survive everyone has to ask for lifeline simply to make ends meets. The masses have been stripped off honour and esteem. One thinks that what the organized labour, Civil Society Organizations (CSO), right groups and activists should be doing is to focus and demand for proper management of the economy, accountability of public officers and fight against official corruption and poor governance instead of campaigning for protections of former governors being called to account for moneys they allegedly misappropriated while in office. The circuit show has to stop so that Nigeria can move forward!

    •Kebonkwu Esq is an Abuja-based attorney.

  • A nation in distress

    Nigeria is seriously distressed. Not only has it failed to serve as a melting pot for ethnic, religious and primordial cleavages, the Nigerian state has over the years, tended to reinforce these fault lines.

    Thus, we can only talk of the Nigerian nation in a very loose sense of the term. Its strict application which will entail the wielding together of the disparate entities and imbuing in them a common sense of belonging and national identity remains largely illusory. For this, we have had to contend with aberrant competition between primordial tendencies and the central authority for the loyalty of the citizens.

    National integration which should have formed the fulcrum of political action since independence has since taken the back seat. Little wonder the plethora of systemic dysfunctions that have overtime stood on our way to genuine national progress. Boko Haram insurgency, militancy and armed banditry, agitations for self-determination and the insurgency of the Fulani herdsmen are clear manifestations of systemic stress and inability of the centre to cohere.

    The system is not just working. Concerns have continued to mount on suitable and sustainable approaches to statecraft for genuine national development and progress to proceed unhindered. In this search, a number of ideas have been recurrent. Some of these, though not entirely novel, have come to dominate public discourse of recent.

    Two strands of opinion trend in the public space as veritable strategies to re-position and re-invent the country. Before now, restructuring had been canvassed as holding the ace.  But in the last one month or so, the challenge of leadership assumed some prominence. The primacy of knowledgeable and patriotic leadership in the nation’s statecraft though not novel, assumed renewed national flavour with the recent outings of two key former heads of state. In their loaded letters to President Muhammadu Buhari on why he should not run for another term, Olusegun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Babangida canvassed a paradigm shift in the political recruitment process.

    The main thesis of their presentation was that Buhari does not have what it takes to lead the country in terms of the necessary professional skills, strength of the body, knowledge of contemporary leadership dynamics and requisite academic training. They both routed for well educated, dynamic, knowledgeable and young Nigerians with the requisite capacities to grapple with the complexities of the dynamic world.

    They crave for visionary leaders in the mould of the ‘philosopher king’ envisioned by Plato. Obasanjo went further to volunteer an assessment of the two major political parties- APC and PDP with a damning verdict that good leadership can no longer emerge from the two parties given their lack lustre performance in governance. He then moved for an alternative platform- a paradigm shift in the spirit of the Kuhnian revolution where a new order emerges to supplant an existing one.

    Since then, some political actors have given varying interpretations to that message. These interpretations vary from the selfish to the most unreasonable; the unrealistic to the impracticable. It also came with the undertone that none of those in APC or PDP would fit into the leadership matrix Nigeria needs at the moment. That is obviously an overgeneralization. Even then, Obasanjo’s qualification to determine the requisite national leadership template is still largely contentious irrespective of the accident of having occupied that office for the length of time he did.

    That however, does not diminish the import of his presentation. It does not irrespective of the faulty attempt to view his call for paradigm shift from the narrow prism of age. Their suggestions represent a composite of qualifications not limited to age. There are two strands of Obasanjo’s thoughts on leadership as encapsulated in that letter. The first is the desirability for more purposeful, knowledgeable and enterprising leader with the strength and capacity to grapple with the wider dynamics of statecraft. This goes without saying.

    The other and more contentious is the conclusion that neither the APC nor PDP is capable of producing good leadership for this country any longer. This flies in the face of reason. At best, it is a poor guesswork, lacking any root in empiricism. The reason for his position is not hard to fathom. In his desperate bid to find justification for his third force, Obasanjo had to embark on a predetermined vengeful voyage of writing off the prospects of good and quality leadership emerging from the two dominant parties. Neither the past poor performances of the PDP which he led nor the failings of the Buhari led-APC would suffice for a vote of no confidence in their capacities to throw up good and efficient leadership in the future.

    The other flaw in Obasanjo’s presentation lies in its undue focus on political parties rather than the intervening systemic variables that impinge on and determine the direction of our political recruitment process. Here, such mundane issues as ethnicity, religion, geo-politics and the inordinate attempt by sections to dominate others come very prominently. Their destabilizing tendencies have overtime reinforced what foremost political Philosopher; Richard Joseph characterized as prebendal politics- the struggle for public office to acquire power and wealth for one’s immediate family and members of his ethnic group.

    Geo-politics saw to the emergence of Obasanjo, Jonathan and Buhari. It will also continue to shape and colour our political recruitment process now or in the nearest future as long as our politics fails to develop beyond the categorization of Joseph. In it can also be found why corruption has become part of our national life. How Obasanjo’s new brand of leaders will emerge and fare when mundane tendencies majorly determine political recruitment and action remains contentious? How such idea will be given vent by those who see leadership at the centre as opportunity to skew national patronage disproportionately to the section from which the president comes is another issue. What of vested interests both in and outside of government whose main concerns are to maintain their stranglehold on the nation’s politics and economy for selfish ends?

    What these underscore is the inevitability of attitudinal and orientation change. For as long as we are stuck to old attitudes and prejudices; opposing innovations and time tested approaches to co-habitation and national integration, for so long shall we continue to throw up leaders tainted by our ruinous pasts. We are all part and parcel of the ailing Nigerian state. We are all part of its past and present prejudices. Whatever leadership that emerges now, will still owe its allegiance and success to the complex forces that will throw it up. Hard as they may try, they will still have to contend with debilitating influences and forces that saw to their emergence. Buhari’s leadership is a case in point.

    That is where restructuring cues in very appropriately. Sadly, Obasanjo has been ambivalent on this critical re-engineering therapy even as Babangida lends his full weight to its imperative. It is difficult to evolve the leadership being craved for in the face of the daunting imperfections of extant federal order. Even when we succeed in throwing up quality and good leaders, they will soon be corrupted and disabled by inordinate competition to take advantage of the very rich, influential and powerful central government. Corruption; do or die politics and all the centrifugal tendencies that have stood on the way to national integration are reared and sustained by the disproportionate wealth and power at the control of the federal government.

    Devolution of powers, fiscal federalism and equity between and among the component units will substantially whittle down these negative tendencies and facilitate national integration. For now, these negative influences will continue to incapacitate those thrown up for leadership until they are successfully stymied to the satisfaction of the constituents. Is it surprising that schism is at an all time high now?

     

  • A nation and its fuel saga

    Despite being Africa’s largest oil producer, Nigeria imports petroleum products. According to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), the country spent N2.068 trillion on fuel importation between January and September 2017. Corruption, importation hiccups and infrastructure challenges, among others, have combined to cause products shortage. Energy Correspondent AKINOLA AJIBADE examines the intricacies of fuel supply.

    The problem has defied solution. Despite widely reported efforts by the authorities, industry operators and stakeholders to find lasting solution to the lingering crisis in the downstream sector of the nation’s oil and gas industry, where protracted fuel scarcity has continued to unleash untold hardship on Nigerians, it has refused to abate. Rather than do so, fuel scarcity has emerged, arguably, as Africa’s largest oil producer’s worst nightmare.

    Since December last year when the latest round of fuel scarcity hit the country, robbing Nigerians of a blissful, hitch free yuletide, the situation has yet to improve, months after. Checks by The Nation revealed that the product is still largely unavailable in some parts of the country. Fuel queues have yet to disappear completely from some service stations across the country, particularly where the product is being sold at the regulated price of N145 per litre.

    Findings by The Nation showed that petrol, also known as Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), is still being sold at between N165 to N180 per litre in some parts of Lagos, Nigeria’s commercial capital. In the southeast, particularly Owerri, the Imo State capital, the products is being sold for as much as between N200 per litre in some filling stations, a development, which lent credence to the fact that the product is still unavailable, at least, in sufficient quantity.

    Curiously, the scarcity of the product and its attendant high cost have persisted despite widely reported interventions by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). Its Group General Manager, Public Affairs, Udu Ughamadu, has never stopped telling angry Nigerians that it has been supplying more fuel with a view to reducing the burden the situation has foisted on consumers across the country.

    For instance, he said the country imported fuel worth $4.6 billion in December last year in order to ensure that enough fuel was distributed in the country. According to him, the December intervention helped the government to ascertain the level of fuel needed in the country during emergency period.

    Ughamadu said the country consumes between 39 to 40 million litres of fuel per day and loses N774million daily to  activities who smuggle petroleum prodcuts  to neighnouring countries, in order to make more money.     Although, he stressed that the government has ensured that the supply go round the country in order to prevent scarcity, the expected succour has, however, refused to come the way of Nigerians as the problem has persisted.

    The attendant anger and frustration may have forced the NNPC to dish out several reasons the Africa’s largest oil producer has remained yoked by protracted fuel scarcity. It listed some of the factors responsible for the problem as rising cost of importation, diversion and delay in clearing fuel cargoes at the ports, among others.

    According to Ughamadu, NNPC remains the sole importer of fuel into the country, a situation, which he said was a heavy burden on NNPC’s shrinking purse. He said, for instance, that NNPC imports fuel at N181 per litre and sells the product at N145 per litre. “At N181 per litre of fuel, the Corporation is paying subsidies on fuel that it is importing into the country,” he complained.

    “It is not convenient for NNPC to import fuel at N181. You can see that the difference between the landing cost of N181 per litre and the official pump price of N145 per litter is N36.

    “If the Corporation, which is owned by the government is not comfortable with the rising cost of importation of fuel, how much more the  private operators, especially marketers that are complaining of not having enough funds to import fuel into the country?”he asked.

    The Nation, however, learnt that the problem goes beyond cost of importation. According to the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Dr. Ibe Kachikwu, dearth of infrastructure is at the core of the problem. To him,  the lingering fuel scarcity was caused by lack of sufficient fuel reserves.

    He said with sufficient fuel reserves, the government could have a fall back option to supply fuel in the event that there is fuel scarcity in the country. He also said the speed at which cargoes were cleared at the ports was low, a development which affects distribution of  the product across the country, coupled with the decision by some marketers to divert petroleum products to neighboring countries.

    Speaking at a meeting of the joint committee of the Senate and House of Representatives, recently, Kachikwu blamed the fuel scarcity on saboteurs, adding that they have been undermining government’s efforts  to improve fuel supply through imposing illegal charges on truck owners.

    “The causes were: first, diversion was very key and second, there were logistics issues. Once those diversions began Apapa Wharf was a problem to be able to move things due to bad roads. Lack of sufficient reserve in our system also made us unable to respond to the supply gap arising largely from the fact that private sector pulled out from supply,”he said.

    He continued: “There has been a loose enforcement on diversion of fuel in the country and we have not been able to police our depots adequately.” The Minister also added that the disparity in the landing cost has prevented private marketers from importing petroleum into the country.

     

    Scarcity self-inflicted, say stakeholders

    While the Minister’s and the NNPC’s explanations may sound plausible, a common thread that runs through them is perhaps, an attempt to ignore the more fundamental challenge of lack of political will by successive governments to holistically address the country’s lack of local refining capacity. The thinking of not a few stakeholders, particularly marketers, is that the lingering fuel crisis is a subset of the problems in the nation’s oil & gas industry.

    For instance, the Secretary of Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN), Mr. Femi Olawore, did not mince words when he said fuel scarcity persists in the country because the Federal Government has failed to resolve issues that border on the operation of the refineries.

    According to him, the four refineries put together produce below 100 per cent, despite the decision by the Federal Government to fix them. He was specific that efforts by the governments to rehabilitate the refineries, coupled with huge some of money sunk into them, have yielded little efforts as the refineries have failed to process enough crude to serve the country’s needs.

    Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), Chairman in Southwest,  Alhaji Debo Ahmed, agreed with Olawore. He described the refineries’ condition as worrisome. According to him, the refineries produce below capacity, which made the government to resort to fuel importation.

    “The four state-owned refineries namely, Warri, Port Harcourt 1&2 and Kaduna refineries are partially operating. They operate between 30 per cent to 40 per cent and sometimes 50 per cent, and these figures are too small for the country to achieve fuel sufficiency,”Ahmed pointed out.

    The IPMAN Chairman was emphatic that “fuel scarcity will continue to exist in Nigeria as long as the Federal Government fails to put in place measures to solve the problems facing the refineries once and for all”.

    He also said the cost of importing fuel into the country was high, adding that the development has made it impossible for the marketers to have fuel in their outlets. He told The Nation that marketers are not comfortable with the rising cost of importation of fuel into the country.

    The disparity in the price at which fuel is being brought into the country, he said, was as a result of the needs and destinations of the refiners abroad. “The refining companies abroad have different prices and often times, the prices are determined by the capacities and locations of their plants.

    “If a refinery offers a litre of fuel at the rate of $350, another firm may charge lesser amount to refine fuel, while the price may be higher in another firm. By the time marketers add other costs to the cost of refining the product, the cost becomes unaffordable to the marketers,”he said.

    Ahmed also explained that the problems in the industry are inter-dependent because they relate to one another. For instance, he said if a problem exists in the exploration arm of the industry it has cumulative effects on other arms such as production, refining and distribution of petroleum by-products such as petrol, diesel and kerosene.

    Ejigbo Satellite Depot IPMAN Chairman, Alhaji Alanamu Balogun said the government has cut down fuel supplies to marketers, following the scarcity of fuel, which gripped the country during the Christmas and New Year period.

    He said the NNPC could not afford to supply the product in sufficient quantity to meet the needs of over 170 million Nigerians. According to him, getting fuel to buy has become a serious problem, especially in the Northern and Eastern parts of the country. This is because the NNPC has drastically reduced the supply of fuel to the marketers, due to scarcity. “This explains why many people cannot, as usual, go to petrol stations and get the product easily,” he said.

    Also, Executive Secretary, Depot and Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPMAN), Mr. Femi Adewole, said the removal of subsidy and failure by the Federal Government to pay the subsidy arrears owed marketers were responsible for the fuel scarcity, which gripped the country in December 2017 and extended to early 2018.

    He said the government owed marketers $2 billion, about N500 billion in subsidy arrears. He accused government of hurting the marketers by refusing to pay the subsidies owed them, adding that marketers are unable to import fuel because of government’s failure to pay the subsidies.

    Adewole said: “We (marketers) have made our submission to the government that the fuel scarcity was as a result of removal of subsidies, non-payment of the arrears and the price of crude that remained in December following the hurricane Katrina in the month of September-October. As a result, prices of crude went up and marketers lost the ability to import fuel at N145 per litre.”

    Reliable industry sources confirmed to The Nation that the Federal Government indeed, moved to sort out issues around payment of subsidies with a view to reducing the burdens of importation of fuel on marketers, especially those that belong to MOMAN and DAPMAN).

    The government was said to have fulfilled its own side of the bargain with regards to an agreement reached with the marketers to pay them subsidies. However, the government at a point stopped the payment, following the discovery that the subsidies were allegedly being diverted to other uses by some marketers. This made the affected marketers to stop importation of fuel.

     

    Obsolete facilities

    are pains in the neck

    Balogun added that apart from the fact that the demand for fuel outweighs supply, there is also the problem of obsolete facilities at depots, as many of them cannot boast of enough tanks to store products supplied to them by the NNPC.

    His words: “Fuel scarcity persists because NNPC cannot supply enough fuel to the depots because the facilities are moribund. Imagine a situation whereby marketers are coming from Abuja, Ilorin, Ibadan, Ore and other depots to load in Ejigbo.

    “Before, Ejigbo depot was loading 120 trucks or more a day. But the depot is now loading below 60 trucks a day. Out of the 60 trucks, the depot will give Ore depot two or three trucks, give Ibadan two trucks and other depots around.”

    He said at the end of the day, Lagos is left with 30 or 40 trucks, which according to him, are not enough to meet the consumers’ needs.

     

    Consumers groan

    As the scarcity persists, some consumers have been screaming blue murder, describing the situation as a national embarrassment. For instance, a commercial bus driver, Mr. Sunday Ojuolape, lamented how he struggled to get fuel for his 18-seater bus.

    Ojuolape, a resident of Abule-Egba, a Lagos surburb, said the fuel situations have not improved despite assurances by the authorities in the Ministry and the NNPC that the scarcity was being addressed. He said many of the fuel stations are complaining of not having enough fuel in their dumps.

    The commercial bus driver kicked that because of the product scarcity, he had to pay more to get fuel.  “And to make matters worse, any attempts to pass the burden on to passengers is being resisted, leading to constant quarrels,”he said.

    A marketer in Ilorin, who declined to be mentioned, said fuel is scarce in the ancient city. He said it has become difficult for him and his colleagues to get enough fuel to sell, adding that the issue is making it difficult for their business to survive.

     

    Importation digs

    hole in govt’s purse

    Beyond consumers’ lamentations, the huge capital flight caused by unbridled importation of petroleum products, especially fuel, has remained a serious blight on government’s efforts to turn the economy around.

    According to Kachikwu, Nigeria spent a whopping N2.068 trillion on the importation of petroleum products within a nine-month period, from January to September 2017, rising by 14.32 per cent from N1.809 trillion recorded in the same period in 2016.

    According to data obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) foreign trade statistics for third quarter 2017, of the total petroleum products imported, N1.541 trillion was spent on PMS importation.

    A breakdown of the country’s petroleum products importation on a quarter-on-quarter basis showed that N757.397 billion, N707.475 billion and N602.889 billion were spent on the importation of the commodities in the first, second and third quarters respectively, compared to N434.39 billion, N598.36 billion and N776.947 billion recorded in the first, second and third quarters of 2016 respectively.

    NBS said in the third quarter of 2017 alone, the country spent N476.755 billion on petrol importation, representing 20.30 per cent of total imports in the same period, while gas oil importation accounted for 2.42 per cent of the country’s total importation with N56.752 billion.

    Nigeria produces about 1.8 million barrels of oil daily, but imports an average of between 2 billion litres to 4.2 billion litres of fuel monthly. The thinking is that if the huge petroleum products import bill is halted by fixing the refineries, the money could be channelled into fixing infrastructure, which has been a pain in the neck of operators in various sectors of the economy.

     

    Way forward

    Apart from the need to urgently fix the refineries, not a few industry stakeholders have called for full deregulation of the downstream sector of the oil & gas industry. Some of them, who spoke with The Nation, argued that deregulation brings more players into the production, exploration, refining and trading of petroleum products.

    For instance, Integrated Oil and Gas Limited Chairman, Capt. Emmanuel Ihenacho (rtd.), said deregulation will have the long-term effect of making fuel available in the country. He said any attempt by the Federal Government to fully deregulate the down-sub-sector of the oil and gas industry will revolutionise the industry by opening the door for more players.

    He, however, applauded the government for allowing private investors to invest in refinery operations, adding that the idea would help in improving domestic consumption of fuel as well as bringing more revenue to the government.

    “Dangote Petrochemical Refineries is coming on stream in 2019 to refine 650,000 barrels of crude per day. This is not only huge, but it will also afford Nigeria the opportunity to export processed petroleum products to neighbouring countries. The development will in no distance future help the country achieve self sufficiency in fuel usage,” Ihenacho said.

    He also expressed optimism that the establishment of modular refineries will re-invigorate the sub-sector, as it is going to open door for more operators in that segment of the industry.

    “By allowing people to be licensed as modular refinery operators, the government is trying to improve on the quality and volume of refined petroleum products in the country,” Ihenacho pointed out, adding that the initiative will also galvanise other economic activities in the country.

    Ahmed could not agree less. He said modular refineries are the way out of the lingering fuel scarcity in the country. He, therefore, urged the government to bring more investors into modular refinery activities.

    Sound recommendations, no doubt, but it remains to be seen how government responds to them. What is clear, however, is that until and unless government summons the political will to address these issues, the problem of fuel scarcity in the country will remain.

  • A nation in free fall

    If anyone needed any barometer to gauge how much as a people we have sunk, it is the on-going but systemic displacement of law and the mores as we know it by the rampaging brigade of self-helpers across the land. Today, it seems part of the striving to reconfigure the new-normal in our ethically-challenged society is the deadly contest between elements sworn to champion society’s regression into unimaginable barbarity and the brigade sworn to dispense with the niceties of due process as they set out to mete summary justice. While neither side is necessarily guaranteed to win, the rest of us – the orderly society – are the assured losers.

    I start with the discovery by residents of Ijaiye, Ahmadiyya and Abule-Egba areas of Lagos State of a ritualists’ den in the early hours of Tuesday last week. Using The Guardian report as guide, the matter is said to have started with a horrific cry from an underground tunnel linked to a canal – a shrill cry which apparently drew the attention of a female sweeper. By the time passers-by drawn to help locate the fellow behind the cry entered the canal, the victim had been reportedly killed – allegedly by the ritualists – although her little baby was reportedly found still alive. A follow up sweep by security men would yield a man said to belong to a 28-member gang operating under the canal. The residents, by now incensed stormed the scene ostensibly to rescue more victims and possibly apprehend the ritualists. The efforts reportedly paid-off with two suspects brought out only to be whisked off by the police. Thereafter, it became a case of the mob taking charge as two more suspects brought out from the underground were burnt alive by the mob who overpowered the police and other security agencies.

    Another scene would play out two days later along the busy Lagos-Abeokuta expressway by Ile-Zik Bus Stop, Ikeja where again, two men, suspected to be kidnappers were similarly set ablaze. It is something like a scene from a movie.

    It is a familiar story. The big part is supposed to be  the  cold, ruthless killers on rampage. Whether it is the ritualists or the Mafiosi-styled killer cult – Badoo –operating from their Ikorodu redoubt, the fear of the merchants of human parts has since become the beginning of wisdom. The bigger story however is the scandal of a society on fast regression into savagery; a scathing testimonial of the boundless contradictions of our thoroughly diseased and astoundingly superstitious society; a society where science and rationality are in full flight; where religion trumps reason and religiosity is in full ascendance.

    There is however another angle to last week’s discovery that is arguably a fitting testimony the dual character of the Centre of Excellence; a city that is arguably the most progressive on the continent; yet is one where superstitions of the most heinous kind not only inhere but thrive. A city with the highest number of religious houses on the continent yet is the bastion of some of the most fetish, syncretistic practices.  It is a story of a state which although aspires to a world-class status, yet insists on manifesting some of the more malevolent features of prehistoric society.

    Say what we may of the cult of Badoo or those of ritualists, they did not chance upon us. Those in the group are no ghosts; they live among us. Their wives shop in the same market with ours, their children the same school with our children. That they have grown to become a menace to the rest of us is to be put squarely to the uncaring, indifferent society that we have nurtured.  In other words, the situation, at the very basic level, is a symptom of failure of citizenship. I say this borne of conviction that only an indifferent people would permit the swathe under which such anti-social groups would thrive. While we know enough to blame the leadership – from the traditional to the government –  for the failure to secure the public space, the problem is that the failures of our basic humanity is what comes back to haunt us in a spiral of tragedy.

    Today, there are enough stories to illustrate how most Nigerians, despite their pretensions, are light years away from modernity. Is it not interesting that the same Nigerians that are only too ready to spread the fable about some toxic GSM numbers said to induce heart attacks when picked cannot find the use for the same tools in moments of emergency? How often do Nigerians get those silly solicitations so inelegantly baked as it were from the mythical mill?

    Yes, while the government is encouraged to do its part by providing modern security infrastructure, what about the citizens who couldn’t be bothered about the age-long values or accept the basic duty of being ones brother’s keeper?

    It is something for those pushing for reworking of the national architecture to think about.

    Now, that takes yours truly to the massacre at St. Patrick Catholic Church in Ozubulu, Anambra State in the course of an early morning mass. The story – although still largely unofficial –of a business gone sour has all the elements of the underworld gang wars. While preliminary account tends to suggest a clash over money and power, it comes basically to the story of individuals who have not only renounced the values that bind the collective together, but sold their souls to the devil.

    That some loony would slaughter 12 unarmed innocents for whatever reason is as evil as it is unimaginable. Of course, those mouthing sacrilege only because the church suffered savage violation of its hallowed precincts miss the point: mass slaughter for any reason or no reason at all is bad; unjustifiable. Taking the turf fights into the church – the symbol of the moral community, is although indicative of a society in free fall, hardly makes it worse.

    For the church, the lesson must be to continually denounce evil; to condemn, relentlessly, the crass individualism that has taken over the gospel; to eschew the gospel of mammon that guarantees the followers a one-way ticket to hell.

  • A nation without leaders

    A nation without leaders

    To Anthony Cardinal Olubunmi Okogie, no leader gives what he does not have. The fiery cleric believes Nigeria needs a visionary leadership to steer its ship to the Promised Land. In this article, the Archbishop Emeritus of Lagos says the country is in dire need of quality leadership as an executive and a legislature locked in a recurrence of unprincipled and sterile conflict cannot in any way fix the country. 

    When a nation is in turmoil, those who have faith in God must pray. Given clear indices that Nigeria is in turmoil, we pray: Gracious God, grant that our leaders become wise, and the wise become our leaders. But it would be irresponsible fideism to simply pray and fold our arms. Those who pray must think, and, having sought and obtained answers to right questions, they must act intelligently.

    As Nigeria passes from one turbulent season to another, it has become inescapable to inquire: what is the quality of leaders – of the men and women at the helm of affairs – in our beloved Nigeria?  Can it be said that those at the helm of affairs – at federal, state, and local levels of government – are sufficiently competent to navigate the ship of state? Do our leaders fit the bill?

     

    Some indices

    The high level of insecurity in our land; the abysmally low quality of life of the average Nigerian, in scandalously sharp contrast with the opulence in which past and political office holders live; the self-serving and malevolent demagoguery that accompanies unitarist, secessionist, and xenophobic agitations in our country; the propagation of the stubborn myth that one’s ethnic community is marginalised by all other ethnic communities, when in fact, every ethnic community is marginalised by the incompetence of our leaders; the acceptance of this myth by young, discontented but gullible Nigerians:  these and many other indices offer little or no hope to even the most incurable optimist in the land.

     

    Our kind of leaders

    Instead of devoting their mental and physical capacities to governance, our leaders are seeking their own interests. Nigerians bear the excruciating burden of being ruled by politicians who simply care less about Nigerians. The burden is increased when they have to listen to religious leaders who whip up emotions and deceive by using the name of God, claiming visions and miracles.  We do not care about our legacy, we care only about the power we wield, the wealth – often ill-gotten – we display, and above all, the pleasure and affluence we seek.

    What do we make of a country where an individual owns a fleet of private jets while an overwhelming percentage of its citizens cannot afford a bus ride to the market? What do we make of a country where the wealth of the land, wealth that belongs to the people and not to government, is used to provide security for government officials, while there is no security for the average man or woman in the street?

    We have the police and the military; we have assorted security agencies with exotic names.  Yet, Nigerians are robbed and murdered in their homes, abducted on the streets, at the mercy of gangsters, ritualists and cultists in their neighbourhood, while the police are helpless to the point of non-existence. The only sign that there is policing is when policemen and women extort money from Nigerians, often at gun point.

    Our security agencies need to get the sequence of their steps right. Thorough investigation must precede an arrest and diligent prosecution with evidence must come before conviction in a lawfully constituted court. That is what obtains in other climes. But, in our own Nigeria, media trial is fashionable. Suspects are paraded on prime-time television, guns and bullets are displayed in front of them, the police spokesman presents them to Nigerians and pronounces them guilty in front of television cameras. Case closed.  Nigerians are not asking for any follow-up. They hear of no trial, no conviction, no sentencing. What has happened to numerous suspects paraded on television in this country?

    While we seek answers, to that question, we note that, from time to time, Amnesty International (AI) raises alarm about extra-judicial killings in Nigeria. Are Nigerians satisfied with the response of the police? Why is it that once suspects are paraded and presented as guilty – and the legal and moral propriety of the parade is another bone of contention – we very rarely see them in court?  Is there no law that says a suspect must be charged to court within 48 hours? Why then are suspects kept for days and weeks and months without trial?

    It is in the same vein that we must ask: what has happened to so many public office holders pronounced guilty by the EFCC (Economic and Financial Commission) and DSS (Department of State Services) in the media before they were even charged to court? We know that some of them were set free by the law courts. We also know that government reacts with a familiar refrain: “corruption is fighting back”. But is there no correlation between the quality of investigation and prosecution on the one hand, and the verdict given by our judges on the other hand?

    A thief is a thief. If you apprehend him red-handed but fail to provide evidence in court to lead to his conviction, do not camouflage the incompetence of your team of investigators and prosecutors by blaming the unfavourable outcome of the case on corrupt judges. We are not to hold brief for any judge. But we must bear this in mind: The onus of proof is on the accuser, not on the accused. That is why the accused is innocent until proven guilty. Whether he is accused of kidnapping the citizen or of kidnapping public funds, as is the case with those who have stolen the wealth of this country, thorough investigation must precede diligent prosecution. To violate this principle is to bid farewell to security of life, property and reputation. It is to receive a resounding defeat in the much-publicised war against corruption. It is to live in a country where die-hard criminals get away with murder while the innocent gets convicted. He is convicted, not because he has been found guilty, but because – thanks to media trial – he has been demonised and made to look guilty. It is to give the dog a bad name and hang him.

    But when criminals are properly investigated we would be in a position to prevent crime. Where we do not prevent crime, life and property are not safe. Where life and property are not safe, investments are not safe.  Investors take to their heels and vote with their capital.  Where there are no investments, the quality of life of citizens takes a plunge; their abject poverty breeds discontent and anger, insecurity, secessionist and xenophobic tendencies.

     

    Finally

    Precisely for these reasons, this country is in very urgent need of quality leadership. Our situation cannot be addressed by an executive and a legislature locked in a recurrence of unprincipled and sterile conflicts. In more concrete terms, neither an ailing and absentee President nor an acting President can lead Nigeria out of the present situation. Nigerian leaders must wake up lest the ship of state sink. They must stop fiddling while the country is burning.

    So, we pray: Grant, O Lord, that our leaders become wise, and that the wise become our leaders. Amen.