Tag: Academic Staff Union of Universities

  • We are concerned about 16m jobless graduates, says ASUU

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has expressed its displeasure over 16 million unemployed graduates and about 12 million children out of school.

    The union called on President Muhammadu Buhari to safeguard the future of Nigerians and protect them from being tagged “youth sitting down and waiting for freebies”.

    University of Ibadan ASUU Chairman Dr. Deji Omole, who stated this in a chat with reporters, added that it became imperative for the Federal Government to be reminded that the future of the children of the masses must not be used to play politics.

    Recalling that the government had raised the hopes of declaring emergency in the education sector in April, this year, apparently to proffer solutions to the low quality of education being offered Nigerian children, he wondered why in this last week of April, the plan to declare an emergency in the sector had not been perfected.

    Omole said: “We are sad for a government that fails to improve access to education for teeming millions of youth yearning for education to state that the same youth are sitting down and waiting for freebies.

    “What has the government done to salvage the condition of 12 million out of school children in Nigeria? What has the government done to ensure employment for over 16 million unemployed Nigerians?

    “What plan does the government have for graduates who go through the mandatory National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) every year but frustrated by lack of job and hostile environment to even start a small and medium scale business? If the government fails to attend to the needs of the youth today, they will become nightmares for Nigeria in the future.”

  • ASUU decries N66 million capital projects allocation to UI

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) on Monday decried a paltry sum of N66 million allocation for capital projects in University of Ibadan with a student population of about 30,000 .

    The union wondered that the same senators that appropriated a paltry sum of N66 million for capital projects in UI is paid N13.5 million as running cost per month.

    ASUU stated that this can only happen where the ruling class lacks vision like Nigeria.

    It noted that the nonchalant attitude of the Buhari-led government to education appears to be the worse in the history of Nigeria with about 7percent allocation to Education.

    The chairman, ASUU University of Ibadan, Dr Deji Omole who stated this on Monday in an interview with newsmen noted that the failure to vote enough money to public varsity education is already causing gradual crisis of confrontation between University administration and students in some parts of the country.

    “It will be difficult to have a citizen that will love the country in the future if the current trend of abandoning the poor while taking care of the rich.

    Read Also: ASUU: Fed Govt neglecting varsity education

    While each senators is paid N13.5million as running cost per month the same Senate appropriated a paltry sum of N66million for capital projects for University of Ibadan with students population of about 30,000 . This can only happen where the ruling class lack vision like Nigeria. This same government refuses to drop a kobo for the revitalization of public universities. Now many children of the masses are denied access because universities cannot admit beyond what the dilapidated infrastructure can take. Yet their parents cannot afford private university. the federal government is owing about N800billion revitalization funds to public varsities as contained in the agreements with ASUU”

    Omole who noted that the Union will oppose any plan to force children of masses out of school by imposing on them the dues that are the duties of federal government, said the ruling APC has performed poorly in Education.

    According to the ASUU boss, the United States of America that all elites run to fund her public varsities because the USA is interested in bridging the gap between the rich and the poor knows the negative implication of having a growing pool of illiterates as we have in Nigeria.

    Omole however noted that the Buhari government has paid lip service to public education but prefers to pacify militants and terrorists.

    ASUU chairman noted that while the masses are groaning in hardship the political class have increased in sizes and store enough money taken from the collective patrimony in preparation for 2019 general elections.

  • ASUU, research institutes clash over TETFund

    Should the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) come to the aid of colleges of agriculture and research institutes? No, says the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU); yes, counters the Academic Staff Union of Research Institutes (ASURI). Both unions are divided on the need to amend the TETFund Act 2011 to widen its mandate. To ASURI, it will be a disservice to exclude agriculture and research institutes from TETFund’s intervention.

    Established in 2011 to complement the Education Trust Fund (ETF), which was created in 1993, the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) has been leaving its mark in many higher institutions.

    It deploys funds and manpower for the rehabilitation of facilities.

    According to the TETFund Act of 2011, the agency’s scope of operation extends to all government-owned schools, including universities, polytechnics, colleges of education and special institutes for research. The agency’s source of income is the two per cent education tax imposed on assessable profit of registered companies.

    The decaying infrastructure in tertiary institutions became a source of concern for members of the academia, who sounded the alarm that public institutions could collapse if the situation was not arrested. Incessant industrial actions became the order of the day to force the government to provide funds for higher education.

    TETFund’s establishment was seen as a breath of fresh air in managing the infrastructure and operations of tertiary institutions.

    At inception, TETFund’s activities were present in all tertiary institutions, including colleges of agriculture, which are mandate research institutes. Three years later, the Act 2011 setting up the agency was amended, removing colleges of agriculture from the scheme.

    Since then, the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), representing the interest of universities, has been countering any move to rectify the anormaly.

    To extend TETFund’s activities to colleges of agriculture, Senator Abdullahi Adamu of Nasarawa West is sponsoring a bill seeking re-amendment of the TETFund Act to include colleges of agriculture. The bill wants Section 20 of the Act amended by enlarging the interpretation of the clause “tertiary education institutions” to include “colleges of agriculture”.

    The bill, which has scaled the second reading in the Senate, further seeks the amendment of the Principal Act in Section 7(3) by deleting the ratio of 2:1:1 between universities, polytechnics and colleges of education, and inserting the clause “universities, polytechnics, colleges of education and colleges of agriculture”.

    At a public hearing recently held by the Senate Committee overseeing TETFund activities, there were heated arguments between interested parties while making submissions on the content of the bill. At the hearing, it was discovered that the bill did not specify the exact quota to be allocated to colleges of agriculture.

    Senator Biodun Olujimi, Deputy Minority Whip, who stood in for the Senate President, appealed to the parties to be open-minded in their contributions, and wished the committee a fruitful deliberation.

    The committee chairman, Senator Jibrin Barau, said members would be unbiased umpires in deciding the merit of the amendment of the TETFund Act. He said his committee would consider contributions from all parties to make the agency better.

    In his presentation, the Secretary General of the Academic Staff Union of Research Institutes (ASURI), Dr Theophilus Ndubuaku, said it was a disservice by the agency to exclude colleges of agriculture from the list of beneficiaries of the scheme. He said the decision could not be justified, noting that research institutes had the mandate to engage in academic research with the objective to equip middle-level manpower.

    He said: “Research institutes, in a real sense, require TETFund intervention more than universities, because our activities focus on better equipping those who not only help in commercialising agriculture in Nigeria, but also help in modern research to drive diversification of the economy and re-engineering being championed by the Federal Government.”

    Ndubuaku queried the decision of TETFund to exclude colleges of agriculture, which, he said, are awarding degrees after four to five years of studies, but fund colleges of education that “award low-grade certificates” after three years.

    He accused ASUU of laying a bad foundaation for the future of education, saying it would be illogical for any academic union to consider research institutes as non-academic institutions.

    Ndubuaku said: “Let the Federal Government give a fair share to research institutes, specifically for research purposes and post-graduate studies. Our researchers often end their careers in universities as lecturers after receiving training from our institutes.”

    In his counter-argument, ASUU National President Prof Biodun Ogunyemi disagreed with the Senate Committee members and advocates of the inclusion of research institutes. The ASUU boss noted that universities remained under-funded under the current TETFund operation, saying the agency should not be further burdened with additional beneficiaries.

    He said any change to the TETFund Act would be resisted by the union, urging colleges of agriculture and research institutes to engage the government on other means of getting funds, rather than calling for the amendment of TETFund Act.

    Some non-governmental organisations (NGO) and civil society groups at the public hearing lent their voices in support of ASUU’s position, urging the Senate to stop the proposed amendment.

    The representative of TETFund at the hearing noted that the N1 billion given to varsities yearly was not enough to address the challenges of infrastructure and academics in the institutions, adding that the inclusion of over 30 research institutes would overstretch the agency’s resources.

    While the drama played out, members of the Senate Committee tactically gave their nod to the submissions made by the parties to douse the tension at the hearing.

    While the Senate Committee closed the hearing on the bill, it was unclear which side the outcome would favour.

    CAMPUSLIFE gathered that there is a similar bill being sponsored by Senator Monsurat Sunmonu of Oyo Central, which seeks the amendment of TETFund Act to include research institutes as beneficiaries of grants, scholarships and other interventions by TETFund.

    According to Sunmonu’s bill, Section 7 (3) of the Principal Act should be amended by substituting the clause “The distribution of funds shall be in the ratio of 2:1:1 as between universities, polytechnics and colleges of education” and inserting a new clause: “The distribution of funds shall be in the ratio of 2:2:1:1 as between universities, research institutions, polytechnics and colleges of education.”

    CAMPUSLIFE gathered that Sunmonu’s bill is yet to be considered for public hearing after scaling the second reading in the Senate.

    Some members of academia, who spoke to CAMPUSLIFE, lent their voice in support of the amendment of the TETFund Act to accommodate colleges of agriculture and research institutes.

    Prof Leonard Agwunobi of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Calabar (UNICAL), said since the agency’s mandate is to support education and research, there should be no excuse for not incorporating all academic institutions in its activities.

    He said: “If the amendment of the Act would help these excluded colleges and institutes to improve their activities, the Senate should go ahead. These institutions, in my opinion, should be part of beficiaries since they have mandate to carry out research and TETFund captures reseach as part of its scopes.”

    Dr Celestine Okonobe of Nigeria Institute For Oil palm Research (NIFOR) said TETFund was established to support tertiary education.

    He said: “The question is, are colleges of agriculture not tertiary education institutions? If yes, why excluding them from TETFund’s support? The agency needs to extend operations to research institutes that feed universities with needed materials and data for research works. If research institutes are not poperly equipped, how can they serve the mandate of their establishment?”

    Managing Consultant of TF & Associate, Mr. Toye Fawole, said: “I have followed the ASUU/ASURI debate on the amendment of TETFund Act closely. It is obvious that ASUU wants to monopolise the agency and makes it serve universities alone. This is not right. I expect ASUU to call ASURI for discussion on how to ensure that the frontier of learning and research is expended through the intervention funds.

    “For our education to get better, these unions must learn how to accomodate each other and work for common interest. This carry-your-cross-alone spirit is very unfortunate. Research institutes must be adequately funded by the government, just as universalities are being funded.”

  • Two years on, LASU VC takes stock

    Two years on, LASU VC takes stock

    Lagos State University (LASU) Vice Chancellor Prof Lanre Adigun Fagbohun is celebrating his second year in office. Many of the workers are praising him for turning things around since he assumed office on January 11, 2016. But the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) says nothing has changed under him. 

    When Prof Lanre Adigun Fagbohun resumed as the eighth Vice-Chancellor of Lagos State University (LASU) on January 11, 2016, the institution was reeling in crisis. Two years after, the school has known peace. But to the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) it is “peace of the  graveyard”. Many of the workers who are praising the VC, do not agree with ASUU.

    Non-academic  Staff union leaders and students are happy about the peace that prevails in the 34-year-old institution. They advised management to consolidate on staff welfare, which was described as one of the most contentious issues in the institution.

    Describing as “fragile” the peace on campus, ASUU said the management takes delight in self glorification and victimising perceived enemies.

    “Indeed LASU looks calm and peaceful, but it is the peace of the graveyard, said ASUU-LASU secretary Dr Anthony Dansu.

    The Fagbohun-led administration came on board on the heels of the crises that led to the exit of  the immediate past management which  contended with workers’ allegations on victimisation, non-promotion, double standard, corruption, and high-handedness, among others.

    Last week, the information unit of the university came out with a lengthy statement reeling out the achievements of the Fagbohun management watch.

    Tagged: Two years in office: Prof Olanrewaju Fagbohun heralds a new dawn in LASU, the institution’s Acting PRO Ademola Adekoya, who signed the document, spoke glowingly of his boss. Adekoya reeled out management’s achievements ranging from engendering peace via all-inclusive governance; encouraging human capacity development; entrenching culture of discipline and rule of Law; ensuring the take-off of LASU International School; improvement in physical infrastructure; initiating quality assurance implementation committee; and ensuring a cordial relationship between students and  staff.

    Others include: improved staff welfare and promotion; instituting LASU Excellence Award; sustenance of   LASU  Scholars’ Award; replacing LASU External System with open distance learning;  establishment of directorate of advancement;  reclamation of encroached land; running a committee-based system, improved  scholarships and international ratings.

     

    Crisis with ASUU

    Last  September the governing council  sacked 15 members of ASUU and two non-academic staff. The axed ASUU members were led by the chairman and vice; Dr Isaac Akinloye Oyewunmi and Dr Adebowale Adeyemi Suenu, respectively.

    Justifying their sack, the university said Oyewunmi was dismissed for demanding N50, 000 from 2003 modular year students of Political Science Education on the sandwich programme to process their results. Similarly, management said Adeyemi Suenu was fired for unilaterally altering the results of 12 students already advised to withdraw by Senate. Nevertheless, the issue has continued to generate accusations and counter accusations between the two parties with the Lagos Zone of ASUU, which last month, called on the Lagos State Governor Akinwunmi Ambode to intervene by setting up an independent panel to review the case. ASUU is claiming their union leaders were being unduly victimised.

    In response to a request by The Nation, Dansu, described some of management claims as dubious.

    He said: “The Vice Chancellor is claiming credit for the improvement in infrastructure. It is a dubious claim, mainly because what the state government did was agreed between the Visitor and the four staff unions long before his emergence. For a university that receives close to half a billion naira monthly as subvention, the infrastructural development programme of this administration has been far from impressive”.

    He continued: “Greater attention is being paid to jamboree and fanfare than the core essence of a university. The university just declared it admitted 3500 students out of possible 8000 because of infrastructural deficit. This is a lower figure than that of last year. What it means is that in terms of capacity, the university is in a worse position than it was last year. Thousands of Lagosians have been denied admission because the administration has been inept in the discharge of its basic responsibilities. It prefers to run after imaginary enemies.

    “The university administration is busy sowing the seeds of crises within the system. Union leaders are being unjustly dismissed, our condition of service jointly agreed with all the unions was recently consigned to the bin and rewritten by the administration, with the most draconian insertions imaginable smuggled into it.

    “It is therefore, clear that whatever progress members of staff are making, it is in spite of the administration, not because of it. We can only hope that two years of excitement and revelry will be enough, so that the remainder of the tenure of the administration can be dedicated to serious pursuits capable of uplifting the university.”

    Reacting to ASUU claim, Adekoya said the release was not initiated by Fagbohun but by the Information Unit which felt the world needs to be informed of what the management is doing.

    Aside, Adekoya said ASUU should  praise management for ensuring that all promotion arrears have being addressed.

    “Before this management came on board, there were staff who had remained on the same status for like seven or eight years. But I can tell you categorically that all outstanding promotion arrears have been resolved, same for salary arrears and bonuses.

    “Over the last two sessions academic activities have not been disrupted by any crisis.

    “It is true management admitted about 3500 students in the current admission exercise, that is the decision and management would not compromise on that.

    “The reason for this is that before now, LASU used to admit many students thereby overstretching the facilities.

    “Last year, management admitted over 6000 students and had to provide additional facilities for them in addition to students already in the system. However, this year, we want to manage our resources by ensuring our facilities can cater for those we have offered admissions. Most importantly, we are being careful not to run foul of National Universities Commission rules because once you continue to overstretch your resources; you are gradually at the verge of losing your accreditation status.”

     

    Workers lend their voices

    Workers who spoke to The Nation said Fagbohun, a professor of Environmental Law, is living up to the promises he made at State House Alausa during his inauguration two years ago; yet the present atmosphere calls for synergy if the peace in the institution must be sustained.

    Chairman Non Academic Staff Union of University Comrade Albert Agosu, said management needs to consolidate on its efforts before the outstanding three years is completed.

    “It will be unfair of me to say he (Fagbohun) has not tried, especially in terms of staff welfare. He has human feelings and he is making progressive impact.

    Agosu continued: “Naturally, there is no perfect system but to a large extent, those challenges he inherited from his predecessor had been addressed.”

    Agosu said the derelict state of many of staff quarters does not befit the ongoing rebranding agenda.

    “When  Governor Ambode attended our convocation last year, he pleaded that what he wanted was peace and promised every other thing would follow. At present, there is a 600-capacity hostel in LASU courtesy of PPP; but there is a hostel nearing completion and built by the immediate past governor. Unfortunately, that hostel has since been abandoned for no reason.  That project needs to be revisited.

    “Over the last two years, LASU has witnessed peace; yet there is a need to work in concert so as to ensure we can sustain this peace in the next three years.”

    His counterpart in SSANU Comrade Saheed Oseni agreed with him.

    “At present, there is peace in LASU but we must not allow it degenerate,” Oseni said.

    “I will appeal to management to ensure issues bordering on staff discipline are treated fairly and without bias in the interest of all.

    “We still have contentious issues on staff welfare and few other things. Management is trying but workers are Oliver Twist. We shall continue to ask for more.

     

    Students’ Union also react

    LASU Students Union President Samuel Olalere, noted that students are working in concert with management to evolve a new LASU brand.

    “The hooliganism and gangasterism that used to be a part of students activities are fast ebbing away. So far, we have been able to key into the LASU brand and this has changed the perception of outsiders about us either within or outside the country.

    “The culture of discipline has also made students to sit up, and the awards of scholarships to outstanding students, is now prodding many of us towards academic excellence.

    That notwithstanding, Olalere said the recent introduction of N20,000 Acceptance Fee by management is unjustifiable.

    “Management said they needed to jerk up the university IGR and they are justifying it by saying our tuition (N25,000 across board) is relatively low when compared with other institutions.

    “However, we feel the management is not prudent enough. As Student Union, each student pays N450 as Student Due; in the end what gets to SU is N125, and from these we are able to organise more student-centred activities. Therefore, it is we students that need more of this IGR because of our various activities.  So if despite the meagre N125, we are still able to manage and organise these programmes successfully, then I don’t see any reason why management could not operate within its present means.”

    Prof Abiodun Akinpelu of LASU Faculty of Education said his sacked colleagues unfortunately were victims of the new era of discipline management introduced.

    He said: “We are all made to follow laid down rules and regulations in our official transactions, else we face the consequences. Era of impunity was truly visited, and lasting discipline introduced at all levels. It was however sad that some of the cases during the period degenerated to the level of dismissal of some staff. We can see everyone working more cautiously, no more business as usual. Working however became strenuous as we had so many deadlines with quite a lot of assignments. This actually led to the unprecedented achievements. It’s now glaring that more hands would be needed especially where some staff retired and there’s no replacement for some years now.”

    “The past twoyears have brought an end to groaning along the lines of promotion. Over 123 academic staff got elevated to professorial cadre within the period while a good number of non-academic staff got lifted to higher cadres too. This is quite unprecedented in the history of the university.”

    A lecturer from the Faculty of Science who pleaded not to have his name mentioned, lamented that the problem of LASU is the failure to learn from history.

    “When you look at LASU’s problems over the years, there is nothing spectacular.The situation has remained the same. For me, it is not only about the personality of the VC, it is about those praise singers surrounding him.

    “There are lecturers in this institution who for long have left the core essence of teaching. Their job is to curry favours of whoever is in power in a bid to securing one appointment or another. These praise singers have always been around derailing the dream of every administration in power.”

    A worker in SSANU expressed happiness that having gone through so much under the last two administrations, workers are now being watchful so as to avoid the mistakes of the past.

    “Before, we (workers) were the ones who would say this VC is bad, and should be replaced, only to later complain that his replacement is even worse than his predecessor.

    “If you recall under Prof Akanni Hussein, (LASU sixth VC who had a running battle with workers and was eventually prevented from running a second term),   people said he was bad and vowed never to allow him complete a second time which had already been approved by the government.

    “When (Prof Oladapo) Obafunwa (Hussein’s successor) came on board, everybody was also happy that a new era had come; but in no time, trouble started again and workers said Hussein was even a better administrator.

    “Now it’s like we have learned our lessons and are now sleeping with only one eye open. This current management has been quite open; but that does not mean workesr should go to bed yet. We all need to be vigilant,” the source said.

     

     

  • ASUU condemns sack in LASU, KSU

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Kano zone has condemned the sack of its members at the Kogi State University (KSU) and Lagos State University (LASU), describing it as unconstitutional.

    In a statement on Monday, Zonal Coordinator, Prof Mohammad Lawan, called for their immediate re-instatement for being unjustly sacked.

    The union accused LASU Vice Chancellor, Prof Olarenwaju Fagbohun, of acting with impunity by purportedly sacking the ASUU-LASU Chairman, Dr Isaac Akinloye Oyewumi and the Vice Chairman, Dr Adebowale Adeyemi Suenu over the allegation  of demanding money via an unnamed agent to process students’ result in 2011.

    The union also condemned the purported proscription of ASUU-Kogi State University (KSU) chapter by Governor Yahaya Bello as well as the forceful ejection and ban of sacked ASUU members from the campus.

    The union lamented that despite peace overtures by ASUU, the Visitors and management of the two universities continued to act with impunity, which is against the constitutional provisions of the country, and all extant  national and international labour laws.

    The ASUU Kano Zone is made up of Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria; Bayero University Kano (BUK); Kaduna State University (KASU); Kano University of Science and Technology (KUST), Wudil; Federal University, Dutse and Maitama Sule University, Kano.

  • N23b: UNILORIN ASUU accuses Fed Govt of partiality

    N23b: UNILORIN ASUU accuses Fed Govt of partiality

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) in the University of Ilorin (UNILORIN), Kwara State,has said that  the Federal Ministry of Education and its parastatals have been hijacked by the national ASUU.

    The teachers were aggrieved that they were left out of the N23 billion Earned Academic Allowance (EAA) released last week to members of  ASUU) in partial fulfilment of the agreement between the union and the Federal Government.

    ASUU traced the latest development to alleged unholy alliance between the national ASUU and the ministry.

    Speaking with reporters in Ilorin, Kwara State, over the development, chairman of the university’s branch of the union, Dr Usman Adebimpe, was surprised that teachers who did not go on strike for 18 years were being deprived of an allowance meant to compensate those who worked while their counterparts who were perennially on strike were being paid.

    The UNILORIN ASUU leader, who revealed that he had been under severe pressure from members for about a week now, asked the National Assembly to wade into the matter immediately to forestall a situation where members of the branch would be pushed to the wall. He, however ruled out strike as an option by the union to press home its demand.

    Adebimpe, whose faction is not recognised by the national body, said: “After so many attempts at frustrating us and brining us to their fold by force and not by dialogue, they now found an ally in the Federal Ministry of Education. As I talk to you now, the Federal Ministry of Education has been taken over by ASSU national. I know I am on record. Everywhere is now being controlled by ASUU national.

    “To the extent that they now dictate who should be given the Federal Government approved earned academic allowance. So they shared N23 billion to ASUU by the Federal Government and they excluded two universities, ASUU of UNILORIN and ASUU of UNN and the excuse they gave when we began to fire from several angles was that it was because what we submitted was faulty.

    “And we told them that it was a coincidence that the two universities that did not go on strike were the two universities that also submitted what they called faulty documentation and to the extent that to date nobody got to know about it.

    “We have petitioned the President, the Senate President and the Speaker, House of Representatives. We are saying that the minister would be told that our members actually worked and they are the ones who actually qualified for the allowance because we actually earned it but the minister is now giving it to people who didn’t work so it is more or less a strike allowance.

    “If that is the moral, we will not complain because we would not spoil the efforts we have been making since 2001. But since it is tagged earned allowance, and our members were working then, not now, but for the past 18 years, unbroken, I do not know who is a better earner of that allowance.

    “Even if they now pay me tomorrow I have been traumatised, like my other colleagues. If we must continue in this order, then we have to seek protection from the public against the antics of the Federal Ministry of Education and their cohorts.

    “Our members are demoralised; they have been mounting pressure on us because they have been working for nine years graduating students at each session and yet they are the ones now to be denied this allowance. If things are not handled properly, only God knows what will happen because we may not be able to control them.

    “Their intention is that we did not go on strike so we must be punished but we would not be pushed into that because otherwise we would have yielded to their call and lost the 18 year record we have now.”

  • Trouble over earned allowances

    Trouble over earned allowances

    The Federal Government may soon be having a problem on its hands with the release of funds for the payment of earned academic allowances and earned allowances to university workers.
    Some unions are accusing the government of bias towards ASUU, which got the lion’s share of the N23 billion released to 22 universities. KOFOWOROLA BELO-OSAGIE, NICHOLAS KALU, OSEHEYE OKWUOFU, KOLADE ADEYEMI and YINKA ADENIRAN report.

    It was just last September that the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) called off a five-week strike over non-implementation of its agreement with the Federal Government. One of its demands was the payment of earned academic allowances, which had accrued to N23 billion as at 2009/2010.

    The Federal Government, in fulfilling its promise, this week directed the payment of earned academic allowances/earned allowances to 22 Federal Government-owned universities to academic and non-academic members of staff.  While academics under ASUU will get N18.3billion, non-teaching staff members belonging to the Senior Staff Association of Nigerian University (SSANU) and the Non-Academic Staff Union (NASU) will get N4.6 billion.

    However, the sharing formula has begun to cause disaffection among the unions – with the non-teaching workers questioning the huge disparity.

    At the University of Ibadan on Monday, the Vice Chancellor (VC), Prof Idowu Olayinka announced to leaders of the various unions that he had been directed to pay ASUU members N1,626,117,386.20 of the total N1,731,827,144.53 for the allowances, while the others would get N105,709,758.33.

    The directive caused a lockdown of the university the following day as the non-teaching members of staff paralysed academic and administrative activities by locking three out of the four gates leading to the university.  Lecturers were said to have stayed away from the classrooms for fear of being attacked.

    Reacting to the development, ASUU President, Prof Biodun Ogunyemi, said the union had specific discussions with the Federal Government concerning payment of the earned academic allowances.  He said other unions were free to demand for their balance from the government, just like ASUU would also do.

    He said: “The position in the letter is clear.  We made separate demands based on different documents.  The truth is that the entire N23 billion was initially allocated to Academic Staff based on verified claims.

    “In 2013, there were arbitrariness in the distribution of funds for earned allowances.  Note that we never talked about earned allowances, but earned academic allowances.

    “When the funds were allocated the guidelines were not clear.  Many universities arbitrarily distributed the funds.  We  felt that it should not be repeated.

    “As far back as November last year we were at the National Assembly to make specific claims for the earned academic allowances.  We were not negotiating for any other union; we were talking about our own members.

    “Government appealed to us that others should be accommodated and that was why the N23 billion was reduced.  Is it a bad idea that government said bend backwards for others and we agreed?

    “We do not undermine the struggle of the other unions.  It is not all the claims that have been paid.  If any union feels they were not fully paid, they should go to government.  They can always ask for the balance of their claims just as we are going to do.  We only insisted that any distribution must be made based on a specific framework.”

    When contacted twice on Tuesday to speak on the issue, SSANU National President, Sam Egwoke, said he was attending a meeting and could not comment. “I am at a meeting please, I cannot talk about it,” he said on phone.

    However, on Tuesday, SSANU’s Vice President (Western Zone), Comrade Alfred Jimoh, said the protest was a rejection of the sharing formula.

    He said: “It is spontaneous reactions of members, who are oppressed, depressed, mistreated in their place of work. This is a result of ridiculous attitude of university proprietors – government – and the teaching staff in the university system as it is evident in the sharing of earned allowances that was sent into the universities. A lot of things are wrong with that thing.

    “The first time in the history of payment of salaries and allowances in Nigerian universities, government met with the teachers and stratified the fund released into the universities and divided it among them.

    “Secondly, government asked unions to go and compute their salaries and bring it, which had never happened before. For employers to ask employees to calculate your earnings and bring it. Yes, we all did it and submitted to the government, but through back door we were shocked to the marrow that government that is fighting against corruption can sit down and do this level of corruption in the university system. And we believe that it is the same agenda of removing and reducing the non-teaching staff of Nigerian universities. The teaching staff have been crying out since 1993 up till now, it is the same agenda.”

    Comrade Wale Akinremi, SSANU Chairman, University of Ibadan chapter, said: “We still don’t want to believe that the money has been shared till now. There is no responsible government or agents that will send that type of letter to us that is flying around in the university. If at all the letter says that as a result of verified submissions, we want to know the ratio that gives ASUU N1.6 billion and N105million to non-teaching.

    “When we did the last one, we had N2.1 billion in UI, the non-teaching had almost a billion and ASUU had over N1billion. We want to know what has changed in the new verification.

    “There was nothing like earn academic allowance in 2009 Agreement.  It was fraudulently imported by the government representatives because they are coming from ASUU constituency.  We did not vote ASUU, but we voted President Muhammadu Buhari to fight corruption. With the way they are going, they will cause chaos in the university system. In a system, every component of that system is important, university system is universal; no one is superior.

    On his part, NASU Chairman Comrade Oluwasegun Arojo, said: “It is obvious that most of the documents emanating from the Federal Government have  been influenced by ASUU. The best time to liberate ourselves from the shackles is now, we have been patient enough. We demonstrated this morning (Tuesday) to express our feeling to the government and citizens that we are not second class citizens. ASUU has claimed to be first class citizens, claiming that they have magic  fingers; we will give them our own best.”

    At the University of Calabar (UNICAL), NASU Chairman, Comrade Sunday Ovat, said the N200 million released was insufficient to pay all non-teaching members of staff their allowances compared to ASUU’s N615 million.

    He said: “Initially a circular for N615 million from the Federal Government was sent specifically for the non teaching staff, but later another circular came that N200 million was for non teaching staff and N600 million for teaching staff. The N200 million is not enough to pay non teaching staff their earned allowance. That is our contest.

    “The payment has not started yet because if they start, some people would earn while others will not, we don’t want a situation where some of our members will earn and others will not.

    “What we agreed is that if the Federal Government does not have enough to pay from 2009 to date, they should pay the ones they can cover, then we can now ask for the other ones.”

    Ovat said NASU members had not protested the situation though they felt bad.

    “The N200 million, I say again, is not enough, but if it was the N615 million in the initial circular that was sent specifically mentioned for non teaching staff, it would have been enough. But they withdrew that one and sent N200million for NASU and N600 million for ASUU. So, many of us feel bad. But there has been no formal protest over the situation,” he said.

    On his part, ASUU Chairman, UNICAL Chapter, Dr Tony Eyang, urged the government to speedily pay up the outstanding allowances since 2010.

    “We know that it is just a fraction of what is being owed that has been released. But that in itself is commendable. We expect that the balance should be paid and timely too before it becomes a source of agitation again. They are owing part of 2009, 2010 up till date, but what they have released can only pay for 2010. We urge the government not to wait for another round of agitation before it is release.”

    Non-teaching workers are not also happy at the Bayero University Kano (BUK).

    Chairman of SSANU in BUK, Haruna Aliyu,  who spoke on behalf of the other sister unions, said that the non-teaching staff were awaiting directived from the Joint Action Committee  (JAC) for the next line of action.

    He said BUK was allocated N734, 886, 838.47, out of which, the academic staff got N685, 063, 675.47, while thenon-Academic staff got N49, 823, 163.00.

    Aliyu, said :” To our astonishment, the funds  was shared by the Federal Government, instead of it sent directly to the Universities and allow them to share it in accordance, with each union’s agreement, with the government.”

    ”It is in this regard that, the three Non-teaching staff union under the office of the Joint Action Committee (JAC), rejected the allocation and directed their members to stay away from participating in the payment of the money in their respective universities and await further directives from the National body,” he said.

    However, the BUK ASUU Chairman, Dr Ibrahim MagajI Barde, said the lecturers got what they worked for:

    ‘We in BUK have no problem in respect of the allowances, which we had already received from the Federal Government and the beneficiaries paid.

    “The claim was based on the nature of work between the Academic and Non-Academic Staff, so I can’t comprehend the  type of allowance they are demanding for because  theirs is responsibility allowance.”

     

     

  • LASU defends sack of 15 dons

    LASU defends sack of 15 dons

    Management of Lagos State University (LASU) on Monday defended the sack Lagos State University (LASU) management on Monday defended the sack of 15 members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), about two weeks ago.

    It claimed it followed due process in their sack. The affected lecturers, include the chairman of ASUU-LASU, Dr Isaac Akinloye Oyewunmi, and his vice, Dr Adebowale Adeyemi-Suenu.

    Oyewunmi was sacked for collecting N50,000 from 2003 modular year students of Political Science Education in the sandwich programme; while Adeyemi-Suenu was said to have unilaterally altered results of 12 students already advised to withdraw by Senate in the Department of History and International Studies  in the 2015/2016 Academic session.

    Addressing journalists at the Senate building, the Vice Chancellor (VC), Prof Lanre Fagbohun, said he received the petition against Oyewunmi last October and wrote him to respond to the allegation, which he denied. Fagbohun, however, said three others mentioned in the petition said Oyewunmi demanded for money.  This, the VC said, led to the setting up of the fact-finding panel, which established that he had a case to answer.

    Fagbohun said apart from the petitioner and the three other witnesses, there was an audio recording of his conversation with the former Director of LASU External System, Dr Tajudeen Abanikanda, where Oyewunmi allegedly admitted collecting the bribe.

    Fagbohun said another committee found Adeyemi-Suenu guilty of manipulating students’ results, adding that  ASUU made the dismissal  look like the union was being victimised.

    “I am a member of ASUU, so why will I have to destroy a union that I know has added value to this great institution?.

    “We need to recognise that we are dealing with individuals as employees of this university in relation to transgressions against the rules and regulations of this university. First and foremost, a person is an employee before becoming a member of the union, therefore, we should not draw our respected union into this.

    “We are talking of individuals, who ran foul of the university rules and as a responsible institution we shall not close our eyes to it,” said the VC.

    Fagbohun said the management is encouraging students to take up the task of whistleblowing, promising that reported cases would be promptly addressed by the management.

    The VC said he did not initiate Oyewunmi’s case, but inherited it from the past administration which passed it to the Governing Council.

    He said: “We are talking of an individual (petitioner), who complained when the former Governor Fashola was on seat, and he continued to complain, but felt he was not being heard. By the time you read the record of the proceedings, you will find out that Governor Fashola then sent a text to the Vice Chancellor to investigate the allegation. By the time that VC was leaving, he submitted a report to the current Pro-Chancellor, which formed part of the handing over note.”

    He said Oyewunmi’s case came into the picture again because from time to time, LASU management was being inundated by calls from government requesting an update on petitions written by the aggrieved individuals.

    He said contrary to the union’s claim, 24 of the 26 members of the Governing Council were in attendance and all endorsed the dismissal.

    LASU Students’ Union President, Kappo Samuel Olawale, said the union was also investigating the matter.

    He said: “As a students’ body, we would not be happy to see our members being exploited. What we are saying is if you are saying a lecturer is doing this or that, we are not going to be a party to it.

    “As a students’ body, we should not just sit but study the situation since the university has also given those dismissed the opportunity to appeal their case.”

    However, ASUU has described as untrue  the audio material which claimed that Oyewunmi admitted to the allegation.

    Secretary to the union, Dr Tony Dansu, said the school management was being economical with truth about inheriting Oyewunmi’s case.

    “I beg to disagree that the vice chancellor inherited the case from the immediate past administration,” Dansu said.

    He continued: “This was a case of 2012 and nothing has been heard about it again beyond when Dr Oyewunmi was invited and asked some questions by the former Acting Director, but he did not know that he was being recorded.

    “As ASUU, I can categorically tell you that all that talk about one audio visual that showed Oyewunmi as begging and grovel for pardon are all ruse.

    “What happened was that someone accused you of using a student to demand money. You the accused now went to investigate from two students and found that that thing is true, and you came back to tell the person who first accused you, that ‘I have investigated and found out its true’. So how does that translate to owning up on an offense you did not commit?

    “We are more than sure this is a case of victimisation. Oyewunmi and Adeyemi-Suenu are not being tried as Individuals but leaders of ASUU-LASU for insisting on checks and balances.”

     

  • LASU dons disown ASUU-LASU

    Professors and Associate Professors at the Lagos State University (LASU) have dissociated themselves from the victimisation claim of the leaders of its Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).

    They asked the aggrieved lecturers to seek redress in court.

    They made this known at a meeting last week at the senate chambers, where the issue involving disciplinary actions against some academic staff of the university and conflicting statements stemming from ASUU-LASU Executives was addressed.

    In a communiqué signed by Prof. Martins Anetekhai and Dr Sylvester Odion Akhaine, the body of Professors and Associate Professors, condemned the intrusion of the zonal chapter of ASUU for conducting a press conference claiming that Dr Akinloye Oyewunmi and Dr Adeyemi-Suenu, were still leaders of the union.

    However, they noted that their stance against the ASUU-LASU leadership did not detract from their support for a united front for the union.

    “We observe the undue interference of the Zonal Co-ordinator of ASUU (Lagos Zone) calling a Press Conference, the content of which did not emanate from the ASUU-LASU congress and therefore, we totally dissociate ourselves from it.

    “The union belongs to all of us and all hands must be on deck to ensure a united ASUU-LASU body,” the group said.

  • ASUU suspends strike, directs members to resume today

    ASUU suspends strike, directs members to resume today

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has conditionally suspended their five weeks old strike embarked upon to press for the implementation of agreements reached with the government.

    It directed its members to return to the classroom with immediately.

    President of the Union, Professor Biodun Ogunyemi who addressed a news conference at about 9.30 pm Monday night after another round of meeting with the government delegation led by the Minister of Labour, Senator Chris Ngige, directed all members of the union to return to work after their branch congresses on Tuesday.

    He said they decided to conditionally suspend the strike action in view of the timeline of October 2017 for the implementation of the signed agreement.

    Trending: Army did not declare IPOB terrorist organisation – Buratai

    He said that the union will not hesitate to resume the suspended action if the government renege on the signed agreement which he called Memorandum of Action, adding that the signed agreement was backed by a definite timeline for implementation.

    He warned that the government must not deliberately dishonor the agreement, pointing out that the continuous breach of signed agreement has been responsible for the constant strike action in the Universities.

    Ogunyemi said that the current agreement with the government is based on mutual trust between the union and the government, adding that the trust of the union must be respected by the government.

    The meeting which started about 4.00pm was supposed to last for about one hour, but dragged for about four hours before agreement was reached on All contending issues.

    Briefing Journalist earlier after the meeting which ended at about 7.55pm, Minister of Labour and Employment, Senator Chris Ngige said all the gray areas have been sorted out and an agreement reached.

    He said that members of the union had insisted that they were tired of having agreements that are not implemented, pointing out that the content of the agreement was taken from the series of meeting with the union since the commencement of the strike.

    He said further that that both the government and the union understood themselves and agreed in several issues, assuring that the agreement reached will be implemented by the government in line with available resources.

    Areas of agreement include funding for revitalization of public universities and the issue of Earn Academic Allowances, the issue of University Staff Schools and the implementation of the judgement of the National Industrial Court, National Universities Pension Management Company and guidelines for pension matters formProfessors.

    He also said that the union agreed to the exemption offered by the government regarding the issue of TSA, which include the issue of grants, endowment fund as well as salary short fall which he said is already being implemented by government.

    On the issue of state universities, he said they agreed that the union will submit a position paper to the federal government on their observation with a view for government to advise state government on the funding of state universities.

    He describe the union as patriotic members of the society, pointing out that anybody who demand better working equipment is no doubt a patriot.