Tag: Adesanya

  • Adesanya faces up to three months in jail for drunk-driving

    Adesanya faces up to three months in jail for drunk-driving

    Former UFC middleweight champion, Israel Adesanya, risks facing up to three months in jail after he pleaded guilty to drunk-driving charges in New Zealand.

    The incident reportedly took place on August 19, three weeks before his UFC 293 loss to Sean Strickland.

    It was reported that Adesanya encountered a Random Breath Testing unit in Auckland after dinner with friends.

    He was found with 87 milligrams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood in his system, which was above the legal limit of 50 milligrams.

    After pleading guilty at the Auckland District Court, Adesanya released a statement to The New Zealand Herald, saying:

    “I want to apologise to the community, my family and my team for the decision I made to get behind the wheel after drinking at a dinner.

    Read Also: Israel Adesanya’s UFC 293 defeat: Drake loses $500,000 bet

    “I was pulled over and gave an evidentiary blood test, the reading was 87 milligrams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood.

    “I am disappointed with my decision to drive, it was wrong. I know that people might follow me and I want them to know I do not think this behavior is acceptable.”

    According to ESPN, he could face up to a $2,680 fine and/or three months in jail and will be back in court on January 10 for sentencing.

  • UFC 293: Drake loses $500k after Adesanya shock defeat

    UFC 293: Drake loses $500k after Adesanya shock defeat

    DRAKE lost $500,000 after betting on Israel Adesanya to retain his middleweight title at UFC 293.

    The Last Stylebender suffered a shock defeat to Sean Strickland in one of the biggest upsets in the history of MMA.

    Strickland, 32, won by unanimous decision after dominating all five rounds.

    However, Drake was left disappointed having lost half-a-million dollars backing Adesanya to win.

    Just hours before the main event, the rapper took to Instagram to share that he had bet $500k (£401,000) on the New Zealand-born star to knock Strickland out.

    With odds of 1.84, Drake was hoping for a huge $920k (£738,000) payout.

    However, Strickland’s stunning victory ultimately cost him.

    Drake is renowned for his outrageous sporting wagers – which infamously ‘curse’ whoever he has bet on.

    A number of sports stars have fallen victim to the ‘Drake curse’, including Serena Williams and Conor McGregor.

    Read Also: UFC: Adesanya weighs chances  against Strickland

    YouTuber-turned-boxer Jake Paul also suffered the effects when he lost to Tommy Fury earlier this year.

    He joked: “F***! This is Drake’s fault!

    “Drake, bro, why did you do this to me?

    “No, it’s my fault. $400,000 is nothing to him – he has won a lot more money betting on me before.

    “He’s probably about even now. Sorry Drake, I’ll get that W in the rematch!”

  • UFC: Adesanya weighs chances  against Strickland

    UFC: Adesanya weighs chances  against Strickland

    UFC middleweight champion Israel Adesanya views himself as the underdog against Sean Strickland on Saturday in Australia.

    Adesanya competes in his 11th  title fight in five years and is a strong favourite against American Strickland.

    But the 34-year-old New Zealander said  Strickland is “dangerous” and cannot be underestimated.

    “A man with nothing to lose and everything to gain is a dangerous man,” Adesanya, 32, said.”I think that’s what makes him dangerous. He doesn’t care. He knows I’m going to beat him.

    “So he doesn’t care. He’s going to try to do his best to beat me by any means necessary. I look at myself as the underdog in this fight.”

    Strickland was a surprise opponent for Adesanya after two wins and two defeats in his last four fights.

    Read Also: Man Utd take Antony abuse allegations ‘seriously’

    But top contender Dricus du Plessis of South Africa turned down the title shot, which allowed Strickland to step into contention.

    He has 27 wins and five losses on his record, including against former champion Alex Pereira and top contender Jared Cannonier.

    Strickland has trash talked Adesanya for much of the build-up, claiming he punched one of his fans “in jest” when he arrived in Australia earlier this week.

    Adesanya, however, said  he  was not paying attention to Strickland’s attempts to get under his skin as he searches for his 25th  pro win.

    “This is deja vu to me,” Adesanya said. “He did say he’s a better striker than me, so I welcome him to try.

    “I’ve been doing this for a long time and I am yet to choke [anyone] out.

    “So that’s one thing that’s on my list. I hope he wrestles. If not, cool, stand and bang.

    “The man dance, if you will. He’s selling wolf tickets (empty promises) when he talks about that.

    “I don’t think he’s going to man dance with me and if he does, I’m a better dancer than him.”

  • Adesanya to defend UFC 293 title against Strickland

    Adesanya to defend UFC 293 title against Strickland

    Israel Adesanya has admitted he is rooting for ‘new blood’ when Khamzat Chimaev faces his former rival Paulo Costa.

    After beating the majority of middleweight contenders in the UFC, Adesanya admitted that he is always seeking new challenges and competition.

    He’ll face one of these when he takes on Sean Strickland in UFC 293 in Sydney as part of the main event.

    Chimaev’s showdown against Costa could see the winner face Adesanya, with Costa previously losing to him.

    Speaking to on the fight, Adesanya admitted that he is rooting for Chimaev as he said: “I don’t know who’s going to win but I think if I’m favouring, I might be favouring Khamzat a little bit more,”

    Adesanya continued to tell MMA Fighting while appearing on behalf of Stake.com: “(I’m rooting for him) because I like new blood.”

    Read Also: Israel Adesanya celebrates ‘sweet win’ with Usman Kamaru, Adekunle Gold, others at nightclub

    However, he warned Chimaev that the fight against Costa will not be an easy one despite Adesanya beating him in the past.

     “I just made Paulo look easy but trust me, he’s a hard fighter,” Adesanya continued. “He’s a hard fighter but I made him look easy. But I think I’m rooting for Khamzat more in that fight.”

    He finalised by admitting that he could look to face Chimaev before the end of the year and could scout his potential future opponent.

     “Isn’t that funny? ”Adesanya said.

    “I’m the one actually pushing for fights. I’m even trying to have one more this year. We’ll see. Yeah, definitely [might get one more fight this year]. We’ll see.”

  • Adesanya wins UFC Interim Middleweight title

    Nigeria-born Mixed Martial Arts fighter, Israel ‘The Last Stylebender’ Adesanya has won the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) interim middleweight title after defeating Kelvin Gastelum via a unanimous decision, after five rounds of intense fighting.

    Adesanya (17-0), knocked out his American opponent twice with all three judges scoring the five-round bout for Adesanya. All three scorecards read 48-46, including 10-8 marks in the decisive fifth round.

    Adesanya was knocked down early in the first round when Gastelum landed a left hook but gained the upper hand in the second round and dropped Gastelum with a counter right hand.

    He continued with his good form in the third round before Gastelum surprised him with a left head kick.

    Gastelum was later beaten to a bloody mess in the final 30 seconds when he was floored twice but he refused to quit and was lucky to see the final horn as referee Marc Goddard gave the brave Mexican-American fighter every opportunity to survive.

    Adesanya, who becomes the 10th fighter in UFC history to win a belt with an undefeated record said after the fight: “I was ready for war.  I told you all.  “I wanted to take him out but I was ready for war because he is Mexicano.

    “I am not one to quit,” Adesanya added. “I am strong mentally. I am bulletproof in the brain.

    Adesanya will now face undisputed middleweight champion Robert Whittaker to unify the belts.

    Whittaker was forced to withdraw from a title defence with Gastelum earlier this year because of a hernia surgery.

  • 2019 polls: Akure women’s group back Adesanya

    Women’s group in Akure, the Ondo State capital, Women Arise for Good Governance (WAGG), has backed the House of Representatives ambition of a woman lawmaker, Kemisola Adesanya, in next year’s general elections.

    Adesanya, who is a second-term lawmaker representing Akure South Constituency I in the House of Assembly, is seeking to represent Akure South/North Federal Constituency in the National Assembly.

    In a statement by its Coordinator, Adebisi Oladimeji, the group said they had decided to support the candidature of Kemisola Adesanya to represent Akure South/North Federal constituency at the House of Representatives.

    She said the group took the decision due to its conviction that Adesanya has all it takes to bring development and dividends of democracy to Akure.

    Oladimeji said the group chose Adesanya not only for its preference for a woman candidate, but also because the lawmaker, in the last seven years, had performed well and provided humanitarian service to the people through the various life-impacting constituency projects and programmes to her constituents.

    The statement said: “Kemisola is no doubt an upright politician with the interest of the people at heart. Based on her antecedents and contribution to youth and women empowerment, employment generation and skills development as well as other landmark contributions to the development of Akure, we strongly believe that her election as a federal lawmaker in 2019 will bring better representation that will attract development and more dividends of democracy to Akure.”

  • Adesanya: 10 years after

    Afenifere leader Senator Abraham Adesanya passed on 10 years ago. Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU writes on the legacies of the elder statesman and the effects of his demise on the pan-Yoruba socio-political group.

    Ten years ago, the news of his demise reverberated across the six geo-political zones. The incident marked the depletion of the Awoists, who have faithfully propagated the ideals of the sage, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo. He was mourned by compatriots who acknowledged that he died without a significant political blemish. Like his political leaders, the indomitable Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Chief Adekunle Ajasin, he was above board in many areas; highly disciplined, knowledgeable, versatile, incorruptible and committed to the pursuit of the federal principle.

    At 86, he died a fulfilled politician after a protracted illness, although he often lamented that civil rule, and not democracy, was restored in 1999, following a protracted battle against the military by the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO).

    Abraham Aderibigbe Adesanya, successful transporter, astute lawyer and shrewd politician was a member of the old order. The Yoruba chief from Ijebu-Igbo, Ogun State, was, until his demise, the National Leader of Afenifere and chieftain of the now weakened Alliance for Democracy (AD). The position of Leader of Afenifere was not a salaried position. Adesanya also refused to use his status to make money at the twilight of life. When one of young his aides, who is a journalist, asked him to mobilise the Southwest functionaries in government to contribute salaries for the leader, thereby converting he position into a lucrative one, Adesanya, who was in the same car with him, kept mute.

    On getting to a market in Yaba, Lagos Mainland, he asked the aide to get down and approach the masses there for the reward he had in mind for the Afenifere leadership. He said to him: “Get down from the car and go to these people in the market and ask for the salary for Afenifere leader. They are the people we are serving”. The aide was rebuked by that explanation. When the governors of the Southwest later presented a jeep to him, the old man was not excited. He requested for a small ladder, which he would climb to get to the vehicle. It was curious that an Ijebu man could shun opulence, materialism, funfair and the love of money.

    In post-Adesanya era, the absence of the great leader was felt by the organisation. He was a lover of proverbs, which he employed as corrective tools. As leader of a divided politico-cultural organisation, he employed wisdom and his moral authority to forge cohesion. He aligned the organisation with the progressive tendency, which is consistent with its historical antecedent. Therefore, observers were curious when, following his death, surviving Afenifere leaders gravitated towards the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governments; first in Ogun State, and later, the Jonathan presidency, after dangling the carrot of national conference, which report the former president lacked the will and sincerity to implement.

    As the Afenifere leader, he canvassed the national question. He favousred a return to parliamentary system. He was also an advocate of true federalism. Adesanya called for state police, restructuring and decentralisation of power.

    At the fifth anniversary lecture in his memory at the Afe Babalola Hall, University of Lagos, Akoka, eminent Nigerians, including Lagos State Governor Babatunde (SAN), who was represented by his Regional Integration Special Adviser, the late Rev. Tunji Adebiyi, former Ogun State Governor Aremo Segun Osoba, and Oodua peoples Congress (OPC) founder Dr. Fredrick Fasehun, described him as a great nationalist who served his nation and country creditably. The event was organised by the Ogun State Students Association.

    A lecturer from the Department of International Relations, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Prof. Alade Fawole, who spoke on “The place of the Yoruba in Nigerian politics and development”, said that Adesanya took a cue from Awolowo by being a good citizen of Yoruba before being a good citizen of Nigeria. “In his several endeavours and engagements, his life was defined by integrity, honour, the Omoluabi concept, selflessness, unwavering commitment to principles, loyalty to the people and their cause, and commitment to ensuring the greatest happiness for the greatest number of the people”, he added.

    Fawole however, charged them to remember that their strength lies in the progressive creed bequeathed by Awo and sustained by Ajasin and Adesanya. He urged Yoruba to defend its legacies in education. The don also called for support for the integration agenda mooted by the ARG and implemented by the Southwest governors.

    Adesanya was a role model and mentor to many politicians who relished values and principles. For him, contentment was a great virtue. Thus, as a regional legislator in the First Republic, senator in the Second Republic, and NADECO leader during the dark days of the military rule, his watchword was service to humanity. He loathed avarice, materialism, primitive accumulation and other acts of political indecency. He objected to lateness to meetings. He was perceived as a moral voice moderating the activities of the progressive Yoruba actors who were ultimately divided by the scramble for power at the federal, state and local governments.

    That stiff competition for political offices took its toll on the umbrella organisation he led till he passed on. The signs of strains were visible, owing to the cracks in the fold since the late Chief Ganiyu Dawodu opposed the candidature of Senator Bola Tinubu for the Lagos State governorship and the late Chief Bola Ige and Chief Oluyemisi Falae clashed at D’Rovans, Ibadan, during the AD presidential primaries. Although he managed, to a large extent, to unite the two caucuses, it was evident that the group only wobbled on into a perilous future. Following his departure to the great beyond, Afenifere broke down.

    Some Afenifere chieftains may wish to reflect in their memoirs the circumstances surrounding the removal of its Secretary, Ayo Opadokun, who was alleged to have been hobnobbing with the former All Peoples Party (APP) Governor Mohamamed Lawal of Kwara State. While Opadokun was shoved aside, the group did not raise an eyebrow when another chieftain, Senator Cornelius Adebayo, former governor of Kwara State, was appointed as minister by former President Obasanjo.

    During Adesanya’s burial at Ijebu-Igbo, the rivalry and division in Afenifere came to the fore. The two factions of Afenifere, led by Chief Rueben Fasoranti and Senator Ayo Fasanmi, were in the ancient town to pay their last respects and score political points. The death of their leader failed to unite them. Up to now, reconciliation has proved difficult. The acrimony, observers contend, is not only a disservice to the memory of Adesanya, but also to the memory of Ajasin and Awo.

    For Adesanya, politics was not a profession. It was a vocation. Before he joined the fray, he had established himself as a businessman and lawyer. He successfully ran a transport business. He was also not a failure at the bar. But, he entered politics as a rebel, who was estranged from the party tradition of the time. He questioned the decision of the AG leadership, which advised him not to contest election into the Western Regional House of Assembly in 1956. When he acted contrary, he lost his deposit at the poll.

    Adesanya was already a household name in his Ijebu-Igbo Constituency before independence. The people were rooting for him. However, the ruling Action Group (AG) advised him to opt out of the contest, promising to reward him with the seat in 1960. He jettisoned the advice and contested as an independent candidate. He suffered the same fate like the young lawyer from Akure, Akinola Aguda, who, despite his popularity, lost to the AG candidate. But, in 1960, Adesanya bounced back. He retraced his steps to the AG, contested for the same seat on that platform and won. Since then, he treasured the doctrine of party supremacy.

    The Ijebu-Igbo politician loved his leader, Awo. But, he always refrained from playing to the gallery. That lack of flair for frivolities endeared him to his leader. Whenever he visited the sage, the old man would instantly grant him an audience because he believed that Adesanya must have come for an important business. When the AG split into two factions, following the AG crisis, which reached the peak at the rancorous Jos Congress in 1962, he rejected the entreaties from Premier Ladoke Akintola to dump Awo’s AG for the Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP), which was derisively referred to as ‘Demo Party’.

    Adesanya was present at the court throughout the treason felony trial of Awolowo. As a young lawyer, he had the privilege to carry the gown of the British legal icon, Dingle Foot, to the court. The trial was window dressing as the leader of the Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and Premier of the Northern region, Sardauna Ahmadu Bello, Prime Minister Abubakar Balewa and Akintola had made up their minds that Awo should be liquidated. When the judge, whose hands were tied, Justice George Soniran Sowemimo, sentenced the Leader of Opposition to 10 year imprisonment, the AG members wailed inside and outside the High Court.

    Awo was unperturbed. He surveyed the court, looking for a loyal disciple whose eyes were not soaked with tears. Adesanya, who he fondly called ‘Ajantala,’ was the man. Awo wanted to give him a parting note for his beloved wife, Hannah Idowu Dideolu. But, as he handed over the note to him, he too burst into tears. Awo, who had refused to be seized by emotion, rebuked his faithful disciple. “What do you want me to be doing now when you are crying?” he asked. Immediately, Adesanya wiped away his tears.

    In the seventies, Adesanya was a strong member of the Committee of Friends, which metamorphosed into the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN). He was elected a senator in 1979 and re-elected in 1983. Up to now, that part-time legislature had remained the best. Adesanya, who was not a bench warmer, contributed to robust debates on the floor. He also rendered valuable legal services to his party when the notorious National Party of Nigeria (NPN) rigged elections in some parts of the country. When the military sacked the legitimate authorities from power in 1983, the Adesanya’s parliamentary career ended on that note.

    In the Third Republic, politicians were in disarray. They were tossed around by former military President Ibrahim Babangida, who, through his dubious political experimentation, extended the handover date. Initially, Adesanya heeded Awo’s advice to the progressives that they should learn to wine with the devil with a long spoon. But, when the proscribed Social Democratic Party (SDP) aspirant, the late Chief Moshood Abiola, showed remorse and pleaded with the Yoruba establishment to endorse his candidature, Adesanya was one of the delegates who elected him as the candidate in Jos, the Plateau State capital.

    The annulment of the historic June 12, 1993 presidential election won by Abiola threw up Adesanya as an activist in his old age. Following the death of the Afenifere Leader, Chief Adekunle Ajasin, he was selected as the new leader at Ibadan by Yoruba stakeholders. Ige, the Yoruba irredentist,  became his deputy. He also doubled as the NADECO leader at the home front, when the late Chief Anthony Enahoro escaped abroad. He suffered bruises in the hand of the military. When he escaped death by whiskers when his vehicle was attacked, he earned the appellation, Apamaku. He was unwavering in his staunch support for the enthronement of democracy to the end.

    Adesanya and other Afenifere leaders, including Chief Ayo Adebanjo and Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, played an active role in the emergence of Tinubu as the governor of Lagos State in 1999. The Third Republic senator had expressed his desire to return to the Upper Chamber. But, in their wisdom, the Yoruba leaders advised him to run for governor, a move that enraged their colleague, Dawodu, a member of the Afenifere Controlling Leadership, who resisted their decision, but without success.

    Many were surprised that Dawodu, a long standing governorship aspirant, had refused to aspire in 1999. It was an error of judgment on his part to have thrown his weight behind Funso Williams, who had been branded as a functionary of military government. Afenifere and NADECO leaders, including Dawodu were opposed to that military government.

    How to bring Tinubu and Dawodu to a truce was a challenge. Also, it was difficult to fully reconcile Ige with Adebanjo and Ajayi, who Ige believed moved against him at D’Rovans. Ige accepted to serve as minister under President Olusegun Obasanjo without consultation or clearance from the umbrella group. He never returned alive.

    Up came the Yoruba Council of Elders (YCE), which tended to reduce Afenifere’s influence, instead of complimenting it. The first YCE President was Ven. Emmanuel Alayande. The secretary was Justice Adewale Thompson, who was a day older than Adesanya. Whenever Adesanya and Thompson met, they used to crack jokes. Thompson would demand that Adesanya should first greet him because he was his senior by age. Then, Adesanya would say: “Good morning my elder brother by one day.”

    But, a gulf developed, following the setting up of the YCE. When Alayande shunned Afenifere meeting, he fired salvos at the Afenifere leader. “Is it because we (AG) leaders asked him to carry the gown of Dingle Foot that he now thinks that he is the leader?”, he asked. At domestic level, Adesanya was also battling with another challenge. His daughter, Mrs. Dupe Adelaja, was appointed as a minister. She was divided between loyalty to her father and husband. Her father, Adesanya, enjoined her to reject the offer, saying: “If she is a daughter of her father, she will not accept it”. But, other relations thought differently.

    Former Governor Tinubu felt threatened when Dawodu, the Lagos AD chairman, indicated that he could not be persuaded to support him for a second term. Tinubu moved swiftly. He objected to Dawodu’s continuation in office as the chairman, preferring Prince Abiodun Ogunleye for the position. He offered other big appointments to the god of Lagos. Adesanya was torn between Tinubu and Dawodu. He could not abandon his friend of AG and UPN days. Yet, he understood Tinubu perfectly. He even received bashing for not permitting other members of the Controlling Leadership to descend on the former governor during the crisis. The Afenifere leader strategically allowed a committee chaired by Ajayi to suggest a power sharing formula, ahead of 2003 elections. The committee came up with the controversial 60:40 formula. Also, for strategic reasons, Tinubu camp rejected the proposal.

    Under Adesanya’s watchful eyes, Afenifere was on the brink. Dawodu pulled his supporters out of the political family and took refuge in PAC. On the eve of the 2003 governorship election in Lagos, he directed his supporters to support the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, the late Williams. At that stage, Afenifere’s influence had been weakened, because while the five governors it supported in Ogun, Osun, Oyo, Ondo and Ekiti states were displaced by the PDP, Tinubu of Lagos survived the earthquake.

    Ahead of 2003, there were pressures on the group to support Obasanjo, based on ethnic sentiment. Opinion was divided. Previously, Afenifere was said to have interceded for a prominent Yoruba captain of industry in the banking and communication sectors, who had fled the country, following victimisation by the federal Government. The mission to Aso Rock failed. So, Adesanya expressed reservations about any pact with Obasanjo. Former Ogun State Governor Osoba and his Oyo State counterpart, the late Alhaji Lam Adesina, thought otherwise. When Osoba, Adesina, Ade Adefarati, Adebisi Akande and Adeniyi Adebayo were allegedly rigged out, it was evident that Afenifere had been reduced to a toothless bulldog which could only bark, but not bite.

    Between 1999 and 2003, there were also complaints that Afenifere was losing its grip on the governors. Its monitoring activities in the six states were allegedly resisted.

    The crises in the six chapters of Afenifere/AD in Lagos, Ondo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti, Oyo, and to some extent, Ekiti, took their tolls on the group. Fed up with the rift between governors and their deputies, the lieutenants of Awo, who had witnessed similar feuds between Awo and Akintola, Ige and Sunday Afolabi, and Ajasin and Omoboriowo, asked the deputy governors who could not cooperate with their bosses to resign. Thus, Senator Kofoworola Bucknor-Akerele and Iyiola Omisore, who had become estranged with Tinubu and Akande, had to leave the administrations. Also, scores of the AD chieftains defected to the PDP, firing salvos to their former camps. They included Senator Musiliu Obanikoro, Senator Sunday Fajimi, Hon. Foluke Ette, Hon. Niyi Owolade, Femi Onimole, Chief S.K. Babalola and Chief Segun Adegoke. Later, Dayo Adeyeye and Dare Babarinsa quit the camp, following the 2007 post-primary crisis in Ekiti. Also, at that time, Yoruba being marginalised, although their son was the President.

    These were not Adesanya’s making. But, the tragedy of losing political power to conservative rivals in the Southwest was too heavy for the leader to bear. Afenifere warriors refused to listen to his fatherly counsels, which he offered in words laced with proverbs. Soon, the leader succumbed to illness. There was no succession plan. Ige, his deputy, had died and there was no replacement yet. At that twilight of life, chieftains from Ijebu axis started to jostle for the position of leader. But, the younger elements like Dayo Adeyeye, Niyi Afuye, Jimi Agbaje and Yinka Odumakin advised Adesanya to nominate Fasoranti as the Acting Leader to halt the insinuation that Afenifere was ‘Ijebu Mafia.” The leader did not recover from the illness.

    The first test for his successor, Fasoranti was the crisis in the AD. Two members of Ige camp, Senator Mojisoluwa Akinfenwa and Akande, were jostling for the national chairmanship of AD. Two parallel congresses were held in Abuja and Lagos where the rival chairmen emerged. But, during the meeting of Afenifere at Akure, Fasoranti recognised Akinfenwa as chairman, claiming that the convention that produced him complied with the guidelines. The majority of chieftains who backed Akande at the Lagos convention rejected the Akure Declaration, accusing Fasoranti of bias. At the meeting of Afenifere in Jibowu, Lagos, those opposed to him proclaimed Fasanmi as the deputy leader. Fasoranti and Fasanmi joined the AG in 1951.

    Adesanya left behind a divided Yoruba race. He did not inherit a fully united race as leader. More importantly, he left behind a divided Afenifere. In post-Adesanya era, progressives in Yorubaland have continued to work at cross purpose. They have refused to rise beyond the personality clashes of the past. Although the 80th birthday of Adebanjo should have provided the opportunity for reunion, the opportunity was bungled. Adebanjo attributed all the crises to the Tinubus and Osobas of this world.

    Efforts to reconcile the camps by the members of the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), led by Hon. Wale Oshun, had proved abortive. However, the recent visit to the Akure home of Fasoranti by Tinubu, who is the pillar of the Fasanmi/Akande/Osoba/Durojaye faction of Afenifere, and Tinubu’s presence at the 90th birthday of Adebanjo in Lagos give a ray of hope about reconciliation.

    Two years ago, Fasoranti threatened to resigned as leader. He complained about indiscipline in the organisation. He was prevailed upon by members who promised to turn a new leaf.

    What future for Afenifere? Many people believe that reconciliation is the solution. There is strength in unity. According to them, if Afenifere reconciles, cultural groups in other geo-political zone will become jittery and accord Yoruba more respect.

     

  • Between Adesanya and Adedibu

    Abraham Adesanya and Lamidi Adedibu offer contrasting paths, which present-day politicians are free tread.

    Chief Adesanya died 10 years ago.  But today a sterling assemblage, split into resource persons and the audience, is gathering in Lagos to discuss the future, tied to his memory.  The title of the symposium: “Leadership and the future of Nigeria”.  It is a classic of facing the future, armed with stellar legacies from the past.

    Alhaji Adedibu is not quite dead for 10 years.  He died seven years ago.  Perhaps to mark 10 years of his death, in three years time, his Amala-and-Gbegiri brood of rambunctious politicians would gather to do him requisite honour.  Until then, we’ll have to see what happens.  But given the reported abandonment of his once quaking Aafin Molete in Ibadan, the prognosis is not so good.

    That would appear the difference between the narrow and winding way of politics that leads to salvation; and the wide and merry way that leads to perdition.

    Adesanya, all his life, stuck to that narrow way, no matter the odds; no matter the discomfort, no matter the danger.  A faction of the South West progressives share federal power today, courtesy the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential triumph in the 2015 elections.

    But Adesanya, though he epitomized the Yoruba political ethos as much as anyone in his generation, never basked in federal power.  All his political life, he played opposition politics, but with dignity, with rigour, with principle.  He lived and died, revered by friend and foe.

    Adedibu was an unfazed wheeler-dealer, if ever there was one.  Politics to him was just another pay cheque, without scruples.  During the Abacha iron dictatorship, when Adesanya and other National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) braves were virtually walking in the valley and shadows of death, Adedibu and co were making merry in an unending gravy.

    When he showed up as a putative member of then All People’s Party (APP), his political leprosy so nettled the purists, who later fled to form the Alliance for Democracy (AD), to trumpet: Abacha People’s Party!  That was the end of that poor party in Yorubaland.

    Adedibu’s political merchandizing would drive him into the then ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), after it had been fully formed in then sitting President Olusegun Obasanjo’s grim image, and the more decent elements in-there had been weeded out.

    The Alaafin Molete, in his capacity as Obasanjo’s South West garrison commander, took full charge, as sector commander in the South West electoral front, in the infamous do-or-die electoral war of 2007.  When mighty Lamidi sneezed, even sitting governors, like Alhaji Rashidi Ladoja, caught a cold and trembled with fear!

    Adedibu, linked to Adegoke Adelabu, the great Ibadan politician, again echoed the Karl Marx quip that history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce.

    Adedibu farcically aped the Adelabu school of street-wise politics, but without Adelabu’s clock-like ticking intellect.  Busari Adelakun first essayed that aping.  He ended a tragedy.  Adedibu tried a second encore.  He ended a farce.

    Still, the Alaafin Molete had something going for him — proverbial generosity, and fellow-feeling for his plebs, many of them opportunistic, power-craving hustlers without scruples.  That was why his Aafin rocked with Amala-and-Gbegiri feastin g, 24-7, with the multitude feeding in tribute to Abula politics!

    But less than 10 years after, it’s deathly quiet on the feasting floor!

    It is the exact opposite with Adesanya, who followed the narrow and tortuous way; but left a legacy to crow about.  The evidence is today’s Lagos gathering, 10 years after.

    Adesanya of Adedibu?  Current politician can make their choice.  As the English say, as you lay your bed, you lie on it.

     

     

  • Adesanya: A time to remember

    Chief Abraham Adesanya’s 10th death anniversary is a time to remember and a time to reflect. The elder statesman and pro-democracy activist died at 85 on April 27, 2008.  It is fitting that a symposium on “Leadership and the future of Nigeria” to mark the remembrance will take place on May 2 at the MUSON Centre, Onikan, Lagos.  A statement by the chairman of the publicity committee, Prof Adebayo Williams, described Adesanya as “a great Nigerian nationalist, exemplary Yoruba patriot and leader, statesman, philosopher, moral avatar and illustrious chairman of the Afenifere and National Democratic Coalition (NADECO).”

    Interestingly, the remembrance will be spiced with a book of tributes    ”from the public as well as friends, associates, acquaintances, admirers, well-wishers and fellow travellers of Senator Abraham Adesanya.” These tributes to Adesanya are like pictures that capture not only his life and times but also significant parts of Nigeria’s political history in which he played historic roles.  When democratic rule was restored in 1999 after a 16-year period of military domination, there was no doubt that Adesanya was qualified to be named among the heroes of democracy.  He was a giant who made a gigantic contribution to the efforts that won the battle for democracy.

    Former Governor of Ogun State, Chief Olusegun Osoba, underlined the value of the book of tributes, saying, “The story of his life and the colour and fragrance of his politics are worth memorialising.” Osoba said in his tribute: “I am sure there are records of Chief Adesanya’s many speeches and writings on the subject of restructuring that can guide the honest scholar and politician on the way forward… I have lamented the dearth of published works on the political philosophies and experiences of our political leaders. I would have been happy to read first-hand while Chief Adesanya was alive some of his experiences in politics especially in the days of resistance to military rule when he led NADECO.” He added:  “It would have been thrilling to hear from him how he escaped the assassin’s bullets when his car was shot at in broad daylight in the dark days of Abacha dictatorship on January 14, 1997. What was his experience like in detention at Divisional Police Headquarters, Club Road, Ikoyi, and at the Police Medical Centre Bourdillon Road, Ikoyi? It would have been great to hear from him his encounters with Chief Olusegun Obasanjo whilst in office in the early days of the Fourth Republic.”

    Talking of how Adesanya survived a gun attack that defined his importance as a progressive combatant, Yinka Odumakin, National Publicity Secretary, Afenifere, told an interesting story in his tribute:  ”I once heard from him the story of native doctor in Ijebu-Igbo who used to call people to death. His modus operandi was pouring water in a calabash, placing a stick in the hands of a virgin girl. Once he calls the name of his victim and the head appears in the calabash, the girl will hit with the stick. The person died instantly.  But he got more than what he bargained for the day he was to practice his act on Abraham Adesanya .The girl was ready with his stick as the man called “Abraham Adesanya.” The virgin told him she could see two heads in the calabash, including the Babalawo’s, and asked which one to hit. He told her not to touch any! His escape from Abacha bullets earned him the sobriquet Apamaku (The one you kill that doesn’t die).”

     High-profile political player Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, in his tribute, gave an insight into one of his political battles that involved Adesanya: “Of course, we did not always agree on all issues. For instance, in the run-up to the 2003 election, Afenifere wanted the two dominant groups in the AD in Lagos State to share all elective positions on a 60:40 basis. The vast majority of rank and file party members, however, insisted on every interested party member testing their strength in free and fair party primaries. I had no choice but to go along with the decision of the majority in the interest of intra-party democracy and fairness. That decision, I believe, was one of the reasons why Lagos was the only state in the South West that the PDP was unable to capture in 2003. Even though, we did not go along with the position of Afenifere in that instance, Pa Adesanya did not hold it personally against me or the Lagos State leadership of the AD. He understood that it was a matter of principle.”

     Chief Emeka Anyaoku, Commonwealth Secretary-General (1990- 2000), said in his tribute: “Here, I would recall a personal anecdote of his powerful statement in defence of me in the Senate in 1983 when some members of the Senate Screening Committee, for questionable reasons, tried to mess me up during the Ministerial confirmation hearing that preceded my appointment by President Shagari as Nigeria’s Foreign Minister. Significantly, Senator Adesanya’s stout defence of me occurred even before he met me in person.”

    It is thought-provoking that this celebration of Adesanya, his ideas and ideals, is coming at a time when the meaning of progressivism has been corrupted and the definition of a progressive has been degraded.  What would Adesanya have thought of today’s self-defined progressives who pay lip service to the noble pursuit of progress?

    Adesanya played exemplary leadership roles in Afenifere and NADECO that should inspire the leaders of today. But the times have changed and things have changed. Afenifere, the Yoruba organisation that was known for its progressive essence, is essentially now a shadow of its former self. NADECO, the patriotic pro-democracy movement that was known for its punching power, was ironically a casualty of democracy and has failed to rise from the ashes.

    Ten years after Adesanya’s death, Nigeria is still grappling with the national question and structural issues.  Recollections of his life and times should inspire reflections on the nexus between progressive leadership and the progress of Nigeria. The ultimate tribute to the giant from Ijebu-Igbo is that his legacy is still relevant.

     

  • Adesanya: Celebrating a giant

    Eleven years before his departure, Abraham Adesanya survived a gun attack that defined his importance as a progressive combatant. He was nearly 75 at the time.  Here, a picture of what happened: “On 14 January 1997, his uncompromising stance to the military misrule led to an attempt on his life at the behest of the then head of state, General Sanni Abacha. Adesanya had just left his law chambers on the fateful day sitting at the back of his car when an unknown team of assailants (later unveiled to be General Sanni Abacha’s killer squad) struck. The front and back screens of his Mercedes Benz car were shattered and the car seats perforated by bullets from the assailants’ guns but he escaped unhurt with his driver. The car was later transferred to a Lagos museum.”

    It was a dangerous time to be a pro-democracy fighter. Many of those who resisted the incumbent military dictator fled overseas and fought from there. Adesanya stayed in the country and weathered the storm. It was testimony to his courage and conviction. When democratic rule was restored in 1999 after a 16-year period of military domination, there was no doubt that Adesanya was qualified to be named among the heroes of democracy.

    It is good news that this year, a decade after his death in April 2008 at the age of 85, Adesanya will be celebrated as a giant who made a gigantic contribution to the efforts that won the battle for democracy.   The Publicity Committee promoting the Abraham Adesanya 10th Anniversary has announced that there will be “a series of events to mark the 10th anniversary of the translation to higher glory of the great Nigerian nationalist, exemplary Yoruba patriot and leader, statesman, philosopher, moral avatar and illustrious chairman of the Afenifere and National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), Senator Abraham Adesanya.”  The chairman of the committee, Prof Adebayo Williams, was quoted as saying that the celebration in May will feature a lecture on the state of the nation, the launching of a book of tributes and a memorial service.

    A statement said:”The publicity committee wishes to seize this opportunity to invite contributions to the book of tributes from the public as well as friends, associates, acquaintances, admirers, well-wishers and fellow travellers of Senator Abraham Adesanya. The contributions are to include but are not limited to the following: scholarly expositions, reminiscences, tributes, eulogies, poetry, memorabilia and rare pictures and other exotica. The contributions, which should not be less than 500 words but not more than 1,000 words, are expected to reach the committee not later than February 15.”

    It is thought-provoking that this celebration of Adesanya, his ideas and ideals, is coming at a time when the meaning of progressivism has been corrupted and the definition of a progressive has been degraded.  What would Adesanya have thought of today’s self-defined progressives who pay lip service to the noble pursuit of progress?

    Williams recalled:  “During his lifetime, the late Abraham Adesanya bestrode the Nigerian political scene like a colossus. He was a giant among giants…He was as principled as he was fanatically devoted to the fundamental tenets of progressive politics, often putting his life on the line in defence of these sacred ideals. For him, the unprincipled and amoral political life is not a life worth living, no matter the wealth and fame accruing…Fearless and unrelenting as a leader, forthright and uncompromising as a follower, you always knew where you stood with the late titan. Adesanya was a man totally without cant or seedy equivocations.”

    Adesanya played exemplary leadership roles in Afenifere and NADECO that should inspire the leaders of today. But the times have changed and things have changed. Afenifere, the Yoruba organisation that was known for its progressive essence, is essentially now a shadow of its former self. NADECO, the patriotic pro-democracy movement that was known for its punching power, was ironically a casualty of democracy and has failed to rise from the ashes.

    Adesanya studied Law in the UK at Holborn College of Law. On his return to Nigeria in 1959, he joined the Action Group led by Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the progressive star who continues to shine decades after his death in 1987. Adesanya’s choice of a progressive political circle showed where he stood on the question of political progress.  It is a reflection of his capacity that “The same year, he was nominated and eventually elected to the defunct Western House of Assembly to represent Ijebu Igbo constituency in the 12 December 1959 House of Representatives Election.” He later became a senator in the Second Republic as a member of the Unity Party of Nigeria, which was an evolutionary extension of the Action Group.

    It is noteworthy that he showed a commendable consistency in his political trajectory, which is sadly missing in many political careers today with fair-weather politicians switching parties without a sense of consistency and a sense of what is honourable.

    When he achieved recognition as “Asiwaju of Yorubaland,” following the exits of Awolowo and Chief Adekunle Ajasin,  Adesanya’ s political voice became louder, more influential and deserving of greater attention. This information gives an insight into Adesanya’s performance on the big stage:    “Later, Adesanya under the auspices of Afenifere and the Yoruba Council of Elders, alongside others led a congress of Yoruba elder statesmen through a congress that rose to pronounce that the convocation of a constitutional conference, where new confederating terms would be determined for the country, was inevitable for the good of Nigerians.”

    Ten years after his death, Nigeria is still grappling with the national question and structural issues. The celebration of his life and times at this period should further promote the need to reimagine the country. It is expected that important political players will use the occasion of this anniversary to say positive things about Adesanya because he was indeed a positive factor in the country’s political progression. He has been immortalised in various ways, particularly in the Southwest, but the lessons of his life are of national significance.

    It is a tribute to the giant from Ijebu-Igbo that he is still remembered and respected for the progressive path he trod.

     

    • This piece was first published on January 8, 2018. It is reproduced to highlight the 10th anniversary of Chief Abraham Adesanya’s death on April 27, 2008.