Tag: Adoke

  • Nigeria records success in anti-drug trafficking measures – Adoke

    Nigeria records success in anti-drug trafficking measures – Adoke

    The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Mohammed Adoke, on Thursday said the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency had recorded tremendous success in the fight against drug trafficking and its abuse in the country.

    Adoke told the News Agency of in Addis Ababa that Nigeria was determined to eradicate drug trafficking and its abuse, especially among the youth.

    “It was our success story in fighting drug trafficking, abuse and other related issues like consumption that made the United States government to recognise our efforts and delisted Nigeria from the list of trafficking nations,’’ the minister said.

    Adoke, who is attending the fifth session of the African Union Conference of Ministers of Drug Control and Prevention in Addis Ababa, said the NDLEA would not relent in its effort at ensuring that Nigeria was not used as a transit nation by drug traffickers.

    “Nigeria is not a consuming nation for hard drugs, and we will ensure that the country is not also used for transit or as a route by drug traffickers, ’’Adoke said.

    The minister commended the Chairman of the agency, Alhaji Ahmadu Giade, for his courage in the fight against the scourge which he said had been reduced to the barest minimum, and urged him to sustain the tempo.

    He said that the country would consider the report of the commission on the implementation of the decisions of the fourth session of the AU Conference of Ministers of Drug Control and Prevention.

    He further said that the report of the experts’ meeting and existing continental best practice in Drug Policy and Practice in Tanzania would also be considered.

    NAN reports that the session will elect the new bureau for the Conference.

    Nigeria’s delegates to the meeting included officials from the NDLEA and NAFDAC.

     

  • Adoke’s many controversial steps

    Adoke’s many controversial steps

    Since his appointment as Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice on April 6, 2010, Mohammed Adoke (SAN) has earned more criticisms than praises from the people.

    He was appointed by then Acting President Goodluck Jonathan to replace Michael Aondoakaa, who was controversy personified while in office, following the death of President Umar Yar’Adua. Many thought with Aondoakaa’s exit, the office would be controversy-free but that has not been the case. The situation is also not helped by a government reputed for many wrong decisions on critical issues.

    Adoke’s reign has attracted controversies, the latest being the unpopular role he is believed to be playing in the unexplained and equally unpopular decision of the government on Bakassi.

    Adoke’s name also featured prominently as being behind government’s plot to cripple the anti-corruption agencies and the questionable withdrawal of cases against prominent Nigerians, politicians and multi-national agencies.

    For instance, when a case against four persons over fraudulent fuel subsidy payments was withdrawn at the Lagos State High Court, Igbosere, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) lawyer said he was instructed by Adoke to withdraw the charge. The defendants were charged with offences bordering on conspiracy, obtaining money by false pretence, forgery and use of false documents.

    They were alleged to have forged bills of lading and other documents, with which they perpetrated the fraud.

    At the twilight of her tenure in office, former EFCC Chairman Mrs Farida Waziri and Adoke engaged in unfriendly exchanges, resulting in public speculation that Adoke was playing the card of a government determined to ease Waziri out.

    At a point, Adoke was said to have written two letters dated July 20, 2011 to the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the Chairman of the Police Service Commission (PSC), seeking clarification on the rank of Mrs Waziri at the time of her retirement.

    Adoke has also been criticised over the series of controversial withdrawals of some high profile court cases, including those against the Vaswani Brothers; the case against the former Comptroller-General of the Nigeria Customs Service, Ahmed Bello, and the former Chairman of the Police Equipment Fund (PEF) Mr. Kenny Martins.

    The AGF was at a time, accused on interfering in cases like that against former Chairman, House of Representative Committee on Power, Ndidi Elumelu; the N5 billion fraud case against a former Chief Executive of the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Ransome Owan, and 17 directors and members of his board have also stagnated on account of alleged interference in the cases filed by the EFCC.

    Adoke was also criticised over the November 22, 2010 agreement between the government and Siemens under which Siemens was to pay N7bn to the Nigerian Government in exchange for prosecution for alleged criminal conduct.

    He attracted the anger of his professional colleagues recently for lamenting growing unethical conduct among legal practitioners in the country.

    Adoke was reported to have, at a ceremony for the conferment the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria on some lawyers on September 12, stated that “it is a matter of deep regret that lawyers, including some Senior Advocates routinely engage in unwholesome practices unbecoming of members of this noble profession.”

  • Onshore/Offshore dichotomy: Northern elders slam Adoke

    Onshore/Offshore dichotomy: Northern elders slam Adoke

    Northern elders are angry with the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Mohammed  Adoke, for declaring  the debate on the onshore/offshore oil dichotomy as closed.
     The Northern Elders Forum (NEF) yesterday said the Attorney General has no right whatsoever to say Nigerians cannot debate any issue of interest to them.
    “Who is he to say that the debate on onshore/offshore dichotomy is closed? Who is he to say that the debate on onshore/offshore dichotomy is closed? By who?” spokesman for the NEF, Prof. Ango Abdullahi fumed yesterday in Abuja in a reaction to the minister’s statement.
    Speaking at the  valedictory session in honour of retiring Justice Francis Tabai of the Supreme Court on Thursday, Adoke had warned the public to avoid overheating the polity through re-opening the debate on the onshore/offshore oil dichotomy in the allocation of revenue.
    But speaking to reporters on the sideline of the inaugural session of the Constitution Review Committee set up by the NEF in Abuja, Prof. Abdullahi lashed out at the minister: “Is he saying that Nigerians have no right to speak on issues which onshore/offshore dichotomy is, for him to say that the debate is closed? On what grounds?
    “It sounds stupid to me. It is a matter of continuous discussion and debate. He has no right to say that the matter is closed.”
    On the forum’s Constitution Review and Political Committees, the former  Presidential Adviser on Agriculture said the North is looking primarily at resource control, sovereign national conference and onshore/offshore dichotomy.
    He said: “Primarily, the issues the North is looking at are  resource control,  sovereign national conference as advocated and then  onshore/offshore dichotomy. These are on the front burner of the constitution review. And the legal think tank here would review those positions and know how the North would approach it.”
    On the 2015 presidential election, he said: “For us here, primarily we are involved first in securing the unity of our people. If our people are not safe and are not secured, 2015 will not make any meaning to us in this group because we believe that a united North will now be able to talk politics with sense.
    “We are already bedevilled by a lot of crises, security challenges, unemployment and poverty.  So with all these ones, I don’t think we have the luxury to be discussing 2015 for now at this level. We believe that if we are organised and united, we may be able to know where the balance stands in 2015.
    “The question is that the issue of politics as we understand it, particularly when it comes to elections, there are rules for elections and the elections will be contested on the basis of rules. So, let it be. And that is what it will be in 2015.
    He noted that the political committee set up by the NEF “is supposed to look at the politics of Nigeria and see how the North will fit into it or how Nigeria will fit into it in 2015.”
     On agitation for state police, he said: “The agitation for state police already has gathered momentum and it is clear that there are certain past leaders of this country that already are championing it. Most of the southern governors are pro-state police and majority of our governors here are not disposed to state police.
    “For us in the committee here, we are going to weigh the propriety of that vis-a-vis national interest. In fact, at the inaugural speech here, the chairman insisted that the North must not do anything that will be unjust to anybody living in Nigeria. We believe in the unity of this country.”
    He added: “To me personally again, the issue of zoning should be thrown away. Contest should be open, and so be it. The question of allocation of positions based on certain region should be thrown away and let people be free to contest.”
    He described the practice of the presidential system in Nigeria as expensive, but he did not say whether the NEF would be calling for a change of the system during the on-going constitution review process.
     “As a group, we feel that we have embarked on a change that has brought disaster to Nigeria. The presidential system of government is a major disaster to Nigerians,” he said, adding: ”I have never seen governance as expensive as what we have on ground today, and even if we are copying the presidential system from the United States, we are bad copiers of the system that operates in the United States today.
    “For example, a senator in Nigeria earns $1.5 million while the President of the United States earns $400,000 a year. So, something must be wrong in the manner in which we understand the presidential system of government, especially if we are copying from the United States.
    “But talking about cost of governance from the little project I am trying to undertake now, I have reached a stage where I can pronounce that the cost of governance under the presidential system that we have is three to four times more than the parliamentary system which we threw away in 1979.”
    Those who attended the meeting included the Convener, Alhaji Yusuf Maitama Sule; Chairman of the session, Paul Unongo; Ustaz Yunus Usman, SAN; Alhaji Bashir Dalhatu; Senator John Wash Pam; Air Marshal Al-amin Daggash; Alhaji Lawal  Yusufari; Barr. Ibrahim Umar; Barr. Salmanu Rilwanu; Barr. Abdulfatah Bello and Barr. Solomon Dalong.
    Others were Barr. Mustapha Bashir Wali; Barr. Simon Orkuma; Gen. Paul Tarfa (rtd); Alhaji Sanni Zango Daura; Barr. R.O. Yusuf; Barr Usman Abashiya; Barr Muhammed Sani Katu; Barr. Moses Tagifek; Kalli Gazali; Capt. Paul Thaha’al and Barr Muslim Maigari.