Tag: age

  • Re: NASS’ll back extension of teachers retirement age

    SIR: The above captioned story was published in The Nation of Thursday June 1, page 7. And few other newspapers also carried same story.

    The appeal was made by the National President of the Nigerian Union of Teachers NUT, Michael Alogba Olukoya when he led NUT officials to the Speaker of the parliament Mr. Yakubu Dogara.

    The union leader said: “ we teachers of Nigeria in primary and secondary schools do seek and demand that our retirement age be raised to 65 years to increase the teacher retention rate in our schools “.

    The request made by the teachers union on extension of of retirement age at this time is misplaced and untimely. This is because there are more important issues that need urgent attention, than demanding a frivolous extension of retirement age for Nigerian teachers under this uncertain economic situation and unfriendly working conditions.

    Elsewhere, in France, The Telegraph reports in 2010 that tens of thousands of French workers took to the streets to protest against government plans to raise the retirement age.

    And this are workers operating under stable economy with attractive emoluments for its workers. Their counterparts in Nigeria are demanding for extension.

    NUT should demand for improved welfare and working condition of teachers, a workable pension scheme, affordable healthcare system for teachers, hazard allowance and other allowances.

    And also training and retraining of teachers, special salaries, provision of latest laboratory kits, and state of the art facilities are what is required; not teachers perpetual slavery in the name of retirement extension and starvation wage they received as minimum wage!

    The union should insist that the National Assembly enact laws that will guarantee those items and ensure effective implementation of the above mentioned welfares for teachers. Longevity in the service is not the solution but a better deal!

     

    • Abdullateef Tanko A.

    nayashit@yahoo.com

  • On 65 years retirement age for teachers

    Public policy is generally regarded as the instrumentality by which governments often attempt to ameliorate public problems and address matters of social concern. For any policy to achieve the desired goals or objectives and engender social stability, it must be well thought out and must also be an outcome of rigorous processes of data collection and  data analysis about the issue it intends to address. For most of the developed countries, this of course is, the trajectory of most, if not all, their public policies, while for the developing countries, personal interest, ethnic bias, warped processes of data collection and  analysis if any at all, political consideration, and nepotism have been the banes of their policy processes and the root causes of policy summersault and outright policy failure.

    Recently, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Yakubu Dogara announced publicly and with all finality that the retirement age of teachers in primary and secondary schools in the country would be raised from 60 years to 65 years. Hear him: “we have done it for the tertiary institutions and the judiciary, so nothing should stop us from taking the bull by the horns. They say that wine gets better with age. It was the same consideration that motivated us to raise that of judges. So, this is something we can pursue.”

    One, in making the pronouncement, the Speaker spoke as if he was the President.  Methinks a government pronouncement on a policy proposal of this magnitude and profundity ought to have come from the President either as his party or government policy, though also with the knowledge of Dogara as a party leader. Is this not therefore, an indication that the All Progressive Congress is in disarray?

    Two, I observed that, though education is on the concurrent legislative list, however, the federal government technically, neither has teachers in primary nor in secondary schools. True, the Federal Government has unity secondary schools, however, the teachers there are designated as Education Officers and they oscillate in their working career between the Federal Ministry of Education and the Unity Schools and they will still retire at 60 even if teachers’ retirement age is raised to 65. In the spirit of federalism therefore, is it proper for the federal government to be the authority to dictate to the states when their teachers would retire if not because our constitution is a pseudo-federal one? Is it not also proper for the states to be given consideration in this matter because of their differences and peculiarities?

    Three, is the fact that it has been done for the judges and tertiary educational institutions enough justification for also wanting to concede it to primary and secondary school teachers? Should such policy move not be precipitated by very concrete reasons rather than by populism and proverbial saying?

    In any event, let it be said that, retirement age in every country is as dynamic as the human society itself. Thus, there is nothing wrong in reviewing retirement age if there are reasonable basis for doing so. For instance, in Canada retirement age has been raised from 65 to 67 years. Justifying the move, the government said, “delaying retirement benefits, worth more than  $6,000 a year, for 2 years, will encourage people to stay in the work force longer and save the government billions of  dollars”. It was reported further that “Canadians are living longer and healthier. There are fewer workers to take their place when they retire. Old age security must change with it. But these changes are to take place not over the next few years, but also over the next  generation. The adjustments may start in 2023 and phased gradually over six years”.

    In this proposal by the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT), supported by Hon. Dogara, one could possibly discern only one justification, and such justification may even perhaps be apt for just a section of the federation. A close analysis of teachers’ distribution in Nigeria has revealed that, there are not enough qualified teachers of northern extraction in most of the states in the northern part of the country. Even the non-northern teachers employed by some northern states are usually engaged on contract basis and often leave with time for the fear of job insecurity. In order to mitigate this challenge, it may be reasonable to raise retirement age for teachers in northern states for now but must be done by their respective state governments based on their needs and not by the federal authority as it has been arrogated to it.The retirement age may not even be uniformly fixed by the states in the region. In the southern part of the country, the narrative is different. There are innumerable unemployed graduate teachers in the region. To create room for this army of unemployed youth therefore, it may be reasonable to leave retirement age at 60 if it can not even be reduced at the legislative discretion of each state in the region.

    Also, we are in a country where most people don’t declare their true age. Thus even at 60 years, people do overstay in service by an average of between 3-5years. If increased, we may soon come to terms with massive inefficiency, ineffectiveness, unproductivity and more deaths in service granted our low life expectancy. Furthermore, when the retirement age of university teachers was reviewed, it rested majorly on shortage of Ph.D holders and dwindling rank of professors to mentor younger academics.

    The question is: whom do primary and secondary school teachers want to mentor for all that long? Even at tertiary institutions level, while the  basis for the raise for non-teaching staff remains unconvincing, it is still debatable whether the review has really helped the university system as there allegedly exists today, unproductive academic and non-academic workers and barely active or healthy professors and more deaths in the 65-70 age bracket. Ditto with the judges. Let it be also said that, all the reviewed figures of retirement age of the developed countries cited above were not arbitrarily arrived at by them. They were arrived at after a meticulous and rigorous analysis of labuor trends in those countries by their governments and not on mere agitation or suspicious lobbying. The question then is: how did we even arrive at 65 years for teachers? Has it not been arbitrarily copied from other climes? Perhaps if the realities of our country are taken into consideration, retirement age could be 62, 63, 70 or even less than 60 for different states and sectors.

    One even doubts whether labour leaders have ever paused and researched hard to find out whether higher retirement age will serve the interest of the workers and the larger society better in the long run. In any event, I think what is obtainable in the Indian federation should be the model or frame-work for Nigeria as a federal state. In India, both the federal and state authorities have the constitutional right to fix retirement age based essentially on needs. At the federal level in India, the retirement age generally is 60 years while it varies from state to state and service to service. The air force staff retire at 57 years. For example, in Haryana, a North India state near New Delhi, the state government is considering  raising the retirement age of medical doctors working in government hospitals in the state from 58 years to 65 years as a result of shortage of medical doctors in that state not on mere agitation or in pursuit of populism. Today, Nigeria has numerous unemployed and under employed doctors. In the light of this and in the spirit of  true federalism and the need to stem the tide of joblessness in our country, and prevent the risks of inefficiency, ineffectiveness and unproductivity among other dangers, the states should be  allowed to determine the retirement age of their teachers, while the federal and state governments might even take a second look at the existing retirement ages  in the tertiary educational institutions and the judiciary to ascertain if the existing retirement ages in the two institutions have really been achieving the desired objectives in the face of the gargantuan unemployment and under employment that pervade the country.

     

    • Dr. Adebisi is of the Federal College of Agriculture, Akure.
  • ‘Age not barrier to child bearing’

    ‘Age not barrier to child bearing’

    Children are a delight to behold anyday. Oyeyemi gbenga-mustapha reports on a clinic’s effort to ensure that this year’s  Children’s Day remaines children conceived through Assisted Reproductive Therapy (art).

    Although the event was part of the Nordica Fertility Centre’s Children’s Day party for the year, it turned out to be a celebration of tenacity, ecstasy, reunion and advocacy for the centre’s patrons.

    To Dr Abayomi Ajayi, the owner of the centre, the decision to hold the party hinged on the fact that children are the future of every family and country, and they must be celebrated. It was to mark the day for the children, who were being celebrated across the country. Age, he said, is never a barrier to having children since the technology is there to assist.

    “And just as we say at Nordica, we complete the family. A 60-year-old can bear children. The condition are: having a womb and being healthy. But due to cultural reasons of raising children, we try not to do it for a 70-year-old,”he said.

    The venue was the Fun Factory, Admiralty Way, Lekki, Victoria Island.  Gaily dressed children came in one after the other with their parents. They were treated to different games, edibles and gifts.

    Then appeared the famous ‘Five-Alive’- the quintuplets conceived through Dr Abayomi Ajayi’s expertise at the Nordica Fertility Centre. They are the Shofunlayo quintuplets nicknamed ‘Five Alive’ because they survived—against normal expectations—at their birth in 2011. They are part of the 1, 250 (and still) counting babies conceived through Assisted Reproduction Therapy (ART) at Nordica Fertility Centre, which began in 2003.

    The kids’ names are: Eyitayo, Eyitope, Eyitomini, Eyimofe and Eyidayo. They are six years old and their mother — Olayemi Victoria, was an inspiration at the gathering. They got N100, 000 for being the family that has the highest number of IVF children through the centre. Six children in all. The couple already had a child (singleton) ahead of the quintuplets, which made the number six.

    Their presence as they walked into the venue with their mother  electrified the place. Everyone wanted a glimpse of the ‘famous five’. On their heels was another mother- Mrs Folasade Akiode, a retired director of pharmacy, with her two daughters.

    Mrs Akiode is the oldest client of Nordica Fertility Centre, Lagos. She had her pregnancy at 56 and delivered a set triplets- two girls and a boythefollowing year. The boy died a neonate, but that did not dampen Mrs Akiode’s joy.

    She recalled being married for  18 years and how menopause set in. She said: “I am happy I won’t die childless. IVF worked for me. It is real. My children will be seven years this year. I named them Mojereigbagbo Esther and Eriigbagbo Mary.” She got N50,000 for being the oldest client.

    Dr Ajayi later called on the government to help in making assisted- reproductive therapy (ART) more affordable and accessible. “At the moment, forex still remains a huge issue because most of the things we use are imported. There is a limit which one can increase the cost of IVF. Just like any entrepreneur faces daunting challenges, so does ART sector,” he said.

    He appealed to the Federal Government to eradicate quackery in the sector so that clients can get value for what they are paying for. “The type of treatment a patient will get depends on the condition he or she presents with. People need to know more about IVF so as to avoid being scammed. That way, both genuine practitioners and clients will be able to confront fraudsters,” he said, wishing that health insurance could include IVF.

    Treasurer, Fertility Awareness Advocacy Initiative (FAAI), a support group formed by clients who had sucessful IVF experience, Ebenezer Soetan, a father of a boy (Emmanuel) conceived through IVF after 11 years in marriage when his wife was close to 50 years, said the group will  create awareness and serve as a support group. “There are many families out there, who are not aware of IVF or can’t afford same. They can draw from our experience. We’ve been there and have successful stories to tell through the thick and thin. IVF babies are intelligent and normal,” said Soetan.

    FAAI Chairman’s, Mrs Lara Evborokhai said: “Don’t fold your arms and cry. And be concluding things. I waited 16 years before Sarah came. She will be four by July. I did not conclude that somebody stole my womb. Neither did I conclude that a witch was hunting me.”

    The Clinic Manager/Counselor, Mrs Tola Ajayi said  people who have fertility challenge should try ART, “Though the most daunting part of it all is the moment when a cycle fails. It is always emotional. But the success of the same IVF keeps hope alive,” she said.

  • Coup, in this age?

    In the past, the public got to know of any problem within the military when the offenders were being executed. In the military, the punishment for any crime against the state was death. The military does not joke with its stability. This is why any rumbling is quickly put down before it snowballs into something else.  Officers and soldiers know that their loyalty to the state, especially the Commander-in-Chief (C-i-C), must not be called to question. Once a soldier’s loyalty is in doubt, he is a goner. Loyalty must be total; there is nothing like partial loyalty, which is the same as being disloyal.

    There is no room for warning once a soldier crosses the line. The rules are rigid and clear. Discipline is the keyword. A soldier must be disciplined through and through and this must show in his conduct. Whether in and out of the barracks, he must reflect the military discipline. This is why soldiers are one of a kind. They are not like civilians because they live a regimented life. Soldiers are the soul of a country because they stand as its bulwark against external aggression. But some of them have sold their souls to the devil because of a mess of porridge.

    Those are the ones who connive with all sorts of character to do the unthinkable – the takeover of government. Soldiers are not trained to be coup plotters. But at a time, it was the in-thing in Nigeria for soldiers to stage a coup. They carry out the illicit act at times with the help of outsiders, that is non-soldiers. But, most times, it is a plot by soldiers working with some of their superiors. Nigeria has had its fair share of coups beginning with the first military putsch of January 15, 1966. Six months later, there was another coup, which brought in then Lt Col Yakubu Gowon as head of state.

    By now, we should have outgrown coups. Our military should not at this age and time be talking of any plot to take over government by any other means except the ballot box. By Monday, the Buhari administration will be two. Although President Muhammadu Buhari does not enjoy good health, that should not be enough reason for some people to want to use the military to force him out. Why are those people in a hurry to shoo Buhari out? Is it a constitutional offence for the president to fall ill? The Constitution does not say that the president is a super human being that he cannot fall ill. What it frowns at is where the president is incapacitated by his illness that he cannot do his job. To avoid having a lame duck president,  it makes provision for the vice president to take charge in acting capacity and not as “coordinator of government affairs”.

    Those thinking of removing Buhari through coup do not love this country. They must have something to hide; if not they will not be talking of a coup when we have a president who is on a mission to rescue the country, his health permitting. If they are not satisfied with the president’s performance, all they need do is wait for another two years to exercise their franchise to vote him out. Anything short of that will be breaching the Constitution, which allows the president to hold office for four years at the first instance. Assuming that the president is not performing, which is even not the case in this instance, is it the covert plot to remove him the way to go?

    Many of our politicians will never learn. They are always looking for the easy way out of any challenge without giving a second thought to its fall-out. We were in this country when some politicians invited the late Gen Sani Abacha to take over from the contraption called the Interim National Government (ING) and hand over to the late Bashorun M.K.O Abiola, who won the June 12, 1993 presidential election. The late Abacha took over power and held on to it until he died. Unlike 1993, we are not in any crisis now. So, why are “some individuals approaching some officers and soldiers for undisclosed political reasons” as stated by the Chief of Army Staff, Lt Gen Tukur Buratai last week.

    The “undisclosed political reasons” is euphemism for a coup. The army chief knew what he was saying when he raised that alarm. We are lucky that we are no longer in the era of the military where anything goes, otherwise, some people may since have been arbitrarily arrested and court-martialled for treason. Coup, pustch, forceful take over of government or whatever name it may be called, is no longer fashionable. At least, not in this era of advanced technology. If soldiers gather anyhow these days in beer parlours to drink and take pepper soup, ala the coup theory propounded by that fine police officer, Alex Ogugbuaja, before they know it, they will find themselves on social media with details of what they are doing.

    How can any sane person even think of holding talks with soldiers for ‘’undisclosed political reasons’’ in this age when nothing is no longer secret. Gone are the days that Nigerian Telecommunications Ltd (NITEL), Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria (FRCN) and Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) facilities can be shut down by a bunch of soldiers to facilitate the forceful take over of government. Before they strike now, they would have been caught and made to face the consequences of their action. But this matter should not be allowed to end like this. The military should ferret out those trying to compromise its men and bring them to book. It should however not be a witch-hunt of opponents of the government.

    If we allow this matter to die without investigating it to logical conclusion, we may be leaving fire on our roof to go to sleep. How are we sure that these people will not make another move? We should not fear their gathering, though, because it will be in vain. Whenever they gather to plot against the people’s will, they will fall for the simple fact that coup is an idea whose time is gone.

  • Age and assets: No-go areas?

    It is certainly a curious piece of information that Chief Ricky Tarfa (SAN) allegedly refused to declare his age to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    At an Igbosere High Court, Lagos,  on May 17, according to a report: “A witness, Zakari Usman from the EFCC Special Task Force Unit testified that Tarfa refused to state his age seven times during his investigation for alleged obstruction of the agency’s operatives.”

    The report continued: “The witness testified that the assets declaration form issued to Tarfa by the agency had a column requiring age declaration in seven places, but the senior advocate left all the spaces blank. He said the defendant also failed to declare his assets contrary to Section 7(a) and (b) of the EFCC Act.”

    It is curious that Tarfa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, allegedly refused to state his age in a form that required him to do so. Was there something he wanted to hide by not declaring his age? Was there something his age declaration would have exposed?  Since age declaration was not optional in this case, why would a lawyer of his status act as though it was?

    It is also curious that Tarfa allegedly failed to declare his assets as required by law? Was there something to hide? Was there something that would have been exposed?

    It is interesting that, according to the report, “the prosecution also played a video in court, titled: “Rickey Tarfa’s refusal”, which allegedly showed the defendant’s alleged refusal to fill the form.”

    The case: “Tarfa was arrested on February 9, 2016, for allegedly hiding two suspects – Nazaire Sorou Gnanhoue and Modeste Finagnon, both Beninoise – in his Mercedes Benz Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV), thereby shielding them from being arrested and obstructing justice. He was arraigned on March 10, 2016, and pleaded not guilty to a 27-count charge, which was subsequently amended to 26.”

    Further information: “The agency alleged, among others, that the lawyer offered N5.3million gratification to Justice Hyeladzira Nganjiwa of the Federal High Court, Lagos to compromise the judge.”

    It is interesting that Usman was quoted as saying the investigators “wrote a letter to GTBank, and information contained in the bank’s response showed the defendant’s date of birth as February 23, 1950.”

    The public may get to hear from Tarfa why he allegedly refused to declare his age as required, and why he allegedly failed to declare his assets as required. Before that happens, the information in the public space makes him look like a dodger.

  • Exposing age cheats

    Franco-German tactician Gernot Rohr has been talking since he returned from holidays about his plans for the Super Eagles.  Rohr has the task of getting Nigeria to the 2018 World Cup in Russia and the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations slated for Cameroon. So far, the odds are in Nigeria’s favour to qualify for both competitions except that the Indomitable Lions of Cameroon are bad customers any day.

    Indomitable Lions are Africa’s kings. They have rebuilt their team with new boys who play with zeal and determination. Any team desirous of a victory over the Cameroonians must match them grit-for-grit, with their strongest points being the players’ pace and ruthless finishing in front of the goalkeeper. Coaches dread the Indomitable Lions and Rohr isn’t an exception.

    Rohr has been providing insights into the kind of squad he wants for Nigeria. He watched the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations. He took notes, which he hopes will guide him in beating the Lions in Uyo in August. Rohr has been ruffling feathers of those who were head coaches. Rohr told us, for instance, why Vincent Enyeama cannot return to the team, stressing that the goalkeeper had disciplinary issues with chieftains of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), although they will tell you that Enyeama can return to the squad if he is listed by Rohr.

    Rohr informed us that the Eagles will play two friendlies against a Corsican side and against Burkina Faso in France as part of his plans to effectively prepare the Eagles for the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations qualifier against the Bafana Bafana of South Africa inside the magnificent Nest of Champions Stadium in Uyo. Rohr guided the Eagles through its 1-1 draw against Senegal in London March 23.

    A few people criticised the influx of new kids in the Eagles camp after the 1-1 draw against Senegal. But Rohr revealed that he threw the camp open when it became apparent that the Burkinabes’ game had been cancelled. Rather than dismissing the players, he reckoned that the best opportunity for the mulattoes he had been trying to convince to play for Nigeria to appreciate the need to belong here was for him to invite them to play against his team. It worked magic. They came in droves and we can safely say that Chelsea kid Ola Aina and Arsenal’s Chuba Akpom may be the surprise package to destroy the Cameroonians.

    There is also the excitement around the Eagles over a likely game against either 2014 World Cup champions Germany or the Three Lions of England at an unnamed venue when the matches of FIFA-free window of November 13 are played. Such high profile matches are what we need to truly prepare the Eagles for the 2018 World Cup in Russia. Victory over Germany will shake Europe with the team becoming the toast of other European countries that will be in any World Cup group having an African nation. But the thunderbolt that Nigerian players lie about their ages has stirred the hornet’s nest with our shylock club agents going for his neck – “Kill him”; “Sack him” and “What is he saying… are some of the rants from these people who have mostly enslaved our good players in all manner of clubs outside the country. We should learn to take the lessons arising from the message than pillorying the messenger. For Rohr, age counts when you discover any talent. Investing in younger players, most times, means longer stay with the national team, if they are not injured. Of course, it will be ridiculous for us to invest in 30 young players and they would all be injured at the same time.

    These agents are the ones who falsify our players’ ages in a bid to get them to play for Nigeria as a pre-requisite to get European clubs’ contracts. The list of players who have changed their names when they get to Europe is long. Our players have many international passports with different names. And Rohr’s comment about their ages isn’t strange. Many former stars have been mocked by their European mates and managers about their ages.

    Time was when a particular club agent had 70 per cent of the members of the squad. In fact, it was said then that anyone who wanted to play for Nigeria must sign with this agent or consider his dream a mirage. Indeed, stars such as Sunday Mbah rue the mistake they made by refusing to join the camp, culminating in his unceremonious exit from the Eagles. 

    Since the time of Clemens Westerhoff, it has been difficult to set the criteria for picking players in the Super Eagles. The team has become a rehabilitation centre of sort, with many of them unable to represent the country in more than two competitions after their debut. Yet other countries such as Brazil, Argentina, England, Spain, France and Germany etc have graduated many of their rookies into their senior teams.

    In 1989, Nigeria lost 0-2 in the finals to Portugal. Paulo Sousa and Jao Pinto starred for the Portuguese side. Don’t ask me to name our Nigeria U-20 players in the game because they retired many years ago.

    Let us check out the list of Spanish youngsters who were in Nigeria for the 1999 U-20 Youth Championship which they won. In the 1999 tournament held in Nigeria, Seydou Keita (Mali) Xavi (Spain), Gabri (Spain), Pablo Counago (Spain), Fernando Varela (Spain), Ronaldinho (Brazil) and Shinji Ono (Japan) were the leading lights. They are still playing the game with Ronaldinho crowned the World Footballer of the Year. We had Julius Aghahowa, Pius Ikedia and Joseph Yobo as our brightest stars. Where is Aghahowa now? Is he still playing? For how long did he play for Nigeria after he was discovered in 1999? What about Ikedia? Yobo quit the Eagles after the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, becoming the first Nigerian to be capped 100 times.

    In 2009, Neymar drew all the applause spotting Brazil’s over-size jersey as a substitute in most games at the Teslim Balogun Stadium in Lagos during the FIFA U-17 World Cup. Brazil didn’t play in the finals like our Golden Eaglets. Yet, many of those young boys are in the Brazilian side. Ours have either retired or have quit the game for several reasons.

    Rohr’s age salvo is the fillip that the domestic league clubs need to compel them to parade U-15 players for their junior teams. The league Management Company (LMC) and indeed the NFF can start collating the names of the players. Aside setting the template for the future, LMC and NFF men can guide the players’ movement to Europe, not to countries where the game is just a novelty. We are losing talented players to shylock club agents because we don’t have credible data for the correct names of players even if they falsify their names.

    Perhaps, the NFF could move to regularise the youth academies. This is the only way we can collate data that shape the way our players develop. Conversely, the NFF should start grading the coaches who train all levels of our football. Only specialised coaches should be given badges to train kids from age three to 12 to ensure that they have a grasp of the rudiments of the game. Countries with discerning patterns of play acquire them from the regulated academies.

    With a regulated academy structure, it will be easier for national team coaches to assemble boys and girls who are under 17, for instance, for the Golden Eaglets and Falconets, using the talents in the academies and those playing in the local league. This structure reduces the time to blend the players for the coaches since they would have been schooled to play under a unitary pattern designed for the academies and the clubs.

    We have won the U-17 World Cup diadem five times, yet we haven’t been able to play in the World Cup finals at the U-20 level since 1989 and 2005. It doesn’t add up, especially where the bulk of the U-17 players graduated to the next category. Winning the cadet trophy five times suggests that we have a viable template for nurseries. Foul. The dearth of talents is the reason Rohr is opting for the Nigeria-born kids, whose ages are verifiable at the touch of the button on any wire service, unlike ours where we still present manipulated sworn affidavits, even for talents born in the 20th and 21st Centuries.

    We cannot continue with a system that has crippled our sports. We need to do those things others do seamlessly if we hope to compete with them. Age plays a vital role in sports. We recycle ageing stars because we have no nurseries to groom talents. Rohr’s comments should push us to emulate others.

     

    Federations’ elections

    So much has been divulged in the media about the guidelines for the next federations’ elections. What shocks this writer about the guidelines is that we want to eliminate people who won the previous elections through rule-change at short notice. I’m not supporting sit-tight administrators. No. If they were duly elected through a process, then they should be allowed to be voted out, where we are sure that they are unpopular.

    Those of them with tenured mandate should quit honourably as they got to the position because others quit when it was time. Those who are functional officers in their international federations should be made ex- officials so that they can keep their positions. It must be said that they got there through Nigeria’s platform, which we must protect, no matter who is involved. Nigeria is bigger than anyone.

    Honourable sports minister sir, Nigeria mustn’t be banned by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for electoral breaches. The rules shouldn’t be different when it comes to Nigeria as 210 countries in IOC run their elections without qualms. Ours shouldn’t different.

  • Imo 2019 and the Okorocha age rhetoric

    Governor Rochas Okorocha has been reported as saying that he will not hand over to anybody above fiftyyears of age. Anothervariant of his theory is that he will retire everybody above that age from active politics in the state by the time he is leaving office.At the recent annual conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Owerri, he repeated his age limit pronouncements to the total consternation of the learned gentlemen.

    An altercation that ensued between the governor and the chair of the NBA led Okorocha to describing the former as “bereft of ideas,” a statement that further infuriated the lawyers who came from all over the country. Initially, many thought thatthe age ceiling talk were restricted to Imo audiences. But extending it for the consumption of outsiders, especially legal practitioners who are conversant with the  extant laws of the land, is to carry  an obvious  joke too far.

    Okorocha’s posturing is worrisome not because he possesses the power or capacity to implement his laughable age law but for the mere fact that it makes a mockery of the entire Imo collective. Apart from entailing some contradictions over his own leaks on the potential beneficiaries of a succession plan being put together exclusively by him, the age ceiling talk is at once a deliberate andinadvertent portrayal of the entire people of Imo state as ignorant, timid and a people who have given in to the idiosyncrasies of a fellow who seems to have convinced himself that he will be the sole determinant of who will be the next governor of the state.

    Apart from being a sad commentary on a people reputed as one of the most sophisticated in Nigeria, Okorocha’sutterances on the 2019 Imo governorship transition has led to negative prognosis on the shape of things to come. It has made the rest of the country to wonder if Imo is no longer part of Nigeria.

    The constitution and the extant electoral laws have clear provisions on age requirement for people vying for elective offices. They stipulate minimum requirements, not maximum. Therefore, Okorocha’s maximum age ceiling would baffle every knowledgeable Nigerian. Has Imo created its own constitution and electoral laws?

    Today, there is palpable fear in the state of a major upheaval, a fear predicatedentirely on the perception that Okorocha has narrowed down his choice of a successor to a certain relation of his and will stop at nothing to achieve that goal. Every adult resident of the state would reel out a list of Okorocha’s close allieswho he has “promised” to hand over to. But they will quickly tell you that going by the governor’s own rule on age, over 98 per cent of those to whom he has made such‘promises’ are  either already over fifty years of age or will have gone beyond fifty by the time the 2019 general elections are held.

    It is hard to tell how the promise list originated but the names are on the lip of every knowledgeable adult Imo citizen, especially those residence in the state; and this notwithstanding the fact that the governor has oftendenied that he has anointed anybody. Apart from the fact that, as an indigene of the state, I share in the shame associated with such a retrogressive development,I have a particular interest in the age ban matter.

    Among one of the most celebrated promises to a would-be successor is the one made to my kinsman, Mr. George Eche, the current Secretary to the State Government.Okorocha had sometime last year at a gathering populated mostly by people from my local government area, Ngor Okpala, where Eche hails from, expressed sentiments over the perceived marginalization of my area in the scheme of things. He went ahead to state that he would like to pick a successor from there. Besides that Eche, then newly appointed, was present, reports had it that the way the governor spoke left no one in doubt that he was telling our people that  Eche is a son in whom he was well pleased and a likely successor.

    Ever since, speculations over Eche’s prospects as the next governor of Imo state have been quite high, of course. Agreed, there are a few other persons from my LGA who have governorship ambition and who, one-on-one, would scale higher than Eche, but nothing can diminish the excitement of a people in learning that one of their own has the chance of being anointed by the very powerful governoras his successor.

    To be sure, not everybody in Ngor Okpala would be enamored but I can beat my chest to state that most of the skeptics are merely watching and will key in at the appropriate time.Now, Eche, from very authentic records, is already over 50 years of age. So, where lies Okorocha’s “promise” and the hope of my people? Is it going to be a dashed expectation for an innocent people who, unlike many others in the state, did not lobby the governor to express such sentiments and even raised their expectation in the direction he did? Needless to say, my people are watching.

    It is also not likely that the good people of Mbaitoli Local Government Area are finding the age ban funny.Except for a handful of individuals in the area, the people have had their eyes fixed on the governorship in 2019 through their son, Prince Eze Madumere, Okorocha’s deputy. Like Eche, Madumere is also above 50years of age. We can go and on but by the time we go down the list, the only two fellows that will be remaining on Okorocha’s fabled succession plan are Hon. Chike Okafor and Mr Uche Nwosu, the governor’s Chief of Staff.

    Even so, I understand that Okafor will be over 50 by the time of the 2019 general elections;which leaves only Nwosu, a son-in-law of the governor, on the list.It is said that he will be less than 50years old by May 29, 2019. The governor may recruit more people into the list but for now, a simple rule of the thumb analysis, which leaves Nwosu as the only man standing, has left tongues wagging.

    A majority of Imo citizens are left with no other conclusionthan that the age ban is tailored to suit the objective of installing Nwosu as the next governor. While the general discomfiture caused by that is understandable, let me hasten to state that I do not necessarily share in the thinking that Nwosu stands disqualified to be governor in 2019 simply because he is Okorocha’s son-in-law.As an individual,he is a bone fide citizen of the state and has the right to aspire to any office whether or not his father-in-law is the governor. God forbid, what if his wife, Okorocha’s daughter, divorces him tomorrow?I can see somebody spring up from his on her seat to say “tell them” but there is a caveat.

    For, if I go by my own theory that Nwosu,ordinarily, has the right to vie for any office, then Okorocha’s age ban falls flat on its belly because it means that Nwosu can vie on his own merit without his father-in-law resorting to the age ceiling trick. It is a cheap antic which, as I have noted earlier, ridicules the entire people of the state. It is also a hollow idea that merely creates animosity within the APC, especially among those in the governor’s list of the would-be successors; and heightenstension in the entire Imo polity.

    But since, as we have seen, the governor has no powers to implement the age ban, why should the peace-loving people of Imo be made to go through unnecessary anxiety arising from such shenanigans and a banal idea?

    As far as I am concerned, Okorocha lost every sympathy or understanding from the people over his right to make inputs on who succeeds him the moment he came up with the idea of the age ban because they see it as an affront on their collective intelligence. By that simple suggestion, he portrays the people of the state as uninformed and cowardly. As a matter of fact, it is not uncommon to hear some people argue that the governor believes that he has conquered the entire state.

    To play the Devil’s Advocate, however,the age ban weakens the chances of his son-in-law whom many say is a “nice guy.” If I were Nwosu, I would ask my father-in-law to withdraw the age ban tactics. Not even his fellow youths are enamoredof it because it lacks sophistication.

    Needless to say, they can hardly be impressed with the claim that the age ban is to empower them. Of course, the more politically conscious among themhave already bought into the idea that the age ban is meant to achieve a pre-determined objective.

  • The age of AK47 Pastor

    The age of AK47 Pastor

    Like the proverbial stubborn grass that defies the gardener’s sickle – quick to sprout after every cut, the lexicon of public conversation has undoubtedly grown with a raft of terms and phrases since the last compilation on the page. Consistent with our tradition, we shall be undertaking an update – an induction, if you like – of the new entrants today, the first in the New Year.

    “To be forewarned is to be forearmed”: At normal times, the spectacle of a cleric bearing arms would appear abominable, even heretical. Lesser mortals could be forgiven if they lacked faith and surrendered to fear. Certainly not a Pastor or Reverend Father.

    For the clergy to bear a rifle would, therefore, likely be interpreted as doubting God’s sovereign words to guard and protect His children, always. If the shepherd would succumb to fear, what becomes of the flock? But these are surely abnormal times.

    Nothing tells the story of an emerging ecclesiastical oxymoron today perhaps better than the image of a Reverend Father with a loaded rifle, much more ruthless AK47, slung on his shoulder ostensibly while conducting a church service (pictured here), flanked by a company of soldiers in battle fatigue.

    The powerful picture has been circulating in the social media in the past few weeks. With digital clarity, it surely speaks to the palpable tension in parts of the north where Christian worshippers are increasingly coming under relentless attacks by those identified as Fulani herders but strongly suspected of harboring darker sectarian agenda.

    Maybe, a counterpoise to Boko Haram’s sepulchral imagery of deranged Shekau with AK47 against the grotesque backdrop of a black flag. While responding to the recent killing of Christian worshippers in Southern Kaduna, the Archbishop of the Abuja Diocese, Cardinal John Onaiyekan, in what ominously signaled the hardening of position, stated that it was no longer conceivable to expect faithful not to defend themselves henceforth.

    Since the picture came un-captioned, it is difficult to tell where this happened. Regardless, its message is unmistakable: a steely determination to continue preaching the gospel in the face of mortal danger, exhorting people never to doubt God’s omni-potence in the hour of peril, never mind if the preacher’s other finger is firmly on the AK47’s trigger.

    It obviously mirrors the season of danger. …Omega Fire!: Chants of “Holy Ghost fire!” are common refrain when Christians are gathered in supplication to God Almighty in Nigeria. It is a powerful invocation of celestial forces against perceived enemies.

    “Omega Fire!” surreptitiously joined the diary two days ago following the reported attempted arrest of the General Overseer of the Omega Fire Ministry Worldwide by DSS operatives in Ado- Ekiti. His sin? Commanding his faithful to kill any of the murderous herdsmen that dares come close to him or the church.

    Apparently, like many Christian leaders unhappy at perceived official indifference to the continued mass killings of Christians across the country, balding Apostle Johnson Suleiman had reached his own tether’s end. No longer prepared to turn the biblical other cheek, the Auchi-based cleric is now ready for “action” or “Omega Fire!” According to media reports, but for the agility of the Ekiti Governor Ayo Fayose who had graciously extended his now celebrated executive vigilante services to Pastor Suleiman following a mere distress call to him in the small hours of Wednesday, the man of God would have been herded to DSS detention camp. (The cleric was in town on a two-day crusade.)

    Like Rambo, Fayose, who once rescued the wife of a PDP chieftain in similar circumstance, stormed the hotel and personally led the Omega Fire Pastor to the safety of the Government House.

    Coincidentally, in Ekiti, a stern law was already in place seeking to regulate herders’ conduct. Just as there remains a standing rule from Fayose himself expressly empowering Ekiti hunters to “kill any armed herdsmen before they kill you or rape your wives.” To an extent, Suleiman’s threat, even if restated in Ekiti, could, therefore, be situated in the context of an exercise in self-defense against possible physical attack by the murder gang masquerading as herders.

    In the circumstance, we can only appeal to those with powerful voices like Suleiman to refrain from incitement to violence, out of a shared sense of civic responsibility. But that hardly absolves DSS’ glaring partisanship. Or this tendency to flex big muscles only against those who already could be described as the victims.

    At this writing, DSS was yet to explain if the cleric had spurned any invitation for a “chat”. But everyone knows Suleiman’s address in Auchi, Edo State where the “inflammatory” statement was reportedly made. Why this new obsession with waylaying targets at night? Couldn’t the arrest wait till the morning? Couldn’t it, in fact, be deferred till Suleiman returned to his Auchi base? Again, how come we hardly see this sort of “rapid response”, this razor-sharp efficiency, this fanaticism for law and order on the part of DSS elsewhere when armed herders are on their own rampage?

    Instead, the killer herdsmen thereafter get appeased with cash payments to “forgive” their victims. Big puzzle indeed. Grass-cutter: From the dawn of time, this species of rabbit has undoubtedly been the mouthwatering delight of bush-meat connoisseurs and patrons of pepper-soup joints by the street-corner. It is the wild rat, a mammoth rabbit, the jumbo-size of the regular domestic mouse house-keepers are familiar with.

    Perhaps more in recognition of its pre-eminence in the rabbit family than the ferocity of its canine on the grass, everyone got used to addressing this creature exclusively as “grass-cutter”. But not after a little scandal exploded around the clearing of grass around some IDP camps in Borno and elsewhere in the North-east in which no less a political heavyweight than the Secretary to the Federal Government, the avuncular Lawal Babachir, is gravely implicated. According to the findings of the Shehu Sani-led Committee on Mounting Humanitarian Crisis in the North-East region, Babachir allegedly helped himself to a chunk of the money paid to the firm in which he had a substantial stake before his current appointment and, worse still, is accused of being the sole signatory to its bank account until recently.

    Suddenly, political adversaries and other mischief- makers have begun to see grass-cutter in a different light. So, the mere mention of grass-cutter anywhere in Aso Rock or Abuja today is now interpreted as a coded reference to the award of any murky contract. Well, the good news is that Babachir, I am reliably informed, is hardly fazed by such side-talk, much less the outrageously malicious whisper of the uncharitable who go a step further by insisting they see some semblance between his sparse mustache and the whisker of that hunter’s favorite in the bush.

    Accidental bombing: Over the years, hapless Nigerians have learnt to reconcile themselves to the reality of “accidental discharge” whenever a policeman extrajudicially shoots anyone dead. The standard official response is that “It’s a case of accidental discharge”, a euphemism that the weapon mistakenly fired. But when a whole fighter jet of the Nigerian Air Force chose to rain, not Manna, but bombs on a camp sheltering citizens displaced by the Boko Haram insurgency – like we witnessed at Rann in Borno State a fortnight ago, the language understandably changes to reflect the magnitude, the gravity of the catastrophe.

    Acting on what turned out a false tip-off from an unnamed western power that absconding Boko Haram fighters had found a new sanctuary, the pilot supposedly on routine aerial patrol sadly ended up hitting the IDP camps not once, not twice, but – Lord – thrice! Worse still, whereas officialdom tried to downplay the casualty figures by admitting between 50 and 57, independent sources including international relief bodies quoted figures in excess of 200. Now, it does seem whereas police’s “accidental discharge” refers to killing of the innocent on retail basis, “accidental bombing” describes killing of the defenseless and the traumatized on industrial scale.

    God save us! Jammeh: If mortal fear had gripped many quarters – both high and low – at the height of the recent political face-off in The Gambia, the reason was undoubtedly partly a reading of the name of her now disgraced dictator. The word “jam” surely conjures less-than-pleasant imageries. In street parlance, “to jam” means “to hit” something. To “jam wahala” connotes serious kerfuffle. Any motorist in urban centre will, for instance, attest “traffic jam” is no pleasant experience. So, when a power-drunk dictator began to beat war-drums frantically and his name is derived from stressing “jam” to become “Jammeh”, the trepidation in the hearts of ordinary mortals could then only be imagined.

    But history teaches us that most bullies and braggarts are in reality cowards seeking to hide their dark inadequacies in some coarse facade. Yahya Jammeh turned out not to be exception. As they say, those who made a career from beheading others will hardly continue to sit easy at the sight of a sword-wielding stranger. Surrounded by ECOWAS’ far superior weapon of mass destruction, the brutal Jammeh, who had ruled the tiny West African country with an iron fist for 22 years, finally surrendered last Saturday.

    But not until huge cost had been incurred by Nigeria and others in mobilizing thousands of battle-ready troops and dozens of fighter jets to Gambia’s shores. Dramatically, not a single bullet was fired before the emperor finally fell. So, the word “Jammeh” is now generally accepted as synonym for empty boast or needless clowning.

    To play a Jammeh is to squander the altar of glory and instead offer oneself for international ignominy. (Meanwhile, whereas there are conflicting accounts on the actual number of luxury super cars taken and the quantity of cash looted in his last two weeks in power, a lie has been put to the claim that a cargo of $11m was physically hurled into the private jet that ferried Jammeh from Banjul that Saturday night to an uncertain fate. Out of rare magnanimity, Nigeria’s Asiwaju Bola Tinubu had allowed his jet to be used to finally break the 48- hour stand-off.) FRC code: Movie aficionados will certainly recall the American epic entitled “Da Vinci Code”.

    The 2006 thriller explores ancient Christian mythology which the Roman Catholic establishment found too outlandish, if not blasphemous outright. In the circumstance, the more controversial a work of art is, the higher its chances of commercial success. Little wonder then that it netted a whopping $224 million worldwide in its first weekend of premier and proceeded to gross a hefty $758 by the turn of 2006.

    Eleven years later, a milder variant of Da Vinci Code would seem to assail the Christian community in Nigeria and bears a more cryptic acronym, the FRC Code. In principle, the Federal Reporting Council code expressly seeks to compel heads of not-for-profit bodies, including religious organizations, to be more transparent in the rendition of their financial records.

    But portions considered “intrusive” and “offensive” by the leaders of the Pentecostal sector of the Christian community include those that prescribe term and age limits for their General Overseers. With the charismatic G.O of the most populous RCCG, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, dramatically tendering his resignation, thereby volunteering himself as the “martyr” of the protest against the FRC code, sectarian tempers naturally flared up across the country.

    Jim Obaze, the rambunctious executive secretary of FRC, was the next casualty as he was booted out unceremoniously by President Buhari, with the enforcement of the code suspended entirely. Soon, a new twist entered the narrative when the vocal Pastor Tunde Bakare, head of the Latter Rain Assembly and by no means an influential voice in the Pentecostal community, weighed in forcefully in defense of the FRC code, sensationally squealing that those preaching against it were actually money-launderers scared of the law and afraid of losing access to easy money.

    Ever since, funereal silence has descended on the entire FRC business. The last time the issue popped up among some top players in the Pentecostal district in Lagos, one account quoted a prominent Pastor as reducing every thing to a joke by likening the FRC Code to an attempt to tamper with his own “stomach infrastructure”. It was needless seeking any confirmation, to avoid further trouble.

    Alternative facts: Anyone still doubting the power in a name should consider the example of Sean Spicer, the chief spokesman of the newly inaugurated President Donald Trump of the United States. Still wallowing in the triumphalism that has defined the Trump camp generally since their shock victory in the November 8 polls, Spicer was all fire in his maiden press conference at the White House last Saturday. However, what became news after that outing was not his hauteur nor the fact that he chose not to answer questions to his rather tempestuous briefing in what seemed a continuation of Trump’s self-declared “running war” with the media.

    Fresh dust was raised by his rather sensational claim that the crowd that witnessed his boss’ inauguration on January 20 was “the largest in history”. Ah! But trust CNN not to take the line, hook and sinker in the circumstance.

    The sheer ugliness of that fat lie was soon exposed when the popular global TV channel flashed an over-view of the audience at the epochal Washington event. With the many empty patches in the broad canvass, it was crystal clear Trump and Spicer had, as usual, sexed things up.

    Trust CNN still, another of Trump’s spin doctors, Ms. Kellyanne Conway, was soon cornered shortly afterwards on the same issue. In a moment of costly verbal indiscretion (mental exhaustion?) on a live programme, she cautioned the CNN corespondent not to “over-dramatize” Spicer’s comment, defending that her colleague was simply “giving the alternative fact”.

    Like shark smelling blood, CNN thereafter made a sing-song of “alternative fact” for the rest of the day. Forty-eight hours later, it was an evidently subdued Spicer who showed up at another world press conference with a new spin. Clearing his throat, he clarified that his theory of “the biggest audience” actually referred to those physically “present and watching across the world”. Ah! Well, perhaps the joke is actually on the rest of us.

    From the mere intimation of his name, it would completely be out of character if Spicer did not “spice” things from the outset. Many thanks to Conway, “alternative fact” should henceforth serve as further annotation to “post truth” – a new word added to English lexicon in 2016. Roughly put, post-truth refers to circumstances when the reality does not correlate with the objective facts.

  • LYDIA FORSON: I’m not ashamed of my new age

    LYDIA FORSON: I’m not ashamed of my new age

    Curvy Ghanaian actress, Lydia Forson, recently turned 32, declaring that, against societal perception, her new age is nothing to be ashamed of.

    In most cases, it is believed that before 30, a lady should be settled to a married life and career. However, the actress declared that she is happy for the grace to witness the new age.

    “I’m 32 years old today; yes, let me spell it out for you; thirty-two. I’m not going to let anyone shame me into thinking I shouldn’t say this out loud, or believe that it’s a sign that I’m running out of time, for what I do not know.

    “Many instead of looking at age as a thing of pride we’ve shrouded it in negativity. I lost a friend this morning to cancer and it just dawned on me that she didn’t get to have this opportunity.

    “So I’m going to scream my age out loud and wear it with a badge if I have to. Why? Because 32 years is how many mornings I’ve woken up and nights I’ve gone to bed.

    “32 is how many years I’ve inhaled and exhaled without skipping a beat, it’s the number years I’ve made it past Christmas, New Years and other holidays, and more than anything it’s the number of years I’ve been able to say I’m alive, when others couldn’t,” the actress declared.

  • Age discrimination and job seekers

    SIR: Discrimination  like  a  cancerous  cell  grows  when  tolerated,  stunts  development  and  decelerates  productivity. In  every  facet  of  our  national history,  we  seem  to  be making  progress  at  a  snail  crawling  speed  when compared  with  nations  who  became  independent  same  time  with  us.

    Unemployment  rate  in  Nigeria  increased  to  10.40  percent  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2015, which  is  roughly  eight million Nigerians. It  is  in  Nigeria  that  students  attend  universities  for  a  four -year  course  and  end  up  spending  seven  years as  a  result  of  numerous  strikes  by varsity  lecturers  and  forced  recesses  occasioned  by  unrest.

    It  is  in  Nigeria  that  graduates  would  search  frantically  for  five,  seven  and  even  nine  years  for  jobs  without success. Bearing  this  in  mind,  it  is  so  unkind  for  employers  to  put  more  pressure  and  pauperize  he  already traumatized  job  seeker  as  a  result  of  age  discrimination.

    In  civilized  nations,  many  labour  laws  have  been  enacted  against  age  discrimination  in employment matters. For  example  in  1967,  under  the  U.S   Age discrimination  in  employment  Act,  it  is  unlawful  to  fail  to  hire or  sack  someone  on  the  grounds  of  age  if  the  employee  is  over  40. Also  the  U.K  Age  Discrimination  in  employment  Act  of  2006  makes  it  unlawful  to  deny  any  age  group employment  as  long  as  one is  within  the  legal  working  age.

    The  advanced  countries  with  anti-age  discrimination  laws  have  made  enviable  strides  in  social  justice  by creating  a  level  playing  field  for  all  their  capable  citizenry  at  the  workplace.

    A  negative  effect  of  this  age  discrimination  by  employers  of  labour  is  that  it  makes  many  Nigerians  to declare  false  ages  to  be  eligible  for  employment. In  many  countries  of  the  world,  employment  practices  are  based  on  skills  and  competence  rather  than age,  but  in  Nigeria,  employers  especially  the  government,  who  should  lead  by  not  throwing  away competent  hands,  deny  employment  to  its  citizenry.

    Most  banks,  through  various  Human  Resources  Organizations  deny  many  Nigerians  contract  employment  if you  are  above  24  years  or  26  years  if  lucky. If  this  government  that  got  huge  votes  from  the  teeming  unemployed  youths,  now  deny  same  by  tagging its  vacancy  in  the  EFCC  recruitment at  27  years,  thereby  shutting  out  the  skillful and competent  hands  from  serving  their  fatherland, it  is  disheartening  and  unpatriotic.

    We  are  in  the  21st  century;  the  federal  legislators  should  be  deliberating  about  laws  that engender  unity, foster  rapid  development,  bring  about  attitudinal  change  and  not  the  comical  relief  they  are  reeling  with Saraki  today,  budget  controversy  tomorrow.

    The  President  should  do  the  needful  by  issuing  a  Presidential  directive  against  age  discrimination  towards job -seekers  so  as  not  to  shut  out  talented,  passionate  and  patriotic  citizens. It  was  on  the  basis  of  competence  and  passion that our  beloved  President  was  elected  as  against  those  that termed  him  too  old  and  incompetent.

     

    • Rosemary Kevwe,

    Lagos.