Tag: Adebukola Banjoko

  • N1.64bn fraud suit: Nyame to know fate on May 30

    N1.64bn fraud suit: Nyame to know fate on May 30

    Former Governor of Taraba, Jolly Nyame, charged with N1.64bn fraud suit, will on May 30, know his fate as Justice Adebukola Banjoko of the FCT High Court will deliver judgment.

    Banjoko fixed the date for judgment after counsel to parties had adopted their addresses.

    The EFCC  charged Nyame with criminal breach of trust and misappropriation of government funds on June 22, 2010.

    Earlier, Mr Olalekan Ojo, Counsel to Nyame said the confessional statement the EFCC had relied on was marred by inconsistency and therefore urged the court to discountenance it.

    Ojo argued that his client had promised to return the alleged stolen funds if prosecution witnesses could show evidence to prove that he stole them.

    He said: “My Lord, at it stance, no witness has testified or brought out any evidence linking my client to have stolen any funds from Taraba Government’’.

    He also urged the court to be circumspect of frivolous evidence given by some of the prosecution witnesses with the viewing to dismissing them.

    Ojo specifically mentioned Mrs Asabe Mengua, a prosecution witness whom he claimed took her evidence from the state’s former Commissioner for Finance, Abubakar Tutare, who had testified earlier.

    Ojo therefore, drew the attention of the court to the fact that Mengua had told the court that she heard from Tutare that Nyame directed that certain funds be paid to Salman Global Ventures Ltd.

    The counsel argued that such evidence was not substantive, direct but `unreliable’ and `fraudulent’.

    “Our contention is that the prosecution has been unable to prove that the defendant gave that directive’’, he said.

    He further argued that the evidence given by Tutare was a “self confessed beneficiary of an alleged fraud being fielded as a witness.’’

    He submitted that all the allegations brought against his client had not been proven to secure his conviction, adding that all financial dealings under Nyame as governor were impeccable.

    Ojo went ahead to urge the court dismiss the suit, adding that the state’s financial record indicated that the ex-governor diligently expended the funds on state projects and not on himself.

    Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), the Prosecuting Counsel, had urged the court to discountenance the arguments of the defence as the prosecution had been able to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

    Jacobs said he had called fourteen relevant witnesses, adding that the defendant’s statement reproduced as evidence supported the prosecution in the case.

    Jacobs said all financial misdemeanour committed during the defendant’s tenure as governor were aptly heaped on him.

    “My Lord, the simple question to ask is whether the sum of N1.64 was stolen while the defendant was in charge as governor of the state. The answer is a big yes.

    Jacob therefore submitted that the principal culprit was Nyame, adding that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses exposed how the defendant stole and misused the monies.

    He said the defendant had also supported the case by admitting that he collected money in his statement which he had not retracted.

    “My Lord, we urge the court to dismiss all the issues canvassed by the defendant and go ahead to convict him’’, he said.

    NAN

  • Alleged fraud: Ex-governor Nyame justifies extra-budgetary expenditure

    Alleged fraud: Ex-governor Nyame justifies extra-budgetary expenditure

    Former governor of Taraba State, Jolly Nyame said extra-budgetary expenditure is normal when executing government projects as there is always room for supplementary budget.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ), slammed a 21-count charge on Nyame, bordering on misappropriation of Taraba funds to the tune of N1.64billion during his tenure as governor.

    Nyame, who was cross examined by EFCC’s prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Jacobs ( SAN ), was responding to a question on whether he regarded spending state funds outside budgetary provision as prudent.

    The prosecution served the former governor with exhibit 001, which was money budgeted for the Governor’s Office during his tenure in 2005.

    The Governor’s Office made an excess expenditure of N982million.
    In his response, Nyame said, “budgets are only estimates,’’ adding that he considered himself being prudent with state funds though he exceeded budgetary provisions “because I performed.’’

    Jacobs also made available exhibit 002, being overhead cost for 2006 for the Governor’s Office.

    The House of Assembly approved N40 million, while N713million was spent, with an excess expenditure of N673million.

    When asked by Jacobs if he regarded that as being prudent too, Nyame replied, “My Lord, I was prudent and it could have been the House of Assembly that could have proved otherwise.’’

    In 2007, N100million was budgeted for the Governor’s Office as overhead, while N2.1billion was spent, with N2billion as excess expenditure.

    When asked by the prosecution if he knew that it was an offence to exceed the budget estimate, the former governor replied that he knew, but only if there was no supplementary budget.

    Nyame said that exceeding budget estimates was normal when executing government projects and that “there is room for supplementary budget.’’

    Justice Adebukola Banjoko adjourned the case until Oct. 12 for continuation of cross examination.

    NAN

  • Court adjourns Dariye ’s alleged N1.162bn fraud trial

    Court adjourns Dariye ’s alleged N1.162bn fraud trial

    An FCT High Court in Gudu, on Monday adjourned the trial of former Gov. Joshua Dariye of Plateau until Oct.10 at the instance of the defence.

    Dariye is facing a 21-count charge bordering on money laundering and diversion of ecological fund to the tune of N1.162 billion.

    Dariye’s new counsel, former Attorney General of the Federation, Mr Kanu Agabi (SAN), asked for the adjournment to enable him get acquainted with the case.

    “I am appealing for the very last time and beg you on my knees. I have also pleaded with Rotimi Jacobs, grant us one more adjournment to get acquainted with the case,’’ Agabi said.

    In his response, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) prosecuting counsel, Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), told the court that the case had lingered for so long.

    Jacobs noted that the judge had advised the defendant to bring a counsel who will continue with the case when his former counsel withdrew from the matter.

    He said the defendant had called 16 witnesses, but yet to close his case.

    He reminded the court that it was while Agabi was the Attorney General of the Federation that Dariye was arrested and investigated.

    According to him, the UK has even refunded some of the stolen funds recovered from Dariye to the Federal Government.

    “How can he then come and appear as defence counsel,’’ Jacobs queried.

    Justice Adebukola Banjoko, in granting the adjournment, said that she did that in the interest of justice.

    Banjoko also said that she expected the defence counsel to honour his word and study the case.

    “Now that you are here, I know you will live up to expectation,’’ she said.

    The judge also ordered that the new counsel be furnished with the records of proceedings to enable him get acquainted with the case.

  • $620,000 ‘bribe’: Judge cautions  Lawan, Emenalo against delay

    $620,000 ‘bribe’: Judge cautions Lawan, Emenalo against delay

    Justice Adebukola Banjoko of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Gudu, Abuja, has cautioned a former Chairman of the House of Representatives ad hoc Committee on Fuel Subsidy Regime and its ex-Secretary, Farouk Lawan, and Boniface Emenalo against using delay tactics to frustrate their trial.

    The judge issued the caution yesterday when the planned commencement of trial in the case against Lawan and Emenalo was stalled because  of the application for a stay of proceedings filed before the Court of Appeal, Abuja, by the accused persons.

    Lawan and Emenalo were re-arraigned on a seven-count charge before Justice Banjoko on June 11.

    They are accused of receiving bride and abusing their offices in relation to the allegation that they received $620, 000 as bribe from the Chairman,  Zenon Oil and Gas, Mr Femi Otedola.

    They allegedly took the bribe ostensibly to exclude the names of Otedola’s companies – Zenon Petroleum and Gas Limited and Synopsis Enterprises Limited – from the list of companies found to have “defrauded” the Federal Government of billions of naira.

    The accused were earlier arraigned on the same charge before Justice Mudashiru Oniyangi (formerly of the FCT High Court, Maitama) before his elevation to the Court of Appeal some months ago.

    Justice Banjoko, after the proceedings of June 11, adjourned till July 7 for the commencement of the trial.

    But yesterday, defence lawyer, Akinyemi Aremu, informed the court that the accused had appealed an earlier decision of the Court of Appeal, Abuja, to the Supreme Court.

    They were also said to have applied to the Court of Appeal for a stay of proceedings before the trial court.

    “The matter is slated for hearing today. However, we have filed a motion for a stay of proceedings at the Court of Appeal, dated July 4. As settled in plethora of decisions, the proper and tidy thing to do is to stay proceedings pending a resolution of the motion at the Court of Appeal

    “The nature of our application is preservatory: once steps are taken, it will destroy the res in the matter. If the court proceeds with the hearing of the matter, the application would have been rendered nugatory,” Aremu said.

    He sought an adjournment.

    The lead prosecution lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), did not oppose the request for an adjournment.

    But he expressed disappointment that the accused persons’ application for a stay of proceedings, filed on July 4, was meant to frustrate the speedy hearing of the case.

     

    Awomolo, who said he would contest the accused persons’ application for stay of proceedings, asked the court for short adjournment on the ground that it was now the tradition of the court to accord criminal cases expeditious hearing.

    Ruling, Justice Banjoko observed that “this is a classic case of delay tactics by the defendants’ counsel. I urge lawyers to rely on their competence rather than employ delay tactics in the defence of their cases.”

    She adjourned to October 28 for parties to report development at the Court of Appeal and possible hearing of the case.