As Nigeria approaches another election cycle, government and civic leaders have urged young Nigerians to embrace volunteerism, discipline, and service as the path to leadership rather than expecting power to be handed to them.
This call formed the central message at the Nigeria@65 Conference in Abuja on Tuesday by the Citizenship and Leadership Training Centre (CLTC), themed “Restoring Values and Volunteerism Among the Youth.”
Director-General of the CLTC, Rinsola Abiola, said the event, organised in collaboration with Aspitah Global Resources, the United Nations Inter-Agency Group on Youth, and the Nigeria Youth Futures Fund (NYFF) under LEAP Africa, aimed to reignite civic consciousness and value-driven leadership among Nigeria’s youth.
“At 65, our nation stands at a critical point where restoring discipline, empathy and national service has become indispensable to our collective growth. Every act of volunteerism, no matter how small, contributes to the greatness of our country,” she said.
Abiola emphasised that volunteerism is the foundation of true leadership, noting that young Nigerians must first serve their communities before aspiring to lead them.
“This event provides a platform to reflect on the principles that once defined us as a people and to chart new pathways through which our youth can reclaim the spirit of volunteerism — an ethos that drives active citizenship and national renewal,” she added.
The message was echoed by the Director-General of the National Orientation Agency (NOA) and other senior officials who attended the event.
They stressed that the nation’s future depends on the willingness of youths to rebuild trust in governance through civic engagement and responsible citizenship.
Representing the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the agency’s Head of Enlightenment and Reorientation, Aisha Mohammed, said civic engagement and integrity education remain central to nation-building.
“It is in recognition of the power of youth engagement that the EFCC established clubs in schools to get young people involved in activities that make them better citizens. Volunteerism is a vital tool for developing the country”, she said.
She urged young Nigerians to view integrity as a personal responsibility and volunteerism as a patriotic duty, not a burden.
The Director-General of the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), Brigadier-General Olakunle Nafiu, reminded the youth that service to the nation remains the truest test of leadership.
“For over five decades, the NYSC has been a platform for national service and unity. Young Nigerians are not mere beneficiaries of Nigeria — they are its chief architects”, he said.
Nafiu disclosed that the scheme is deepening its impact by linking volunteerism with entrepreneurship and national development, while continuing collaboration with the CLTC to train young people in civic values and leadership skills.
National Commander of Man O’ War Nigeria, Gbenga Adedamola, described volunteerism as “the soul of patriotism.”
“The future we seek cannot be built by government alone; it requires citizens, especially young people, who are ready to serve, to lead, and to build. Let’s make volunteerism a culture, not just an act”, he said.
Delivering the keynote address, Iyinoluwa Aboyeji, tech entrepreneur and CEO of Future Africa, argued that Nigeria’s biggest challenge is a failure of leadership, not of leaders — a misinterpretation, he said, that has persisted since Chinua Achebe’s 1983 classic, “The Trouble with Nigeria.”
“Most people misread Achebe’s statement. The trouble with Nigeria is not bad leaders; it’s the failure of leadership as a culture. Leadership is not a title or privilege, but a shared awareness that empowers people to influence and unite others toward a common goal”, he said.
Aboyeji cautioned against the “messianic leader syndrome” that makes Nigerians believe one person can fix the country.
“By making leadership one man’s job, we deny ourselves the agency required to demonstrate leadership across different levels of society,” he said.
He urged young Nigerians to take ownership of the country’s destiny through service, innovation, and resilience.
“We must teach our youth to be resolute, responsible, resourceful, resilient and relentless,” he declared.
Prof. Tunji Olaopa, Chairman of the Federal Civil Service Commission, said the erosion of moral values has weakened public service ethics.
“We still get nostalgic about the public service of old that conferred honour on service to the nation. The youth bulge can be our greatest asset if properly mentored, engaged, and empowered”, he said.
Olaopa urged young Nigerians to regard public service as a noble vocation.
“Reform must make public service a noble vocation again. We must rethink incentives and workplace culture to align with a generation that values innovation, flexibility and purpose,” he added.
A United Nations Resident Coordinator, speaking as a UN volunteer, said even the smallest act of service could transform communities.
“When young people rise to serve, then the soul of the nation can be reborn,” she said.
The conference climaxed with the Youth Leadership Debate Finale, an initiative of LEAP Africa, where students from universities nationwide displayed intellect and patriotism.
Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University (formerly Benue State University) clinched first place, represented by Esther Nguuma Dodo and Blessing Ehigocho Oigaba, who won ₦2.5 million and laptops.
Lagos State University’s Obadimeji David and Saheed Sunday placed second, winning ₦1.5 million and tablets, while University of Uyo’s Effiong Favour and Umoren Blossom came third, earning ₦1 million and mobile phones.
Every June 12, Nigeria observes a significant date that embodies both the aspirations for democracy and the painful betrayal of that dream. This day commemorates the 1993 presidential election, celebrated as the most free and fair in the country’s history but ultimately annulled by the military regime led by General Ibrahim Babangida. While the focus has often been on the political and military figures involved, there has been less emphasis on the intellectual shortcomings that contributed to this democratic failure. These shortcomings—the “intellectual sins” of June 12—include silence, complicity, and ideological failures that continue to impact Nigeria’s pursuit of democracy.
The election that could have changed Everything
Every June 12, Nigeria observes a significant date that embodies both the aspirations for democracy and the painful betrayal of that dream. This day commemorates the 1993 presidential election, celebrated as the most free and fair in the country’s history but ultimately annulled by the military regime led by General Ibrahim Babangida. While the focus has often been on the political and military figures involved, there has been less emphasis on the intellectual shortcomings that contributed to this democratic failure. These shortcomings—the “intellectual sins” of June 12—include silence, complicity, and ideological failures that continue to impact Nigeria’s pursuit of democracy.On June 12, 1993, Nigerians came together to vote for Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola, a well-known southern Muslim celebrated for his wealth, philanthropy, and political acumen. His electoral victory was more than just a tally of votes; it became a powerful symbol of national unity and a collective longing for civilian governance following years of military rule.
The military’s annulment of the election results, based on vague security concerns and claims of irregularities, was profoundly disappointing. This decision was not merely a political manoeuvre; it represented a significant betrayal of the democratic values that the election was meant to uphold.
The silence of the intellectual class
One of the most troubling aspects of the June 12 crisis was the widespread silence—or, even worse, the rationalizations—by many in Nigeria’s intellectual elite. University professors, public commentators, and thought leaders, who should have served as the nation’s moral compass, largely failed to speak out against the annulment. Some even justified it, wrapping their arguments in legal jargon or appealing to national stability.
The silence in this situation was not neutral; it was an act of complicity. During times of national crisis, when the intelligentsia chooses to remain silent, this absence is not merely a lack of comment—it is an endorsement of the status quo. Nigeria’s intellectual class’s failure to provide a strong defence of democracy in 1993 highlighted a more profound issue: a lack of genuine commitment to democratic governance.
Ethnic Chauvinism and the failure of national integration:
The annulment highlighted the fragility of Nigeria’s national identity. Although Abiola had widespread appeal across the country, the decision to invalidate his victory was perceived mainly as influenced by northern political elites who were uneasy about a southern Muslim becoming president. This perception, whether accurate or not, strengthened the belief that Nigeria’s democracy is held captive by ethnic and regional interests.
Once again, the intellectual class fell short. Instead of confronting the ethnicization of politics, many scholars and commentators either overlooked it or contributed to it. The chance to use June 12 as a catalyst for national integration and civic nationalism was missed.
The Legal and Constitutional Vacuum:
The events of June 12 highlighted Nigeria’s fragile legal and constitutional framework. The annulment of the election exposed the country’s institutions as inadequate in preventing executive overreach and safeguarding the electoral process. At that time, there was a lack of an independent judiciary capable of contesting military actions, an ineffective legislature to oversee government activities, and a civil society that was not sufficiently strong to mobilize in response.
The Institutional weakness in Nigeria was not a coincidence; it stemmed from years of intellectual neglect. The country’s legal scholars, constitutional designers, and policy thinkers did not create a system robust enough to resist authoritarian tendencies. Consequently, the annulment of electoral processes directly resulted from this inadequacy.
The military’s commitment to transitioning Nigeria to civilian rule was fraught with inconsistencies. The annulment of the June 12 elections exposed the illusion that democratic governance could be realised without a fundamental change in the country’s political culture. The transition program itself was characterized by a top-down approach, a lack of transparency, and a focus on maintaining the interests of the elite.
Many intellectuals were drawn into the myth surrounding a purportedly democratic transition process. By actively participating in advisory roles, they inadvertently lent credibility to a system that lacked true democratic principles. Their failure to critically examine the underlying foundations of this transition program represents a significant intellectual oversight.
The Repetition of History:
The aftermath of June 12 has had lasting repercussions for Nigeria, as the country seems trapped in a cycle of repeating past mistakes. Key issues such as electoral malpractice, the dominance of elites over democratic institutions, and the suppression of dissent are still prevalent in the political landscape. Unfortunately, society has not fully grasped or embraced the vital lessons from June 12, indicating a failure to learn from history.
The recurring failures
In Nigeria’s democracy highlight a deeper intellectual shortcoming, as there is a reluctance to engage in critical self-reflection and necessary institutional reform. It is simpler for leaders to honour June 12 through ceremonies and speeches rather than address the uncomfortable realities that emerge from this historical moment.
A Path to Redemption:
Nigeria needs to initiate a new democratic renaissance to address the intellectual shortcomings highlighted on June 12. This revival should focus on enhancing civic education, implementing institutional reforms, and reaffirming a strong commitment to democratic values.
1. Enhancing civic education within society is essential to ensuring the vitality of democracy. This involves prioritizing the teaching of democratic principles, critical thinking, and active citizenship in schools, universities, and media outlets. By doing so, citizens will become more aware of their rights and responsibilities, thus fostering a more engaged and informed populace.
2. Strengthen Institutions: A functioning democracy requires that the judiciary, electoral commission, and legislature operate without political interference. Achieving this necessitates legal reforms and a significant cultural shift in how power is exercised and contested within society.
3. Empower a New Generation of Public Intellectuals: Nigeria requires independent thinkers who prioritize democratic values over ethnic or political affiliations. These intellectuals should courageously challenge authority and advocate for democratic principles, unafraid of potential repercussions.
4. Confront the Past Honestly: The June 12 crisis serves as an important historical event that should be incorporated into school curricula and discussed in public forums. It carries significant moral lessons that are essential for understanding the past. By acknowledging and confronting this history, Nigeria can work towards establishing a more just and democratic future.
Conclusion: Democracy as a moral imperative
June 12 serves as a powerful reminder of Nigeria’s complex democratic journey, highlighting both its potential and challenges. Rather than merely marking the date with hollow statements, engaging in a genuine reflection on the past is essential. The mistakes of that time—characterized by silence, complicity, and ideological failures—should not be repeated. As we honour this day, we must recommit ourselves to the ideals embodied by Abiola’s victory, including justice, unity, and the empowerment of the people.
Democracy transcends being merely a system of governance; it is fundamentally a moral obligation. Every citizen, particularly those influential in shaping public opinion, has the responsibility to uphold and defend democratic principles with bravery, clarity, and firm conviction.
A coalition of civil society groups and residents in Osun State has called on the federal government to pay all presidential entitlements due to the family of the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola as a form of atonement for his sacrifice for democracy.
The demand was made during a Democracy Day solidarity walk organised in partnership with the Osun state government.
The walk, which drew a large turnout, proceeded from Old-Garage through Orisunbare, Ola-Iya, and Fakunle to the Old Governor’s Office, where a panel session was held.
Addressing journalists at the event, Chairman of the Osun Civil Societies Coalition, Comrade Waheed Lawal, praised Abiola’s commitment to democratic ideals and commended the Federal Government for recognising June 12 in his honour.
He insisted that Abiola’s family deserves to be compensated with all benefits due to a democratically elected president.
“Abiola struggled and paid the ultimate price to entrench democracy in Nigeria,” Lawal said. “It would be unjust not to pay his family their entitlements. Doing so would be a symbolic act of atonement for the pain they endured.”
He also urged the Osun State Government to fulfil its promises of employing more teachers, creating job opportunities for youths, and strengthening security.
In a lecture delivered during the session, Comrade Lanre Arogundade noted that many of the issues Abiola campaigned against still persist, urging all levels of government to intensify efforts in delivering good governance to Nigerians.
The family of the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993, presidential election, late Bashorun MKO Abiola, has called on the National Assembly to pass enabling legislation that would permanently enshrine June 12 as a significant part of Nigeria’s democratic history.
Speaking on Democracy Day in Abeokuta, Hameen Abiola, a son of the late politician and spokesman for the family, said the move is essential to safeguard the ideals of June 12 from being forgotten by future generations unfamiliar with the struggles and sacrifices that led to Nigeria’s current democratic dispensation.
Hameen emphasised that formal recognition through legislation would serve to immortalise not just MKO Abiola, but also his late wife, Kudirat Abiola, and the many Nigerians who lost their lives during the struggle to actualise the June 12 mandate.
He made the appeal while receiving a state government delegation led by Deputy Governor Noimot Salako-Oyedele at the family home in Oja-Agbo, Abeokuta, where a special Islamic prayer session was held in honour of the late Abiola.
Noting recent political developments in the country, Hameen urged the Federal Government and the National Assembly to take urgent steps to institutionalise the memory of June 12, ensuring younger generations understand the values, sacrifices, and democratic rebirth that followed the annulled 1993 election.
He said, “We appreciate the Federal Government of Nigeria for the honour done to our father, he is not only our father but a father of many Nigerians, given the supreme sacrifice he had to pay for the democracy that we are all enjoying today.
“We thank former President Muhammad Buhari for conferring on our father the award of GCFR, which is a great step in the right direction. However it is our passionate appeal that the federal government can permanently enact a bill that will forever make June 12 Democracy Day so that the future generations who may not understand the roles that our father played in returning the country to democratic rule and therefore abolished this June 12 as the Democracy Day which is picked to celebrate our father, Chief MKO Abiola.
“If you observe very well, you’ll realise that the current generation is getting old and it is our hope that going forward, the federal government will permanently sign a Bill into law saying that future generations will not abolish June 12 as Democracy Day in recognition of the sacrifice made by our late father.
“Why is that because some youths of this generation don’t understand the value of the sacrifice made by the late Chief MKO Abiola? So, we hope that a Bill will be passed that will permanently institutionalise and say that June 12 will continue to exist till the end of time in Nigeria.
“The only person that can do this is President Bola Tinubu because he had been there with our late father right from inception, he understood what we stood for, and so in addition to the support he has given the family, he should please help us with the bill.”
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has conferred national honours on more than 80 Nigerians—both living and deceased—during his inaugural State of the Nation address in honour of this year’s Democracy Day.
The President, who reeled the names out with other messages while addressing a joint session of the National Assembly to mark 26 years of uninterrupted democratic rule in Nigeria on Thursday, also announced the granting of full pardon to the heroes of the Ogoni Struggle, identified as the Ogoni nine.
The president used the solemn occasion to commemorate key figures in the June 12 pro-democracy movement, notably Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, his late wife Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, and environmental rights activist Ken Saro-Wiwa.
“In this light, I announce the conferment of the posthumous national honour of CFR on Kudirat Abiola, the heroine of the June 12 struggle,” Tinubu declared to loud applause from lawmakers and guests. “We must celebrate the courage of those who stood against military repression and injustice.”
Alhaja Kudirat Abiola was posthumously awarded the Commander of the Federal Republic (CFR) for her role in resisting military rule, a struggle that ultimately led to her assassination. Tinubu described her as the “heroine of the June 12 struggle.”
Also honoured was the late Major General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, who received the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR), the highest national honour typically reserved for heads of state.
He was recognised for mobilising political resistance to military rule and advancing democratic reforms.
Other posthumous recipients included key figures in Nigeria’s pro-democracy movement: Professor Humphrey Nwosu (CON), who chaired the National Electoral Commission during the 1993 elections; Rear Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu (CON); Pa Alfred Rewane (CFR); Bagauda Kaltho (OON); Chima Ubani (OON); Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti (CON); Chief Alao Aka-Bashorun (CON); and Chief Frank Kokori (CON), among others.
The list extended to civil rights advocates, journalists, politicians, and unionists who lost their lives in the pursuit of justice and democracy.
Honourees included Emma Ezeazu, Bamidele Aturu, Fredrick Fasehun, Professor Festus Iyayi, Dr. John Yima Sen, Alhaja Gambo Sawaba, Dr. Edwin Madunagu, Dr. Alex Ibru, Chief Bola Ige, Pa Reuben Fasoranti, Senator Ayo Fasanmi, Senator Polycarp Nwite, and Dr. Nurudeen Olowopopo.
In a move described as symbolic of national reconciliation, Tinubu posthumously recognised Ken Saro-Wiwa and his fellow environmental activists known as the Ogoni Nine, who were executed in 1995 under the regime of General Sani Abacha.
Saro-Wiwa was awarded the Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON), while Saturday Dobee, Nordu Eawo, Daniel Gbooko, Paul Levera, Felix Nuate, Baribor Bera, Barinem Kiobel, and John Kpuine were each awarded the Officer of the Order of the Niger (OON).
The President further announced that he would invoke his constitutional powers to grant a full state pardon to the Ogoni Nine and others, whose names will be released following consultations with the National Council of State.
Living icons of democratic activism and intellectual freedom were also celebrated. Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka was awarded the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON), while renowned journalism scholar Professor Olatunji Dare received the Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON).
Prominent journalists and media pioneers were similarly honoured: Kunle Ajibade (OON), Nosa Igiebor (OON), Dapo Olorunyomi (OON), Bayo Onanuga (CON), Ayo Obe (OON), Dare Babarinsa (CON), and Seye Kehinde (OON).
Among the human rights lawyers and activists honoured were Femi Falana, SAN (CON), Barrister Felix Morka (CON), Barrister Ledum Mitee (CON), and Professor Shafideen Amuwo (CON).
Other notable recipients included Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah (CON), Senator Shehu Sani (CON), Governor Uba Sani (CON), Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi (CON), Honourable Labaran Maku (OON), Dr. Tunji Alausa (CON), Mr. Nick Dazang (OON), Hon. Abdul Oroh (OON), Barrister Luke Aghanenu (OON), Odia Ofeimun (CON), Hon. Olawale Osun (CON), Dr. Amos Akingba (CON), and Professor Segun Gbadegesin (CON).
Further commendations went to Professor Julius Ihonvbere, Professor Bayo Williams, Senator Abu Ibrahim, Professor Bolaji Akinyemi, Dr. Kayode Shonoiki, and Senator Ameh Ebute, who were also recognised with honours ranging from Commander to Grand Commander of the Federal Republic.
Veteran journalist and Vanguard Newspapers founder Uncle Sam Amuka Pemu was honoured with a Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON), a day before his 90th birthday.
President Tinubu also formally decorated the current presiding officers of the National Assembly, who had previously received national honours:
“The honours were not just symbolic, but a national acknowledgment of those who defended truth, fought repression, and expanded Nigeria’s democratic space”, Tinubu said.
He called on Nigerians, particularly political leaders, to uphold the values of the June 12 movement in their actions and policies.
“We must rededicate ourselves to the ideals of June 12: freedom, transparent and accountable government, social justice, active citizen participation, and a just society where no one is oppressed”, he said.
President Tinubu concluded his address with a call for national reflection and progress, urging the country to move beyond symbolic recognition and build a future anchored on the sacrifices of past heroes.
Hon. Oluwagbenga Abiola, Executive Vice Chairman of Agege Local Government and a top contender in the forthcoming July 12 Local Government Election, has thrown his full support behind the decision of the All Progressives Congress (APC) leadership to adopt Abdulganiyu Obasa as the party’s flagbearer.
Abiola, a political protégé of Agege APC leader and Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa, made the declaration while speaking to journalists on Wednesday in Lagos.
His endorsement follows a call by Agege stakeholders—comprising community and political leaders—who, at a news conference on Monday, urged the Speaker to support his son Abdulganiyu for the council chairmanship.
They described the move as a way to reward Speaker Obasa’s longstanding humanitarian contributions to the community.
Addressing speculation that he was being pressured to drop his ambition, Abiola dismissed such claims and instead expressed deep gratitude to Speaker Obasa, whom he described as his political benefactor.
“I will remain forever grateful to Rt. Hon. Obasa for the opportunities he has given me. I pledge my total support for the party’s decision and the leadership of our great party,” Abiola said, affirming his loyalty to both the Speaker and the APC hierarchy.
Abiola said: “Let me just make it clear that I will and can never pitch tend against my leader, Rt.-Hon. Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa.
“This is the man that made me. He appointed me as special assistant on media to the office of the Speaker when he became Speaker in 2015. I won’t be an ingrate.
“After that, in 2016, I became Sole Administrator for Agege LG, being recommended by the Speaker and appointed by the Governor.
“With that appointment, I made history by becoming the youngest local government boss in the state.
“In 2017, when I handed over to the current Executive Chairman, the party and the Speaker also facilitated my appointment as Secretary to the Local Government and in 2021 as the Vice Chairman .
“So, tell me, why would I pitch tent against the decision of such a man that has built me in terms of capacity, political dexterity, and network all over?”.
Abiola said that it was true he had the ambition to succeed the current chairman, but he must submit to the party’s decision “without any reservation”.
“Yes, I aspired as it is he dream of everybody that has passed through the ranks, especially as vice chairman to become the chairman, but the party has spoken and I concur.
“The party leadership has come together, stakeholders have come together, and they have agreed that they want the Speaker to allow his son become the next Chairman.
“So, I stand by everything that they have done. I stand with and by Obasa. I stand with and by APC Agege and the leadership of APC. I agree with stakeholders’ resolution,” he added.
According to him, since his aspiration is all about service to people, there are still many opportunities for him in the future as a young and vibrant politician.
“I know that the leader I have is one that knows what is best politically and can also recommend me for, even better positions in the nearest future.
“I’m still young. I still have the vibrancy. I’ll work for the party. I’ll make sure the party wins,” he said.
Abiola said that he had directed his teeming youth-based followers under the platform of Obasa Youth Alliance (OYA) to redirect all energy towards actualising the party’s decision.
Mrs Abiodun Oyefusi has called on the federal government to initiate a process that will lead to total overhaul of electoral bodies in the country.
Oyefusi, a politician, said this became necessary following the recent revelation by former military president Ibrahim Babangida regarding the annulled June 12, 1993, presidential election, which MKO Abiola, the candidate of defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP) won.
With the disclosure, Oyefusi said the country needs an electoral process that will protect future elections and their candidates.
According to her, the need to overhaul the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and state electoral bodies to restore credibility, transparency, and true democracy in Nigeria cannot be overemphasized.
Princess Oyefusi, a staunch advocate for electoral reforms, emphasized that the best way to honor the legacy of Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola and the ideals of June 12 is to ensure that Nigerians’ votes genuinely count.
She stressed that a credible electoral system is fundamental to the people enjoying the dividends of democracy.
“The June 12 election remains a symbol of the people’s will and the fight for democratic integrity. However, decades later, our electoral process continues to face challenges that undermine the voice of the electorate. If we are truly committed to honoring MKO Abiola and what he stood for, we must act decisively by reforming our electoral institutions to guarantee transparency, fairness, and accountability,” she stated.
Princess Oyefusi further urged policymakers, civil society organizations, and Nigerians at large to unite in demanding electoral reforms that will restore public confidence in the democratic process.
She reiterated that without an independent and efficient electoral system, the promise of democracy will remain unfulfilled.
“We cannot continue to allow electoral fraud, manipulation, and inefficiency to define our elections. A true democracy is one where the people’s mandate is respected, and that starts with a functional and trustworthy electoral system,” she added.
She called on the National Assembly to prioritize electoral reforms, including the adoption of modern voting technologies and stringent measures to prevent electoral malpractice.
She also advocated for stronger oversight mechanisms to ensure that state electoral commissions operate independently, free from political interference.
He also said Abacha had deep-seated hatred for the claimed winner of the annuled June 12 election, Chief M.K.O Abiola, whom he said would have been eliminated by the Abacha-led “forces”.
Babangida made these revelations in his autobiography “A Journey in Service” presented to the public on Thursday in Abuja.
The former maximum leader said in the book that Abacha was one of his biggest headaches during his unending transition programme to civil rule.
Admitting Abacha once saved his life and risked his life to ensure that he (Babangida) took over in 1985, the warlord of Minna Hilltop mansion described the Kano-born general as a complex character, whose intention cannot be easily understood.
Babangida on pages 278 and 279 of the book painted the relationship that existed between and his comrade at arms while he was in the military.
He wrote: “Without question, one of my biggest headaches at this time was Sani Abacha. I knew that Abacha was ambivalent about a return to civil rule. But I thought, in retrospect now, naively, that he would support our transition to civil rule programme.
“As I said earlier, Abacha and I had come a long way. We were good friends, and he had indeed been nice to me. As I have said elsewhere, he saved my life once and also risked his life to ensure that I took over in 1985. I could never forget those details.
“But it’s also correct that he was a complex character. He was capable of bottling up a lot inside without giving a hint of where he was. And then, suddenly, the bottle bursts, and we begin to see a different person.”
He further said: “I obviously didn’t know everything about him! For instance, I was alarmed to discover that he and a handful of others mobilised negative opinions against me within the military, portraying me as the problem. That campaign was geared towards a violent military coup to remove me as President forcefully.
“But even more bizarre for me was my discovery of the loathing that Abacha had for the person of Abiola, whom I thought had a good relationship with him.”
Babangida on page 275 of his book alluded that the annulment of the June 12 election was masterminded and hatched by “forces” led by Abacha.
He further said on page 278 of the book that the same Abacha “forces” would have eliminated Abiola if he had allowed him to become the President.
Shedding light on Abacha’s disdain for the acclaimed winner of June 12 election, Babangida wrote: “Unfortunately, the forces gathered against him (Abiola) after the June 12 elections were so formidable that I was convinced that if he became President, he would be quickly eliminated by the same very forces who pretended to be his friends.
“While I accept that the unfortunate denial of his mandate amounted to a subversion of the will of the Nigerian people, I was petrified that if Abiola got killed, it could lead to a civil war. Having participated in one civil war, with all its horrors, pains and devastation, I wasn’t prepared to see another.”
All three former vice presidents were also in attendance.
The venue was not the State House Council Chamber inside Aso Villa, but the Transcorp Hilton Hotel in the heart of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
The occasion was the twin event of a public presentation of the autobiography of former military President Gen. Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) titled “A Journey in Service” and the inauguration of his proposed Presidential Library to be located in his hometown Minna, Niger State.
Gen. Babangida led the military government between August 27, 1985 and August 27, 1993.
That government initiated the transition to civil rule programme which culminated in the June 12, 1993, presidential election won by the late business mogul Moshood Abiola.
On June 23, the election was annulled, leading to a chain of events, including the setting up of an interim government headed by the late Chief Ernest Shonekan which collapsed within 91 days, followed by Gen. Sani Abacha’s military government.
Yesterday, Gen. Babangida admitted for the first time in 32 years that Abiola won the election.
He praised former President Muhammadu Buhari for declaring Abiola president based on the results.
He explained also for the first time how the election was cancelled by forces led by Gen. Abacha who was then the Chief of Army Staff, without his authorisation.
But he accepted responsibility for the actions taken by his government.
In attendance along with the cream of the country’s political and business leaders were former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan and former Heads of State Gen. Yakubu Gowon and Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar.
Three living former vice presidents Atiku Abubakar, Namadi Sambo and Yemi Osinbajo, who reviewed the book, graced the event.
IBB takes responsibility for June 12 annulment
Gen. Babangida described the annulment as a “most regrettable” incident in Nigeria’s history.
He said: “I have had to contend with this question all the time – when will you tell your side of the story?
“Understandably, our period of service has evoked many questions and stories among the public.
“This book, which chronicles my experiences, decisions and challenges, tries to answer some of these questions from my modest perspective.”
Gen. Babangida highlighted the sweeping reforms and significant challenges his government faced, particularly in the economy, foreign affairs, defence and national security.
He noted that despite the sacrifices and inconveniences endured by Nigerians during his tenure, his administration was committed to leaving the country better than it was.
The former leader acknowledged the historic significance of the June 12, 1993, election widely regarded as Nigeria’s freest and fairest at the time.
However, he expressed deep regret that his administration, which had designed the electoral system that produced such a credible process, ultimately failed to complete it.
“Undoubtedly, credible, free, and fair elections were held on June 12, 1993.
“However, the tragic irony of history remains that the administration that devised a near-perfect electoral system and conducted those near-perfect elections could not complete the process.
“That accident of history is most regrettable. The nation is entitled to expect my impression of regret,” he said.
Not shying away from accepting personal accountability for the decision that led to the annulment, Gen. Babangida said: “As the leader of the military administration, I accept full responsibility for all decisions taken under my watch, and June 12 happened under my watch.
“Mistakes, oversight, and missteps happened in quick succession, but as I state in my book, in all matters, we acted in the supreme national interest so that Nigeria could survive.”
Reflecting on Nigeria’s democratic journey, Gen. Babangida acknowledged that his administration’s actions disrupted the nation’s transition to civilian rule but emphasised that the country ultimately overcame the setback.
“Our nation’s march to democracy was interrupted, a fact that I deeply regret.
“But Nigeria survived, and democracy is still alive, a testament to our regime and commitment to progress.”
‘Abacha forces annulled poll’
Gen. Babangida said he was away in Katsina on a condolence visit to the Yar’adu family when some forces led by the late Gen. Abacha annulled the election without his knowledge.
In a portion of the book, he sheds more light on the intrigues culminating in the cancellation of the election.
The former leader noted in the book that he was away in Katsina to commiserate with the Yar’Adua family over the death of Alhaji Musa Yar’Adua, only for him to be informed that the June 12 election had been annulled.
In the book, Gen. Babangida admitted that the annulment of the election was contained in “a terse, poorly worded statement from a scrap of paper, which bore neither the presidential seal nor the official letterhead of the government”.
Exonerating himself, Gen. Babangida on page 275 of his book admitted that the annulment was only a component of a series of other options.
He said: “But to suddenly have an announcement made without my authority was, to put it mildly, alarming. I remember saying: ‘These nefarious inside forces opposed to the elections have outflanked me!’
“I would later find out that the ‘forces’, led by Gen. Sani Abacha (late) annulled the elections. There and then, I knew I was caught up between ‘the devil and the deep blue sea’! From then on, the June 12 elections took on a painful twist for which, as I will show later, I regrettably take responsibility.”
Gen. Babangida also regretted in the book how the fallout of the annulment of June 12 divided the military hierarchy in 1993.
On page 276 of the book, Gen. Babangida writes: “Within the military leadership, there was palpable outrage. The best of us, like Lt. General Salihu Ibrahim and Maj.-Gen. Ishola Williams were alarmed and Col. Abubakar Dangiwa Umar threatened to resign.
“Even Admiral Augustus Aikhomu (late), whose press secretary, Nduka Irabor, had announced the annulment, was horrified. The public vilified me.
“Instigated, among other things, by elements within the armed forces, the Nigerian press called me all kinds of names and described me as a power-drunk dictator who desperately wanted to cling on to power.”
The former military leader described Tinubu as Asiwaju of the universe and Jagaban of Niger State.
Book reviewer Prof. Yemi Osinbajo said Gen. Babangida wrote that Abiola secured a majority of votes and achieved the constitutionally required spread of 25 per cent in two-thirds of states.
IBB inspired me into politics
Recounting how his political journey was inspired by Gen. Babangida, President Tinubu said without his leadership and reforms, people like him would not have ventured into politics.
He described the former leader as a visionary, who championed the inclusion of young, brilliant minds in governance.
He said: “Without you, people like me wouldn’t be in politics. Your progressive revolution encouraged young, brilliant people to participate in politics. We were with you in Dodan Barracks, and you inspired some of us.”
The president reminisced about Gen. Babangida’s leadership and the impact of his policies, particularly in economic and political development.
He praised Gen. Babangida’s role in fostering a new generation of bankers and politicians, noting that the launch of his presidential library was a testament to his legacy.
Tinubu said: “When you look at the programme, some of the bankers and many of us here today, we saw the happiness of a missionary in Babangida. Thank you for what you are.”
Reflecting on his early political career, President Tinubu recounted a tense encounter with Gen. Babangida over the delayed inauguration of elected officials.
He recalled how he challenged the former military ruler on the repeated postponement of the swearing-in of National Assembly members in 1990 despite widespread anticipation.
He said: “One thing I cannot forget: You were in office, and you’ll recall we were elected. You kept on postponing the inauguration. You summoned us to Abuja, and when we became rancorous, you moved us to the International Conference Center.
“I was not expecting to make any comment, I was just listening in my own radical manner, thinking, ‘This man will not inaugurate us again.’ But before we returned to the hotel, the hotel was locked – no keys.”
He recalled how, despite fears that his bold confrontation would land him in jail, Gen. Babangida displayed statesmanship by giving him a handshake afterwards.
President Tinubu said: “I confronted you, telling you that you had an opportunity to make history that day. Why not inaugurate us?
“Why were you calling us back and postponing the inauguration? They thought I would end up in jail. But you came out at the end, shook my hand, and I can never forget that moment. You are courageous.”
Reaffirming Gen. Babangida’s impact on his personal and political life, the president described the Minna-born General as a leader deserving recognition.
He said: “That inspiration has been so impactful in my life. You deserve this day, and we celebrate you for what you are and what you have contributed to the history of this great country.”
Reflecting on Gen. Babangida’s economic policies, President Tinubu praised his role in transforming Nigeria’s banking sector by granting licenses to new-generation banks.
According to him, this decision changed the country’s financial landscape forever.
On the controversial annulment, President Tinubu said he was pleased to hear Gen. Babangida’s reflections on the matter, emphasising the importance of learning from history.
In a firm commitment to governance, the President vowed to make tough but necessary decisions in Nigeria’s best interest, no matter the challenges.
“All I can promise as the President is to strive to do the best, put the best forward, take decisions – no matter how difficult they are – in the interest of the country. You have done so, you have laid the example. Thank you very much.”
President Tinubu cited recent global shifts as a wake-up call for Africa to become more self-reliant and competitive, noting that unfolding events in the United States (U.S.) and Europe highlight the need for the continent to rise to the challenge of nation-building.
The President said: “I’m glad about what is happening in America and in Europe, the contradiction that we are seeing now all over.
“What is it telling us? It’s telling us to wake up, to make Africa a better place, particularly this country, Nigeria.”
The President acknowledged the sacrifices required to advance Nigeria and expressed appreciation for the patience and perseverance of the people.
What they said
Immediate past Ghanaian President Nana Akufor-Ado challenged Nigeria to provide ‘’aggressive’’ leadership for Africa.
He said the call was necessitated by the nature of developments in Europe, Asia and the Americas.
Delivering the keynote address, the former President said Nigeria and Nigerians have vital roles to play in uniting African nations and their economies.
He said: “I cannot forgo the chance of this prestigious platform to mount an important hobby horse of mine, and that is the appeal I’ve made before in this great country, to the political and economic elite of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to take aggressively the leadership of West Africa, and Africa’s efforts to unite our nations and economies.
“Developments in the world indicate the nature of the concentrations that are emerging in Europe, Asia and the Americas, to fortify and expand the possibilities of power and wealth available to them.
“We in Africa cannot afford to be left out of such a process and for our prospects of effective integration to materialise, the Federal Republic of Nigeria has to assume our historic responsibilities and lead our development towards an integrated democratic West Africa and Africa.”
He also advised African nations to desist from reliance on foreign aid, arguing that the COVID-19 pandemic made some nations to be independent.
I recruited Babangida, Abdulsalami into Army
Gen. Gowon recalled how he drafted Gen. Babangida, Gen. Abdulsalami and eight other young “boys’’ who he did not name to join the military in 1962.
He particularly commended the resilience, dedication and courage of Gen. Babangida.
Going down memory lane, Gen. Gowon remembered how Gen. Babangida restored his military ranks and honours after being stripped of them all in 1976 for his alleged involvement in the failed Bukar Suka Dimka coup.
Obasanjo tells author to expect criticisms
Gen. Obasanjo advised the former military President to expect criticisms that would trail his book.
Gen. Obasanjo, who chaired the occasion, commended Gen. Babangida for writing the book, stressing that he (Babangida) has not only contributed to history-making, he has documented history.
He said: “You have not only contributed to history, you have contributed to documenting history.
“It is an important part of our nation-building to keep accurate records.
“Please don’t be unduly worried about critics and put him down syndrome.
“The book will be reviewed, read, quoted, praised and lambasted.
“Some will agree with you in part, and some will disagree with you in part.
“Some may even wholly disagree with you. Why should you write the book?
‘’They will say it is self-glorification. Controversy may even develop. It’s all good for you and good for the book and our nation-building.
“The more praised and condemned the book is, the better because it means that it is being read.
“Please don’t be unduly worried about critics and put-him-down syndrome.
“It may even be an indication of success but take note of objective criticisms. You should expect a reaction galore. The reaction will be good, bad and ugly.”
IBB product of prophesy, says Abdulsalami
Gen. Babangida’s childhood friend and Nigeria’s last head of state, Gen. Abdulsalami, said the author was a product of prophecy.
He recalled how a soothsayer in Minna predicted in 1952 that Gen. Babangida would lead the country.
Abdulsalami said: “Mr President, with your permission, I will go back to memory lane.
“When we were growing up on the street of Minna (Niger State capital), that was about 80 years ago, it might interest all the distinguished guests here that as far back as 1952, a soothsayer told us that Ibrahim was going to be the Head of State of this country.
“Ibrahim and I joined the military, courtesy of the then Captain Gowon, a young dashing and very smart officer.
“Captain Gowon came to lecture us to join the military. When we joined the Army, all we were hoping for was to get to the rank of captain and then retire.
“But God in His mercy propelled us to become generals, and by His grace, both of us became heads state of this country.’’
Gen. Abdulsalami thanked Gen. Babangida for their friendship and brotherhood, saying: “No moment goes by when we remember our escapades without bringing smiles to our faces.”
He prayed for the smile to “continue during our twilight as we continue our service to this nation.”
Jonathan: Author still relevant
Dr. Jonathan said the author remains relevant in the country’s contemporary political development after over three decades of leaving office.
He said the fact that his wisdom was still being sought by many who troop to his Minna Hilltop home for consultation was a testament to his relevance.
Dr. Jonathan said: “Ibrahim Bagandiga as we all know, is one of the most charismatic leaders in this country. He is up-to-date.
“People go as if they are on a pilgrimage to consult him. We thank God for giving him that grace and the wisdom to continue to mentor people.”
Turning to Gen. Babangida, the former President said: “In terms of leadership, Nigerians know you have contributed significantly in terms of the infrastructure development of this country and social mobilisation.
“We cannot write the history of Nigeria without dedicating a reasonable part to your service. You’ve done well.”
Dr. Jonathan called on the Federal Government to take over the administration of the proposed Library and that of former President Obasanjo in Abeokuta, Ogun State.
He said: “When I left office the first six months, I visited most of the presidential libraries in the United States. The presidential libraries there are taken as federal government assets.
“So, Mr. President should set up a department in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) office.”
Former President Muhammadu Buhari, who was represented by ex-Transportation Minister Jaji Sambo, expressed hope that Gen. Babangida would continue to offer valuable counsel to Nigeria’s current leaders.
Naira rain
Leading pack of fundraisers for the proposed IBB Presidential Library was business magnate, Abdulsamad Rabiu, who donated N5 billion.
Former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Theophilus Danjuma donated N3 billion and Africa’s richest man, Aliko Dangote, pledged an annual donation of N2 billion for four years.
Others included Oranto Oil boss, Arthur Eze, N500 million, Pastor Folorunso Alakija and Senator Sani Musa, who did not make their donations public.
Abuja stands still for Babangida
There was traffic gridlock on roads leading to Transcorp Hilton Hotel venue of the event as early as 8:30am.
Many dignitaries and guests struggled to gain access to the venue.
As early as 7am, security presence was visible within and around the hotel as armed policemen, plain-clothed detectives and security personnel stood strategically to direct human and vehicular traffic.
From the Unity Fountain to Aguyi Ironsi Street and Adetokunbo Ademola Cresent, many invitees hopped out of their cars and walked down to the Congress Hall.
Access into the hall was not without thorough screening by the security operatives stationed at the three checkpoints created on the approach to the hall.
Notwithstanding Gen. Babangida’s membership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in attendance at the three-hour event were politicians from across different political divides.
They freely mingled and threw banters at the gathering that reflected the former military leader’s political influence in the West African sub-region.
Former Sierra Leone’s President Ernest Bio Koroma and his Ghanaian counterpart Akufor-Ado were among the international guests.
Dangote, Rabiu and Alakija were among the representatives of the business community.
Also in attendance were serving and former governors, members of the National Assembly, and traditional and religious leaders.
Dangote hails architect of private sector IBB
Dangote yesterday praised Gen. Babangida for implementing policies that liberated the private sector in during his regime.
He commended Babangida for his transformative policies that encouraged local investors to play prominent roles in the economy.
Dangote highlighted the abolition of import licences, which helped stimulate domestic industries.
These reforms, among others, ensured that Nigeria now has more private-sector involvement than any other country in Africa, he said.
This shift, according to Dangote, led to a contribution of 85 per cent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from the private sector, while the government contributes just 15 per cent.
He said: “Your Excellency, I would like to express my sincere gratitude for all you have done for Nigeria. Many may not realise that you were the architect of the private sector in Nigeria.
“Anyone in the private sector who has achieved prominence today owes it to you, as you provided us with the necessary licences. In the past, we used to struggle to obtain licences through intermediaries, including Indians.”
Dangote recalled how Babangida’s policies facilitated the growth of Nigerian businesses, enabling them to thrive.
He said: “Your Excellency, in 1986, you abolished the requirements for import licences, and it was because of that decision that we were able to reach the highest levels of growth.
“I recall a day when you granted almost 30 of us banking licences. You also instructed five Nigerians to pay N1 million each for oil blocs.
“Your Excellency, I could continue to list all the reforms you introduced that liberated the private sector, which is why Nigeria has more private sector involvement than any other country in Africa.
“It is only in Nigeria where government contribution to GDP is a mere 15 per cent, with the remainder being driven by the private sector.”
Expressing hope that future leaders will adopt similar policies for the betterment of the country, he said: “I want to thank you once again, and I am confident that future leaders will continue to follow your example, working closely with the private sector.”
On his contribution to the IBB Presidential Library project, Dangote said: “Your Excellency, based on what I have observed, I believe this project will require at least four years to complete.
“I would like to contribute N2 billion each year for the next four years, amounting to N8 billion in total. Should the project extend beyond four years, I will continue to contribute N2 billion annually.”
Abdul Mumuni Abiola, son of the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Abiola (MKO), has provided intimate revelations about his father’s legacy and the complex dynamics of their family during an exclusive interview on the Mic On Podcast with Seun Okinbaloye.
Central to their discussion was a striking revelation about the scale of the Abiola family, disclosed through a significant blood test.
“My father had 40 wives,” Abdul disclosed during the podcast, “and after blood tests, his children numbered 55,”
This revelation not only highlighted the intricacies of Abiola’s personal life but also underscored the deep intersection of his private affairs with his public persona and Nigeria’s tumultuous political history.
Reflecting on the profound significance of June 12, Abdul described it as a poignant annual moment.
“It’s a time where the nation can reflect on where we are and where we need to be,” he remarked, emphasising the emotional weight and historical importance of the election day that was tragically annulled.
The conversation also delved into the profound tragedies that befell his family, particularly the untimely deaths of both his father and mother.
“Two to three years after my father’s arrest, my mom was shot down on the streets of Lagos State,” Abdul recalled, vividly recounting the devastating losses that irrevocably shaped their lives.
Highlighting Abiola’s character, Abdul passionately extolled his father’s humility.
“My father was so humble. The way he spoke to the gate man was no different from how he spoke to a king,” he emphasised
Expressing disappointment in the management of the family’s extensive assets and businesses, Abdul lamented: “It’s a total shame, not just for the Abiola family but for the Nigerian people,”
The interview also touched upon familial tensions, particularly regarding the stewardship of Abiola’s estate.
The late businessman’s son openly criticised his half-brother, Kola, for what he perceived as mishandling their father’s legacy.
He said kola cannot rule Nigeria.
“MKO Abiola’s legacy would have been properly sustained if Kola was in a better position. And he could have been a voice of better democratic values, but he chose not to.
“During the time my father was still in jail, he was busy (with other things). It’s sad, but I’m a little pleased that my father didn’t come out to see what his first son has become.
“I’m unhappy with him (Kola Abiola), and even Nigerians are unhappy. You can see how many people voted for him when he campaigned for the presidency.
“I wondered how he thought he could be president when he could not manage Abiola’s empire. How will he manage Nigeria?
“This is the problem in Nigeria: people are not showing capacity in their own little sphere of work but want a higher position.”
Abdul emphasised his father’s enduring vision for Nigeria, centred on poverty eradication and inclusive governance, which he believes remains critically relevant today.
He contrasted this with his disillusionment over current Nigerian political leadership, stressing the urgent need for leaders prioritising public welfare over personal gain.
Hinting at his political ambitions, Abdul expressed a desire to enter public service to effect meaningful change, echoing the principles of service that defined his father’s life and aspirations.
Questioning the role of Western powers in Nigerian and African affairs, Abdul voiced concerns about potential interference and agendas that could undermine democratic values and the interests of the Nigerian people.
Despite the challenges and complexities discussed, Abdul remains resolute in upholding his father’s legacy, navigating intricate family dynamics while steadfastly preserving the Abiola name amidst contemporary socio-economic pressures.
