Tag: Adewole Adebayo

  • Akwashiki’s death devastating loss to Nigeria, says Adebayo

    Akwashiki’s death devastating loss to Nigeria, says Adebayo

    • •Party leaders pay tributes to Nasarawa North senator

    The presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Prince Adewole Adebayo, has described the death of Senator Godiya Akwashiki as a devastating loss to the nation, Nasarawa State, the opposition.

    Adebayo spoke yesterday at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, while receiving the remains of the late lawmaker along with other party chieftains across the party lines and family members.

    Fifty-two-year-old Akwashiki was the senator representing Nasarawa North of Nasarawa State. He died in an Indian hospital on December 31, last year.

    Speaking at a solemn ceremony for the late senator, Adebayo expressed sadness that the death of Senator Akwashiki was not only a setback for the party but also a loss to the quality legislation he represented and national politics.

    The SDP flag bearer described the late senator as one of the strongest voices within the party and the National Assembly.

    Adebayo, who applauded the presence of leaders across party lines, including former governors and senior legislators, said the calibre of attendees underscored the late senator’s far-reaching impact beyond partisan politics.

    He prayed for the repose of Senator Akwashiki’s soul and asked God to grant the family, the Eggon Nation, Nasarawa State, and Nigerians the strength to bear the loss.

    Read Also: Coalition decries legislative interference in exam bodies affairs

    Nasarawa State House of Assembly Speaker Danladi Jatau  noted that Akwashiki’s demise was a great loss to the state and Nigeria, adding that the outstanding contributions of the late senator to good governance and development were remarkable.

    The Speaker recalled serving with Akwashiki in the state legislature between 2011 and 2015, stressing that the late senator later returned to the House as Deputy Speaker.

    He also recalled that Akwashiki made history as the first person from the Nasarawa North Senatorial District to be elected twice to the Senate, describing him as a dedicated and performing legislator. According to him, the loss was particularly painful to young people who looked up to him as a mentor and leader.

    Eulogising the late lawmaker, SDP’s acting National Chairman, Dr. Abubakar Sadiq Gombe, said the painful death of Akwashiki has created irreparable loss to the party, Nasarawa State, and the nation.

    He said the party was deeply saddened by the passing of the Senator, whom he described as a committed party man and a strong pillar of Nigeria’s democracy.

    Gombe noted that the presence of leaders from different political parties at the event showed that Senator Akwashiki’s contributions cut across party lines, stressing that his death was a national loss.

    Notable political leaders at the ceremony include the Chairman of the House Committee on Solid Minerals, Jonathan Gbefwi-Gaza, federal and state lawmakers, SDP leaders in the state, and community and traditional leaders from Eggon Nation were in attendance at the brief ceremony at the airport in honour of the late Senator.

    The remains of the late Senator Godiya Akwashiki were later deposited at the National Hospital, Abuja.

  • ‘Real change requires patience, discipline, and ideological clarity’

    ‘Real change requires patience, discipline, and ideological clarity’

    Prince Adewole Adebayo, the presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the 2023 general election, speaks with journalists on the coalition talks, civil society, insecurity, and Nigeria’s future. The Nation Correspondent in Akure, Tosin Tope was there. Excerpt.

    Why have you not joined Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, and others to form the coalition into African Democratic Congress (ADC) party?

    I cannot force out a government elected for a fixed term. I do not believe in coups or sabotage. I can criticize and warn Nigerians. We are talking with others about coalition, but opposition must be principled. Disliking Tinubu is not enough. Whoever replaces him must not be worse. If three people argue over roasting, frying, or boiling a chicken, none of them is good for the chicken. Some coalition seekers come straight from the EFCC investigations or prison. Politics cannot be a refuge for criminals or opportunists. Coalition is only possible with patriots – people who love Nigeria, are accountable, and have clean records.

    Is it true you singlehandedly blocked the coalition to be organised in the SDP?

    I’m not saying single-handedly. I convinced my party people that if we cannot help the Nigerian people, let’s not kill them. It’s better to not enter government than to enter government and become the enemy of the people. You can’t do it. It’s just not right. Nigeria has a lot of people who have never tasted government before.

    All of the people who have been in the government since independence today are not up to 1%. Nigeria is not short of talent. So, if you want to stop what is going on, you need to bring fresh people or select among those who have served before who have relatively good records.

    You have to see that the motivation is not about some people being incapable of being outside government for 6 hours. They will be disoriented because they are used to a free car, free housing, and passing toll gates without paying, and free medical care. These are the things they defend in the name of fighting for you. They just can’t survive without government patronage. If they are ministers today, tomorrow you put them as the chairman of a nursery or primary school board. They go there. They just must drive an SUV, what is happening is not important. And that is what is motivating their politics. So, it’s their style. I’m not saying they should not be in politics.

    The main reason why I entered politics and devoted my life to politics was because of that lie that Nigerians were telling themselves that they had no alternative.

    In a few months’ time, the process for the 2027 election will commence, and I know you are interested in the race. Are you not worried that Nigeria is gradually turning into a one-party state?

    I’m not worried at all, because logic suggests to you that if you have a one-tendency elite, it’s a matter of time before they will stop pretending to be different and morph into one political party. If you look at most of the political parties that have been in existence since 1998, when we started this current transition, which is now 26 years of uninterrupted similar governments, the elites are the same.

    Most of the political parties are the same. They are mostly neoliberal. The elites are uniformly corrupt, uniformly thoughtless. So you can find someone who has been in government for eight years, and then when they are asked to summarise their political philosophy, they don’t know it. But you can find out their political philosophy when they leave office and the EFCC charges them to court and says about the fraud that they committed.

    So these elites don’t understand the sense of a republic. They don’t take the job seriously. They don’t have a sense of leadership. They don’t need anyone. And they are not accountable to anyone. And their economic philosophy is contrary to what is in the Constitution. Even though they swear by the Constitution every time they assume office that they will abide by the Constitution, particularly Section 12 of the Constitution, fundamental objectives and the rising principle of frequency.

    So this way you summarise all of them, behaving similarly all across over time and crisscrossing from one party to the other seamlessly without having to renounce anything.

    Read Also: Troops recover large cache of  ammunition in Maiduguri

    But in reality, there cannot be a one-party state. Because the natural dialectic is that any union between hungry people and the overfed people cannot last. Any union between unemployed people and the people who are causing their unemployment cannot be together. A union of poor people and those who stole all their wealth cannot endure.

    We are reaching a point where the real position is not for a one-party state. The elites, decadent as they are, are the leftovers of the crumbs of military rule. If you look at the history of most of them, their careers began with working for military governments during the dark days of military dictatorship, helping them to hide money.

    You said civil society is weak and the media compromised. What can Nigerians do going forward?

    First, stop lying to yourselves. If the economy is bad, say it. You cannot claim progress while begging for food, rent, and school fees. Second, organize. Civil society must wake up. It used to check government power. Now, it is a recruitment ground for political appointments. The media must return to accountability journalism. Third, serious patriots must join politics. Politics determines leadership, and leadership determines whether we live in hell or paradise. That is what we are doing in the SDP. If you join us and you are corrupt, we will remove you. Real change requires patience, discipline, and ideological clarity.

    What is your view on the U.S. airstrikes against terrorists in Nigeria?

    I am still in fact-finding mode. I have not seen credible local confirmation of any strikes in Sokoto or Kwara. Security is the responsibility of the Nigerian government. The government has not convinced me it lacks the capacity to defeat terrorists. Foreign cooperation is acceptable, but Nigeria must remain in command. I would not want to be Commander-in-Chief in my own country while another country announces strikes on my behalf. Boko Haram and similar groups are not invincible. The media must also be responsible. If foreign media report attacks, Nigerians cannot verify locally. It is a national embarrassment. We must know what is happening in our own country.

    The Adebayo National Marathon is entering its 2nd year, can you give us a brief intro for establishing the marathon? 

    It has given people purpose and the opportunity to use their strength and stamina, and we put people together, and this is me, and this is you. If you want to be successful, you have to endure this. You have to plan, you have to focus, you have to work hard, and you have to project. You have to prepare for this. You have to compete for this. You have to endure. Because just as individuals are running their races, companies are also running their races. This is why development is a marathon.

    What’s the turnout like this year?

    We have the planning committee, Omoleye Sowore is the chairperson, the secretary, Dr. Olu Agunloye is a member, there are a few other members, but they are all around, mostly around competitiveness.

    Why particularly a marathon? And why the choice of  Ondo State?

    There’s nothing particular about the marathon. So it’s just that today is for a marathon. Other days are for other sports.

    Sports is the beginning of good health. It’s the beginning of having a strong military.

    And if you start with young people, it’s the beginning of developing a character. Because to wake up in the morning and train for a marathon that’s taking place a year from now, is a way to develop character, to follow purpose, and to also become part of an international community. And if you check the elevation of Ondo City, we are fairly as good as the average East African area, apart from the Mountain Range, Mount Kenya, and a few other spots.

    But generally, we are high enough in the topography to be able to do just a few kilometers from here to this mountain range and the range of runners.

  • 2027: Why SDP rejected coalition talks to wrest power from Tinubu, by Adebayo

    2027: Why SDP rejected coalition talks to wrest power from Tinubu, by Adebayo

    • ‘Most opposition leaders would be bad presidents’

    The former presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the 2023 general election, Prince Adewole Adebayo, has explained why the coalition talks involving his party and some others failed.

    He said the main opposition figures pushing for an alliance lack credibility, clear ideology, and the moral standing required to rescue Nigeria.

    Adewole, who said the SDP was never opposed to any coalition politics in principle, added that the party would not align with individuals, questionable characters, or politicians whose records and motivations contradict the party’s values.

    Addressing reporters yesterday during the 2025 Christmas Marathon and Health Walk he and his wife, Queen Lilian, organised in Akure, the Ondo State capital, Adebayo said opposition to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu alone is not enough justification for forming a coalition.

    “We are talking with the coalition, and we are trying to find a common purpose. This common purpose has to have meaning in the lives of ordinary Nigerians.

    “The fact that I don’t like President Bola Ahmed Tinubu does not mean I should accept the same things I dislike him for from others. That’s why I interviewed each of them who came. I don’t even bother to interview some of them, and you all know them.

    “They are people who came to our party, and we didn’t allow them to come in, and they have now re-grouped to another party to do their own thing. We told many of them to go away because you can’t say you wanted to rescue Nigeria and you’re a fraud,” Adebayo said.

    The SDP stalwart argued that many opposition figures attempting to form a coalition are merely trying to capitalise on public anger over the present government’s “poor performance” rather than offering genuine alternatives.

    Read Also: SDP hails Supreme Court verdict, says ruling reinforces party autonomy

    Using an analogy, he said Nigerians should not be deceived by cosmetic differences among politicians like Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi.

    He said these political figures, like other politicians, are seeking patronage in government under the guise of fighting for the masses.

    “I think it’s better to make sure that the person who wants to collaborate with you doesn’t have similar tendencies like the person you want to take power from. It will be like: what’s the point for a chicken to vote for any of these three people?

    “Someone said the best way to handle a chicken during Christmas is to roast it. Another said fry it; another said parboil it. How would the chicken vote for any of them?

    “Since they could disagree among themselves, none of them could then force the chicken. What we are trying to do is to ensure that people don’t capitalise on the bad performance of the government, or to come and insinuate to us or ride on the wave of that anger.”

    “So, these people who are coming are going to be worse. When I saw their mascot (the late President Muhammadu) Buhari, I was convinced that we would be dead. We should make sure that someone who is not worse is not smuggled in,” he said.

    Adebayo urged fellow Nigerians to ensure that individuals “worse than the government” are not “smuggled” into power under the pretext of opposition unity.

    The SDP stalwart said many politicians who sought to join the party were rejected after internal screening.

    He noted that some were not even granted interviews.

    “We told many of them to go away. You can’t say you want to rescue Nigeria when you’re a fraud,” Adebayo stated.

    The SDP stalwart also criticised politicians with questionable pasts and character, most especially those facing corruption charges and allegations and planning to take over from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    “Some people are doing coalition after leaving the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) custody on bail,” he said.

    According to him, criminality and opportunism have no place in genuine reform politics.

    “The fact that I am angry with President Tinubu doesn’t say I’m blind. How can I say President Tinubu is not capable of governing due to agility and now bring or work with someone who is his older brother?

    “In the long run, you must be credible. What drives you to do something must not be hatred or opportunism. You must look at a way to make the country better.”

    The SDP leader stressed that any coalition must be based on shared ideology and accountability.

    “You must first confess your contribution to the problems we are facing today as a country before you can talk about coalition,” he said.

    Adebayo said many politicians are driven by dependence on government patronage, positing how he persuaded his party leaders that remaining out of power was preferable to betraying Nigerians.

    “Some people are incapable of being outside government for six hours because they are used to free cars, houses, and privileges.

    “For me, if you cannot help the Nigerian people, let us not kill them. It is better not to enter government than to become enemies of the people,” he said.

  • I’ll remain in SDP, unless… – Adebayo

    I’ll remain in SDP, unless… – Adebayo

    Adewole Adebayo was the presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) during the 2023 general elections. He has continued to work assiduously with other like minds, to reposition the party for the 2027 general elections. In this interview, he bares his mind on different issues concerning the party and politics in Nigeria. Excerpts

    What has your party, the SDP, been doing since the 2023 elections?

    Well, what we have been doing after the election is to let people know that the conversation continues, because while we were campaigning, part of our talking points was for the immediate electorate. Most of it was for a longer vision about the country and it wouldn’t matter who won the election or who lost the election. Some issues would not leave us. And the earlier we build consensus around those issues the better so that hopefully they will not be subject of campaign.

    We are probably one of the few countries in the world that are still campaigning about corruption. Every decent person knows that corruption is not good. It’s not a political programme. It is admitted by most people in the world that a corrupt society will not go anywhere. So, if we all agree about that, no one will choose a president with respect to the attitude towards corruption because all presidents, all presidential candidates, all politicians and all leaders at different levels of our national life will agree that corruption is bad. The fact that we need to be united around certain principles, like fairness, justice, equity and rule of law, should not make them political programmes.

     Are you still in the SDP or in another party now? What are your political leanings, thoughts, and plans for 2027?

    I joined the SDP in 1991 when I was 19 years old and even when the party was banned, I didn’t join any other party. As close as I was to those who were running the PDP in those days, I didn’t join the party even though some of them were my clients. I have relationships with some of them, and when they started this APC, I didn’t even consider it for a second. So, basically, the only party, the only political party I’ve ever joined in my life is the SDP, which I joined when I was 19 years old, and that’s where I will remain, unless the party ceases to exist, but I can’t join any other party. I will remain in the SDP.

     There were rumours that the SDP was working for the APC or open to negotiations. What do you have to say about that?

     Well, we don’t know the rumours and talk, what I know is what the SDP is doing officially. I only participate in what the SDP is doing officially but what I find out is that people who are in political parties tend to have loyalty outside their political party. I think it’s part of the problems we try to solve by bringing more ethical leaders. But 100 percent of my own politics is done inside the SDP. And this day and time, there is no way you could have a relationship with people that there won’t be evidence of it. Either  they will see you with them, you will take a photo with them, they will trace their money to you or they will trace the activity to you. So, if you really want to know where somebody belongs to, other than just passing rumour or propaganda, you will know.

    There may be elements of people in the SDP who have sympathies for other parties but what we tend to do is when we catch them, we relegate them or expel them. But for the SDP, we know it has three different epochs. There was the SDP which I joined in 1991 which was the SDP of the third republic; that’s where you will see people like Rashidi Ladoja for example. He was our senator. You will see people like  Lekan Balogun, Tinubu, Atiku Abubakar and so many of them like that, who were in the SDP at that time. So if you look around those who are in politics today, many of them were in the SDP.

    There were two political parties at that time, the SDP and the National Republican Convention (NRC). It looks like those who went to the NRC are not as successful as those who went to the SDP; you don’t see many of the NRC people any more. But the SDP ones, you’ll find them in every policy. So, sometimes when we go out, when we meet them, this is always our party, we’re all together and things like that. So, if President Tinubu and many of the people around him still have that nostalgia about the SDP, that’s one epoch.

    The second epoch of the SDP was when Chief Alaye came with Pat Utomi and so many of them like that, and they started and they revived the SDP. And so anywhere I go now and I say I am a leader of the SDP, Utomi is quick to say, “no, that’s my party. The position you are in now, I used to be there.” So that’s the second epoch of it.

    The third epoch is what we are doing now, which is the SDP of young people who don’t have the history of having occupied any office in the SDP. We just want to revive the little to the left principle of it, which incidentally coincides with chapter two for our constitution, fundamental objectives and direct principles of state policy.

     How will the SDP build a strong, sincere party with an ethos and manifesto, given that most parties are just platforms for seizing power?

     It is possible and it has happened. When it comes to Manifesto, you have the school of politicians and governors. You can ask the director to ask your students to analyse, do a comparative analysis of the manifesto and look at the SDP and juxtapose it against what the constitution says. So, the manifesto is okay for us, we are fine with the manifesto. And you also remember that our manifesto did not arise from an emergency company of words put together for election. It is the product of the Centre for Democratic Studies. So at that time, there was some ideological grounding that, along with the party, was founded. And I thank Chief Alaye, Professor Pat Utomi and others who, when they had the opportunity to create a new political party, decided to say, let’s go back to the SDP. Kofalaye was there, he ran for president on that platform.

    Read Also: Adeboye urges Nigerians to elevate God for progress, as Sanwo-olu reiterates commitment to serve

    So the ideology is okay. What is required is democratic patience, because in my background, we are asked to do revolutionary patience. Not everybody wants to be revolu•tionary like me, so we say democratic patience, which is that I am running for president on ideas. I will do my best to win based on those ideas and if I win, I will govern based on those ideas, but if I don’t win and my time passes, another person is coming to carry that torch. That’s why, Abiola is not here but I’m running on farewell to poverty and insecurity. I’m running on the last programme; we still play the same Abiola mantra,  the same jingle we’re running now in Abuja for the area councils and for Dr Obinna who is running for the Abuja Metropolitan Area Council, AMAC. He came to me and he had done all his manifesto, logo and everything. It’s following the same thing which the SDP used when Wole Adesina won this election. The first election to elect the mayor of Abuja was won by the SDP in 1992. Same thing that he used to campaign; same logo was added to the Abiola, so it continues

     The situation of our country is going to speak to our standing in the world and all of these things if they are the main reason you’re in politics I have no doubt that you would be patriotic and you will stay in your party and you’ll do what is right…

     There are people in the party that I don’t even speak to at all. I don’t preach to them. I don’t speak to them because I know how their heart bleeds for the country. So, when they have reason to make a decision in the party, I don’t disturb myself. I know that what they are going to do is right. But there are other people whom we have to discuss with.

    There was a candidate in one of our recent government relations. He just joined us, and for some reasons, the party leadership thought he should be the governorship candidate. I was overseas, I came back, I saw him and I said, okay. He said he wanted to meet with me. And he came with a brilliant way by which he could bribe voters. He knows the commissioner of police, he knows the United States, he knows this and that and that, and we can win the election. And I said, I’m sorry, we don’t want to win that way.

    You know, if this is how you want to win, we cannot do it. So, he said in his former party, he used to help them, but they never made him a candidate. Now he has been made a candidate, he wants to help us. I said,’ I’m sorry, I can’t do it but talk to other people.’ And when he talks to other people, more and more people are saying, well, we can’t do it. You know, and recently, when they were putting together this coalition, they thought that maybe some of us were too rigid and we didn’t want to win. And when we started talking to other leaders in the party, the same question of ideology, purpose and credibility were being asked.

    There are many people, old, young, male and female, who are committed to Nigeria and they’re working through the SDP.

     What is your opinion of Nigeria at 65, the journey so far?

     We started accidentally. There is no great philosopher or great thinker within our population who says, oh, let us all come together. Let me unite people. If you study the history of some kingdoms, some countries, some societies, it will be indigenous, maybe warring tribes, warring groups, disunited by many factors, by politics, but united by culture. And a great leader rises among them and says, let me unite my people. That’s not the history of Nigeria. The history of Nigeria is an external necessity for trade. So Nigeria started merely as a trade zone, just like these days you have a free trade zone and export processing zone; it’s a zone. It’s like the arbitrariness with which they created areas for discos. So we created Lagos disco, Ibadan disco, Benin disco, Yola disco, different discos, you know. So, that’s how Nigeria was to the Royal Niger Company. It was just a trade zone.

     Let’s have this trade zone. And those trade zones were different kingdoms and communities and all of that. And somehow for the efficiency of the business, they decided to hand it over back to the British government and run it as a protectorate and part of it as a colony. And then after a while, they ran it as protectorates, you know, next to each other. In 1914, they said let’s amalgamate together. So, but 46 years later, the people who put it together just said, we’ve had enough of it, let’s see, let’s hand it over to the locals now. And young people who had never run anything before, but who were united by the philosophy that these are indigenous people, right from Herbert Macaulay in Lagos took charge. And those who gave a lot of trouble to Lugard and Clifford were called Trousard Negroes by Lugard, because he was highly irritated about them. And if you look at the way Lugard analyzed the elite who were asking for home rule, and asking that the British should leave, he considered them to be Trousard Negroes who had no knowledge of the country, who were in Lagos, sending their clothes through a dev star company to Liverpool to be laundered and well ironed and sent back to them in Lagos. And they didn’t know anywhere 100 kilometers north of Lagos. They didn’t know anything and he dismissed them. But over time, they organized a center of the Nigerian youth movement, they split into political parties, the NCNC, Action Group, Northern Peoples Congress, and within a short order, they were getting independence. So if you look at what happened in 1999, if you look at the period between when Obasanjo came in 1999 and now, it’s about the same period that the independence movement started, and we got independence within that short time. Without independence, we had people that were going to parliament who did not know anywhere 25, 30 or 100 kilometers away from the hometown. There was no sense in going to parliament in Lagos coming from, maybe, somewhere around Ikom which is now the Cross River State. Even when they went to Lancaster House to negotiate independence, they went there as strangers because I remember that my uncle represented Ondo at that conference and went with the Action Group delegation. And they were going there almost like the way Ukraine is going to meet Russia in Washington or somewhere or Switzerland. So, but somehow they managed, elections were held and all the promises that we had at that time, majority of the promises arose from the self-governance of the regions. But they managed to create a region in 1963, not only that, to declare a republic. So somehow, whether they knew what they were doing or not, the politics of that time made them declare a republic. We are now on our own. We have nothing to do with the British judicial system, British Privy Council and all of that. The Queen is no longer our head of state. Nnamdi Azikiwe, our Governor General, is now our President and head of state. But you know, we didn’t manage hard to join so far. Secondly, the First Republic was a disaster because dishonesty happened in the election. Corruption crept in; collection of 10 percent was introduced; streets were named. Half the people had not achieved anything. So the guys wanted to remove British colonial imprints but people like McGregor and all of that made Lagos liveable. You will see the McGregor Canal and all those streets named after engineers, volunteers, and many people who pioneered. They named the streets after themselves anyway. So, they were cheating each other, killing each other, criminality, and all of that. And then the Republic collapsed and the military took over. And for some reasons, the military too could not have a consensus. So, there were two coups in 1966. And we are still debating why we had two coups in 1966 but if we had questions about the first coup, the second coup was clear.

    The second coup was meant to retaliate for the first coup. So, that was the end of a spirit of order regimentation in the Nigerian army because we had to take a young officer, Yakubu Gowon, to be head of state above his seniors. And for some reasons, all the training they got together in Sandhurst, all the marching together, all the training that Welby Everard gave them and all the officers, everything collapsed. And the two factions of the military caused the civil war and fought that civil war for a long time. And the civil war, we thought, was a very brutal one, not very good, no accountability, many victims of unlawful killing, rape, robbery, and maltreatment generally. They lived, some are still living, but some died without any compensation or any inquiry, because we ended up with the vicious statement of no victor, no vanquish. We didn’t set up any inquiry. So, impunity came into it and we got a series of poor demobilization, which led to armed robbery because they were going all over the place. So the military started to do coups against each other and then Obasanjo came with Murtala. Murtala started it and said; “Okay, you know what? We are going to have a transition to civil rule.” And at that time, apart from Kashim Imam, who refused, almost everybody who was asked among the politicians of the first republic, starting with Awolowo, Kori Haripo, Enahoro, Joseph Tarka, Mallam Aminu Kano, many, many people who were in politics supported the military.

     So that was the first unity of the political class with the military.

     Then secondly, the intellectuals also served with the military. So by the time we were having the Constituent Assembly in 1977, the political class, the military, and the intellectual class, including people like Bala Usman, people like Chinua Achebe and many of them came together and said, there was a Constituent Assembly in 1977, and that Constituent Assembly was the foundation for switching from the parliamentary system to the presidential system, a one party national party. The last one who started making regulations for forming political parties was not as liberal as it was in the first republic where you and people in your village can form parties. But now the party has to be national. So, we’re trying to nationalize our politics. And we had a beautifully written constitution where F. R. A. Williams was chairman of the drafting committee; very sound constitutional lawyers joined them. And we had a Constitution, and in that Constitution is where we put Chapter 2, and also Chapter 4.

    Chapter 2 contains fundamental objectives. What is our way of running? What’s our government about? What’s the principle behind the government? If you are going to the government, what’s the purpose of the government? So those issues were raised there. How do we manage our economy? How do we manage our resources? How do we manage opportunities? And the issue of national balance and all of that was put there. And then we have Chapter 4 of the Constitution, which was the Bill of Rights, fundamental rights and how to enforce fundamental rights, because of the abuse of fundamental rights, especially by the native authority police and by local chiefs and kings in those days in their courts. So if you read Awolowo’s path to Nigerian freedom and many of those things, you will see many of them and what the people of the Northern Element Progressive Union went through in the hand of the NPC in the North, and so on and so forth. So, we started to have the Western structure of the political party system, with FEDECO established in the constitution, and you can register now. And then, some national parties came out of it. Politicians went through many troubles when they were forming political parties. You had to think of someone from far away to be a member of your executive. You had to have structure in every state across the country, especially politicians from the north. The Northern People’s Congress never had a branch outside the north. They never had anything. They would only do alliance with the NCNC at the beginning. They would only do alliance with the democratic party, they would do alliance with South-South NNA people and all of that. So now we transited to the second republic with Shagari and the election was terrible as well because the military was learning on the election. We had the infamous two-third (2/3) argument with the Supreme Court. So, in the Second Republic, the Supreme Court decided who was the winner. It was not by consensus. And you can remember how Shagari managed in four years, three months; the economy was relatively poorly managed. There was a lot of corruption. Even though Shagari himself was not a man who was personally corrupt, he was permissive. Before Goodluck Jonathan, there was Shagari, a soft person who looked harmless on their own, but everybody around them took advantage and they were losing the country, one way or the other.

    And then the military came back again, with Buhari. But, the most transformational aspect was when Babangida came. It was quite theatrical, he tried to run the military government as if it was a civilian government, even still with strong tactics, but with endless transition like that of Gowon. Endless transition that should have ended in 1990. But it continued and that’s how SDP-NRC came up and we found ourselves at a point where we conducted the 1993 election.

    Then the intention of Babangida showed because when the election was successfully conducted, they annulled it and they had a terrible government which was very problematic for the country. There was an international crisis; NADECO was formed, and it was like the country was looking like Zaire or Congo. Eventually, Abacha died, and Abdulsalami came with an 11-month programme. We found ourselves having a civilian government but what do we have? We had a civilian government that was essentially military because the president that they gave to us wasn’t democratic. They trusted him and they brought him out and essentially he was already like a pretty dynamic candidate And if you look at the election results, it was very doubtful if the election result was what was used to determine who the winner was. And there are many people who have researched and can’t find the presidential election result. I’m not sure what his official result is. So, Obasanjo started using his own experience and he tried to mock some of the losers. And because he was under sanctions imposed on us during Abacha, he was able to get many of the sanctions off and the Congress started having a life. Obasanjo had experience about how to govern, but he was not a democrat. He’s not a democrat. Maybe, he is now a democrat, but he wasn’t as a head of state and as a president. He wasn’t because the 2003 election is one of the worst elections in Nigeria. You can go and get the notes of Jimmy Carter, who was asked to come and be an election observer. We thought that was bad enough, until 2007, when the winner said, this election leaves much to be desired. We’ve been having these bad elections like that for 26 years. The thing we’ve achieved is that we’ve continued to have a civilian system. We’ve not, the Nigerian elite have not woken up the militant wing to go and get their uniform and take over. I think all the crimes, vices, and evil that could be done are already permitted under the system. So there’s no need for you to break it, it’s already performing; they all remain there. So we, the democrats, are happy that we have had a broken civilian system but all the promises we’ve not been keeping them. Not one of the promises has been kept and not one administration, from Obasanjo to Yar’Adua to Jonathan Goodluck to Muhammadu Buhari, now to Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has kept the promise. But as bad as the presidential system has been, we are in more trouble at the subsidiary level. The governors have been worse than even the presidents. Today, the best government in Nigeria is still the Federal Government. The most accountable, even though they’re not accountable, but the most accountable is still the Federal Government. The National Assembly is totally betraying the people. They’re still the best legislative house in Nigeria because the rest are just there as the lapdog, the governors of the state; totally responsible. So this is where we are. That’s the journey of the country in politics. The journey of the country, the social history of Nigeria, is that we’ve managed somehow to domesticate certain virtues. Education, which unfortunately has too much of a Westernisation in it, but we’ve managed to domesticate that. And some of our brothers in the North who have a Middle Eastern orientation to education, who are on the Almajiri system, have also been very good in the curriculum and liturgy of Islamic education and they’ve given a good account of themselves. So we are a fairly educated society even though we have a large amount of people, especially the younger ones, out of school. The quality of the education has not been rising as much as it should but a bit of it has been attenuated by the paradigm subsidy of the global ICT revolution. So you could attend a polytechnic but if you have access to the internet you could have a peer review contribution to your education. You could be in a university, but you have access to some journals online and all of that, so you’re not limited to the physical library in your school or lack of it. So it has also made many of our young people to be able to pair very well with their peers in the world, but a vast majority of our people are left behind.

    On the economic side, we’ve managed to mismanage ourselves completely because our GDP, the GDP of Nigeria today should have been the GDP of any state only, not even up to the GDP of Lagos or Oyo, or Kano, or Anambra, or Rivers so we have done poorly in our economy and there are three principal reasons for that. We’ve stolen and exported a lot of our wealth overseas and a lot of this wealth is now being frozen. Many of the people who took the wealth can’t invest well and they can’t recover a lot of the properties that they have there. So, we’ve exported our money. There are two parts of the exportation of our money. So many people will buy public servants so this money is taken away by families, friends and proxies. It is a loss to the economy. You will excuse me but our GDP is so small that a country of three million elsewhere has a bigger GDP than us. A country of 10, 20 or at most 60 million, has better GDP than us. So, it is our money being stolen and taken overseas. And the second part of the money being stolen is the money being stolen through over-invoicing and other wastages to foreign elements who come to help them take the money.

    Before you can steal $1 billion, you have to let the foreigner to whom you are stealing it to exaggerate their entitlement to $10 billion and take the money away. All they are doing with solid minerals; they just come and take all the resources away and there’s nothing anybody is doing.

    So now, the second reason our economy is doing poorly is lack of opportunities. We are not employing our people because the elites are claiming money they don’t need. Oil is big enough taxation so is solid minerals. They don’t really need you as long as they have enough money to buy houses on Island, buy estates in Dubai, buy houses in the best part of Europe, London and wherever. So I thought they have that; they don’t think that that is enough but they don’t realize that for Nigeria to be a country that can take out these people, we need to be budgeting about $300 to $350 billion annually in our federal budget. While at the states will do other things; I’m talking about federal budget a lot because when I did the calculation during my first time running for president, I realised that to meet the manifesto, to meet the objectives in the constitution as enunciated in chapter two, the budget needed to be $30 billion, and I had to continuously budget that. And I look at that year, the budget was 35 billion, so I had to budget 10 times more. And I started thinking, how are you gonna fund this so that I don’t look like a clown? And that’s what led me to that famous noise I was making regarding that majority of our crude oil at that time, 80 percent of the crude oil was being stolen. And then I see the amount being stolen in the solid minerals. And when you see the amount being stolen in other ways from the fiscal aspect of the taxation and all of that, I realize that you can raise that kind of money. I want to see the amount of labour that our people can generate, productivity that they can do. If you produce 10 million pairs of shoes locally, you have where to sell them. And you see all the other skills. If you farm ginger and you have ginger oil, you could make more money. If there was a Nigerian ginger oil company, it would make more money than any business. Then you go from sector to sector like that. If you go to fisheries, you will make more money. So I realized that if we invested a little more in our universities, we would save all the money. Some will still go abroad because of fantasy or other reasons, but you will have a net inflow of undergraduates from other countries coming to Nigeria to pay money, to attend University of Lagos and go anywhere you have schools in Nigeria; people will come. So, with all that investment being made, if we do housing, that will throw our GDP up, and people can just by virtue of having an NCE certificate and letter of employment, be given houses to buy, and they can pay for 35 years. They will buy and then they have a structured way by which they know they have to work.

     So the third element why our GDP is small is because of poor recording of the GDP. Recently, we did rebasing. When Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala was minister, we did a rebasing and the GDP shot up. But a lot of people have been captured in our GDP. And now, you can build a house in many parts of Nigeria, build a house, rent the house to the tenants and collect your rent. And today, I can tell you, statistically, there will be up to 200,000 people who pay their house rent today. And I’m not sure that it will be recorded anywhere, because rent income is not recorded. Maybe some states are trying to adapt.

  • Why Nigeria is facing infrastructure challenges – Adebayo

    Why Nigeria is facing infrastructure challenges – Adebayo

    The 2023 presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Prince Adewole Adebayo has faulted the policy of disposing of critical government enterprises under the guise of privatisation, stressing that privatisation of government enterprises is wrong.

    The former SDP presidential candidate blamed the massive infrastructure challenge in Nigeria today on the sale of public assets between 1999 and today.

    He particularly blamed the Olusegun Obasanjo administration for selling such public assets as the then National Electric Power Authority (NEPA), the Nigeria Telecommunications Limited (NITEL), the National Insurance Corporation of Nigeria (NICON), and the Nigerian Hotels Limited, among others.

    He argued that what the government should have done was to privatise the industry or the sector, but not the enterprise.

     “What you privatise is the industry, the sector, not the enterprises. Privatisation of government enterprises is wrong. What you need is to open the sector; that’s all,” he said.

    He lamented that the ripple effects of that singular policy have been massive infrastructure challenges, massive savings challenges, massive unemployment and a lack of where to train people.

    “This is because in those days, if you finished school, you could join NEPA and they would train you. Many engineers in Nigeria today were produced there; many people who are great engineers today are products of NEPA.

    Read Also: Deputy Speaker Kalu advocates for inclusive Constitution that serves all Nigerians 

    “So, you have somewhere to go and work, but we have destroyed the public works department. So if you see any state government in front of the camera trying to commission or start a 10km road, you will see one Lebanese person standing in front of them. Even simple work that they could do with the public works department, they will not.

    He argued that even with the privatisation of NITEL, there was still a telecommunication problem because most of the telecom companies still rely on the NITEL exchange to function optimally. “We also have a telecommunication problem because most of the carriers are still relying on NITEL; they are still relying on the NITEL exchange and all of that…” he said.

    He also queried the rationale behind the privatisation of the power company when the operators lack the capacity to run it efficiently and effectively. “People are now generating electricity, but what has happened is that many of these investments will rely on consumers to buy their own transformers,” he said.

    He promised that his party, the SDP, has a better idea, saying, “The idea is to reconstitute and raise new Nigerians who are going to now man these enterprises and then grow industries out of them.”

  • Why there is disunity in the country, by SDP chieftain

    Why there is disunity in the country, by SDP chieftain

    The Leader of Social Democratic Party (SDP) and the party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 general election, Prince Adewole Adebayo, has expressed sadness about the level of disunity in the country after 65 years of independence.

    He said at the outset, there was no great philosopher or great thinker who could have united the people as it was done in other climes.

    “If you study the history of some kingdoms, some countries and some societies, it will be indigenous warring tribes or groups, disunited by many factors, including politics, but united by culture. And a great leader rises among them and says, ‘let me unite my people.’ That’s not the history of Nigeria. Nigeria started accidentally; there are no great philosophers or great thinkers within our population who said, ‘oh, let us all come together. Let me unite people’”, he said.

    He attributed the disunity and the array of problems confronting Nigeria 65 years after independence to its evolution, saying: “So, Nigeria started merely as a trade zone, just like you have a free trade zone or export processing zone; it’s a zone. It is like the arbitrariness with which they created areas for discos. We created Lagos disco, Ibadan disco, Benin disco, Yola disco and others.

    Read Also: Dele Alake, the quintessential communications strategist at 68

    “So that’s how Nigeria was to the Royal Niger Company. It was just a trade zone. Let’s have this trade zone and those trade zones are different kingdoms and communities and all of that. And somehow for the efficiency of the business, they decided to hand it over back to the British government and run it as a protectorate and part of it as a colony.

    “And then after a while, they ran it as protectorates, you know, next to each other. In 1914, they said let’s amalgamate together. So, but 46 years later, the people who put it together just said, we’ve had enough of it, let’s hand it over to the locals now.

    And young people who had never run anything before, but who were united by the philosophy that these are indigenous people, right from Herbert Macaulay in Lagos, Nnamdi Azikiwe, Ahmed Bello and others took charge.”

    He expressed hope that the SDP, which he described as an independent party with ideals different from other parties, was ready to take Nigeria out of the woods.

    He said it was very rare to find a true SDP person, who would have interest in the APC or the PDP because the idea of what they were doing was totally opposite to what the SDP was preaching.

    On how the party is preparing for the 2027 contest, he said the dialogue to strengthen the party continued among members because there were elements who would work against the party’s interest.

    “When I ran for president, there were elements that worked against us in the party. There were party agents who would not show up and state chairmen who collected our agent card and then went and gave it to another political party.

    “I went to Kwara and discovered that from our research sheets, we scored 122,000 votes, but they recorded only 22,000 for us and the people who were working with us; who were supposed to protest and do everything, thought that they could have a relationship with the ruling party and then they messed that up.

    “So, we’re changing those leaderships, we’re bringing new people in.

    “So it takes a while to get a political party, whose majority of members will be people that are selfless, patriotic and in politics because they want nothing other than a better country. That’s what we are building in the SDP,” he said.

  • SDP not working for APC – Adebayo

    SDP not working for APC – Adebayo

    The candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the 2023 presidential election, Prince Adewole Adebayo, has debunked the claims in certain quarters that the party was covertly working for the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

     He said he was not aware of such an arrangement, stressing that the only thing he knows is what the party is doing to strategise ahead of the 2027 elections.

    He, however, agreed that some party members could have their loyalty outside the party, but stressed that it is one of the problems that the party leadership is battling to solve. “We don’t know the rumours and talk, but what I know is what the party is doing. I only participate in what the SDP is doing officially.

    “But what I find out is that people who are in political parties tend to have loyalty outside their political parties. I think it’s part of the problems we try to solve by bringing more ethical leaders.

    “But all my politics, 100 per cent of my own politics, is done inside the SDP. And in this day and time, there is no way you could have a relationship with people that there won’t be evidence of. Either they will see you with them, you will take a photo with them, they will trace their money to you, or they will trace the activity to you.

    “So, if you really want to know where somebody belongs, if you want to know, other than just passing rumour or propaganda, you will know.

    “So, there may be elements of people in the SDP who have sympathies for other parties as well, but what we intend to do is when we catch them, we relegate them or expel them,” he said.

    Read Also: Electoral Reform: Will Nigeria get it right?

    On Nigeria’s 65 years of independence, he lamented that the leaders have failed to live up to the founding fathers’ dream.

    He lamented that corruption and rule of law have remained a campaign thrust 65 years after independence, a development he said was quite unfortunate.

    He noted that everybody knows that corruption is bad and unacceptable and should not be in the system, but lamented that instead of seeing it as something that should not even arise in the first place, successive administrations have used it as a campaign thrust.

    He also stated that Nigeria’s perennial problems are traceable to its history.

    He noted that the history of Nigeria is rooted in trade,  that of an external necessity for trade. “Nigeria started merely as a trade zone, just like you have a free trade zone or export processing zone nowadays.

    “So it’s a zone. It’s like the arbitrariness with which they created areas for discos. Lagos disco, Ibadan disco, Benin disco, Yola disco, different discos, you know. “That’s how Nigeria was to the Royal Niger Company. It was just a trade zone. And those trade zones are different kingdoms and communities and all of that,” he said.

  • Nigeria at 65: Hope against the odds, by Adewole Adebayo

    Nigeria at 65: Hope against the odds, by Adewole Adebayo

    As an ocean of green and white sweeps across our streets, Independence Day reminds us that this day is not a mere ritual of rejoicing, but a solemn renewal of our covenant as a people. 

    My thoughts return each October 1 to the words of Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa in 1960: “This is a wonderful day, and it is all the more wonderful because we have awaited it with increasing impatience…we have acquired our rightful status, and Nigeria now stands well-built upon firm foundations.” 

    His words remain alive today, urging us not to rest in nostalgia but to labour with courage toward the destiny they envisioned.

    Independence Day offers Nigeria a rare opportunity to pause and reflect. It is a moment to honour our profound history, but more importantly, to look ahead to the next chapter in our great story. 

    Despite the challenges of today, I remain optimistic when I consider the strides our country has made since 1 October 1960. Nigeria has grown from a population of about 45 million at independence to more than 237 million which is the largest in Africa and the 6th largest in the world today. We have moved from just a handful of universities in 1960 to more than 260 tertiary institutions today. 

    READ ALSO: Nigeria @ 65: Wike hails Tinubu’s progress, urges Nigerians to embrace peace, unity

    Our creative industries are global forces, with Nollywood supporting hundreds of thousands of direct jobs and, by broader estimates, over 1,000,000 direct and indirect jobs, and contributing roughly N1.9–N2.0 trillion to the economy.

    Yet optimism alone will not carry us forward. For the twenty-first century will be the African Century, and it is not a question of if, but of when. 

    The true test is whether Nigeria will rise as the continent’s vanguard or stumble as a colossus with feet of clay. Without justice, scale becomes spectacle; and without equity, abundance breeds misery. Nowhere is this clearer than in the poverty that scars our land. 

    The National Bureau of Statistics’ Multidimensional Poverty Index revealed that 63% of Nigerians, some 133,000,000 men, women, and children, are deprived of health, education, and decent living standards. 

    The World Bank confirms that nearly one in three Nigerians live below the global poverty line of $2.15 a day. Humanitarian agencies further warn that about 31 million of our people face acute food insecurity, while a third of children under five suffer stunted growth. These are not abstract figures; they are broken lives, and they demand a national response as urgent as war.

    Security remains the greatest test of our generation. Banditry, insurgency, and communal violence have sown terror across our land, displacing millions and crippling markets. United Nations data shows more than 2.3 million Nigerians internally displaced by the end of 2024. 

    Conflict trackers record thousands of violent incidents that have shattered livelihoods and hope. No nation can prosper while its people live in fear. Peace is not optional; it is the precondition for progress, the anchor of prosperity, and the oxygen of national renewal.

    Closely linked to insecurity is Nigeria’s infrastructure deficit, which the African Development Bank estimates at over $100 billion. Our power sector is a glaring example. While South Africa generates more than 40,000 MW of electricity, Nigeria struggles with less than 4,853.69 MW on average for a population four times larger. Our roads tell the same story: more than 30% of federal roads are in poor condition, and only 1 in 5 rural communities is linked to an all-season motorable road. Broadband penetration stands at just 45%, far below global averages. This infrastructure gap is not an abstract figure; it is the barrier that prevents farmers from getting produce to market, prevents young entrepreneurs from accessing digital opportunities, and prevents patients from reaching hospitals in time. Infrastructure should be our launchpad into greatness, yet it has become the chain holding us down.

    Corruption makes this tragedy complete. When public funds become private spoils, classrooms stay empty, hospitals remain broken, and electricity never flows. Illicit financial flows bleed our treasury of billions that should be building schools, clinics, and power plants. This is not merely inefficiency; it is treason against our future. Nigeria is estimated to lose $18 billion annually to illicit financial flows, funds that could have built hospitals, schools, and power plants. Instead, they are siphoned into private pockets, deepening poverty and eroding trust in government. Corruption does not only weaken our institutions; it undermines the very belief that progress is possible.

    However, even in the midst of these staggering challenges, hope is not extinguished. If we can forge peace, everything else becomes possible We can still bend the arc of history if we commit to three urgent tasks. First, to place security at the heart of national renewal: forging a unified, accountable doctrine that integrates military force, intelligence, policing, and community peacebuilding, while safeguarding human rights. Second, to launch an infrastructure revolution which will be financed with transparency, driven by public-private partnership, and executed with the discipline of a nation on a mission. Third, to uproot corruption with finality, ensuring that every naira is traceable, every contract enforceable, and every official accountable, regardless of station.

    Above all, we must lift the young. With over 70% of our people under 30, Nigeria’s future stands in classrooms, vocational centres, farms, and tech hubs. We must bind education to enterprise, scale digital and vocational training, and direct meaningful budgetary commitments to youth employment and innovation. This is not welfare. it is the master strategy for national greatness.

    On this day, as the words of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa echo in my head, I remain unshaken in my optimism. For Nigeria to take its next great step forward, any government of the future must place security at the very heart of its agenda. Without peace, nothing else can flourish. We must develop a coherent national security strategy, one that unifies the military, police, and intelligence services under a single coordinated doctrine, and equips them with the modern tools of surveillance and response, from drones to satellites, that will allow us to outsmart insurgents and restore peace to our land.

    Peace will unlock the infrastructure we so urgently need. It will allow roads and railways to connect our towns and cities. It will enable power grids to light up homes and factories, and digital networks to support a modern economy. It will allow schools to reopen without fear and hospitals to function without interruption. But this will only be possible if we also confront corruption head-on, ensuring that every naira budgeted for development is accounted for. Citizens must be able to track public spending openly, and no official must be above the law.

    Nigeria has never shied away from its challenges. Our history is full of obstacles that once seemed insurmountable, yet we overcame them. In each season, we rose because we chose courage over fear, unity over division, and hope over hopelessness. The urgent task before us now is to build a Nigeria where no Nigerian is left behind, and where no community is consigned to despair. If we meet this test, we will awaken the Nigeria of our dreams: a nation where schools and hospitals are beacons of service, where roads and railways stitch our land into unity, where power grids illuminate every home, where digital networks link us to the world, and where we can banish and say a total farewell to hunger and poverty not as slogans, but as lived reality.

    This is the true promise of independence. This is the noble vision our founding fathers entrusted to us. This is the vision we must dare, together.

    Adebayo, SDP leader and the party’s 2023 presidential candidate, writes from Ondo.

  • President’s reforms improving economy, says SDP chief Adebayo

    President’s reforms improving economy, says SDP chief Adebayo

    A former presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Prince Adewole Adebayo, has said President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s steps have begun to stabilise and improve the economy.

    Adebayo, who spoke on a national television programme, described the economy left behind by former President Muhammadu Buhari as “poorly managed, an emergency room patient”.

    The SDP stalwart noted that President Tinubu “has managed to stabilise the patient”.

    He added: “It is obvious that the economy that President Buhari left was poorly managed, was an emergency room patient, and, like any emergency room patient, the road to recovery would be a good diagnosis by the doctor.

    “What President Tinubu has done is to stabilise the patient, but I’m not so sure that he has managed to know the ailment. So, the patient is not going to die immediately, but he hasn’t found a cure.”

    Adebayo said some of the President’s measures aggravated the situation initially but argued that “over time, he appears to have one or two wins in two sectors, which is why it appears that they may be deceived into thinking that the patient is on his road to recovery”.

    READ ALSO: A way out for the North

    Sharing his thoughts on the state of the nation’s revenue, the SDP stalwart noted that the government has made progress.

    “He’s managed to get more revenue, at least in nominal terms, and domestic borrowing, which was the feature of President Tinubu’s public finance, has reduced. So, he’s managed to get some revenue.

    “Of course, because of other wrong-headed policies, that money he’s got, in real terms, would not be able to finance a lot of the government spending and infrastructure. However, in terms of the balance sheet, President Tinubu has managed to have a better balance sheet than Buhari left him.”

    He also welcomed the relative drop in inflation but argued that the figures were more about methodology than real progress.

    “If they say inflation has dropped to about 20.7 per cent now, from 31.7 per cent last month, it’s not because the economy is performing better, but because the counting has changed. Inflation is a good number, better number than before. But it’s not a number that’s going to take you to the promised land,” Adebayo added.

  • Adebayo to ex-VP, El-Rufai: you can’t hijack SDP for personal battle against Tinubu

    Adebayo to ex-VP, El-Rufai: you can’t hijack SDP for personal battle against Tinubu

    Discordant tunes in the opposition parties over coalition and merger persisted yesterday.

    Former Social Democratic Party (SDP) presidential candidate Adewole Adebayo said efforts by  former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai to hijack the party for personal battles against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu would be resisted.

    Frowning at their unilateral approach to coalition, he said SDP is not a “getaway car for a conspiracy and robbery”.

    Adebayo, who spoke during the 50th birthday of his wife, Queen Lillian Adebayo in Abuja, said SDP is not a platform for personal political battles.

    Also yesterday, former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Deputy National  Chairman Chief Olabode George warned Atiku for opening alliance talks on behalf of the party without consultation.

    He also chided the former vice president for visiting former President Muhammadu Buhari in connection with coalition.

    But Atiku fired back, saying that George was ignorant of his mission to Buhari in Kaduna, capital of Kaduna State.

    His media aide, Paul Ibe, said in a statement that he only paid a post-sallah visit, and not a political visit, to Buhari.

    Ibe said:”Bode George is ignorant of the place of the former President. He was President under an APC-led administration. But with the conclusion of his tenure, he is now a statesman who should be accessible to Nigerians, including the Waziri Adamawa.

    “He is not occupying a partisan position. Atiku did not go to discuss coalition or politics with Buhari. He paid him a post-Sallah visit.”

    Read Also: Biola Adebayo, others gift actress Dupe Jayesimi car on Mother’s Day

    Adebayo: we want to know motive behind coalition

    Adebayo said the motive behind the coalition should be properly explained and understood before SDP can jump into it.

    He also said the coalition notwithstanding, he would run for president in 2027.

    Adebayo said: “Of course, my party knows that I’m running for the 2027 election. As for the coalition, we are listening to them. We don’t want to be a getaway car for a conspiracy and robbery we did not plan. That’s not available.

    “If the coalition is for the Nigerian people, the SDP is available. But if it is just a crime centre for disappointed Tinubu followers, they should go back to him and resolve their differences there. Don’t come to SDP to borrow us for a fight we are not involved in.”

    Former African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, who also witnessed the ceremony, took a swipe on the ongoing coalition move by opposition elements.

    He said although he supported of coalition and opposition in a democratic setting, the individuals involved in the move lack the credibility to champion real change.

    Sowore said: “I support coalitions and opposition. But not the kind that has people like El-Rufai. When the time comes, the moment they are offered what they want, they will go back to where they came from.

    “The APC was a coalition. Did you forget? The people who are asking to form another coalition were former APC members. In fact, most of them were Buhari cabinet members who are supposed to be in prison forming a union of prisoners, not coalitions.”

    George: Atiku can’t lead coalition talks for PDP

    George berated Atiku for failing to discuss his coalitiin plans with the PDP leadership, adding that the former vice president assumed that the party would just automatically fall in line.

    The PDP Board of Trustees (BoT) member, who spoke on television, accused Atiku of attempting to treat the PDP like his personal property.